Ukraine has been a member of the Open Government Partnership (OGP) since 2011. Its current action plan has 26 commitments related to access to information, civic engagement, e-government, and anti-corruption. The next plan should focus on implementing and enforcing laws passed. Despite political difficulties, Ukraine has made significant progress passing open government laws. It should participate in peer learning and exchange through OGP working groups and meetings to focus on areas like public procurement and reducing red tape.
Indicators for Implementing and Monitoring Human RightsMaksym Klyuchar
This document discusses frameworks for developing human rights indicators to monitor implementation and protection of human rights. It addresses the importance of indicators in making information more concrete, facilitating monitoring, and enabling effective communication and policy responses. The document outlines approaches for identifying appropriate human rights indicators, including ensuring they address relevant human rights principles and standards. It also discusses challenges in developing indicators and criteria for selecting indicators, such as ensuring they can be disaggregated and are objective. The document provides examples of different types of data and methods that can be used to measure indicators, such as events-based data, surveys, and administrative statistics. It emphasizes the importance of rights-based monitoring in focusing on vulnerable groups and certain institutional arrangements.
Ukraine has been a member of the Open Government Partnership (OGP) since 2011. Its current action plan has 26 commitments related to access to information, civic engagement, e-government, and anti-corruption. The next plan should focus on implementing and enforcing laws passed. Despite political difficulties, Ukraine has made significant progress passing open government laws. It should participate in peer learning and exchange through OGP working groups and meetings to focus on areas like public procurement and reducing red tape.
Indicators for Implementing and Monitoring Human RightsMaksym Klyuchar
This document discusses frameworks for developing human rights indicators to monitor implementation and protection of human rights. It addresses the importance of indicators in making information more concrete, facilitating monitoring, and enabling effective communication and policy responses. The document outlines approaches for identifying appropriate human rights indicators, including ensuring they address relevant human rights principles and standards. It also discusses challenges in developing indicators and criteria for selecting indicators, such as ensuring they can be disaggregated and are objective. The document provides examples of different types of data and methods that can be used to measure indicators, such as events-based data, surveys, and administrative statistics. It emphasizes the importance of rights-based monitoring in focusing on vulnerable groups and certain institutional arrangements.
Indicators for Monitoring Implementation of a National Human Rights PlanMaksym Klyuchar
This document discusses developing indicators to monitor the implementation of human rights plans. It outlines reasons for systematically collecting human rights data, including making assessments more objective and creating accountability. Both qualitative and quantitative indicators can be used. Good indicators are relevant, reliable, and based on transparent methodology. Data should be disaggregated and timely. The document also examines the British Human Rights Measurement Framework as an example and priorities like prioritizing national law and using existing data sources.
This document discusses Seoul's Construction Cost Sharing (CCS) system, which discloses information on public construction projects through a website called Allimi. It notes that over 164,000 people accessed Allimi in 2015. The CCS system was recognized with a Human Technology Award for its transparency. Key factors in CCS's success included political will, civil society input, dedicated staff, and reforms to encourage transparency. Overall lessons included standardizing processes to reduce corruption risks, providing real-time information for accountability, and ongoing system upgrades and funding. The document recommends effective enforcement, sufficient resources, data standardization, offline engagement, and anti-corruption policies to prevent issues.
This document provides an overview of Seoul's One-PMIS (Project Management Information System) and the construction information disclosure system called "Allimi". It describes the workflow and user roles in One-PMIS, the various modules for project overview, progress management, reporting, safety management, and document management. It also explains the linked construction information disclosure system Allimi and how it provides public access to certain project documents and data.
The document summarizes Seoul's Clean Construction System which was introduced to improve construction project efficiency and transparency. It has four components: One-PMIS, an online project management system; Allimi, a public information disclosure system; an automated subcontractor payment system; and an electronic human resources system. One-PMIS allows real-time monitoring of construction materials, workers, and processes. Allimi is a public portal providing contract details, photos, stakeholders, and allowing citizen participation. Seoul made One-PMIS use mandatory for large public projects and provides training and support to promote its institutionalization. The document recommends other countries enact laws requiring similar online construction management systems.
The Construction Sector Tranparency Initiative in UkraineMaksym Klyuchar
The document discusses the Construction Sector Transparency Initiative (CoST) in Ukraine. It provides an overview of CoST, explaining that it aims to increase transparency and accountability in public infrastructure projects. It outlines CoST's core features, including multi-stakeholder groups, disclosure of project data, and independent assurance of disclosed data. The document then provides background on CoST in Ukraine, describing the pilot projects and strategic priorities, which include applying CoST's disclosure approach and aligning with other transparency initiatives.
Transparency and open data initiatives in Ukraine's infrastructure projectsMaksym Klyuchar
Kyiv, 17 June 2016 – The Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine and UNDP organised a webinar to present developments and experiences in public construction transparency in South Korea and Ukraine.
Transparency and open data initiatives in Ukraine's infrastructure projectsMaksym Klyuchar
Transparency and open data initiatives have been implemented in Ukraine's infrastructure projects to increase accountability. A 2015 law on public access to information and a government decree require over 300 datasets to be disclosed in open, machine-readable formats through a centralized open data web portal. The Ministry of Infrastructure has also launched transparency initiatives by disclosing 50 datasets on areas like state-owned enterprises and implementing an inexpensive IT system to consolidate reports and share data through the national open data portal. These measures aim to increase transparency and public trust in infrastructure projects.
The document describes an HRBA quiz with multiple choice questions about integrating human rights-based approaches into different stages of a project cycle.
In one question, a civil society organization in Country X conducted a study finding ethnic minorities cannot access health rights equally as the majority. They immediately launched an advocacy campaign. This violates HRBA by not involving stakeholders or analyzing root causes first.
Another question asks how a friend should respond after Lucy tells her she got a job but lied about being pregnant. The best option is to tell Lucy to contact the Employment Equality Committee to report discrimination, addressing the rights violation systemically.
The quiz questions assess understanding of integrating participation, analysis of root causes and capacity building into situation analysis,
The document summarizes 3 case studies where human rights-based approaches (HRBA) and gender mainstreaming were applied:
1) In Kosovo, a citizens' initiative used HRBA to amend laws allowing compensation for material and non-material damages from human rights abuses.
2) In Brazil, the Munduruku indigenous people used HRBA to gain legal recognition of their traditional lands, despite government pressure.
3) In the Philippines, women's rights organizations intervened to pressure negotiations towards a peace deal between the government and rebels, resulting in strong provisions for women's rights in autonomous regions.
The HRBA is based on international human rights law including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and 9 core international human rights treaties that establish civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights. These treaties include the ICCPR, ICESCR, CERD, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, ICRMW, CED, and CRPD. Each treaty establishes rights and monitoring committees that examine state parties' compliance through review of reports and individual complaints. The HRBA uses these international human rights principles and standards to guide programming and ensure it furthers the realization of human rights for all people.
Indicators for Monitoring Implementation of a National Human Rights PlanMaksym Klyuchar
This document discusses developing indicators to monitor the implementation of human rights plans. It outlines reasons for systematically collecting human rights data, including making assessments more objective and creating accountability. Both qualitative and quantitative indicators can be used. Good indicators are relevant, reliable, and based on transparent methodology. Data should be disaggregated and timely. The document also examines the British Human Rights Measurement Framework as an example and priorities like prioritizing national law and using existing data sources.
This document discusses Seoul's Construction Cost Sharing (CCS) system, which discloses information on public construction projects through a website called Allimi. It notes that over 164,000 people accessed Allimi in 2015. The CCS system was recognized with a Human Technology Award for its transparency. Key factors in CCS's success included political will, civil society input, dedicated staff, and reforms to encourage transparency. Overall lessons included standardizing processes to reduce corruption risks, providing real-time information for accountability, and ongoing system upgrades and funding. The document recommends effective enforcement, sufficient resources, data standardization, offline engagement, and anti-corruption policies to prevent issues.
This document provides an overview of Seoul's One-PMIS (Project Management Information System) and the construction information disclosure system called "Allimi". It describes the workflow and user roles in One-PMIS, the various modules for project overview, progress management, reporting, safety management, and document management. It also explains the linked construction information disclosure system Allimi and how it provides public access to certain project documents and data.
The document summarizes Seoul's Clean Construction System which was introduced to improve construction project efficiency and transparency. It has four components: One-PMIS, an online project management system; Allimi, a public information disclosure system; an automated subcontractor payment system; and an electronic human resources system. One-PMIS allows real-time monitoring of construction materials, workers, and processes. Allimi is a public portal providing contract details, photos, stakeholders, and allowing citizen participation. Seoul made One-PMIS use mandatory for large public projects and provides training and support to promote its institutionalization. The document recommends other countries enact laws requiring similar online construction management systems.
The Construction Sector Tranparency Initiative in UkraineMaksym Klyuchar
The document discusses the Construction Sector Transparency Initiative (CoST) in Ukraine. It provides an overview of CoST, explaining that it aims to increase transparency and accountability in public infrastructure projects. It outlines CoST's core features, including multi-stakeholder groups, disclosure of project data, and independent assurance of disclosed data. The document then provides background on CoST in Ukraine, describing the pilot projects and strategic priorities, which include applying CoST's disclosure approach and aligning with other transparency initiatives.
Transparency and open data initiatives in Ukraine's infrastructure projectsMaksym Klyuchar
Kyiv, 17 June 2016 – The Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine and UNDP organised a webinar to present developments and experiences in public construction transparency in South Korea and Ukraine.
Transparency and open data initiatives in Ukraine's infrastructure projectsMaksym Klyuchar
Transparency and open data initiatives have been implemented in Ukraine's infrastructure projects to increase accountability. A 2015 law on public access to information and a government decree require over 300 datasets to be disclosed in open, machine-readable formats through a centralized open data web portal. The Ministry of Infrastructure has also launched transparency initiatives by disclosing 50 datasets on areas like state-owned enterprises and implementing an inexpensive IT system to consolidate reports and share data through the national open data portal. These measures aim to increase transparency and public trust in infrastructure projects.
The document describes an HRBA quiz with multiple choice questions about integrating human rights-based approaches into different stages of a project cycle.
In one question, a civil society organization in Country X conducted a study finding ethnic minorities cannot access health rights equally as the majority. They immediately launched an advocacy campaign. This violates HRBA by not involving stakeholders or analyzing root causes first.
Another question asks how a friend should respond after Lucy tells her she got a job but lied about being pregnant. The best option is to tell Lucy to contact the Employment Equality Committee to report discrimination, addressing the rights violation systemically.
The quiz questions assess understanding of integrating participation, analysis of root causes and capacity building into situation analysis,
The document summarizes 3 case studies where human rights-based approaches (HRBA) and gender mainstreaming were applied:
1) In Kosovo, a citizens' initiative used HRBA to amend laws allowing compensation for material and non-material damages from human rights abuses.
2) In Brazil, the Munduruku indigenous people used HRBA to gain legal recognition of their traditional lands, despite government pressure.
3) In the Philippines, women's rights organizations intervened to pressure negotiations towards a peace deal between the government and rebels, resulting in strong provisions for women's rights in autonomous regions.
The HRBA is based on international human rights law including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and 9 core international human rights treaties that establish civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights. These treaties include the ICCPR, ICESCR, CERD, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, ICRMW, CED, and CRPD. Each treaty establishes rights and monitoring committees that examine state parties' compliance through review of reports and individual complaints. The HRBA uses these international human rights principles and standards to guide programming and ensure it furthers the realization of human rights for all people.
1. Краковецький Олександр
CEO, DevRain Solutions, CTO ДонорUA
alex.krakovetskiy@devrain.com
Світовий та український досвід
роботи з геопросторовими даними
2. Типи геопросторових даних
1. Опис локації або об’єкту (наприклад, "France" або "Mountain View, CA")
2. Точки (Points) (пара широта-довгота)
3. Лінія або шлях (Lines or Paths) (набір точок)
4. Полігони (Polygons or Shapes) (набір точок, що утворюють замкнену
фігуру)
4. Геолокація, геофенсинг, геокодування
Геолокація – визначення координат (пари значень
довгота-широта).
Геофенсинг – визначення границь геопросторового
об’єкту.
Геокодува́ння — призначення об'єкту карти
певного універсального географічного
ідентифікатора (наприклад, географічні координати
на земній кулі - широта і довгота). Зворотнє
геокодування навпаки використовує географічні
координати, щоб знайти опис місця розташування
(наприклад, поштову адресу будівлі, назву
поселення тощо).
5. Де взяти дані?
1. http://data.gov.ua
2. http://www.geonames.org/
3. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset?
metadata_type=geospatial
4. 10 Free GIS Data Sources: Best
Global Raster and Vector Datasets
http://gisgeography.com/best-
free-gis-data-sources-raster-
vector/
5. Free GIS Data
http://freegisdata.rtwilson.com/
6. Foursquare API
https://developer.foursquare.com
7. Видані направлення авіакомпаніям України
Призначення для
експлуатації міжнародних
повітряних ліній.
https://www.google.com/map
s/d/viewer?mid=zQyzchol-
IlQ.kqJvVjvXIY-s
8. Місця та івенти
Туристичні місця України та
події.
https://www.google.com/map
s/d/viewer?mid=z8K60YZvAy
vw.kjWTOyma-sGE
11. УкрТрансГаз
На карті показані трубопроводи
через які газ потрапляє до
України і через які залишає її.
Показані сховища а також скільки
газу закачано та викачано за
добу і багато іншого.
http://utg.ua/live/
15. OpenGrid
Chicago has launched OpenGrid, which turns open data into maps. For
instance, citizens can visualize various databases to see how many potholes are
around them, what new restaurants have passed their initial inspections, and the
status of the city’s response to a 311 request. Meanwhile, people who are
thinking about starting a new business can visualize company records on the
map to see what is already located around them.
http://opengrid.io/, http://chicago.opengrid.io/opengrid/
18. OpenLayers
OpenLayers helps you place
dynamic maps in any web
page and it has no server-
side dependencies. Plus, it
can display map markers and
tiles that you have
downloaded from any source.
http://openlayers.org/
20. Перелік медичних закладів, де
можна здати кров, а також
медичних лабораторій "Сінево",
де приймють кров для аналізів.
Де здати кров?
https://donor.ua/centers/map
Статистика
https://donor.ua/statistics/maps
23. 1. Експортуємо дані в kml формат -
https://donor.ua/kml/centers та
https://donor.ua/kml/synevo.
2. Заходимо в Google My Maps, створюємо нову карту.
3. Завантажуємо kml шари (один або декілька).
4. Налаштовуємо, зберігаємо, шаримо.
https://donor.ua/blog/2043
24. Олександр Краковецький
CEO, DevRain Solutions
Експерт Державного агентства з питань
електронного урядування України при підтримці
ПРООН
alex.krakovetskiy@devrain.com
https://www.facebook.com/alex.krakovetskiy
@msugvnua
Питання?