3. Research Funding by Selected JPND Countries
Country Basic % Clinical % H&S.C.% Total %
Ireland 76 15 9 100
Spain 74 26 0 100
Belgium 100 0 0 100
NthLands 47 27 26 100
EU 88 4 8 100
4. Dementia in Ireland
• There are currently an estimated 55,000 people with
dementia (PWD) in Ireland
– Rising to 94,000 in 2031
– Rising to 152,000 in 2046
• Average cost per PWD estimated at €40,500
• Total burden an estimated €1.9 billion
• Informal care accounts for 50% of overall costs of care
• Residential and acute care account for about 40%
• Community and primary and social equal to about 10%
5. What We Know
• People with dementia have a strong preference towards remaining at home
in their communities; data and information to help them do this is very
scarce
• Providing appropriate support to carers can reduce caregiver burden and
enhance the family commitment to caring
• The current provision of formal care in the community is fragmented, and
often lacks the flexibility and specificity to address the changing needs of
people with dementia
• Costs are high and will become higher; financing long-term care is a big issue
• Measurement of impact and outcomes in dementia is poor
• Spending on social research on dementia is low
• There may be over-reliance on antipsychotic drugs both in the community
and especially in long-stay care
• Prevention matters
7. Biological Model
• Biological model presents a clinical perspective
• “Dementia as a clinical syndrome is characterised by
global cognitive impairment, which represents a
decline from previous level of functioning, and is
associated with impairment in functional abilities
and, in many cases, behavioural and psychiatric
disturbances,” (NICE Mental Health Guidelines, 2007)
• Person with dementia as patient to be treated
• Necessary but not sufficient
7
8. Personhood
• Kitwood (1997) defines personhood as “a
standing or status that is bestowed upon one
human being by others in the context of
particular social relationships and institutional
arrangements”
• Person-centred care is the instrument often
used to achieve personhood, which is not to
be confused with individualised care (Brooker
2003)
8
9. Citizenship
• Citizenship is traditionally defined in the
social science literature as a “status
bestowed on those who are full members of
a community. All who possess the status are
equal with respect to the rights and duties
which the status bestows,” (Marshall, 1949/92:
18)
• A citizen is defined by the acquisition of, and
participation or inclusion in, the country or
community in which they live, (Gould, 1988)
9
10. Social Model of Dementia
• “The social model of care seeks to understand
the emotions and behaviours of the person
with dementia by placing him or her within
the context of his or her social circumstances
and biography. By learning about each person
with dementia as an individual, with his or her
own history and background, care and support
can be designed to be more appropriate to
individual needs,” (NICE Mental Health
Guidelines, 2007)
11. Psychosocial Theoretical Foundations
• Rooted in personhood/person centredness,
autonomy, dignity, respect, communication,
understanding dementia processes and
symptoms
• Concerned with human interactive behaviour
between providers/families and the person
with dementia (PWD)
• Reciprocity and integration mediated within a
social context
12. History
• Relatively new – origins in 1960’s and Reality Orientation
work
• But few studies emerged pre-2000 – mostly small-scale,
short-term, diverse, opportunistic and site-specific
• Absence of theoretical frameworks
• Difficulty of undertaking RCT’s – methodological issues –
replication difficult
• Absence of appropriate outcome measures
• Inadequate research funding
13. Psychosocial Interventions
• Therapeutic endeavour involving human interactive
behaviour between therapist(s) and clients
throughout the course of the intervention
• Any intervention that focuses on psychological
and/or social factors rather than biological factors
• Include a wide range of behavioural therapies,
educational programmes, psychotherapy and
support groups
14. Psychosocial Domains: American
Psychiatric Association
• Behavioral approaches – identify antecedents and
consequences of problem behaviors and attempt to reduce
the frequency of behaviors by making changes in the
environment (e.g. regular toileting)
• Stimulation-oriented – recreational activity, art, music or pet
therapy – aim to maximize pleasurable activities
• Emotion-oriented – supportive psychotherapy, reminiscence,
validation therapy, sensory integration, simulated presence
therapy
• Cognition-oriented – focus on specific cognitive defects:
reality orientation, cognitive retraining, skills training
15. Specific Interventions Across Europe
• Carer support, physical activities,
reminiscence, multi-sensory
stimulation/snoezelan, behaviour therapy,
massage/touch, cognitive behaviour therapy,
recreational activities, environmental design,
cognitive stimulation, music therapy,
aromatherapy, animal assisted therapy, reality
orientation, memory training, validation and
emotion oriented care
16. Quality of Interventions
• Few studies in Olazaran’s 2010 review met
high quality standards: 13/179
• Interventions/participants not fully described
• Sample sizes low < 30
• Absence of blinding of outcome assessment
• Not enough emphasis on compliance -
Intention to Treat Analysis
• High attrition rates
• Absence of validated outcome measures
17. General Quality of Life (EQ-5D)
• There is debate around the extent to which generic preference–based measures
fully capture aspects of quality of life associated with dementia
• The EQ-5D does not sufficiently cover the impact of changes in cognitive
functioning on quality of life
• Although the cognitive challenges of dementia, including deficits in memory,
insight, language and interpretation, would be expected to impact on an
instrument‘s performance, there has been little validation of the EQ-5D for this
condition
• A cognitive dimension has been developed for the EQ-5D, but utility values for the
EQ-5D incorporating this component are in the early stages
• Differences in response have also been found between people with dementia and
family carers, with patients reporting higher utility scores than carers
• Recent work from Sheffield on the development of a health state classification
system derived from the DEMQOL system, a measure of health-related quality of
life in dementia by patient self-report and carer proxy-report
18. Typical Outcomes
• Quality of life person with dementia (QoL-AD scale)
• DEMQOL
• Activities of daily living (Bristol ADL)
• Depression (Cornell scale for depression in dementia
(CSDD))
• Autobiographical memory (autobiographical memory
interview (AMI(E))
• Agitation ((Cohen-Mansfield agitation inventory
(CMAI))
• Anxiety (rating anxiety in dementia (RAID) and hospital
anxiety and depression scale (HADS))
• Caregiver burden (Zarit burden interview)
• Personhood – the self
18
19. Some Examples of RCTs of PSIs
• UK: (Spector et al, 2003): 7 week cognitive stimulation therapy
programme was associated with significantly improved cognition
(MMSE, ADAS-Cog) and QoL (QoL-AD); n = 115
• Argentina (Serrani Azcurra, 2012): a 12 week life story-based
reminiscence programme in long-stay residential units showed a
significant improvement in QoL (SRQoL scale) and engagement (SES
scale) of residents; n = 135
• UK: (Woods et al. 2012) REMCARE: 10 months, joint reminiscence
groups for people with dementia and their family caregivers
identified no differences in QoL for PWD (QoL-AD) and an increase
in stress for carers (anxiety subscale of GHQ-28); n = 448 PWD
20. Focus on Reminiscence
• Cochrane Review concluded that there was uncertainty
in relation to the effectiveness of reminiscence therapy
and called for more and better designed trials in the area
• Five trials but in total only covered 144 participants
• Inconclusive evidence on effectiveness
• Some evidence of improvement in cognition and in
mood, as well as decrease in caregiver strain
• Our work in Ireland on reminiscence – (Int.Journal of
Geriatric Psychiatry)
21. Reminiscence –Irish Study
• Intervention - structured education
programme
• 3 days training for care staff
• Two group single-blind cluster randomised
trial
• 153 in intervention; 151 in control
• 18 residential units in trial
• Baseline data collected and 18-22 weeks later
• 4-point difference required in QoL-AD
22. Outcome measures
• Primary outcome
– Quality of life: Quality of Life in Alzheimer’s disease (QoL-AD)
resident score
• Secondary outcomes
– Quality of life: Quality of Life in Alzheimer’s disease (QoL-AD)
caregiver score
– Agitation: Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI)
– Depression: Cornell Scale for Depression (CSDD
– Staff burden: Zarit Burden Interview
24. Psychosocial Guidelines Across Countries
• Inclusion of psychosocial interventions in dementia guidelines
across Europe is limited
• Guidelines for psychosocial interventions found in only 5/12
countries (Vasse et al., 2012)
• UK NICE guidelines had best methodological quality and
included most recommendations (e.g. recommend the use of
group Cognitive Stimulation for people with mild to moderate
dementia, irrespective of drug treatments received).
• Physical activity and carer interventions recommended most
often across all guidelines
• Even when guidelines exist physicians tend to recommend
pharmacological interventions far more often (Rimmer et al,
2005)
25. Psychosocial interventions in national
dementia strategies
• French Alzheimer Plan… create/identify specific units for
patients suffering from behavioural problems in long-stay care
and provide activities, including PSIs, delivered by specially
trained staff (e.g. occupational and psychomotor therapists)
• Some reference to the use of non-pharmacological
management strategies and/or reduction in use of
antipsychotics for BPSD in English Dementia Strategy
• References to psychosocial needs in Irish Dementia Strategy
• Generally, national dementia strategies focused at higher level
(improving diagnosis, improving quality of care) than on major
paradigm shift towards psychosocial interventions
26. New Paradigm
Personhood not patient/client
Prevention as much as cure
Strengths more than deficits
Capabilities more than risk
Inclusion (citizenship) not exclusion
Social as important as biological