20211027 sc order in zakia jafri slp
•
0 likes•88 views
The Supreme Court of India was hearing a special leave petition related to the 2002 Gujarat riots case. The hearing that began on October 26th was adjourned and will now continue on November 10th at the request of the petitioners' counsel Kapil Sibal, as he needed more time to conclude arguments and the court was going into Diwali break. The petitioners were allowed to file 4 additional volumes of documents before the next hearing date.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Gauri lankesh sc order
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding two special leave petitions. The matters were called for hearing and after hearing arguments from counsel for the petitioners and respondents, the court reserved judgment and requested written submissions from counsel for the parties within one week.
Guj hc bail order
The document discusses a court order modifying an earlier order regarding the release of certain petitioners on bail. Specifically, it changes the wording of the earlier order to indicate that petitioners no.2, 6, 7 and 8 should be released on bail rather than petitioners no.1, 6, 7 and 8. The rest of the earlier order is to remain unchanged. The modification order was issued to correct discrepancies pointed out in the note for speaking to minutes.
Order 3
1) A report on an investigation into an incident was submitted to the court in a sealed envelope. The report stated that 4 accused had been apprehended while the 5th was absconding, and they were waiting for reports from the forensic lab and doctor on the cause of death.
2) The court directed the state government to expedite submission of the forensic report and submit a further report on March 1st.
3) The court also directed a respondent to provide details on compliance with assurances to employ spouses of the deceased and to explain prejudging the incident as an accidental fall.
4) The state government was directed to consider directions to authorities on implementing rules regarding employment as manual scavengers and
Order 1
The High Court of Karnataka found that the state government had failed to comply with the provisions of the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013. While the state had complied with one directive, it failed to comply with all other directives from the court's previous order. The court granted the state one more opportunity to file a fresh compliance affidavit by March 1st. It also directed the state government to place on record the actions taken regarding a specific incident of manual scavenging that occurred in January 2020, in addition to registering an FIR. The petitions will be listed again on February 10th for the state to inform the court about actions taken.
Order 2
The High Court of Karnataka ordered the State Government to submit a report in a sealed cover regarding the investigation in an FIR registered with the Kalaburagi City Police Station on January 28th, 2021. The court directed this before dealing with the issues and contentions raised in an Action Taken Report submitted by the twelfth respondent. The petitions will be listed on February 17th, 2021 at 11:40 for consideration of the investigation report.
Aictu vs uoi
This document summarizes orders from the High Court of Karnataka regarding the implementation of the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013. The Court notes that there has been little implementation of the Act and Rules in Karnataka. It issues a rule nisi and will exercise continuing mandamus to monitor the situation. As an interim measure, the Court reiterates that manual scavenging violates fundamental rights and dignity. It summarizes key aspects of the Act, including the broad definition of "manual scavenger" and provisions requiring the demolition of insanitary latrines and the construction of sanitary community latrines. The Court finds there has been inadequate implementation of the Act aimed at eliminating this in
Shaikh farid notice issued order
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking compensation from the state government respondents for the death of the minor son/brother of the petitioners, who died due to police firing on September 23, 2021 at their village in Darrang District, Assam. The court issued notice to the respondent state government officials, returnable by December 1, 2021. The petitioners were also directed to serve copies of the writ petition and annexures to the state government advocate by October 26, 2021. The case was listed for further proceedings.
Kerala hc ration order
The High Court of Kerala granted a stay on the operation of an order by the Chief Electoral Officer that deferred a proposal by the State of Kerala to distribute 10kg of rice at Rs. 15/kg to non-priority ration card holders in March and April 2021. The Court summarized the documents and arguments presented, and found that the proposal could not be prohibited by the model code of conduct as the decision for distribution was taken as early as February 4, 2021 based on the state budget and before the elections were contemplated. However, the Court specified the distribution must be done without any ostentatious functions that could influence voters.
Recommended
Gauri lankesh sc order
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding two special leave petitions. The matters were called for hearing and after hearing arguments from counsel for the petitioners and respondents, the court reserved judgment and requested written submissions from counsel for the parties within one week.
Guj hc bail order
The document discusses a court order modifying an earlier order regarding the release of certain petitioners on bail. Specifically, it changes the wording of the earlier order to indicate that petitioners no.2, 6, 7 and 8 should be released on bail rather than petitioners no.1, 6, 7 and 8. The rest of the earlier order is to remain unchanged. The modification order was issued to correct discrepancies pointed out in the note for speaking to minutes.
Order 3
1) A report on an investigation into an incident was submitted to the court in a sealed envelope. The report stated that 4 accused had been apprehended while the 5th was absconding, and they were waiting for reports from the forensic lab and doctor on the cause of death.
2) The court directed the state government to expedite submission of the forensic report and submit a further report on March 1st.
3) The court also directed a respondent to provide details on compliance with assurances to employ spouses of the deceased and to explain prejudging the incident as an accidental fall.
4) The state government was directed to consider directions to authorities on implementing rules regarding employment as manual scavengers and
Order 1
The High Court of Karnataka found that the state government had failed to comply with the provisions of the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013. While the state had complied with one directive, it failed to comply with all other directives from the court's previous order. The court granted the state one more opportunity to file a fresh compliance affidavit by March 1st. It also directed the state government to place on record the actions taken regarding a specific incident of manual scavenging that occurred in January 2020, in addition to registering an FIR. The petitions will be listed again on February 10th for the state to inform the court about actions taken.
Order 2
The High Court of Karnataka ordered the State Government to submit a report in a sealed cover regarding the investigation in an FIR registered with the Kalaburagi City Police Station on January 28th, 2021. The court directed this before dealing with the issues and contentions raised in an Action Taken Report submitted by the twelfth respondent. The petitions will be listed on February 17th, 2021 at 11:40 for consideration of the investigation report.
Aictu vs uoi
This document summarizes orders from the High Court of Karnataka regarding the implementation of the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013. The Court notes that there has been little implementation of the Act and Rules in Karnataka. It issues a rule nisi and will exercise continuing mandamus to monitor the situation. As an interim measure, the Court reiterates that manual scavenging violates fundamental rights and dignity. It summarizes key aspects of the Act, including the broad definition of "manual scavenger" and provisions requiring the demolition of insanitary latrines and the construction of sanitary community latrines. The Court finds there has been inadequate implementation of the Act aimed at eliminating this in
Shaikh farid notice issued order
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking compensation from the state government respondents for the death of the minor son/brother of the petitioners, who died due to police firing on September 23, 2021 at their village in Darrang District, Assam. The court issued notice to the respondent state government officials, returnable by December 1, 2021. The petitioners were also directed to serve copies of the writ petition and annexures to the state government advocate by October 26, 2021. The case was listed for further proceedings.
Kerala hc ration order
The High Court of Kerala granted a stay on the operation of an order by the Chief Electoral Officer that deferred a proposal by the State of Kerala to distribute 10kg of rice at Rs. 15/kg to non-priority ration card holders in March and April 2021. The Court summarized the documents and arguments presented, and found that the proposal could not be prohibited by the model code of conduct as the decision for distribution was taken as early as February 4, 2021 based on the state budget and before the elections were contemplated. However, the Court specified the distribution must be done without any ostentatious functions that could influence voters.
20211103 gauhati hc order in rehab for assam evicted families
The Gauhati High Court is hearing two PIL cases (PIL No. 65/2021 and PIL (Suo Moto) No. 6/2021) related to eviction and rehabilitation of alleged encroachers in Sipajhar, Assam. The Advocate General of Assam has been granted one week's time to file a detailed counter affidavit in the cases. The petitioner has been given three weeks thereafter to file a rejoinder. No coercive measures are currently being taken against the remaining alleged encroachers as efforts are being made to convince them to move voluntarily. The cases have been listed for further hearing on December 14, 2021.
High court single bench judgment soman case - wpc no 21529 of 2012
1. The document is a court judgment regarding a writ petition filed by V.S. Achuthanandan, a former Chief Minister of Kerala, seeking to quash an FIR registered against him for alleged offenses of corruption and criminal misconduct.
2. The FIR was registered based on a vigilance inquiry ordered by the new government into the assignment of government land to a relative of Achuthanandan during his tenure as Chief Minister.
3. Achuthanandan contends that there was no illegality in the land assignment or subsequent decision to exempt the assignee from alienation restrictions. The government argues there is evidence of abuse of power and conspiracy to provide wrongful gain.
4.
Ktaka hc manual scavenging order march 16
The High Court of Karnataka heard a case regarding compliance with the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013. The Court found that the State Government had not complied with most of the directions in the Court's previous order. The Court directed the State Government to file a detailed affidavit by April 20th regarding compliance with all directions. It also directed the State to ensure local authorities use modern technology to clean sewers and septic tanks as required by the Act.
Maynal haque order
This 3 sentence summary provides the essential information from the 2 page court document:
The document is from the Gauhati High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh regarding a writ petition filed by Makbul Ali and Ainuddin against the State of Assam and its Commissioner and Secretary of Home Affairs, Deputy Commissioner of Darrang, Director General of Police of Assam, and Superintendent of Police of Darrang. The matter was listed along with another writ petition for hearing on December 1, 2021 before the Hon'ble Justice Manash Ranjan Pathak as prayed for by the petitioners.
WPC 224759/2012 high court Kerala Judgement uploaded by James Joseph Adhikara...
WPC 224759/2012 high court Kerala Judgement uploaded by James Joseph Adhikara...Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
WPC 224759/2012 high court Kerala Judgement uploaded by James Joseph Adhikarathil 9447464502
None of the parties have been able to point out to me any
provision of law, which prohibits acceptance of tax in respect of a
property when the property is under a mortgage to a creditor by
either the owner of the property or a former owner of the property.
It is settled law that the mortgage runs with the land and transfer of
ownership after the creation of the mortgage does not affect the
validity of the mortgage itself. Sanjay singh order
The Supreme Court of India heard matters related to special leave petitions and a writ petition filed by Sanjay Singh. The Court granted permission to file the SLP without a certified copy of the impugned order. It noted the petitioner's argument that sanction was granted under the wrong section of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Court issued a notice, permitted service of the notice on the standing counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh, and directed that the petitioner not be arrested in relation to one case. It sought a counter affidavit within two weeks and listed the matter in the third week of March 2021. For the writ petition, the Court issued a limited notice on the question of clubbing together certain FIRs registered against the petitioner.
Sc order uapa sep 9
The Supreme Court of India allowed an appeal challenging the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. The appellants were arrested in connection with offenses under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and sought bail after 90 days as no chargesheet was filed. The High Court had rejected bail, noting the extension granted to the investigation. However, the Supreme Court held that under its previous judgment, the Magistrate did not have jurisdiction to extend the investigation period for UAPA offenses. Therefore, the appellants were entitled to default bail as the investigation was not completed within the prescribed period. The Court directed the appellants be released on bail and for the trial to be concluded expeditiously.
Fakhrey alam sc order 15-mar-2021
The Supreme Court of India heard a case regarding an appellant who was denied default bail after being charged under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. The Court determined that the 180-day period to file charges under this Act had expired, so the appellant was entitled to default bail. It allowed the appeal and granted default bail to the appellant subject to the trial court's conditions.
Jkhan hc may 3 order
The High Court of Jharkhand heard 3 petitions regarding the construction of a new 500-bed hospital in Ranchi. In 2017, the court had ordered the construction to be completed in phases by 2017 and 2018 to benefit poor patients, but there were delays. In 2021, the court summoned the Chief Secretary to explain the delays and ongoing issues with oxygen supply. While some beds with oxygen cylinders were made, the main liquid oxygen plant was still not installed. The court held the government and contractor in contempt for not complying with the 2017 order and directed them to expedite completion, especially the oxygen plant, to address the COVID crisis. It also ordered exploration of using an existing hospital to add more oxygen beds. The case was
20191129 gauhati hc order in 29 gorkha ft cases wpc 8490 18
1) The document is 52 pages long and appears to be court documents from the Gauhati High Court pertaining to several writ petitions challenging aspects of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam.
2) It includes details of 14 different writ petitions, listing the petitioners and respondents in each case.
3) The petitioners seem to be Assamese residents who did not make it to the final NRC list, challenging their exclusion, while the respondents include the Government of India, Government of Assam, election authorities and NRC authorities.
Mp hc final order 01-apr-2021
The petition challenges an order of preventive detention passed against the petitioner under the National Security Act, 1980. The order is challenged on two grounds: (1) the State failed to prove that the order of detention and approval were communicated to the Central Government as required by law; and (2) the District Magistrate took 3 days to forward the case to the State Government for approval, violating the legal requirement to do so "forthwith". Based on previous court decisions on interpreting similar requirements under the NSA, the court allows the petition and quashes the detention order.
20210409 guwahati hc bail to chenbhanu begum
This document is a 3-page court order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Chenbhanu Begum challenging a Foreigners Tribunal order declaring her a foreigner. The court issued notice to the respondents, accepted undertakings from their representatives, and ordered the petitioner to appear before the Superintendent of Police and furnish a bail bond so she is not arrested pending the petition's hearing. Her biometrics will also be captured, and she must seek permission to leave the district. The lower court records will be called for, and the matter will be listed after their receipt.
Karnataka hc order 1
The High Court of Karnataka granted permission for the fifth respondent to withdraw an affidavit and file a fresh one within one week. The court also directed the state government to provide information on rules/regulations prescribing fines for violating COVID norms and amounts for compounding related offenses. Further, the state was told to submit details on action taken against violators of norms at a recent rally in Bengaluru demanding reservation. The sixth respondent was given one week to file an affidavit and the petitioner to provide names and addresses of office bearers of the ninth respondent. The case will be heard again on March 12.
Karnataka hc order 2
The High Court of Karnataka heard a petition regarding large-scale violations of COVID-19 safety rules at political rallies in the state. The Court noted the state government had failed to properly enforce rules on masks and distancing. It ordered political parties be added as respondents and asked them to issue strict instructions to members to follow safety rules. The Court gave one week to amend the petition and eight weeks to physically file amendments. It set a hearing date of December 4th and ordered the state government to provide details of any fines collected for violations.
Uapa writ-petition-final
The petition challenges certain provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, as amended, on the grounds that they violate fundamental rights under the Constitution. Specifically, the petition challenges the 2019 amendment which arbitrarily classifies "terrorists" without basis in law. It also challenges the near-impossibility of obtaining bail under Section 43D(5) as inserted in 2008, which denies bail if a prima facie case is established. The petition argues these provisions allow arbitrary exercise of power, prevent individuals from challenging bad faith prosecutions, and violate rights to life and liberty. The petition seeks to strike down or read down these provisions.
Sc order right to be represented 18 dec
The Supreme Court of India set aside the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad that had affirmed the appellant's conviction. The Supreme Court found that the High Court disposed of the appellant's appeal in his absence and without legal representation, which violated his right to due process under the Indian Constitution. The case was restored to the High Court to be reheard, with directions that the appellant receive legal representation and for the matter to be heard expeditiously.
Vinod dua judgment
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India case regarding a writ petition filed by Vinod Dua against the registration of an FIR against him. The FIR was filed pursuant to a complaint alleging that statements made by Dua in a YouTube talk show on March 30th spread false information and violated sections of the Indian Penal Code. In the writ petition, Dua argues that the contents of the video were critical analysis of the government and not unlawful. He seeks quashing of the FIR and guidelines for registering FIRs against members of the media with over 10 years of experience. The state's affidavit in reply refers to sections of the Disaster Management Act regarding punishment for false claims or warnings leading to panic during a pandemic.
Case of rinas v. finland, tax bis in idem 27 01-2015 (1)
The document summarizes a European Court of Human Rights case involving a Russian national, Pavel Vladimirovic Rinas, who was subjected to both taxation proceedings and criminal proceedings in Finland related to alleged tax fraud from 1999-2004. The court had to determine whether the ne bis in idem principle was violated, as Rinas received tax surcharges in the taxation proceedings and was also convicted of aggravated tax fraud in the criminal proceedings for some of the same tax years. Both parties agreed the proceedings were criminal in nature for analyzing the ne bis in idem issue. The court ultimately had to decide whether Rinas was tried and punished twice for the same offenses.
Michigan Supreme Court Brief_Coalition
This document is a response brief filed by defendants-appellants in the Michigan Supreme Court appealing a lower court ruling. It argues that (1) the state pension plan established by the legislature is constitutional and does not infringe on the Michigan Civil Service Commission's authority over compensation and employment conditions, and (2) the commission does not have exclusive authority over the pension plan but rather its role has been complementary to the legislature's authority to enact and amend the plan. The brief provides historical context and analyzes the relevant constitutional provisions and case law to support its positions.
Sc on wmen in mental health ins
The Supreme Court of India heard a contempt petition regarding the vaccination and rehabilitation of persons with mental illness.
The Court directed all states to vaccinate inmates of mental health institutions within 1 month and submit a progress report by October 15th. It noted issues with some states merely redesignating existing facilities as halfway homes instead of establishing new ones per court orders.
The Court highlighted problems with Maharashtra shifting patients to beggar homes and old age homes, directing proper relocation by November 30th. It also found fault with Uttar Pradesh redesignating old age homes as halfway homes.
To monitor progress, the Court ordered the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment to create an online dashboard with real
Complaint Document of Widow Asha Rani Devi to Hon'ble the Chief Justice of In...
The document is a complaint filed with the Chief Justice of India alleging planned judicial murder by the Supreme Court of India. It summarizes a long-running legal dispute involving two states and multiple cases related to property and domestic issues. It alleges bias and impropriety and requests intervention into reversing judicial orders and allowing a pending petition to be heard regarding cancellation of legal notices and relief from ongoing criminal cases.
Additional document against Second Appeal D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017
Additional documents against Second Appeal vide D.No. 183722 dated 03.11.2016 being filed vide D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017 before CIC New Delhi along with FAA, District & Session Judge's reply.
More Related Content
What's hot
20211103 gauhati hc order in rehab for assam evicted families
The Gauhati High Court is hearing two PIL cases (PIL No. 65/2021 and PIL (Suo Moto) No. 6/2021) related to eviction and rehabilitation of alleged encroachers in Sipajhar, Assam. The Advocate General of Assam has been granted one week's time to file a detailed counter affidavit in the cases. The petitioner has been given three weeks thereafter to file a rejoinder. No coercive measures are currently being taken against the remaining alleged encroachers as efforts are being made to convince them to move voluntarily. The cases have been listed for further hearing on December 14, 2021.
High court single bench judgment soman case - wpc no 21529 of 2012
1. The document is a court judgment regarding a writ petition filed by V.S. Achuthanandan, a former Chief Minister of Kerala, seeking to quash an FIR registered against him for alleged offenses of corruption and criminal misconduct.
2. The FIR was registered based on a vigilance inquiry ordered by the new government into the assignment of government land to a relative of Achuthanandan during his tenure as Chief Minister.
3. Achuthanandan contends that there was no illegality in the land assignment or subsequent decision to exempt the assignee from alienation restrictions. The government argues there is evidence of abuse of power and conspiracy to provide wrongful gain.
4.
Ktaka hc manual scavenging order march 16
The High Court of Karnataka heard a case regarding compliance with the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013. The Court found that the State Government had not complied with most of the directions in the Court's previous order. The Court directed the State Government to file a detailed affidavit by April 20th regarding compliance with all directions. It also directed the State to ensure local authorities use modern technology to clean sewers and septic tanks as required by the Act.
Maynal haque order
This 3 sentence summary provides the essential information from the 2 page court document:
The document is from the Gauhati High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh regarding a writ petition filed by Makbul Ali and Ainuddin against the State of Assam and its Commissioner and Secretary of Home Affairs, Deputy Commissioner of Darrang, Director General of Police of Assam, and Superintendent of Police of Darrang. The matter was listed along with another writ petition for hearing on December 1, 2021 before the Hon'ble Justice Manash Ranjan Pathak as prayed for by the petitioners.
WPC 224759/2012 high court Kerala Judgement uploaded by James Joseph Adhikara...
WPC 224759/2012 high court Kerala Judgement uploaded by James Joseph Adhikara...Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
WPC 224759/2012 high court Kerala Judgement uploaded by James Joseph Adhikarathil 9447464502
None of the parties have been able to point out to me any
provision of law, which prohibits acceptance of tax in respect of a
property when the property is under a mortgage to a creditor by
either the owner of the property or a former owner of the property.
It is settled law that the mortgage runs with the land and transfer of
ownership after the creation of the mortgage does not affect the
validity of the mortgage itself. Sanjay singh order
The Supreme Court of India heard matters related to special leave petitions and a writ petition filed by Sanjay Singh. The Court granted permission to file the SLP without a certified copy of the impugned order. It noted the petitioner's argument that sanction was granted under the wrong section of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Court issued a notice, permitted service of the notice on the standing counsel for the State of Uttar Pradesh, and directed that the petitioner not be arrested in relation to one case. It sought a counter affidavit within two weeks and listed the matter in the third week of March 2021. For the writ petition, the Court issued a limited notice on the question of clubbing together certain FIRs registered against the petitioner.
Sc order uapa sep 9
The Supreme Court of India allowed an appeal challenging the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. The appellants were arrested in connection with offenses under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and sought bail after 90 days as no chargesheet was filed. The High Court had rejected bail, noting the extension granted to the investigation. However, the Supreme Court held that under its previous judgment, the Magistrate did not have jurisdiction to extend the investigation period for UAPA offenses. Therefore, the appellants were entitled to default bail as the investigation was not completed within the prescribed period. The Court directed the appellants be released on bail and for the trial to be concluded expeditiously.
Fakhrey alam sc order 15-mar-2021
The Supreme Court of India heard a case regarding an appellant who was denied default bail after being charged under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. The Court determined that the 180-day period to file charges under this Act had expired, so the appellant was entitled to default bail. It allowed the appeal and granted default bail to the appellant subject to the trial court's conditions.
Jkhan hc may 3 order
The High Court of Jharkhand heard 3 petitions regarding the construction of a new 500-bed hospital in Ranchi. In 2017, the court had ordered the construction to be completed in phases by 2017 and 2018 to benefit poor patients, but there were delays. In 2021, the court summoned the Chief Secretary to explain the delays and ongoing issues with oxygen supply. While some beds with oxygen cylinders were made, the main liquid oxygen plant was still not installed. The court held the government and contractor in contempt for not complying with the 2017 order and directed them to expedite completion, especially the oxygen plant, to address the COVID crisis. It also ordered exploration of using an existing hospital to add more oxygen beds. The case was
20191129 gauhati hc order in 29 gorkha ft cases wpc 8490 18
1) The document is 52 pages long and appears to be court documents from the Gauhati High Court pertaining to several writ petitions challenging aspects of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam.
2) It includes details of 14 different writ petitions, listing the petitioners and respondents in each case.
3) The petitioners seem to be Assamese residents who did not make it to the final NRC list, challenging their exclusion, while the respondents include the Government of India, Government of Assam, election authorities and NRC authorities.
Mp hc final order 01-apr-2021
The petition challenges an order of preventive detention passed against the petitioner under the National Security Act, 1980. The order is challenged on two grounds: (1) the State failed to prove that the order of detention and approval were communicated to the Central Government as required by law; and (2) the District Magistrate took 3 days to forward the case to the State Government for approval, violating the legal requirement to do so "forthwith". Based on previous court decisions on interpreting similar requirements under the NSA, the court allows the petition and quashes the detention order.
20210409 guwahati hc bail to chenbhanu begum
This document is a 3-page court order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Chenbhanu Begum challenging a Foreigners Tribunal order declaring her a foreigner. The court issued notice to the respondents, accepted undertakings from their representatives, and ordered the petitioner to appear before the Superintendent of Police and furnish a bail bond so she is not arrested pending the petition's hearing. Her biometrics will also be captured, and she must seek permission to leave the district. The lower court records will be called for, and the matter will be listed after their receipt.
Karnataka hc order 1
The High Court of Karnataka granted permission for the fifth respondent to withdraw an affidavit and file a fresh one within one week. The court also directed the state government to provide information on rules/regulations prescribing fines for violating COVID norms and amounts for compounding related offenses. Further, the state was told to submit details on action taken against violators of norms at a recent rally in Bengaluru demanding reservation. The sixth respondent was given one week to file an affidavit and the petitioner to provide names and addresses of office bearers of the ninth respondent. The case will be heard again on March 12.
Karnataka hc order 2
The High Court of Karnataka heard a petition regarding large-scale violations of COVID-19 safety rules at political rallies in the state. The Court noted the state government had failed to properly enforce rules on masks and distancing. It ordered political parties be added as respondents and asked them to issue strict instructions to members to follow safety rules. The Court gave one week to amend the petition and eight weeks to physically file amendments. It set a hearing date of December 4th and ordered the state government to provide details of any fines collected for violations.
Uapa writ-petition-final
The petition challenges certain provisions of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, as amended, on the grounds that they violate fundamental rights under the Constitution. Specifically, the petition challenges the 2019 amendment which arbitrarily classifies "terrorists" without basis in law. It also challenges the near-impossibility of obtaining bail under Section 43D(5) as inserted in 2008, which denies bail if a prima facie case is established. The petition argues these provisions allow arbitrary exercise of power, prevent individuals from challenging bad faith prosecutions, and violate rights to life and liberty. The petition seeks to strike down or read down these provisions.
Sc order right to be represented 18 dec
The Supreme Court of India set aside the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad that had affirmed the appellant's conviction. The Supreme Court found that the High Court disposed of the appellant's appeal in his absence and without legal representation, which violated his right to due process under the Indian Constitution. The case was restored to the High Court to be reheard, with directions that the appellant receive legal representation and for the matter to be heard expeditiously.
Vinod dua judgment
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India case regarding a writ petition filed by Vinod Dua against the registration of an FIR against him. The FIR was filed pursuant to a complaint alleging that statements made by Dua in a YouTube talk show on March 30th spread false information and violated sections of the Indian Penal Code. In the writ petition, Dua argues that the contents of the video were critical analysis of the government and not unlawful. He seeks quashing of the FIR and guidelines for registering FIRs against members of the media with over 10 years of experience. The state's affidavit in reply refers to sections of the Disaster Management Act regarding punishment for false claims or warnings leading to panic during a pandemic.
Case of rinas v. finland, tax bis in idem 27 01-2015 (1)
The document summarizes a European Court of Human Rights case involving a Russian national, Pavel Vladimirovic Rinas, who was subjected to both taxation proceedings and criminal proceedings in Finland related to alleged tax fraud from 1999-2004. The court had to determine whether the ne bis in idem principle was violated, as Rinas received tax surcharges in the taxation proceedings and was also convicted of aggravated tax fraud in the criminal proceedings for some of the same tax years. Both parties agreed the proceedings were criminal in nature for analyzing the ne bis in idem issue. The court ultimately had to decide whether Rinas was tried and punished twice for the same offenses.
Michigan Supreme Court Brief_Coalition
This document is a response brief filed by defendants-appellants in the Michigan Supreme Court appealing a lower court ruling. It argues that (1) the state pension plan established by the legislature is constitutional and does not infringe on the Michigan Civil Service Commission's authority over compensation and employment conditions, and (2) the commission does not have exclusive authority over the pension plan but rather its role has been complementary to the legislature's authority to enact and amend the plan. The brief provides historical context and analyzes the relevant constitutional provisions and case law to support its positions.
Sc on wmen in mental health ins
The Supreme Court of India heard a contempt petition regarding the vaccination and rehabilitation of persons with mental illness.
The Court directed all states to vaccinate inmates of mental health institutions within 1 month and submit a progress report by October 15th. It noted issues with some states merely redesignating existing facilities as halfway homes instead of establishing new ones per court orders.
The Court highlighted problems with Maharashtra shifting patients to beggar homes and old age homes, directing proper relocation by November 30th. It also found fault with Uttar Pradesh redesignating old age homes as halfway homes.
To monitor progress, the Court ordered the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment to create an online dashboard with real
What's hot (20)
20211103 gauhati hc order in rehab for assam evicted families
20211103 gauhati hc order in rehab for assam evicted families
High court single bench judgment soman case - wpc no 21529 of 2012
High court single bench judgment soman case - wpc no 21529 of 2012
WPC 224759/2012 high court Kerala Judgement uploaded by James Joseph Adhikara...
WPC 224759/2012 high court Kerala Judgement uploaded by James Joseph Adhikara...
20191129 gauhati hc order in 29 gorkha ft cases wpc 8490 18
20191129 gauhati hc order in 29 gorkha ft cases wpc 8490 18
Case of rinas v. finland, tax bis in idem 27 01-2015 (1)
Case of rinas v. finland, tax bis in idem 27 01-2015 (1)
Similar to 20211027 sc order in zakia jafri slp
Complaint Document of Widow Asha Rani Devi to Hon'ble the Chief Justice of In...
The document is a complaint filed with the Chief Justice of India alleging planned judicial murder by the Supreme Court of India. It summarizes a long-running legal dispute involving two states and multiple cases related to property and domestic issues. It alleges bias and impropriety and requests intervention into reversing judicial orders and allowing a pending petition to be heard regarding cancellation of legal notices and relief from ongoing criminal cases.
Additional document against Second Appeal D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017
Additional documents against Second Appeal vide D.No. 183722 dated 03.11.2016 being filed vide D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017 before CIC New Delhi along with FAA, District & Session Judge's reply.
Urgent whistleblower information 14.05.18
This document is an urgent whistleblower application filed in an Indian court. It seeks to bring important information on record related to the administration of justice in judicial institutions. It references several pending applications filed by the whistleblower dating back to 2011 that remain undecided. These applications contain evidence of criminal conspiracy and involvement of public servants and judicial officers that the whistleblower seeks to present. The document requests that if the whistleblower's locus standi (standing) is questioned, the pending probate case determining this issue must be decided first before the applications can be heard. It urges the court to decide the various pending applications in sequence to allow the whistleblower to present pre-charge evidence in the matter.
Urgent whistleblower information as filed 14.05.18
This document provides information about pending whistleblower applications in an ongoing judicial matter. It notes that the whistleblower/applicant has 10 pending applications in the case that have yet to be decided, dating back to 2011. These applications include requests for records, to add parties to the case, and to present evidence. The document calls for the applications to be decided in sequential order so that the whistleblower can properly present evidence in the matter involving alleged criminal conspiracy. It also discusses how a pending probate case could impact the whistleblower's ability to prosecute the case depending on the determination of his locus standi or legal standing.
Zakia jafri 34207 2018 3_1_31133_order_11-nov-2021
This document provides the record of proceedings for a special leave petition hearing in the Supreme Court of India regarding the 2002 Gujarat riots case. It lists the advocates present and notes that the matter was heard in part and will continue on November 16th, 2021 for further arguments. The three judge bench of the Supreme Court comprised of Justices Khanwilkar, Maheshwari and Ravi Kumar.
Zakia sc order 34207 2018 3_1_31554_order_25-nov-2021
This document provides a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a special leave petition related to the 2002 Gujarat riots case. It lists the petitioners and respondents, and notes that the matter was heard in part by Justices Khanwilkar, Maheshwari and Ravikumar. Several interim applications were also listed. The matter was adjourned and listed for further arguments on December 1, 2021.
Zakia jafri sc 34207 2018 3_1_31354_order_17-nov-2021
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a special leave petition related to the 2002 Gujarat riots case. It summarizes that the matter was heard in part by a three-judge bench and will continue to be heard on November 23, 2021. Counsel for the petitioner and respondent were present. The court heard initial arguments and scheduled further arguments for a future date.
Zakia jafri34207 2018 3_2_31132_order_10-nov-2021
This document records proceedings in the Supreme Court of India for a special leave petition related to the 2002 Gujarat riots case. It lists the petitioners and respondents and their legal counsel who were present for the hearing. The court heard initial arguments and ordered for the matter to be further heard the next day.
Letter dated 22.11.2022 to Branch Officer Section 10 at Supreme Court of Ind...
Take all 84 e-filed legal documents with effect from 07.06.2022 to 22.11.2022 along with physical filed legal document with effect from 14.06.2022 to till date on Record of office report for the date of hearing on 25.11.2022
Gulfisha fatima
The court order denies the application of accused Gulfisha Fatima for statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC. It notes that Gulfisha was arrested on April 11, 2020 in the present case. While over 183 days had passed since her arrest, the charge sheet was filed within the extended period of investigation on September 16, 2020. It also finds that the court has jurisdiction in this matter as per notifications and orders issued by the Delhi government and High Court designating the court to try cases related to the 2020 Delhi riots. Therefore, the court dismisses Gulfisha's application for statutory bail as no case for relief under Section 167(2) is made out.
Gulfisha bail order
The court order denies the application of accused Gulfisha Fatima for statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC. It notes that Gulfisha was arrested on April 11, 2020 in the present case. While over 183 days had passed since her arrest, the charge sheet was filed within the extended period of investigation on September 16, 2020. It also finds that the court has jurisdiction in this matter based on notifications and orders issued by the Delhi government and Delhi High Court designating the court to try cases related to the 2020 Delhi riots. Therefore, the court dismisses Gulfisha's application for statutory bail as no grounds for it exist.
Pravat mohanty sc judgment
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India case involving two appellants, Pravat Chandra Mohanty and Pratap Kumar Choudhury, who were convicted of assaulting and causing the death of Kasinath Naik. The Supreme Court heard arguments from counsel for the appellants, the state of Odisha, and the legal representatives of the deceased. The appellants deposited compensation in court and all parties agreed to compound the offense of conviction under Section 324 IPC. The Supreme Court considered converting the Section 324 conviction to Section 323 or substituting imprisonment with a fine, given the appellants' advanced age.
Sanjiv bhatt order
1. The applicant/accused Sanjiv Rajendra Bhatt filed applications under Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking production of certain documents for his defense that were not part of the chargesheet.
2. The trial court rejected the applications, observing that the documents were not necessary and desirable for a just decision and the applications were aimed at delaying the trial.
3. In this revision application, Bhatt has challenged the rejection of his Section 91 applications, arguing that he is entitled to all documents not relied on by the prosecution as part of a fair trial. The state opposes, arguing the documents are not relevant and the applications are an abuse of process aimed at delaying trial.
Response to District Judge dated 02.10.2017 against NOTICE under section 82 C...
Framed Accused responded to Corrupt Magistrate/District Judge/C.J.M. dated 02.10.2010 through email.
gauhati-high-court-foreigner-tribunal-03032023-461954.pdf
The court remanded the case back to the Foreigners Tribunal to pass a reasoned order after reviewing the records of two previous cases regarding the petitioner's citizenship status. An earlier opinion declaring the petitioner not a foreigner lacked reasons and was therefore not a valid basis for the principle of res judicata to apply. However, in the interest of justice, the court ordered the Tribunal to consider materials from both previous cases and issue a new reasoned ruling, while no coercive action should be taken against the petitioner until then. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.
Cmm order
This document is a court order from a case involving multiple accused persons. It summarizes proceedings from a hearing where the prosecution requested more time for further investigation into the case. The court allowed more time but imposed a cost of Rs. 25,000 to be split among the accused, noting delays in the investigation. It also ordered the Secretary of Home Affairs to inquire about responsibility for the costs being imposed and deducting the amount from the responsible officer's salary. The case was adjourned to a future date for further proceedings.
Karnataka hc order july 13
This judgment summarizes a criminal appeal regarding the denial of bail to an accused, Mohan Nayak. Key details:
- Nayak was arrested on July 18, 2018 in connection with the killing of journalist Gowri Lankesh and remanded to custody.
- The investigating officer sought and received a 90-day extension to file charges against Nayak under the KCOCA Act.
- Nayak argued the charges were not actually filed until after the extended deadline of November 27, 2018, so he was entitled to bail under Section 167(2) of the CrPC.
- However, the prosecution argued the charges were filed on November 23, 2018 as shown on documents
RTI dated 7.12.22 against suppression of Gang Rape matter.pdf
Supreme Court of India is main accused in Non Bail able Warrant and Gang Rape matter W.P.(Crl.) D.NO. 18546/2022. Sixteen petitions (SLP. Writ, Review, Curative and M.A) have been filed against interlinked with this matter since 2012 to till date, yet no rescue of 18 year ago kidnapped pregnant wife Rina Kumari (Guddi) and abducted unseen minor daughter from the clutches of sex Abusers State by Supreme Court of India and Union of India as on date
1158_2022_1_11_40959_Order_13-Jan-2023.pdf
1. The contempt petition alleges that there has been no progress in the investigation of an FIR registered 5 months after a hate speech incident on December 19, 2021, despite 8 months having passed.
2. The Additional Solicitor General submits there is no contempt of the Supreme Court's directions.
3. The court directs the Investigating Officer to submit an affidavit within 2 weeks detailing the steps taken in the investigation since the December 2021 incident.
4. The contempt petition will be heard again on January 30, 2023.
Cctv camera sc order sept 16
The Supreme Court of India heard a petition regarding CCTV cameras in police stations and oversight committees to monitor police stations. The Court ordered all States and Union Territories to provide information on: (1) the status of CCTV cameras installed in each police station; and (2) the constitution of oversight committees in accordance with a previous Court order. The Court directed the Registry to immediately notify all States and Union Territories, and expects a response with the requested information to be filed before the next hearing on November 24, 2020. The Court also directed that all future affidavits and documents in the case be shared with the amicus curiae.
Similar to 20211027 sc order in zakia jafri slp (20)
Complaint Document of Widow Asha Rani Devi to Hon'ble the Chief Justice of In...
Complaint Document of Widow Asha Rani Devi to Hon'ble the Chief Justice of In...
Additional document against Second Appeal D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017
Additional document against Second Appeal D.No. 169135 dated 03.10.2017
Urgent whistleblower information as filed 14.05.18
Urgent whistleblower information as filed 14.05.18
Zakia jafri 34207 2018 3_1_31133_order_11-nov-2021
Zakia jafri 34207 2018 3_1_31133_order_11-nov-2021
Zakia sc order 34207 2018 3_1_31554_order_25-nov-2021
Zakia sc order 34207 2018 3_1_31554_order_25-nov-2021
Zakia jafri sc 34207 2018 3_1_31354_order_17-nov-2021
Zakia jafri sc 34207 2018 3_1_31354_order_17-nov-2021
Letter dated 22.11.2022 to Branch Officer Section 10 at Supreme Court of Ind...
Letter dated 22.11.2022 to Branch Officer Section 10 at Supreme Court of Ind...
Response to District Judge dated 02.10.2017 against NOTICE under section 82 C...
Response to District Judge dated 02.10.2017 against NOTICE under section 82 C...
gauhati-high-court-foreigner-tribunal-03032023-461954.pdf
gauhati-high-court-foreigner-tribunal-03032023-461954.pdf
RTI dated 7.12.22 against suppression of Gang Rape matter.pdf
RTI dated 7.12.22 against suppression of Gang Rape matter.pdf
Recently uploaded
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Pim Betist's presentation about generative AI in the legal sector at Lexpo.com '24
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Corporate Governance : Scope and Legal Framework
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
MEANING
Corporate Governance refers to the way in which companies are governed and to what purpose. It identifies who has power and accountability, and who makes decisions. It is, in essence, a toolkit that enables management and the board to deal more effectively with the challenges of running a company.
一比一原版英国伦敦商学院毕业证（lbs毕业证书）如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【英国伦敦商学院毕业证（lbs毕业证书）成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理英国伦敦商学院毕业证（lbs毕业证书）【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理英国伦敦商学院毕业证（lbs毕业证书）【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理英国伦敦商学院毕业证（lbs毕业证书）【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理英国伦敦商学院毕业证（lbs毕业证书）【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
一比一原版多伦多都会大学毕业证(TMU毕业证书)学历如何办理
原版办【微信号:95270640】【多伦多都会大学毕业证(TMU毕业证书)】【微信号:95270640】《成绩单、外壳、雅思、offer、真实留信官方学历认证（永久存档/真实可查）》采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作（包括：隐形水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠，文字图案浮雕，激光镭射，紫外荧光，温感，复印防伪）行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备，十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，业务范围有加拿大、英国、澳洲、韩国、美国、新加坡，新西兰等学历材料，包您满意。
【我们承诺采用的是学校原版纸张（纸质、底色、纹路）我们拥有全套进口原装设备，特殊工艺都是采用不同机器制作，仿真度基本可以达到100%，所有工艺效果都可提前给客户展示，不满意可以根据客户要求进行调整，直到满意为止！】
【业务选择办理准则】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理一份就读学校的毕业证【微信号95270640】文凭即可
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理一份毕业证【微信号95270640】即可
三、进国企，银行，事业单位，考公务员等等，这些单位是必需要提供真实教育部认证的，办理教育部认证所需资料众多且烦琐，所有材料您都必须提供原件，我们凭借丰富的经验，快捷的绿色通道帮您快速整合材料，让您少走弯路。
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
留信网服务项目：
1、留学生专业人才库服务（留信分析）
2、国（境）学习人员提供就业推荐信服务
3、留学人员区块链存储服务
【关于价格问题（保证一手价格）】
我们所定的价格是非常合理的，而且我们现在做得单子大多数都是代理和回头客户介绍的所以一般现在有新的单子 我给客户的都是第一手的代理价格，因为我想坦诚对待大家 不想跟大家在价格方面浪费时间
对于老客户或者被老客户介绍过来的朋友，我们都会适当给一些优惠。
选择实体注册公司办理，更放心，更安全！我们的承诺：客户在留信官方认证查询网站查询到认证通过结果后付款，不成功不收费！
在线办理(UNE毕业证书)新英格兰大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(UNE毕业证书)新英格兰大学毕业证成绩单》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
一比一原版新加坡国立大学毕业证(本硕）nus学位证书如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【新加坡国立大学毕业证(本硕）nus学位证书成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理新加坡国立大学毕业证(本硕）nus学位证书【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理新加坡国立大学毕业证(本硕）nus学位证书【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理新加坡国立大学毕业证(本硕）nus学位证书【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理新加坡国立大学毕业证(本硕）nus学位证书【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
一比一原版伯恩茅斯大学毕业证（bu毕业证）如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【伯恩茅斯大学毕业证（bu毕业证）成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理伯恩茅斯大学毕业证（bu毕业证）【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理伯恩茅斯大学毕业证（bu毕业证）【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理伯恩茅斯大学毕业证（bu毕业证）【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理伯恩茅斯大学毕业证（bu毕业证）【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
Lincoln硕士毕业证成绩单【微信95270640】办理新西兰林肯大学毕业证原版一模一样、Lincoln毕业证制作【Q微信95270640】《新西兰林肯大学毕业证购买流程》《Lincoln成绩单制作》新西兰林肯大学毕业证书Lincoln毕业证文凭新西兰林肯大学
本科毕业证书,学历学位认证如何办理【留学国外学位学历认证、毕业证、成绩单、大学Offer、雅思托福代考、语言证书、学生卡、高仿教育部认证等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务】代办国外（海外）英国、加拿大、美国、新西兰、澳大利亚、新西兰等国外各大学毕业证、文凭学历证书、成绩单、学历学位认证真实可查。
[留学文凭学历认证(留信认证使馆认证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单毕业证证书大学Offer请假条成绩单语言证书国际回国人员证明高仿教育部认证申请学校等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务。
多年留学服务公司,拥有海外样板无数能完美1:1还原海外各国大学degreeDiplomaTranscripts等毕业材料。海外大学毕业材料都有哪些工艺呢？工艺难度主要由：烫金.钢印.底纹.水印.防伪光标.热敏防伪等等组成。而且我们每天都在更新海外文凭的样板以求所有同学都能享受到完美的品质服务。
国外毕业证学位证成绩单办理方法：
1客户提供办理新西兰林肯大学新西兰林肯大学毕业证学位证信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：我们有专业老师帮你查询）；
2开始安排制作毕业证成绩单电子图；
3毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快读邮寄）
— — — — 我们是挂科和未毕业同学们的福音我们是实体公司精益求精的工艺！ — — — -
一真实留信认证的作用(私企外企荣誉的见证):
1：该专业认证可证明留学生真实留学身份同时对留学生所学专业等级给予评定。
2：国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书这个入网证书并且可以归档到地方。
3：凡是获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内将在公安部网内查询个人身份证信息后同步读取人才网入库信息。
4：个人职称评审加20分个人信誉贷款加10分。
5：在国家人才网主办的全国网络招聘大会中纳入资料供国家500强等高端企业选择人才。问山娃想买什么想吃什么山娃知道父亲赚钱很辛苦除了书籍和文具山娃啥也不要能牵着父亲的手满城闲逛他已心满意足了父亲连挑了三套童装叫山娃试穿山娃有点不想父亲说城里不比乡下要穿得漂漂亮亮爸怎么不穿得漂亮望着父亲山娃反问道父亲听了并不回答只是吃吃地笑山娃很精神越逛越起劲父亲却越逛越疲倦望着父亲呵欠连天的样子山娃也说困了累了回家吧小屋闷罐一般头顶上的三叶扇彻夜呜呜作响搅得满屋热气腾腾也搅得山娃心烦意乱父亲一的
原版定做(sheffield学位证书)英国谢菲尔德大学毕业证文凭证书原版一模一样
原版定制【微信:bwp0011】《(sheffield学位证书)英国谢菲尔德大学毕业证文凭证书》【微信:bwp0011】成绩单 、雅思、外壳、留信学历认证永久存档查询，采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作（包括：隐形水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠，文字图案浮雕，激光镭射，紫外荧光，温感，复印防伪）行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备，十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，业务范围有加拿大、英国、澳洲、韩国、美国、新加坡，新西兰等学历材料，包您满意。
【业务选择办理准则】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理一份就读学校的毕业证【微信bwp0011】文凭即可
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理一份毕业证【微信bwp0011】即可
三、进国企，银行，事业单位，考公务员等等，这些单位是必需要提供真实教育部认证的，办理教育部认证所需资料众多且烦琐，所有材料您都必须提供原件，我们凭借丰富的经验，快捷的绿色通道帮您快速整合材料，让您少走弯路。
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
【关于价格问题（保证一手价格）】
我们所定的价格是非常合理的，而且我们现在做得单子大多数都是代理和回头客户介绍的所以一般现在有新的单子 我给客户的都是第一手的代理价格，因为我想坦诚对待大家 不想跟大家在价格方面浪费时间
对于老客户或者被老客户介绍过来的朋友，我们都会适当给一些优惠。
Capital Punishment by Saif Javed (LLM)ppt.pptx
This PowerPoint presentation, titled "Capital Punishment in India: Constitutionality and Rarest of Rare Principle," is a comprehensive exploration of the death penalty within the Indian criminal justice system. Authored by Saif Javed, an LL.M student specializing in Criminal Law and Criminology at Kazi Nazrul University, the presentation delves into the constitutional aspects and ethical debates surrounding capital punishment. It examines key legal provisions, significant case laws, and the specific categories of offenders excluded from the death penalty. The presentation also discusses recent recommendations by the Law Commission of India regarding the gradual abolishment of capital punishment, except for terrorism-related offenses. This detailed analysis aims to foster informed discussions on the future of the death penalty in India.
一比一原版(uwlc毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学拉克罗斯分校毕业证如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【(uwlc毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学拉克罗斯分校毕业证成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理(uwlc毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学拉克罗斯分校毕业证【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理(uwlc毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学拉克罗斯分校毕业证【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理(uwlc毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学拉克罗斯分校毕业证【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理(uwlc毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学拉克罗斯分校毕业证【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
Pedal to the Court Understanding Your Rights after a Cycling Collision.pdf
The immediate step is an intelligent choice; don’t procrastinate. In the aftermath of the crash, taking care of yourself and taking quick steps can help you protect yourself from significant injuries. Make sure that you have collected the essential data and information.
一比一原版(uwgb毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学绿湾分校毕业证如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【(uwgb毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学绿湾分校毕业证成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理(uwgb毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学绿湾分校毕业证【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理(uwgb毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学绿湾分校毕业证【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理(uwgb毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学绿湾分校毕业证【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理(uwgb毕业证书)美国威斯康星大学绿湾分校毕业证【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
Presentation by Justin Ordoyo
University of the Philippines College of Law
一比一原版(ual毕业证书)伦敦艺术大学毕业证如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【(ual毕业证书)伦敦艺术大学毕业证成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理(ual毕业证书)伦敦艺术大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理(ual毕业证书)伦敦艺术大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理(ual毕业证书)伦敦艺术大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理(ual毕业证书)伦敦艺术大学毕业证【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
一比一原版新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕）ntu学位证书如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕）ntu学位证书成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕）ntu学位证书【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕）ntu学位证书【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕）ntu学位证书【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕）ntu学位证书【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
一比一原版牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证（牛布毕业证）如何办理
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证（牛布毕业证）成绩单】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
办理牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证（牛布毕业证）【微信：741003700 】外观非常简单，由纸质材料制成，上面印有校徽、校名、毕业生姓名、专业等信息。
办理牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证（牛布毕业证）【微信：741003700 】格式相对统一，各专业都有相应的模板。通常包括以下部分：
校徽：象征着学校的荣誉和传承。
校名:学校英文全称
授予学位：本部分将注明获得的具体学位名称。
毕业生姓名：这是最重要的信息之一，标志着该证书是由特定人员获得的。
颁发日期：这是毕业正式生效的时间，也代表着毕业生学业的结束。
其他信息：根据不同的专业和学位，可能会有一些特定的信息或章节。
办理牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证（牛布毕业证）【微信：741003700 】价值很高，需要妥善保管。一般来说，应放置在安全、干燥、防潮的地方，避免长时间暴露在阳光下。如需使用，最好使用复印件而不是原件，以免丢失。
综上所述，办理牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证（牛布毕业证）【微信：741003700 】是证明身份和学历的高价值文件。外观简单庄重，格式统一，包括重要的个人信息和发布日期。对持有人来说，妥善保管是非常重要的。
Recently uploaded (20)
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
Pedal to the Court Understanding Your Rights after a Cycling Collision.pdf
Pedal to the Court Understanding Your Rights after a Cycling Collision.pdf
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
20211027 sc order in zakia jafri slp
- 1. 1 ITEM NO.17 COURT NO.3 SECTION II-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 34207/2018 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05-10-2017 in CRA No. 205/2014 passed by the High Court Of Gujarat At Ahmedabad) ZAKIA AHSAN JAFRI & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. Respondent(s) IA No. 154256/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 154257/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS, IA No. 173677/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES, IA No. 161337/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES & IA No. 154254/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/) Date : 27-10-2021 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mihir Desai, Sr. adv. Ms. Aparna Bhat, AOR Ms. Karishma Maria, Adv. Mr. Nizam Pasha, Adv. Mr. Adit Pujari, Adv. Mr. Raghav Tankha, Adv. Mr. Mihir Joshi, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Adv. Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, AOR Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee, AOR (NP) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following Digitally signed by NEETU KHAJURIA Date: 2021.10.28 19:38:23 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
- 2. 2 O R D E R We have been hearing this matter since yesterday i.e., 26th October, 2021. When the Bench assembled after lunch break, Mr. Kapil Sibal, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners, informed us that he is likely to take some more time and will not be able to conclude his arguments even by tomorrow. He submits that as there will be Diwali break during the next week, it would be appropriate that hearing of this matter be continued after the Diwali vacation. In the meantime, he intends to file four more volumes as convenience compilation along with propositions. He has also informed us that no further documents will be filed thereafter. As a result, we defer the hearing of this matter till 10th November, 2021, as jointly requested. Registry is directed to accept the additional paper-books to be filed in the form of convenience volumes. It will also be open to the petitioners to file the same through e-filing, provided advance copy is made available to the counsel appearing for
- 3. 3 the opposite parties. (NEETU KHAJURIA) COURT MASTER (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER