Toolbox Meeting
Venue
Bilfinger Tebodin
Online – Microsoft Teams | 18 June 2020
HYDROGEN
page 2
2H2 +O2 2H2O + Energy
LHV of H2 = 120 MJ/kg
LHV of CH4 = 50 MJ/kg
 Hydrogen is Zero Emission Fuel
H2
CH4
LEL
4%
5%
HEL
75%
17%
PARIS AGREEMENT & WIND ENERGY
page 3
• Limit the increase of global average temperature to <2°C above pre-industrial
levels and to pursue 1.5°C
• No country is on target to achieve this goal
• Wind & Solar energy play a major role
• Current offshore wind power capacity ~24GW
• Wind Power generation rapidly growing
• Wind Energy to power conversion is challenging due to variability of wind
• Grid cannot cope at high wind conditions
• Steel plant need gas, not electricity
• Hydrogen mixed with gas reduces carbon foot print
• High concentration of hydrogen in gas leads to high NOx levels
• Electrolysis to convert purified sea water to H2
• Generated Hydrogen can be stored or injected into existing gas infrastructure
• H2 can be stored in depleted gas fields through wells
• North Sea will be a major activity center with many offshore well platforms that will be
decommissioned
WIND ENERGY TO HYDROGEN
page 4
GREEN, BLUE & GREY HYDROGEN
page 5
• Green Hydrogen produced from renewable energy like wind
• Blue hydrogen produced from non – renewable energy source. Can be from
natural gas provided CO2 is captured & stored.
• Grey hydrogen is present day hydrogen production from natural gas using SMR
process. No CO2 capture.
• Electrolysis Technology carbon footprint  0.01 kg CO2/MJ hydrogen
• SMR without CCS carbon footprint 0.09 kg CO2/MJ hydrogen
• Hydrogen mixing in natural gas  15% - 40%
• Electrolysis using electricity from grid has higher carbon foot-print.
page 6
Comparison of Electrolysis technologies
QUESTIONS
page 7
• How do we sell concept of Hydrogen production from Solar PVs?
• Power is continuous or Hydrogen production is continuous?
• Hydrogen storage in underground caverns? What is the potential?
LOHC
page 8
• Overall Effciency is 69% if the surplus energy during dehydrogenation step is not
recovered. If it is recovered somehow, the efficiency will be 88%.
Of course the above assessment does not take into consideration the aspects of the
carrier chemical production.
Efficiency of 69% compares OK with respect to Liquid hydrogen which has 72%
efficiency.
Questions
page 9

presentation.pptx

  • 1.
    Toolbox Meeting Venue Bilfinger Tebodin Online– Microsoft Teams | 18 June 2020
  • 2.
    HYDROGEN page 2 2H2 +O22H2O + Energy LHV of H2 = 120 MJ/kg LHV of CH4 = 50 MJ/kg  Hydrogen is Zero Emission Fuel H2 CH4 LEL 4% 5% HEL 75% 17%
  • 3.
    PARIS AGREEMENT &WIND ENERGY page 3 • Limit the increase of global average temperature to <2°C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue 1.5°C • No country is on target to achieve this goal • Wind & Solar energy play a major role • Current offshore wind power capacity ~24GW • Wind Power generation rapidly growing • Wind Energy to power conversion is challenging due to variability of wind • Grid cannot cope at high wind conditions
  • 4.
    • Steel plantneed gas, not electricity • Hydrogen mixed with gas reduces carbon foot print • High concentration of hydrogen in gas leads to high NOx levels • Electrolysis to convert purified sea water to H2 • Generated Hydrogen can be stored or injected into existing gas infrastructure • H2 can be stored in depleted gas fields through wells • North Sea will be a major activity center with many offshore well platforms that will be decommissioned WIND ENERGY TO HYDROGEN page 4
  • 5.
    GREEN, BLUE &GREY HYDROGEN page 5 • Green Hydrogen produced from renewable energy like wind • Blue hydrogen produced from non – renewable energy source. Can be from natural gas provided CO2 is captured & stored. • Grey hydrogen is present day hydrogen production from natural gas using SMR process. No CO2 capture. • Electrolysis Technology carbon footprint  0.01 kg CO2/MJ hydrogen • SMR without CCS carbon footprint 0.09 kg CO2/MJ hydrogen • Hydrogen mixing in natural gas  15% - 40% • Electrolysis using electricity from grid has higher carbon foot-print.
  • 6.
    page 6 Comparison ofElectrolysis technologies
  • 7.
    QUESTIONS page 7 • Howdo we sell concept of Hydrogen production from Solar PVs? • Power is continuous or Hydrogen production is continuous? • Hydrogen storage in underground caverns? What is the potential?
  • 8.
    LOHC page 8 • OverallEffciency is 69% if the surplus energy during dehydrogenation step is not recovered. If it is recovered somehow, the efficiency will be 88%. Of course the above assessment does not take into consideration the aspects of the carrier chemical production. Efficiency of 69% compares OK with respect to Liquid hydrogen which has 72% efficiency.
  • 9.