- shareNL
- shareNL founders
- shareNL co-founders
- examples from (my) daily life
research on collaborative consumption (by Pieter van de Glind)
opinion leaders
stakeholders
collaborate
shareNL | Harmen van Sprang | public hearing | European Economic and Social Committee | 25 September 2013
1. EESC PUBLIC HEARING BRUSSELS
Collaborative consumption:
a sustainable model for the 21st century
‣ European Economic and Social Committee
‣ public hearing
‣ part I: concept, challenges & opportunities
‣ 25 September 2013
‣ Brussels, Belgium
2. ‘It is imperative to encourage the
relevant authorities to develop as
many actions as possible to provide
information and raise awareness
about collaborative consumption.’
- EESC
EESC OBJECTIVE
3. ‘And to carry out the necessary
studies to promote new alternatives
and evaluate the advantages of
existing studies.’ - EESC
EESC OBJECTIVE
4. CONTENTS
‣ shareNL
‣ shareNL founders
‣ shareNL co-founders
‣ examples from (my) daily life
‣ research on collaborative consumption (by Pieter van de Glind)
‣ opinion leaders
‣ stakeholders
‣ collaborate
5. shareNL
‣ collaborative consumption platform NL
‣ consumers / businesses / government
‣ research / consultancy / events
‣ 6 founders
‣ co-founder: Pieter van de Glind (research)
‣ co-founder: Harmen van Sprang
‣ @share_NL
SHARENL
22. RESEARCH
The consumer potential of collaborative
consumption.
Identifying (the) motives of Dutch collaborative
consumers &
Measuring the consumer potential of collaborative
consumption within the municipality of Amsterdam.
23. What is, and which factors explain, the willingness of Amsterdam
citizens to take part in collaborative consumption?
Sub questions:
1. what factors have caused current users of collaborative consumption to
start using it?
2. what is the willingness of Amsterdam citizens that are not yet taking
part in collaborative consumption to start doing so?
3. what factors found in sub question 1 relate to the willingness of
Amsterdam citizens that are not taking part in collaborative consumption
to start doing so?
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
25. What is, and which factors explain, the willingness of Amsterdam
citizens to take part in collaborative consumption?
Sub questions:
1. what factors have caused current users of collaborative consumption to
start using it?
2. what is the willingness of Amsterdam citizens that are not yet taking
part in collaborative consumption to start doing so?
3. what factors found in sub question 1 relate to the willingness of
Amsterdam citizens that are not taking part in collaborative consumption
to start doing so?
RESEARCH QUESTION 1
26. Extrinsic motives:
‣ practical need
‣ financial gains
‣ receiving praise from others
Intrinsic motives:
‣ social
‣ environmental
Other factors:
‣ online & offline experience
‣ (social) media
‣ recommendation
RESULTS
27. What is, and which factors explain, the willingness of Amsterdam
citizens to take part in collaborative consumption?
Sub questions:
1. what factors have caused current users of collaborative consumption to
start using it?
2. what is the willingness of Amsterdam citizens that are not yet taking
part in collaborative consumption to start doing so?
3. what factors found in sub question 1 relate to the willingness of
Amsterdam citizens that are not taking part in collaborative consumption
to start doing so?
RESEARCH QUESTION 2
28. RESEARCH SAMPLE
A large N-survey (online) amongst 1330 panel members of the
Research and Statistics Department of Amsterdam (O+S)
33. What is, and which factors explain, the willingness of Amsterdam
citizens to take part in collaborative consumption?
Sub questions:
1. what factors have caused current users of collaborative consumption to
start using it?
2. what is the willingness of Amsterdam citizens that are not yet taking
part in collaborative consumption to start doing so?
3. what factors found in sub question 1 relate to the willingness of
Amsterdam citizens that are not taking part in collaborative consumption
to start doing so?
RESEARCH QUESTION 3
35. ‘You should never lend out your wife,
your car and your camera.
Misery will follow.’
RESULTS
36. Explaining factors
‣ saving / making money
‣ meeting people
‣ contributing to a healthy environment
‣ recommendation
‣ general social attitude
‣ social attitude towards the neighbourhood
‣ environmental behaviour
‣ online and offline experience
RESULTS
NORMAL INDEPENDENT VARIABLES
37. Not explaining factors
‣ following mainstream media
‣ being subscribed and/or active on social media (like Facebook)
‣ already taking part in collaborative consumption
RESULTS
NORMAL INDEPENDENT VARIABLES
38. Small significant effects found for all demographics
‣ gender: women slightly more likely than men
‣ education level correlates positively with the dependent variables
‣ income correlates negatively with meal, skill and garden exchanges
‣ age correlates negatively with garden and accommodation
‣ ethnicity: minority of non-western foreigners most likely to take part in
collaborative consumption
‣ household type: people living alone, or alone with children are more
likely to take part in collaborative consumption than other household
groups
DEMOGRAPHICS
RESULTS
39. Konnektid Peerby Snappcar Thuisafgehaald
(Shareyourmeal)
Toogethr
I know this platform
and I have subscribed
0,2 1,1 0,7 3,2 0,3
I know this platform
but have not
subscribed
1,1 4,4 7,4 20,2 1,6
I do not know this
platform
98,7 94,5 92 76,6 98,1
Do you know these collaborative consumption platforms?
RESULTS
40. RESEARCH QUESTIONS
What is, and which factors explain, the willingness of Amsterdam
citizens to take part in collaborative consumption?
Sub questions:
1. what factors have caused current users of collaborative consumption to
start using it?
2. what is the willingness of Amsterdam citizens that are not yet taking
part in collaborative consumption to start doing so?
3. what factors found in sub question 1 relate to the willingness of
Amsterdam citizens that are not taking part in collaborative consumption
to start doing so?
41. CONCLUSIONS
There is a substantial willingness
among Amsterdam citizens to take
part in collaborative consumption.
42. CONCLUSIONS
Different people are willing to take
part in different examples of
collaborative consumption and have
different intrinsic and extrinsic
motives to do so.
44. CONCLUSIONS
From a consumer behaviour
perspective, the findings from this
research indicate that the transition
to a new socioeconomic
groundswell of collaborative
consumption is indeed taking place.
45. CONCLUSIONS
And it is likely that collaborative
consumption will gain even more
momentum over the next years.
50. OPINION LEADER: RACHEL BOTSMAN
Rachel Botsman
‘Transition from hyperconsumption towards a century
of collaborative consumption.’
51. OPINION LEADER: LISA GANSKY
Lisa Gansky
‘Technology connects us. Humanity unites us.’
As heard from Lisa at our shareNL meetup last
Thursday (via Google Hangout)
63. ‣ EESC: Dorota, Miriam & Yolanda
‣ shareNL founders
‣ colleagues in the field
‣ Syntens Innovation Center
‣ you for your interest in this topic
‣ my wife for standing beside me
‣ and last but not least...
CREDITS
Thank you