1
PROJECT ADVISOR: DR. ASIF HAMEED
GROUP MEMBERS: M. Umair Ali 2013-civ-22
Latif Jan 2013-civ-52
Zubair Khalique 2013-civ-51
Ahmad Imran 2013-civ-43
-To study different
Leadership styles
-To identify the different
styles of leadership being
practiced by the project
managers in construction
industry of Pakistan
-To determine the relation
of field experience and
leadership style
Objectives
2
Problem
Statement
Management of construction
projects is not only about time,
cost and quality. It is also related
to human resource management
and effective leadership.
It is therefore important to
evaluate the leadership style
practices by the project leaders.
The study aims to identify
leadership style practices of
construction and project
managers in the construction
industry.
"THE PROCESS OF INFLUENCING OTHERS TO BEHAVE IN
PREFERRED WAYS TO ACCOMPLISH ORGANIZATIONAL
OBJECTIVES"
—Mintzberg (1972)
3
Leadershi
p
"THE ABILITY TO INSPIRE CONFIDENCE AND SUPPORT
AMONG THE PEOPLE WHO ARE NEEDED TO ACHIEVE
ORGANIZATIONAL GOALS"
-Kim & Maubourgne (1992)
TYPES of LEadership
4
Transactional Leadership
D e m o c r a t i c L e a d e r s h i p
C h a r i s m a t i c L e a d e r s h i p
L a i s s e z - f a i r e L e a d e r s h i p
Transformational Leadership
01
02
03
04
05
Transactional
Leadership
Ideology
- Exchange of services based leadership
- Rewards and Punishments
01
Pros
- Rapid formulation of a vision
- Endorses enthusiasm
- Inspiration to motivate people
Cons
- Can face serious detail challenges
- Might overlook reality and truth
- Carries the potential for abuse
5
Do this by evening and you’ll all get bonus!
Transformational
Leadership
Ideology
- Motivation and Inspiration based
- transforming individuals, teams, and
firms -to exceed beyond the status quo
02
Pros
- a structured and clear system
- Short term, easy to achieve goals
- increase in production
Cons
- Does not Encourage Creativity
- unbendable policies and rules.
6
You’re going to change the world! Lets Begin!
Democratic Leadership
Ideology
- Leading based on the consensus
- Leader encourages members to
determine goals and procedures, and
stimulates member’s self-direction.
03
Pros
- fits almost every business.
- promotes a creative environment
- builds strong teams
Cons
- takes long to process decisions
- Can lead to wrong decisions
7
What do you think we should do?
Charismatic Leadership
Ideology
- fire that ignites follower’s energy and
commitment, producing results above and
beyond the call of duty
04
Pros
- Organizations are committed to a central
mission
- Charismatic-led companies tend to be
cohesive because their workers have a
clear purpose
Cons
- Organizations can become dependent on
charismatic leaders
- Leaders may develop tunnel vision or
arrogance
8
You all are heroes, ready to recreate history!!
Laissez-Faire Leadership
Ideology
- Laissez-faire means “let it be” or “leave it
alone.”
- allows the group to develop on its own
decisions
05
Pros
- Allows experts to function productively
- Promotes Creativity
Cons
- lack of accountability
- ineffective time management
9
Do this or that, as you see fit
"Literature
Review”
Defining different terms
included in research work.
Reviewing the previous
researched published on this
topic.
“Hypothesis
Development”
This part deals with defining the
problem statement and
purposing hypothesis
Hypothesis : “There is no relation
between experience level of
project manager and leadership
style.”
“Questionnaire
Design”
In this chapter a questionnaire
was designed. The questionnaire
was divided into 2 parts
Part 1: General Information of
Respondent.
Part 2: Identification of
Leadership Style
METHODOLOGY, the path followed in research work
1
"Data
Collection”
The data was collected during a
time of 5 months and ended in
Feb 2017. Out of google forms
created online, 10 forms were
received from 14 potential
respondents. While 30 forms
were sent to the project
managers in the field out of
which we got the response of
22
“Analysis of
Data”
This chapter deals with the
results obtained after the
statistical analysis. SPSS version
17 and Microsoft Excel 2016 were
used for ranking of leadership
styles and testing the hypothesis.
t-Test was used to relate the
different demographic
parameters with leadership styles
“Result
Formulation”
It includes the interpretation of
results. Showing the results in
the form of graphs and charts
and deducing the results to
accept or reject the hypothesis
METHODOLOGY, the path followed in research work
1
Questionnaire
My preference is to think long range: what it might be
QUESTION NO. 7
SAMPLES QUESTIONS
1 2 3 4 5
I allow employees to make decisions and have complete
freedom
1 2 3 4 5
QUESTION NO. 15
This question is representing the transformational leadership style. More the
response to the right of the scale, more likely is respondent to possess
transformational leadership
Questions are placed randomly on the questionnaire. This question is from
Laissez-Faire Leadership style. Each category is scored in the end to get the
collective response of respondent
13
13
DATA Analysis
TOOLS USED
Microsoft Excel
IBM SPSS
Responses to statements were in the
form of a five-point Likert scale,
where
1 = Strongly Disagree,
2 = Disagree
3 = Neutral
4 = Agree
5 = Strongly Agree
The mean item score (MIS) was
derived from the following formula
.
Where;
n1 = number of respondents for strongly
disagree
n2 = number of respondents for disagree
n3 = number of respondents for neutral
n4 = number of respondents for agree
n5 = number of respondents for strongly
agree
N = Total number of respondents
1
TRANSFORMATIONAL
LEADERSHIP
Rank: 01
MIS: 4.28
SD: 0.64
1
DEMOCRATIC
LEADERSHIP
Rank: 02
MIS: 4.23
SD: 0.66
TRANSACTIONAL
LEADERSHIP
Rank: 03
MIS: 4.13
SD: 0.73
CHARISMATIC
LEADERSHIP
Rank: 04
MIS: 4.04
SD: 0.85
LAISSEZ-FAIRE
LEADERSHIP
Rank: 05
MIS: 3.66
SD: 0.97
RESULTS
1 2 3 4 5
1
RELATIONSHIP OF EXPERIENCE WITH LEADERSHIP STYLE
Leadership Styles changed from Democratic to Transformational with experience
Laissez-Faire Leadership Styles is least likely by both groups (Exp. & Moderate Exp.)
“I allow employees to make decisions and have complete freedom” is most varied response question
Its MIS for experienced people is 4.4 while for moderate experienced it’s 3.7. Meaning with experience
Project Managers are likely to give freedom to subordinates to make their decisions.
1
Transactional
Leadership
Transformationl
Leadership
Democratic
Leadership
Charismatic
Leadership
Laissez-Faire
Leadership
4.09
4.32
4.13
4.03
3.76
Experienced Respondents
Experienced Respondents
1
Transactional
Leadership
Transformationl
Leadership
Democratic
Leadership
Charismatic
Leadership
Laissez-Faire
Leadership
4.2 4.23
4.36
4.04
3.53
Moderate Experienced Respondents
Moderate Experienced Respondents
SUMMARY
1
“
2
—John Quincy Adams
IF YOUR ACTIONS INSPIRE OTHERS TO DREAM MORE,
LEARN MORE, DO MORE AND BECOME MORE,
YOU ARE A LEADER.
THANK YOU
THANK YOU
“

Presentation Leadership Styles Construction.pptx

  • 1.
    1 PROJECT ADVISOR: DR.ASIF HAMEED GROUP MEMBERS: M. Umair Ali 2013-civ-22 Latif Jan 2013-civ-52 Zubair Khalique 2013-civ-51 Ahmad Imran 2013-civ-43
  • 2.
    -To study different Leadershipstyles -To identify the different styles of leadership being practiced by the project managers in construction industry of Pakistan -To determine the relation of field experience and leadership style Objectives 2 Problem Statement Management of construction projects is not only about time, cost and quality. It is also related to human resource management and effective leadership. It is therefore important to evaluate the leadership style practices by the project leaders. The study aims to identify leadership style practices of construction and project managers in the construction industry.
  • 3.
    "THE PROCESS OFINFLUENCING OTHERS TO BEHAVE IN PREFERRED WAYS TO ACCOMPLISH ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES" —Mintzberg (1972) 3 Leadershi p "THE ABILITY TO INSPIRE CONFIDENCE AND SUPPORT AMONG THE PEOPLE WHO ARE NEEDED TO ACHIEVE ORGANIZATIONAL GOALS" -Kim & Maubourgne (1992)
  • 4.
    TYPES of LEadership 4 TransactionalLeadership D e m o c r a t i c L e a d e r s h i p C h a r i s m a t i c L e a d e r s h i p L a i s s e z - f a i r e L e a d e r s h i p Transformational Leadership 01 02 03 04 05
  • 5.
    Transactional Leadership Ideology - Exchange ofservices based leadership - Rewards and Punishments 01 Pros - Rapid formulation of a vision - Endorses enthusiasm - Inspiration to motivate people Cons - Can face serious detail challenges - Might overlook reality and truth - Carries the potential for abuse 5 Do this by evening and you’ll all get bonus!
  • 6.
    Transformational Leadership Ideology - Motivation andInspiration based - transforming individuals, teams, and firms -to exceed beyond the status quo 02 Pros - a structured and clear system - Short term, easy to achieve goals - increase in production Cons - Does not Encourage Creativity - unbendable policies and rules. 6 You’re going to change the world! Lets Begin!
  • 7.
    Democratic Leadership Ideology - Leadingbased on the consensus - Leader encourages members to determine goals and procedures, and stimulates member’s self-direction. 03 Pros - fits almost every business. - promotes a creative environment - builds strong teams Cons - takes long to process decisions - Can lead to wrong decisions 7 What do you think we should do?
  • 8.
    Charismatic Leadership Ideology - firethat ignites follower’s energy and commitment, producing results above and beyond the call of duty 04 Pros - Organizations are committed to a central mission - Charismatic-led companies tend to be cohesive because their workers have a clear purpose Cons - Organizations can become dependent on charismatic leaders - Leaders may develop tunnel vision or arrogance 8 You all are heroes, ready to recreate history!!
  • 9.
    Laissez-Faire Leadership Ideology - Laissez-fairemeans “let it be” or “leave it alone.” - allows the group to develop on its own decisions 05 Pros - Allows experts to function productively - Promotes Creativity Cons - lack of accountability - ineffective time management 9 Do this or that, as you see fit
  • 10.
    "Literature Review” Defining different terms includedin research work. Reviewing the previous researched published on this topic. “Hypothesis Development” This part deals with defining the problem statement and purposing hypothesis Hypothesis : “There is no relation between experience level of project manager and leadership style.” “Questionnaire Design” In this chapter a questionnaire was designed. The questionnaire was divided into 2 parts Part 1: General Information of Respondent. Part 2: Identification of Leadership Style METHODOLOGY, the path followed in research work 1
  • 11.
    "Data Collection” The data wascollected during a time of 5 months and ended in Feb 2017. Out of google forms created online, 10 forms were received from 14 potential respondents. While 30 forms were sent to the project managers in the field out of which we got the response of 22 “Analysis of Data” This chapter deals with the results obtained after the statistical analysis. SPSS version 17 and Microsoft Excel 2016 were used for ranking of leadership styles and testing the hypothesis. t-Test was used to relate the different demographic parameters with leadership styles “Result Formulation” It includes the interpretation of results. Showing the results in the form of graphs and charts and deducing the results to accept or reject the hypothesis METHODOLOGY, the path followed in research work 1
  • 12.
    Questionnaire My preference isto think long range: what it might be QUESTION NO. 7 SAMPLES QUESTIONS 1 2 3 4 5 I allow employees to make decisions and have complete freedom 1 2 3 4 5 QUESTION NO. 15 This question is representing the transformational leadership style. More the response to the right of the scale, more likely is respondent to possess transformational leadership Questions are placed randomly on the questionnaire. This question is from Laissez-Faire Leadership style. Each category is scored in the end to get the collective response of respondent
  • 13.
    13 13 DATA Analysis TOOLS USED MicrosoftExcel IBM SPSS Responses to statements were in the form of a five-point Likert scale, where 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree 3 = Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
  • 14.
    The mean itemscore (MIS) was derived from the following formula . Where; n1 = number of respondents for strongly disagree n2 = number of respondents for disagree n3 = number of respondents for neutral n4 = number of respondents for agree n5 = number of respondents for strongly agree N = Total number of respondents 1
  • 15.
    TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP Rank: 01 MIS: 4.28 SD:0.64 1 DEMOCRATIC LEADERSHIP Rank: 02 MIS: 4.23 SD: 0.66 TRANSACTIONAL LEADERSHIP Rank: 03 MIS: 4.13 SD: 0.73 CHARISMATIC LEADERSHIP Rank: 04 MIS: 4.04 SD: 0.85 LAISSEZ-FAIRE LEADERSHIP Rank: 05 MIS: 3.66 SD: 0.97 RESULTS 1 2 3 4 5
  • 16.
    1 RELATIONSHIP OF EXPERIENCEWITH LEADERSHIP STYLE Leadership Styles changed from Democratic to Transformational with experience Laissez-Faire Leadership Styles is least likely by both groups (Exp. & Moderate Exp.) “I allow employees to make decisions and have complete freedom” is most varied response question Its MIS for experienced people is 4.4 while for moderate experienced it’s 3.7. Meaning with experience Project Managers are likely to give freedom to subordinates to make their decisions.
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
    “ 2 —John Quincy Adams IFYOUR ACTIONS INSPIRE OTHERS TO DREAM MORE, LEARN MORE, DO MORE AND BECOME MORE, YOU ARE A LEADER.
  • 21.

Editor's Notes

  • #1 To use this title animation slide with a new image simply 1) move the top semi-transparent shape to the side, 2) delete placeholder image, 3) click on the picture icon to add a new picture, 4) Move semi-transparent shape back to original position, 5) Update text on slide.
  • #16 Tip: When using complex image as full-bleed background add a transparency (70%-90%) fill layer to give contrast to text.
  • #19 Combine an image and multiple key statements with a strong grid.