The document provides information on the rules of gameplay, including what information is considered public, derived, or hidden from other players. It discusses common shortcuts used in gameplay and asks the reader hypothetical questions to test their understanding of the rules.
This document discusses bribery and collusion in competitive Magic: The Gathering tournaments. It provides examples of prohibited behaviors according to the IPG and MTR such as offering incentives to opponents to concede, draw, or change results. It also outlines the proper procedure for tournament judges to disqualify players, which includes collecting written statements from all involved, securing the sanctioning number, and entering the penalty into the WER system.
1. The document discusses changes made to Magic tournament rules regarding penalties for hidden card errors. The new remedy is to have the opponent choose a card from the offending player's hand and return it to the library, negating any advantage gained.
2. It provides examples of situations that would constitute hidden card errors and the appropriate infractions, penalties, and remedies. It also includes a quiz testing readers' understanding of applying the hidden card error policy in different game scenarios.
3. The summary highlights that the key change discussed is implementing an opponent's choice remedy for hidden card errors, where the opponent selects a card from the offending player's hand to return to the library, rather than less impactful remedies like
This document discusses soft skills and best practices for investigating issues in gaming tournaments. It recommends developing soft skills like communication, flexibility and empathy. When investigating issues, it advises listening to all sides without judgment, analyzing the root cause, and making a ruling when no further evidence can change your view. The risks and rewards of different levels of tournaments are also compared, like having a higher chance of issues but better prizes at Grand Prix.
This document discusses the role of the scorekeeper in Magic: The Gathering tournaments. It explains that the scorekeeper is responsible for generating pairings, entering results, and ensuring all tournament records are correct. The scorekeeper also ensures any issues are resolved with the head judge. While the role requires ensuring accurate record keeping, the document emphasizes that mistakes can happen and should be addressed calmly to prioritize keeping the event running smoothly.
Sharing your experiences from a tournament or a conference by telling your friends all about it is great, but if you want to reach a bigger audience (or if you're working on your L2 pre-test requirements), writing a report is the right thing for you. Writing a report is not so hard, but writing a good report... now that's a completely different story. Come and learn with us how to do it the right way!
As a wise Chinese man once said: "Man who not know rules/policy updates, not make good judge decision. Man who not make good judge decision, not be good judge". In honor of this famous saying, we're going to make sure everyone's up to date on the latest and greatest. See you there!
Even if you're a rules guru, and even if you know the MTR, JAR and IPG by heart, running a real event might store some new things to learn. Table numbering, pairings distribution and end-of-round procedures have a great impact on a tournament. Do it right and everyone is happy. Do it wrong, and delays and unhappy players start to pile up. These unwritten skills and practices have been passed on from one judge generation to the next, and now it's your chance to improve at them as well.
The document provides information on the rules of gameplay, including what information is considered public, derived, or hidden from other players. It discusses common shortcuts used in gameplay and asks the reader hypothetical questions to test their understanding of the rules.
This document discusses bribery and collusion in competitive Magic: The Gathering tournaments. It provides examples of prohibited behaviors according to the IPG and MTR such as offering incentives to opponents to concede, draw, or change results. It also outlines the proper procedure for tournament judges to disqualify players, which includes collecting written statements from all involved, securing the sanctioning number, and entering the penalty into the WER system.
1. The document discusses changes made to Magic tournament rules regarding penalties for hidden card errors. The new remedy is to have the opponent choose a card from the offending player's hand and return it to the library, negating any advantage gained.
2. It provides examples of situations that would constitute hidden card errors and the appropriate infractions, penalties, and remedies. It also includes a quiz testing readers' understanding of applying the hidden card error policy in different game scenarios.
3. The summary highlights that the key change discussed is implementing an opponent's choice remedy for hidden card errors, where the opponent selects a card from the offending player's hand to return to the library, rather than less impactful remedies like
This document discusses soft skills and best practices for investigating issues in gaming tournaments. It recommends developing soft skills like communication, flexibility and empathy. When investigating issues, it advises listening to all sides without judgment, analyzing the root cause, and making a ruling when no further evidence can change your view. The risks and rewards of different levels of tournaments are also compared, like having a higher chance of issues but better prizes at Grand Prix.
This document discusses the role of the scorekeeper in Magic: The Gathering tournaments. It explains that the scorekeeper is responsible for generating pairings, entering results, and ensuring all tournament records are correct. The scorekeeper also ensures any issues are resolved with the head judge. While the role requires ensuring accurate record keeping, the document emphasizes that mistakes can happen and should be addressed calmly to prioritize keeping the event running smoothly.
Sharing your experiences from a tournament or a conference by telling your friends all about it is great, but if you want to reach a bigger audience (or if you're working on your L2 pre-test requirements), writing a report is the right thing for you. Writing a report is not so hard, but writing a good report... now that's a completely different story. Come and learn with us how to do it the right way!
As a wise Chinese man once said: "Man who not know rules/policy updates, not make good judge decision. Man who not make good judge decision, not be good judge". In honor of this famous saying, we're going to make sure everyone's up to date on the latest and greatest. See you there!
Even if you're a rules guru, and even if you know the MTR, JAR and IPG by heart, running a real event might store some new things to learn. Table numbering, pairings distribution and end-of-round procedures have a great impact on a tournament. Do it right and everyone is happy. Do it wrong, and delays and unhappy players start to pile up. These unwritten skills and practices have been passed on from one judge generation to the next, and now it's your chance to improve at them as well.
"Strive not to be a success, but rather to be of value."
Customer service, in a nutshell, is meeting the needs of the players.
But what is it they need exactly? What can we do beyond what they need and expect? And how can the most unhappy players be our greatest source of learning?
Prezentacija Dokumenata koji su potrebni kad dođe do dq koji su na našem jeziku, postupak oko pisanja i uzimanja izjava, faq za igrače i TOove... - prezentira Milorad Pavlović
Iako kastovanje spelova (Castin Spells) izgleda kako najednostavnija stvar u MTG ona je i jedna od najbitnih stvari u ovoj igri. Na ovom seminaru obajsnicemo detalnije sva 8 koraka od kojih se sastoji kastovanje spelova kako i probleme koji mogu da se pojave oko tog cina. Spremite se za interaktivni seminar koji ce vam pomoci da naucite sve male tajne oko kastovanje spelova kako i lakse odgovoriti na sva pitanja koje mogu da vam budu postavne na turniru gde sudite. - prezentira Vladimir Trajčevski
Uloga floor judge a na wmcq i pptq turnirimatrixobird
Prezentacija namenjena level 1 sudijama koji žele čuti iskustva i savete pri suđenju wmcq ili pptq turnira kao floor judge. Prezentacija posvećena komunikaciji i organizaciji sudijskog para prilikom suđenja. - prezentira Nikola Vulović
The most common thing we do as judges is interact with players answering judge calls. In this seminar we will discuss what's the best way to spot a player that needs us, what to watch out when talking to them, how to deliver the best ruling, what are the common mistakes judges make, how to control difficult situations and many more. - prezentira Jernej Lipovec
This presentation is centered on initiative and where a judge can expend it. We are going to discuss Judge Projects, draw parallels to open source projects and see what people can offer and gain from such activities. We will be speaking about the more popular and the more famous Projects, such as the Annotated IPG team or the teams behind [O] blogs. Our focus is not only projects though. We will also analyze what an active judge can do for his/her community on a local level. This is not meant to be a one-man-show, but rather, an exchange of ideas and why not - positive promises!
We all know deckchecks and most of us have performed them multiple times. But are you doing it fast enough? Are you checking for everything? Oh and since we are on it, why do they exist?
Giving a ruling seminar ee summer conf 2015trixobird
The return of the popular judging workshop, where you are not just listening about rulings but get a chance to experience or deliver them. Interactive scenarios, timely feedback and lots of fun for everyone! It is so beautifully engineered that it is more real than real judging!
This presentation will be about how to separate which is illegal which is not as well as clearing the topics for everyone on both MTR and IPG. There will be examples along with rules and different opinions from different judges all over the world will be shown. Also, how to notice, what to do, how to watch these situations and when to suspect.
Judge's slogan is "keep it fun, keep it fair". In the workshop we will focus on fairness by helping you spotting cheaters. We will present some scenarios and we will analyse them together step by step. Your active participation is required.
This presentation will cover the main activities of judging at a GP. The presentation will start with preparing for the GP and will cover all the usual activities one can participate in during the GP.
What is recognition? What is reward? Where are all the foils? Are we movinf forward or backwards? This is the best place to give us feedback and improbe judge program worldwide
This document discusses the evolution of Magic: The Gathering tournament rules and penalties over the years from 1998 to present. It covers topics like the Magic Tournament Rules (MTR), Infraction Procedure Guide (IPG), changes to specific infractions like missed triggers over time, and provides a walk down memory lane of rule and penalty guideline revisions between 1998 and 2014. The constant changes to the rules and penalties over the years are meant to improve the judge program and tournament experience for players.
This document outlines an East Europe regional conference held in Katerini, Greece in 2014. The conference discussed the differences between Level 1 and Level 2 certification requirements, how to prepare for Level 2 certification, and shared experiences from those who have already achieved Level 2 status. Regional Level 2 project experiences were also shared.
Seminar gp milan_2011_judge-to-players_interactiontrixobird
This document discusses interactions between judges and tournament organizers (TOs) and players. It addresses popular issues like compensation, penalty overrules, and judges not being invited to tournaments. It provides advice on how to have respectful discussions with TOs about these issues by proving your value, consulting others, and using diplomatic communication. The document also categorizes different player types like those who show disrespect, struggle with penalties, or are "rules lawyers," and offers guidance on how judges should constructively handle interactions with each group.
Seminar gp milan_2011_judge-to-players_interactiontrixobird
This document discusses interactions between judges and tournament organizers (TOs) and players. It addresses popular issues like compensation, penalty overrules, and judges not being invited to tournaments. It provides advice on how to have respectful discussions with TOs about these issues by proving your value, consulting others, and using diplomatic communication. The document also categorizes different player types like those who show disrespect, struggle with penalties, or are "rules lawyers," and offers guidance on how judges should constructively handle interactions with each type.
This document provides guidance on writing reviews for other judges in the Judge Center. It explains that the purpose of a review is to recognize good work and provide constructive advice for improvement. It emphasizes being helpful, tactful, and specific when writing about strengths and areas for growth. The document also offers tips for observing other judges, things to include in a review, and perspectives for both writing and receiving reviews.
"Strive not to be a success, but rather to be of value."
Customer service, in a nutshell, is meeting the needs of the players.
But what is it they need exactly? What can we do beyond what they need and expect? And how can the most unhappy players be our greatest source of learning?
Prezentacija Dokumenata koji su potrebni kad dođe do dq koji su na našem jeziku, postupak oko pisanja i uzimanja izjava, faq za igrače i TOove... - prezentira Milorad Pavlović
Iako kastovanje spelova (Castin Spells) izgleda kako najednostavnija stvar u MTG ona je i jedna od najbitnih stvari u ovoj igri. Na ovom seminaru obajsnicemo detalnije sva 8 koraka od kojih se sastoji kastovanje spelova kako i probleme koji mogu da se pojave oko tog cina. Spremite se za interaktivni seminar koji ce vam pomoci da naucite sve male tajne oko kastovanje spelova kako i lakse odgovoriti na sva pitanja koje mogu da vam budu postavne na turniru gde sudite. - prezentira Vladimir Trajčevski
Uloga floor judge a na wmcq i pptq turnirimatrixobird
Prezentacija namenjena level 1 sudijama koji žele čuti iskustva i savete pri suđenju wmcq ili pptq turnira kao floor judge. Prezentacija posvećena komunikaciji i organizaciji sudijskog para prilikom suđenja. - prezentira Nikola Vulović
The most common thing we do as judges is interact with players answering judge calls. In this seminar we will discuss what's the best way to spot a player that needs us, what to watch out when talking to them, how to deliver the best ruling, what are the common mistakes judges make, how to control difficult situations and many more. - prezentira Jernej Lipovec
This presentation is centered on initiative and where a judge can expend it. We are going to discuss Judge Projects, draw parallels to open source projects and see what people can offer and gain from such activities. We will be speaking about the more popular and the more famous Projects, such as the Annotated IPG team or the teams behind [O] blogs. Our focus is not only projects though. We will also analyze what an active judge can do for his/her community on a local level. This is not meant to be a one-man-show, but rather, an exchange of ideas and why not - positive promises!
We all know deckchecks and most of us have performed them multiple times. But are you doing it fast enough? Are you checking for everything? Oh and since we are on it, why do they exist?
Giving a ruling seminar ee summer conf 2015trixobird
The return of the popular judging workshop, where you are not just listening about rulings but get a chance to experience or deliver them. Interactive scenarios, timely feedback and lots of fun for everyone! It is so beautifully engineered that it is more real than real judging!
This presentation will be about how to separate which is illegal which is not as well as clearing the topics for everyone on both MTR and IPG. There will be examples along with rules and different opinions from different judges all over the world will be shown. Also, how to notice, what to do, how to watch these situations and when to suspect.
Judge's slogan is "keep it fun, keep it fair". In the workshop we will focus on fairness by helping you spotting cheaters. We will present some scenarios and we will analyse them together step by step. Your active participation is required.
This presentation will cover the main activities of judging at a GP. The presentation will start with preparing for the GP and will cover all the usual activities one can participate in during the GP.
What is recognition? What is reward? Where are all the foils? Are we movinf forward or backwards? This is the best place to give us feedback and improbe judge program worldwide
This document discusses the evolution of Magic: The Gathering tournament rules and penalties over the years from 1998 to present. It covers topics like the Magic Tournament Rules (MTR), Infraction Procedure Guide (IPG), changes to specific infractions like missed triggers over time, and provides a walk down memory lane of rule and penalty guideline revisions between 1998 and 2014. The constant changes to the rules and penalties over the years are meant to improve the judge program and tournament experience for players.
This document outlines an East Europe regional conference held in Katerini, Greece in 2014. The conference discussed the differences between Level 1 and Level 2 certification requirements, how to prepare for Level 2 certification, and shared experiences from those who have already achieved Level 2 status. Regional Level 2 project experiences were also shared.
Seminar gp milan_2011_judge-to-players_interactiontrixobird
This document discusses interactions between judges and tournament organizers (TOs) and players. It addresses popular issues like compensation, penalty overrules, and judges not being invited to tournaments. It provides advice on how to have respectful discussions with TOs about these issues by proving your value, consulting others, and using diplomatic communication. The document also categorizes different player types like those who show disrespect, struggle with penalties, or are "rules lawyers," and offers guidance on how judges should constructively handle interactions with each group.
Seminar gp milan_2011_judge-to-players_interactiontrixobird
This document discusses interactions between judges and tournament organizers (TOs) and players. It addresses popular issues like compensation, penalty overrules, and judges not being invited to tournaments. It provides advice on how to have respectful discussions with TOs about these issues by proving your value, consulting others, and using diplomatic communication. The document also categorizes different player types like those who show disrespect, struggle with penalties, or are "rules lawyers," and offers guidance on how judges should constructively handle interactions with each type.
This document provides guidance on writing reviews for other judges in the Judge Center. It explains that the purpose of a review is to recognize good work and provide constructive advice for improvement. It emphasizes being helpful, tactful, and specific when writing about strengths and areas for growth. The document also offers tips for observing other judges, things to include in a review, and perspectives for both writing and receiving reviews.
45. thanks for watching
ευχαριστώ για την
παρακολούθηση
Благодаря за гледане
izlemek için teşekkürler
הצפייה על תודה
hvala za gledanje
Dank für aufpassen
mulțumiri pentru vizionarea
Ви благодариме за гледање
Editor's Notes
Feedback vs Reviews
What is feedback, what is review
Feedback > review
Oral before written
Conversation vs Essay
Question Value Ladder
First we understand the subject
Questions in order to understand
Type of questions:
Closed
Yes
No
Open
Explanation
Idea
Leading: Leads to Actions
Guiding: Helps other to see what you see
Discovery: No one has the answer yet
Challenging(Why?): Question with assumption (the 5 why rule)
Lewin Formula
B=f(P,E)
What is personality (Internal)
How somebody acts
Reasoning
How you built
Beliefs
Temper
Values
What is environment (external)
Upbringing
Culture
Education
Events
Social Stuff
Judge level
Income
What is easily changeable?
The four Pillows
“I” perspective: the feedback is personal; it is me that is giving it to you. “People say” gives a sense of accusation and make the negatives more difficult to communicate
Professional: Move away from the crowd, let the subject know that this is feedback session, even better ask her/him if that’s all right to give that feedback at this time.
Example: Use the specific examples that you notice this behavior. This way it is not all theory
Behavior: Suggest specific changes the environment that could lead to changes in Behavior
That’s all the animals
No animals were harmed
oral
written
conversation
essay
How do we gather feeback?
First we need to understand
We do it by asking questions
What kind of questions? Enter the question value ladder
Conscientiousness = careful, or vigilant
Agreeableness= empathetic and altruistic
Neuroticism= emotional stability