Nodeep kaur smc
•
0 likes•582 views
The court received complaints through email regarding the illegal confinement of Nodeep Kaur, a Dalit labour activist by the Haryana police under orders from a judge. The complaints did not provide the address of the complainants or other relevant details. The court treated the emails as a criminal writ petition and issued notice to the state of Haryana. The additional advocate general for Haryana accepted notice on behalf of the state and requested time to file a reply or status report. The case was adjourned to February 24th and directed to be listed urgently.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
deed of settlement
This document is a deed of settlement between Chan Chee Seng and Tan Gaik Suan, who are getting divorced. It outlines agreements regarding child custody, maintenance payments, division of property including a vehicle and bank accounts, costs of the divorce proceedings, and a statement that this settlement represents the final agreement between the parties. The wife will have primary custody of their minor child, and the husband will have visitation rights and pay monthly maintenance.
Sanjay singh order
The Supreme Court of India heard matters related to special leave petitions and a writ petition filed by Sanjay Singh. The Court granted permission to file the SLP without a certified copy of the impugned order. It noted the petitioner's argument that sanction was granted under the wrong section of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Court issued a notice, permitted service of the notice on the standing counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh, and directed that the petitioner not be arrested in relation to one case. It sought a counter affidavit within two weeks and listed the matter in the third week of March 2021. For the writ petition, the Court issued a limited notice on the question of clubbing together certain FIRs registered against the petitioner.
Punjab haryana hc sedition bail
The document summarizes two petitions filed by Dalbir seeking regular bail in two FIRs registered against him for speeches alleged to have objectionable content against the Chief Minister of Haryana. The court granted bail to Dalbir subject to furnishing a surety of Rs. 2 lakhs in each case, noting that freedom of speech is a fundamental right, the investigation in both cases is complete, and conclusion of trial will take time. However, the state can seek cancellation of bail if Dalbir is found to misuse the bail granted.
Nodeep kaur hc order
This document summarizes a court case between Naudeep Kaur and the State of Haryana. The court ordered Naudeep Kaur to receive a medical examination on January 18th, 2021, but the State had not placed the medical report on the record. The State's counsel requested more time to submit the medical report. The court then adjourned the case to February 26th, 2021.
BIA Remands of Immigration Judge James Nugent from 01/01/2014 to 05/26/2016
EOIR FOIA ID # 2016-23184. Also, see acknowledgment letter at following link: http://www.slideshare.net/abogadobryan/eoir-acknowledgment-letter-for-201623284
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
1) The defendants filed a statement of disputed facts in response to the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in a case involving the plaintiff's confinement at a community corrections facility.
2) The defendants disputed several of the plaintiff's factual claims, citing evidence from the affidavit of the facility director and documents related to the conditions of the plaintiff's release and confinement.
3) Specifically, the defendants argued that the plaintiff violated the terms of his release by driving without permission and possessing a cell phone, leading to his transfer back to prison by the Bureau of Prisons.
Doc.88 1
1) The defendants filed a statement of disputed facts in response to the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in a case involving the plaintiff's release from a community corrections center.
2) The defendants disputed many of the plaintiff's facts, citing an affidavit from the director of the community corrections center in support.
3) The plaintiff was ultimately sent back to a correctional facility by the Bureau of Prisons for violating the terms of his release by driving without permission and possessing a cell phone.
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
1) The defendants filed a response in opposition to the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in a lawsuit brought by a former federal inmate against a residential reentry center and its employees.
2) The plaintiff violated conditions of his release from federal prison by driving a car and possessing a cell phone. He was then transferred back to federal prison to serve the remainder of his sentence.
3) The defendants argue that the plaintiff cannot maintain any causes of action against them because the federal Bureau of Prisons, not the defendants, made the decision to return the plaintiff to prison for his violations of rules. Therefore, the defendants should be granted summary judgment.
Recommended
deed of settlement
This document is a deed of settlement between Chan Chee Seng and Tan Gaik Suan, who are getting divorced. It outlines agreements regarding child custody, maintenance payments, division of property including a vehicle and bank accounts, costs of the divorce proceedings, and a statement that this settlement represents the final agreement between the parties. The wife will have primary custody of their minor child, and the husband will have visitation rights and pay monthly maintenance.
Sanjay singh order
The Supreme Court of India heard matters related to special leave petitions and a writ petition filed by Sanjay Singh. The Court granted permission to file the SLP without a certified copy of the impugned order. It noted the petitioner's argument that sanction was granted under the wrong section of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Court issued a notice, permitted service of the notice on the standing counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh, and directed that the petitioner not be arrested in relation to one case. It sought a counter affidavit within two weeks and listed the matter in the third week of March 2021. For the writ petition, the Court issued a limited notice on the question of clubbing together certain FIRs registered against the petitioner.
Punjab haryana hc sedition bail
The document summarizes two petitions filed by Dalbir seeking regular bail in two FIRs registered against him for speeches alleged to have objectionable content against the Chief Minister of Haryana. The court granted bail to Dalbir subject to furnishing a surety of Rs. 2 lakhs in each case, noting that freedom of speech is a fundamental right, the investigation in both cases is complete, and conclusion of trial will take time. However, the state can seek cancellation of bail if Dalbir is found to misuse the bail granted.
Nodeep kaur hc order
This document summarizes a court case between Naudeep Kaur and the State of Haryana. The court ordered Naudeep Kaur to receive a medical examination on January 18th, 2021, but the State had not placed the medical report on the record. The State's counsel requested more time to submit the medical report. The court then adjourned the case to February 26th, 2021.
BIA Remands of Immigration Judge James Nugent from 01/01/2014 to 05/26/2016
EOIR FOIA ID # 2016-23184. Also, see acknowledgment letter at following link: http://www.slideshare.net/abogadobryan/eoir-acknowledgment-letter-for-201623284
Defendants dismas charties, inc., ana gispert, derek thomas and lashanda adam...
1) The defendants filed a statement of disputed facts in response to the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in a case involving the plaintiff's confinement at a community corrections facility.
2) The defendants disputed several of the plaintiff's factual claims, citing evidence from the affidavit of the facility director and documents related to the conditions of the plaintiff's release and confinement.
3) Specifically, the defendants argued that the plaintiff violated the terms of his release by driving without permission and possessing a cell phone, leading to his transfer back to prison by the Bureau of Prisons.
Doc.88 1
1) The defendants filed a statement of disputed facts in response to the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in a case involving the plaintiff's release from a community corrections center.
2) The defendants disputed many of the plaintiff's facts, citing an affidavit from the director of the community corrections center in support.
3) The plaintiff was ultimately sent back to a correctional facility by the Bureau of Prisons for violating the terms of his release by driving without permission and possessing a cell phone.
Defendants’ response brief in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary ju...
1) The defendants filed a response in opposition to the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in a lawsuit brought by a former federal inmate against a residential reentry center and its employees.
2) The plaintiff violated conditions of his release from federal prison by driving a car and possessing a cell phone. He was then transferred back to federal prison to serve the remainder of his sentence.
3) The defendants argue that the plaintiff cannot maintain any causes of action against them because the federal Bureau of Prisons, not the defendants, made the decision to return the plaintiff to prison for his violations of rules. Therefore, the defendants should be granted summary judgment.
BIA Remands of Immigration Judge Theresa Holmes-Simmons from 01/01/2014 to 05...
EOIR FOIA ID # 2016-23184. Also, see acknowledgment letter at following link: http://www.slideshare.net/abogadobryan/eoir-acknowledgment-letter-for-201623284
Memorandum in Support of the Motion
A fictitious legal brief to remit the final judgment of bail forfeiture. Capt. Bryant issued a bond for the release of Rutger Batty who later failed to appear in court. Mr. Batty was in a Texas jail because of a prior illegal gun possession charge. Though Mr. Batty was not incarcerated in a North Carolina jail or a federal prison within the United States, Captain Bryant wants Weft and Wright, P.L.L.C. to try and get the forfeited bail money remitted.
Del hc covid order apr 20
Digitally Signed
By:BHUPINDER SINGH
ROHELLA
Signing Date:20.04.2021 23:05
Signature Not Verified
1) The court heard submissions from various parties on the COVID-19 situation in Delhi, including availability of beds, oxygen supplies, testing, and critical medicines.
2) It was reported that oxygen supplies in some Delhi hospitals would be exhausted within 4-8 hours. The court directed the central government to immediately divert oxygen supplies from industrial to medical use.
3) The court issued notices of contempt to INOX for failing to comply with an order to supply oxygen to Delhi hospitals, and summoned the MD/owner and UP chief
Bjp mp sujay patil order
This document summarizes a court case regarding the procurement of Remdesivir injections during the COVID-19 pandemic. It discusses a criminal application filed by relatives of COVID patients seeking to intervene in the case on behalf of a Member of Parliament who helped procure injections. The court rejects their application, finding that they are not necessary to determine if the MP's actions followed legal procedures. The court examines documents from the District Collector regarding the approved purchase of 1700 injections through legal channels, which differ from claims about injections transported via private plane. The legality of the procurement methods is still under investigation.
Pravat mohanty sc judgment
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India case involving two appellants, Pravat Chandra Mohanty and Pratap Kumar Choudhury, who were convicted of assaulting and causing the death of Kasinath Naik. The Supreme Court heard arguments from counsel for the appellants, the state of Odisha, and the legal representatives of the deceased. The appellants deposited compensation in court and all parties agreed to compound the offense of conviction under Section 324 IPC. The Supreme Court considered converting the Section 324 conviction to Section 323 or substituting imprisonment with a fine, given the appellants' advanced age.
CRPC_125 USEFUL JUDGMENT
This document provides a summary of 25 judicial rulings related to Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) pertaining to maintenance. Some key points from the rulings include:
1) Provisions of Section 125 CrPC should be construed liberally as it is a social welfare legislation aimed at providing speedy relief to destitute wives and children.
2) The nature of proceedings under Section 125 CrPC is civil, not criminal, and a strict burden of proof of marriage is not required.
3) Mental cruelty can be grounds for divorce or separate living if the conduct is grave and weighty.
4) A long-term live-in relationship may be presumed to be a
Response to District Judge dated 02.10.2017 against NOTICE under section 82 C...
Framed Accused responded to Corrupt Magistrate/District Judge/C.J.M. dated 02.10.2010 through email.
Doc.95
The defendants object to part of the magistrate's report and recommendation in a civil case. They agree with the recommendation to grant the defendants' motion to dismiss. However, they disagree with allowing the plaintiff to amend the complaint. The defendants request that the court refer additional pending motions, like motions for summary judgment, to the magistrate for consideration along with the report to support dismissing the case in favor of the defendants after discovery has closed.
Document 95
The defendants object to part of the magistrate's report and recommendation in a civil case. They agree with the recommendation to grant the defendants' motion to dismiss. However, they disagree with allowing the plaintiff to amend the complaint. The defendants request that the court refer additional pending motions, like motions for summary judgment, to the magistrate for consideration along with the report to support dismissing the case in favor of the defendants after discovery has closed.
20211027 sc order in zakia jafri slp
The Supreme Court of India was hearing a special leave petition related to the 2002 Gujarat riots case. The hearing that began on October 26th was adjourned and will now continue on November 10th at the request of the petitioners' counsel Kapil Sibal, as he needed more time to conclude arguments and the court was going into Diwali break. The petitioners were allowed to file 4 additional volumes of documents before the next hearing date.
96753
The Illinois Commerce Commission considered a petition from Illinois-American Water Company (IAWC) to enter into an affiliated interest agreement with American Water Resources, Inc. (AWR). After initially approving the agreement, the Commission reopened the case and sought additional information. Staff then recommended denying the agreement, while other parties proposed changes. The Commission summarizes the procedural history and denies IAWC's motion to withdraw their petition, as it was filed solely to avoid an unfavorable ruling. The Commission will make its final decision on the agreement based on the full evidentiary record developed over 13 months.
Pnh hc crwp 4725 2021_03_06_2021_final_order
The court granted protection to two petitioners (ages 17 and 20) seeking protection from the family of the female petitioner. While the couple was not married, the court recognized that live-in relationships are permissible and directed police to decide the petitioners' representation for protection within a week if any threat to their life and liberty is found. The order does not protect the couple from legal action for violating laws.
Punjab har hc march 25 order
The petitioner filed a petition seeking regular bail in a case where he was accused of drugging and sexually assaulting his daughter-in-law and blackmailing her with photographs and videos of the assault. The High Court dismissed the petition on the grounds that (1) contradictions in the complainant's statements is a matter for trial, and (2) the trial is at an advanced stage. However, the Court noted the seriousness of the allegations and instructed police to investigate further given the complainant's change in position.
Cwp 2672 2021_05_02_2021_interim_order
This document is a court case summary from February 5th, 2021. It notes that the case of Sandeep Singh and Others vs Union of India and Others was heard via video conference due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Notice of motion was issued, with representatives from the respondent parties (Union of India, State of Haryana) accepting notice. A reply was scheduled for February 8th, 2021.
Delhi hc order-bail_delhi-riots (1)
The petitioner, Irshad Ahmed, filed a bail application in the Delhi High Court for offenses related to rioting and arson. The prosecution opposed bail, stating that the petitioner was present with 100 others on the terrace of an accused's house, throwing petrol bombs. A witness identified the petitioner. However, the court noted there was no electronic evidence implicating the petitioner and the witnesses did not report the incident on the date it occurred. While not commenting on the merits, the court granted bail to the petitioner on furnishing a bond and surety, and transferred the order to the trial court.
27345 2021 34_3_33174_order_07-feb-2022
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition and related interlocutory applications. The Court had previously passed an order on January 10th, 2022 protecting the applicant from harassment. However, that order was not formally served on the Superintendent of Police. As a result, a notice was issued to the applicant requiring his attendance. The Court clarified that the applicant remains protected by the previous order and no further steps shall be taken pursuant to the notice. The Court directed the State of Tripura to communicate copies of both the present and previous orders to the Superintendent of Police to ensure compliance and prevent harassment of the applicant. The interlocutory applications were disposed of.
Shiv kumar pnh hc mar 16 order
This document summarizes a court case regarding allegations of illegal detention and custodial torture of an individual named Shiv Kumar. The court ordered an independent inquiry by the District and Sessions Judge of Faridabad into the allegations. The court also ordered that the ongoing police investigation by the Special Investigation Team be allowed to continue but that they not submit a final report without permission from the court. The matter was scheduled for further hearing on May 11th for a status report on the independent inquiry and investigation.
Interlocutory Application dated 9.10.22 for Cancellation of NBW before SC.pdf
Recall the order dated 25.08.2010 and 08.09.2011, whereby Non-Bailaible Warrants were issued against the petitioner Om Prakash and his mother Asha Rani Devi by Begusarai Court under the judicature of Patna High Court in 9-P/2010 and 397c/2011 (Criminal Case Complaint (P) no. 5591/2013) case and Cancel the Non-Bailaible Warrants issued against the Petitioner and his mother to eradicate Prostitution and International Sex Racket.
Application (I.A.No.164340) for Non Bailable Warrant dated 01.11.2022 SC.pdf
Non Bailable Warrant issued kept secret and maintained since 2010 to confiscate my Property, to push my families into prostitution and to kill my parents including me.
Navneet singh order
The petitioner, the grandfather of Navreet Singh who died at a farmers' protest, seeks a court-monitored special investigation into his grandson's death. The petitioner claims Navreet died of a bullet injury, not an accident as reported by police. The court orders the police to share all evidence and documents from their investigation by the next hearing date. The court also issues notice to remaining respondents and schedules the next hearing.
Delhi court bail apr 9
1) This document is an order from a court case (State V/s Kasim) regarding an application for bail filed by the accused Kasim.
2) The case involves gunshot injuries to Prince Bansal during riots in Dayalpur on February 25, 2020. Kasim is accused of stone pelting and taking part in the rioting.
3) The court grants bail to Kasim on the grounds of parity with two co-accused persons who had previously been granted bail, and that the investigation is complete and trial will take a long time.
Nodeep kaur bail order
The petitioner, Naudeep Kaur, filed a petition seeking regular bail in an FIR registered against her and others for offenses related to rioting and assaulting police officers during a protest. [The court notes that] Two FIRs were registered for the same incident, and the petitioner was already granted bail in one case. While the prosecution claimed the protest turned violent, the petitioner argued she was peacefully protesting unpaid wages. Considering the petitioner has been in custody since January and the matter requires further investigation, the court granted her bail, but warned she must not violate any laws or create law and order issues.
More Related Content
What's hot
BIA Remands of Immigration Judge Theresa Holmes-Simmons from 01/01/2014 to 05...
EOIR FOIA ID # 2016-23184. Also, see acknowledgment letter at following link: http://www.slideshare.net/abogadobryan/eoir-acknowledgment-letter-for-201623284
Memorandum in Support of the Motion
A fictitious legal brief to remit the final judgment of bail forfeiture. Capt. Bryant issued a bond for the release of Rutger Batty who later failed to appear in court. Mr. Batty was in a Texas jail because of a prior illegal gun possession charge. Though Mr. Batty was not incarcerated in a North Carolina jail or a federal prison within the United States, Captain Bryant wants Weft and Wright, P.L.L.C. to try and get the forfeited bail money remitted.
Del hc covid order apr 20
Digitally Signed
By:BHUPINDER SINGH
ROHELLA
Signing Date:20.04.2021 23:05
Signature Not Verified
1) The court heard submissions from various parties on the COVID-19 situation in Delhi, including availability of beds, oxygen supplies, testing, and critical medicines.
2) It was reported that oxygen supplies in some Delhi hospitals would be exhausted within 4-8 hours. The court directed the central government to immediately divert oxygen supplies from industrial to medical use.
3) The court issued notices of contempt to INOX for failing to comply with an order to supply oxygen to Delhi hospitals, and summoned the MD/owner and UP chief
Bjp mp sujay patil order
This document summarizes a court case regarding the procurement of Remdesivir injections during the COVID-19 pandemic. It discusses a criminal application filed by relatives of COVID patients seeking to intervene in the case on behalf of a Member of Parliament who helped procure injections. The court rejects their application, finding that they are not necessary to determine if the MP's actions followed legal procedures. The court examines documents from the District Collector regarding the approved purchase of 1700 injections through legal channels, which differ from claims about injections transported via private plane. The legality of the procurement methods is still under investigation.
Pravat mohanty sc judgment
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India case involving two appellants, Pravat Chandra Mohanty and Pratap Kumar Choudhury, who were convicted of assaulting and causing the death of Kasinath Naik. The Supreme Court heard arguments from counsel for the appellants, the state of Odisha, and the legal representatives of the deceased. The appellants deposited compensation in court and all parties agreed to compound the offense of conviction under Section 324 IPC. The Supreme Court considered converting the Section 324 conviction to Section 323 or substituting imprisonment with a fine, given the appellants' advanced age.
CRPC_125 USEFUL JUDGMENT
This document provides a summary of 25 judicial rulings related to Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) pertaining to maintenance. Some key points from the rulings include:
1) Provisions of Section 125 CrPC should be construed liberally as it is a social welfare legislation aimed at providing speedy relief to destitute wives and children.
2) The nature of proceedings under Section 125 CrPC is civil, not criminal, and a strict burden of proof of marriage is not required.
3) Mental cruelty can be grounds for divorce or separate living if the conduct is grave and weighty.
4) A long-term live-in relationship may be presumed to be a
Response to District Judge dated 02.10.2017 against NOTICE under section 82 C...
Framed Accused responded to Corrupt Magistrate/District Judge/C.J.M. dated 02.10.2010 through email.
Doc.95
The defendants object to part of the magistrate's report and recommendation in a civil case. They agree with the recommendation to grant the defendants' motion to dismiss. However, they disagree with allowing the plaintiff to amend the complaint. The defendants request that the court refer additional pending motions, like motions for summary judgment, to the magistrate for consideration along with the report to support dismissing the case in favor of the defendants after discovery has closed.
Document 95
The defendants object to part of the magistrate's report and recommendation in a civil case. They agree with the recommendation to grant the defendants' motion to dismiss. However, they disagree with allowing the plaintiff to amend the complaint. The defendants request that the court refer additional pending motions, like motions for summary judgment, to the magistrate for consideration along with the report to support dismissing the case in favor of the defendants after discovery has closed.
20211027 sc order in zakia jafri slp
The Supreme Court of India was hearing a special leave petition related to the 2002 Gujarat riots case. The hearing that began on October 26th was adjourned and will now continue on November 10th at the request of the petitioners' counsel Kapil Sibal, as he needed more time to conclude arguments and the court was going into Diwali break. The petitioners were allowed to file 4 additional volumes of documents before the next hearing date.
96753
The Illinois Commerce Commission considered a petition from Illinois-American Water Company (IAWC) to enter into an affiliated interest agreement with American Water Resources, Inc. (AWR). After initially approving the agreement, the Commission reopened the case and sought additional information. Staff then recommended denying the agreement, while other parties proposed changes. The Commission summarizes the procedural history and denies IAWC's motion to withdraw their petition, as it was filed solely to avoid an unfavorable ruling. The Commission will make its final decision on the agreement based on the full evidentiary record developed over 13 months.
Pnh hc crwp 4725 2021_03_06_2021_final_order
The court granted protection to two petitioners (ages 17 and 20) seeking protection from the family of the female petitioner. While the couple was not married, the court recognized that live-in relationships are permissible and directed police to decide the petitioners' representation for protection within a week if any threat to their life and liberty is found. The order does not protect the couple from legal action for violating laws.
What's hot (12)
BIA Remands of Immigration Judge Theresa Holmes-Simmons from 01/01/2014 to 05...
BIA Remands of Immigration Judge Theresa Holmes-Simmons from 01/01/2014 to 05...
Response to District Judge dated 02.10.2017 against NOTICE under section 82 C...
Response to District Judge dated 02.10.2017 against NOTICE under section 82 C...
Similar to Nodeep kaur smc
Punjab har hc march 25 order
The petitioner filed a petition seeking regular bail in a case where he was accused of drugging and sexually assaulting his daughter-in-law and blackmailing her with photographs and videos of the assault. The High Court dismissed the petition on the grounds that (1) contradictions in the complainant's statements is a matter for trial, and (2) the trial is at an advanced stage. However, the Court noted the seriousness of the allegations and instructed police to investigate further given the complainant's change in position.
Cwp 2672 2021_05_02_2021_interim_order
This document is a court case summary from February 5th, 2021. It notes that the case of Sandeep Singh and Others vs Union of India and Others was heard via video conference due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Notice of motion was issued, with representatives from the respondent parties (Union of India, State of Haryana) accepting notice. A reply was scheduled for February 8th, 2021.
Delhi hc order-bail_delhi-riots (1)
The petitioner, Irshad Ahmed, filed a bail application in the Delhi High Court for offenses related to rioting and arson. The prosecution opposed bail, stating that the petitioner was present with 100 others on the terrace of an accused's house, throwing petrol bombs. A witness identified the petitioner. However, the court noted there was no electronic evidence implicating the petitioner and the witnesses did not report the incident on the date it occurred. While not commenting on the merits, the court granted bail to the petitioner on furnishing a bond and surety, and transferred the order to the trial court.
27345 2021 34_3_33174_order_07-feb-2022
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition and related interlocutory applications. The Court had previously passed an order on January 10th, 2022 protecting the applicant from harassment. However, that order was not formally served on the Superintendent of Police. As a result, a notice was issued to the applicant requiring his attendance. The Court clarified that the applicant remains protected by the previous order and no further steps shall be taken pursuant to the notice. The Court directed the State of Tripura to communicate copies of both the present and previous orders to the Superintendent of Police to ensure compliance and prevent harassment of the applicant. The interlocutory applications were disposed of.
Shiv kumar pnh hc mar 16 order
This document summarizes a court case regarding allegations of illegal detention and custodial torture of an individual named Shiv Kumar. The court ordered an independent inquiry by the District and Sessions Judge of Faridabad into the allegations. The court also ordered that the ongoing police investigation by the Special Investigation Team be allowed to continue but that they not submit a final report without permission from the court. The matter was scheduled for further hearing on May 11th for a status report on the independent inquiry and investigation.
Interlocutory Application dated 9.10.22 for Cancellation of NBW before SC.pdf
Recall the order dated 25.08.2010 and 08.09.2011, whereby Non-Bailaible Warrants were issued against the petitioner Om Prakash and his mother Asha Rani Devi by Begusarai Court under the judicature of Patna High Court in 9-P/2010 and 397c/2011 (Criminal Case Complaint (P) no. 5591/2013) case and Cancel the Non-Bailaible Warrants issued against the Petitioner and his mother to eradicate Prostitution and International Sex Racket.
Application (I.A.No.164340) for Non Bailable Warrant dated 01.11.2022 SC.pdf
Non Bailable Warrant issued kept secret and maintained since 2010 to confiscate my Property, to push my families into prostitution and to kill my parents including me.
Navneet singh order
The petitioner, the grandfather of Navreet Singh who died at a farmers' protest, seeks a court-monitored special investigation into his grandson's death. The petitioner claims Navreet died of a bullet injury, not an accident as reported by police. The court orders the police to share all evidence and documents from their investigation by the next hearing date. The court also issues notice to remaining respondents and schedules the next hearing.
Delhi court bail apr 9
1) This document is an order from a court case (State V/s Kasim) regarding an application for bail filed by the accused Kasim.
2) The case involves gunshot injuries to Prince Bansal during riots in Dayalpur on February 25, 2020. Kasim is accused of stone pelting and taking part in the rioting.
3) The court grants bail to Kasim on the grounds of parity with two co-accused persons who had previously been granted bail, and that the investigation is complete and trial will take a long time.
Nodeep kaur bail order
The petitioner, Naudeep Kaur, filed a petition seeking regular bail in an FIR registered against her and others for offenses related to rioting and assaulting police officers during a protest. [The court notes that] Two FIRs were registered for the same incident, and the petitioner was already granted bail in one case. While the prosecution claimed the protest turned violent, the petitioner argued she was peacefully protesting unpaid wages. Considering the petitioner has been in custody since January and the matter requires further investigation, the court granted her bail, but warned she must not violate any laws or create law and order issues.
Sc covid death
This document summarizes proceedings in the Supreme Court of India regarding two writ petitions filed seeking a direction to provide Rs. 4 lakh ex-gratia compensation to families of those who died from COVID-19. The petitioners argued this compensation is required under disaster relief funds. The government sought time to provide details on the relevant compensation scheme and guidelines. The court granted the government 10 days to file a counter affidavit and the petitioner 3 days to file a rejoinder, scheduling the next hearing for June 11.
Complaint dated 14.11.2022 against Corrupt Supreme Court Employee Rajni Shar...
Complaint against corrupt staff Shri Sunil Chauhan Additional Registrar and Ms. Rajni Sharma dealing assistant section 1B at Supreme Court of India
Delhi riots bail feb 3
1. This document summarizes a bail application hearing for Kuldeep Singh, who is accused in an FIR for rioting and murder.
2. The defense argues that Kuldeep should be granted bail on the grounds that other co-accused have received bail and he has been in custody since March 2020. However, the prosecution argues that Kuldeep was identified by witnesses as part of the riotous mob that beat the victim to death.
3. The judge heard arguments from both sides and will review the case details and chargesheet before making a decision on whether to grant bail to Kuldeep Singh.
Petition 242 of 2021.pdf
The writ petition concerns a case of alleged child sexual abuse, forced hidden prostitution of minor girls, human trafficking, and illicit sex trade reported by the petitioner whistleblower to authorities. The petitioner reported the incident to the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights on 12th April 2021. On 13th April 2021, an official from NCPCR responded requesting more details from the petitioner within 3 days to take immediate action. However, the petitioner alleges he was unlawfully detained by Delhi Police for blowing the whistle on the case and filing reports to rescue and rehabilitate the minor victims. He now seeks intervention from the Supreme Court under Article 32.
Petition against child sexual abuse and hidden prostitution before Supreme Co...
North East Delhi, Shastri Park area
Complete petition against busting International Sex racket in W.P.(Crl.) 242/2021 before Supreme Court of India.
Additional document against Second Appeal D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017
Additional documents against Second Appeal vide D.No. 183722 dated 03.11.2016 being filed vide D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017 before CIC New Delhi along with FAA, District & Session Judge's reply.
Madras HC - Illegal resolution was passed by the Bar Association.pdf
The document is an order from the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court regarding a bail petition.
There were 3 petitioners/accused seeking bail who were charged with offenses against the defacto complainant, a practicing advocate, and his wife. The Karaikudi Bar Association had passed a resolution directing its members not to file any bail application in the case.
The High Court granted permission for the bail petition to be filed directly with the High Court given the exceptional circumstances of the bar association resolution preventing the petitioners' counsel from representing them. The High Court also granted bail to the 3 petitioners based on factors such as the petitioners' surrender and time already served, and lack of serious
Preet singh order
1. The court document discusses an application for regular bail filed by Preet Singh, who is accused of offenses under the Indian Penal Code and Epidemic Diseases Act for organizing an event at Jantar Mantar in Delhi without permission.
2. The prosecution argues that Preet Singh made inflammatory speeches and slogans against a particular religion, while the defense claims he is falsely implicated and did not engage in unlawful speech or activities.
3. The court must now determine whether to grant bail to Preet Singh based on the arguments made by the prosecution and defense regarding the evidence in the case and potential risks if he is released.
Preet singh and ors order
The document is a court order regarding an application for bail by Preet Singh, who has been accused of offenses under the IPC and Epidemic Diseases Act related to organizing a gathering without permission. The investigating officer opposed bail, citing video evidence of Singh's presence and the risk of further offenses. However, the court denied bail, noting that while the offenses are bailable, Singh's case differs from a previously bailed accused who was not seen inciting crowds in video clips as Singh was. The court found that further investigation was needed and denied bail at this stage.
Abad hc love jihad bail
This document summarizes a court case in Criminal Appeal No. 2158 of 2021. The appellant, Motilal, appealed to set aside an order denying him bail. Motilal claims to have had a distinct role from co-accused, only being present during the alleged victim's conversion, not directly involved. The court found nothing convincing justifying denying bail. The court allowed the appeal and set aside the order denying bail, ordering Motilal be released on bail with conditions but not extending to co-accused.
Similar to Nodeep kaur smc (20)
Interlocutory Application dated 9.10.22 for Cancellation of NBW before SC.pdf
Interlocutory Application dated 9.10.22 for Cancellation of NBW before SC.pdf
Application (I.A.No.164340) for Non Bailable Warrant dated 01.11.2022 SC.pdf
Application (I.A.No.164340) for Non Bailable Warrant dated 01.11.2022 SC.pdf
Complaint dated 14.11.2022 against Corrupt Supreme Court Employee Rajni Shar...
Complaint dated 14.11.2022 against Corrupt Supreme Court Employee Rajni Shar...
Petition against child sexual abuse and hidden prostitution before Supreme Co...
Petition against child sexual abuse and hidden prostitution before Supreme Co...
Additional document against Second Appeal D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017
Additional document against Second Appeal D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017
Madras HC - Illegal resolution was passed by the Bar Association.pdf
Madras HC - Illegal resolution was passed by the Bar Association.pdf
More from ZahidManiyar
Letter to-dgp-18 oct21
1. The families of prisoners held in Taloja Central Prison and Byculla Women's Prison wrote a letter regarding the discontinuation of weekly telephone interviews for family members when physical visits resume.
2. They expressed concern that discontinuing phone calls would cause problems for out-of-town family members who cannot easily travel to Mumbai for physical visits, as well as economically weak and elderly relatives.
3. The letter requested that phone interviews be allowed to continue in a hybrid model, where Mumbai-based relatives could choose a physical or phone visit, to ensure prisoners' right to communicate with family and advocates as guaranteed by the Indian Constitution.
Tripura hc order
The High Court of Tripura issued an order directing the State of Tripura Aids Control Society to be impleaded as a respondent. The State and Union of India were directed to issue guidelines to conduct a thorough research of all persons in State prisons to ascertain if any are infected with HIV. If any infected persons are found, necessary action must be taken for their treatment and care in accordance with law to prevent an epidemic. A report on the matter must be submitted to the court by November 9, 2021. The court also requested an Amicus Curiae to assist and oversee the matter.
Report vigilantism and attack on the freedom of religion in meerut
This document summarizes an incident of communal violence and vigilantism in Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India. It discusses the history of communal tensions and riots in Meerut dating back to the 1930s. On September 20, 2017, two members of the Jehovah's Witnesses religious group were invited into a Hindu man's home but then detained against their will for over an hour, assaulted, and handed over to the police with false allegations of forced conversion efforts. The police refused to register a complaint about the assault and illegally detained the victims overnight without medical treatment. The document analyzes this incident as an example of the shift in India to smaller scale vigilantism targeting religious minorities, with the tacit support
Christians under attack_in_india_report
The document provides a summary of attacks on Christians in India, including two specific incidents in Roorkee and Mau, Uttar Pradesh:
1) In Roorkee, a mob of 250-300 people attacked a church, injuring several attendees. Police did not provide security despite prior complaints.
2) In Mau, a mob accused Christians of conversion during a prayer meeting. Seven people including the pastor were arrested under anti-conversion laws.
It also lists other incidents of threats, violence and false accusations against Christians in various parts of Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and other states, indicating growing targeted attacks against the Christian minority in India.
Sharjeel imam vs state
The document discusses an application for bail filed by Sharjeel Imam. It summarizes the key details of the case, including the charges against Imam related to speeches he delivered on December 13th and 15th, 2019 regarding protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act. While the prosecution argues Imam's speeches incited violence, the judge found the evidence linking Imam's speeches to subsequent acts of violence by co-accused to be scanty and inconclusive. The judge granted Imam bail for offenses related to inciting violence but will further examine charges of sedition against Imam.
Sharjeel imam vs state
The document discusses a bail application hearing for Sharjeel Imam. It summarizes the key details of the case, including the charges against Imam related to speeches he delivered on December 13th and 15th, 2019 regarding protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act. It notes that while the prosecution argues Imam's speeches incited violence, the defense argues there is no evidence linking Imam's words to any criminal acts. In its ruling, the court finds the evidence against Imam for abetting offenses to be insufficient and scanty.
Ramesh kumar order
This document summarizes a court case revision petition hearing. The judge stayed the operation of the previous court order from October 12, 2021 until the next hearing date of November 12, 2021. The revision petition notice was ordered to be issued to the respondents. The trial court record was reviewed and the special public prosecutor and police inspector were present to provide submissions.
Cmm order
This document is a court order from a case involving multiple accused persons. It summarizes proceedings from a hearing where the prosecution requested more time for further investigation into the case. The court allowed more time but imposed a cost of Rs. 25,000 to be split among the accused, noting delays in the investigation. It also ordered the Secretary of Home Affairs to inquire about responsibility for the costs being imposed and deducting the amount from the responsible officer's salary. The case was adjourned to a future date for further proceedings.
Archbishop --press-statement
The Archbishop of Bangalore expresses concern over the Karnataka government's plan to survey Christian missionaries and places of worship. He argues that such surveys could unfairly target and endanger the Christian community. The Archbishop questions why only Christians are being surveyed, noting that Christians constitute a small percentage of the population. He calls on the government to respect constitutional protections of religious freedom and consider the educational and social services provided by Christian institutions instead of pursuing anti-conversion policies.
For website 211014 cjp-ncm complaint over muslim family in indore chairperson...
The complaint alleges that a Muslim family in Indore, Madhya Pradesh was attacked by a mob of 150 people associated with the RSS on October 9, 2021. The family was threatened and told to leave the village. Family members sustained head injuries and their house was ransacked. The police delayed registering an FIR and instead filed a counter-complaint against the family. The complaint cites other recent incidents of violence and harassment against Muslims in Indore and calls on the National Commission for Minorities to investigate and take action to prevent further attacks.
For website 211013 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to vice chairman (1)
The complaint alleges that on October 10, 2021 in Mau, Uttar Pradesh, two incidents occurred where Christian religious gatherings were disrupted by Hindu nationalist mobs. In one incident, two nuns were attacked, dragged to the police station and detained for hours on baseless allegations of religious conversion. In another incident, a Christian prayer service was raided and the pastor and congregants were taken to the police station. The complaint urges the National Commission for Minorities to investigate these attacks, ensure protection for religious minorities, condemn the attacks and pressure authorities to take swift action. It notes a pattern of increasing attacks on Christians in India by Hindu nationalist groups.
For website 21103 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to chairperson (1)
1. Citizens for Justice and Peace wrote to the National Commission for Minorities regarding two attacks on Christians in Mau, Uttar Pradesh on October 10, 2021. In the first incident, a mob attacked two nuns and their driver at a bus stand and took them to the police station. In the second incident, a mob disrupted a Christian prayer service and took the pastor and worshippers to the police station.
2. The letter requests that the Commission conduct an inquiry into the attacks, ensure protection for religious minorities, condemn the attacks and urge police to take action, and issue guidelines for dealing with communally motivated attacks. It argues that such attacks violate constitutional rights and aim to subjugate minority communities through fear.
Aiufwp eia response (1) converted
The document is a response letter from the All India Union of Forest Working People (AIUFWP) regarding the draft EIA Notification 2020. The key points made in the letter are:
1) The AIUFWP demands a complete withdrawal of the draft EIA Notification 2020 as it weakens environmental protections and public participation in decision making.
2) The draft was released during a national lockdown without proper accessibility or consideration of forest communities who will be most impacted.
3) Weakening environmental regulations could exacerbate future pandemics by further damaging nature.
4) The draft favors industries and projects over environmental protection by reducing scrutiny and exempting many from public hearings and consent requirements.
Maulana fazlul order
The applicant Maulana Fazlul Karim Qasimi was arrested in August 2021 for a Facebook post expressing the view that the Taliban in Afghanistan are not terrorists. The applicant's lawyer argued that the court had granted bail to someone in a similar case for expressing such an opinion. While reviewing the case diary, the court found nothing incriminating against the applicant beyond the Facebook post. Given the lack of other evidence, the court doubted if the post alone constituted a cognizable offense. Therefore, the court directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a bond, finding further custody unnecessary in this case.
Maqbool alam order
The document is a 3-page court order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a bail application filed by Maqbool Alam, who was charged with several offenses including praising a terrorist organization on Facebook. The court heard arguments from Alam's lawyer and the public prosecutor. Upon reviewing the Facebook posts and finding that they did not require further custodial interrogation, the court granted bail to Alam subject to furnishing a bond and ensuring he does not interfere with the investigation.
Kerala hc order d rajagopal-v-ayyappan-anr-402210
This document summarizes two criminal revision petitions filed in the High Court of Kerala against judgments from lower courts. The lower courts had found police officers guilty of assaulting a complainant while he was in custody. The police officers argue on appeal that the lower courts erred in not requiring sanction from the state government before prosecuting public servants. The High Court examines the evidence and finds that the injuries occurred while the complainant was in police custody, supporting his allegation that police assaulted him at the police station lockup. Medical evidence also supports the complainant's version of events. The High Court dismisses the criminal revision petitions filed by the police officers.
Kpss security of kp's - 05.10.2021
The Kashmiri Pandit Sangarash Samiti (KPSS) wrote a letter to the Lieutenant Governor of Jammu and Kashmir regarding the security of non-migrant Kashmiri Pandits and Hindus living in the Kashmir Valley. KPSS has submitted communications over the past year requesting a meeting about this issue, but their requests have been ignored. Over the past 10 days, intelligence reports indicate prominent Kashmiri Pandit/Hindu businessmen will be targeted, and one was killed on October 5th. KPSS warns that if another Pandit/Hindu is killed due to administrative and security failures, they will file a petition with the International Human Rights Commission and launch a signature campaign against the administration for neglect
Lakhimpur kheri press statement from ct_us_06102021
The Central Trade Unions strongly condemned the killing of farmers protesting in Lakhimpur Kheri, Uttar Pradesh. They demanded the resignation of the Minister of State for Home and stringent punishment for the culprits. The trade unions also condemned the police for preventing opposition leaders and union leaders from visiting the families of the deceased. They reiterated their support for farmers in their struggle against the farm laws.
Allahabad hc wpil(a) 1585 2021
This document summarizes a court order from a Public Interest Litigation case in the State of Uttar Pradesh, India. The order lists several related cases to be heard together on October 22nd. It notes that two specific cases were not listed as directed in a previous order and threatens action against the responsible registry officer. It also directs the respondents to provide the petitioner's counsel a copy of the counter affidavit filed in connected writ petitions.
Mp hc wp 9320 2021_order_30-sep-2021
The document discusses two writ petitions related to prison overcrowding and conditions in Madhya Pradesh. It summarizes the suggestions provided by an amicus curiae to improve prison conditions, which include establishing women's prisons, borstal schools for youth offenders, mental health services, vocational training programs, healthcare facilities, sanitation infrastructure, educational opportunities, and recreational activities for inmates. The court acknowledges the urgent need for prison reforms and decongesting the prisons in the state.
More from ZahidManiyar (20)
Report vigilantism and attack on the freedom of religion in meerut
Report vigilantism and attack on the freedom of religion in meerut
For website 211014 cjp-ncm complaint over muslim family in indore chairperson...
For website 211014 cjp-ncm complaint over muslim family in indore chairperson...
For website 211013 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to vice chairman (1)
For website 211013 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to vice chairman (1)
For website 21103 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to chairperson (1)
For website 21103 cjp ncm complaint over nun attacks to chairperson (1)
Lakhimpur kheri press statement from ct_us_06102021
Lakhimpur kheri press statement from ct_us_06102021
Recently uploaded
A draft Ukraine-Russia treaty from April 2022
A draft Ukraine-Russia treaty from April 2022, published here in full for the first time.
Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...
केरल उच्च न्यायालय ने 11 जून, 2024 को मंडला पूजा में भाग लेने की अनुमति मांगने वाली 10 वर्षीय लड़की की रिट याचिका को खारिज कर दिया, जिसमें सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की एक बड़ी पीठ के समक्ष इस मुद्दे की लंबित प्रकृति पर जोर दिया गया। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति अनिल के. नरेंद्रन और न्यायमूर्ति हरिशंकर वी. मेनन की खंडपीठ द्वारा पारित किया गया
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
Discover the essential tools and strategies for modern PR business success. Learn how to craft compelling news releases, leverage press release sites and news wires, stay updated with PR news, and integrate effective PR practices to enhance your brand's visibility and credibility. Elevate your PR efforts with our comprehensive guide.
13062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Youngest c m in India- Pema Khandu Biography
Pema Khandu, born on August 21, 1979, is an Indian politician and the Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh. He is the son of former Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh, Dorjee Khandu. Pema Khandu assumed office as the Chief Minister in July 2016, making him one of the youngest Chief Ministers in India at that time.
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75LUMINATIVE MEDIA/PROJECT COUNSEL MEDIA GROUP
From his beginnings with a daily newspaper, he moved easily through Newsweek magazine to cable news and, later, to the frontiers of online journalism.在线办理(latrobe毕业证书)拉筹伯大学毕业证Offer一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(latrobe毕业证书)拉筹伯大学毕业证》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Recently uploaded (8)
Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...
Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75
Nodeep kaur smc
- 1. 122 CRWP-1493-2021 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION V/S STATE Present : None for the petitioner. **** The case has been taken up for hearing through video conferencing. Complaints dated 06.02.2021 and 08.02.2021 have been received through e-mail regarding illegal confinement of Nodeep Kaur, Dalit Labour Activist by the Haryana Police and under the orders of Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jaswant Singh have been treated as Criminal Writ Petition and ordered to be listed on judicial side. In the complaints sent through e-mail the complainants have not mentioned their address and have not given other relevant particulars. Notice of motion to State of Haryana. Mr. Ranvir Singh Arya, Addl. A.G., Haryana who is present in the video conferencing, has accepted notice on behalf of the respondent-State and seeks time to file reply/status report. Adjourned to 24.02.2021. To be shown in the urgent list. The Registry is directed to supply copy of the petition to learned State Counsel. 12.02.2021 (ARUN KUMAR TYAGI) Vinay JUDGE 1 of 1 ::: Downloaded on - 13-02-2021 17:53:00 :::