ASSESSING THE CONDITION OF FINANCIAL DISTRESS W ITH ANALYSIS OF LIQUIDITY, SO...AJHSSR Journal
ABSTRACT : Financial distress is the stage of declining financial conditions that occurred before bankruptcy.
To determine the risk of bankruptcy by knowing the signs of financial distress. Financial distress can analyze
financial statements using financial ratios, namely liquidity, solvency and profitability. The purpose of this study
was to examine the effect of liquidity, solvency and profitability on financial distress conditions. The population
in this study were 30 consumer goods industrial companies. By using purposive sampling technique, 21
companies were obtained. Using 3 (three) years, 63 observations were obtained. Data analysis technique is
logistic regression analysis with SPSS V.23 program. The results of this study indicate that liquidity and
profitability have a negative and significant effect on financial distress conditions so that the hypothesis is
accepted, but solvency has a positive and significant effect on financial distress conditions, this means rejecting
the hypothesis.
Determinant of Income Smoothing At Manufacturing Firms Listed On Indonesia St...inventionjournals
This research conducted to analyze the influence of profitability, financial risk (leverage), value of firm, institutional ownership and public ownership on the Income smoothing at Manufacturing firms listed in Indonesia stock exchange (IDX). The data used in this research was secondary data and there was 68 samples taken through purposive sampling technique. The method used in analyzing the relationship between the independent variables and dependent variables was multiple linear regression methods and classical assumption test. These findings simultaneously indicated that profitability, leverage, the value of the firm, institutional ownership and public ownership influence on the income smoothing. The partially results performed that leverage and value of firm influenced positively on income smoothing, while the profitability, institutional ownership, and public ownership influenced negatively on the income smoothing of manufacturing firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange.
This study aims to determine the effect of financial distress and disclosure to the going concern of banking
companies listing on Indonesia Stock Exchange. Population of this research is all banking companies
listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange. Sample in this research is 6 banking companies. The analysis method
is logistic regression. The result of the research shows that financial distress has a negative effect on
going-concern opinion, while disclosure negatively affect of going concern opinion on banking company
listing in Indonesian Stock Exchange.
This a presentation I created to present my company's (Chester) results after eight hypothetical years of competition, using the Capsim business simulation game. In the simulation, participants had to manage all aspects of the business, including R&D, manufacturing, marketing, and finance. At the end of the simulation, I was the top company in the industry.
ASSESSING THE CONDITION OF FINANCIAL DISTRESS W ITH ANALYSIS OF LIQUIDITY, SO...AJHSSR Journal
ABSTRACT : Financial distress is the stage of declining financial conditions that occurred before bankruptcy.
To determine the risk of bankruptcy by knowing the signs of financial distress. Financial distress can analyze
financial statements using financial ratios, namely liquidity, solvency and profitability. The purpose of this study
was to examine the effect of liquidity, solvency and profitability on financial distress conditions. The population
in this study were 30 consumer goods industrial companies. By using purposive sampling technique, 21
companies were obtained. Using 3 (three) years, 63 observations were obtained. Data analysis technique is
logistic regression analysis with SPSS V.23 program. The results of this study indicate that liquidity and
profitability have a negative and significant effect on financial distress conditions so that the hypothesis is
accepted, but solvency has a positive and significant effect on financial distress conditions, this means rejecting
the hypothesis.
Determinant of Income Smoothing At Manufacturing Firms Listed On Indonesia St...inventionjournals
This research conducted to analyze the influence of profitability, financial risk (leverage), value of firm, institutional ownership and public ownership on the Income smoothing at Manufacturing firms listed in Indonesia stock exchange (IDX). The data used in this research was secondary data and there was 68 samples taken through purposive sampling technique. The method used in analyzing the relationship between the independent variables and dependent variables was multiple linear regression methods and classical assumption test. These findings simultaneously indicated that profitability, leverage, the value of the firm, institutional ownership and public ownership influence on the income smoothing. The partially results performed that leverage and value of firm influenced positively on income smoothing, while the profitability, institutional ownership, and public ownership influenced negatively on the income smoothing of manufacturing firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange.
This study aims to determine the effect of financial distress and disclosure to the going concern of banking
companies listing on Indonesia Stock Exchange. Population of this research is all banking companies
listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange. Sample in this research is 6 banking companies. The analysis method
is logistic regression. The result of the research shows that financial distress has a negative effect on
going-concern opinion, while disclosure negatively affect of going concern opinion on banking company
listing in Indonesian Stock Exchange.
This a presentation I created to present my company's (Chester) results after eight hypothetical years of competition, using the Capsim business simulation game. In the simulation, participants had to manage all aspects of the business, including R&D, manufacturing, marketing, and finance. At the end of the simulation, I was the top company in the industry.
Part 1Halliburton company beta 1.6, Helix energy solutions beta .docxsmile790243
Part 1
Halliburton company beta 1.6, Helix energy solutions beta 1.71, Superior energy services beta 1.69 and Schlumberger limited 1.65
Beta is the extent of a company’s stock's tremor, similar to the general market. By definition, the market, for instance, has a beta of 1.0, and individual stocks are situated by the sum they veer off.
Stocks that change all the more frequently after some time have a beta above 1.0. If a stock moves not decisively the market, the stock's beta is under 1.0. High-beta stocks ought to be progressively risky; notwithstanding, give better yield potential; low-beta stocks present less danger yet also lower returns.
One course for a stock money related authority to consider an opportunity is to part it into two characterizations. The fundamental class is called efficient peril, which is the threat of the entire market declining. The money related crisis in 2008 is an instance of a productive peril event when no proportion of expanding could shield examiners from losing a motivating force in their stock portfolios. Systematic hazard is, in any case, called un-diversifiable risk.
Unsystematic or diversifiable perils are identified with an individual stock. The surprising assertion that Lumber Liquidators (LL) had been selling hardwood flooring with unsafe degrees of formaldehyde in 2015 is an instance of an unsystematic peril that was express to that association. Unsystematic hazards can be, for the most part, directed through expanding.
A beta of 1.0 shows that its worth activity is immovably connected to the industry. A stock that has a beta of 1.0 indicates a valid risk. In any case, the beta estimation can't perceive any unsystematic hazard.
A beta estimation of under 1.0 suggests that the security is theoretically less eccentric than the market, which implies the portfolio is less risky with the stock included than without it. For example, utility stocks consistently have low betas since they will, by and large, move more continuously than grandstand midpoints.
Another factor that is incorporated would be the capital structure of each firm. Firms that have assorted capital structures will have different betas. For example, an association with less commitment financing will have a lower beta than an association with higher commitment financing.
Section 2: Capital Budgeting
IRR and NPV are both used in the evaluation methodology for capital utilization. Net present worth (NPV) limits the flood of expected wages identified with a proposed dare to their present value, which presents a cash surplus or deficiency for the undertaking. Internal rate of return (IRR) figures the evaluated speed of return at which those proportional earnings will achieve a net present estimation of zero. The two capital arranging systems have some similarities and differences listed: Result. The NPV system realizes dollar regard that an errand will convey, while IRR produces the rate return that the endeavor is required to make.
Reason. The.
Amazon just made above the industry average financially during the Global Recession period, although taking a number of out-of-box strategies - including related diversification, horizontal integration etc. (during that crisis). But these efforts resulted in a delayed pay off, with the financial growth picking up since 2014.
1. Our book mentions, An analyst could easily get lost in examini.docxjackiewalcutt
1. Our book mentions, “An analyst could easily get lost in examining ratios and lose track of financial management’s primary objective – the maximization of shareholders’ wealth. The manager and analyst must be concerned with how ratios can help to explain share price behavior. It’s important to know why the price is outperforming competing firms’ price or why the stock is underperforming its peers” (Byrd et al, 2013). The ticker symbol for the company I chose that starts with the first letter of my last name “Canales” is Coca Cola. Since I am comparing financial ratios, the other company from the same industry that I’m comparing it to is PepsiCo.
Current Ratio (CR) – Current ratio = current assets ÷ current liabilities. This type of ratio defines how effective the organization is with repaying their current debts from their current assets. Coca Cola’s CR is 1.090, whereas PepsiCo’s CR is 1.095; they are pretty much neck and neck and 1:1 is the reliable ratio but each of the organization’s liabilities must be managed.
Net Profit Margin Ratio – This type of ratio shows how effective a firm is to turn its profit from its revenue. In order to get more profit, the company has to have more sales. On the other hand, a low ratio denotes that its consumers are not happy with its products thus sales fall. This ratio is computed by: Net profit ÷ sales x 100. The net profit ratio for Coca Cola is 18.8% (The Coca Cola Company, 2014) and 9.4% for PepsiCo (PepsiCo, 2014). Both companies show net profits in the forefront of the industry but Coca Cola can turn its sales to profit more than PepsiCo. Although, the cause for the low net profit may be attributed to changes in their soda choice.
Assets Turnover Ratio – This type of ration defines and overall effectiveness of an organization’s daily operations. Coca Cola’s ratio is at 5.78 and PepsiCo’s ratio is 8.87. Since Coca Cola is at a low ration this tells us that this company is not as effective as PepsiCo (possibly due to inefficient use of equipment or inventory loss, etc.). In contrast, PepsiCo shows an increase in assets turnover ratio although the company must pay attention to its net profit that is decreasing. As a result, PepsiCo must put a lot more emphasis in its weak areas to raise their net profit.
Angie
References
Byrd, J., Hickman, K., & McPherson, M. (2013). Managerial Finance. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint
The Coca Cola Company. (2014). Form 10-K.Annual Report. Retrieved from http://assets.cocacolacompany.com/d2/78/7d7cad454f3fbd033d55d786b890/2014-annual-report-on-form-10-k.pdf
Pepsico. (2014). Pepsico 50 years & growing.PepsiCo 2014 Annual Report. Retrieved from http://www.pepsico.com/docs/album/default-document-library/pepsico-2014-annual-report_final.pdf?sfvrsn=0
2.
I have decided to pick Disney(Walt Disney Company) as my company. Its ticker symbol is DIS. Disney is not just a movie company anymore. It has become a huge media conglomerate. They own ESPN, ABC, Mirama ...
Assignment 1 Chapter 2 Mini Case Financial .docxtrippettjettie
Assignment 1: Chapter 2 Mini Case: “Financial Statement and Cash Flow Analysis”
In the mini case in our textbook we were given an account balance sheet for Jaeden Industries as of December 31, 2010 along with their income statement and balance sheet from the previous year. It also stated that the firm’s dividend payout ratio is 25% and the tax rate is 34%. The firm’s stock price on December 31, 2009, was $ 42.89 and on December 31, 2010, it was $ 56.82. In part A of our assignment it asks us to use the financial statements in the text to determine Jaeden’s free cash flow, liquidity, debt and profitability ratios, and market ratios for year 2010.
Part A
Jaeden’s Free Cash Flow
The measure of free cash flow (FCF) is the amount of cash flow available to investors; the providers of debt and equity capital. It represents the net amount of cash flow remaining after the firm has met all operating needs and has made all required payments on both long- term (fixed) and short- term (current) investments (Graham, Megginson, Smart pg. 34). However, in order to determine the free cash flow you have to obtain the operating cash flow (OCF), which are cash inflows and outflows directly related to the production and sale of products or services.
OCF = [Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) × (1 - T)] + Depreciation (T=.34%)
OCF = (42000000-26460000-1621000-800000) x (1 – T) + Depreciation
OCF = 13119000 x (1 - .34) + 800000
OCF = 9458540
Now that we have the OCF we can solve for the FCF
FCF = OCF – Capital Expenditures + Depreciation – Networking Capital
FCF = 9458540 – 2932000 – (4530181-190000-150000)
FCF = 9458540 – 2932000 – 4190181
FCF = 2336359
Jaeden’s free cash flow is 2336359
Jaeden’s Liquidity
Our textbook states that liquidity ratios measure a firm’s ability to satisfy its short-term obligations as they come due. Current ratio and quick ratio are two measures of liquidity. Current Ratio is defined as current assets divided by current liabilities and it is used to measure a firm’s ability to meet short-term obligations. Current assets include cash, marketable securities, accounts receivable, and inventory. Current liabilities include accounts payable, notes payable, and accruals. Quick ratio is somewhat similar except it excludes a certain asset that is, inventory. Inventory turnover provides a measure of how quickly a firm sells its goods (Graham, Megginson, Smart pg. 43). Inventory turnover can be converted into average age turnover simply by dividing the turnover figure by the amount of days in a year.
Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities
Current Ratio = (3689000 + 5423000 + 1836000 + 4118000) / (3136000 + 706000 + 500000)
Current Ratio = 15066000 / 4342000
Current Ratio = 3.469829572
Quick Ratio = Current Assets – Inventory / Current Liabilities
Quick Ratio = (3689000 + 5423000 + 1836000) – 4118000 / (3136000 + 706000 + 500000)
Quick Ratio = (10948000 – 4118000) / (3136000 + 706000 + 5000 ...
Equity-Investment Analyst who have been working in the financial markets for over 35 years. A University of Pennsylvania Wharton School of Business Graduate, an Investment and Financial leader on Capital Hill in Washington, DC and 20 years of financial modeling and analysis consulting experience. I am a teacher, a mentor and accomplished businessman eager to share my experience, and helpful advice
Part 1Halliburton company beta 1.6, Helix energy solutions beta .docxsmile790243
Part 1
Halliburton company beta 1.6, Helix energy solutions beta 1.71, Superior energy services beta 1.69 and Schlumberger limited 1.65
Beta is the extent of a company’s stock's tremor, similar to the general market. By definition, the market, for instance, has a beta of 1.0, and individual stocks are situated by the sum they veer off.
Stocks that change all the more frequently after some time have a beta above 1.0. If a stock moves not decisively the market, the stock's beta is under 1.0. High-beta stocks ought to be progressively risky; notwithstanding, give better yield potential; low-beta stocks present less danger yet also lower returns.
One course for a stock money related authority to consider an opportunity is to part it into two characterizations. The fundamental class is called efficient peril, which is the threat of the entire market declining. The money related crisis in 2008 is an instance of a productive peril event when no proportion of expanding could shield examiners from losing a motivating force in their stock portfolios. Systematic hazard is, in any case, called un-diversifiable risk.
Unsystematic or diversifiable perils are identified with an individual stock. The surprising assertion that Lumber Liquidators (LL) had been selling hardwood flooring with unsafe degrees of formaldehyde in 2015 is an instance of an unsystematic peril that was express to that association. Unsystematic hazards can be, for the most part, directed through expanding.
A beta of 1.0 shows that its worth activity is immovably connected to the industry. A stock that has a beta of 1.0 indicates a valid risk. In any case, the beta estimation can't perceive any unsystematic hazard.
A beta estimation of under 1.0 suggests that the security is theoretically less eccentric than the market, which implies the portfolio is less risky with the stock included than without it. For example, utility stocks consistently have low betas since they will, by and large, move more continuously than grandstand midpoints.
Another factor that is incorporated would be the capital structure of each firm. Firms that have assorted capital structures will have different betas. For example, an association with less commitment financing will have a lower beta than an association with higher commitment financing.
Section 2: Capital Budgeting
IRR and NPV are both used in the evaluation methodology for capital utilization. Net present worth (NPV) limits the flood of expected wages identified with a proposed dare to their present value, which presents a cash surplus or deficiency for the undertaking. Internal rate of return (IRR) figures the evaluated speed of return at which those proportional earnings will achieve a net present estimation of zero. The two capital arranging systems have some similarities and differences listed: Result. The NPV system realizes dollar regard that an errand will convey, while IRR produces the rate return that the endeavor is required to make.
Reason. The.
Amazon just made above the industry average financially during the Global Recession period, although taking a number of out-of-box strategies - including related diversification, horizontal integration etc. (during that crisis). But these efforts resulted in a delayed pay off, with the financial growth picking up since 2014.
1. Our book mentions, An analyst could easily get lost in examini.docxjackiewalcutt
1. Our book mentions, “An analyst could easily get lost in examining ratios and lose track of financial management’s primary objective – the maximization of shareholders’ wealth. The manager and analyst must be concerned with how ratios can help to explain share price behavior. It’s important to know why the price is outperforming competing firms’ price or why the stock is underperforming its peers” (Byrd et al, 2013). The ticker symbol for the company I chose that starts with the first letter of my last name “Canales” is Coca Cola. Since I am comparing financial ratios, the other company from the same industry that I’m comparing it to is PepsiCo.
Current Ratio (CR) – Current ratio = current assets ÷ current liabilities. This type of ratio defines how effective the organization is with repaying their current debts from their current assets. Coca Cola’s CR is 1.090, whereas PepsiCo’s CR is 1.095; they are pretty much neck and neck and 1:1 is the reliable ratio but each of the organization’s liabilities must be managed.
Net Profit Margin Ratio – This type of ratio shows how effective a firm is to turn its profit from its revenue. In order to get more profit, the company has to have more sales. On the other hand, a low ratio denotes that its consumers are not happy with its products thus sales fall. This ratio is computed by: Net profit ÷ sales x 100. The net profit ratio for Coca Cola is 18.8% (The Coca Cola Company, 2014) and 9.4% for PepsiCo (PepsiCo, 2014). Both companies show net profits in the forefront of the industry but Coca Cola can turn its sales to profit more than PepsiCo. Although, the cause for the low net profit may be attributed to changes in their soda choice.
Assets Turnover Ratio – This type of ration defines and overall effectiveness of an organization’s daily operations. Coca Cola’s ratio is at 5.78 and PepsiCo’s ratio is 8.87. Since Coca Cola is at a low ration this tells us that this company is not as effective as PepsiCo (possibly due to inefficient use of equipment or inventory loss, etc.). In contrast, PepsiCo shows an increase in assets turnover ratio although the company must pay attention to its net profit that is decreasing. As a result, PepsiCo must put a lot more emphasis in its weak areas to raise their net profit.
Angie
References
Byrd, J., Hickman, K., & McPherson, M. (2013). Managerial Finance. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint
The Coca Cola Company. (2014). Form 10-K.Annual Report. Retrieved from http://assets.cocacolacompany.com/d2/78/7d7cad454f3fbd033d55d786b890/2014-annual-report-on-form-10-k.pdf
Pepsico. (2014). Pepsico 50 years & growing.PepsiCo 2014 Annual Report. Retrieved from http://www.pepsico.com/docs/album/default-document-library/pepsico-2014-annual-report_final.pdf?sfvrsn=0
2.
I have decided to pick Disney(Walt Disney Company) as my company. Its ticker symbol is DIS. Disney is not just a movie company anymore. It has become a huge media conglomerate. They own ESPN, ABC, Mirama ...
Assignment 1 Chapter 2 Mini Case Financial .docxtrippettjettie
Assignment 1: Chapter 2 Mini Case: “Financial Statement and Cash Flow Analysis”
In the mini case in our textbook we were given an account balance sheet for Jaeden Industries as of December 31, 2010 along with their income statement and balance sheet from the previous year. It also stated that the firm’s dividend payout ratio is 25% and the tax rate is 34%. The firm’s stock price on December 31, 2009, was $ 42.89 and on December 31, 2010, it was $ 56.82. In part A of our assignment it asks us to use the financial statements in the text to determine Jaeden’s free cash flow, liquidity, debt and profitability ratios, and market ratios for year 2010.
Part A
Jaeden’s Free Cash Flow
The measure of free cash flow (FCF) is the amount of cash flow available to investors; the providers of debt and equity capital. It represents the net amount of cash flow remaining after the firm has met all operating needs and has made all required payments on both long- term (fixed) and short- term (current) investments (Graham, Megginson, Smart pg. 34). However, in order to determine the free cash flow you have to obtain the operating cash flow (OCF), which are cash inflows and outflows directly related to the production and sale of products or services.
OCF = [Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) × (1 - T)] + Depreciation (T=.34%)
OCF = (42000000-26460000-1621000-800000) x (1 – T) + Depreciation
OCF = 13119000 x (1 - .34) + 800000
OCF = 9458540
Now that we have the OCF we can solve for the FCF
FCF = OCF – Capital Expenditures + Depreciation – Networking Capital
FCF = 9458540 – 2932000 – (4530181-190000-150000)
FCF = 9458540 – 2932000 – 4190181
FCF = 2336359
Jaeden’s free cash flow is 2336359
Jaeden’s Liquidity
Our textbook states that liquidity ratios measure a firm’s ability to satisfy its short-term obligations as they come due. Current ratio and quick ratio are two measures of liquidity. Current Ratio is defined as current assets divided by current liabilities and it is used to measure a firm’s ability to meet short-term obligations. Current assets include cash, marketable securities, accounts receivable, and inventory. Current liabilities include accounts payable, notes payable, and accruals. Quick ratio is somewhat similar except it excludes a certain asset that is, inventory. Inventory turnover provides a measure of how quickly a firm sells its goods (Graham, Megginson, Smart pg. 43). Inventory turnover can be converted into average age turnover simply by dividing the turnover figure by the amount of days in a year.
Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities
Current Ratio = (3689000 + 5423000 + 1836000 + 4118000) / (3136000 + 706000 + 500000)
Current Ratio = 15066000 / 4342000
Current Ratio = 3.469829572
Quick Ratio = Current Assets – Inventory / Current Liabilities
Quick Ratio = (3689000 + 5423000 + 1836000) – 4118000 / (3136000 + 706000 + 500000)
Quick Ratio = (10948000 – 4118000) / (3136000 + 706000 + 5000 ...
Equity-Investment Analyst who have been working in the financial markets for over 35 years. A University of Pennsylvania Wharton School of Business Graduate, an Investment and Financial leader on Capital Hill in Washington, DC and 20 years of financial modeling and analysis consulting experience. I am a teacher, a mentor and accomplished businessman eager to share my experience, and helpful advice
Financial statement analysis of beximco pharmaceuticals limited
Phase 4 Individual Assignment
1. Select Comfort
Select Comfort Key Assignment
Phase 4 Individual Project
Joseph Ortiz
Professor Jackie Russell
Colorado Technical University
May 6th, 2012
1
2. Select Comfort
Select Comfort
Select Comfort is a manufacturer of adjustable air-chamber mattresses branded Sleep
Number beds as well as their bases and bedding accessories. They were founded more than
twenty years ago and currently sell their products almost exclusively through company-owned
retail stores, direct marketing, and sleepnumber.com (Investor Relations, 2012). Like many
companies of the time, Select Comfort grew rapidly through the middle of the last decade until
the recession hit forced them to streamline operations in order to remain viable. They do seem to
have rebounded well with this newer strategy and have improved in many key areas from 2010
to 2011.
This report will analyze those trends and compare them to the furniture industry.
Additionally, we will examine the costs Select Comfort incurs to manufacture their beds and
accessories and determine the most efficient way of recording these costs. Finally, we will
conclude with the overall health of the Select Comfort company and whether any
recommendations for financial improvement can be made.
Ratio Analysis
2011 2010 Industry Average
Current ratio 1.61 1.21 1.84
Acid-test (quick) ratio 1.09 0.89 1.31
Debt ratio 0.51 0.66 Data Unavailable
Inventory turnover 12.26 12.89 5.57
Accounts receivable turnover 62.58 80.74 26.5
Return on net sales 0.081 0.052 Data Unavailable
Return on total assets 0.280 0.219 0.096
Return on common stockholder’s equity 0.646 0.785 0.163
Earnings per share 1.07 0.57 Data Unavailable
(CNNMoney, 2012) (Investor Relations, 2012) (Reuters, 2012)
2
3. Select Comfort
Above, you can see the performance of Select Comfort in specific key ratios that will
help us determine their ability to pay current liabilities, pay long-term debt, sell through their
inventory, and collect on receivables, as well as analyze their profitability and attractiveness to
investors. They can also help identify possible fraud if ratios are found to be abnormally higher
than average, it could indicate that certain assets or liabilities are not being reported. With the
implementation of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, there is even greater scrutiny on companies
to make accurate financial reporting to the public (Kotler & Armstrong, 2012). We will review
each of these ratios on an individual level.
The current ratio measures how much in current assets a company has above how much it
has in current liabilities. Anything above a 1.00 indicates that the company has more than
enough assets to cover its liabilities (Kotler & Armstrong, 2012). Select comfort had a current
ratio of 1.61 in 2011 which was up 33% from the previous year. However, it is still below the
home furnishing industry average of 1.84. This ratio represents a positive for the company. It is
trending upward and although not yet at the industry average, the reason can, in part, be
explained by Select Comfort’s just-in-time inventory philosophy where each bed is assembled
after it is purchased, leaving low average levels of inventory, which contributes to the slightly
below average current ratio. The advantage of a lower inventory level will be discussed at length
in a proceeding section.
The acid-test (quick ratio) is a measurement of liquidity. It analyses a company’s ability
to pay its current liabilities with the cash it has on hand, plus any short-term investments and
current receivables (Kotler & Armstrong, 2012). A quick ratio of 1.09 means that Select Comfort
could theoretically pay all of its current liabilities if they were all to become due immediately.
Their 2010 quick ratio of .89 means that in that year, they could not. The industry average of
3
4. Select Comfort
1.31 is significantly higher than in many other industries where the average is between .90 and
1.00 (Kotler & Armstrong, 2012). The reason for this is difficult to determine but it may be
because other companies within the industry are growing sales more rapidly or paying their bills
more slowly (Investing Answers, n.d.). Regardless, I think Select Comfort’s acid-test reveals a
company with normal liquidity and which is trending in the right direction.
The company’s debt ratio of .51 basically means that slightly more than half of their
assets are financed by debt (Kotler & Armstrong, 2012). This is down significantly from 2010
where two-thirds of their assets were financed by debt. Interestingly, according to Select
Comfort’s 2012 Annual report, they currently have no debt (Investor Relations, 2012). This
claim is substantiated by Reuters which lists both the company’s long term debt and total debt to
equity ratios as zero (Reuters, 2012). The reason for this discrepancy seems to be in the
definition of debt where Select Comfort is recognizing debt only as what is owed to a bank or
other lender whereas the debt ratio includes money owed in employee compensation and state
and federal taxes among others. There is no industrial average for this ratio but the fact that
Select Comfort was able cut their debt ratio from .66 to .51 as well as was able to claim no debt
on their annual report is a positive sign.
The ability for a company to be able to sell through their inventory can be measured by
dividing the cost of goods sold by the average inventory level for that year (Kotler & Armstrong,
2012). Select Comfort’s inventory turnover ratio of 12.26 indicates that they are able to sell
through their inventory roughly once a month. This is well above the industry average of 5.57
and is a testament to the success of Select Comfort’s just-in-time inventory system. This system,
where a customer places an order through a retail site, direct order, or online purchase, and then
the product is manufactured, allows the company the flexibility to keep minimal inventory in
4
5. Select Comfort
both their warehouses and showrooms. This means that the actual inventory on hand is
comprised primarily of the accessories, which includes pillows, mattress pads, sheet sets, and
blankets. The advantage of this inventory structure is that available retail and warehouse space
can be minimized and the company can quickly and easily produce new models based on new
trends and technologies without being saddled with outdated inventory. Even the traditional
drawbacks of just-in-time inventory, such as being too reliant on one supplier, are not as
prevalent here because products are going straight to the consumer without going to a retailer
first and there is already a consumer expectation that the bed will take time to be built. Overall,
this is one of the biggest areas of strength for this company.
Another strength of Select Comfort’s financials is their accounts receivable turnover
ratio. This measures the ability to collect cash from customers who have made purchases on
credit (Kotler & Armstrong, 2012). Select Comfort’s turnover ratio of 62.58 is more than twice
the industry average of 26.5. This means that the company is doing an exceptional job of
converting their receivables into cash. This could be due to the stringencies they have in place to
qualify customers for financing and/or the promotional options they have in place for customers
to pay within specific guidelines. In 2010, the rate was even higher at 80.74 which may have
been a reaction to the credit crisis in 2008 but the fact that this number has dropped may show
more willingness to lend. As long as this number stays above the industry average and doesn’t
get too much higher, it should be seen as a positive.
The next three ratios all measure Select Comfort’s profitability (Kotler & Armstrong,
2012). The .081 return on net sales rate means that of every $1 the company earns in sales, about
8 cents of that is profit. The second ratio, return on net assets represents how well the company is
using its assets to produce a profit. Select Comfort’s return on net asset ratio of .280 has
5
6. Select Comfort
increased from 2010 and is well above the industry average of .096. Finally, the third
profitability ratio, return on common stockholder’s equity, shows how much income the
company is making off of each dollar invested by the common shareholders. The company’s
.646 return on equity ratio is nearly 4 times the industry average which is tremendous. These
profitability ratios reveal a solid business model which is rebounding nicely from the 2008
financial meltdown.
Lastly, the earnings per share (EPS) ratio is a common ratio used by investors to judge a
company’s market performance (Kotler & Armstrong, 2012). The 1.07 EPS that Select Comfort
reported is an increase of 88% over the previous year. While such an increase cannot be expected
by investors year-over-year, management seems confident that the trend will continue, stating
“we are confident in our goal to drive continued earnings-per-share growth of at least 20 percent
per year over the next three years” (Investor Relations, 2012). Unfortunately, I could not locate
an industry average for earnings per share but I compiled a list of five different companies within
the bed and home furnishing sector to use as a comparison:
Company 2011 Earnings Per Share
Tempurpedic 3.18
Select Comfort 1.07
Ethan Allen 1.01
La-Z-Boy 0.45
Sealy -0.21
(CNNMoney, 2012)
Based on the data, Select Comfort compares favorably to most of its competition. However, the
high EPS reported by Tempurpedic shows that there is plenty of room for improvement.
6
7. Select Comfort
Costs
According to Select Comfort, their “retail stores carry significant fixed costs” (Investor
Relations, 2012). These costs include the lease for the showroom space, the possible property
taxes, utilities, the depreciation of floor models, and insurance costs. In addition to the almost
400 retail locations, Select Comfort also has two U.S. manufacturing plants. They share most of
the same fixed costs as do the retail store but also incur the fixed cost of the actual machinery
used to build the beds. In addition to these fixed costs, Select Comfort has a lot of variable costs
that increase with the more products they sell. This would include the cost of the materials, the
cost of the labor and machine hours to build the product, and the delivery costs to have the beds
brought to the consumers after they are built. Finally, the retail employees are paid on a base +
commission structure which makes their wages a mixed cost. They have a base salary that they
receive regardless of how much they sell and then are paid a percentage of each sale they make.
Select Comfort has four different bed series and nine different mattresses. These are
offered in eight different sizes. They also offer specialty beds for RVs. In addition to the
mattresses, they offer a wide variety of accessories including pillows, sheets, blankets, mattress
pads, remote controls, and bed frames/legs. With the exception of the accessories, everything is
built-to-order. This means that Select Comfort would be well off using some application of the
Activity-Based Costing system. Because there is much more work that goes into building a
mattress to a customer’s specifications than producing a blanket, the same overhead rate should
not be used for all of the products. A study should be done to determine all of the cost drivers for
each product and how much of each driver is needed to produce each product (Accounting
Coach). This will ensure that cost levels are not skewed towards a certain product and that
management can accurately price each product and identify cost-saving measures as well.
7
8. Select Comfort
Conclusion
Based on the preceding information, Select Comfort seems to be a company with solid
but not exceptional financial strength. They do have an efficient model for how they run their
operations including their sales channels and their inventory system. This is reflected in many of
the key financial ratios we highlighted earlier where they were around or above the industry
averages in most of them. They are still working to overcome the recession that started in 2008
but have reacted better than many similar companies who were also hit by the meltdown. The
important thing for Select Comfort to do the in the future is continue to embrace their business
model, while mixing slow but gradual growth with effective cost-cutting measures.
8
9. Select Comfort
References
Accounting Coach. (n.d.). Explanation of the Topic... activity based costing. Retrieved April 29, 2012,
from Accounting Coach: http://www.accountingcoach.com/online-accounting-
course/35Xpg01.html
CNNMoney. (2012). Retrieved May 5, 2012, from http://money.cnn.com/
Glann, N. (2009, February 25). Mixed Costs: Differentiating the Fixed from the Variable Costs . Retrieved
May 5, 2012, from Yahoo Voices: http://voices.yahoo.com/mixed-costs-differentiating-fixed-
variable-2699014.html
Investing Answers. (n.d.). Acid-Test. Retrieved May 5, 2012, from Investing Answers:
http://www.investinganswers.com/financial-dictionary/ratio-analysis/acid-test-ratio-1225
Investor Relations. (2012, February 26). Retrieved May 5, 2012, from Sleep Number:
http://www.sleepnumber.com/eng/aboutus/InvestorRelations.cfm
Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2012). Principles of Marketing 14th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
Prentice Hall.
Reuters. (2012, May 4). Financials: Select Comfort Corp. (SCSS.O). Retrieved May 5, 2012, from Reuters:
http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/financialHighlights?symbol=SCSS.O
9