got this in my folder, if you have objection of me posting it here, please inform and i will remove it immediately,
great presentation on rti act 2005,
The document provides an overview of the Right to Information Act 2005 in India with the following key points:
1. The objectives of the RTI Act are to promote transparency and accountability in government bodies. It aims to provide citizens access to information held by public authorities to combat corruption.
2. The Act sets up information commissions and public information officers to receive and respond to requests from citizens. It also outlines exemptions for certain types of sensitive information.
3. All government bodies are covered under the Act and are obligated to proactively publish information, designate information officers, and adhere to strict response timelines when responding to citizen requests. Non-compliance can result in penalties.
This document provides an overview of the Right to Information Act in India. It discusses that RTI was recognized as a fundamental right in India in 2005 and enacted to promote transparency and accountability. It outlines key aspects of the act including definitions of information and public authorities, citizens' right to access information, exceptions, procedures for filing RTI requests, and examples of successful uses of RTI like exposing corruption. The document also briefly discusses the history and objectives of the act as well as penalties for non-compliance.
The Right to Information Act (RTI Act) was enacted in 2005 to bring transparency and accountability to the working of public authorities in India. It grants citizens the right to access information held by public bodies, subject to certain exemptions. Key aspects of the RTI Act include designated Public Information Officers who are required to respond to information requests within 30 days, appeal processes for information rejections, and penalties for non-compliance. Citizens can use the RTI Act to obtain information from public authorities for a small fee.
The Right to Information Act was implemented in India to provide citizens the right to access information from public authorities in order to promote transparency and accountability. It applies to all states and union territories except Jammu and Kashmir. The Act requires public authorities to disclose information proactively and respond to requests within a 30 day period. It also establishes penalties for non-compliance and appeal processes for information seekers. However, there are exemptions for information that could affect national security, investigation processes, or commercial interests.
The Right to Information Act 2005 aims to promote transparency and accountability by giving all Indian citizens the right to information. Key aspects include the right to inspect records, take notes and obtain copies of documents. Public authorities must publish information about their functions and processes, and designate Public Information Officers to provide information to requesters within defined timeframes. Exemptions exist for information that could harm national security or investigations. Citizens can appeal to Information Commissions if their requests are denied.
The document discusses the key aspects of the Right to Information Act passed in India in 2005. It outlines the salient features of the act including its goal of maximum disclosure and transparency of information held by public authorities. It defines the right to information and public authority. It describes the responsibilities of Public Information Officers, procedures for information requests, exemptions, penalties for non-compliance, and appellate process.
The Right to Information Act (RTI) was enacted in 2005 to provide citizens access to information held by public authorities and promote transparency. It allows citizens to request information from any public authority through application in writing or electronically. While most government information can be accessed, there are some exemptions like information related to national security, court proceedings, trade secrets etc. The RTI has been very effective in uncovering corruption, though some activists have faced threats and attacks while using the law.
This document discusses the Right to Information Act (RTI Act) in India and its role in improving governance. It provides an outline of the key points covered, including the background and objective of the RTI Act, important sections of the act, the roles of stakeholders, how citizens can file RTI applications, examples of RTI activists' work, and two case studies related to the Supreme Court of India. The overall message is that while the RTI Act has helped increase transparency and accountability after seven years of implementation, it still has not been used to its full potential due to issues like lack of awareness, threats faced by activists, and political and bureaucratic resistance to transparency.
The document provides an overview of the Right to Information Act 2005 in India with the following key points:
1. The objectives of the RTI Act are to promote transparency and accountability in government bodies. It aims to provide citizens access to information held by public authorities to combat corruption.
2. The Act sets up information commissions and public information officers to receive and respond to requests from citizens. It also outlines exemptions for certain types of sensitive information.
3. All government bodies are covered under the Act and are obligated to proactively publish information, designate information officers, and adhere to strict response timelines when responding to citizen requests. Non-compliance can result in penalties.
This document provides an overview of the Right to Information Act in India. It discusses that RTI was recognized as a fundamental right in India in 2005 and enacted to promote transparency and accountability. It outlines key aspects of the act including definitions of information and public authorities, citizens' right to access information, exceptions, procedures for filing RTI requests, and examples of successful uses of RTI like exposing corruption. The document also briefly discusses the history and objectives of the act as well as penalties for non-compliance.
The Right to Information Act (RTI Act) was enacted in 2005 to bring transparency and accountability to the working of public authorities in India. It grants citizens the right to access information held by public bodies, subject to certain exemptions. Key aspects of the RTI Act include designated Public Information Officers who are required to respond to information requests within 30 days, appeal processes for information rejections, and penalties for non-compliance. Citizens can use the RTI Act to obtain information from public authorities for a small fee.
The Right to Information Act was implemented in India to provide citizens the right to access information from public authorities in order to promote transparency and accountability. It applies to all states and union territories except Jammu and Kashmir. The Act requires public authorities to disclose information proactively and respond to requests within a 30 day period. It also establishes penalties for non-compliance and appeal processes for information seekers. However, there are exemptions for information that could affect national security, investigation processes, or commercial interests.
The Right to Information Act 2005 aims to promote transparency and accountability by giving all Indian citizens the right to information. Key aspects include the right to inspect records, take notes and obtain copies of documents. Public authorities must publish information about their functions and processes, and designate Public Information Officers to provide information to requesters within defined timeframes. Exemptions exist for information that could harm national security or investigations. Citizens can appeal to Information Commissions if their requests are denied.
The document discusses the key aspects of the Right to Information Act passed in India in 2005. It outlines the salient features of the act including its goal of maximum disclosure and transparency of information held by public authorities. It defines the right to information and public authority. It describes the responsibilities of Public Information Officers, procedures for information requests, exemptions, penalties for non-compliance, and appellate process.
The Right to Information Act (RTI) was enacted in 2005 to provide citizens access to information held by public authorities and promote transparency. It allows citizens to request information from any public authority through application in writing or electronically. While most government information can be accessed, there are some exemptions like information related to national security, court proceedings, trade secrets etc. The RTI has been very effective in uncovering corruption, though some activists have faced threats and attacks while using the law.
This document discusses the Right to Information Act (RTI Act) in India and its role in improving governance. It provides an outline of the key points covered, including the background and objective of the RTI Act, important sections of the act, the roles of stakeholders, how citizens can file RTI applications, examples of RTI activists' work, and two case studies related to the Supreme Court of India. The overall message is that while the RTI Act has helped increase transparency and accountability after seven years of implementation, it still has not been used to its full potential due to issues like lack of awareness, threats faced by activists, and political and bureaucratic resistance to transparency.
This paper focuses on various aspects of health care law including the constitutional perspective, obligations, and negligence of medical professionals and remedies available to
consumers of health care.
This document provides an overview of the Right to Information Act of 2005 in India. It discusses what RTI is, the need for the act, who is covered under the act, how to file an RTI application, the roles of Public Information Officers, the time frame for disposing requests, and some case studies of students using RTI to access exam answer sheets and address issues like garbage disposal and tobacco shops near schools. It also discusses how over Rs. 2,490 crore in tax exemptions were given to political parties based on an RTI request, and provides some conclusions on the impact and future of the RTI Act in India.
The document discusses Supreme Court Rules 1966, Delhi High Court Rules 1967, The Limitation Act 1963, The Registration Act 1908 and Bench-Bar Relations.
It provides an overview of the key provisions of the Supreme Court Rules related to advocates, single judges, writ petitions and election petitions. It also summarizes some key provisions of the Delhi High Court Rules related to advocates, single judges and civil/criminal jurisdiction.
The summary then provides a high-level overview of the main provisions of The Limitation Act and The Registration Act related to limitation periods, legal disability exclusions and effects of registration. It concludes with a brief discussion of the Advocates Act 1961 and roles of the State Bar Council and Bar Council of India regarding
The document discusses the Right to Information Act in India. It provides 3 key points:
1) The Right to Information is a fundamental right under the Indian Constitution as access to information is necessary for protecting life, liberty, and forming opinions.
2) The Right to Information Act established a process for citizens to access information from public authorities and provides a grievance mechanism for those denied information.
3) Some examples of successes using Right to Information applications include exposing illegal water extraction in New Delhi, helping a hawker fight police harassment in Delhi, and a life convict proving their innocence in Andhra Pradesh.
The document outlines the key obligations and requirements for public authorities under the Right to Information Act in India. It discusses that public authorities must proactively publish information on their organization, functions, processes, policies and decisions. They must also designate Public Information Officers, Assistant Public Information Officers and Appellate Officers to respond to information requests from citizens. Public authorities are required to submit annual reports on implementation of the Act and comply with decisions of Information Commissions. The overall aim is to create a regime that provides citizens access to information held by the government to promote transparency.
The Right to Information Act was enacted in 2005 to replace the previous Freedom of Information Act and provide citizens access to information held by public authorities in India. Key provisions include:
- Citizens can request information from any public authority, which must reply within 30 days.
- Authorities must proactively publish certain information so citizens need minimum recourse to formal requests.
- The objective is to promote transparency and accountability in governance.
This document outlines the key aspects of the Right to Information Act in India, including its objectives, limitations, definitions, and requirements for suo moto disclosures by public authorities. The objectives are to promote transparency and accountability in governance. Public authorities must proactively publish and disseminate various types of information, including their organizational structure, policies, budgets, procurement processes, and details of discretionary grants and foreign tours. The document also defines key terms like "information", "public authority", and "right to information".
A brief of the legal provisions governing the dowry law applicable in India. The parents, relatives and friends of both bride and groom are liable under the Act
The document contains information about several individuals including their names and contact numbers. It also contains multiple paragraphs discussing the right to information in India, including its historical context, legal basis under the constitution, key court judgements, and provisions under the Right to Information Act 2005. The act aims to promote transparency and accountability in governance. It establishes a regime for citizens to access information held by public authorities within defined timeframes.
The document summarizes the Citizenship Act of 1955 in India. It discusses how citizenship can be acquired through birth, descent, registration, and naturalization. Citizenship can be acquired by being born in India, having an Indian parent or grandparent, marrying an Indian citizen, residing in India for a certain number of years, or having a parent who is a citizen. The Act has been amended over time to address citizenship in territories acquired by India and overseas citizenship. The Constitution outlines citizenship at the commencement of India and for migrants from Pakistan.
Presentation on RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT 2005
HISTORY OF RTI ACT 2005
WHY AND WHAT
WHEN AND WHERE
WHO
HOW
FEES
PROCESS
APPEALS
IMPORTANT SECTIONS
INFORMATION WHICH CANNOT BE SHARED
The document summarizes key aspects of the Right to Information Act 2005 in India, which aims to promote transparency and accountability in governance. It discusses the objectives of the act, what information can be accessed, exceptions, procedures for filing information requests, penalties for non-compliance, and responsibilities of public authorities to proactively disclose information. The act established central and state information commissions to hear appeals related to information requests.
The document provides an overview of the Right to Information Act 2005 in India. It discusses that the Act provides citizens with a legal framework to access information held by public authorities, promoting transparency. It defines public authorities and the types of information covered. Exemptions to disclosure are listed. The procedures for filing information requests and associated timelines and fees are outlined. Penalties for non-compliance are also summarized.
The document discusses the concepts of justice and legal aid in India. It defines justice as fairness based on ethics and law, and upholding justice as maintaining fairness in society. Legal aid provides free legal services to those below the poverty line who cannot otherwise afford representation. The constitution mandates that the state provide legal aid to ensure equal access to justice. It discusses the history of legal aid in India and various committees and acts that have helped develop the legal aid system, including the Legal Services Authority Act of 1987. The summary provides an overview of the key topics and concepts addressed in the document.
The document discusses the Right to Information Act of 2005 in India. It covers when the Act came into force, what types of organizations it covers, the obligations of public authorities under the Act, what information can and cannot be disclosed, the process for requesting information, associated timelines and fees, and grounds for rejection of information requests.
The document defines a First Information Report (FIR) and outlines related procedures. An FIR is the earliest information about a cognizable crime recorded by the police. It can be filed by any person with knowledge of the crime. The FIR must be registered by the police at the local police station where the crime occurred. Guidelines provide that FIR registration is mandatory for cognizable offenses, while preliminary inquiries may be conducted for other cases to determine jurisdiction. Reasons must be provided if there is any delay or refusal to register an FIR. Online filing of FIRs is also available in some states for cognizable offenses.
RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT
RIGHT TO INFORMATION WHY?
Democracy requires an informed citizenry.
Transparency of information vital to its functioning.
To contain corruption
Re-define larger framework of Accountability, Democracy, Ethics and Rights.
Under-pins administrative reforms.
Enables Human Rights to be realized.
Harmonize conflicting interests.
RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005
The RTI bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha in December 2004.
It was passed by both Houses of the Parliament in may 2005.
The assent of the President was received on 15th June 2005 and act was notified in the Gazette of India on 21st June 2005.
The RTI act has been operational on 12th October 2005 after completion of 120 days from the date of Presidential assent.
SALIENT FEATURES OF THE ACT
Maximum Disclosures
Duty to Publish
Suo motu and web based disclosures
Duty to Furnish
PIO and Deemed PIO
Exemption – As per section 8 and 9 of the Act.
Covers Private Body & Third Party Information
Penalty for defiance.
Independent and Non-judicial appellate mechanism
Empowerment of citizens
DEFINITION OF “INFORMATION” {SECTION 2 (f) & 2(j) of RTI Act, 2005}
Obtaining information in the form of diskettes, floppies, tapes, video cassettes or in any other electronic mode or through printouts where such information is stored in a computer or in any other device.
What is a Public Authority?
“Public Authority" means any authority or body or institution of self- government established or constituted— (a)by or under the Constitution; (b)by any other law made by Parliament; (c)by any other law made by State Legislature; (d)by notification issued or order made by the appropriate Government, and includes any— (i) body owned, controlled or substantially financed; (ii) non-Government organization substantially financed, directly or indirectly by funds provided by the appropriate Government;
A public authority has to fulfill certain obligations as per RTI Act – 2005.
The document summarizes key aspects of the Right to Information Act 2005 in India. It outlines the objectives of the act to promote transparency and accountability. It defines public authorities, information, and records. It describes the right to information and obligations of public authorities to publish information, designate information officers, and provide reasons for decisions. The act aims to minimize use of the act by proactively providing information to the public.
The document summarizes key aspects of the Right to Information (RTI) Act 2005 in India. It outlines who can make requests under the Act (all citizens), how to make requests and appeal denials, the types of information covered, obligations of public authorities to proactively disclose information, and exemptions. The purpose of the Act is to promote transparency and accountability in government bodies.
This document outlines the appeal process and penalties under the Right to Information Act of India. It discusses the time limits for filing an appeal, which is 30 days from the date of receipt of the decision by the Central Public Information Officer or expiry of the response timeframe. The appeal authority may admit appeals filed after the deadline if sufficient cause is shown. It also describes the appeal authority's powers, which include imposing penalties up to Rs. 25,000 on officers who deny information without reasonable cause or give incomplete responses. Certain intelligence and security organizations are exempt from most provisions of this act.
This paper focuses on various aspects of health care law including the constitutional perspective, obligations, and negligence of medical professionals and remedies available to
consumers of health care.
This document provides an overview of the Right to Information Act of 2005 in India. It discusses what RTI is, the need for the act, who is covered under the act, how to file an RTI application, the roles of Public Information Officers, the time frame for disposing requests, and some case studies of students using RTI to access exam answer sheets and address issues like garbage disposal and tobacco shops near schools. It also discusses how over Rs. 2,490 crore in tax exemptions were given to political parties based on an RTI request, and provides some conclusions on the impact and future of the RTI Act in India.
The document discusses Supreme Court Rules 1966, Delhi High Court Rules 1967, The Limitation Act 1963, The Registration Act 1908 and Bench-Bar Relations.
It provides an overview of the key provisions of the Supreme Court Rules related to advocates, single judges, writ petitions and election petitions. It also summarizes some key provisions of the Delhi High Court Rules related to advocates, single judges and civil/criminal jurisdiction.
The summary then provides a high-level overview of the main provisions of The Limitation Act and The Registration Act related to limitation periods, legal disability exclusions and effects of registration. It concludes with a brief discussion of the Advocates Act 1961 and roles of the State Bar Council and Bar Council of India regarding
The document discusses the Right to Information Act in India. It provides 3 key points:
1) The Right to Information is a fundamental right under the Indian Constitution as access to information is necessary for protecting life, liberty, and forming opinions.
2) The Right to Information Act established a process for citizens to access information from public authorities and provides a grievance mechanism for those denied information.
3) Some examples of successes using Right to Information applications include exposing illegal water extraction in New Delhi, helping a hawker fight police harassment in Delhi, and a life convict proving their innocence in Andhra Pradesh.
The document outlines the key obligations and requirements for public authorities under the Right to Information Act in India. It discusses that public authorities must proactively publish information on their organization, functions, processes, policies and decisions. They must also designate Public Information Officers, Assistant Public Information Officers and Appellate Officers to respond to information requests from citizens. Public authorities are required to submit annual reports on implementation of the Act and comply with decisions of Information Commissions. The overall aim is to create a regime that provides citizens access to information held by the government to promote transparency.
The Right to Information Act was enacted in 2005 to replace the previous Freedom of Information Act and provide citizens access to information held by public authorities in India. Key provisions include:
- Citizens can request information from any public authority, which must reply within 30 days.
- Authorities must proactively publish certain information so citizens need minimum recourse to formal requests.
- The objective is to promote transparency and accountability in governance.
This document outlines the key aspects of the Right to Information Act in India, including its objectives, limitations, definitions, and requirements for suo moto disclosures by public authorities. The objectives are to promote transparency and accountability in governance. Public authorities must proactively publish and disseminate various types of information, including their organizational structure, policies, budgets, procurement processes, and details of discretionary grants and foreign tours. The document also defines key terms like "information", "public authority", and "right to information".
A brief of the legal provisions governing the dowry law applicable in India. The parents, relatives and friends of both bride and groom are liable under the Act
The document contains information about several individuals including their names and contact numbers. It also contains multiple paragraphs discussing the right to information in India, including its historical context, legal basis under the constitution, key court judgements, and provisions under the Right to Information Act 2005. The act aims to promote transparency and accountability in governance. It establishes a regime for citizens to access information held by public authorities within defined timeframes.
The document summarizes the Citizenship Act of 1955 in India. It discusses how citizenship can be acquired through birth, descent, registration, and naturalization. Citizenship can be acquired by being born in India, having an Indian parent or grandparent, marrying an Indian citizen, residing in India for a certain number of years, or having a parent who is a citizen. The Act has been amended over time to address citizenship in territories acquired by India and overseas citizenship. The Constitution outlines citizenship at the commencement of India and for migrants from Pakistan.
Presentation on RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT 2005
HISTORY OF RTI ACT 2005
WHY AND WHAT
WHEN AND WHERE
WHO
HOW
FEES
PROCESS
APPEALS
IMPORTANT SECTIONS
INFORMATION WHICH CANNOT BE SHARED
The document summarizes key aspects of the Right to Information Act 2005 in India, which aims to promote transparency and accountability in governance. It discusses the objectives of the act, what information can be accessed, exceptions, procedures for filing information requests, penalties for non-compliance, and responsibilities of public authorities to proactively disclose information. The act established central and state information commissions to hear appeals related to information requests.
The document provides an overview of the Right to Information Act 2005 in India. It discusses that the Act provides citizens with a legal framework to access information held by public authorities, promoting transparency. It defines public authorities and the types of information covered. Exemptions to disclosure are listed. The procedures for filing information requests and associated timelines and fees are outlined. Penalties for non-compliance are also summarized.
The document discusses the concepts of justice and legal aid in India. It defines justice as fairness based on ethics and law, and upholding justice as maintaining fairness in society. Legal aid provides free legal services to those below the poverty line who cannot otherwise afford representation. The constitution mandates that the state provide legal aid to ensure equal access to justice. It discusses the history of legal aid in India and various committees and acts that have helped develop the legal aid system, including the Legal Services Authority Act of 1987. The summary provides an overview of the key topics and concepts addressed in the document.
The document discusses the Right to Information Act of 2005 in India. It covers when the Act came into force, what types of organizations it covers, the obligations of public authorities under the Act, what information can and cannot be disclosed, the process for requesting information, associated timelines and fees, and grounds for rejection of information requests.
The document defines a First Information Report (FIR) and outlines related procedures. An FIR is the earliest information about a cognizable crime recorded by the police. It can be filed by any person with knowledge of the crime. The FIR must be registered by the police at the local police station where the crime occurred. Guidelines provide that FIR registration is mandatory for cognizable offenses, while preliminary inquiries may be conducted for other cases to determine jurisdiction. Reasons must be provided if there is any delay or refusal to register an FIR. Online filing of FIRs is also available in some states for cognizable offenses.
RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT
RIGHT TO INFORMATION WHY?
Democracy requires an informed citizenry.
Transparency of information vital to its functioning.
To contain corruption
Re-define larger framework of Accountability, Democracy, Ethics and Rights.
Under-pins administrative reforms.
Enables Human Rights to be realized.
Harmonize conflicting interests.
RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005
The RTI bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha in December 2004.
It was passed by both Houses of the Parliament in may 2005.
The assent of the President was received on 15th June 2005 and act was notified in the Gazette of India on 21st June 2005.
The RTI act has been operational on 12th October 2005 after completion of 120 days from the date of Presidential assent.
SALIENT FEATURES OF THE ACT
Maximum Disclosures
Duty to Publish
Suo motu and web based disclosures
Duty to Furnish
PIO and Deemed PIO
Exemption – As per section 8 and 9 of the Act.
Covers Private Body & Third Party Information
Penalty for defiance.
Independent and Non-judicial appellate mechanism
Empowerment of citizens
DEFINITION OF “INFORMATION” {SECTION 2 (f) & 2(j) of RTI Act, 2005}
Obtaining information in the form of diskettes, floppies, tapes, video cassettes or in any other electronic mode or through printouts where such information is stored in a computer or in any other device.
What is a Public Authority?
“Public Authority" means any authority or body or institution of self- government established or constituted— (a)by or under the Constitution; (b)by any other law made by Parliament; (c)by any other law made by State Legislature; (d)by notification issued or order made by the appropriate Government, and includes any— (i) body owned, controlled or substantially financed; (ii) non-Government organization substantially financed, directly or indirectly by funds provided by the appropriate Government;
A public authority has to fulfill certain obligations as per RTI Act – 2005.
The document summarizes key aspects of the Right to Information Act 2005 in India. It outlines the objectives of the act to promote transparency and accountability. It defines public authorities, information, and records. It describes the right to information and obligations of public authorities to publish information, designate information officers, and provide reasons for decisions. The act aims to minimize use of the act by proactively providing information to the public.
The document summarizes key aspects of the Right to Information (RTI) Act 2005 in India. It outlines who can make requests under the Act (all citizens), how to make requests and appeal denials, the types of information covered, obligations of public authorities to proactively disclose information, and exemptions. The purpose of the Act is to promote transparency and accountability in government bodies.
This document outlines the appeal process and penalties under the Right to Information Act of India. It discusses the time limits for filing an appeal, which is 30 days from the date of receipt of the decision by the Central Public Information Officer or expiry of the response timeframe. The appeal authority may admit appeals filed after the deadline if sufficient cause is shown. It also describes the appeal authority's powers, which include imposing penalties up to Rs. 25,000 on officers who deny information without reasonable cause or give incomplete responses. Certain intelligence and security organizations are exempt from most provisions of this act.
RTI India -Development factors and the loopholes in itSrikanth Kuthuru
This presentation includes the details about the development in india using RTI , the drawbacks of it and some suggestions for the improvement of the act.
The document provides an overview of the Right to Information Act 2005 in India. It discusses that the Act provides citizens with the legal right to access information from public authorities to promote transparency and accountability. It defines public authority and the types of information that can be accessed. It outlines the procedure for requesting information, associated timelines and fees. It also discusses exemptions and penalties under the Act. The Act aims to empower citizens, reduce corruption and make the government more responsive by promoting openness in its functioning.
The document discusses several Supreme Court cases related to the Right to Information Act (RTI).
In the first case, the Supreme Court held that personal details disclosed in income tax returns and documents related to punishment of employees are exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act. However, some service-related information like appointment and promotion orders must be disclosed.
The second case discusses the right of examinees to inspect their evaluated answer sheets under the RTI Act. While re-evaluation was not allowed, inspecting answer sheets was held to be permissible.
The third case discusses that while applicants can access opinions and orders under RTI, they cannot question the reasons for such decisions,
The document provides information about the Right to Information Act 2005 in India. It discusses that some see RTI as a tool while others see it as a weapon. It then asks several questions about information, rights, and who will provide and benefit from information obtained through RTI requests. The rest of the document outlines the RTI application process, appeal process, exemptions, penalties, common uses of RTI, government obligations, where RTI requests can be filed, examples of people who have used RTI, and differences before and after filing RTI requests. Useful websites related to RTI are also provided. The document encourages citizens to use their right to information responsibly.
1. The document discusses the first appeal procedure under the RTI Act in India. It provides details about filing a first appeal with the First Appellate Authority if the applicant is dissatisfied with the Public Information Officer's response.
2. It notes common complaints that First Appellate Authorities do not take appeals seriously and do not try to provide information. There are demands to impose fines on FAAs for inaction.
3. The document outlines the timelines and process that FAAs should follow in disposing appeals, including giving speaking orders and furnishing information directly if necessary.
1. The Right to Information Act was introduced in 2005 to promote transparency and accountability in government bodies by giving citizens the right to access information held by public authorities.
2. The Act empowers citizens to request information from any public body, inspect government documents, take notes and certified samples, and obtain information in electronic or print form.
3. Implementation of the Act has led to greater transparency in government operations, increased citizen participation in governance, and reduced corruption by making government bodies more accountable for their actions and decisions.
Presentation on Right to Information Act : by Hemant Goswami : Burning Brain Society : at Chandigarh Central State Library, Sector 17, Chandigarh 160017 INDIA
The document provides an overview of the Right to Information Act 2009 in Jammu and Kashmir. Some key points:
- The Act aims to provide citizens the right to access information held by public authorities, promote transparency, and curb corruption.
- It establishes a practical regime for citizens to obtain government records and replaced previous state RTI acts.
- The Act follows the structure of the central RTI Act of 2005 and applies to both state and central government bodies in Jammu and Kashmir.
- It outlines procedures for filing RTI applications, timelines for responses, fees, exemptions, obligations of public authorities, and establishes the State Information Commission to oversee the law.
The document discusses the key features and sections of the Jammu and Kashmir Right to Information Act 2009. It outlines the 28 sections in the Act and the 13 provisions in the Rules. It summarizes the eligibility to seek information, definitions of public authorities and information, roles of Public Information Officers, application process, fees, timelines for response, exemptions to disclosure, appeal process, penalties for non-compliance, and the importance of proactive disclosure of information under Section 4 of the Act.
The document summarizes key aspects of the Right to Information Act 2005 in India such as:
1) It defines what constitutes "information" and a "public authority" according to the Act.
2) It outlines the obligations of public authorities including proactively disclosing information, maintaining records, and responding to requests within a specific timeframe.
3) It describes the types of information that are exempt from disclosure such as information related to national security or that received in confidence.
4) It provides details on the complaint and appeal process through the Central Information Commission for issues related to information requests.
This document summarizes the key aspects of the Right to Information Act 2005 in India. It was passed by the Indian Parliament in June 2005 and came into effect in October 2005. The objectives of the act are to increase transparency, accountability and reduce corruption in governance by empowering citizens with the right to access information held by public authorities. The act defines terms like right to information, prescribed, public authority and record. It also summarizes two important court cases, one regarding an individual's right to access a copy of the First Information Report and another regarding access to information on a bank's categorization held by the Reserve Bank of India.
RTI ACT, 2005 PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING APPLICATION, APPEAL, COMPLAINTPrakash Prakash
The document outlines the procedure for filing requests, appeals and complaints under the Right to Information Act 2005 in India, including initially filing an application with the relevant public authority, then filing first and second appeals with the first appellate authority and Central Information Commission respectively if the request is denied. It provides details on application fees, response fees, formats for appeals, and avenues for appeal against orders of the Central and State Information Commissions.
The Right to Information Act was enacted in 2005 to promote transparency and accountability in government. It relaxed restrictions on information disclosure that were previously imposed by laws like the Official Secrets Act. To effectively exercise rights under the Act, public awareness is important. Various institutions like educational institutions, government bodies, NGOs and the Central Information Commission have undertaken initiatives to educate the public about the Act through workshops, seminars, curriculum inclusion and awareness campaigns using materials like posters, pamphlets and advertisements. Widespread dissemination of information about the public's right to information is necessary to strengthen participatory democracy and good governance.
This presentation on The RTI Act 2005 is for general understanding of the netizens. The act was enacted to upheld Transparency & Accountability in Public offices.
ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT AND HUMAN RIGHTS.pptxKuriakoseBaby1
- Public authorities must maintain and index all records to facilitate access under the Right to Information Act. They must also computerize records where reasonable to do so.
- Authorities must publish information like their functions, decision processes, policies, committees, employee directories, budgets and programs within 120 days.
- The objectives of the Act are to empower citizens to access information from the government, ensure transparency, and promote accountability.
- Citizens can make information requests in writing or electronically, providing details of the information sought. Requests generally must be processed within 30 days, though extensions are allowed in some cases. Fees of Rs. 10 apply but are waived for some.
RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT 2005 right to informationhlo951790
The document summarizes the Right to Information Act 2005 in India. It was enacted by Parliament to provide citizens access to information from public authorities in order to promote transparency and accountability. Under the Act, citizens can request information and public authorities must provide responses within 30 days. The Act also established Central and State Information Commissions to oversee its implementation and hear appeals.
The document discusses the history and evolution of the right to information globally and in India, from its earliest references in Sweden in 1776 to India passing its own Right to Information Act in 2005. It provides context on international resolutions and declarations supporting access to information as a fundamental right. Key milestones and provisions of India's Right to Information Act are outlined, establishing a practical regime for citizens to access government information.
The document provides an overview of the Right to Information Act 2005 in India. Some key points:
- The Act was passed in 2005 to promote transparency and accountability in government. It gives Indian citizens the right to request and receive information from public authorities.
- Information that can be requested includes documents, emails, reports, and data held by government departments and agencies. Some types of information related to privacy, investigations, and national security are exempt.
- The Act establishes procedures for requesting information, designates Public Information Officers to handle requests, and sets timelines for responses. It also creates an appeals process and penalties for non-compliance.
- The goal is to empower citizens by increasing access to government information
The document discusses the Right to Information Act of 2005 in India. It provides an overview of the key aspects of the act including its purpose of strengthening democracy and governance transparency. It outlines the 6 chapters and 31 sections that make up the act. It describes the various stakeholders involved like the Public Information Officer, Appellate Authority, citizen, and information commissions. It explains the timelines for disposing information requests, defines what constitutes information, outlines public authorities, and exemptions to disclosure. It also summarizes the appeal process and potential penalties for non-compliance.
The document discusses the Right to Information Act 2005 and the Official Secrets Act 1923 in India. It provides background on the need for the RTI Act, including promoting transparency and accountability. It outlines important sections of the RTI Act regarding access to information, designation of information officers, appeals process and penalties. It also discusses the Central Information Commission and landmark cases related to RTI. The document then provides history and aspects covered under the Official Secrets Act 1923, including espionage and secret information. It notes tensions between the RTI Act and OSA, as well as committees recommending changes to the latter. Finally, it outlines some cases where the OSA was invoked against journalists.
The Right to Information Act was published in 2005 to provide Indian citizens the right to obtain information from public authorities. It aims to promote transparency and accountability in government bodies. Under the Act, all public authorities must appoint Public Information Officers to receive and respond to requests for information from citizens within 30 days. While most government information must be provided, there are some exemptions such as information that would breach privacy or impede law enforcement. Citizens can appeal to higher authorities if their requests are denied. The Act also requires the government to promote awareness about right to information.
The document provides an overview of the Right to Information Act in India, including its purpose, timeline, key aspects, and implementation. It aims to promote transparency and accountability in governance. Key points include:
- The Act ensures citizens' right to information from public authorities to contain corruption and have an informed democracy.
- It establishes certain obligations of public authorities like proactive disclosure of information and designation of Public Information Officers.
- There are provisions for appeals and penalties for non-compliance. State Information Commissions oversee its implementation.
The document summarizes the key aspects of the Right to Information Act 2005 in India. The objectives of the act are to promote transparency and accountability in public authorities, contain corruption, and increase citizens' awareness of their rights. It gives citizens the right to access information from public authorities, subject to certain exemptions. It also outlines the obligations of public authorities, such as designating Public Information Officers, publishing information proactively, and responding to requests within a maximum of 30 days. Penalties are prescribed for non-compliance by public authorities.
Right to privacy on internet and Data Protectionatuljaybhaye
The document discusses the concepts of privacy and data protection on the internet. It defines the right to privacy and explains how privacy is recognized differently across various jurisdictions like the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, European Convention on Human Rights, and the Constitution of India. It also summarizes key privacy laws in the US and UK. The document then discusses various threats to privacy from technologies like cookies, web bugs, and viruses. It provides details about sensitive personal data protection laws in India and the UK. Finally, it discusses the right to privacy versus the right to interception under Indian law.
The document discusses the Right to Information (RTI) Act in India. It provides:
1) An overview of key aspects of the RTI Act such as the citizens' right to obtain information from public authorities, relevant definitions, and provisions for filing RTI applications.
2) A step-by-step explanation of how to draft and file an RTI application, including addressing it to the Public Information Officer, describing the information sought, and including an inspection clause.
3) Details on the appeal process if the information requested is not provided or is incomplete, including filing first and second appeals.
The document aims to educate citizens about their right to information and how to effectively exercise this right
RTI Act was introduced in India in 2005 and guarantees the right to information under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution. The RTI Act aims to promote transparency and accountability in government bodies. It defines public authorities and information broadly and mandates the proactive disclosure of information. While most information can be accessed, there are some exceptions relating to sovereignty, commercial confidence, fiduciary relationships, and personal privacy. Requests for information are made to Public Information Officers, with appeals available within a defined timeline if information is denied.
Duites and Responsibilities of Public Information Officer under the Right To ...ParthSagdeo2
Salient features of the RTI act and PIOs are officers designated by the public authorities in all administrative units or offices under it to provide information to the citizens requesting information under the Act. Any officer, whose assistance has been sought by the PIO for the proper discharge of his or her duties, shall render all assistance and for contraventions of the provisions of this Act, such other officer shall be treated as a PIO.
The document provides an overview of the Right to Information Act in India. Some key points:
1) The Act establishes the right of Indian citizens to access information held by public authorities, subject to exemptions for issues like national security or cabinet papers.
2) It defines "information" and "public authorities" and establishes processes for citizens to request information and appeal denials.
3) Public authorities must proactively disclose information and respond to requests within 30 days, with penalties for non-compliance.
4) The Act aims to balance transparency with other interests but establishes the paramountcy of democratic ideals of an informed citizenry.
The Right to Information Act, 2005 is widely hailed to be one of the best enactments concerning access to information to public, with an excellent implementation record. The soul of the RTI Act can be understood by its Preamble- "Democracy requires an informed citizenry and transparency of information which are vital to its functioning and also to contain corruption and to hold Governments and their instrumentalities accountable to the
governed". Keeping this goal in mind this presentation would strive to describe the ambit and scope of the RTI Act by categorizing the relevant provisions of the Act under four distinct blocks. The first block includes all provisions related to the Right to Access in context of the 'information’, 'public authority', 'record', 'right to information' under Sections 2 and 3 and the interpretation accorded to the same by the State Information Commissions, Central Information Commission and the various High Courts and the Supreme Court during the last decade . The second block includes provisions dealing with the Procedural Guarantees that ensure an application to the PIO seeking information that can be disclosed under this Act is efficiently and effectively disposed of. The third block deals with provisions related to exceptions from disclosing the information which are listed out in Sections 8, 9, 10, 11 and 24 of the Act. However, these exceptions come with some provisos under which the information exempted can be disclosed under certain circumstances and one such prime reason as seen in judicial pronouncements is ‘The Larger Public Interest’. The fourth block deals with the provisions related to Appeals, Sanctions and Protections. Further, the presentation will substantiate relevant case laws where the RTI Act has indeed helped citizens realize the principles enshrined in the Preamble and will highlight the challenges confronting the RTI and also suggest ways to move forward.
Explore the Power of Transparency: Right to Information (RTI)
Delve into the fundamental right that empowers citizens to access information held by public authorities. This presentation sheds light on the essence of the Right to Information Act, its significance in fostering transparency, and its role in shaping accountable governance.
Discover the ins and outs of RTI, from its historical context to its modern-day implications. Uncover how this pivotal legislation acts as a catalyst for accountability, encouraging citizen engagement and ensuring responsive governance.
Join us on a journey through the nuances of RTI, understanding its applications, impact, and the power it bestows upon citizens to question, seek, and receive information from public bodies.
Empower yourself with knowledge and learn how the Right to Information fosters a more informed and participative society, transforming the landscape of governance for the better."
The Right to Information Act provides Indian citizens the right to request and access information from public authorities. It replaced the Freedom of Information Act of 2002, which was criticized for allowing too many exemptions. The RTI Act applies to all states except Jammu and Kashmir and covers constitutional authorities, bodies established by acts of parliament or state legislatures, and bodies substantially funded by the government. Citizens can submit written requests to public authorities' Public Information Officers, who must respond within 30 days. Certain types of information related to security, court proceedings, personal privacy, and trade secrets are exempt from disclosure.
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdfveteranlegal
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
Integrating Advocacy and Legal Tactics to Tackle Online Consumer Complaintsseoglobal20
Our company bridges the gap between registered users and experienced advocates, offering a user-friendly online platform for seamless interaction. This platform empowers users to voice their grievances, particularly regarding online consumer issues. We streamline support by utilizing our team of expert advocates to provide consultancy services and initiate appropriate legal actions.
Our Online Consumer Legal Forum offers comprehensive guidance to individuals and businesses facing consumer complaints. With a dedicated team, round-the-clock support, and efficient complaint management, we are the preferred solution for addressing consumer grievances.
Our intuitive online interface allows individuals to register complaints, seek legal advice, and pursue justice conveniently. Users can submit complaints via mobile devices and send legal notices to companies directly through our portal.
Corporate Governance : Scope and Legal Frameworkdevaki57
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
MEANING
Corporate Governance refers to the way in which companies are governed and to what purpose. It identifies who has power and accountability, and who makes decisions. It is, in essence, a toolkit that enables management and the board to deal more effectively with the challenges of running a company.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
1. Right to Information Act 2005
Academic Staff College .
Mysore
Prof. K.S Suresh
Principal
JSS Law College ( Aut.)
Mysore
2. Right to Information Act 2005
Objects of the Act:
1. To provide practical regime of RTI to secure access to information from Public
Authorities for the citizens
2. To promote transparency and accountability in Public Authorities.
3. As Democratic nation it, requires informed citizenry to function.
4. To contain corruption and to resolve conflict of interest.
5. To hold Govt.s and instrumentalities accountable to the governed
Background of the Act:
1. Official Secrets Act, 1923.
2. T.N. and Goa RTI Acts. 1997.
3. Karnataka, Rajasthan, UP RTI Acts, 2000.
4. A.P., Assam, Delhi RTI Acts, 2001. Kerala RTI Act, 2002.M.P. RTI Act, 2003
5. Freedom of Information Act 2002.
6. RTI (central Act) 2005 ( 31 sections and 2 schedules)
JSS Law College 2
3. “The world suffers a lot not because of the
violence of bad people, but because of the
silence of good people”
- Napoleon
JSS Law College 3
4. Right to Information Act 2005
Sec. 1.(1) Short title, (2) Extent, (3) Commencement
.(Secs.4,5,12,13,15,16,24,27&28 shall come into force at once &
the remaining within 120 days)
Sec. 2. Definitions (definitions of 14 terms are given)
2(a). ‘Appropriate Government’ (Conflict of Jurisdiction)
2(e). ‘Competent Authority’ (speaker ,CJI,CJH, President, Govs.&
administrator appointed under Art. 239)
2(f). ‘Information’
“Information means any material in any form including records,
documents, memos, emails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars,
orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data
material held in any electronic form and information relating to any
private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other
law for the time being in force”.
JSS Law College 4
5. Right to Information Act 2005
2(h). ‘Public Authority’ means and includes authorities created;
1. by or under the Constitution;
2. by any other law made by Parliament;
3. by any other law made by State Legislature;
4. by notification issued or order made by the appropriate Government and
includes:
(a). any- body owned, controlled or substantially financed
(b). non-Government organization substantially financed directly or
indirectly by the appropriate Government.
2(i). ‘Record’: It Includes-(document , manuscript , file, microfilm,
facsimile etc,.)
2(j). ‘Right to Information’: The right to Information accessible under
the Act including; to inspect work ,documents records; to take notes,
extracts; certified copies, samples etc,.
2(n).‘Third party’: ( First, Second and Third parties under RTI)The person
other than a citizen making the application including a Public Authority.
JSS Law College 5
6. Right to Information Act 2005
Sec.3. Right to information: Subject to provisions of the Act
every citizen shall the have right to information.(by birth
descent, registration and naturalisation.)
Sec.4. Obligation of Public Authorities
4(1) (a).Shall maintain records duly catalogued and indexed and ensure
that all records to be computerized within reasonable time,
subject to availability of finance and it shall be connected
to network.
4(1)(b).Publish within 120 days information on 17 items such as:
1. Organization, functions and Duties,
2. Powers and duties of officers.
3. Procedure followed in decision making including channels of supervision.
4. Norms set for discharge of functions.
5. The rules, regulations, instructions, manuals and records held and used by it.
6. Statement of categories of documents that held or under its control.
JSS Law College 6
7. Right to Information Act 2005
7. The particulars of consultation arrangement, with public for formulating
policy etc,.
8. Statement of Boards, councils, committees constituted for advice , meetings
and minutes of such bodies and whether they are open for public etc,.
9. Directory of Officers and employees.
10. Monthly remuneration received by each employee and system of
compensation .
11. Budget allocated , particulars of plans, proposed expenditure report of
disbursement.
12. Manner of execution of subsidy programmes. Amounts and details of
beneficiaries.
13. Particulars of recipients of concessions, permits etc,.
14. Details of information held in electronic form.
15. Facilities available for citizens for obtaining information, working hours ,
library, reading rooms facilities etc,
16. Names, designation and details of PIOs .
17. Such other information as may be prescribed.
JSS Law College 7
8. Right to Information Act 2005
4(2). Endeavor to provide Suo motu as much
information to public through various modes at
regular intervals through various modes
including internet .
4(3). Every information shall be disseminated
widely in easily accessible manner to the public.
4(4). All materials shall Dissemination by considering
cost, easy accessibility language, etc., for free or at
JSS Law College 8
9. Right to Information Act 2005
Sec. 5. Designation of PIOs :
1. Designation of PIOs by PAs in their administrative units/ offices within
120 days .
2. Designate at sub-divisional level APIOs . To receive application for
forwarding to PIOs or AAs
3. Every PIO shall deal with requests and render assistance for the person
seeking.
4. PIO may seek the assistance of any others for discharge of duties.
5. The person whose assistance is sought shall provide.
Sec. 6. Request for information to PIO/APIO;
1. May seek by writing or in electronic format with requisite information
accompanying fees . Oral requests to be reduced to writing
2. No reason for information is required and his personal details except
address,
3. Transfer the application to the PAs concerned within five days and
inform the applicant.
JSS Law College 9
10. Right to Information Act 2005
Sec. 7 Disposal of Requests.
1.As expeditiously as possible within 30 days and 48 hours, if
it is concerned with violations of human Rights and reject if
comes under Secs. 8 or 9.
2.If not given within time – it is deemed to have been refused.
(Deemed refusal)
3.Provide details of cost and inform about the review right on
cost
4.Provide assistance to the sensorily disabled persons.
5.If information sought is published /electronic format charge
the fee prescribed. (No fee for BPL card holders)
6.PIO to consult third parties before providing information.
7.Public Information Authority may reject by giving reasons,
appeal privileges and appellate authority particulars..
8.Information shall be provided in the format sought.
JSS Law College 10
11. Right to Information Act 2005
Sec.8 . (1)Exemption from Disclosure. No obligation provide
the following:
a. Disclosure would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of
India.(Copies of Home ministry. directions to CBI on interception of
telephone. Correspondence with USSR on Nethajis disappearance)
b. Expressly forbidden to be published by any court. ( Draft judgement
cannot be given; Inspection of land on which there was pending suit.
c. Which would cause a breach of privilege of Parliament (Five privileges –
speech, control over its affairs, publication, arrest and punish contempt eg.,
standing committee materials, budget proposals)
d. Commercial confidence, trade secrets or intellectual property
e. Information available to a person in his fiduciary relationship,
( examiners, doctors, advocates - legal opinions Visitors registers of police
stations are exempted.
f. Information received in confidence from Foreign Government
g. Which would endanger the life or physical safety of any person
JSS Law College 11
12. Right to Information Act 2005
a. Which would impede the process of investigation
b. Cabinet papers including records of deliberations.
c. Information of personal nature which has no relation to public
activity/privacy unless it serves a larger public interest. Provided
further, what cannot be denied to Parliament or State Legislature
cannot be denied to an individual.
2. Not withstanding OS Act 1923, PA may allow access if public interest
outweighs the individual interest.
3. Subject to clauses a,c, i of 8(1) information beyond 20 yrs shall be
provided
Sec. 9. Rejection on the ground of copyright.
Sec. 10. Severability.
JSS Law College 12
13. Right to Information Act 2005
Sec. 11. Third Party Information.
1. Information supplied by third party and to be treated as confidential, PIO
must cause a notice to third party inviting his submission within 5 days.
Except trade secrets, disclosure may be made if the public interest
outweighs.
2. The third party within ten days to make representation on disclosure.
3. PIO to decide within 40 days make a decision.
4. Third party to whom notice is given may prefer an appeal under Sec. 19.
( Third party to be heard before imparting information)
Sec. 12. Constitution of CIC:
( No. of Ics, selection committee, CIC powers of general superintendence, qualification of
CIC &Cis, not to hold office of profit & HQ Delhi.)
Sec. 13. Term of office and conditions of service.
( 5yrs., including aggregate, oath and resignation)
Sec. 14. Removal of C.I. Commissioner.
Sec. 15. Constitution of SIC.
Sec. 16. Term of office and conditions of service.
Sec. 17. Removal of S.I. Commissioner.
JSS Law College 13
14. Right to Information Act 2005
Sec. 18. Powers and function of Information Commissions –
appeals and penalties.
Functions : 1. Receive and inquire in to complaints of:
a. who has not been able to file because PIO is not appointed ,
b. on refusals;
c. not responded;
d. unreasonable fee;
e. incomplete or misleading information etc,.
f. Any other matter
2. Initiate inquiry if reasonable grounds exist.
3. It enjoys the same powers as that of civil courts such as;
Enforce attendance; inspection of documents; receiving evidence in
affidavit; Requesting any public record; issuing summons etc,.
4. Examine any records and such records shall not be withheld.
JSS Law College 14
15. Right to Information Act 2005
Sec. 19. Appeals – First and Second appeal.
The Commission may;
1. Require the PA for :
I. Providing access to information
II. Appointing PIOs
III. Make necessary changes in the practice of maintenance, management and destruction of
records.
IV. Enhancing the provisions of training of the officials
2. PA to compensate
3. Impose penalties
4. Reject applications.
Sec. 21. Protection of action taken in good faith
Sec. 20. Penalties – fine upon hearing him and disciplinary actions under service rules.
Sec. 22. Overriding effect of the Act.
Sec. 23. Bar on Judn. of courts.
Sec. 24. Act not to apply for certain organizations.(18 Organisations)
Sec. 25. Monitoring and Reporting.
Sec. 26. Govt. to prepare programmes.
Sec. 27. Power to make rules by App. Govt.
Sec. 28. Power to make rules by Competent Authorities.
Sec. 29. Laying of rules before Parliament.
JSS Law College 15
16. RTI Compliance In India
States:
• Karnataka ranks 15th
among 28 states with below average
performance.
• Nagaland and Delhi ranked as high performers (performance level is 62%
and 56%).
• Bihar is amongst the top five states in performance.
• Central Govt. performance is at 53%. States at 28%.
RTI Compliance in Ministries:
• Panchayath Raj(87%); Agri.& Co-op(80%).
• Environment & Forest at 11%.
• Housing & Urban Poverty zero compliance.
• Arunachal; Assam are zero compliance States.
• Uttarakhand and Kerala are at the bottom.
• Cases pending Karnataka in 2011 are 13000.
16JSS Law College
17. Rulings by the Information Commissions 2(f)& (J)
1. PIO said file is lost – held wrong decisions – directed to file Police
complaint and departmental inquiry against the custodian.
2. Asked for the details of a post and whether he can apply – Held it is not
information.
3. Information sought on the estranged wife, held to seek redressal in
appropriate forum.
4. Sought the information about the officer who had approved mutation and
passed orders – PIO rejected as 8(1)(J) held wrong, directed to supply.
5. Sought information about brother’s LIC policy, since he is not the legal
hair it attracts 8(1)(J).
6. Unsatisfied petitioner, held, best course is to permit inspection of all
records.
7. How service tax of service provider is determined. It is not information
under 2(f).
8. No dialogues with the public authority such as question of fact and Law.
JSS Law College 17
18. Rulings by the Information Commissions 2(f)& (J)
6. Asked for information relating to oath regarding minor penalty
proceedings; held it did not create any information hence need not be
given.
7. Information already on the public domain should not be asked.
8. Complaint was advised to specify the required information.
9. Sought to know the action on request for transfer – held transfer is the
prerogative of the authority, there need not be any reason for it.
13. Information of the case in the court which is in progress – need not be
given as it is incomplete.
14. C I C has no authority review the CIC’s earlier decision - since it is
speaking order, writ may be filed.
15. Sought information on the statements in the newspapers by the Secretary
of the public authority, denied saying not aware of it – held no
information may be sought on reports, assumptions and presumptions.
16. 20 years document only 3 out of 10 exemption clauses are applicable
hence, has to be provided.
JSS Law College 18
19. Checklist for PIOs
1. Whether the applicant is a bona fide citizen?
2. PIO can not refuse the Application.
3. Name and details of the Applicant.
4. If BPL category, proof of documents.
5. Ensuring the application Fee.
6. Illiterate/disabled persons and assistance.
7. Oral requests to be reduced to writing.
8. No reasons to be asked.
9. Issue acknowledgement for application.
10. Open a Case file and & record in the RTI application
register.
JSS Law College 19
20. Checklist for PIOs
11. Time starts from the date of receipt of application.
12. Check details of information sought.
13. Whether it falls under sec. 8 or 9, if so reject by giving reasons.
14. Format in which sought and means of communication.
15. Whether the information is readily available/ published/ on the
domain.
16. Whether life and liberty involved?
17. If held by others, he is deemed PIOs.
18. Calculate cost.
19. Intimate the applicant.
20. Provide assistance for inspection of work, material, certified
samples etc,.
21. Wait till applicant pays the fees to provide the information.
JSS Law College 20