test
•
0 likes•606 views
This document discusses the Supreme Court case Atlantic Marine Construction Co., Inc. v. U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. It addresses a forum selection clause in a contract between Atlantic Marine and J-Crew for construction work. The Supreme Court held that when a defendant files a motion to transfer venue based on a forum selection clause, the case should be transferred unless there are extraordinary circumstances that disfavor the transfer. The takeaway point is that forum selection clauses should be enforced through transfer of venue rather than dismissal of the case.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Personal Recognizance Bond
This document is an appearance bond for a defendant in a criminal case. It outlines the defendant's agreement to appear for all court proceedings, surrender if convicted to serve any sentence imposed, and comply with all conditions of release. It also details the terms of the bond including that it may be forfeited if the defendant fails to comply, and outlines ownership and acceptance of the bond terms by the defendant and any sureties providing property or a bail bond to secure the defendant's release pending trial.
Guilty Plea Colloquy
The document outlines a standard set of questions and procedures used by a judge to ensure a defendant's guilty plea is made knowingly, voluntarily, and with understanding of the consequences. The judge confirms the defendant's competence, that they understand the charges and maximum penalties, the rights waived by pleading guilty, any plea agreements, and establishes a factual basis for the crime before accepting the guilty plea.
History
After the Revolutionary War, many people feared a strong central government so the states agreed to the Articles of Confederation, but this plan did not work well. In response, leaders like George Washington and James Madison attended the Constitutional Convention to develop a new framework, resulting in the Constitution of the United States which established the executive, legislative, and judicial branches and defined their powers.
SDNY Redacted Proffer Agreement
This document outlines the terms of a proffer agreement between a client, their attorney, and an Assistant US Attorney. Key points:
1. This is not a cooperation agreement - the government is not obligated to offer any agreements in exchange for the client's proffer.
2. Statements from the proffer cannot be used against the client, except for charges of false statements or obstruction of justice.
3. The government can use information from the proffer to pursue other investigative leads and for cross-examination should the client testify.
4. The agreement allows the government to use statements from the proffer if the client later seeks sentencing reductions for cooperation or substantial assistance.
Law-Exchange.co.uk Powerpoint
Judicial creativity refers to the extent to which judges can display creativity in interpreting legal precedent and statutes. There is an ongoing debate around the appropriate balance of power between Parliament and the judiciary. While traditionally judges were seen as applying but not creating law, modern views recognize that judicial decisions are influenced by various social and personal factors, and that judges inevitably make law to some degree through their rulings. Judges can establish new precedents when there are gaps in existing laws, as seen in cases like Hunter v Canary Wharf and Airedale NHS v Bland, or develop precedents further, as in Merritt v Merritt which distinguished an earlier precedent.
Estate Planning for the Non Traditional Family
Historically, most estate plans revolved around the nuclear family structure of husband and wife who were married for the first time and children that were born of that marriage.
Over the course of the last 20 plus years, divorce rates have increased, more opposite-sex couples are opting to live together without getting married, and there is a greater awareness of same sex couples who are committed to each other. In these situations the traditional approach of estate planning is not always appropriate.
For purposes of this presentation, the “non-traditional family” consists of either a same sex couple, whether or not recognized as “married” for state law purposes, as well as the opposite sex couple who are committed to each other, but for one reason or another have decided not to get married.
1 Although opposite sex couples who have previously been married and have children by a prior marriage are also considered a “non-traditional family” and have unique issues, this relationship will not be addressed in this presentation.
10000000024
This document is a motion and order for admission pro hac vice of Robert J. Ward to represent certain parties in the bankruptcy cases of Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. and Allied Systems, LTD. (L.P.). The motion provides certification that Robert J. Ward is eligible for admission, a member in good standing of the New York bar, and familiar with the local rules of the court. The order grants the motion for pro hac vice admission.
Sample stipulation and order to appoint discovery referee in California
This sample stipulation and order to appoint a discovery referee in California is used pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 638 to appoint a discovery referee to set the date, time and place for all hearings determined by the referee to be necessary, to direct the issuance of subpoenas, to preside over hearings, to take evidence, and to rule on objections, motions, and other requests made during the course of the hearing. The sample stipulation and order is 3 pages and includes brief instructions. The author is an entrepreneur and retired litigation paralegal that worked in California and Federal litigation from January 1995 through September 2017 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided.
Recommended
Personal Recognizance Bond
This document is an appearance bond for a defendant in a criminal case. It outlines the defendant's agreement to appear for all court proceedings, surrender if convicted to serve any sentence imposed, and comply with all conditions of release. It also details the terms of the bond including that it may be forfeited if the defendant fails to comply, and outlines ownership and acceptance of the bond terms by the defendant and any sureties providing property or a bail bond to secure the defendant's release pending trial.
Guilty Plea Colloquy
The document outlines a standard set of questions and procedures used by a judge to ensure a defendant's guilty plea is made knowingly, voluntarily, and with understanding of the consequences. The judge confirms the defendant's competence, that they understand the charges and maximum penalties, the rights waived by pleading guilty, any plea agreements, and establishes a factual basis for the crime before accepting the guilty plea.
History
After the Revolutionary War, many people feared a strong central government so the states agreed to the Articles of Confederation, but this plan did not work well. In response, leaders like George Washington and James Madison attended the Constitutional Convention to develop a new framework, resulting in the Constitution of the United States which established the executive, legislative, and judicial branches and defined their powers.
SDNY Redacted Proffer Agreement
This document outlines the terms of a proffer agreement between a client, their attorney, and an Assistant US Attorney. Key points:
1. This is not a cooperation agreement - the government is not obligated to offer any agreements in exchange for the client's proffer.
2. Statements from the proffer cannot be used against the client, except for charges of false statements or obstruction of justice.
3. The government can use information from the proffer to pursue other investigative leads and for cross-examination should the client testify.
4. The agreement allows the government to use statements from the proffer if the client later seeks sentencing reductions for cooperation or substantial assistance.
Law-Exchange.co.uk Powerpoint
Judicial creativity refers to the extent to which judges can display creativity in interpreting legal precedent and statutes. There is an ongoing debate around the appropriate balance of power between Parliament and the judiciary. While traditionally judges were seen as applying but not creating law, modern views recognize that judicial decisions are influenced by various social and personal factors, and that judges inevitably make law to some degree through their rulings. Judges can establish new precedents when there are gaps in existing laws, as seen in cases like Hunter v Canary Wharf and Airedale NHS v Bland, or develop precedents further, as in Merritt v Merritt which distinguished an earlier precedent.
Estate Planning for the Non Traditional Family
Historically, most estate plans revolved around the nuclear family structure of husband and wife who were married for the first time and children that were born of that marriage.
Over the course of the last 20 plus years, divorce rates have increased, more opposite-sex couples are opting to live together without getting married, and there is a greater awareness of same sex couples who are committed to each other. In these situations the traditional approach of estate planning is not always appropriate.
For purposes of this presentation, the “non-traditional family” consists of either a same sex couple, whether or not recognized as “married” for state law purposes, as well as the opposite sex couple who are committed to each other, but for one reason or another have decided not to get married.
1 Although opposite sex couples who have previously been married and have children by a prior marriage are also considered a “non-traditional family” and have unique issues, this relationship will not be addressed in this presentation.
10000000024
This document is a motion and order for admission pro hac vice of Robert J. Ward to represent certain parties in the bankruptcy cases of Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. and Allied Systems, LTD. (L.P.). The motion provides certification that Robert J. Ward is eligible for admission, a member in good standing of the New York bar, and familiar with the local rules of the court. The order grants the motion for pro hac vice admission.
Sample stipulation and order to appoint discovery referee in California
This sample stipulation and order to appoint a discovery referee in California is used pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 638 to appoint a discovery referee to set the date, time and place for all hearings determined by the referee to be necessary, to direct the issuance of subpoenas, to preside over hearings, to take evidence, and to rule on objections, motions, and other requests made during the course of the hearing. The sample stipulation and order is 3 pages and includes brief instructions. The author is an entrepreneur and retired litigation paralegal that worked in California and Federal litigation from January 1995 through September 2017 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided.
10000000045
This document is a motion and proposed order to admit Jeffrey W. Kelley pro hac vice to represent Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. and Allied Systems, Ltd. (L.P.) in their Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases. Christopher M. Samis, a Delaware attorney, moves for Mr. Kelley's admission. Mr. Kelley is a member in good standing of the Georgia bar and is admitted to practice in Georgia state courts and federal district and bankruptcy courts in Georgia. The certification also states that Mr. Kelley will submit to this Court's disciplinary jurisdiction and has paid the required fee.
Sample ex parte application for TRO and preliminary injunction in United Stat...
This sample ex parte application for temporary restraining order in United States District Court also requests the issuance of a preliminary injunction pending the trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a) and (b) on the grounds that the plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer, substantial irreparable harm if injunctive relief is not granted. The sample on which this preview is based is 16 pages and includes brief instructions, a memorandum of points and authorities with citations to case law and statutory authority, sample declaration and proposed order. The author is an entrepreneur and retired litigation paralegal that worked in California and Federal litigation from January 1995 through September 2017 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided.
10000000042
1) Christopher Samis, a member of the Delaware Bar, moves to admit Ezra Cohen of Troutman Sanders LLP pro hac vice to represent Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. and Allied Systems, Ltd. (L.P.), who have filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
2) Ezra Cohen is a member in good standing of the Georgia Bar and is admitted to practice in Georgia state courts and certain Federal courts.
3) Cohen certifies that he is eligible for admission, pays the required fee, and agrees to submit to the Court's disciplinary jurisdiction. The Court grants the motion.
Sample notice of change of address for California divorce
This sample notice of change of address for a California divorce is used under the provisions of California Rule of Court 2.200 which requires every attorney or party whose mailing address, telephone number, fax number, or e-mail address, if one was provided, changes while an action is pending must serve on all parties and file a written notice of the change. The sample is in Microsoft Word format and can be easily modified. The author is an entrepreneur and retired litigation paralegal that worked in California and Federal litigation from January 1995 through September 2017 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided.
Sample notice of change of address for California civil case
This sample notice of change of address for a California civil case is used pursuant to the provisions of California Rule of Court 2.200 which requires every attorney or party whose mailing address, telephone number, fax number, or e-mail address, if one was provided, changes while an action is pending must serve on all parties and file a written notice of the change. The sample is in Microsoft Word format and can be easily modified. The author is an entrepreneur and retired litigation paralegal that worked in California and Federal litigation from January 1995 through September 2017 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided.
Sample motion to vacate default under Rule 55(c) in United States District Court
This sample motion to vacate a default under Rule 55(c) in United States District Court is used when a default has been entered but no judgment. The sample motion is used by a defendant to request that the Court vacate an entry of default against them for good cause. The sample on which this preview is based is 10 pages and includes brief instructions, a memorandum of points and authorities with citations to case law and statutory authority, sample declaration and proof of service. The author is an entrepreneur and freelance paralegal that worked in California and Federal litigation from January 1995 through September 2017 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided.
Gibbons v. Ogden
In 1811, Robert Livingston assigned Aaron Ogden an exclusive license to operate a ferry service between New York and New Jersey. Seeking to compete on this lucrative route, Thomas Gibbons obtained a federal license and began operating a ferry as well. Ogden sued, claiming infringement of his monopoly rights. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Gibbons, with Chief Justice John Marshall finding that Congress had the power to regulate interstate commerce, including navigation between states. Marshall's broad interpretation of the Commerce Clause allowed for future federal regulation of industries and established the supremacy of federal law over state law in such matters.
Armstrong v. Chesapeake Exploration Court Decision
A court case in which a landowner in Ohio sued to cancel a lease because the driller and the company that owns the lease have not paid any royalties since drilling. The Fifth Appellate District Court of Ohio found that because a specific provision in the original lease does not provide for cancellation due to non-payment of royalties, the landowners will have to continue to get screwed.
case
The document is a Supreme Court syllabus summarizing the case of New York v. United States. It discusses a 1985 federal law regulating the disposal of low-level radioactive waste. The law included monetary incentives, access incentives, and a "take title" provision imposing obligations on states. The Court found that the monetary and access incentives were constitutional, but that the "take title" provision unconstitutionally compelled states to regulate according to federal instructions in violation of the 10th Amendment. The provision was severed from the rest of the law, which remained valid.
Bol entrega
This document is a bill of lading for the shipment of 45 bags of clear, hot washed post consumer PET bottle flake from Global Holdings and Development LLC in the United States to Pactiv Foodservice Mexico S de RL in Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico. The shipment contains 55,000 pounds of material and has a delivery appointment for Saturday, February 27th at 9:00 AM CST. The bill of lading provides shipping details like the names and addresses of the shipper and recipient, trailer and seal numbers, order numbers, packaging details, and signatures acknowledging receipt of the shipment.
Doc1037 robert oneil paul ballard_todd hickman_seeking approval_settlement & ...
This document is a Trustee's Motion to Approve Compromise and Settlement with Defendants Robert O'Neal, Paul Ballard and Todd Hickman in an Adversary proceeding. The Trustee is seeking the court's approval of a settlement agreement between the Trustee and the Defendants that would allow portions of the Defendants' claims against the Debtor's estate and resolve all claims between the parties. Key terms of the settlement include allowing 75% of O'Neal's claim, 60% of Ballard's claim, and 60% of Hickman's claim. The Trustee believes the settlement is in the best interest of the estate to avoid costly and uncertain litigation.
Gmo temporary injunction
The United States District Court for the District of Hawaii held a status conference regarding a lawsuit filed by several plaintiffs against the County of Maui. At the conference, the parties' attorneys advised the court that they have agreed to extend the effective date of a Maui County ordinance regarding genetically engineered crops. The attorneys are preparing a stipulation and proposed order detailing the terms of an injunction, including the reasons for issuing it and what acts would be restrained or required. The court then entered a temporary injunction prohibiting enactment and enforcement of the ordinance until December 5th to allow time to review the stipulation, unless ordered otherwise.
Sample meet and confer declaration for motion to strike in California
This sample meet and confer declaration for a motion to strike in California is filed under Code of Civil Procedure § 435.5(a) to demonstrate compliance with the new meet and confer requirements before a motion to strike can be filed that became effective on January 1, 2018. The sample is 5 pages and includes brief instructions, sample wording and a proof of service by mail. The author is an entrepreneur and retired litigation paralegal that worked in California and Federal litigation from January 1995 through September 2017 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided.
Bankruptcy Writing Sample
1) The Family Court is the proper forum to determine if Husband's bankruptcy discharge applies to debts from the divorce decree. The discharge order did not specify which debts were discharged.
2) Debts from a divorce decree, including a hold harmless provision requiring Husband to pay half the credit union debt, are not automatically discharged through bankruptcy.
3) Husband's nonspecific bankruptcy discharge does not override his obligation in the divorce decree to pay half the credit union debt. The Commissioner erred in ruling the debt was discharged.
Sc100361 Bunges v. Gaggero, et al
This document is the defendants' closing argument in response to the plaintiffs' closing argument regarding trust documents presented in a real estate dispute. It argues that the plaintiffs' claims of fraudulent conduct by the defendant are unsupported and illogical. It asserts that the trust documents in question have no relevance to the legal issues being tried, which involve the interpretation of purchase and sale agreements for two properties. The defendant argues that the plaintiffs have presented no valid legal basis to rescind the agreements and that the evidence shows the plaintiffs were unable to complete the purchase for financial reasons.
Bernie Madoff can go free on bail, Judge rules
A federal judge ruled that accused Wall Street Ponzi scheme defendant can go free on bail, but must me certain conditions.
Sample opposition to motion for new trial in United States District Court
This sample opposition to a motion for a new trial in United States District Court is filed on the grounds that (1) the motion is untimely pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(b) in that it was filed more than 28 days after entry of judgment, the moving party has failed to meet their burden of showing that (2) the verdict is contrary to the clear weight of the evidence, (3) is based upon false or perjurious evidence, (4) a new trial is necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice and (5) newly discovered evidence that could not have been discovered earlier with due diligence and the newly discovered evidence is of such magnitude that production of it earlier would likely have changed the outcome of the case. The sample on which this preview is based is 10 pages and includes brief instructions, a memorandum of points and authorities with citations to case law and statutory authority, sample declaration and proof of service. The author is an entrepreneur and retired litigation paralegal that worked in California and Federal litigation from January 1995 through September 2017 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided.
Recent Developments in Aviation Law
This document summarizes recent developments in aviation law across various topics:
- Insurance case law addressed the validity of appraisal clauses, compliance with pilot warranties, and bad faith claims.
- Most federal circuit courts have adopted federal preemption of aviation safety, but approaches differ across circuits.
- Federal jurisdiction issues concerned when federal question, diversity, or admiralty jurisdiction apply to aviation cases.
- Personal jurisdiction cases addressed various aviation entities like manufacturers, operators, and overhaul facilities.
- Other topics included the General Aviation Revitalization Act and its interpretations, expert testimony admissibility, punitive damages availability, and interpretations of the Montreal Convention.
Doc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-away
The Trustee filed a motion seeking court approval of a compromise and settlement agreement between the Trustee and the Freeman Parties. The agreement provides that Robert Freeman and David Ward will withdraw their respective $92,500 proof of claims against the estate with prejudice, and the Trustee will dismiss the Freeman Parties from an adversary proceeding. The agreement achieves a walk-away settlement and full mutual release of claims between the parties. The Trustee believes the settlement is in the best interest of creditors and the estate by avoiding substantial time and costs of litigation, despite believing there are good objections to the proof of claims.
Brandywine fiveacp fees
This order addresses motions filed by landowners seeking attorneys' fees and costs from Atlantic Coast Pipeline (ACP) following ACP's abandonment of eminent domain proceedings to obtain an easement on the landowners' property for a natural gas pipeline. The court disagrees with a Ninth Circuit decision and finds that, under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act, landowners are entitled to reimbursement of reasonable litigation expenses from the private company exercising federal eminent domain authority. As such, the court will determine appropriate reimbursement for the landowners' attorney fees and costs incurred due to the condemnation proceeding. The court also denies ACP's request for limited discovery on the landowners' fee arrangements with counsel.
State of wash case mandatory arbitration clause in an insurance contract wa...
This case involves a dispute over whether arbitration clauses in two insurance policies issued by James River Insurance Company to the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) are enforceable. The trial court denied James River's motion to compel arbitration, finding the clauses violated state statutes prohibiting agreements that deprive state courts of jurisdiction over actions against insurers. The Supreme Court of Washington affirms, finding that the statutes are intended to protect the right to bring an original action in state court and that binding arbitration deprives courts of jurisdiction to consider the substance of disputes.
Arbitration-Law-Darren-Chaker
Arbitration law update, Darren-Chaker, written by leading law firm, citing case law, statute and other legal resources about recent arbitration developments.
More Related Content
What's hot
10000000045
This document is a motion and proposed order to admit Jeffrey W. Kelley pro hac vice to represent Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. and Allied Systems, Ltd. (L.P.) in their Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases. Christopher M. Samis, a Delaware attorney, moves for Mr. Kelley's admission. Mr. Kelley is a member in good standing of the Georgia bar and is admitted to practice in Georgia state courts and federal district and bankruptcy courts in Georgia. The certification also states that Mr. Kelley will submit to this Court's disciplinary jurisdiction and has paid the required fee.
Sample ex parte application for TRO and preliminary injunction in United Stat...
This sample ex parte application for temporary restraining order in United States District Court also requests the issuance of a preliminary injunction pending the trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a) and (b) on the grounds that the plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer, substantial irreparable harm if injunctive relief is not granted. The sample on which this preview is based is 16 pages and includes brief instructions, a memorandum of points and authorities with citations to case law and statutory authority, sample declaration and proposed order. The author is an entrepreneur and retired litigation paralegal that worked in California and Federal litigation from January 1995 through September 2017 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided.
10000000042
1) Christopher Samis, a member of the Delaware Bar, moves to admit Ezra Cohen of Troutman Sanders LLP pro hac vice to represent Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. and Allied Systems, Ltd. (L.P.), who have filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
2) Ezra Cohen is a member in good standing of the Georgia Bar and is admitted to practice in Georgia state courts and certain Federal courts.
3) Cohen certifies that he is eligible for admission, pays the required fee, and agrees to submit to the Court's disciplinary jurisdiction. The Court grants the motion.
Sample notice of change of address for California divorce
This sample notice of change of address for a California divorce is used under the provisions of California Rule of Court 2.200 which requires every attorney or party whose mailing address, telephone number, fax number, or e-mail address, if one was provided, changes while an action is pending must serve on all parties and file a written notice of the change. The sample is in Microsoft Word format and can be easily modified. The author is an entrepreneur and retired litigation paralegal that worked in California and Federal litigation from January 1995 through September 2017 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided.
Sample notice of change of address for California civil case
This sample notice of change of address for a California civil case is used pursuant to the provisions of California Rule of Court 2.200 which requires every attorney or party whose mailing address, telephone number, fax number, or e-mail address, if one was provided, changes while an action is pending must serve on all parties and file a written notice of the change. The sample is in Microsoft Word format and can be easily modified. The author is an entrepreneur and retired litigation paralegal that worked in California and Federal litigation from January 1995 through September 2017 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided.
Sample motion to vacate default under Rule 55(c) in United States District Court
This sample motion to vacate a default under Rule 55(c) in United States District Court is used when a default has been entered but no judgment. The sample motion is used by a defendant to request that the Court vacate an entry of default against them for good cause. The sample on which this preview is based is 10 pages and includes brief instructions, a memorandum of points and authorities with citations to case law and statutory authority, sample declaration and proof of service. The author is an entrepreneur and freelance paralegal that worked in California and Federal litigation from January 1995 through September 2017 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided.
Gibbons v. Ogden
In 1811, Robert Livingston assigned Aaron Ogden an exclusive license to operate a ferry service between New York and New Jersey. Seeking to compete on this lucrative route, Thomas Gibbons obtained a federal license and began operating a ferry as well. Ogden sued, claiming infringement of his monopoly rights. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Gibbons, with Chief Justice John Marshall finding that Congress had the power to regulate interstate commerce, including navigation between states. Marshall's broad interpretation of the Commerce Clause allowed for future federal regulation of industries and established the supremacy of federal law over state law in such matters.
Armstrong v. Chesapeake Exploration Court Decision
A court case in which a landowner in Ohio sued to cancel a lease because the driller and the company that owns the lease have not paid any royalties since drilling. The Fifth Appellate District Court of Ohio found that because a specific provision in the original lease does not provide for cancellation due to non-payment of royalties, the landowners will have to continue to get screwed.
case
The document is a Supreme Court syllabus summarizing the case of New York v. United States. It discusses a 1985 federal law regulating the disposal of low-level radioactive waste. The law included monetary incentives, access incentives, and a "take title" provision imposing obligations on states. The Court found that the monetary and access incentives were constitutional, but that the "take title" provision unconstitutionally compelled states to regulate according to federal instructions in violation of the 10th Amendment. The provision was severed from the rest of the law, which remained valid.
Bol entrega
This document is a bill of lading for the shipment of 45 bags of clear, hot washed post consumer PET bottle flake from Global Holdings and Development LLC in the United States to Pactiv Foodservice Mexico S de RL in Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico. The shipment contains 55,000 pounds of material and has a delivery appointment for Saturday, February 27th at 9:00 AM CST. The bill of lading provides shipping details like the names and addresses of the shipper and recipient, trailer and seal numbers, order numbers, packaging details, and signatures acknowledging receipt of the shipment.
Doc1037 robert oneil paul ballard_todd hickman_seeking approval_settlement & ...
This document is a Trustee's Motion to Approve Compromise and Settlement with Defendants Robert O'Neal, Paul Ballard and Todd Hickman in an Adversary proceeding. The Trustee is seeking the court's approval of a settlement agreement between the Trustee and the Defendants that would allow portions of the Defendants' claims against the Debtor's estate and resolve all claims between the parties. Key terms of the settlement include allowing 75% of O'Neal's claim, 60% of Ballard's claim, and 60% of Hickman's claim. The Trustee believes the settlement is in the best interest of the estate to avoid costly and uncertain litigation.
Gmo temporary injunction
The United States District Court for the District of Hawaii held a status conference regarding a lawsuit filed by several plaintiffs against the County of Maui. At the conference, the parties' attorneys advised the court that they have agreed to extend the effective date of a Maui County ordinance regarding genetically engineered crops. The attorneys are preparing a stipulation and proposed order detailing the terms of an injunction, including the reasons for issuing it and what acts would be restrained or required. The court then entered a temporary injunction prohibiting enactment and enforcement of the ordinance until December 5th to allow time to review the stipulation, unless ordered otherwise.
Sample meet and confer declaration for motion to strike in California
This sample meet and confer declaration for a motion to strike in California is filed under Code of Civil Procedure § 435.5(a) to demonstrate compliance with the new meet and confer requirements before a motion to strike can be filed that became effective on January 1, 2018. The sample is 5 pages and includes brief instructions, sample wording and a proof of service by mail. The author is an entrepreneur and retired litigation paralegal that worked in California and Federal litigation from January 1995 through September 2017 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided.
Bankruptcy Writing Sample
1) The Family Court is the proper forum to determine if Husband's bankruptcy discharge applies to debts from the divorce decree. The discharge order did not specify which debts were discharged.
2) Debts from a divorce decree, including a hold harmless provision requiring Husband to pay half the credit union debt, are not automatically discharged through bankruptcy.
3) Husband's nonspecific bankruptcy discharge does not override his obligation in the divorce decree to pay half the credit union debt. The Commissioner erred in ruling the debt was discharged.
Sc100361 Bunges v. Gaggero, et al
This document is the defendants' closing argument in response to the plaintiffs' closing argument regarding trust documents presented in a real estate dispute. It argues that the plaintiffs' claims of fraudulent conduct by the defendant are unsupported and illogical. It asserts that the trust documents in question have no relevance to the legal issues being tried, which involve the interpretation of purchase and sale agreements for two properties. The defendant argues that the plaintiffs have presented no valid legal basis to rescind the agreements and that the evidence shows the plaintiffs were unable to complete the purchase for financial reasons.
Bernie Madoff can go free on bail, Judge rules
A federal judge ruled that accused Wall Street Ponzi scheme defendant can go free on bail, but must me certain conditions.
Sample opposition to motion for new trial in United States District Court
This sample opposition to a motion for a new trial in United States District Court is filed on the grounds that (1) the motion is untimely pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(b) in that it was filed more than 28 days after entry of judgment, the moving party has failed to meet their burden of showing that (2) the verdict is contrary to the clear weight of the evidence, (3) is based upon false or perjurious evidence, (4) a new trial is necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice and (5) newly discovered evidence that could not have been discovered earlier with due diligence and the newly discovered evidence is of such magnitude that production of it earlier would likely have changed the outcome of the case. The sample on which this preview is based is 10 pages and includes brief instructions, a memorandum of points and authorities with citations to case law and statutory authority, sample declaration and proof of service. The author is an entrepreneur and retired litigation paralegal that worked in California and Federal litigation from January 1995 through September 2017 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided.
What's hot (17)
Sample ex parte application for TRO and preliminary injunction in United Stat...
Sample ex parte application for TRO and preliminary injunction in United Stat...
Sample notice of change of address for California divorce
Sample notice of change of address for California divorce
Sample notice of change of address for California civil case
Sample notice of change of address for California civil case
Sample motion to vacate default under Rule 55(c) in United States District Court
Sample motion to vacate default under Rule 55(c) in United States District Court
Armstrong v. Chesapeake Exploration Court Decision
Armstrong v. Chesapeake Exploration Court Decision
Doc1037 robert oneil paul ballard_todd hickman_seeking approval_settlement & ...
Doc1037 robert oneil paul ballard_todd hickman_seeking approval_settlement & ...
Sample meet and confer declaration for motion to strike in California
Sample meet and confer declaration for motion to strike in California
Sample opposition to motion for new trial in United States District Court
Sample opposition to motion for new trial in United States District Court
Similar to test
Recent Developments in Aviation Law
This document summarizes recent developments in aviation law across various topics:
- Insurance case law addressed the validity of appraisal clauses, compliance with pilot warranties, and bad faith claims.
- Most federal circuit courts have adopted federal preemption of aviation safety, but approaches differ across circuits.
- Federal jurisdiction issues concerned when federal question, diversity, or admiralty jurisdiction apply to aviation cases.
- Personal jurisdiction cases addressed various aviation entities like manufacturers, operators, and overhaul facilities.
- Other topics included the General Aviation Revitalization Act and its interpretations, expert testimony admissibility, punitive damages availability, and interpretations of the Montreal Convention.
Doc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-away
The Trustee filed a motion seeking court approval of a compromise and settlement agreement between the Trustee and the Freeman Parties. The agreement provides that Robert Freeman and David Ward will withdraw their respective $92,500 proof of claims against the estate with prejudice, and the Trustee will dismiss the Freeman Parties from an adversary proceeding. The agreement achieves a walk-away settlement and full mutual release of claims between the parties. The Trustee believes the settlement is in the best interest of creditors and the estate by avoiding substantial time and costs of litigation, despite believing there are good objections to the proof of claims.
Brandywine fiveacp fees
This order addresses motions filed by landowners seeking attorneys' fees and costs from Atlantic Coast Pipeline (ACP) following ACP's abandonment of eminent domain proceedings to obtain an easement on the landowners' property for a natural gas pipeline. The court disagrees with a Ninth Circuit decision and finds that, under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act, landowners are entitled to reimbursement of reasonable litigation expenses from the private company exercising federal eminent domain authority. As such, the court will determine appropriate reimbursement for the landowners' attorney fees and costs incurred due to the condemnation proceeding. The court also denies ACP's request for limited discovery on the landowners' fee arrangements with counsel.
State of wash case mandatory arbitration clause in an insurance contract wa...
This case involves a dispute over whether arbitration clauses in two insurance policies issued by James River Insurance Company to the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) are enforceable. The trial court denied James River's motion to compel arbitration, finding the clauses violated state statutes prohibiting agreements that deprive state courts of jurisdiction over actions against insurers. The Supreme Court of Washington affirms, finding that the statutes are intended to protect the right to bring an original action in state court and that binding arbitration deprives courts of jurisdiction to consider the substance of disputes.
Arbitration-Law-Darren-Chaker
Arbitration law update, Darren-Chaker, written by leading law firm, citing case law, statute and other legal resources about recent arbitration developments.
Corte suprema de texas caso hb 1131
This brief was submitted by intervenors-appellees-cross-appellants in defense of a Texas law (HB 1131) that restricts vertical integration between automobile insurers and autobody repair shops. The brief argues that HB 1131 does not violate the dormant Commerce Clause or the First Amendment. Regarding the dormant Commerce Clause, the brief asserts that HB 1131 regulates evenhandedly and was not enacted for protectionist purposes. Regarding the First Amendment, the brief argues that the commercial speech restrictions in HB 1131 regulate only false or misleading speech and place incidental burdens that are permissible. The brief urges the court to reject the challenges to HB 1131 and affirm the district court's
Federal Court Decision in Alex Cooper v. EQT Production
The decision by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. EQT had leased land from Alex Cooper, et al with an initial five-year term. The lease provided for a five-year extension. It also required EQT to drill at least one well on/under the property during the first five-year lease. EQT failed to drill a well in the first term but instead elected to extend the lease for an additional five years. The federal judge found that EQT has the right to extend the lease even if they didn't drill a well during the first term.
Shifting Tides - The Temporary Nature of Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction
The document discusses the temporary nature of bankruptcy court jurisdiction. It examines a Rhode Island bankruptcy court case that found jurisdiction is temporal and can shift over time as the underlying Chapter 7 case progresses. When adversary proceedings remain active past the closing of the main bankruptcy case, the court may find it no longer has jurisdiction to retain the proceeding. The document then provides an in-depth overview of the sources and limits of bankruptcy court jurisdiction under the U.S. Constitution and bankruptcy code. It distinguishes between core proceedings, related-to proceedings, and unrelated matters to further explain the shifting scope of a bankruptcy court's authority.
06/20/14 – Dunnet Bay Amicus Brief
The district court's opinion granted summary judgment to the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) in a case brought by Dunnet Bay Construction Company challenging IDOT's implementation of federal Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) participation goals. The American Road and Transportation Builders Association argues in an amicus brief that the district court's opinion establishes an erroneous standard of review that would effectively eliminate meaningful judicial review of whether state agencies have converted federal DBE participation goals into unlawful quotas. Specifically, the opinion (1) applied a deferential standard of review rather than strict scrutiny; (2) limited review to whether IDOT followed federal regulations rather than considering evidence the goals operated as quotas; and (3) found IDOT could not have
Filed artba amicus brief
The district court's opinion granted summary judgment to the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) in a case brought by Dunnet Bay Construction Company challenging IDOT's implementation of federal Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) participation goals. The American Road and Transportation Builders Association argues in an amicus brief that the district court's opinion establishes an erroneous standard of review that would effectively eliminate meaningful judicial review of whether DBE goals have been unlawfully converted to quotas. Specifically, the opinion (1) applies a deferential standard of review rather than strict scrutiny; (2) limits review to whether IDOT followed federal regulations rather than considering evidence the goals operated as quotas; and (3) finds no way IDOT could have exceeded
54 - Memorandum Decision and Order
This memorandum decision addresses cross motions for summary judgment in a case regarding leases on the Osprey Meadows Golf Course and Lodge. Bryant, as the court-appointed fiduciary for RSPT, holds a promissory note, mortgage, and assignment of rents on the property from the defaulting owner, WMG. Tamarack Municipal Association (TMA) leased and operated the golf course and lodge. The court denies Bryant's motions for summary judgment on contract claims and to strike expert testimony. The court partially grants and denies TMA's motion for summary judgment, finding issues of fact remain regarding Bryant's authority to terminate TMA's leases unilaterally upon WMG's default.
Ohio Court Case: Bilbaran Farm, Inc. v. Bakerwell, Inc.
A case heard by the Fifth District Court of Appeals in Ohio in which a landowner claimed that the relatively little drilling done on a small portion of their land should allow them to reclaim title to the mineral rights and release the unused portions of the land to another driller. The court disagreed, ruling the language in the lease does not allow it.
Federal Court Order Suspending AB 219
Copy of Order issued by U.S. District Court suspending AB 219, a new statute which made deliveries of ready-mix concrete subject to California Prevailing Wage Law.
FLL Airport Expansion Opinion
This document is a court opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit regarding a dispute over the expansion of the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport. The Federal Aviation Administration approved Broward County's plan to extend a runway and close another, over objections that an alternative plan would be preferable environmentally. The opinion finds that the FAA approval is a final order, the petitioners have standing, and that the FAA did not act arbitrarily or in violation of relevant statutes in approving the county's plan rather than the alternative.
10000000050
This document is an objection filed by the United States Trustee to motions filed by Petitioning Creditors and Alleged Debtors to seal certain documents filed with the court. The U.S. Trustee does not oppose sealing documents pending a ruling on whether the bankruptcy cases will proceed, but argues that any sealing should end if the court finds cause to open bankruptcy cases, as the information would then become public. The U.S. Trustee asserts that bankruptcy law favors public disclosure of information relevant to creditors and parties in interest.
Understanding Easements: Adam Leitman Bailey
Adam Leitman Bailey of Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. helps real estate professionals understand easements
EEOC v. Wedco, Inc. - Racial Harassment Lawsuit.
EEOC vs. Wedco, Inc. - Racial Harassment Lawsuit.
Larry Mitchell, EEOC, Wedco, Inc, Nevada, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Procedural Issues in Bad Faith Litigation
This document summarizes key issues in removing bad faith litigation from state to federal court, including improper joinder and establishing the amount in controversy. It also discusses procedural issues like concurrent litigation, choice of law analyses, and enforcing or ignoring choice of law clauses in insurance contracts. The document is from a national forum on bad faith claims and litigation, and provides an overview of removal procedures and the tests used to determine improper joinder or the applicability of state versus federal law.
Oneok v. Learjet- SCOTUS Decision 04-21-15
This document is a Supreme Court syllabus for the case ONEOK, Inc. v. Learjet, Inc. It provides a summary of the key details of the case in 3 paragraphs:
1) Respondents, a group of manufacturers, hospitals, and other institutions that buy natural gas directly from interstate pipelines, sued petitioners claiming the pipelines had engaged in behavior that violated state antitrust laws by reporting false information to natural gas indices.
2) The district court granted summary judgment for the pipelines, finding the claims were preempted by the Natural Gas Act. The appeals court reversed, finding the claims aimed at obtaining damages for excessive retail prices, not wholesale prices regulated by the act.
3
Standards of review on review of agency decisions 9th circuit 21-pages
This document summarizes the standards for judicial review of agency decisions under the Administrative Procedures Act. It discusses how agency decisions may be overturned if they are arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or not in accordance with the law. It also outlines the narrow scope of review and deference given to agency interpretations of statutes and regulations. Finally, it provides examples of specific agencies that are subject to judicial review, including FERC, EPA, FCC, and others.
Similar to test (20)
Doc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-away
Doc962 freeman group motion compromise & settlement_ a walk-away
State of wash case mandatory arbitration clause in an insurance contract wa...
State of wash case mandatory arbitration clause in an insurance contract wa...
Federal Court Decision in Alex Cooper v. EQT Production
Federal Court Decision in Alex Cooper v. EQT Production
Shifting Tides - The Temporary Nature of Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction
Shifting Tides - The Temporary Nature of Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction
Ohio Court Case: Bilbaran Farm, Inc. v. Bakerwell, Inc.
Ohio Court Case: Bilbaran Farm, Inc. v. Bakerwell, Inc.
Standards of review on review of agency decisions 9th circuit 21-pages
Standards of review on review of agency decisions 9th circuit 21-pages
Recently uploaded
The Art and Science of Cryptoforensic Investigation: Best Practices and Tools
The Art and Science of Cryptoforensic Investigation: Best Practices and Tools
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Pim Betist's presentation about generative AI in the legal sector at Lexpo.com '24
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...Syed Muhammad Humza Hussain
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
slide deck : Patenting innovations in 3D printing
Search Warrants for NH Law Enforcement Officers
Training aid for law enforcement officers related to search warrants, the requirements needed, drafting, and execution of the search warrant.
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
USDA grants bolster rural communities, driving growth, sustainability, and prosperity through strategic development initiatives and financial support.
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
Presentation by Justin Ordoyo
University of the Philippines College of Law
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Business Laws Sunita saha
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
Lincoln硕士毕业证成绩单【微信95270640】办理新西兰林肯大学毕业证原版一模一样、Lincoln毕业证制作【Q微信95270640】《新西兰林肯大学毕业证购买流程》《Lincoln成绩单制作》新西兰林肯大学毕业证书Lincoln毕业证文凭新西兰林肯大学
本科毕业证书,学历学位认证如何办理【留学国外学位学历认证、毕业证、成绩单、大学Offer、雅思托福代考、语言证书、学生卡、高仿教育部认证等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务】代办国外（海外）英国、加拿大、美国、新西兰、澳大利亚、新西兰等国外各大学毕业证、文凭学历证书、成绩单、学历学位认证真实可查。
[留学文凭学历认证(留信认证使馆认证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单毕业证证书大学Offer请假条成绩单语言证书国际回国人员证明高仿教育部认证申请学校等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务。
多年留学服务公司,拥有海外样板无数能完美1:1还原海外各国大学degreeDiplomaTranscripts等毕业材料。海外大学毕业材料都有哪些工艺呢？工艺难度主要由：烫金.钢印.底纹.水印.防伪光标.热敏防伪等等组成。而且我们每天都在更新海外文凭的样板以求所有同学都能享受到完美的品质服务。
国外毕业证学位证成绩单办理方法：
1客户提供办理新西兰林肯大学新西兰林肯大学毕业证学位证信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：我们有专业老师帮你查询）；
2开始安排制作毕业证成绩单电子图；
3毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快读邮寄）
— — — — 我们是挂科和未毕业同学们的福音我们是实体公司精益求精的工艺！ — — — -
一真实留信认证的作用(私企外企荣誉的见证):
1：该专业认证可证明留学生真实留学身份同时对留学生所学专业等级给予评定。
2：国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书这个入网证书并且可以归档到地方。
3：凡是获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内将在公安部网内查询个人身份证信息后同步读取人才网入库信息。
4：个人职称评审加20分个人信誉贷款加10分。
5：在国家人才网主办的全国网络招聘大会中纳入资料供国家500强等高端企业选择人才。问山娃想买什么想吃什么山娃知道父亲赚钱很辛苦除了书籍和文具山娃啥也不要能牵着父亲的手满城闲逛他已心满意足了父亲连挑了三套童装叫山娃试穿山娃有点不想父亲说城里不比乡下要穿得漂漂亮亮爸怎么不穿得漂亮望着父亲山娃反问道父亲听了并不回答只是吃吃地笑山娃很精神越逛越起劲父亲却越逛越疲倦望着父亲呵欠连天的样子山娃也说困了累了回家吧小屋闷罐一般头顶上的三叶扇彻夜呜呜作响搅得满屋热气腾腾也搅得山娃心烦意乱父亲一的
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
Recently uploaded (20)
The Art and Science of Cryptoforensic Investigation: Best Practices and Tools
The Art and Science of Cryptoforensic Investigation: Best Practices and Tools
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
test
- 1. ATLANTIC MARINE v. J-CREW William Allensworth Allensworth & Porter, LLP
- 2. 2 ATLANTIC MARINE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 12–929. Argued October 9, 2013—Decided December 3, 2013
- 3. 3 FORUM SELECTION CLAUSE
- 4. 4 DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE
- 5. 5 TEXAS STATUTE Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 272.001 (a) This section applies only to a contract that is principally for the construction or repair of an improvement to real property located in this state. (b) If a contract contains a provision making the contract or any conflict arising under the contract subject to another state's law, litigation in the courts of another state, or arbitration in another state, that provision is voidable by the party obligated by the contract to perform the construction or repair.
- 6. 6 STEWART ORGANIZATION, INC. V. RICOH CORP., 487 U.S. 22 (1988)
- 7. 7 STEWART ORGANIZATION, INC. V. RICOH CORP., 487 U.S. 22 (1988)
- 8. 8 28 U.S.C. § 1404
- 9. 9 28 U.S.C. § 1406
- 10. 10 TAKE AWAY POINT Atlantic Marine Const. Co., Inc. v. U.S. Dist. Court for..., 134 S.Ct. 568 (2013) “When a defendant files a § 1404(a) motion, a district court should transfer the case unless extraordinary circumstances unrelated to the convenience of the parties clearly disfavor a transfer. No such exceptional factors appear to be present in this case.”
- 11. 11
- 12. 12
- 13. 13
- 14. 14