This document discusses strategies for gaining community acceptance and overcoming opposition to proposed aggregate quarry projects. It finds that 62% of Americans oppose quarries in their hometown and politics are a major factor. It recommends conducting political due diligence, demonstrating public support, and engaging in community outreach before submitting permit applications. Key strategies include meeting with neighbors one-on-one early in the process, identifying and addressing concerns, and organizing supporters to speak at public hearings. Maintaining open communication, being responsive to complaints, and getting involved in the community through donations, tours and volunteer activities can help gain acceptance.
Globální studie Havas Worldwide: Lidé kupují více od odpovědných firemMarketingSalesMedia
Studie agentury Havas probíhá v České republice a dalších třiceti zemích světa. Tentokrát se zaměřila na tzv. názorové vůdce, neboli "prosumery", kteří jsou mj. ochotní utratit víc za produkty, které jsou šetrné k přírodě či společnosti. Studie ukazuje, že nyní většina lidí začíná takto uvažovat a jednat.
Drafted first chapter of Welcome to the Fifth Estate by Geoff Livingston before editorial review. This document discusses Fifth Estate, Long Tail and social media control theories.
Offering tips, techniques and models to better inform citizens about what they need to know, this deeply-reported session on political journalism will provide insights into how "horse-race" reporting shortchanges voters and why issues journalism can productively shape reporting on the 2020 campaign.
Rising Waters, Difficult Decisions: Findings from the Calgary flood projectglennmcgillivray
On March 23, ICLR held a Friday Forum workshop titled 'Rising Waters, Difficult Decisions: Findings from the Calgary flood project', lead by Tim Haney of Mount Royal University. The 2013 Southern Alberta flood inundated Calgary and many surrounding communities. The flood prompted what was, at the time, the largest urban evacuation and the costliest disaster in Canadian history. The flood also exposed gaps in residents’ understanding of their flood risk, their ability to prepare for and engage in flood evacuation, and their capacity to respond to floods. This webinar provided a summary of Dr. Haney's 2017 study 'Rising Waters, Difficult Decisions: Findings and Recommendations from the Calgary Flood Project' which revealed, among other things, that many Calgarians misunderstood their flood risk prior to the event. Many residents did not hear the evacuation order, or did not believe that it applied to them, and, even among those who heard the order, a remarkable number of Calgarians failed to evacuate before the flood. The study contains five concrete policy recommendations for municipal, provincial, and federal government officials, and policymakers.
Dr. Tim Haney is Professor of Sociology and Director of the Centre for Community Disaster Research at Calgary’s Mount Royal University. Dr. Haney's research looks at how families, neighbourhoods, and communities prepare for and respond to catastrophic events like hurricanes, floods, wildfires, and oil spills. His articles have looked at how disaster-affected residents perceive risk and experience uncertainty, how they make evacuation decisions, how disasters affect their environmental views and practices, how the social networks of affected residents change over the course of evacuation and displacement, as well as establishing best-practices for disaster research methods. Tim Haney holds a PhD in sociology from University of Oregon (2009) and an MA in sociology from Tulane University (2005).
Globální studie Havas Worldwide: Lidé kupují více od odpovědných firemMarketingSalesMedia
Studie agentury Havas probíhá v České republice a dalších třiceti zemích světa. Tentokrát se zaměřila na tzv. názorové vůdce, neboli "prosumery", kteří jsou mj. ochotní utratit víc za produkty, které jsou šetrné k přírodě či společnosti. Studie ukazuje, že nyní většina lidí začíná takto uvažovat a jednat.
Drafted first chapter of Welcome to the Fifth Estate by Geoff Livingston before editorial review. This document discusses Fifth Estate, Long Tail and social media control theories.
Offering tips, techniques and models to better inform citizens about what they need to know, this deeply-reported session on political journalism will provide insights into how "horse-race" reporting shortchanges voters and why issues journalism can productively shape reporting on the 2020 campaign.
Rising Waters, Difficult Decisions: Findings from the Calgary flood projectglennmcgillivray
On March 23, ICLR held a Friday Forum workshop titled 'Rising Waters, Difficult Decisions: Findings from the Calgary flood project', lead by Tim Haney of Mount Royal University. The 2013 Southern Alberta flood inundated Calgary and many surrounding communities. The flood prompted what was, at the time, the largest urban evacuation and the costliest disaster in Canadian history. The flood also exposed gaps in residents’ understanding of their flood risk, their ability to prepare for and engage in flood evacuation, and their capacity to respond to floods. This webinar provided a summary of Dr. Haney's 2017 study 'Rising Waters, Difficult Decisions: Findings and Recommendations from the Calgary Flood Project' which revealed, among other things, that many Calgarians misunderstood their flood risk prior to the event. Many residents did not hear the evacuation order, or did not believe that it applied to them, and, even among those who heard the order, a remarkable number of Calgarians failed to evacuate before the flood. The study contains five concrete policy recommendations for municipal, provincial, and federal government officials, and policymakers.
Dr. Tim Haney is Professor of Sociology and Director of the Centre for Community Disaster Research at Calgary’s Mount Royal University. Dr. Haney's research looks at how families, neighbourhoods, and communities prepare for and respond to catastrophic events like hurricanes, floods, wildfires, and oil spills. His articles have looked at how disaster-affected residents perceive risk and experience uncertainty, how they make evacuation decisions, how disasters affect their environmental views and practices, how the social networks of affected residents change over the course of evacuation and displacement, as well as establishing best-practices for disaster research methods. Tim Haney holds a PhD in sociology from University of Oregon (2009) and an MA in sociology from Tulane University (2005).
Nonprofits in the San Francisco Bay Area have long struggled to find and keep affordable space in the region’s red-hot real estate market. The COVID-19 pandemic has brought a new array of space challenges for nonprofits. Nonprofits now face new challenges - renegotiating leases, shedding unused space, adapting spaces to meet physical distancing requirements, even expanding to meet increased demand for services. Even without the staggering economic consequences of the pandemic, the future of nonprofit workspace is in flux as many nonprofits have moved to remote working arrangements and are considering alternatives to the future of workspace.
In late 2020, in collaboration with Community Vision and the Nonprofit Displacement Project, NCG commissioned a survey to better understand how COVID-19 has impacted the operations and workspace needs of Bay Area nonprofits. NCG engaged Harder+Company Community Research to design and conduct the survey, which explored 3 core areas: how the pandemic has impacted Bay Area nonprofits’ programming and operations; impending eviction and financial concerns; and nonprofits’ future workspace plans. These findings will inform NCG and their partners as they develop strategies to support nonprofits in their current and future workspace needs.
A constitutional amendment that will forever change the way development is approved; …A community vote on every comprehensive plan amendment approved by every unit of local government…
*This includes special purpose districts that have plans, too.
The role of the community leader as activist or local campaigner. An introduction to concepts of influence mapping, marketing, tactical choices and the relationship between community services and community activism. Includes group activities to better explore the concepts.
This is an analysis by Milano Management student Dava Antoniotti of the One Kalamazoo Campaign to pass a municipal ordinance prohibiting discrimination of lesbian, gay and bisexual people in the city of Kalamazoo, Michigan.
Smart Growth and Suburbia:What Is It? Who’s Behind It?James Dellinger
Environmental groups, urban
planners and “not-in-my-backyard”
homeowners oppose what they consider
uncontrolled land development—also
known as “suburban sprawl.” They are devising
so-called “smart growth” initiatives
planning future land use. But these proposals
limit consumer choices and trample on
property rights. Smart-growth legislation
also unfairly discriminates against new and
less affluent homeowners who are priced out
of the housing market when land-use restrictions
cause property values to skyrocket.
What is smart-growth and who funds this
growing movement?
Attitudes toward Online Availability of US Public RecordsSean Munson
Many have enthusiastically greeted the ability to search and view public records online as a great advance for transparency and accountability. Such ability, however, also creates value tensions with privacy and other important human values. In this paper, we report findings from a survey of 134 residents of the US Pacific Northwest on their awareness of and attitudes towards online access to political campaign records and real estate transaction histories, bringing to light some of the social implications of technological changes that increase ease of access to public records. We show that, while respondents often understood the reason behind making these records public, considerable concern about the current accessibility of these records exists, along with a precautionary indication that such open access may reduce public participation for some individuals.
Panel organized for the RECAST conference in Santa Fe, marking the 20th anniversary of the public process that created the Santa Fe Railyard Redevelopment. Panelists included: Joel Mills, Cheryl Morgan, Erin Simmons, and Thea Crum. The panel explored issues facing cities today and multiple democratic methodologies (participatory budgeting, democratic urbanism) for city building.
Take on Wall Street Poll Analysis: Policy BriefingCWAUnion
A poll conducted in four pivotal swing states – Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Missouri – suggests that voter anger towards Wall Street remains high and can be a persuasive line of attack for Democrats campaigning to recapture a majority in the U.S. Senate.
This was a paper I wrote during my internship with Detroit Future City. It centers on Community Benefit Agreements, best practices for CBAs, and how these best practices can be implemented in the City of Detroit to increase resident empowerment.
On the streets, on social networks and at the ballot box, people are voicing their discontent. They are worried about the environment. They are demanding social equality. They are advocating for better living and working conditions. And they are reacting to perceived institutional injustices. In short, they are angry at their leaders and they are making sure their voices are heard. This is not about a handful of radicals shouting from the wilderness. What we are witnessing is a massive shift in the ‘middle’. Indeed, the voices on the fringes of these issues largely remain shrill and extreme. What is changing is the quiet chorus of voices that make up the middle ground (i.e., the average voter).
For many governments, this upswelling of discontent could not be happening at a worse time. Public budgets are highly constrained (either by debt or by borrowing limits). Technologies are rapidly changing. New risks are emerging. And planning is becoming infinitely more complex. The pace of response from governments is proving to be inadequate.
Building a Stronger Local Media Ecosystem: The Role of Media PolicyDamian Radcliffe
This paper plays out against a backdrop of continued closures and diminished local news reporting across much of the United States. It explores the role that media policy can and should play in supporting local journalism.
In examining this topic, we investigate three fundamental questions:
What is local media policy?
What are the key existential issues and/or problems local media policy must wrestle with?
What potential solutions to the local news crisis can media policy potentially help address?
The core of our response to these questions is derived from a series of five public webinars hosted by the Tow Center. Through these events, we invited a range of industry and academic experts to share their perspectives on areas related to these major themes.
Our conversations explored the scope of media policy, barriers to implementation, opportunities for policy to make a difference, and some of the unique characteristics that shape U.S. media policy and attitudes toward potential policy interventions.
To this, we have added further context and updates on some of the latest policy developments, based on a literature review and our continued interest in this subject.
Nonprofits in the San Francisco Bay Area have long struggled to find and keep affordable space in the region’s red-hot real estate market. The COVID-19 pandemic has brought a new array of space challenges for nonprofits. Nonprofits now face new challenges - renegotiating leases, shedding unused space, adapting spaces to meet physical distancing requirements, even expanding to meet increased demand for services. Even without the staggering economic consequences of the pandemic, the future of nonprofit workspace is in flux as many nonprofits have moved to remote working arrangements and are considering alternatives to the future of workspace.
In late 2020, in collaboration with Community Vision and the Nonprofit Displacement Project, NCG commissioned a survey to better understand how COVID-19 has impacted the operations and workspace needs of Bay Area nonprofits. NCG engaged Harder+Company Community Research to design and conduct the survey, which explored 3 core areas: how the pandemic has impacted Bay Area nonprofits’ programming and operations; impending eviction and financial concerns; and nonprofits’ future workspace plans. These findings will inform NCG and their partners as they develop strategies to support nonprofits in their current and future workspace needs.
A constitutional amendment that will forever change the way development is approved; …A community vote on every comprehensive plan amendment approved by every unit of local government…
*This includes special purpose districts that have plans, too.
The role of the community leader as activist or local campaigner. An introduction to concepts of influence mapping, marketing, tactical choices and the relationship between community services and community activism. Includes group activities to better explore the concepts.
This is an analysis by Milano Management student Dava Antoniotti of the One Kalamazoo Campaign to pass a municipal ordinance prohibiting discrimination of lesbian, gay and bisexual people in the city of Kalamazoo, Michigan.
Smart Growth and Suburbia:What Is It? Who’s Behind It?James Dellinger
Environmental groups, urban
planners and “not-in-my-backyard”
homeowners oppose what they consider
uncontrolled land development—also
known as “suburban sprawl.” They are devising
so-called “smart growth” initiatives
planning future land use. But these proposals
limit consumer choices and trample on
property rights. Smart-growth legislation
also unfairly discriminates against new and
less affluent homeowners who are priced out
of the housing market when land-use restrictions
cause property values to skyrocket.
What is smart-growth and who funds this
growing movement?
Attitudes toward Online Availability of US Public RecordsSean Munson
Many have enthusiastically greeted the ability to search and view public records online as a great advance for transparency and accountability. Such ability, however, also creates value tensions with privacy and other important human values. In this paper, we report findings from a survey of 134 residents of the US Pacific Northwest on their awareness of and attitudes towards online access to political campaign records and real estate transaction histories, bringing to light some of the social implications of technological changes that increase ease of access to public records. We show that, while respondents often understood the reason behind making these records public, considerable concern about the current accessibility of these records exists, along with a precautionary indication that such open access may reduce public participation for some individuals.
Panel organized for the RECAST conference in Santa Fe, marking the 20th anniversary of the public process that created the Santa Fe Railyard Redevelopment. Panelists included: Joel Mills, Cheryl Morgan, Erin Simmons, and Thea Crum. The panel explored issues facing cities today and multiple democratic methodologies (participatory budgeting, democratic urbanism) for city building.
Take on Wall Street Poll Analysis: Policy BriefingCWAUnion
A poll conducted in four pivotal swing states – Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Missouri – suggests that voter anger towards Wall Street remains high and can be a persuasive line of attack for Democrats campaigning to recapture a majority in the U.S. Senate.
This was a paper I wrote during my internship with Detroit Future City. It centers on Community Benefit Agreements, best practices for CBAs, and how these best practices can be implemented in the City of Detroit to increase resident empowerment.
On the streets, on social networks and at the ballot box, people are voicing their discontent. They are worried about the environment. They are demanding social equality. They are advocating for better living and working conditions. And they are reacting to perceived institutional injustices. In short, they are angry at their leaders and they are making sure their voices are heard. This is not about a handful of radicals shouting from the wilderness. What we are witnessing is a massive shift in the ‘middle’. Indeed, the voices on the fringes of these issues largely remain shrill and extreme. What is changing is the quiet chorus of voices that make up the middle ground (i.e., the average voter).
For many governments, this upswelling of discontent could not be happening at a worse time. Public budgets are highly constrained (either by debt or by borrowing limits). Technologies are rapidly changing. New risks are emerging. And planning is becoming infinitely more complex. The pace of response from governments is proving to be inadequate.
Building a Stronger Local Media Ecosystem: The Role of Media PolicyDamian Radcliffe
This paper plays out against a backdrop of continued closures and diminished local news reporting across much of the United States. It explores the role that media policy can and should play in supporting local journalism.
In examining this topic, we investigate three fundamental questions:
What is local media policy?
What are the key existential issues and/or problems local media policy must wrestle with?
What potential solutions to the local news crisis can media policy potentially help address?
The core of our response to these questions is derived from a series of five public webinars hosted by the Tow Center. Through these events, we invited a range of industry and academic experts to share their perspectives on areas related to these major themes.
Our conversations explored the scope of media policy, barriers to implementation, opportunities for policy to make a difference, and some of the unique characteristics that shape U.S. media policy and attitudes toward potential policy interventions.
To this, we have added further context and updates on some of the latest policy developments, based on a literature review and our continued interest in this subject.
1. Stone, Sand & Gravel Review, September/October 2009 29
S
ixty-two percent of Americans say they’d oppose an
aggregate quarry if one were proposed in their home-
town. To put that in perspective, it’s more opposition than
a nuclear power plant registered in the 2009 Saint Index survey
of attitudes about local real estate development projects.
Despite the economic recession, America’s NIMBY (Not
In My Back Yard) attitude is still overwhelming in every
region, the nationwide survey of 1,000 adults found. An
aggregate quarry is near the top of the “unwanted” list, trail-
ing only a landfill (78 per-
cent opposition) or a casino
(77 percent) when it comes
to a person’s hometown.
In such an environment,
it is increasingly necessary
for operators seeking to
develop or expand a quarry
to demonstrate public sup-
port before local politicians
will vote for a needed zon-
ing change, an air permit
application or any other
public approvals.
No matter how good a
project is or how many tax
dollars it will bring into a
community, elected officials increasingly take the expedi-
ent path of siding with the roomful of angry constituents
– especially if the only voices in favor are the applicant and
his paid consultants.
Without visible public support to justify or provide
“cover” for voting in favor of a controversial project, politi-
cians have no desire or will to defy the voters who can vote
them out of office.
Opposition groups, meanwhile, are becoming sophisti-
cated in their methods and
abilities to network with
like-minded NIMBY activ-
ists around the globe. They
exchange ideas and can send
a negative news story about
an operator or quarry across
the country.
Public approvals and
zoning changes are politi-
cal decisions. While the
science and technical stud-
ies supporting an applica-
tion are knowable parts
in the processes,
the politics are
often volitile and
Overcoming Opposition
and Building
Community Acceptance:
Everything is
Politicalby Christopher Hopkins
Senior Vice President for Aggregates and Mining
The Saint Consulting Group
>
2. Stone, Sand & Gravel Review, September/October 2009 31
unpredictable. Nearly all politi-
cians posess a strong desire to be
re-elected, and to be re-elected they
must be liked. Therefore, they need
to be on the “correct” side of contro-
versial decisions in the judgement of
a majority of voters.
The problem we face on a daily
basis is that fear sells, and the unknown
is scary to most folks. Lack of knowl-
edge makes it easy for untruths about
a quarry operation to quickly take root
in a community when spread by oppo-
nents. Telling people that their way of
life is about to change for the worse is a
sure way to rile homeowners. A quarry
developer ignores this dynamic at his
or her peril.
Residents ultimately oppose quar-
ry development because they do not
understand it or the science that goes
into the industry. Most members of
the general public have in mind a
picture of somebody standing over
an old-fashioned plunger, setting off
an uncontrolled blast that sends boul-
ders flying. And almost nobody has
even the vaguest understanding of
where you stand with the local politi-
cians (not what they tell you to your
face, but what they say to their con-
stituents). The due dilligence process
should also involve identifying where
potential opposition is likely to sur-
face and the possible concerns of your
closest neighbors.
Other basic information to gather
includes issues such as: Where does
the mayor live (near your site)? Do
members of the the city council rou-
tinely defer to the wishes of the coun-
cilor in whose district the project is
located? What are the relationships
on the board? If Councilor A is going
to vote yes, do others always vote
with him? Being fully aware of these
dynamics is essential in tallying your
vote count prior to the public hear-
ings, identifying which councilors
need attention and knowing where to
focus resident outreach.
There Are Few Secrets in the
Internet Age
The Internet provides any
opponents and community
the wide variety of uses aggregates
have in their everyday lives.
Most opposition to a quarry comes
from nearby residents. At times they
are bolstered by regional and national
environmental organizations, a situ-
ation that depends a great deal on the
size of the development and who the
developer is. Local residents oppose
projects for the most primal of reasons;
in their opinions, they are protecting
their primary asset, the value of their
home and their quality of life.
All Politics is Local, All Land
Use is Political
Companies spend a great deal of
resources prior to filing an appplication
and announcing their project publicly.
Environmental studies are completed,
drilling is done, samples are examined.
But most companies do not make the
effort to gain an in-depth understand-
ing of what can be the highest hurdle to
overcome — the local politics.
Before filing any application,
conducting political due diligence
is a logical step. You need to know >
388842_Bituminous.indd 1 6/26/08 12:54:47 PM
3. Stone, Sand & Gravel Review, September/October 2009 33
groups access to stories going back
years, and the archives know no geo-
graphical bounds. If you are a nation-
wide quarry company, a problem you
had four years ago in Macon, Ga., is
now fodder for opponents of a quarry
you are trying to permit in Tacoma,
Wash. The Internet allows opponents
to easily identify and interact with
other community groups around the
country or even the world. Groups
bond together, exchange strategies,
information and stories. Everything
that was regional in the past is now
international. So, conduct what poli-
ticians call “opposition research” on
yourself. Find out what news stories
or other information is available about
you and your company on the internet
before you start.
The Internet also is used to indict the
industry as a whole. Tales about poor
operators who care little for neighbors
or maintaining good community and
environmental standards become fod-
der for opposition groups. These stories
may have absolutely nothing to do with
the way you conduct your business, but
community, treasure their positions
and want nothing more than to get re-
elected. They may like your project
and recognize the economic benefits
that it will bring, but when faced with
outraged constituents, they will walk
away from you (regardless of what
they have told you and your relation-
ship with them beforehand). There are
exceptions, of course, but don’t risk
your project by assuming your applica-
tion is that special exception.
Outreach to citzens is best con-
ducted as early in the process as pos-
sible. You really do not want your
closest neighbors reading about your
quarry for the first time in the newspa-
per. Much good will can be garnered
by sitting down at the kitchen table,
telling them your plans, getting their
input and then maintaining commu-
nication. These neighbors may never
support you, but they will appreciate
your outreach, as will the board mem-
bers. One of the worst things that can
be said by a neighbor at a pub-
lic hearing is “they never even
met with me.”
be ready to answer for them during the
permitting process.
Conducting Community
Outreach
Community outreach should be
conducted before you go public, but
time it with notifying the elected offi-
cials. Meet with the neighbors one to
one before your opposition does. It
is easier to form an opinion than to
change an opinion. It is important
that you avoid large group settings if
at all possible. Holding one large com-
munity meeting in an effort to get your
outreach over and done is a recipe for
disaster. The larger the group, the
more difficult it becomes to control.
A small group of aggitators can domi-
nate a public meeting and turn the rest
of the crowd against you — and the
next day’s news story will be all about
the “intense citzen opposition” to your
quarry or mine.
When facing a difficult land use
battle and strong opposition, remem-
ber that voters matter. Local elected
officials, regardless of the size of the
440275_Buell.indd 1 7/30/09 9:56:02 PM
>
4. 34 Stone, Sand & Gravel Review, September/October 2009
An important part of out-
reach is documenting every-
thing you do. It not only
allows you to rebut untrue
claims that may be made
later during the hearing pro-
cess, but is the beginning of
a valuable data base of sup-
porters, potential supporters
and opponents. Remember
that a silent supporter is no
help to your cause. When
residents say they support
what you are doing, ask
them to sign a letter or peti-
tion stating that support.
Remain in touch and build relation-
ships with your supporters and poten-
tial supporters, and you may be able
to call upon them to speak at a pub-
lic hearing. If not, you’ll still have a
written expression of their support to
offer public officials.
Once you meet with your neighbors,
it is time to begin organizing those
residents who do not live in close prox-
imity, but who may see the benefits
of the quarry either through jobs, tax
revenues or the multiplier effect you
will have on local businesses. These
residents are likely to sign a petition,
write a letter or attend a public hearing
if approached. Other outreach should
be done with local organizations, youth
sports and recreation groups that need
park improvements, local businesses,
the local Chamber of Commerce and
friends and relatives of your employ-
ees. These are all potential supporters
if approached.
Identify and approach “grasstops”
community leaders, often long-term
residents who are civicly active and are
influential with local officials.
Taking Action
A quiet supporter is no help to
your cause. To be an effective sup-
porter a citizen must be convinced to
take some sort of action. That action
could be as simple as signing a peti-
tion, being filmed for a video peti-
tion, writing a letter of support or
speaking for you at a public hearing.
Supporters who are most effective
are those who will attend a public
hearing on your behalf. Make sure
You may not realize it, but
you are going to have to go
back to the town or county
again sometime in the future.
You may want to expand your
reserves, you may want a spe-
cial permit or a variance of
some sort in the future. You
have a business in the commu-
nity, and it is always better to
have a good relationship and be
a good corporate neighbor.
This should be looked upon
as an opportunity. Who is a
better advocate in the future
than your most ardent oppo-
nent who becomes a supporter? A
past opponent or a neighbor who will
stand up at a future hearing in town
or a neighboring county and testify
that you did everything you said you’d
do is worth as much as any attorney,
lobbyist or expert you hire. Embracing
your opponents is good business. You
may not ever get some of them on
board, but you will be commended for
making the effort.
Ignoring your opposition will result
in a large headache as you run your
operations. Those opponents will file
complaints with the city or county and
constantly be critical of your opera-
tions, and their statements can be used
against you in neighboring communi-
ties. By maintaining communications,
you are able to keep your fingers on
the pulse of the community, you can
disarm unfounded rumors early in the
process, and you will create a lot of
good will.
Communication is Key
One of the most important parts of
any community plan is good commu-
nication. It is suggested that you have
a company contact person for the com-
munity. This should be a consistent per-
son who can field complaints, respond
to them, provide answers and be
responsive. The worst that can be done
is to ignore questions and complaints
because after they call you and do not
get a response, their next call will be
to the mayor or their councilor. You do
not want to hear about their complaints
from the mayor, especially if they tried
you and got no response.
you give them talking points and that
they know when to get up to speak.
Having voter after voter get up and
say the exact same thing diminishes
the value. It is also important to stag-
ger your speakers so they are not fol-
lowed by a parade of uninterupted
opponents. If you stagger your speak-
ers, you can break up any flow and
momentum the opposition may gather
if left uninterrupted.
You need to carefully prepare for
a public hearing. One idea we’ve had
success with is holding a barbeque
for supporters prior to the hearing at
a location near the hearing room. It
provides an informal setting to prepare
them, and they can all march together
to the hearing. Have your supporters
wear a bright lapel sticker, even those
who will not speak, so board mem-
bers know they support your project.
Remember to make sure your support-
ers remain respectful, no matter how
outragous your opponents act.
What Do You Do Now?
You have just been successful and
won all your necessary permits. It was
a long, contentious, sometimes bruising
process, but you are about to open for
business and start sending stone to mar-
ket. What do you do with those neigh-
bors who opposed your application?
You can gloat, not give them the time
or day and remind them constantly that
you won and they lost. While that is
probably the most tempting response,
it is also the wrong one. You need to
remember that this is a business and
not personal.
5. Stone, Sand & Gravel Review, September/October 2009 35
You will find that some
people will always be unrea-
sonable or that you cannot
give them the answer they
want, but always respond
within 24 to 48 hours and
acknowledge their perception
of the problem, because that is
how they see it. This could be
simply an annoyance for you,
but it is extremely important
to them, so treat it as such.
It will also assist with the
mayor and the councilors if
you have already responded
to the complaint.
Here are several simple steps you
can take to reduce the number of
complaints and keep goodwill within
the community and with the local
politicians:
• Be as consistent as possible with
your blasting schedule.
• Develop a blasting notification sys-
tem with anyone who requests it.
• Doabsolutelyeverythingyouprom-
ised during the permitting process.
Adopt a grade at the local
schools and have an annual
quarry tour. Arrange for a
geologist to speak to a sci-
ence class. Events such as this
can become an annual field
trip and educational class.
It can also be an excellent
opportunity to speak to par-
ents and teachers in a relaxed
atmosphere about the role
that aggregates play in their
everyday lives.
Most companies will spon-
sor a local sports team. But
wouldn’t it be more effective
to have you or your employees coach
a little league team or a softball team?
This gives your employee another
chance to interact with parents as well,
discussing the aggregate industry and
everything that we do, safety and envi-
ronmental concerns.
One current trend is for corporations
to have a volunteer day, where
they allow employees a day to
volunteer in the community.
• Mitigate your dust as much as
possible.
• Have your drivers obey all local
traffic guidelines.
Community Involvement
Get involved in the community.
Becoming more than just another
business that donates to local causes
can go a long way to enhance your
image as a good corporate citizen.
>
416287_Rotonics.indd 1 1/16/09 4:31:40 PM
6. Stone, Sand & Gravel Review, September/October 2009 37
Take it a step further and have your
employees volunteer on a project that
you sponsor. Build a sand play area in
the local park, reclaim an old field with
the materials from the quarry. After
you do this, you can name it after a
prominent resident and have a dedica-
tion ceremony hosted by you and cov-
ered by the local media.
We have clients who hold an annual
open house at the quarry, sponsor a
community cookout and tour of the pit
or use their pits for the 4th
of July fire-
works display.
The Database
In order to get the most benefit from
these activities, you need to maintain
a database. Maintain a sign-in sheet
for all tours and put the names into
the database. Send thank-you notes,
Christmas cards and other correspon-
dence. This will create a potential
supporter list for any future instance
where you need to call upon commu-
nity backers. It is also very difficult
for a resident to oppose you if they
It also will benefit you to publicize
the industry awards you may receive.
The NSSGA annual awards for com-
munity outreach, environmental and
safety awards should be highlighted.
You worked for them and you earned
them. It will assist you in the future if
you have a recorded history of indus-
try recognition for the way you operate
your quarry.
You have choices during and after
your permitting process. You can either
work with the community and keep the
lines of communication open or not.
The benefits from conducting outreach
and staying involved with the commu-
nity are real. ■
Christopher Hopkins is senior vice president
for Aggregates and Mining with The Saint
Consulting Group, a political land use
consultancy that specializes in winning zoning
and permitting battles for controversial
development projects in the U.S., Canada
and United Kingdom. Hopkins is scheduled to
present this topic at the 2010 AGG1 Academy.
have come to one of your events or
you coached their child.
There is nothing that makes me
want to scream more than when a cli-
ent says, “We do all that, but we don’t
like to make a big deal out of it.”
WRONG! Make a big deal out of
it. There is nothing wrong with get-
ting recognition for doing good work.
Making it public lets those in the
community see you as a genuine part
of the community and not just a busi-
ness operating in town. Becoming
a recognized member of the com-
munity promotes good will with the
local government and local commu-
nity organizations. This will also be
a benefit with the local elected offi-
cials. The mayor and other local poli-
ticians love to get their names and
pictures in the newspaper accepting
one of those six-foot checks or at a
ribbon cutting ceremony for a new or
revamped ball field. It is extremely
difficult for an official to oppose you
when you were in the local newspa-
per together last month.
TO MOVE
IDLERS | PULLEYS | IMPACT BEDS | ACCESSORIES
LUFF INDUSTRIES LTD.
235010 WRANGLER ROAD, ROCKY VIEW (CALGARY), ALBERTA, CANADA T1X 0K3
TOLL-FREE: 1-888-349-LUFF (5833) | www.luffindustries.com
POWER
Luff Industries Ltd. manufactures the most durable product line
available on the market today. Call to find out how Luff can
increase your Conveying Performance.
TOLL-FREE: 1-888-349-LUFF (5833)
436760_Luff.indd 1 7/7/09 1:26:57 PM
- Asbestos
- Crystalline Silica
- Diesel Particulate
- Heavy Metals
- Hexavalent Chromium
- Nanotechnology
- Particle A nalysis
- Solvents & Vapors
Talk with one of our experts
today, and see the di erence
RJ Lee Group makes.
Proud To
Be Di erent.
P A W AP A
416945_RJLee.indd 1 1/21/09 6:51:46 PM