Presentation of Liane Schalatek, Heinrich Böll Stiftung, at the session 2 of the GCF Watch international webinar series "Gender, indigenous peoples and REDD+ within the GCF".
Takeaways from B.28 & Looking Ahead in 2021AIDA_Americas
The document summarizes key outcomes and discussions from the 28th Board Meeting of the Green Climate Fund (B.28) and looks ahead to priorities and policies under consideration in 2021. At B.28, the Board approved $1.2 billion in funding for 15 projects focused on mitigation and adaptation. However, several important policy decisions and reports were postponed. Since then, some policies have been adopted between meetings, concerning some observers. In 2021, the Board will consider sectoral guidance, updated investment and accreditation frameworks, and policies on evaluation, safeguards, and private sector engagement. Beyond 2021, the GCF will undergo its second performance review and replenishment.
The Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) aims to help countries mobilize domestic and international resources for biodiversity conservation and sustainable development. It uses a four-component approach: [1] assessing biodiversity policies and institutions, [2] reviewing biodiversity expenditures, [3] determining biodiversity financing needs and gaps, and [4] developing resource mobilization strategies. BIOFIN has been implemented in 19 countries so far and will expand to 29 countries with a total budget of over $28 million from 2012-2018. The initiative provides tools and guidance to help countries mainstream biodiversity into development plans and budgets to reduce threats while increasing biodiversity financing.
The document discusses the methodology used by multilateral development banks (MDBs) to jointly track climate finance commitments and reporting. It covers:
1) How MDBs created a methodology in 2011 to encourage scaling up of climate finance globally and commit to transparency in tracking and reporting. They have collectively financed around $25 billion annually or $75 billion total between 2011-2013.
2) The methodology tracks climate adaptation and mitigation finance to developing countries irrespective of greenhouse gas accounting. It reports financial flows disaggregated by various categories.
3) Plans for 2015 include publishing a 2014 joint report on climate finance, agreeing on definitions for tracking finance leverage, and continuing cooperation with other organizations on transparency and principles for tracking
This document provides an overview of the OECD DAC statistics and Rio markers system for tracking climate, biodiversity, and desertification related finance. It discusses how the Rio markers are applied to development activities to indicate if objectives target the Rio conventions as a principal, significant, or not at all. It also describes how the data can be viewed from both a recipient and provider perspective to analyze development finance flows. The document outlines some key features and areas for future improvement to ensure the DAC methodologies and data remain a reference on development assistance targeting environmental objectives.
Engaging Private Sector for Financing the National Adaptation Plan | Vidya So...NAP Global Network
Presentation by Vidya Soundarajan, Head of Action on Climate Today's India Programme, for a Targeted Topics Forum on financing National Adaptation Plan (NAP) processes. This event was held in Mexico City in June 2017.
Using Fiscal Instruments to Finance the NAP Process | Jo-Ellen Parry, IISDNAP Global Network
Fiscal instruments such as taxes, fees, and bonds can raise revenue to finance climate adaptation actions outlined in national adaptation plans. Revenue can also be redistributed through subsidies and reforms. For example, Indonesia reformed gasoline subsidies in 2014, freeing up over $13 billion that was invested in programs to build adaptive capacity. However, using fiscal instruments for adaptation comes with challenges like adverse impacts and political sensitivities that require support from key ministries.
This document provides an update on the Partnership for Climate Finance and Development and ongoing dialogues related to climate finance and the post-2015 sustainable development goals (SDGs). The Partnership promotes effective use of climate finance at the country level through cooperation among climate, finance, and development communities. It operates at global, regional, and country levels. A series of dialogues have been held or are planned around climate finance and the SDGs. For successful implementation of the SDGs, the document advocates for a holistic, integrated approach that breaks down silos, tailors goals to local contexts, strengthens capacity and partnerships, and ensures policy and financing coherence.
The document describes Indonesia's climate tracking system. It defines climate-related activities and outlines Indonesia's system for compiling data on domestic and international public climate finance from its national budget, local government budgets, and international development partners. The system involves setting definitions, applying the definitions to identify climate-related activities, and verifying the coding with agencies. The tracking system could be enhanced by improving climate finance tagging in budgets and reporting on flows to better manage domestic and international funds.
Takeaways from B.28 & Looking Ahead in 2021AIDA_Americas
The document summarizes key outcomes and discussions from the 28th Board Meeting of the Green Climate Fund (B.28) and looks ahead to priorities and policies under consideration in 2021. At B.28, the Board approved $1.2 billion in funding for 15 projects focused on mitigation and adaptation. However, several important policy decisions and reports were postponed. Since then, some policies have been adopted between meetings, concerning some observers. In 2021, the Board will consider sectoral guidance, updated investment and accreditation frameworks, and policies on evaluation, safeguards, and private sector engagement. Beyond 2021, the GCF will undergo its second performance review and replenishment.
The Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) aims to help countries mobilize domestic and international resources for biodiversity conservation and sustainable development. It uses a four-component approach: [1] assessing biodiversity policies and institutions, [2] reviewing biodiversity expenditures, [3] determining biodiversity financing needs and gaps, and [4] developing resource mobilization strategies. BIOFIN has been implemented in 19 countries so far and will expand to 29 countries with a total budget of over $28 million from 2012-2018. The initiative provides tools and guidance to help countries mainstream biodiversity into development plans and budgets to reduce threats while increasing biodiversity financing.
The document discusses the methodology used by multilateral development banks (MDBs) to jointly track climate finance commitments and reporting. It covers:
1) How MDBs created a methodology in 2011 to encourage scaling up of climate finance globally and commit to transparency in tracking and reporting. They have collectively financed around $25 billion annually or $75 billion total between 2011-2013.
2) The methodology tracks climate adaptation and mitigation finance to developing countries irrespective of greenhouse gas accounting. It reports financial flows disaggregated by various categories.
3) Plans for 2015 include publishing a 2014 joint report on climate finance, agreeing on definitions for tracking finance leverage, and continuing cooperation with other organizations on transparency and principles for tracking
This document provides an overview of the OECD DAC statistics and Rio markers system for tracking climate, biodiversity, and desertification related finance. It discusses how the Rio markers are applied to development activities to indicate if objectives target the Rio conventions as a principal, significant, or not at all. It also describes how the data can be viewed from both a recipient and provider perspective to analyze development finance flows. The document outlines some key features and areas for future improvement to ensure the DAC methodologies and data remain a reference on development assistance targeting environmental objectives.
Engaging Private Sector for Financing the National Adaptation Plan | Vidya So...NAP Global Network
Presentation by Vidya Soundarajan, Head of Action on Climate Today's India Programme, for a Targeted Topics Forum on financing National Adaptation Plan (NAP) processes. This event was held in Mexico City in June 2017.
Using Fiscal Instruments to Finance the NAP Process | Jo-Ellen Parry, IISDNAP Global Network
Fiscal instruments such as taxes, fees, and bonds can raise revenue to finance climate adaptation actions outlined in national adaptation plans. Revenue can also be redistributed through subsidies and reforms. For example, Indonesia reformed gasoline subsidies in 2014, freeing up over $13 billion that was invested in programs to build adaptive capacity. However, using fiscal instruments for adaptation comes with challenges like adverse impacts and political sensitivities that require support from key ministries.
This document provides an update on the Partnership for Climate Finance and Development and ongoing dialogues related to climate finance and the post-2015 sustainable development goals (SDGs). The Partnership promotes effective use of climate finance at the country level through cooperation among climate, finance, and development communities. It operates at global, regional, and country levels. A series of dialogues have been held or are planned around climate finance and the SDGs. For successful implementation of the SDGs, the document advocates for a holistic, integrated approach that breaks down silos, tailors goals to local contexts, strengthens capacity and partnerships, and ensures policy and financing coherence.
The document describes Indonesia's climate tracking system. It defines climate-related activities and outlines Indonesia's system for compiling data on domestic and international public climate finance from its national budget, local government budgets, and international development partners. The system involves setting definitions, applying the definitions to identify climate-related activities, and verifying the coding with agencies. The tracking system could be enhanced by improving climate finance tagging in budgets and reporting on flows to better manage domestic and international funds.
The document discusses modernizing how development finance is measured post-2015. It outlines that the OECD DAC statistical system aims to promote transparency and accountability while incentivizing increased and smarter development resources. It summarizes the outcomes of the 2014 OECD DAC High Level Meeting which included modernizing ODA measurement to better reflect concessionality of loans, targeting ODA to countries most in need, and creating a new measure called TOSSD to capture all official finance supporting sustainable development.
Accessing Funds from the National Budget | Susann Mende, GIZNAP Global Network
Presentation by Susann Mende, GIZ, as part of a Targeted Topics Forum on financing National Adaptation Plan (NAP) processes. This event was held in Mexico City in June 2017.
This document summarizes updates from the Rio conventions on reporting of finance provided. It finds that 96% of expected reports were received in 2014. A total of $3.99 billion in financial commitments were reported for 3,992 activities, with 36% of weighted commitments from developed country parties supporting global activities. Most funds targeted Africa, Asia, and countries in need of Mediterranean support. The document also reviews progress on setting land degradation neutrality targets and improving synergies among Rio conventions in reporting and monitoring.
India's Climate Finance Resource Assessment Exercise : Rio Markers and other Tracking Tools, Mr. Appukuttan Nair Damodaran, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore, India
The document discusses two perspectives in reporting on development finance statistics by the OECD's Development Assistance Committee (DAC): the recipient and provider perspectives. It explains how bilateral flows and multilateral outflows are considered from the recipient perspective, while the provider perspective includes bilateral flows and imputed multilateral contributions. The document also provides an update on proposals to include several additional multilateral institutions in the DAC's Annex 2, which lists organizations for which member countries report core contributions.
Tracking climate-related finance in Zambia, Mr. David Kaluba, National Climate Change Secretariat, Ministry of Finance, Zambia (joining by video conference)
A Financing Perspective on the NAP Process | Jo-Ellen Parry, IISDNAP Global Network
The document discusses financing needs for the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) process and potential sources of financing. It notes that financing is needed throughout the NAP process to cover both operating costs and investment costs. The amount of financing required will vary by country but is expected to be significant. Potential sources of financing discussed include domestic public sources, bilateral and multilateral providers, and private finance. The document recommends developing a dedicated NAP financing strategy early in the process to help align financing needs with sources and promote a coordinated approach.
Presentation by Alec Crawford (NAP Global Network) given at the workshop "Jamaica’s National Adaptation Plan: Integrating Climate Change into National and Ministerial Budgets" in July 2017.
Introduction: Why Focus on Financing Implementation of NAPs? NAP Global Network
2nd Targeted Topics Forum, Kingston, March 15, 2016
National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Global Network
Presented by Anne Hammill, International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
Tracking international climate-related finance in Viet Nam, Ms. Nguyen Thi Dieu Trinh, Department of Science, Education, Natural Resources and Environment, Ministry of Planning and Investment, Viet Nam
1) There is a need for greater quantification in reporting on finance for the Rio Conventions due to new quantified goals under the UNFCCC, CBD, and other agreements.
2) Two main approaches for greater quantification are identifying financial components within activities or using "coefficient" estimates to scale Rio marker data, but both raise feasibility issues.
3) Most members currently use Rio markers and coefficients to report financing, though approaches vary, and harmonization could improve comparability.
This document summarizes members' approaches and methodologies for reporting climate finance data to the UNFCCC. It finds that while the UNFCCC uses standard templates, reporting practices still vary in terms of currencies used, conversion rates, metrics, and how recipient countries and funding are classified. The document recommends providing more detailed and standardized activity-level data in reporting to increase transparency. It also suggests the OECD reporting template could be improved to capture all key elements and facilitate easier data sharing between Rio conventions like the UNFCCC.
1) The document outlines key questions to consider for the Global Stocktake under the Paris Agreement, including questions about collective progress on mitigation, adaptation, finance, technology development and transfer, and capacity building.
2) It discusses assessing whether the goals of the Paris Agreement are being achieved, and identifying opportunities and challenges, lessons learned, and recommendations to strengthen climate action.
3) The document raises questions about how to ensure an integrated consideration of inputs across topics during the technical assessment and how to inform parties of outputs to enhance climate commitments and cooperation.
Progress against the work plan and next steps future work after closure of the Task team (Ms. Stephanie Ockenden and Ms. Valérie Gaveau, OECD DAC Secretariat).
1. Austria tracks climate finance at the national level using a strategy and eligibility criteria set by the Environment Ministry in coordination with other ministries and stakeholders.
2. Data is collected annually and reported in April/May on the previous year's climate finance, with final data reported by September to the EU and UNFCCC. A consultant provides technical support to improve tracking methods.
3. Austria's accounting rules count grants based on commitments and non-grants on disbursements, and apply discounts when climate markers score activities as partially relevant to climate. This aims to avoid double-counting activities.
- JICA's approach to marking Rio markers involves a process of project identification, policy dialogue, and project formation between JICA and partner countries to determine if a project's objectives and expected results primarily address climate change or biodiversity (principal marker) or contribute in a non-primary way (significant marker).
- JICA developed a Climate Finance Impact Tool to provide methodologies for measuring and reporting mitigation and adaptation results and to mainstream adaptation into projects.
- Rio marking should be an integral part of project appraisal to help mainstream climate and biodiversity objectives, and the process facilitates policy dialogue between partners on development priorities.
Introduction to the NAP Global Network | Jamaica, July 2017NAP Global Network
Presentation by Alec Crawford (NAP Global Network) given at the workshop "Jamaica’s National Adaptation Plan: Integrating Climate Change into National and Ministerial Budgets" in July 2017.
The document summarizes discussions from sessions at the NAP Expo on accessing funding from the Green Climate Fund (GCF) for national adaptation plan (NAP) formulation and other adaptation planning processes.
Key points include: an overview of GCF support for NAPs including the status of approved proposals; 10 criteria for successful NAP proposals to the GCF; and a discussion of country experiences accessing GCF funding including from the Democratic Republic of Congo, Colombia, and Bangladesh. The sessions also included breakout groups to discuss enhancing sub-national adaptation action and stimulating financing through climate information communication.
Secrets of a Successful Land Development Approval Processkevin_riles
The document outlines an agenda for a conference on mastering the land development approval process. It discusses understanding the players and approval steps, discovering tricks of the trade, and opportunities for appraisers. It provides examples of development projects and challenges, emphasizing the importance of assembling the right team, understanding stakeholders' motivations, and having a five-step action plan.
The document discusses modernizing how development finance is measured post-2015. It outlines that the OECD DAC statistical system aims to promote transparency and accountability while incentivizing increased and smarter development resources. It summarizes the outcomes of the 2014 OECD DAC High Level Meeting which included modernizing ODA measurement to better reflect concessionality of loans, targeting ODA to countries most in need, and creating a new measure called TOSSD to capture all official finance supporting sustainable development.
Accessing Funds from the National Budget | Susann Mende, GIZNAP Global Network
Presentation by Susann Mende, GIZ, as part of a Targeted Topics Forum on financing National Adaptation Plan (NAP) processes. This event was held in Mexico City in June 2017.
This document summarizes updates from the Rio conventions on reporting of finance provided. It finds that 96% of expected reports were received in 2014. A total of $3.99 billion in financial commitments were reported for 3,992 activities, with 36% of weighted commitments from developed country parties supporting global activities. Most funds targeted Africa, Asia, and countries in need of Mediterranean support. The document also reviews progress on setting land degradation neutrality targets and improving synergies among Rio conventions in reporting and monitoring.
India's Climate Finance Resource Assessment Exercise : Rio Markers and other Tracking Tools, Mr. Appukuttan Nair Damodaran, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore, India
The document discusses two perspectives in reporting on development finance statistics by the OECD's Development Assistance Committee (DAC): the recipient and provider perspectives. It explains how bilateral flows and multilateral outflows are considered from the recipient perspective, while the provider perspective includes bilateral flows and imputed multilateral contributions. The document also provides an update on proposals to include several additional multilateral institutions in the DAC's Annex 2, which lists organizations for which member countries report core contributions.
Tracking climate-related finance in Zambia, Mr. David Kaluba, National Climate Change Secretariat, Ministry of Finance, Zambia (joining by video conference)
A Financing Perspective on the NAP Process | Jo-Ellen Parry, IISDNAP Global Network
The document discusses financing needs for the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) process and potential sources of financing. It notes that financing is needed throughout the NAP process to cover both operating costs and investment costs. The amount of financing required will vary by country but is expected to be significant. Potential sources of financing discussed include domestic public sources, bilateral and multilateral providers, and private finance. The document recommends developing a dedicated NAP financing strategy early in the process to help align financing needs with sources and promote a coordinated approach.
Presentation by Alec Crawford (NAP Global Network) given at the workshop "Jamaica’s National Adaptation Plan: Integrating Climate Change into National and Ministerial Budgets" in July 2017.
Introduction: Why Focus on Financing Implementation of NAPs? NAP Global Network
2nd Targeted Topics Forum, Kingston, March 15, 2016
National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Global Network
Presented by Anne Hammill, International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
Tracking international climate-related finance in Viet Nam, Ms. Nguyen Thi Dieu Trinh, Department of Science, Education, Natural Resources and Environment, Ministry of Planning and Investment, Viet Nam
1) There is a need for greater quantification in reporting on finance for the Rio Conventions due to new quantified goals under the UNFCCC, CBD, and other agreements.
2) Two main approaches for greater quantification are identifying financial components within activities or using "coefficient" estimates to scale Rio marker data, but both raise feasibility issues.
3) Most members currently use Rio markers and coefficients to report financing, though approaches vary, and harmonization could improve comparability.
This document summarizes members' approaches and methodologies for reporting climate finance data to the UNFCCC. It finds that while the UNFCCC uses standard templates, reporting practices still vary in terms of currencies used, conversion rates, metrics, and how recipient countries and funding are classified. The document recommends providing more detailed and standardized activity-level data in reporting to increase transparency. It also suggests the OECD reporting template could be improved to capture all key elements and facilitate easier data sharing between Rio conventions like the UNFCCC.
1) The document outlines key questions to consider for the Global Stocktake under the Paris Agreement, including questions about collective progress on mitigation, adaptation, finance, technology development and transfer, and capacity building.
2) It discusses assessing whether the goals of the Paris Agreement are being achieved, and identifying opportunities and challenges, lessons learned, and recommendations to strengthen climate action.
3) The document raises questions about how to ensure an integrated consideration of inputs across topics during the technical assessment and how to inform parties of outputs to enhance climate commitments and cooperation.
Progress against the work plan and next steps future work after closure of the Task team (Ms. Stephanie Ockenden and Ms. Valérie Gaveau, OECD DAC Secretariat).
1. Austria tracks climate finance at the national level using a strategy and eligibility criteria set by the Environment Ministry in coordination with other ministries and stakeholders.
2. Data is collected annually and reported in April/May on the previous year's climate finance, with final data reported by September to the EU and UNFCCC. A consultant provides technical support to improve tracking methods.
3. Austria's accounting rules count grants based on commitments and non-grants on disbursements, and apply discounts when climate markers score activities as partially relevant to climate. This aims to avoid double-counting activities.
- JICA's approach to marking Rio markers involves a process of project identification, policy dialogue, and project formation between JICA and partner countries to determine if a project's objectives and expected results primarily address climate change or biodiversity (principal marker) or contribute in a non-primary way (significant marker).
- JICA developed a Climate Finance Impact Tool to provide methodologies for measuring and reporting mitigation and adaptation results and to mainstream adaptation into projects.
- Rio marking should be an integral part of project appraisal to help mainstream climate and biodiversity objectives, and the process facilitates policy dialogue between partners on development priorities.
Introduction to the NAP Global Network | Jamaica, July 2017NAP Global Network
Presentation by Alec Crawford (NAP Global Network) given at the workshop "Jamaica’s National Adaptation Plan: Integrating Climate Change into National and Ministerial Budgets" in July 2017.
The document summarizes discussions from sessions at the NAP Expo on accessing funding from the Green Climate Fund (GCF) for national adaptation plan (NAP) formulation and other adaptation planning processes.
Key points include: an overview of GCF support for NAPs including the status of approved proposals; 10 criteria for successful NAP proposals to the GCF; and a discussion of country experiences accessing GCF funding including from the Democratic Republic of Congo, Colombia, and Bangladesh. The sessions also included breakout groups to discuss enhancing sub-national adaptation action and stimulating financing through climate information communication.
Secrets of a Successful Land Development Approval Processkevin_riles
The document outlines an agenda for a conference on mastering the land development approval process. It discusses understanding the players and approval steps, discovering tricks of the trade, and opportunities for appraisers. It provides examples of development projects and challenges, emphasizing the importance of assembling the right team, understanding stakeholders' motivations, and having a five-step action plan.
The document discusses the Global Environment Facility's (GEF) role in managing the Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF) and Special Climate Change Fund (SCCF) to finance adaptation projects in developing countries. It provides an overview of the GEF's adaptation programming strategy and priorities for GEF-6, the status and distribution of funding through the LDCF and SCCF, and ways to strengthen gender integration, ecosystem-based adaptation, private sector engagement, and support for Small Island Developing States in future projects. Key statistics on funding amounts, number of projects, and beneficiary countries are also presented.
The committee was formed to revisit Sea Grant's allocation policy and criteria for distributing funding among programs as, when adjusted for inflation, the appropriated funding has been steadily declining and may reach zero by 2035. Surveys of Sea Grant programs found a range of views on allocation models but broad support for minimum funding levels and maintaining the current model while addressing inherent inequities. Concerns were also raised that the uncertain budget prospects and NOAA's lack of interest in Sea Grant may not be the right time to make major changes to the allocation approach.
This webinar is a primer on how to get involved in key Houston-area flood-mitigation efforts. It provides an overview of the funding involved, methods of public commenting, and an introduction to current concerns in area communities most vulnerable to flooding.
Watch the webinar at: https://texaslivingwaters.org/deeper-dive/a-seat-at-the-table-how-to-engage-in-houston-area-flood-mitigation/
Speakers include:
Dr. Earthea Nance, Associate Professor, Texas Southern University
Danielle Goshen, Water Policy & Outreach Specialist, Galveston Bay Foundation
Amy Reed, Staff Attorney, Environmental Law Institute
Stephanie Oehler, Public Interest Law Fellow, Environmental Law Institute
Jordan Macha, Executive Director, Bayou City Waterkeeper
Amanda Fuller, Director, Texas Coast & Water Program, National Wildlife Federation
The workshop is the first of an intended series of conversations on how area residents can better participate in key processes that will shape their neighborhoods' futures. If you'd like more information on future events contact us at info@texaslivingwaters.org.
This event was hosted online on Aug 5, 2020 by the National Wildlife Federation, Sierra Club (Lone Star Chapter), Bayou City Waterkeeper, and Galveston Bay Foundation.
The Broadband Technology Opportunities Program (BTOP) was established through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 to expand broadband access across the United States. It provides $4.7 billion in competitive grants for broadband infrastructure projects, sustainable broadband adoption programs, and improvements to public computer centers. The National Telecommunications and Information Administration administers BTOP grants and oversees compliance with federal regulations regarding financial management, procurement, record keeping, and environmental reviews.
A Public Private Partnership Approch to Climate FinanceAldo Baietti
The detrimental effects of climate change are growing, yet investments in clean technologies are still grossly insufficient, making it necessary to re-think how these projects should be evaluated, structured and financed in order to render them viable and attractive opportunities to polluting alternatives. Existing approaches lack key features in order to adequately address the key financing challenges of these investments, and do not utilize public support to its maximum effectiveness. The international community is essential in resolving this financing challenge, and host governments need to create an environment that levels the playing field for green investments vis-à-vis their conventional alternatives. The Green Infrastructure Finance Framework places clean investments in a commonly understood framework of structured finance with public finance components, as in many hybrid PPPs. The framework includes four
main elements: (i) a viability gap methodology for evaluating, structuring and equitably allocating financing responsibilities to different private and public parties; (ii) linkage to a country’s PPP’s procurement and regulatory framework along with an MRV component for ensuring the service obligations of projects; (iii) measures for addressing the adequacy of the climate for these investments; and (iv) a financing and advisory interface for allocating a wide variety of public sources of financing in a coherent fashion.
The document discusses two ongoing initiatives at the Global Fund: the Architecture Review and National Strategy Applications. The Architecture Review aims to simplify the Global Fund's processes and support continued growth through a "single stream of funding" model. The National Strategy Applications initiative seeks to increase country ownership by basing applications on validated national strategies. It outlines plans for a first learning wave of NSA applications to begin in 2009 to test the approach before broader implementation.
Draft Substantial Amendment 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan, Cook County IL cookcountyblog
The County of Cook, Illinois is seeking a substantial amendment to its 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan to establish a $30 million loan pool under HUD's Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program to support economic development initiatives. This would require revising the plan's economic development priorities and strategies. The amendment document provides the revised narratives and outlines a process for stakeholder consultation and citizen participation, including public hearings with the Community Development Advisory Council and Cook County Board of Commissioners.
Presented by Belynda Petrie at the International Forum on Water and Food (IFWF), South Africa, 14-17 November 2011.
The International Forum on Water and Food (IFWF) is the premier gathering of water and food scientists working on improving water management for agricultural production in developing countries.
The CGIAR Challenge Program for Water and Food (CPWF) represents one of the most comprehensive investments in the world on water, food and environment research.The Forum explores how the CPWF research-for-development (R4D) approach can address water and food challenges through a combination of process, institutional and technical innovations.
Jim Proce - 2018 Capital Improvement Planning Process CPM ClassJim Proce
Jim Proce, adjunct instructor, for the Certified Public Manager Program at Texas State University (NCTCOG-Arlington TX) brings this real-life module to the classroom workshop setting. With a little help from Jim Nichols, PE, ICMA-CM, the content covers CIP back-hoes to budgets and everything in between. This has been presented in several venues, agencies, and professional associations and serves as a primer and checklist for all things CIP. For more information contact jimproce@gmail.com
DHSEM Presentation to Local Officials and Staff for Flood RecoveryTrost, Micki
This document summarizes a presentation given by the Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) to elected officials and staff. It provided an overview of DHSEM's mitigation and recovery programs, staffing, the Public Assistance program lifecycle and roles, reimbursements, and other grants programs. DHSEM is hiring additional staff and contractors to manage increased workload from recent disasters, and working to expedite scope change requests and reimbursements to subgrantees. The document reviewed the status of several grants programs, including Community Development Block Grant disaster recovery, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, and NRCS Emergency Watershed Protection Program.
Multilateral development banks in carbon assets and climate financing in Africa Alfred Bimha
Multilateral development banks play a major role in global climate and carbon financing, including in Africa. The World Bank and African Development Bank administer several funds for climate financing in Africa, such as the Clean Technology Fund, Forest Carbon Partnership Facility, and Pilot Program for Climate Resilience. While these banks have increased climate financing, some challenges remain such as long approval processes, influence of major shareholders over funding conditions, and capacity constraints in many African countries. The future of carbon markets and further climate financing opportunities in Africa will depend on outcomes of international climate negotiations.
The document discusses the role of the Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA) in mobilizing financing for green economy projects through mechanisms like the National Green Fund. It describes the types of funding and financing instruments provided by the Green Fund, including grants, loans, and equity, to support initiatives that promote renewable energy, low carbon development, and environmental management. The Green Fund aims to facilitate South Africa's transition to a greener economy through strategic investments across key sectors.
This document discusses sources and types of climate financing mechanisms. It outlines key messages on climate finance including the need to address how much funding is required and where it will come from. It then provides an overview of existing global funding mechanisms like the Global Environmental Facility and Adaptation Fund. It also discusses sources of climate finance including private, public, and multilateral sources. The document outlines instruments used to disburse funds like loans, equity, and grants. It notes that most financing supports mitigation efforts while a smaller portion goes to adaptation. Innovative means to leverage more funds are also proposed.
Leo Park GCF - Green Climate Fund: Developing a green finance facility to cat...OECD Environment
The Green Climate Fund is the world's largest dedicated climate fund, established to help developing countries reduce greenhouse gas emissions and strengthen resilience to climate change impacts. It has pledged $9.8 billion for its first replenishment period and has approved 143 projects totaling $6.2 billion to date across 106 countries. The Fund uses its Private Sector Facility to promote private sector climate action through innovative financing instruments like loans, equity, and guarantees to de-risk investments and mobilize private capital for low-carbon and climate-resilient development. Examples of Private Sector Facility projects include a $56 million concessional loan and grant to the Development Bank of Southern Africa for a lending facility to catalyze $850 million in
The document discusses challenges with donor-driven aid and lack of country ownership. It proposes that aid management tools can help address these issues by helping countries clearly articulate their priorities and development strategies, coordinate all resources including domestic and external funding, track aid flows, and strengthen national budget and planning processes. This would allow countries to exercise greater leadership and shift the balance of power in development partnerships away from donors towards national governments. The examples from Afghanistan show how aid tracking systems were adapted to support national budget preparation and allocation decisions.
Similar to Overview of Decisions and Discussions at GCF B.29 (20)
Los compromisos climáticos del Grupo BIDAIDA_Americas
Presentación de Javier Dávalos, coordinador del Programa de Clima de la Asociación Interamericana para la Defensa del Ambiente (AIDA), en el seminario web "El rol del Grupo BID en la transición energética justa en América Latina y el Caribe", realizado el 28 de febrero de 2024.
Este documento resume el caso judicial "Mecheros" en Ecuador, en el que un grupo de ciudadanos demandó al gobierno ecuatoriano para detener la quema de gas natural de forma rutinaria cerca de sus comunidades. Aunque la corte falló a favor de los demandantes y ordenó la eliminación gradual de los mecheros, el gobierno no ha cumplido con la orden, poniendo en riesgo la salud de las comunidades y violando los compromisos climáticos del Ecuador. El documento argumenta que la sentencia judicial no ha logrado garantizar la prote
Litigio Climático en Ecuador: Análisis de CasosAIDA_Americas
Presentación de Carla Luzuriaga y Diana Herrera, relatoras para la jurisdicción de Ecuador de la Plataforma de Litigio Climático para América Latina y el Caribe, en el seminario web "Aportes para el litigio climático desde Ecuador", realizado el 5 de julio de 2023.
El caso del proyecto BioCLIMA ante el IRMAIDA_Americas
Presentación de Florencia Ortúzar, Asociación Interamericana para la Defensa del Ambiente (AIDA), en el seminario web "Fondo Verde del Clima: Actualización para América Latina", realizado el 27 de abril de 2023.
Incremento de la Resiliencia Climática basada en Ecosistemas de Comunidades R...AIDA_Americas
Presentación de Wilson Rocha, FAO Bolivia, en el seminario web "Fondo Verde del Clima: Actualización para América Latina", realizado el 27 de abril de 2023.
Este documento describe el Programa Nacional HECO en Colombia, el cual tiene como objetivo asegurar la conservación y financiamiento de áreas protegidas y paisajes clave de forma duradera. En su primera fase, HECO protegerá 32 millones de hectáreas (16% del territorio) mediante la ampliación de áreas protegidas y estrategias de conservación. El Proyecto para la Financiación para la Permanecia se centrará en consolidar el Sistema Nacional de Áreas Protegidas de Colombia.
Reseña general de la última reunión de la Junta del FVC (B.35) y de sus princ...AIDA_Americas
Presentación de Bertha Argueta, Germanwatch, en el seminario web "Fondo Verde del Clima: Actualización para América Latina", realizado por el 27 de abril de 2023.
Radiografía de los Litigios Climáticos en MéxicoAIDA_Americas
Presentación de Thalia Viveros y Aranza Montero Guizar, relatoras de la Plataforma de Litigio Climático para América Latina y el Caribe (jurisdicción México), en el seminario web "Situación del litigio climático en México: Avances y retos", realizado el 30 de marzo de 2023.
El caso de los Acuerdos del CENACE y la SENER del 2020AIDA_Americas
Presentación de Úrsula Garzón, gerente de litigio del Centro Mexicano de Derecho Ambiental A. C. (CEMDA), en el seminario web "Situación del litigio climático en México: Avances y retos", realizado el 30 de marzo de 2023.
O Fundo Verde do Clima, processo de acreditação e acesso aos fundosAIDA_Americas
A Fundação Avina iniciou seu processo de re-acreditação junto ao Fundo Verde do Clima em setembro de 2022 sob as mesmas condições atuais. A Avina é credenciada como organização regional para direcionar recursos do FVC para projetos de adaptação às mudanças climáticas na América Latina, trabalhando com governos como Brasil, Peru e Equador. O documento descreve o processo de engajamento com partes interessadas para o desenvolvimento do projeto "Marajó Resiliente" no Brasil.
Panorama dos fundos climáticos no BrasilAIDA_Americas
O documento lista diferentes fontes de recursos para financiamento de políticas socioambientais no Brasil, como o Fundo Nacional sobre Mudança do Clima, o Fundo Amazônia e o Fundo Clima. Cada fundo tem prioridades, gestão e formas de acesso diferentes. Além dos fundos, o orçamento público também financia políticas socioambientais.
Riesgo de falla de presa de relaves: Proyecto Minero Mirador-EcuadorAIDA_Americas
Las presas de relaves generados por la minería metálica a gran escala representan un alto riesgo de falla e impactos ambientales severos. Los relaves son desechos de roca y fluidos tóxicos que se almacenan en presas, las cuales fallan frecuentemente liberando contaminantes e inundaciones. El documento recomienda evitar construir presas de relaves en zonas de alto riesgo sísmico, mejorar el manejo y reciclaje de metales para reducir los relaves, e implementar medidas de seguridad y monit
Pérdida de Biodiversidad y Afectación al Corredor Biológico Mesoamericano del...AIDA_Americas
Presentación de Isaías Ramos (panameño, biólogo con especialización en gestión ambiental y miembro del Centro de Incidencia Ambiental), en el seminario web "Impactos de la minería en Centroamérica: Estudios de casos", realizado el 15 de noviembre de 2022.
Minería en Crucitas:Costa Rica 2008-2022 ppp 18-10-22 (1).pptxAIDA_Americas
Presentación de Marino Marozzi (costarricense, doctor en economía aplicada, catedrático titulado y consultor) en el seminario web "Impactos de la minería en Centroamérica: Estudios de casos", realizado el 15 de noviembre de 2022.
Boletim da Litigancia Climática no Brasil 2022AIDA_Americas
O documento apresenta os principais resultados da Plataforma de Litigância Climática no Brasil referentes a casos mapeados até agosto de 2022, fornecendo:
1) Uma análise do histórico da litigância climática no Brasil, indicando um aumento expressivo de casos a partir de 2019;
2) Uma classificação dos casos de acordo com o tipo de ação, polo ativo, polo passivo, medidas abordadas e outras categorias;
3) Gráficos e tabelas com os resultados das classificações, mostrando a distrib
Litígio climático BNDES/BNDESPar: Mudanças climáticas, direitos humanos e de...AIDA_Americas
Presentación de Gabriel Mantelli, Defensa de los Derechos Socioambientales de Conectas Direitos Humanos, en el seminario web "El impulso de Brasil al litigio climático: avances y desafíos", realizado el 11 de octubre de 2022.
Reclaiming hydrogen for a renewable futureAIDA_Americas
Presentación de Lauren Withey, de Earthjustice, en el seminario web "Hidrógeno: Retos, riesgos y oportunidades para Latinoamérica", realizado el 7 de septiembre de 2022.
Hidrógeno como propuesta energética: Situación en Latinoamérica, retos, riesg...AIDA_Americas
Este documento presenta información sobre el hidrógeno como una opción energética para América Latina, incluyendo los desafíos, riesgos y oportunidades. Se discuten los diferentes procesos de producción de hidrógeno, sus emisiones de carbono asociadas, y el potencial del hidrógeno verde producido con energías renovables. También se analiza el estado actual y las perspectivas del hidrógeno en varios países de la región, reconociendo la necesidad de descarbonizar la producción existente y asegurar que nuevas dem
RoHS stands for Restriction of Hazardous Substances, which is also known as t...vijaykumar292010
RoHS stands for Restriction of Hazardous Substances, which is also known as the Directive 2002/95/EC. It includes the restrictions for the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment. RoHS is a WEEE (Waste of Electrical and Electronic Equipment).
Improving the viability of probiotics by encapsulation methods for developmen...Open Access Research Paper
The popularity of functional foods among scientists and common people has been increasing day by day. Awareness and modernization make the consumer think better regarding food and nutrition. Now a day’s individual knows very well about the relation between food consumption and disease prevalence. Humans have a diversity of microbes in the gut that together form the gut microflora. Probiotics are the health-promoting live microbial cells improve host health through gut and brain connection and fighting against harmful bacteria. Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus are the two bacterial genera which are considered to be probiotic. These good bacteria are facing challenges of viability. There are so many factors such as sensitivity to heat, pH, acidity, osmotic effect, mechanical shear, chemical components, freezing and storage time as well which affects the viability of probiotics in the dairy food matrix as well as in the gut. Multiple efforts have been done in the past and ongoing in present for these beneficial microbial population stability until their destination in the gut. One of a useful technique known as microencapsulation makes the probiotic effective in the diversified conditions and maintain these microbe’s community to the optimum level for achieving targeted benefits. Dairy products are found to be an ideal vehicle for probiotic incorporation. It has been seen that the encapsulated microbial cells show higher viability than the free cells in different processing and storage conditions as well as against bile salts in the gut. They make the food functional when incorporated, without affecting the product sensory characteristics.
Kinetic studies on malachite green dye adsorption from aqueous solutions by A...Open Access Research Paper
Water polluted by dyestuffs compounds is a global threat to health and the environment; accordingly, we prepared a green novel sorbent chemical and Physical system from an algae, chitosan and chitosan nanoparticle and impregnated with algae with chitosan nanocomposite for the sorption of Malachite green dye from water. The algae with chitosan nanocomposite by a simple method and used as a recyclable and effective adsorbent for the removal of malachite green dye from aqueous solutions. Algae, chitosan, chitosan nanoparticle and algae with chitosan nanocomposite were characterized using different physicochemical methods. The functional groups and chemical compounds found in algae, chitosan, chitosan algae, chitosan nanoparticle, and chitosan nanoparticle with algae were identified using FTIR, SEM, and TGADTA/DTG techniques. The optimal adsorption conditions, different dosages, pH and Temperature the amount of algae with chitosan nanocomposite were determined. At optimized conditions and the batch equilibrium studies more than 99% of the dye was removed. The adsorption process data matched well kinetics showed that the reaction order for dye varied with pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order. Furthermore, the maximum adsorption capacity of the algae with chitosan nanocomposite toward malachite green dye reached as high as 15.5mg/g, respectively. Finally, multiple times reusing of algae with chitosan nanocomposite and removing dye from a real wastewater has made it a promising and attractive option for further practical applications.
Evolving Lifecycles with High Resolution Site Characterization (HRSC) and 3-D...Joshua Orris
The incorporation of a 3DCSM and completion of HRSC provided a tool for enhanced, data-driven, decisions to support a change in remediation closure strategies. Currently, an approved pilot study has been obtained to shut-down the remediation systems (ISCO, P&T) and conduct a hydraulic study under non-pumping conditions. A separate micro-biological bench scale treatability study was competed that yielded positive results for an emerging innovative technology. As a result, a field pilot study has commenced with results expected in nine-twelve months. With the results of the hydraulic study, field pilot studies and an updated risk assessment leading site monitoring optimization cost lifecycle savings upwards of $15MM towards an alternatively evolved best available technology remediation closure strategy.
Optimizing Post Remediation Groundwater Performance with Enhanced Microbiolog...Joshua Orris
Results of geophysics and pneumatic injection pilot tests during 2003 – 2007 yielded significant positive results for injection delivery design and contaminant mass treatment, resulting in permanent shut-down of an existing groundwater Pump & Treat system.
Accessible source areas were subsequently removed (2011) by soil excavation and treated with the placement of Emulsified Vegetable Oil EVO and zero-valent iron ZVI to accelerate treatment of impacted groundwater in overburden and weathered fractured bedrock. Post pilot test and post remediation groundwater monitoring has included analyses of CVOCs, organic fatty acids, dissolved gases and QuantArray® -Chlor to quantify key microorganisms (e.g., Dehalococcoides, Dehalobacter, etc.) and functional genes (e.g., vinyl chloride reductase, methane monooxygenase, etc.) to assess potential for reductive dechlorination and aerobic cometabolism of CVOCs.
In 2022, the first commercial application of MetaArray™ was performed at the site. MetaArray™ utilizes statistical analysis, such as principal component analysis and multivariate analysis to provide evidence that reductive dechlorination is active or even that it is slowing. This creates actionable data allowing users to save money by making important site management decisions earlier.
The results of the MetaArray™ analysis’ support vector machine (SVM) identified groundwater monitoring wells with a 80% confidence that were characterized as either Limited for Reductive Decholorination or had a High Reductive Reduction Dechlorination potential. The results of MetaArray™ will be used to further optimize the site’s post remediation monitoring program for monitored natural attenuation.
Lessons from operationalizing integrated landscape approaches
Overview of Decisions and Discussions at GCF B.29
1. The Green Political
Foundation
1
Overview of Decisions and Discussions at GCF B.29
• B.29 ambitious agenda, most agenda items remained unopened
• Some discourse about the financial status of the GCF (commitment authority and status of
contributions)
• Discourse about the role of iTAP in preventing funding proposals from reaching the Board
• Decisions taken:
• 4 project/program proposals adopted, US$ 501 mio GCF funding
• 10 accreditation applicants approved, including SMBC; 2 re-accreditations approved
• Adoption of Integrated Results Management Framework IRMF after several days of
procedural wrestling (including controversial vote on whether options to determine
consensus have been exhausted – “vote on whether to vote”)
• Several crucial discussions/decisions postponed:
•Update to the accreditation framework, including PSAA
•Incremental and full cost methodology
•Policy on concessionality
•GCF support to adaptation
•Second performance review of the GCF
2. The Green Political
Foundation
Discourse about the financial status of the GCF
(commitment authority and status of contributions)
• Of GCF-1 pledged amount of USD 9.998 billion equivalent, 29 countries and 2 regions have
confirmed part or all of their GCF-1 pledges, amounting to USD 9.53 billion equivalent or 96 %
•GCF-1 project approvals so far ~ around 3.7 billion from B.25 to including B.29
•Before B.29, only US$ 1.13 billion left in commitment authority
•With current levels -- commitment authority would fall between B31-B.33 (2022) to USD 666
mio per meeting, with roughly USD 385 mio available per BM for projects. For B.34-B-37
(2023/24) roughly UD 911 per Board meeting available, with USD 792 Mio per meeting for
projects
•Adjusted timing Scenario (adjusting the timing of some contributions by moving 50% of
payments scheduled in December to September in 2022 only) -- improves commitment
authority/funding availability from B.33 onward through B.37 to about USD 701 bn per Board
meeting for projects; but B.31 and B.32 remain low at USD 407 million each for projects
•Additional contribution Scenario (USA or others contribute additional finance (scenario
assumes USA 1.25 bn contribution in Feb. 2022 and in Feb. 2023 each) -- with assumed US
contribution in 2022 and 2023 (early in the year), average commitment authority B.31 through
B.37 would be USD 1.6 bn per meeting total, with availability of funding for projects on average
USD 892 mio (although technically more in 2023 then in 2022)
7. The Green Political
Foundation
Accreditation decision B.29 -- 10 accreditation applicants approved,
including SMBC, with 2 re-accreditations
After B.29 – 113 accredited entities, 71 DAEs (57 NIEs, 14 RIEs) and 42 IAEs
• APL100 -- Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC), Japan -- MIE
• APL106 -- Development Bank of Philippines (DBP), Philippines – NIE (M)
• APL107 -- Development Bank of Zambia (DBZ), Zambia – NIE (M)
• APL108 -- Infrastructure Development Bank of Zimbabwe (IDBZ) – NIE (S)
• APL109 -- Moroccan Agency for Sustainable Energy (MASEN) – NIE (L)
• APL110 -- Vietnam Development Bank (VDB) – NIE (S)
• APL111 -- Korea International Cooperation Agency (KOICA), South Korea – NIE (S)
• APL112 -- Nacional Financiera Banca de Desarrollo (NAFIN), Mexico – NIE (M)
• APL113 -- Joint Stock Company TBC Bank (TBC), Georgia – NIE (M)
• APL114 -- Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA) – RIE (S)
Re-accreditation applicants:
•RAPL021 – Agency for Agricultural Development of Morocco (ADA) – NIE (S)
•RAPL003 – Secretariat of the Pacific Environment Programme (SPREP) – RIE (M)
8. The Green Political
Foundation
Adoption of Integrated Results Management Framework (IRMF)
• long outstanding item; meant to replace exiting results management and performance
measurements frameworks for mitigation and adaptation into one integrated framework
measuring results and impacts (and linked up with Updated Strategic Plan)
• several contentious issues related to:
•How to measure paradigm shift
•Role of sustainable development and co-benefits discourse
•Assistance for DAEs to adjust to new framework (as part of RPSP, additional US$ 12 mio)
•Board’s role in seeing/approving Secretariat’s implementation guidelines handbook
•With progress stalled, procedural call (by US BM) to determine that all efforts at reaching
consensus have failed (= to open way for vote – first potential application on policy item)
• Co-Chairs determination that consensus was still possible; was challenged by developed
country Board members, pushing for a “vote on whether to vote”
•Legal wrangling; not clear and contention if this was intended/covered by Board decision setting
up voting procedure (decision B.23/03); this included vote (rejected challenge to co-chairs
determination 12 : 8 with 4 abstentions).
• With further small group work, negotiated consensus on critical issues, but with strong
objections from several developing country BMs (African Group) on procedure.
9. The Green Political
Foundation
On the agenda, but not opened -- crucial discussions/decisions postponed:
• Update to the accreditation framework, including Project-Specific Assessment Approach (PSAA)
• Matters related to the investment framework (for information)
• Incremental and full cost methodology (Inf)
• Policy on concessionality (Inf)
• GCF support to adaptation (Inf)
•Matters related for evaluations
• Second performance review of the GCF
• Review of the terms of reference for the Independent Evaluation Unit (IEU)
• Evaluations by the IEU (including rapid assessment of Request for Proposals, RfPs)
Expectation of further increase of decisions-between-meetings (BBMs) (including 10th Report
of the GCF to the COP of the UNFCCC)