This document discusses pancreatic neoplasms and their imaging appearance. It provides details on the WHO classification and imaging protocols for evaluating pancreatic cancers. Key points include descriptions of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and its appearance on CT/MRI, as well as other pancreatic masses like serous cystadenoma, mucinous cystic neoplasm, and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. Differential diagnoses and imaging features that predict malignancy are also reviewed.
4. PANCREAS-SPECIFIC PROTOCOL FOR
PANCREATIC CANCER
4
Thin-section, multi-phase technique with
Pre-contrast images and
Early arterial phase (CT angiography phase) images of the aorta and the superior
mesenteric artery (17-25 s after the start of contrast injection),
Pancreatic phase (35-50 s after the start of contrast injection), and
Portal venous phase images (55-70 s after the start of contrast injection).
Pancreatic phase images show peak pancreatic parenchymal enhancement, and therefore
provide the best lesion to pancreas contrast.
Portal phase images are helpful to assess the extent of venous involvement and to identify
possible liver metastases.
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
5. POST PROCESSING
◈ Oblique coronal or sagittal MPR and CMPR along the
pancreatic duct can clearly demonstrate the relationship between
tumors and the pancreatic duct or adjacent major structures.
◈ MinIP images use the lowest density values along each ray and
clearly show low-density structures such as pancreatic and bile
ducts. The recommended MinIP slab thickness is 3 mm for the
pancreatic duct.
◈ Maximum intensity projections are also often used to evaluate
the relationship between tumors and adjacent, enhanced vessels
5
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
6. PANCREATIC DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA
◈ Malignancy arising from ductal epithelium of exocrine pancreas.
◈ > 95% of pancreatic malignancies
◈ Age: Median age at onset - 71 years, Almost always after age 45, Peak:
7th-8th decade
◈ M:F = 1.3 : 1
◈ RISK FACTORS: Family history, Cigarette smoking, alcohol, obesity,
diabetes mellitus, Chronic pancreatitis, high fat diet.
◈ ASSOCIATIONS: Hereditary pancreatitis, hereditary breast and ovarian
cancer syndrome, Peutz-Jeghers, ataxia telangiectasia, familial colon
cancer, Gardner syndrome, and familial aggregation of pancreatic cancer.
6
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
7. PANCREATIC DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA
SYMPTOMS:
◈ Jaundice, severe weight loss, epigastric pain radiating to back,
◈ Asymptomatic – body and tail tumours
◈ Trosseau syndrome (migratory thrombophlebitis) due to tumour
induced hypercoagulability
◈ Bleeding varices – result from SMV or splenic vein occlusion
LAB:
Elevated tumour markers – CA 19-9 (Most important), CEA, CA 242.
CA 19-9: Normal range 0-37 U/ml, >37 U/ml is considered abnormal. 7
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
8. PANCREATIC DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA
IMAGING FINDINGS
◈ Head (60%), body (20%), diffuse (15%),
tail (5%)
◈ Average size 2-3 cm
◈ Poorly marginated, hypodense mass
with tendency to infiltrate posteriorly into
retroperitoneum
◈ Tumor enhance poorly most
conspicuous in portal venous (~ 70
seconds) and pancreatic (~ 40 seconds)
contrast phases
◈ Tumor virtually never calcifies in
absence of treatment. 8
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
9. PANCREATIC DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA
IMAGING FINDINGS
5% of tumors isodense to pancreas on all
phases, requiring attention to secondary signs
of tumor
◈ SECONDARY SIGNS
-Strong tendency to obstruct pancreatic and
common bile ducts with abrupt ductal cutoff at
site of obstruction
-Abnormal contour of pancreas with loss of
normal fatty lobulation and texture
-Pancreatic parenchymal atrophy upstream from
mass
-Soft tissue infiltration to involve adjacent
vessels and organs e.g., duodenum, bowel,
stomach, and adrenals 9
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
10. PANCREATIC DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA
IMAGING FINDINGS - MRI
◈ Tumor conspicuous on T1WI, appearing low signal and juxtaposed against high
signal pancreatic parenchyma.
◈ Atrophic pancreas upstream from tumor often abnormally low signal on T1WI
◈ Conspicuity on T1WI C+
◈ T2WI generally not useful for tumor detection, as tumors often isointense to
pancreas
◈ MRCP and T2WI can nicely demonstrate abrupt cutoff and obstruction of
pancreatic and common bile ducts
◈ Tumors often demonstrate restricted diffusion with lower ADC values than
adjacent normal pancreas.
◈ MR generally 2nd choice (behind CT) for evaluating vascular involvement. 10
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
14. PANCREATIC DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA
IMAGING FINDINGS
◈ ULTRASOUND
-Hypoechoic mass
with only minimal
internal color
Doppler flow
vascularity
- Biliary dilatation
and pancreatic
ductal dilatation
upstream from
tumor
◈ BARIUM UPPER GI
STUDY
-Frostberg 3 sign: Inverted
3 contour to medial part of
duodenal sweep
-Widening of c-loop of
duodenum
-Antral padding: Extrinsic
indentation by tumour of PI
margin of antrum
◈ ERCP
- “Double duct sign”
Obstruction of MPD
and CBD at same
level
- Abrupt cut off
- Irregular, nodular,
rat-tailed ducts
14
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
16. ROLE OF PET
◈ Not effective for
diagnosis of primary
tumour
◈ Not helpful to assess
vascular invasion or
locoregional staging
◈ Ductal ca vs benign
lesions
◈ Ductal Ca vs AIP
◈ Judging response to
treatment
◈ Post treatment fibrosis vs
residual tumour
◈ Useful for Distant staging
16
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
18. MD ANDERSON CRITERIA FOR DETERMINATION OF
LOCOREGIONAL RESECTABILITY
18
RESECTABLE
Local LN
immediately
around tumour
No distant LN/
Mets/ Vascular
involvement
BORDERLINE
RESECTABLE
< 180o
encasement of
SMA
Short segment
occlusion of
SMV/PV
UNRESECTABLE
Distant mets /
Bulky LN distant
from mass
Vascular
involvement
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
23. Only 15-20% of patients
are candidates for surgery
at time of presentation
5-year survival rate is ~
20% after surgery
Survival no better than
chemoradiation alone if
surgery performed for
tumor found to be locally
advanced.
5-year survival rate is <
5% without surgery with
median survival of 3.5
months
23
Presentation
Advanced local disease or
metastases (65%)
Tumour confined to
pancreas (14%)
Localized disease with
spread to regional lymph
nodes (21%)
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
24. PANCREATIC ADENOCARCINOMA - Rx
◈ Only potentially curative treatment for resectable tumor is complete surgical resection
with negative surgical margins (R0 resection)
◈ Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple resection) for tumors of pancreatic head/uncinate,
distal pancreatectomy for tumors of body/tail, and very rarely total pancreatectomy
◈ Chemotherapy and radiation (external beam) utilized for resectable, borderline, and
unresectable cancers
◈ Gemcitabine and FOLFIRINOX are chemotherapy mainstays.
◈ Neoadjuvant chemoradiation often utilized prior to surgery in borderline resectable
tumors
◈ Palliative procedures include endoscopic biliary stenting (for jaundice), enteric stents or
diverting gastrojejunostomy (for gastric/duodenal obstruction), and chemical
splanchnicectomy or celiac nerve block to palliate abdominal pain.
24
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
26. DIFFERENTIALS
Autoimmune
pancreatitis
-Delayed enhancement
-No upstream atrophy
-MPD dilatation not more
than 5 mm
-Penetrating duct sign
-sausage shaped with Halo
sign
-Extra pancreatic findings
-Improvement after steroid
therapy
Chronic
pancreatitis
Beaded duct
Ductal calculi
Parenchymal calcifications
Lymphoma
Almost never causes ductal
obstruction or atrophy
Disseminated disease
Lymphadenopathy
26
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
27. DIFFERENTIALS
Groove
pancreatitis
-Sheet-like, curvilinear
soft tissue mass
between pancreatic
head and duodenum
Distal CBD
CholangioCa
-CBD duct wall
thickening
-Delayed enhancement
-Intra-ductal mass
-MPD may not be
dilated
Ampullary
adenoma/Carcinoma
- Detected when small
- Extrahepatic ductal
dilatation
- Enhancement on both
art and venous
phases
27
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
28. SEROUS CYSTADENOMA
◈ 30% of pancreatic cystic
neoplasms.
◈ Females, median age 65 yrs
”Grandmother lesion”
◈ Benign lesion
◈ More common in pancreatic
head
◈ Growth rate = 4 mm /yr
◈ Imaging surveillance in
asymptomatic patients. 28
1. Microcystic or honeycomb pattern
2. Macrocystic or Oligocystic variant
(<10%) > 2 cm cysts. This variant is
difficult to distinguish from mucinous
cystic tumour.
3. “Solid” serous adenoma – enhancing
septa predominate.
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
30. SEROUS CYSTADENOMA - CT
◈ May appear solid on CT -
compact arrangement of cysts
◈ Fine external lobulations +
◈ Enhancement of septa/ cyst wall.
◈ Fibrous central scar + a
characteristic stellate calcification
is seen in 30% of cases –
pathognomonic
◈ Calcifications commonly
peripheral 30
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
31. SEROUS CYSTADENOMA - MRI
◈ T1WI: Cystic components
hypointense
◈ T2WI: Cystic components
hyperintense and fibrous
components/central scar
hypointense
◈ T1WI C+: Enhancement of
septations/lesion{periphery with
delayed enhancement of central
scar
31
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
32. SEROUS CYSTADENOMA
◈ Endoscopic US:
Aspiration of the cyst
contents revealed thin
fluid with no cellular
atypia or elevated tumor
markers.
32
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
35. Unillocular or multilocular
< 6 cysts
Relatively large cysts > 2 cms
Displacing MPD
MUCINOUS CYSTIC NEOPLASM
◈ Premalignant/malignant
◈ Tendency to occur in tail of
pancreas.
◈ Contains ovarian stroma
◈ “Mother” lesion – middle
aged females
◈ Complete surgical resection
with adjuvant chemotherapy
35
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
36. MUCINOUS CYSTIC NEOPLASM - IMAGING
◈ CT
Multilocular encapsulated
cyst
Peripheral curvilinear Ca++
(16%)
◈ MRI
Typically show high T2; low
T1, but may be slightly less
T2 hyperintense due to
mucin content. 36
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
39. INTRADUCTAL PAPILLARY
MUCINOUS NEOPLASM (IPMN)
◈ Mucin-producing papillary
tumor arising from
epithelium of main
pancreatic duct (MPD) or
duct side branches.
◈ Incidental finding
◈ Age 50-70 yrs, Male
◈ More common in familial
pancreatic cancer, PJ &
FAP
39
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
40. IPMN – IMAGING FEATURES
MAIN DUCT IPMN
-Markedly dilated,
tortuous MPD often
with bulging
ampulla filled with
fluid (mucin)
-Amorphous
calcifications may
be seen within duct
-Pancreas often
atrophic
SIDE BRANCH
IPMN
-Multifocality,
Multiple cystic
lesions scattered
throughout the
pancreas
-Comunication with
adjacent MPD is the
key to diagnosis
COMBINED IPMN
Cystic lesion in
contiguity with
dilated MPD
40
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
41. IPMN – IMAGING FEATURES
MAIN DUCT IPMN SIDE BRANCH IPMN
41
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
42. IPMN - MRI
◈ MRCP
Direct communication with main pancreatic duct easier to
identify on thin-section 3D MRCP images
◈ Secretin MRCP
Enlargement of cyst following administration of secretin may
be secondary sign of communication with main duct.
◈ ADC Map
Malignant IPMN may have lower ADC values on DWI
compared to benign IPMN. 42
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
43. IPMN – ERCP FEATURES
1. Direct visualization of
patulous, bulging, "fish-
mouth” ampulla with
mucin extruding through
ampulla in main duct
IPMN
2. Can demonstrate
dilatation of MPD or
communication of side
branch IPMN with MPD 43
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
44. IPMN WITH INVASIVE CARCINOMA
Worrisome features: EUS
with cyst aspiration
Cyst size ≥ 3 cm
MPD dilatation 5-9 mm
peripheral wall thickening
mural nodularity
abrupt change in MPD
caliber with upstream
pancreatic atrophy.
High-risk features:
warrants resection.
MPD dilatation ≥ 1 cm
Enhancing solid mural
nodularity, or biliary
obstruction
44
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
46. NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOURS OF PANCREAS
◈ Arising from pancreatic endocrine cells – APUD cells
◈ Age: 4th – 6th decades, MEN1: <30 yrs
◈ 85% arise in the pancreas while 15% ectopic (Duodenum,
stomach, lymph nodes & ovary)
◈ Functioning & Non functioning
◈ Now, Syndromic & Non syndromic
◈ Associations:
MEN 1 (Gastrinomas), VHL, NF 1 & Tuberous sclerosis
46
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
47. SYNDROMIC NET
①Produce clinical
syndrome
②Small < 3 cms
③Insulinoma,
glucagonoma,
gastrinoma,
somatostatinoma,
VIPoma (vasoactive
intestinal polypeptide),
carcinoid
NON SYNDROMIC NET
①Symptoms due to mas
effect, large at
presentation /metastases
②Much larger (> 5 cms)
with frequent
cystic/necrotic
degeneration.
③Strong tendency to be
malignant (80-100%)
④Cystic NETs more likely
to be non-insulin-
producing /nonsyndromic
47
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
48. INSULINOMA
①M.c. NET (50%)
②Solitary
③Benign(90%)
④F>M
⑤Whipple’s triad
-Hypoglycemia
-Low fasting glucose
-Relief by iv glucose
⑥Surgically resected
⑦Excellent prognosis
GASTRINOMA
①2nd M.c (25%)
②Multiple
③Malignant(60%)
④M>F
⑤Ass. with MEN 1
⑥“Passaro’s” Gastrinoma
triangle
⑦Zollinger ellison syn.
⑧Poor prognosis
48
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
49. SYNDROMIC NET - GLUCAGONOMA
◈ Skin rash(Necrolytic
erythema migrans)
◈ Diarrhoea
◈ Diabetes
◈ Weight loss
◈ Thromboembolism –
DVT & PE
49
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
50. NET – IMAGING FEATURES
CT
◈ Well circumscribed
◈ Non infiltrative margins
◈ Ca++ common
◈ Conspicuous on arterial
phase
◈ Invasion of PV /SMV
◈ No biliary or pancreatic
duct obstruction/atrophy 50
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
51. NET – IMAGING FEATURES
MRI
T1 Hypointense
T2 Hyperintense
Enhancement
similar to CECT
DWI help identify
tiny occult lesions
ULTRASOUND
Endoscopic – Hypo
to isoechoic
Increased
vascularity
Intra-op: help
identify small non-
palpable lesions
PET/CT
Increased FDG
uptake
Novel tracers:
Ga -68 DOTA
F-18 DOPA
Indium 111
DTPA
octreotide
(Octreoscan)
51
DSA
Hepatic venous
sampling after
arterial stimulation –
increased hormone
levels in occult
tumours
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
52. 52
Guo, Chuangen
et al. “Value of
diffusion-
weighted MRI
in predicting
WHO grade in
G1/G2
pancreatic
neuroendocrine
tumors.” Oncolo
gy letters vol.
13,6
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
53. 53
Barrio, Martin,
and Eugene P
Ceppa.
“Diagnosing
microscopic
pancreatic
neuroendocrine
tumor using 68-
Ga-DOTATATE
PET/CT: case
series.” Journal
of surgical case
reports vol.
2018,9 rjy237. 29
Sep. 2018.
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
56. PANCREATIC SOLID & PSEUDOPAPILLARY
NEOPLASM
◈ Rare slow growing, low grade
◈ < 35 years, >90 % females
◈ M. c. Abd pain
◈ Tumor markers not typically
elevated
◈ Anywhere in pancreas
◈ <10% metastasize or recur
◈ Excellent prognosis after
complete surgical resection 56
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
57. SPEN IMAGING
CT
◈ Well defined, encapsulated
mass with thick enhancing
capsule
◈ With cystic components and
internal haemorrhage
◈ Frequent central or peripheral
Ca++ (50%)
◈ No biliary or pancreatic ductal
obstruction
◈ Metastases/ vascular invasion -
rare 57
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
58. SPEN IMAGING
MRI
◈ Large, well-demarcated mass
with central areas of low and
high T1 signal intensity
(hemorrhage)
◈ Presence of internal
hemorrhage highly characteristic
feature, and may result in fluid-
fluid or hematocrit levels
◈ Capsule appears as rim of low
T2 signal intensity and
enhances on post-gadolinium
images
58
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
59. SPEN IMAGING
US
◈ Echogenic rim
of tumour
capsule
◈ Echogenic mass
with necrotic
centre (or)
◈ Completely
cystic with
subcapsular rim
of tumour
ANGIO
◈ Hypo to
avascular with
peripheral
displacement of
vessels
PET
◈ Variable, may
show increased
uptake
59
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
60. PANCREATIC LYMPHOMA
◈ Homogeneous soft tissue mass with little
enhancement
◈ Diffuse enlargement of pancreas with
infiltrating tumor (± peripancreatic fat
involvement) may mimic acute
pancreatitis
◈ Almost always associated
lymphadenopathy or other sites of
lymphomatous involvement
◈ Tumor classically encases peripancreatic
vessels without narrowing or occlusion
60
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
61. PANCREATIC METASTASES
May be solitary (73%), multiple (10%), or diffusely
infiltrative (15%)
Enhancement pattern is variable, but typically
mimics primary tumor
– Hypervascular: Most often renal cell cancer (RCC)
– Hypovascular: Lung, breast, melanoma, colon
Concomitant intraabdominal metastases in 60-95%,
Dilatation of pancreatic duct or bile ducts less
common than pancreatic adenocarcinoma (40%)
Encasement or narrowing of peripancreatic
vasculature is unusual 61
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
75. BULGING PAPILLA
1. IPMN
2. Papillitis
3. Ampullary adenoCa
4. Peri ampullary Ca
5. AIP
6. Choledochocele
75
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
76. PERI-AMPULLARY CA
Tumor arising within 2 cm of the
major papilla
I. Pancreatic carcinoma (85%)
2. Cholangiocarcinoma of distal
common bile duct (6%)
3. Ampullary tumor (4%):
adenoma I carcinoma
4. Duodenal wall tumor
adenocarcinoma, adenoma,
carcinoid, smooth muscle
tumor
DOUBLE DUCT SIGN
1. Ampullary tumor (most
common)
2. Pancreatic ductal
adenocarcinoma
3. Stone impacted in
ampulla of Vater
4. Papillary stenosis
76
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
77. PANCREATIC
NEOPLASMS WITH CA++
(a) Microcystic adenoma (in
33%): "sunburst" appearance of
calcifications
(b) Macrocystic cystadenoma In
15%): amorphous peripheral
calcifications
(c) NET
(d) Cavernous lymphangioma &
hemangioma: multiple
phleboliths
(D) Metastases from colon
cancer
DIFFUSELY ENLARGED
PANCREAS
1. Malignant Lymphoma
2. Plasmacytoma
3. Metastases
4. Diffuse infiltrative pancreatic
Ca
5. Autoimmune pancreatitis
77
Anu@StanleyRadiologyDept
4th leading cause of mortality
Incidence rate= mortality rate
5 yr survival rate < 5 %
CT sensitivity for pancreatic cancer is excellent (~ 97%) Excellent modality for determining unresectability
(positive predictive value for unresectability of 89-100%)/ Less effective in determining resectability, as only 60-
91% of tumors found to be resectable on CT are actually resectable at surgery
Obstructive pseocycst/
CT sensitivity for pancreatic cancer is excellent (~ 97%) Excellent modality for determining unresectability
(positive predictive value for unresectability of 89-100%)/ Less effective in determining resectability, as only 60-
91% of tumors found to be resectable on CT are actually resectable at surgery
Normal pancreas - Diffusely high signal intensity on T1WI (≥ liver)/Parenchyma variable in signal on T2WI/Pancreas enhances avidly and homogeneously on T1WI C+ (hyperintense to liver on arterial phase and isointense on delayed phase){
T1/T2
T1C arterial and delayed
MRCP / ADC
change resectability
status of ~ 20% of patients compared to CECT
T1 limited to pancreas < 2 cms
Most common sites are liver, peritoneum, and lungs
Benign pancreatic tumor lined by glycogen-rich cells that arise from acinar cells. ~ 40%) are discovered incidentally in asymptomatic patients. Does not typically result in biliary or pancreatic ductal obstruction or pancreatic atrophy
MR able to better characterize internal morphology than
CT, with ↑ sensitivity for microcysts
MR able to better characterize internal morphology than
CT, with ↑ sensitivity for microcysts
May show areas of T1 hyperintensity due to internal hemorrhage, proteinaceous content, or mucin. Internal septations (typically T2 hypointense) easier to perceive on MR compared to CT
Axial CECT with curved planar reformation shows a diffusely dilated MPD ſt witha bulging ampulla st, a characteristic feature of main duct IPMN. (Right) Axial CECT demonstrates a markedly dilated MPD that contains intraductal solid tissue ſ characteristic of a malignant
main duct IPMN.
gaping ampulla with clear mucin pouring from the orifice, a classic finding in main duct IPMN due to mucin hypersecretion by the tumor
surgery depends on cyst location and extent of MPd involvement: Whipple, distal pancreatectomy, or total pancreatectomy
Main ductal ipmn
amine precursor uptake and decarboxylation (APUD) cells
Nonsyndromic tumors - Hypofunctioning or clinically silent large tumors
Strong correlation between size of nonsyndromic tumors and malignancy, particularly when > 2 cm
Gastrinoma triangle defined by cystic duct and common bile duct (CBD) superiorly,{2nd and 3rd parts of duodenum inferiorly, and pancreatic neck and body
Medially. Most commonly arise in duodenal wall/-Severe peptic ulcer disease
-Increased acidity
-Diarrhoea
Rarely can be most conspicuous on venous phase
Rather than encasement. Some small tumors may rarely secrete serotonin that can
cause fibrosis and obstruction of pancreatic duct
marked fold thickening ſt and wall hyperenhancement in the proximal aspect of the stomach. The more distal stomach demonstrates normal wall thicknes
Young woman
Fevers, arthralgias, skin rash, and fat necrosis due to
elevated lipase levels (often > 1000 U/L)