STUDIES IN ESTHER 
By Glenn Pease 
CONTENTS 
1. PROVIDENCE IN THE WORLD Based on Esther 1:1-9 
2. PROVIDENCE THROUGH WOMEN Based on Esther 1:10-22 
3. THE PARADOX OF PLEASURE Based on Esther 2:1-4 
4. FATHER AND DAUGHTER Based on Esther 2:5-11 
5. THE POWER OF BEAUTY Based on Esther 2:5-18 
6. THE IMPACT OF INFLUENCE Based on Esther 2:15-23 
7. THE PARADOX OF PATRIOTISM Based on Esther 2:19-3:6 
8. COINCIDENCE OR PROVIDENCE? Based on Esther 6:1-11 
9. THE HUMOR OF HISTORY Based on Esther 9:20-28 
10. PROVIDENCE IN AMERICAN HISTORY Esther 10:1-3 
1. PROVIDENCE IN THE WORLD Based on Esther 1:1-9 
Time magazine covered the extravagance of the Shaw Of Iran 
back in 1971. It was the 2500th year anniversary of the founding of 
the Persian Empire by Cyrus the Great. Nine kings and five queens 
were there, along with princes and princesses, and 16 presidents. It 
was a high class elegant affair that cost $100,000 dollars. As 
extravagant as it was, however, it could not hold a candle to the 
banquet thrown by his predecessor many centuries early. Esther 
begins with an account of possibly the greatest most plush banquet 
of all time. It will probably never be excelled until the redeemed 
enter into the marriage supper of the Lamb. 
King Ahasurus, better known as King Xerxes, had a banquet for
all of his princes, military leaders, and political leaders. It lasted for 
180 days, or one half of a year. Now that is what you call a party, it 
was a six months smorgasbord. Then he topped that off with a 
seven day banquet for all the people in the capital city of Susa. 
Xerxes, like most absolute rulers, could be very cruel, but you can be 
sure of one thing, nobody ever called him a party pooper. The one 
thing wealthy people have in common is a love for parties. This is 
their way of revealing their wealth and status. Mrs. Cornelious 
Vanderbuilt use to spend three hundred thousand a year on 
entertainment. 
Scholars are convinced that Xerxes is trying to make a big 
impression. He has an ambition to conquer the Greeks, and rule, 
not just most of the world, but all of the world. This half-year 
banquet was to get all of his leaders together to persuade them to 
cooperate, and plan the strategy. Verse 4 stresses that Xerxes 
paraded his riches and glory before them, and you get the 
impression it is like may day in Russia, when all of the big rockets, 
tanks, and other weapons are paraded before the leaders, in order to 
build the ego, and say to all, look at how great and powerful we are. 
You can be sure that everyone was impressed with the power and 
glory of Xerxes. He had wealth beyond our imagination, and we will 
never see as much gold as he had until we look down as we walk the 
streets of the heavenly city. 
There is no point in trying to describe the splendor of his 
kingdom. The point we need to see is that the story of Esther takes 
place in an environment of pleasure and treasure without measure. 
Almost the entire book takes place in the palace of the king. It is in 
the midst of glory that we see only in fairy tales. Esther, the Jewish 
girl, was a mere nobody, and she was exalted into this atmosphere of 
elegant royalty. It is a true Cinderella story. It is important that we 
see the environment in which the story takes place. That is the only 
way you will be able to grasp why things in this book seem to be
acceptable that would be totally unacceptable in any other context, 
for both Jews and Christians. 
Martin Luther never could enter into the context of Esther, and 
see it from the perspective of ancient Eastern royalty. The result is, 
he despised the book of Esther, and felt it was immoral, and ought 
not to be in the Bible. You don't have to like what went on in the 
palace of king Xerxes, but the fact is we can learn a lot of relevant 
truth about God's working in history by taking advantage of this 
behind the scenes peek. We are privileged to get an inside view of 
what is happening in the palace that affects the people of the whole 
world. We get to follow God into the most exclusive setting, and see 
how He providentially works behind closed doors in the decision 
making centers of world governments. Just to be aware that God 
works in such ways is a valuable revelation that can change your 
world view. 
The first thing the book of Esther does for us is it forces us to 
broaden our perspective on the sphere of God's working. God is not 
limited to Israel. He is not limited to His chosen people. God is the 
God of the whole world, and His providence works even in the 
pagan world. Mal. 1:5 says, "Great is the Lord, even beyond the 
borders of Israel." In 
verse 11 God says, "My name will be great among the nations, from 
the rising to the setting of the sun." Esther brings us into a Persian 
setting, where we see the whole history of God's people bound up in 
what happens in Persia. God did not start working in Persia just 
because Esther and the Jews were there. He had been providentially 
working in and through the Persians from the start of their 
kingdom. 
Cyrus the Great conquered the Medes and the united them with 
the Persians to form the Medo-Persian Empire. He was a master 
strategist who figured out ways to conquer the unconquerable.
Mounted Lydian spearmen blocked the road of his forward march. 
It was like a man with a bebe gun going against a tank. But he sent 
his baggage camels in front of his lines, and the sight of these beasts 
frightened the Lydian horses, and they ran off in disorder, and 
Cyrus marched on to victory. 
When Cyrus marched into Babylon, and made it a part of the 
Persian Empire in 539 B.C., he had some reason for pride. He got a 
bit heavy on the titles, however, when he proclaimed, "I am Cyrus, 
king of the universe, great king, mighty king, king of Babylon, 
king of Sumer and Akkad, king of the world." That just about 
covered it. He was the richest most powerful man in the world, and 
he was a pagan. So we write him off as of no value to the purpose of 
God in history-right? Wrong! He played a major role in God's 
plan, and that is the point we want to stress, for if we limit God in 
the sphere of His providence in history, we fail to see Him as the 
God of all history, and all people, even the pagan people's of the 
world. There is only one God, and He is the God of all, whether they 
know it or not. 
In the case of Cyrus, the Bible is so clear in its revelation that we 
cannot miss it. 22 times the Old Testament refers to Cyrus the 
Great, and everyone of them is positive. Some are so positive as to be 
shocking. Daniel served under Cyrus, and his successor, Darius, 
and he was greatly blessed. Darius was the Persian king who had 
him thrown into the lion's den, and who was so grateful that Daniel 
was spared. The Persians played a major part in God's plan for 
Israel. God said of Cyrus the Great in Isa. 44:28, "He is my 
shepherd and He shall fulfill all my purpose." God used this great 
pagan ruler to get his people back into the promise land. He sent 
them back, and he paid for the rebuilding of God's temple in 
Jerusalem. He also sent back with them all the treasures that had 
been carried away in Babylon.
God used him like he was an Abraham, Moses, or a Joshua. But 
the fact is, he did not even know the God of Israel who was using 
him. Isa. 45:1 says, "Thus says the Lord to His anointed, to Cyrus, 
whose right hand I have grasped, to subdue nations before him, 
and ungird the loins of kings, to open doors before him that gates 
may not be closed: I will go before you and level mountains, I will 
break in pieces the doors of bronze and cut asunder the bars of 
iron..." After other promises of guidance, God says, "I call you by 
your name, I surname you, though you do not know me." 
Now I don't want to go on studying Cryus, for it could take a full 
message just to look at the text dealing with this man's role in God's 
plan. I share this brief glimpse so we can see the close 
interrelationship of Persia and the people of God. They were 
intertwined from the beginning. The book of Esther is just one 
chapter in the context of their interrelationship. Here again it is the 
king of Persia who is the power who will either destroy or deliver 
the Jews. They will perish or prosper depending upon his choices. 
So we see God again working behind the scenes to lead this king to 
fulfill His purpose in history. 
Do not think that God does not work in the pagan governments of 
the world. Do not put God in a box by thinking that pagan leaders 
will never do anything good in the world, and never make decisions 
to further the cause of God in the world. This is not only narrow 
thinking, it is anti-Biblical. God never did pull out of Persia. When 
we come to the New Testament, the very first people to receive the 
message of the Messiah's birth were the three wisemen, or the Magi 
of Persia. John Chrysostom, the great golden mouthed preacher of 
the fourth century, wrote, "The Incarnate Word on coming to the 
world gave to the Persians, in the persons of the Magi, the first 
manifestation of his mercy and light-so that the Jews themselves 
learned from the mouths of Persians of the birth of their Messiah."
St. Thomas brought the Gospel to Persia, and there has been a 
continuous history of Jewish and Christian influence in Persia. We 
cannot cover this whole history, but let me share some highlights, for 
it relates to what we see God doing in Esther. Esther is just a peek 
into a vast world of God's providence. It cannot all be a part of 
Scripture, or the world could not contain the acts of God in history. 
The point I want to make is that God has been working in Persia 
from its beginning, and we will know many people in heaven who 
came to Christ in Persia. In the third century many of the famous 
doctors of Persia were Christians. In 485 A.D., the chief advisors to 
the king of Persia was a Christian. Some of the kings of Persia 
married Christian women, and so you have other stories like this of 
Esther, where a Jew becomes queen of Persia, married to a pagan 
king. Christians were among the best educated, and so even when 
the Arabs conquered Persia in 632, the Christians continued to get 
the key positions in government and institutions of higher learning. 
In the 1200's when Marco Polo visited Persia he found a 
flourishing Christians community. The Christians had become the 
favored minority over the Muslim majority. There is much more 
that is positive, but we need to look at the negative side also, which 
explains why Christianity is not a power in Iran today. Iran is, of 
course, the modern name of Persia. God's providence is to give His 
people a chance to do His will. He does not force them, and if they 
chose to disobey they can lose His blessing. 
The Christians had it made by their wise living, and they could 
have won the whole nation. But when Christians refused to be 
Christian, the message of the Gospel does not work. The first 
mistake of Christians in Persia was their refusal to use the language 
of the masses. They had their Syriac Bible, but would not use the 
Arabic, the language of the people. When the Arabs took over, and 
used Arabic, the masses became a part of Islam instead of 
Christianity. Today the church goes into all the world to give people
the Bible in their own language. Christians have learned from 
history, if you don't give people the Bible in their own tongue, you 
will not be able to build on a lasting foundation. Persian history is a 
perfect example. 
Christians were very well educated. They were leaders in the 
land. Instead of being loving toward the masses, they mocked their 
ignorance, and despised their pagan customs, and deliberately 
drank wine on their holy days to show their contempt. You don't 
have to know much history to know what is the inevitable result of 
such folly. In 1369 Tamberlane, a descendant of Genghiz Khan, 
came to power in Persia. He unleashed a reign of terror on 
Christians. They were rounded up and murdered, and the churches 
were destroyed, and Christianity never recovered from this scourge. 
Yes, there will be many in heaven from Persia, but the sad fact is, 
there will be many less than there should be, because God's 
providence is not the only force in history. 
We need to see this side also, lest we be superficial and conclude, 
that sense God is providentially working in history, we don't have to 
worry about anything. Not so, for man is still responsible for his 
decisions and choices, and what he does can make a big difference in 
the course of history. Not everything that is, is just how God wants 
it. Man is constantly making choices that are foolish. God's people 
can get a break and then blow it, and all can be ruined. 
Mordecai made this clear to Esther in 4:14 where he warned her 
when she toyed with the idea of not getting involved. He said, "For 
if you keep silence at such a time as this, relief and deliverance will 
rise for the Jews from another quarter, but you and your fathers 
house will perish." In other words, Esther still had to make a free 
choice to go along with the providence of God. She could have said 
no, and blown it, and gone down in history as a famous traitor 
rather than a heroine. In all our study of providence, let us never
lose sight of the full responsibility of man to follow and obey the will 
of God. If God opens the door, and I do not go through it, I will not 
experience the providence of God, and the blessing is lost. 
Now, having looked at all this history surrounding and growing 
out of the book of Esther, the question is, how is all of this to have an 
effect on our lives today? It is to have this effect in us, that we never 
write off politics as a sphere where God is not active. No matter 
how dirty, corrupt, and scandalous politics can be, it is a key area of 
life where God is at work to accomplish His purpose in history. Yes, 
government is secular, but that is the point of the book of Esther. 
God is active in the secular world. God so loved the world, not just 
the church, and His own people. God loved the world, and still does, 
and He works in the sphere of that secular world He loves. Esther 
has no reference to God, or anything religious. It is a secular story 
from beginning to end. It is in the Bible to make it a clear revelation 
to all people for all time, God is the God of the secular world as well 
as the religious world. Grasping this can change your whole outlook 
on life, and make all of life and history more exciting. 
Do not ever assume that a non-Christian leader or politician 
cannot be a channel of God's purpose in history. To do so is to be 
blind to the record of God's actual working. God used the pagan 
rulers of all the great empires of world to achieve His plan. The 
Babylonians, Persians, Greeks and Romans, everyone of them 
played a major role in God's plan, and many of them came to be 
true believers in each of these great empires. But whether the 
leaders did or not become believers, God used them. He used 
Caesar Augustus to make a decree to tax the world. This fulfilled 
the prophecy of the Messiah being born in Bethlehem. Pagan kings 
and Centurions were constantly playing roles in Paul's life and 
ministry. When he ended up in Rome, the pagan authorities gave 
him great freedom to teach and preach about Jesus. Without God's 
providential leading in the lives of pagan authorities, Paul would not
have gotten to share the Gospel in the capital of the world, and 
impact all of world history. 
We see it so clearly in Esther, how God used pagans for His 
purpose, but it was not new. God has always worked outside of 
Israel, for His providence is universal. Moses was one of the 
greatest leaders in the history of Israel, but who had a major 
influence on his life? It was Jethro, his father-in -law, who was a 
priest of Midian. He was not a part of Israel, but Moses married his 
daughter, and got to know him well. They became good friends, and 
it was Jethro that Moses turned to for advice when the burden of 
judging Israel too heavy. In Ex. 18 we read of how Jethro told him 
to set up many lower courts with good men to judge, and he would 
then be the supreme court where the hardest cases would come. 
Moses gave heed, and this outsider changed the course of Israel's 
history. 
Melchizedek was such a godly priest in Salem that even though he 
was a Gentile outside of the people of Israel, he was chosen of God to 
be a type of His Son, the Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus is called a priest 
forever after the order of Melchizedek. He was not called a priest 
after Aaron, or after Israel's priesthood, but after the Gentile 
Melchizedek. Abraham, the father of Judaism, even paid tithes to 
this Gentile priest. God was working in a powerful way outside 
Israel. 
We tend to focus on men, for men have, all through ancient 
history, been the leaders and decision makers. Esther has a balance 
of male and female cooperation. It took both Esther and Mordecai 
to fulfill the plan of God for Israel. God used both female and male 
for the Gentile world as well. Vashti by her refusal to do what was 
immoral, set the stage for the whole drama that brought Esther to 
the throne. God is an equal opportunity employer in His 
providential guidance of history. We will see more of this as we
continue our study. 
The queen of Sheba came to visit Solomon, and she was so 
impressed by his wealth and wisdom, she became a believer. She 
took her faith back to her Gentile land, and only eternity will reveal 
how God's providence worked through her, but we will know, for 
Jesus said she will be in heaven judging those who refuse to see the 
light Christ brought, which was even greater than that of Solomon. 
We read in Matt. 12:42, "The queen of the South will arise at the 
judgment with this generation and condemn it, for she came from 
the ends of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon, and behold, 
something greater than Solomon is here." 
It is hard for us to grasp that God is working in the lives of 
people outside the church. It was hard for Peter to comprehend this 
when in Acts 10 God was working in the life of Cornelius, and 
Italian Gentile who had never heard the Gospel. God had to use a 
vision, and speak to Peter directly, to get him to go to Cornelius. 
But finally, Peter became a believer in God's providence in the lives 
of those outside the people of God, and he said in Acts 10:34-35, 
"Truly I perceive that God shows no partiality, but in every nation 
anyone who fears Him and does what is right is acceptable to Him." 
Peter became aware that God so loved the world, and so was at 
work in all the world to seek and to save. 
Jonah not only could not grasp this truth, he hated it. He 
expected God to wipe out the pagans of Ninevah. Instead, God used 
the message He brought to bring them to repentance, and He had 
mercy on them. They were a nation of pagans, and yet God loved 
them and spared them. Numerous are the examples of God sparing 
pagan peoples. There are no people that God does not care about. 
Those who would be truly Christlike must be world conscious 
people. There must be a love and concern for all people to truly 
fulfill the will of God. Never has this been more true than today
when our world has become so small, that whatever happens to any 
people can affect all people. We need to be aware of, and be excited 
about the fact that God is providentially working in all the world. 
2. PROVIDENCE THROUGH WOMEN Based on Esther 1:10-22 
Paul Aurandt tells this fascinating true story that deals with the 
paradox of positive rebellion. In April of 1847 it looked as if Mexico 
was ready to make peace with the United States. President James 
Polk chose Nicholas Trist to go as a peace commissioner. On his 
way Trist spoke to reporters and told them too much. President 
Polk was upset, and sent a letter to Trist telling him to return. Trist 
read the letter and responded by saying he did not want to return. 
The President was infuriated, and blasted Trist, but he could not 
stop his negotiations with the Mexicans. Today, of course, this could 
never happen with our speedy communications, but in 1848 it was a 
different story. Trist, with no authority to do so, signed a treaty 
with the Mexicans, and brought it back to the U. S. He was 
immediately banished from government, and his salary was cut off, 
and he was forced to go to work for a railroad to feed his family. 
The president and congress accepted the treaty he signed, 
however, for it was too good to refuse. It gave the U. S. what is now 
all of Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, Nevada, California, and part of 
Wyoming, and Colorado. Not a bad deal for a guy who was actually 
fired, and not suppose to even be on the job. It cost him dearly, but 
his rebellion gained for the rest of us a large portion of our nation. 
You just never know what blessings are going to come out of 
what seems to be so negative. Vashti provides us with another
example of this in the first chapter of Esther. She rebels against the 
order of her husband, the king of Persia, the most powerful man on 
the planet. It cost her dearly to refuse him and rebel, but it was a 
major step on the road to Israel's being saved as a nation. If she had 
not rebelled and lost her place as queen, and likely even her life, 
there would be no way for Esther to come to the throne, where she 
was the key to her people's deliverance. 
Here is a pagan Persian Queen making a drastic decision that will 
change the course of history for God's people. She, of course, does 
not even know that she is doing it. Her action has nothing to do with 
anyone but herself. The question is, why did she do it? The context 
makes it quite clear that she was a victim of stag party morality. 
While she and the ladies were having their banquet in a separate 
place, the king and his leaders were really living it up. Nobody was 
forced to drink, but verse 10 says the king had his share and was 
feeling merry with wine. The banquet was in its seventh day, and 
there was only one thing left to do before it ended. They had seen 
the glory of all that men can make, but men still loves most of all to 
see the glory that only God can make-the glory of a beautiful 
woman. 
Vashti the Queen was a beauty to behold, and the king was 
determined that the climax of his six months and one week of 
banqueting would be the marching of his lovely wife before this 
hoard of bleary-eyed, drunken, and lustful men. From his 
perspective at the time, being full of wine, it sounded like his best 
idea ever. He later sobered up and regretted his folly, but by then 
the damage had been done. 
The most powerful argument for abstaining from alcoholic 
beverages is the history of man's fool decisions under its influence. 
One of the greatest causes of human sorrow in the world is that the 
leaders of the world tend to mix alcohol and government. Prov. 31:4
says, "It is not for kings...to drink wine, or for rulers to desire strong 
drink lest they drink and forget what the law decrees, and deprive 
all the oppressed of their rights. Herodotus, the Greek historian 
writes much about the Persians, and tells us that it was their custom 
to get drunk when they deliberated on weighty matters, but that 
they then reexamined their decisions the next day when they were 
sober. Xerxes did not follow this rule in our text, 
and many have failed to do so throughout history. 
Thank God we do not know how many of the decisions that affect 
our lives are made by men whose minds are under the control of 
booze. What we do know from history is frightening enough. One 
example should be enough to see the potential for the kingdom of 
darkness. In 1643 Governor Kieft of the New Netherlands had a 
drunken party with his council. They decided it was time to teach 
the Indians a lesson. In the dead of night they attacked a sleeping 
village, and massacred 80 helpless Indians. This lead to a history of 
sorrow and heartache for both whites and Indians that is beyond 
calculation. Kieft was the first white man to offer a reward for 
Indian scalps, and that is why it became so popular among the 
Indians to take white scalps in revenge. That one drunken party led 
to hell on earth, and hell forever, for masses of people on both sides. 
Satan can offer no better suggestion on how to improve the evils 
of leadership than by mixing alcohol and decision making. Yet, it 
has been the way of world all through history. To the shame of 
Christian nations, the Islamic nations have seen the folly of it, and 
have forbidden alcoholic beverages. Alcohol reduces inhibitions, 
and men will do under its influence what they would never allow 
when sober. Lot was a righteous man, but under the influence of 
alcohol he became incestuous with both of his daughters. Noah's 
one day of folly was due to his getting drunk. Add up the foolish 
acts of otherwise sensible men, and you will discover the great 
majority of them are made under the influence of alcohol.
Stonewall Jackson was a strict temperance man, and his example 
cause many of his officers to be the same. He was once out in a 
drenching rain, and a fellow officer insisted that he take a drink. 
"No sir, I cannot do it," he replied. "I tell you I am more afraid of 
King alcohol then of all the bullets of the enemy." If more men 
feared it, as he did, there would be far fewer tragedies in this life. 
Yet men have the audacity to blame God for suffering in this world, 
when a large share of it can be clearly traced to man's choice to drug 
his brain with alcohol. 
I was impressed with the story of a boy in Scotland who was slow, 
and so he was the butt of many jokes by his village peers. On one 
occasion they were teasing him, and trying to entice him to drinking. 
Whereupon, this supposed simpleton responded with true wisdom. 
He said, "If the Lord Almighty has given few wits to me, He has at 
least given me enough sense to keep the little I have." 
Unfortunately, Xerxes was not as wise as this simpleton. 
But Vashti was no fool. When she got the order to come over to the 
men's banquet, she knew she was being used to satisfy the kings lust 
for a new thrill, and she refused. It was either the kings majesty, or 
the queens modesty that had to be sacrificed, and so she chose to 
defy his request, and, thereby, became the first truly noble person in 
the book of Esther. Some even feel she was more noble than Esther. 
Morgan, that prince of expositors, cries out, "Let the name of 
Vashti be held in everlasting honor for her refusal." The majority 
of commentators agree, but some feel it was her duty to obey her 
husband regardless of the circumstances. This view would have 
some basis if it was an innocent request for her to come and greet his 
honored guest. But we know too much about Persian history, and 
human nature, to think that is all it was. Herodotus tells of how 
some Greeks made the mistake of bringing some of their wives to a 
Persian banquet. The Persians kept making sexual advances toward 
them even while their husbands were there.
Vashti had her banquet for the women in a separate place from 
the men, not just for lack of space, but because the women knew 
what the men were like after they had been drinking. Sooner or 
later, and usually sooner, a group of men would get around to the 
subject of women, and where alcohol is involved you can count on 
it, the subject will turn to the immoral. What all this means is that 
Vashti was to be the frosting on the cake at this stag party. She was 
to march in, and satisfy the lust of this drunken crowd of men, and 
she said, "No! I won't do it!" She is the equivalent of the movie star 
who is offered fame and fortune for becoming a centerfold, and she 
says, "No!" Vashti was a pagan woman, but let us not forget, even 
pagans have moral standards, and here is one who lived by hers, 
even at great cost. She was the wealthiest and most famous woman 
on earth, but she sacrificed it all, and became a nobody, rather than 
humiliate herself. 
Xerxes and Vashti are prime examples of the fact that riches are 
not the key to a good marriage. That key is not riches, but respect. 
Xerxes could sleep in a golden bed, and drink from a golden cup, but 
that did not make him a good husband. He exhibited the common 
danger of all who have wealth and power. He treated people like 
possessions, and this included his wife. The records reveal that 
many professional men tend to use their wives as show pieces. The 
wives soon learn they are not loved for themselves, but for the statis 
they bring to their husbands, and the marriage collapses because 
women demand to be treated as persons. Thus, we see the paradox 
of beauty. A beautiful woman is a delight and a danger. She can be 
a blessing or a burden to herself, and to men. Most, if not all, men, 
are women watchers, and this is simply a recognition of the 
handiwork of God. The problem is that it can be excessive, and go 
from looking and appreciating to lusting and aggression. 
Faust sold his soul to the devil for the right to have any wish he 
desired, and he requested that Helen of Troy, the most beautiful
woman in the world, be reincarnated so he could see her. His 
request was granted, and he feasted his eyes on the face that 
launched a thousand ships. He sold his soul out of lust for beauty. 
That is excessive. We need to keep a sense of balance, however, lest 
we knock beauty. Esther became the Queen, and saved her people 
because she was unusually beautiful. Beauty can be used for the 
purposes of God and good, as well as for the kingdom of darkness 
and evil. Beauty is good in itself, but like all good, it can be misused 
and abused, and become a tool of evil. 
Vashti was Queen because of her beauty, but it was also her 
beauty that led to her downfall, for had she not been so beautiful, 
she never would have been selected to please the lustful eyes of those 
drunken men. The burden of beauty is a paradox that many 
women have had to bear. In our culture the beautiful woman is 
showered with opportunities. Beauty contests offer them 
scholarships, great jobs, much wealth. They can go on to movies, 
the stage, and rise to the top. But, the other side is that they face 
such pressure to use their beauty for what is immoral. The point is, 
the story of Vashti is a story that is repeating itself over and over 
again all through history. Non-Christian women are making choices 
like she had to everyday. They are choosing self-respect and dignity 
rather than conformity to the lust of men. 
You can respond by saying, "Big deal!" There are for every 
Vashti who says no, hundreds of others to fill in the gap of their 
refusal. This is true, but, nevertheless, the refusal of the few can 
change the course of history. And that was the case with Vashti. 
The few stubborn women who take their stand against impossible 
odds are the women who have helped make the women of our day 
the most free in history. Vashti was alone against a government 
totally dominated by men. Susan B. Anthony grew up in a society 
very similar, but she revolted against it, and made a big difference 
because of the Christian principles that forced men to modify their
methods. 
She was born in 1820 into a Quaker family where women were 
treated with respect and equality. Her father went bankrupt, and so 
she and her sisters became teachers. For 15 years they taught with 
three dollars a week as their top salary. Men teachers were 
receiving three times that amount. She decided to draw up a 
Declaration of Rights for women, and she presented it to the New 
York legislature. She got the signatures of ten thousand women, but 
the bill was rejected. She went back to the people and kept 
gathering signatures, and kept lecturing across the state. She 
covered 54 out of 60 counties, and every time she went to the 
legislature she was turned down. Six times she went with her 
petitions, and six times she was rejected. Finally, after unbelievable 
personal sacrifice, she returned the seventh time, and in 1860 the 
New York legislature adopted a bill granting women the right to 
own property, and the right to the money they earned, plus other 
rights. 
The next battle was women's right to vote. She persuaded 15 
other brave women to join her, and they marched into the polling 
headquarters in Rochester in 1872. She told the election inspectors 
they were there to vote. They told her it was illegal. She pulled out 
a copy of the U. S. Constitution and said, "Prove it!" They couldn't, 
and so she and her three sisters, and other women, voted. The 
newspapers splashed the incident across their front pages. It was a 
report of what King Xerxes advisers told him. These women had to 
be punished, or all women would think they had a right to vote. 
Had Susan B. Anthony lived in Persia, she would have gotten no 
further than Vashti, but she lived in America, and had the freedom 
to express her views. She toured the Midwest and drew large 
crowds to her lecture which was titled, Is It A Crime For A U. S. 
Citizen To Vote? We don't have time to look at her spectacular 
trial, but she won, and went on as president of The National
Women Suffrage Association to prepare the way for the 19th 
amendment that gave women the right to vote. By her rebellion she 
changed the course of history. She did it, because like Vashti, she 
had the courage to say no, and refused to submit to what was not 
right. 
It is always right for any male or female to resist cooperation 
with evil, and God can use that resistance for His purpose of 
overcoming evil. Vashti said no to immorality, and God used that, 
right along with Mordecai's saying no to idolatry. These two 
personal responses of saying no, led to the providential yes of 
redemption. Never say, never say no, for words like refusal and 
rebellion in the proper context, as we see them in Esther, are not 
vices, but virtues. 
Xerxes, with all his power, found out he could not order his wife 
to do anything he pleased, and get his way. What an enormous 
embarrassment. He had just spent 6 months and one week 
impressing all the leaders of his Empire. He could conquer the 
Greeks and rule the world, but then his wife says no to him. He 
can't even conquer one woman. The battle of the sexes is the oldest 
war on earth, just because it cannot be won. There can be peace and 
reconciliation, but there can be no total victory in this battle, 
because both sexes have a higher allegiance than to each other. 
Joseph Parker, the great English preacher wrote, "There is a 
higher law than even the will of a king than a husband-the law that 
gives a woman the right to guard her own modesty when those who 
should guard it for her do not. Vashti obeyed that higher law 
written by the Creator....and we can think nothing but good of her 
in the matter." William Taylor, author of many books, wrote, "No 
husband has a right to command his wife to do what is wrong, and 
liberty of conscience ought to be as sacred in the home as in the 
state."
This act of rebellion by Vashti was a case of civil disobedience to 
the government, as well as disobedience to her husband, for he was 
also the king, and the absolute law of the land. We see here that 
what is true for the authority of a husband and a government are 
the same. There authority does not allow them to violate a persons 
moral dignity. No earthly authority has the right to command what 
is contrary to a persons religious and moral principles. One is 
always right to obey God rather than man. This does not mean one 
will not suffer consequences for their stand. The head of the house, 
or the head of the state may have power beyond your ability to 
escape. Such was the case for Vashti, and such is the experience of 
millions of Christians. 
If you have dreamed of being a queen, and feel that is the highest 
goal of life, you are taking your dreams from fairy tales, and not 
from history. The average American woman is far more blest, and 
richer in true values than most of the queens of history. Narah Lofts 
in her book, Queens Of England writes, "I am sure that if all the 
Queens the world has ever known would rise from their graves and 
give a truthful account of their lives, the majority of their stories 
would be on the sorrowful side." Even Esther had to endure 
isolation, neglect, and fear for her life. I point this out in order to 
emphasize the greater power, freedom, and rights that you have as 
American women, then the royalty of the ages have enjoyed. Most 
queens would envy you, and gladly traded their castle to have what 
you have. 
The surprising thing is you have what you have because of the 
providence of God in the lives of women like Vashti. She was used 
to save Judaism, and this is our heritage as Christians. Before her, 
God used other pagan women to keep his program alive. Moses was 
saved by an Egyptian princess. She helped make him the mad God 
used to change all of history. When we look at the genealogy of 
Jesus in Matt. 1, it is surprising that Jesus was not a pure Jew.
Gentile blood flowed in his veins. This means that the blood he shed 
for the sins of the world was both Jewish and Gentile blood. Where 
did it come from? From pagan women God used to change the 
course of history. 
One such woman was Rahab the Caananite, also called the 
harlot, who aided Israel in taking Jericho. She became a part of the 
blood line to the Messiah. After her came Ruth the Moabitess. She 
was another Gentile who came into the blood line, so that two of the 
four women in the genealogy of Jesus were Gentiles, and one of the 
two books of the Bible named after women was a Gentile-Ruth. 
When we come to the New Testament we see Jesus dealing with the 
Samaritan woman at the well. Samaritans were hated by Jews, but 
Jesus loved her and won her, and she became His best evangelist, 
and through her many Samaritans were saved. 
Jesus could identify with her, for He too was a mixture of Jewish 
and Gentile blood, and He was doing in the flesh what He had been 
doing all through history, using women, be they rich or poor, pagan 
or Jewish, to accomplish His purpose in the world. What women 
decide, and what women do, has been, is, and will be, a vital part of 
human progress, for history keeps on confirming what the Bible 
clearly reveals: God's providence works through women. 
3. THE PARADOX OF PLEASURE Based on Esther 2:1-4 
Alexander Selkirk was one of those men who always had to learn 
the hard way. The records of his church in Scotland show that he 
was disciplined several times for causing trouble in the church. In 
May of 1703 he said good-bye to all that, and at age 27 went off to
sea. He tried to run things on the ship as he did church, and he got 
into a furious argument with the Captain. They were anchored off a 
small island four hundred miles from Chile. Alexander got so mad 
he packed up his possessions and went ashore. "You don't dare sail 
without me," he shouted to the Captain. The Captain was not 
impressed with his conviction, and gave the order to sail. Poor 
Alexander could not believe it. He thought he was indispensable. 
He was wadeing out up to his arm pits pleading for the Captain to 
forgive him, but the Captain was as stubborn as he was, and he 
sailed away, never to return. 
Fortunately for Alexander the island had been inhabited by Jon 
Fernandez two centuries earlier, and he had left some goats on the 
island. These gave him food and skins. For four years and four 
months he depended on them for survival. When he was finally 
rescued, he could hardly remember how to talk. When he got back 
to England he was a sensation, and several books were written about 
him. The most famous was fiction, but it used his experience as a 
model. The book was Robinson Crusoe. 
That was a tough way to learn to keep his mouth shut. It is so 
hard not to do something, or say something foolish or destructive 
when you are angry. Even great men often have to learn the hard 
way that loss of temper can be costly. Xerxes was the ruler of the 
Persian Empire, he could have anything he pleased, but he lost his 
wife, whom he truly treasured, because of his anger. Xerxes had a 
reputation for losing his temper when he could not have his own 
way. He once wanted to cross the waters of the hellespont, but it 
was so rough his troops could not build a bridge. He got so angry he 
took chains to the water, and he began to flog it. Like most temper 
tantrums, it was not very effective. 
It is so hard to play God when nature and others will not 
cooperate. The water would not stop for him, and his wife would
not start for him, and he blew his stack. And why shouldn't he? He 
was the most powerful man in the world, and why should he not get 
angry for the same reason the rest of us get angry? Why do we get 
angry? Primarily because something or someone has spoiled our 
pleasure. We are not different from King Xerxes. He had his heart 
set on seeing all his noble leaders gape in envy as he revealed the 
beauty of his wife to them. Half the joy of possessing something is in 
showing it to those who don't. Vashti had the audacity to rob him of 
this pleasure. He blazed with anger within, because she would not 
grant his whim. 
If you examine your own life, you will discover that most of your 
anger is based on the hindrance of your pleasure. You have plans, 
and somebody does not cooperate, and the pleasure you hope for is 
lost, and you are angry. Children cry most often because they can't 
have their own way. Somebody is always hindering them from 
having their pleasure. They want to play with the new camera you 
just bought, and you insist it is not a toy, and there heart is broken. 
They want to run barefoot in a junk infested lot, and you deny them 
of their pleasure. On and on goes the list of pleasures a child desires 
that are constantly being hindered by parents, who get no pleasure 
out of picking up pieces of a two hundred dollar camera, and 
rushing to the emergency room for stitches. 
What we see then, is that from the beginning, life is a battle to see 
whose pleasures are met, and whose are denied. Striving for 
pleasure is a far more powerful factor in all of our lives then we 
realize. Because we do not examine our lives from the perspective of 
the pleasure motive, we look on the events of the book of Esther with 
some degree of shock.It is scandalous that every beautiful virgin in 
the empire was to be made available to the king, to meet his demand 
for pleasure. Keep in mind, he is the most powerful man in the 
world. The whole book revolves around his pleasure. What pleases 
him determines the life or death of every human being of his time. If
he pleases, whole nations are destroyed,and if he pleases, they are 
spared. God's providence had to work through His pleasure motive. 
The first two chapters reveal that he was dominated by sensual 
pleasure. His party life and sex life established the environment in 
which the entire story takes place. Xerxes is no different than the 
rulers of that part of the world today. A reporter who traveled to all 
of the oil rich Arab countries, and interviewed all of the kings and 
sheiks, reported that they lived just like Xerxes did. Wine, women, 
and song, and every pleasure man is capable of was a way of life. 
Xerxes is said to have offered a reward for anyone who could invent 
a new pleasure. This is the challenge today for those who have so 
much money they cannot think of any new way of spending it. 
The book of Esther is not dealing with something old and 
irrelevant, but rather, with a subject so real and relevant to all of us, 
but one that we often fail to think about seriously, the subject of 
pleasure. Before we get all bent out of shape about Xerxes, and his 
lust for pleasure, lets examine our own lives. When we do, we will 
discover that we are not so different from this sensual king. The 
main difference is that we do not have the power and wealth to 
command the pleasures he had, but the difference is really only one 
of degree. We too enjoy parties with good things to eat and drink, 
and we enjoy beautiful furniture and drapes. We enjoy nice clothes, 
and I have seldom heard of a Christian who does not enjoy sexual 
pleasure. 
The more we examine the Christian life, the more we begin to 
realize we are very pleasure oriented. We don't feel the lest guilt for 
enjoying the pleasure of music, fellowship, an all that being a part of 
the body of Christ involves. Why should we? Jesus enjoyed the 
social pleasures of His time. He enjoyed the party, the wedding, the 
feasting, the singing, the fun of fishing, and fellowship. So what we
have is, the paradox of pleasure. It is both something we are to crave 
and seek and enjoy, and yet it is something that can be so dangerous 
that it can quickly lead us to fall, and be out of the will of God. 
Pleasure is both a virtue and a vice. 
The search for pleasure is the primary motivation behind the evil 
of man. Satan appealed to the pleasure nature to get man to fall. 
He said, taste the forbidden fruit and you will have the pleasure of 
being like God, and they jumped at the chance. But good is also 
motivated by pleasure. The Gospel is an appeal to the pleasure 
nature as well, for Jesus says, "Come unto me all ye who labor and 
are heavy laden, and I will give you rest." Jesus offers men the joy of 
eternal life, and the pleasure of abundant life. There is not available 
anywhere in the world a hope for greater pleasure than what Jesus 
offers those who put their faith in Him. 
What this means is we cannot afford to be reacting as Christians 
so often do. They look at Xerxes, and his six months banquet of 
gluttony, drunkenness, and perpetual beautiful virgins for his lust, 
and they say this is disgusting. Then they think their mission in life 
should be to prevent as much pleasure as possible. This over 
reaction to evil pleasure in the world has caused Christians to totally 
misrepresent Christ, and pervert the Gospel so that it loses its 
appeal to most everyone but sadist who delight in pain. History is 
full of the folly of Christian ascetics, who thought they pleased God 
by pain rather pleasure. They wore hair shirts to itch and be 
miserable. They flogged themselves thinking that suffering was the 
key to sanctification. Fun and pleasure were so related to sin that 
misery and boredom were exalted to the level of virtues. 
To avoid this reaction to worldly pleasure we need to see where 
the Bible stands on the issue of pleasure. The first thing we see, as 
we examine God's Word, is that God is the Creator of pleasure. He 
made the world and man, and said it is very good, and He took
pleasure in all that He had made. He made man with a nervous 
system capable of enjoying much pleasure of sight, sound, taste, 
smell, and feeling. He designed man to be a pleasure loving 
creature. Every pleasure we are capable of is a cause to thank God, 
for it is by His will we have that capacity. David acknowledges God 
as the source of all of life's pleasures in Psa. 36:7-8. "How precious 
is thy steadfast love, O God! The children of men take refuge in the 
shadow of thy wings. They feast on the abundance of thy house, and 
thou givest them drink from the rivers of thy pleasures." 
God gives rivers of pleasure, even in time, before the believers 
dwell by the River of Life, where all pain will be forever gone, and 
life will be endless pleasure, for, "At God's right hand our pleasures 
for ever more." (Psa. 16:11). God delights in the pleasures of His 
servants says Psa. 35:27. God is a personality who enjoys great 
pleasure Himself. Psa. 149:4 says, "For the Lord takes pleasure in 
His people." As we, as parents and grandparents, take pleasure in 
seeing our children grow and develop, so God delights in His 
children. 
God wanted the temple rebuilt in Jerusalem, and He said to the 
people in Hag. 1:8, "Go up to the hills and bring wood and build the 
house, that I may take pleasure in it and that I may appear in my 
glory, says the Lord." God is no where revealed as a vast cosmic 
machine. God is a person who feels, and His goal is to accomplish 
what is good and pleasurable. Phil. 2:13 says, "For God is at work 
in you, both to will and to work for His good pleasure." Jesus said 
in Luke 12:32, "Fear not, little flock, for it is your Father's 
good pleasure to give you the kingdom." 
Let's get it straight in our minds, God is not a sadist who loves 
pain and delights in suffering . The goal of God is pleasure for 
Himself, and for all His people. He makes it clear in Ezek. 18:23. 
"Have I any pleasure in the death of the wicked, says the Lord God,
and not rather that he should turn from his way and live?" God's 
goal for every man is a goal of pleasure. Hell is pain and heaven is 
pleasure, and heaven is always God's goal. I looked in a dictionary 
of synonyms and antonyms, and found this list of the opposites of 
pleasure. Listen to them, and see if you catch the flow of heaven or 
hell. 
Displeasure Evil Desolation 
Sorrow Pain Anxiety 
Woe Hurt Burden 
Grief Wound Adversity 
Suffering Affliction Trouble 
Vexation Anguish Unhappiness 
Worry Despair Tribulation 
Sickness Misfortune 
This is not an ideal shopping list for Christmas, or any other day 
in life. In fact, the only place you can get that list fulfilled perfectly 
is in hell. Not a one of them will be a part of heaven. So we are 
stuck with an enormous paradox. The entire plan of God, and the 
goal of Christians, is pleasure. Yet, that seems to be the major 
problem of sinful man, and the primary method of worldliness. 
Even Plato could see it and say, "Pleasure is the greatest incentive to 
evil." It is the pleasure principle that leads men into every form of 
lust, and which takes them lower than the beast. Yet, it is the 
pleasure principle that leads men to the highest levels of godliness, 
and enables them to fulfill the purpose of God. 
The book of Esther is a perfect illustration of the paradox of 
pleasure. It begins with a feast that is dedicated to worldly pleasure, 
and gratification of the senses. It ends with the proclamation of a 
perpetual feast that will also gratify the senses, but will be in 
thanksgiving for the providence of God. The pleasure of the people 
of God at a banquet is no less enjoyable than that of the sensuous
secularist. Xerxes had more of every sensual pleasure, but the fact 
is, he did not enjoy eating, sexuality, and other aesthetic 
pleasures anymore than the Jews did, or than Christians do today. 
How then can we distinguish between pleasures which are 
displeasing to God, and those which please Him? How can we 
unravel this paradox so we know which side we are on? How can we 
know if we are at Xerxes's banquet, or Esther's banquet? The first 
thing we need to do is to recognize pleasure is not evil. It is good, 
and from God. Then we need to recognize that all good can be 
perverted and abused. That is what evil is-it is good used in a way 
that God never intended. 
C. S. Lewis in The Screwtape Letters has the Sr. devil writing to 
the Jr. devil explaining the work of temptation. He writes, "Never 
forget that when we are dealing with any pleasure in its healthy and 
normal and satisfying form, we are, in a sense, on the Enemy's 
ground. I know we have won many a soul through pleasure. All the 
same, it is His invention, not ours. He made the pleasures; all our 
research so far has not enabled us to produce one. All we can do is 
to encourage the humans to take the pleasures which our 
Enemy has produced, at times, or in ways, or in degrees, which he 
has forbidden." 
The tempters task is to get men to think, if a little is good, a lot 
must be better. If he can get men to use God's pleasures to excess, 
he can get them hooked, so that the very gifts of God become idols, 
that lead them astray from God. Such is the subtle plan of the 
deceiver, and it is a very effective plan. We live in a culture where 
pleasure is no longer a gift from God, for it has become god. 
Norman Lobsenz has written a book titled, Is Anybody Happy. It is 
a study of the American search for pleasure. The goal of life for 
Americans is a good time. Our national Mecca is Disney World. 
Pleasure is the alpha and omega of life. The national heroes are no
longer the titans of industry, or the somber statesman, or solitary 
inventors. Now it is the movie star, the sports hero, and 
international playboy, who have taken their place. 
The important thing now is to have fun. Lobsenz writes, 
"Advertisers, never slow to sense a trend, have leaped on the 
bandwagon, and there is now hardly an artifact or an activity that is 
not intimately connected with spine-tingling happiness. Brushing 
your teeth with a certain tooth paste, of course-is fun. Cutting the 
grass-with a certain lawnmower-is exciting. Do you want to know 
the real joy of good living? Drink a certain beer....soap flakes give 
glamorous suds. It is fun to paint your house with so and so's paint. 
Eye glasses are bewitching. Light bulbs are romantic. Building 
materials are festive. Soft drinks are sociable. Kitchen appliances 
are smart. Anything you buy that is made of shining aluminum will 
mirror your laughter. Even paying the bills for these items is a 
pleasure if you have an account at a certain bank." Lobsenz says he 
expects someday to see a billboard with the bony finger of Uncle 
Sam pointing at him asking, "Have you had your fun today?" 
We are under a new morality-the fun morality. It says, if it feels 
good do it. It is not new of course, for Xerxes was a pro at it 2,500 
years ago. Instead of feeling ashamed for having too much pleasure, 
from now on we are to feel guilty if we do not have enough. People 
are now going to psychiatrist and asking, "What is wrong with me? 
I can't let go and have enough fun." People feel so obligated to have 
fun they attack it with all the energy they use to put into 
achievement. This pursuit of pleasure often ends in broken 
marriages, broken lives, and death, especially for those who find 
their pleasure in alcohol and other drugs. 
Is the Christian approach to try and be a kill joy, and oppose 
pleasure, and call people back to a work ethic, where go go go is the 
battle cry? Not at all! The Christian is for pleasure too, for that is
God's plan for man. The Christian simply needs to point out the 
folly of making pleasure an idol. It is not the end of life, but a means 
to a higher end. "Man's chief end is to glorify God and enjoy Him 
forever." We are into pleasure too, but because it is not an end in 
itself, but a means to the end of enjoying God, we have an objective 
standard by which we measure the value of all pleasures. In other 
words, we count the cost. Satan does not want man to count the 
cost, for his whole strategy is to get men to choose pleasure at any 
cost. The cost factor is what enables the Christian to have a guide to 
legitimate pleasure. You can tell if you are being excessive in your 
pursuit of pleasure by what it is costing you. 
Any pleasure that costs you your growth in Christian fruitfulness 
is folly, and excessive pleasure. Jesus made this clear in the parable 
of the sower, where the seed that fell among the thorns did not lead 
to fruitfulness. He tells us in Luke 8:14, "There are those who hear, 
but as they go on their way they are choked by the cares and riches 
and pleasures of life, and their fruit does not mature." They pay too 
much for their pleasure. They lose the highest pleasure of life-the 
pleasure of pleasing God, and being what He wills, for the sake of 
pleasure that will pass away. They trade in their diamonds for 
marbles. 
The Gospel is not a call to forsake pleasure, but it is a call to rise 
to higher pleasure, and to enjoy that which lasts forever. The 
motive for all self-denial, which keeps the Christian from immoral 
pleasure, is the hope for enduring pleasure. Listen to Paul giving 
counsel to the rich Christians who could so easily indulge themselves 
in excessive pleasures. He writes in I Tim. 6:17-19, "As for the rich 
in this world, charge them not to be haughty, nor to set their hope 
on uncertain riches but on God who richly furnishes us with 
everything to enjoy. They are to do good, to be rich in good deeds, 
liberal and generous, thus laying up for themselves a good 
foundation for the future. So that they may take hold of the life
which is life indeed." 
Paul is saying, you only go around once in this life, so do it with 
gusto. But for Paul, that does not mean to drink beer, it means to 
enjoy the higher and lasting pleasures of doing the will of God, 
which guarantees we will have abundant life now, and an eternal life 
of pleasure on the highest level. The Christian is one who evaluates 
pleasure, and does not just grab at it indiscriminately. He asks, does 
this enlarge, or does it enrich my Christian life, and my attitude of 
gratitude to God? The Christian is on the greatest pleasure trip 
possible. If we could not assert that the plan of Christ leads to the 
greatest pleasure for the greatest number, we would be saying that 
there is a better way. The fact is, no one even pretends to offer a 
better way than Christ. We can say with the advertisers who are 
confident of their products, "If you can find a better way than 
Christ-take it." 
When referring to God, it is an absolute truth that Father knows 
best. He forbids only those forms of pleasure which, in the long 
run, lead to pain greater than the pleasure. God never forbids any 
pleasure which will last, and be a part of your growth toward the 
goal of becoming like Him. He only forbids that which costs too 
much. Forbidden pleasure is a rip off. It costs you the favor of God, 
and usually has a kick back of pain that far exceeds the pleasure. 
How often people take drugs to feel good, only to end up in jail or 
worse, and feeling rotten, and with problems that are now worse 
than before. Biblical morality is a fight back morality. It is a 
demand that you don't be a sucker, and get ripped off by cheap 
imitations. 
Jesus Christ, and He alone, offers the real thing-life abundant 
and life eternal. He paid and enormous cost, and endured the pains 
of hell, that we might enjoy the pleasures of heaven. Whatever price 
we need to pay to be loyal to Him is small cost for so great a gift.
The martyr who suffers death rather than deny Christ, does so for 
pleasure. He knows the cost is nothing compared to what he will 
enjoy at Christ's right hand. That is why one of my favorite 
preachers, F. W. Boreham, said, "The tragedy of the age is not that 
people are getting too much pleasure, but that they are not getting 
enough." Life Xerxes, the world is pleasure mad, but in all of their 
sensual self-indulgence, they do not find the pleasure of peace and 
meaning, or eternal hope. They pursue pleasure as a god, and are 
left empty. The Christian pursues the will of God, and is filled with 
pleasure. 
The world grabs the rose and clutches and thus must bare the 
pains of the thorn. The Christian does not need to grasp it, but can 
enjoy it, and not cling, for he knows he cannot lose the rose even if it 
dies, for he is a child of the rose's Creator, and knows the rose will 
be his forever. Honey is bought to dear by those who risk the bees 
stingers. The Christian is one who is wise in his pleasure seeking. 
He enjoys all God has given us to enjoy, but avoiding excess and the 
forbidden, knowing this leads to the greatest pleasure. 
Contrary to the view that Christianity is opposed to the search 
for pleasure, the opposite is the case. We have found the very thing 
man is searching for, the way to the highest most lasting pleasure of 
which man is capable. With this highest goal of salvation settled, the 
Christian then can enjoy the lesser pleasures of life more completely, 
for they are not so essential that he has to cling to them for meaning. 
The highest and permanent being assured in Christ, he can relax, 
and enjoy the passing without the risk of idolatry. 
To sum it up, the paradox of pleasure is that the pursuit of 
pleasure can lead you to the pit of hell, or to the pinnacle of heaven. 
It is life's most dangerous or delightful path to travel. 
The ecstasy of victory, or the agony of defeat, awaits all who travel 
it. Which you find depends on whether Xerxes is your example, or
Jesus Christ. You either do what pleases you with no higher loyalty 
than your own pleasure, or you do what pleases God, with His will 
as your motive for rejecting or accepting pleasure. Those who 
choose the way of Christ, saying, not my will but thine be done, will 
enjoy at God's right hand pleasure for ever more. 
4. FATHER AND DAUGHTER Based on Esther 2:5-11 
George Barnell, a Jew living in North Carolina, back in 1871 
fathered one of the most unusual daughters in Americans history. 
Jane Barnell grew up to become the famous Lady Olga, the bearded 
lady of the circus. She had a thick beard hanging 13 and a half 
inches, and also a large mustache. The beard started to grow when 
she was 2 and at 4 she was being displayed, and 65 years later she 
was still going strong. 
When Jane was a toddler, and her father was out of town on 
business, her mother took her to the Great Orient Family Circus, 
and came home without her. When the father returned home he 
was frantic. He appealed to the police, and North Carolina and 
surrounding states were scoured, but the circus and Jane had 
vanished. They had gone to Europe. It was several years later in a 
Berlin orphanage that the father finally found her, and brought her 
back to the United States. She grew to adulthood on a farm where 
she shaved just like the young men. At 21 she was persuaded to let 
her beard grow and enter the circus. She did, and spent the rest of 
her life traveling the world as an exhibit to the curious. 
The story of Mordecai and Esther is also a story of a Jewish 
father and daughter, but with this distinction that Esther was as 
unusually feminine as Jane was unusually masculine. Esther was
one of the most beautiful girls that ever lived. She was the Miss 
Universe of her day. She was the most beautiful girl in the Persian 
Empire, which included most of the known world. 
Our focus on this Father's Day is not upon Esther, however, but 
upon Mordecai. A contemporary bitter male said, "The only 
thoroughly masculine domain not yet invaded by women is growing 
a mustache." He obviously never saw Lady Olga, or the many other 
bearded ladies of history. The real uninvaded domain of 
masculinity is fatherhood. No woman can beat a man at this role, 
for no matter how good she is with children, she is always a good 
mother, and not a good father. 
Mordecai was an excellent father event though there is no record 
of his having any children of his own. Esther was his adopted 
daughter. We have established in a different message that you do 
not have to give birth to a child to be a good mother. The same 
holds true for being a father, and Mordecai is proof of this. Joseph 
was also a good father to Jesus, even though he did not actually 
father Him in the sense that He was from his seed. That is the 
easiest part of fatherhood. The real challenge is to so love a child 
that it becomes a mature and balanced adult with a solid foundation 
of spiritual principles to guide them through life. Mordecai was this 
kind of father to Esther. 
Most all of the Bible accounts of fathers are those who deal with 
fathers and sons. Here we have a rare case of a father and daughter 
combination. And what a combination they were! They saved 
Israel from destruction, and they changed the course of history. It is 
of interest to note the balance of the Bible where we see any 
combination of people can be used of God to accomplish His 
purpose. In the New Testament it is Mary the mother and Jesus the 
Son, with the father only faintly in the picture. Here in the Old 
Testament we see Mordecai the father and Esther the daughter, with
the mother not in the picture at all. God can, and does, use any 
combination, for any of them can be winners. 
It is important to see this, for life is complex and uncertain. 
There are all kinds of ideals that are best, but the fact is, they are 
not attained by millions. I don't know why Mary had to raise her 
family without Joseph, nor why Mordecai had to raise Esther 
without his wife. Nor do I know why there are so many other less 
than ideal family situations. All I know is that there is good news, 
for any of these less than ideal situations can be used of God for His 
glory, and for His purpose, and life can be full of blessings. Let's 
look at some examples of how Mordecai was a successful father in a 
less than ideal situation. He gave to Esther three things that made 
her a successful daughter, and him a successful father. First of all 
he gave her- 
I. AID IN ADOPTION. 
Esther was of a minority race, in a foreign land, and a pagan 
culture, plus she was an adopted child. Adoption can be less than 
the ideal simply because there are complications in the minds of 
adopted children. They tend to struggle with insecurity, and their 
self-esteem. The father is in danger of trying to protect them so 
much that they become over dependent. On the other hand, to so 
push them into independence that they feel rejected and unloved. It 
is a tough job maintaining just the right balance so an adopted child 
can feel adequately loved, and still press on to be mature and 
independent. This, of course, is the same battle all fathers have, but 
with an adopted child there is an added complexity. Blessed is the 
father who can provide the aid that is needed. 
I have not known many adopted children, but the few I have 
known have all struggled to some degree with their self-image. It 
takes a wise father to help them see and feel that they are just as
loved, and just as valuable, as their own seed. Mordecia clearly 
succeeded with Esther, for she was a loving daughter, and one who 
could be fully independent of Mordeica. She could listen and follow 
his guidance, and was as beautiful within as she was on the outside. 
This is not to say that the father of an adopted child not turning 
out well is a poor father. Some of the finest fathers fail in 
attempting to reform a rebel. Andrew Jackson as President of the 
United States had to write this letter to his adopted son Andrew Jr. 
He was in trouble already at age 14, and by 25 he was a heavy 
drinker and deeply in debt. He wrote this on April 14, 1835. 
"I now address you with the fondness of a father's heart. 
How care then you ought to be to shun all bad company, 
or to engage in any dissipation whatever and particularly 
intoxication. When I reflect on the fate of your cousin 
Savern, reduced to the contempt of all by his brutal 
intemperance I shutter when I see any appearance of it 
in any branch of our connection." 
When General Jackson died he was 24 thousand dollars in debt 
due to his rebellious unheeding son. I do not believe he was a bad 
father. Mordecai may have failed with this son also. All I am saying 
is, that in a less than ideal situation he did succeed with Esther. She 
adapted to a life that was full of tragedy and sorrow as her people 
were carried away captive, and her parents were taken in death. 
We are not told if they died from violence or natural causes, but 
either way she was left an orphan in a foreign land. Mordecai aided 
her in adapting to her circumstances, and she became a beautiful 
well-rounded person. It would have been easy to become bitter and 
hateful toward the Persians. Mordecai had to teach her not to hate 
the Gentiles she lived among, and she did adapt and learn to love 
them. The second thing we see that Mordecai did for her is that he 
taught her the-
II. ACCEPTANCE OF AUTHORITY. 
Esther became the Queen, and she had more power in the snap of 
her finger than Mordecai had in his whole life. He was nobody in 
terms of real power, and yet Esther obeyed his authority, and did 
not reveal that she was a Jew. Her loyalty to her father's authority 
is a key factor in God's providential plan to save the Jewish race. 
Had Mordecai failed to teach Esther to accept authority, and to be 
loyal to authority, the whole plan of God would not have worked out 
as it did. 
One of the greatest tragedies of life is a father who does not win 
respect for his authority from his children. It is a recognized fact 
that a major cause of the breakdown of the American family is the 
loss of authority by dads. A little girl inquired, "Mommy, if the 
stork brings babies; if Santa brings our presents; if the Lord gives 
us our daily bread, and Uncle Sam our social security, what is daddy 
good for." 
It is no joke when kids really feel this way. Colonel Farley, 
founder of Boy's Ranch says 90% of the youth who come to him 
come from homes where there was little or no influence of the 
father. Between 80 and 90% of the boys in Boy's Town come from 
the same type of home. Judge Leibowitz of Brooklyn's highest 
criminal court has concluded that the number one factor in 
criminality is failure of the father's role. 
If a father does not influence his child to respect authority, the 
opposite is what will take place, and they will reject authority. They 
will tend to become problem makers in society. Diogenes the Greek 
was said to have stuck the father when the son swore. He was 
illustrating the direct influence of the father on the son. Weak 
influence of fathers is a major cause of weak people in all areas of 
life. Studies show that 94% of veterans under treatment or
psychiatric reasons experienced father rejection. 
We need to balance out what we are saying here by looking at the 
total picture revealed by the book of Esther. Strong influence of 
fathers is not necessarily good either. There is another father in this 
book by the name of Haman, who is the enemy of Mordecai. The 
whole book is like a Hatfields and Macoys type story, for it is about 
two fathers and their children who are determined to eliminate each 
other from the map of Persia. 
Haman had all of the advantages. He had 10 sons, and Mordecai 
had only one daughter. Haman had position and power, and all 
Mordecai had was hope in the providence of God. The point I want 
to make here is that Haman was basically a strong father. This book 
reveals that he had a powerful influence on his sons, and they did 
respect his authority. They joined him in his battle of bigotry, and 
gave their lives because of their loyalty. Because evil fathers can 
teach their children good principles, we need to rise above the 
secular level to see a Christian father's duty. Doubtless, there are 
fathers in the Mafia, and other underworld organizations, who teach 
their children strong respect for authority, and they become loyal 
people to the cause of crime. You can't even be good at being bad 
without respect for authority. 
We need to see, therefore, that no father has done his job well 
until his child respects the highest authority, which is the authority 
of God. Haman failed because his sons obeyed only human 
authority, and they were loyal to folly that was contrary to God's 
will. Mordecai taught Esther to respect his authority also, but his 
authority was based on his obedience to God's authority. We see 
this in chapter 4 where Esther begins to waver in her obedience to 
his authority. He responds by lifting her sights to a higher level, and 
by getting her to focus on the providence of God. In 4:14 Mordecai 
says, "For if you keep silence at such a time as this, relief and
deliverance will rise for the Jews from another quarter, but you and 
your father's house will perish. And who knows whether you have 
not come to the kingdom for such a time as this?" 
Esther was moved by this to go ahead and risk her life trusting in 
the providence of God. The lesson is clear: No father can be the 
final authority, for all fathers fall short of the glory of God. Only 
those fathers who give their children an ultimate foundation can be 
called good fathers in the biblical sense. A good father is a fallible 
father with faith in the infallible Father in heaven, and he passes on 
this faith to his children. This means a good father does not need to 
be uptight about his weaknesses and failures, for he does not have to 
pretend he is perfect and infallible. The respect for his authority is 
not based on its infallibility, but on his respect for the authority of 
God. 
A Christian father needs to be honest about his own mistakes, 
and not try to pretend that he is always right. Joseph Bayly, the 
popular Christian author, has raised 7 children. He has punished 
them when they were innocent. He has failed to tell them he is sorry. 
He has inflicted pain by his ignorance. He sat one of this little boys 
on a log in the woods to rest. He had short pants on and there was 
poison ivy all around the log. You can imagine the fun dad had 
trying to be innocent and intelligent after that. Bayly says there is 
no escape from guilt. He had to travel so much when his little girl 
was small that when he came home she would not recognize him 
when he wanted to hold her. The point is, he did not need to fear 
that his failures would cause his 7 year old to be out pushing sweet 
old ladies in front of cement mixers. They were taught that human 
authority is to be respected in so far as it conformed to God's 
authority, as revealed in His Word. this is the goal of all who would 
be truly successful fathers. The final value we see imparted by this 
first rate father is-
III. ABUNDANCE OF ATTENTION. 
Note verse 11 where the text says that every day Mordecai 
checked on Esther to see how she was doing. Not every weekend, or 
every month, but every day. She is a married woman, and she is the 
Queen of the Persian Empire, yet Mordecai does not let a day go by 
without letting her know he is concerned. This gives us a strong hint 
as to the kind of father he was. He was an available father. In our 
busy world nobody seems to have enough time to do all that should 
be done, and the result is fathers are often not available to their 
children. 
Children , by their very nature, are not interested in doing what 
matters for even the long run, let alone eternity. They specialize in 
the trivial and the transient. In other words, kids love to do what is 
a waste of time. That is contrary to adult intelligence. We cannot 
waster time, and so we are always trying to make all time count. 
The fact is, it is very biblical, for we are told to redeem the time. 
The problem is that we become legalists, and we forget that Jesus 
also taught we must become as little children. There is a time to 
waste time. That is, we must learn to enjoy doing things like 
children love, which are very momentary fun as an end in itself. 
I must confess that I have struggled with this for years, and even 
as I preach it, I do not always practice it. I am conditioned by the 
philosophy that we must try to kill two birds with one stone, and 
make every moment count. Don't waste time, or time will waste you. 
I still believe these things, but more and more I realize that it is an 
error to fail to balance this thinking with a childlike love for the 
enjoyment of the present. Jesus had time in His short life, and even 
shorter ministry, to enjoy living. He had times of fun, fellowship, 
laughter and song. He took time out from healing and preaching to 
go fishing. We always miss the boat when we take our eyes off 
Jesus, and push any truth to an extreme.
This comes home to you when you read that Boswell, the famous 
biographer of Samuel Johnson, who said he would never forget the 
day his father took time out of his bush schedule to take him fishing. 
It is a highlight of his life, and he learned so much. Boswell's father 
kept a diary, and when he died it was found, and that day that 
meant so much to his son had this entry in it. "Gone fishing today 
with my son; a day wasted." 
Maybe it was wasted in the sense that he got nothing done, but if 
getting nothing done is what it takes to be available to your child, 
and make them feel your attention and care, then nothing is what 
needs to be done. This is not the kind of nothing that Aristotle 
defines when he said that nothing is what rocks dream of. That is 
really nothing, but the nothing of wasting time with your child is 
really something. It is an investment in the future. A father who 
cares enough to waste time for his child's sake will produce a child 
who will redeem the time for God's sake. 
Availability is the key to being a good dad. One daughter tells of 
an interesting thing her father did as she was growing up, and he 
was her only parent. When she started school he gave her a dime 
and said, "Patty, I want you always to keep this dime in your purse. 
Anytime you need me, you call the plant. Tell them you want to talk 
to your dad, and I guarantee they will let you right through." Many 
years later she wrote, "There is no way I could tell you what that ten 
cent piece from my father meant. Even when I didn't need him, just 
to know I had it in my purse made me feel secure." Little things can 
help your child feel secure because they give them that sense of 
access to your care and concern. 
This is what Mordecai did for Esther. He made it clear that he 
was always available. So often you read of a father, or see one 
playing the role on television, who gets a phone call for a business 
obligation just as the family is ready to go on vacation. So often they
choose the business obligation rather than the family obligation, and 
the family feels that they are always secondary. Mordecai may have 
had many other things to do, but he made contact every day with 
Esther. She knew he was always available. He wanted to know how 
she was. A father needs to be informed about his children. When 
dad knows what is going on in the life of his child, that child feels 
loved. A study found that a high percentage of children do not even 
know what their father does for a living. This indicates very poor 
communication between fathers and children. Too many fathers feel 
they cannot waste time by being available to their children. 
A group of 300 7th and 8th graders kept accurate records of just 
how much time dad spent with them over a two week period. The 
average came out to only 7 and a half minutes per week. Many only 
saw their father at the supper table, and many did not see him at all 
for days at a time. One of the best gifts any dad can give a child is 
what Mordecai gave to Esther. It is sometime every day showing 
them attention. Mordecai did it for his daughter who was a grown 
woman. How much more is it needed for those still in childhood. 
May God help us as fathers to see the wisdom of Mordecai, and 
make sure our children feel that we are available to them on a 
regular basis. This is the key to being the father our children need. 
5. THE POWER OF BEAUTY Based on Esther 2:5-18 
In its 4,000 years of history only one woman became Emperor of 
China with absolute power. She was Wu tes-t'ien. She got to the 
throne of China for the same reason Esther got to the throne of 
Persia. She was a startling beauty. As a young girl she was 
renowned
for her beauty, and the Emperor made her his concubine. 
Ordinarily a concubine like her would be relegated to secluded 
quarters, after the death of the Emperor. She would live her life out 
in quiet retirement. She was so beautiful, however, that the son of 
the Emperor also desired her as a concubine. She was not only 
beautiful, she was clever. She bore him several sons, and then 
promoted them among the leaders as the legitimate heirs to the 
throne. She gained many political allies, and so maneuvered behind 
the scenes that when the Emperor suffered a crippling stroke, she 
was made Empress in 655 A.D. She was brilliant as well as 
beautiful, and was excellent in administration. She cut taxes, won a 
war,and had a united prosperous country under her long reign. 
It is rare, but the fact is, there are many cases in history of 
women doing an excellent job of leading a whole nation. One 
thousand years before Esther, in 1520 B.C. Hatshepst became the 
first woman Pharaoh of Egypt, for 21 years she reigned, and 
glorious monuments exist to praise her success. When Julius Caesar 
marched into Egypt in 48 B.C. there was a vicious dispute going on 
as to who the next ruler should be. Should it be Pothinius or his 
sister Cleopatra. Cleopatra wanted to plead her case before Caesar, 
but she knew if she tried to get to him her brother would have his 
spies kill her. Nobody would dare interfere with a gift for Caesar, 
however, and so a beautiful oriental carpet was sent from her palace 
to Caesar. Imagine his surprise when the carpet was unrolled and a 
19 year old girl stepped out to announce she was Cleopatra, the 
rightful Queen of Egypt. Caesar fell in love with her beauty, and she 
did become the Queen. 
If you want to read of how Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Spain, 
England, and other nations, were all ruled by greatly honored 
women, you can find these fascinating histories in Mildred Boyds 
book, Rulers In Petticoats. My interest in these stories for our study 
of Esther is that they confirm what we see to be a major theme of
this book, and that is, there is power in beauty. Women know it, 
and that is why one of the largest industries in the world is the 
beauty industry. Billions are spent each year by women who know 
their greatest asset is in looking beautiful. Brains and other 
qualities are also vital, but it is beauty that opens the door for these 
other gifts to get a chance to function. 
Many modern women admit they use beauty to their advantage 
in industry. They say they dress in a deliberate attempt to win favor 
with those who have power, and thereby they are raised to positions 
of power themselves. If conflict is developing between them and a 
male boss, they can calm the waters by coming on with some 
feminine charm. In beauty contests there is nothing subtle and 
hidden. They are on open display to win prizes, prestige, and power 
by means of beauty. Many object to the whole emphasis on beauty 
as pagan perversion. They feel nothing is more secular than the 
parading of female bodies before the world. 
The book of Esther, however, forces us to focus on this type of 
secular scene, for God in His providence uses just such a beauty 
contest to save his people. It was Esther's beauty that got her into 
the palace, and into a position of power where she could be used to 
save her people. No other quality but beauty could have gotten her 
there. King Xerxes was not looking for a female genius, or the best 
woman runner, or sports figure. He was looking for beauty. His 
demand for beauty was far beyond what is demanded for a Miss 
America or Miss Universe contest. His contestants had to spend one 
solid year doing nothing but beautifying themselves just to spend a 
night with him. After a year of using oils, spices, and ointments, 
they would be as soft and smooth as a baby. 
Esther had to have been one of the most beautiful women to ever 
live. Out of all the beautiful girls of the Empire, she won the favor 
of Hegai, the keeper of the women. Verse 15 indicates she was also
voted Miss Congeniality by the other girls, for she was favored by all 
who saw her. Now this really is a Cinderella story in that, aside 
from her beauty, Esther had all sorts of disadvantages. She was a 
poor orphan in a foreign land, and part of a minority group. 
Fortunately for her she had a relative who took her in when her 
parents died. Mordecai was her cousin, but he adopted her as his 
daughter. Here is a rare case of cousins becoming father and 
daughter. 
Her Hebrew name was Hadassah. That is not a name known to 
us, but the largest Jewish organization of women in the world is 
called Hadassah, and they support the Hadassah Hospital in 
Jerusalem. Esther was her Persian name and this has become more 
popular among Gentiles. Esther means star. Estelle and Stella come 
from the same root. Take female beauty out of this book, and the 
star is gone. This poor adopted orphan would never have been 
heard of in history had she not been blest with beauty. Even with 
her beauty would she have won the contest with all her competitors 
had she not spent a year using all of the beauty aids available in her 
day? 
The Bible puts you in a real bind if you are dogmatically against 
beauty aids, for they were part of the providential plan of God that 
saved the Jewish race. Dr. William Stidger, one of the great 
American preachers, and author of over forty books, comes on 
strong in favor or beauty aids. He writes, "As far as I am 
concerned.....there is something sacred in the everlasting passion 
women have for making themselves more beautiful. I have no 
sympathy with these reformers who find nothing more important to 
do than harangue women for using rouge, powder, clothes, and 
what have you, to make themselves more beautiful." 
Certainly we can all agree, there is nothing spiritual or superior 
about being unclean, unkempt, and unpresentable for public
viewing. All of us enjoy beauty, but like all good things, this too is so 
easily perverted. Conrad Hilton, the multimillionaire owner of the 
Hilton hotel's around the world, was once married to Zsa Zsa 
Gabor. He discovered that with her, beauty was a full time affair. 
She started at ten in the morning before her dressing table. He says 
it was a ritual with bottles, jars, and pots, both large and small. 
It could have been the rite of ancient Aztex temple. After lunch and 
shopping it was back to the dressing table for more make-up, and 
agonizing decisions on furs and jewelry. Hilton learned first hand 
about the idolatry of beauty, and of how impossible it is to live with 
a woman who is obsessed with vain-glory. 
So what we have in the power of beauty is another paradoxical 
power. It can drive you to the heights of virtue, or plunge you to the 
depths of vice. It can lead to one praising God for this gift, or it can 
lead to pride that competes with God. It has the power to produce 
stories of victory, or stories of vanity. One of the reasons women are 
so effective in taking the Gospel into all the world is there beauty. 
Beauty attracts, and if the attracter points to God, her beauty is a 
stepping stone into the kingdom of beauty, the kingdom of God. 
Many have the testimony of the poet- 
The might of one fair face sublimes my love, 
For it hath wean'd my heart from low desires; 
Nor death I need, nor purgatorial fires. 
Thy beauty-ante-past of joys above 
Instructs me in the bliss that saints approve, 
For Lo! How good, how beautiful must be 
The God that made so good a thing as thee. 
Is by the power of beauty that women have had their fair share of 
the control of history. By beauty the weak can master the strong, 
and Esther decides the course that the absolute monarch will take. 
The Biblical ideal of female beauty involves the mental as well as the
physical. Brainless beauty is a joke. Prov. 11:22 says, "Like a gold 
ring in a swine's snout is a beautiful woman without discretion." In 
other words, a beautiful woman has to use the inside of her head as 
well as the outside to have any real power in her beauty. Capito 
wrote, "Beauty alone, may please, not captivate; If lacking grace, tis 
but a hookless bait." 
Beauty can be superficial, and without depth, and this is what has 
led to the saying that beauty is only skin deep. Prov. 31:30 agrees 
when it says, "Charm is deceitful and beauty is vain, but a woman 
who fears the Lord is to be praised." So we come again to the 
paradoxical nature of beauty. It can be vain, but it can also be a 
great value. It is the paradoxical nature of reality that leads to so 
much overreaction, and imbalance in our thinking. Because 
everything that is good can also be bad, and perverted, so as to 
become a source of evil, there is the constant temptation of 
abandoning what is good to avoid that danger. All through history 
Christians have abandoned what is good, and left Satan free to use it 
as a tool for evil. Just as tanks abandoned on the battlefield will be 
used by the enemy to fight those who abandoned them, so beauty, 
when abandoned by Christians, will be used by enemy forces against 
Christians. 
The value of studying the book of Esther is that it forces us to 
reevaluate our views on the secular realm of life. It forces us to look 
at beauty as a tool in the hands of God, and it forces us to ask 
questions about beauty, as it did about pleasure. What we find 
when we search the Scripture is that beauty is no minor issue in 
God's plan. It is basic and vital to the plan of God, and not just for 
the saving of Israel, but for saving all men from the pit of hell. It is 
no surprise that God is portrayed in the Bible as ultimate beauty. 
After all, He is the author of all beauty. Someone said, "God is not 
only the all-wise and all-powerful, but the all-beautiful." In Psa. 
27:4 all that David longs for is to dwell in the house of the Lord and
to behold the beauty of the Lord. The hope of all believers is to see 
the King in His beauty. When that great event takes place, we will 
all partake fully of His beauty, and become perfected, and be like 
Him. 
The goal of God is that all the redeemed might be like Jesus. To 
be glorified is to be beautified with the beauty of Jesus. But beauty 
is not just the goal, it is a powerful element of the Christian life on 
the way to the goal. Three times the palmist says we are to 
"Worship the Lord in the beauty of holiness." The power of 
worship is in beauty. Beauty runs through the Bible, and we are 
called upon to behold it over and over. There is the beautiful robe, 
beautiful women, a beautiful situation, a beautiful heaven, a 
beautiful crown, a beautiful gate, and even the beautiful feet of those 
who proclaim the Gospel. There are numerous beauties in the 
temple, and there is the beauty of wisdom. 
Jonathan Edwards, one of the greatest American preachers, came 
to the conclusion, as he studied the Bible, that beauty was really at 
the very heart of all theology. We tend to think of beauty as a 
secular subject, but he made it the heart of his sacred theology. This 
man changed the course of history in America, and he made beauty 
the unifying theme of theology. He could see what most Christians 
never notice. God is beautiful, and all that He does is beautiful, and 
so the good and the beautiful are one. We could not love God if He 
was not beautiful. If He was only powerful, He could force us to do 
His will, but He could not force us to love Him. Love is a response 
we can only give to beauty. If we had no revelation of God's beauty 
in nature, or in the plan of redemption, we could not love God. God 
could only win man's love by the power of beauty. 
It works the other way also. Man is ugly in sin, and so it would 
be hopeless for us to have fellowship with God, but Jesus became a 
man, and by the beauty of His holiness, and the beauty of His
sacrifice, the way was opened for all to become beautiful, and, 
thereby acceptable to God. Grasping the loveliness and the supreme 
excellency of our Lord is the beginning of the victorious Christian 
life. Those who do not see the beauty of Christ will not have the 
motivating power to follow Him. They will be sidetracked 
constantly by the superficial beauties of worldliness. All the fruits 
of the spirit are expressions of the beauty of Jesus in human life. 
Edwards said, "God is the foundation and the fountain of all 
being and all beauty." Sin is a deformity and lack of beauty. All 
have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. That is, no one 
measures up to the beauty God intended for them. They are all 
defective. To be saved is to be restored to the place where you have 
the right to begin the process of beautification. The doctrine of 
sanctification is really a doctrine of beautification. To grow in 
Christlikeness is the same as growing in beauty. Beauty is the 
measure of God's presence, just as ugliness is the measure of God's 
absence. If a man is insensitive to beauty, and can see no beauty in 
life, or in people, he is alienated from God. The man who sees most 
beauty, and is full of appreciation for it, is the man closest to God. 
When all beauty is gone, and all of life is ugly, that is when people 
take their own life, for the loss of all beauty is hell. In hell there will 
be no beauty, and in heaven there will be nothing but beauty. One's 
relationship to beauty in this life is the measure of the hell on earth, 
or the heaven on earth, that one experiences. The only way to get 
heaven on earth is to see the beauty of heavenly things, and the 
loveliness of God's way. Only those captivated by the power of 
beauty will be open to the working of God's Spirit. Edwards says 
that in the hierarchy of values, first is existence, and then excellence; 
first is being and then beauty. Anything defective in beauty is 
defective in being. 
The ability to discern what is truly beautiful from what is only
superficial beauty is the key to the abundant life. Jesus only used 
the word beautiful once in the New Testament record, and it was a 
warning about the danger of superficial beauty. In Matt. 23:27-28 
we read, "Woe to you, Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you 
are like whitewashed tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but 
within they are full of dead men's bones and all uncleanness. So you 
also outwardly appear righteous to men, but within you are full of 
hypocrisy and iniquity. Here is surface beauty. It has no depth, and 
is mere veneer. 
Superficial beauty is Satan's primary method of deception. All 
men chose what they feel is beautiful. The first sin of choosing the 
forbidden fruit was made very attractive. All sin is made to seem 
beautiful. Satan does not expect anybody to be tempted by the ugly. 
He knows God made man in His image, and so He knows man is 
made to select the beautiful, and shun the ugly. So he can only 
attract men to evil by making it seem beautiful. People chose folly 
for the same reason they chose wisdom. It looks good, and seems 
like the best way to go. The liquor adds portray the camaraderie of 
the bar. Sports and sex, and all that seems adventurous is linked to 
this drug, for drunkenness is not attractive or beautiful. They never 
show the dead and twisted bodies of drunk drivers. They never show 
the ugliness of the vomit, and the awful agony of families ruined by 
drinking. Evil can only survive by using the power of beauty to 
attract. 
God wants us to chose beauty. We are made to do so, and in 
Christ we are given the Holy Spirit, who will lead us to chose the 
highest in beauty. Christian morality and ethics are built around 
beauty. Whatever is truly beautiful, and by truly beautiful I mean 
lasting beauty, is right. What is wrong is that which may have 
temporary beauty, but which leads to permanent ugliness. Christian 
maturity is growing in your discernment so that you can see the 
whole, and not just the part. Much of life is beautiful in part, but
awful in the whole. A poison snake is beautiful in part, as are poison 
berries, but they are not wise choices, for as a whole they are ugly 
and destructive. The power of evil lies in its use of superficial and 
partial beauty to entice men to chose the way of folly. Evil is a 
parasite which depends on what is good for its existence. 
This brings us back to Xerxes and Esther. It is because Xerxes 
lives for beauty and pleasure that God was able to use his choice for 
His own purpose. Pagan people, all through history, have chosen 
what they feel is beautiful. This does lead to great evil because of 
Satan's deception, but let us remember, the world is full of true 
beauty as well, and even evil men often chose what is good because 
of its beauty. Esther was a beautiful and godly woman. Her beauty 
went to the heart, and was not just skin deep. Her beauty would be 
attractive to most all men in history, pagan or Christian. The point 
is, Satan is not the only one in the beauty business. God's 
providence also works through beauty. The beauty of women is one 
of the key ways God has worked in history. 
Esther in her day, and in our day, one of the great stories is that 
of Mei-ling, better known as Madam Chaing Kai-shek. Chaing 
Kai-shek was a Chinese war lord who was very successful in battle. 
One of the Christian families of China sent their daughter 
Mei-ling to America to be educated. When she returned, she was 
active in the political and social affairs of the nation. On one 
occasion Chaing Kai-shek's path crossed that of Mei-ling, and for 
him it was love at first sight. He could not resist the charm and 
beauty of this Americanized daughter of the Orient. We cannot go 
into the details of the long five year battle to win her hand in 
marriage, but battle it was, for he was a godless immoral warrior 
living with a concubine, and she was a beautiful Christian. His love 
for her beauty changed his history, and he became a Christian. He 
went on to become the Generalissimo of China, and together they 
did great things for the cause of Christ. It never would have
happened without beauty. 
What all this means is that we need to keep a dual perspective on 
life, and especially the secular life. Take beauty contest for example. 
Yes there is lust and perversion of beauty, but do not forget, God is 
not shut out of that realm of life. God is working through beauty, 
and often the winner of these contests is a dedicated Christian 
woman. She goes on to touch many lives for Christ, and all because 
she was beautiful. 
Not all of us have the gift of beauty that attracts kings, generals, 
and wide popularity, but all Christians have gifts that are beautiful. 
All the gifts of the spirit are attractive, and they are designed to 
attract others. Every Christian is to be a light in a dark world 
attracting the lost to the Savior. Nothing is really finished until it is 
fully beautiful, and that includes us. God will never be done with us 
until we are perfectly beautiful. Beauty is our goal, and beauty is 
what we need to pray for. The more beautiful we are in every aspect 
of life, the more likely the providence of God will work through us to 
accomplish His purpose, for there is power in beauty. 
6. EVERYBODY TOUCHES SOMEBODY Based on Esther 
2:15-23 
Harriet Beecher Stowe was a preacher's daughter who was born 
in 1811. She certainly didn't look like she would ever amount to 
much. She was shy and had a large nose and a hunched back. She 
considered herself to be quite homely. Calvin Stowe, professor of 
Biblical Lit. in Lane Theological Seminary in Cincinnati, saw beauty 
in her, however, and asked her to marry him. He was not exactly 
prince charming himself with his balding head and problem of
overweight and nearsightedness. 
It was never a very smooth marriage, for they both had such bad 
self-images. Calvin had such fits of self-contempt that he got sick in 
order to escape duties. The result was he never made enough money 
to support his wife and seven children. Harriet had to work to 
support the family. She wrote articles and short stories. She so 
dispised slavery and all it did to degrade people, and she longed to 
use her gift of writing to fight it, but it seemed so hopeless. She was 
a nobody living in a day of great male writers, all of whom also 
hated slavery, but avoided writing about it. Longfellow, Hawthorn, 
Emerson, Melville, Thorew and Whittier were just some of the great 
names of her day. 
Harriets sister kept insisting she should write to show the whole 
nation what an accursed thing slavery was. One Sunday as she sat 
in church during a communion service the plot of her book formed 
in her mind. It is hard to doubt that it was a God-given plot, for her 
book called Uncle Tom's Cabin took the world by storm. It sold 
300,000 copies in America, and 1,000,000 in England the very first 
year. It was translated into 36 languages. The impact of her book 
was so great it is considered one of the most influential books in the 
history of America. Abraham Lincoln's response when he met her 
was, "So this is the little lady who made this big war." 
Here was a woman who changed the course of history. She was 
not a beautiful woman like Esther. Her power was still the power of 
beauty, however, for it was the literary beauty of her book that 
moved people to action. Beauty has many different forms. It may 
be artistic, literary, intellectual, or physical, but the point is, God's 
providence in history always works through one form of beauty or 
another. That is why the apostle Paul writes to Christians in Gal. 
6:9, "Let us not grow weary in well-doing, for in due season we shall 
reap, if we do not lose heart." The Greek word for well is the word
for beautiful. Paul is saying do not grow weary in beautiful doing or 
beautiful action. Acting beautifully is the key to your reward and 
the reaping of a harvest. It is not just being beautiful, but beautiful 
actions that become a part of God's providence in history. 
The book of Esther is full of the beauty of doing as well as the 
beauty of being. Esther's beauty of being depended upon the beauty 
of doing to accomplish God's purpose. We see from this that all of 
us can be part of God's providence. The beauty of being may be 
limited to the few, but the beauty of doing is open to all. 
Everyone of us can do beautiful things that aid the fulfillment of 
God's plan. The book of Esther reveals that God's providence is 
always working with a balance of male and felmale imput. Men are 
constantly being influenced by women, and women by men. In our 
text we are looking at the key men in the life of Esther. We want to 
focus on the least of these three men in order to see how the 
influence of even the least can be great. 
Hegai is certainly one of the least known characters of the Bible. 
I have never even heard of him being used in a Bible quiz. Rare 
would be the person who knew of Hegai, the keeper of Xerxes 
harem. He was eunuch, which means he was incapable of sexual 
function. His purpose in life was to see that the women in the harem 
were always in the best condition for the pleasure of Xerxes. It 
would be easy to past by Hegai without mention, and leave him in 
the limbo of neglect, but a careful reading of chapter 2 reveals that 
he was key link in the chain of events that led to the salvation of the 
Jews. 
Verse 9 reveals how he took a special liking to Esther, and 
quickly got her started on the beauty aids and proper diet. He 
became her coach, as it were, to win and event over emorous 
competition. We see here the beauty of friendship. This was not a 
sexual male and female relationship at all. Hegai appreciated
Esther's beauty and her personality. He liked her as person, and he 
saw her as the best for the king. Esther also came to appreciate 
Hegai. She obeyed his coaching and took his advice. In verse 15 we 
see that when her chance came to see the king and impress him, she 
took with her only what Hegai advised her to take. He was the best 
counselor she had. With him Esther had an inside track to the heart 
of the king. 
The paradox here is, we have a pagan, who cares nothing about 
the Jews or God's plan for Israel, playing a key role in God's plan 
for their deliverence. God did not need Hegai, for He could work 
out things in another way if He chose. In fact, later on Mordecai 
says that God did not even need Esther. Nobody is indispensible to 
God. He can always get His purpose accomplished, but the point is, 
He chose to use the influence of this pagan servant, and that choice 
of God opens up a fascinating insight into God's providence in 
history. 
We have a tendency to limit God, and we assume He will only 
work through His own people. This limited view makes us miss the 
values that God can achieve through the influence of non-Christians. 
Hegai was a pagan. He did not even know the God of Israel, and 
Esther could not be a witness to him, for she had to keep secret she 
was a Jew. There is no evangelism or witnessing on the part of 
Esther. She was just a friend to Hegai. This reveals that our 
relationship to those outside the kingdom of God can be a factor in 
our success in serving the kingdom of God. Do not think that non- 
Christians play no role in your life. There are many examples of 
how non-believers are a key influence in believer's lives. 
Joseph's whole life was a series of encounters with pagan people. 
He was thrown into prison because of a bad encounter, but gets out 
of prison to share his dream by the aid of a pagan servant of the 
king. He went on to become a leader in Egypt and had a positive
relationship with a pagan Pharaoh. All around him there were 
pagan people who respected him and depended upon him. Joseph 
lived most of his life in a relationship with non-believers. Daniel had 
a simular experience as a political leader in Babylon. He had his 
close Jewish friends, but he also had a good relationship to the king. 
The Apostle Paul was constantly envolved with non-Christian 
Roman leaders. One of them was to him like Hegai was to Esther. 
In Acts 27 we read of the Roman Centurian named Julius. He is 
another very obscure character of the Bible. He was in charge of 
Paul as he headed to Rome to stand before Caesar. In Acts 27:5 we 
read, "And Julius treated Paul kindly and gave him leave to go to 
his friends and be cared for." Later, when they were caught in a 
storm on the sea, the Centurian listened to Paul and cut loose the 
boat some were going to use to escape. By so doing, this entire ship 
of pagan sailors was saved. 276 persons were spared by the 
providence of God, using the influence of a pagan leader. 
There was a crisis when the Roman soldiers felt the only wise 
plan was to kill all the prisoners lest they escape. Paul would have 
died had it not been for the friendship of this pagan Centurian. In 
Acts 27:43 we read, "But the Centurian, wishing to save Paul, kept 
them from caring out their purpose." The beautiful acts of 
friendship between Paul and this pagan leader led them to be a team 
that brought everyone through the entire ordeal. God used a 
believer and a non-believer together to fulfill His plan of sparing all 
these lives. Doctor Luke then goes on to record in Acts 28, after they 
were all safe on the Island of Malta, "And the natives showed us 
unusual kindness." The cheif, whose name was Publius, showed 
them great hosptiality for three days. Then when they sailed, we 
read in verse 10, "They presented many gifts to us." 
These experiences of Paul with pagan friendship and kindness 
reveal that what happened to Esther was not just an isolated
incident. All through history God's people have been blessed by the 
kind and beautiful acts of those who were not believers. God's plan 
includes doing many good things in history by the influence of non-believers 
as well as believers. There are millions of Christians who 
have been healed, taught, spared and aided by non-Christian 
doctors, teachers and professionals of all kinds. You are a rare 
Christian indeed if you have never been positively influenced by a 
non-believer. They are not saved by the many good works they do 
for us, but God's will is often done on earth because of their good 
works. 
The relationship we have to all people is important, for God can 
use everyone's influence for His purpose. One of the most amazing 
examples is the experience of Stenborg, the painter. Over 200 years 
ago in Dusseldorf, Germany, he painted his famous Gipsy Girl. His 
model let her black eyes wonder about his studio. Then they were 
arrested by the thorn crowned faces of Jesus he had painted for the 
church. She begged the artist to explain the picture. He told her the 
story of the cross. When he finished the Gipsy girl said, "You must 
love Him very much when He has done all that for you." The 
painter was stung with shame, for the fact was, he did not love Jesus. 
That remark motivated him to respond to Christ, and then, as a 
painter who adored the Saviour, he painted another picture of 
Christ, and displayed it int he public gallery of Dusseldorf. 
Underneath he inscribed the words, "All this I did for Thee; What 
hast thou done for me?" 
One day, Count Zinzendorf, a rich young man, stood before that 
painting, and the question challenged him to the depth of his soul. 
He surrendered to Christ and became the founder of Moravin 
Missions. In a few years there were missionaries going to all parts of 
the world. The Moravinans had a profound influence on John 
Wesley, who was used of God to change the world, and the influence 
goes on and on and on from a little Gipsy girl who simply asked a
painter if he loved Jesus. 
John Donne was right when he said no man is an island. Paul put 
it in Rom. 14:7, "For none of us lives to himself, and none of us die 
to himself." None of us live or die without influencing others for 
good or ill. This is not just a law for believers, it is true for all men, 
for even the lost have an influence for good or ill. This world is 
better or worse for every person in it. It has been better because of 
people like Hegai, Julius, the Gipsy girl, and innumerble obscure 
nobodies. What are the implications of this reality? 
For one thing, it means your relationship to non-Christians can 
be a significant part of life. Non-Christian family, friends, 
neighbors, and others may play a very important part in your life. 
Non-Chrisitan authors may influence you in many directions. Paul 
read pagan poets and found in them truths that he could quote in his 
sermons. In his famous sermon on Mars Hill in Acts 17:28 he said, 
"For in Him we live and move and have our being, as even as some 
of your poets have said, 'For we are indeed His offspring.'" Paul 
quotes the pagan poets because they confirm what the Bible says. 
Today, preachers are constantly quoting non-Christian poets, 
scientists, psychiatrists, and a host of other authories, who in their 
realm of study discover that Biblical principles are true, not just for 
Christians, but for non-Christians as well. 
What we need to see is that a Christian has a duel relationship to 
the world. Some of the world is like Haman, who hated God's people 
and God's truths, and they do all they can to persecute and destory. 
But, there is also a world that is sympathic to God's people and 
God's truths. It is open to the influence of God's people, and can be 
used as an instument in the providence of God. When the Bible 
warns us not to love the world, and not to be comformed to it, it is 
referring to the danger of getting intrapped in the world's value 
system. Some Christians interpret this to mean, have nothing to do
with non-Christians. This leads to a life of isolation where they 
have no influence on the world because they are not open to be 
influenced by the world. Separation from the world means 
separation from the sin of the world, and not separation from 
people. Jesus was a friend of sinners, but totally free of sin. 
Christians who feel they have an obligation to be obnoxious and 
unkind to non-Christians are blind to the way God's providence 
works in history. Paul said Christians are to live peaceably with all 
men as much as is it possible. Paul knew from his own experience 
that good relationships, to even pagan people, can mean a better 
atmosphere in which the providence of God can work toward 
positive goals. The pharisees were very strict in not associating with 
the unclean people. They did not relate to non-Jews and even other 
Jews who did not attend the synagogue. One of there chief 
objections to Jesus was that He would eat with anyone, even the 
publicans and sinners. These people were to them mere nobodies, 
and not a part of God's people. These godless nobodies did not 
count with them. They failed to see that everybody is somebody 
with God, and everybody touches somebody in a way that hurts or 
helps. Jesus blasted them, in spite of their high and strict principles, 
because they did not love people and relate to them in helpful ways. 
We should never be so proud that we cannot take advice from a 
non-Christian. Esther took Hegai's advice and it was the best thing 
that ever happened to her. We may never have heard of her had she 
not listened to this pagan friend. She could have chosen to snub this 
Gentile pagan, and instead inquire of her Jewish neighbor. 
But her Jewish friend may have told her to eat onions and leeks 
before she went in to see the king. You recall, the Jews were willing 
to give up their freedom to get back to Egypt so they could have 
onions and leeks. Esther could have taken this advice 
and have been so offensive to the king that she would have been 
dismissed on the spot. The point is, Hegai was the best authority,
and she was wise to follow his advice. It is wise for any Christian to 
follow the wisdom of a non-Christian who is authority in his field. It 
is not only not wrong to follow such advice, it is wrong not to follow 
it if it does not conflict with the revealed of God. You could be 
missing God's will by neglecting it. Do not count anybody out as a 
resource for knowing God's will. 
If God uses everybody to touch somebody, and that includes 
obscure pagans like Hegai, how much more does He use His own 
children to touch the world? Do not be deceived, you are constantly 
influencing everyone who knows you for good or ill. The poet has 
written, 
My life shall touch a dozen lives 
Before this day is done, 
Leave countless marks of good or ill, 
Ere sets the evening sun. 
This, the wish I always wish, 
The prayer I always pray: 
Lord, may my life help others' lives 
It touches by the way. 
May God help us all to pray such a prayer everyday, for everyday, 
everybody touches somebody. 
7. THE PARADOX OF PATRIOTISM Based on Esther 2:19-3:6 
Newscaster Paul Harvey, some years ago, told his radio listeners 
this remarkable story from World War II. From the Island of 
Guam one of our mighty B-29 bombers took off for 
Kokura, Japan. It was carrying deadly cargo as it circled high
above the city. A cloud covered the city, so the plane kept circling 
for half an hour, and then for three quarters of an hour, and finally 
after 55 minutes the gas supply was reaching the danger zone. The 
plane had to leave its primary target, and go to a secondary target 
where the sky was clear. Then the command could be given, 
"Bombs away!" 
Only weeks later did the military receive information that chilled 
many a heart. Thousands of allied prisoners of war, the largest 
concentration of Americans in enemy hands, had been moved to 
Kokura a week before the bombing mission. Had it not been for 
that cloud, thousands of Americans now alive would have been 
killed, for that B-29 was carrying the world's second atomic bomb. 
It was taken instead to the secondary target-Nagasaki. 
The direction history takes, so often is determined by such minor 
things. Small things play a big role in life. The illustrations of this 
are numerous, yet it is a truth that demands balance, or it leads to 
folly. God's providence is constantly working through little things, 
but not every little thing is of significance. To think so can lead to 
becoming neurotic, for you will search for meaning in every trivial 
event of life. The danger of this is illustrated by the little girl who 
came running into her house sobbing. She threw herself into her 
mothers arms, and cried out, "God doesn't love me anymore!" The 
mother was shocked and puzzled at what could produce such a 
crisis. "Why do you say that?" she asked, assuring her that God 
does love her. "No mother!" she wailed. "I know He doesn't love 
me. I tried Him with a daisy." In case you have never tried that less 
than fool proof method of predicting love, by pulling off petals to, 
"He loves me, he loves me not," let me recommend that you never 
start, if you are going to take it seriously. 
The fact is, there are little things that are just little things. They 
are minor and insignificant. They are not subtle and hidden
methods by which great things are accomplished. I don't think it is 
a healthy exercise to go through life trying to figure out if God is 
trying to say something through every minor event. When God does 
work through such events, it is only known as we look back and see 
the minor event as a link in the chain that leads to the fulfillment of 
His purpose. 
This is what we see in the life of Mordecai. As a cloud saved 
many Americans, so a conversation saved many Jews. Mordecai 
over heard a couple of the kings servants plotting to assassinate him. 
This was very common in the ancient world, because the only way to 
get rid of an absolute monarch was by assassination. They never 
quit, and could not be voted out, and so violence was the only 
method open for change. Many of kings of Persians were 
assassinated, including Xerxes. He was saved by Mordecai, but 
fourteen years later one of his servants succeeded in his plot to kill 
him. 
Assassination was common even in Israel. In I Kings 15 we read 
of how Baasha conspired to kill Nadab, the king of Israel, after he 
had reigned only two years. Baasha became king then, and reigned 
24 years, but he was also a evil king, so nothing was gained by the 
people in this politics of violence. His son Elah became king, and 2 
years later his servant Zimri assassinated him, and became king. 
Once you killed the king, you had to kill the whole family, and many 
of his friends, so the violence of the ancient world was terrible. 
There are other gruesome assassinations in the Old Testament. I 
point this out so that we can see clearly the nature of Mordecai's 
political decision, when he chose to become an informer, and 
revealed the conspiracy against Xerxes 
We see in Mordecai's experience good reason for why political 
decisions are so paradoxical, and why it is that politicians are often 
so variable. We see it in Mordecai's patriotism. In the last
paragraph of chapter 2 we see Mordecai as a defender of the state, 
and then in the first paragraph of chapter 3 we him as a defier of the 
state. He first saved Xerxes life, and then he turns around and 
refuses to obey his orders of bowing to Haman, his highest 
representative. In the one place Mordecai is a conservative, and in 
the next he is a liberal. In the one he is a loyal citizen, and in the 
next he is a rebel. 
We need to study both sides of the patriotism of Mordecai, for the 
Bible and history make it clear that the Christian who cannot be 
paradoxical in his politics and patriotism will not be able to live a 
life of wisdom in relation to the state. The paradox is, inconsistency 
in relationship to man is the only way you can be consistent in your 
relationship to God. Let's focus first on the positive side. 
I. MORDECAI AS DEFENDER OF THE STATE. 
By defender, I mean Mordecai risked his life in order to a loyal 
citizen, and to maintain the order of the state by reporting the 
conspiracy to kill the king. Mordecai was a foreigner, and he could 
have had the attitude that this is not my country, so what do I care? 
The believer is one who knows God is the God of order, and unless 
the leaders of a state are so corrupt that a revolution is demanded, 
those leaders should be honored. Many Christians have, and do 
now, live under tyrants, and forms of government that we could not 
tolerate as Americans. They live with far less freedom than us, but 
they still love their country, and are patriotic. 
One of the reasons the Jews have been able to become leaders in 
nations all over the world is because they have practiced the 
principle of honoring and defending the state they are in. Paul in 
Rom. 13 lays this down as a principle for Christians in any state. 
"Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there 
is no authority except from God..." They are to receive our respect
and honor. By practicing this Christianity has been able to thrive 
under all sorts of governments. 
Mordecai was a great example of this principle, and thus a great 
asset to the Persian Empire. By becoming an informer he took a 
great risk for the sake of Xerxes, for informers tend to get their 
names added to the hit list. Vincent Teresa was the number 3 man 
in the New England Mafia. He had stolen 10 million for himself in 
crime, and 150 million for his bosses and confederates. When he 
turned informer, back in the early 70's, dozens of big times mobsters 
ended up in prison. It took the FBI's most brilliant minds 
working constantly just to keep him alive. Assassination squads 
were everywhere. Doctors, lawyers, and even policeman were paid 
by Mafia to get him. It may have not have been this hot for 
Mordecai, but had the assassins found out he was the informer, 
he would have been their first target. He took risks to be a defender 
of the state. 
He was a hero of the state, and he was later greatly rewarded for 
his loyalty. Patriotism played a major role in God's providence in 
his life, and all of Israel. Patriotism is a virtue, but we must see that 
it also has its limitations. When the state is exalted to the level of 
God, then defense of the state is idolatry. Patriotism can have many 
motives, and this is why it is only a relative, and not an absolute, 
virtue. Even the Mafia are patriotic towards America, for its 
freedoms make it the greatest place on earth for crime. Vincent 
Teresa closes his book, My Life In The Mafia, with this paragraph. 
Let me tell you something: I'm the proudest guy in the 
world to be an American. Before I went to jail I had 
plenty of chances to take off and go live in a villa on 
the Italian coast, but I wouldn't leave this country. I'd 
rather spend 20 years in the can in America than 20 
years free in Italy. The reason is, I love this country,
and that's the way it is with most mob guys. The mob 
will not stand for anything against this country. They'll 
rob from government arsenals and rob government 
stock and sell it; but if they could discover that anyone's 
trying to overthrow the country or anything like that, 
they'll fight him. Most mob guys that I know of vote. 
We vote whatever is the best way to make money. If 
its going to be one of these guys who is going to be on 
the reform kick all the time, we'll all band together and 
vote against him. 
There is a higher percentage of the Mafia who vote, then of born 
again Christians. So what I am saying is that patriotism is good, but 
not an absolute good. If not modified by a higher loyalty to God, it 
can become an evil. Thus, we turn to the other side of Mordecai and 
see- 
II. MORDECAI AS THE DEFIER OF THE STATE. 
Verse 2 of chapter 3 makes it clear that bowing to Haman was not 
a mere matter of courtesy, it was the law of the land, for the king 
had commanded it. Not to bow was an act of defiance against the 
state. Mordecai refused to bow. He had just risked his life for 
Xerxes, but now when there is no risk at all involved, he will not join 
the others and bow. What has happened to his patriotism as a loyal 
citizen? Mordecai seems to be inconsistent. After all, he let his 
daughter marry the king, so he is related to him, and yet he will not 
pay him the respect of bowing to his highest representative. 
The result of this stubborn refusal is that Haman becomes 
hateful, and determines the entire Jewish race will pay for this 
insubordination. Either Mordecai is a stubborn fool, or he is 
standing for a principle more precious than life itself. The only clue 
we have is in verse 4 where Mordecai's only defense for his action is
that he was a Jew. In other words, we are dealing here with an issue 
of religious liberty, or the multifaceted and complex issue of the 
separation of church and state. What Mordecai is saying is that as a 
Jew there is a limit as to how far he can go in conforming to the 
state. He could risk his life for the state, but he could not give up 
his religious liberty by bowing to Haman, for he would be giving to 
the state the allegiance he owed only to God. The issue here is really 
a matter of idolatry. Do we obey God or man? 
The whole thing would be sheer folly if it was a matter of 
personal pride. If Mordecai just didn't like Haman, his action 
would be disgraceful. He risks the lives of his people out of stubborn 
pride. If we see it as a battle for religious liberty, however, then we 
can see what has been a pattern of God's providence all through 
history. Mordecai had his priorities straight. God is number one, 
and the state can never be obeyed if it attempts to usurp that place 
in our lives. The defenders of the state must become defiers of the 
state when the state threatens to crush religious liberty. The state 
has a right to our loyalty as long as it recognizes its place in God's 
providence. When it begins to encroach on God's domain, then our 
loyalty to God demands that we defy the state. The state becomes 
Satanic when it demands of us allegiance due only to God. We must 
chose then either to deify the state, or defy the state. 
We know the issue of bowing to Haman was an attempt to deify 
the state, for we have the record of Herodotus the ancient historian. 
He tells us of others who came to Xerxes, and who refused to 
acknowledge him as god. He tells of the Lacedoemonians whom the 
guards forced to their knees before Xerxes, yet, they refused to bow 
their heads, for they said they had not come to Persia for the 
purpose of worshipping a man. Xerxes excused them from bowing, 
for he had respect for their religious liberty. Haman, you will note, 
never told Xerxes that his hatred of the Jews and Mordecai stemmed 
from Mordecai's refusal to bow to him. This was never reported to
Xerxes at all, for if it had been, he would have nipped it in the bud 
right there, for he allowed for religious liberty. 
Haman is the culprit in the book of Esther, for his personal 
hatred, based on his desire to be treated like deity, is the cause for all 
the evil in the book. He plotted to get all the Jews killed so Xerxes 
would never even know why. What we are dealing with here is a 
corrupt politician in an otherwise reasonably just government. 
Haman had let power go to his head, and he will not tolerate being 
treated as secondary to God. He will get revenge on those who dare 
to put God first. The lesson of Esther is that the believer can never 
do anything other than defy those who presume to take God's place. 
The history of America revolves around this basic principle. 
A hundred years before the revolutionary war, king Charles II of 
England demanded that the Mass. colony relinquished its religious 
liberty, and let the Church of England control things, with only 
church members having the right to vote. The Puritans were 
enraged, and went into their pulpits preaching that they must defy 
the kings orders. Better that they die free than submit to such 
tyranny. The king heard of their rebellion, and ordered 5,000 
troops to sail to Mass. to crush the rebellion. Increase Mather called 
for a day of prayer and fasting, and later they learned that king 
Charles had died on that very day of 1685. The result was the army 
never set sail. The Puritans were convinced that defiance to a state 
which threatens religious liberty is obedience to God. This principle 
became the foundation for the American Revolution. 
The result is we are a nation where the right to defy the 
government is guaranteed. If the state tries to interfere with our 
religious liberty, we can take the state to the supreme court, and 
fight for our rights. We have a Constitution which gives us a right 
to protest and demonstrate against our governments policies. 
Thank God for freedom that most of the world has never known.
What we have is based on the basic truth that man has the right to 
put God first, and to defy any authority that tries to take that first 
place in our lives. 
Most of us have never lived through a period where the state is 
deified, and demanded absolute allegiance. Hopefully we will never 
have to, but the Christians under Hitler had to. I never realized until 
recently that Hitler established his own church in Germany. It was 
called The German Church Of Positive Christianity. Its design was 
to counter-act all Christian opposition, and destroy Christianity. It 
was extremely effective, and won most of the youth of Germany. 
Julius Leuthenses wrote, "Adolf Hitler is own living witness of the 
present era, who confirms the good work of the eternal Divine Spirit 
in history, and who, through his activity, enables us to understand in 
a new way the teachings of Christ and His mission. Our watchword 
is not that Hitler is equal to Christ, but: Through Hitler to Jesus 
Christ." 
That is just the beginning. Soon the preaching of the cross was 
forbidden in church. The picture of Hitler was hung in front of all 
churches, and he was referred to in official statements as the way, 
the truth, and the light. All Germans were urged to die for him, 
and make their dying words heil Hitler. Hitler was so clever, only 
the devil himself could have been guiding him, for he completely 
revised Christianity, and made Nazism a perverted Christianity. He 
declared mount Hesselberg his sacred mountain, and Julius 
Streicher his high priest. Standing before the bonfire he said, 
"When we look into the flames of this holy fire, and throw our sins 
into them, we can descend from this mountain with clean souls. We 
do not need priests and ministers. We have become our own 
priests." 
Hitler actually became a god to millions of people who could not 
see their folly until it was to late. I share this because Hitler and
Haman were two of a kind. There pride, racial hatred, and abuse of 
power make them brothers of the pit. Both sought to wipe out the 
Jewish race. But there were Mordecai's in Hitler's day as well. 
They defied the state, and fought Hitler, and they made a difference. 
The tragic fact is, these Mordecai's were two few in number. The 
majority of Christians, both Catholic and Protestant, were deceived 
by Hitler's clever use of patriotism. The people were whipped into a 
religious frenzy of love and loyalty to the Fatherland. Hitler could 
do not wrong, and Germany could do no wrong. The Patriotic 
fervor so captivated Christians, that the voices of the church in 
opposition were muted. Hitler was free to do the works of Satan 
with little resistance. Millions of Christians cooperated in the 
killing of 6 million Jews. 
It is the story of history repeating itself over and over again, 
because of idolatry. God's people bowed down to a false god, and as 
always, the result is tragic judgment. Had there been more 
Mordecai's defying the state when it began to encroach on God's 
territory, the tragic and demonic history of Germany could have 
been avoided. Many Christian leaders are writing today of the 
danger of an American Civil Religion. It uses Christian 
terminology, just as Hitler did, but it is not Christian. It is a state 
religion that is designed to convince Christian people that 
everything the state does is the will of God. It is a powerful political 
tool. 
Because of the ever present danger of the state becoming a god, 
the Christian must be all the more conscious of the need to exalt the 
Lordship of Jesus. Nothing is Christian, no matter how good, or 
how American, which does not bow to Jesus Christ, and confess Him 
as Lord. Mordecai, as a Jew, would bow to none but Jehovah, and 
you and I, as Christians, can bow to none but Jesus. Because it is so, 
we must be ready to both defend and defy the state.
8. COINCIDENCE OR PROVIDENCE? Based on Esther 6:1-11 
Everyone experiences coincidence somewhere in life. Two people 
say the same thing at the same time. You go to call someone and the 
phone rings, and it is the person you were going to call. You flip 
open the hymnal, and it opens right to the number you were looking 
for. On and on we could go until we listed one you have 
experienced, for coincidence is common to all. 
But sometimes coincidence rises to a level that is more amazing. 
Such is the case with the death of my father. The coincidence is in 
relation to Lavonne's father. It is not very likely there are many 
mates in the world who had fathers with the same name of Charles, 
who lived in the same town, worked in the same meat packing plant, 
lived in the same house where they both died, only a few feet apart, 
although ten years apart, both in the night in similar ways, and both 
were buried in the same cemetery, on the opposite side of town from 
where they died. 
Lest you puzzle over why they both died in the same place, let me 
explain. My parents bought Lavonne's parents trailer home after 
her father died. You have to admit this is an unusual series of 
coincidences. It is rather amazing to me just because it is so highly 
unlikely, but as far as I know, it has no significance whatever. I 
share it for that very reason, to illustrate that coincidence, however 
amazing, and contrary to the odds, may be no more than just a 
matter of chance. Nothing would be affected in anyone's life, that 
we are aware of, if our fathers had not lived and died with these 
coincidences. I see no value or loss in what happened. It just 
happened to work out that way. 
Coincidence, therefore, does not necessarily have meaning. But
what if coincidence does have meaning? Then we rise to the level 
where coincidence becomes providence. Providence is coincidence 
with a purpose-God's purpose. It is no longer a mere matter of 
chance, but is the fulfilling of God's plan in history. This too can be 
illustrated by what took place when my father died. I had no 
intention of going to Sioux Falls, South Dakota. I had already 
written my parents and told them we would not be coming. Dad was 
failing fast, however, and we did not know if he could hold out much 
longer. Lavonne told this Jan Toy, and Jan shared with Steve, and 
Steve talked to the deacons. He then called me and urged me to take 
a few days off to go see my father. 
I called home that night and mom said it would be appreciated if 
I would come home for a few days. We went, and found dad in 
terrible shape. He had aged 20 years in the months since I had last 
seen him. We talked off and on through the day, and he listened to 
one of my sermons on heaven that I had on tape. That night my 
older brother and I visited with him. He was more alert than he had 
been for sometime. In the morning mom called saying, "I think he is 
gone." I leaped out of bed and ran into dad's room, and saw at a 
glance that he was dead. I told mom to call his doctor. While she 
was gone I pushed his eyelids closed. 
I was surprised he had gone so fast, yet I was calm, for I had 
prayed before going to sleep, "Lord if he cannot get well, take him 
home." I was only repeating the prayer he had prayed himself a few 
hours earlier. Lavonne and I were there to take mom to the funeral 
home, and make all the arrangements, and then to the cemetery to 
finish arrangements. Then we went back home to spend the day 
contacting relatives all over the country. Had we not been there 
when we were, we would have missed the chance to be with dad on 
his last day, and mom would have been alone. Neither my brother 
nor my sister could have helped her that day. It was perfect timing 
that we had made it.
What a coincidence that the church would give me time off just 
when it was most needed. Nobody could know it was the best time, 
but God did, and so we see a coincidence with a purpose, and we 
consider this the providence of God. God was working in minds, 
events, and timing to accomplish a blessing in the lives of His people. 
The blessings were so marvelous that none of us really started the 
grief process until sometime later. The point of this long 
introduction is to make clear that there is a distinction between 
coincidence and providence. 
Coincidence is a matter of chance, and it makes no real difference 
in life, one way or the other. It may be amazing, but if it never 
happened, no one would be hurt. If I had never gotten called by 
someone I was going to call, or had never flipped open the hymnal to 
the exact page, it would not have made any difference. Providence, 
on the other hand has clear purpose and meaning. You can see the 
hand of God in it, and you cannot help but thank and praise Him for 
His guidance. Esther is a book that has one coincidence after 
another. Because each of them is so vital to the survival of the Jews, 
and to their victory over their enemies, it is a book that specializes in 
the providence of God. 
No where in the Bible will you find the providence of God more 
conspicuous then in this book, where God is never mentioned. 
Vashti, the Queen of Persia, rebels against her husband and loses 
her throne, so that the Jews can have a Jewish Queen on the throne, 
just when she was needed for their deliverance. What a coincidence! 
The keeper of the harem favored Esther, and he helped her, out of a 
host of beautiful girls, to so please the king, that she was selected as 
the Queen. What a break! 
Mordecai overheard two men plot to assassinate the king, and by 
reporting it he saved the kings life. Now we come to chapter 6, and 
the whole story revolves around an amazing coincidence. The king
could not sleep one night, and it happened to be the same night in 
which Haman, the Jew hater, was plotting to destroy Mordecai. 
What a marvelous coincidence that the king would call for the book 
of memorable deeds to be read to him that night, and that the 
forgotten deed of Mordecai would be read to him just minutes 
before Haman came to request that Mordecai be hung. If this 
coincidence had not take place, the whole story would have been 
tragedy rather than comedy, and the Jews would have been 
destroyed. Mordecai will be hung, or be a hero, and it all depended 
upon the coincidence of the kings being read this particular page in 
the record book he turned to. 
The destiny of God's people swings on the hinge of coincidence, 
but coincidence with such purpose and importance that we see 
clearly the providence of God. It is the hand of God in history 
directing the timing of events so as to determine the course of 
history. There is no miracle here at all. Everything is perfectly 
normal and natural. The king can not sleep, and so he calls for 
records to be read. He may have done this three times a week for 20 
years. There is nothing marvelous about it. But this night the 
coincidence of reading about Mordecai's noble deed of saving his 
life, just before Haman came to request his death, changed the 
course of history. The coincidences of the book of Esther are not 
amazing or startling in themselves. They are rather trivial even, but 
the purpose they fulfill shows them to be the providence of God. 
We need to be alerted to the providence of God in our lives by 
evaluating coincidence. Because we take coincidence for granted, we 
likely miss much of the evidence of God's leading in our lives. In 
other words, we do not sense that everyday the trivial events, 
contacts, and turn of events could be the providence of God. 
Katherine Marshall tells of her experience after the death of Peter 
Marshall. She was going to write the story of her famous husband's 
life. But did not know how to get information on Peter's step-father.
She had exhausted all possible sources of information, she thought. 
Then one night, an English couple she had met invited her to dinner. 
In the course of the evening she felt and urge to tell them about her 
need. She could have suppressed that urge, considering it to be 
inappropriate, but she went ahead and shared. 
The man interrupted her as she told of her need, and said, 
"Certainly you couldn't be speaking of Peter Findlay?" "Yes," she 
said, "Why?" The atmosphere was electrified. The man responded, 
"I worked beside him for years in the same office at Stewarts and 
Lloyds in Glasgow. I knew him well. What do you want to know?" 
Katherine Marshall had just experienced coincidence with a 
purpose, and thus, in the providence of God, she received what she 
needed. There were 800 thousand people in the District of 
Colombia, and only one of them knew anything about Peter Findlay, 
and he was the one who invited her to dinner. That experience of 
providence gave Katherine the courage she needed to go on to 
become one of the greatest Christian authors of the 20th century. 
By this event of providence, she heard God saying to her, "I'm in 
this with you." 
God may be seeking to guide us, and answer our prayers, by 
means of purposeful coincidence. We need to be aware of this, and 
learn to be more sensitive to this kind of leading in our lives. It may 
be happening more than we realize, and we miss it, or because we do 
not recognize it as the way God works, we fail to experience what 
God has for us in His providence. I am not saying that God will 
remove all of our problems if we are more sensitive to His 
providence. I do not see any such promise in the Bible. But God 
will work in all things for good with those who love Him, and are 
called according to His purpose. This simply means we need to be on 
the lookout for the purpose in coincidence, for this is one of the 
common ways in which God brings good out of all sorts of 
situations.
If a coincidence has no particular value, or purpose, then it is 
coincidence, and that it that. It is a matter of chance events. By 
chance events I mean, those things that happen that are not directed 
by God's purpose, but are the result of the laws of nature He has 
created. Because He created these laws, He is, in a sense, the author 
of all that happens. But when he just allows the laws to function, and 
does not enter into them to interfere for a specific purpose, you do 
not call that providence. 
For example, I worked for 4 years at a printing company. My 
job included the laying out of paper for the paper cutter. I would 
lay out tons of paper on any one day, and over the years filled out 
thousands of orders. Every once in while I would go the shelves of 
stock with an order. The order would call for 325 sheets of blue 20 
lb. paper 18 by 34. I would start counting the sheets in an open 
package, and to my surprise, I would end up with exactly 325 
sheets-just what I needed. It was always a surprise, because it was a 
rare coincidence, but it did happen, and I was impressed with how 
often the unlikely could happen by chance. What I was experiencing 
was coincidence. It had no meaning or purpose. It would happen to 
anyone who spent hours everyday counting out paper. It was a 
mere matter of chance. The only way it could be of value would be 
if it happened every time, and made you the best paper counter in 
the world, because you would not need to count at all, knowing the 
package had just what you needed. If a coincidence does not serve 
any meaningful purpose, it cannot be considered providential. 
Paul Aurandt in The Rest Of The Story tells of a marvelous 
coincidence in the filming of the Wizard of Oz. Frank Morgan 
played the wizard, and Professor Marvel, the traveling sideshow 
man that Dorothy met. MGM'S wardrobe department was notified 
that they needed a coat for Professor Marvel. It had to reflect a sort 
of shabby gentility, a grandeur gone to seed. The staff went to 
second hand shops in Los Angeles, and they came back with 50
coats. The director and Frank met to select one. The one they 
decided on was a Prince Albert coat, with a velvet collar. It was 
worn, but spoke of former elegance. 
One day, as the Professor Marvel scenes were being shot, Frank 
Morgan pulled out the pocket of his coat, and he noticed the name of 
the original owner. It was such a surprise, the MGM executives 
wired the tailor in Chicago to confirm what they had discovered. It 
was confirmed-the coat they had selected was originally made for 
the man who wrote the book-The Wizard Of Oz. It is an amazing 
story, it is so highly unlikely that you feel almost compelled to see 
forces beyond man involved. But because it has no significance or 
meaning, that is recorded, it is not likely it was providential. It 
made no difference, for had it not been his coat it would have served 
the same purpose. No purpose was achieved by this amazing 
coincidence, and without purpose it is not providential. 
Why is it important to make the distinction between coincidence 
and providence? Because, if you don't, you end up with a superficial 
theology that loses all sense of balance, and makes God responsible 
for much that is evil and folly. Just as an example: If God is 
responsible for all coincidence, then God is the key supporter of the 
gambling establishments of the world, and thus, the great benefactor 
of the Mafia, and other underworld organizations. Every time a slot 
machine comes up with three of a kind, that is a coincidence. Every 
time the roulette wheel stops where you have your money placed, 
that is a coincidence. If God intervened in this system of chance, the 
entire world of gambling could be eliminated in one day, for enough 
of these coincidence would destroy gambling. Christians could own 
Las Vegas in a week if God worked providentially in gambling. God 
does not do so, however, for it is not His plan to prevent men having 
a free choice to be foolish. Man is free to choose to gamble, and God 
will not interfere with that choice.
The point is, gambling is a world of coincidence, and not a world 
of providence. This is not to say, God never works providentially in 
this realm, but in general it is a world system guided by the laws of 
chance, and is not a God guided system. If it was, and all 
coincidence was of God, then the Christian would have an obligation 
to both gamble and promote it, as a way of achieving God's purpose 
in history. Coincidence can be good, evil, or indifferent. Providence 
is always good, for it is for the fulfilling of God's purpose. 
Coincidence can be very negative. Two cars meet at the same time 
at the intersection, and life is taken. Millions of coincidences happen 
in which wrong timing leads to evil and death. 
In Esther we see Haman being the victim of God's judgment 
through His good providence to Mordecai. In other words, for 
Mordecai to be spared, and all the Jews to be saved, the enemies of 
the Jews had to be destroyed. So there can be a negative side to 
providence as well. Haman was hung because of the providential 
guidance of God in protecting Mordecai. If you can show that 
tragedy to someone is the key to the survival of someone else in 
God's will, you can see providence is good, even in negative results. 
Most accidents, however, do not fall into this category, but are in the 
category of coincidence which is determined by chance, and not by 
God. 
God still works in all things for good, and can bring values out of 
life's negatives, but the negative is not necessarily a part of His plan. 
If I chose to be a fool, and gamble away a thousand dollars, my loss 
and depression may lead me to change my life in a very positive way. 
This does not mean that God's plan was for me to be a fool and 
gamble. It just means that His providence never ceases to seek ways 
of bringing good out of evil. The evil, however, is not part of His 
plan. 
The entire issue of prayer is based on the distinction between
coincidence and providence. If all that happens in life is God's plan, 
then, of course, prayer is meaningless, and we just as well sing, 
whatever will be will be, and forget it. If, however, we live in a 
world where there is a combination of natural law, and wills that 
determine what happens, then prayer makes sense. What we are 
doing in prayer is asking that God exercise His will, and guide 
events to accomplish His purpose. Prayer is saying to God, "I know 
you can make a difference in the events of life, and I want to 
cooperate in seeing those differences made that fulfill your will for 
me." Why pray, "Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven," if it 
will be done regardless? The point is, it won't be done unless we 
cooperate with God's providential guidance. 
With this attitude in mind, you can face every day as an 
adventure in which all that you do, and all that you say, can make a 
difference in your own destiny, and the destiny of others. Even 
trivial decisions can take you down a path to values you might have 
otherwise have missed. God's method of guiding is not usually by 
miracle, but by providence, as we see all through the book of Esther. 
The Jewish race was saved in Esther by the providential timing of 
trivial events. It is the most common way that God has for 
protecting His people from tragedy yet today. 
Let me close with an illustration of how God once providentially 
answered the oft repeated prayer, "God save the Queen." Queen 
Victoria was on the express train racing through the night to 
London. Suddenly the engineer saw a strange sight in the engine's 
headlight. A weird figure in a black cloak waving its arms caused 
the engineer to grab for the brakes, and bring the train to a grinding 
halt. He and his partner jumped out to see what it was. They 
walked down the track, and stared in horror, for they saw a bridge 
washed out, and toppled into the swollen stream. All would have 
been killed had they not stopped. But they could not find the one 
who warned them. The engineer climbed back into his cab and
switched on the lamp. At the base was a huge dead moth. He held it 
up to the lamp, and it cast a shadow which explained what they saw. 
The Queen was told, and she said, "I'm sure it was no accident. It 
was God's way of protecting us." It was clearly an amazing 
coincidence, that was also the providence of God. 
9. THE HUMOR OF HISTORY Based on Esther 9:20-28 
It was one of the greatest celebrations in the history of the 
American people. The bells rang in Independence Hall in 
Philadelphia. There was a hundred gun salute in City Hall Park of 
New York. In Chicago there was a volunteer possession of people 
seven miles long. In California they celebrated for two days. This 
happened in May of 1869. It was when the railroad from Omaha 
and the railroad from Sacramento met at Promontory Point, Utah. 
The last spike of California gold was driven by Governor Leland 
Standford. Two locomotives drew up close to each other, and the 
news was sent by telegraph all over the country. People rejoiced 
and celebrated because the United States was now, by means of the 
railroad, really united. Carl VanDoren writes, "This was probably 
the most important and most exciting non-military ceremony in the 
whole history of the American people." 
It thrilled a whole nation then, but today you would find it hard 
to find an American who even knows it happened. Those few 
historians who do know certainly do not throw a party to celebrate 
it. Some great events in history do not live on to capture the minds 
and hearts of all future generations. But, on the other hand, some 
events live on perpetually, and even grow in their intensity with 
time. Such is the case with the event called Purim. It means next to
nothing to us as Gentiles, but to the Jews it means a great deal. A 
study of this Jewish holiday and feast will help us understand the 
book of Esther, and the purpose for it being in the Bible. 
One of the greatest paradoxes of history is that the Jews, who 
have suffered so incredibly, have also been the source of incredible 
laughter. Tevye, the Jewish father in Fiddler On The Roof, was a 
funny man in a very unfunny and tragic situation. This has always 
been the case with Jews who love the book of Esther, and keep the 
feast of Purim. Purim, says Herman Wach, the Jewish author, is the 
nearest thing in Judaism to a carnival. It is a time of riotous 
rejoicing. In some places it has made a street festival just like the 
Mardi Gras. 
It is the one day in the year when disordered hilarity is permitted 
in the synagogue. Reverence and restraint are virtues all year long, 
but not on this day. They are cast to the wind, and what would be 
outrageous any other time is permitted on this day. Children are 
given noise makers of all kinds, and they take them into the 
synagogue. All is silent as the first two chapters of the book of 
Esther are read. Then the reader comes to chapter three where he 
reads the name of Hamen the Agagite, and this triggers off a 
hurricane of racket. Everyone stomps their feet, and the children 
make a staggering contribution to the noise with their noise makers. 
Eventually the dim dies down and the reader continues, but when he 
comes to the name of Hamen again, all bedlam breaks loose. Since 
Hamen is named often in the book of Esther, the amount of noise is 
both frequent and enormous. 
This celebration has been going on for well over two thousand 
years among Jews all over the world. It is Christmas, Thanksgiving, 
Easter, the Fourth of July, and Halloween all rolled into one great 
two day celebration. Jewish schools have all sorts of plays, skits, 
and music, to reenact the drama of Esther. Is the day of all kinds of
silliness, jokes, and laughter. Men and youth dress up like clowns 
and play tricks, and tell jokes. Children wear masks and go from 
house to house. Gifts are exchanged, and all are required to share 
with the poor so that it is a fun day for all, no matter what their 
economic condition. 
Now you must certainly wonder why all of this hilarity, frivolity, 
and laughter? What makes Purim so different from all other feasts 
of Judaism? The answer is the profound Jewish conviction that the 
drama of history is a comedy and not a tragedy. This is not to say 
life is not full of tragic events, but rather, that when history is over, 
God will have the last laugh, and there will be a happy ending for all 
who are a part of the family of God. This is a basic Biblical 
philosophy of life, and it explains how the Jews can be so optimistic 
through all of their trials. It also explains why Christians have even 
a greater hope because of the greater revelation we have of ultimate 
victory in Christ. 
Purim is a holiday which proclaims the humor of history. In a 
very real sense the book of Esther is a joke book. It is based on the 
same theme that makes millions of people laugh every day as they 
watch cartoons. Evil plots are made to capture, injure, or destroy 
the innocent, but they always backfire and injure the one who 
planned them instead. That is the basic theme repeated in 
multitudes of cartoons, and that it the theme of Esther. Hamen, the 
powerful Jew hater, so despised Mordecai that he plots not only to 
destroy him, but all of the Jews. He is so clever, as evil men often 
are, that it looks like he has a fool proof scheme to annihilate them. 
By surprising providential events, however, a Jewish woman 
becomes the Queen, and by her superior cleverness Hamen the bigot 
ends up swinging from the very gallows he built to hand Mordecai. 
Mordecai then gets Hamens job as the leading official in the Persian 
government. All of the Jews of the world are not only spared,
they end up with greater power and influence than they ever would 
have had if wicked Hamen had not hated them so. It is another 
great Biblical story of good out of evil, and that is why Esther and 
Mordecai wrote letters to all of the Jews, and established the feast of 
Purim, and ordered that it be a perpetual holiday for all of history. 
Just as Jesus established the Lord's supper as a perpetual 
remembrance of His death, that Christians might never forget the 
source of their salvation, so the feast of Purim is established that 
God's people might never forget that for them history is a comedy. 
No matter how dark or miserable it gets, it will have a happy ending. 
No matter how much you are forced to weep, tears will not endure, 
for the story will end with laughter. Will there be laughter in 
heaven? Just as certainly as there will be weeping in hell. 
Christopher Fry wrote an article in Vogue back in 1951 in which 
he describes the dream a friend shared with him. He dreamed of a 
great book with a tragic page and then a comic page. He turned 
them with excitement to determine which the last page would be, for 
this would reveal if the meaning of life was to be tragic or comic. 
The final page contained 100 words and they were uproariously 
funny. He awoke laughing. This is the message of Esther and Job, 
and the book of Revelation. Comedy and humor are not an escape 
from reality, but, rather, an escape into ultimate reality and the 
Kingdom of faith. There is salvation in a sense of humor. We are 
not talking about saving faith in the sense of being granted eternal 
life. Faith in Jesus Christ alone is the only faith that saves like that. 
A sense of humor will not save anyone in this sense, but it will, and 
has saved millions from the valley of pessimism and discouragement. 
Carl Kassulke, the Minnesota Viking star football player, who 
was paralyzed by a motor cycle accident, told of his experience in 
the University of Minnesota hospital. He was always up to some
prank, but one night he threw a water balloon at one of his 
roommates in the middle of the night. The bed was drenched, and 
the roommate returned the attack. A near riot broke loose as half 
the floor was awakened. It was the greatest water fight he ever had, 
and they were all crippled. He writes, "In view of how easy it was to 
become depressed about our future- and there were moments of 
awful despair-we really needed some silliness in our lives." 
Therapy was not enough. They needed the therapy of laughter and 
humor to endure the battle. Suffering is serious business, but if you 
take it too serious you become a frowning skeptic and a scowling 
cynic. Even suffering must be faced with a sense of humor to allow 
the healing of God to take place. 
Bob Hope, and dozens of other comedians have traveled millions 
of miles to bring laughter to men in the armed forces who faced 
death constantly. This seems like a strange paradox. Those in the 
gravest danger laughing at silly jokes. Is this a sign of man's 
depravity to be filled with laughter in the face of man's greatest 
enemy? No! It is not. It is, in fact, just the opposite. It is a sign of 
mans being made in the image of God. It is proof that that image, 
however marred by the fall, was not demolished, but continues to 
shine even in fallen mankind. 
A sense of humor in this war-torn, sin-scared world is a testimony 
to the great Biblical truth that laughter will last forever when all 
tears are wiped away. If people are funny, it is because God is the 
author of humor, and he has built humor into history so that we 
might see His smile and hear His laughter even where He is not even 
mentioned. Esther is notorious for having no reference to God 
whatever. As we study the book we will see that this is part of the 
fun of it all. It is like Walt Disney's invisible man who can do all 
sorts of amazing things without anyone seeing him. It becomes all 
the more hilarious because he is apparently not there.
Esther seems like a totally secular story. There is nothing 
religious about it. There is no worship, no prayer, and no reference 
to God, Scripture, or preaching. If fasting was not in the book, 
there would not be the slightest hint of anything religious. The 
funny thing about it is-God is more active in this book then where 
He is often mentioned. It is one of the most spiritual of all the books 
of the Bible. And what makes it so unique is, it is fun to study it 
because it is filled with humor-the humor of God's providence in 
history. It is God's joke book revealing His sense of humor. 
Judaism is an earthly religion, and so God's Old Testament 
revelation of the humor of history ends with an earthly victory, and 
an earthly feast with joy and laugher. In the New Testament Jesus 
brings life and immortality to light through the Gospel, and so we as 
Christians look at this same truth on a far higher level. We focus on 
the great marriage supper of the Lamb as our goal, and basis for 
optimism. Let us not forget, however, that we, like the Jews, still 
need to live in time. Therefore, we still need to grasp the practical 
and positive philosophy of life God gave us through the book of 
Esther. The spirit of optimism was in Israel long before Esther, for 
it goes with faith. Everyone looked at Goliath and said, he is so big I 
can't mess with him. But David said, he is so big I can't miss him. 
By faith in God the weak challenge the strong and they win, and the 
heart is filled with laughter. 
Christians can be a part of the problem instead of part of the 
solution if they fail to develop a proper sense of humor. This is what 
happened to the Pharisees in the time of Christ. They were godly 
and sincerely religious people. They were not a part of the answer, 
however, but a part of the problem, because they lacked a sense of 
humor. They took themselves too seriously. This type of person 
always becomes a legalist. Every T must be crossed just so. Every i 
must be dotted just so. They make religion a burden rather than a 
blessing like Jesus did. Jesus had fun in living, and He was being
supremely religious and spiritual all the time. Jesus said His 
disciples did not fast because life with Him was like a wedding 
reception where fasting was not appropriate. It was a fun-filled life 
of service with singing and rejoicing, and feasting was appropriate 
because so many people were being saved, healed, encouraged and 
enriched. 
The Pharisees did not like all of this light-heartiness connected 
with religion. They saw some rules being broken. Never mind that 
the man or woman who had been a cripple or blind for life is now 
praising God with hilarious joy. The real issue for them was, are 
these things appropriate on the Sabbath? No sense of humor and no 
spirit of joy that responds with laughter when evil is overcome and 
outwitted by the forces of good ever characterized the Pharisees. All 
they cared about was being serious about every technicality of the 
law. If you study history you will discover this pattern repeating 
itself over and over again. When people cease to laugh, and take 
everything too seriously, they do not develop true faith, but instead, 
they destroy it. 
The Quamram community left us the Dead Sea Scrolls. They 
withdrew from life and became super-serious legalist. Laughter 
and fun were banished. It is no wonder they became a dead end, and 
ceased to exist as a channel God could use in history. Christians 
have tried this same route and failed equally. The monasteries 
became places of fanatical legalism where life was 100% serious 
and solemn. Laughter was not only secular it was sinful. If God had 
not raised up such fun-loving saints as Francis of Assissi, there would 
have been little of value to come out of the millions of miserable man 
hours spent in mindless obedience to man made rituals. 
Any time you see a man or movement taking itself so serious it 
cannot laugh at itself, you can be assured it has lost a key to balance, 
and will likely go to an extreme, and cease to be an effective tool for
God. As a teen-ager I use to love to listen to that great Catholic 
preacher on TV-Fulton J. Sheen. He was easy for me to listen to 
because he was humorous. He was convinced Jesus came into this 
world to teach men about the divine sense of humor. H e wrote these 
words about Jesus- "Everything He said, everything He did, could be 
summed up in these words: Nothing in this world is to be taken 
seriously, nothing except the salvation of the soul. What shall it 
profit a man if he gained the whole world and lose his own soul." 
The Pharisees took everything to seriously, and the result was, 
they made religious faith about as much fun as a one sided teeter 
totter. The balance life will have ups and downs, for both sorrow 
and joy are real and legitimate. The Pharisees lacked balance and 
stressed only one side of the reality of life. Kierkegaard, the great 
Danish theologian said that Christianity has the most humorous view 
of life. Wise are those who see this and make sure that humor 
plays a major role in their Christian life. 
The cross was Satan's plot to destroy the Son of God. By it he 
hoped to eliminate the plan of God to save man. This diabolic 
scheme backfired and became instead the door to its fulfillment, and 
the cause of his final defeat. The cross is a symbol of joy and 
rejoicing because it is a symbol of the victory of good over evil. It is 
the ultimate symbol of the humor of history. 
If you saw a cartoon where huge tanks were sent out to do battle 
with a rabbit, and you saw them coming back defeated, you would 
laugh, for it would be ridiculous. The Bible is full of this humor. It is 
not only in Esther, but in the New Testament where the combined 
powers of Rome and Judaism came together to keep a dead man in 
the tomb. The huge rock is sealed, the Roman guards are in place, 
and yet the story ends with a dead man escaping. The resurrection 
is God's delightful sense of humor at its greatest. It reveals that 
history, for the believer is a comedy-a story with a happy ending.
Dante called his greatest work The Divine Comedy because he had a 
Biblical view of history, and he knew when God wrapped it all up it 
would have a happy ending. 
The message of the Bible is clear-never give up, hang in there 
however rough the battle, for the victory is certain, and in Christ we 
will always have the last laugh. Eugene O'Neill captured this theme 
in his play Lazarus Laughed. After His resurrection from the dead 
Lazarus says, "I heard the heart of Jesus laughing in my heart-and I 
laughed in the laughter of God." He had lost all fear of death, 
and the play ends with Lazarus being threatened by the authorities, 
but he does not deny his Lord, but instead, he dies a martyrs death, 
laughing. That is the way all of God's children could die if they were 
fully aware of the humor of history. 
10. PROVIDENCE IN AMERICAN HISTORY Esther 10:1-3 
Great leaders are often providentially preserved from what ought 
to have been certain death. This happens before they rise to a level 
where they are a blessing to many people. In the history of the Jews, 
Mordecai is one of these leaders. He came within minutes of being 
hung on a gallows, and instead, became a powerful leader for the 
good of his people.You can go to Iran yet today, and in Hamadan, 
North East of Baghdad, you will find the tomb of Esther and 
Mordecai. Their dark hardwood coffins stand side by side, and the 
Hebrew inscription craved along the upper edge is Esther 10:3. 
God's providential protection of Mordecai changed the course of 
history, and the Jews have celebrated the event every year since, on 
the holiday called Purim.
The fourth of July brings us to the place where we see history 
repeating itself. We celebrate this day for the same reason the Jews 
celebrate Purim. It is a day of celebration for America, because God 
just as clearly delivered our nation as He did the nation of Israel. It 
was a matter of providence, just as sure as that we see in the book of 
Esther. As we look at it, we soon see why it is that history repeats 
itself. It is because God just loves to repeat a good story, and the 
stories of the weak conquering the strong, and the simple outwitting 
the wise, are His favorites. 
George Washington, the father of our country, was one of the 
most godly leaders in history, and God's providence in his life has 
blessed all Americans, just as that in Mordecai's life has blessed all 
Jews. We can't begin to share them all, but let me give you a taste. 
In the battle of Monongahela, Washington was a young officer in the 
Virginia Militia. In that battle this 23 year old officer had two horses 
shot out from under him, and 4 musket balls passed through his coat. 
The Indians, who were expert marksmen, were so impressed with his 
survival that the chief prophesied he would be a famous leader, for 
the Great Spirit protected him. The chief shared that with 
Washington himself years later. Washington was not surprised, for 
he sensed the hand of God on him also. He wrote to his brother after 
the battle, "Death was leveling my companions on every side of me, 
but by the all-powerful disposition of providence, I have been 
protected." 
It was no accident that Washington with his weak, untrained, and 
outnumbered frontier farmers whipped the strong, and well trained 
British soldiers. They were the best army in the world of that day. It 
is the most common story of God's providence. It is David and 
Goliath all over again. It is Mordecai and Haman again. Haman is 
the next most powerful man next to the king. He had almost absolute 
power. If he abused it, no questions were asked. He could do as he 
pleased. Mordecai, on the other hand, was a Jew, and had no power
at all, in comparison. It was like the 13 colonies challenging the 
mighty power of England. They didn't have a chance. But the 
beauty of history is that it is not left to chance. God steps in, time 
and time again, and the little guy wins. 
By the providence of God, David won over Goliath, and went on 
to become king of Israel. By the providence of God Mordecai won 
over Haman, and went on to become a key leader in Persia. By the 
providence of God Washington led the 13 colonies to victory over the 
British, and went on to become the 1st president of the United States. 
It is not coincidence that the pattern keeps repeating itself in history. 
It is providence, because it is the way God loves to work, so we can 
see His hand in history. 
Let me share another parallel between the providence in 
Mordecai's life, and that in the life of Washington. Mordecai's life 
was spared because of some obscure servant opening the book of 
records to the account of his saving the kings life. God has used 
books to change the course of history for millions of people and many 
nations. We see it in Washington's life as well. The British had held 
Boston for a year and a half. They were secure there, with British 
ships in the harbor. They were ready to blow anyone off the map 
who dared to come near. Washington, on the hillside over looking 
Boston, knew he did not dare to even fire a shot. Washington went 
with his officers to try and figure out a way to retake this key city. It 
seemed hopeless, and no idea stood a chance of succeeding. 
That night, Rufus Putnam, a young amateur engineer, was 
passing by General Willis Heath's quarters, and decided to pay him a 
visit. While there he saw a book on the general's shelf on field 
engineering. That discovery was a trivial thing, but it changed the 
course of history. In that book Putnam found plans designed by the 
French for a defensive weapon that would eliminate the threat of the 
British cannons. It was a large wood frame filled with hundreds of
bundles of tightly bound sticks and dirt. He ran to share this 
discovery with Washington. He saw the value of it immediately, and 
commanded 800 men to work through the night constructing them. 
At dawn, the British were stunned by what they saw. When the 
cannon balls hit these barricades they bounced back doing no 
damage whatever. The Americans in one night neutralized the 
enemies key weapon. Now the Americans had the advantage, and so 
the British pulled out of Boston. Washington marched in taking the 
city without the loss of a single life. 
Was that stumbling across an idea in a book a mere accident, or 
was it the providence of God? Those who were there praised God. If 
there is one word that stands out more than any other, when you 
read the history of the Revolutionary War, it is the word providence. 
It was in the vocabulary of nearly all who wrote of it. When 
Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson drew up the draft of the 
Declaration of Independence, the congress insisted that these words 
be added. "And for the support of this declaration, with a firm 
reliance on the Protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge 
to each other our lives, our fortunes and our Sacred Honor!" Those 
men who signed the Declaration risked everything to do so. Many of 
them paid the price, and it was everything. 
That is why the first vote was only 9 of the 13 colonies in favor. 
The debate was hot and furious, and good men differed greatly on 
their views of what was wise and right. They needed a unanimous 
decision, and so the debate went on. There were many parallels with 
the conflict we see in Esther. Haman hated Mordecai and his 
religion. Britain hated the Americans for their religious liberty, and 
for starting so many churches not loyal to the Church of England. 
British troops turned many of the churches into barns for their 
horses, or bars and grog shops. The pews and pulpits were burned. 
More than 50 churches were totally destroyed, and many others 
damaged severely. The spiritual conflict played a major role, and
those Americans who believed in religious liberty were the ones who 
finally persuaded the others that the Declaration of Independence 
had to be passed. 
God worked in other providential ways, and when the next vote 
was cast, it was 12 for and 1 abstaining. It was unanimous, and the 
U. S. was born. The people of the colonies celebrated just like the 
Jews celebrated Purim for their deliverance. The Americans will 
celebrate the 4th of July until Christ comes again, just as the Jews 
will celebrate Purim, for they both stand for the providence of God 
in history. 
John Adams, who fought for the Declaration, and later became 
president of the U.S., wrote to his wife after it passed, and in that 
letter he said of that day, "It ought to be commemorated, as the Day 
of Deliverance, by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty. It ought 
to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shows, games, sports, 
guns, bells, bonfires, and illuminations, from one end of this 
continent to the other, from this time forward and forevermore." 
That sounds just like the words of Mordecai in chapter 9, where 
Purim is to be celebrated by all Jews of all time forevermore. 
As Americans we have experienced the providence of God just as 
the Jews did in Esther. And as Baptists, we have experienced a 
double dose. Few Baptists realize it, but in the thirty year period 
from 1770 to 1800, when all the great events of the American 
Revolution took place, the Baptists grew like wildfire. In that short 
time they went from a place of relative obscurity to become the 
largest denomination in America. Other churches were dying, and in 
a state of decline, but when the Revolution was over the Baptists had 
twice the number of people as the next largest denomination. In a 
very real sense, the birth of our nation, and the birth of the Baptist 
denomination went hand in hand, and this too was clearly 
providential.
The Baptists had only a handful of churches in the 13 colonies in 
1740. How did they grow so fast? It was because Baptists were 
democratic in their form of church government. The very principles 
that were driving the colonies to seek independence from the 
oppressive authority of England were already seeing in operation in 
the Baptist church. Most all other churches were run from the top 
down. The people did not have the freedom to decide. Many were 
still run by the state church in England, and others by a powerful 
higher hierarchy. The Baptists alone were free and democratic. As 
American people felt the need for freedom from political oppression, 
they felt it also in the realm of religious oppression. New leadership 
in the Baptist churches were sick and tired of mere survival within 
the Puritan system. The Puritans did not allow for religious liberty, 
but the Baptists became bold and aggressive, and were determined 
that America would be the land of the free, where people could 
worship with complete religious liberty. 
Issac Backus, the Baptist leader in New England, began to write 
tract after tract dealing with the folly of mixing the church and state. 
People came to America to escape that sort of thing in England and 
Europe. They came here to get away from a state controlled church. 
He insisted that the state should have no control over the church. 
The cry for religious liberty within the colonies became the cause of 
Baptists. The Baptists were the most consistent people in their 
longing for liberty, for they wanted it, not only from England, but 
from the oppression in New England. Baptists were taxed in the 
colonies to support the Puritan churches. They were experiencing 
taxation without representation right here. The Baptists, therefore, 
had a war going on two fronts. They fought for civil liberty from 
England, and religious liberty within the colonies. 
Roger Williams was the founder of the first Baptist church in 
America. He didn't seem to have a chance. The law was against him, 
and the church was against him, and the political leaders were
against him. It was the most spectacular trial in American history to 
that point, when he was taken to court because of his fight for 
religious liberty. He was found guilty and sentenced to banishment. 
Americans were not yet ready for such radical liberty, and they 
wanted this man out of the country. Fourteen men were hired to 
surprise him in the night, and drag him to a ship where he would be 
carried into exile. Governor Winthrop, who was his secret friend 
sent him a warning. He kissed his wife and new born baby, and fled 
into a blinding snow storm. For weeks he survived without bread or 
any weapon. He ate roots and nuts, and was finally rescued by 
friendly Indians. 
It was only by the providence of God that his life was spared, and 
that is why when he established a permanent home he called it 
Providence, Rhode Island. It was the first place on earth where there 
was total religious freedom, and separation of church and state. He 
founded the first Baptist church of America there in 1639. His 
marble statue stands in the Hall of Fame in the Capital building in 
Washington D.C. More biographies of Roger Williams have been 
written than of any other American next to Benjamin Franklin. 
What he did laid a foundation for religious liberty for the rest of our 
history. 
The Baptist church had a spirit of liberty, which gave it a built in 
appeal for an nation ready to fight for liberty. Baptists were so 
clearly in tune with the temper of the times that people began to 
regard the Baptists as the truly American church. The result was, 
people flocked to the church of liberty, and the Baptists came 
through the Revolution, the largest denomination in this new nation 
of liberty. Ever since the Baptists have played a major role in the 
history of our land. Samuel Francis Smith, a Baptist pastor, 
wrote one of our finest patriotic hymns: My County Tis Of Thee. 
Francis Bellamy, another Baptist pastor, wrote The Pledge of 
Allegiance to the Flag. Mark Watkinson, still another Baptist pastor,
inspired the Secretary of the Treasury in 1861 to get congress to 
approve putting, "In God We Trust," on U. S. coins. Baptists played 
a key role in getting the Bill of Rights into the Constitution, and have 
been the major force in maintaining the separation of church and 
state. 
The point of all this history is to illustrate that we celebrate the 
4th of July for the same reason the Jews celebrate Purim. It is a day 
to look back and see the providence of God in our history. It is a day 
to recognize that we are a blessed people, because God does put His 
hand into history and give victory to those who honor Him. It is 
great to be an American, but greater yet to be a Christian of any 
land, for the greatest liberty of all is to be set free from the power 
and penalty of sin. All other freedoms are of little worth without 
freedom in Christ. "If the Son shall set you free, you shall be free 
indeed."

Studies in esther

  • 1.
    STUDIES IN ESTHER By Glenn Pease CONTENTS 1. PROVIDENCE IN THE WORLD Based on Esther 1:1-9 2. PROVIDENCE THROUGH WOMEN Based on Esther 1:10-22 3. THE PARADOX OF PLEASURE Based on Esther 2:1-4 4. FATHER AND DAUGHTER Based on Esther 2:5-11 5. THE POWER OF BEAUTY Based on Esther 2:5-18 6. THE IMPACT OF INFLUENCE Based on Esther 2:15-23 7. THE PARADOX OF PATRIOTISM Based on Esther 2:19-3:6 8. COINCIDENCE OR PROVIDENCE? Based on Esther 6:1-11 9. THE HUMOR OF HISTORY Based on Esther 9:20-28 10. PROVIDENCE IN AMERICAN HISTORY Esther 10:1-3 1. PROVIDENCE IN THE WORLD Based on Esther 1:1-9 Time magazine covered the extravagance of the Shaw Of Iran back in 1971. It was the 2500th year anniversary of the founding of the Persian Empire by Cyrus the Great. Nine kings and five queens were there, along with princes and princesses, and 16 presidents. It was a high class elegant affair that cost $100,000 dollars. As extravagant as it was, however, it could not hold a candle to the banquet thrown by his predecessor many centuries early. Esther begins with an account of possibly the greatest most plush banquet of all time. It will probably never be excelled until the redeemed enter into the marriage supper of the Lamb. King Ahasurus, better known as King Xerxes, had a banquet for
  • 2.
    all of hisprinces, military leaders, and political leaders. It lasted for 180 days, or one half of a year. Now that is what you call a party, it was a six months smorgasbord. Then he topped that off with a seven day banquet for all the people in the capital city of Susa. Xerxes, like most absolute rulers, could be very cruel, but you can be sure of one thing, nobody ever called him a party pooper. The one thing wealthy people have in common is a love for parties. This is their way of revealing their wealth and status. Mrs. Cornelious Vanderbuilt use to spend three hundred thousand a year on entertainment. Scholars are convinced that Xerxes is trying to make a big impression. He has an ambition to conquer the Greeks, and rule, not just most of the world, but all of the world. This half-year banquet was to get all of his leaders together to persuade them to cooperate, and plan the strategy. Verse 4 stresses that Xerxes paraded his riches and glory before them, and you get the impression it is like may day in Russia, when all of the big rockets, tanks, and other weapons are paraded before the leaders, in order to build the ego, and say to all, look at how great and powerful we are. You can be sure that everyone was impressed with the power and glory of Xerxes. He had wealth beyond our imagination, and we will never see as much gold as he had until we look down as we walk the streets of the heavenly city. There is no point in trying to describe the splendor of his kingdom. The point we need to see is that the story of Esther takes place in an environment of pleasure and treasure without measure. Almost the entire book takes place in the palace of the king. It is in the midst of glory that we see only in fairy tales. Esther, the Jewish girl, was a mere nobody, and she was exalted into this atmosphere of elegant royalty. It is a true Cinderella story. It is important that we see the environment in which the story takes place. That is the only way you will be able to grasp why things in this book seem to be
  • 3.
    acceptable that wouldbe totally unacceptable in any other context, for both Jews and Christians. Martin Luther never could enter into the context of Esther, and see it from the perspective of ancient Eastern royalty. The result is, he despised the book of Esther, and felt it was immoral, and ought not to be in the Bible. You don't have to like what went on in the palace of king Xerxes, but the fact is we can learn a lot of relevant truth about God's working in history by taking advantage of this behind the scenes peek. We are privileged to get an inside view of what is happening in the palace that affects the people of the whole world. We get to follow God into the most exclusive setting, and see how He providentially works behind closed doors in the decision making centers of world governments. Just to be aware that God works in such ways is a valuable revelation that can change your world view. The first thing the book of Esther does for us is it forces us to broaden our perspective on the sphere of God's working. God is not limited to Israel. He is not limited to His chosen people. God is the God of the whole world, and His providence works even in the pagan world. Mal. 1:5 says, "Great is the Lord, even beyond the borders of Israel." In verse 11 God says, "My name will be great among the nations, from the rising to the setting of the sun." Esther brings us into a Persian setting, where we see the whole history of God's people bound up in what happens in Persia. God did not start working in Persia just because Esther and the Jews were there. He had been providentially working in and through the Persians from the start of their kingdom. Cyrus the Great conquered the Medes and the united them with the Persians to form the Medo-Persian Empire. He was a master strategist who figured out ways to conquer the unconquerable.
  • 4.
    Mounted Lydian spearmenblocked the road of his forward march. It was like a man with a bebe gun going against a tank. But he sent his baggage camels in front of his lines, and the sight of these beasts frightened the Lydian horses, and they ran off in disorder, and Cyrus marched on to victory. When Cyrus marched into Babylon, and made it a part of the Persian Empire in 539 B.C., he had some reason for pride. He got a bit heavy on the titles, however, when he proclaimed, "I am Cyrus, king of the universe, great king, mighty king, king of Babylon, king of Sumer and Akkad, king of the world." That just about covered it. He was the richest most powerful man in the world, and he was a pagan. So we write him off as of no value to the purpose of God in history-right? Wrong! He played a major role in God's plan, and that is the point we want to stress, for if we limit God in the sphere of His providence in history, we fail to see Him as the God of all history, and all people, even the pagan people's of the world. There is only one God, and He is the God of all, whether they know it or not. In the case of Cyrus, the Bible is so clear in its revelation that we cannot miss it. 22 times the Old Testament refers to Cyrus the Great, and everyone of them is positive. Some are so positive as to be shocking. Daniel served under Cyrus, and his successor, Darius, and he was greatly blessed. Darius was the Persian king who had him thrown into the lion's den, and who was so grateful that Daniel was spared. The Persians played a major part in God's plan for Israel. God said of Cyrus the Great in Isa. 44:28, "He is my shepherd and He shall fulfill all my purpose." God used this great pagan ruler to get his people back into the promise land. He sent them back, and he paid for the rebuilding of God's temple in Jerusalem. He also sent back with them all the treasures that had been carried away in Babylon.
  • 5.
    God used himlike he was an Abraham, Moses, or a Joshua. But the fact is, he did not even know the God of Israel who was using him. Isa. 45:1 says, "Thus says the Lord to His anointed, to Cyrus, whose right hand I have grasped, to subdue nations before him, and ungird the loins of kings, to open doors before him that gates may not be closed: I will go before you and level mountains, I will break in pieces the doors of bronze and cut asunder the bars of iron..." After other promises of guidance, God says, "I call you by your name, I surname you, though you do not know me." Now I don't want to go on studying Cryus, for it could take a full message just to look at the text dealing with this man's role in God's plan. I share this brief glimpse so we can see the close interrelationship of Persia and the people of God. They were intertwined from the beginning. The book of Esther is just one chapter in the context of their interrelationship. Here again it is the king of Persia who is the power who will either destroy or deliver the Jews. They will perish or prosper depending upon his choices. So we see God again working behind the scenes to lead this king to fulfill His purpose in history. Do not think that God does not work in the pagan governments of the world. Do not put God in a box by thinking that pagan leaders will never do anything good in the world, and never make decisions to further the cause of God in the world. This is not only narrow thinking, it is anti-Biblical. God never did pull out of Persia. When we come to the New Testament, the very first people to receive the message of the Messiah's birth were the three wisemen, or the Magi of Persia. John Chrysostom, the great golden mouthed preacher of the fourth century, wrote, "The Incarnate Word on coming to the world gave to the Persians, in the persons of the Magi, the first manifestation of his mercy and light-so that the Jews themselves learned from the mouths of Persians of the birth of their Messiah."
  • 6.
    St. Thomas broughtthe Gospel to Persia, and there has been a continuous history of Jewish and Christian influence in Persia. We cannot cover this whole history, but let me share some highlights, for it relates to what we see God doing in Esther. Esther is just a peek into a vast world of God's providence. It cannot all be a part of Scripture, or the world could not contain the acts of God in history. The point I want to make is that God has been working in Persia from its beginning, and we will know many people in heaven who came to Christ in Persia. In the third century many of the famous doctors of Persia were Christians. In 485 A.D., the chief advisors to the king of Persia was a Christian. Some of the kings of Persia married Christian women, and so you have other stories like this of Esther, where a Jew becomes queen of Persia, married to a pagan king. Christians were among the best educated, and so even when the Arabs conquered Persia in 632, the Christians continued to get the key positions in government and institutions of higher learning. In the 1200's when Marco Polo visited Persia he found a flourishing Christians community. The Christians had become the favored minority over the Muslim majority. There is much more that is positive, but we need to look at the negative side also, which explains why Christianity is not a power in Iran today. Iran is, of course, the modern name of Persia. God's providence is to give His people a chance to do His will. He does not force them, and if they chose to disobey they can lose His blessing. The Christians had it made by their wise living, and they could have won the whole nation. But when Christians refused to be Christian, the message of the Gospel does not work. The first mistake of Christians in Persia was their refusal to use the language of the masses. They had their Syriac Bible, but would not use the Arabic, the language of the people. When the Arabs took over, and used Arabic, the masses became a part of Islam instead of Christianity. Today the church goes into all the world to give people
  • 7.
    the Bible intheir own language. Christians have learned from history, if you don't give people the Bible in their own tongue, you will not be able to build on a lasting foundation. Persian history is a perfect example. Christians were very well educated. They were leaders in the land. Instead of being loving toward the masses, they mocked their ignorance, and despised their pagan customs, and deliberately drank wine on their holy days to show their contempt. You don't have to know much history to know what is the inevitable result of such folly. In 1369 Tamberlane, a descendant of Genghiz Khan, came to power in Persia. He unleashed a reign of terror on Christians. They were rounded up and murdered, and the churches were destroyed, and Christianity never recovered from this scourge. Yes, there will be many in heaven from Persia, but the sad fact is, there will be many less than there should be, because God's providence is not the only force in history. We need to see this side also, lest we be superficial and conclude, that sense God is providentially working in history, we don't have to worry about anything. Not so, for man is still responsible for his decisions and choices, and what he does can make a big difference in the course of history. Not everything that is, is just how God wants it. Man is constantly making choices that are foolish. God's people can get a break and then blow it, and all can be ruined. Mordecai made this clear to Esther in 4:14 where he warned her when she toyed with the idea of not getting involved. He said, "For if you keep silence at such a time as this, relief and deliverance will rise for the Jews from another quarter, but you and your fathers house will perish." In other words, Esther still had to make a free choice to go along with the providence of God. She could have said no, and blown it, and gone down in history as a famous traitor rather than a heroine. In all our study of providence, let us never
  • 8.
    lose sight ofthe full responsibility of man to follow and obey the will of God. If God opens the door, and I do not go through it, I will not experience the providence of God, and the blessing is lost. Now, having looked at all this history surrounding and growing out of the book of Esther, the question is, how is all of this to have an effect on our lives today? It is to have this effect in us, that we never write off politics as a sphere where God is not active. No matter how dirty, corrupt, and scandalous politics can be, it is a key area of life where God is at work to accomplish His purpose in history. Yes, government is secular, but that is the point of the book of Esther. God is active in the secular world. God so loved the world, not just the church, and His own people. God loved the world, and still does, and He works in the sphere of that secular world He loves. Esther has no reference to God, or anything religious. It is a secular story from beginning to end. It is in the Bible to make it a clear revelation to all people for all time, God is the God of the secular world as well as the religious world. Grasping this can change your whole outlook on life, and make all of life and history more exciting. Do not ever assume that a non-Christian leader or politician cannot be a channel of God's purpose in history. To do so is to be blind to the record of God's actual working. God used the pagan rulers of all the great empires of world to achieve His plan. The Babylonians, Persians, Greeks and Romans, everyone of them played a major role in God's plan, and many of them came to be true believers in each of these great empires. But whether the leaders did or not become believers, God used them. He used Caesar Augustus to make a decree to tax the world. This fulfilled the prophecy of the Messiah being born in Bethlehem. Pagan kings and Centurions were constantly playing roles in Paul's life and ministry. When he ended up in Rome, the pagan authorities gave him great freedom to teach and preach about Jesus. Without God's providential leading in the lives of pagan authorities, Paul would not
  • 9.
    have gotten toshare the Gospel in the capital of the world, and impact all of world history. We see it so clearly in Esther, how God used pagans for His purpose, but it was not new. God has always worked outside of Israel, for His providence is universal. Moses was one of the greatest leaders in the history of Israel, but who had a major influence on his life? It was Jethro, his father-in -law, who was a priest of Midian. He was not a part of Israel, but Moses married his daughter, and got to know him well. They became good friends, and it was Jethro that Moses turned to for advice when the burden of judging Israel too heavy. In Ex. 18 we read of how Jethro told him to set up many lower courts with good men to judge, and he would then be the supreme court where the hardest cases would come. Moses gave heed, and this outsider changed the course of Israel's history. Melchizedek was such a godly priest in Salem that even though he was a Gentile outside of the people of Israel, he was chosen of God to be a type of His Son, the Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus is called a priest forever after the order of Melchizedek. He was not called a priest after Aaron, or after Israel's priesthood, but after the Gentile Melchizedek. Abraham, the father of Judaism, even paid tithes to this Gentile priest. God was working in a powerful way outside Israel. We tend to focus on men, for men have, all through ancient history, been the leaders and decision makers. Esther has a balance of male and female cooperation. It took both Esther and Mordecai to fulfill the plan of God for Israel. God used both female and male for the Gentile world as well. Vashti by her refusal to do what was immoral, set the stage for the whole drama that brought Esther to the throne. God is an equal opportunity employer in His providential guidance of history. We will see more of this as we
  • 10.
    continue our study. The queen of Sheba came to visit Solomon, and she was so impressed by his wealth and wisdom, she became a believer. She took her faith back to her Gentile land, and only eternity will reveal how God's providence worked through her, but we will know, for Jesus said she will be in heaven judging those who refuse to see the light Christ brought, which was even greater than that of Solomon. We read in Matt. 12:42, "The queen of the South will arise at the judgment with this generation and condemn it, for she came from the ends of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon, and behold, something greater than Solomon is here." It is hard for us to grasp that God is working in the lives of people outside the church. It was hard for Peter to comprehend this when in Acts 10 God was working in the life of Cornelius, and Italian Gentile who had never heard the Gospel. God had to use a vision, and speak to Peter directly, to get him to go to Cornelius. But finally, Peter became a believer in God's providence in the lives of those outside the people of God, and he said in Acts 10:34-35, "Truly I perceive that God shows no partiality, but in every nation anyone who fears Him and does what is right is acceptable to Him." Peter became aware that God so loved the world, and so was at work in all the world to seek and to save. Jonah not only could not grasp this truth, he hated it. He expected God to wipe out the pagans of Ninevah. Instead, God used the message He brought to bring them to repentance, and He had mercy on them. They were a nation of pagans, and yet God loved them and spared them. Numerous are the examples of God sparing pagan peoples. There are no people that God does not care about. Those who would be truly Christlike must be world conscious people. There must be a love and concern for all people to truly fulfill the will of God. Never has this been more true than today
  • 11.
    when our worldhas become so small, that whatever happens to any people can affect all people. We need to be aware of, and be excited about the fact that God is providentially working in all the world. 2. PROVIDENCE THROUGH WOMEN Based on Esther 1:10-22 Paul Aurandt tells this fascinating true story that deals with the paradox of positive rebellion. In April of 1847 it looked as if Mexico was ready to make peace with the United States. President James Polk chose Nicholas Trist to go as a peace commissioner. On his way Trist spoke to reporters and told them too much. President Polk was upset, and sent a letter to Trist telling him to return. Trist read the letter and responded by saying he did not want to return. The President was infuriated, and blasted Trist, but he could not stop his negotiations with the Mexicans. Today, of course, this could never happen with our speedy communications, but in 1848 it was a different story. Trist, with no authority to do so, signed a treaty with the Mexicans, and brought it back to the U. S. He was immediately banished from government, and his salary was cut off, and he was forced to go to work for a railroad to feed his family. The president and congress accepted the treaty he signed, however, for it was too good to refuse. It gave the U. S. what is now all of Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, Nevada, California, and part of Wyoming, and Colorado. Not a bad deal for a guy who was actually fired, and not suppose to even be on the job. It cost him dearly, but his rebellion gained for the rest of us a large portion of our nation. You just never know what blessings are going to come out of what seems to be so negative. Vashti provides us with another
  • 12.
    example of thisin the first chapter of Esther. She rebels against the order of her husband, the king of Persia, the most powerful man on the planet. It cost her dearly to refuse him and rebel, but it was a major step on the road to Israel's being saved as a nation. If she had not rebelled and lost her place as queen, and likely even her life, there would be no way for Esther to come to the throne, where she was the key to her people's deliverance. Here is a pagan Persian Queen making a drastic decision that will change the course of history for God's people. She, of course, does not even know that she is doing it. Her action has nothing to do with anyone but herself. The question is, why did she do it? The context makes it quite clear that she was a victim of stag party morality. While she and the ladies were having their banquet in a separate place, the king and his leaders were really living it up. Nobody was forced to drink, but verse 10 says the king had his share and was feeling merry with wine. The banquet was in its seventh day, and there was only one thing left to do before it ended. They had seen the glory of all that men can make, but men still loves most of all to see the glory that only God can make-the glory of a beautiful woman. Vashti the Queen was a beauty to behold, and the king was determined that the climax of his six months and one week of banqueting would be the marching of his lovely wife before this hoard of bleary-eyed, drunken, and lustful men. From his perspective at the time, being full of wine, it sounded like his best idea ever. He later sobered up and regretted his folly, but by then the damage had been done. The most powerful argument for abstaining from alcoholic beverages is the history of man's fool decisions under its influence. One of the greatest causes of human sorrow in the world is that the leaders of the world tend to mix alcohol and government. Prov. 31:4
  • 13.
    says, "It isnot for kings...to drink wine, or for rulers to desire strong drink lest they drink and forget what the law decrees, and deprive all the oppressed of their rights. Herodotus, the Greek historian writes much about the Persians, and tells us that it was their custom to get drunk when they deliberated on weighty matters, but that they then reexamined their decisions the next day when they were sober. Xerxes did not follow this rule in our text, and many have failed to do so throughout history. Thank God we do not know how many of the decisions that affect our lives are made by men whose minds are under the control of booze. What we do know from history is frightening enough. One example should be enough to see the potential for the kingdom of darkness. In 1643 Governor Kieft of the New Netherlands had a drunken party with his council. They decided it was time to teach the Indians a lesson. In the dead of night they attacked a sleeping village, and massacred 80 helpless Indians. This lead to a history of sorrow and heartache for both whites and Indians that is beyond calculation. Kieft was the first white man to offer a reward for Indian scalps, and that is why it became so popular among the Indians to take white scalps in revenge. That one drunken party led to hell on earth, and hell forever, for masses of people on both sides. Satan can offer no better suggestion on how to improve the evils of leadership than by mixing alcohol and decision making. Yet, it has been the way of world all through history. To the shame of Christian nations, the Islamic nations have seen the folly of it, and have forbidden alcoholic beverages. Alcohol reduces inhibitions, and men will do under its influence what they would never allow when sober. Lot was a righteous man, but under the influence of alcohol he became incestuous with both of his daughters. Noah's one day of folly was due to his getting drunk. Add up the foolish acts of otherwise sensible men, and you will discover the great majority of them are made under the influence of alcohol.
  • 14.
    Stonewall Jackson wasa strict temperance man, and his example cause many of his officers to be the same. He was once out in a drenching rain, and a fellow officer insisted that he take a drink. "No sir, I cannot do it," he replied. "I tell you I am more afraid of King alcohol then of all the bullets of the enemy." If more men feared it, as he did, there would be far fewer tragedies in this life. Yet men have the audacity to blame God for suffering in this world, when a large share of it can be clearly traced to man's choice to drug his brain with alcohol. I was impressed with the story of a boy in Scotland who was slow, and so he was the butt of many jokes by his village peers. On one occasion they were teasing him, and trying to entice him to drinking. Whereupon, this supposed simpleton responded with true wisdom. He said, "If the Lord Almighty has given few wits to me, He has at least given me enough sense to keep the little I have." Unfortunately, Xerxes was not as wise as this simpleton. But Vashti was no fool. When she got the order to come over to the men's banquet, she knew she was being used to satisfy the kings lust for a new thrill, and she refused. It was either the kings majesty, or the queens modesty that had to be sacrificed, and so she chose to defy his request, and, thereby, became the first truly noble person in the book of Esther. Some even feel she was more noble than Esther. Morgan, that prince of expositors, cries out, "Let the name of Vashti be held in everlasting honor for her refusal." The majority of commentators agree, but some feel it was her duty to obey her husband regardless of the circumstances. This view would have some basis if it was an innocent request for her to come and greet his honored guest. But we know too much about Persian history, and human nature, to think that is all it was. Herodotus tells of how some Greeks made the mistake of bringing some of their wives to a Persian banquet. The Persians kept making sexual advances toward them even while their husbands were there.
  • 15.
    Vashti had herbanquet for the women in a separate place from the men, not just for lack of space, but because the women knew what the men were like after they had been drinking. Sooner or later, and usually sooner, a group of men would get around to the subject of women, and where alcohol is involved you can count on it, the subject will turn to the immoral. What all this means is that Vashti was to be the frosting on the cake at this stag party. She was to march in, and satisfy the lust of this drunken crowd of men, and she said, "No! I won't do it!" She is the equivalent of the movie star who is offered fame and fortune for becoming a centerfold, and she says, "No!" Vashti was a pagan woman, but let us not forget, even pagans have moral standards, and here is one who lived by hers, even at great cost. She was the wealthiest and most famous woman on earth, but she sacrificed it all, and became a nobody, rather than humiliate herself. Xerxes and Vashti are prime examples of the fact that riches are not the key to a good marriage. That key is not riches, but respect. Xerxes could sleep in a golden bed, and drink from a golden cup, but that did not make him a good husband. He exhibited the common danger of all who have wealth and power. He treated people like possessions, and this included his wife. The records reveal that many professional men tend to use their wives as show pieces. The wives soon learn they are not loved for themselves, but for the statis they bring to their husbands, and the marriage collapses because women demand to be treated as persons. Thus, we see the paradox of beauty. A beautiful woman is a delight and a danger. She can be a blessing or a burden to herself, and to men. Most, if not all, men, are women watchers, and this is simply a recognition of the handiwork of God. The problem is that it can be excessive, and go from looking and appreciating to lusting and aggression. Faust sold his soul to the devil for the right to have any wish he desired, and he requested that Helen of Troy, the most beautiful
  • 16.
    woman in theworld, be reincarnated so he could see her. His request was granted, and he feasted his eyes on the face that launched a thousand ships. He sold his soul out of lust for beauty. That is excessive. We need to keep a sense of balance, however, lest we knock beauty. Esther became the Queen, and saved her people because she was unusually beautiful. Beauty can be used for the purposes of God and good, as well as for the kingdom of darkness and evil. Beauty is good in itself, but like all good, it can be misused and abused, and become a tool of evil. Vashti was Queen because of her beauty, but it was also her beauty that led to her downfall, for had she not been so beautiful, she never would have been selected to please the lustful eyes of those drunken men. The burden of beauty is a paradox that many women have had to bear. In our culture the beautiful woman is showered with opportunities. Beauty contests offer them scholarships, great jobs, much wealth. They can go on to movies, the stage, and rise to the top. But, the other side is that they face such pressure to use their beauty for what is immoral. The point is, the story of Vashti is a story that is repeating itself over and over again all through history. Non-Christian women are making choices like she had to everyday. They are choosing self-respect and dignity rather than conformity to the lust of men. You can respond by saying, "Big deal!" There are for every Vashti who says no, hundreds of others to fill in the gap of their refusal. This is true, but, nevertheless, the refusal of the few can change the course of history. And that was the case with Vashti. The few stubborn women who take their stand against impossible odds are the women who have helped make the women of our day the most free in history. Vashti was alone against a government totally dominated by men. Susan B. Anthony grew up in a society very similar, but she revolted against it, and made a big difference because of the Christian principles that forced men to modify their
  • 17.
    methods. She wasborn in 1820 into a Quaker family where women were treated with respect and equality. Her father went bankrupt, and so she and her sisters became teachers. For 15 years they taught with three dollars a week as their top salary. Men teachers were receiving three times that amount. She decided to draw up a Declaration of Rights for women, and she presented it to the New York legislature. She got the signatures of ten thousand women, but the bill was rejected. She went back to the people and kept gathering signatures, and kept lecturing across the state. She covered 54 out of 60 counties, and every time she went to the legislature she was turned down. Six times she went with her petitions, and six times she was rejected. Finally, after unbelievable personal sacrifice, she returned the seventh time, and in 1860 the New York legislature adopted a bill granting women the right to own property, and the right to the money they earned, plus other rights. The next battle was women's right to vote. She persuaded 15 other brave women to join her, and they marched into the polling headquarters in Rochester in 1872. She told the election inspectors they were there to vote. They told her it was illegal. She pulled out a copy of the U. S. Constitution and said, "Prove it!" They couldn't, and so she and her three sisters, and other women, voted. The newspapers splashed the incident across their front pages. It was a report of what King Xerxes advisers told him. These women had to be punished, or all women would think they had a right to vote. Had Susan B. Anthony lived in Persia, she would have gotten no further than Vashti, but she lived in America, and had the freedom to express her views. She toured the Midwest and drew large crowds to her lecture which was titled, Is It A Crime For A U. S. Citizen To Vote? We don't have time to look at her spectacular trial, but she won, and went on as president of The National
  • 18.
    Women Suffrage Associationto prepare the way for the 19th amendment that gave women the right to vote. By her rebellion she changed the course of history. She did it, because like Vashti, she had the courage to say no, and refused to submit to what was not right. It is always right for any male or female to resist cooperation with evil, and God can use that resistance for His purpose of overcoming evil. Vashti said no to immorality, and God used that, right along with Mordecai's saying no to idolatry. These two personal responses of saying no, led to the providential yes of redemption. Never say, never say no, for words like refusal and rebellion in the proper context, as we see them in Esther, are not vices, but virtues. Xerxes, with all his power, found out he could not order his wife to do anything he pleased, and get his way. What an enormous embarrassment. He had just spent 6 months and one week impressing all the leaders of his Empire. He could conquer the Greeks and rule the world, but then his wife says no to him. He can't even conquer one woman. The battle of the sexes is the oldest war on earth, just because it cannot be won. There can be peace and reconciliation, but there can be no total victory in this battle, because both sexes have a higher allegiance than to each other. Joseph Parker, the great English preacher wrote, "There is a higher law than even the will of a king than a husband-the law that gives a woman the right to guard her own modesty when those who should guard it for her do not. Vashti obeyed that higher law written by the Creator....and we can think nothing but good of her in the matter." William Taylor, author of many books, wrote, "No husband has a right to command his wife to do what is wrong, and liberty of conscience ought to be as sacred in the home as in the state."
  • 19.
    This act ofrebellion by Vashti was a case of civil disobedience to the government, as well as disobedience to her husband, for he was also the king, and the absolute law of the land. We see here that what is true for the authority of a husband and a government are the same. There authority does not allow them to violate a persons moral dignity. No earthly authority has the right to command what is contrary to a persons religious and moral principles. One is always right to obey God rather than man. This does not mean one will not suffer consequences for their stand. The head of the house, or the head of the state may have power beyond your ability to escape. Such was the case for Vashti, and such is the experience of millions of Christians. If you have dreamed of being a queen, and feel that is the highest goal of life, you are taking your dreams from fairy tales, and not from history. The average American woman is far more blest, and richer in true values than most of the queens of history. Narah Lofts in her book, Queens Of England writes, "I am sure that if all the Queens the world has ever known would rise from their graves and give a truthful account of their lives, the majority of their stories would be on the sorrowful side." Even Esther had to endure isolation, neglect, and fear for her life. I point this out in order to emphasize the greater power, freedom, and rights that you have as American women, then the royalty of the ages have enjoyed. Most queens would envy you, and gladly traded their castle to have what you have. The surprising thing is you have what you have because of the providence of God in the lives of women like Vashti. She was used to save Judaism, and this is our heritage as Christians. Before her, God used other pagan women to keep his program alive. Moses was saved by an Egyptian princess. She helped make him the mad God used to change all of history. When we look at the genealogy of Jesus in Matt. 1, it is surprising that Jesus was not a pure Jew.
  • 20.
    Gentile blood flowedin his veins. This means that the blood he shed for the sins of the world was both Jewish and Gentile blood. Where did it come from? From pagan women God used to change the course of history. One such woman was Rahab the Caananite, also called the harlot, who aided Israel in taking Jericho. She became a part of the blood line to the Messiah. After her came Ruth the Moabitess. She was another Gentile who came into the blood line, so that two of the four women in the genealogy of Jesus were Gentiles, and one of the two books of the Bible named after women was a Gentile-Ruth. When we come to the New Testament we see Jesus dealing with the Samaritan woman at the well. Samaritans were hated by Jews, but Jesus loved her and won her, and she became His best evangelist, and through her many Samaritans were saved. Jesus could identify with her, for He too was a mixture of Jewish and Gentile blood, and He was doing in the flesh what He had been doing all through history, using women, be they rich or poor, pagan or Jewish, to accomplish His purpose in the world. What women decide, and what women do, has been, is, and will be, a vital part of human progress, for history keeps on confirming what the Bible clearly reveals: God's providence works through women. 3. THE PARADOX OF PLEASURE Based on Esther 2:1-4 Alexander Selkirk was one of those men who always had to learn the hard way. The records of his church in Scotland show that he was disciplined several times for causing trouble in the church. In May of 1703 he said good-bye to all that, and at age 27 went off to
  • 21.
    sea. He triedto run things on the ship as he did church, and he got into a furious argument with the Captain. They were anchored off a small island four hundred miles from Chile. Alexander got so mad he packed up his possessions and went ashore. "You don't dare sail without me," he shouted to the Captain. The Captain was not impressed with his conviction, and gave the order to sail. Poor Alexander could not believe it. He thought he was indispensable. He was wadeing out up to his arm pits pleading for the Captain to forgive him, but the Captain was as stubborn as he was, and he sailed away, never to return. Fortunately for Alexander the island had been inhabited by Jon Fernandez two centuries earlier, and he had left some goats on the island. These gave him food and skins. For four years and four months he depended on them for survival. When he was finally rescued, he could hardly remember how to talk. When he got back to England he was a sensation, and several books were written about him. The most famous was fiction, but it used his experience as a model. The book was Robinson Crusoe. That was a tough way to learn to keep his mouth shut. It is so hard not to do something, or say something foolish or destructive when you are angry. Even great men often have to learn the hard way that loss of temper can be costly. Xerxes was the ruler of the Persian Empire, he could have anything he pleased, but he lost his wife, whom he truly treasured, because of his anger. Xerxes had a reputation for losing his temper when he could not have his own way. He once wanted to cross the waters of the hellespont, but it was so rough his troops could not build a bridge. He got so angry he took chains to the water, and he began to flog it. Like most temper tantrums, it was not very effective. It is so hard to play God when nature and others will not cooperate. The water would not stop for him, and his wife would
  • 22.
    not start forhim, and he blew his stack. And why shouldn't he? He was the most powerful man in the world, and why should he not get angry for the same reason the rest of us get angry? Why do we get angry? Primarily because something or someone has spoiled our pleasure. We are not different from King Xerxes. He had his heart set on seeing all his noble leaders gape in envy as he revealed the beauty of his wife to them. Half the joy of possessing something is in showing it to those who don't. Vashti had the audacity to rob him of this pleasure. He blazed with anger within, because she would not grant his whim. If you examine your own life, you will discover that most of your anger is based on the hindrance of your pleasure. You have plans, and somebody does not cooperate, and the pleasure you hope for is lost, and you are angry. Children cry most often because they can't have their own way. Somebody is always hindering them from having their pleasure. They want to play with the new camera you just bought, and you insist it is not a toy, and there heart is broken. They want to run barefoot in a junk infested lot, and you deny them of their pleasure. On and on goes the list of pleasures a child desires that are constantly being hindered by parents, who get no pleasure out of picking up pieces of a two hundred dollar camera, and rushing to the emergency room for stitches. What we see then, is that from the beginning, life is a battle to see whose pleasures are met, and whose are denied. Striving for pleasure is a far more powerful factor in all of our lives then we realize. Because we do not examine our lives from the perspective of the pleasure motive, we look on the events of the book of Esther with some degree of shock.It is scandalous that every beautiful virgin in the empire was to be made available to the king, to meet his demand for pleasure. Keep in mind, he is the most powerful man in the world. The whole book revolves around his pleasure. What pleases him determines the life or death of every human being of his time. If
  • 23.
    he pleases, wholenations are destroyed,and if he pleases, they are spared. God's providence had to work through His pleasure motive. The first two chapters reveal that he was dominated by sensual pleasure. His party life and sex life established the environment in which the entire story takes place. Xerxes is no different than the rulers of that part of the world today. A reporter who traveled to all of the oil rich Arab countries, and interviewed all of the kings and sheiks, reported that they lived just like Xerxes did. Wine, women, and song, and every pleasure man is capable of was a way of life. Xerxes is said to have offered a reward for anyone who could invent a new pleasure. This is the challenge today for those who have so much money they cannot think of any new way of spending it. The book of Esther is not dealing with something old and irrelevant, but rather, with a subject so real and relevant to all of us, but one that we often fail to think about seriously, the subject of pleasure. Before we get all bent out of shape about Xerxes, and his lust for pleasure, lets examine our own lives. When we do, we will discover that we are not so different from this sensual king. The main difference is that we do not have the power and wealth to command the pleasures he had, but the difference is really only one of degree. We too enjoy parties with good things to eat and drink, and we enjoy beautiful furniture and drapes. We enjoy nice clothes, and I have seldom heard of a Christian who does not enjoy sexual pleasure. The more we examine the Christian life, the more we begin to realize we are very pleasure oriented. We don't feel the lest guilt for enjoying the pleasure of music, fellowship, an all that being a part of the body of Christ involves. Why should we? Jesus enjoyed the social pleasures of His time. He enjoyed the party, the wedding, the feasting, the singing, the fun of fishing, and fellowship. So what we
  • 24.
    have is, theparadox of pleasure. It is both something we are to crave and seek and enjoy, and yet it is something that can be so dangerous that it can quickly lead us to fall, and be out of the will of God. Pleasure is both a virtue and a vice. The search for pleasure is the primary motivation behind the evil of man. Satan appealed to the pleasure nature to get man to fall. He said, taste the forbidden fruit and you will have the pleasure of being like God, and they jumped at the chance. But good is also motivated by pleasure. The Gospel is an appeal to the pleasure nature as well, for Jesus says, "Come unto me all ye who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest." Jesus offers men the joy of eternal life, and the pleasure of abundant life. There is not available anywhere in the world a hope for greater pleasure than what Jesus offers those who put their faith in Him. What this means is we cannot afford to be reacting as Christians so often do. They look at Xerxes, and his six months banquet of gluttony, drunkenness, and perpetual beautiful virgins for his lust, and they say this is disgusting. Then they think their mission in life should be to prevent as much pleasure as possible. This over reaction to evil pleasure in the world has caused Christians to totally misrepresent Christ, and pervert the Gospel so that it loses its appeal to most everyone but sadist who delight in pain. History is full of the folly of Christian ascetics, who thought they pleased God by pain rather pleasure. They wore hair shirts to itch and be miserable. They flogged themselves thinking that suffering was the key to sanctification. Fun and pleasure were so related to sin that misery and boredom were exalted to the level of virtues. To avoid this reaction to worldly pleasure we need to see where the Bible stands on the issue of pleasure. The first thing we see, as we examine God's Word, is that God is the Creator of pleasure. He made the world and man, and said it is very good, and He took
  • 25.
    pleasure in allthat He had made. He made man with a nervous system capable of enjoying much pleasure of sight, sound, taste, smell, and feeling. He designed man to be a pleasure loving creature. Every pleasure we are capable of is a cause to thank God, for it is by His will we have that capacity. David acknowledges God as the source of all of life's pleasures in Psa. 36:7-8. "How precious is thy steadfast love, O God! The children of men take refuge in the shadow of thy wings. They feast on the abundance of thy house, and thou givest them drink from the rivers of thy pleasures." God gives rivers of pleasure, even in time, before the believers dwell by the River of Life, where all pain will be forever gone, and life will be endless pleasure, for, "At God's right hand our pleasures for ever more." (Psa. 16:11). God delights in the pleasures of His servants says Psa. 35:27. God is a personality who enjoys great pleasure Himself. Psa. 149:4 says, "For the Lord takes pleasure in His people." As we, as parents and grandparents, take pleasure in seeing our children grow and develop, so God delights in His children. God wanted the temple rebuilt in Jerusalem, and He said to the people in Hag. 1:8, "Go up to the hills and bring wood and build the house, that I may take pleasure in it and that I may appear in my glory, says the Lord." God is no where revealed as a vast cosmic machine. God is a person who feels, and His goal is to accomplish what is good and pleasurable. Phil. 2:13 says, "For God is at work in you, both to will and to work for His good pleasure." Jesus said in Luke 12:32, "Fear not, little flock, for it is your Father's good pleasure to give you the kingdom." Let's get it straight in our minds, God is not a sadist who loves pain and delights in suffering . The goal of God is pleasure for Himself, and for all His people. He makes it clear in Ezek. 18:23. "Have I any pleasure in the death of the wicked, says the Lord God,
  • 26.
    and not ratherthat he should turn from his way and live?" God's goal for every man is a goal of pleasure. Hell is pain and heaven is pleasure, and heaven is always God's goal. I looked in a dictionary of synonyms and antonyms, and found this list of the opposites of pleasure. Listen to them, and see if you catch the flow of heaven or hell. Displeasure Evil Desolation Sorrow Pain Anxiety Woe Hurt Burden Grief Wound Adversity Suffering Affliction Trouble Vexation Anguish Unhappiness Worry Despair Tribulation Sickness Misfortune This is not an ideal shopping list for Christmas, or any other day in life. In fact, the only place you can get that list fulfilled perfectly is in hell. Not a one of them will be a part of heaven. So we are stuck with an enormous paradox. The entire plan of God, and the goal of Christians, is pleasure. Yet, that seems to be the major problem of sinful man, and the primary method of worldliness. Even Plato could see it and say, "Pleasure is the greatest incentive to evil." It is the pleasure principle that leads men into every form of lust, and which takes them lower than the beast. Yet, it is the pleasure principle that leads men to the highest levels of godliness, and enables them to fulfill the purpose of God. The book of Esther is a perfect illustration of the paradox of pleasure. It begins with a feast that is dedicated to worldly pleasure, and gratification of the senses. It ends with the proclamation of a perpetual feast that will also gratify the senses, but will be in thanksgiving for the providence of God. The pleasure of the people of God at a banquet is no less enjoyable than that of the sensuous
  • 27.
    secularist. Xerxes hadmore of every sensual pleasure, but the fact is, he did not enjoy eating, sexuality, and other aesthetic pleasures anymore than the Jews did, or than Christians do today. How then can we distinguish between pleasures which are displeasing to God, and those which please Him? How can we unravel this paradox so we know which side we are on? How can we know if we are at Xerxes's banquet, or Esther's banquet? The first thing we need to do is to recognize pleasure is not evil. It is good, and from God. Then we need to recognize that all good can be perverted and abused. That is what evil is-it is good used in a way that God never intended. C. S. Lewis in The Screwtape Letters has the Sr. devil writing to the Jr. devil explaining the work of temptation. He writes, "Never forget that when we are dealing with any pleasure in its healthy and normal and satisfying form, we are, in a sense, on the Enemy's ground. I know we have won many a soul through pleasure. All the same, it is His invention, not ours. He made the pleasures; all our research so far has not enabled us to produce one. All we can do is to encourage the humans to take the pleasures which our Enemy has produced, at times, or in ways, or in degrees, which he has forbidden." The tempters task is to get men to think, if a little is good, a lot must be better. If he can get men to use God's pleasures to excess, he can get them hooked, so that the very gifts of God become idols, that lead them astray from God. Such is the subtle plan of the deceiver, and it is a very effective plan. We live in a culture where pleasure is no longer a gift from God, for it has become god. Norman Lobsenz has written a book titled, Is Anybody Happy. It is a study of the American search for pleasure. The goal of life for Americans is a good time. Our national Mecca is Disney World. Pleasure is the alpha and omega of life. The national heroes are no
  • 28.
    longer the titansof industry, or the somber statesman, or solitary inventors. Now it is the movie star, the sports hero, and international playboy, who have taken their place. The important thing now is to have fun. Lobsenz writes, "Advertisers, never slow to sense a trend, have leaped on the bandwagon, and there is now hardly an artifact or an activity that is not intimately connected with spine-tingling happiness. Brushing your teeth with a certain tooth paste, of course-is fun. Cutting the grass-with a certain lawnmower-is exciting. Do you want to know the real joy of good living? Drink a certain beer....soap flakes give glamorous suds. It is fun to paint your house with so and so's paint. Eye glasses are bewitching. Light bulbs are romantic. Building materials are festive. Soft drinks are sociable. Kitchen appliances are smart. Anything you buy that is made of shining aluminum will mirror your laughter. Even paying the bills for these items is a pleasure if you have an account at a certain bank." Lobsenz says he expects someday to see a billboard with the bony finger of Uncle Sam pointing at him asking, "Have you had your fun today?" We are under a new morality-the fun morality. It says, if it feels good do it. It is not new of course, for Xerxes was a pro at it 2,500 years ago. Instead of feeling ashamed for having too much pleasure, from now on we are to feel guilty if we do not have enough. People are now going to psychiatrist and asking, "What is wrong with me? I can't let go and have enough fun." People feel so obligated to have fun they attack it with all the energy they use to put into achievement. This pursuit of pleasure often ends in broken marriages, broken lives, and death, especially for those who find their pleasure in alcohol and other drugs. Is the Christian approach to try and be a kill joy, and oppose pleasure, and call people back to a work ethic, where go go go is the battle cry? Not at all! The Christian is for pleasure too, for that is
  • 29.
    God's plan forman. The Christian simply needs to point out the folly of making pleasure an idol. It is not the end of life, but a means to a higher end. "Man's chief end is to glorify God and enjoy Him forever." We are into pleasure too, but because it is not an end in itself, but a means to the end of enjoying God, we have an objective standard by which we measure the value of all pleasures. In other words, we count the cost. Satan does not want man to count the cost, for his whole strategy is to get men to choose pleasure at any cost. The cost factor is what enables the Christian to have a guide to legitimate pleasure. You can tell if you are being excessive in your pursuit of pleasure by what it is costing you. Any pleasure that costs you your growth in Christian fruitfulness is folly, and excessive pleasure. Jesus made this clear in the parable of the sower, where the seed that fell among the thorns did not lead to fruitfulness. He tells us in Luke 8:14, "There are those who hear, but as they go on their way they are choked by the cares and riches and pleasures of life, and their fruit does not mature." They pay too much for their pleasure. They lose the highest pleasure of life-the pleasure of pleasing God, and being what He wills, for the sake of pleasure that will pass away. They trade in their diamonds for marbles. The Gospel is not a call to forsake pleasure, but it is a call to rise to higher pleasure, and to enjoy that which lasts forever. The motive for all self-denial, which keeps the Christian from immoral pleasure, is the hope for enduring pleasure. Listen to Paul giving counsel to the rich Christians who could so easily indulge themselves in excessive pleasures. He writes in I Tim. 6:17-19, "As for the rich in this world, charge them not to be haughty, nor to set their hope on uncertain riches but on God who richly furnishes us with everything to enjoy. They are to do good, to be rich in good deeds, liberal and generous, thus laying up for themselves a good foundation for the future. So that they may take hold of the life
  • 30.
    which is lifeindeed." Paul is saying, you only go around once in this life, so do it with gusto. But for Paul, that does not mean to drink beer, it means to enjoy the higher and lasting pleasures of doing the will of God, which guarantees we will have abundant life now, and an eternal life of pleasure on the highest level. The Christian is one who evaluates pleasure, and does not just grab at it indiscriminately. He asks, does this enlarge, or does it enrich my Christian life, and my attitude of gratitude to God? The Christian is on the greatest pleasure trip possible. If we could not assert that the plan of Christ leads to the greatest pleasure for the greatest number, we would be saying that there is a better way. The fact is, no one even pretends to offer a better way than Christ. We can say with the advertisers who are confident of their products, "If you can find a better way than Christ-take it." When referring to God, it is an absolute truth that Father knows best. He forbids only those forms of pleasure which, in the long run, lead to pain greater than the pleasure. God never forbids any pleasure which will last, and be a part of your growth toward the goal of becoming like Him. He only forbids that which costs too much. Forbidden pleasure is a rip off. It costs you the favor of God, and usually has a kick back of pain that far exceeds the pleasure. How often people take drugs to feel good, only to end up in jail or worse, and feeling rotten, and with problems that are now worse than before. Biblical morality is a fight back morality. It is a demand that you don't be a sucker, and get ripped off by cheap imitations. Jesus Christ, and He alone, offers the real thing-life abundant and life eternal. He paid and enormous cost, and endured the pains of hell, that we might enjoy the pleasures of heaven. Whatever price we need to pay to be loyal to Him is small cost for so great a gift.
  • 31.
    The martyr whosuffers death rather than deny Christ, does so for pleasure. He knows the cost is nothing compared to what he will enjoy at Christ's right hand. That is why one of my favorite preachers, F. W. Boreham, said, "The tragedy of the age is not that people are getting too much pleasure, but that they are not getting enough." Life Xerxes, the world is pleasure mad, but in all of their sensual self-indulgence, they do not find the pleasure of peace and meaning, or eternal hope. They pursue pleasure as a god, and are left empty. The Christian pursues the will of God, and is filled with pleasure. The world grabs the rose and clutches and thus must bare the pains of the thorn. The Christian does not need to grasp it, but can enjoy it, and not cling, for he knows he cannot lose the rose even if it dies, for he is a child of the rose's Creator, and knows the rose will be his forever. Honey is bought to dear by those who risk the bees stingers. The Christian is one who is wise in his pleasure seeking. He enjoys all God has given us to enjoy, but avoiding excess and the forbidden, knowing this leads to the greatest pleasure. Contrary to the view that Christianity is opposed to the search for pleasure, the opposite is the case. We have found the very thing man is searching for, the way to the highest most lasting pleasure of which man is capable. With this highest goal of salvation settled, the Christian then can enjoy the lesser pleasures of life more completely, for they are not so essential that he has to cling to them for meaning. The highest and permanent being assured in Christ, he can relax, and enjoy the passing without the risk of idolatry. To sum it up, the paradox of pleasure is that the pursuit of pleasure can lead you to the pit of hell, or to the pinnacle of heaven. It is life's most dangerous or delightful path to travel. The ecstasy of victory, or the agony of defeat, awaits all who travel it. Which you find depends on whether Xerxes is your example, or
  • 32.
    Jesus Christ. Youeither do what pleases you with no higher loyalty than your own pleasure, or you do what pleases God, with His will as your motive for rejecting or accepting pleasure. Those who choose the way of Christ, saying, not my will but thine be done, will enjoy at God's right hand pleasure for ever more. 4. FATHER AND DAUGHTER Based on Esther 2:5-11 George Barnell, a Jew living in North Carolina, back in 1871 fathered one of the most unusual daughters in Americans history. Jane Barnell grew up to become the famous Lady Olga, the bearded lady of the circus. She had a thick beard hanging 13 and a half inches, and also a large mustache. The beard started to grow when she was 2 and at 4 she was being displayed, and 65 years later she was still going strong. When Jane was a toddler, and her father was out of town on business, her mother took her to the Great Orient Family Circus, and came home without her. When the father returned home he was frantic. He appealed to the police, and North Carolina and surrounding states were scoured, but the circus and Jane had vanished. They had gone to Europe. It was several years later in a Berlin orphanage that the father finally found her, and brought her back to the United States. She grew to adulthood on a farm where she shaved just like the young men. At 21 she was persuaded to let her beard grow and enter the circus. She did, and spent the rest of her life traveling the world as an exhibit to the curious. The story of Mordecai and Esther is also a story of a Jewish father and daughter, but with this distinction that Esther was as unusually feminine as Jane was unusually masculine. Esther was
  • 33.
    one of themost beautiful girls that ever lived. She was the Miss Universe of her day. She was the most beautiful girl in the Persian Empire, which included most of the known world. Our focus on this Father's Day is not upon Esther, however, but upon Mordecai. A contemporary bitter male said, "The only thoroughly masculine domain not yet invaded by women is growing a mustache." He obviously never saw Lady Olga, or the many other bearded ladies of history. The real uninvaded domain of masculinity is fatherhood. No woman can beat a man at this role, for no matter how good she is with children, she is always a good mother, and not a good father. Mordecai was an excellent father event though there is no record of his having any children of his own. Esther was his adopted daughter. We have established in a different message that you do not have to give birth to a child to be a good mother. The same holds true for being a father, and Mordecai is proof of this. Joseph was also a good father to Jesus, even though he did not actually father Him in the sense that He was from his seed. That is the easiest part of fatherhood. The real challenge is to so love a child that it becomes a mature and balanced adult with a solid foundation of spiritual principles to guide them through life. Mordecai was this kind of father to Esther. Most all of the Bible accounts of fathers are those who deal with fathers and sons. Here we have a rare case of a father and daughter combination. And what a combination they were! They saved Israel from destruction, and they changed the course of history. It is of interest to note the balance of the Bible where we see any combination of people can be used of God to accomplish His purpose. In the New Testament it is Mary the mother and Jesus the Son, with the father only faintly in the picture. Here in the Old Testament we see Mordecai the father and Esther the daughter, with
  • 34.
    the mother notin the picture at all. God can, and does, use any combination, for any of them can be winners. It is important to see this, for life is complex and uncertain. There are all kinds of ideals that are best, but the fact is, they are not attained by millions. I don't know why Mary had to raise her family without Joseph, nor why Mordecai had to raise Esther without his wife. Nor do I know why there are so many other less than ideal family situations. All I know is that there is good news, for any of these less than ideal situations can be used of God for His glory, and for His purpose, and life can be full of blessings. Let's look at some examples of how Mordecai was a successful father in a less than ideal situation. He gave to Esther three things that made her a successful daughter, and him a successful father. First of all he gave her- I. AID IN ADOPTION. Esther was of a minority race, in a foreign land, and a pagan culture, plus she was an adopted child. Adoption can be less than the ideal simply because there are complications in the minds of adopted children. They tend to struggle with insecurity, and their self-esteem. The father is in danger of trying to protect them so much that they become over dependent. On the other hand, to so push them into independence that they feel rejected and unloved. It is a tough job maintaining just the right balance so an adopted child can feel adequately loved, and still press on to be mature and independent. This, of course, is the same battle all fathers have, but with an adopted child there is an added complexity. Blessed is the father who can provide the aid that is needed. I have not known many adopted children, but the few I have known have all struggled to some degree with their self-image. It takes a wise father to help them see and feel that they are just as
  • 35.
    loved, and justas valuable, as their own seed. Mordecia clearly succeeded with Esther, for she was a loving daughter, and one who could be fully independent of Mordeica. She could listen and follow his guidance, and was as beautiful within as she was on the outside. This is not to say that the father of an adopted child not turning out well is a poor father. Some of the finest fathers fail in attempting to reform a rebel. Andrew Jackson as President of the United States had to write this letter to his adopted son Andrew Jr. He was in trouble already at age 14, and by 25 he was a heavy drinker and deeply in debt. He wrote this on April 14, 1835. "I now address you with the fondness of a father's heart. How care then you ought to be to shun all bad company, or to engage in any dissipation whatever and particularly intoxication. When I reflect on the fate of your cousin Savern, reduced to the contempt of all by his brutal intemperance I shutter when I see any appearance of it in any branch of our connection." When General Jackson died he was 24 thousand dollars in debt due to his rebellious unheeding son. I do not believe he was a bad father. Mordecai may have failed with this son also. All I am saying is, that in a less than ideal situation he did succeed with Esther. She adapted to a life that was full of tragedy and sorrow as her people were carried away captive, and her parents were taken in death. We are not told if they died from violence or natural causes, but either way she was left an orphan in a foreign land. Mordecai aided her in adapting to her circumstances, and she became a beautiful well-rounded person. It would have been easy to become bitter and hateful toward the Persians. Mordecai had to teach her not to hate the Gentiles she lived among, and she did adapt and learn to love them. The second thing we see that Mordecai did for her is that he taught her the-
  • 36.
    II. ACCEPTANCE OFAUTHORITY. Esther became the Queen, and she had more power in the snap of her finger than Mordecai had in his whole life. He was nobody in terms of real power, and yet Esther obeyed his authority, and did not reveal that she was a Jew. Her loyalty to her father's authority is a key factor in God's providential plan to save the Jewish race. Had Mordecai failed to teach Esther to accept authority, and to be loyal to authority, the whole plan of God would not have worked out as it did. One of the greatest tragedies of life is a father who does not win respect for his authority from his children. It is a recognized fact that a major cause of the breakdown of the American family is the loss of authority by dads. A little girl inquired, "Mommy, if the stork brings babies; if Santa brings our presents; if the Lord gives us our daily bread, and Uncle Sam our social security, what is daddy good for." It is no joke when kids really feel this way. Colonel Farley, founder of Boy's Ranch says 90% of the youth who come to him come from homes where there was little or no influence of the father. Between 80 and 90% of the boys in Boy's Town come from the same type of home. Judge Leibowitz of Brooklyn's highest criminal court has concluded that the number one factor in criminality is failure of the father's role. If a father does not influence his child to respect authority, the opposite is what will take place, and they will reject authority. They will tend to become problem makers in society. Diogenes the Greek was said to have stuck the father when the son swore. He was illustrating the direct influence of the father on the son. Weak influence of fathers is a major cause of weak people in all areas of life. Studies show that 94% of veterans under treatment or
  • 37.
    psychiatric reasons experiencedfather rejection. We need to balance out what we are saying here by looking at the total picture revealed by the book of Esther. Strong influence of fathers is not necessarily good either. There is another father in this book by the name of Haman, who is the enemy of Mordecai. The whole book is like a Hatfields and Macoys type story, for it is about two fathers and their children who are determined to eliminate each other from the map of Persia. Haman had all of the advantages. He had 10 sons, and Mordecai had only one daughter. Haman had position and power, and all Mordecai had was hope in the providence of God. The point I want to make here is that Haman was basically a strong father. This book reveals that he had a powerful influence on his sons, and they did respect his authority. They joined him in his battle of bigotry, and gave their lives because of their loyalty. Because evil fathers can teach their children good principles, we need to rise above the secular level to see a Christian father's duty. Doubtless, there are fathers in the Mafia, and other underworld organizations, who teach their children strong respect for authority, and they become loyal people to the cause of crime. You can't even be good at being bad without respect for authority. We need to see, therefore, that no father has done his job well until his child respects the highest authority, which is the authority of God. Haman failed because his sons obeyed only human authority, and they were loyal to folly that was contrary to God's will. Mordecai taught Esther to respect his authority also, but his authority was based on his obedience to God's authority. We see this in chapter 4 where Esther begins to waver in her obedience to his authority. He responds by lifting her sights to a higher level, and by getting her to focus on the providence of God. In 4:14 Mordecai says, "For if you keep silence at such a time as this, relief and
  • 38.
    deliverance will risefor the Jews from another quarter, but you and your father's house will perish. And who knows whether you have not come to the kingdom for such a time as this?" Esther was moved by this to go ahead and risk her life trusting in the providence of God. The lesson is clear: No father can be the final authority, for all fathers fall short of the glory of God. Only those fathers who give their children an ultimate foundation can be called good fathers in the biblical sense. A good father is a fallible father with faith in the infallible Father in heaven, and he passes on this faith to his children. This means a good father does not need to be uptight about his weaknesses and failures, for he does not have to pretend he is perfect and infallible. The respect for his authority is not based on its infallibility, but on his respect for the authority of God. A Christian father needs to be honest about his own mistakes, and not try to pretend that he is always right. Joseph Bayly, the popular Christian author, has raised 7 children. He has punished them when they were innocent. He has failed to tell them he is sorry. He has inflicted pain by his ignorance. He sat one of this little boys on a log in the woods to rest. He had short pants on and there was poison ivy all around the log. You can imagine the fun dad had trying to be innocent and intelligent after that. Bayly says there is no escape from guilt. He had to travel so much when his little girl was small that when he came home she would not recognize him when he wanted to hold her. The point is, he did not need to fear that his failures would cause his 7 year old to be out pushing sweet old ladies in front of cement mixers. They were taught that human authority is to be respected in so far as it conformed to God's authority, as revealed in His Word. this is the goal of all who would be truly successful fathers. The final value we see imparted by this first rate father is-
  • 39.
    III. ABUNDANCE OFATTENTION. Note verse 11 where the text says that every day Mordecai checked on Esther to see how she was doing. Not every weekend, or every month, but every day. She is a married woman, and she is the Queen of the Persian Empire, yet Mordecai does not let a day go by without letting her know he is concerned. This gives us a strong hint as to the kind of father he was. He was an available father. In our busy world nobody seems to have enough time to do all that should be done, and the result is fathers are often not available to their children. Children , by their very nature, are not interested in doing what matters for even the long run, let alone eternity. They specialize in the trivial and the transient. In other words, kids love to do what is a waste of time. That is contrary to adult intelligence. We cannot waster time, and so we are always trying to make all time count. The fact is, it is very biblical, for we are told to redeem the time. The problem is that we become legalists, and we forget that Jesus also taught we must become as little children. There is a time to waste time. That is, we must learn to enjoy doing things like children love, which are very momentary fun as an end in itself. I must confess that I have struggled with this for years, and even as I preach it, I do not always practice it. I am conditioned by the philosophy that we must try to kill two birds with one stone, and make every moment count. Don't waste time, or time will waste you. I still believe these things, but more and more I realize that it is an error to fail to balance this thinking with a childlike love for the enjoyment of the present. Jesus had time in His short life, and even shorter ministry, to enjoy living. He had times of fun, fellowship, laughter and song. He took time out from healing and preaching to go fishing. We always miss the boat when we take our eyes off Jesus, and push any truth to an extreme.
  • 40.
    This comes hometo you when you read that Boswell, the famous biographer of Samuel Johnson, who said he would never forget the day his father took time out of his bush schedule to take him fishing. It is a highlight of his life, and he learned so much. Boswell's father kept a diary, and when he died it was found, and that day that meant so much to his son had this entry in it. "Gone fishing today with my son; a day wasted." Maybe it was wasted in the sense that he got nothing done, but if getting nothing done is what it takes to be available to your child, and make them feel your attention and care, then nothing is what needs to be done. This is not the kind of nothing that Aristotle defines when he said that nothing is what rocks dream of. That is really nothing, but the nothing of wasting time with your child is really something. It is an investment in the future. A father who cares enough to waste time for his child's sake will produce a child who will redeem the time for God's sake. Availability is the key to being a good dad. One daughter tells of an interesting thing her father did as she was growing up, and he was her only parent. When she started school he gave her a dime and said, "Patty, I want you always to keep this dime in your purse. Anytime you need me, you call the plant. Tell them you want to talk to your dad, and I guarantee they will let you right through." Many years later she wrote, "There is no way I could tell you what that ten cent piece from my father meant. Even when I didn't need him, just to know I had it in my purse made me feel secure." Little things can help your child feel secure because they give them that sense of access to your care and concern. This is what Mordecai did for Esther. He made it clear that he was always available. So often you read of a father, or see one playing the role on television, who gets a phone call for a business obligation just as the family is ready to go on vacation. So often they
  • 41.
    choose the businessobligation rather than the family obligation, and the family feels that they are always secondary. Mordecai may have had many other things to do, but he made contact every day with Esther. She knew he was always available. He wanted to know how she was. A father needs to be informed about his children. When dad knows what is going on in the life of his child, that child feels loved. A study found that a high percentage of children do not even know what their father does for a living. This indicates very poor communication between fathers and children. Too many fathers feel they cannot waste time by being available to their children. A group of 300 7th and 8th graders kept accurate records of just how much time dad spent with them over a two week period. The average came out to only 7 and a half minutes per week. Many only saw their father at the supper table, and many did not see him at all for days at a time. One of the best gifts any dad can give a child is what Mordecai gave to Esther. It is sometime every day showing them attention. Mordecai did it for his daughter who was a grown woman. How much more is it needed for those still in childhood. May God help us as fathers to see the wisdom of Mordecai, and make sure our children feel that we are available to them on a regular basis. This is the key to being the father our children need. 5. THE POWER OF BEAUTY Based on Esther 2:5-18 In its 4,000 years of history only one woman became Emperor of China with absolute power. She was Wu tes-t'ien. She got to the throne of China for the same reason Esther got to the throne of Persia. She was a startling beauty. As a young girl she was renowned
  • 42.
    for her beauty,and the Emperor made her his concubine. Ordinarily a concubine like her would be relegated to secluded quarters, after the death of the Emperor. She would live her life out in quiet retirement. She was so beautiful, however, that the son of the Emperor also desired her as a concubine. She was not only beautiful, she was clever. She bore him several sons, and then promoted them among the leaders as the legitimate heirs to the throne. She gained many political allies, and so maneuvered behind the scenes that when the Emperor suffered a crippling stroke, she was made Empress in 655 A.D. She was brilliant as well as beautiful, and was excellent in administration. She cut taxes, won a war,and had a united prosperous country under her long reign. It is rare, but the fact is, there are many cases in history of women doing an excellent job of leading a whole nation. One thousand years before Esther, in 1520 B.C. Hatshepst became the first woman Pharaoh of Egypt, for 21 years she reigned, and glorious monuments exist to praise her success. When Julius Caesar marched into Egypt in 48 B.C. there was a vicious dispute going on as to who the next ruler should be. Should it be Pothinius or his sister Cleopatra. Cleopatra wanted to plead her case before Caesar, but she knew if she tried to get to him her brother would have his spies kill her. Nobody would dare interfere with a gift for Caesar, however, and so a beautiful oriental carpet was sent from her palace to Caesar. Imagine his surprise when the carpet was unrolled and a 19 year old girl stepped out to announce she was Cleopatra, the rightful Queen of Egypt. Caesar fell in love with her beauty, and she did become the Queen. If you want to read of how Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Spain, England, and other nations, were all ruled by greatly honored women, you can find these fascinating histories in Mildred Boyds book, Rulers In Petticoats. My interest in these stories for our study of Esther is that they confirm what we see to be a major theme of
  • 43.
    this book, andthat is, there is power in beauty. Women know it, and that is why one of the largest industries in the world is the beauty industry. Billions are spent each year by women who know their greatest asset is in looking beautiful. Brains and other qualities are also vital, but it is beauty that opens the door for these other gifts to get a chance to function. Many modern women admit they use beauty to their advantage in industry. They say they dress in a deliberate attempt to win favor with those who have power, and thereby they are raised to positions of power themselves. If conflict is developing between them and a male boss, they can calm the waters by coming on with some feminine charm. In beauty contests there is nothing subtle and hidden. They are on open display to win prizes, prestige, and power by means of beauty. Many object to the whole emphasis on beauty as pagan perversion. They feel nothing is more secular than the parading of female bodies before the world. The book of Esther, however, forces us to focus on this type of secular scene, for God in His providence uses just such a beauty contest to save his people. It was Esther's beauty that got her into the palace, and into a position of power where she could be used to save her people. No other quality but beauty could have gotten her there. King Xerxes was not looking for a female genius, or the best woman runner, or sports figure. He was looking for beauty. His demand for beauty was far beyond what is demanded for a Miss America or Miss Universe contest. His contestants had to spend one solid year doing nothing but beautifying themselves just to spend a night with him. After a year of using oils, spices, and ointments, they would be as soft and smooth as a baby. Esther had to have been one of the most beautiful women to ever live. Out of all the beautiful girls of the Empire, she won the favor of Hegai, the keeper of the women. Verse 15 indicates she was also
  • 44.
    voted Miss Congenialityby the other girls, for she was favored by all who saw her. Now this really is a Cinderella story in that, aside from her beauty, Esther had all sorts of disadvantages. She was a poor orphan in a foreign land, and part of a minority group. Fortunately for her she had a relative who took her in when her parents died. Mordecai was her cousin, but he adopted her as his daughter. Here is a rare case of cousins becoming father and daughter. Her Hebrew name was Hadassah. That is not a name known to us, but the largest Jewish organization of women in the world is called Hadassah, and they support the Hadassah Hospital in Jerusalem. Esther was her Persian name and this has become more popular among Gentiles. Esther means star. Estelle and Stella come from the same root. Take female beauty out of this book, and the star is gone. This poor adopted orphan would never have been heard of in history had she not been blest with beauty. Even with her beauty would she have won the contest with all her competitors had she not spent a year using all of the beauty aids available in her day? The Bible puts you in a real bind if you are dogmatically against beauty aids, for they were part of the providential plan of God that saved the Jewish race. Dr. William Stidger, one of the great American preachers, and author of over forty books, comes on strong in favor or beauty aids. He writes, "As far as I am concerned.....there is something sacred in the everlasting passion women have for making themselves more beautiful. I have no sympathy with these reformers who find nothing more important to do than harangue women for using rouge, powder, clothes, and what have you, to make themselves more beautiful." Certainly we can all agree, there is nothing spiritual or superior about being unclean, unkempt, and unpresentable for public
  • 45.
    viewing. All ofus enjoy beauty, but like all good things, this too is so easily perverted. Conrad Hilton, the multimillionaire owner of the Hilton hotel's around the world, was once married to Zsa Zsa Gabor. He discovered that with her, beauty was a full time affair. She started at ten in the morning before her dressing table. He says it was a ritual with bottles, jars, and pots, both large and small. It could have been the rite of ancient Aztex temple. After lunch and shopping it was back to the dressing table for more make-up, and agonizing decisions on furs and jewelry. Hilton learned first hand about the idolatry of beauty, and of how impossible it is to live with a woman who is obsessed with vain-glory. So what we have in the power of beauty is another paradoxical power. It can drive you to the heights of virtue, or plunge you to the depths of vice. It can lead to one praising God for this gift, or it can lead to pride that competes with God. It has the power to produce stories of victory, or stories of vanity. One of the reasons women are so effective in taking the Gospel into all the world is there beauty. Beauty attracts, and if the attracter points to God, her beauty is a stepping stone into the kingdom of beauty, the kingdom of God. Many have the testimony of the poet- The might of one fair face sublimes my love, For it hath wean'd my heart from low desires; Nor death I need, nor purgatorial fires. Thy beauty-ante-past of joys above Instructs me in the bliss that saints approve, For Lo! How good, how beautiful must be The God that made so good a thing as thee. Is by the power of beauty that women have had their fair share of the control of history. By beauty the weak can master the strong, and Esther decides the course that the absolute monarch will take. The Biblical ideal of female beauty involves the mental as well as the
  • 46.
    physical. Brainless beautyis a joke. Prov. 11:22 says, "Like a gold ring in a swine's snout is a beautiful woman without discretion." In other words, a beautiful woman has to use the inside of her head as well as the outside to have any real power in her beauty. Capito wrote, "Beauty alone, may please, not captivate; If lacking grace, tis but a hookless bait." Beauty can be superficial, and without depth, and this is what has led to the saying that beauty is only skin deep. Prov. 31:30 agrees when it says, "Charm is deceitful and beauty is vain, but a woman who fears the Lord is to be praised." So we come again to the paradoxical nature of beauty. It can be vain, but it can also be a great value. It is the paradoxical nature of reality that leads to so much overreaction, and imbalance in our thinking. Because everything that is good can also be bad, and perverted, so as to become a source of evil, there is the constant temptation of abandoning what is good to avoid that danger. All through history Christians have abandoned what is good, and left Satan free to use it as a tool for evil. Just as tanks abandoned on the battlefield will be used by the enemy to fight those who abandoned them, so beauty, when abandoned by Christians, will be used by enemy forces against Christians. The value of studying the book of Esther is that it forces us to reevaluate our views on the secular realm of life. It forces us to look at beauty as a tool in the hands of God, and it forces us to ask questions about beauty, as it did about pleasure. What we find when we search the Scripture is that beauty is no minor issue in God's plan. It is basic and vital to the plan of God, and not just for the saving of Israel, but for saving all men from the pit of hell. It is no surprise that God is portrayed in the Bible as ultimate beauty. After all, He is the author of all beauty. Someone said, "God is not only the all-wise and all-powerful, but the all-beautiful." In Psa. 27:4 all that David longs for is to dwell in the house of the Lord and
  • 47.
    to behold thebeauty of the Lord. The hope of all believers is to see the King in His beauty. When that great event takes place, we will all partake fully of His beauty, and become perfected, and be like Him. The goal of God is that all the redeemed might be like Jesus. To be glorified is to be beautified with the beauty of Jesus. But beauty is not just the goal, it is a powerful element of the Christian life on the way to the goal. Three times the palmist says we are to "Worship the Lord in the beauty of holiness." The power of worship is in beauty. Beauty runs through the Bible, and we are called upon to behold it over and over. There is the beautiful robe, beautiful women, a beautiful situation, a beautiful heaven, a beautiful crown, a beautiful gate, and even the beautiful feet of those who proclaim the Gospel. There are numerous beauties in the temple, and there is the beauty of wisdom. Jonathan Edwards, one of the greatest American preachers, came to the conclusion, as he studied the Bible, that beauty was really at the very heart of all theology. We tend to think of beauty as a secular subject, but he made it the heart of his sacred theology. This man changed the course of history in America, and he made beauty the unifying theme of theology. He could see what most Christians never notice. God is beautiful, and all that He does is beautiful, and so the good and the beautiful are one. We could not love God if He was not beautiful. If He was only powerful, He could force us to do His will, but He could not force us to love Him. Love is a response we can only give to beauty. If we had no revelation of God's beauty in nature, or in the plan of redemption, we could not love God. God could only win man's love by the power of beauty. It works the other way also. Man is ugly in sin, and so it would be hopeless for us to have fellowship with God, but Jesus became a man, and by the beauty of His holiness, and the beauty of His
  • 48.
    sacrifice, the waywas opened for all to become beautiful, and, thereby acceptable to God. Grasping the loveliness and the supreme excellency of our Lord is the beginning of the victorious Christian life. Those who do not see the beauty of Christ will not have the motivating power to follow Him. They will be sidetracked constantly by the superficial beauties of worldliness. All the fruits of the spirit are expressions of the beauty of Jesus in human life. Edwards said, "God is the foundation and the fountain of all being and all beauty." Sin is a deformity and lack of beauty. All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. That is, no one measures up to the beauty God intended for them. They are all defective. To be saved is to be restored to the place where you have the right to begin the process of beautification. The doctrine of sanctification is really a doctrine of beautification. To grow in Christlikeness is the same as growing in beauty. Beauty is the measure of God's presence, just as ugliness is the measure of God's absence. If a man is insensitive to beauty, and can see no beauty in life, or in people, he is alienated from God. The man who sees most beauty, and is full of appreciation for it, is the man closest to God. When all beauty is gone, and all of life is ugly, that is when people take their own life, for the loss of all beauty is hell. In hell there will be no beauty, and in heaven there will be nothing but beauty. One's relationship to beauty in this life is the measure of the hell on earth, or the heaven on earth, that one experiences. The only way to get heaven on earth is to see the beauty of heavenly things, and the loveliness of God's way. Only those captivated by the power of beauty will be open to the working of God's Spirit. Edwards says that in the hierarchy of values, first is existence, and then excellence; first is being and then beauty. Anything defective in beauty is defective in being. The ability to discern what is truly beautiful from what is only
  • 49.
    superficial beauty isthe key to the abundant life. Jesus only used the word beautiful once in the New Testament record, and it was a warning about the danger of superficial beauty. In Matt. 23:27-28 we read, "Woe to you, Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but within they are full of dead men's bones and all uncleanness. So you also outwardly appear righteous to men, but within you are full of hypocrisy and iniquity. Here is surface beauty. It has no depth, and is mere veneer. Superficial beauty is Satan's primary method of deception. All men chose what they feel is beautiful. The first sin of choosing the forbidden fruit was made very attractive. All sin is made to seem beautiful. Satan does not expect anybody to be tempted by the ugly. He knows God made man in His image, and so He knows man is made to select the beautiful, and shun the ugly. So he can only attract men to evil by making it seem beautiful. People chose folly for the same reason they chose wisdom. It looks good, and seems like the best way to go. The liquor adds portray the camaraderie of the bar. Sports and sex, and all that seems adventurous is linked to this drug, for drunkenness is not attractive or beautiful. They never show the dead and twisted bodies of drunk drivers. They never show the ugliness of the vomit, and the awful agony of families ruined by drinking. Evil can only survive by using the power of beauty to attract. God wants us to chose beauty. We are made to do so, and in Christ we are given the Holy Spirit, who will lead us to chose the highest in beauty. Christian morality and ethics are built around beauty. Whatever is truly beautiful, and by truly beautiful I mean lasting beauty, is right. What is wrong is that which may have temporary beauty, but which leads to permanent ugliness. Christian maturity is growing in your discernment so that you can see the whole, and not just the part. Much of life is beautiful in part, but
  • 50.
    awful in thewhole. A poison snake is beautiful in part, as are poison berries, but they are not wise choices, for as a whole they are ugly and destructive. The power of evil lies in its use of superficial and partial beauty to entice men to chose the way of folly. Evil is a parasite which depends on what is good for its existence. This brings us back to Xerxes and Esther. It is because Xerxes lives for beauty and pleasure that God was able to use his choice for His own purpose. Pagan people, all through history, have chosen what they feel is beautiful. This does lead to great evil because of Satan's deception, but let us remember, the world is full of true beauty as well, and even evil men often chose what is good because of its beauty. Esther was a beautiful and godly woman. Her beauty went to the heart, and was not just skin deep. Her beauty would be attractive to most all men in history, pagan or Christian. The point is, Satan is not the only one in the beauty business. God's providence also works through beauty. The beauty of women is one of the key ways God has worked in history. Esther in her day, and in our day, one of the great stories is that of Mei-ling, better known as Madam Chaing Kai-shek. Chaing Kai-shek was a Chinese war lord who was very successful in battle. One of the Christian families of China sent their daughter Mei-ling to America to be educated. When she returned, she was active in the political and social affairs of the nation. On one occasion Chaing Kai-shek's path crossed that of Mei-ling, and for him it was love at first sight. He could not resist the charm and beauty of this Americanized daughter of the Orient. We cannot go into the details of the long five year battle to win her hand in marriage, but battle it was, for he was a godless immoral warrior living with a concubine, and she was a beautiful Christian. His love for her beauty changed his history, and he became a Christian. He went on to become the Generalissimo of China, and together they did great things for the cause of Christ. It never would have
  • 51.
    happened without beauty. What all this means is that we need to keep a dual perspective on life, and especially the secular life. Take beauty contest for example. Yes there is lust and perversion of beauty, but do not forget, God is not shut out of that realm of life. God is working through beauty, and often the winner of these contests is a dedicated Christian woman. She goes on to touch many lives for Christ, and all because she was beautiful. Not all of us have the gift of beauty that attracts kings, generals, and wide popularity, but all Christians have gifts that are beautiful. All the gifts of the spirit are attractive, and they are designed to attract others. Every Christian is to be a light in a dark world attracting the lost to the Savior. Nothing is really finished until it is fully beautiful, and that includes us. God will never be done with us until we are perfectly beautiful. Beauty is our goal, and beauty is what we need to pray for. The more beautiful we are in every aspect of life, the more likely the providence of God will work through us to accomplish His purpose, for there is power in beauty. 6. EVERYBODY TOUCHES SOMEBODY Based on Esther 2:15-23 Harriet Beecher Stowe was a preacher's daughter who was born in 1811. She certainly didn't look like she would ever amount to much. She was shy and had a large nose and a hunched back. She considered herself to be quite homely. Calvin Stowe, professor of Biblical Lit. in Lane Theological Seminary in Cincinnati, saw beauty in her, however, and asked her to marry him. He was not exactly prince charming himself with his balding head and problem of
  • 52.
    overweight and nearsightedness. It was never a very smooth marriage, for they both had such bad self-images. Calvin had such fits of self-contempt that he got sick in order to escape duties. The result was he never made enough money to support his wife and seven children. Harriet had to work to support the family. She wrote articles and short stories. She so dispised slavery and all it did to degrade people, and she longed to use her gift of writing to fight it, but it seemed so hopeless. She was a nobody living in a day of great male writers, all of whom also hated slavery, but avoided writing about it. Longfellow, Hawthorn, Emerson, Melville, Thorew and Whittier were just some of the great names of her day. Harriets sister kept insisting she should write to show the whole nation what an accursed thing slavery was. One Sunday as she sat in church during a communion service the plot of her book formed in her mind. It is hard to doubt that it was a God-given plot, for her book called Uncle Tom's Cabin took the world by storm. It sold 300,000 copies in America, and 1,000,000 in England the very first year. It was translated into 36 languages. The impact of her book was so great it is considered one of the most influential books in the history of America. Abraham Lincoln's response when he met her was, "So this is the little lady who made this big war." Here was a woman who changed the course of history. She was not a beautiful woman like Esther. Her power was still the power of beauty, however, for it was the literary beauty of her book that moved people to action. Beauty has many different forms. It may be artistic, literary, intellectual, or physical, but the point is, God's providence in history always works through one form of beauty or another. That is why the apostle Paul writes to Christians in Gal. 6:9, "Let us not grow weary in well-doing, for in due season we shall reap, if we do not lose heart." The Greek word for well is the word
  • 53.
    for beautiful. Paulis saying do not grow weary in beautiful doing or beautiful action. Acting beautifully is the key to your reward and the reaping of a harvest. It is not just being beautiful, but beautiful actions that become a part of God's providence in history. The book of Esther is full of the beauty of doing as well as the beauty of being. Esther's beauty of being depended upon the beauty of doing to accomplish God's purpose. We see from this that all of us can be part of God's providence. The beauty of being may be limited to the few, but the beauty of doing is open to all. Everyone of us can do beautiful things that aid the fulfillment of God's plan. The book of Esther reveals that God's providence is always working with a balance of male and felmale imput. Men are constantly being influenced by women, and women by men. In our text we are looking at the key men in the life of Esther. We want to focus on the least of these three men in order to see how the influence of even the least can be great. Hegai is certainly one of the least known characters of the Bible. I have never even heard of him being used in a Bible quiz. Rare would be the person who knew of Hegai, the keeper of Xerxes harem. He was eunuch, which means he was incapable of sexual function. His purpose in life was to see that the women in the harem were always in the best condition for the pleasure of Xerxes. It would be easy to past by Hegai without mention, and leave him in the limbo of neglect, but a careful reading of chapter 2 reveals that he was key link in the chain of events that led to the salvation of the Jews. Verse 9 reveals how he took a special liking to Esther, and quickly got her started on the beauty aids and proper diet. He became her coach, as it were, to win and event over emorous competition. We see here the beauty of friendship. This was not a sexual male and female relationship at all. Hegai appreciated
  • 54.
    Esther's beauty andher personality. He liked her as person, and he saw her as the best for the king. Esther also came to appreciate Hegai. She obeyed his coaching and took his advice. In verse 15 we see that when her chance came to see the king and impress him, she took with her only what Hegai advised her to take. He was the best counselor she had. With him Esther had an inside track to the heart of the king. The paradox here is, we have a pagan, who cares nothing about the Jews or God's plan for Israel, playing a key role in God's plan for their deliverence. God did not need Hegai, for He could work out things in another way if He chose. In fact, later on Mordecai says that God did not even need Esther. Nobody is indispensible to God. He can always get His purpose accomplished, but the point is, He chose to use the influence of this pagan servant, and that choice of God opens up a fascinating insight into God's providence in history. We have a tendency to limit God, and we assume He will only work through His own people. This limited view makes us miss the values that God can achieve through the influence of non-Christians. Hegai was a pagan. He did not even know the God of Israel, and Esther could not be a witness to him, for she had to keep secret she was a Jew. There is no evangelism or witnessing on the part of Esther. She was just a friend to Hegai. This reveals that our relationship to those outside the kingdom of God can be a factor in our success in serving the kingdom of God. Do not think that non- Christians play no role in your life. There are many examples of how non-believers are a key influence in believer's lives. Joseph's whole life was a series of encounters with pagan people. He was thrown into prison because of a bad encounter, but gets out of prison to share his dream by the aid of a pagan servant of the king. He went on to become a leader in Egypt and had a positive
  • 55.
    relationship with apagan Pharaoh. All around him there were pagan people who respected him and depended upon him. Joseph lived most of his life in a relationship with non-believers. Daniel had a simular experience as a political leader in Babylon. He had his close Jewish friends, but he also had a good relationship to the king. The Apostle Paul was constantly envolved with non-Christian Roman leaders. One of them was to him like Hegai was to Esther. In Acts 27 we read of the Roman Centurian named Julius. He is another very obscure character of the Bible. He was in charge of Paul as he headed to Rome to stand before Caesar. In Acts 27:5 we read, "And Julius treated Paul kindly and gave him leave to go to his friends and be cared for." Later, when they were caught in a storm on the sea, the Centurian listened to Paul and cut loose the boat some were going to use to escape. By so doing, this entire ship of pagan sailors was saved. 276 persons were spared by the providence of God, using the influence of a pagan leader. There was a crisis when the Roman soldiers felt the only wise plan was to kill all the prisoners lest they escape. Paul would have died had it not been for the friendship of this pagan Centurian. In Acts 27:43 we read, "But the Centurian, wishing to save Paul, kept them from caring out their purpose." The beautiful acts of friendship between Paul and this pagan leader led them to be a team that brought everyone through the entire ordeal. God used a believer and a non-believer together to fulfill His plan of sparing all these lives. Doctor Luke then goes on to record in Acts 28, after they were all safe on the Island of Malta, "And the natives showed us unusual kindness." The cheif, whose name was Publius, showed them great hosptiality for three days. Then when they sailed, we read in verse 10, "They presented many gifts to us." These experiences of Paul with pagan friendship and kindness reveal that what happened to Esther was not just an isolated
  • 56.
    incident. All throughhistory God's people have been blessed by the kind and beautiful acts of those who were not believers. God's plan includes doing many good things in history by the influence of non-believers as well as believers. There are millions of Christians who have been healed, taught, spared and aided by non-Christian doctors, teachers and professionals of all kinds. You are a rare Christian indeed if you have never been positively influenced by a non-believer. They are not saved by the many good works they do for us, but God's will is often done on earth because of their good works. The relationship we have to all people is important, for God can use everyone's influence for His purpose. One of the most amazing examples is the experience of Stenborg, the painter. Over 200 years ago in Dusseldorf, Germany, he painted his famous Gipsy Girl. His model let her black eyes wonder about his studio. Then they were arrested by the thorn crowned faces of Jesus he had painted for the church. She begged the artist to explain the picture. He told her the story of the cross. When he finished the Gipsy girl said, "You must love Him very much when He has done all that for you." The painter was stung with shame, for the fact was, he did not love Jesus. That remark motivated him to respond to Christ, and then, as a painter who adored the Saviour, he painted another picture of Christ, and displayed it int he public gallery of Dusseldorf. Underneath he inscribed the words, "All this I did for Thee; What hast thou done for me?" One day, Count Zinzendorf, a rich young man, stood before that painting, and the question challenged him to the depth of his soul. He surrendered to Christ and became the founder of Moravin Missions. In a few years there were missionaries going to all parts of the world. The Moravinans had a profound influence on John Wesley, who was used of God to change the world, and the influence goes on and on and on from a little Gipsy girl who simply asked a
  • 57.
    painter if heloved Jesus. John Donne was right when he said no man is an island. Paul put it in Rom. 14:7, "For none of us lives to himself, and none of us die to himself." None of us live or die without influencing others for good or ill. This is not just a law for believers, it is true for all men, for even the lost have an influence for good or ill. This world is better or worse for every person in it. It has been better because of people like Hegai, Julius, the Gipsy girl, and innumerble obscure nobodies. What are the implications of this reality? For one thing, it means your relationship to non-Christians can be a significant part of life. Non-Christian family, friends, neighbors, and others may play a very important part in your life. Non-Chrisitan authors may influence you in many directions. Paul read pagan poets and found in them truths that he could quote in his sermons. In his famous sermon on Mars Hill in Acts 17:28 he said, "For in Him we live and move and have our being, as even as some of your poets have said, 'For we are indeed His offspring.'" Paul quotes the pagan poets because they confirm what the Bible says. Today, preachers are constantly quoting non-Christian poets, scientists, psychiatrists, and a host of other authories, who in their realm of study discover that Biblical principles are true, not just for Christians, but for non-Christians as well. What we need to see is that a Christian has a duel relationship to the world. Some of the world is like Haman, who hated God's people and God's truths, and they do all they can to persecute and destory. But, there is also a world that is sympathic to God's people and God's truths. It is open to the influence of God's people, and can be used as an instument in the providence of God. When the Bible warns us not to love the world, and not to be comformed to it, it is referring to the danger of getting intrapped in the world's value system. Some Christians interpret this to mean, have nothing to do
  • 58.
    with non-Christians. Thisleads to a life of isolation where they have no influence on the world because they are not open to be influenced by the world. Separation from the world means separation from the sin of the world, and not separation from people. Jesus was a friend of sinners, but totally free of sin. Christians who feel they have an obligation to be obnoxious and unkind to non-Christians are blind to the way God's providence works in history. Paul said Christians are to live peaceably with all men as much as is it possible. Paul knew from his own experience that good relationships, to even pagan people, can mean a better atmosphere in which the providence of God can work toward positive goals. The pharisees were very strict in not associating with the unclean people. They did not relate to non-Jews and even other Jews who did not attend the synagogue. One of there chief objections to Jesus was that He would eat with anyone, even the publicans and sinners. These people were to them mere nobodies, and not a part of God's people. These godless nobodies did not count with them. They failed to see that everybody is somebody with God, and everybody touches somebody in a way that hurts or helps. Jesus blasted them, in spite of their high and strict principles, because they did not love people and relate to them in helpful ways. We should never be so proud that we cannot take advice from a non-Christian. Esther took Hegai's advice and it was the best thing that ever happened to her. We may never have heard of her had she not listened to this pagan friend. She could have chosen to snub this Gentile pagan, and instead inquire of her Jewish neighbor. But her Jewish friend may have told her to eat onions and leeks before she went in to see the king. You recall, the Jews were willing to give up their freedom to get back to Egypt so they could have onions and leeks. Esther could have taken this advice and have been so offensive to the king that she would have been dismissed on the spot. The point is, Hegai was the best authority,
  • 59.
    and she waswise to follow his advice. It is wise for any Christian to follow the wisdom of a non-Christian who is authority in his field. It is not only not wrong to follow such advice, it is wrong not to follow it if it does not conflict with the revealed of God. You could be missing God's will by neglecting it. Do not count anybody out as a resource for knowing God's will. If God uses everybody to touch somebody, and that includes obscure pagans like Hegai, how much more does He use His own children to touch the world? Do not be deceived, you are constantly influencing everyone who knows you for good or ill. The poet has written, My life shall touch a dozen lives Before this day is done, Leave countless marks of good or ill, Ere sets the evening sun. This, the wish I always wish, The prayer I always pray: Lord, may my life help others' lives It touches by the way. May God help us all to pray such a prayer everyday, for everyday, everybody touches somebody. 7. THE PARADOX OF PATRIOTISM Based on Esther 2:19-3:6 Newscaster Paul Harvey, some years ago, told his radio listeners this remarkable story from World War II. From the Island of Guam one of our mighty B-29 bombers took off for Kokura, Japan. It was carrying deadly cargo as it circled high
  • 60.
    above the city.A cloud covered the city, so the plane kept circling for half an hour, and then for three quarters of an hour, and finally after 55 minutes the gas supply was reaching the danger zone. The plane had to leave its primary target, and go to a secondary target where the sky was clear. Then the command could be given, "Bombs away!" Only weeks later did the military receive information that chilled many a heart. Thousands of allied prisoners of war, the largest concentration of Americans in enemy hands, had been moved to Kokura a week before the bombing mission. Had it not been for that cloud, thousands of Americans now alive would have been killed, for that B-29 was carrying the world's second atomic bomb. It was taken instead to the secondary target-Nagasaki. The direction history takes, so often is determined by such minor things. Small things play a big role in life. The illustrations of this are numerous, yet it is a truth that demands balance, or it leads to folly. God's providence is constantly working through little things, but not every little thing is of significance. To think so can lead to becoming neurotic, for you will search for meaning in every trivial event of life. The danger of this is illustrated by the little girl who came running into her house sobbing. She threw herself into her mothers arms, and cried out, "God doesn't love me anymore!" The mother was shocked and puzzled at what could produce such a crisis. "Why do you say that?" she asked, assuring her that God does love her. "No mother!" she wailed. "I know He doesn't love me. I tried Him with a daisy." In case you have never tried that less than fool proof method of predicting love, by pulling off petals to, "He loves me, he loves me not," let me recommend that you never start, if you are going to take it seriously. The fact is, there are little things that are just little things. They are minor and insignificant. They are not subtle and hidden
  • 61.
    methods by whichgreat things are accomplished. I don't think it is a healthy exercise to go through life trying to figure out if God is trying to say something through every minor event. When God does work through such events, it is only known as we look back and see the minor event as a link in the chain that leads to the fulfillment of His purpose. This is what we see in the life of Mordecai. As a cloud saved many Americans, so a conversation saved many Jews. Mordecai over heard a couple of the kings servants plotting to assassinate him. This was very common in the ancient world, because the only way to get rid of an absolute monarch was by assassination. They never quit, and could not be voted out, and so violence was the only method open for change. Many of kings of Persians were assassinated, including Xerxes. He was saved by Mordecai, but fourteen years later one of his servants succeeded in his plot to kill him. Assassination was common even in Israel. In I Kings 15 we read of how Baasha conspired to kill Nadab, the king of Israel, after he had reigned only two years. Baasha became king then, and reigned 24 years, but he was also a evil king, so nothing was gained by the people in this politics of violence. His son Elah became king, and 2 years later his servant Zimri assassinated him, and became king. Once you killed the king, you had to kill the whole family, and many of his friends, so the violence of the ancient world was terrible. There are other gruesome assassinations in the Old Testament. I point this out so that we can see clearly the nature of Mordecai's political decision, when he chose to become an informer, and revealed the conspiracy against Xerxes We see in Mordecai's experience good reason for why political decisions are so paradoxical, and why it is that politicians are often so variable. We see it in Mordecai's patriotism. In the last
  • 62.
    paragraph of chapter2 we see Mordecai as a defender of the state, and then in the first paragraph of chapter 3 we him as a defier of the state. He first saved Xerxes life, and then he turns around and refuses to obey his orders of bowing to Haman, his highest representative. In the one place Mordecai is a conservative, and in the next he is a liberal. In the one he is a loyal citizen, and in the next he is a rebel. We need to study both sides of the patriotism of Mordecai, for the Bible and history make it clear that the Christian who cannot be paradoxical in his politics and patriotism will not be able to live a life of wisdom in relation to the state. The paradox is, inconsistency in relationship to man is the only way you can be consistent in your relationship to God. Let's focus first on the positive side. I. MORDECAI AS DEFENDER OF THE STATE. By defender, I mean Mordecai risked his life in order to a loyal citizen, and to maintain the order of the state by reporting the conspiracy to kill the king. Mordecai was a foreigner, and he could have had the attitude that this is not my country, so what do I care? The believer is one who knows God is the God of order, and unless the leaders of a state are so corrupt that a revolution is demanded, those leaders should be honored. Many Christians have, and do now, live under tyrants, and forms of government that we could not tolerate as Americans. They live with far less freedom than us, but they still love their country, and are patriotic. One of the reasons the Jews have been able to become leaders in nations all over the world is because they have practiced the principle of honoring and defending the state they are in. Paul in Rom. 13 lays this down as a principle for Christians in any state. "Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God..." They are to receive our respect
  • 63.
    and honor. Bypracticing this Christianity has been able to thrive under all sorts of governments. Mordecai was a great example of this principle, and thus a great asset to the Persian Empire. By becoming an informer he took a great risk for the sake of Xerxes, for informers tend to get their names added to the hit list. Vincent Teresa was the number 3 man in the New England Mafia. He had stolen 10 million for himself in crime, and 150 million for his bosses and confederates. When he turned informer, back in the early 70's, dozens of big times mobsters ended up in prison. It took the FBI's most brilliant minds working constantly just to keep him alive. Assassination squads were everywhere. Doctors, lawyers, and even policeman were paid by Mafia to get him. It may have not have been this hot for Mordecai, but had the assassins found out he was the informer, he would have been their first target. He took risks to be a defender of the state. He was a hero of the state, and he was later greatly rewarded for his loyalty. Patriotism played a major role in God's providence in his life, and all of Israel. Patriotism is a virtue, but we must see that it also has its limitations. When the state is exalted to the level of God, then defense of the state is idolatry. Patriotism can have many motives, and this is why it is only a relative, and not an absolute, virtue. Even the Mafia are patriotic towards America, for its freedoms make it the greatest place on earth for crime. Vincent Teresa closes his book, My Life In The Mafia, with this paragraph. Let me tell you something: I'm the proudest guy in the world to be an American. Before I went to jail I had plenty of chances to take off and go live in a villa on the Italian coast, but I wouldn't leave this country. I'd rather spend 20 years in the can in America than 20 years free in Italy. The reason is, I love this country,
  • 64.
    and that's theway it is with most mob guys. The mob will not stand for anything against this country. They'll rob from government arsenals and rob government stock and sell it; but if they could discover that anyone's trying to overthrow the country or anything like that, they'll fight him. Most mob guys that I know of vote. We vote whatever is the best way to make money. If its going to be one of these guys who is going to be on the reform kick all the time, we'll all band together and vote against him. There is a higher percentage of the Mafia who vote, then of born again Christians. So what I am saying is that patriotism is good, but not an absolute good. If not modified by a higher loyalty to God, it can become an evil. Thus, we turn to the other side of Mordecai and see- II. MORDECAI AS THE DEFIER OF THE STATE. Verse 2 of chapter 3 makes it clear that bowing to Haman was not a mere matter of courtesy, it was the law of the land, for the king had commanded it. Not to bow was an act of defiance against the state. Mordecai refused to bow. He had just risked his life for Xerxes, but now when there is no risk at all involved, he will not join the others and bow. What has happened to his patriotism as a loyal citizen? Mordecai seems to be inconsistent. After all, he let his daughter marry the king, so he is related to him, and yet he will not pay him the respect of bowing to his highest representative. The result of this stubborn refusal is that Haman becomes hateful, and determines the entire Jewish race will pay for this insubordination. Either Mordecai is a stubborn fool, or he is standing for a principle more precious than life itself. The only clue we have is in verse 4 where Mordecai's only defense for his action is
  • 65.
    that he wasa Jew. In other words, we are dealing here with an issue of religious liberty, or the multifaceted and complex issue of the separation of church and state. What Mordecai is saying is that as a Jew there is a limit as to how far he can go in conforming to the state. He could risk his life for the state, but he could not give up his religious liberty by bowing to Haman, for he would be giving to the state the allegiance he owed only to God. The issue here is really a matter of idolatry. Do we obey God or man? The whole thing would be sheer folly if it was a matter of personal pride. If Mordecai just didn't like Haman, his action would be disgraceful. He risks the lives of his people out of stubborn pride. If we see it as a battle for religious liberty, however, then we can see what has been a pattern of God's providence all through history. Mordecai had his priorities straight. God is number one, and the state can never be obeyed if it attempts to usurp that place in our lives. The defenders of the state must become defiers of the state when the state threatens to crush religious liberty. The state has a right to our loyalty as long as it recognizes its place in God's providence. When it begins to encroach on God's domain, then our loyalty to God demands that we defy the state. The state becomes Satanic when it demands of us allegiance due only to God. We must chose then either to deify the state, or defy the state. We know the issue of bowing to Haman was an attempt to deify the state, for we have the record of Herodotus the ancient historian. He tells us of others who came to Xerxes, and who refused to acknowledge him as god. He tells of the Lacedoemonians whom the guards forced to their knees before Xerxes, yet, they refused to bow their heads, for they said they had not come to Persia for the purpose of worshipping a man. Xerxes excused them from bowing, for he had respect for their religious liberty. Haman, you will note, never told Xerxes that his hatred of the Jews and Mordecai stemmed from Mordecai's refusal to bow to him. This was never reported to
  • 66.
    Xerxes at all,for if it had been, he would have nipped it in the bud right there, for he allowed for religious liberty. Haman is the culprit in the book of Esther, for his personal hatred, based on his desire to be treated like deity, is the cause for all the evil in the book. He plotted to get all the Jews killed so Xerxes would never even know why. What we are dealing with here is a corrupt politician in an otherwise reasonably just government. Haman had let power go to his head, and he will not tolerate being treated as secondary to God. He will get revenge on those who dare to put God first. The lesson of Esther is that the believer can never do anything other than defy those who presume to take God's place. The history of America revolves around this basic principle. A hundred years before the revolutionary war, king Charles II of England demanded that the Mass. colony relinquished its religious liberty, and let the Church of England control things, with only church members having the right to vote. The Puritans were enraged, and went into their pulpits preaching that they must defy the kings orders. Better that they die free than submit to such tyranny. The king heard of their rebellion, and ordered 5,000 troops to sail to Mass. to crush the rebellion. Increase Mather called for a day of prayer and fasting, and later they learned that king Charles had died on that very day of 1685. The result was the army never set sail. The Puritans were convinced that defiance to a state which threatens religious liberty is obedience to God. This principle became the foundation for the American Revolution. The result is we are a nation where the right to defy the government is guaranteed. If the state tries to interfere with our religious liberty, we can take the state to the supreme court, and fight for our rights. We have a Constitution which gives us a right to protest and demonstrate against our governments policies. Thank God for freedom that most of the world has never known.
  • 67.
    What we haveis based on the basic truth that man has the right to put God first, and to defy any authority that tries to take that first place in our lives. Most of us have never lived through a period where the state is deified, and demanded absolute allegiance. Hopefully we will never have to, but the Christians under Hitler had to. I never realized until recently that Hitler established his own church in Germany. It was called The German Church Of Positive Christianity. Its design was to counter-act all Christian opposition, and destroy Christianity. It was extremely effective, and won most of the youth of Germany. Julius Leuthenses wrote, "Adolf Hitler is own living witness of the present era, who confirms the good work of the eternal Divine Spirit in history, and who, through his activity, enables us to understand in a new way the teachings of Christ and His mission. Our watchword is not that Hitler is equal to Christ, but: Through Hitler to Jesus Christ." That is just the beginning. Soon the preaching of the cross was forbidden in church. The picture of Hitler was hung in front of all churches, and he was referred to in official statements as the way, the truth, and the light. All Germans were urged to die for him, and make their dying words heil Hitler. Hitler was so clever, only the devil himself could have been guiding him, for he completely revised Christianity, and made Nazism a perverted Christianity. He declared mount Hesselberg his sacred mountain, and Julius Streicher his high priest. Standing before the bonfire he said, "When we look into the flames of this holy fire, and throw our sins into them, we can descend from this mountain with clean souls. We do not need priests and ministers. We have become our own priests." Hitler actually became a god to millions of people who could not see their folly until it was to late. I share this because Hitler and
  • 68.
    Haman were twoof a kind. There pride, racial hatred, and abuse of power make them brothers of the pit. Both sought to wipe out the Jewish race. But there were Mordecai's in Hitler's day as well. They defied the state, and fought Hitler, and they made a difference. The tragic fact is, these Mordecai's were two few in number. The majority of Christians, both Catholic and Protestant, were deceived by Hitler's clever use of patriotism. The people were whipped into a religious frenzy of love and loyalty to the Fatherland. Hitler could do not wrong, and Germany could do no wrong. The Patriotic fervor so captivated Christians, that the voices of the church in opposition were muted. Hitler was free to do the works of Satan with little resistance. Millions of Christians cooperated in the killing of 6 million Jews. It is the story of history repeating itself over and over again, because of idolatry. God's people bowed down to a false god, and as always, the result is tragic judgment. Had there been more Mordecai's defying the state when it began to encroach on God's territory, the tragic and demonic history of Germany could have been avoided. Many Christian leaders are writing today of the danger of an American Civil Religion. It uses Christian terminology, just as Hitler did, but it is not Christian. It is a state religion that is designed to convince Christian people that everything the state does is the will of God. It is a powerful political tool. Because of the ever present danger of the state becoming a god, the Christian must be all the more conscious of the need to exalt the Lordship of Jesus. Nothing is Christian, no matter how good, or how American, which does not bow to Jesus Christ, and confess Him as Lord. Mordecai, as a Jew, would bow to none but Jehovah, and you and I, as Christians, can bow to none but Jesus. Because it is so, we must be ready to both defend and defy the state.
  • 69.
    8. COINCIDENCE ORPROVIDENCE? Based on Esther 6:1-11 Everyone experiences coincidence somewhere in life. Two people say the same thing at the same time. You go to call someone and the phone rings, and it is the person you were going to call. You flip open the hymnal, and it opens right to the number you were looking for. On and on we could go until we listed one you have experienced, for coincidence is common to all. But sometimes coincidence rises to a level that is more amazing. Such is the case with the death of my father. The coincidence is in relation to Lavonne's father. It is not very likely there are many mates in the world who had fathers with the same name of Charles, who lived in the same town, worked in the same meat packing plant, lived in the same house where they both died, only a few feet apart, although ten years apart, both in the night in similar ways, and both were buried in the same cemetery, on the opposite side of town from where they died. Lest you puzzle over why they both died in the same place, let me explain. My parents bought Lavonne's parents trailer home after her father died. You have to admit this is an unusual series of coincidences. It is rather amazing to me just because it is so highly unlikely, but as far as I know, it has no significance whatever. I share it for that very reason, to illustrate that coincidence, however amazing, and contrary to the odds, may be no more than just a matter of chance. Nothing would be affected in anyone's life, that we are aware of, if our fathers had not lived and died with these coincidences. I see no value or loss in what happened. It just happened to work out that way. Coincidence, therefore, does not necessarily have meaning. But
  • 70.
    what if coincidencedoes have meaning? Then we rise to the level where coincidence becomes providence. Providence is coincidence with a purpose-God's purpose. It is no longer a mere matter of chance, but is the fulfilling of God's plan in history. This too can be illustrated by what took place when my father died. I had no intention of going to Sioux Falls, South Dakota. I had already written my parents and told them we would not be coming. Dad was failing fast, however, and we did not know if he could hold out much longer. Lavonne told this Jan Toy, and Jan shared with Steve, and Steve talked to the deacons. He then called me and urged me to take a few days off to go see my father. I called home that night and mom said it would be appreciated if I would come home for a few days. We went, and found dad in terrible shape. He had aged 20 years in the months since I had last seen him. We talked off and on through the day, and he listened to one of my sermons on heaven that I had on tape. That night my older brother and I visited with him. He was more alert than he had been for sometime. In the morning mom called saying, "I think he is gone." I leaped out of bed and ran into dad's room, and saw at a glance that he was dead. I told mom to call his doctor. While she was gone I pushed his eyelids closed. I was surprised he had gone so fast, yet I was calm, for I had prayed before going to sleep, "Lord if he cannot get well, take him home." I was only repeating the prayer he had prayed himself a few hours earlier. Lavonne and I were there to take mom to the funeral home, and make all the arrangements, and then to the cemetery to finish arrangements. Then we went back home to spend the day contacting relatives all over the country. Had we not been there when we were, we would have missed the chance to be with dad on his last day, and mom would have been alone. Neither my brother nor my sister could have helped her that day. It was perfect timing that we had made it.
  • 71.
    What a coincidencethat the church would give me time off just when it was most needed. Nobody could know it was the best time, but God did, and so we see a coincidence with a purpose, and we consider this the providence of God. God was working in minds, events, and timing to accomplish a blessing in the lives of His people. The blessings were so marvelous that none of us really started the grief process until sometime later. The point of this long introduction is to make clear that there is a distinction between coincidence and providence. Coincidence is a matter of chance, and it makes no real difference in life, one way or the other. It may be amazing, but if it never happened, no one would be hurt. If I had never gotten called by someone I was going to call, or had never flipped open the hymnal to the exact page, it would not have made any difference. Providence, on the other hand has clear purpose and meaning. You can see the hand of God in it, and you cannot help but thank and praise Him for His guidance. Esther is a book that has one coincidence after another. Because each of them is so vital to the survival of the Jews, and to their victory over their enemies, it is a book that specializes in the providence of God. No where in the Bible will you find the providence of God more conspicuous then in this book, where God is never mentioned. Vashti, the Queen of Persia, rebels against her husband and loses her throne, so that the Jews can have a Jewish Queen on the throne, just when she was needed for their deliverance. What a coincidence! The keeper of the harem favored Esther, and he helped her, out of a host of beautiful girls, to so please the king, that she was selected as the Queen. What a break! Mordecai overheard two men plot to assassinate the king, and by reporting it he saved the kings life. Now we come to chapter 6, and the whole story revolves around an amazing coincidence. The king
  • 72.
    could not sleepone night, and it happened to be the same night in which Haman, the Jew hater, was plotting to destroy Mordecai. What a marvelous coincidence that the king would call for the book of memorable deeds to be read to him that night, and that the forgotten deed of Mordecai would be read to him just minutes before Haman came to request that Mordecai be hung. If this coincidence had not take place, the whole story would have been tragedy rather than comedy, and the Jews would have been destroyed. Mordecai will be hung, or be a hero, and it all depended upon the coincidence of the kings being read this particular page in the record book he turned to. The destiny of God's people swings on the hinge of coincidence, but coincidence with such purpose and importance that we see clearly the providence of God. It is the hand of God in history directing the timing of events so as to determine the course of history. There is no miracle here at all. Everything is perfectly normal and natural. The king can not sleep, and so he calls for records to be read. He may have done this three times a week for 20 years. There is nothing marvelous about it. But this night the coincidence of reading about Mordecai's noble deed of saving his life, just before Haman came to request his death, changed the course of history. The coincidences of the book of Esther are not amazing or startling in themselves. They are rather trivial even, but the purpose they fulfill shows them to be the providence of God. We need to be alerted to the providence of God in our lives by evaluating coincidence. Because we take coincidence for granted, we likely miss much of the evidence of God's leading in our lives. In other words, we do not sense that everyday the trivial events, contacts, and turn of events could be the providence of God. Katherine Marshall tells of her experience after the death of Peter Marshall. She was going to write the story of her famous husband's life. But did not know how to get information on Peter's step-father.
  • 73.
    She had exhaustedall possible sources of information, she thought. Then one night, an English couple she had met invited her to dinner. In the course of the evening she felt and urge to tell them about her need. She could have suppressed that urge, considering it to be inappropriate, but she went ahead and shared. The man interrupted her as she told of her need, and said, "Certainly you couldn't be speaking of Peter Findlay?" "Yes," she said, "Why?" The atmosphere was electrified. The man responded, "I worked beside him for years in the same office at Stewarts and Lloyds in Glasgow. I knew him well. What do you want to know?" Katherine Marshall had just experienced coincidence with a purpose, and thus, in the providence of God, she received what she needed. There were 800 thousand people in the District of Colombia, and only one of them knew anything about Peter Findlay, and he was the one who invited her to dinner. That experience of providence gave Katherine the courage she needed to go on to become one of the greatest Christian authors of the 20th century. By this event of providence, she heard God saying to her, "I'm in this with you." God may be seeking to guide us, and answer our prayers, by means of purposeful coincidence. We need to be aware of this, and learn to be more sensitive to this kind of leading in our lives. It may be happening more than we realize, and we miss it, or because we do not recognize it as the way God works, we fail to experience what God has for us in His providence. I am not saying that God will remove all of our problems if we are more sensitive to His providence. I do not see any such promise in the Bible. But God will work in all things for good with those who love Him, and are called according to His purpose. This simply means we need to be on the lookout for the purpose in coincidence, for this is one of the common ways in which God brings good out of all sorts of situations.
  • 74.
    If a coincidencehas no particular value, or purpose, then it is coincidence, and that it that. It is a matter of chance events. By chance events I mean, those things that happen that are not directed by God's purpose, but are the result of the laws of nature He has created. Because He created these laws, He is, in a sense, the author of all that happens. But when he just allows the laws to function, and does not enter into them to interfere for a specific purpose, you do not call that providence. For example, I worked for 4 years at a printing company. My job included the laying out of paper for the paper cutter. I would lay out tons of paper on any one day, and over the years filled out thousands of orders. Every once in while I would go the shelves of stock with an order. The order would call for 325 sheets of blue 20 lb. paper 18 by 34. I would start counting the sheets in an open package, and to my surprise, I would end up with exactly 325 sheets-just what I needed. It was always a surprise, because it was a rare coincidence, but it did happen, and I was impressed with how often the unlikely could happen by chance. What I was experiencing was coincidence. It had no meaning or purpose. It would happen to anyone who spent hours everyday counting out paper. It was a mere matter of chance. The only way it could be of value would be if it happened every time, and made you the best paper counter in the world, because you would not need to count at all, knowing the package had just what you needed. If a coincidence does not serve any meaningful purpose, it cannot be considered providential. Paul Aurandt in The Rest Of The Story tells of a marvelous coincidence in the filming of the Wizard of Oz. Frank Morgan played the wizard, and Professor Marvel, the traveling sideshow man that Dorothy met. MGM'S wardrobe department was notified that they needed a coat for Professor Marvel. It had to reflect a sort of shabby gentility, a grandeur gone to seed. The staff went to second hand shops in Los Angeles, and they came back with 50
  • 75.
    coats. The directorand Frank met to select one. The one they decided on was a Prince Albert coat, with a velvet collar. It was worn, but spoke of former elegance. One day, as the Professor Marvel scenes were being shot, Frank Morgan pulled out the pocket of his coat, and he noticed the name of the original owner. It was such a surprise, the MGM executives wired the tailor in Chicago to confirm what they had discovered. It was confirmed-the coat they had selected was originally made for the man who wrote the book-The Wizard Of Oz. It is an amazing story, it is so highly unlikely that you feel almost compelled to see forces beyond man involved. But because it has no significance or meaning, that is recorded, it is not likely it was providential. It made no difference, for had it not been his coat it would have served the same purpose. No purpose was achieved by this amazing coincidence, and without purpose it is not providential. Why is it important to make the distinction between coincidence and providence? Because, if you don't, you end up with a superficial theology that loses all sense of balance, and makes God responsible for much that is evil and folly. Just as an example: If God is responsible for all coincidence, then God is the key supporter of the gambling establishments of the world, and thus, the great benefactor of the Mafia, and other underworld organizations. Every time a slot machine comes up with three of a kind, that is a coincidence. Every time the roulette wheel stops where you have your money placed, that is a coincidence. If God intervened in this system of chance, the entire world of gambling could be eliminated in one day, for enough of these coincidence would destroy gambling. Christians could own Las Vegas in a week if God worked providentially in gambling. God does not do so, however, for it is not His plan to prevent men having a free choice to be foolish. Man is free to choose to gamble, and God will not interfere with that choice.
  • 76.
    The point is,gambling is a world of coincidence, and not a world of providence. This is not to say, God never works providentially in this realm, but in general it is a world system guided by the laws of chance, and is not a God guided system. If it was, and all coincidence was of God, then the Christian would have an obligation to both gamble and promote it, as a way of achieving God's purpose in history. Coincidence can be good, evil, or indifferent. Providence is always good, for it is for the fulfilling of God's purpose. Coincidence can be very negative. Two cars meet at the same time at the intersection, and life is taken. Millions of coincidences happen in which wrong timing leads to evil and death. In Esther we see Haman being the victim of God's judgment through His good providence to Mordecai. In other words, for Mordecai to be spared, and all the Jews to be saved, the enemies of the Jews had to be destroyed. So there can be a negative side to providence as well. Haman was hung because of the providential guidance of God in protecting Mordecai. If you can show that tragedy to someone is the key to the survival of someone else in God's will, you can see providence is good, even in negative results. Most accidents, however, do not fall into this category, but are in the category of coincidence which is determined by chance, and not by God. God still works in all things for good, and can bring values out of life's negatives, but the negative is not necessarily a part of His plan. If I chose to be a fool, and gamble away a thousand dollars, my loss and depression may lead me to change my life in a very positive way. This does not mean that God's plan was for me to be a fool and gamble. It just means that His providence never ceases to seek ways of bringing good out of evil. The evil, however, is not part of His plan. The entire issue of prayer is based on the distinction between
  • 77.
    coincidence and providence.If all that happens in life is God's plan, then, of course, prayer is meaningless, and we just as well sing, whatever will be will be, and forget it. If, however, we live in a world where there is a combination of natural law, and wills that determine what happens, then prayer makes sense. What we are doing in prayer is asking that God exercise His will, and guide events to accomplish His purpose. Prayer is saying to God, "I know you can make a difference in the events of life, and I want to cooperate in seeing those differences made that fulfill your will for me." Why pray, "Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven," if it will be done regardless? The point is, it won't be done unless we cooperate with God's providential guidance. With this attitude in mind, you can face every day as an adventure in which all that you do, and all that you say, can make a difference in your own destiny, and the destiny of others. Even trivial decisions can take you down a path to values you might have otherwise have missed. God's method of guiding is not usually by miracle, but by providence, as we see all through the book of Esther. The Jewish race was saved in Esther by the providential timing of trivial events. It is the most common way that God has for protecting His people from tragedy yet today. Let me close with an illustration of how God once providentially answered the oft repeated prayer, "God save the Queen." Queen Victoria was on the express train racing through the night to London. Suddenly the engineer saw a strange sight in the engine's headlight. A weird figure in a black cloak waving its arms caused the engineer to grab for the brakes, and bring the train to a grinding halt. He and his partner jumped out to see what it was. They walked down the track, and stared in horror, for they saw a bridge washed out, and toppled into the swollen stream. All would have been killed had they not stopped. But they could not find the one who warned them. The engineer climbed back into his cab and
  • 78.
    switched on thelamp. At the base was a huge dead moth. He held it up to the lamp, and it cast a shadow which explained what they saw. The Queen was told, and she said, "I'm sure it was no accident. It was God's way of protecting us." It was clearly an amazing coincidence, that was also the providence of God. 9. THE HUMOR OF HISTORY Based on Esther 9:20-28 It was one of the greatest celebrations in the history of the American people. The bells rang in Independence Hall in Philadelphia. There was a hundred gun salute in City Hall Park of New York. In Chicago there was a volunteer possession of people seven miles long. In California they celebrated for two days. This happened in May of 1869. It was when the railroad from Omaha and the railroad from Sacramento met at Promontory Point, Utah. The last spike of California gold was driven by Governor Leland Standford. Two locomotives drew up close to each other, and the news was sent by telegraph all over the country. People rejoiced and celebrated because the United States was now, by means of the railroad, really united. Carl VanDoren writes, "This was probably the most important and most exciting non-military ceremony in the whole history of the American people." It thrilled a whole nation then, but today you would find it hard to find an American who even knows it happened. Those few historians who do know certainly do not throw a party to celebrate it. Some great events in history do not live on to capture the minds and hearts of all future generations. But, on the other hand, some events live on perpetually, and even grow in their intensity with time. Such is the case with the event called Purim. It means next to
  • 79.
    nothing to usas Gentiles, but to the Jews it means a great deal. A study of this Jewish holiday and feast will help us understand the book of Esther, and the purpose for it being in the Bible. One of the greatest paradoxes of history is that the Jews, who have suffered so incredibly, have also been the source of incredible laughter. Tevye, the Jewish father in Fiddler On The Roof, was a funny man in a very unfunny and tragic situation. This has always been the case with Jews who love the book of Esther, and keep the feast of Purim. Purim, says Herman Wach, the Jewish author, is the nearest thing in Judaism to a carnival. It is a time of riotous rejoicing. In some places it has made a street festival just like the Mardi Gras. It is the one day in the year when disordered hilarity is permitted in the synagogue. Reverence and restraint are virtues all year long, but not on this day. They are cast to the wind, and what would be outrageous any other time is permitted on this day. Children are given noise makers of all kinds, and they take them into the synagogue. All is silent as the first two chapters of the book of Esther are read. Then the reader comes to chapter three where he reads the name of Hamen the Agagite, and this triggers off a hurricane of racket. Everyone stomps their feet, and the children make a staggering contribution to the noise with their noise makers. Eventually the dim dies down and the reader continues, but when he comes to the name of Hamen again, all bedlam breaks loose. Since Hamen is named often in the book of Esther, the amount of noise is both frequent and enormous. This celebration has been going on for well over two thousand years among Jews all over the world. It is Christmas, Thanksgiving, Easter, the Fourth of July, and Halloween all rolled into one great two day celebration. Jewish schools have all sorts of plays, skits, and music, to reenact the drama of Esther. Is the day of all kinds of
  • 80.
    silliness, jokes, andlaughter. Men and youth dress up like clowns and play tricks, and tell jokes. Children wear masks and go from house to house. Gifts are exchanged, and all are required to share with the poor so that it is a fun day for all, no matter what their economic condition. Now you must certainly wonder why all of this hilarity, frivolity, and laughter? What makes Purim so different from all other feasts of Judaism? The answer is the profound Jewish conviction that the drama of history is a comedy and not a tragedy. This is not to say life is not full of tragic events, but rather, that when history is over, God will have the last laugh, and there will be a happy ending for all who are a part of the family of God. This is a basic Biblical philosophy of life, and it explains how the Jews can be so optimistic through all of their trials. It also explains why Christians have even a greater hope because of the greater revelation we have of ultimate victory in Christ. Purim is a holiday which proclaims the humor of history. In a very real sense the book of Esther is a joke book. It is based on the same theme that makes millions of people laugh every day as they watch cartoons. Evil plots are made to capture, injure, or destroy the innocent, but they always backfire and injure the one who planned them instead. That is the basic theme repeated in multitudes of cartoons, and that it the theme of Esther. Hamen, the powerful Jew hater, so despised Mordecai that he plots not only to destroy him, but all of the Jews. He is so clever, as evil men often are, that it looks like he has a fool proof scheme to annihilate them. By surprising providential events, however, a Jewish woman becomes the Queen, and by her superior cleverness Hamen the bigot ends up swinging from the very gallows he built to hand Mordecai. Mordecai then gets Hamens job as the leading official in the Persian government. All of the Jews of the world are not only spared,
  • 81.
    they end upwith greater power and influence than they ever would have had if wicked Hamen had not hated them so. It is another great Biblical story of good out of evil, and that is why Esther and Mordecai wrote letters to all of the Jews, and established the feast of Purim, and ordered that it be a perpetual holiday for all of history. Just as Jesus established the Lord's supper as a perpetual remembrance of His death, that Christians might never forget the source of their salvation, so the feast of Purim is established that God's people might never forget that for them history is a comedy. No matter how dark or miserable it gets, it will have a happy ending. No matter how much you are forced to weep, tears will not endure, for the story will end with laughter. Will there be laughter in heaven? Just as certainly as there will be weeping in hell. Christopher Fry wrote an article in Vogue back in 1951 in which he describes the dream a friend shared with him. He dreamed of a great book with a tragic page and then a comic page. He turned them with excitement to determine which the last page would be, for this would reveal if the meaning of life was to be tragic or comic. The final page contained 100 words and they were uproariously funny. He awoke laughing. This is the message of Esther and Job, and the book of Revelation. Comedy and humor are not an escape from reality, but, rather, an escape into ultimate reality and the Kingdom of faith. There is salvation in a sense of humor. We are not talking about saving faith in the sense of being granted eternal life. Faith in Jesus Christ alone is the only faith that saves like that. A sense of humor will not save anyone in this sense, but it will, and has saved millions from the valley of pessimism and discouragement. Carl Kassulke, the Minnesota Viking star football player, who was paralyzed by a motor cycle accident, told of his experience in the University of Minnesota hospital. He was always up to some
  • 82.
    prank, but onenight he threw a water balloon at one of his roommates in the middle of the night. The bed was drenched, and the roommate returned the attack. A near riot broke loose as half the floor was awakened. It was the greatest water fight he ever had, and they were all crippled. He writes, "In view of how easy it was to become depressed about our future- and there were moments of awful despair-we really needed some silliness in our lives." Therapy was not enough. They needed the therapy of laughter and humor to endure the battle. Suffering is serious business, but if you take it too serious you become a frowning skeptic and a scowling cynic. Even suffering must be faced with a sense of humor to allow the healing of God to take place. Bob Hope, and dozens of other comedians have traveled millions of miles to bring laughter to men in the armed forces who faced death constantly. This seems like a strange paradox. Those in the gravest danger laughing at silly jokes. Is this a sign of man's depravity to be filled with laughter in the face of man's greatest enemy? No! It is not. It is, in fact, just the opposite. It is a sign of mans being made in the image of God. It is proof that that image, however marred by the fall, was not demolished, but continues to shine even in fallen mankind. A sense of humor in this war-torn, sin-scared world is a testimony to the great Biblical truth that laughter will last forever when all tears are wiped away. If people are funny, it is because God is the author of humor, and he has built humor into history so that we might see His smile and hear His laughter even where He is not even mentioned. Esther is notorious for having no reference to God whatever. As we study the book we will see that this is part of the fun of it all. It is like Walt Disney's invisible man who can do all sorts of amazing things without anyone seeing him. It becomes all the more hilarious because he is apparently not there.
  • 83.
    Esther seems likea totally secular story. There is nothing religious about it. There is no worship, no prayer, and no reference to God, Scripture, or preaching. If fasting was not in the book, there would not be the slightest hint of anything religious. The funny thing about it is-God is more active in this book then where He is often mentioned. It is one of the most spiritual of all the books of the Bible. And what makes it so unique is, it is fun to study it because it is filled with humor-the humor of God's providence in history. It is God's joke book revealing His sense of humor. Judaism is an earthly religion, and so God's Old Testament revelation of the humor of history ends with an earthly victory, and an earthly feast with joy and laugher. In the New Testament Jesus brings life and immortality to light through the Gospel, and so we as Christians look at this same truth on a far higher level. We focus on the great marriage supper of the Lamb as our goal, and basis for optimism. Let us not forget, however, that we, like the Jews, still need to live in time. Therefore, we still need to grasp the practical and positive philosophy of life God gave us through the book of Esther. The spirit of optimism was in Israel long before Esther, for it goes with faith. Everyone looked at Goliath and said, he is so big I can't mess with him. But David said, he is so big I can't miss him. By faith in God the weak challenge the strong and they win, and the heart is filled with laughter. Christians can be a part of the problem instead of part of the solution if they fail to develop a proper sense of humor. This is what happened to the Pharisees in the time of Christ. They were godly and sincerely religious people. They were not a part of the answer, however, but a part of the problem, because they lacked a sense of humor. They took themselves too seriously. This type of person always becomes a legalist. Every T must be crossed just so. Every i must be dotted just so. They make religion a burden rather than a blessing like Jesus did. Jesus had fun in living, and He was being
  • 84.
    supremely religious andspiritual all the time. Jesus said His disciples did not fast because life with Him was like a wedding reception where fasting was not appropriate. It was a fun-filled life of service with singing and rejoicing, and feasting was appropriate because so many people were being saved, healed, encouraged and enriched. The Pharisees did not like all of this light-heartiness connected with religion. They saw some rules being broken. Never mind that the man or woman who had been a cripple or blind for life is now praising God with hilarious joy. The real issue for them was, are these things appropriate on the Sabbath? No sense of humor and no spirit of joy that responds with laughter when evil is overcome and outwitted by the forces of good ever characterized the Pharisees. All they cared about was being serious about every technicality of the law. If you study history you will discover this pattern repeating itself over and over again. When people cease to laugh, and take everything too seriously, they do not develop true faith, but instead, they destroy it. The Quamram community left us the Dead Sea Scrolls. They withdrew from life and became super-serious legalist. Laughter and fun were banished. It is no wonder they became a dead end, and ceased to exist as a channel God could use in history. Christians have tried this same route and failed equally. The monasteries became places of fanatical legalism where life was 100% serious and solemn. Laughter was not only secular it was sinful. If God had not raised up such fun-loving saints as Francis of Assissi, there would have been little of value to come out of the millions of miserable man hours spent in mindless obedience to man made rituals. Any time you see a man or movement taking itself so serious it cannot laugh at itself, you can be assured it has lost a key to balance, and will likely go to an extreme, and cease to be an effective tool for
  • 85.
    God. As ateen-ager I use to love to listen to that great Catholic preacher on TV-Fulton J. Sheen. He was easy for me to listen to because he was humorous. He was convinced Jesus came into this world to teach men about the divine sense of humor. H e wrote these words about Jesus- "Everything He said, everything He did, could be summed up in these words: Nothing in this world is to be taken seriously, nothing except the salvation of the soul. What shall it profit a man if he gained the whole world and lose his own soul." The Pharisees took everything to seriously, and the result was, they made religious faith about as much fun as a one sided teeter totter. The balance life will have ups and downs, for both sorrow and joy are real and legitimate. The Pharisees lacked balance and stressed only one side of the reality of life. Kierkegaard, the great Danish theologian said that Christianity has the most humorous view of life. Wise are those who see this and make sure that humor plays a major role in their Christian life. The cross was Satan's plot to destroy the Son of God. By it he hoped to eliminate the plan of God to save man. This diabolic scheme backfired and became instead the door to its fulfillment, and the cause of his final defeat. The cross is a symbol of joy and rejoicing because it is a symbol of the victory of good over evil. It is the ultimate symbol of the humor of history. If you saw a cartoon where huge tanks were sent out to do battle with a rabbit, and you saw them coming back defeated, you would laugh, for it would be ridiculous. The Bible is full of this humor. It is not only in Esther, but in the New Testament where the combined powers of Rome and Judaism came together to keep a dead man in the tomb. The huge rock is sealed, the Roman guards are in place, and yet the story ends with a dead man escaping. The resurrection is God's delightful sense of humor at its greatest. It reveals that history, for the believer is a comedy-a story with a happy ending.
  • 86.
    Dante called hisgreatest work The Divine Comedy because he had a Biblical view of history, and he knew when God wrapped it all up it would have a happy ending. The message of the Bible is clear-never give up, hang in there however rough the battle, for the victory is certain, and in Christ we will always have the last laugh. Eugene O'Neill captured this theme in his play Lazarus Laughed. After His resurrection from the dead Lazarus says, "I heard the heart of Jesus laughing in my heart-and I laughed in the laughter of God." He had lost all fear of death, and the play ends with Lazarus being threatened by the authorities, but he does not deny his Lord, but instead, he dies a martyrs death, laughing. That is the way all of God's children could die if they were fully aware of the humor of history. 10. PROVIDENCE IN AMERICAN HISTORY Esther 10:1-3 Great leaders are often providentially preserved from what ought to have been certain death. This happens before they rise to a level where they are a blessing to many people. In the history of the Jews, Mordecai is one of these leaders. He came within minutes of being hung on a gallows, and instead, became a powerful leader for the good of his people.You can go to Iran yet today, and in Hamadan, North East of Baghdad, you will find the tomb of Esther and Mordecai. Their dark hardwood coffins stand side by side, and the Hebrew inscription craved along the upper edge is Esther 10:3. God's providential protection of Mordecai changed the course of history, and the Jews have celebrated the event every year since, on the holiday called Purim.
  • 87.
    The fourth ofJuly brings us to the place where we see history repeating itself. We celebrate this day for the same reason the Jews celebrate Purim. It is a day of celebration for America, because God just as clearly delivered our nation as He did the nation of Israel. It was a matter of providence, just as sure as that we see in the book of Esther. As we look at it, we soon see why it is that history repeats itself. It is because God just loves to repeat a good story, and the stories of the weak conquering the strong, and the simple outwitting the wise, are His favorites. George Washington, the father of our country, was one of the most godly leaders in history, and God's providence in his life has blessed all Americans, just as that in Mordecai's life has blessed all Jews. We can't begin to share them all, but let me give you a taste. In the battle of Monongahela, Washington was a young officer in the Virginia Militia. In that battle this 23 year old officer had two horses shot out from under him, and 4 musket balls passed through his coat. The Indians, who were expert marksmen, were so impressed with his survival that the chief prophesied he would be a famous leader, for the Great Spirit protected him. The chief shared that with Washington himself years later. Washington was not surprised, for he sensed the hand of God on him also. He wrote to his brother after the battle, "Death was leveling my companions on every side of me, but by the all-powerful disposition of providence, I have been protected." It was no accident that Washington with his weak, untrained, and outnumbered frontier farmers whipped the strong, and well trained British soldiers. They were the best army in the world of that day. It is the most common story of God's providence. It is David and Goliath all over again. It is Mordecai and Haman again. Haman is the next most powerful man next to the king. He had almost absolute power. If he abused it, no questions were asked. He could do as he pleased. Mordecai, on the other hand, was a Jew, and had no power
  • 88.
    at all, incomparison. It was like the 13 colonies challenging the mighty power of England. They didn't have a chance. But the beauty of history is that it is not left to chance. God steps in, time and time again, and the little guy wins. By the providence of God, David won over Goliath, and went on to become king of Israel. By the providence of God Mordecai won over Haman, and went on to become a key leader in Persia. By the providence of God Washington led the 13 colonies to victory over the British, and went on to become the 1st president of the United States. It is not coincidence that the pattern keeps repeating itself in history. It is providence, because it is the way God loves to work, so we can see His hand in history. Let me share another parallel between the providence in Mordecai's life, and that in the life of Washington. Mordecai's life was spared because of some obscure servant opening the book of records to the account of his saving the kings life. God has used books to change the course of history for millions of people and many nations. We see it in Washington's life as well. The British had held Boston for a year and a half. They were secure there, with British ships in the harbor. They were ready to blow anyone off the map who dared to come near. Washington, on the hillside over looking Boston, knew he did not dare to even fire a shot. Washington went with his officers to try and figure out a way to retake this key city. It seemed hopeless, and no idea stood a chance of succeeding. That night, Rufus Putnam, a young amateur engineer, was passing by General Willis Heath's quarters, and decided to pay him a visit. While there he saw a book on the general's shelf on field engineering. That discovery was a trivial thing, but it changed the course of history. In that book Putnam found plans designed by the French for a defensive weapon that would eliminate the threat of the British cannons. It was a large wood frame filled with hundreds of
  • 89.
    bundles of tightlybound sticks and dirt. He ran to share this discovery with Washington. He saw the value of it immediately, and commanded 800 men to work through the night constructing them. At dawn, the British were stunned by what they saw. When the cannon balls hit these barricades they bounced back doing no damage whatever. The Americans in one night neutralized the enemies key weapon. Now the Americans had the advantage, and so the British pulled out of Boston. Washington marched in taking the city without the loss of a single life. Was that stumbling across an idea in a book a mere accident, or was it the providence of God? Those who were there praised God. If there is one word that stands out more than any other, when you read the history of the Revolutionary War, it is the word providence. It was in the vocabulary of nearly all who wrote of it. When Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson drew up the draft of the Declaration of Independence, the congress insisted that these words be added. "And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the Protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our Sacred Honor!" Those men who signed the Declaration risked everything to do so. Many of them paid the price, and it was everything. That is why the first vote was only 9 of the 13 colonies in favor. The debate was hot and furious, and good men differed greatly on their views of what was wise and right. They needed a unanimous decision, and so the debate went on. There were many parallels with the conflict we see in Esther. Haman hated Mordecai and his religion. Britain hated the Americans for their religious liberty, and for starting so many churches not loyal to the Church of England. British troops turned many of the churches into barns for their horses, or bars and grog shops. The pews and pulpits were burned. More than 50 churches were totally destroyed, and many others damaged severely. The spiritual conflict played a major role, and
  • 90.
    those Americans whobelieved in religious liberty were the ones who finally persuaded the others that the Declaration of Independence had to be passed. God worked in other providential ways, and when the next vote was cast, it was 12 for and 1 abstaining. It was unanimous, and the U. S. was born. The people of the colonies celebrated just like the Jews celebrated Purim for their deliverance. The Americans will celebrate the 4th of July until Christ comes again, just as the Jews will celebrate Purim, for they both stand for the providence of God in history. John Adams, who fought for the Declaration, and later became president of the U.S., wrote to his wife after it passed, and in that letter he said of that day, "It ought to be commemorated, as the Day of Deliverance, by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shows, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires, and illuminations, from one end of this continent to the other, from this time forward and forevermore." That sounds just like the words of Mordecai in chapter 9, where Purim is to be celebrated by all Jews of all time forevermore. As Americans we have experienced the providence of God just as the Jews did in Esther. And as Baptists, we have experienced a double dose. Few Baptists realize it, but in the thirty year period from 1770 to 1800, when all the great events of the American Revolution took place, the Baptists grew like wildfire. In that short time they went from a place of relative obscurity to become the largest denomination in America. Other churches were dying, and in a state of decline, but when the Revolution was over the Baptists had twice the number of people as the next largest denomination. In a very real sense, the birth of our nation, and the birth of the Baptist denomination went hand in hand, and this too was clearly providential.
  • 91.
    The Baptists hadonly a handful of churches in the 13 colonies in 1740. How did they grow so fast? It was because Baptists were democratic in their form of church government. The very principles that were driving the colonies to seek independence from the oppressive authority of England were already seeing in operation in the Baptist church. Most all other churches were run from the top down. The people did not have the freedom to decide. Many were still run by the state church in England, and others by a powerful higher hierarchy. The Baptists alone were free and democratic. As American people felt the need for freedom from political oppression, they felt it also in the realm of religious oppression. New leadership in the Baptist churches were sick and tired of mere survival within the Puritan system. The Puritans did not allow for religious liberty, but the Baptists became bold and aggressive, and were determined that America would be the land of the free, where people could worship with complete religious liberty. Issac Backus, the Baptist leader in New England, began to write tract after tract dealing with the folly of mixing the church and state. People came to America to escape that sort of thing in England and Europe. They came here to get away from a state controlled church. He insisted that the state should have no control over the church. The cry for religious liberty within the colonies became the cause of Baptists. The Baptists were the most consistent people in their longing for liberty, for they wanted it, not only from England, but from the oppression in New England. Baptists were taxed in the colonies to support the Puritan churches. They were experiencing taxation without representation right here. The Baptists, therefore, had a war going on two fronts. They fought for civil liberty from England, and religious liberty within the colonies. Roger Williams was the founder of the first Baptist church in America. He didn't seem to have a chance. The law was against him, and the church was against him, and the political leaders were
  • 92.
    against him. Itwas the most spectacular trial in American history to that point, when he was taken to court because of his fight for religious liberty. He was found guilty and sentenced to banishment. Americans were not yet ready for such radical liberty, and they wanted this man out of the country. Fourteen men were hired to surprise him in the night, and drag him to a ship where he would be carried into exile. Governor Winthrop, who was his secret friend sent him a warning. He kissed his wife and new born baby, and fled into a blinding snow storm. For weeks he survived without bread or any weapon. He ate roots and nuts, and was finally rescued by friendly Indians. It was only by the providence of God that his life was spared, and that is why when he established a permanent home he called it Providence, Rhode Island. It was the first place on earth where there was total religious freedom, and separation of church and state. He founded the first Baptist church of America there in 1639. His marble statue stands in the Hall of Fame in the Capital building in Washington D.C. More biographies of Roger Williams have been written than of any other American next to Benjamin Franklin. What he did laid a foundation for religious liberty for the rest of our history. The Baptist church had a spirit of liberty, which gave it a built in appeal for an nation ready to fight for liberty. Baptists were so clearly in tune with the temper of the times that people began to regard the Baptists as the truly American church. The result was, people flocked to the church of liberty, and the Baptists came through the Revolution, the largest denomination in this new nation of liberty. Ever since the Baptists have played a major role in the history of our land. Samuel Francis Smith, a Baptist pastor, wrote one of our finest patriotic hymns: My County Tis Of Thee. Francis Bellamy, another Baptist pastor, wrote The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. Mark Watkinson, still another Baptist pastor,
  • 93.
    inspired the Secretaryof the Treasury in 1861 to get congress to approve putting, "In God We Trust," on U. S. coins. Baptists played a key role in getting the Bill of Rights into the Constitution, and have been the major force in maintaining the separation of church and state. The point of all this history is to illustrate that we celebrate the 4th of July for the same reason the Jews celebrate Purim. It is a day to look back and see the providence of God in our history. It is a day to recognize that we are a blessed people, because God does put His hand into history and give victory to those who honor Him. It is great to be an American, but greater yet to be a Christian of any land, for the greatest liberty of all is to be set free from the power and penalty of sin. All other freedoms are of little worth without freedom in Christ. "If the Son shall set you free, you shall be free indeed."