![Enterprise risk-mgmt[1]](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/enterprise-risk-mgmt1-120905013017-phpapp01-thumbnail.jpg?width=640&height=640&fit=bounds)
Reputation
- 1. Reputation Risk Management Alchemist
- 2. Nate, Cyworld SecurityBreach Puts Private Info of 35 Million at Risk The Korean Communications Commission (KCC) annaounced today that hackers had broken into Nate and Cyworld, potentially exposing the personal details of some 35 million members of the tw o sites. How are you going to act?
- 3. proactive Reputation Risk Management Crisis Management
- 4. There has beenno Reputation Risk Management Financial Risk Reputation Risk Operational Risk • Difficulty • Factoring into Capital Adequacy • Basel II Intenationl accord for regulating requirment capital requirements for large international banks • Operation risk – The risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events. How to Measure – Excludes Reputation Risk Quantify Recognize as Capital ?
- 5. Example – CurrentStatus A Large US Pharmaceutical Company Relatively Well-doing company For Operational Finacial Risk For Reputation Risk • COSO Framework • Evaluation of Problems that could affect Reputation • Committee Of Sponsoring Organizaions of the Tradeway • Problems Commission – Pending lawsuit – Weak product-testing • Framework for procedures Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) – Product-liability concerns – Control systems for detecting fraud • Only when Major Decisions • Involving aquisitions • Informally • Unevenly
- 6. Example – CurrentStatus A Large US Pharmaceutical Company Relatively Well-doing company For Operational Finacial Risk For Reputation Risk • COSO Framework • Evaluation of Problems that could affect Reputation • Committee Of Sponsoring Organizaions of the Tradeway • Problems Commission – Pending lawsuit – Weak product-testing • Framework for procedures Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) – Product-liability concerns – Control systems for detecting fraud • Only when Major Decisions • Involving aquisitions • Informally • Unevenly
- 7. There has beenno Reputation Risk Management Financial Risk Reputation Risk Operational Risk • Difficulty • Factoring into Capital Adequacy • Basel II Intenationl accord for regulating requirment capital requirements for large international banks • Operation risk – The risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events. How to Measure – Excludes Reputation Risk Quantify Recognize as Capital ?
- 8. TrainingIQ AAA How SMART are U ? GPA Note taking AA Go to Library SSAT Buy Textbooks BBB DCAT Solve Problems BB Strategic / Determinants Criteria Steps Inteligence Reputation Assess Reputation AAA Evaluate Reputation-Reality Gap Reality AA Close Gaps Belief & Expectations Changing Monitor Changing belief & expectations BBB Weak Internal Coordination Put ONE person in charge BB Strategic/ Steps Criteria Determinants Reputation Risk How to Measure Quantify ? Inteligence Reputation Reputation Risk Recognize as Capital
- 9. Determinant and Step Reputation - by Others • • events Several Environment-friendly • RefineryExplosion • Positioned as a - killing 15 responsible corporation • Leak in a that cares about the corroded pipeline Reputation-Reality Gap environment at Prudhoe bay • “Beyond Petroleum” Changing Belief & Expectations • Allegations of campaign tax evasion in Weak Internal Coordination • Russia Multibillion-dollar initiative • Allegations of to expand ots alternative- propane market business Criteria / Determinants energy manipulation Assess Reputation Evaluate Reality Reality – by Me Reputation - by Others Close Gaps Strategic Steps Gap
- 10. Determinant and Step Assess Reputation Reputation-Reality Gap • Media Analysis Changing Belief & Expectations • Most important – Rather than surveys Weak Internal Coordination » From Customers, Employees, Investors, NGOs • Media Strategy Criteria / Determinants • Stay above Awreness threshold • Make Stories in leading media Assess Reputation – Over 20% to be positive Evaluate Reality – Less 10% to be negative Close Gaps • Secure Share of voice – Over 35% to keep negative stories minimum – Over 50% to win critics Strategic Steps • Having complete context • Reputation of a company is a function of – Others reputation – Relative reputaton of the industry overall
- 11. Determinant and Step Evaluate Reality Reputation-Reality Gap • Objective Evaluation Changing Belief & Expectations • Pitfall Weak Internal Coordination – Overestimating own capabilities – Believe they have good reputation Criteria / Determinants • Measurement Assess Reputation – Contextual Evaluate Reality – Objective Close Gaps – quantative Strategic Steps
- 12. Determinant and Step Close Gaps Reputation-Reality Gap • Actual character > Reputation Changing Belief & Expectations • Strengthen reputation by Weak Internal Coordination – Investor relations program – Corporate communications program Criteria / Determinants • Reputation > Actual character Assess Reputation Evaluate Reality • If unjustifiably positive Close Gaps • Should do either – Improve its capabilities, behavior, performance – Moderate stakeholders’ perceptions » In careful, measured ways Strategic Steps
- 13. Determinant and Step • GE in 2005Leading Company A • Ecomagination initiative – Doubling its R&D Reputation-Reality Gap investment in Developing Cleaner Technologies Changing Belief & Expectations – Reduced greenhouse Weak Internal Coordination emissions Criteria / Determinants • New Expectation created – Companies to be eco- friendly Assess Reputation Evaluate Reality Close Gaps • Painkiller Vioxx Monitor Changing Belief & Expectations • Caused Heart attack • New Expectation created Strategic Steps Adhere to old standard – Drug companies to disclose more detaild results and analysis of clinical trials
- 14. Determinant and Step Monitoring changing Belief & Expectations Reputation-Reality Gap • Regular surveys Changing Belief & Expectations • From employees, customers, other stakeholders • Whether data suggests that Reputation-Reality gap is Weak Internal Coordination materializing or widening • Experts surveys Criteria / Determinants • Political, Demographic, Social trends • Influencial NGO Assess Reputation • Activists Evaluate Reality – Environmental, Wages, Working Close Gaps conditions, Labor practices Monitor Changing Belief & Expectations • Media monitoring • How fast and to what extent belief and expectations change Strategic Steps
- 15. Determinant and Step Weak Internal Coordination • Marketing department vs. Developers Reputation-Reality Gap • In Software company • Large advertising for a new product Changing Belief & Expectations – Before developers identify bugs Weak Internal Coordination Criteria / Determinants Put ONE person in charge Assess Reputation • In charge of all those 5 steps Evaluate Reality • Candidates Close Gaps • Can be Monitor Changing Belief & Expectations Put ONE person in charge – COO, CFO, – Heads of Risk management, Strategic planning, Internal audit Strategic Steps • Cannot be – Heads of Marketing, Corporate communications, General counsel