Photo Sharing
 Digital cameras and smart phones produce
  hundreds (thousands) of photos – small
  tsunamis of images.
 Photos are very demanding. They need:
     Naming/tagging/descriptions
     Editing (fixing/cropping/culling)
     Storing (high res photos can be space hogs)
     Sharing with others
       Select peeps (relatives/close friends)
       Larger groups (includeing acquaintances)
       Everyone (public)
                             The Problems
 Photo sharing options that are:
     Efficient (fast)
     Reliable (no loss of photos)
     Intuitive to use esp. at the beginning
     Easy for others to access and use and return
      to
     Attractive and/or clean or not unattractive
     Affordable and/or free



                          What you want
picasa.google.c
om/
f l i c k r. c o m

smugmug.co
m
imageevent.c
om
mejuba.com

facebook.co
m
   Free for 1 GB (200 photos)
   Share videos (1 min. maximum)
   $25 per year for unlimited
   26 million users (2010)
   Huge photo sharing community – mostly amateur
    photographers who chat amongst themselves.
   Everyone loves it (except for me)
   Yahoo offshoot
   Uploading isn’t difficult
   Organizing is not intuitive and is maddeningly
    cumbersome
   Nice slideshow with lots of options
                                         flickr
 No batch downloads
 Editing pictures isn’t straightforward – links
  and title captions don’t always work or stick
 No thumbnails (lot of scrolling and no view all)
 Cannot give multiple images same name
 No export from iPhoto
 No email notification if someone comments
 No control over images on your home page
 Privacy control possible but hard work
 Why isn’t a set called an album?

                           flicker … cons
 Collections
     Top tier
 Sets
     aka Albums
 Galleries
     Galleries are a way to curate up to 18
      public photos or videos of your fellow
      members into one place. It’s an
      opportunity to celebrate the creativity of
      fellow members in a unique way i.e.
      around a theme, an idea or just
      because.
                     flickr … structure
 Free for 1 GB of photos and videos
 $25 per year 25 GB, $50 for 100 GB
 More of a social community
 500,000 users (2010)
 Everyone loves it (except for me)
 Google offshoot
 Uploading isn’t difficult
 Organizing is easier than Flickr … a cleaner
  interface
 You can edit photos
 Basic slideshow
                                        picasa
 Facebook wannabe (Circles)
 Could end up expensive
 Quality of photos?




                       picasa … cons
 Photographers site
 Everything is absolutely beautiful
 Support Heros are beyond terrific
 And you pay for it
     $32 year for basic w/unlimited photos
     $48 year for your own domain + unlimited hd
      videos
     $125 for professional photographers




                                    smugmug
 Limited community – your photos may not be
  discovered (if you care)




                                smugmug
 $25 year for 1500 images (one time additional
  fees for 1500 extra images)
 Public galleries separate – you have to go to
  them to see them (as opposed to Flickr/Picasia)
 Albums and sub-albums
 Organizing is super straightforward and logical
 Unlimited video
 Slideshow is OK
 Sharing is super easy
 Editing captions in thumbnails is quick and easy

                              imageevent
 Not at all beautiful
 Uploading can be sluggish
 Slideshow not as beautiful
 Back to thumbnails in a stupid place




                               imageevent
 Free for unlimited photos and videos
 Transfer photos from other sites (Picasa/Flickr)
 Straightforward
 Pretty easy to use including organizing
 Album structure more like Image Event (pc-ish)




                                      mejuba
 Ugly
 No community
 Difficult to share
 Slow loading
 No support
 Transferring photos not so easy
 You get what you pay for …




                                    mejuba
 This is where it’s at IMO
 The structure forces you to choose select photos
 And to add some fun, witty, interesting comments
 Your friends get involved




                                  facebook
 You wouldn’t upload 2000 holiday pics from your
  cruise to Alaska
 Privacy – it barely exists (even if you think it does
  or try to make it so)
 Finding photos can be a challenge




                                     facebook
 http://www.socialsafe.net/
 Cheap!
     $3.50 year for 1 profile
     $7.00 for up to 4 profiles
 This makes facebook work for me …
 I can search for a ‘story’
 Their support is incredibly responsive and
  nice (George and Pascal)




                                   SocialSafe
 SlideShare is awash in slideshows
  showing you how to use the various photo
  sharing sites http://www.slideshare.net/




                              SlideShare

Photo Sharing

  • 1.
  • 2.
     Digital camerasand smart phones produce hundreds (thousands) of photos – small tsunamis of images.  Photos are very demanding. They need:  Naming/tagging/descriptions  Editing (fixing/cropping/culling)  Storing (high res photos can be space hogs)  Sharing with others  Select peeps (relatives/close friends)  Larger groups (includeing acquaintances)  Everyone (public) The Problems
  • 3.
     Photo sharingoptions that are:  Efficient (fast)  Reliable (no loss of photos)  Intuitive to use esp. at the beginning  Easy for others to access and use and return to  Attractive and/or clean or not unattractive  Affordable and/or free What you want
  • 4.
    picasa.google.c om/ f l ic k r. c o m smugmug.co m imageevent.c om mejuba.com facebook.co m
  • 5.
    Free for 1 GB (200 photos)  Share videos (1 min. maximum)  $25 per year for unlimited  26 million users (2010)  Huge photo sharing community – mostly amateur photographers who chat amongst themselves.  Everyone loves it (except for me)  Yahoo offshoot  Uploading isn’t difficult  Organizing is not intuitive and is maddeningly cumbersome  Nice slideshow with lots of options flickr
  • 6.
     No batchdownloads  Editing pictures isn’t straightforward – links and title captions don’t always work or stick  No thumbnails (lot of scrolling and no view all)  Cannot give multiple images same name  No export from iPhoto  No email notification if someone comments  No control over images on your home page  Privacy control possible but hard work  Why isn’t a set called an album? flicker … cons
  • 7.
     Collections  Top tier  Sets  aka Albums  Galleries  Galleries are a way to curate up to 18 public photos or videos of your fellow members into one place. It’s an opportunity to celebrate the creativity of fellow members in a unique way i.e. around a theme, an idea or just because. flickr … structure
  • 8.
     Free for1 GB of photos and videos  $25 per year 25 GB, $50 for 100 GB  More of a social community  500,000 users (2010)  Everyone loves it (except for me)  Google offshoot  Uploading isn’t difficult  Organizing is easier than Flickr … a cleaner interface  You can edit photos  Basic slideshow picasa
  • 9.
     Facebook wannabe(Circles)  Could end up expensive  Quality of photos? picasa … cons
  • 10.
     Photographers site Everything is absolutely beautiful  Support Heros are beyond terrific  And you pay for it  $32 year for basic w/unlimited photos  $48 year for your own domain + unlimited hd videos  $125 for professional photographers smugmug
  • 11.
     Limited community– your photos may not be discovered (if you care) smugmug
  • 12.
     $25 yearfor 1500 images (one time additional fees for 1500 extra images)  Public galleries separate – you have to go to them to see them (as opposed to Flickr/Picasia)  Albums and sub-albums  Organizing is super straightforward and logical  Unlimited video  Slideshow is OK  Sharing is super easy  Editing captions in thumbnails is quick and easy imageevent
  • 13.
     Not atall beautiful  Uploading can be sluggish  Slideshow not as beautiful  Back to thumbnails in a stupid place imageevent
  • 14.
     Free forunlimited photos and videos  Transfer photos from other sites (Picasa/Flickr)  Straightforward  Pretty easy to use including organizing  Album structure more like Image Event (pc-ish) mejuba
  • 15.
     Ugly  Nocommunity  Difficult to share  Slow loading  No support  Transferring photos not so easy  You get what you pay for … mejuba
  • 16.
     This iswhere it’s at IMO  The structure forces you to choose select photos  And to add some fun, witty, interesting comments  Your friends get involved facebook
  • 17.
     You wouldn’tupload 2000 holiday pics from your cruise to Alaska  Privacy – it barely exists (even if you think it does or try to make it so)  Finding photos can be a challenge facebook
  • 18.
     http://www.socialsafe.net/  Cheap!  $3.50 year for 1 profile  $7.00 for up to 4 profiles  This makes facebook work for me …  I can search for a ‘story’  Their support is incredibly responsive and nice (George and Pascal) SocialSafe
  • 19.
     SlideShare isawash in slideshows showing you how to use the various photo sharing sites http://www.slideshare.net/ SlideShare