The document discusses how prior knowledge impacts learning and provides strategies for using students' existing knowledge in English language teaching. It defines prior knowledge as knowledge gained through life experiences and background knowledge as academic knowledge. The brain strengthens neural connections through practice and reinforcement of known information. To help students learn, teachers should activate their prior knowledge through pre-tasks, build on what students already know through a spiral curriculum, and leverage students' interests which are often related to their prior knowledge.
IATEFL Discovery Learning or Direct Instruction? Cognitive Load TheoryCarol Lethaby
The document discusses cognitive load theory and its implications for discovery learning versus direct instruction in English language teaching. It explains that learning a second language involves biologically secondary knowledge, which requires conscious effort and explicit instruction. According to cognitive load theory, working memory is limited, so instruction should minimize extraneous cognitive load and optimize germane load by creating tasks that prompt meaningful learning through connections to prior knowledge. While discovery learning may strain working memory, carefully structured tasks with optimal challenge can produce desirable difficulties that improve long-term learning.
This document discusses the relationship between neuroscience research and language teaching. It begins by outlining some commonly held beliefs or "neuromyths" among language teachers, such as the idea that students learn best through their preferred learning style. The document then summarizes research that has disproven these neuromyths. It discusses how prior knowledge and cognitive load have been shown through neuroscience research to impact learning. Specifically, it outlines how building on students' prior knowledge and avoiding excessive cognitive load can help learning. The document concludes by recommending teachers focus on evidence-based practices informed by neuroscience research rather than unsupported beliefs.
The document provides an overview of the Little Books of Answers program. It describes the program as a set of 60 leveled books that ask and answer factual questions about science and social studies topics. Each book title poses a question that is then answered within the text. The books cover topics such as earth science, history, and animals. They are designed to teach comprehension strategies and vocabulary in a way that is research-based and appropriate for both struggling readers and English language learners.
This document provides an agenda for a network meeting in 2013. The agenda includes opening Symbaloo and NYSED PPTs, various housekeeping items like bullying, professional development, and website changes. It also discusses weekly news, copyright, advocacy, and Overdrive. There is discussion of a character education program for preteens and teens that addresses bullying, self-confidence, and other issues. Rigor, evaluations, and depth of knowledge are discussed in planning lessons. The use of mentor texts and close reading are also covered.
Integrating Literacy Across the Curriculum JenSweigartINK
This document outlines Jen Sweigart's approach to integrating literacy into science and social studies lessons. She begins with a modeled reading where she thinks aloud to demonstrate comprehension strategies. This is followed by shared reading where students apply the strategies to complex texts with teacher support. Students then build content-driven anchor charts citing text evidence. Hands-on activities help synthesize learning. The approach emphasizes using reading strategies like questioning, determining importance, and synthesizing across genres to develop deep understanding of concepts in a positive learning environment.
Evidence-based teaching strategies in ELTCarol Lethaby
The document discusses various learning strategies and their effectiveness based on educational research. It begins by listing strategies that teachers and learners have used, and rates their usefulness based on research. Highly useful strategies include practice testing, distributed practice, and interleaved practice. Moderately useful strategies are elaborative interrogation and self-explanation. Less useful strategies are highlighting, summarizing, visualizing, mnemonics, and re-reading. The document emphasizes that prior knowledge is the most important factor for learning and provides examples of how teachers can activate students' prior knowledge in language learning.
Carol Lethaby discusses the importance of using pre-tasks before presenting reading and listening texts to language learners. Pre-tasks activate and build on learners' background knowledge of both the content and language, which can help them understand and engage with the text. Effective pre-tasks include activating vocabulary, building content knowledge through techniques like KWL charts, and using visuals that directly support the text without overloading learners. Pre-tasks help learners make connections and succeed in comprehending by providing necessary context before reading.
IATEFL Discovery Learning or Direct Instruction? Cognitive Load TheoryCarol Lethaby
The document discusses cognitive load theory and its implications for discovery learning versus direct instruction in English language teaching. It explains that learning a second language involves biologically secondary knowledge, which requires conscious effort and explicit instruction. According to cognitive load theory, working memory is limited, so instruction should minimize extraneous cognitive load and optimize germane load by creating tasks that prompt meaningful learning through connections to prior knowledge. While discovery learning may strain working memory, carefully structured tasks with optimal challenge can produce desirable difficulties that improve long-term learning.
This document discusses the relationship between neuroscience research and language teaching. It begins by outlining some commonly held beliefs or "neuromyths" among language teachers, such as the idea that students learn best through their preferred learning style. The document then summarizes research that has disproven these neuromyths. It discusses how prior knowledge and cognitive load have been shown through neuroscience research to impact learning. Specifically, it outlines how building on students' prior knowledge and avoiding excessive cognitive load can help learning. The document concludes by recommending teachers focus on evidence-based practices informed by neuroscience research rather than unsupported beliefs.
The document provides an overview of the Little Books of Answers program. It describes the program as a set of 60 leveled books that ask and answer factual questions about science and social studies topics. Each book title poses a question that is then answered within the text. The books cover topics such as earth science, history, and animals. They are designed to teach comprehension strategies and vocabulary in a way that is research-based and appropriate for both struggling readers and English language learners.
This document provides an agenda for a network meeting in 2013. The agenda includes opening Symbaloo and NYSED PPTs, various housekeeping items like bullying, professional development, and website changes. It also discusses weekly news, copyright, advocacy, and Overdrive. There is discussion of a character education program for preteens and teens that addresses bullying, self-confidence, and other issues. Rigor, evaluations, and depth of knowledge are discussed in planning lessons. The use of mentor texts and close reading are also covered.
Integrating Literacy Across the Curriculum JenSweigartINK
This document outlines Jen Sweigart's approach to integrating literacy into science and social studies lessons. She begins with a modeled reading where she thinks aloud to demonstrate comprehension strategies. This is followed by shared reading where students apply the strategies to complex texts with teacher support. Students then build content-driven anchor charts citing text evidence. Hands-on activities help synthesize learning. The approach emphasizes using reading strategies like questioning, determining importance, and synthesizing across genres to develop deep understanding of concepts in a positive learning environment.
Evidence-based teaching strategies in ELTCarol Lethaby
The document discusses various learning strategies and their effectiveness based on educational research. It begins by listing strategies that teachers and learners have used, and rates their usefulness based on research. Highly useful strategies include practice testing, distributed practice, and interleaved practice. Moderately useful strategies are elaborative interrogation and self-explanation. Less useful strategies are highlighting, summarizing, visualizing, mnemonics, and re-reading. The document emphasizes that prior knowledge is the most important factor for learning and provides examples of how teachers can activate students' prior knowledge in language learning.
Carol Lethaby discusses the importance of using pre-tasks before presenting reading and listening texts to language learners. Pre-tasks activate and build on learners' background knowledge of both the content and language, which can help them understand and engage with the text. Effective pre-tasks include activating vocabulary, building content knowledge through techniques like KWL charts, and using visuals that directly support the text without overloading learners. Pre-tasks help learners make connections and succeed in comprehending by providing necessary context before reading.
An introductory session to the past three years work with Changing Results for Young Readers, the results and the 'Every Child, Every Day' framework as introduced by Allington and Gabriel.
Active learning for the adult classroom final naeycStella Baker
This document summarizes Donna Greene and Stella Baker's presentation on using a flipped classroom model to enhance critical thinking skills in adult learners. They discuss challenges with traditional lecture-based teaching not developing these skills. Their flipped model has students learn content at home through online resources like a LibGuide created by the college's librarian. This frees up class time for active learning exercises focusing on application, analysis and evaluation. By drawing on adult learning theory emphasizing self-directed learning from experience, the model helps develop the critical thinking needed to apply course lessons.
This document outlines an administrative perspective on literacy in intermediate grades. It discusses the importance of effective instructional practices and teacher collaboration to improve student learning. It also provides an overview of the process for conducting classroom reviews to support teachers in meeting the diverse needs of all students.
This document discusses different types of classroom research methods: psychometric tradition, naturalistic inquiry, and action research. It provides details on what each method studies, similarities and differences between the methods, examples of research questions that would fit each method, and key issues researchers may want to investigate in classrooms. The document also discusses the role of objectivity and subjectivity in research, arguing that both have a place when researching human behaviors and experiences in educational contexts.
CommunityED Project "Back to Basics" Feb 1, 2014Alison Schofield
The two presentations from our 2nd Community-ED Project, Feb. 1st, 2014, "Back to Basics". This included the talk by Francesca McGeary on "Turning the Disability of EAL/ESL Students into a Gift" and Alison Schofield on "Unravelling the Mysteries of Learning".
The document provides an overview of effective teaching strategies to engage students, as presented by Faye Brownlie. It discusses frameworks like universal design for learning and backwards design. Specific approaches are outlined, including assessment for learning, open-ended strategies, gradual release of responsibility, and inquiry-based learning. The importance of direct comprehension instruction, effective principles embedded in content, motivation, and formative assessment are also highlighted. Examples are given of thinking strategies applied in a grade 9 science classroom on teaching electricity concepts.
Classroom research can provide useful information about how foreign language instruction is carried out compared to assumptions. The document discusses research methods including psychometric tradition, naturalistic inquiry, and action research. It identifies example research questions for each method and key issues for classroom researchers to investigate, such as strategies when resources are limited. While objectivity is valued, the document argues research on human subjects requires some subjectivity to consider student needs, interests, and personalities.
This document discusses research approaches in second language classrooms. It compares the psychometric tradition, naturalistic inquiry, and action research. It identifies key differences such as the psychometric tradition valuing objectivity and quantitative data while naturalistic inquiry values subjectivity and qualitative data. Examples of research questions suited for each approach are provided. Finally, the document discusses finding a balance between objectivity and subjectivity in research, noting that when studying humans some level of subjectivity is needed to account for things like needs, interests, and personalities.
This document discusses the importance of developing thinking skills in students. It suggests that when students are actively engaged in their learning through developing a sense of direction and inquiry, they learn faster, take in more information, gain a deeper understanding, and recall more. It also emphasizes giving students a feeling of security, challenge, opportunity to wonder, and self-confidence in lessons. Finally, it provides examples of skills-focused activities teachers can use to develop thinking skills like questioning, research, reflection, and discussion in students.
This document provides an overview of strategies and frameworks for improving learning for all students. It discusses reviewing and revising school plans, collecting student information to inform classroom learning, collaborating in co-teaching models, and ensuring approaches meet the needs of diverse learners through strengths-based assessments and the universal design for learning. Specific co-teaching models like one teach one support are presented to facilitate collaborative problem-solving between teachers. The goal is to shift toward an inclusive model that supports students within the regular classroom.
Creating standards for adult learners NYS TESOL annual conf.2013ershawwa
The document discusses using goal setting to help adult English language learners take control of their learning. It describes two case studies where teachers implemented goal setting activities. In the first case study, teachers had students at a community organization complete questionnaires about their English use and goals. In the second case study, teachers gave an ESP class a weekly questionnaire to set goals and strategies for independent study. The document concludes that having students actively set and track goals can increase autonomy and help them get more from independent study.
Active learning for the adult classroom dg naeycStella Baker
This document summarizes Donna Greene's presentation on using a flipped classroom model to enhance critical thinking skills in adult learners. Greene discusses challenges with traditional lecture-based teaching not developing critical thinking. She explored adult learning theory showing adults learn best through self-directed, hands-on experiences. Greene implemented a flipped classroom where students reviewed course content at home and spent class time applying knowledge through activities and discussions. She collaborated with the librarian Stella Baker to create online research guides helping students develop skills to independently find and evaluate scholarly sources. Greene believes this flipped model aligns better with how adults learn compared to traditional lecture-based teaching.
Here are 3 questions from different levels of Bloom's Taxonomy based on Chapters 1-6 of The Giver:
Knowledge: What is Jonas's role in the community?
Comprehension: Why does Jonas feel uneasy when he sees the newchild?
Application: If you were Jonas, how would you feel about receiving special training from The Giver?
Let me know if you have any other questions!
Technology integration with foreign and 2 nd languageLyany811
This lesson plan aims to help English language learners build their science vocabulary by teaching the key terms of the scientific method. The teacher will use a PowerPoint presentation to engage students and explain each step of the scientific method. Students will then practice using the KIM strategy to memorize the new vocabulary words. After learning the terms, students will work in groups to research and choose a topic for a science fair project. The lesson incorporates technology, group work, and assessments to help English learners develop important science vocabulary.
Here are two potential launching activity questions from the KWL chart and a discussion of how they could be used:
Question 1: How do plants get their food?
This is a fundamental question about photosynthesis that students likely have. An engaging launching activity could have students observe and compare plants that are with and without sunlight to start forming hypotheses about how plants get their food.
Question 2: What are the parts of a plant and what is their function?
Providing students with pictures or physical examples of plant parts and having them work to correctly identify and describe the function of roots, stems, leaves, flowers etc. This gets students interacting with examples to build their base knowledge before exploring these concepts in more depth. Disc
The document discusses the KWL chart method for facilitating language lessons through inquiry-based learning. It involves 6 steps: 1) familiarizing with the KWL chart, 2) starting with an essential question, 3) finding out what is already known, 4) finding out what students want to know, 5) finding answers from experts, and 6) concluding what has been learned. The goal is to actively involve students in their learning through questioning and group discussions to fill out the KWL chart. Technology can be used to search for information from reliable sources to answer the questions.
Desirable Difficulty or Cognitive Overload?Carol Lethaby
This document discusses combining text and visuals in language learning. It explains that text and visuals should support each other to avoid cognitive overload. The theory of cognitive load posits that the brain has limited working memory but large long-term memory organized in schemas. When combining text and visuals, tasks should minimize extraneous load, maximize relevant processing (germane load), and create "desirable difficulty" to improve learning and schema formation.
1How to Write a Statement of Teaching PhilosophyA pr.docxfelicidaddinwoodie
1
How to Write a Statement of
Teaching Philosophy
A practical workshop on what a
teaching philosophy is and how
to get started
Dr. Heather Doherty, PhD
Leder Human Biology Program
Curriculum Fellow
Today we are going to go through a series of activities with the goal of every
person leaving this classroom with a starter kit for writing their own teaching
philosophy. Does everyone have a packet? Okay, let’s get started.
2
Outline
1. Audience and Goals
2. Teaching Experience
3. Teaching Style
4. Teaching Values
5. Anatomy and Construction
6. Tips and Resources
Before you write, you need to know your audience and define the purpose of a
teaching philosophy. Then you need the content: your teaching experience,
your teaching style, and what you value in teaching. Once you have the parts, I
will show you how to put it together. We will finish with some tips and further
resources to consult as you write.
3
Who asks for a teaching
philosophy?
~33% of job ads for faculty
• ~60% will request it during the hiring process
• Others want it but won’t request it
– “…those who are truly interested in teaching will submit a
statement of teaching philosophy without being asked to do so;
therefore, we never asked for is specifically.”
• More commonly requested by:
– BS/MS colleges
– Candidates in the natural sciences
• Establish your and their commitment to teaching
Deborah Meizlish and Matthew Kaplan. “Valuing and Evaluating Teaching in Academic Hiring: A Multidisciplinary, Cross-
Institutional Study.” The Journal of Higher Education - Volume 79, Number 5, September/October 2008, pp. 489-512.
Meizlish and Kaplan as well as others have done research on what type and
what percentage of faculty job ads ask for a teaching philosophy. After looking
about 500 ads, they found about 33% ask for a teaching philosophy to be part of
the initial application package. Around another 30% to bring it to 60% total will
ask for a teaching philosophy at some point during the hiring process. More
importantly, there are other employers that won’t ask for it even though they
expect it as this quote illustrates. In general, teaching philosophies are most
often requested by schools who have an emphasis on training at the Bachelors
and Masters degree level, which is not surprising as teaching is often a larger
emphasis and a larger part of faculty efforts at these institutions. In addition,
candidates in the natural sciences are more often asked for a teaching
philosophy. This request at first seems a little surprising, but mostly has to do
with the fact that the average graduate student or post-doc may not have a lot of
teaching experience. A teaching philosophy lets the hiring institution know that
you value teaching and have thought about it. The institution asking for the
teaching philosophy lets you know what they value teaching.
4
What does a teaching philosophy
contain?
• Offers evidence of practice
• ...
The document discusses using evidence-based teaching strategies in English language teaching. It outlines five strategies that research has shown to be effective for learning: elaborative interrogation, self-explanation, distributed practice, interleaved practice, and practice testing. For each strategy, the document provides an overview of supporting research evidence and examples of how the strategy could be applied to language teaching. The overall message is that teachers should be aware of strategies with evidence backing their effectiveness and look for ways to incorporate these ideas into their own classrooms.
This document discusses developments in technology and education. It notes that while technology is used widely in education, students still value face-to-face interaction with teachers. Both online and blended learning can be effective for language learning if the instructor is involved. The document also questions assumptions about "digital natives" and whether technologies are fundamentally changing students' brains. It emphasizes that moderate and strategic use of technology in education under an engaged teacher is most effective.
An introductory session to the past three years work with Changing Results for Young Readers, the results and the 'Every Child, Every Day' framework as introduced by Allington and Gabriel.
Active learning for the adult classroom final naeycStella Baker
This document summarizes Donna Greene and Stella Baker's presentation on using a flipped classroom model to enhance critical thinking skills in adult learners. They discuss challenges with traditional lecture-based teaching not developing these skills. Their flipped model has students learn content at home through online resources like a LibGuide created by the college's librarian. This frees up class time for active learning exercises focusing on application, analysis and evaluation. By drawing on adult learning theory emphasizing self-directed learning from experience, the model helps develop the critical thinking needed to apply course lessons.
This document outlines an administrative perspective on literacy in intermediate grades. It discusses the importance of effective instructional practices and teacher collaboration to improve student learning. It also provides an overview of the process for conducting classroom reviews to support teachers in meeting the diverse needs of all students.
This document discusses different types of classroom research methods: psychometric tradition, naturalistic inquiry, and action research. It provides details on what each method studies, similarities and differences between the methods, examples of research questions that would fit each method, and key issues researchers may want to investigate in classrooms. The document also discusses the role of objectivity and subjectivity in research, arguing that both have a place when researching human behaviors and experiences in educational contexts.
CommunityED Project "Back to Basics" Feb 1, 2014Alison Schofield
The two presentations from our 2nd Community-ED Project, Feb. 1st, 2014, "Back to Basics". This included the talk by Francesca McGeary on "Turning the Disability of EAL/ESL Students into a Gift" and Alison Schofield on "Unravelling the Mysteries of Learning".
The document provides an overview of effective teaching strategies to engage students, as presented by Faye Brownlie. It discusses frameworks like universal design for learning and backwards design. Specific approaches are outlined, including assessment for learning, open-ended strategies, gradual release of responsibility, and inquiry-based learning. The importance of direct comprehension instruction, effective principles embedded in content, motivation, and formative assessment are also highlighted. Examples are given of thinking strategies applied in a grade 9 science classroom on teaching electricity concepts.
Classroom research can provide useful information about how foreign language instruction is carried out compared to assumptions. The document discusses research methods including psychometric tradition, naturalistic inquiry, and action research. It identifies example research questions for each method and key issues for classroom researchers to investigate, such as strategies when resources are limited. While objectivity is valued, the document argues research on human subjects requires some subjectivity to consider student needs, interests, and personalities.
This document discusses research approaches in second language classrooms. It compares the psychometric tradition, naturalistic inquiry, and action research. It identifies key differences such as the psychometric tradition valuing objectivity and quantitative data while naturalistic inquiry values subjectivity and qualitative data. Examples of research questions suited for each approach are provided. Finally, the document discusses finding a balance between objectivity and subjectivity in research, noting that when studying humans some level of subjectivity is needed to account for things like needs, interests, and personalities.
This document discusses the importance of developing thinking skills in students. It suggests that when students are actively engaged in their learning through developing a sense of direction and inquiry, they learn faster, take in more information, gain a deeper understanding, and recall more. It also emphasizes giving students a feeling of security, challenge, opportunity to wonder, and self-confidence in lessons. Finally, it provides examples of skills-focused activities teachers can use to develop thinking skills like questioning, research, reflection, and discussion in students.
This document provides an overview of strategies and frameworks for improving learning for all students. It discusses reviewing and revising school plans, collecting student information to inform classroom learning, collaborating in co-teaching models, and ensuring approaches meet the needs of diverse learners through strengths-based assessments and the universal design for learning. Specific co-teaching models like one teach one support are presented to facilitate collaborative problem-solving between teachers. The goal is to shift toward an inclusive model that supports students within the regular classroom.
Creating standards for adult learners NYS TESOL annual conf.2013ershawwa
The document discusses using goal setting to help adult English language learners take control of their learning. It describes two case studies where teachers implemented goal setting activities. In the first case study, teachers had students at a community organization complete questionnaires about their English use and goals. In the second case study, teachers gave an ESP class a weekly questionnaire to set goals and strategies for independent study. The document concludes that having students actively set and track goals can increase autonomy and help them get more from independent study.
Active learning for the adult classroom dg naeycStella Baker
This document summarizes Donna Greene's presentation on using a flipped classroom model to enhance critical thinking skills in adult learners. Greene discusses challenges with traditional lecture-based teaching not developing critical thinking. She explored adult learning theory showing adults learn best through self-directed, hands-on experiences. Greene implemented a flipped classroom where students reviewed course content at home and spent class time applying knowledge through activities and discussions. She collaborated with the librarian Stella Baker to create online research guides helping students develop skills to independently find and evaluate scholarly sources. Greene believes this flipped model aligns better with how adults learn compared to traditional lecture-based teaching.
Here are 3 questions from different levels of Bloom's Taxonomy based on Chapters 1-6 of The Giver:
Knowledge: What is Jonas's role in the community?
Comprehension: Why does Jonas feel uneasy when he sees the newchild?
Application: If you were Jonas, how would you feel about receiving special training from The Giver?
Let me know if you have any other questions!
Technology integration with foreign and 2 nd languageLyany811
This lesson plan aims to help English language learners build their science vocabulary by teaching the key terms of the scientific method. The teacher will use a PowerPoint presentation to engage students and explain each step of the scientific method. Students will then practice using the KIM strategy to memorize the new vocabulary words. After learning the terms, students will work in groups to research and choose a topic for a science fair project. The lesson incorporates technology, group work, and assessments to help English learners develop important science vocabulary.
Here are two potential launching activity questions from the KWL chart and a discussion of how they could be used:
Question 1: How do plants get their food?
This is a fundamental question about photosynthesis that students likely have. An engaging launching activity could have students observe and compare plants that are with and without sunlight to start forming hypotheses about how plants get their food.
Question 2: What are the parts of a plant and what is their function?
Providing students with pictures or physical examples of plant parts and having them work to correctly identify and describe the function of roots, stems, leaves, flowers etc. This gets students interacting with examples to build their base knowledge before exploring these concepts in more depth. Disc
The document discusses the KWL chart method for facilitating language lessons through inquiry-based learning. It involves 6 steps: 1) familiarizing with the KWL chart, 2) starting with an essential question, 3) finding out what is already known, 4) finding out what students want to know, 5) finding answers from experts, and 6) concluding what has been learned. The goal is to actively involve students in their learning through questioning and group discussions to fill out the KWL chart. Technology can be used to search for information from reliable sources to answer the questions.
Desirable Difficulty or Cognitive Overload?Carol Lethaby
This document discusses combining text and visuals in language learning. It explains that text and visuals should support each other to avoid cognitive overload. The theory of cognitive load posits that the brain has limited working memory but large long-term memory organized in schemas. When combining text and visuals, tasks should minimize extraneous load, maximize relevant processing (germane load), and create "desirable difficulty" to improve learning and schema formation.
1How to Write a Statement of Teaching PhilosophyA pr.docxfelicidaddinwoodie
1
How to Write a Statement of
Teaching Philosophy
A practical workshop on what a
teaching philosophy is and how
to get started
Dr. Heather Doherty, PhD
Leder Human Biology Program
Curriculum Fellow
Today we are going to go through a series of activities with the goal of every
person leaving this classroom with a starter kit for writing their own teaching
philosophy. Does everyone have a packet? Okay, let’s get started.
2
Outline
1. Audience and Goals
2. Teaching Experience
3. Teaching Style
4. Teaching Values
5. Anatomy and Construction
6. Tips and Resources
Before you write, you need to know your audience and define the purpose of a
teaching philosophy. Then you need the content: your teaching experience,
your teaching style, and what you value in teaching. Once you have the parts, I
will show you how to put it together. We will finish with some tips and further
resources to consult as you write.
3
Who asks for a teaching
philosophy?
~33% of job ads for faculty
• ~60% will request it during the hiring process
• Others want it but won’t request it
– “…those who are truly interested in teaching will submit a
statement of teaching philosophy without being asked to do so;
therefore, we never asked for is specifically.”
• More commonly requested by:
– BS/MS colleges
– Candidates in the natural sciences
• Establish your and their commitment to teaching
Deborah Meizlish and Matthew Kaplan. “Valuing and Evaluating Teaching in Academic Hiring: A Multidisciplinary, Cross-
Institutional Study.” The Journal of Higher Education - Volume 79, Number 5, September/October 2008, pp. 489-512.
Meizlish and Kaplan as well as others have done research on what type and
what percentage of faculty job ads ask for a teaching philosophy. After looking
about 500 ads, they found about 33% ask for a teaching philosophy to be part of
the initial application package. Around another 30% to bring it to 60% total will
ask for a teaching philosophy at some point during the hiring process. More
importantly, there are other employers that won’t ask for it even though they
expect it as this quote illustrates. In general, teaching philosophies are most
often requested by schools who have an emphasis on training at the Bachelors
and Masters degree level, which is not surprising as teaching is often a larger
emphasis and a larger part of faculty efforts at these institutions. In addition,
candidates in the natural sciences are more often asked for a teaching
philosophy. This request at first seems a little surprising, but mostly has to do
with the fact that the average graduate student or post-doc may not have a lot of
teaching experience. A teaching philosophy lets the hiring institution know that
you value teaching and have thought about it. The institution asking for the
teaching philosophy lets you know what they value teaching.
4
What does a teaching philosophy
contain?
• Offers evidence of practice
• ...
The document discusses using evidence-based teaching strategies in English language teaching. It outlines five strategies that research has shown to be effective for learning: elaborative interrogation, self-explanation, distributed practice, interleaved practice, and practice testing. For each strategy, the document provides an overview of supporting research evidence and examples of how the strategy could be applied to language teaching. The overall message is that teachers should be aware of strategies with evidence backing their effectiveness and look for ways to incorporate these ideas into their own classrooms.
This document discusses developments in technology and education. It notes that while technology is used widely in education, students still value face-to-face interaction with teachers. Both online and blended learning can be effective for language learning if the instructor is involved. The document also questions assumptions about "digital natives" and whether technologies are fundamentally changing students' brains. It emphasizes that moderate and strategic use of technology in education under an engaged teacher is most effective.
Based on a talk by Carol Lethaby at TESOL, 2017 Seattle.
Some argue that girls and boys learn language differently. Using classroom video and the concepts of 'priming' and 'stereotype threat', the presenter asserts that education, not hardwiring, is what ensures that both sexes flourish when learning language. Teaching ideas to combat sexism and promote success with all children are presented.
Exposing Neuromyths and Evidence-Based Training TESOL 2017Carol Lethaby
Based on a talk at TESOL 2017
The presenters evaluate some commonly held misconceptions in education that may be influencing the practice of English language teachers. Referencing scientific evidence and recent research, they show why such beliefs are considered myths and how pervasive these ideas are. Alternative, evidence-based teacher education concepts and activities are proposed and exemplified.
Presentation from TESOL 2015, Toronto, Canada.
Bridging the Gap: Neuroscience, Learning Styles and Teacher Training by Carol Lethaby and Patricia Harries
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UPRAHUL
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering.pptxDenish Jangid
Chapter wise All Notes of First year Basic Civil Engineering
Syllabus
Chapter-1
Introduction to objective, scope and outcome the subject
Chapter 2
Introduction: Scope and Specialization of Civil Engineering, Role of civil Engineer in Society, Impact of infrastructural development on economy of country.
Chapter 3
Surveying: Object Principles & Types of Surveying; Site Plans, Plans & Maps; Scales & Unit of different Measurements.
Linear Measurements: Instruments used. Linear Measurement by Tape, Ranging out Survey Lines and overcoming Obstructions; Measurements on sloping ground; Tape corrections, conventional symbols. Angular Measurements: Instruments used; Introduction to Compass Surveying, Bearings and Longitude & Latitude of a Line, Introduction to total station.
Levelling: Instrument used Object of levelling, Methods of levelling in brief, and Contour maps.
Chapter 4
Buildings: Selection of site for Buildings, Layout of Building Plan, Types of buildings, Plinth area, carpet area, floor space index, Introduction to building byelaws, concept of sun light & ventilation. Components of Buildings & their functions, Basic concept of R.C.C., Introduction to types of foundation
Chapter 5
Transportation: Introduction to Transportation Engineering; Traffic and Road Safety: Types and Characteristics of Various Modes of Transportation; Various Road Traffic Signs, Causes of Accidents and Road Safety Measures.
Chapter 6
Environmental Engineering: Environmental Pollution, Environmental Acts and Regulations, Functional Concepts of Ecology, Basics of Species, Biodiversity, Ecosystem, Hydrological Cycle; Chemical Cycles: Carbon, Nitrogen & Phosphorus; Energy Flow in Ecosystems.
Water Pollution: Water Quality standards, Introduction to Treatment & Disposal of Waste Water. Reuse and Saving of Water, Rain Water Harvesting. Solid Waste Management: Classification of Solid Waste, Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Solid. Recycling of Solid Waste: Energy Recovery, Sanitary Landfill, On-Site Sanitation. Air & Noise Pollution: Primary and Secondary air pollutants, Harmful effects of Air Pollution, Control of Air Pollution. . Noise Pollution Harmful Effects of noise pollution, control of noise pollution, Global warming & Climate Change, Ozone depletion, Greenhouse effect
Text Books:
1. Palancharmy, Basic Civil Engineering, McGraw Hill publishers.
2. Satheesh Gopi, Basic Civil Engineering, Pearson Publishers.
3. Ketki Rangwala Dalal, Essentials of Civil Engineering, Charotar Publishing House.
4. BCP, Surveying volume 1
Beyond Degrees - Empowering the Workforce in the Context of Skills-First.pptxEduSkills OECD
Iván Bornacelly, Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Skills, OECD, presents at the webinar 'Tackling job market gaps with a skills-first approach' on 12 June 2024
2. Before we start:
1 What do you understand by the term
‘prior knowledge’ or ‘background
knowledge’?
2 What kind of prior knowledge do your
students have?
3 What does prior knowledge have to do
with the brain and learning?
4 How can we use what learners in
Mexico know already in English language
teaching?
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
3. 1 What is ‘prior knowledge’ or
‘background knowledge’?
4. “If I had to reduce all of cognitive
psychology to one principle it would be
this: the most important single factor
influencing learning is what the learner
already knows. Ascertain this and teach
him accordingly.”
(Ausubel, 1978: flyleaf)
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
5. •“the single most widely
demonstrated difference [in
learning outcomes] is prior
knowledge.”
•(Clark, 2014: 335).
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
6. Students who have a great deal
of background knowledge in a
given subject area are likely to
learn new information readily and
quite well. The converse is also
true.
Marzano, 2004
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
7. Prior and background knowledge
•Prior knowledge – previously acquired
knowledge gained through life and
experience
•Background knowledge – academic prior
knowledge
• (Marzano 2004)
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
8. •Note: faulty background knowledge can
also affect learning, so it’s important to
check for this too.
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
9. 2 What kind of prior knowledge
does the learner have?
10. Two types of knowledge
•A knowledge of the world
•B knowledge of language
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
11. A Knowledge of the world / content
knowledge
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
12. B Knowledge of language
•Knowledge of L1
•Knowledge of L2
•Language awareness
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
15. Present perfect
tense? I’ve never
heard of it!
Excuse me,
could you tell
me about the
present perfect
tense, please?
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
18. Excuse
me, could
you tell
me about
the
present
perfect
tense,
please?
Certainly! It’s
formed with the
present tense of
the verb have
and the past
participle, for
example, I’ve
eaten my dinner.
It has different
meanings …
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
19. Language awareness
•Understanding of how language / languages work
“Insight into pattern in language has been
shown to be a key element in aptitude for
foreign language acquisition”
(Hawkins, 1987: 4)
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
20. What do we know about what our
learners already know?
•They know a lot of Spanish
•They live in Mexico and know about
Mexico
•Their educational background – the
schools and education they receive
•Their cultural background and norms in
Mexico
•Some of the English they already know
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
21. 3 What does prior knowledge have
to do with the brain and learning?
24. Brain cell (neuron)
• Adults have about 100 billion
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
25. Neural network based on synapses
(connections)
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
26. Connections!
•Language processing in left hemisphere
•Different processes / tasks associated with
different areas, but …
•Synapses – connections between neurons
•New information – connections
•Known information – reinforces connections –
using complex neural networks
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
27. So …..
How can we use this information
to help learners to learn?
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
28. Howard-Jones et al, 2018
•Applying the Science of Learning in the
Classroom
• In Impact Journal of the Chartered College of Teaching
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
29. Howard-Jones et al (2018)
•Engagement, building and consolidation
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
30. Engagement
•“The relationship between engagement
and learning is not a simple one. While
engagement can lead to learning,
learning can also lead to a more positive
emotional response and further
engagement with learning.”
• (Supekar et al, 2015 in Howard-Jones et al, 2018)
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
31. Building of knowledge
•“For new learning to be acquired in an
educational and meaningful sense, it
must also be connected to prior
knowledge, and this requires two-way
communication.”
• Howard-Jones et al, 2018
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
32. •In other words, teachers need to find
out and activate what learners know
already.
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
33. •(“the building of new knowledge is
often accompanied by increased
activation of the prefrontal regions of
the brain” Van Kesteren, 2014; Howard-
Jones et al, 2018)
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
34. Consolidation of learning
•New learning is more vulnerable to loss
• While we are using effort to process to remember and
apply new information the working memory is at full
capacity.
• As we consolidate our learning, the effort becomes less
and it becomes more permanent
• We make the connections stronger and we can then use
automatic processing.
•The importance of PRACTICE!!
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
35. For example:
• Ss learn that by adding –ed to a verb they can speak about
the past
• At first they apply this rule consciously and with effort
• As the rule becomes more consolidated they don’t need to
apply so much conscious effort and can learn something
new – working memory is freed up
• If this knowledge is not consolidated – reinforced / practiced
/ used – the learner will forget the rule as it remained in
working memory only briefly and will be lost when learner is
focused on / trying to learn something else.
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
36. For example:
• Ss learn new set of vocabulary items – about 10
• When you first introduce the words learners can hold them
in their working memory and work with them.
• If you practice and return to the words, this consolidates the
learning and they no longer take up space in working
memory as they’re making it to long-term memory (through
connections with what the learner already knows).
• If the words are not consolidated, the learner will forget
them as the working memory is taken up with something
new. The connections are not strong enough …
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
37. First principle of neural connectivity
“cells that fire together wire together”
•The more you do something the stronger the
connectivity
http://www.theguardian.com/science/head-quarters/live/2014/oct/02/the-greatest-brain-myth-there-ever-was
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
38. Second principle of connectivity
“use it or lose it!”
•If you don’t use the connection – it will
be pruned!
http://www.theguardian.com/science/head-quarters/live/2014/oct/02/the-greatest-brain-myth-there-ever-was
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
39. •“On a daily basis, we adjust and extend the
enormous knowledge base in our brain.”
•“It is very important in education that courses
build on each other as much as possible,
because knowledge builds from its
antecedents.”
• Building on prior knowledge: How does the student brain learn?
• May 12, 2014 Marlieke van Kesteren
• http://www.neuwritewest.org/blog/2014/5/12/building-on-prior-
knowledge-how-does-the-student-brain-learn
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
40. Applications to education
“… once we understand more about how
our brain uses prior knowledge (the stuff
we already know) to learn new
information, we could tap into our prior
knowledge better and more selectively
before we learn new information.”.””
Van Kesteren, 2014
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
41. “the single most widely
demonstrated difference [in learning
outcomes] is prior knowledge.”
•(Clark, 2014: 335).
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
42. 4 How can we use what learners in Mexico
know already in English language teaching?
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
43. “the single most widely
demonstrated difference [in
learning outcomes] is prior
knowledge.”
Clark, 2014: 335
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
44. •“.. what students already know about
the content is one of the strongest
indicators of how well they will learn
new information relative to the
content.”
• Marzano, 2004
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
45. What prior knowledge do L2 students have?
•Content
•L1
•L2
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
46. How can we use what students know to help
them to learn more easily?
1 Use pre-tasks
• activate background knowledge
• build background knowledge
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
47. From: English ID 2 by Paul Seligson, Carol Lethaby and Luiz Otavio Barros, Richmond 2013
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
48. From: English ID 2 by Paul Seligson, Carol Lethaby and Luiz Otavio Barros, Richmond 2013
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
49. How can we use what students know to help
them to learn better?
2 Re-cycle and build on what
learners know:
- use a spiral curriculum
- start with what learners know
already
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
50. From: English ID 1 by Paul Seligson, Carol Lethaby and Chris Gontow, Richmond 2013
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
51. From: Just Right Pre-Intermediate by Jeremy Harmer, Ana Acevedo and Carol Lethaby Cengage 2006
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
52. •“It is very important in education that
courses build on each other as much as
possible, because knowledge builds from its
antecedents.”
• Van Kesteren, 2014
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
53. How can we use what students know to help
them to learn better?
3 Know about learners’ interests / what they
know
•We are most interested in / motivated by the
things we already know something about
•(“interest in the topic is also important but
often is related to prior knowledge.”)
•Therefore … we need to make connections
between what we do in class and students’
real lives.
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
54. Check for ‘faulty’ prior knowledge
•Constantly be aware of prior knowledge –
don’t assume that learners know something
– check it.
•“faulty background knowledge”
•Eg basic vocabulary, parts of speech, names
of tenses
•Find out what the learners know.
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
55. How can we use what students know to help
them to learn better?
Cognitive overload
4 Don’t overload learners
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
56. “Visual representations appear to be
most effective when they are designed to
support the cognitive processes
necessary for deep comprehension.”
Butcher, 2006
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
58. •If we present learners with too much
information – text and complex visuals that
don’t support comprehension of the text
this will be too hard for learners.
•Text and visuals need to support each other.
•It’s about working memory capacity and
therefore essential to activate and build prior
knowledge
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
59. Working memory
•Overload leads to information
loss – either incoming information
will not be processed, or an item “in
process” will be dropped for a new
one.
• https://sites.google.com/view/efratfurst/learning-in-the-brain
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
60. •Learning from Text with Diagrams:
Promoting Mental Model Development
and Inference Generation
•Butcher, Kirsten R.
•Journal of Educational Psychology, v98 n1
p182-197 Feb 2006
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
61. How can we use what students know to help
them to learn better?
5 Use L1 to help learners learn English
“Research consistently shows that more new
words can be learned using L1 translations
than with L2-based definitions (Laufer and
Shmueli, 1997; Ramachandran and Rahim,
2004).” In Schmitt, 2008
German.aiflc
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
62. Language knowledge
• Research shows that learners need to know
approximately 98 percent of the words in
written or spoken discourse in order to
understand it well
•(Nation, 2006).
•Nation, I.S.P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is
needed for reading and listening? Canadian
Modern Language Review 63, 1: 59-82.
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
63. 6 Use L1 and L2 knowledge
•Help students to notice similarities and
differences
•Use cognates – false cognates
•Build on what learners already know in English
eg words and expressions in English
•Predict problems – spend more time on tricky
areas, less time on easy things
•Use references to background and culture of
the student – make connections to real life
How can we use what students know to help
them to learn better?
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
64. Summary
•Prior knowledge is essential in
helping us to learn new things
•We are finding out more about the
brain and how prior knowledge is
connected with new information
•We can use what we know about
the brain and how it works to help
us to help learners
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
65. Before we start:
1 What do you understand by the term
‘prior knowledge’ or ‘background
knowledge’?
2 What kind of prior knowledge do your
students have?
3 What does prior knowledge have to do
with the brain and learning?
4 How can we use what learners in
Mexico know already in English language
teaching?
Prior knowledge: Carol Lethaby, 2018
Two experiments investigated learning outcomes and comprehension processes when students learned about the heart and circulatory system using (a) text only, (b) text with simplified diagrams designed to highlight important structural relations, or (c) text with more detailed diagrams reflecting a more accurate representation. Experiment 1 found that both types of diagrams supported mental model development, but simplified diagrams best supported factual learning. Experiment 2 replicated learning effects from Experiment 1 and tested the influence of diagrams on novices' comprehension processes. Protocol analyses indicated that both types of diagrams supported inference generation and reduced comprehension errors, but simplified diagrams most strongly supported information integration during learning. Visual representations appear to be most effective when they are designed to support the cognitive processes necessary for deep comprehension.