SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 46
Download to read offline
Geology and Cu-Ni-PGE mineralization in
the South Kawishiwi Intrusion, Duluth
Complex, Minnesota
Dean M. Peterson
Senior Vice President, Exploration
May 5, 2009
2
Forward Looking Statement
No regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained in
this presentation. This presentation includes certain statements that may be
deemed “forward looking statements”. All statements in this presentation, other
than statement of historical facts, that address future production, reserve potential,
exploration drilling, exploitation activities and events or developments that the
Company expects are forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes
the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on
reasonable assumptions, statements are not guarantees of future performance and
actual results or developments may differ materially from the forward-looking
statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially form those in
the forward-looking statements include market prices, exploitation and exploration
successes, continued availability of capital and financing, general economic, market
or business conditions. Investors should be cautious that any such statements are
not guarantees of future performance and that actual results or developments may
differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. The
company does not undertake to update or revise any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, save and except
as may be required by applicable securities laws.
No regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained in this presentation.
This presentation includes certain statements that may be deemed “forward looking statements”. All
statements in this presentation, other than statement of historical facts, that address future production,
reserve potential, exploration drilling, exploitation activities and events or developments that the
Company expects are forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes the expectations
expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, statements are
not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from
the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially form those
in the forward-looking statements include market prices, exploitation and exploration successes,
continued availability of capital and financing, general economic, market or business conditions.
Investors should be cautious that any such statements are not guarantees of future performance and
that actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking
statements. The company does not undertake to update or revise any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, save and except as may be
required by applicable securities laws.
Outline
3
• Regional Geology
• South Kawishiwi Intrusion
• Crystal-rich Slurries
• Thinking Outside the Gossan
• Details on the Maturi Cu-Ni-PGE Deposit
Size Comparison of Camps/Deposits
44
Mid-Continent Mantle Plume
The 1.1 billion year old Mid
Continent Rift mantle
plume was centered
on Lake Superior
5
Mineral System Approach
6
The mineral system approach to exploration attempts to
understand ore deposits as the final expression of multi-scale
systems encompassing the Earth that focus mass and
transfer energy to ultimately form ore deposits.
This approach to mineral exploration leads to systematic, scale-
dependent targeting models and allows for the recognition of
the largest-scale footprints of ore-forming systems.
Bedrock Geology, NE Minnesota
7
Virginia Fm.
Sulfur source
8
Sulfide Saturation, Where??
Gravity
Inversion
Model
(State Data)
The Reason Why is Physical Process?
Mantle melts become
sulfur-saturated when
they first encounter
bedded rocks in their
140 km rise from the
mantle, the sulfidic
Virginia Fm.
9
Sulfide-bearing crystal-rich magmas intrude upwards
Sulfide-free crystal-bearing magmas intrude upwards
9
Basic Gravity Field Model
10
Tectonics & Horizontal Magma Injection
11
Exotic Inclusions in the NLM
It is physically impossible for the NLM to carry
very large, high density exotic xenoliths from
great depths to their present position at troctolite
liquid viscosities. The magma must have been
more viscous (ie., a crystal-liquid slurry)
Nonmagnetic Basalt
Biwabik Iron Fm.
1212
Regional Magmatic Flow Model
1. Magma ascends through a mantle feeder dike
2. Sulfide saturation occurs while magma incorporates
sedimentary rocks (Virginia Fm sulfidic argillites)
3. Rift-parallel faulting opens a sub-horizontal space (NLM)
that magma traverses to the SW along
4. Subhorizontal sill intersects an active
transform fault and magma sills out (to
NNW) to form the Spruce Road Deposit
5. Continued flow lifts the hangingwall
Anorthosite as sill-like magma fingers
traverse to the WSW
6. Much Later – The Bald Eagle Intrusion
intrudes in a “Trap Door” fashion structurally
higher than the SKI
Idealized Magma Flow Model
Figures from Peterson, 2008
13
14
Bedrock Geology Map
A Fundamental Tenet: Describing Rocks
DESCRIPTION OF MAP
UNITS
We attempt to interpret the
magmatic history and
processes that formed the
mafic intrusions of the
Duluth Complex
15
Initial Conditions
• The most critical part of analyzing and understanding
magmatic processes involves a clear and concise knowledge
of the nature of the system at the outset: when it all began !!
• The initial magmatic conditions that we think about include:
The geometry of the system;
The composition and initial state of crystallinity of the
magma;
The sequence of emplacement of the magma; and
The location of channelized magma flow and its resultant
variable ores.
16
Initial Conditions, SKI
• What was the initial geometry of SKI magmas?
– Granitoid and/or locally sedimentary footwall
– Anorthosite hangingwall
– Sill-like bodies that intruded horizontally via the NLM
• What were the initial conditions of the magma?
– Troctolitic composition silicate melts (essentially Basalt)
– Phenocrysts of olivine and plagioclase (a crystal-liquid slurry)
– Initially sulfur super-saturated melts
• Therefore, contained sulfide droplets
• Sulfide droplets enriched in metals
1717
18
SKI Plagioclase Phenocryst
19
Heterogeneous Troctolite
20
Heterogeneous Troctolite
Textures of SKI Rocks & Ores
Back to 1st Principals
2121
22
Detailed Geology & Cross Sections
22
23
Maturi Cross Sections: East
24
Maturi Cross Sections: West
Cross Section Interpretations
We must go back to the
INITIAL CONDITIONS of the system.
The magma intruded as a sub-horizontal sill
Therefore one must rotate sections back ~24
o
to the horizontal!
25
Now We Can Interpret The Facts
… and understand magma channelization and its effects on
ore types and their associated grades & tonnages
26
Maturi Ore Deposit Model, circa 2009
27
Eastern High-Grade PGE Zone
28
29
Now in 2013, Prefeasibility Drill Holes
The 2013 Maturi Stratigraphy & Model
30
The goal is to best model the
Maturi Deposit based on all
available geological evidence.
The goal is to best model the
Maturi Deposit based on all
available geological evidence.
Intrusive History Model
31
Stage 1
Barren
Stage 2
Lower Grade
Stage 3
Higher Grade
Stage 1
Barren
Stage 2
Lower Grade
Stage 3
Higher Grade
Principal Component Analysis
32
Sulfide
Mineralization
Interstitial
Oxide-Augite
Footwall
Contamination
Mineralogical Control on Ores
33
There clearly are Geometallurgical implications of the new Geological Model
Stage 3 Mineralized Zones Stage 2 Mineralized Zones
Hole by Hole Interpretation
34
35
@0.5% Cu cut-off
From (ft.) To (ft.) Length (ft.) Cu (wt%) Ni (wt%) Au (ppm) Pt (ppm) Pd (ppm) Ag (ppm)
4032 4192 160 0.81 0.25 0.14 0.31 0.75 3.15
Distinct Stage 3 Magma Lobes
Lobe 3
Lobe 2
Lobe 1
Stage 1: Thickness of the Zone
36
Stage 2, Thickness of the Zone
37
Stage 3, Thickness of the Zone
38
39
Maturi, Stage 3 Block Model
40
1 Kilometer
Maturi Stage 3 Block Model, Copper
41
1 Kilometer
Maturi Stage 3 Block Model, Nickel
42
1 Kilometer
Maturi Stage 3 Block Model, Pt+Pd+Au
43
Maturi Indicated Mineral Resources
Cu Cutoff Tons Cu Ni Pt Pd Au
(%) (Mt) (%) (%) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm)
0.2 1,137 0.57 0.18 0.151 0.343 0.081
0.3 1,065 0.59 0.19 0.157 0.356 0.085
0.4 936 0.63 0.20 0.167 0.379 0.090
0.5 739 0.67 0.21 0.185 0.419 0.099
0.6 538 0.72 0.23 0.200 0.454 0.107
Maturi Inferred Mineral Resources
Cu Cutoff Tons Cu Ni Pt Pd Au
(%) (Mt) (%) (%) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm)
0.2 782 0.43 0.14 0.118 0.266 0.060
0.3 542 0.51 0.17 0.140 0.320 0.072
0.4 383 0.57 0.19 0.164 0.375 0.083
0.5 256 0.63 0.20 0.197 0.443 0.098
0.6 141 0.70 0.22 0.237 0.531 0.116
Maturi Deposit, NI 43-101 Resources
44
Maturi Stage 3 Indicated Mineral Resources Maturi Stage 2 Indicated Mineral Resources
Cu Cutoff Tons Cu Ni Pt Pd Au Cu Cutoff Tons Cu Ni Pt Pd Au
(%) (Mt) (%) (%) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (%) (Mt) (%) (%) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm)
0.2 643 0.68 0.22 0.198 0.449 0.105 0.2 440 0.45 0.14 0.092 0.210 0.053
0.3 643 0.68 0.22 0.198 0.449 0.105 0.3 405 0.46 0.15 0.094 0.215 0.054
0.4 641 0.68 0.22 0.198 0.449 0.105 0.4 292 0.50 0.16 0.100 0.228 0.058
0.5 622 0.69 0.22 0.199 0.451 0.106 0.5 117 0.58 0.18 0.111 0.253 0.065
0.6 500 0.72 0.23 0.206 0.468 0.109 0.6 38 0.67 0.20 0.119 0.276 0.071
Maturi Stage 3 Inferred Mineral Resources Maturi Stage 2 Inferred Mineral Resources
Cu Cutoff Tons Cu Ni Pt Pd Au Cu Cutoff Tons Cu Ni Pt Pd Au
(%) (Mt) (%) (%) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (%) (Mt) (%) (%) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm)
0.2 234 0.62 0.20 0.206 0.464 0.100 0.2 240 0.41 0.14 0.084 0.200 0.049
0.3 232 0.62 0.20 0.208 0.466 0.101 0.3 199 0.44 0.15 0.087 0.210 0.052
0.4 225 0.63 0.20 0.210 0.472 0.102 0.4 127 0.49 0.16 0.095 0.228 0.057
0.5 198 0.65 0.21 0.222 0.495 0.107 0.5 50 0.56 0.18 0.105 0.252 0.064
0.6 129 0.70 0.22 0.248 0.554 0.120 0.6 11 0.64 0.20 0.115 0.277 0.070
Maturi Deposit, NI 43-101 Resources
45
The Duluth Metals Success Story
We had an intuitive geologic thought in 2006
east of the Maturi gossan and it seems to have
some legs via our recent resource estimate….
We had an intuitive geologic thought in 2006
east of the Maturi gossan and it seems to have
some legs via our recent resource estimate….
46
Thank You

More Related Content

What's hot

Murchison Minerals Corporate Presentation - 2022
Murchison Minerals Corporate Presentation - 2022Murchison Minerals Corporate Presentation - 2022
Murchison Minerals Corporate Presentation - 2022CHF Investor Relations
 
Nan maniitsoq 3 feb 2012 toronto compressed
Nan maniitsoq 3 feb 2012 toronto compressedNan maniitsoq 3 feb 2012 toronto compressed
Nan maniitsoq 3 feb 2012 toronto compressedVMS Ventures
 
News Release: Commerce Resources Corp. Intersects 19.71% TREO Over 0.82m at ...
News Release:  Commerce Resources Corp. Intersects 19.71% TREO Over 0.82m at ...News Release:  Commerce Resources Corp. Intersects 19.71% TREO Over 0.82m at ...
News Release: Commerce Resources Corp. Intersects 19.71% TREO Over 0.82m at ...Commerce Resources Corp. (TSXv:CCE)
 
Enduro Metals- Mines-and-Money-2021 - Corporate Presentation
Enduro Metals-  Mines-and-Money-2021 - Corporate PresentationEnduro Metals-  Mines-and-Money-2021 - Corporate Presentation
Enduro Metals- Mines-and-Money-2021 - Corporate PresentationMomentumPR
 
Millrock Resources - Corporate Presentation - March 2014
Millrock Resources - Corporate Presentation - March 2014Millrock Resources - Corporate Presentation - March 2014
Millrock Resources - Corporate Presentation - March 2014Millrock Resources
 
VMS Corporate Presentation July 2015
VMS Corporate Presentation July 2015VMS Corporate Presentation July 2015
VMS Corporate Presentation July 2015VMS Ventures
 

What's hot (10)

Murchison Minerals Corporate Presentation - 2022
Murchison Minerals Corporate Presentation - 2022Murchison Minerals Corporate Presentation - 2022
Murchison Minerals Corporate Presentation - 2022
 
New york 2013 final
New york 2013 finalNew york 2013 final
New york 2013 final
 
Nan maniitsoq 3 feb 2012 toronto compressed
Nan maniitsoq 3 feb 2012 toronto compressedNan maniitsoq 3 feb 2012 toronto compressed
Nan maniitsoq 3 feb 2012 toronto compressed
 
Corporate Presentation
Corporate PresentationCorporate Presentation
Corporate Presentation
 
IMPACT Silver Corp. Presentation
IMPACT Silver Corp. PresentationIMPACT Silver Corp. Presentation
IMPACT Silver Corp. Presentation
 
News Release: Commerce Resources Corp. Intersects 19.71% TREO Over 0.82m at ...
News Release:  Commerce Resources Corp. Intersects 19.71% TREO Over 0.82m at ...News Release:  Commerce Resources Corp. Intersects 19.71% TREO Over 0.82m at ...
News Release: Commerce Resources Corp. Intersects 19.71% TREO Over 0.82m at ...
 
Enduro Metals- Mines-and-Money-2021 - Corporate Presentation
Enduro Metals-  Mines-and-Money-2021 - Corporate PresentationEnduro Metals-  Mines-and-Money-2021 - Corporate Presentation
Enduro Metals- Mines-and-Money-2021 - Corporate Presentation
 
Millrock Resources - Corporate Presentation - March 2014
Millrock Resources - Corporate Presentation - March 2014Millrock Resources - Corporate Presentation - March 2014
Millrock Resources - Corporate Presentation - March 2014
 
VMS Corporate Presentation July 2015
VMS Corporate Presentation July 2015VMS Corporate Presentation July 2015
VMS Corporate Presentation July 2015
 
Corporate Presentation January 2011
Corporate Presentation January 2011Corporate Presentation January 2011
Corporate Presentation January 2011
 

Similar to Peterson_PDAC_Ni-Cu-PGE_Shortcourse_March2013_b

140724 rab sample short diff font
140724 rab sample short diff font140724 rab sample short diff font
140724 rab sample short diff fontsparky263
 
GRG.v copper projects
GRG.v copper projectsGRG.v copper projects
GRG.v copper projectsShawn Perger
 
Fabled Silver Gold September 2020 Presentation
Fabled Silver Gold September 2020 PresentationFabled Silver Gold September 2020 Presentation
Fabled Silver Gold September 2020 PresentationAdnet Communications
 
Reservoir Minerals Presentation - March 2016
Reservoir Minerals Presentation - March 2016Reservoir Minerals Presentation - March 2016
Reservoir Minerals Presentation - March 2016reservoirminerals
 
Reservoir Minerals Presentation - March 2016
Reservoir Minerals Presentation - March 2016Reservoir Minerals Presentation - March 2016
Reservoir Minerals Presentation - March 2016reservoirminerals
 
150918 corporate presentation
150918 corporate presentation150918 corporate presentation
150918 corporate presentationreservoirminerals
 
FMEL PowerPoint Presentation
FMEL PowerPoint PresentationFMEL PowerPoint Presentation
FMEL PowerPoint PresentationFMELFMEL
 
150928 corporate presentation
150928 corporate presentation150928 corporate presentation
150928 corporate presentationreservoirminerals
 
Lion One Metals Presentation Oct 2018
Lion One Metals Presentation Oct 2018Lion One Metals Presentation Oct 2018
Lion One Metals Presentation Oct 2018Joe Gray
 
150825 corporate presentation
150825 corporate presentation150825 corporate presentation
150825 corporate presentationreservoirminerals
 
Lion One Metals August 2018 Presentation
Lion One Metals August 2018 PresentationLion One Metals August 2018 Presentation
Lion One Metals August 2018 PresentationJoe Gray
 
Lion One Metals Presenation Oct 2018
Lion One Metals Presenation Oct 2018 Lion One Metals Presenation Oct 2018
Lion One Metals Presenation Oct 2018 Joe Gray
 
Reservoir Minerals Corporate Presentation 2015
Reservoir Minerals Corporate Presentation 2015Reservoir Minerals Corporate Presentation 2015
Reservoir Minerals Corporate Presentation 2015reservoirminerals
 
Thesis Gold October 2021 Investor Deck
Thesis Gold October 2021 Investor DeckThesis Gold October 2021 Investor Deck
Thesis Gold October 2021 Investor DeckThe Howard Group Inc.
 
Plateau Energy Metals Corp Presentation (July 2019)
Plateau Energy Metals Corp Presentation (July 2019)Plateau Energy Metals Corp Presentation (July 2019)
Plateau Energy Metals Corp Presentation (July 2019)Bianca Pisciola
 
Managing Directors Presentation 2011 AGM
Managing Directors Presentation 2011 AGMManaging Directors Presentation 2011 AGM
Managing Directors Presentation 2011 AGMMinotaur Exploration
 
Lion One Metals Presentation Jan 2019
Lion One Metals Presentation Jan 2019Lion One Metals Presentation Jan 2019
Lion One Metals Presentation Jan 2019Joe Gray
 

Similar to Peterson_PDAC_Ni-Cu-PGE_Shortcourse_March2013_b (20)

140724 rab sample short diff font
140724 rab sample short diff font140724 rab sample short diff font
140724 rab sample short diff font
 
GRG.v copper projects
GRG.v copper projectsGRG.v copper projects
GRG.v copper projects
 
160111 corp presentation
160111 corp presentation160111 corp presentation
160111 corp presentation
 
Fabled Silver Gold September 2020 Presentation
Fabled Silver Gold September 2020 PresentationFabled Silver Gold September 2020 Presentation
Fabled Silver Gold September 2020 Presentation
 
Reservoir Minerals Presentation - March 2016
Reservoir Minerals Presentation - March 2016Reservoir Minerals Presentation - March 2016
Reservoir Minerals Presentation - March 2016
 
Reservoir Minerals Presentation - March 2016
Reservoir Minerals Presentation - March 2016Reservoir Minerals Presentation - March 2016
Reservoir Minerals Presentation - March 2016
 
150918 corporate presentation
150918 corporate presentation150918 corporate presentation
150918 corporate presentation
 
FMEL PowerPoint Presentation
FMEL PowerPoint PresentationFMEL PowerPoint Presentation
FMEL PowerPoint Presentation
 
Presentation
PresentationPresentation
Presentation
 
150928 corporate presentation
150928 corporate presentation150928 corporate presentation
150928 corporate presentation
 
Impact Silver Presentation
Impact Silver PresentationImpact Silver Presentation
Impact Silver Presentation
 
Lion One Metals Presentation Oct 2018
Lion One Metals Presentation Oct 2018Lion One Metals Presentation Oct 2018
Lion One Metals Presentation Oct 2018
 
150825 corporate presentation
150825 corporate presentation150825 corporate presentation
150825 corporate presentation
 
Lion One Metals August 2018 Presentation
Lion One Metals August 2018 PresentationLion One Metals August 2018 Presentation
Lion One Metals August 2018 Presentation
 
Lion One Metals Presenation Oct 2018
Lion One Metals Presenation Oct 2018 Lion One Metals Presenation Oct 2018
Lion One Metals Presenation Oct 2018
 
Reservoir Minerals Corporate Presentation 2015
Reservoir Minerals Corporate Presentation 2015Reservoir Minerals Corporate Presentation 2015
Reservoir Minerals Corporate Presentation 2015
 
Thesis Gold October 2021 Investor Deck
Thesis Gold October 2021 Investor DeckThesis Gold October 2021 Investor Deck
Thesis Gold October 2021 Investor Deck
 
Plateau Energy Metals Corp Presentation (July 2019)
Plateau Energy Metals Corp Presentation (July 2019)Plateau Energy Metals Corp Presentation (July 2019)
Plateau Energy Metals Corp Presentation (July 2019)
 
Managing Directors Presentation 2011 AGM
Managing Directors Presentation 2011 AGMManaging Directors Presentation 2011 AGM
Managing Directors Presentation 2011 AGM
 
Lion One Metals Presentation Jan 2019
Lion One Metals Presentation Jan 2019Lion One Metals Presentation Jan 2019
Lion One Metals Presentation Jan 2019
 

Peterson_PDAC_Ni-Cu-PGE_Shortcourse_March2013_b

  • 1. Geology and Cu-Ni-PGE mineralization in the South Kawishiwi Intrusion, Duluth Complex, Minnesota Dean M. Peterson Senior Vice President, Exploration
  • 2. May 5, 2009 2 Forward Looking Statement No regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained in this presentation. This presentation includes certain statements that may be deemed “forward looking statements”. All statements in this presentation, other than statement of historical facts, that address future production, reserve potential, exploration drilling, exploitation activities and events or developments that the Company expects are forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially form those in the forward-looking statements include market prices, exploitation and exploration successes, continued availability of capital and financing, general economic, market or business conditions. Investors should be cautious that any such statements are not guarantees of future performance and that actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. The company does not undertake to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, save and except as may be required by applicable securities laws. No regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained in this presentation. This presentation includes certain statements that may be deemed “forward looking statements”. All statements in this presentation, other than statement of historical facts, that address future production, reserve potential, exploration drilling, exploitation activities and events or developments that the Company expects are forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially form those in the forward-looking statements include market prices, exploitation and exploration successes, continued availability of capital and financing, general economic, market or business conditions. Investors should be cautious that any such statements are not guarantees of future performance and that actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. The company does not undertake to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, save and except as may be required by applicable securities laws.
  • 3. Outline 3 • Regional Geology • South Kawishiwi Intrusion • Crystal-rich Slurries • Thinking Outside the Gossan • Details on the Maturi Cu-Ni-PGE Deposit
  • 4. Size Comparison of Camps/Deposits 44
  • 5. Mid-Continent Mantle Plume The 1.1 billion year old Mid Continent Rift mantle plume was centered on Lake Superior 5
  • 6. Mineral System Approach 6 The mineral system approach to exploration attempts to understand ore deposits as the final expression of multi-scale systems encompassing the Earth that focus mass and transfer energy to ultimately form ore deposits. This approach to mineral exploration leads to systematic, scale- dependent targeting models and allows for the recognition of the largest-scale footprints of ore-forming systems.
  • 7. Bedrock Geology, NE Minnesota 7 Virginia Fm. Sulfur source
  • 9. The Reason Why is Physical Process? Mantle melts become sulfur-saturated when they first encounter bedded rocks in their 140 km rise from the mantle, the sulfidic Virginia Fm. 9 Sulfide-bearing crystal-rich magmas intrude upwards Sulfide-free crystal-bearing magmas intrude upwards 9
  • 11. Tectonics & Horizontal Magma Injection 11
  • 12. Exotic Inclusions in the NLM It is physically impossible for the NLM to carry very large, high density exotic xenoliths from great depths to their present position at troctolite liquid viscosities. The magma must have been more viscous (ie., a crystal-liquid slurry) Nonmagnetic Basalt Biwabik Iron Fm. 1212
  • 13. Regional Magmatic Flow Model 1. Magma ascends through a mantle feeder dike 2. Sulfide saturation occurs while magma incorporates sedimentary rocks (Virginia Fm sulfidic argillites) 3. Rift-parallel faulting opens a sub-horizontal space (NLM) that magma traverses to the SW along 4. Subhorizontal sill intersects an active transform fault and magma sills out (to NNW) to form the Spruce Road Deposit 5. Continued flow lifts the hangingwall Anorthosite as sill-like magma fingers traverse to the WSW 6. Much Later – The Bald Eagle Intrusion intrudes in a “Trap Door” fashion structurally higher than the SKI Idealized Magma Flow Model Figures from Peterson, 2008 13
  • 15. A Fundamental Tenet: Describing Rocks DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS We attempt to interpret the magmatic history and processes that formed the mafic intrusions of the Duluth Complex 15
  • 16. Initial Conditions • The most critical part of analyzing and understanding magmatic processes involves a clear and concise knowledge of the nature of the system at the outset: when it all began !! • The initial magmatic conditions that we think about include: The geometry of the system; The composition and initial state of crystallinity of the magma; The sequence of emplacement of the magma; and The location of channelized magma flow and its resultant variable ores. 16
  • 17. Initial Conditions, SKI • What was the initial geometry of SKI magmas? – Granitoid and/or locally sedimentary footwall – Anorthosite hangingwall – Sill-like bodies that intruded horizontally via the NLM • What were the initial conditions of the magma? – Troctolitic composition silicate melts (essentially Basalt) – Phenocrysts of olivine and plagioclase (a crystal-liquid slurry) – Initially sulfur super-saturated melts • Therefore, contained sulfide droplets • Sulfide droplets enriched in metals 1717
  • 21. Textures of SKI Rocks & Ores Back to 1st Principals 2121
  • 22. 22 Detailed Geology & Cross Sections 22
  • 25. Cross Section Interpretations We must go back to the INITIAL CONDITIONS of the system. The magma intruded as a sub-horizontal sill Therefore one must rotate sections back ~24 o to the horizontal! 25
  • 26. Now We Can Interpret The Facts … and understand magma channelization and its effects on ore types and their associated grades & tonnages 26
  • 27. Maturi Ore Deposit Model, circa 2009 27
  • 29. 29 Now in 2013, Prefeasibility Drill Holes
  • 30. The 2013 Maturi Stratigraphy & Model 30 The goal is to best model the Maturi Deposit based on all available geological evidence. The goal is to best model the Maturi Deposit based on all available geological evidence.
  • 31. Intrusive History Model 31 Stage 1 Barren Stage 2 Lower Grade Stage 3 Higher Grade Stage 1 Barren Stage 2 Lower Grade Stage 3 Higher Grade
  • 33. Mineralogical Control on Ores 33 There clearly are Geometallurgical implications of the new Geological Model Stage 3 Mineralized Zones Stage 2 Mineralized Zones
  • 34. Hole by Hole Interpretation 34
  • 35. 35 @0.5% Cu cut-off From (ft.) To (ft.) Length (ft.) Cu (wt%) Ni (wt%) Au (ppm) Pt (ppm) Pd (ppm) Ag (ppm) 4032 4192 160 0.81 0.25 0.14 0.31 0.75 3.15 Distinct Stage 3 Magma Lobes Lobe 3 Lobe 2 Lobe 1
  • 36. Stage 1: Thickness of the Zone 36
  • 37. Stage 2, Thickness of the Zone 37
  • 38. Stage 3, Thickness of the Zone 38
  • 39. 39 Maturi, Stage 3 Block Model
  • 40. 40 1 Kilometer Maturi Stage 3 Block Model, Copper
  • 41. 41 1 Kilometer Maturi Stage 3 Block Model, Nickel
  • 42. 42 1 Kilometer Maturi Stage 3 Block Model, Pt+Pd+Au
  • 43. 43 Maturi Indicated Mineral Resources Cu Cutoff Tons Cu Ni Pt Pd Au (%) (Mt) (%) (%) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 0.2 1,137 0.57 0.18 0.151 0.343 0.081 0.3 1,065 0.59 0.19 0.157 0.356 0.085 0.4 936 0.63 0.20 0.167 0.379 0.090 0.5 739 0.67 0.21 0.185 0.419 0.099 0.6 538 0.72 0.23 0.200 0.454 0.107 Maturi Inferred Mineral Resources Cu Cutoff Tons Cu Ni Pt Pd Au (%) (Mt) (%) (%) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 0.2 782 0.43 0.14 0.118 0.266 0.060 0.3 542 0.51 0.17 0.140 0.320 0.072 0.4 383 0.57 0.19 0.164 0.375 0.083 0.5 256 0.63 0.20 0.197 0.443 0.098 0.6 141 0.70 0.22 0.237 0.531 0.116 Maturi Deposit, NI 43-101 Resources
  • 44. 44 Maturi Stage 3 Indicated Mineral Resources Maturi Stage 2 Indicated Mineral Resources Cu Cutoff Tons Cu Ni Pt Pd Au Cu Cutoff Tons Cu Ni Pt Pd Au (%) (Mt) (%) (%) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (%) (Mt) (%) (%) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 0.2 643 0.68 0.22 0.198 0.449 0.105 0.2 440 0.45 0.14 0.092 0.210 0.053 0.3 643 0.68 0.22 0.198 0.449 0.105 0.3 405 0.46 0.15 0.094 0.215 0.054 0.4 641 0.68 0.22 0.198 0.449 0.105 0.4 292 0.50 0.16 0.100 0.228 0.058 0.5 622 0.69 0.22 0.199 0.451 0.106 0.5 117 0.58 0.18 0.111 0.253 0.065 0.6 500 0.72 0.23 0.206 0.468 0.109 0.6 38 0.67 0.20 0.119 0.276 0.071 Maturi Stage 3 Inferred Mineral Resources Maturi Stage 2 Inferred Mineral Resources Cu Cutoff Tons Cu Ni Pt Pd Au Cu Cutoff Tons Cu Ni Pt Pd Au (%) (Mt) (%) (%) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (%) (Mt) (%) (%) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) 0.2 234 0.62 0.20 0.206 0.464 0.100 0.2 240 0.41 0.14 0.084 0.200 0.049 0.3 232 0.62 0.20 0.208 0.466 0.101 0.3 199 0.44 0.15 0.087 0.210 0.052 0.4 225 0.63 0.20 0.210 0.472 0.102 0.4 127 0.49 0.16 0.095 0.228 0.057 0.5 198 0.65 0.21 0.222 0.495 0.107 0.5 50 0.56 0.18 0.105 0.252 0.064 0.6 129 0.70 0.22 0.248 0.554 0.120 0.6 11 0.64 0.20 0.115 0.277 0.070 Maturi Deposit, NI 43-101 Resources
  • 45. 45 The Duluth Metals Success Story We had an intuitive geologic thought in 2006 east of the Maturi gossan and it seems to have some legs via our recent resource estimate…. We had an intuitive geologic thought in 2006 east of the Maturi gossan and it seems to have some legs via our recent resource estimate….