1. INTRODUCTIONThe right to die is the concept based on the opinion that a human being is entitled to end their life.
Euthanasia, or mercy killing, means the deliberate killing of a patient who is terminally ill and/or
in severe and chronic pain. The word ‘Euthanasia’ is a derivative from the Greek words ‘eu’ and
‘thanotos’ which literally mean “good death”.1 The death of a terminally ill patient is accelerated
through active or passive means in order to relieve such patient of pain or suffering. However, the
issue of euthanasia is not as simple as the literal translation of the term. The issue is complex and
involves several moral, ethical, societal and economic aspects.2 Those who are in favor of
euthanasia argue on the right to self-determination and futility of prolonging a life without meaning
and dignity and those who are against the practice believe that emphasizes must be given to
palliative care, and that legalizing euthanasia would be violate of the principle of sanctity of life.3
It is because of this that most of the States allow only passive euthanasia and to check the misuse
enacted laws on the subject.
1) The document discusses euthanasia from socio-legal perspectives in India, including provisions in international and national public health systems and constitutional and judicial trends concerning the right to euthanasia.
2) It explores philosophical and religious views on euthanasia from various traditions like Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and examines how advances in medicine have complicated concepts of death.
3) Key differences are outlined between euthanasia, assisted suicide, and suicide. Arguments for euthanasia include relieving extreme pain, respecting patient autonomy when quality of life is low, and potentially saving medical resources.
1) Physician assisted suicide (PAS) involves a doctor helping a patient end their life through medical means, such as providing a lethal dose of drugs. It is currently illegal in the UK under the Suicide Act 1961.
2) The case law has established a distinction between passive euthanasia through withdrawal or non-provision of life-sustaining treatment (allowed) versus active euthanasia through administering lethal substances (illegal).
3) The Purdy case established that the DPP must provide clear guidelines on when prosecutions for assisted suicide will occur to allow individuals to make informed choices about their end of life plans within the law.
This document discusses euthanasia in Nigeria from a legal and societal perspective. It begins by defining euthanasia and outlining the medical justifications provided for it. However, it argues that the right to life is protected under the Nigerian constitution and cannot be waived, with few exceptions. Killing another person is seen as highly unlawful and against societal norms. The document concludes that euthanasia would not be accepted in Nigerian society as it violates the sacredness of life.
This document discusses the legal definition and requirements of a dying declaration according to Indian law. It notes that a dying declaration is a statement made by a person about the cause of their death or circumstances leading to their death. For a dying declaration to be admissible, the victim must have been mentally fit and unable to have been prompted when making the statement. The statement is best recorded by a magistrate with a doctor's certification of the victim's mental state. Dying declarations can help determine the cause of death in criminal cases.
Dying declaration is an exception to the rule against hearsay evidence. It refers to statements made by a dying person about the cause of their death. It is considered reliable because the maxim is that a person would not lie as they are dying and facing their maker. For a dying declaration to be admissible, it must relate to the cause of death, be made by a competent person, and not be inconsistent, doubtful, influenced, or untrue. Dying declarations can be written, verbal, through gestures, or nods and are given evidentiary value in court.
This document defines different types of medical evidence and provides examples. It discusses documentary evidence such as medical certificates, medico-legal reports, and dying declarations. Medical certificates are issued by doctors regarding health matters. Medico-legal reports are prepared by doctors in criminal cases and contain three parts: introduction, examination findings, and opinion/inference. Dying declarations are statements made by a dying person about the cause of death. Oral evidence refers to witness testimony in court regarding facts perceived directly through senses. Hearsay and circumstantial evidence are also discussed as indirect types of evidence.
Following is the detailed description of Dying Deposition and Dying Declaration being followed in Indian Legalities from a Medical students perspective. The presentation should prove to be helpful for educators and primarily for medical students for their understanding and academics.
References - Forensic Medicine And Toxicology (29th edition) By DR. K.S. Narayan Reddy
Introduction to Euthanasia – Medically Assisted Murder or Mercy Killing by Sh...SHRADDHA PANDIT
This is a PPT on basic introduction to Euthanasia – Medically Assisted Murder or Mercy Killing. It is useful for BA as well as BA.LLB, BBA.LLB, LLM, UGC NET and SET. Students should refer to textbooks and reference books for in-depth study.
1) The document discusses euthanasia from socio-legal perspectives in India, including provisions in international and national public health systems and constitutional and judicial trends concerning the right to euthanasia.
2) It explores philosophical and religious views on euthanasia from various traditions like Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and examines how advances in medicine have complicated concepts of death.
3) Key differences are outlined between euthanasia, assisted suicide, and suicide. Arguments for euthanasia include relieving extreme pain, respecting patient autonomy when quality of life is low, and potentially saving medical resources.
1) Physician assisted suicide (PAS) involves a doctor helping a patient end their life through medical means, such as providing a lethal dose of drugs. It is currently illegal in the UK under the Suicide Act 1961.
2) The case law has established a distinction between passive euthanasia through withdrawal or non-provision of life-sustaining treatment (allowed) versus active euthanasia through administering lethal substances (illegal).
3) The Purdy case established that the DPP must provide clear guidelines on when prosecutions for assisted suicide will occur to allow individuals to make informed choices about their end of life plans within the law.
This document discusses euthanasia in Nigeria from a legal and societal perspective. It begins by defining euthanasia and outlining the medical justifications provided for it. However, it argues that the right to life is protected under the Nigerian constitution and cannot be waived, with few exceptions. Killing another person is seen as highly unlawful and against societal norms. The document concludes that euthanasia would not be accepted in Nigerian society as it violates the sacredness of life.
This document discusses the legal definition and requirements of a dying declaration according to Indian law. It notes that a dying declaration is a statement made by a person about the cause of their death or circumstances leading to their death. For a dying declaration to be admissible, the victim must have been mentally fit and unable to have been prompted when making the statement. The statement is best recorded by a magistrate with a doctor's certification of the victim's mental state. Dying declarations can help determine the cause of death in criminal cases.
Dying declaration is an exception to the rule against hearsay evidence. It refers to statements made by a dying person about the cause of their death. It is considered reliable because the maxim is that a person would not lie as they are dying and facing their maker. For a dying declaration to be admissible, it must relate to the cause of death, be made by a competent person, and not be inconsistent, doubtful, influenced, or untrue. Dying declarations can be written, verbal, through gestures, or nods and are given evidentiary value in court.
This document defines different types of medical evidence and provides examples. It discusses documentary evidence such as medical certificates, medico-legal reports, and dying declarations. Medical certificates are issued by doctors regarding health matters. Medico-legal reports are prepared by doctors in criminal cases and contain three parts: introduction, examination findings, and opinion/inference. Dying declarations are statements made by a dying person about the cause of death. Oral evidence refers to witness testimony in court regarding facts perceived directly through senses. Hearsay and circumstantial evidence are also discussed as indirect types of evidence.
Following is the detailed description of Dying Deposition and Dying Declaration being followed in Indian Legalities from a Medical students perspective. The presentation should prove to be helpful for educators and primarily for medical students for their understanding and academics.
References - Forensic Medicine And Toxicology (29th edition) By DR. K.S. Narayan Reddy
Introduction to Euthanasia – Medically Assisted Murder or Mercy Killing by Sh...SHRADDHA PANDIT
This is a PPT on basic introduction to Euthanasia – Medically Assisted Murder or Mercy Killing. It is useful for BA as well as BA.LLB, BBA.LLB, LLM, UGC NET and SET. Students should refer to textbooks and reference books for in-depth study.
Euthanasia refers to intentionally ending a life to relieve suffering from an incurable disease or condition. It can be voluntary, non-voluntary, or involuntary depending on patient consent. Arguments for euthanasia include autonomy, compassion, and controlling suffering, while arguments against include the slippery slope towards non-voluntary euthanasia and that there are alternatives to relieve suffering without intentionally ending a life. Religiously and legally, active euthanasia is generally prohibited but passive euthanasia may be permitted in some circumstances with appropriate safeguards.
This document discusses euthanasia and its classification, components, legal status in India, and consequences. It defines euthanasia as the intentional ending of a patient's life by a doctor at the request of the patient or family member. Euthanasia can be voluntary, non-voluntary, or involuntary. It also distinguishes between active euthanasia, which uses lethal substances, and passive euthanasia, which withholds treatment. While passive euthanasia is legal in India, active euthanasia remains illegal. The document also notes debates around autonomy, medical ethics, abuse potential, and slippery slope concerns with legalizing euthanasia.
Is euthanasia illegal in Bangladesh? If it is, then under what legal provisions is it made illegal? Whether it is high time to legalize euthanasia or whether such legalization would be disastrous for the country considering overall socioeconomic situations.
This document discusses euthanasia, including definitions, types, pros, ethical issues, and global scenarios. Euthanasia refers to ending a life to relieve suffering and can be voluntary, non-voluntary, or involuntary. It is debated as either providing relief from pain or potentially leading to non-voluntary death, health care abuse, and a rejection of life's value. While illegal in India, other countries have legalized forms of euthanasia and assisted suicide.
Euthanasia : Violation of Article 21 of the ConstituitonASHOK MINJ
Euthanasia violates Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, according to the document. Article 21 guarantees the right to life. While passive euthanasia has been allowed in certain cases by the Supreme Court, active euthanasia takes away life, which cannot be done as life is an inalienable right. Legalizing euthanasia could degrade the sanctity of life and societal values of aiding fulfillment, potentially leading to misuse by easily getting rid of sick or old people. The document examines the concept and types of euthanasia, current legal position in India including Law Commission reports, and relevant case laws to argue euthanasia violates right to life.
Right to live right to die with dignity special context to euthanasiakbinayakiya
Its About Euthanasia law around Globe and In india. Right to live and Right to die with dignity. This is our fundamental Rights. In rest of the world it has been already allowed and Recently in India it allowed.
This document discusses euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. It defines euthanasia as intentionally ending a life to relieve suffering. Active euthanasia involves direct action like lethal injection, while passive euthanasia is withdrawing life support. Voluntary euthanasia requires consent, while non-voluntary applies to those unable to consent like comatose patients. Laws vary globally, with the Netherlands and some Australian states legalizing voluntary euthanasia under strict guidelines. The document also discusses suicide and concludes that right to die is still developing legally, and is currently prohibited in Nepal.
This document discusses euthanasia and its classification, definitions, and status in various countries. It defines euthanasia as intentionally ending a person's life to relieve suffering from an incurable disease. Euthanasia can be active, such as lethal injection, or passive, such as refusing life-sustaining treatment. It also defines voluntary, non-voluntary, and involuntary euthanasia based on patient consent. The document outlines euthanasia laws and cases in countries like the Netherlands, India, Pakistan, China, and the United States.
Euthanasia (rIGHT TO DIE OR SLIPPERY SLOPE TO LEGALIZED MURDER?)Kshitij Shete
Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide or physician-assisted suicide, is the practice of intentionally ending a life to relieve persistent and unstoppable suffering. There are differing views on whether euthanasia should be legally permitted. Supporters argue that individuals have a right to die with dignity if suffering, while opponents warn of potential for abuse and a slippery slope towards murder. The document discusses various classifications and types of euthanasia, as well as arguments for and against its legalization regarding issues like government overreach, palliative care access, healthcare costs, risks to vulnerable groups, and religious concerns."
The document discusses euthanasia and the right to die. It provides an overview of euthanasia and discusses different types. It also examines international perspectives on euthanasia legislation in countries like the US, UK, Netherlands, Canada, Australia, and Belgium. The landmark Indian case of Aruna Ramachandra Shanbaug is summarized, where the Supreme Court ruled to legalize passive euthanasia. While active euthanasia remains illegal in India, the document argues that terminally ill patients should have the right to a dignified and peaceful death. It concludes by stating that the primary goal of healthcare should be to reduce suffering rather than prolong life at all costs.
Euthanasia refers to intentionally ending a life to relieve suffering. It is derived from Greek words meaning "good death." There are different types including voluntary, non-voluntary, involuntary, passive and active euthanasia. While some countries have legalized euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide under certain conditions, it remains a controversial issue with arguments on both sides around a patient's right to die with dignity and the ethical role of physicians. The document discusses the definition, history, laws and debates around euthanasia.
This document provides a summary of the current UK law regarding a patient's right to refuse medical treatment. It discusses several important cases that have shaped this area of law:
1) Re T established the fundamental principle that competent adult patients have an absolute right to refuse medical treatment. This case is still the benchmark in UK law.
2) Exceptions to the Re T principle include cases where refusal could lead to the death of a viable fetus. However, later cases established that all competent adults, including pregnant women, can refuse treatment.
3) Younger patients can consent under the "Gillick competence" standard, where a minor understands the treatment, or refuse if their refusal is overridden by parental consent and medical
Running head APPLICATION OF AN ETHICAL THEORY1APPLICATION OF.docxjoellemurphey
Running head: APPLICATION OF AN ETHICAL THEORY 1
APPLICATION OF AN ETHICAL THEORY 2
Application of an Ethical Theory
Trudie J. Harris
Professor: PHI 208 Ethics and Moral Reasoning
Instructor: Christopher Kinney
Date: Feb 23, 2015
Granting the people who are terminally ill the right to die has been debatable overtime. It is worth noting that people who are terminally ill have a limited period of time to live. As such, some parties argue that whether or not they continue living they will at long last die and hence it is only justifiable if they are given the right to decide whether to live or to die. Others argue that it is an equivalent people if terminally ill people are granted the right to die and hence it is unethical act. Applying the theory of deontology it is unethical to let people who are terminally ill have the right to die.
The theory of deontology is centered on the motives of the person who carries out a specific action. Kant (2008) provides that it is not the consequences attributable to a specific action that can be used as a basis of classifying the action right or wrong but rather it is the motive with the doer of the action did it. Kant argues that at times consequences of an action may contradict the intentions of the doer. Thus, desirable consequences may arise by coincidence from act whose doer wanted to undesirable consequences. Consequently, by bad luck undesirable consequences may arise from an act whose doer intended desirable consequences for the action. Hence, this fact forms a basis on which Kant finds it justifiable to consider the motives of an individual when looking at the consequences of an act. Kant (2008) further adds that for an individual to act in a way that is considered moral h/she must act in respect of the moral law. He provides that an individual should act in a way that always upholds the sense of humanity and that the each individual should undertake to act out of their own goodwill in upholding humanity.
Applying the theory of deontology and provisions of Immanuel Kant renders it unethical to grant terminally ill people the right to die. As noted in the paragraph above, it is the motive of the doer of a specific act that determines whether the act is right or wrong and not the consequences that can be attributed to the specific act. Hence, the motive of granting terminally ill people the right to die will be more or less a motive of killing which is unethical. Though terminally ill people may be granted the right to die as a course of action to save them from the psychological torture that they may go through knowing that they will finally die, considering the motive the act will be unethical. It is also worth noting that according to Kant (2008) individual should act in respect to the moral law that requires that people should always act in a way that upholds the sense of humanity. Granting terminally ill people the right to die can be considered as being against humanity and hence ...
This document discusses euthanasia and the debate around its legalization. It defines euthanasia as taking action to deliberately cause another person's death to relieve persistent pain from a terminal illness. There are two types - active euthanasia deliberately causes death through lethal substances, while passive euthanasia withholds life-sustaining treatment. The document outlines arguments for and against legalization, including that it respects patient autonomy over enduring suffering, but could slip down a slope towards non-voluntary euthanasia or be misused for financial gain. It concludes that with proper regulation, euthanasia could be legally implemented while deterring misuse, though some problems may still exist as with any law
This document discusses euthanasia and assisted suicide. It defines euthanasia as the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable disease. It outlines the types of euthanasia, including voluntary, involuntary, and non-voluntary. It discusses active euthanasia, which is bringing about death through action, versus passive euthanasia, which is bringing about death through omission of treatment. The document also discusses the legal status of euthanasia in different countries and states.
Study on the Impact of FOCUS-PDCA Management Model on the Disinfection Qualit...MehranMouzam
To analyze the impact of FOCUS-PDCA management model on the disinfection quality of flexible endoscopes. Method: A study was conducted on 128 flexible endoscopes in our hospital. According to different management plans, flexible endoscopes were divided into a control group (conventional management model) and an experimental group (FOCUS-PDCA management model). The flexible endoscopes evaluated in both control group and the experimental group were 64 each. The ATP values, management quality, and bacterial colony exceeding standards were observed in two groups. Results: Before management, there was no significant difference in ATP values between the two groups, with P>0.05; after management, compared with the control group (106.25 ± 6.812), the ATP value in the experimental group was lower, with P<0.05. The scores of disinfection standards (4.39 ± 0.49), cleaning standards (4.22 ± 0.45), management systems (4.13 ± 0.34), and management assessment (4.97 ± 0.25) in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group (3.89 ± 0.31, 3.20 ± 0.41, 3.12 ± 0.13, 3.95 ± 0.21), with P<0.05. In the experimental group, the bacterial colony exceeding standard rate of gastroscopy was 3.13%, bacterial colony exceeding standard rate of colonoscopy was 0.00%, bacterial colony exceeding standard rate of bronchoscopy was 1.56%, and the total bacterial colony exceeding standard rate of total colonies was 6.25%, which were significantly lower than the control group's 12.50%, 7.81%, 12.50%, and 32.81%, respectively with P<0.05. Conclusion: The FOCUS-PDCA management model is more conducive to reducing the ATP values of flexible endoscopes, improving the disinfection qualification rate, and improving management quality. This model is worthy of further promotion.
Reduced Radiation Exposure in Dual-Energy Computed Tomography of the Chest: ...MehranMouzam
ABSTRACT:
Objective: This study purports to answer the question: Does a dual-energy CT scan of the chest using reduced radiation result in images of equal or better quality compared to those produced by the gold standard of care?
Methods: With the agreement of the Ethical Review Committee and written informed consent from 32 patients, who received dual-energy CT (DECT) scan of the chest in a dual-source scanner, a second set of images was taken at a reduced radiation dose. On virtual monochromatic images at 40 and 60 keV, three thoracic radiologists evaluated image quality, normal thoracic structures, and pulmonary and mediastinal aberrations. Students analyzed the data using analysis of variance, Kappa statistics, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.
Results: No irregularities in the scans were missed in the virtual monochrome photographs of all patients at a lower radiation dose, and the images were found to be of sufficient quality. At 40 and 60 keV, standard-of-care pictures produced equal contrast enhancement and lesion detection. Observers were entirely consistent with one another. Among other characteristics, reduced-dose DECT had a CTDIvol of 3.0 ±0.6 mGy, and a size specified dose estimate (SSDE) of 4.0 ±0.6 mGy, a dose-length product (DLP) of 107 ±30 mgy.cm, and an effective dose (ED) of 1.15 ±0.4 mSv.
Conclusion: Dual-energy computed tomography of the chest allows for the administration of lower radiation doses (CTDIvol <3 mGy).
The Evolving Nature of Mother-Representations Across the Waves of FeminismMehranMouzam
Whether they’ve occupied the foreground or the background of literary works, mothers as primary subjects or as their shadows - have forever been weaved into the vital, in stories told either about them and/or, about their children. Motherhood and the matrifocal narrative, on the whole, have undergone various conceptual reconstructions that have been both a direct and indirect result of the different waves of feminism across the globe. Feminist concerns over ideas of motherhood and their related representations in literary texts, popular culture, and media, etc. have sought to understand the dichotomy between biological ideas of being a mother and its social and cultural constructions, which essentially shape the gendered expectations of mothers, especially because such socio-cultural constructions carry the cis-gendered heteronormative expectation of what it necessarily means to be a ‘socially accepted’ mother. The ''maternal'' representations in literature and other artistic mediums have evolved to accommodate the ever-changing, dynamism that the term ''mother'' brings forth. The mother figure is no longer only nurturing, ever-suffering and sappy but also loud, angry, and articulate.
Investigating the Challenges Faced by Iraqi Secondary School Students in Engl...MehranMouzam
The aim of the current study is to uncover the challenges encountering Iraqi students in the secondary school classrooms. Five students in a public secondary school located in Misan province participate in this investigational study. The study explores the challenges the students face in the learning process; particularly in the acquisition of oral proficiency. However, oral proficiency, even as used by the teacher, hardly ever functions as a means for students to acquire knowledge and explore new ideas. This paper attempts to identify the challenges or problems that students encounter in teaching English oral proficiency.
Data collection methods used in this study include students’ interviews and classroom observations. After collecting information and taking notes on the students’ oral proficiency. Data collected demonstrates that the acquisition of the students’ oral proficiency is associated with several challenges and problems that inhibit their pursuit to interact and express themselves in real-life situations. In sum, the study concludes that when learning English oral proficiency, several challenges prevent the students’ oral performance or progress such as improperly trained teacher, government policy, assessment systems, exposure to English, and less use of audio-visual aids etc.
Appointment of non muslim ruler in muslim countryMehranMouzam
The modern world has turned multicultural and the socio-political changes have created a new code of conduct at the global level. Multireligion societies are getting developed. Now the nature of modern politics creates new questions. It has been said that Muslim countries have also to choose a new democratic system of politics in which it is not inevitable now to appoint only Muslim rulers in Muslim states. Traditional and liberal narratives have got into the clash in Muslim countries in this regard. This study deals with the logic of both above-said categories of thinkers. The shreds of evidence from the Quran and Hadith, which prohibit the appointment of non-Muslim in Muslim countries, are presented first along with the logics of Muslim scholars who take them into consideration. The later liberal narrative has been explained followed by ending remarks through conclusion.
A study on urdu speakers’ use of english stress patterns phonological variationMehranMouzam
The aim of this research paper is to study Urdu Speakers’ use of English Stress Patterns and their phonological variation from native speakers of Pakistani EFL learners. The stress patterns of English language are affected by the influence of L1Urdu speakers’ perception in Pakistan which ultimately influences English pronunciation and sometimes its meanings as well. It also results difficulties faced by learners in our class rooms. Based on phonological differences between two languages, the researchers assume that there is a wide discrepancy in stress patterns among those spoken and used by native speakers and read and perceived by Pakistani students in our classrooms using English as second language. It carries a tangible impact of Urdu stress pattern with almost equal stress on all the syllables which is quite problematic both for teachers and learners of English whether it is as Second Language Learning or as Foreign Language Learning. To find out concrete results quantitative analysis of stress patterns was made on the selected sample taking from public sector university students. Findings of the research provide a useful pedagogical insight into the perspective of English language teaching with particular emphasis on spoken proficiency of English among students whose L1 is Urdu. The findings of the research suggest invariably the wrong placement of lexical stress in English words in Pakistan by Urdu speakers who have Urdu as L1 because they either place the stress on the syllable preceding the actual syllable or following it. Finally, it is suggested to follow the native speakers tone as a final remedy.
More Related Content
Similar to RIGHT TO DIE: A STUDY OF DIFFERENT JURISDICTIONS
Euthanasia refers to intentionally ending a life to relieve suffering from an incurable disease or condition. It can be voluntary, non-voluntary, or involuntary depending on patient consent. Arguments for euthanasia include autonomy, compassion, and controlling suffering, while arguments against include the slippery slope towards non-voluntary euthanasia and that there are alternatives to relieve suffering without intentionally ending a life. Religiously and legally, active euthanasia is generally prohibited but passive euthanasia may be permitted in some circumstances with appropriate safeguards.
This document discusses euthanasia and its classification, components, legal status in India, and consequences. It defines euthanasia as the intentional ending of a patient's life by a doctor at the request of the patient or family member. Euthanasia can be voluntary, non-voluntary, or involuntary. It also distinguishes between active euthanasia, which uses lethal substances, and passive euthanasia, which withholds treatment. While passive euthanasia is legal in India, active euthanasia remains illegal. The document also notes debates around autonomy, medical ethics, abuse potential, and slippery slope concerns with legalizing euthanasia.
Is euthanasia illegal in Bangladesh? If it is, then under what legal provisions is it made illegal? Whether it is high time to legalize euthanasia or whether such legalization would be disastrous for the country considering overall socioeconomic situations.
This document discusses euthanasia, including definitions, types, pros, ethical issues, and global scenarios. Euthanasia refers to ending a life to relieve suffering and can be voluntary, non-voluntary, or involuntary. It is debated as either providing relief from pain or potentially leading to non-voluntary death, health care abuse, and a rejection of life's value. While illegal in India, other countries have legalized forms of euthanasia and assisted suicide.
Euthanasia : Violation of Article 21 of the ConstituitonASHOK MINJ
Euthanasia violates Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, according to the document. Article 21 guarantees the right to life. While passive euthanasia has been allowed in certain cases by the Supreme Court, active euthanasia takes away life, which cannot be done as life is an inalienable right. Legalizing euthanasia could degrade the sanctity of life and societal values of aiding fulfillment, potentially leading to misuse by easily getting rid of sick or old people. The document examines the concept and types of euthanasia, current legal position in India including Law Commission reports, and relevant case laws to argue euthanasia violates right to life.
Right to live right to die with dignity special context to euthanasiakbinayakiya
Its About Euthanasia law around Globe and In india. Right to live and Right to die with dignity. This is our fundamental Rights. In rest of the world it has been already allowed and Recently in India it allowed.
This document discusses euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. It defines euthanasia as intentionally ending a life to relieve suffering. Active euthanasia involves direct action like lethal injection, while passive euthanasia is withdrawing life support. Voluntary euthanasia requires consent, while non-voluntary applies to those unable to consent like comatose patients. Laws vary globally, with the Netherlands and some Australian states legalizing voluntary euthanasia under strict guidelines. The document also discusses suicide and concludes that right to die is still developing legally, and is currently prohibited in Nepal.
This document discusses euthanasia and its classification, definitions, and status in various countries. It defines euthanasia as intentionally ending a person's life to relieve suffering from an incurable disease. Euthanasia can be active, such as lethal injection, or passive, such as refusing life-sustaining treatment. It also defines voluntary, non-voluntary, and involuntary euthanasia based on patient consent. The document outlines euthanasia laws and cases in countries like the Netherlands, India, Pakistan, China, and the United States.
Euthanasia (rIGHT TO DIE OR SLIPPERY SLOPE TO LEGALIZED MURDER?)Kshitij Shete
Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide or physician-assisted suicide, is the practice of intentionally ending a life to relieve persistent and unstoppable suffering. There are differing views on whether euthanasia should be legally permitted. Supporters argue that individuals have a right to die with dignity if suffering, while opponents warn of potential for abuse and a slippery slope towards murder. The document discusses various classifications and types of euthanasia, as well as arguments for and against its legalization regarding issues like government overreach, palliative care access, healthcare costs, risks to vulnerable groups, and religious concerns."
The document discusses euthanasia and the right to die. It provides an overview of euthanasia and discusses different types. It also examines international perspectives on euthanasia legislation in countries like the US, UK, Netherlands, Canada, Australia, and Belgium. The landmark Indian case of Aruna Ramachandra Shanbaug is summarized, where the Supreme Court ruled to legalize passive euthanasia. While active euthanasia remains illegal in India, the document argues that terminally ill patients should have the right to a dignified and peaceful death. It concludes by stating that the primary goal of healthcare should be to reduce suffering rather than prolong life at all costs.
Euthanasia refers to intentionally ending a life to relieve suffering. It is derived from Greek words meaning "good death." There are different types including voluntary, non-voluntary, involuntary, passive and active euthanasia. While some countries have legalized euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide under certain conditions, it remains a controversial issue with arguments on both sides around a patient's right to die with dignity and the ethical role of physicians. The document discusses the definition, history, laws and debates around euthanasia.
This document provides a summary of the current UK law regarding a patient's right to refuse medical treatment. It discusses several important cases that have shaped this area of law:
1) Re T established the fundamental principle that competent adult patients have an absolute right to refuse medical treatment. This case is still the benchmark in UK law.
2) Exceptions to the Re T principle include cases where refusal could lead to the death of a viable fetus. However, later cases established that all competent adults, including pregnant women, can refuse treatment.
3) Younger patients can consent under the "Gillick competence" standard, where a minor understands the treatment, or refuse if their refusal is overridden by parental consent and medical
Running head APPLICATION OF AN ETHICAL THEORY1APPLICATION OF.docxjoellemurphey
Running head: APPLICATION OF AN ETHICAL THEORY 1
APPLICATION OF AN ETHICAL THEORY 2
Application of an Ethical Theory
Trudie J. Harris
Professor: PHI 208 Ethics and Moral Reasoning
Instructor: Christopher Kinney
Date: Feb 23, 2015
Granting the people who are terminally ill the right to die has been debatable overtime. It is worth noting that people who are terminally ill have a limited period of time to live. As such, some parties argue that whether or not they continue living they will at long last die and hence it is only justifiable if they are given the right to decide whether to live or to die. Others argue that it is an equivalent people if terminally ill people are granted the right to die and hence it is unethical act. Applying the theory of deontology it is unethical to let people who are terminally ill have the right to die.
The theory of deontology is centered on the motives of the person who carries out a specific action. Kant (2008) provides that it is not the consequences attributable to a specific action that can be used as a basis of classifying the action right or wrong but rather it is the motive with the doer of the action did it. Kant argues that at times consequences of an action may contradict the intentions of the doer. Thus, desirable consequences may arise by coincidence from act whose doer wanted to undesirable consequences. Consequently, by bad luck undesirable consequences may arise from an act whose doer intended desirable consequences for the action. Hence, this fact forms a basis on which Kant finds it justifiable to consider the motives of an individual when looking at the consequences of an act. Kant (2008) further adds that for an individual to act in a way that is considered moral h/she must act in respect of the moral law. He provides that an individual should act in a way that always upholds the sense of humanity and that the each individual should undertake to act out of their own goodwill in upholding humanity.
Applying the theory of deontology and provisions of Immanuel Kant renders it unethical to grant terminally ill people the right to die. As noted in the paragraph above, it is the motive of the doer of a specific act that determines whether the act is right or wrong and not the consequences that can be attributed to the specific act. Hence, the motive of granting terminally ill people the right to die will be more or less a motive of killing which is unethical. Though terminally ill people may be granted the right to die as a course of action to save them from the psychological torture that they may go through knowing that they will finally die, considering the motive the act will be unethical. It is also worth noting that according to Kant (2008) individual should act in respect to the moral law that requires that people should always act in a way that upholds the sense of humanity. Granting terminally ill people the right to die can be considered as being against humanity and hence ...
This document discusses euthanasia and the debate around its legalization. It defines euthanasia as taking action to deliberately cause another person's death to relieve persistent pain from a terminal illness. There are two types - active euthanasia deliberately causes death through lethal substances, while passive euthanasia withholds life-sustaining treatment. The document outlines arguments for and against legalization, including that it respects patient autonomy over enduring suffering, but could slip down a slope towards non-voluntary euthanasia or be misused for financial gain. It concludes that with proper regulation, euthanasia could be legally implemented while deterring misuse, though some problems may still exist as with any law
This document discusses euthanasia and assisted suicide. It defines euthanasia as the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable disease. It outlines the types of euthanasia, including voluntary, involuntary, and non-voluntary. It discusses active euthanasia, which is bringing about death through action, versus passive euthanasia, which is bringing about death through omission of treatment. The document also discusses the legal status of euthanasia in different countries and states.
Similar to RIGHT TO DIE: A STUDY OF DIFFERENT JURISDICTIONS (16)
Study on the Impact of FOCUS-PDCA Management Model on the Disinfection Qualit...MehranMouzam
To analyze the impact of FOCUS-PDCA management model on the disinfection quality of flexible endoscopes. Method: A study was conducted on 128 flexible endoscopes in our hospital. According to different management plans, flexible endoscopes were divided into a control group (conventional management model) and an experimental group (FOCUS-PDCA management model). The flexible endoscopes evaluated in both control group and the experimental group were 64 each. The ATP values, management quality, and bacterial colony exceeding standards were observed in two groups. Results: Before management, there was no significant difference in ATP values between the two groups, with P>0.05; after management, compared with the control group (106.25 ± 6.812), the ATP value in the experimental group was lower, with P<0.05. The scores of disinfection standards (4.39 ± 0.49), cleaning standards (4.22 ± 0.45), management systems (4.13 ± 0.34), and management assessment (4.97 ± 0.25) in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group (3.89 ± 0.31, 3.20 ± 0.41, 3.12 ± 0.13, 3.95 ± 0.21), with P<0.05. In the experimental group, the bacterial colony exceeding standard rate of gastroscopy was 3.13%, bacterial colony exceeding standard rate of colonoscopy was 0.00%, bacterial colony exceeding standard rate of bronchoscopy was 1.56%, and the total bacterial colony exceeding standard rate of total colonies was 6.25%, which were significantly lower than the control group's 12.50%, 7.81%, 12.50%, and 32.81%, respectively with P<0.05. Conclusion: The FOCUS-PDCA management model is more conducive to reducing the ATP values of flexible endoscopes, improving the disinfection qualification rate, and improving management quality. This model is worthy of further promotion.
Reduced Radiation Exposure in Dual-Energy Computed Tomography of the Chest: ...MehranMouzam
ABSTRACT:
Objective: This study purports to answer the question: Does a dual-energy CT scan of the chest using reduced radiation result in images of equal or better quality compared to those produced by the gold standard of care?
Methods: With the agreement of the Ethical Review Committee and written informed consent from 32 patients, who received dual-energy CT (DECT) scan of the chest in a dual-source scanner, a second set of images was taken at a reduced radiation dose. On virtual monochromatic images at 40 and 60 keV, three thoracic radiologists evaluated image quality, normal thoracic structures, and pulmonary and mediastinal aberrations. Students analyzed the data using analysis of variance, Kappa statistics, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.
Results: No irregularities in the scans were missed in the virtual monochrome photographs of all patients at a lower radiation dose, and the images were found to be of sufficient quality. At 40 and 60 keV, standard-of-care pictures produced equal contrast enhancement and lesion detection. Observers were entirely consistent with one another. Among other characteristics, reduced-dose DECT had a CTDIvol of 3.0 ±0.6 mGy, and a size specified dose estimate (SSDE) of 4.0 ±0.6 mGy, a dose-length product (DLP) of 107 ±30 mgy.cm, and an effective dose (ED) of 1.15 ±0.4 mSv.
Conclusion: Dual-energy computed tomography of the chest allows for the administration of lower radiation doses (CTDIvol <3 mGy).
The Evolving Nature of Mother-Representations Across the Waves of FeminismMehranMouzam
Whether they’ve occupied the foreground or the background of literary works, mothers as primary subjects or as their shadows - have forever been weaved into the vital, in stories told either about them and/or, about their children. Motherhood and the matrifocal narrative, on the whole, have undergone various conceptual reconstructions that have been both a direct and indirect result of the different waves of feminism across the globe. Feminist concerns over ideas of motherhood and their related representations in literary texts, popular culture, and media, etc. have sought to understand the dichotomy between biological ideas of being a mother and its social and cultural constructions, which essentially shape the gendered expectations of mothers, especially because such socio-cultural constructions carry the cis-gendered heteronormative expectation of what it necessarily means to be a ‘socially accepted’ mother. The ''maternal'' representations in literature and other artistic mediums have evolved to accommodate the ever-changing, dynamism that the term ''mother'' brings forth. The mother figure is no longer only nurturing, ever-suffering and sappy but also loud, angry, and articulate.
Investigating the Challenges Faced by Iraqi Secondary School Students in Engl...MehranMouzam
The aim of the current study is to uncover the challenges encountering Iraqi students in the secondary school classrooms. Five students in a public secondary school located in Misan province participate in this investigational study. The study explores the challenges the students face in the learning process; particularly in the acquisition of oral proficiency. However, oral proficiency, even as used by the teacher, hardly ever functions as a means for students to acquire knowledge and explore new ideas. This paper attempts to identify the challenges or problems that students encounter in teaching English oral proficiency.
Data collection methods used in this study include students’ interviews and classroom observations. After collecting information and taking notes on the students’ oral proficiency. Data collected demonstrates that the acquisition of the students’ oral proficiency is associated with several challenges and problems that inhibit their pursuit to interact and express themselves in real-life situations. In sum, the study concludes that when learning English oral proficiency, several challenges prevent the students’ oral performance or progress such as improperly trained teacher, government policy, assessment systems, exposure to English, and less use of audio-visual aids etc.
Appointment of non muslim ruler in muslim countryMehranMouzam
The modern world has turned multicultural and the socio-political changes have created a new code of conduct at the global level. Multireligion societies are getting developed. Now the nature of modern politics creates new questions. It has been said that Muslim countries have also to choose a new democratic system of politics in which it is not inevitable now to appoint only Muslim rulers in Muslim states. Traditional and liberal narratives have got into the clash in Muslim countries in this regard. This study deals with the logic of both above-said categories of thinkers. The shreds of evidence from the Quran and Hadith, which prohibit the appointment of non-Muslim in Muslim countries, are presented first along with the logics of Muslim scholars who take them into consideration. The later liberal narrative has been explained followed by ending remarks through conclusion.
A study on urdu speakers’ use of english stress patterns phonological variationMehranMouzam
The aim of this research paper is to study Urdu Speakers’ use of English Stress Patterns and their phonological variation from native speakers of Pakistani EFL learners. The stress patterns of English language are affected by the influence of L1Urdu speakers’ perception in Pakistan which ultimately influences English pronunciation and sometimes its meanings as well. It also results difficulties faced by learners in our class rooms. Based on phonological differences between two languages, the researchers assume that there is a wide discrepancy in stress patterns among those spoken and used by native speakers and read and perceived by Pakistani students in our classrooms using English as second language. It carries a tangible impact of Urdu stress pattern with almost equal stress on all the syllables which is quite problematic both for teachers and learners of English whether it is as Second Language Learning or as Foreign Language Learning. To find out concrete results quantitative analysis of stress patterns was made on the selected sample taking from public sector university students. Findings of the research provide a useful pedagogical insight into the perspective of English language teaching with particular emphasis on spoken proficiency of English among students whose L1 is Urdu. The findings of the research suggest invariably the wrong placement of lexical stress in English words in Pakistan by Urdu speakers who have Urdu as L1 because they either place the stress on the syllable preceding the actual syllable or following it. Finally, it is suggested to follow the native speakers tone as a final remedy.
Forensic discourse analysis of legal and courtroom interaction dr arshad aliMehranMouzam
The primary objective of this study is to look into the complexities and complications of legal discourse and how they manifest themselves in the courtroom. The research looks at the dynamics in a courtroom and the jury room in the film 12 Angry Men. The study aims to show how language acts as a source of agency and power in a legal setting, as well as to look into how speakers cooperate in a legal setting. The researcher devised a framework based on Heffer's (2013) legal and forensic discourse model as well as Grice's (1975) Cooperative Principle and its maxims. The data for the study comes from the film 12 Angry Men, which is based on a true story. Forensic discourse analysis was used to analyse the data. This method analyses the utterances and other features present in the legal discourse, as well as its implications. The main findings of the study show that the judge's voice is projected in the court with a significant amount of dominance. Similarly, there is a lack of direct communication that affects the trial by making it difficult for the jury to fully comprehend the facts of the case. Furthermore, the agency is frequently removed from the jury, resulting in a misunderstanding of the case. The majority of the jury members are bored and sleepy, while others have an unhealthy fondness for the prosecution. The final finding concerns the jury members' power play in the jury trial, as evidenced by the jury members' failure to project their voices effectively, and their lack of cooperation. The forensic discourse analysis reveals that all of the maxims were repeatedly violated by the jury members. The most frequently flouted maxims, however, were those of quantity and relevance. This demonstrates how the desire for authority and the lack of agency can have far-reaching implications for the final decision.
IMPACT OF PATERNALISTIC LEADERSHIP ON EMPLOYEE COMMITMENT AND INNOVATIVE WOR...MehranMouzam
1. Description of Research Work
Innovation is a key concern of HR now a days. It is the key requirement for organizational success (Akram,
Lei, Haider, & Hussain, 2018). It gives new ways to do work, to overcome situations, to solve problems
and to make decisions. Dedahanov et al. (2019) claims that PLB and EE promotes innovative work
behaviour of employees. This positive impact can be enhanced by I-deals that are now trending in
manipulating job behaviours of employees. Recent studies conducted by Microsoft Japan on a four-day
working week claims that, not only the employees became happier and satisfied, they became productive
at workplace. These shortened working weeks and flexibility made employees more efficient and
productive at workplace (Paul, 2019). Leadership styles are now playing major roles in organizations and
are proved to be crucial factors for their success. PLB is a practical approach to get maximum out of
employees. According to Hornung, Rouseau, Glaser, Angerer, and Weigh (2011), loyalty and commitment
of employees are major outcomes of PLB. When employees are committed at workplace, their performance
boost ups which ultimately effects the organizational performance positively. This study is conducted to
observe and to describe the role of PLB on employee’s commitment level and how I-deals can mediate this
relationship in pharmaceutical sector. According to PPMA (2017), Pakistan’s pharmaceutical industry is
progressive, vibrant and future oriented. It consists of more than 700 manufacturing units, having 25-
multinational pharmaceutical units working in country. 70% of country’s demand of finished medicines is
been met by this sector and have shown a remarkable growth over last ten years and has export turnover of
more than 12 million and accounts for less than one percent of country’s GDP. To observe this productive
phenomenon of PLB, I-deals, EE, IWB and commitment in such a fast-growing sector can help to develop
positive outcomes for them.
Tribulus terrestris, also known as puncture vine, has traditionally been used in Ayurvedic and Unani medicine. The document discusses research on the effects of Tribulus terrestris dried fruit powder on drug-induced nephrotoxicity in rats. It summarizes various studies that have found Tribulus terrestris contains phytochemicals like saponins, flavonoids, and alkaloids that may have beneficial effects including increasing testosterone levels and protecting the kidneys from drug toxicity. The study aimed to evaluate whether Tribulus terrestris powder could reduce drug-induced nephrotoxicity in rats.
1. The document analyzes international cooperation mechanisms between Pakistan and China for combating piracy, examining them from the perspective of international law. It focuses on the significance of mechanisms established through regional approaches.
2. Piracy and armed robbery at sea have increased in the post-Cold War era due to political and economic instability in developing countries. The UNCLOS framework establishes guidelines for international cooperation against these crimes.
3. Pakistan and China have developed increasingly close maritime cooperation in the Indian Ocean, with China joining multinational anti-piracy efforts and reopening its embassy in Somalia. Their cooperation through the CPEC project and Gwadar Port development is also strategically important.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
RIGHT TO DIE: A STUDY OF DIFFERENT JURISDICTIONS
1. 1
RIGHT TO DIE: A STUDY OF DIFFERENT JURISDICTIONS
Submitted by – Shruti Sahni
LLM, 19546
1. INTRODUCTION-
The right to die is the concept based on the opinion that a human being is entitled to end their life.
Euthanasia, or mercy killing, means the deliberate killing of a patient who is terminally ill and/or
in severe and chronic pain. The word ‘Euthanasia’ is a derivative from the Greek words ‘eu’ and
‘thanotos’ which literally mean “good death”.1
The death of a terminally ill patient is accelerated
through active or passive means in order to relieve such patient of pain or suffering. However, the
issue of euthanasia is not as simple as the literal translation of the term. The issue is complex and
involves several moral, ethical, societal and economic aspects.2
Those who are in favor of
euthanasia argue on the right to self-determination and futility of prolonging a life without meaning
and dignity and those who are against the practice believe that emphasizes must be given to
palliative care, and that legalizing euthanasia would be violate of the principle of sanctity of life.3
It is because of this that most of the States allow only passive euthanasia and to check the misuse
enacted laws on the subject.
1.1.Meaning of Euthanasia – Active Euthanasia and Passive Euthanasia
It is important to first understand the concept of euthanasia before we study right to die and right
to life in the light of Article 21. Euthanasia is basically an intentional premature termination of
another person’s life either by direct intervention(active euthanasia) or by withholding life
prolonging measured and resources (passive euthanasia) either at the express or implied request of
that person(voluntary euthanasia) or in the absence of such approval or request (non- voluntary
euthanasia).4
Euthanasia is often confused with assisted dying and assisted dying. Euthanasia
refers to an instance where active steps are taken to end someone’s life, but the fatal act is carried
1
Edward J. Gurney, “Is There a Right to Die – A Study of the Law of Euthanasia”, 3 CUMB. -SAMFORD L. REV.
235, 1972.
2
Deepak Gupta, Sushma Bhatnagar & Seema Mishra, “Euthanasia; Issues Implied Within”, The Internet Journal of
Pain, Symptom Control and Pallative Care, 2006.
3
Vini Singh, “On advance directives and Attorney Authorizations- An analysis of Judgement of Supreme Court in
Common Cause (Registered Society) v Union of India”, Constitutional Law & Administrative Law Quarterly,
Vol.4.2, 2018, pp. 23-34.
4
Common Cause (Registered Society) v Union of India, (2018) 5 SCC 1, para 46.
2. 2
out by someone else, such as a doctor. Assisted suicide is when someone takes their own life but
is assisted by somebody else. Rather than a doctor carrying out the fatal act, they themselves do
so. Assisted dying can refer to either euthanasia or assisted suicide.
In the case of Aruna Shanbaug5
the Apex Court discussed in detail the difference between active
euthanasia and passive euthanasia. Active euthanasia is also known as “positive euthanasia” and
this type of euthanasia entails a positive act or affirmative action or an act of commission entailing
the use of lethal substances or forces to cause intentional death of the person by direct intervention
e.g. a lethal injection given to a person with cancer who is in agony.6
Passive euthanasia on the
other hand entails withdrawal of life supporting system or withholding of a medical treatment for
continuance of life e.g. removal of a heart lung machine from a person in coma. Passive euthanasia
is also called “negative euthanasia”.7
Passive euthanasia is further classified as voluntary and non-
voluntary. In Voluntary passive euthanasia, where the consent is taken from the patient whereas
in non-voluntary euthanasia, the consent is unavailable on account of the condition of the patient
for example, when he is in coma.8
It is perhaps due to the distinction between these two forms of euthanasia most of the countries
today have legalized passive euthanasia either by the way of legislations or through judicial
interventions but there remains ambiguity whether active euthanasia should be granted legal status
or not.9
Active human euthanasia is legal in the Netherlands, Belgium, Colombia, Luxembourg,
and Canada. Passive euthanasia or assisted suicide is legalized in Switzerland, Germany,
the Netherlands.
2. RIGHT TO DIE WITH DIGNITY A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT-
Right to die with dignity has been declared as a fundamental right within the fold of “right to live
with dignity” guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.10
Every individual is entitled to take
his/her decision about the continuance or discontinuance of life when the process of death has
already commenced and he or she has reached an irreversible permanent progressive state where
5
Aruna Ramchandra Shanbuag v Union of India, (2011) 4 SCC 454.
6
Supra at note 5, para 39.
7
Ibid, at para 66.
8
Ibid, at para 40.
9
James Ashfor, “Countries where euthanasia is legal”(2019) https://www.theweek.co.uk, available at
https://www.theweek.co.uk/102978/countries-where-euthanasia-is-legal (last accessed date- 29.10.2019).
10
Supra at note 4.
3. 3
death is not far away. This is called the right of self-determination. Each individual has the right
to die with dignity which is an inextricable facet of article 21 of the Constitution.
In cases where there is no hope of recovery, accelerating the process of death for reducing suffering
constitutes a right to live with dignity. Due to the advancement of modern medical technology
pertaining to medical science and respiration, a situation has been created where the dying process
of the patient is unnecessarily prolonged causing distress and agony to the patient as well as to the
near and dear ones and, consequently, the patient is in a persistent vegetative state thereby allowing
free intrusion.
The right to die with dignity is distinguished from suicide, physician-assisted suicide, or
euthanasia. In the case of suicide, there has to be a self-initiated positive action with a specific
intention to cause one’s own death.11
On the other hand, a patient’s right to refuse treatment lacks
his specific intention to die; rather, it protects the patient from unwanted medical treatment. When
a patient refuses a medical treatment he is not self-initiating his death instead, he is allowing the
disease to take its natural course. If in this process death occurs, it will be because of the disease.12
3. LANDMARK DECISIONS WHICH PAVED THE WAY FOR RIGHT TO DIE WITH
DIGNITY –
3.1. P. Rathinam’s case13 – The question of unconstitutionality of Section 309 of the Indian
Penal Code-
In this case writ petitions were filled challenging the constitutional validity of Section 309 of IPC
and contending it to violate of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution. Section 309 penalizes attempt
to commit suicide.14
The Court held that, right to life means not only physical existence but also
the quality of life. The Court relying on the case of Maruti Shripati Dubal15
held that what is true
of one fundamental right is also true of another fundamental right and on the said premise, that it
cannot be disputed that fundamental rights have their positive as well as negative aspects.
11
V. Venkatesan, “Dying with Dignity” (2018) https://frontline.thehindu.com , Available at-
https://frontline.thehindu.com/the-nation/dying-with-dignity/article10105943.ece (Accessed on- 29.10.2019)
12
Ibid.
13
P. Rathinam v. Union of India, AIR 1994 SC 1844.
14
Whoever attempts to commit suicide and does any act towards the commission of such offence, shall he punished
with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with fine, or with both.
15
Maruti Shripati Dubal v State of Bombay, 1987 (1) BCR 499.
4. 4
Logically it must follow that the right to live would include the right not to live, i.e., right to die
or to terminate one’s life. right to live of which Article 21 speaks of can be said to bring in its trail
the right not to live a forced life. The Court declared Section 309 IPC ultra vires and held that it
deserved to be effaced from the statute book to humanize our penal laws.
3.2. Gian Kaur’s case16 – The question of unconstitutionality of Section 306 of the Indian
Penal Code
In the Gian Kaur case, the Constitution Bench considered the correctness of the decision rendered
in P. Rathinam. It was urged that once Section 309 IPC had been held to be unconstitutional, any
person abetting the commission of suicide by another is merely assisting in the enforcement of the
fundamental right under Article 21 and, therefore, Section 306 IPC penalizing abetment of suicide
is equally violate of Article 21. The court held that when a man commits suicide, he performs
certain positive overt acts and such acts cannot be included within the protection of the “right to
life” under Article 21. It also held that the significant aspect of “sanctity of life” should not be
overlooked. With respect to the case of euthanasia the Court held
“A question may arise, in the context of a dying man who is terminally ill or in a persistent
vegetative state that he may be permitted to terminate it by a premature extinction of his
life in those circumstances. This category of cases may fall within the ambit of the ―right
to die with dignity as a part of right to live with dignity, when death due to termination of
natural life is certain and imminent and the process of natural death has commenced.”17
The court differentiated the case of euthanasia with that of suicide and held that the former is not
the case of extinguishing life but only of accelerating conclusion of the process of natural death
which has already commenced. Even in such cases the physical assisted termination of life is not
permitted by Article 21 of the Constitution. Article 21 do not permit termination of life to reduce
the period of suffering during the process of certain natural death.
3.3. Aruna Shanbaug case - Passive Euthanasia:
16
Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab, (1996) 2 SCC 648.
17
Supra at 15, Para 25.
5. 5
The case of Aruna Ramachandra Shanbaug18
is the first case in India which deliberated at length
on ‘euthanasia’. The Supreme Court held that passive euthanasia is permissible in our country and
laid down the safeguards and guidelines to be observed in the case of a terminally ill patient who
is not in a position to signify consent on account of physical or mental predicaments such as
irreversible coma and unsound mind. Only the family members were given the right to withdraw
the life supporting system with the final approval of High Court. The High Court in its turn will
have to obtain the opinion of three medical experts. The distinctive feature of PVS, it was pointed
out, is that brain stem remains active and functioning while the cortex has lost its function and
activity.19
The Court addressed the question when a person can be said to be dead. It was answered
by saying that “one is dead when one’s brain is dead”. Brain death is different from PVS.
The question was then posed as to who is to decide what the patient’s best interest is where he or
she is in a Persistent Vegetative State (PVS). It was then answered by holding that although the
wishes of the parents, spouse or other close relatives and the opinion of the attending doctors
should carry due weight, it is not decisive and it is ultimately for the Court to decide as parens
patriae as to what is in the best interest of the patient. The High Court has been entrusted with this
responsibility.
Whenever any petition has been filled in any High Court for the approval, the Chief Justice of the
High Court shall immediately constitute the bench of three high court judges who shall decide
whether approval should be granted or not. The Bench should seek the opinion of a committee of
three reputed doctors. Preferably one of the three doctors should be a neurologist, one should be a
psychiatrist, and the third a physician. The committee of three doctors nominated by the Bench
should carefully examine the patient and also consult the record of the patient as well as taking the
views of the hospital staff and submit its report to the High Court Bench. The Court will also
supply the copy of the report to the friends or family of the patient. Only after hearing them high
Court should give its verdict.20
3.4. Common Cause v Union of India21- Right to Die with Dignity
18
Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug v. Union of India, (2011) 4 SCC 454.
19
Supra at 17, Para 70.
20
Supra at 17, Para 85 and 134.
21
Supra at 4.
6. 6
In the year 2005 an NGO named Common cause filled a writ petition in the Supreme Court seeking
legalization of “advance directive and attorney authorizations” in order to enable the people who
are terminally till or are in the permanent vegetative state, to exercise their right to die with dignity.
The matter was referred to the constitutional bench of the Court.
The bench derived the right to die with dignity from the privacy autonomy dignity matrix within
the guarantee under Article 21 as expounded in the Puttaswamy22
case. The Court upheld the right
of an individual who is capable of consent, to issue advance directive to allow for the withdrawal
of life supporting technology, if the patient is terminally ill or in the permanent vegetative state.23
The bench also issued guidelines in order to prevent any possible misuse of such directives and
provided the manner in which such directives may be executed in order to ensure the balance
between law and bioethics.24
The bench analyzed the precedents set out by the Apex court from P. Rathinam25
case to
Shanbaug26
case in order to uphold the right to die with dignity. The rulings have distinguished
between “right to die” and “right to die with dignity” and only the latter is considered to be the
part of guarantee to life and personal liberty under Article 21 in a limited manner, i.e. only in the
form of passive euthanasia and only for the terminally ill and patients in the permanent vegetative
state. The right of a dying man to die with dignity when life is ebbing out, and in the case of a
terminally ill patient or a person in PVS, where there is no hope of recovery, accelerating the
process of death for reducing the period of suffering constitutes a right to live with dignity.
An inquiry into common law jurisdictions reveals that all adults with capacity to consent have the
right of self- determination and autonomy. The said rights pave the way for the right to refuse
medical treatment which has acclaimed universal recognition. A competent person who has come
of age has the right to refuse specific treatment or all treatment or opt for an alternative treatment,
even if such decision entails a risk of death.
22
Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1.
23
Supra at 4, Para 187.
24
Supra at 4, Para 197-201.
25
Supra at 13.
26
Supra at 17.
7. 7
PROCEDURE AND SAFEGUARDS FOR ISSUE OF ADVANCE DERICTIVE-
Advance directives are instruments through which persons express their wishes at a prior point in
time, when they are capable of making an informed decision, regarding their medical treatment in
the future, when they are not in a position to make an informed decision, by reason of being
unconscious or in a PVS or in a coma.
The Supreme Court in the Case of Common Cause27
has observed that “A failure to legally
recognize advance medical directive would amount to non-facilitation of the right to smoothen the
dying process and the right to live with dignity… Though the sanctity of life has to be kept on a
high pedestrian yet in the cases of terminally ill persons or PVS patients where there is no hope
for revival, priority shall be given to advance directive or right to self-determination.”28
The Apex Court in the above mentioned case has set out guidelines for a valid advance directive.
The advance directive can only be issued by a person who, is an adult, of sound mind and able to
understand the consequences of executing the document. It must clearly state as to when medical
treatment may be withdrawn or no specific medical treatment shall be given which will only have
the effect of delaying the process of death that may otherwise cause him/her pain, anguish and
suffering. The document must be voluntary executed without any coercion, undue influence and
inducement. The document must be in writing and must be signed by the executor in the presence
of two attesting witnesses after which it has to be countersigned by the Judicial Magistrate of First
Class(JMFC). The JMFC shall also inform the family members of the executor about the execution
of advance directive.29
When the executor becomes terminally ill and is undergoing prolonged medical treatment with no
hope of recovery and cure of the ailment, the treating physician, when made aware about the
Advance Directive, shall ascertain the genuineness and authenticity thereof from the jurisdictional
JMFC. On being satisfied with the advance directive the physician/hospital shall constitute a
Medical Board consisting of the Head of the treating Department and at least three experts with 20
years of experience in medical field. The Board shall after examining the condition of the patient
27
Supra at 17.
28
Supra at 17, Para 177
29
Supra at 17, Para 191.
8. 8
will give its opinion whether to certify or not to certify carrying out the instructions of withdrawal
or refusal of further medical treatment. If the Hospital Medical Board certifies that the instructions
contained in the Advance Directive ought to be carried out the hospital shall inform the Collector
about the proposal. The Collector shall then constitute another Medical Board comprising of Chief
District Medical Officer of the concerned district as the Chairman and three expert doctors with
experience in the in the medical profession of at least twenty years. After examining the patient if
the Board agrees with the opinion of the Hospital’s Medical board they may endorse the certificate
to carry out the instructions given in the Advance Directive. Chief District Medical Officer, shall
convey the decision of the Board to the jurisdictional JMFC before giving effect to the decision to
withdraw the medical treatment administered to the executor. The JMFC shall visit the patient at
the earliest and, after examining all aspects, authorize the implementation of the decision of the
Board. The executor can at any stage revoke the document before it is acted upon and
implemented.30
If permission to withdraw medical treatment is refused by the Medical Board, it would be open to
the executor of the Advance Directive or his family members or even the treating doctor or the
hospital staff to approach the High Court by way of writ petition under Article 226 of the
Constitution.31
Whenever any such petition is filled before the High Court, the Chief Justice of the
said High Court shall constitute a Division Bench to decide upon grant of approval or to refuse the
same.32
The High Court shall render its decision at the earliest as such matters cannot brook any
delay and it shall ascribe reasons specifically keeping in mind the principles of "best interests of
the patient".33
An individual may withdraw or alter the Advance Directive at any time when he/she has the
capacity to do so.34
Withdrawal or revocation of an Advance Directive must be in writing. If the
Advance Directive is not clear and ambiguous, the concerned Medical Boards shall not give effect
to the same.35
The person who has made an advance directive is not to be differented from the
30
Supra at 17, para 191(d).
31
Supra at 17, Para 191(e)(i).
32
ibid
33
Supra at 17, Para 191(e)(iii)
34
Supra at 17, Para 191(f)(i)
35
Supra at 17, Para 191(f)(iii)
9. 9
person who has not made an Advance directive. In cases where there is no advance directive, same
procedure and safeguards is to be applied.
EUTHANASIA: INTERNATIONAL POSITION
Those in favor of euthanasia say that in a civilized society, people should be able to choose when
they are ready to die and should be helped if they are unable to end their lives on their own.
Basically they believe that a person should be put out of his misery. But the one who are against
euthanasia and assisted suicide, saying life is given by God and only God can take it. Many things
that euthanasia can be misused and people can be killed against their will.
When we talk about assisted dying, Switzerland allows physician-assisted suicide without a
minimum age requirement, diagnosis or symptom state. However, assisted suicide is deemed
illegal if the motivations are “selfish”.36
In Netherlands Euthanasia and assisted suicide are legal
in cases where someone is experiencing unbearable suffering and there is no chance of it
improving. Canada allows euthanasia and assisted suicide for adults suffering from “grievous and
irremediable conditions” whose death is “reasonably foreseeable”.37
Judgements of various international courts were referred by the Supreme Court in the case of
Common Cause38
and Aruna Shambuag39
while interpreting Article 21 to include right to die with
dignity. All the judges in the above cases have referred the ruling of the House of Lords in
Airdale40
, wherein the House of Lords has allowed passive euthanasia for patients in permanent
vegetative state. The court held that in cases where patients are unlikely to recover and are in such
a state that a large number of medical professionals hold the view that prolongation of life is not
the best interest of the patient, then an exception can be made to the principle to the sanctity of
life. In fact, giving treatment to patient who does not wish to continue it, and which confers no
benefit upon him, would amount to invasive manipulation of such patient’s body.41
It is also
emphasized that to prevent misuse, the opinion of the Court must be sought in cases of any medical
36
Christopher de Bellaigue, “Death on demand: has euthanasia gone too far?”, (18 January 2019),
https://www.theguardian.com. Available at - https://www.theguardian.com/news/2019/jan/18/death-on-demand-has-
euthanasia-gone-too-far-netherlands-assisted-dying (accessed on 27.10.2019)
37
Ibid.
38
Supra at 4.
39
Supra at 18.
40
Airedale N.H.S. v. Anthony Bland [1993] A.C. 789.
41
Ibid.
10. 10
disagreement, dispute between next of kin, or a disagreement of next of kin with the medical
opinion or absence of next of kin to give consent. Further, it is observed that prolongation of life
in such cases as a lose-lose situation and the skill, labour and money that would be utilized in
prolonging the life of the patient could be fruitfully employed in improving the condition of other
patients, who if treated, may be able to lead a healthy life. However, despite permitting passive
euthanasia, it refrained from developing any law with respect to the same and left the question for
coordination with the Parliament. The parliament enacted Mental Capacity Act, 2005 with the
purpose to provide a legal framework for acting and making decisions on behalf of adults who lack
the capacity to make particular decisions for themselves. The provisions of Mental Capacity Act,
2005 contains detailed provisions as to capacity to consent, appointment of guardian and medical
opinion. The guidelines propounded by Misra C.J. in Common Cause case42
bear a close similarity
with the provisions of this Act.
In the USA with people have the right to refuse treatment and physician assisted suicide is
legalized. However, the courts in India have only approved the right to refuse the treatment and
disapproved physician assisted suicide. The legislation in the States of Oregon, Washington,
Montana and Columbia provide for advance directives and safeguards with respect to their
implementation. The decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court in Cruzan v. Director, Missouri
department of health43
, wherein the Court upheld patient autonomy by declaring that in order to
oblige the physician to end life support, the State would require a “clear and convincing evidence”
of the patients desire to do so. The court in Schloendroff v. New York Hospital Trust44
, in order to
hold that individual autonomy protects the right of an individual to direct removal of life support
in the cases of terminal illness.
The Supreme Court of Canada in Carter v. Canada45
, held that the physically assisted suicide was
permitted in cases such as grievous medical conditions when such wish was expressed by an adult
who is capable of giving consent. In Australia, advance directives and the right to refuse treatment
42
Supra at 4.
43
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health 497 U.S. 261 (1990).
44
Schloendorff v. New York Hospital Trust 211 N.Y. 125 (1914).
45
Carter v. Canada (2015) SCC 5.
11. 11
have been considered as common law rights. The best interest of patient is given priority in
deciding whether treatment can be withdrawn or not.
CONCLUSION
Right to life creates a compelling State interest in preserving human life, on the other hand it also
assures the individual autonomy to take decisions with respect to his/her own body. The social,
philosophical, ethical and economical aspects regarding this issue have to be considered whenever
we talk about the right to die and euthanasia. Recognizing right to have a dignified death is only
one side of the coin. The important question which needs to be answered is how this right is to be
interpreted and decided with respect to the people demanding it. This question if not answered
will lead to hundreds of cases being filled in various constitutional courts and cause tremendous
increase in litigation.
If proper check is not made this right can be exploited by many for their greed. Poor status of
education and lack of legal awareness can cause exploitation of advance directives. It is important
for the government to enact a strict legislation through with a check can be made.