SlideShare a Scribd company logo
C O N F I D E N T I A L

Driscoll Expansion:
Parent Survey Results
November 26, 2013

Brookline Advisors
C O N F I D E N T I A L

Table Of Contents
•
•
•
•

•

•

Respondents…………………………………………………………………………......3
Plan Awareness……………………………………………………………………….....4
Key Factors for a Good School…………………………………………………….....6
y
Concerns……………………………………………………………………………….....7
Project & Scope…………………………………………………………………………...7
Expansion Specifics………………………………………………………………………8
District Leadership ……………………………………………………………………….9
9
Property Values………………………………………………………………………….10
Feasibility…………………………………………………………………………………11
Solutions………………………………………………………………………………...12
Can it Work?.........................................................................................................12
Work?
12
New Build vs. ‘Build in Place’…………………………………………………………..13
Footprint…………………………………………………………………………………..14
Specific Solutions………………………………………………………………………..15
Smaller Expansions ...…………………………………………………………………..16
16
Usage Data……………………………………………………………………………....17
Cars……………………………………………………………………………………….17
Playgrounds……………………………………………………………………………...18
About the Author…………………………………………………………………….....19
Ab t th A th
19

2
C O N F I D E N T I A L

Respondents

•
•
•
•

165 parents filled out surveys from a list of 670 Driscoll parent emails
All but 5 responses came via direct email response (no possibility for double
entries)
The remaining 5 came by web links from IP addresses not used by other
respondents
Respondent family breakdown:
I / We have children in t he f ollowing grades:
60.0%
50.6%
50.0%

44.9%

40.0%
31.6%
30.0%
30 0%
20.0%

16.5%

10.0%
0.0%
Toddler-Pre K

K-2nd grade

3

3-5th grade

6-8th grade
C O N F I D E N T I A L

Awareness
R a ting
A v e ra g e
3.83

H o w info rme d d o y o u fe e l a b o ut the p ro p o s e d e xp a ns io n p ro je c t? (0=N o t a t a ll, 10= Fully Info rme d )

26

30

R e s p o ns e
Co unt
160

27

25
20

20

12

11

9

10

10

14
4

2

9

10

0
0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

R a ti
ting
A v e ra g e

40

37

30

29

R e s p o ns e
Co unt

2.72

D o y o u fe e l a d e q ua te s te p s ha v e b e e n ta k e n to e xp la in the p ro je c t s c o p e a nd imp a c ts to y o u?
(0=T o ta lly D is a g re e , 10=T o ta lly A g re e )

162

28
21

20

12

8

6

5

10

6

10
3

5

3

8

9

10

0
0

1

2

3

4

7

R a ti
ting
A v e ra g e
2.18

D o y o u fe e l y o u we re s uffic ie ntly c o ns ulte d / inc lud e d in the p ro c e s s ? (0=N o t a t a ll, 10= Fully
Co ns ulte d / Inc lud e d )

80

60

60
27

40

22

20

17

6

11

4

5

4

4

4

2

5

6

7

8

9

10

0
0

1

2

3

4

R e s p o ns e
Co unt
162
C O N F I D E N T I A L

Awareness Continued
R a ting
A v e ra g e
2.11

B -SP A CE ’s c ha rte r re q uire d its wo rk b e “wid e ly d is c us s e d a c ro s s the c o mmunity in B ro o k line a nd
re c e iv e s ig nific a nt p ub lic s up p o rt.” D o y o u b e lie v e tha t g o a l wa s a c hie v e d ? (0=T o ta lly D is a g re e ,
10=T o ta lly A g re e )

60

56
33

40

24
11

20

12

3

4

10

2

4

3

4

3

6

7

8

9

10

0
0

1

2

5

5

R e s p o ns e
Co unt
162
C O N F I D E N T I A L

Key Factors For A Good School
T he fo llo wing fa c to rs ma k e a g o o d s c ho o l: (0= N o t a Fa c to r, 10 = Critic a l)
R a ting
A v e ra g e

Good Teachers
Small Class Size
Administration
Active Parent Community
Neighborhood Centric
Quality of Facilities
K-8 Model

R e s p o ns e
Co unt

9.90
8.66
8.28
8.31
7.52
7.46
5.88

A ns we r Op tio ns

160
160
160
158
157
159
160

a ns we re d q ue s t o n
s e e
tio

160
60

The f ollowing factors make a good school: (0= Not a Factor, 10 = Critical)
K-8 Model
K 8M d l
Quality of Facilities
Neighborhood Centric
Active P
A i Parent Community
C
i
Administration
Small Class Size
Good Teachers
0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

6

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

10.00
C O N F I D E N T I A L

Concerns: Project & Project Scope
R a ting
A v e ra g e
1.91

P le a s e ra te y o ur o v e ra ll c o nc e rn/ e xc ite me nt o v e r the p ro p o s e d p ro je c t (0= D e e p ly Co nc e rne d ,
10=V e ry E xc ite d )
80

R e s p o ns e
Co unt
155

70

60
40

24

20

11

17

2

3

9

7

5

4

3

4

1

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0
0

1

R a ting
A v e ra g e
3.01

A n 800 s e a t s c ho o l is a s g o o d a s a 500 s e a t e le me nta ry / K-8 s c ho o l (0=T o ta lly D is a g re e , 10=T o ta lly
a g re e )
60

R e s p o ns e
Co unt
156

47

40
18

20

15

12

15

23
6

3

7

6

7

8

2

8

0
0

1

2

3

4

5

9

10

R a ting
A v e ra g e
3.43

A 700 s e a t s c ho o l is a s g o o d a s a 500 s e a t e le me nta ry / K-8 s c ho o l (0=T o ta lly D is a g re e , 10=T o ta lly
a g re e )
60
40

32
18

20

20

27
14

16
5

7

5

3

6

7

8

9

9

0
0

1

2

3

4

5
7

10

R e s p o ns e
Co unt
156
C O N F I D E N T I A L

Concerns: Ranking Specific Expansion Elements
If y o u ha v e c o nc e rns , p le a s e ra te the fo llo wing p o te ntia l is s ue s (0= N o t
Co nc e rne d , 10= D e e p ly Co nc e rne d )
R a ting
R e s p o ns e
A ns we r Op tio ns
A v e ra g e
Co unt
Significant loss of green space/pupil
Capacity of existing lot size to support 200 more pupils
Traffic safety
Parking access
Student relocation plans and duration are not yet
Ability of the town to complete 3 or more simultaneous

8.25
8.25
7.03
6.12
8.50
8.14

155
153
155
153
155
154

a ns we re d q ue s tio n

155

I f y ou have concerns, please rate the following potential issues (0= Not Concerned, 10= Deeply Concerned)
Ability of the town to
complete 3 or more …
Student relocation plans
and duration are not yet …
Parking access
Traffic safety
Capacity of existing lot size
to support 200 more pupils
Significant loss of green
/
il
space/pupil
0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

8

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

10.00
C O N F I D E N T I A L

Perspectives On District Leadership
R a ting
A v e ra g e
6.48

H o w muc h fa ith d id y o u ha v e in the g e ne ra l a d minis tra tio n o f B ro o k line S c ho o ls 1 y e a r a g o ? (0= N o ne ,
10= T o ta l)

R e s p o ns e
Co unt
147

60
39

40

27

20

5

1

0

1

2

18

9

6

3

5

6

23

4

8

0
5

6

7

8

9

10

R a ting
A v e ra g e
3.95

H o w muc h fa ith d o y o u ha v e in the g e ne ra l a d minis tra tio n o f B ro o k line S c ho o ls to d a y ? (0= N o ne , 10=
T o ta l)

60
40
20

18

22

15

15

18

13

20
9

11

7

0

0
0

1

2

3

4

5

9

6

7

8

9

10

R e s p o ns e
Co unt
148
C O N F I D E N T I A L

Concern about Property Value Impact
D o y o u fe e l y o ur re s id e nc e will b e mo re o r le s s a ttra c tiv e to future re s id e nts if the p ro je c t g o e s fo rwa rd a s is ?
P o s itiv e
Imp a c t

N o Imp a c t

N e g a tiv e
Imp a c t

R e s p o ns e Co unt

11

A ns we r Op tio ns

54

86

151

Do you feel your residence will be more or less attractive to 
future residents if the project goes forward as is?
86

54

11

Positive Impact

No Impact

10

Negative Impact
C O N F I D E N T I A L

Concern About Feasibility

R a ting
A v e ra g e
4.89
4 89

D o y o u think g ro wth re la te d p a rk ing a nd tra ffic s a fe ty is s ue s c a n b e a d e q ua te ly d e a lt with b y g o o d
d e s ig n? (0= N o t a t a ll, 10=A b s o lute ly )
(0
10 A

R e s p o ns e
Co unt
148

30
20
20

14
9

10

18

16

10

14

15

17

14
1

0
0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

S tud e nts / a c re o f p la y s p a c e lo o k s lik e it will g ro w b y 90% + to the hig he s t d e ns ity in the d is tric t. D o y o u
think this c a n b e a d e q ua te ly d e a lt with b y g o o d d e s ig n? (0= N o t a t a ll, 10=A b s o lute ly )

60

9

10

R a ting
A v e ra g e
3.09

R e s p o ns e
Co unt
149

41

40
16

20

23
12

15

3

4

9

5

5

6

10

9

5

4

7

8

9

10

0
0

1

2

11
C O N F I D E N T I A L

Solutions – Can An Expansion Be Made To Work?
D o y o u b e lie v e a c c o mmo d a tio ns c a n b e ma d e to ma k e the g ro wth o f the
s c ho o l a c c e p ta b le ?
R e s p o ns e
R e s p o ns e
A ns we r Op tio ns
P e rc e nt
Co unt
Yes
No

68.5%
68 5%
31.5%

102
47

a ns we re d q ue s tio n

149

Do y ou believe accommodations can be made to make the growth of the
s c hool acceptable?

31.5%
Yes
No

68.5%

12
C O N F I D E N T I A L

Solutions – New Build vs. ‘Build In Place’
U s ing MS B A d a ta , B ro o k line ha s the 3rd hig he s t s c ho o l s ize o f the to p 20
d is tric ts a nd will lik e ly mo v e to 2nd hig he s t s c ho o l s ize …
R e s p o ns e
R e s p o ns e
A ns we r Op tio ns
P e rc e nt
Co unt
Yes
No

86.5%
13.5%

128
20

a ns we re d q ue s tio n

148

Us ing MSBA data, Brookline has the 3rd highest school size of the top 20
dis tricts and will likely move to 2nd highest school size under the ‘Expand in
P lace’ plan. Would you support the town s pending more money on a plan
t hat constructed a new school?

13.5%

Yes
No

86.5%

13
C O N F I D E N T I A L

Solutions - Footprint
If a n e q uita b le wa y to p urc ha s e mo re p ro p e rty c o uld b e fo und , wo uld y o u
s up p o rt the to wn s p e nd ing mo re mo ne y to inc re a s e to ta l s p a c e in ra tio to
R e s p o ns e
R e s p o ns e
A ns we r Op tio ns
P e rc e nt
Co unt
Yes
No

87.8%
12.2%

130
18

a ns we re d q ue s tio n

148

Would You S upport The Town B uying More Land?

12.2%

Yes
No

87.8%

14
C O N F I D E N T I A L

Solutions Continued
R a ting
A v e ra g e
4.56

If a fina l p la n d ra ma tic a lly a nd uno b trus iv e ly inc re a s e d p a rk ing (e x: und e rg ro und lo t, e tc .) wo uld tha t
d e c re a s e y o ur c o nc e rns ? (0= N o t a t a ll, 10= It W o uld R e mo v e my Co nc e rn)

R e s p o ns e
Co unt
146

25

30
18

20

16

13

11

17

14

14

7

10

6

5

9

10

0
0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

R a ting
A v e ra g e
4.71

If the to wn c o mmitte d to a full re no v a tio n o f D ris c o ll wo uld tha t re d uc e y o ur c o nc e rns ? (0= N o t a t a ll,
10= It W o uld R e mo v e my Co nc e rn)
40

R e s p o ns e
Co unt
150

29

30
14

20

17

14

10

17

16

11

7

12

7

6

0
0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

R a ting
A v e ra g e
5.52

If the fina l p la n re q uire d tha t p la y s p a c e / p up il s ta y c o ns ta nt wo uld tha t d e c re a s e y o ur c o nc e rns ? (0=
N o t a t a ll, 10= It W o uld R e mo v e my Co nc e rn)

25

30
20
10

9

14

12

22
17

20
11

6

5

8

0
0

1

2

3

4

5
15

6

7

8

9

10

R e s p o ns e
Co unt
149
C O N F I D E N T I A L

Solutions – Would Less Expansion Be Preferable?

R a ting
A v e ra g e
5.58
5 58

If the fina l p la n a d d e d 100 p up ils ra the r tha n 200 wo uld tha t re d uc e y o ur c o nc e rns ? (0= N o t a t a ll, 10= It
W o uld R e mo v e my Co nc e rn)

40

30

30
20

29
21

12

10

10
1

4

R e s p o ns e
Co unt
148

21

9

8

3

0
0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

R a ting
A v e ra g e
6.60

If the p ro je c t a d d e d 75 p up ils ra the r tha n 200 wo uld tha t re d uc e y o ur c o nc e rns ? (0= N o t a t a ll, 10= It
W o uld R e mo v e my Co nc e rn)

40
30
20

20
10

10

0

4

7
3

4

25

28
15

4

2

15

20

10

0
0

1

5

16

6

7

8

9

10

R e s p o ns e
Co unt
148
C O N F I D E N T I A L

Usage - Playground
D o e s y o ur fa mily ma k e us e o f s c ho o l p la y s p a c e o uts id e o f re g ula r ho urs ?
R e s p o ns e
P e rc e nt

Yes
Y
No

R e s p o ns e
Co unt

88.5%
88 5%
11.5%

A ns we r Op tio ns

139
18

a ns we re d q ue s tio n

157

Does your family make use of school play s pace outside of regular hours?

11.5%

Yes
Y
No

88.5%

17
C O N F I D E N T I A L

Usage - Cars
W ha t p e rc e nta g e o f y o ur d ro p o ff/ p ic k up trip s inv o lv e the us e o f a c a r? [ 0-100% ]
R e s p o ns e
A v e ra g e

R e s p o ns e
Co unt

42%

A ns we r Op tio ns

157

0-100%

% of Pickup/Drop Offs That Involve A Car
60
50

48

40
26

30
20
20

14

14
8

10

10

8
3

1

5

0
0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

18

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%
C O N F I D E N T I A L

About the Survey

•

Hello, my name is Sundar Srinivasan. I am a Driscoll Parent and the
husband of a BHS and Devotion alum.

•

I put together this survey because I did not think such a major project
should be rushed forward without anyone taking a broad sounding of
the community’s actual priorities and concerns
community s
concerns.

•

I have no pre-conceived notions or agenda other than wanting to make
sure any proposed plan is reasonable and realistic.

•

You can reach me at sundar@driscollexpansion.org or look for me
most mornings at drop off on the west side of the school. Feel free to
stop me with any q
p
y questions or ideas.

19

More Related Content

Similar to Survey results

How to Understand the ROI of Investing in People
How to Understand the ROI of Investing in PeopleHow to Understand the ROI of Investing in People
How to Understand the ROI of Investing in People
Qualtrics
 
Icn ca presentation-webinar
Icn ca presentation-webinarIcn ca presentation-webinar
Icn ca presentation-webinar
publicengagement
 
Australian Community Trends Report National Study summary by Mark McCrindle
Australian Community Trends Report National Study summary by Mark McCrindle Australian Community Trends Report National Study summary by Mark McCrindle
Australian Community Trends Report National Study summary by Mark McCrindle
Mark McCrindle
 
Profile-15
Profile-15Profile-15
Profile-15
Nishat Haider
 
State of the Cloud 2019 from Bessemer Venture Partners
State of the Cloud 2019 from Bessemer Venture PartnersState of the Cloud 2019 from Bessemer Venture Partners
State of the Cloud 2019 from Bessemer Venture Partners
saastr
 
Drug User Development Projects - Public
Drug User Development Projects - PublicDrug User Development Projects - Public
Drug User Development Projects - Public
Rui Coimbra
 
How to understand the ROI of investing in People
How to understand the ROI of investing in People How to understand the ROI of investing in People
How to understand the ROI of investing in People
Maia Josebachvili
 
Bessemer Venture Partners' 2019 State of the Cloud
Bessemer Venture Partners' 2019 State of the CloudBessemer Venture Partners' 2019 State of the Cloud
Bessemer Venture Partners' 2019 State of the Cloud
Bessemer Venture Partners
 
Challenge & Promise of HE Internships_Hora_062221
Challenge & Promise of HE Internships_Hora_062221Challenge & Promise of HE Internships_Hora_062221
Challenge & Promise of HE Internships_Hora_062221
Matthew Hora
 
Communication project.ppt
Communication project.pptCommunication project.ppt
Communication project.ppt
BabatundeSogunro
 
Know How: Graduates & Research Placement Application Form
Know How: Graduates & Research Placement Application FormKnow How: Graduates & Research Placement Application Form
Know How: Graduates & Research Placement Application Form
nearnow
 
Scorecards
ScorecardsScorecards
Scorecards
John Halsted
 
Rosa Cano_openexpo2018_sin_texto
Rosa Cano_openexpo2018_sin_textoRosa Cano_openexpo2018_sin_texto
Rosa Cano_openexpo2018_sin_texto
Rosa Cano
 
08.06.15 training occupant_engagement
08.06.15 training occupant_engagement08.06.15 training occupant_engagement
08.06.15 training occupant_engagement
melanie_bissonnette
 
Construir productos y transformación digital mezclando tecnología y educación...
Construir productos y transformación digital mezclando tecnología y educación...Construir productos y transformación digital mezclando tecnología y educación...
Construir productos y transformación digital mezclando tecnología y educación...
Rosa Cano
 
Crafting a Three Legged Stool for Effective Collaboration - Daphne Bourne
Crafting a Three Legged Stool for Effective Collaboration - Daphne BourneCrafting a Three Legged Stool for Effective Collaboration - Daphne Bourne
Crafting a Three Legged Stool for Effective Collaboration - Daphne Bourne
DesignOps Global Conference
 
Private Rented Communities by urbanbubble
Private Rented Communities by urbanbubblePrivate Rented Communities by urbanbubble
Private Rented Communities by urbanbubble
Farah Bahsoon, MSc
 
MCCIA 014
MCCIA 014MCCIA 014
BS portfolio
BS portfolioBS portfolio
BS portfolio
Md. Niazur Rahman
 
Climate Information Services for NAPs in Thailand
Climate Information Services for NAPs in ThailandClimate Information Services for NAPs in Thailand
Climate Information Services for NAPs in Thailand
UNDP Climate
 

Similar to Survey results (20)

How to Understand the ROI of Investing in People
How to Understand the ROI of Investing in PeopleHow to Understand the ROI of Investing in People
How to Understand the ROI of Investing in People
 
Icn ca presentation-webinar
Icn ca presentation-webinarIcn ca presentation-webinar
Icn ca presentation-webinar
 
Australian Community Trends Report National Study summary by Mark McCrindle
Australian Community Trends Report National Study summary by Mark McCrindle Australian Community Trends Report National Study summary by Mark McCrindle
Australian Community Trends Report National Study summary by Mark McCrindle
 
Profile-15
Profile-15Profile-15
Profile-15
 
State of the Cloud 2019 from Bessemer Venture Partners
State of the Cloud 2019 from Bessemer Venture PartnersState of the Cloud 2019 from Bessemer Venture Partners
State of the Cloud 2019 from Bessemer Venture Partners
 
Drug User Development Projects - Public
Drug User Development Projects - PublicDrug User Development Projects - Public
Drug User Development Projects - Public
 
How to understand the ROI of investing in People
How to understand the ROI of investing in People How to understand the ROI of investing in People
How to understand the ROI of investing in People
 
Bessemer Venture Partners' 2019 State of the Cloud
Bessemer Venture Partners' 2019 State of the CloudBessemer Venture Partners' 2019 State of the Cloud
Bessemer Venture Partners' 2019 State of the Cloud
 
Challenge & Promise of HE Internships_Hora_062221
Challenge & Promise of HE Internships_Hora_062221Challenge & Promise of HE Internships_Hora_062221
Challenge & Promise of HE Internships_Hora_062221
 
Communication project.ppt
Communication project.pptCommunication project.ppt
Communication project.ppt
 
Know How: Graduates & Research Placement Application Form
Know How: Graduates & Research Placement Application FormKnow How: Graduates & Research Placement Application Form
Know How: Graduates & Research Placement Application Form
 
Scorecards
ScorecardsScorecards
Scorecards
 
Rosa Cano_openexpo2018_sin_texto
Rosa Cano_openexpo2018_sin_textoRosa Cano_openexpo2018_sin_texto
Rosa Cano_openexpo2018_sin_texto
 
08.06.15 training occupant_engagement
08.06.15 training occupant_engagement08.06.15 training occupant_engagement
08.06.15 training occupant_engagement
 
Construir productos y transformación digital mezclando tecnología y educación...
Construir productos y transformación digital mezclando tecnología y educación...Construir productos y transformación digital mezclando tecnología y educación...
Construir productos y transformación digital mezclando tecnología y educación...
 
Crafting a Three Legged Stool for Effective Collaboration - Daphne Bourne
Crafting a Three Legged Stool for Effective Collaboration - Daphne BourneCrafting a Three Legged Stool for Effective Collaboration - Daphne Bourne
Crafting a Three Legged Stool for Effective Collaboration - Daphne Bourne
 
Private Rented Communities by urbanbubble
Private Rented Communities by urbanbubblePrivate Rented Communities by urbanbubble
Private Rented Communities by urbanbubble
 
MCCIA 014
MCCIA 014MCCIA 014
MCCIA 014
 
BS portfolio
BS portfolioBS portfolio
BS portfolio
 
Climate Information Services for NAPs in Thailand
Climate Information Services for NAPs in ThailandClimate Information Services for NAPs in Thailand
Climate Information Services for NAPs in Thailand
 

Survey results

  • 1. C O N F I D E N T I A L Driscoll Expansion: Parent Survey Results November 26, 2013 Brookline Advisors
  • 2. C O N F I D E N T I A L Table Of Contents • • • • • • Respondents…………………………………………………………………………......3 Plan Awareness……………………………………………………………………….....4 Key Factors for a Good School…………………………………………………….....6 y Concerns……………………………………………………………………………….....7 Project & Scope…………………………………………………………………………...7 Expansion Specifics………………………………………………………………………8 District Leadership ……………………………………………………………………….9 9 Property Values………………………………………………………………………….10 Feasibility…………………………………………………………………………………11 Solutions………………………………………………………………………………...12 Can it Work?.........................................................................................................12 Work? 12 New Build vs. ‘Build in Place’…………………………………………………………..13 Footprint…………………………………………………………………………………..14 Specific Solutions………………………………………………………………………..15 Smaller Expansions ...…………………………………………………………………..16 16 Usage Data……………………………………………………………………………....17 Cars……………………………………………………………………………………….17 Playgrounds……………………………………………………………………………...18 About the Author…………………………………………………………………….....19 Ab t th A th 19 2
  • 3. C O N F I D E N T I A L Respondents • • • • 165 parents filled out surveys from a list of 670 Driscoll parent emails All but 5 responses came via direct email response (no possibility for double entries) The remaining 5 came by web links from IP addresses not used by other respondents Respondent family breakdown: I / We have children in t he f ollowing grades: 60.0% 50.6% 50.0% 44.9% 40.0% 31.6% 30.0% 30 0% 20.0% 16.5% 10.0% 0.0% Toddler-Pre K K-2nd grade 3 3-5th grade 6-8th grade
  • 4. C O N F I D E N T I A L Awareness R a ting A v e ra g e 3.83 H o w info rme d d o y o u fe e l a b o ut the p ro p o s e d e xp a ns io n p ro je c t? (0=N o t a t a ll, 10= Fully Info rme d ) 26 30 R e s p o ns e Co unt 160 27 25 20 20 12 11 9 10 10 14 4 2 9 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 R a ti ting A v e ra g e 40 37 30 29 R e s p o ns e Co unt 2.72 D o y o u fe e l a d e q ua te s te p s ha v e b e e n ta k e n to e xp la in the p ro je c t s c o p e a nd imp a c ts to y o u? (0=T o ta lly D is a g re e , 10=T o ta lly A g re e ) 162 28 21 20 12 8 6 5 10 6 10 3 5 3 8 9 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 7 R a ti ting A v e ra g e 2.18 D o y o u fe e l y o u we re s uffic ie ntly c o ns ulte d / inc lud e d in the p ro c e s s ? (0=N o t a t a ll, 10= Fully Co ns ulte d / Inc lud e d ) 80 60 60 27 40 22 20 17 6 11 4 5 4 4 4 2 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 R e s p o ns e Co unt 162
  • 5. C O N F I D E N T I A L Awareness Continued R a ting A v e ra g e 2.11 B -SP A CE ’s c ha rte r re q uire d its wo rk b e “wid e ly d is c us s e d a c ro s s the c o mmunity in B ro o k line a nd re c e iv e s ig nific a nt p ub lic s up p o rt.” D o y o u b e lie v e tha t g o a l wa s a c hie v e d ? (0=T o ta lly D is a g re e , 10=T o ta lly A g re e ) 60 56 33 40 24 11 20 12 3 4 10 2 4 3 4 3 6 7 8 9 10 0 0 1 2 5 5 R e s p o ns e Co unt 162
  • 6. C O N F I D E N T I A L Key Factors For A Good School T he fo llo wing fa c to rs ma k e a g o o d s c ho o l: (0= N o t a Fa c to r, 10 = Critic a l) R a ting A v e ra g e Good Teachers Small Class Size Administration Active Parent Community Neighborhood Centric Quality of Facilities K-8 Model R e s p o ns e Co unt 9.90 8.66 8.28 8.31 7.52 7.46 5.88 A ns we r Op tio ns 160 160 160 158 157 159 160 a ns we re d q ue s t o n s e e tio 160 60 The f ollowing factors make a good school: (0= Not a Factor, 10 = Critical) K-8 Model K 8M d l Quality of Facilities Neighborhood Centric Active P A i Parent Community C i Administration Small Class Size Good Teachers 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 6 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00
  • 7. C O N F I D E N T I A L Concerns: Project & Project Scope R a ting A v e ra g e 1.91 P le a s e ra te y o ur o v e ra ll c o nc e rn/ e xc ite me nt o v e r the p ro p o s e d p ro je c t (0= D e e p ly Co nc e rne d , 10=V e ry E xc ite d ) 80 R e s p o ns e Co unt 155 70 60 40 24 20 11 17 2 3 9 7 5 4 3 4 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 0 1 R a ting A v e ra g e 3.01 A n 800 s e a t s c ho o l is a s g o o d a s a 500 s e a t e le me nta ry / K-8 s c ho o l (0=T o ta lly D is a g re e , 10=T o ta lly a g re e ) 60 R e s p o ns e Co unt 156 47 40 18 20 15 12 15 23 6 3 7 6 7 8 2 8 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 9 10 R a ting A v e ra g e 3.43 A 700 s e a t s c ho o l is a s g o o d a s a 500 s e a t e le me nta ry / K-8 s c ho o l (0=T o ta lly D is a g re e , 10=T o ta lly a g re e ) 60 40 32 18 20 20 27 14 16 5 7 5 3 6 7 8 9 9 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 7 10 R e s p o ns e Co unt 156
  • 8. C O N F I D E N T I A L Concerns: Ranking Specific Expansion Elements If y o u ha v e c o nc e rns , p le a s e ra te the fo llo wing p o te ntia l is s ue s (0= N o t Co nc e rne d , 10= D e e p ly Co nc e rne d ) R a ting R e s p o ns e A ns we r Op tio ns A v e ra g e Co unt Significant loss of green space/pupil Capacity of existing lot size to support 200 more pupils Traffic safety Parking access Student relocation plans and duration are not yet Ability of the town to complete 3 or more simultaneous 8.25 8.25 7.03 6.12 8.50 8.14 155 153 155 153 155 154 a ns we re d q ue s tio n 155 I f y ou have concerns, please rate the following potential issues (0= Not Concerned, 10= Deeply Concerned) Ability of the town to complete 3 or more … Student relocation plans and duration are not yet … Parking access Traffic safety Capacity of existing lot size to support 200 more pupils Significant loss of green / il space/pupil 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 8 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00
  • 9. C O N F I D E N T I A L Perspectives On District Leadership R a ting A v e ra g e 6.48 H o w muc h fa ith d id y o u ha v e in the g e ne ra l a d minis tra tio n o f B ro o k line S c ho o ls 1 y e a r a g o ? (0= N o ne , 10= T o ta l) R e s p o ns e Co unt 147 60 39 40 27 20 5 1 0 1 2 18 9 6 3 5 6 23 4 8 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 R a ting A v e ra g e 3.95 H o w muc h fa ith d o y o u ha v e in the g e ne ra l a d minis tra tio n o f B ro o k line S c ho o ls to d a y ? (0= N o ne , 10= T o ta l) 60 40 20 18 22 15 15 18 13 20 9 11 7 0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 9 6 7 8 9 10 R e s p o ns e Co unt 148
  • 10. C O N F I D E N T I A L Concern about Property Value Impact D o y o u fe e l y o ur re s id e nc e will b e mo re o r le s s a ttra c tiv e to future re s id e nts if the p ro je c t g o e s fo rwa rd a s is ? P o s itiv e Imp a c t N o Imp a c t N e g a tiv e Imp a c t R e s p o ns e Co unt 11 A ns we r Op tio ns 54 86 151 Do you feel your residence will be more or less attractive to  future residents if the project goes forward as is? 86 54 11 Positive Impact No Impact 10 Negative Impact
  • 11. C O N F I D E N T I A L Concern About Feasibility R a ting A v e ra g e 4.89 4 89 D o y o u think g ro wth re la te d p a rk ing a nd tra ffic s a fe ty is s ue s c a n b e a d e q ua te ly d e a lt with b y g o o d d e s ig n? (0= N o t a t a ll, 10=A b s o lute ly ) (0 10 A R e s p o ns e Co unt 148 30 20 20 14 9 10 18 16 10 14 15 17 14 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 S tud e nts / a c re o f p la y s p a c e lo o k s lik e it will g ro w b y 90% + to the hig he s t d e ns ity in the d is tric t. D o y o u think this c a n b e a d e q ua te ly d e a lt with b y g o o d d e s ig n? (0= N o t a t a ll, 10=A b s o lute ly ) 60 9 10 R a ting A v e ra g e 3.09 R e s p o ns e Co unt 149 41 40 16 20 23 12 15 3 4 9 5 5 6 10 9 5 4 7 8 9 10 0 0 1 2 11
  • 12. C O N F I D E N T I A L Solutions – Can An Expansion Be Made To Work? D o y o u b e lie v e a c c o mmo d a tio ns c a n b e ma d e to ma k e the g ro wth o f the s c ho o l a c c e p ta b le ? R e s p o ns e R e s p o ns e A ns we r Op tio ns P e rc e nt Co unt Yes No 68.5% 68 5% 31.5% 102 47 a ns we re d q ue s tio n 149 Do y ou believe accommodations can be made to make the growth of the s c hool acceptable? 31.5% Yes No 68.5% 12
  • 13. C O N F I D E N T I A L Solutions – New Build vs. ‘Build In Place’ U s ing MS B A d a ta , B ro o k line ha s the 3rd hig he s t s c ho o l s ize o f the to p 20 d is tric ts a nd will lik e ly mo v e to 2nd hig he s t s c ho o l s ize … R e s p o ns e R e s p o ns e A ns we r Op tio ns P e rc e nt Co unt Yes No 86.5% 13.5% 128 20 a ns we re d q ue s tio n 148 Us ing MSBA data, Brookline has the 3rd highest school size of the top 20 dis tricts and will likely move to 2nd highest school size under the ‘Expand in P lace’ plan. Would you support the town s pending more money on a plan t hat constructed a new school? 13.5% Yes No 86.5% 13
  • 14. C O N F I D E N T I A L Solutions - Footprint If a n e q uita b le wa y to p urc ha s e mo re p ro p e rty c o uld b e fo und , wo uld y o u s up p o rt the to wn s p e nd ing mo re mo ne y to inc re a s e to ta l s p a c e in ra tio to R e s p o ns e R e s p o ns e A ns we r Op tio ns P e rc e nt Co unt Yes No 87.8% 12.2% 130 18 a ns we re d q ue s tio n 148 Would You S upport The Town B uying More Land? 12.2% Yes No 87.8% 14
  • 15. C O N F I D E N T I A L Solutions Continued R a ting A v e ra g e 4.56 If a fina l p la n d ra ma tic a lly a nd uno b trus iv e ly inc re a s e d p a rk ing (e x: und e rg ro und lo t, e tc .) wo uld tha t d e c re a s e y o ur c o nc e rns ? (0= N o t a t a ll, 10= It W o uld R e mo v e my Co nc e rn) R e s p o ns e Co unt 146 25 30 18 20 16 13 11 17 14 14 7 10 6 5 9 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 R a ting A v e ra g e 4.71 If the to wn c o mmitte d to a full re no v a tio n o f D ris c o ll wo uld tha t re d uc e y o ur c o nc e rns ? (0= N o t a t a ll, 10= It W o uld R e mo v e my Co nc e rn) 40 R e s p o ns e Co unt 150 29 30 14 20 17 14 10 17 16 11 7 12 7 6 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 R a ting A v e ra g e 5.52 If the fina l p la n re q uire d tha t p la y s p a c e / p up il s ta y c o ns ta nt wo uld tha t d e c re a s e y o ur c o nc e rns ? (0= N o t a t a ll, 10= It W o uld R e mo v e my Co nc e rn) 25 30 20 10 9 14 12 22 17 20 11 6 5 8 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 15 6 7 8 9 10 R e s p o ns e Co unt 149
  • 16. C O N F I D E N T I A L Solutions – Would Less Expansion Be Preferable? R a ting A v e ra g e 5.58 5 58 If the fina l p la n a d d e d 100 p up ils ra the r tha n 200 wo uld tha t re d uc e y o ur c o nc e rns ? (0= N o t a t a ll, 10= It W o uld R e mo v e my Co nc e rn) 40 30 30 20 29 21 12 10 10 1 4 R e s p o ns e Co unt 148 21 9 8 3 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 R a ting A v e ra g e 6.60 If the p ro je c t a d d e d 75 p up ils ra the r tha n 200 wo uld tha t re d uc e y o ur c o nc e rns ? (0= N o t a t a ll, 10= It W o uld R e mo v e my Co nc e rn) 40 30 20 20 10 10 0 4 7 3 4 25 28 15 4 2 15 20 10 0 0 1 5 16 6 7 8 9 10 R e s p o ns e Co unt 148
  • 17. C O N F I D E N T I A L Usage - Playground D o e s y o ur fa mily ma k e us e o f s c ho o l p la y s p a c e o uts id e o f re g ula r ho urs ? R e s p o ns e P e rc e nt Yes Y No R e s p o ns e Co unt 88.5% 88 5% 11.5% A ns we r Op tio ns 139 18 a ns we re d q ue s tio n 157 Does your family make use of school play s pace outside of regular hours? 11.5% Yes Y No 88.5% 17
  • 18. C O N F I D E N T I A L Usage - Cars W ha t p e rc e nta g e o f y o ur d ro p o ff/ p ic k up trip s inv o lv e the us e o f a c a r? [ 0-100% ] R e s p o ns e A v e ra g e R e s p o ns e Co unt 42% A ns we r Op tio ns 157 0-100% % of Pickup/Drop Offs That Involve A Car 60 50 48 40 26 30 20 20 14 14 8 10 10 8 3 1 5 0 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 18 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
  • 19. C O N F I D E N T I A L About the Survey • Hello, my name is Sundar Srinivasan. I am a Driscoll Parent and the husband of a BHS and Devotion alum. • I put together this survey because I did not think such a major project should be rushed forward without anyone taking a broad sounding of the community’s actual priorities and concerns community s concerns. • I have no pre-conceived notions or agenda other than wanting to make sure any proposed plan is reasonable and realistic. • You can reach me at sundar@driscollexpansion.org or look for me most mornings at drop off on the west side of the school. Feel free to stop me with any q p y questions or ideas. 19