This document discusses using different finite element analysis modeling methods for the same assembly to verify results. It presents CAD models and material properties, then shows displacement and stress results for the assembly using different element types including hex, tet, shell, and solid elements. The maximum displacement and stress values are documented for each element type modeling method. The conclusion is that the objective of comparing results from different FEA modeling methods is achieved.

1. 1. Introduction
2. Objective
3. Material property of components
4. CAD model
5. Unfold CAD model for sheet metal operation
6. Base FEA assembly model
7. Load and boundary condition
8. Displacement results for deferent types of element
selection
9. Stress results for deferent types of element selection
10. Documents of max value of displacement & stress for
deferent types of element selection
11. Conclusion of the presentation

5.  Verification of FEA results by use of deferent
FEA modeling methods with same element
pattern and assembly method with same load
and boundary condition(inertia relief) .
 It is a exercise of use of deferent testing
methods and what type of assembly will satisfy
it in all respect.

6. Material Young’s shear Poison's
densitY
naMe Modulus Modulus ratio
aluMinuM
7.00e4 2.632e4 0.33 2.8e-9
alloY
steel 2.10e5 8.203e4 0.28 7.83e-9

14. Hex model of individual component is tHe base model

15. Mid face of Hex Model of individual coMponent

16. outer face of Hex Model of individual coMponent

17. tet Model extracted by splitting of Hex Model of
individual coMponent

21. iMages of area Having HigHer displaceMent value on
loading condition
HEX ELEMENT TET ELEMENT
SHELL ELEMENT IN OUTER FACE SHELL ELEMENT IN MID PLAN

22. ASSEMBLY ELEMENT NODE SHOWING MAX VALUE AND RESULT TO
TYPE VALUE BE TAKEN FOR REVIEW
HEX MODEL 1.73E+00
TET MODEL 7.27E-01
MID PLANE MODEL 1.81E+00
HIGHER DISPLACEMENT
OUTER SURFACE MODEL 1.82E+00
VALUE

25. ASSEMBLY ELEMENT ELEMENT SHOWING VALUE AND RESULT TO
TYPE MAX VALUE BE TAKEN FOR REVIEW
HEX MODEL 1.66E+02
TET MODEL 1.14E+02
MID PLANE MODEL 1.89E+02
HIGHER DISPLACEMENT
OUTER SURFACE MODEL 1.91E+02
VALUE

28.  The objective is achieved by getting different
results from assembly by use of deferent
modeling methods without change of base
pattern of FEA model.
 Same assembly has to go for dynamic inertia
relief test to gather output results variation.