by Daria Cybulska.
For https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Programs:Evaluation_portal/News/Wikimedia_Conference_2014_Pre-conference_Program_Evaluation_and_Design_Workshop
Over the last two years, Wikimedia UK has worked towards creating a firmer structure supporting our Wikimedian in Residence project. Some residencies were set up from the office. Agreements, JDs, objectives. cultural sector, eduLooking at them, it seemed that they are doing fine
What do others think of what I’m doing?? Is there a point in continuing? End of 2013, -reflect on the programme’s successes and challenges - review. March - May 2014opinions ofresidents, // host institutions, // contribution from the community in general INNOVATION as a process improvement How to review?
Survey! (20 ppl)Forms, then maybe meetingsWhat do I want to find out?How to ask that?HELP! From PE&D
Designing the survey (teamwork, precision)What do I want to find out - almost the same time as creating the actual survey. (not jumping straight in!)Question creation.Depending on what/how you ask, people will tell you a different thing. If you are not sure what you are asking, the answers can be muddled too, or very unfocused. “were you happy with the residency?”All questions are there for a reason, and in a sensible order. If you don’t need to find something out, then don’t ask.Errors Jamie has picked up from me: (weighted scales)
Comments from the community about the survey sparked other discussions Space for additional comments Residents engaged - wanted to help with a programme they felt a big part ofBrainstorm meeting with residentsIdentify similar issues (which I was able to see because of the overview of the survey responses). Prioritise what we could work on to fixPlans for beyond - creating recommendations and implementation!
