Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney
•
1 like•143 views
San Diego attorney Scott McMillan recently lost a major lawsuit where he sought to have websites that published about being in a report for child molestation, losing dozens of cases, settling a lawsuit for $20, from multiple search engines. Scott McMillan suffered a major loss when the federal court was defeated. Next, it appears Scott McMillan La Mesa attorney lumped in request to seal records with a request to order the defendant from publishing additional material about Scott McMillan. Ninth Circuit recently denied Scott McMillan's request for an injunction. The child molestation report is part of San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2017-0036344 and clearly lists San Diego attorney Scott McMillan as being involved.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Government’s motion for extension of time to file response to defendant’s mot...
The government filed a motion requesting a two-week extension to respond to the defendant's motion for return of property. Several items seized from the defendant's home during a 2008 search warrant were identified in the defendant's motion. The government is working to obtain affidavits from law enforcement agents regarding the status and location of the items. Due to the recent identification and location of some items, the government requires additional time to compile the necessary documentation for its response. The motion requests extending the response deadline from April 23rd to May 7th to allow time for completion of the affidavits and paperwork.
Rolando Cribeiro Order
This letter from Arthur P. Zucker, representing Rolando Cribeiro, requests that the court extend Mr. Cribeiro's voluntary surrender date from January 6, 2014 to mid-February 2014. Mr. Cribeiro has been assisting his mother with her health issues, which have recently become more serious, including taking her to medical appointments. Both the government and pretrial services do not oppose extending the surrender date. The letter is seeking the court's consideration and approval to allow Mr. Cribeiro more time to help his mother before beginning his five-month sentence.
Expert witness disclosure
The defendant is disclosing an expert witness, William L. Clements, to testify in their case. Clements will testify about the ambiguity of International Trading in Arms Regulations and the scope of the United States Munitions List. Specifically, he will state that the regulations do not enumerate specific military parts and that manufacturer input is needed to determine if a part is for military use. Clements will also testify that some commercial parts may be included in military aircraft, so the use alone does not determine regulatory status. The defense is seeking additional expert witnesses on military aircraft parts and manufacturing.
Doc. 13 11599-e
This document is an initial brief filed by Traian Bujduveanu in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit appealing a lower court decision. It provides background on the case, which involves claims by Bujduveanu against Dismas Charities Inc. and several employees for violations of his civil rights during his residency at a halfway house operated by Dismas. It outlines the procedural history of the case in the lower court and provides statements of facts and the case intended to support Bujduveanu's appeal.
Doc. 52
The court denied the plaintiff's motion to compel the production of documents from the defendants. The court found the motion was premature because the time allowed for the defendants to respond to the document request under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure had not expired yet. The court also noted the plaintiff failed to follow the discovery procedures outlined in a previous court order. The plaintiff may file a renewed motion to compel after the defendants' response time has passed.
Order denying plaintiff's motion to compel
The court denied the plaintiff's motion to compel the production of documents from the defendants. The court found the motion was premature because the time allowed for the defendants to respond to the document request under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure had not expired yet. The court also noted the plaintiff failed to follow the discovery procedures outlined in a previous court order. The plaintiff may file a renewed motion to compel after the defendants' response time has passed.
Motion for extension of time to file expert witness disclosures
The defendant filed a motion for an extension of time to file expert witness disclosures. The defendant is charged with multiple counts related to violating the Iran embargo and arms export control acts, which require expert testimony. The government disclosed some expert witnesses on December 17th but the disclosure was incomplete. The defense needs additional time to hire experts and file disclosures once the government provides a full disclosure. The motion requests extending the deadline to disclose experts by 30 days after the government's full disclosure, as well as extending the deadline to file motions to dismiss until after reviewing the expert disclosures.
Yoo Torture Memo Pt1
"In the March 14, 2003 memo, Yoo says the Constitution was not in play with regard to the interrogations because the Fifth Amendment (which provides for due process of law) and the Eighth Amendment (which prevents the government from employing cruel and usual punishment) does "not extend to alien enemy combatants held abroad.":
The memo goes on to explain that federal criminal statutes regarding assault and other crimes against the body don't apply to authorized military interrogations overseas and that statutes that do apply to the conduct of U.S. officials abroad pertaining to war crimes and torture establish a limited obligation on the part of interrogators to refrain from bodily harm."
Recommended
Government’s motion for extension of time to file response to defendant’s mot...
The government filed a motion requesting a two-week extension to respond to the defendant's motion for return of property. Several items seized from the defendant's home during a 2008 search warrant were identified in the defendant's motion. The government is working to obtain affidavits from law enforcement agents regarding the status and location of the items. Due to the recent identification and location of some items, the government requires additional time to compile the necessary documentation for its response. The motion requests extending the response deadline from April 23rd to May 7th to allow time for completion of the affidavits and paperwork.
Rolando Cribeiro Order
This letter from Arthur P. Zucker, representing Rolando Cribeiro, requests that the court extend Mr. Cribeiro's voluntary surrender date from January 6, 2014 to mid-February 2014. Mr. Cribeiro has been assisting his mother with her health issues, which have recently become more serious, including taking her to medical appointments. Both the government and pretrial services do not oppose extending the surrender date. The letter is seeking the court's consideration and approval to allow Mr. Cribeiro more time to help his mother before beginning his five-month sentence.
Expert witness disclosure
The defendant is disclosing an expert witness, William L. Clements, to testify in their case. Clements will testify about the ambiguity of International Trading in Arms Regulations and the scope of the United States Munitions List. Specifically, he will state that the regulations do not enumerate specific military parts and that manufacturer input is needed to determine if a part is for military use. Clements will also testify that some commercial parts may be included in military aircraft, so the use alone does not determine regulatory status. The defense is seeking additional expert witnesses on military aircraft parts and manufacturing.
Doc. 13 11599-e
This document is an initial brief filed by Traian Bujduveanu in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit appealing a lower court decision. It provides background on the case, which involves claims by Bujduveanu against Dismas Charities Inc. and several employees for violations of his civil rights during his residency at a halfway house operated by Dismas. It outlines the procedural history of the case in the lower court and provides statements of facts and the case intended to support Bujduveanu's appeal.
Doc. 52
The court denied the plaintiff's motion to compel the production of documents from the defendants. The court found the motion was premature because the time allowed for the defendants to respond to the document request under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure had not expired yet. The court also noted the plaintiff failed to follow the discovery procedures outlined in a previous court order. The plaintiff may file a renewed motion to compel after the defendants' response time has passed.
Order denying plaintiff's motion to compel
The court denied the plaintiff's motion to compel the production of documents from the defendants. The court found the motion was premature because the time allowed for the defendants to respond to the document request under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure had not expired yet. The court also noted the plaintiff failed to follow the discovery procedures outlined in a previous court order. The plaintiff may file a renewed motion to compel after the defendants' response time has passed.
Motion for extension of time to file expert witness disclosures
The defendant filed a motion for an extension of time to file expert witness disclosures. The defendant is charged with multiple counts related to violating the Iran embargo and arms export control acts, which require expert testimony. The government disclosed some expert witnesses on December 17th but the disclosure was incomplete. The defense needs additional time to hire experts and file disclosures once the government provides a full disclosure. The motion requests extending the deadline to disclose experts by 30 days after the government's full disclosure, as well as extending the deadline to file motions to dismiss until after reviewing the expert disclosures.
Yoo Torture Memo Pt1
"In the March 14, 2003 memo, Yoo says the Constitution was not in play with regard to the interrogations because the Fifth Amendment (which provides for due process of law) and the Eighth Amendment (which prevents the government from employing cruel and usual punishment) does "not extend to alien enemy combatants held abroad.":
The memo goes on to explain that federal criminal statutes regarding assault and other crimes against the body don't apply to authorized military interrogations overseas and that statutes that do apply to the conduct of U.S. officials abroad pertaining to war crimes and torture establish a limited obligation on the part of interrogators to refrain from bodily harm."
Scott Mcmillan San Diego Attorney
Scott McMillan San Diego attorney, small office in La Mesa, was sued repeatedly for legal malpractice and had other cases dismissed due to failing to file a filing fee, a brief, or other procedural issue. After San Diego attorney Scott McMillan lost a major case where he sued Darren Chaker in federal court attempting to have information about a child molestation report naming Scott McMillan removed and his past sanctions taken off search results, he ended up committing malpractice against himself where his own appeal was dismissed, just read the order!
17 1302 documents
This document provides a notice of docketing for an appeal filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The appeal is case number 17-1302, involving CardiAQ Valve Technologies v. Neovasc Inc. The notice lists critical dates for the appeal, including dates for entry of appearance, certificate of interest, docketing statement, requests for extensions of time, briefs, and scheduling conflicts for oral argument. It also provides contact information for the parties and clerks.
Necc removal
This document is a Notice of Removal filed by attorneys for New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. (NECC) to remove a personal injury lawsuit against NECC from Los Angeles County Superior Court to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The attorneys argue that the court has jurisdiction due to NECC's bankruptcy proceedings and an order establishing a multidistrict litigation regarding NECC cases. They further argue the case should be transferred to the multidistrict litigation in Massachusetts, where the bankruptcy is taking place.
NY Court of Appeals Motion to Accept Town of Dryden Ban Case
The official motion filed with the New York State Court of Appeals, NY's highest court, to hear the case of Norse Energy v Town of Dryden over the town's vote to ban all fracking and drilling throughout the township.
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision in Harper v Muskingum Watershed Conse...
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision in Harper v Muskingum Watershed Conse...Marcellus Drilling News
Anti-drilling landowners (backed by Food & Water Watch) claimed the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District had violated the deed to the land it owns by leasing that land for Utica Shale drilling. The Sixth Circuit dismissed the case. The anti-drillers lost.Sixth Circuit Court Stay of WOTUS Regulation
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on Oct 9, 2015 issued a stay on the odious and overreaching Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)/Army Corps of Engineers' (ECA) so-called update that redefines Waters of the United States (WOTUS) to include just about everything, including mud puddles. Some 13 states sued to stop the new rule. This action keeps the rule from being adopted in any of the 50 states until a lawsuit, brought by the 13 states, has a chance of playing out in court.
FindLaw | Prop. 8 Challenge Dismissal
This document summarizes a court case regarding a same-sex couple challenging California's Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage. The court granted California's motion to dismiss, finding that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge Proposition 8. Specifically, the court found that the plaintiffs did not demonstrate a concrete and particularized injury, or that their injury could be redressed by a favorable court decision, which are both requirements for standing. This was the second time the plaintiffs had brought similar challenges to the court regarding same-sex marriage bans.
5-6-2016-Pls.-Mem.-Supp.-Summ.-J.-Deitz-v.-Belmont-15-CVS-3203-Gaston-Cty.-Su...
This document is a memorandum submitted to the Gaston County Clerk of Superior Court regarding a public records lawsuit filed by Dan Deitz and Ellen Deitz Tucker against the City of Belmont and its City Manager. The memorandum provides background on the lawsuit, which seeks access to an investigative report into the Belmont Police Department that was compiled by a private firm, ISS Agency. The memorandum argues that the ISS report is not a confidential personnel record exempt from disclosure under the public records law, and requests that the court declare the report a public record subject to disclosure in its entirety or require Defendants to produce public portions of the report.
Decision by U.S. District Judge David N. Hurd on Force Majeure Case in New Yo...
Decision by U.S. District Judge David N. Hurd on Force Majeure Case in New Yo...Marcellus Drilling News
A decision issued by Judge David Hurd in a case of landowners from Broome and Tioga Counties in New York State against Chesapeake Energy and Statoilhydro. Chesapeake is attempting to extend leases on property for gas drilling claiming that the moratorium in New York has stopped them from drilling. Landowners claim the leases were signed long before horizontal hydraulic fracturing of shale was done and that Chesapeake could have drilled, conventionally, any time they chose to.USA v. Matt Beasley Extension
The United States Attorney's Office and defense counsel for Matthew Wade Beasley filed a stipulation requesting the court to extend two deadlines: 1) conducting a preliminary hearing within 14 days of the defendant's initial appearance and 2) filing an indictment within 30 days of arrest. The parties are attempting to resolve the matter before indictment through a pre-indictment plea agreement and need more time. The defendant consents to waiving his rights under the speedy trial act and rule 5.1 and extending the deadlines to allow for potential resolution. The parties request scheduling the preliminary hearing 120 days from the date of the filing.
Motion to Disqualify
This document is a motion by the United States to disqualify defense attorneys Myles Breiner and Kevin Sumida from representing defendants Katherine and Louis Kealoha. The motion argues Breiner and Sumida have conflicts of interest that prevent them from providing competent representation due to their simultaneous representation of both Kealohas and other past representations. Specifically, Breiner previously represented plaintiffs suing Louis Kealoha for civil rights violations and a defendant prosecuted by Katherine Kealoha. Sumida may be a witness in the current case. The motion asks the court to disqualify both attorneys to avoid ethical issues and ensure the trial proceeds fairly.
Illustration.notice of dismissal
Plaintiff Vladimir Malakhov filed a notice of voluntary dismissal, dismissing the case against Defendant Michael D. Cohen that was filed in the 11th Judicial Circuit Court in Miami-Dade County, Florida. Plaintiff's attorney certified that a copy of the notice of dismissal was mailed to Defendant's attorney.
PA Superior Court Decision: Northern Forests II, Inc. v. Keta Realty Company
This document summarizes a court case regarding a 1989 default judgment obtained by Northern Forests II, Inc. (NF) in a quiet title action. In 2013, the trial court struck the default judgment as void for lack of proper service on the original defendants. NF then filed an amended complaint alleging adverse possession. The trial court sustained preliminary objections and dismissed the amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action. NF and Ultra Resources, Inc. appealed the dismissal.
Fall 2010 open memo assignment no doubt v. activision right of publicity cali...
This document is a court order from a case between No Doubt, a band, and Activision Publishing regarding Activision's use of No Doubt's likenesses in a video game. The court orders both parties to submit briefs on whether No Doubt's state law claims are preempted by federal copyright law, which would give the federal court subject matter jurisdiction. Both parties must argue whether the substance of No Doubt's complaint alleges a claim covered by copyright law. The court sets a briefing schedule for both opening briefs and opposing briefs to assist it in determining if it has jurisdiction over the case.
Гильдия авторов против Hathitrust
This document is a stipulation filed in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York between The Authors Guild and several university libraries (HathiTrust) regarding replacement copies of books in the HathiTrust Digital Library. The stipulation represents that the libraries will only replace copies that are damaged, deteriorating, lost or stolen, and where a replacement cannot be obtained at a fair price. The libraries also agree to notify The Authors Guild if they change these practices for 5 years. The parties agree to dismiss the remanded claim from the appeals court with prejudice, with each party bearing their own costs.
Do Pictures belong in Judicial Opinions or Law Briefs?
What does a circuit court of appeals judge, lawyers for the Dallas Mavericks and Manny Pacquiao have in common? All included images in their opinion and briefs.
Do pictures belong in these type of law documents?
FindLaw | Madoff Bail Denied by Appeals Court
This document is a summary order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding United States v. Madoff. It affirms the district court's denial of bail for Bernard Madoff pending his sentencing. The appellate court found that given Madoff's age (70), potential lengthy sentence (150 years), and the means and opportunity to flee, the district court did not clearly err in determining he posed a risk of flight and denying bail.
FLL Airport Expansion Re-Hearing
This court order consolidates two cases, 09-1064 and 09-1067, regarding a dispute over an airport expansion. It instructs the clerk to withhold issuing the mandate until seven days after ruling on any petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc that may be filed. This will allow time for further consideration of the case without preventing the eventual enforcement of the court's ruling.
Doc. 126 1
This document provides the Defendants' response to the Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. It includes 11 disputed facts from the Plaintiff's motion. For each fact, the Defendants deny the Plaintiff's version and provide evidence from the affidavit of Ana Gispert supporting their denial. They assert that the Plaintiff violated the rules of his community corrections program by driving without permission and possessing a cell phone. As a result, the Bureau of Prisons transferred the Plaintiff back to prison to serve the remainder of his sentence.
Doc. 126 1
This document contains the Defendants' response to the Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. It disputes 11 facts asserted by the Plaintiff. The Defendants deny that the Plaintiff could perform only light duty work and assert that his work and confinement were in accordance with his medical condition. They also deny allegations regarding restrictions on religious services and assert that the Plaintiff violated rules by driving without permission and possessing a cell phone. Finally, they assert that the Bureau of Prisons, not the Defendants, transferred the Plaintiff to another facility for these violations.
Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney Sanctions
San Diego attorney Scott McMillan was sanctioned as shown by this court order where Scott McMillan , McMillan Law Firm, La Mesa, had to notify the court he paid the money ordered by the court. Scott McMillan has a long history of losing cases. This is just one case where he suffered an adverse result.
Scott McMillan v Darren Chaker RICO
Scott McMillan lost a major lawsuit against Darren Chaker, where San Diego attorney Scott McMillan demanded posts about Scott McMillan are deindexed by Google. The Ninth Circuit found Darren Chaker did not violate any law and affirmed the dismissal order of the lower court. This brief was filed by the law firm who represented Darren Chaker on appeal.
More Related Content
Similar to Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney
Scott Mcmillan San Diego Attorney
Scott McMillan San Diego attorney, small office in La Mesa, was sued repeatedly for legal malpractice and had other cases dismissed due to failing to file a filing fee, a brief, or other procedural issue. After San Diego attorney Scott McMillan lost a major case where he sued Darren Chaker in federal court attempting to have information about a child molestation report naming Scott McMillan removed and his past sanctions taken off search results, he ended up committing malpractice against himself where his own appeal was dismissed, just read the order!
17 1302 documents
This document provides a notice of docketing for an appeal filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The appeal is case number 17-1302, involving CardiAQ Valve Technologies v. Neovasc Inc. The notice lists critical dates for the appeal, including dates for entry of appearance, certificate of interest, docketing statement, requests for extensions of time, briefs, and scheduling conflicts for oral argument. It also provides contact information for the parties and clerks.
Necc removal
This document is a Notice of Removal filed by attorneys for New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. (NECC) to remove a personal injury lawsuit against NECC from Los Angeles County Superior Court to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The attorneys argue that the court has jurisdiction due to NECC's bankruptcy proceedings and an order establishing a multidistrict litigation regarding NECC cases. They further argue the case should be transferred to the multidistrict litigation in Massachusetts, where the bankruptcy is taking place.
NY Court of Appeals Motion to Accept Town of Dryden Ban Case
The official motion filed with the New York State Court of Appeals, NY's highest court, to hear the case of Norse Energy v Town of Dryden over the town's vote to ban all fracking and drilling throughout the township.
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision in Harper v Muskingum Watershed Conse...
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision in Harper v Muskingum Watershed Conse...Marcellus Drilling News
Anti-drilling landowners (backed by Food & Water Watch) claimed the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District had violated the deed to the land it owns by leasing that land for Utica Shale drilling. The Sixth Circuit dismissed the case. The anti-drillers lost.Sixth Circuit Court Stay of WOTUS Regulation
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on Oct 9, 2015 issued a stay on the odious and overreaching Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)/Army Corps of Engineers' (ECA) so-called update that redefines Waters of the United States (WOTUS) to include just about everything, including mud puddles. Some 13 states sued to stop the new rule. This action keeps the rule from being adopted in any of the 50 states until a lawsuit, brought by the 13 states, has a chance of playing out in court.
FindLaw | Prop. 8 Challenge Dismissal
This document summarizes a court case regarding a same-sex couple challenging California's Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage. The court granted California's motion to dismiss, finding that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge Proposition 8. Specifically, the court found that the plaintiffs did not demonstrate a concrete and particularized injury, or that their injury could be redressed by a favorable court decision, which are both requirements for standing. This was the second time the plaintiffs had brought similar challenges to the court regarding same-sex marriage bans.
5-6-2016-Pls.-Mem.-Supp.-Summ.-J.-Deitz-v.-Belmont-15-CVS-3203-Gaston-Cty.-Su...
This document is a memorandum submitted to the Gaston County Clerk of Superior Court regarding a public records lawsuit filed by Dan Deitz and Ellen Deitz Tucker against the City of Belmont and its City Manager. The memorandum provides background on the lawsuit, which seeks access to an investigative report into the Belmont Police Department that was compiled by a private firm, ISS Agency. The memorandum argues that the ISS report is not a confidential personnel record exempt from disclosure under the public records law, and requests that the court declare the report a public record subject to disclosure in its entirety or require Defendants to produce public portions of the report.
Decision by U.S. District Judge David N. Hurd on Force Majeure Case in New Yo...
Decision by U.S. District Judge David N. Hurd on Force Majeure Case in New Yo...Marcellus Drilling News
A decision issued by Judge David Hurd in a case of landowners from Broome and Tioga Counties in New York State against Chesapeake Energy and Statoilhydro. Chesapeake is attempting to extend leases on property for gas drilling claiming that the moratorium in New York has stopped them from drilling. Landowners claim the leases were signed long before horizontal hydraulic fracturing of shale was done and that Chesapeake could have drilled, conventionally, any time they chose to.USA v. Matt Beasley Extension
The United States Attorney's Office and defense counsel for Matthew Wade Beasley filed a stipulation requesting the court to extend two deadlines: 1) conducting a preliminary hearing within 14 days of the defendant's initial appearance and 2) filing an indictment within 30 days of arrest. The parties are attempting to resolve the matter before indictment through a pre-indictment plea agreement and need more time. The defendant consents to waiving his rights under the speedy trial act and rule 5.1 and extending the deadlines to allow for potential resolution. The parties request scheduling the preliminary hearing 120 days from the date of the filing.
Motion to Disqualify
This document is a motion by the United States to disqualify defense attorneys Myles Breiner and Kevin Sumida from representing defendants Katherine and Louis Kealoha. The motion argues Breiner and Sumida have conflicts of interest that prevent them from providing competent representation due to their simultaneous representation of both Kealohas and other past representations. Specifically, Breiner previously represented plaintiffs suing Louis Kealoha for civil rights violations and a defendant prosecuted by Katherine Kealoha. Sumida may be a witness in the current case. The motion asks the court to disqualify both attorneys to avoid ethical issues and ensure the trial proceeds fairly.
Illustration.notice of dismissal
Plaintiff Vladimir Malakhov filed a notice of voluntary dismissal, dismissing the case against Defendant Michael D. Cohen that was filed in the 11th Judicial Circuit Court in Miami-Dade County, Florida. Plaintiff's attorney certified that a copy of the notice of dismissal was mailed to Defendant's attorney.
PA Superior Court Decision: Northern Forests II, Inc. v. Keta Realty Company
This document summarizes a court case regarding a 1989 default judgment obtained by Northern Forests II, Inc. (NF) in a quiet title action. In 2013, the trial court struck the default judgment as void for lack of proper service on the original defendants. NF then filed an amended complaint alleging adverse possession. The trial court sustained preliminary objections and dismissed the amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action. NF and Ultra Resources, Inc. appealed the dismissal.
Fall 2010 open memo assignment no doubt v. activision right of publicity cali...
This document is a court order from a case between No Doubt, a band, and Activision Publishing regarding Activision's use of No Doubt's likenesses in a video game. The court orders both parties to submit briefs on whether No Doubt's state law claims are preempted by federal copyright law, which would give the federal court subject matter jurisdiction. Both parties must argue whether the substance of No Doubt's complaint alleges a claim covered by copyright law. The court sets a briefing schedule for both opening briefs and opposing briefs to assist it in determining if it has jurisdiction over the case.
Гильдия авторов против Hathitrust
This document is a stipulation filed in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York between The Authors Guild and several university libraries (HathiTrust) regarding replacement copies of books in the HathiTrust Digital Library. The stipulation represents that the libraries will only replace copies that are damaged, deteriorating, lost or stolen, and where a replacement cannot be obtained at a fair price. The libraries also agree to notify The Authors Guild if they change these practices for 5 years. The parties agree to dismiss the remanded claim from the appeals court with prejudice, with each party bearing their own costs.
Do Pictures belong in Judicial Opinions or Law Briefs?
What does a circuit court of appeals judge, lawyers for the Dallas Mavericks and Manny Pacquiao have in common? All included images in their opinion and briefs.
Do pictures belong in these type of law documents?
FindLaw | Madoff Bail Denied by Appeals Court
This document is a summary order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding United States v. Madoff. It affirms the district court's denial of bail for Bernard Madoff pending his sentencing. The appellate court found that given Madoff's age (70), potential lengthy sentence (150 years), and the means and opportunity to flee, the district court did not clearly err in determining he posed a risk of flight and denying bail.
FLL Airport Expansion Re-Hearing
This court order consolidates two cases, 09-1064 and 09-1067, regarding a dispute over an airport expansion. It instructs the clerk to withhold issuing the mandate until seven days after ruling on any petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc that may be filed. This will allow time for further consideration of the case without preventing the eventual enforcement of the court's ruling.
Doc. 126 1
This document provides the Defendants' response to the Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. It includes 11 disputed facts from the Plaintiff's motion. For each fact, the Defendants deny the Plaintiff's version and provide evidence from the affidavit of Ana Gispert supporting their denial. They assert that the Plaintiff violated the rules of his community corrections program by driving without permission and possessing a cell phone. As a result, the Bureau of Prisons transferred the Plaintiff back to prison to serve the remainder of his sentence.
Doc. 126 1
This document contains the Defendants' response to the Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. It disputes 11 facts asserted by the Plaintiff. The Defendants deny that the Plaintiff could perform only light duty work and assert that his work and confinement were in accordance with his medical condition. They also deny allegations regarding restrictions on religious services and assert that the Plaintiff violated rules by driving without permission and possessing a cell phone. Finally, they assert that the Bureau of Prisons, not the Defendants, transferred the Plaintiff to another facility for these violations.
Similar to Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney (20)
NY Court of Appeals Motion to Accept Town of Dryden Ban Case
NY Court of Appeals Motion to Accept Town of Dryden Ban Case
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision in Harper v Muskingum Watershed Conse...
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision in Harper v Muskingum Watershed Conse...
5-6-2016-Pls.-Mem.-Supp.-Summ.-J.-Deitz-v.-Belmont-15-CVS-3203-Gaston-Cty.-Su...
5-6-2016-Pls.-Mem.-Supp.-Summ.-J.-Deitz-v.-Belmont-15-CVS-3203-Gaston-Cty.-Su...
Decision by U.S. District Judge David N. Hurd on Force Majeure Case in New Yo...
Decision by U.S. District Judge David N. Hurd on Force Majeure Case in New Yo...
PA Superior Court Decision: Northern Forests II, Inc. v. Keta Realty Company
PA Superior Court Decision: Northern Forests II, Inc. v. Keta Realty Company
Fall 2010 open memo assignment no doubt v. activision right of publicity cali...
Fall 2010 open memo assignment no doubt v. activision right of publicity cali...
Do Pictures belong in Judicial Opinions or Law Briefs?
Do Pictures belong in Judicial Opinions or Law Briefs?
More from Darren Chaker
Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney Sanctions
San Diego attorney Scott McMillan was sanctioned as shown by this court order where Scott McMillan , McMillan Law Firm, La Mesa, had to notify the court he paid the money ordered by the court. Scott McMillan has a long history of losing cases. This is just one case where he suffered an adverse result.
Scott McMillan v Darren Chaker RICO
Scott McMillan lost a major lawsuit against Darren Chaker, where San Diego attorney Scott McMillan demanded posts about Scott McMillan are deindexed by Google. The Ninth Circuit found Darren Chaker did not violate any law and affirmed the dismissal order of the lower court. This brief was filed by the law firm who represented Darren Chaker on appeal.
Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney Loss
San Diego attorney Scott McMillan lost another major case in California concerning a wrongful death claim. The theories of liability Scott McMillan San Diego attorney put before the court were nothing more than meritless and the appellate court rejected his arguments just as the trial court did. Several other major losses of Scott McMillan , office in La Mesa, CA, were posted online including a case where he conceded he made false statements to the court. See United States District Court, Southern District of California, Case No. 3:16-cv-2186, Doc 82.
San Diego Scott McMillan Attorney Sanctions
Scott McMillan San Diego attorney, McMillan Academy of Law dean, order sanctioned for misconduct, malpractice, San Diego Superior Court. Court awarded sanctions against Scott McMillan, same time frame Michelle Volk , San Diego Attorney , now works for JohnWHoardAttorneys John_Howard_Attorney_San_Diego , had worked for McMillan_Law_Firm_La_Mesa
Darren Chaker blog brief
Brief filed in Hassell v. Bird, posted by Darren Chaker. The California Supreme Court found federal law protects websites from claims even where defamation is alleged. Several briefs were filed in the Supreme Court concerning this case.
Darren Chaker First Amendment
Darren Chaker shares a great case concerning the First Amendent and how probable cause to arrest may be determined by police. The Ninth Circuit gives a great analysis of the protection given by the First Amendment.
Darren chaker brief
The document is an application for leave to file an amici curiae brief in support of appellant Yelp, Inc. in a case before the California Supreme Court. The application was filed by several technology companies and non-profits, including Change.org, Engine, GitHub, Medium, Patreon, SiteJabber, and Wikimedia Foundation. They argue that the Court of Appeal's ruling deprives small collaborative platforms of important Section 230 immunity protections and threatens their ability to operate as forums for free expression and economic growth if upheld.
Scott McMillan La Mesa Faces Sanctions for Lying to Court
The defendant objects to the plaintiffs' claim that this case is related to a previous criminal case. The defendant argues that the cases do not meet the criteria to be considered related under the local civil rules as they do not involve the same parties, claims, property, or events. Additionally, the defendant asserts that the plaintiffs' counsel failed to properly file a notice of related cases as required by the rules. The defendant requests that the court deny the plaintiffs' claim of related cases and considers sanctions against the plaintiffs' counsel for failing to follow the proper procedures.
EFF Brief Darren Chaker
Darren Chaker shares this brief on Cell phone location data, and how police obtain this data without a warrant. The brief filed by the EFF and filed in the Supreme Court focuses on the expectation of privacy.
Cases concerns cell tower privacy, use of Stingray, and other investigative devices continues , and we hope the Supreme Court provides some clarification on the rule.
Darren Chaker First Amendment Brief
This document is an amicus brief filed by the First Amendment Lawyers Association in support of the respondent in the Supreme Court case United States v. Alvarez. The brief argues that the government's position urging limits on First Amendment protections is alarming and inconsistent with decades of precedent. It asserts that the Court should reject defining new categories of unprotected speech and should apply the traditional categorical approach to determining protection, maintaining a strong presumption of protection for all expression. The brief aims to caution the Court against eroding established First Amendment principles in this case.
Darren Chaker Privacy Brief
The Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine whether law enforcement's acquisition of seven months of cell site location information from a suspect's cell phone provider without a warrant violated the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Circuit initially ruled that it did violate the Fourth Amendment, but then reversed en banc. The petitioner argues that the Supreme Court should reconsider precedents on reasonable expectations of privacy and the third-party doctrine in light of new technologies that can track location over long periods of time without user knowledge. The petitioner also argues the good faith exception should not apply given ambiguities in the Stored Communications Act.
Scott Mcmillan law firm la mesa
Scott McMillan, Michelle Volk , of McMillan_Law_Firm_La_Mesa sued for fraud, legal malpractice and sounds to me like elder abuse by forcing a lady to work for free. Read the pending federal lawsuit for details brought by a top national law firm in San Diego. The San Diego federal court case is now pending.
Darren Chaker Fourth Amendment Order
Federal court order from Nevada, Fourth Amendment issues, detailing illegal detention. Darren Chaker, writes frequently on such issues and was provided the order to help educate people on rights and judicial cases impacting every day life.
First Amendment Darren Chaker
San_Diego_ACLU brief filed in civil rights case in federal court, Darren Chaker provides this to the public to better understand the value and aptitude the ACLU brings to cases when it deals with civil rights matters,
Darren Chaker Victory in Texas
Impact litigation at its finest. Darren Chaker made law in Texas with top First Amendment law firm Graves Dougherty Hearon & Moody - sure they cost a lot,but the case made law and now allows any person to access the full roster of peace officer and personnel employed by any municipal or state agency. Former Constable Ron Hickman, opposed Darren Chaker based on frivolous arguments disclosing the names of his employees would risk lives. Incredibly, every day peace officers go to court and state there name in open court, sign there name on affidavits for search and arrest warrants, and names appear in police reports. The arguments failed and the case has been used over 136 times by the media, individuals, and attorneys,
Privacy Law Update Darren Chaker
Privacy Law Update Darren Chaker provides from a true leading law firm discusses privacy law , court cases, appellate opinions in federal and state court, as well as other privacy issues employers need to know in California.
Privacy Court Opinion Darren Chaker
Darren Chaker, opinion by federal court on privacy issues, and in federal case. Important issues in privacy and internet are addressed in lawsuit, very useful cases discussed.
Darren Chaker Judicial Notice Motion
Darren_Chaker provides Motion for Judicial Notice, filed in California Supreme Court, in pending merits petition concerning the court taking notice of Secretary of State records in the appeal.
Federal Lawsuit San Diego Police Darren Chaker
1983 civil rights lawsuit against San Diego Police, Darren_Chaker, provides concerning alleged civil rights abuse in California. Attorney fees are common in civil rights cases.
Darren Chaker Prior Restraint First Amendment
The document is an amicus letter brief submitted by media organizations including the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press to the Court of Appeal of California. The brief argues that the court's order sealing a reply brief and directing its return amounts to an unconstitutional prior restraint on speech. The order prevents the media from possessing and reporting information that was lawfully obtained. Prior restraints are strongly disfavored and the order should be vacated to avoid establishing a dangerous precedent restricting lawful publication.
More from Darren Chaker (20)
Scott McMillan La Mesa Faces Sanctions for Lying to Court
Scott McMillan La Mesa Faces Sanctions for Lying to Court
Recently uploaded
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
Incometax Compliance_PF_ ESI- June 2024
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
असंगत न्यायालयी फैसलों के कारण भारत में महिलाओं को सुरक्षित गर्भपात के लिए एक भ्रामक और अनुचित कानूनी लड़ाई का सामना करना पड़ रहा है।
1比1制作(swansea毕业证书)英国斯旺西大学毕业证学位证书托业成绩单原版一模一样
原版纸张【微信：741003700 】【(swansea毕业证书)英国斯旺西大学毕业证】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Business and Corporate Case Update (2024)
Presentation at the Idaho State Bar Business & Corporate Law Section's Annual Meeting on June 4, 2024
原版仿制(aut毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰理工大学毕业证文凭毕业证雅思成绩单原版一模一样
原版纸张【微信：741003700 】【(aut毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰理工大学毕业证文凭】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理(waikato毕业证书)新西兰怀卡托大学毕业证双学位证书原版一模一样
原版纸张【微信：741003700 】【(waikato毕业证书)新西兰怀卡托大学毕业证】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
slide deck : Patenting innovations in 3D printing
定制(nus毕业证书)新加坡国立大学毕业证学位证书实拍图原版一模一样
原版纸张【微信：741003700 】【(nus毕业证书)新加坡国立大学毕业证学位证书】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Recently uploaded (20)
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney
- 1. SVG/Sealed Documents UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SCOTT A. MCMILLAN and THE MCMILLAN LAW FIRM, APC, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross- Appellees, v. DARREN D. CHAKER, DBA Counter Forensics, an individual, and as trustee of PLATINUM HOLDINGS GROUP TRUST; et al., Defendants-Appellees/Cross- Appellants. No. 17-56676 18-55343 D.C. No. 3:16-cv-02186-WQH-MDD Southern District of California, San Diego ORDER Before: Peter L. Shaw, Appellate Commissioner. excerpts of record under seal is granted No. 25) to maintain the remaining materials in Volume 8 under seal is granted. is denied without prejudice to renewal before the district court. Because the materials in Volume 8, the motion to seal itself will be maintained under seal. The Clerk will publicly file the first brief on cross appeal and Volumes 1 through 7 of the excerpts of record, and will file Volume 8 under seal. FILED APR 23 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
- 2. SVG/Sealed Documents 2 The existing briefing schedule will continue in effect.