SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
Download to read offline
Using Job Analyses to Prevent Musculoskeletal Injuries
By Gilbert E. Smith 3/11/2015
Permissions
Employers that have physically demanding jobs or a high rate of musculoskeletal injuries and
illnesses among their employees may be interested in conducting job analyses of selected jobs as a
first step in maintaining or increasing job productivity and controlling workers’ compensation and
health care costs.
Human resource professionals are responsible for creating the policies that support using job
analyses for employment testing and to provide safety and claims professionals with documentation
of job demands for workers’ compensation and disability management programs.
Job Description vs. Job Analysis
HR typically uses job descriptions to describe the essential functions of a job. The Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) uses the term “essential functions” to determine what a person must
do in a specific job. For example, a machinist may need to lift 10 pounds and operate a specific
machine, but he may not be required to carry a 10-pound load from the storage area to his
workstation. Thus, lifting would be essential but carrying would not, even if employees currently carry
materials out of convenience.
Job analysis, on the other hand, breaks down the essential functions into discrete, measureable
tasks that describe specific weights, forces and frequencies and the environment in which the task is
completed.
Using Job Analyses
Job analysis is the foundation for all injury prevention and injury management tools. Injury prevention
tools include employee testing, where an employer can develop hiring policies for high-risk jobs that
require applicants to perform a physical agility test (based on the job analysis) to determine if the
candidate can meet the job requirements. This test is typically performed in combination with other
employment selection tools, such as interviews and drug testing.
With large numbers of adults unemployed, some may be inclined to apply for jobs for which they are
not well-suited. If a job requires strength, flexibility and stamina but can be done by someone without
much training, many applicants may pass through the hiring process even when they are not really
prepared for the demanding work. Perhaps not surprisingly, some employees are not entirely truthful
on their applications or health histories; for example, some may have sustained previous serious
injuries or may have chronic low back pain that is incompatible with performing the physical
demands of the job for which they applied. Other injury prevention tools that use job analyses
include ergonomic and safety assessments to reduce risks that are identified during the job analysis
process.
Injury management includes use of the job analysis data by claims professionals to provide
physicians with information about the job to determine the employee’s ability to safely return to work
and/or the work restrictions that should be imposed. Job analysis data are also used to develop
structured work programs that employers can offer to restricted workers as real work options during
their recovery from an illness or injury.
Forward-thinking employers are now using job analysis data to develop fit-for-duty tests that
measure an employee’s ability to do the job safely. When an employee has been off work for a
period of time due to a personal disability or a work-related injury, the fit-for-duty test can be used to
determine whether the employee can safely perform the physical requirements for return-to-work at
their usual job. Sending a compromised employee back to the job prematurely risks re-injury, further
disability or a new work-related injury.
Job analyses are frequently used to give health care providers a better idea of what the job entails.
An employee may not present the job objectively if he has an ulterior motive (i.e., desires to stay off
work when healed or return to work when still compromised). An objective job analysis will tell the
health care provider just how strenuous the job is so that the provider understands how the job
impacts the employee’s health.
Another opportunity that comes from a good job analysis is a fresh look at jobs that may be putting
employees at high risk for injury. When job tasks are broken down, it may be more obvious how the
job can be modified to make it safer. For instance, three types of jobs were done by employees in
one department. One job involved small hand tasks with repetitive motion. Another job required long
periods of static posture reaching overhead. A third job required frequent heavy lifting. Each job put
employees at risk for injuries because the tasks were done all day, every day. When the three jobs
were combined and employees rotated among the tasks, spending no more than two to three hours
on any one task, injuries declined. The job analyses helped convince the employer to try job rotation.
Selecting a Job Analysis Provider
Many companies throughout the United States conduct job analyses. Some companies have
elaborate equipment that is used to conduct physical performance testing, and their job analysis
system is based on the equipment they are trying to sell or use.
Any company that provides job analyses and pre-employment or fit-for-duty tests must be willing to
defend their system in court, should charges of discrimination be raised. A company that is not
willing to take that step may not have a service that will stand up to legal scrutiny. The ADA requires
that the job is objectively defined, that physical requirements are objective and measurable, and that
a test is designed based on the job analysis and not a specific testing system.
After job analyses have been completed, performance tests can be set up onsite at the company’s
location or offsite in a therapy clinic. Employers can designate someone in HR, safety or health
services to be trained to conduct the tests, but in most cases the company that designed the test will
also conduct the test. Use of this third-party approach helps ensure objectivity and keeps the hiring
company free of biased, political or nonobjective decision-making. Results of testing should be
“meets requirements” or “does not meet requirements.” So if someone can safely lift the required 15
pounds but is unable to do that 20 times per hour as specified in the job analysis, he “does not meet
requirements” of that particular job.
In some cases, an employer may be interested in hiring large numbers of workers in a short time
period. Some companies that conduct job analyses and employment tests can also provide training
for job applicants who would like to be able to do the job but did not meet the job’s requirements.
Getting job applicants in shape for a specific job requires understanding the job demands so that
training is directed and not generalized. Training may include skills, such as safe lifting techniques,
as well as conditioning, such as developing thigh strength to make it possible to lift safely. Some
government-sponsored job-training programs provide conditioning exercises along with skills training
so that job applicants are given the best opportunity for success.
Worker-Job Match
Job analyses and injury prevention and injury management programs that are based on job analyses
create a “worker-job match.” Ongoing injury prevention programs that include employee testing (pre-
employment), ergonomic and safety programs, stretching and conditioning, and injury management
rehabilitation for musculoskeletal injuries using onsite therapy, structured return-to-work programs
and fit-for-duty testing provide a comprehensive approach to an employer interested in controlling
workers’ compensation and disability costs and increasing productivity.
Occupational injuries and employee disability can be very costly in terms of medical care and lost
productivity. Job analyses that are legally defensible and job-specific can be used to develop HR
policies and claims management programs that will create worker job-matching at the time of
employment and throughout an employee’s tenure with a company.
Gilbert E. Smith is senior partner at GSC-Arisces, a provider of work-related injury prevention
programs.
Quick Links:
SHRM Online Safety & Security page
Subscribe to SHRM’s Safety & Security HR e-newsletter

More Related Content

Similar to SHRM Job Analysis

W S General Sales For Marketing Representatives Newformat2
W S General Sales  For  Marketing  Representatives Newformat2W S General Sales  For  Marketing  Representatives Newformat2
W S General Sales For Marketing Representatives Newformat2
WorkSTEPS, Inc.
 
Ergonomic Hazards in the Workplace 1 .docx
Ergonomic Hazards in the Workplace   1  .docxErgonomic Hazards in the Workplace   1  .docx
Ergonomic Hazards in the Workplace 1 .docx
russelldayna
 
Job Analysis and Design Introduction This section focu.docx
Job Analysis and Design Introduction This section focu.docxJob Analysis and Design Introduction This section focu.docx
Job Analysis and Design Introduction This section focu.docx
priestmanmable
 
CHAPTER 6 Position Descriptions Chapter Objectives
CHAPTER 6 Position Descriptions Chapter Objectives CHAPTER 6 Position Descriptions Chapter Objectives
CHAPTER 6 Position Descriptions Chapter Objectives
WilheminaRossi174
 
Running Head Employee Compensation1Employee compensation5.docx
Running Head Employee Compensation1Employee compensation5.docxRunning Head Employee Compensation1Employee compensation5.docx
Running Head Employee Compensation1Employee compensation5.docx
charisellington63520
 
673Foundations of Psychological TestingNoel Hendrick.docx
673Foundations of Psychological TestingNoel Hendrick.docx673Foundations of Psychological TestingNoel Hendrick.docx
673Foundations of Psychological TestingNoel Hendrick.docx
alinainglis
 
HUMA PROJECT REPORT updated (1)
HUMA PROJECT REPORT updated (1)HUMA PROJECT REPORT updated (1)
HUMA PROJECT REPORT updated (1)
Brighton Crozier
 
Assignment 1 Discussion—Motivating Employees Through Compensation.docx
Assignment 1 Discussion—Motivating Employees Through Compensation.docxAssignment 1 Discussion—Motivating Employees Through Compensation.docx
Assignment 1 Discussion—Motivating Employees Through Compensation.docx
fredharris32
 
Ergonomics GAO Report 1997
Ergonomics GAO Report 1997Ergonomics GAO Report 1997
Ergonomics GAO Report 1997
Alisha Manley
 

Similar to SHRM Job Analysis (20)

A holistic approach to wc loss prevention and control
A holistic approach to wc  loss prevention and controlA holistic approach to wc  loss prevention and control
A holistic approach to wc loss prevention and control
 
W S General Sales For Marketing Representatives Newformat2
W S General Sales  For  Marketing  Representatives Newformat2W S General Sales  For  Marketing  Representatives Newformat2
W S General Sales For Marketing Representatives Newformat2
 
Ergonomic Hazards in the Workplace 1 .docx
Ergonomic Hazards in the Workplace   1  .docxErgonomic Hazards in the Workplace   1  .docx
Ergonomic Hazards in the Workplace 1 .docx
 
Job simulation
Job simulationJob simulation
Job simulation
 
Job Analysis and Design Introduction This section focu.docx
Job Analysis and Design Introduction This section focu.docxJob Analysis and Design Introduction This section focu.docx
Job Analysis and Design Introduction This section focu.docx
 
Employment Test: Processes of Conducting Test
Employment Test: Processes of Conducting TestEmployment Test: Processes of Conducting Test
Employment Test: Processes of Conducting Test
 
Pre Employment Medical Article
Pre Employment Medical ArticlePre Employment Medical Article
Pre Employment Medical Article
 
CHAPTER 6 Position Descriptions Chapter Objectives
CHAPTER 6 Position Descriptions Chapter Objectives CHAPTER 6 Position Descriptions Chapter Objectives
CHAPTER 6 Position Descriptions Chapter Objectives
 
Running Head Employee Compensation1Employee compensation5.docx
Running Head Employee Compensation1Employee compensation5.docxRunning Head Employee Compensation1Employee compensation5.docx
Running Head Employee Compensation1Employee compensation5.docx
 
673Foundations of Psychological TestingNoel Hendrick.docx
673Foundations of Psychological TestingNoel Hendrick.docx673Foundations of Psychological TestingNoel Hendrick.docx
673Foundations of Psychological TestingNoel Hendrick.docx
 
Human Sample
Human SampleHuman Sample
Human Sample
 
Human_sample
Human_sampleHuman_sample
Human_sample
 
Functional Job Decription
Functional Job DecriptionFunctional Job Decription
Functional Job Decription
 
Employee Health Screenings Can Be Well Worth the Effort
Employee Health Screenings Can Be Well Worth the EffortEmployee Health Screenings Can Be Well Worth the Effort
Employee Health Screenings Can Be Well Worth the Effort
 
HUMA PROJECT REPORT updated (1)
HUMA PROJECT REPORT updated (1)HUMA PROJECT REPORT updated (1)
HUMA PROJECT REPORT updated (1)
 
Assignment 1 Discussion—Motivating Employees Through Compensation.docx
Assignment 1 Discussion—Motivating Employees Through Compensation.docxAssignment 1 Discussion—Motivating Employees Through Compensation.docx
Assignment 1 Discussion—Motivating Employees Through Compensation.docx
 
Analysis And Reflections On Indergard
Analysis And Reflections On IndergardAnalysis And Reflections On Indergard
Analysis And Reflections On Indergard
 
Ergonomics GAO Report 1997
Ergonomics GAO Report 1997Ergonomics GAO Report 1997
Ergonomics GAO Report 1997
 
Chapter 11
Chapter 11Chapter 11
Chapter 11
 
Return To Work Presentation
Return To Work PresentationReturn To Work Presentation
Return To Work Presentation
 

SHRM Job Analysis

  • 1. Using Job Analyses to Prevent Musculoskeletal Injuries By Gilbert E. Smith 3/11/2015 Permissions Employers that have physically demanding jobs or a high rate of musculoskeletal injuries and illnesses among their employees may be interested in conducting job analyses of selected jobs as a first step in maintaining or increasing job productivity and controlling workers’ compensation and health care costs. Human resource professionals are responsible for creating the policies that support using job analyses for employment testing and to provide safety and claims professionals with documentation of job demands for workers’ compensation and disability management programs. Job Description vs. Job Analysis HR typically uses job descriptions to describe the essential functions of a job. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) uses the term “essential functions” to determine what a person must do in a specific job. For example, a machinist may need to lift 10 pounds and operate a specific machine, but he may not be required to carry a 10-pound load from the storage area to his workstation. Thus, lifting would be essential but carrying would not, even if employees currently carry materials out of convenience. Job analysis, on the other hand, breaks down the essential functions into discrete, measureable tasks that describe specific weights, forces and frequencies and the environment in which the task is completed.
  • 2. Using Job Analyses Job analysis is the foundation for all injury prevention and injury management tools. Injury prevention tools include employee testing, where an employer can develop hiring policies for high-risk jobs that require applicants to perform a physical agility test (based on the job analysis) to determine if the candidate can meet the job requirements. This test is typically performed in combination with other employment selection tools, such as interviews and drug testing. With large numbers of adults unemployed, some may be inclined to apply for jobs for which they are not well-suited. If a job requires strength, flexibility and stamina but can be done by someone without much training, many applicants may pass through the hiring process even when they are not really prepared for the demanding work. Perhaps not surprisingly, some employees are not entirely truthful on their applications or health histories; for example, some may have sustained previous serious injuries or may have chronic low back pain that is incompatible with performing the physical demands of the job for which they applied. Other injury prevention tools that use job analyses include ergonomic and safety assessments to reduce risks that are identified during the job analysis process. Injury management includes use of the job analysis data by claims professionals to provide physicians with information about the job to determine the employee’s ability to safely return to work and/or the work restrictions that should be imposed. Job analysis data are also used to develop structured work programs that employers can offer to restricted workers as real work options during their recovery from an illness or injury. Forward-thinking employers are now using job analysis data to develop fit-for-duty tests that measure an employee’s ability to do the job safely. When an employee has been off work for a period of time due to a personal disability or a work-related injury, the fit-for-duty test can be used to determine whether the employee can safely perform the physical requirements for return-to-work at their usual job. Sending a compromised employee back to the job prematurely risks re-injury, further disability or a new work-related injury. Job analyses are frequently used to give health care providers a better idea of what the job entails. An employee may not present the job objectively if he has an ulterior motive (i.e., desires to stay off work when healed or return to work when still compromised). An objective job analysis will tell the health care provider just how strenuous the job is so that the provider understands how the job impacts the employee’s health. Another opportunity that comes from a good job analysis is a fresh look at jobs that may be putting employees at high risk for injury. When job tasks are broken down, it may be more obvious how the job can be modified to make it safer. For instance, three types of jobs were done by employees in
  • 3. one department. One job involved small hand tasks with repetitive motion. Another job required long periods of static posture reaching overhead. A third job required frequent heavy lifting. Each job put employees at risk for injuries because the tasks were done all day, every day. When the three jobs were combined and employees rotated among the tasks, spending no more than two to three hours on any one task, injuries declined. The job analyses helped convince the employer to try job rotation. Selecting a Job Analysis Provider Many companies throughout the United States conduct job analyses. Some companies have elaborate equipment that is used to conduct physical performance testing, and their job analysis system is based on the equipment they are trying to sell or use. Any company that provides job analyses and pre-employment or fit-for-duty tests must be willing to defend their system in court, should charges of discrimination be raised. A company that is not willing to take that step may not have a service that will stand up to legal scrutiny. The ADA requires that the job is objectively defined, that physical requirements are objective and measurable, and that a test is designed based on the job analysis and not a specific testing system. After job analyses have been completed, performance tests can be set up onsite at the company’s location or offsite in a therapy clinic. Employers can designate someone in HR, safety or health services to be trained to conduct the tests, but in most cases the company that designed the test will also conduct the test. Use of this third-party approach helps ensure objectivity and keeps the hiring company free of biased, political or nonobjective decision-making. Results of testing should be “meets requirements” or “does not meet requirements.” So if someone can safely lift the required 15 pounds but is unable to do that 20 times per hour as specified in the job analysis, he “does not meet requirements” of that particular job. In some cases, an employer may be interested in hiring large numbers of workers in a short time period. Some companies that conduct job analyses and employment tests can also provide training for job applicants who would like to be able to do the job but did not meet the job’s requirements. Getting job applicants in shape for a specific job requires understanding the job demands so that training is directed and not generalized. Training may include skills, such as safe lifting techniques, as well as conditioning, such as developing thigh strength to make it possible to lift safely. Some government-sponsored job-training programs provide conditioning exercises along with skills training so that job applicants are given the best opportunity for success.
  • 4. Worker-Job Match Job analyses and injury prevention and injury management programs that are based on job analyses create a “worker-job match.” Ongoing injury prevention programs that include employee testing (pre- employment), ergonomic and safety programs, stretching and conditioning, and injury management rehabilitation for musculoskeletal injuries using onsite therapy, structured return-to-work programs and fit-for-duty testing provide a comprehensive approach to an employer interested in controlling workers’ compensation and disability costs and increasing productivity. Occupational injuries and employee disability can be very costly in terms of medical care and lost productivity. Job analyses that are legally defensible and job-specific can be used to develop HR policies and claims management programs that will create worker job-matching at the time of employment and throughout an employee’s tenure with a company. Gilbert E. Smith is senior partner at GSC-Arisces, a provider of work-related injury prevention programs. Quick Links: SHRM Online Safety & Security page Subscribe to SHRM’s Safety & Security HR e-newsletter