Ukraine has been a member of the Open Government Partnership (OGP) since 2011. Its current action plan has 26 commitments related to access to information, civic engagement, e-government, and anti-corruption. The next plan should focus on implementing and enforcing laws passed. Despite political difficulties, Ukraine has made significant progress passing open government laws. It should participate in peer learning and exchange through OGP working groups and meetings to focus on areas like public procurement and reducing red tape.
Indicators for Implementing and Monitoring Human RightsMaksym Klyuchar
This document discusses frameworks for developing human rights indicators to monitor implementation and protection of human rights. It addresses the importance of indicators in making information more concrete, facilitating monitoring, and enabling effective communication and policy responses. The document outlines approaches for identifying appropriate human rights indicators, including ensuring they address relevant human rights principles and standards. It also discusses challenges in developing indicators and criteria for selecting indicators, such as ensuring they can be disaggregated and are objective. The document provides examples of different types of data and methods that can be used to measure indicators, such as events-based data, surveys, and administrative statistics. It emphasizes the importance of rights-based monitoring in focusing on vulnerable groups and certain institutional arrangements.
Indicators for Monitoring Implementation of a National Human Rights PlanMaksym Klyuchar
This document discusses developing indicators to monitor the implementation of human rights plans. It outlines reasons for systematically collecting human rights data, including making assessments more objective and creating accountability. Both qualitative and quantitative indicators can be used. Good indicators are relevant, reliable, and based on transparent methodology. Data should be disaggregated and timely. The document also examines the British Human Rights Measurement Framework as an example and priorities like prioritizing national law and using existing data sources.
Ukraine has been a member of the Open Government Partnership (OGP) since 2011. Its current action plan has 26 commitments related to access to information, civic engagement, e-government, and anti-corruption. The next plan should focus on implementing and enforcing laws passed. Despite political difficulties, Ukraine has made significant progress passing open government laws. It should participate in peer learning and exchange through OGP working groups and meetings to focus on areas like public procurement and reducing red tape.
Indicators for Implementing and Monitoring Human RightsMaksym Klyuchar
This document discusses frameworks for developing human rights indicators to monitor implementation and protection of human rights. It addresses the importance of indicators in making information more concrete, facilitating monitoring, and enabling effective communication and policy responses. The document outlines approaches for identifying appropriate human rights indicators, including ensuring they address relevant human rights principles and standards. It also discusses challenges in developing indicators and criteria for selecting indicators, such as ensuring they can be disaggregated and are objective. The document provides examples of different types of data and methods that can be used to measure indicators, such as events-based data, surveys, and administrative statistics. It emphasizes the importance of rights-based monitoring in focusing on vulnerable groups and certain institutional arrangements.
Indicators for Monitoring Implementation of a National Human Rights PlanMaksym Klyuchar
This document discusses developing indicators to monitor the implementation of human rights plans. It outlines reasons for systematically collecting human rights data, including making assessments more objective and creating accountability. Both qualitative and quantitative indicators can be used. Good indicators are relevant, reliable, and based on transparent methodology. Data should be disaggregated and timely. The document also examines the British Human Rights Measurement Framework as an example and priorities like prioritizing national law and using existing data sources.
This document discusses Seoul's Construction Cost Sharing (CCS) system, which discloses information on public construction projects through a website called Allimi. It notes that over 164,000 people accessed Allimi in 2015. The CCS system was recognized with a Human Technology Award for its transparency. Key factors in CCS's success included political will, civil society input, dedicated staff, and reforms to encourage transparency. Overall lessons included standardizing processes to reduce corruption risks, providing real-time information for accountability, and ongoing system upgrades and funding. The document recommends effective enforcement, sufficient resources, data standardization, offline engagement, and anti-corruption policies to prevent issues.
This document provides an overview of Seoul's One-PMIS (Project Management Information System) and the construction information disclosure system called "Allimi". It describes the workflow and user roles in One-PMIS, the various modules for project overview, progress management, reporting, safety management, and document management. It also explains the linked construction information disclosure system Allimi and how it provides public access to certain project documents and data.
The document summarizes Seoul's Clean Construction System which was introduced to improve construction project efficiency and transparency. It has four components: One-PMIS, an online project management system; Allimi, a public information disclosure system; an automated subcontractor payment system; and an electronic human resources system. One-PMIS allows real-time monitoring of construction materials, workers, and processes. Allimi is a public portal providing contract details, photos, stakeholders, and allowing citizen participation. Seoul made One-PMIS use mandatory for large public projects and provides training and support to promote its institutionalization. The document recommends other countries enact laws requiring similar online construction management systems.
The Construction Sector Tranparency Initiative in UkraineMaksym Klyuchar
The document discusses the Construction Sector Transparency Initiative (CoST) in Ukraine. It provides an overview of CoST, explaining that it aims to increase transparency and accountability in public infrastructure projects. It outlines CoST's core features, including multi-stakeholder groups, disclosure of project data, and independent assurance of disclosed data. The document then provides background on CoST in Ukraine, describing the pilot projects and strategic priorities, which include applying CoST's disclosure approach and aligning with other transparency initiatives.
Transparency and open data initiatives in Ukraine's infrastructure projectsMaksym Klyuchar
Kyiv, 17 June 2016 – The Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine and UNDP organised a webinar to present developments and experiences in public construction transparency in South Korea and Ukraine.
Transparency and open data initiatives in Ukraine's infrastructure projectsMaksym Klyuchar
Transparency and open data initiatives have been implemented in Ukraine's infrastructure projects to increase accountability. A 2015 law on public access to information and a government decree require over 300 datasets to be disclosed in open, machine-readable formats through a centralized open data web portal. The Ministry of Infrastructure has also launched transparency initiatives by disclosing 50 datasets on areas like state-owned enterprises and implementing an inexpensive IT system to consolidate reports and share data through the national open data portal. These measures aim to increase transparency and public trust in infrastructure projects.
The document describes an HRBA quiz with multiple choice questions about integrating human rights-based approaches into different stages of a project cycle.
In one question, a civil society organization in Country X conducted a study finding ethnic minorities cannot access health rights equally as the majority. They immediately launched an advocacy campaign. This violates HRBA by not involving stakeholders or analyzing root causes first.
Another question asks how a friend should respond after Lucy tells her she got a job but lied about being pregnant. The best option is to tell Lucy to contact the Employment Equality Committee to report discrimination, addressing the rights violation systemically.
The quiz questions assess understanding of integrating participation, analysis of root causes and capacity building into situation analysis,
The document summarizes 3 case studies where human rights-based approaches (HRBA) and gender mainstreaming were applied:
1) In Kosovo, a citizens' initiative used HRBA to amend laws allowing compensation for material and non-material damages from human rights abuses.
2) In Brazil, the Munduruku indigenous people used HRBA to gain legal recognition of their traditional lands, despite government pressure.
3) In the Philippines, women's rights organizations intervened to pressure negotiations towards a peace deal between the government and rebels, resulting in strong provisions for women's rights in autonomous regions.
The HRBA is based on international human rights law including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and 9 core international human rights treaties that establish civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights. These treaties include the ICCPR, ICESCR, CERD, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, ICRMW, CED, and CRPD. Each treaty establishes rights and monitoring committees that examine state parties' compliance through review of reports and individual complaints. The HRBA uses these international human rights principles and standards to guide programming and ensure it furthers the realization of human rights for all people.
This document discusses using a problem tree analysis to examine human rights-based approaches. It suggests looking at the roots and trunk of issues to understand obstacles for implementing HRBA, and branches to see how problems manifest in daily activities. In just 3 sentences or less, it touches on using a problem tree framework to analyze barriers to applying human rights approaches and how they appear in work.
HRBA is a conceptual framework based on international human rights standards that promotes and protects human rights. It seeks to analyze inequalities and redress discriminatory practices and unjust distributions of power that impede development. Key principles of HRBA include participation, transparency, accountability, good governance, and non-discrimination. These principles guide the responsibilities of duty-bearers to respect, protect, and fulfill human rights, and the empowerment of rights-holders to claim their rights. Gender mainstreaming utilizes similar principles to promote gender equality and women's empowerment in all areas of policymaking and programming.
This document discusses Seoul's Construction Cost Sharing (CCS) system, which discloses information on public construction projects through a website called Allimi. It notes that over 164,000 people accessed Allimi in 2015. The CCS system was recognized with a Human Technology Award for its transparency. Key factors in CCS's success included political will, civil society input, dedicated staff, and reforms to encourage transparency. Overall lessons included standardizing processes to reduce corruption risks, providing real-time information for accountability, and ongoing system upgrades and funding. The document recommends effective enforcement, sufficient resources, data standardization, offline engagement, and anti-corruption policies to prevent issues.
This document provides an overview of Seoul's One-PMIS (Project Management Information System) and the construction information disclosure system called "Allimi". It describes the workflow and user roles in One-PMIS, the various modules for project overview, progress management, reporting, safety management, and document management. It also explains the linked construction information disclosure system Allimi and how it provides public access to certain project documents and data.
The document summarizes Seoul's Clean Construction System which was introduced to improve construction project efficiency and transparency. It has four components: One-PMIS, an online project management system; Allimi, a public information disclosure system; an automated subcontractor payment system; and an electronic human resources system. One-PMIS allows real-time monitoring of construction materials, workers, and processes. Allimi is a public portal providing contract details, photos, stakeholders, and allowing citizen participation. Seoul made One-PMIS use mandatory for large public projects and provides training and support to promote its institutionalization. The document recommends other countries enact laws requiring similar online construction management systems.
The Construction Sector Tranparency Initiative in UkraineMaksym Klyuchar
The document discusses the Construction Sector Transparency Initiative (CoST) in Ukraine. It provides an overview of CoST, explaining that it aims to increase transparency and accountability in public infrastructure projects. It outlines CoST's core features, including multi-stakeholder groups, disclosure of project data, and independent assurance of disclosed data. The document then provides background on CoST in Ukraine, describing the pilot projects and strategic priorities, which include applying CoST's disclosure approach and aligning with other transparency initiatives.
Transparency and open data initiatives in Ukraine's infrastructure projectsMaksym Klyuchar
Kyiv, 17 June 2016 – The Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine and UNDP organised a webinar to present developments and experiences in public construction transparency in South Korea and Ukraine.
Transparency and open data initiatives in Ukraine's infrastructure projectsMaksym Klyuchar
Transparency and open data initiatives have been implemented in Ukraine's infrastructure projects to increase accountability. A 2015 law on public access to information and a government decree require over 300 datasets to be disclosed in open, machine-readable formats through a centralized open data web portal. The Ministry of Infrastructure has also launched transparency initiatives by disclosing 50 datasets on areas like state-owned enterprises and implementing an inexpensive IT system to consolidate reports and share data through the national open data portal. These measures aim to increase transparency and public trust in infrastructure projects.
The document describes an HRBA quiz with multiple choice questions about integrating human rights-based approaches into different stages of a project cycle.
In one question, a civil society organization in Country X conducted a study finding ethnic minorities cannot access health rights equally as the majority. They immediately launched an advocacy campaign. This violates HRBA by not involving stakeholders or analyzing root causes first.
Another question asks how a friend should respond after Lucy tells her she got a job but lied about being pregnant. The best option is to tell Lucy to contact the Employment Equality Committee to report discrimination, addressing the rights violation systemically.
The quiz questions assess understanding of integrating participation, analysis of root causes and capacity building into situation analysis,
The document summarizes 3 case studies where human rights-based approaches (HRBA) and gender mainstreaming were applied:
1) In Kosovo, a citizens' initiative used HRBA to amend laws allowing compensation for material and non-material damages from human rights abuses.
2) In Brazil, the Munduruku indigenous people used HRBA to gain legal recognition of their traditional lands, despite government pressure.
3) In the Philippines, women's rights organizations intervened to pressure negotiations towards a peace deal between the government and rebels, resulting in strong provisions for women's rights in autonomous regions.
The HRBA is based on international human rights law including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and 9 core international human rights treaties that establish civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights. These treaties include the ICCPR, ICESCR, CERD, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, ICRMW, CED, and CRPD. Each treaty establishes rights and monitoring committees that examine state parties' compliance through review of reports and individual complaints. The HRBA uses these international human rights principles and standards to guide programming and ensure it furthers the realization of human rights for all people.
This document discusses using a problem tree analysis to examine human rights-based approaches. It suggests looking at the roots and trunk of issues to understand obstacles for implementing HRBA, and branches to see how problems manifest in daily activities. In just 3 sentences or less, it touches on using a problem tree framework to analyze barriers to applying human rights approaches and how they appear in work.
HRBA is a conceptual framework based on international human rights standards that promotes and protects human rights. It seeks to analyze inequalities and redress discriminatory practices and unjust distributions of power that impede development. Key principles of HRBA include participation, transparency, accountability, good governance, and non-discrimination. These principles guide the responsibilities of duty-bearers to respect, protect, and fulfill human rights, and the empowerment of rights-holders to claim their rights. Gender mainstreaming utilizes similar principles to promote gender equality and women's empowerment in all areas of policymaking and programming.
2. 13
11
11
9
Доступ до інформації
Громадська участь
Підзвітність влади
Технології та інновації для підзвітності та
прозорості
Акцент зобов'язань
21
7
Явно пов’язані з цінностями ПВУ
Мають трансформуючий потенційний
вплив
Оцінка зобов'язань
3. “Зіркові” зобов'язання
5.3 Доступ до
архівів
комуністичного
режиму
7. Наглядовий
механізм для права
на доступ до
інформації
6. Проект закону
про відкриті дані
Явно
пов’язані з
цінностям
и ПВУ
Мають
трансформ
уючий
потенційни
й вплив
Виконані
значною
або
повною
мірою
За попередньою методологією (до 2015): 7
зіркових зобов’язань в Плані дій 2014-2015 рр.
5. Головні рекомендації
1. Підтвердити відданість процесу ПВУ на найвищому
політичному рівні, краще популяризувати ПВУ та його
зобов’язання
2. Забезпечити ефективну співпрацю з громадянським
суспільством під час реалізації кожного із зобов’язань та
залучити представників приватного сектора до процесу
ПВУ
3. Реформувати координаційний механізм в рамках ПВУ
шляхом кращого оперативного управління ініціативою та
розділення відповідальності за управління ініціативою з
представниками громадянського суспільства. Забезпечити
відчуття “власності” з боку органів-виконавців за
допомогою формального процесу координації та співпраці.
6. Головні рекомендації (2)
4. Звузити сферу охоплення плану дій та визначити
пріоритетні зобов’язання в наступному плані дій. У
кожному розділі план дій міг би містити одне чи два
амбітних зобов’язання та передбачати стислу дорожню
карту їх реалізації. Це могли би бути зобов’язання, що
мають найбільш трансформуючий вплив та вимагають
чіткого партнерства з громадянським суспільством.
5. Зосередити увагу на амбітних та реалістичних
пріоритетах, таких як введення в дію системи
електронного подання та перевірки декларацій
публічних службовців, подальше розкриття та інтеграція
різноманітних державних реєстрів за допомогою доступу
онлайн та у формі відкритих даних, переведення всього
циклу публічних закупівель на електронну платформу,
розроблення дорожньої карти електронної демократії в
Україні.