- The document summarizes an interview between Jamie Ritchie and Niall Lawless, an experienced Irish construction adjudicator, about adjudication in Ireland.
- In the interview, Lawless discusses some of the main differences between adjudication in the UK and Ireland, including that in Ireland it is limited to payment disputes. He also provides insight into typical adjudicator backgrounds and fees.
- Common grounds for challenging an adjudicator's decision that Lawless has seen include issues around jurisdiction and natural justice. He also notes some circumstances where an oral hearing in adjudication may be appropriate.
A company can take several forms such as a sole proprietorship, partnership, or corporation. Large companies may invest in startup companies through corporate venturing. There are many career paths for architects beyond private practice, including working for local or other public sector organizations, large companies, manufacturers, academia, or specializing in certain building types or tasks. Some architects also work as adjudicators, arbitrators, or expert witnesses in the construction industry.
Mediation and Arbitration have evolved as effective and/or efficient dispute resolution mechanisms in
commercial disputes but has the use of experts within these processes evolved along the way? Many
commercial disputes will benefit from expert analysis or opinion to move beyond various technical,
financial, legal or other information impasses. This session will cover the Expert’s, Counsel’s and the
Mediator/Arbitrator’s perspectives on the traditional approach to using experts as well as exploring new
and innovative ideas.
1. The document discusses professional ethics for architects, including obligations to the public, clients, profession and colleagues. It outlines ethical standards from codes of conduct that govern architects.
2. Historically, the Code of Hammurabi from 1700 BC held builders responsible for proper construction and included capital punishment for negligence resulting in loss of life.
3. Modern professional ethics codes provide guidelines on topics like conflicts of interest, undisclosed business relationships, misrepresenting qualifications, and criticizing other architects' work. Architects are obligated to prioritize public safety.
Selecting the Right Valuation Expert (Series: Valuation)Financial Poise
This webinar discusses selecting the right valuation expert. It explores when a valuation expert is needed, typically for litigation or transactions requiring independent appraisals. The webinar covers how to evaluate an expert's credentials and experience, and whether communications with an expert are privileged. It also describes what an expert report entails and standards experts must meet. Lastly, it provides suggestions for valuation experts, such as adequately establishing credentials and being familiar with the relevant industry.
This document provides an overview of professional liability for Kishankumar Solanki's presentation. It begins with definitions of key terms like "profession" and "professional." It explains that professionals can be liable to clients, users, regulatory bodies, and communities affected by their work. The main risks professionals face are contractual liabilities for failing to meet obligations, torts like negligence and misrepresentation, and breaching their fiduciary duties. The presentation recommends professionals take a risk management approach by understanding stakeholders, assessing risks, and implementing responses like avoiding high-risk work, mitigating risks, transferring risks through insurance, and accepting some risks.
Professional Ethics in Engineering Chapter 2 Profession and Ethics HKSHari Shrestha
This document outlines the topics to be covered in a course on professional ethics in engineering. It discusses definitions of key terms like profession, professionalism, and ethics. It also summarizes codes of ethics from organizations like ABET and IEEE that govern engineering practice. The relationship of engineers to clients, contractors, and other engineers is examined. Moral dilemmas in decision making and issues of negligence and liability are also addressed.
This article discusses the importance of respect in the legal profession. It argues that good lawyers demonstrate respect in three key areas: respect for clients, respect for colleagues, and respect for the court. The article then provides examples of behaviors that show respect in each of these areas, such as listening to and communicating with clients, extending professional courtesies to colleagues, and following proper courtroom protocols when before a judge. It concludes that demonstrating respect for all participants in the legal system is fundamental to being an effective lawyer and upholding the values of the profession.
- The document summarizes an interview between Jamie Ritchie and Niall Lawless, an experienced Irish construction adjudicator, about adjudication in Ireland.
- In the interview, Lawless discusses some of the main differences between adjudication in the UK and Ireland, including that in Ireland it is limited to payment disputes. He also provides insight into typical adjudicator backgrounds and fees.
- Common grounds for challenging an adjudicator's decision that Lawless has seen include issues around jurisdiction and natural justice. He also notes some circumstances where an oral hearing in adjudication may be appropriate.
A company can take several forms such as a sole proprietorship, partnership, or corporation. Large companies may invest in startup companies through corporate venturing. There are many career paths for architects beyond private practice, including working for local or other public sector organizations, large companies, manufacturers, academia, or specializing in certain building types or tasks. Some architects also work as adjudicators, arbitrators, or expert witnesses in the construction industry.
Mediation and Arbitration have evolved as effective and/or efficient dispute resolution mechanisms in
commercial disputes but has the use of experts within these processes evolved along the way? Many
commercial disputes will benefit from expert analysis or opinion to move beyond various technical,
financial, legal or other information impasses. This session will cover the Expert’s, Counsel’s and the
Mediator/Arbitrator’s perspectives on the traditional approach to using experts as well as exploring new
and innovative ideas.
1. The document discusses professional ethics for architects, including obligations to the public, clients, profession and colleagues. It outlines ethical standards from codes of conduct that govern architects.
2. Historically, the Code of Hammurabi from 1700 BC held builders responsible for proper construction and included capital punishment for negligence resulting in loss of life.
3. Modern professional ethics codes provide guidelines on topics like conflicts of interest, undisclosed business relationships, misrepresenting qualifications, and criticizing other architects' work. Architects are obligated to prioritize public safety.
Selecting the Right Valuation Expert (Series: Valuation)Financial Poise
This webinar discusses selecting the right valuation expert. It explores when a valuation expert is needed, typically for litigation or transactions requiring independent appraisals. The webinar covers how to evaluate an expert's credentials and experience, and whether communications with an expert are privileged. It also describes what an expert report entails and standards experts must meet. Lastly, it provides suggestions for valuation experts, such as adequately establishing credentials and being familiar with the relevant industry.
This document provides an overview of professional liability for Kishankumar Solanki's presentation. It begins with definitions of key terms like "profession" and "professional." It explains that professionals can be liable to clients, users, regulatory bodies, and communities affected by their work. The main risks professionals face are contractual liabilities for failing to meet obligations, torts like negligence and misrepresentation, and breaching their fiduciary duties. The presentation recommends professionals take a risk management approach by understanding stakeholders, assessing risks, and implementing responses like avoiding high-risk work, mitigating risks, transferring risks through insurance, and accepting some risks.
Professional Ethics in Engineering Chapter 2 Profession and Ethics HKSHari Shrestha
This document outlines the topics to be covered in a course on professional ethics in engineering. It discusses definitions of key terms like profession, professionalism, and ethics. It also summarizes codes of ethics from organizations like ABET and IEEE that govern engineering practice. The relationship of engineers to clients, contractors, and other engineers is examined. Moral dilemmas in decision making and issues of negligence and liability are also addressed.
This article discusses the importance of respect in the legal profession. It argues that good lawyers demonstrate respect in three key areas: respect for clients, respect for colleagues, and respect for the court. The article then provides examples of behaviors that show respect in each of these areas, such as listening to and communicating with clients, extending professional courtesies to colleagues, and following proper courtroom protocols when before a judge. It concludes that demonstrating respect for all participants in the legal system is fundamental to being an effective lawyer and upholding the values of the profession.
You have a business interest, an asset, or a potential liability that you need to value. When do you need a valuation expert? While some negotiations or transactions may require an independent third party for appraisals, nearly all litigation on these topics will require an expert. How do you evaluate the credentials of an expert? What type of experience will you need your expert to possess? The process of selecting the appropriate expert starts with identifying the issues in dispute. This webinar explores the key factors you should consider in choosing your valuation expert.
Part of the webinar series: Valuation 2022
See more at https://www.financialpoise.com/webinars/
How to Avoid Malpractice & Disciplinary Actions - General Do's and Don'ts (Se...Financial Poise
This webinar presents basic practice pointers to avoid malpractice and disciplinary actions, and how to respond to claims of malpractice or unethical behavior if they arise. The panel also discusses the role that malpractice insurance plays in these situations and the ramifications of a malpractice judgment or disciplinary action. Model Rules addressed may include: those that govern the client-lawyer relationship (Rules 1.1 through 1.10; 1.13; and 1.16); those that that speak to transactions with persons other than clients (Rules 4.1 through 4.4); those that govern the responsibilities of managing and supervisory lawyers, subordinate lawyers, non-lawyer assistance, independence, unauthorized practice of law, and multijurisdictional practice (Rules 5.1 through 5.5); and those that govern communication, including advertising and solicitation of clients (Rules 7.1 through 7.5).
To view the accompanying webinar, go to: https://www.financialpoise.com/financial-poise-webinars/how-to-avoid-malpractice-disciplinary-actions-general-dos-and-donts-2021/
The document discusses etiquette and ethics for professional accountants. It covers:
1. Concepts of etiquette, decorum, and propriety.
2. Tips for social media etiquette including keeping personal and business accounts separate and using proper grammar.
3. The IFAC code of ethics including fundamental principles of integrity, objectivity, competence, confidentiality, and professional behavior.
4. Threats to compliance like self-interest, self-review, advocacy, familiarity, and intimidation threats and potential safeguards.
LEGAL ETHICS – BEST PRACTICES 2022 - How to Avoid Malpractice & Disciplinary ...Financial Poise
This webinar presents basic practice pointers to avoid malpractice and disciplinary actions, and how to respond to claims of malpractice or unethical behavior if they arise. The panel also discusses the role that malpractice insurance plays in these situations and the ramifications of a malpractice judgment or disciplinary action. Model Rules addressed may include: those that govern the client-lawyer relationship (Rules 1.1 through 1.10; 1.13; and 1.16); those that that speak to transactions with persons other than clients (Rules 4.1 through 4.4); those that govern the responsibilities of managing and supervisory lawyers, subordinate lawyers, non-lawyer assistance, independence, unauthorized practice of law, and multijurisdictional practice (Rules 5.1 through 5.5); and those that govern communication, including advertising and solicitation of clients (Rules 7.1 through 7.5).
Part of the webinar series: LEGAL ETHICS – BEST PRACTICES 2022
See more at https://www.financialpoise.com/webinars/
Engineers are often required to act as expert witnesses and advisors. As expert witnesses, they must provide independent and impartial evidence to help explain technical issues to courts or tribunals. They may need to prepare reports, meet with other experts, and provide testimony in trials. As advisors, engineers must study problems objectively and consider all technical, economic, environmental, and social aspects before formulating recommendations. They should serve the public interest above all others and adopt a value-guided advocacy role. Choosing experts with clear communication skills and authoritative knowledge is paramount.
OCNZ has adopted a capabilities framework for NZ osteopaths. Domain 6 deals with a wide range of compliance issues - practice takes places in both a spatial environment and a wide legal context
The document discusses ethical dilemmas that may face professional accountants working in public practice. It provides an overview of the accountant's responsibilities to act with integrity and in the public interest, while also serving clients. When resolving ethical issues, the accountant should consider threats to fundamental principles like objectivity and confidentiality, and seek advice if needed. Case studies then illustrate how an accountant can apply a conceptual framework to identify, evaluate, and manage threats to determine an appropriate response. Overall, the document aims to help accountants navigate competing demands and resolve ethical conflicts in line with their professional codes of conduct.
The document describes the Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct for members of KPISOFT. It establishes 5 principles for members to uphold: 1) protect public interest and maintain integrity, 2) demonstrate competence and quality of service, 3) maintain confidential information and privacy, 4) avoid conflicts of interest, and 5) uphold responsibility to the IT profession. For each principle, it provides guidelines for ethical conduct related to that principle. It also defines key terms and notes that this Code does not deny the existence of other important ethical obligations.
Ditching Defect Drama: Keeping Construction Claims ObjectiveKipcon Inc.
When a community is embroiled in a construction defect lawsuit, the challenge becomes making sure the claim is presented objectively, and the cost of the claim won't be more than the corrective work needed. This webinar includes best practices for preventing construction defects and offers alternatives to costly litigation.
Personal Finance Professional Ethics & Standards of Practice - A Professional...milfamln
This webinar covers a high level introduction to the subject of ethics as a primer for understanding the basics of ethics (for those who may not have had any previous formal education or training in ethics). This will help to serve as a framework for approaching the discussion of case studies. A number of brief case studies will be presented, and participants will be given an opportunity to respond in text to questions posed about each case study, including how they might respond in these situations. We will then consider and discuss the case study scenario and our various responses.
This comprehensive handbook covers the fundamental skills and attitudes required by successful consultants from
novice to practitioner level, irrespective of their specialist
area.
When business owners come to the point where they simply can’t see eye to eye, success can become unfeasible. Disputes between business owners can arise from any number of issues and have varying impacts on the actual business, ranging from simple distraction to total dissolution. Depending on the business and circumstance, the means for resolution may or may not be provided for in the relevant by-laws or shareholder agreement. In this webinar, the expert panel discusses different types of shareholder disputes and corresponding remedies, including alternative dispute resolution, buy-sell agreement provisions, and share valuation considerations.
To listen to this webinar on-demand, go to: https://www.financialpoise.com/financial-poise-webinars/resolving-shareholder-disputes-2020/
Turning an Idea or Product into a Business (Series: Business Advice - From St...Financial Poise
This webinar provides an overview of key considerations for turning an idea or product into a business, including selecting a business structure, creating a business plan, building a team, financing options, protecting intellectual property, and hiring and compensating employees. The webinar is part of a series on business advice from start-up to sale. It features a panel of experts including an attorney, business professor, and intellectual property consultant who discuss topics like the advantages and limitations of different business entities and financing strategies for new ventures.
Ethics And The Trial Consultant And Expert WitnessCTIN
The document discusses the roles and responsibilities of trial consultants and expert witnesses. A trial consultant advises the attorney privately and their name and reports are confidential, while an expert witness prepares to testify in court and their name, CV, and reports must be disclosed. The document provides guidance on properly distinguishing between the roles and obligations of a trial consultant versus an expert witness.
Independence is crucial to a successful review, but how well is the idea of “independence” actually understood? Independence is about many things - much more than money and relationships. It is vital to ensure that there are systems, processes, and controls, all of which act to protect the judgements made; just as important are honesty, integrity, and accountability in professional practice.
Independence is crucial to a successful review, but how well is the idea of “independence” actually understood? Independence is about many things - much more than money and relationships. It is vital to ensure that there are systems, processes, and controls, all of which act to protect the judgements made; just as important are honesty, integrity, and accountability in professional practice.
Professional ethics are codes of conduct set by professionals in a field to govern behaviors and uphold reputations. They establish standards of honesty, integrity, competence and respect. For lawyers, ethics are important to maintain the rule of law, ensure the profession has public trust, and fulfill obligations as officers of the court. Competence requires maintaining expertise through continual learning. Upholding ethics is key to the effective and just practice of law.
Individuals at the upper end of the skill range in any occupational group are known as professional level persons and their occupations are referred to as professions.
The concepts of equality, freedom, free speech, freedom of religion, and due process under the law are very strong value positions defined in the Constitution.
These values must be considered paramount and inviolable in any profession.
Integrity is the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles; moral uprightness. It is generally a personal choice to uphold oneself to consistently moral and ethical standards.
You have a business interest, an asset, or a potential liability that you need to value. When do you need a valuation expert? While some negotiations or transactions may require an independent third party for appraisals, nearly all litigation on these topics will require an expert. How do you evaluate the credentials of an expert? What type of experience will you need your expert to possess? The process of selecting the appropriate expert starts with identifying the issues in dispute. This webinar explores the key factors you should consider in choosing your valuation expert.
Part of the webinar series: Valuation 2022
See more at https://www.financialpoise.com/webinars/
How to Avoid Malpractice & Disciplinary Actions - General Do's and Don'ts (Se...Financial Poise
This webinar presents basic practice pointers to avoid malpractice and disciplinary actions, and how to respond to claims of malpractice or unethical behavior if they arise. The panel also discusses the role that malpractice insurance plays in these situations and the ramifications of a malpractice judgment or disciplinary action. Model Rules addressed may include: those that govern the client-lawyer relationship (Rules 1.1 through 1.10; 1.13; and 1.16); those that that speak to transactions with persons other than clients (Rules 4.1 through 4.4); those that govern the responsibilities of managing and supervisory lawyers, subordinate lawyers, non-lawyer assistance, independence, unauthorized practice of law, and multijurisdictional practice (Rules 5.1 through 5.5); and those that govern communication, including advertising and solicitation of clients (Rules 7.1 through 7.5).
To view the accompanying webinar, go to: https://www.financialpoise.com/financial-poise-webinars/how-to-avoid-malpractice-disciplinary-actions-general-dos-and-donts-2021/
The document discusses etiquette and ethics for professional accountants. It covers:
1. Concepts of etiquette, decorum, and propriety.
2. Tips for social media etiquette including keeping personal and business accounts separate and using proper grammar.
3. The IFAC code of ethics including fundamental principles of integrity, objectivity, competence, confidentiality, and professional behavior.
4. Threats to compliance like self-interest, self-review, advocacy, familiarity, and intimidation threats and potential safeguards.
LEGAL ETHICS – BEST PRACTICES 2022 - How to Avoid Malpractice & Disciplinary ...Financial Poise
This webinar presents basic practice pointers to avoid malpractice and disciplinary actions, and how to respond to claims of malpractice or unethical behavior if they arise. The panel also discusses the role that malpractice insurance plays in these situations and the ramifications of a malpractice judgment or disciplinary action. Model Rules addressed may include: those that govern the client-lawyer relationship (Rules 1.1 through 1.10; 1.13; and 1.16); those that that speak to transactions with persons other than clients (Rules 4.1 through 4.4); those that govern the responsibilities of managing and supervisory lawyers, subordinate lawyers, non-lawyer assistance, independence, unauthorized practice of law, and multijurisdictional practice (Rules 5.1 through 5.5); and those that govern communication, including advertising and solicitation of clients (Rules 7.1 through 7.5).
Part of the webinar series: LEGAL ETHICS – BEST PRACTICES 2022
See more at https://www.financialpoise.com/webinars/
Engineers are often required to act as expert witnesses and advisors. As expert witnesses, they must provide independent and impartial evidence to help explain technical issues to courts or tribunals. They may need to prepare reports, meet with other experts, and provide testimony in trials. As advisors, engineers must study problems objectively and consider all technical, economic, environmental, and social aspects before formulating recommendations. They should serve the public interest above all others and adopt a value-guided advocacy role. Choosing experts with clear communication skills and authoritative knowledge is paramount.
OCNZ has adopted a capabilities framework for NZ osteopaths. Domain 6 deals with a wide range of compliance issues - practice takes places in both a spatial environment and a wide legal context
The document discusses ethical dilemmas that may face professional accountants working in public practice. It provides an overview of the accountant's responsibilities to act with integrity and in the public interest, while also serving clients. When resolving ethical issues, the accountant should consider threats to fundamental principles like objectivity and confidentiality, and seek advice if needed. Case studies then illustrate how an accountant can apply a conceptual framework to identify, evaluate, and manage threats to determine an appropriate response. Overall, the document aims to help accountants navigate competing demands and resolve ethical conflicts in line with their professional codes of conduct.
The document describes the Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct for members of KPISOFT. It establishes 5 principles for members to uphold: 1) protect public interest and maintain integrity, 2) demonstrate competence and quality of service, 3) maintain confidential information and privacy, 4) avoid conflicts of interest, and 5) uphold responsibility to the IT profession. For each principle, it provides guidelines for ethical conduct related to that principle. It also defines key terms and notes that this Code does not deny the existence of other important ethical obligations.
Ditching Defect Drama: Keeping Construction Claims ObjectiveKipcon Inc.
When a community is embroiled in a construction defect lawsuit, the challenge becomes making sure the claim is presented objectively, and the cost of the claim won't be more than the corrective work needed. This webinar includes best practices for preventing construction defects and offers alternatives to costly litigation.
Personal Finance Professional Ethics & Standards of Practice - A Professional...milfamln
This webinar covers a high level introduction to the subject of ethics as a primer for understanding the basics of ethics (for those who may not have had any previous formal education or training in ethics). This will help to serve as a framework for approaching the discussion of case studies. A number of brief case studies will be presented, and participants will be given an opportunity to respond in text to questions posed about each case study, including how they might respond in these situations. We will then consider and discuss the case study scenario and our various responses.
This comprehensive handbook covers the fundamental skills and attitudes required by successful consultants from
novice to practitioner level, irrespective of their specialist
area.
When business owners come to the point where they simply can’t see eye to eye, success can become unfeasible. Disputes between business owners can arise from any number of issues and have varying impacts on the actual business, ranging from simple distraction to total dissolution. Depending on the business and circumstance, the means for resolution may or may not be provided for in the relevant by-laws or shareholder agreement. In this webinar, the expert panel discusses different types of shareholder disputes and corresponding remedies, including alternative dispute resolution, buy-sell agreement provisions, and share valuation considerations.
To listen to this webinar on-demand, go to: https://www.financialpoise.com/financial-poise-webinars/resolving-shareholder-disputes-2020/
Turning an Idea or Product into a Business (Series: Business Advice - From St...Financial Poise
This webinar provides an overview of key considerations for turning an idea or product into a business, including selecting a business structure, creating a business plan, building a team, financing options, protecting intellectual property, and hiring and compensating employees. The webinar is part of a series on business advice from start-up to sale. It features a panel of experts including an attorney, business professor, and intellectual property consultant who discuss topics like the advantages and limitations of different business entities and financing strategies for new ventures.
Ethics And The Trial Consultant And Expert WitnessCTIN
The document discusses the roles and responsibilities of trial consultants and expert witnesses. A trial consultant advises the attorney privately and their name and reports are confidential, while an expert witness prepares to testify in court and their name, CV, and reports must be disclosed. The document provides guidance on properly distinguishing between the roles and obligations of a trial consultant versus an expert witness.
Independence is crucial to a successful review, but how well is the idea of “independence” actually understood? Independence is about many things - much more than money and relationships. It is vital to ensure that there are systems, processes, and controls, all of which act to protect the judgements made; just as important are honesty, integrity, and accountability in professional practice.
Independence is crucial to a successful review, but how well is the idea of “independence” actually understood? Independence is about many things - much more than money and relationships. It is vital to ensure that there are systems, processes, and controls, all of which act to protect the judgements made; just as important are honesty, integrity, and accountability in professional practice.
Professional ethics are codes of conduct set by professionals in a field to govern behaviors and uphold reputations. They establish standards of honesty, integrity, competence and respect. For lawyers, ethics are important to maintain the rule of law, ensure the profession has public trust, and fulfill obligations as officers of the court. Competence requires maintaining expertise through continual learning. Upholding ethics is key to the effective and just practice of law.
Individuals at the upper end of the skill range in any occupational group are known as professional level persons and their occupations are referred to as professions.
The concepts of equality, freedom, free speech, freedom of religion, and due process under the law are very strong value positions defined in the Constitution.
These values must be considered paramount and inviolable in any profession.
Integrity is the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles; moral uprightness. It is generally a personal choice to uphold oneself to consistently moral and ethical standards.
Similar to Conflicts of Interest expert witness - PI Focus article 2015 (20)
Capital Punishment by Saif Javed (LLM)ppt.pptxOmGod1
This PowerPoint presentation, titled "Capital Punishment in India: Constitutionality and Rarest of Rare Principle," is a comprehensive exploration of the death penalty within the Indian criminal justice system. Authored by Saif Javed, an LL.M student specializing in Criminal Law and Criminology at Kazi Nazrul University, the presentation delves into the constitutional aspects and ethical debates surrounding capital punishment. It examines key legal provisions, significant case laws, and the specific categories of offenders excluded from the death penalty. The presentation also discusses recent recommendations by the Law Commission of India regarding the gradual abolishment of capital punishment, except for terrorism-related offenses. This detailed analysis aims to foster informed discussions on the future of the death penalty in India.
The presentation deals with the concept of Right to Default Bail laid down under Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 and Section 187 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023.
Indonesian Manpower Regulation on Severance Pay for Retiring Private Sector E...AHRP Law Firm
Law Number 13 of 2003 on Manpower has been partially revoked and amended several times, with the latest amendment made through Law Number 6 of 2023. Attention is drawn to a specific part of the Manpower Law concerning severance pay. This aspect is undoubtedly one of the most crucial parts regulated by the Manpower Law. It is essential for both employers and employees to abide by the law, fulfill their obligations, and retain their rights regarding this matter.
Conflicts of Interest expert witness - PI Focus article 2015
1.
2. 14
This article outlines the ways in
which architecture and building
design professions provide expert
witness evidence, the way some are
regulated, and how one might deal
with any conflicts of interest.
The particular professions referred
to here - architecture, surveying
and building engineering - differ
substantively from medicine, with
which many readers may be more
familiar. That is because they have
clients or employers as the focus of
their expertise, rather than patients;
and a client or employer is not
necessarily an individual, as some may
be corporations or other entities. The
courts provide clear obligations for all
professionals giving evidence as expert
witnesses within the Civil Procedure
Rules, but many professions may also
stipulate their own obligations.
You might expect less scope for
potential conflicts of interest by
experts in the field of architecture,
surveying and building engineering,
than within medical practice. But is
this the case?
In the normal course of events, a client
or employer requests that something
be done, such as a building designed, a
project managed, or a contract drawn
- or they may ask for the provision of
expert witness services. Before any
potential instruction, the parties would
usually have time to think through
any issues that may result from any
instructions subsequently given.
Because of their relatively strong
position compared both with patients
and with the professional in question,
clients or employers need not
necessarily accept any conflicts that
are disclosed to them. Clients are often
more likely to insist that a conflict be
avoided or resolved beforehand.
Architects and surveyors in the
legal process
Solicitors representing both claimants
and defendants often need to find and
retain members of the architectural,
surveying and engineering professions
to serve as expert witnesses and
advise the court on the particular
matters at issue.
An expert witness can be defined as
anyone that has a special knowledge,
skill, experience, training, or
education in a particular field.
In cases related to building
design, construction costs or for
accommodation needs associated
with a personal injury, architects,
surveyors or building engineers
can serve a broad client group by
offering expert witness evidence on a
variety of technical, design, cost and
contractual matters. The architecture
and surveying professions have
become ever more specialised, due to
growing complexity in modern design
and construction processes. Many
of today’s technically complex legal
cases are not resolved without expert
evidence, particularly when it comes
to quantum.
The courts rely on these experts
to provide objective, unbiased
professional expert opinions, and
the value of good expert witnesses
should not be overlooked.
For all professionals who give expert
evidence, expert and trustworthy
opinion is at the root of what makes
members of that profession an
essential benefit to the court or
the public at large. A conflict of
interest can make the perception
of that opinion unreliable just when
reliability is needed.
The professional background
While there are a number of
professional institutions regulating
the practice of architecture and
surveying, most have similar
obligations - although it should be
borne in mind that in the UK, it is not
a statutory obligation for a design
practitioner to have any professional
membership or qualification at
all. For giving expert evidence in
most technical spheres, however,
some form of recognised technical
Nic Cosmos on how professions within the construction sector
approach conflicts of interest by experts
CONFLICTING ADVICE
PI Focus | October 2015
3. October 2015 | PI Focus
15
qualification and an appropriate
professional membership is expected.
Some of the main relevant institutions
have the following guidance in
managing conflicts of interest.
The Architects Registration Board
(extract from The Architects Code:
Standards of Professional Conduct
and Practice):
‘Where a conflict of interest arises
you are expected to disclose
it in writing and manage it to
the satisfaction of all affected
parties. You should seek written
confirmation from all parties
involved giving their informed
consent for you continuing to act.
Where this consent is not received
you should cease acting for one or
more of the parties.’
In the Royal Institute of British
Architects Code of Professional
Conduct, the RIBA lists the following
matters that may amount to a
conflict of interest:
‘Members’ personal, private,
religious, political or financial
interests should not conflict with
their duties and obligations to their
clients or employers. Should such a
conflict arise it should be declared
to the client or employer, and, if the
conflict is unacceptable or cannot
be resolved, the member should
withdraw from the engagement or
resign from the employment.
‘Members involved in any other
business activity which might impact,
even indirectly, on their practice
of architecture, must declare that
involvement to the client or employer
before any contract is finalised.
‘If the other activity is unacceptable
to the client, members should
either withdraw from it during
the engagement, or decline the
commission; if the other activity
is unacceptable to the employer,
members must either withdraw from
it during the employment or resign
from/refuse to accept the job.
‘Members must not undertake
any architectural functions
which require independence and
impartiality (such as the issue of
Architect’s Certificates) if they are
connected to the contracting party.’
The Royal Institution of Chartered
Surveyors’ code of ethics has been
simplified in recent years, but lists the
following matters that may affect or
be perceived to impede a professional
members’ ability to act impartially or
in the best interests of a client:
‘Before taking on a new client or
undertaking new work, you should
ask yourself whether your ability to
act in the best interest of your client
could potentially be impaired by:
• Any financial interest (eg. where you
stand to gain over and above your
normal fee or lose money depending
on the advice you provide)
• A personal relationship (eg. where
the advice you provide is influenced
by the relationship you have with a
third party)
• Commercial relationships (eg.
obligations to another commercial
entity affect your ability to provide
objective advice to a client)
• The interests of your firm (eg.
where the financial interests of
your own firm conflict with the
interests of the client)
If you believe that your impartiality
could be compromised in any way,
then it’s likely that there is a conflict
of interest.’
These professional bodies generally
treat conflict of interest breaches as
serious matters.
It is well understood that the possibility
of conflicts of interest may threaten
the quality or perceived quality of the
individual professional’s judgment,
and consequently, the welfare of the
client or employer in question, the
profession’s standing with the public,
and the reputation of the profession
as a whole. The professions manage
ethical considerations in different
ways, but the foremost values revolve
around loyalty to the client (or the
employer), professional judgment, and
public service.
Clients are often more
likely to insist that a
conlict be avoided or
resolved beforehand
Regardless of the litigation process, for
these professions, conflicts of interest
are always considered to be a threat
to the profession’s reputation. That is
what makes having a conflict of interest
a serious concern in professional
ethics. within most - if not all - of the
relevant professional institutions.
Expert witnesses must disclose
any perceived conflicts of interest,
and must have no interest in the
outcome of the litigation. They must
be current in practice, appropriately
educated, impartial, candid,
truthful, and articulate.
A conflict of interest may occur when
an expert could be influenced, or
could be seen to be influenced, by a
personal interest in carrying out the
assigned work. While there may be
For a reliable and prompt service dental PI reports are prepared and forwarded the
day of examination and alleged clinical negligence within ten days.
33 Arden Road • Finchley • London N3 3AB
Telephone: 020 8346 1411 Fax: 020 8343 1601 Email: egordon@dentmedneg.demon.co.uk
DENTISTRY
Edgar Gordon
MSc DDS BDS MGDS FFGDP
4. PI Focus | October 2015
16
a myriad of factors, some examples
may be because the expert has:
• A financial interest with the party
in dispute or the outcome of the
dispute;
• Accepted a gift or benefit in kind
that may be seen to influence the
impartiality of the expert opinion;
• A personal, philosophical, moral or
other belief or attitude that could
be seen to influence the impartiality
of their expert opinion in respect of
the matter considered;
• A personal (non-professional)
relationship with a party, relative or
associate of a party to the matter;
• Use of their position as an
independent expert witness to
seek employment opportunities
for themselves, friends, family
or colleagues.
The examples suggested cannot be
all encompassing, but any matter that
may give rise to an actual or perceived
conflict of interest should be disclosed.
As noted in my commentary, the
professions of architecture, surveying
and building engineering - as far as
their professional institutions are
concerned - recognise themselves as
having an obligation to serve the public.
Any professional may sometimes
find themselves in some conflict of
interest situations, even when all
reasonable precautions have been
taken to avoid them.
When the avoidance of a conflict of
interest cannot reasonably be foreseen
or cannot be avoided, any censure
is likely to attach not because of the
conflict of interest itself, but rather the
professional’s failure to take proper
steps to deal with it in a proper manner.
Initial enquiries
When a solicitor calls an expert or
enquires about a case, I would hope
that they will first want to ascertain
whether that particular expert has a
conflict of interest. A conflict might
occur if the expert is doing work for
the opposing solicitor and working
on the subject of the dispute, or
knows personally the opposing party
in the litigation.
It is not at all unusual for practising
experts to be retained by the same
firms of solicitors for both claimants
and defendants in different cases,
and in these circumstances it is
inevitable at some stage that the
expert may be appointed by either
simultaneously. If regularly acting
for both claimants and defendants,
the expert may wish to make it clear
that they will not be precluded from
accepting such instructions, but
conversely will also need to ensure
total confidentiality and discretion
within their own organisation.
Architecture, surveying
and building engineering
differ substantively from
medicine… because they
have clients or employers as
the focus of their expertise,
rather than patients
The expert should take all possible
steps to ensure that they are not
already retained by the other
party to the case. In my own
experience it is usual practice
to do a cross check immediately
at the time of any initial enquiry
from a client, to ensure that
confidential information is not
inadvertently passed in either
direction. Incidentally, now that
anonymised documents and
parties to an action are becoming
more common, this is becoming all
the more difficult. In the extreme,
if a case bundle turns up without
prior enquiry, office staff should
be briefed to check whether the
expert is already retained on the
particular matter before reviewing
documents at all - and certainly
before passing on to the expert. In
the event of a potential conflict,
both parties to the case should be
informed of what has occurred in
a clear and transparent manner.
In some instances, it is still open
to the parties to take the view that
the expert be appointed on a single
joint basis, and this approach may
be preferred.
Basic premise
The client and architect or surveyor’s
professional relationship in a
building project is critical, and if a
professional is tasked with a certain
brief or scope of work, they must
discharge that duty for their client
regardless of any questions of
recovery or ongoing litigation.
Interestingly, fees for most of the
professions acting as building
designers have traditionally
been calculated on the basis of a
percentage fee, which is directly
related to the total project cost.
In the particular circumstances
of quantum accommodation
claims, it is the expert witnesses’
responsibility to advise the
court on the costs to provide
the accommodation reasonably
necessary. In practice, this may
differ somewhat from what is
actually built, dependent on a
client’s particular requests, which
sometimes may not be relevant at all
to the claim. Actual costs incurred
in a particular project may vary
substantially between these two
sometimes conflicting standpoints.
So it can be seen that an expert
witness would put themselves in a
very difficult position if acting both as
an expert and as project designer in
the same case, because they would
inevitably have a perceived - if not
real - conflict of interest based on the
fees generated by the project, and
their explicit duty to the court as an
expert witness.
Nevertheless, it appears that the
presence of a conflict of interest does
not automatically disqualify an expert
from providing their evidence. The
Court of Appeal has confirmed this in
the case of Toth v Jarman (2006).
The real issue appears to be
whether or not the expert’s opinion
is considered to be independent,
impartial and unbiased.
Where the conflict of interest is
found to be material or significant,
the court is unlikely to act on the
evidence - or indeed give permission
for the evidence to be heard.
The Court of Appeal in the case
above also considered what should
happen in future, as follows:
‘The expert should not leave
undisclosed any conflict of interest
which might bring into question
the suitability of his evidence as
the basis for the court’s decision.
The conflict of interest could be
of any kind, including a financial
interest, a personal connection,
or an obligation - for example, as
5. October 2015 | PI Focus
17
a member or officer of some other
body. But ultimately, the question of
what conflicts of interest fall within
this description is a question for the
court, taking into account all the
circumstances of the case.’
Professional services provided by a
firm where the particular expert is in
practice for minor non-contentious
initial advice may be considered
acceptable, based on the premise
that any potential for conflict is
fully disclosed and that any fees
due are not materially dependent
on the expert’s own evidence at
any subsequent stage. The exact
circumstances will be material in
each and every case.
Summary
According to the Civil Procedure Rules
Part 35.3, it is the duty of an expert
to help the courts on the matters
within their expertise, and that duty
overrides any obligation to the person
from whom experts have received
instructions, or by whom they are paid.
Judges have been known, in the
exercise of their discretion, to reject
evidence that has been tendered by
experts whom they know to have, or
they suspect of having, any financial
stake in the outcome of the litigation.
This is the main reason why expert
witnesses should never accept
instructions to act as an expert
witness on a ‘no-win, no-fee’ or
similar basis. For many of the
same reasons, an expert witness’s
personal, professional or direct
financial links with parties to a
dispute would normally prohibit
them from acting as an expert
witness in any litigation in which
those parties are engaged.
Courts tend not to look favourably
at expert witnesses with a vested
interest in the outcome of a hearing.
As noted previously, the court has
the power to reject evidence that
would otherwise be admissible, if it
should form an unfavourable view
as to the impartiality of the expert
witness that has provided it. It is
therefore important to make sure
that any potentials for a conflict of
interest are assessed at the outset.
If, for some reason, using such an
expert is unavoidable, any potential
conflict of interest should be clearly
disclosed in the report subsequently
produced, along with a clear
explanation as to why the potential
conflict is immaterial (if indeed it is).
This may render the impartiality of
the expert’s opinion unaffected, but
would always depend on the facts of
the matter in question.
In many instances prior to settlement
of a claim, the safest option may be to
get an expert witness or unconnected
professional from an independent
firm to deal with any construction
proposals or major adaptations
which commence before settlement
or trial - or to simply choose an expert
in respect of whom there could be no
appearance of a potential conflict of
interest. Appointments made after
settlement of a claim would obviously
not have a bearing on any expert
witness conflict issues that would
otherwise have previously arisen.
In practice, law practitioners
and deputies acting on behalf
of protected parties for cases in
progress therefore need to have a
clear understanding of the potential
for difficulties at the outset.
Nic Cosmos is a chartered building
surveyor, chartered building
engineer and director of Camplings
Building Surveying Consultancy,
which provides specialist design
for the disabled. He regularly acts
for the court as an expert witness,
instructed by both claimant and
defendant solicitors. See www.
cbsconsultancy.co.uk
T H E E M P L O Y M E N T E X P E R T S
THE
LONG SHADOW
www.employmentexperts.co.uk call 01473 288 018
fax 01473 288 863email info@employmentexperts.co.uk
Survivors of childhood sexual abuse may suffer from low self-esteem, isolation,
self-hatred, depression, guilt, shame and blame and a sensitive approach is
essential.
We pride ourselves on our supportive and open-ended interviewing technique
and this is what parents and clients had to say:
• ‘The feedback was positive, he had obviously been relaxed in your company’
• ‘You are the first expert witness who has shown empathy and it was a positive
experience for my daughter’
• ‘(Trevor) was someone I could connect with at a human level’
Twice category winner (2012 & 2013) of the Eclipse Proclaim Personal Injury
awards, the judging panel said:
• ‘Run by a genuine individual who has truly altruistic aims and is a true expert’
• ‘Influential in calculating loss for claimants’
APIL Tier 1 approved experts; Sweet & Maxwell checked; ISO 9001 & 14001
accredited.