1. CORPORATE PRESENTATION
AUGUST 2012
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M

2. Cautionary Statement
The
informa-on
in
this
document
has
been
prepared
as
of
March
13,
2012.
Certain
statements
contained
in
this
document
cons-tute
“forward-­‐looking
statements”
within
the
meaning
of
the
United
States
Private
Securi-es
Li-ga-on
Reform
Act
of
1995
and
forward
looking
informa-on
under
the
provisions
of
Canadian
provincial
securi-es
laws.
When
used
in
this
document,
the
words
“an-cipate”,
“expect”,
“es-mate”,
“forecast”,
“will”,
“planned”,
and
similar
expressions
are
intended
to
iden-fy
forward-­‐looking
statements
or
informa-on.
Specifically,
this
presenta-on
contains
forward
looking
statements
regarding
the
results
and
projec-ons
contained
in
the
March
13,
2012
technical
report
of
the
TSX : R
Haile
Gold
project,
including
the
expected
mine
life,
recovery,
capital
costs,
cash
opera-ng
costs
and
other
costs
and
an-cipated
produc-on
of
the
described
open
pit
mine,
the
projected
internal
rate
of
return,
the
projected
payback
period,
the
availability
of
capital
for
development,
sensi-vity
to
metal
prices,
ore
grade,
the
reserve
and
resource
es-mates
on
the
project,
the
financial
analysis,
the
-ming
for
comple-on
of
the
revised
feasibility
study
on
the
Haile
Gold
project,
the
-ming
and
amount
of
future
produc-on,
the
-ming
of
construc-on
of
the
proposed
mine
and
process
facili-es,
capital
and
opera-ng
expenditures,
the
-ming
of
the
receipt
of
permits,
rights
and
authoriza-ons,
communica-ons
with
local
stakeholders
and
community
rela-ons,
availability
of
financing
and
any
and
all
other
-ming,
development,
opera-onal,
financial,
economic,
legal,
regulatory
and
poli-cal
factors
that
may
influence
future
events
or
condi-ons
and
expected
drilling
ac-vi-es.
In
addi-on,
this
presenta-on
also
contains
updated
resource
es-mates
contained
in
the
March
13,
2012
technical
reports.
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
Scien-fic
and
technical
informa-on
referred
herein
has
been
extracted
from
and
are
hereby
qualified
in
their
en-rety
by
reference
to
the
aforemen-oned
technical
reports
(“Technical
Reports”).
Joshua
Snider,
P.E.,
Thomas
L.
Drielick,
P.E.,
Lee
“Pat”
Gochnour,
M.M.S.A.,
John
Marek,
P.E.
and
Derek
Wiwer,
P.E.
are
responsible
for
preparing
the
Technical
Reports.
Each
of
the
above
referenced
persons
is
a
“qualified
person”
as
defined
in
Na-onal
Instrument
43-­‐101
—
Standards
of
Disclosure
for
Mineral
Projects.
Such
forward-­‐looking
statements
are
based
on
a
number
of
material
factors
and
assump-ons,
including,
but
not
limited
in
any
manner,
those
disclosed
in
any
another
of
Romarco’s
public
filings,
and
include
the
ul-mate
determina-on
of
mineral
reserves
and
resources,
availability
and
final
receipt
of
required
approvals,
licenses
and
permits,
sufficient
working
capital
to
develop
and
operate
the
proposed
mine,
access
to
adequate
services
and
supplies,
economic
condi-ons,
commodity
prices,
foreign
currency
exchange
rates,
interest
rates,
access
to
capital
and
debt
markets
and
associated
cost
of
funds,
availability
of
a
qualified
work
force,
lack
of
social
opposi-on
and
legal
challenges,
and
the
ul-mate
ability
to
mine,
process
and
sell
mineral
products
on
economically
favorable
terms.
While
Romarco
considers
these
assump-ons
to
be
reasonable
based
on
informa-on
currently
available
to
it,
they
may
prove
to
be
incorrect.
Actual
results
may
vary
from
such
forward-­‐looking
informa-on
for
a
variety
of
reasons,
including
but
not
limited
to
risks
and
uncertain-es
disclosed
in
other
Romarco
filings
at
www.sedar.com.
Forward-­‐looking
statements
are
based
upon
management’s
beliefs,
es-mate
and
opinions
on
the
date
the
statements
are
made
and,
other
than
as
required
by
law,
Romarco
does
not
intend,
and
undertakes
no
obliga-on
to
update
any
forward-­‐looking
informa-on
to
reflect,
among
other
things,
new
informa-on
or
future
events
Cau-onary
Note
to
United
States
Investors
Concerning
Es-mates
of
Measured,
Indicated
and
Inferred
Resources:
Certain
tables
may
use
the
terms
“Measured”,
“Indicated”
and
“Inferred”
Resources.
United
States
investors
are
advised
that
while
such
terms
are
recognized
and
required
by
Canadian
regula-ons,
however,
the
United
States
Securi-es
and
Exchange
Commission
does
not
recognize
them.
“Inferred
Mineral
Resources”
have
a
great
amount
of
uncertainty
as
to
their
existence,
and
as
to
their
economic
and
legal
feasibility.
It
cannot
be
assumed
that
all
or
any
part
of
an
Inferred
Mineral
Resource
will
ever
be
upgraded
to
a
higher
category.
Under
Canadian
rules,
es-mates
of
Inferred
Mineral
Resources
may
not
form
the
basis
of
feasibility
or
other
economic
studies.
United
States
investors
are
cau-oned
not
to
assume
that
all
or
any
part
of
Measured
or
Indicated
Mineral
Resources
will
ever
be
converted
into
Mineral
Reserves.
United
States
investors
are
also
cau-oned
not
to
assume
that
all
or
any
part
of
a
Mineral
Resource
is
economically
or
legally
mineable.
All
figures
are
US$
unless
otherwise
indicated
2

3. Introduction Haile Gold Mine
u Currently in EIS and Permitting process
TSX : R
u Detailed engineering work on-going
• Target 75% completion by year end
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
u Continuous review of mine plan, alternatives, expansion studies,
underground review
u Exploration reduced in current economic environment
• 3 rigs operating at Haile and regional targets
u $80M in the bank (at July 31, 2012)
u Continued institutional shareholder support
3

4. What makes Haile a unique asset?
u Rated #6 out of 76 new mines starting in 2012 to 2020 by BMO
(May 7, 2012)
TSX : R
u Experienced development team in place
u Key long-lead equipment ordered and secured
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
• Mobile mine fleet
• SAG / Ball mills
u Location – Location – Location
u Low capex ($320mm)
u Low operating costs ($379 / oz LOM)
u High grade (2.06 g/t)
u District potential
4

5. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
STATEMENT PROCESS
þ Contractor
(3rd
Party)
SelecOon
–
Sept.
2,
2011
(announced
Sept.
26,
2011)
þ NoOce
of
Intent
Federal
Register
–
Sept.
23,
2011
TSX : R
þ 30
day
noOce
period
þ Public
Scoping
MeeOng
–
Oct.
27,
2011
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
þ Scoping
Comment
Period
Closed
–
Nov.
28,
2011
CURRENT
STAGE PreparaOon
of
DraJ
EIS
DraJ
EIS
filed
and
comment
period
opens
–
Dec.
14,
2012
DraJ
EIS
Public
Hearing
–
Jan.
29,
2013
DraJ
EIS
comment
period
closes
–
Feb.
28,
2013
Final
EIS
filed
–
July
19,
2013
Record
of
Decision
(ROD)
on
404
Wetlands
permit
–
Aug.
16,
2013
5

6. HGM PERMITTING
TSX : R
Federal – USACE* State – DHEC**
• 404 Wetlands Permit only • 401 Water Quality Certification
USACE is sole deciding • Mine Operating Permit
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
•
regulatory body • Air Quality Permit
• All other agencies are
• NPDES Permit
cooperating or commenting
agencies only – EPA, US Fish • Others
and Wildlife, Catawba Nation,
DHEC, SCDNR etc.
* US Army Corps of Engineers
** South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
6

7. CLEAR PLAN TO BRING
HAILE INTO PRODUCTION
• Strong balance sheet with approximately $80M in cash and no debt(1)
• Well defined project schedules and clear development milestones
TSX : R
Project Schedule for EIS Haile Milestones and Status Report
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Milestone / Activity Status
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 H1 H2
Complete feasibility study P
State mine operating permit
submitted P
Feasibility Study
401/404 permit submitted P
Optimization Resource / reserve report P
Permitting Expand Haile Horseshoe P
Identify new targets P
Construction
Acquire other properties P
Production Explore regional targets P
Update Resource P
Exploration
Draft EIS 2012
7
(1) As disclosed in Q2 MDA June 30, 2012

8. RESOURCES RESERVES
OPEN PIT UNDERGROUND
2011 MEASURED + INDICATED RESOURCES AT US$1,200 GOLD (1)
METRIC TONNES g/t CONTAINED oz
TSX : R
(000s) Au (000s)
MEASURED 36,894 1.79 2,125
INDICATED 34,277 1.74 1,914
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
MEASURED + INDICATED 71,171 1.77 4,039
INFERRED 20,125 1.24 801
2010 RESERVES AT US$950 GOLD (1)
METRIC TONNES g/t CONTAINED oz
(000s) Au (000s)
PROVEN RESERVE 19,592 2.19 1,382
PROBABLE RESERVE 10,917 1.82 636
PROVEN PROBABLE 30,509 2.06 2,018
RESERVE
(1) From March 13, 2012 Technical Report filed on www.sedar.com on March 19, 2012
8

9. LOW CAPITAL COST
Development Capex per ounce of Measured Indicated Resources (inclusive) (US$/oz Au Eq.)(1)
$156
TSX : R
$83 Average: $85
$81
$78
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
$70
$66
$63
Torex Rainy River Extorre International Tower Guyana Goldfields Romarco Victoria Gold
Hill
9
Source: BMO Capital Markets, as at April 30, 2012
(1) Includes precious metals only calculated at long term consensus prices of Au US$1,200/oz and Ag of US$21.35/oz

10. HIGH GRADE FOR OPEN PIT
TSX : R
3.50! 3.17!
3.00!
2.50!
2.09! 2.06!
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
2.00!
1.46!
1.50!
1.03!
1.00! 0.78! 0.73!
0.50!
0.00!
Guyana Goldfields! NovaGold! ROMARCO! Gabriel Resources! Detour Gold! Victoria Gold! Andina!
Reserve Grade for Primary Open Pit Asset (g/t Au) (1)
10
(1) Source: Company Disclosure at March 31, 2012

11. LOW CASH COST
TSX : R
$700!
$617! LOWEST QUARTILE AVERAGE CASH
$600! COST IN Q4 2011 (1)
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
$500!
$379! $428!
$400!
$300!
$200!
$100!
$0!
Industry Average (1) ROMARCO Lowest Quartile (1)
LOM Average (2)
11
(1) Source: Brook Hunt estimates
(2) As per February 2011 Feasibility Study results included in March 13, 2012 Technical Report filed on March 19, 2012 on sedar.com

12. NPV IRR SENSITIVITY
TO GOLD PRICE
Pre-tax NPV and IRR Sensitivity to Gold Price (1)
TSX : R
($ Millions, except gold price)
Gold
PAYBACK
Price
NPV @0%
NPV @ 5%
NPV @ 10%
IRR %
YEARS
Per oz.
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
$1500
$1,426
$930
$621
47.0%
2.0
$1400
$1,259
$811
$534
42.3%
2.2
$1300
$1,092
$693
$447
37.6%
2.4
$1200
$925
$575
$359
32.7%
2.7
$1100
$758
$457
$272
27.6%
3.1
$1000
$591
$339
$185
22.3%
3.8
BASE CASE $950
$507
$279
$141
19.6%
4.2
$800
$257
$102
$10
10.7%
7.6
$700
$90
($16)
($77)
4.0%
9.4
12
(1) As per February 2011 Feasibility Study included in March 13, 2012 Technical Report filed on March 19, 2012 on sedar.com - based on capital costs of $275 million not updated capital cost of $320
million from December 31, 2011 MDA

13. HAILE GOLD MINE
FEASIBILITY STUDY HIGHLIGHTS
u Feasibility Study does not include deep mineralization:
Ø Horseshoe, Mustang, Palomino and Snake Deep deposits
TSX : R
3.5 km
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
274 m
DEPTH (m)
610 m
13

14. HAILE CROSS SECTION
14
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M TSX : R

15. HAILE CROSS SECTION
15
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M TSX : R

16. HAILE CROSS SECTION
16
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M TSX : R

17. RESOURCE GROWTH
At year end 2011
3.5 km
LEDBETTER
TSX : R
MUSTANG
CHAMPION HORSESHOE
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
SMALL
SNAKE
SOUTH PIT
PALOMINO
CHAMPION SMALL SOUTH PIT LEDBETTER SNAKE
HAILE LONG SECTION
US$950 RESERVE PIT LIMITS
HORSESHOE
MUSTANG
US$1200 RESOURCE SHELL
DISCOVERY HOLE
RC-1816 RC-1724 17
2012 EXPLORATION TARGETS 77.7m of 8.0 g/t Au RCT-129 PALOMINO 62.5m @9.6 g/t Au
70.1m @ 5.5 g/t Au

18. CAPITAL STRUCTURE
Capitalization Summary
TSX : R
Exchange/ Symbol TSX:R
Share Price(1) C$0.60
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
Shares Outstanding (Basic) 584.3M
FD Shares Outstanding (TSM)(2) 586.4M
Market Capitalization(1) C$350M
52 Week High / Low(1) C$1.78 / C$0.49
Cash Balance (July 31, 2012) US$80M
(1) As at close on July 31, 2012 18
(2) Includes 2.1M “in-the-money” options at an average strike price of C$0.30 as of July 31, 2012

19. 70% Institutional Ownership
BlackRock
Sun Valley Gold
TSX : R
Franklin Templeton Investments
TOP 15 SHAREHOLDERS
Van Eck
Oppenheimer Funds
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
Norges Bank
Tocqueville
Colonial First State
J.P. Morgan
Fidelity Investments
OF OUR SHARES ARE
TD
INSTITUTIONALLY
Baker Steel Capital Managers / Ruffer OWNED
URAM
BMO Asset Management
Universal Investment 19

20. ANALYST COVERAGE
TSX : R
TARGET PRICE
NBF $2.05
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
Paradigm $2.00
RBC $1.25
GMP $1.00
BMO $0.75
20

21. P/Street NAV
TSX : R
AVERAGE = 0.55x
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
ROMARCO
21
Source: BMO Capital Markets, as at June 30, 2012

22. EV / Resources (1)
$250
$230
TSX : R
$200
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
$150
$108
$100
AVERAGE = $79
$45 $43
$50
$35 $31 $31 $30
$0
Rubicon Torex Belo Sun Romarco
ROMARCO Eco Oro Gabriel Rainy River Midas Gold
Minerals Minerals Resources
22
Source: BMO Capital Markets, as at June 30, 2012
(1) Resources include PP, MI and Inferred precious metals only

23. CAPITAL COSTS BREAKDOWN
TSX : R
Component of CAPEX Feasibility $275M vs March 2012 $320M
EQUIPMENT ~ 1/3 • Scope changes to water
treatment plant
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
CONSTRUCTION ~ 1/3
• Additional liners
OTHER ~ 1/3 • Updated commodity pricing
TOTAL PROJECT $320M • Design enhancements for tailings
and overburden storage areas
• Improved silver recovery circuit
• Added $17M to cover
potential inflation
23

24. CAPITAL COSTS BREAKDOWN -
EQUIPMENT
(in millions of USD)
EQUIPMENT TOTAL ~ 1/3 of CAPEX
TSX : R
Ordered and locked in ~$45
• CAT, Hitachi Shovel, SAG/Ball mill, Other processing
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
equipment
• CAT equipment currently in South Carolina
• ~$0.2 in monthly progress/holding payments
Orders negotiated / prices set ~$25
(pending release for manufacture – indexed to commodities)
• Fine grinding mills, Water Treatment plant, etc.
Not yet ordered, not long-lead time ~$30
24

25. CAPITAL COSTS BREAKDOWN -
CONSTRUCTION
(in millions of USD)
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL ~ 1/3 of CAPEX
TSX : R
Exposure to inflation
• Oil / diesel, concrete, steel etc.
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
• Recently priced
• Supply and demand
• Currently local area has many
contractors and high unemployment
25

26. CAPITAL COSTS BREAKDOWN -
OTHER
(in millions of USD)
OTHER TOTAL ~ 1/3 of CAPEX
TSX : R
• Contingency $30
• Inflation $17
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
• Owner’s Cost ~$20
• EPCM ~$24
• Pre-stripping ~$20
• Little risk of inflation
• $47M combined in contingency ($30M) and
inflation ($17M)
26

27. CAPEX CREEP?
u Why such low capex at Haile (relative to other projects)?
u Other projects are remote and in high risk
TSX : R
environments
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
u Location and Infrastructure excellent at Haile
u Not building local/regional
Ø Power plant
Ø Dams for water supplies
Ø Many kilometers of roads
Ø Employee camp
27

28. BURN RATE – Through 2012
Cash at July 31, 2012 - $80M
(in millions of USD)
TSX : R
Remaining 2012 burn
• Exploration ~$7 - 9
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
• Corporate ~$4 - 6
• HGM project ~$26 - 28
includes capex, engineering, equipment payment, EIS, land, etc.
Projected Cash at end of 2012 - $50M to $55M
28

29. Financing Alternatives
u Funding required ~$370M u Engagement with Barclays
u Construction ~$300M Bank PLC
TSX : R
u Pre-stripping ~$20M u Barclays engaged as
u Working capital ~$50M financial advisor for
potential debt financing
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
u Funding sources u Independent review (PAH)
u Debt – targeting ~$175M - $225M complete
u Equipment lease – targeting ~$25M
u Other options – targeting ~$170M - $220M
Ø Equity
Ø Royalty stream
Ø Forward sale
Ø Alternative debt (eg., high yield, convertible)
Ø Strategic Investor
29

30. STRONG BOARD, MANAGEMENT
TECHNICAL TEAM
Proven gold mine development, finance, permitting and operations experience
Romarco has the team in place to bring Haile into production
TSX : R
Experienced Board of Directors Strong Management Technical Team
Leendert Krol, acting Chairman Diane R. Garrett, Ph.D., President CEO
§ Former Newmont § Former Dayton Mining, US Global Investors
James R. Arnold, Sr. VP, COO
Diane R. Garrett § Former Freeport, Gold Fields – Richards Award Winner
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M
§ Former Dayton Mining, US Global Investors
Stan Rideout, Sr. VP, CFO
James R. Arnold § Former Phelps Dodge
§ Former Freeport, Gold Fields – Richards Award Winner
David Thomas, VP, General Manager
Don MacDonald James Berry, Chief Geologist Regional Exploration Manager
§ CFO KGHM International (formerly QuadraFNX), former § Former Barrick
NovaGold, DeBeers, Dayton Mining
Brent Anderson, Mine Manager
John Marsden § Former Quadra, Freeport
§ Consultant, former Freeport – Richards Award Winner
Mike Gleason, Construction Manager
Patrick Michaels § Former Freeport
§ Portfolio Manager – Zuri-invest, Switzerland Jim Wickens, Process Manager
§ Former Barrick
Gary A. Sugar
§ Former RBC Capital Markets Johnny Pappas, Director of Environmental Affairs
§ Former Freeport
Robert van Doorn
§ Former Mundoro, Rio Narcea, Morgan Stanley Ramona Schneider, Environmental Manager
§ Former Kinross
Dan Symons, Vice President, Investor Relations
§ Former Renmark Financial 30

31. CONTACT INFORMATION
Dan Symons
Vice President, Investor Relations
dsymons@romarco.com
Brookfield Place
161 Bay Street, 27th Floor
Toronto, Ontario M5J 2S1
Tel: 416.367.5500
Fax: 416.367.5505
Email: info@romarco.com
WWW .R O MA R C O .C O M