8. Swine Deltacoronavirus (SDCoV)
• Non-PED coronavirus
– Clinical signs similar to PED and TGE
– 40% PWM for 2-3 weeks
• Described in Hong Kong - 2012
• First case - June 5, 2013
• Diagnostic capabilities
– SDCv PCR
– No serological testing
8
ADDL
11. Porcine Deltacoronavirus Bioassay
• Nine - 14 day old piglets
– Inoculated with PDCoV from field samples
• Euthanized on:
– Day 2 post-infection (PI)
– Day 4 PI
– Day 6 PI
• Showed no evidence of enterocyte infection
• Negative for PDCoV by RT-PCR
11
University of Minnesota
12. Porcine Deltacoronavirus
Retrospective analysis
• 30% positive rate on cases
• Co-infection (PEDv, TGEv, RVA, RVB, RVC)
– 78% positive for PEDv, RVA, RVB, and/or RVC
– RVC positive >50% of the samples
• 4 complete genomes
– US isolates - 99.8% similar
– Chinese strain - 98.9% - 99.2% similar
12
University of Minnesota
13. Outbreak Management
13
Day 0
• Wean down in age
• Begin oral live virus exposure
• +/- oral progestins
Day 1-5
• Aggressive oral live exposure
Day 6-
14
• Euthanize all piglets born
• SANITATION
28. Conditional Vaccine License
Harrisvaccines, Inc
• June 16, 2014 approval
• Qualifications:
– Safety
– Purity
– Reasonable expectation of efficacy
• Long term – Modified Live Vaccine
28
29. PRRS and PEDv Site Classification
Guidelines
31
PEDv Site Classification
I Infected and Shedding
II Stable, Weaned pigs are negative for PEDv
III Provisionally Negative
IV Negative
PRRS Site Classification
1 Positive Unstable
2v Positive stable, Ongoing exposure
2 Positive Stable
3 Provisionally Negative
4 ELISA Negative
31. What do we need to learn?
• Epidemiology
– Watch Canada
• Have they identified a key transmission route?
• Feed risk
– Origin of viral introduction to the US
• Herd stability/eradication
– Poor immune response or viral load?
– Vaccine development
36
32. Canadian PEDv
37
62 cases in Ontario
Accessed on 06/16/2014. http://www.ontariopork.on.ca/ped/ComfirmedCases.aspx
34. PEDv – Late Finishing Infection
• Looseness observed 2 days prior to ADFI drop
– 7 lb/day prior to break
– 2 lb/day at peak - ~80% reduction 2-3 days
• ADG
– Reduced 31% Day 0-7 post infection
• F/G
– No significant difference
39
35. PEDv – Late Finishing Infection
40
Water Intake
– Depressed for 7 days
36. One positive trailer in means 1.7
positive trailers at exit
Plant
Contaminated
at entry
Contaminated
at Plant
Contamination
Ratio
A 2.25% 8.05% 3.58
B 7.00% 4.30% 0.61
C 10.84% 10.81% 1.00
D 2.00% 0.00% 0.00
E 14.56% 3.08% 0.62
G 3.00% 1.03% 0.34
All 5.98% 4.31% 0.72
38. Biosafety of Spray Dried Plasma
Relative to PEDv
1. PEDv does not survive spray-drying
2. Experimentally inoculated spray-dried plasma loses infectivity by 7
days when stored at room temperature
3. Retained samples from Canadian lot of spray-dried porcine
plasma and 2 other samples of PCR positive commercial spray-
dried porcine plasma did not contain infective PED virus
1. FDA acquired samples of the specific lot were negative on bioassay
4. Weaned pigs fed a diet with 5% PCR positive spray-dried plasma
for 14 days post weaning remained PEDv negative for the 21 day
feeding period
43
APC Tech Brief – April, 2014
39. Biosafety of Spray Dried Plasma
• Additional Questions
– Is the lab simulation of spray drying similar to the
actual process?
– What is the sensitivity of the bioassay?
– Does the lab strain of PEDv have the same
survivability to the field strain?
– Do all spray dry plants use the same processing
parameters?
– What is the variation in the plasma production
process?
– What are the QA/QC procedures involved?
44
40. Working Group
Focusing on research, control, and contamination – 4 Priorities:
• To investigate the effectiveness and cost of treatments that
could be used to mitigate the survival of PEDV and other
viruses in feeds
• To conduct contamination risk assessments at all steps within
the feed processing and delivery chain
• To develop a substitute for the currently used swine bioassay
procedures
• To continue to investigate the risk of feed and other pathways
for pathogen entry into the U.S.
45
Editor's Notes
function of exposure compared to immunity.
In this case the immunity is maternally derived so a simple algorithm
Four primary causes:
poor colostrum uptake,
poor quality colostrum,
poor between group hygiene and
high level of dam shedding.
When I look critically at farms with diarrhea often there are problems in all four areas that are due to lack of implementation and not lack of a bottle (vaccine or drug).
It is management not medicine that we need to focus on in almost every case.