The document is a court order regarding the bail application of Swaroop Ram, who has been accused of sedition and forgery. The defense argues that Ram has been falsely implicated and at most a bailable offense is made out. The prosecution argues that serious allegations have been made. The court examines each charge and finds that the offense of forgery is not made out. It also finds that while spreading rumors may be made out, sedition is debatable. Considering the nature of allegations, parity with a co-accused granted bail, and time in custody, the court grants bail to Ram subject to conditions.
Lawweb.in whether application for anticipatory bail can be rejected on the gr...Law Web
Whether application for anticipatory bail can be rejected on the ground that offence was not registered against accused? - See more at: http://www.lawweb.in/2016/04/whether-application-for-anticipatory.html#sthash.VdpyQABj.dpuf
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is the procedural law providing the machinery for punishment of offenders under substantive criminal law.
The code contains elaborate details about the procedure to be followed in every investigation, inquiry and trial, for every offence under the IPC or any other law.
ADMISSIBILITY OF BAD CHARACTER LAW IN UNITED KINGDOMASMAH CHE WAN
It is a study about bad character law in UK, the history, development and current position.
at first the bad character is not admissible, but how by time it becomes admissible.
Lawweb.in whether application for anticipatory bail can be rejected on the gr...Law Web
Whether application for anticipatory bail can be rejected on the ground that offence was not registered against accused? - See more at: http://www.lawweb.in/2016/04/whether-application-for-anticipatory.html#sthash.VdpyQABj.dpuf
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is the procedural law providing the machinery for punishment of offenders under substantive criminal law.
The code contains elaborate details about the procedure to be followed in every investigation, inquiry and trial, for every offence under the IPC or any other law.
ADMISSIBILITY OF BAD CHARACTER LAW IN UNITED KINGDOMASMAH CHE WAN
It is a study about bad character law in UK, the history, development and current position.
at first the bad character is not admissible, but how by time it becomes admissible.
On 16th December, 2012 a young lady (23 years in age) and her friend were returning home after watching a movie in a multiplex located in one of the glittering malls of Delhi. They boarded a bus to undertake a part of the journey back home. While the bus was moving, 5 persons brutally assaulted the young lady, sexually and physically, and also her friend. Both of them were thrown out of the bus. The young lady succumbed to her injuries on 29.12.2012.
HAQ: Center for Child Rights
B1/2, Ground Floor,
Malviya Nagar
New Delhi - 110017
Tel: +91-26677412,26673599
Fax: +91-26674688
Website: www.haqcrc.org
FaceBook Page: https://www.facebook.com/HaqCentreForChildRights
Many prominent jurists have made attempts to define Crime.
1. Sir William BlackstoneIn his 'Commentaries on Law of England', Sir William Blackstone defined Crime as "an act committed or omitted in violation of Public Law forbidding or commanding it".
2. Sir James Stephen"Crime is an act forbidden by law and revolting to the moral sentiments of the society".
3. Kenny"Crimes are wrongs whose sanction is punitive and in no way remissible by an private person, but is remissble by the Crown alone, if remissible at all"
4. Stephen"Crime is an act which is forbidden by law and revolting to the moral sentiments of the society".
5. Paul W. Tappen"An intentional act or omission in violation of criminal law, committed, without defense or justification and sanctioned by law as felony or misdemeanor
A tort is a civil wrong
That (wrong) is based a breach of a duty imposed by law
Which (breach) gives rise to a (personal) civil right of action for for a remedy not exclusive to another area of law.
LAW 3rd Sem
Rajendra V Pai vs Alex Fernandes AIR 2002 SC 1808
In re; A an Advocate AIR 1962 SC 1337
In re; Mr G a Senior Advocate of SC AIR 1954 SC 557
In re; Lalit Mohan Das AIR 1957 SC 250
Sheo Narayan Jafa v Judge Allahabad H.C. AIR 1953 SC 368
P J ratnam Vs D kanik Ran AIR 1964 SC 244
In re; M an Advocate AIR 1957 SC 149
John D'Souza vs Edward Ani 1994 (2) SCC 64
In re: V C Mishra AIR 1995 SC 2348
L D Jaisingham Vs Narain Das N Punjabi 1976 (1) ACC 354
On 16th December, 2012 a young lady (23 years in age) and her friend were returning home after watching a movie in a multiplex located in one of the glittering malls of Delhi. They boarded a bus to undertake a part of the journey back home. While the bus was moving, 5 persons brutally assaulted the young lady, sexually and physically, and also her friend. Both of them were thrown out of the bus. The young lady succumbed to her injuries on 29.12.2012.
HAQ: Center for Child Rights
B1/2, Ground Floor,
Malviya Nagar
New Delhi - 110017
Tel: +91-26677412,26673599
Fax: +91-26674688
Website: www.haqcrc.org
FaceBook Page: https://www.facebook.com/HaqCentreForChildRights
Many prominent jurists have made attempts to define Crime.
1. Sir William BlackstoneIn his 'Commentaries on Law of England', Sir William Blackstone defined Crime as "an act committed or omitted in violation of Public Law forbidding or commanding it".
2. Sir James Stephen"Crime is an act forbidden by law and revolting to the moral sentiments of the society".
3. Kenny"Crimes are wrongs whose sanction is punitive and in no way remissible by an private person, but is remissble by the Crown alone, if remissible at all"
4. Stephen"Crime is an act which is forbidden by law and revolting to the moral sentiments of the society".
5. Paul W. Tappen"An intentional act or omission in violation of criminal law, committed, without defense or justification and sanctioned by law as felony or misdemeanor
A tort is a civil wrong
That (wrong) is based a breach of a duty imposed by law
Which (breach) gives rise to a (personal) civil right of action for for a remedy not exclusive to another area of law.
LAW 3rd Sem
Rajendra V Pai vs Alex Fernandes AIR 2002 SC 1808
In re; A an Advocate AIR 1962 SC 1337
In re; Mr G a Senior Advocate of SC AIR 1954 SC 557
In re; Lalit Mohan Das AIR 1957 SC 250
Sheo Narayan Jafa v Judge Allahabad H.C. AIR 1953 SC 368
P J ratnam Vs D kanik Ran AIR 1964 SC 244
In re; M an Advocate AIR 1957 SC 149
John D'Souza vs Edward Ani 1994 (2) SCC 64
In re: V C Mishra AIR 1995 SC 2348
L D Jaisingham Vs Narain Das N Punjabi 1976 (1) ACC 354
Defamation is a legal term that refers to any statement made by a person, whether verbal or printed, that causes harm to another person’s reputation or character.
It is the communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be accurate, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government, religion or nation a negative or inferior image.
This topic will let you understand what defamation is and how it works in india about laws too.
LLB LAW NOTES ON LAW OF EVIDENCE
FREE AFFIDAVITS AND NOTICES FORMATS
FREE AGREEMENTS AND CONTRACTS FORMATS
FREE LLB LAW NOTES
FREE CA ICWA NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIRST SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SECOND SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW THIRD SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FOURTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW FIFTH SEM NOTES
FREE LLB LAW SIXTH SEM NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FOUNDATION NOTES
FREE CA ICWA INTERMEDIATE NOTES
FREE CA ICWA FINAL NOTES
KANOON KE RAKHWALE INDIA
HIRE LAWYER ONLINE
LAW FIRMS IN DELHI
CA FIRM DELHI
VISIT : https://www.kanoonkerakhwale.com/
VISIT : https://hirelawyeronline.com/
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
Debt Mapping Camp bebas riba to know how much our debt
State v. swaroop ram sedition delhi court order feb 15
1. 1
Bail Application no. 364/2021
State v. Swaroop Ram
FIR No. 37/2021
PS Special Cell
U/s 124A/505/468/471 IPC
15.02.2021
Present: Sh. Surendra Chaudhary, Ld. counsel for
applicant/accused Swaroop Ram.
Arguments heard.
By way of the instant order I propose to dispose of a bail
application moved on behalf of Swaroop Ram.
An application has been moved on behalf of
applicant/accused seeking grant of bail. It is submitted that
applicant/accused has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is
submitted that material alleged against the applicant/accused is innocuous
in nature and it is infact an expression of emotions uttered in disagreement
with government policies. It is further submitted that no offence of sedition
or forgery is made out in the instant case and at best a case u/s 505 IPC is
made out against the applicant/accused, which is bailable in nature. It is
further submitted that investigation qua the applicant/accused is complete
in the sense that police is no longer seeking the custodial interrogation of
the applicant/accused. It is submitted that applicant/accused is ready and
willing to extend all possible cooperation in the on going investigations and
the applicant/accused shall comply with all the directions imposed by this
court if the applicant/accused is granted bail.
It is further submitted by Ld. defence counsel that co-
accused Om Prakash has been granted bail by this court.
On the contrary, Ld. Addl. PP has forcefully submitted that
very serious allegations have been levelled against applicant/accused. It is
submitted that he has not only made a sensational Facebook Post with an
intent to spread disaffection against the State but has also committed
2. 2
forgery. It is argued that the applicant accused has committed the offences
punishable U/s 124A/505/468/471 IPC. It is further argued that considering
the seriousness of allegations against the applicant/accused, he does not
deserve the indulgence of the court.
I have heard the rival submissions made by Ld. counsel for
applicant/accused and Ld. Addl. PP for State.
As per the claim of the prosecution, the role attributable to
the applicant/accused is that:
“....The accused has posted a fake video on his facebook page with
the tagline Delhi Police mae bagawat 200 policekarmiyon ne diya
samuhik istifa. Jai Jawaan Jai Kisan# I_Support_ Rakesh_ Tikait_
Challenge l (There is a rebellion in Delhi Police and around 200
police officials have given mass resignation. Hail the soldier. Hail
the farmer) However the posted video was related to an incident
wherein a senior officer of Delhi Police was briefing police personnel at
the protest site and also encouraging them to tackle the situation
properly.....”
It is argued that he has thereby committed the offence of (i)
Forgery, (ii) Spreading Rumours and (iii) Sedition I shall deal with the
respective charges in seriatim,
FORGERY
I fail to understand as to how come the offence of forgery is
attracted in the instant case unless there is some false document, as
statutorily defined u/s 464 IPC, is created by anyone.
Upon specific query, Ld. Addl. PP has forcefully argued that
since the applicant/accused has made a Facebook page with a fake
message, a false document as provided under Section 464 clause First (b)
is made out in the instant case.
It would be pertinent to reproduce herein Section 464 IPC for
ready reference.
464. Making a false document.--A person is said to make a false
documents or false electronic record –
First-- Who dishonestly or fraudulently--
3. 3
(a) makes, signs, seals or executes a document on part of a
document;
(b) makes or transmits any electronic record or part of any
electronic record;
(c ) affixes any electronic signature on any electronic record;
(d) makes any mark denoting the execution of a document or the
authenticity of the electronic signature,
with the intention of causing it to be believed that such
document or part of document, electronic record or electronic
signature was made, signed, sealed, executed, transmitted or
affixed by or by the authority of a person by whom or by whose
authority he knows that it was not made, signed, sealed, executed
or affixed;
Secondly— who, without lawful authority, dishonestly or
fraudulently, by cancellation or otherwise, alters a document or an
electronic record in any material part thereof, after it has been
made, executed or affixed with digital signature either by himself or
by any other person, whether such person be living or dead at the
time of such alteration; or
Thirdly— who dishonestly or fraudulently causes any person, sign,
seal, execute or alter a document or an electronic record or to affix
his digital signature on any electronic record knowing that such
person by reason of unsoundness of mind or intoxication cannot,
or that by reason of deception practiced upon him, he does not
know the contents of the document or electronic record or the
nature of the alteration.
The ingredients of Section 464 IPC shows that the definition
of false documents falls into the abovesaid three categories. Ld. Addl. PP
has argued that the fake Facebook Page created by the applicant/accused
falls within the first category. In my considered opinion, it is only when a
person dishonestly or fraudulently makes or executes a document with
intention of causing it to be believed that such document was made or
executed by some other person or by the authority of some other
person by whom or by whose authority he knows that it was not made
or executed that he is guilty of creating a ‘ False Document’. In the case
at hand, the prosecution has failed to point out any representation or
endeavor on the part of the applicant/accused to cast an impression that
the Facebook Page was made, executed or created under the authority of
some other person with whose authority it was not made or executed.
4. 4
The making of a false document is the sine qua non for the
offence of Forgery. Consequently, since the prosecution has failed to point
out the creation of any false document in the instant case, I fail to
understand as to how come the offence u/s 468/471 IPC can be invoked in
the instant case. Reliance is placed upon Devendra vs State (2009) 7
SCC 495.
Spreading Rumours
The allegations against the applicant accused for commission of the
offence punishable under Section 505 IPC seems to bear force but that is
bailable offence.
Sedition.
Now I come to the third allegation against the
applicant/accused regarding the commission of offence u/s 124A IPC.
It would be pertinent to reproduce Section 124A IPC for
ready reference.
124A. Sedition.—Whoever, by words, either spoken or written, or
by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, brings or
attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to
excite disaffection towards, the Government established by law in
India, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, to which fine
may be added, or with imprisonment which may extend to three
years, to which fine may be added, or with fine.
Explanation 1.—The expression “disaffection” includes disloyalty
and all feelings of enmity.
Explanation 2.—Comments expressing disapprobation of the
measures of the Government with a view to obtain their alteration
by lawful means, without exciting or attempting to excite hatred,
contempt or disaffection, do not constitute an offence under this
section.
Explanation 3.—Comments expressing disapprobation of the
administrative or other action of the Government without exciting or
attempting to excite hatred, contempt or disaffection, do not
constitute an offence under this section.]
5. 5
Dealing with the interpretation of the word 'Sedition', as
prescribed u/s 124 A of the Indian Penal Code, Hon'ble Apex Court has
dealt with the acts which are proscribed and have a tendency to cause
'disaffection against India' and has observed herein as under in the matter
of Kedar Nath v. State of Bihar AIR 1962 SC 955:
“The provisions of the sections read as a whole, along with
the explanations, make it reasonably clear that the sections
aim at rendering penal only such activities as would be
intended, or have a tendency, to create disorder or
disturbance of public peace by resort to violence. As
already pointed out, the explanations appended to the main
body of the section make it clear that criticism of public
measures or comment on Government action, however
strongly worded, would be within reasonable limits and
would be consistent with the fundamental right of freedom of
speech and expression. It is only when the words, written or
spoken, etc. which have the pernicious tendency or intention
of creating public disorder or disturbance of law and order
that the law steps in to prevent such activities in the interest
of public order. So construed, the section, in our opinion,
strikes the correct balance between individual fundamental
rights and the interest of public order. It is also well settled
that in interpreting an enactment the Court should have
regard not merely to the literal meaning of the words used,
but also take into consideration the antecedent history of the
legislation, its purpose and the mischief it seeks to suppress
[vide (1) Bengal Immunity Company Limited v. State of Bihar
and (2) R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala v. Union of India. Viewed
in that light, we have no hesitation in so construing the
provisions of the sections impugned in these cases as to
limit their application to acts involving intention or tendency
to create disorder, or disturbance of law and order, or
incitement to violence”.
I have personally seen the video in the court room wherein
evidently a senior police officer of Delhi Police is raising slogans, in a very
agitated tone, and a group of Delhi Police personnel are seen standing
besides him. The background voices also suggests a very charged up
atmosphere. It was informed by the IO that the applicant is not the author of
the said post and he has merely forwarded it. The applicant/accused is
reported to be a 21 years old labourer.
The law of sedition is a powerful tool in the hands of the
state to maintain peace and order in the society. However, it cannot be
invoked to quieten the disquiet under the pretence of muzzling the
6. 6
miscreants. Evidently, law proscribes any act which has a tendency to
create disorder or disturbance of public peace by resort to violence. In the
absence of any exhortation, call, incitement or instigation to create disorder
or disturbance of public peace by resort to violence or any allusion or
oblique remark or even any hint towards this objective, attributable to the
applicant accused, I suspect that Section 124 A IPC can be validly invoked
against the applicant. In my considered opinion, on a plain reading of the
tagline attributed to the applicant/accused, invocation of Section 124 A IPC
is a seriously debatable issue.
Be that as it may, applicant/accused Swaroop Ram is in
judicial custody since 05.02.2021. His custodial interrogation is no longer
sought by the police. Considering the nature of allegations against the
applicant/accused, grounds of parity and period of incarceration, the
applicant/accused Swaroop Ram is admitted to bail on his furnishing bail
bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the
satisfaction of the Ld. CMM/ Ld. MM/Link MM/Duty MM and subject to the
conditions that he shall join the further investigation as and when called
upon by the IO; he shall scrupulously appear at each and every stage of
the proceedings before concerned Court so as not to cause any obstruction
or delay to its progress and that he shall not commit an offence similar to
the offence of which he is accused of.
Needless to say that nothing observed herein shall have any
bearing upon the merit of the case.
Application is disposed off accordingly.
Copy of the order be given dasti.
(Dharmender Rana)
ASJ-02, NDD/PHC/New Delhi
15.02.2021