SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 452
Download to read offline
Written March 1999
                                    Updated December 2009




                       Corrections and comments should be e-mailed to
                       Jennifer Rich at jennifer_rich@ca9.uscourts.gov



This outline is intended for use as a starting point for research. It is not intended to express the
views or opinions of the Ninth Circuit, and it may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit.
Table of Contents

I.    INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

II.   STATUTORY BASES FOR CIVIL APPEALS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
      A.  APPEALS FROM FINAL DECISIONS (28 U.S.C. § 1291).. . . . . . . 2
          1.  FINAL DECISIONS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
              a.   Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
                   i.    Need to Consider Finality. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
                   ii.   Policy Behind Final Judgment Rule. . . . . . . . . . . . 3
              b.   Determining Finality.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
                   i.    District Court Intent. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
                   ii.   Adjudication of all Claims. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
              c.   Manufacturing Finality. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
              d.   “Pragmatic” or “Practical” Finality Doctrine. . . . . . . . . 10
                   i.    Parameters of Doctrine.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
                   ii.   Applications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
          2.  COLLATERAL ORDER DOCTRINE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
              a.   Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
              b.   Requirements of Collateral Order Doctrine. . . . . . . . . . 12
              c.   Appealability of Specific Orders under Collateral Order
                   Doctrine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
                   i.    Abstention Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
                   ii.   Orders Denying Immunity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
                   iii.  Disqualification of Counsel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
                   iv.   Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 Sanctions.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
                   v.    Other Orders.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
          3.  ORDERS CERTIFIED UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 54(b). . . . . 18
              a.   Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
                   i.    District Court Determinations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
                   ii.   Appellate Court Review. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
              b.   Contents of Certification Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
                   i.    “No Just Reason for Delay”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
                   ii.   Reference to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). . . . . . . . . . . . 20
                   iii.  “Specific Findings” Supporting Certification. . . 20
              c.   Propriety of Certification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
                   i.    Appellate Review Required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21


                                                    -i-
ii.   Standard of Review. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
                        iii.  Scrutiny under Morrison-Knudsen.. . . . . . . . . . . 22
                        iv.   Trend Toward Greater Deference to District
                              Court.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
           d.      Immediate Appeal from Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) Order
                   Required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
           e.      Denial of Rule 54(b) Certification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
B.   APPEALS FROM INTERLOCUTORY DECISIONS (28 U.S.C.
     § 1292). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
     1.    INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTIVE ORDERS (28 U.S.C.
           § 1292(a)(1)). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
           a.      Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
           b.      Order Granting or Denying an Injunction. . . . . . . . . . . 27
                   i.         Explicit Grant or Denial or Injunction. . . . . . . . . 27
                   ii.        Implicit Grant or Denial of Injunction. . . . . . . . . 27
           c.      Orders Modifying, Continuing, or Dissolving
                   Injunction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
                   i.         Order Modifying Injunction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
                   ii.        Order Continuing Injunction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
                   iii.       Order Dissolving Injunction.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
                   iv.        Order Denying Modification or Dissolution of
                              Injunction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
           d.      Examples of Orders Appealable under 28 U.S.C.
                   § 1292(a)(1). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
                   i.         Order Granting Permanent Injunction. . . . . . . . . 32
                   ii.        Order Denying Entry of Consent Decree. . . . . . . 33
                   iii.       Order Granting Injunction Despite Lack of Motion
                              for Interim Relief. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
                   iv.        Order Requiring Submission of Remedial Plan
                              . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
                   v.         Certain Orders Affecting Assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
                   vi.        Order Denying Relief in Mandamus Action. . . . 34
                   vii. Order Staying Extradition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
                   viii. Order Denying Stay of Immigration Removal
                              Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
                   ix.        Order Disapproving Class Settlement. . . . . . . . . 34



                                             -ii-
e.    Examples of Orders Not Appealable under 28 U.S.C.
           § 1292(a)(1). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         35
           i.      Order Denying Motion to Abstain. . . . . . . . . . . .                          35
           ii.     Order Denying Motion for Stay. . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        35
           iii.    Order Granting England Reservation of
                   Jurisdiction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         36
           iv.     Order Denying Motion to Quash. . . . . . . . . . . . .                          36
           v.      Order Granting Conditional Permissive
                   Intervention. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           36
           vi.     Certain Orders Affecting Assets. . . . . . . . . . . . .                        36
           vii. Order Remanding to Federal Agency.. . . . . . . . .                                37
           viii. Order Denying Summary Judgment Due to
                   Factual Disputes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .             37
           ix.     Order Denying Entry of Consent Decree Not
                   Appealable by Party Against Whom Injunction
                   Sought. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         38
     f.    Temporary Restraining Order.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                     38
           i.      Order Tantamount to Denial of Preliminary
                   Injunction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         38
           ii.     Orders Effectively Deciding Merits of Case. . . .                               39
     g.    Mootness.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        40
2.   INTERLOCUTORY RECEIVERSHIP ORDERS (28 U.S.C.
     § 1292(a)(2)). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    40
3.   INTERLOCUTORY ADMIRALTY ORDERS
     (§ 1292(a)(3)). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     42
     a.    Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        42
     b.    Appealable Admiralty Orders.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                     42
     c.    Nonappealable Admiralty Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                       43
4.   INTERLOCUTORY PERMISSIVE APPEALS (28 U.S.C.
     § 1292(b)). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   44
     a.    Procedure for Appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). . . . .                                 44
           i.      District Court Certification under § 1292(b). . . .                             44
           ii.     Timely Petition from Order Certified under
                   § 1292(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          44
           iii.    Appellate Court Permission to Appeal under
                   § 1292(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          45
           iv.     Stay Pending Appeal from Certified Order. . . . .                               46


                                   -iii-
b.
               Standards for Evaluating § 1292(b) Certification
               Order.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     46
               i.      Order Raises Controlling Question of Law. . . . .                               46
               ii.     Difference of Opinion Exists as to Controlling
                       Question. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         47
               iii.    Immediate Appeal Would Materially Advance
                       Litigation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         47
         c.    Examples of Orders Reviewed under 28 U.S.C.
               § 1292(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        47
         d.    Examples of Orders Not Reviewed under 28 U.S.C
               § 1292(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        48
C.   APPEALABILITY OF SPECIFIC ORDERS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                              49
     1.  ADMIRALTY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .            49
     2.  AGENCY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       49
     3.  APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                            50
         a.    Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        50
         b.    Appointment of Counsel in Title VII Action. . . . . . . . .                             50
     4.  ARBITRATION (9 U.S.C. § 16). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                      51
         a.    Cases Governed by the Federal Arbitration Act.. . . . . .                               51
         b.    Arbitration Orders Appealable under 9 U.S.C. § 16. . .                                  52
         c.    Arbitration Orders Not Appealable under 9 U.S.C.
               § 16. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   53
         d.    Interlocutory v. Final Decision. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                  54
         e.    Other Avenues for Appeal from Arbitration Orders. . .                                   55
     5.  Assets (Liens, Attachments, etc.). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                56
         a.    Orders Restraining Assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                  56
         b.    Orders Releasing Assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                56
     6.  ATTORNEY’S FEES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                57
         a.    Interim Attorney’s Fees Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                    57
         b.    Post-Judgment Attorney’s Fees Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . .                          58
     7.  BANKRUPTCY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .             58
     8.  CLASS ACTIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .              58
         a.    Interlocutory Appeal from Class Certification Order. . .                                58
               i.      Fed. R. Civ. P. 23. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .             58
               ii.     Decisions Predating Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f). . . . . .                            59
         b.    Review of Class Certification Order After Final
               Judgment.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        59


                                           -iv-
i.     Final Order Adjudicating Individual Claim. . . . . 59
               ii.    Dismissal Following Settlement of Individual
                      Claim. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
            iii.      Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute Individual
                      Claim. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
            iv.       Underlying Judgment Reversed on Appeal. . . . . 60
      c.    Appeal from Orders Allocating Cost of Notifying Class
            Members. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
9.    Consolidated Actions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
10.   Contempt and Sanctions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
      a.    Appealability of Contempt or Sanctions Order Issued in
            the Course of an Underlying District Court
            Proceeding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
            i.        Contempt or Sanctions Order Against Party. . . . 62
            ii.       Contempt or sanctions Order against
                      Nonparty.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
            iii.      Contempt or Sanctions Order against Party and
                      Nonparty Jointly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
            iv.       Denial of Motion for Contempt or Sanctions. . . . 68
      b.    Appealability of Contempt or Sanctions Order Issued
            After Final Judgment in an Underlying District Court
            Proceeding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
            i.        Post-Judgment Contempt or Sanctions Order
                      Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
            ii.       Post-Judgment Continuing Contempt Order. . . . 69
            iii.      Order Denying Motion to Vacate Contempt
                      Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
      c.    Appealability of Contempt or Sanctions Order Issued As
            Final Judgment in Enforcement or Contempt
            Proceeding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
            i.        Contempt Order as Final Judgment in
                      Enforcement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
            ii.       Contempt Order as Final Judgment in Contempt
                      Proceeding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
11.   Default.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
      a.    Motion for Default Judgment Granted. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
      b.    Motion for Default Judgment Denied.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71


                                     -v-
c.    Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment Granted.. . . . . . 71
      d.    Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment Denied. . . . . . . 71
12.   Discovery Orders and Subpoenas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
      a.    Appeal by a Person Who is a Party to an Underlying
            District Court Proceeding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
            i.     Order Compelling Discovery. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
            ii.    Protective Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
            iii.   Pretrial Order to Contribute to Discovery
                   Fund. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
            iv.    Post-Judgment Discovery Orders.. . . . . . . . . . . . 74
      b.    Appeal by Person Not a Party to An Underlying District
            Court Proceeding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
            i.     General Rule: Target of Order Compelling
                   Discovery Cannot Appeal Until Contempt Citation
                   Issues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
            ii.    Exceptions Permitting Appeal Absent Contempt
                   Citation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
            iii.   Appeal from Order Denying Motion to
                   Compel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
      c.    Appeal by Person Who is a Party to a Proceeding
            Limited to Enforcement or Discovery. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
            i.     Discovery Order Issued as Final Judgment in
                   Enforcement Proceeding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
            ii.    Discovery Order Issued as Final Judgment in
                   Discovery Proceeding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
13.   DISMISSAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
      a.    Dismissal Denied. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
            i.     Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
            ii.    Denial of Immunity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
      b.    Dismissal Granted.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
            i.     Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
            ii.    Dismissal of Complaint v. Dismissal of
                   Action. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
            iii.   Leave to Amend Complaint. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
            iv.    Involuntary Dismissal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
            v.     Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice. . . . . . . . 86
            vi.    Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice.. . . . . . . . . . 88


                                  -vi-
vii.Dismissal Subject to Condition or
                  Modification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
           viii. Dismissal of Fewer Than All Claims. . . . . . . . . . 89
14.   DISQUALIFICATION.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
      a.   Disqualification of Counsel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
      b.   Disqualification of District Judge.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
15.   IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
16.   IMMIGRATION.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
17.   IMMUNITY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
      a.   Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
      b.   Absolute Presidential or Legislative Immunity. . . . . . . 93
      c.   State Sovereign Immunity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
      d.   Foreign Sovereign Immunity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
      e.   Federal Sovereign Immunity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
      f.   Military Service Immunity (Feres doctrine).. . . . . . . . . 94
      g.   Qualified Immunity of Government Employees. . . . . . 94
           i.     Order Denying Dismissal or Summary
                  Judgment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
           ii.    Only Legal Determinations Subject to
                  Review. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
           iii.   Successive Appeals from Orders Denying
                  Immunity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
      h.   Municipal Liability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
      i.   Immunity from Service (“Specialty Doctrine”). . . . . . . 97
      j.   Settlement Agreement (Contractual Immunity). . . . . . . 98
      k.   Absolute Judicial Immunity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
      l.   Absolute Political Immunity.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
      m.   Absolute Witness Immunity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
      n.   Tribal Sovereign Immunity.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
18.   INJUNCTION.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
19.   INTERVENTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
      a.   Intervention as of Right. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
           i.     Order Denying Intervention Altogether. . . . . . . . 99
           ii.    Order Denying Intervention in Part. . . . . . . . . . . 99
      b.   Permissive Intervention. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
      c.   Must Appeal Denial of Intervention Immediately. . . . 100



                                 -vii-
20.   MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISIONS (28 U.S.C. § 636(c)). 100
      a.   Final Judgment by Magistrate Appealed Directly to
           Court of Appeals.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
      b.   No Appellate Jurisdiction if Magistrate Lacked
           Authority.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
      c.   Parties’ Consent to Entry of Final Judgment by
           Magistrate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
21.   POST-JUDGMENT ORDERS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
      a.   Post-Judgment Orders Generally Final.. . . . . . . . . . . . 103
      b.   Separate Notice of Appeal Generally Required. . . . . . 103
      c.   Appealability of Specific Post-Judgment Orders. . . . . 104
           i.     Post-Judgment Order Granting or Denying
                  Attorney’s Fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
           ii.    Post-Judgment Order Granting or Denying
                  Costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
           iii.   Post-Judgment Order Granting or Denying
                  New Trial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
           iv.    Post-Judgment Orders Related to Discovery. . . 105
           v.     Post-Judgment Contempt Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . 105
           vi.    Orders Granting or Denying Fed. R. Civ.
                  P. 60(b) Relief. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
           vii. Other Post-Judgment Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
22.   PRE-FILING REVIEW ORDER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
23.   RECEIVERSHIP. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
24.   REMAND. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
      a.   Order Remanding to State Court. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
           i.     Remand Due to Defect in Removal
                  Procedure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
           ii.    Remand Due to Lack of Subject Matter
                  Jurisdiction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
           iii.   Remand for Reasons Other than Lack of Subject
                  Matter Jurisdiction or Defect in Removal
                  Procedure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
      b.   Order Remanding to Federal Agency. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
           i.     Remand to Federal Agency on Factual
                  Grounds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113



                                 -viii-
ii.
                        Remand to Federal Agency on Legal
                        Grounds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          113
          c.   Order Denying Petition for Removal from State
               Court. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     115
          d.   Order Denying Motion to Remand to State Court. . . .                                   115
     25. SANCTIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           115
     26. STAYS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     115
          a.   Stay Granted. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          116
               i.       Abstention-Based Stays. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                   116
               ii.      Other Stays. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          117
          b.   Stay Denied.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          118
     27. SUMMARY JUDGMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        118
          a.   Order Denying Summary Judgment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                            118
          b.   Order Granting Partial Summary Judgment. . . . . . . . .                               119
     28. TAX. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   119
     29. TRANSFER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          119
          a.   Transfer from District Court to District Court. . . . . . .                            120
          b.   Transfer from District Court to Court of Appeals. . . .                                120
D.   PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                               120
     1.   GENERALLY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .            120
     2.   BAUMAN FACTORS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                 120
          a.   Alternative Relief Unavailable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                    121
          b.   Possibility of Irreparable Damage or Prejudice. . . . . .                              122
          c.   Clear Error by District Court. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                   123
          d.   Potential for Error to Recur. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                  123
          e.   Important Question of First Impression. . . . . . . . . . . .                          123
     3.   NOTICE OF APPEAL CONSTRUED AS PETITION FOR
          WRIT OF MANDAMUS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                     124
          a.   Appeal Construed as Petition for Writ of
               Mandamus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .            124
          b.   Appeal Not Construed as Petition for Writ of
               Mandamus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .            125
     4.   AVAILABILITY OF MANDAMUS RELIEF FROM
          SPECIFIC ORDERS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .               125
          a.   Class Certification Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                  125
               i.       Fed. R. Civ. P. 23. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .             125
               ii.      Decisions Predating Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f). . . . .                            126


                                           -ix-
b.       Contempt Orders.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       126
                        c.       Discovery Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       126
                                 i.    Mandamus Relief Available. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                  126
                                 ii.   Mandamus Relief Not Available. . . . . . . . . . . .                      127
                        d.       Disqualification Orders.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         128
                                 i.    Disqualification of Judge. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .              128
                                 ii.   Disqualification of Counsel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                128
                        e.       Jury Demand Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         129
                        f.       Media Access Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          129
                        g.       Remand Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      130
                                 i.    Mandamus Relief Available. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                  130
                                 ii.   Mandamus Relief Not Available. . . . . . . . . . . .                      131
                        h.       Transfer Orders.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     131
                        i.       Other Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   132
                                 i.    Mandamus Relief Available. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                  132
                                 ii.   Mandamus Relief Not Available. . . . . . . . . . . .                      134

III.   TIMELINESS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
       A.  TIME PERIOD FOR APPEAL.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136
           1.   TIMELY NOTICE REQUIRED FOR JURISDICTION. . . . 136
           2.   DEADLINE FOR FILING NOTICE OF APPEAL. . . . . . . . 136
           3.   WHETHER UNITED STATES IS A PARTY.. . . . . . . . . . . 136
                a.      Liberal Construction of Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). . . . . . . . 136
                b.      Determining Party Status. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
                        i.         Federal Official as Defendant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
                        ii.        United States as Nominal Plaintiff. . . . . . . . . . . 137
                        iii.       United States Dismissed Prior to Appeal. . . . . . 137
                        iv.        United States as Party in Bifurcated
                                   Proceedings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
                        v.         United States as Party to Consolidated
                                   Action. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
                        vi.        Foreign Government Not Treated Like United
                                   States. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
                        vii. United States Not a Party to Attorney Discipline
                                   Proceeding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
                c.      Defining Agency.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
                        i.         Relevant Factors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139


                                                      -x-
ii.      Factors Applied. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .              139
     4.  COMPUTATION OF TIME TO FILE NOTICE OF
         APPEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     140
         a.   Days Counted in Determining Deadline for Filing
              Notice of Appeal.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .             140
         b.   Date Notice of Appeal Deemed “Filed”. . . . . . . . . . . .                            141
              i.       Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          141
              ii.      Pro Se Prisoners. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .             142
     5.  APPLICABILITY OF FED. R. APP. P. 4(a) TIME
         LIMITS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   142
         a.   Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) Time Limits Applicable.. . . . . . .                              142
         b.   Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) Time Limits Not Applicable. . . .                                 143
     6.  CROSS-APPEALS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .              144
B.   ENTRY OF JUDGMENT.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .               144
     1.  GENERALLY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .            144
     2.  150-DAY RULE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           145
         a.   Application of the 150-Day Rule. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                       145
     3.  SEPARATE DOCUMENT REQUIREMENT.. . . . . . . . . . .                                         146
         a.   Document Distinct from Memorandum. . . . . . . . . . . .                               147
              i.       Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 Requirements Not
                       Satisfied. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        147
              ii.      Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 Requirements Satisfied. . . . .                            148
         b.   Lack of Opinion or Memorandum. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                           149
         c.   Minute Orders.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .            149
         d.   Lack of Separate Judgment Does Not Render Appeal
              Premature. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         150
              i.       Waiver of Separate Document Requirement by
                       Appellee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         150
              ii.      Waiver of Separate Document Requirement by
                       Appellant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          151
              iii.     Objection by Appellee to Lack of Separate
                       Judgment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           151
     4.  MANNER OF ENTERING JUDGMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                    152
     5.  JUDGMENT SIGNED BY CLERK.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                              152
     6.  NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                 153
C.   PREMATURE NOTICE OF APPEAL.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                          153
     1.  GENERALLY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .            153


                                           -xi-
2.  NOTICE FILED BEFORE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. . . . . 153
         a.     Premature Notice Effective.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154
         b.     Premature Notice Not Effective. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
     3.  REMAINING CLAIMS FINALIZED AFTER NOTICE OF
         APPEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
         a.     Compare Rule 54(b) Certification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
         b.     Premature Notice of Appeal Cured.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156
         c.     Premature Notice of Appeal Not Cured. . . . . . . . . . . . 157
D.   EXTENSION OF TIME TO APPEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157
     1.  GENERALLY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157
         a.     Extension of Time to Appeal by Court of Appeals. . . 157
         b.     Extension of Time to Appeal by District Court. . . . . . 158
     2.  EXTENSION OF TIME TO APPEAL UNDER FED. R. APP.
         P. 4(a)(5). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
         a.     Timeliness of Motion for Extension. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
         b.     Form of Motion for Extension. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
                i.       Formal Motion Required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
                ii.      When Notice Required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
         c.     Standard for Granting Motion for Extension. . . . . . . . 159
                i.       Good Cause. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
                ii.       Excusable Neglect. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
         d.     Length of Extension. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161
         e.     Appealability of Extension Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161
     3.  EXTENSION OF TIME TO APPEAL UNDER FED. R. APP.
         P. 4(a)(6). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161
         a.     Timeliness of Motion for Extension. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162
         b.     Form of Motion for Extension. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162
         c.     Standard for Granting Motion for Extension. . . . . . . . 162
                i.       Entitlement to Notice of Entry of Judgment. . . 163
                ii.      Failure to Receive Notice of Entry of
                         Judgment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163
                iii.     Absence of Prejudice to Any Party. . . . . . . . . . 164
         d.     Length of Extension. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164
         e.     Appealability of Extension Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164
     4.  EXTENSION OF TIME TO APPEAL UNDER FED. R.
         CIV. P. 60(b).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164
         a.     Timeliness of Motion for Extension. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165


                                          -xii-
b.
              Factors Considered in Evaluating Motion for
              Extension. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165
E.   UNTIMELY FILING NOT EXCUSED BY UNIQUE
     CIRCUMSTANCES DOCTRINE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166
     1.  OSTERNECK STANDARD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166
     2.  PRE-OSTERNECK DECISIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167
     3.  UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCE DOCTRINE
         ILLEGITIMATE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168
F.   EFFECT OF POST-JUDGMENT MOTIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168
     1.  GENERALLY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168
     2.  POST-JUDGMENT TOLLING MOTIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . 168
         a.   Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168
         b.   Tolling Motion Must Be Specifically Enumerated.. . . 169
         c.   Tolling Motion Must Be Timely Filed. . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
              i.     Time Period for Filing Tolling Motion . . . . . . . 170
              ii.    Days Counted in Calculating Deadline for Filing
                     Tolling Motion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171
              iii.   Classification of Motion Filed Prior to Entry of
                     Judgment as “Post-Judgment”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171
              iv.    Effect of Premature Tolling Motion.. . . . . . . . . 172
              v.     Effect of Untimely Tolling Motion. . . . . . . . . . 172
         d.   Tolling Motion Must Be Written or Recorded. . . . . . . 172
         e.   Tolling Motion Need Not Be Properly Labeled. . . . . . 172
              i.     Motion to Amend or Vacate Judgment. . . . . . . 173
              ii.    Motion for Clarification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173
              iii.   Motion for Attorney’s Fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174
              iv.    Motion for Costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174
              v.     Motion for Prejudgment Interest. . . . . . . . . . . . 175
         f.   Effect of Motion That Lacks Merit or is Procedurally
              Defective.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175
         g.   Tolling Motion May Address Any Appealable
              Order.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176
     3.  NON-TOLLING POST-JUDGMENT MOTIONS. . . . . . . . 176
     4.  MULTIPLE POST-JUDGMENT MOTIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . 177




                                        -xiii-
IV.   NOTICE OF APPEAL (Form, Content and Effect on District Court
      Jurisdiction). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178
      A.     GENERALLY.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178
      B.     DOCUMENTS CONSTITUTING NOTICE OF APPEAL. . . . . . . 178
             1.     GENERALLY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178
             2.     PRO SE APPELLANTS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
             3.     DOCUMENTS CONSTRUED AS NOTICE OF
                    APPEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180
             4.     DOCUMENTS NOT CONSTRUED AS NOTICE OF
                    APPEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182
      C.     CONTENTS OF NOTICE OF APPEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182
             1.     DESIGNATION OF PARTIES APPEALING.. . . . . . . . . . . 182
                    a.        Fed. R. App. P. 3 Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182
                    b.        Parties Inadequately Designated.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183
                    c.        Parties Adequately Designated. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184
             2.     DESIGNATION OF ORDER BEING APPEALED. . . . . . . 185
                    a.        Notice of Appeal Effective Even Though Order
                              Mistakenly or Vaguely Designated. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185
                    b.        Notice of Appeal from One Part of Order Deemed to
                              Encompass Other Part of Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186
                    c.        Notice of Appeal from Final Judgment Deemed to
                              Encompass Prior Rulings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187
                    d.        Notice of Appeal from Post-Judgment Order Deemed to
                              Encompass Final Judgment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188
                    e.        Effect of Second Notice of Appeal.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189
             3.     SIGNATURE OF APPEALING PARTY OR
                    ATTORNEY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189
      D.     AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190
             1.     PERMISSIBLE AMENDMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190
             2.     IMPERMISSIBLE AMENDMENTS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190
      E.     CROSS-APPEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190
             1.     ARGUMENT SUPPORTING JUDGMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . 191
             2.     ARGUMENT ATTACKING JUDGMENT.. . . . . . . . . . . . . 192
             3.     JURISDICTION OR COMITY ARGUMENT. . . . . . . . . . . 193
      F.     EFFECT OF NOTICE OF APPEAL ON DISTRICT COURT
             JURISDICTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193


                                                      -xiv-
1.        APPEAL FROM FINAL JUDGMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                    194
              2.        APPEAL FROM POST-JUDGMENT ORDER.. . . . . . . . . .                                            195
              3.        APPEAL FROM PARTIAL JUDGMENT UNDER RULE
                        54(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   195
              4.        APPEAL FROM COLLATERAL ORDER. . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                        195
                        a.     Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          195
                        b.     Qualified Immunity Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                      196
              5.        APPEAL FROM INTERLOCUTORY ORDER. . . . . . . . . .                                             196
              6.        EXCEPTIONS TO DIVESTITURE RULE. . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                      197
                        a.     Ineffective Notice of Appeal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                    197
                        b.     Jurisdiction to Clarify Order or Correct Error. . . . . . .                             197
                        c.     Jurisdiction to Maintain Status Quo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        198
                               i.        Jurisdiction to Modify Injunction . . . . . . . . . . .                       198
                               ii.       Jurisdiction to Award Sanctions.. . . . . . . . . . . .                       199
                               iii.      Jurisdiction to Adjudicate Substantive Rights. .                              199

V.   SCOPE OF APPEAL (Which Orders and Issues Are Considered on
     Appeal). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    200
     A.   ORDERS CONSIDERED ON APPEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                         200
          1.       ORDERS CONSIDERED ON APPEAL FROM FINAL
                   DECISION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .               200
                   a.        Rulings That Merge into a Final Judgment. . . . . . . . .                                 200
                             i.         Partial Dismissal.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .              200
                             ii.        Partial Summary Judgment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        201
                             iii.       Denial of Immunity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                  201
                             iv.        New Trial Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .               201
                             v.         Class Certification Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                   201
                             vi.        Transfer Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .              202
                             vii. Disqualification Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        202
                             viii. Contempt Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                     202
                             ix.        Interlocutory Injunctive Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . .                      203
                             x.         Order Certified for Permissive Interlocutory
                                        Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          204
                             xi.        Refusal to Rule on Motion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                     204
                   b.        Rulings That Do Not Merge into Final Judgment. . . .                                      204
                             i.         Interlocutory Orders Not Affecting Outcome. .                                  204
                             ii.        Certain Collateral Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                   205


                                                       -xv-
iii.
                      Orders Certified under Rule 54(b). . . . . . . . . . . 205
                     iv.
                      Certain Orders Denying Summary Judgment.. . 206
                     v.
                      Certain Orders Denying Remand. . . . . . . . . . . . 207
                     vi.
                      Orders Preceding Dismissal for Failure to
                      Prosecute. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208
               vii. Post-Judgment Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209
     2.   ORDERS CONSIDERED ON APPEAL FROM AN
          INJUNCTIVE ORDER UNDER § 1292(a)(1).. . . . . . . . . . . 209
          a.   Order Granting or Denying Summary Judgment. . . . . 210
          b.   Order Denying Remand. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211
          c.   Order Granting or Denying Sanctions. . . . . . . . . . . . . 211
          d.   Entry of Default. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211
          e.   Order Certifying Class. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212
          f.   Order Modifying Or Refusing to Modify Injunction. . 212
          g.   Order Compelling Arbitration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213
          h.   Entry of Final Judgment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213
     3.   ORDERS CONSIDERED ON APPEAL FROM AN ORDER
          CERTIFIED UNDER § 1292(b).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214
          a.   Only Certified Order May Be Reviewed. . . . . . . . . . . 214
          b.   Any Ruling Contained in Certified Order May Be
               Reviewed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214
     4.   ORDERS CONSIDERED ON APPEAL FROM AN ORDER
          CERTIFIED UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 54(b). . . . . . . . . . . . 215
     5.   ORDERS CONSIDERED ON APPEAL FROM A
          COLLATERAL ORDER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216
          a.   Review of Related Rulings Permitted.. . . . . . . . . . . . . 216
          b.   Review of Related Rulings Not Permitted. . . . . . . . . . 217
     6.   ORDERS CONSIDERED ON APPEAL FROM A POST-
          JUDGMENT ORDER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218
          a.   Order Denying Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 Motion. . . . . . . . . . 218
          b.   Order Denying Motion to Intervene. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218
B.   ISSUES CONSIDERED ON APPEAL (WAIVER). . . . . . . . . . . . 218
     1.   WAIVER OF JURISDICTIONAL ISSUE.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218
          a.   Appellate Jurisdiction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218
          b.   District Court Jurisdiction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219
               i.     Issue Not Waived. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219
               ii.    Issue Partially Waived. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220


                                       -xvi-
iii.  Issue Waived. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         221
2.   WAIVER OF ISSUE IN DISTRICT COURT. . . . . . . . . . . .                            222
     a.  General Rule. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   222
         i.    Rule of Discretion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           223
         ii.   Waivable Issues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          223
         iii.  Waiver by Failure to Adequately Raise Issue. .                            223
         iv.   Waiver by Stipulation or Concession. . . . . . . . .                      225
     b.  Exceptions and Exemptions to Rule of Waiver. . . . . .                          226
         i.    Preventing Manifest Injustice.. . . . . . . . . . . . . .                 226
         ii.   Intervening Change in Law. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                  227
         iii.  Intervening Change in Circumstance. . . . . . . . .                       227
         iv.   Pure Question of Law.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .              228
         v.    Issue Considered by District Court. . . . . . . . . .                     229
         vi.   Alternative Basis for Affirming. . . . . . . . . . . . .                  229
         vii. Additional Citations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .            230
     c.  Waiver and Pleadings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         230
         i.    Factual Allegations.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           230
         ii.   Causes of Action. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           230
         iii.  Affirmative Defenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .             231
         iv.   Request for Relief.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          231
         v.    Repleading Dismissed Claims in Amended
               Complaint. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      232
     d.  Waiver and Pretrial Motions.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .             232
         i.    Motion to Dismiss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .            232
         ii.   Motion for Summary Judgment. . . . . . . . . . . . .                      233
     e.  Waiver of Trial Issues.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        233
         i.    Peremptory Challenges.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .               233
         ii.   Admissibility of Evidence. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                234
         iii.  Legal Theory. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         234
         iv.   Jury Instructions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        234
         v.    Consistency of Jury Findings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                 235
         vi.   Sufficiency of Evidence. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .              235
         vii. Specificity of Court Findings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                 236
         viii. Waiver and Post-Trial/Post-Judgment
               Submissions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        237
     f.  Waiver of Magistrate/Special Master Issues. . . . . . . .                       238
         i.    Waiver of Objections to Order of Reference. . .                           238


                               -xvii-
ii.
                                Waiver of Objection to Magistrate’s Findings &
                                Recommendations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239
                          iii.  Waiver of Objection to Special Master’s Findings
                                & Conclusions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240
              3.      WAIVER OF ISSUE IN COURT OF APPEALS. . . . . . . . . 241
                      a.  Failure to Raise Issue in Earlier Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . 241
                      b.  Failure to Adequately Brief Issue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241
                          i.    Issue Waived. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242
                          ii.   Issue Not Waived. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243
                      c.  Failure to Provide Adequate Record on Appeal. . . . . . 244
                      d.  Explicit Abandonment of Issue on Appeal. . . . . . . . . . 245

VI.   BANKRUPTCY APPEALS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246
      A.  OVERVIEW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246
          1.  BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PROCESS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246
          2.  ORIGINS OF BANKRUPTCY APPEALS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246
              a.  Allocation of Original Bankruptcy Jurisdiction. . . . . . 246
              b.  Determining Origin of Bankruptcy Decision. . . . . . . . 247
                  i.        Cases Involving District Courts. . . . . . . . . . . . . 247
                  ii.       Cases Involving the BAP. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247
      B.  STATUTORY BASES FOR APPEAL TO NINTH CIRCUIT. . . . 247
          1.  APPEALS FROM DECISIONS OF BAP OR DISTRICT
              COURT ACTING IN APPELLATE CAPACITY. . . . . . . . . 247
              a.  Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247
              b.  Finality under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248
                  i.        Standard for Finality.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249
                  ii.       Finality of Orders that Affirm or Reverse
                            Outright. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250
                  iii.      Finality of Orders Involving Remand. . . . . . . . 250
                  iv.       Finality of Other BAP and District Court
                            Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256
                  v.        Determining Finality of Underlying Bankruptcy
                            Court Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257
              c.  Other Bases for Ninth Circuit Review. . . . . . . . . . . . . 269
                  i.        28 U.S.C. § 1292. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269
                  ii.       Mandamus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270



                                                -xviii-
2.  APPEALS FROM DECISIONS OF DISTRICT COURT
         EXERCISING ORIGINAL BANKRUPTCY
         JURISDICTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      270
         a.   Direct Appeal to the Ninth Circuit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                 270
         b.   Standards for Finality. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         270
              i.     General Rule.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         270
              ii.    “Special Exceptions”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .              271
              iii.   Collateral Order Doctrine & Forgay-Conrad
                     Rule. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      271
         c.   Appealability of Specific Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                 271
              i.     Appealable District Court Decisions. . . . . . . . .                       271
              ii.    Non-Appealable District Court Decisions. . . . .                           272
         d.   Effect of Appeal on District Court Jurisdiction. . . . . .                        272
C.   TIMELINESS OF BANKRUPTCY APPEALS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                             272
     1.  APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BAP OR DISTRICT
         COURT ACTING IN APPELLATE CAPACITY. . . . . . . . .                                    272
         a.   Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    273
         b.   Time to Appeal BAP or District Court Appellate
              Decision. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   273
              i.     Basic Time Period. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .             273
              ii.    United States as a Party to a Bankruptcy
                     Case. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    274
              iii.   “Filing” of Notice of Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                  274
              iv.    Commencement of Time Period.. . . . . . . . . . . .                        274
              v.     Computation of Appeal Deadline.. . . . . . . . . . .                       275
         c.   Extensions of Time to Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                 275
         d.   Tolling Motions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        275
              i.     Motion for Rehearing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .              275
              ii.    Time in Which to File Motion. . . . . . . . . . . . . .                    275
              iii.   Restarting Time to Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                 276
              iv.    Need for New or Amended Notice of Appeal. .                                276
         e.   Determining Timeliness of Underlying Appeal from
              Bankruptcy Court to BAP or District Court. . . . . . . . .                        276
              i.     Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       276
              ii.    Time Period for Filing Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . .                   277
              iii.   Procedure for Filing Notice. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                 277
              iv.    Entry of Judgment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .             277


                                        -xix-
v. Effect of Notice Filed Before Entry of
                          Judgment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           278
               vi.        Extension of Time to Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                      278
               vii. Motions that Toll Time Period for Appeal. . . . .                                   279
     2.  APPEALS FROM DECISIONS OF DISTRICT COURT
         EXERCISING ORIGINAL BANKRUPTCY
         JURISDICTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .              280
D.   SCOPE OF BANKRUPTCY APPEALS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                               280
     1.  MERGER OF INTERLOCUTORY RULINGS INTO
         FINAL JUDGMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                    280
         a.    General Rule. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .            280
         b.    Rulings that Merge. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                280
         c.    Rulings that Do Not Merge. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                       281
         d.    Issues Undecided Below.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                     283
     2.  WAIVER OF ISSUES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                    283
E.   DECISIONS BARRED FROM REVIEW IN COURT OF
     APPEALS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   284
     1.  DECISIONS WHETHER TO REMAND TO STATE
         COURT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       284
     2.  DECISIONS WHETHER TO ABSTAIN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                      285
     3.  DECISIONS WHETHER TO DISMISS OR STAY. . . . . . .                                              285
     4.  DECISIONS NOT APPEALABLE BY CERTAIN
         ENTITIES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        285
         a.    Securities and Exchange Commission. . . . . . . . . . . . .                              285
         b.    Federal Transportation Agencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                         286
         c.    Labor Unions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .              286
         d.    State and Local Commissions.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        286
         e.    State Attorneys General. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                   286
F.   CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES IN BANKRUPTCY APPEALS. . .                                                   286
     1.  STANDING TO APPEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        286
         a.    General Rule. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .            286
         b.    Examples of Standing to Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                          287
         c.    Examples of No Standing to Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . .                             289
     2.  MOOTNESS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .            289
         a.    Appeals Concerning Property Transactions. . . . . . . . .                                289
               i.         Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          289
               ii.        Broad Application of Stay Requirement. . . . . .                              290


                                            -xx-
iii.  Good Faith Requirement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290
                                iv.   Need for Transaction Participants to Be Present on
                                      Appeal to Avoid Mootness.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292
                                v.    Exceptions to Mootness. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292
                                vi.   Rejected Theories for Avoiding Mootness.. . . . 294
                                vii. Scope of Mootness. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294
                       b.       Appeals Concerning Loan Transactions. . . . . . . . . . . . 295
                       c.       Appeals Concerning Reorganization Plans. . . . . . . . . 296
                       d.       Payment of, or Inability to Pay, Judgments, Settlements
                                or Fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297
                                i.    Payment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297
                                ii.   Inability to Pay. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298
                       e.       Dismissal of Bankruptcy Case While Appeal is
                                Pending. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 299
                       f.       Nature of Stay Needed to Prevent Mootness. . . . . . . . 300
                                i.    Stay Must Be Issued by Court with
                                      Jurisdiction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300
                                ii.   Stay Must Pertain to Affected Transactions.. . . 300
                                iii.  Stay Must Cover Time of Affected
                                      Transactions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300

VII.   AGENCY AND TAX COURT APPEALS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301
       A.  AGENCY DECISIONS GENERALLY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301
           1.  INITIATING APPELLATE REVIEW OF AGENCY
               DECISIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301
           2.  AGENCY DECISIONS FOR WHICH DIRECT REVIEW BY
               THE COURT OF APPEALS IS AUTHORIZED. . . . . . . . . 301
               a.   Specific Agencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301
               b.   Venue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 307
               c.    Time in Which to Petition for Review.. . . . . . . . . . . . 307
       B.  IMMIGRATION CASES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308
       C.  TAX COURT DECISIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308
           1.  INITIATING APPELLATE REVIEW OF TAX COURT
               DECISIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308
           2.  VENUE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308
           3.  TIME IN WHICH TO FILE NOTICE OF APPEAL. . . . . . . 308



                                                   -xxi-
VIII.     DIRECT CRIMINAL APPEALS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310
A.    APPEAL BY DEFENDANT (28 U.S.C. § 1291, 1292(a)(1)). . . . . 310
      1.  STATUTORY AUTHORITY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310
          a.       Final Judgment (Sentence). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310
          b.       Interlocutory Order (Injunction). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310
          c.       Collateral Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311
                   i.         Collateral Order Doctrine.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311
                   ii.        Pendent Jurisdiction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 312
      2.  ASSETS SEIZURE OR RESTRAINT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313
      3.  BAIL DECISION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313
          a.       Pretrial Bail.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313
          b.       Bail Pending Appeal by Federal Defendants. . . . . . . . 314
          c.       Bail in Habeas Cases Brought by State Prisoners. . . . 315
          d.       Bail in Extradition Cases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315
          e.       Bail in Cases Concerning Revocation of Supervised
                   Release or Probation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315
                   i.         Bail Pending Disposition in District Court. . . . 315
                   ii.        Bail Pending Appeal.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315
      4.  COMMITMENT ORDER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315
      5.  CONSTITUTIONALITY OF DEATH PENALTY
          STATUTE.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316
      6.  DANGEROUSNESS HEARING UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 4246
          . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316
      7.  DISCLOSURE OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION. . . . . . . 316
      8.  DISCOVERY REQUESTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316
      9.  DISMISSAL OF INDICTMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316
      10. DISQUALIFICATION OF COUNSEL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317
      11. DOUBLE JEOPARDY AND SUCCESSIVE
          PROSECUTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317
          a.       Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317
          b.       Double Punishment.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318
          c.       Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 319
          d.       Successive Prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 5032. . . . . 319
      12. GRAND JURY IRREGULARITIES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 319
      13. IMMUNITY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 320
      14. INDICTMENT CLAUSE VIOLATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321


                                              -xxii-
15.   JURISDICTION OF DISTRICT COURT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                      321
     16.   JUVENILE PROSECUTED AS ADULT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                        321
     17.   JUVENILE RIGHT TO SPEEDY TRIAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                      322
     18.   LACK OF FAIR WARNING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                            322
     19.   PLEA AGREEMENTS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        322
     20.   PRIMARY JURISDICTION DOCTRINE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                       322
     21.   PROBABLE CAUSE DETERMINATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                          323
     22.   PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                      323
           a.      Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           323
           b.      Vindictive or Selective Prosecution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                         323
     23. RES JUDICATA AND COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL. . . . . .                                                    324
     24. RETURN OF PROPERTY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                            324
     25. SHACKLING ORDER.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                          324
     26. SPEEDY TRIAL RIGHTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                           324
           a.      Sixth Amendment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                 324
           b.      Speedy Trial Act. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .              324
           c.      Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act.. . . . . . . . . . . .                            325
     27. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                325
     28. SUFFICIENCY OF INDICTMENT.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                    325
     29. SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE OR RETURN OF
           PROPERTY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .              325
           a.      Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           325
           b.      Criminal Proceedings Pending. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        326
     30. TRANSFER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                326
B.   APPEAL BY GOVERNMENT (28 U.S.C. § 1291, 18 U.S.C.
     § 3731). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   327
     1.    STATUTORY AUTHORITY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                               327
           a.      Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           327
           b.      18 U.S.C. § 3731. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                327
           c.      28 U.S.C. § 1291. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                327
           d.      Appeal by State Government. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        328
                   i.         Order Denying Remand. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                     328
                   ii.        Other Orders.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .            328
     2.    ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL, NEW TRIAL, OR
           ACQUITTAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .               328
           a.      Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           329
                   i.         Order of Dismissal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .               329


                                            -xxiii-
ii.    Order Tantamount to Dismissal. . . . . . . . . . . . . 329
              iii.   Order Granting New Trial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329
              iv.    Acquittal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329
         b.   Double Jeopardy Limitations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 330
              i.     Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 330
              ii.    Attachment of Jeopardy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 330
              iii.   “Acquittal” of Defendant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 331
         c.   Further Factual Proceedings Necessary. . . . . . . . . . . . 335
              i.     General Rule.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335
              ii.    Need for Formal Finding of Guilt. . . . . . . . . . . 335
         d.   Scope of Double Jeopardy Bar. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336
              i.     Alternative Theories of Liability. . . . . . . . . . . . 336
              ii.    Separate Counts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336
         e.   Use of Mandamus to Avoid Double Jeopardy Bar. . . . 337
     3.  ORDER SUPPRESSING/EXCLUDING EVIDENCE OR
         REQUIRING RETURN OF SEIZED PROPERTY. . . . . . . . 337
         a.   Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337
         b.   Provision Broadly Interpreted. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 338
         c.   Certification Requirement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339
              i.     Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339
              ii.    No Purpose of Delay. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340
              iii.   “Substantial Proof of a Fact Material” . . . . . . . 340
              iv.    Timing of Certification.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340
         d.   Double Jeopardy Limitation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341
         e.   Cross-Appeals by Defendants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341
     4.  ORDER IMPOSING SENTENCE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 342
         a.   Sentence Imposed under Guidelines.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 342
         b.   Other Sentences and Related Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 342
     5.  ORDER RELEASING PERSON CHARGED OR
         CONVICTED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 343
     6.  OTHER ORDERS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 343
         a.   Additional Orders Appealable by the Government. . . 344
         b.   Additional Orders Not Appealable by the
              Government. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 345
C.   APPEALS CONCERNING GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS. . . . 345
     1.  ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO QUASH GRAND JURY
         SUBPOENA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 346


                                      -xxiv-
2.  ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH GRAND JURY
         SUBPOENA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 346
     3.  ORDER CONFINING RECALCITRANT WITNESS
         (28 U.S.C. § 1826). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 346
     4.  ORDER DENYING KASTIGAR HEARING. . . . . . . . . . . . . 347
     5.  ORDER GRANTING OR DENYING DISCLOSURE OF
         GRAND JURY MATERIALS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 347
         a.    Disclosure Motions Made During Criminal
               Proceedings.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 347
         b.    Independent Actions Seeking Disclosure. . . . . . . . . . . 347
D.   APPEALS FROM DECISIONS OF MAGISTRATE JUDGES. . . 348
     1.  INITIAL APPEAL TO DISTRICT COURT. . . . . . . . . . . . . 348
         a.    Statutory Authority. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 348
         b.    Time in Which to Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 348
         c.    Appeals Mistakenly Taken to Ninth Circuit. . . . . . . . . 348
     2.  APPEALS FROM DISTRICT COURT TO NINTH
         CIRCUIT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349
         a.    Statutory Authority. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349
               i.      Government Appeals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349
               ii.     Appeals by Defendants.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349
               iii.    Appealability of Non-Final District Court
                       Decisions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349
E.   APPEALS CONCERNING DEFENSE FEES AND
     COMPENSATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 350
     1.  DISTRICT COURT JURISDICTION OVER FEE
         APPLICATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 350
     2.  AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 350
F.   TIMELINESS OF CRIMINAL APPEALS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351
     1.  NON-JURISDICTIONAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351
     2.  TIME TO FILE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351
         a.    Appeal by Defendant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351
         b.    Appeal by Government.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352
     3.  APPLICABILITY OF FED. R. APP. P. 4(b) TIME
         LIMITS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352
         a.    Cases Governed by Rule 4(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352
         b.    Cases Not Governed by Rule 4(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 353
     4.  COMPUTATION OF APPEAL DEADLINE. . . . . . . . . . . . 354


                                        -xxv-
a.   Days Counted. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          354
         b.   Date Notice of Appeal “Filed”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                   354
     5.  “ENTRY” OF JUDGMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                    354
     6.  DOCUMENTS CONSTRUED AS NOTICE OF
         APPEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   355
     7.  PREMATURE NOTICE OF APPEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                               355
     8.  EXTENSION OF TIME TO APPEAL (EXCUSABLE
         NEGLECT). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     356
         a.   Timing of Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .            356
              i.     Appeal Outside 30-Day Extension Period. . . . .                               356
              ii.    Appeal Within 30-Day Extension Period. . . . . .                              356
         b.   Express Finding by District Court. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                     357
         c.   “Excusable Neglect” Standard under Pioneer. . . . . . .                              357
         d.   Determining Excusable Neglect. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                     357
              i.     Lack of Notice from Clerk. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                    357
              ii.    Mistake of Counsel.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                358
              iii.   Other Grounds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .              358
     9.  EFFECT OF POST-JUDGMENT MOTIONS. . . . . . . . . . . .                                    358
         a.   Motion for Reconsideration (by Defendant or
              Government). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         358
         b.   Other Post-Judgment Motions (by Defendant).. . . . . .                               359
         c.   Notice of Appeal Filed While Post-Judgment Motion
              Pending. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     359
G.   SCOPE OF DIRECT CRIMINAL APPEALS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                             360
     1.  ISSUES NOT RAISED BELOW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        360
         a.   Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       360
         b.   Plain Error. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       360
         c.   Other Grounds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           361
     2.  SCOPE OF APPEAL BY DEFENDANT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                 361
         a.   Review of Interlocutory Order on Appeal from Final
              Judgment.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       361
         b.   Ability of Other Defendants to Join in Appeal. . . . . . .                           362
         c.   Appeals from Separate Cases Arising from Same
              Conduct.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      362
         d.   Appeal Following Unconditional Guilty Plea. . . . . . .                              362
              i.     General Rule.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .            362
              ii.    Specific Claims Waived by Guilty Plea. . . . . . .                            363


                                        -xxvi-
iii.   Specific Claims Not Waived by Guilty Plea. . . 364
          e.  Appeal Following Conditional Guilty Plea. . . . . . . . . 365
          f.  Appeal Following Guilty Plea under Rule 11(c)(1)(C)
              Agreement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 365
          g.  Waiver of Right to Appeal in Plea Agreement. . . . . . . 366
              i.     Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 366
              ii.    Non-Waivable Issues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 366
              iii.   Scope of Appeal Waiver. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 367
     3.   SCOPE OF APPEAL BY GOVERNMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . 371
          a.  Interlocutory Appeal from Successive Orders. . . . . . . 371
          b.  Effect of Contents of Notice of Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . 371
H.   EFFECT OF APPEAL ON DISTRICT COURT
     JURISDICTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372
     1.   EFFECT OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS. . . . . . . . . . . . 372
          a.  Appeal by Defendant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372
              i.     General Rule.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372
              ii.    Exceptions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372
          b.  Appeal by Government.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373
     2.   EFFECT OF APPEAL AFTER SENTENCING. . . . . . . . . . 373
          a.  Effect on Trial of Severed Counts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373
          b.  Effect on Motion for New Trial under Fed. R. Crim.
              P. 33. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373
          c.  Effect on Entry of Factual Findings under Fed. R.
              Crim. P. 32. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 374
          d.  Effect on Correction of Sentence under Fed. R. Crim.
              P. 35. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 374
          e.  Effect on Collateral Attack on Proceedings. . . . . . . . . 374
I.   MANDAMUS REVIEW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 375
     1.   GENERAL PRINCIPLES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 375
          a.  Jurisdictional Basis for Writs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 375
          b.  General Standards.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 376
     2.   DEFENDANTS’ PETITIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 377
          a.  Appointment of Public Defender. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 377
          b.  Arraignment by Closed-Circuit Television. . . . . . . . . 377
          c.  Authority of Government Attorney. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 377
          d.  Bail in Habeas Cases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 377
          e.  Constitutionality of Death Penalty Provision. . . . . . . . 377


                                       -xxvii-
f.   Dangerousness of Defendant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                  378
        g.   Disqualification of Defense Counsel. . . . . . . . . . . . . .                     378
        h.   Grand Jury Irregularities.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .            378
        i.   Restraint Order Directed at Counsel.. . . . . . . . . . . . . .                    378
        j.   Sealing of Defendant’s Financial Information. . . . . . .                          379
        k.   Speedy Trial Act Violation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .              379
        l.   Transfer.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   379
        m.   Urinalysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    379
        n.   Venue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   379
     3. GOVERNMENT PETITIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                     380
        a.   Arrest Warrants.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        380
        b.   Bill of Particulars. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       380
        c.   Defenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    380
        d.   Discovery. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     380
        e.   Removal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     381
        f.   Splitting Elements of Crime for Trial. . . . . . . . . . . . . .                   381
     4. THIRD-PARTY PETITIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                    381
        a.   Petition by Media Seeking Access. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                    381
        b.   Petition by Material Witness Seeking Release. . . . . . .                          381
J.   MOOTNESS IN CRIMINAL APPEALS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                       382
     1. LAPSE OF GRAND JURY TERM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                         382
     2. RETURN OF INDICTMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                     382
     3. ISSUANCE OF SUPERCEDING CHARGES. . . . . . . . . . .                                    382
     4. CONVICTION OF DEFENDANT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                          383
     5. RELEASE OF DEFENDANT FROM CONFINEMENT. . .                                              383
        a.   Bail Issues.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    383
        b.   Defendants’ Challenges to Merits of Conviction. . . . .                            383
        c.   Government Challenge to Reversal of Conviction. . . .                              384
        d.   Challenge to Sentences. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .            384
             i.     Initial Sentences. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          385
             ii.    Additional Sentences Imposed on Revocation
                    of Probation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         385
        e.   Challenges to Competency Proceedings.. . . . . . . . . . .                         385
     6. DEPORTATION OF DEFENDANT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                           386
     7. DEFENDANTS’ FUGITIVE STATUS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                            386
        a.   Government Appeals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .              386
             i.     Bail Issues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        386


                                      -xxviii-
ii.   Issues Concerning Reversal of Conviction. . . . 386
                       b.  Appeals by Defendants (Fugitive Disentitlement
                           Doctrine). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 387
                           i.    General Rule Regarding Escape While Appeal is
                                 Pending.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 387
                           ii.   Dismissal Not Constitutionally Required. . . . . . 387
                           iii.  Conditional Dismissals.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 388
                           iv.   Application in Cases Where Defendants Return to
                                 Custody Prior to Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 388
              8.       DEATH OF DEFENDANT (Abatement Doctrine). . . . . . . . 389

IX.   CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS ON FEDERAL
      JURISDICTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   391
      A.   STANDING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      391
           1.  GENERAL PRINCIPLES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        391
               a.    Constitutional Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                       391
               b.    Prudential Limitations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                  392
           2.  STANDING TO APPEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        392
               a.    Party Status. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          392
                     i.         Intervenors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          392
                     ii.        Non-parties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          393
               b.    Aggrieved by Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                  397
                     i.         Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          397
                     ii.        Standing of Class Members. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                      398
                     iii.       Standing of Attorneys/Clients. . . . . . . . . . . . . .                      398
                     iv.        Standing of Prevailing Parties. . . . . . . . . . . . . .                     399
                     v.         Remittitur Orders .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .              399
                     vi.        Standing to Appeal Voluntary Dismissal. . . . . .                             400
      B.   MOOTNESS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      401
           1.  JURISDICTIONAL NATURE OF MOOTNESS. . . . . . . . .                                             401
           2.  GENERAL STANDARD FOR ASSESSING
               MOOTNESS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .            401
               a.    Availability of Effective Relief. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                      401
               b.    Kinds of Relief Available to Preclude Mootness. . . . .                                  402
                     i.         Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          402
                     ii.        Focus on Injuries for Which Relief is Sought. .                               402



                                                   -xxix-
iii.
               Availability of Damages to Preclude
               Mootness. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         403
     c.  “Speculative Contingencies” Insufficient to Sustain
         Controversy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      403
     d.  Controversy Must Continue Throughout Litigation. . .                              404
3.   EXCEPTIONS TO MOOTNESS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                     405
     a.  “Capable of Repetition Yet Evading Review”. . . . . . .                           405
         i.    General Standard. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .             405
         ii.   Events Capable of Being Stayed Pending
               Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       405
         iii.  Particular Cases Found Justiciable. . . . . . . . . . .                     406
         iv.   Particular Cases Found Not Justiciable. . . . . . .                         407
     b.  Voluntary Cessation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          408
         i.    General Standard. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .             408
         ii.   Particular Cases Found Justiciable. . . . . . . . . . .                     408
         iii.  Particular Cases Not Justiciable. . . . . . . . . . . . .                   409
4.   MOOTNESS PRINCIPLES IN PARTICULAR
     CONTEXTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   410
     a.  Cases Involving Changes to Legislation or
         Regulations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    410
         i.    Generally . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       410
         ii.   Cases Not Mooted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .              410
         iii.  Cases Mooted. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           411
     b.  Declaratory Relief Cases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .             412
     c.  Cases Involving Property. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .             412
         i.    Cases Not Mooted. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .               412
         ii.   Cases Mooted. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .           413
     d.  In Rem and Civil Forfeiture Cases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                  413
     e.  Preliminary Injunction Cases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .               414
     f.  Cases Regarding Summons and Subpoenas. . . . . . . . .                            414
     g.  Class Actions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      415
     h.  Cases Concerning Intervention.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                 416
     i.  Insurance Cases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        416
     j.  Environmental Cases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .            416
5.   SCOPE OF MOOTING EVENT’S EFFECT.. . . . . . . . . . . .                               417
     a.  Relationship Among Claims for Retrospective and
         Prospective Relief.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        417


                                -xxx-
b.  Relationship between Merits and Claims for Attorney’s
         Fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 418
6.   PROCEDURAL ASPECTS OF MOOTNESS. . . . . . . . . . . . 418
     a.  Duty of Counsel to Notify Court. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 418
     b.  Burden of Proof. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 419
     c.  Disposition of Moot Appeals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 419




                                -xxxi-
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages
Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline   9th circuit   452-pages

More Related Content

What's hot

Global Medical Cures™ | Antibiotics Resistance Threats in USA
Global Medical Cures™ | Antibiotics Resistance Threats in USAGlobal Medical Cures™ | Antibiotics Resistance Threats in USA
Global Medical Cures™ | Antibiotics Resistance Threats in USAGlobal Medical Cures™
 
The fusarium laboratory manual
The fusarium laboratory manualThe fusarium laboratory manual
The fusarium laboratory manualManuel Sandoval B
 
Como Disparar Us
Como Disparar UsComo Disparar Us
Como Disparar Uskal1d0r
 
ÍNDICE - General (4 páginas)
ÍNDICE - General (4 páginas)ÍNDICE - General (4 páginas)
ÍNDICE - General (4 páginas)FINA ORDORIKA
 
Decobuild2015
Decobuild2015Decobuild2015
Decobuild2015REDA SRL
 
Brazil-Phase-3-Report-EN
Brazil-Phase-3-Report-ENBrazil-Phase-3-Report-EN
Brazil-Phase-3-Report-ENJorge Lúcio
 
the art of flash animation.
the art of flash animation.the art of flash animation.
the art of flash animation.coolproof
 
Nw A847 Opsnanual Jp
Nw A847 Opsnanual JpNw A847 Opsnanual Jp
Nw A847 Opsnanual Jpguestfcf4a03
 
PCA Case No 2013-19 AWARD: In the Matter of the South China Sea Arbitration B...
PCA Case No 2013-19 AWARD: In the Matter of the South China Sea Arbitration B...PCA Case No 2013-19 AWARD: In the Matter of the South China Sea Arbitration B...
PCA Case No 2013-19 AWARD: In the Matter of the South China Sea Arbitration B...Sam Rodriguez Galope
 
ShowProductionFinalProject_121003_v15
ShowProductionFinalProject_121003_v15ShowProductionFinalProject_121003_v15
ShowProductionFinalProject_121003_v15Accenture
 
North Dakota Home Garden Variety Trials
North Dakota Home Garden Variety TrialsNorth Dakota Home Garden Variety Trials
North Dakota Home Garden Variety TrialsFulvia52x
 
Nwn online manual
Nwn online manualNwn online manual
Nwn online manualcris2002
 
Argentina phase-3-report-eng
Argentina phase-3-report-engArgentina phase-3-report-eng
Argentina phase-3-report-engCorrientesaldia
 
Pluripotent stem-cell-handbook-from-nature-and-thermoscience
Pluripotent stem-cell-handbook-from-nature-and-thermosciencePluripotent stem-cell-handbook-from-nature-and-thermoscience
Pluripotent stem-cell-handbook-from-nature-and-thermoscienceAmira moustafa
 
Word formation
Word formationWord formation
Word formationmaiki21
 

What's hot (18)

Global Medical Cures™ | Antibiotics Resistance Threats in USA
Global Medical Cures™ | Antibiotics Resistance Threats in USAGlobal Medical Cures™ | Antibiotics Resistance Threats in USA
Global Medical Cures™ | Antibiotics Resistance Threats in USA
 
The fusarium laboratory manual
The fusarium laboratory manualThe fusarium laboratory manual
The fusarium laboratory manual
 
Como Disparar Us
Como Disparar UsComo Disparar Us
Como Disparar Us
 
ÍNDICE - General (4 páginas)
ÍNDICE - General (4 páginas)ÍNDICE - General (4 páginas)
ÍNDICE - General (4 páginas)
 
Decobuild2015
Decobuild2015Decobuild2015
Decobuild2015
 
Brazil-Phase-3-Report-EN
Brazil-Phase-3-Report-ENBrazil-Phase-3-Report-EN
Brazil-Phase-3-Report-EN
 
the art of flash animation.
the art of flash animation.the art of flash animation.
the art of flash animation.
 
Nw A847 Opsnanual Jp
Nw A847 Opsnanual JpNw A847 Opsnanual Jp
Nw A847 Opsnanual Jp
 
PCA Case No 2013-19 AWARD: In the Matter of the South China Sea Arbitration B...
PCA Case No 2013-19 AWARD: In the Matter of the South China Sea Arbitration B...PCA Case No 2013-19 AWARD: In the Matter of the South China Sea Arbitration B...
PCA Case No 2013-19 AWARD: In the Matter of the South China Sea Arbitration B...
 
ShowProductionFinalProject_121003_v15
ShowProductionFinalProject_121003_v15ShowProductionFinalProject_121003_v15
ShowProductionFinalProject_121003_v15
 
IRB Laws 2011
IRB Laws 2011IRB Laws 2011
IRB Laws 2011
 
5th grade grammar
5th grade grammar5th grade grammar
5th grade grammar
 
Painting Manual :: 2007 acrylic book
Painting Manual :: 2007 acrylic bookPainting Manual :: 2007 acrylic book
Painting Manual :: 2007 acrylic book
 
North Dakota Home Garden Variety Trials
North Dakota Home Garden Variety TrialsNorth Dakota Home Garden Variety Trials
North Dakota Home Garden Variety Trials
 
Nwn online manual
Nwn online manualNwn online manual
Nwn online manual
 
Argentina phase-3-report-eng
Argentina phase-3-report-engArgentina phase-3-report-eng
Argentina phase-3-report-eng
 
Pluripotent stem-cell-handbook-from-nature-and-thermoscience
Pluripotent stem-cell-handbook-from-nature-and-thermosciencePluripotent stem-cell-handbook-from-nature-and-thermoscience
Pluripotent stem-cell-handbook-from-nature-and-thermoscience
 
Word formation
Word formationWord formation
Word formation
 

Similar to Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline 9th circuit 452-pages

Immiigration law outline, selected topics 9th circuit 590-pages
Immiigration law outline, selected topics   9th circuit   590-pagesImmiigration law outline, selected topics   9th circuit   590-pages
Immiigration law outline, selected topics 9th circuit 590-pagesUmesh Heendeniya
 
Immiigration law outline, selected topics 9th circuit 590 pages
Immiigration law outline, selected topics   9th circuit   590 pagesImmiigration law outline, selected topics   9th circuit   590 pages
Immiigration law outline, selected topics 9th circuit 590 pagesUmesh Heendeniya
 
Real Property Transactions in Ukraine
Real Property Transactions in UkraineReal Property Transactions in Ukraine
Real Property Transactions in UkraineLidiya Markova
 
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENTMEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENTHonolulu Civil Beat
 
Washington Technology Responds on Jan 11, 2016 for STEM OPT Deadline Extension
Washington Technology Responds on Jan 11, 2016 for STEM OPT Deadline ExtensionWashington Technology Responds on Jan 11, 2016 for STEM OPT Deadline Extension
Washington Technology Responds on Jan 11, 2016 for STEM OPT Deadline Extensionhappyschools
 
DAHU Claimant Memo
DAHU Claimant MemoDAHU Claimant Memo
DAHU Claimant Memoohoud mously
 
REPORT Wall Street bank involvement with physical commodities (11-18-14)
REPORT Wall Street bank involvement with physical commodities (11-18-14)REPORT Wall Street bank involvement with physical commodities (11-18-14)
REPORT Wall Street bank involvement with physical commodities (11-18-14)GE 94
 
Report wall street bank involvement with physical commodities (11-18-14)
Report wall street bank involvement with physical commodities (11-18-14)Report wall street bank involvement with physical commodities (11-18-14)
Report wall street bank involvement with physical commodities (11-18-14)Ruslan Sivoplyas
 
Standards of review on civil proceedings 9th circuit 201-pages
Standards of review on civil proceedings   9th circuit   201-pagesStandards of review on civil proceedings   9th circuit   201-pages
Standards of review on civil proceedings 9th circuit 201-pagesUmesh Heendeniya
 
Fiesta Bowl Final Public
Fiesta  Bowl  Final  PublicFiesta  Bowl  Final  Public
Fiesta Bowl Final PublicBlogForArizona
 
Standards of review on criminal proceedings 9th circuit 178-pages
Standards of review on criminal proceedings   9th circuit   178-pagesStandards of review on criminal proceedings   9th circuit   178-pages
Standards of review on criminal proceedings 9th circuit 178-pagesUmesh Heendeniya
 
Criminal_Law_and_Practical_Exercises_.pdf
Criminal_Law_and_Practical_Exercises_.pdfCriminal_Law_and_Practical_Exercises_.pdf
Criminal_Law_and_Practical_Exercises_.pdfValentinaPallo
 
Relatório do Senado EUA sobre o Suiçalão
Relatório do Senado EUA sobre o SuiçalãoRelatório do Senado EUA sobre o Suiçalão
Relatório do Senado EUA sobre o SuiçalãoMiguel Rosario
 
Water Supply Advisory Committee Draft Agreement on New Supply Options
Water Supply Advisory Committee Draft Agreement on New Supply OptionsWater Supply Advisory Committee Draft Agreement on New Supply Options
Water Supply Advisory Committee Draft Agreement on New Supply OptionsRobert Singleton
 
Franchisee agreement
Franchisee agreementFranchisee agreement
Franchisee agreementMohit Malviya
 
Zoning ord 10 16-14 (1)
Zoning ord 10 16-14 (1)Zoning ord 10 16-14 (1)
Zoning ord 10 16-14 (1)CityOfDetroit
 
United Nations Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination a...
United Nations Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination a...United Nations Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination a...
United Nations Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination a...Dr Lendy Spires
 

Similar to Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline 9th circuit 452-pages (20)

Immiigration law outline, selected topics 9th circuit 590-pages
Immiigration law outline, selected topics   9th circuit   590-pagesImmiigration law outline, selected topics   9th circuit   590-pages
Immiigration law outline, selected topics 9th circuit 590-pages
 
Immiigration law outline, selected topics 9th circuit 590 pages
Immiigration law outline, selected topics   9th circuit   590 pagesImmiigration law outline, selected topics   9th circuit   590 pages
Immiigration law outline, selected topics 9th circuit 590 pages
 
Real Property Transactions in Ukraine
Real Property Transactions in UkraineReal Property Transactions in Ukraine
Real Property Transactions in Ukraine
 
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENTMEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
 
Washington Technology Responds on Jan 11, 2016 for STEM OPT Deadline Extension
Washington Technology Responds on Jan 11, 2016 for STEM OPT Deadline ExtensionWashington Technology Responds on Jan 11, 2016 for STEM OPT Deadline Extension
Washington Technology Responds on Jan 11, 2016 for STEM OPT Deadline Extension
 
DAHU Claimant Memo
DAHU Claimant MemoDAHU Claimant Memo
DAHU Claimant Memo
 
REPORT Wall Street bank involvement with physical commodities (11-18-14)
REPORT Wall Street bank involvement with physical commodities (11-18-14)REPORT Wall Street bank involvement with physical commodities (11-18-14)
REPORT Wall Street bank involvement with physical commodities (11-18-14)
 
Report wall street bank involvement with physical commodities (11-18-14)
Report wall street bank involvement with physical commodities (11-18-14)Report wall street bank involvement with physical commodities (11-18-14)
Report wall street bank involvement with physical commodities (11-18-14)
 
Standards of review on civil proceedings 9th circuit 201-pages
Standards of review on civil proceedings   9th circuit   201-pagesStandards of review on civil proceedings   9th circuit   201-pages
Standards of review on civil proceedings 9th circuit 201-pages
 
Fiesta Bowl Final Public
Fiesta  Bowl  Final  PublicFiesta  Bowl  Final  Public
Fiesta Bowl Final Public
 
Standards of review on criminal proceedings 9th circuit 178-pages
Standards of review on criminal proceedings   9th circuit   178-pagesStandards of review on criminal proceedings   9th circuit   178-pages
Standards of review on criminal proceedings 9th circuit 178-pages
 
Criminal_Law_and_Practical_Exercises_.pdf
Criminal_Law_and_Practical_Exercises_.pdfCriminal_Law_and_Practical_Exercises_.pdf
Criminal_Law_and_Practical_Exercises_.pdf
 
Relatório do Senado EUA sobre o Suiçalão
Relatório do Senado EUA sobre o SuiçalãoRelatório do Senado EUA sobre o Suiçalão
Relatório do Senado EUA sobre o Suiçalão
 
HSBC AML Case History
HSBC AML Case HistoryHSBC AML Case History
HSBC AML Case History
 
team816
team816team816
team816
 
Water Supply Advisory Committee Draft Agreement on New Supply Options
Water Supply Advisory Committee Draft Agreement on New Supply OptionsWater Supply Advisory Committee Draft Agreement on New Supply Options
Water Supply Advisory Committee Draft Agreement on New Supply Options
 
Franchisee agreement
Franchisee agreementFranchisee agreement
Franchisee agreement
 
Ca2 db245114 02
Ca2 db245114 02Ca2 db245114 02
Ca2 db245114 02
 
Zoning ord 10 16-14 (1)
Zoning ord 10 16-14 (1)Zoning ord 10 16-14 (1)
Zoning ord 10 16-14 (1)
 
United Nations Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination a...
United Nations Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination a...United Nations Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination a...
United Nations Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination a...
 

More from Umesh Heendeniya

USA vs. Dr. Hossein Lahiji, Attorney Najmeh Vahid Dastjerdi - Oregon Federal ...
USA vs. Dr. Hossein Lahiji, Attorney Najmeh Vahid Dastjerdi - Oregon Federal ...USA vs. Dr. Hossein Lahiji, Attorney Najmeh Vahid Dastjerdi - Oregon Federal ...
USA vs. Dr. Hossein Lahiji, Attorney Najmeh Vahid Dastjerdi - Oregon Federal ...Umesh Heendeniya
 
Radcliffe v. Experian - Class action representatives' conflict of interest
Radcliffe v. Experian - Class action representatives' conflict of interestRadcliffe v. Experian - Class action representatives' conflict of interest
Radcliffe v. Experian - Class action representatives' conflict of interestUmesh Heendeniya
 
James Carmody v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners
James Carmody v. Kansas City Board of Police CommissionersJames Carmody v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners
James Carmody v. Kansas City Board of Police CommissionersUmesh Heendeniya
 
Jennifer Westendorf v. West Coast Contractors of Nevada
Jennifer Westendorf v. West Coast Contractors of NevadaJennifer Westendorf v. West Coast Contractors of Nevada
Jennifer Westendorf v. West Coast Contractors of NevadaUmesh Heendeniya
 
Gatto v. United Air Lines, Inc. - Spoliation Instruction in Facebook Account ...
Gatto v. United Air Lines, Inc. - Spoliation Instruction in Facebook Account ...Gatto v. United Air Lines, Inc. - Spoliation Instruction in Facebook Account ...
Gatto v. United Air Lines, Inc. - Spoliation Instruction in Facebook Account ...Umesh Heendeniya
 
EEOC v. Wedco, Inc. - Racial Harassment Lawsuit.
EEOC v. Wedco, Inc. - Racial Harassment Lawsuit.EEOC v. Wedco, Inc. - Racial Harassment Lawsuit.
EEOC v. Wedco, Inc. - Racial Harassment Lawsuit.Umesh Heendeniya
 
Libor Lawsuit - In Re _ LIBOR Antitrust Litigation vs. Bank of America, JPMor...
Libor Lawsuit - In Re _ LIBOR Antitrust Litigation vs. Bank of America, JPMor...Libor Lawsuit - In Re _ LIBOR Antitrust Litigation vs. Bank of America, JPMor...
Libor Lawsuit - In Re _ LIBOR Antitrust Litigation vs. Bank of America, JPMor...Umesh Heendeniya
 
Estate of Carlos Centeno, deceased v. Raani Corporation, Rashid A. Chaudary, ...
Estate of Carlos Centeno, deceased v. Raani Corporation, Rashid A. Chaudary, ...Estate of Carlos Centeno, deceased v. Raani Corporation, Rashid A. Chaudary, ...
Estate of Carlos Centeno, deceased v. Raani Corporation, Rashid A. Chaudary, ...Umesh Heendeniya
 
AllState Sweeping v. Calvin Black, City and County of Denver.
AllState Sweeping v. Calvin Black, City and County of Denver.AllState Sweeping v. Calvin Black, City and County of Denver.
AllState Sweeping v. Calvin Black, City and County of Denver.Umesh Heendeniya
 
Boston Police Officers' Cocaine Drug Testing Appeals Overturned by State Boar...
Boston Police Officers' Cocaine Drug Testing Appeals Overturned by State Boar...Boston Police Officers' Cocaine Drug Testing Appeals Overturned by State Boar...
Boston Police Officers' Cocaine Drug Testing Appeals Overturned by State Boar...Umesh Heendeniya
 
Rob Lowe and Sheryl Lowe v. Laura Boyce and Does 1 through 100 - Lawsuit Agai...
Rob Lowe and Sheryl Lowe v. Laura Boyce and Does 1 through 100 - Lawsuit Agai...Rob Lowe and Sheryl Lowe v. Laura Boyce and Does 1 through 100 - Lawsuit Agai...
Rob Lowe and Sheryl Lowe v. Laura Boyce and Does 1 through 100 - Lawsuit Agai...Umesh Heendeniya
 
Steven Wittels v. David Sanford and Jeremy Heisler - Lawsuit complaint
Steven Wittels v. David Sanford and Jeremy Heisler - Lawsuit complaintSteven Wittels v. David Sanford and Jeremy Heisler - Lawsuit complaint
Steven Wittels v. David Sanford and Jeremy Heisler - Lawsuit complaintUmesh Heendeniya
 
Knives and the Second Amendment, by David Kopel, Esq
Knives and the Second Amendment, by David Kopel, EsqKnives and the Second Amendment, by David Kopel, Esq
Knives and the Second Amendment, by David Kopel, EsqUmesh Heendeniya
 
Linda Eagle v. Sandi Morgan, Haitham Saead, Joseph Mellaci, Elizabeth Sweeney...
Linda Eagle v. Sandi Morgan, Haitham Saead, Joseph Mellaci, Elizabeth Sweeney...Linda Eagle v. Sandi Morgan, Haitham Saead, Joseph Mellaci, Elizabeth Sweeney...
Linda Eagle v. Sandi Morgan, Haitham Saead, Joseph Mellaci, Elizabeth Sweeney...Umesh Heendeniya
 
Estate of Andrew Lee Scott vs. Richard Sylvester, et al - Lake County Wrongfu...
Estate of Andrew Lee Scott vs. Richard Sylvester, et al - Lake County Wrongfu...Estate of Andrew Lee Scott vs. Richard Sylvester, et al - Lake County Wrongfu...
Estate of Andrew Lee Scott vs. Richard Sylvester, et al - Lake County Wrongfu...Umesh Heendeniya
 
State-by-State Guide to Laws on Taping Phone Calls and Conversations, by Repo...
State-by-State Guide to Laws on Taping Phone Calls and Conversations, by Repo...State-by-State Guide to Laws on Taping Phone Calls and Conversations, by Repo...
State-by-State Guide to Laws on Taping Phone Calls and Conversations, by Repo...Umesh Heendeniya
 
Stephen Slevin vs. Board of County Commissioners - Lawsuit Against Jail for M...
Stephen Slevin vs. Board of County Commissioners - Lawsuit Against Jail for M...Stephen Slevin vs. Board of County Commissioners - Lawsuit Against Jail for M...
Stephen Slevin vs. Board of County Commissioners - Lawsuit Against Jail for M...Umesh Heendeniya
 
Brunson and Thompson vs. Michael Dunn - Lawsuit by surviving Afro-American te...
Brunson and Thompson vs. Michael Dunn - Lawsuit by surviving Afro-American te...Brunson and Thompson vs. Michael Dunn - Lawsuit by surviving Afro-American te...
Brunson and Thompson vs. Michael Dunn - Lawsuit by surviving Afro-American te...Umesh Heendeniya
 
Jordan Davis vs. Michael Dunn - Wrongful death lawsuit filed by Afro-American...
Jordan Davis vs. Michael Dunn - Wrongful death lawsuit filed by Afro-American...Jordan Davis vs. Michael Dunn - Wrongful death lawsuit filed by Afro-American...
Jordan Davis vs. Michael Dunn - Wrongful death lawsuit filed by Afro-American...Umesh Heendeniya
 
Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 - Police have no duty to protect c...
Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 - Police have no duty to protect c...Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 - Police have no duty to protect c...
Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 - Police have no duty to protect c...Umesh Heendeniya
 

More from Umesh Heendeniya (20)

USA vs. Dr. Hossein Lahiji, Attorney Najmeh Vahid Dastjerdi - Oregon Federal ...
USA vs. Dr. Hossein Lahiji, Attorney Najmeh Vahid Dastjerdi - Oregon Federal ...USA vs. Dr. Hossein Lahiji, Attorney Najmeh Vahid Dastjerdi - Oregon Federal ...
USA vs. Dr. Hossein Lahiji, Attorney Najmeh Vahid Dastjerdi - Oregon Federal ...
 
Radcliffe v. Experian - Class action representatives' conflict of interest
Radcliffe v. Experian - Class action representatives' conflict of interestRadcliffe v. Experian - Class action representatives' conflict of interest
Radcliffe v. Experian - Class action representatives' conflict of interest
 
James Carmody v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners
James Carmody v. Kansas City Board of Police CommissionersJames Carmody v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners
James Carmody v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners
 
Jennifer Westendorf v. West Coast Contractors of Nevada
Jennifer Westendorf v. West Coast Contractors of NevadaJennifer Westendorf v. West Coast Contractors of Nevada
Jennifer Westendorf v. West Coast Contractors of Nevada
 
Gatto v. United Air Lines, Inc. - Spoliation Instruction in Facebook Account ...
Gatto v. United Air Lines, Inc. - Spoliation Instruction in Facebook Account ...Gatto v. United Air Lines, Inc. - Spoliation Instruction in Facebook Account ...
Gatto v. United Air Lines, Inc. - Spoliation Instruction in Facebook Account ...
 
EEOC v. Wedco, Inc. - Racial Harassment Lawsuit.
EEOC v. Wedco, Inc. - Racial Harassment Lawsuit.EEOC v. Wedco, Inc. - Racial Harassment Lawsuit.
EEOC v. Wedco, Inc. - Racial Harassment Lawsuit.
 
Libor Lawsuit - In Re _ LIBOR Antitrust Litigation vs. Bank of America, JPMor...
Libor Lawsuit - In Re _ LIBOR Antitrust Litigation vs. Bank of America, JPMor...Libor Lawsuit - In Re _ LIBOR Antitrust Litigation vs. Bank of America, JPMor...
Libor Lawsuit - In Re _ LIBOR Antitrust Litigation vs. Bank of America, JPMor...
 
Estate of Carlos Centeno, deceased v. Raani Corporation, Rashid A. Chaudary, ...
Estate of Carlos Centeno, deceased v. Raani Corporation, Rashid A. Chaudary, ...Estate of Carlos Centeno, deceased v. Raani Corporation, Rashid A. Chaudary, ...
Estate of Carlos Centeno, deceased v. Raani Corporation, Rashid A. Chaudary, ...
 
AllState Sweeping v. Calvin Black, City and County of Denver.
AllState Sweeping v. Calvin Black, City and County of Denver.AllState Sweeping v. Calvin Black, City and County of Denver.
AllState Sweeping v. Calvin Black, City and County of Denver.
 
Boston Police Officers' Cocaine Drug Testing Appeals Overturned by State Boar...
Boston Police Officers' Cocaine Drug Testing Appeals Overturned by State Boar...Boston Police Officers' Cocaine Drug Testing Appeals Overturned by State Boar...
Boston Police Officers' Cocaine Drug Testing Appeals Overturned by State Boar...
 
Rob Lowe and Sheryl Lowe v. Laura Boyce and Does 1 through 100 - Lawsuit Agai...
Rob Lowe and Sheryl Lowe v. Laura Boyce and Does 1 through 100 - Lawsuit Agai...Rob Lowe and Sheryl Lowe v. Laura Boyce and Does 1 through 100 - Lawsuit Agai...
Rob Lowe and Sheryl Lowe v. Laura Boyce and Does 1 through 100 - Lawsuit Agai...
 
Steven Wittels v. David Sanford and Jeremy Heisler - Lawsuit complaint
Steven Wittels v. David Sanford and Jeremy Heisler - Lawsuit complaintSteven Wittels v. David Sanford and Jeremy Heisler - Lawsuit complaint
Steven Wittels v. David Sanford and Jeremy Heisler - Lawsuit complaint
 
Knives and the Second Amendment, by David Kopel, Esq
Knives and the Second Amendment, by David Kopel, EsqKnives and the Second Amendment, by David Kopel, Esq
Knives and the Second Amendment, by David Kopel, Esq
 
Linda Eagle v. Sandi Morgan, Haitham Saead, Joseph Mellaci, Elizabeth Sweeney...
Linda Eagle v. Sandi Morgan, Haitham Saead, Joseph Mellaci, Elizabeth Sweeney...Linda Eagle v. Sandi Morgan, Haitham Saead, Joseph Mellaci, Elizabeth Sweeney...
Linda Eagle v. Sandi Morgan, Haitham Saead, Joseph Mellaci, Elizabeth Sweeney...
 
Estate of Andrew Lee Scott vs. Richard Sylvester, et al - Lake County Wrongfu...
Estate of Andrew Lee Scott vs. Richard Sylvester, et al - Lake County Wrongfu...Estate of Andrew Lee Scott vs. Richard Sylvester, et al - Lake County Wrongfu...
Estate of Andrew Lee Scott vs. Richard Sylvester, et al - Lake County Wrongfu...
 
State-by-State Guide to Laws on Taping Phone Calls and Conversations, by Repo...
State-by-State Guide to Laws on Taping Phone Calls and Conversations, by Repo...State-by-State Guide to Laws on Taping Phone Calls and Conversations, by Repo...
State-by-State Guide to Laws on Taping Phone Calls and Conversations, by Repo...
 
Stephen Slevin vs. Board of County Commissioners - Lawsuit Against Jail for M...
Stephen Slevin vs. Board of County Commissioners - Lawsuit Against Jail for M...Stephen Slevin vs. Board of County Commissioners - Lawsuit Against Jail for M...
Stephen Slevin vs. Board of County Commissioners - Lawsuit Against Jail for M...
 
Brunson and Thompson vs. Michael Dunn - Lawsuit by surviving Afro-American te...
Brunson and Thompson vs. Michael Dunn - Lawsuit by surviving Afro-American te...Brunson and Thompson vs. Michael Dunn - Lawsuit by surviving Afro-American te...
Brunson and Thompson vs. Michael Dunn - Lawsuit by surviving Afro-American te...
 
Jordan Davis vs. Michael Dunn - Wrongful death lawsuit filed by Afro-American...
Jordan Davis vs. Michael Dunn - Wrongful death lawsuit filed by Afro-American...Jordan Davis vs. Michael Dunn - Wrongful death lawsuit filed by Afro-American...
Jordan Davis vs. Michael Dunn - Wrongful death lawsuit filed by Afro-American...
 
Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 - Police have no duty to protect c...
Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 - Police have no duty to protect c...Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 - Police have no duty to protect c...
Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 - Police have no duty to protect c...
 

Recently uploaded

Breath, Brain & Beyond_A Holistic Approach to Peak Performance.pdf
Breath, Brain & Beyond_A Holistic Approach to Peak Performance.pdfBreath, Brain & Beyond_A Holistic Approach to Peak Performance.pdf
Breath, Brain & Beyond_A Holistic Approach to Peak Performance.pdfJess Walker
 
办理国外毕业证学位证《原版美国montana文凭》蒙大拿州立大学毕业证制作成绩单修改
办理国外毕业证学位证《原版美国montana文凭》蒙大拿州立大学毕业证制作成绩单修改办理国外毕业证学位证《原版美国montana文凭》蒙大拿州立大学毕业证制作成绩单修改
办理国外毕业证学位证《原版美国montana文凭》蒙大拿州立大学毕业证制作成绩单修改atducpo
 
Dhule Call Girls #9907093804 Contact Number Escorts Service Dhule
Dhule Call Girls #9907093804 Contact Number Escorts Service DhuleDhule Call Girls #9907093804 Contact Number Escorts Service Dhule
Dhule Call Girls #9907093804 Contact Number Escorts Service Dhulesrsj9000
 
Call Girls In Karkardooma 83770 87607 Just-Dial Escorts Service 24X7 Avilable
Call Girls In Karkardooma 83770 87607 Just-Dial Escorts Service 24X7 AvilableCall Girls In Karkardooma 83770 87607 Just-Dial Escorts Service 24X7 Avilable
Call Girls In Karkardooma 83770 87607 Just-Dial Escorts Service 24X7 Avilabledollysharma2066
 
Authentic No 1 Amil Baba In Pakistan Amil Baba In Faisalabad Amil Baba In Kar...
Authentic No 1 Amil Baba In Pakistan Amil Baba In Faisalabad Amil Baba In Kar...Authentic No 1 Amil Baba In Pakistan Amil Baba In Faisalabad Amil Baba In Kar...
Authentic No 1 Amil Baba In Pakistan Amil Baba In Faisalabad Amil Baba In Kar...Authentic No 1 Amil Baba In Pakistan
 
E J Waggoner against Kellogg's Pantheism 8.pptx
E J Waggoner against Kellogg's Pantheism 8.pptxE J Waggoner against Kellogg's Pantheism 8.pptx
E J Waggoner against Kellogg's Pantheism 8.pptxJackieSparrow3
 
Call Girls in Govindpuri Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
Call Girls in Govindpuri Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝Call Girls in Govindpuri Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
Call Girls in Govindpuri Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝soniya singh
 
Inspiring Through Words Power of Inspiration.pptx
Inspiring Through Words Power of Inspiration.pptxInspiring Through Words Power of Inspiration.pptx
Inspiring Through Words Power of Inspiration.pptxShubham Rawat
 
REFLECTIONS Newsletter Jan-Jul 2024.pdf.pdf
REFLECTIONS Newsletter Jan-Jul 2024.pdf.pdfREFLECTIONS Newsletter Jan-Jul 2024.pdf.pdf
REFLECTIONS Newsletter Jan-Jul 2024.pdf.pdfssusere8ea60
 
《塔夫斯大学毕业证成绩单购买》做Tufts文凭毕业证成绩单/伪造美国假文凭假毕业证书图片Q微信741003700《塔夫斯大学毕业证购买》《Tufts毕业文...
《塔夫斯大学毕业证成绩单购买》做Tufts文凭毕业证成绩单/伪造美国假文凭假毕业证书图片Q微信741003700《塔夫斯大学毕业证购买》《Tufts毕业文...《塔夫斯大学毕业证成绩单购买》做Tufts文凭毕业证成绩单/伪造美国假文凭假毕业证书图片Q微信741003700《塔夫斯大学毕业证购买》《Tufts毕业文...
《塔夫斯大学毕业证成绩单购买》做Tufts文凭毕业证成绩单/伪造美国假文凭假毕业证书图片Q微信741003700《塔夫斯大学毕业证购买》《Tufts毕业文...ur8mqw8e
 
(No.1)↠Young Call Girls in Sikanderpur (Gurgaon) ꧁❤ 9711911712 ❤꧂ Escorts
(No.1)↠Young Call Girls in Sikanderpur (Gurgaon) ꧁❤ 9711911712 ❤꧂ Escorts(No.1)↠Young Call Girls in Sikanderpur (Gurgaon) ꧁❤ 9711911712 ❤꧂ Escorts
(No.1)↠Young Call Girls in Sikanderpur (Gurgaon) ꧁❤ 9711911712 ❤꧂ EscortsDelhi Escorts Service
 
办理西悉尼大学毕业证成绩单、制作假文凭
办理西悉尼大学毕业证成绩单、制作假文凭办理西悉尼大学毕业证成绩单、制作假文凭
办理西悉尼大学毕业证成绩单、制作假文凭o8wvnojp
 
Ahmedabad Escorts Girl Services For Male Tourists 9537192988
Ahmedabad Escorts Girl Services For Male Tourists 9537192988Ahmedabad Escorts Girl Services For Male Tourists 9537192988
Ahmedabad Escorts Girl Services For Male Tourists 9537192988oolala9823
 
(南达科他州立大学毕业证学位证成绩单-永久存档)
(南达科他州立大学毕业证学位证成绩单-永久存档)(南达科他州立大学毕业证学位证成绩单-永久存档)
(南达科他州立大学毕业证学位证成绩单-永久存档)oannq
 
南新罕布什尔大学毕业证学位证成绩单-学历认证
南新罕布什尔大学毕业证学位证成绩单-学历认证南新罕布什尔大学毕业证学位证成绩单-学历认证
南新罕布什尔大学毕业证学位证成绩单-学历认证kbdhl05e
 
Call Girls in Kalyan Vihar Delhi 💯 Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
Call Girls in Kalyan Vihar Delhi 💯 Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝Call Girls in Kalyan Vihar Delhi 💯 Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
Call Girls in Kalyan Vihar Delhi 💯 Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝soniya singh
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Breath, Brain & Beyond_A Holistic Approach to Peak Performance.pdf
Breath, Brain & Beyond_A Holistic Approach to Peak Performance.pdfBreath, Brain & Beyond_A Holistic Approach to Peak Performance.pdf
Breath, Brain & Beyond_A Holistic Approach to Peak Performance.pdf
 
办理国外毕业证学位证《原版美国montana文凭》蒙大拿州立大学毕业证制作成绩单修改
办理国外毕业证学位证《原版美国montana文凭》蒙大拿州立大学毕业证制作成绩单修改办理国外毕业证学位证《原版美国montana文凭》蒙大拿州立大学毕业证制作成绩单修改
办理国外毕业证学位证《原版美国montana文凭》蒙大拿州立大学毕业证制作成绩单修改
 
Dhule Call Girls #9907093804 Contact Number Escorts Service Dhule
Dhule Call Girls #9907093804 Contact Number Escorts Service DhuleDhule Call Girls #9907093804 Contact Number Escorts Service Dhule
Dhule Call Girls #9907093804 Contact Number Escorts Service Dhule
 
🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG BOOK model Call Girls In Aerocity Delhi Escort service
🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG BOOK model Call Girls In Aerocity Delhi Escort service🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG BOOK model Call Girls In Aerocity Delhi Escort service
🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG BOOK model Call Girls In Aerocity Delhi Escort service
 
Call Girls In Karkardooma 83770 87607 Just-Dial Escorts Service 24X7 Avilable
Call Girls In Karkardooma 83770 87607 Just-Dial Escorts Service 24X7 AvilableCall Girls In Karkardooma 83770 87607 Just-Dial Escorts Service 24X7 Avilable
Call Girls In Karkardooma 83770 87607 Just-Dial Escorts Service 24X7 Avilable
 
Authentic No 1 Amil Baba In Pakistan Amil Baba In Faisalabad Amil Baba In Kar...
Authentic No 1 Amil Baba In Pakistan Amil Baba In Faisalabad Amil Baba In Kar...Authentic No 1 Amil Baba In Pakistan Amil Baba In Faisalabad Amil Baba In Kar...
Authentic No 1 Amil Baba In Pakistan Amil Baba In Faisalabad Amil Baba In Kar...
 
E J Waggoner against Kellogg's Pantheism 8.pptx
E J Waggoner against Kellogg's Pantheism 8.pptxE J Waggoner against Kellogg's Pantheism 8.pptx
E J Waggoner against Kellogg's Pantheism 8.pptx
 
Call Girls in Govindpuri Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
Call Girls in Govindpuri Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝Call Girls in Govindpuri Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
Call Girls in Govindpuri Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
 
Inspiring Through Words Power of Inspiration.pptx
Inspiring Through Words Power of Inspiration.pptxInspiring Through Words Power of Inspiration.pptx
Inspiring Through Words Power of Inspiration.pptx
 
REFLECTIONS Newsletter Jan-Jul 2024.pdf.pdf
REFLECTIONS Newsletter Jan-Jul 2024.pdf.pdfREFLECTIONS Newsletter Jan-Jul 2024.pdf.pdf
REFLECTIONS Newsletter Jan-Jul 2024.pdf.pdf
 
《塔夫斯大学毕业证成绩单购买》做Tufts文凭毕业证成绩单/伪造美国假文凭假毕业证书图片Q微信741003700《塔夫斯大学毕业证购买》《Tufts毕业文...
《塔夫斯大学毕业证成绩单购买》做Tufts文凭毕业证成绩单/伪造美国假文凭假毕业证书图片Q微信741003700《塔夫斯大学毕业证购买》《Tufts毕业文...《塔夫斯大学毕业证成绩单购买》做Tufts文凭毕业证成绩单/伪造美国假文凭假毕业证书图片Q微信741003700《塔夫斯大学毕业证购买》《Tufts毕业文...
《塔夫斯大学毕业证成绩单购买》做Tufts文凭毕业证成绩单/伪造美国假文凭假毕业证书图片Q微信741003700《塔夫斯大学毕业证购买》《Tufts毕业文...
 
young Call girls in Neb Sarai 🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
young Call girls in Neb Sarai 🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Serviceyoung Call girls in Neb Sarai 🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
young Call girls in Neb Sarai 🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
 
Model Call Girl in Lado Sarai Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Lado Sarai Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Lado Sarai Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Lado Sarai Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
Cheap Rate ➥8448380779 ▻Call Girls In Mg Road Gurgaon
Cheap Rate ➥8448380779 ▻Call Girls In Mg Road GurgaonCheap Rate ➥8448380779 ▻Call Girls In Mg Road Gurgaon
Cheap Rate ➥8448380779 ▻Call Girls In Mg Road Gurgaon
 
(No.1)↠Young Call Girls in Sikanderpur (Gurgaon) ꧁❤ 9711911712 ❤꧂ Escorts
(No.1)↠Young Call Girls in Sikanderpur (Gurgaon) ꧁❤ 9711911712 ❤꧂ Escorts(No.1)↠Young Call Girls in Sikanderpur (Gurgaon) ꧁❤ 9711911712 ❤꧂ Escorts
(No.1)↠Young Call Girls in Sikanderpur (Gurgaon) ꧁❤ 9711911712 ❤꧂ Escorts
 
办理西悉尼大学毕业证成绩单、制作假文凭
办理西悉尼大学毕业证成绩单、制作假文凭办理西悉尼大学毕业证成绩单、制作假文凭
办理西悉尼大学毕业证成绩单、制作假文凭
 
Ahmedabad Escorts Girl Services For Male Tourists 9537192988
Ahmedabad Escorts Girl Services For Male Tourists 9537192988Ahmedabad Escorts Girl Services For Male Tourists 9537192988
Ahmedabad Escorts Girl Services For Male Tourists 9537192988
 
(南达科他州立大学毕业证学位证成绩单-永久存档)
(南达科他州立大学毕业证学位证成绩单-永久存档)(南达科他州立大学毕业证学位证成绩单-永久存档)
(南达科他州立大学毕业证学位证成绩单-永久存档)
 
南新罕布什尔大学毕业证学位证成绩单-学历认证
南新罕布什尔大学毕业证学位证成绩单-学历认证南新罕布什尔大学毕业证学位证成绩单-学历认证
南新罕布什尔大学毕业证学位证成绩单-学历认证
 
Call Girls in Kalyan Vihar Delhi 💯 Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
Call Girls in Kalyan Vihar Delhi 💯 Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝Call Girls in Kalyan Vihar Delhi 💯 Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
Call Girls in Kalyan Vihar Delhi 💯 Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
 

Ninth circuit appellate jurisdiction outline 9th circuit 452-pages

  • 1. Written March 1999 Updated December 2009 Corrections and comments should be e-mailed to Jennifer Rich at jennifer_rich@ca9.uscourts.gov This outline is intended for use as a starting point for research. It is not intended to express the views or opinions of the Ninth Circuit, and it may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit.
  • 2. Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. STATUTORY BASES FOR CIVIL APPEALS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 A. APPEALS FROM FINAL DECISIONS (28 U.S.C. § 1291).. . . . . . . 2 1. FINAL DECISIONS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 a. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 i. Need to Consider Finality. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 ii. Policy Behind Final Judgment Rule. . . . . . . . . . . . 3 b. Determining Finality.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 i. District Court Intent. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 ii. Adjudication of all Claims. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 c. Manufacturing Finality. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 d. “Pragmatic” or “Practical” Finality Doctrine. . . . . . . . . 10 i. Parameters of Doctrine.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 ii. Applications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2. COLLATERAL ORDER DOCTRINE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 a. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 b. Requirements of Collateral Order Doctrine. . . . . . . . . . 12 c. Appealability of Specific Orders under Collateral Order Doctrine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 i. Abstention Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ii. Orders Denying Immunity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 iii. Disqualification of Counsel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 iv. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 Sanctions.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 v. Other Orders.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 3. ORDERS CERTIFIED UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 54(b). . . . . 18 a. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 i. District Court Determinations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 ii. Appellate Court Review. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 b. Contents of Certification Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 i. “No Just Reason for Delay”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 ii. Reference to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). . . . . . . . . . . . 20 iii. “Specific Findings” Supporting Certification. . . 20 c. Propriety of Certification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 i. Appellate Review Required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 -i-
  • 3. ii. Standard of Review. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 iii. Scrutiny under Morrison-Knudsen.. . . . . . . . . . . 22 iv. Trend Toward Greater Deference to District Court.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 d. Immediate Appeal from Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) Order Required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 e. Denial of Rule 54(b) Certification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 B. APPEALS FROM INTERLOCUTORY DECISIONS (28 U.S.C. § 1292). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 1. INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTIVE ORDERS (28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1)). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 a. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 b. Order Granting or Denying an Injunction. . . . . . . . . . . 27 i. Explicit Grant or Denial or Injunction. . . . . . . . . 27 ii. Implicit Grant or Denial of Injunction. . . . . . . . . 27 c. Orders Modifying, Continuing, or Dissolving Injunction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 i. Order Modifying Injunction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 ii. Order Continuing Injunction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 iii. Order Dissolving Injunction.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 iv. Order Denying Modification or Dissolution of Injunction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 d. Examples of Orders Appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 i. Order Granting Permanent Injunction. . . . . . . . . 32 ii. Order Denying Entry of Consent Decree. . . . . . . 33 iii. Order Granting Injunction Despite Lack of Motion for Interim Relief. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 iv. Order Requiring Submission of Remedial Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 v. Certain Orders Affecting Assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 vi. Order Denying Relief in Mandamus Action. . . . 34 vii. Order Staying Extradition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 viii. Order Denying Stay of Immigration Removal Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 ix. Order Disapproving Class Settlement. . . . . . . . . 34 -ii-
  • 4. e. Examples of Orders Not Appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 i. Order Denying Motion to Abstain. . . . . . . . . . . . 35 ii. Order Denying Motion for Stay. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 iii. Order Granting England Reservation of Jurisdiction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 iv. Order Denying Motion to Quash. . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 v. Order Granting Conditional Permissive Intervention. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 vi. Certain Orders Affecting Assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 vii. Order Remanding to Federal Agency.. . . . . . . . . 37 viii. Order Denying Summary Judgment Due to Factual Disputes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 ix. Order Denying Entry of Consent Decree Not Appealable by Party Against Whom Injunction Sought. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 f. Temporary Restraining Order.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 i. Order Tantamount to Denial of Preliminary Injunction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 ii. Orders Effectively Deciding Merits of Case. . . . 39 g. Mootness.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 2. INTERLOCUTORY RECEIVERSHIP ORDERS (28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(2)). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 3. INTERLOCUTORY ADMIRALTY ORDERS (§ 1292(a)(3)). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 a. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 b. Appealable Admiralty Orders.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 c. Nonappealable Admiralty Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 4. INTERLOCUTORY PERMISSIVE APPEALS (28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 a. Procedure for Appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). . . . . 44 i. District Court Certification under § 1292(b). . . . 44 ii. Timely Petition from Order Certified under § 1292(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 iii. Appellate Court Permission to Appeal under § 1292(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 iv. Stay Pending Appeal from Certified Order. . . . . 46 -iii-
  • 5. b. Standards for Evaluating § 1292(b) Certification Order.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 i. Order Raises Controlling Question of Law. . . . . 46 ii. Difference of Opinion Exists as to Controlling Question. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 iii. Immediate Appeal Would Materially Advance Litigation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 c. Examples of Orders Reviewed under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 d. Examples of Orders Not Reviewed under 28 U.S.C § 1292(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 C. APPEALABILITY OF SPECIFIC ORDERS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 1. ADMIRALTY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 2. AGENCY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 3. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 a. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 b. Appointment of Counsel in Title VII Action. . . . . . . . . 50 4. ARBITRATION (9 U.S.C. § 16). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 a. Cases Governed by the Federal Arbitration Act.. . . . . . 51 b. Arbitration Orders Appealable under 9 U.S.C. § 16. . . 52 c. Arbitration Orders Not Appealable under 9 U.S.C. § 16. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 d. Interlocutory v. Final Decision. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 e. Other Avenues for Appeal from Arbitration Orders. . . 55 5. Assets (Liens, Attachments, etc.). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 a. Orders Restraining Assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 b. Orders Releasing Assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 6. ATTORNEY’S FEES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 a. Interim Attorney’s Fees Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 b. Post-Judgment Attorney’s Fees Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 7. BANKRUPTCY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 8. CLASS ACTIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 a. Interlocutory Appeal from Class Certification Order. . . 58 i. Fed. R. Civ. P. 23. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 ii. Decisions Predating Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f). . . . . . 59 b. Review of Class Certification Order After Final Judgment.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 -iv-
  • 6. i. Final Order Adjudicating Individual Claim. . . . . 59 ii. Dismissal Following Settlement of Individual Claim. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 iii. Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute Individual Claim. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 iv. Underlying Judgment Reversed on Appeal. . . . . 60 c. Appeal from Orders Allocating Cost of Notifying Class Members. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 9. Consolidated Actions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 10. Contempt and Sanctions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 a. Appealability of Contempt or Sanctions Order Issued in the Course of an Underlying District Court Proceeding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 i. Contempt or Sanctions Order Against Party. . . . 62 ii. Contempt or sanctions Order against Nonparty.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 iii. Contempt or Sanctions Order against Party and Nonparty Jointly. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 iv. Denial of Motion for Contempt or Sanctions. . . . 68 b. Appealability of Contempt or Sanctions Order Issued After Final Judgment in an Underlying District Court Proceeding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 i. Post-Judgment Contempt or Sanctions Order Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 ii. Post-Judgment Continuing Contempt Order. . . . 69 iii. Order Denying Motion to Vacate Contempt Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 c. Appealability of Contempt or Sanctions Order Issued As Final Judgment in Enforcement or Contempt Proceeding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 i. Contempt Order as Final Judgment in Enforcement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 ii. Contempt Order as Final Judgment in Contempt Proceeding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 11. Default.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 a. Motion for Default Judgment Granted. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 b. Motion for Default Judgment Denied.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 -v-
  • 7. c. Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment Granted.. . . . . . 71 d. Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment Denied. . . . . . . 71 12. Discovery Orders and Subpoenas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 a. Appeal by a Person Who is a Party to an Underlying District Court Proceeding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 i. Order Compelling Discovery. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 ii. Protective Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 iii. Pretrial Order to Contribute to Discovery Fund. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 iv. Post-Judgment Discovery Orders.. . . . . . . . . . . . 74 b. Appeal by Person Not a Party to An Underlying District Court Proceeding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 i. General Rule: Target of Order Compelling Discovery Cannot Appeal Until Contempt Citation Issues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 ii. Exceptions Permitting Appeal Absent Contempt Citation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 iii. Appeal from Order Denying Motion to Compel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 c. Appeal by Person Who is a Party to a Proceeding Limited to Enforcement or Discovery. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 i. Discovery Order Issued as Final Judgment in Enforcement Proceeding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 ii. Discovery Order Issued as Final Judgment in Discovery Proceeding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 13. DISMISSAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 a. Dismissal Denied. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 i. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 ii. Denial of Immunity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 b. Dismissal Granted.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 i. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 ii. Dismissal of Complaint v. Dismissal of Action. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 iii. Leave to Amend Complaint. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 iv. Involuntary Dismissal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 v. Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice. . . . . . . . 86 vi. Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice.. . . . . . . . . . 88 -vi-
  • 8. vii.Dismissal Subject to Condition or Modification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 viii. Dismissal of Fewer Than All Claims. . . . . . . . . . 89 14. DISQUALIFICATION.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 a. Disqualification of Counsel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 b. Disqualification of District Judge.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 15. IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 16. IMMIGRATION.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 17. IMMUNITY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 a. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 b. Absolute Presidential or Legislative Immunity. . . . . . . 93 c. State Sovereign Immunity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 d. Foreign Sovereign Immunity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 e. Federal Sovereign Immunity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 f. Military Service Immunity (Feres doctrine).. . . . . . . . . 94 g. Qualified Immunity of Government Employees. . . . . . 94 i. Order Denying Dismissal or Summary Judgment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 ii. Only Legal Determinations Subject to Review. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 iii. Successive Appeals from Orders Denying Immunity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 h. Municipal Liability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 i. Immunity from Service (“Specialty Doctrine”). . . . . . . 97 j. Settlement Agreement (Contractual Immunity). . . . . . . 98 k. Absolute Judicial Immunity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 l. Absolute Political Immunity.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 m. Absolute Witness Immunity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 n. Tribal Sovereign Immunity.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 18. INJUNCTION.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 19. INTERVENTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 a. Intervention as of Right. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 i. Order Denying Intervention Altogether. . . . . . . . 99 ii. Order Denying Intervention in Part. . . . . . . . . . . 99 b. Permissive Intervention. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 c. Must Appeal Denial of Intervention Immediately. . . . 100 -vii-
  • 9. 20. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISIONS (28 U.S.C. § 636(c)). 100 a. Final Judgment by Magistrate Appealed Directly to Court of Appeals.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 b. No Appellate Jurisdiction if Magistrate Lacked Authority.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 c. Parties’ Consent to Entry of Final Judgment by Magistrate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 21. POST-JUDGMENT ORDERS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 a. Post-Judgment Orders Generally Final.. . . . . . . . . . . . 103 b. Separate Notice of Appeal Generally Required. . . . . . 103 c. Appealability of Specific Post-Judgment Orders. . . . . 104 i. Post-Judgment Order Granting or Denying Attorney’s Fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 ii. Post-Judgment Order Granting or Denying Costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 iii. Post-Judgment Order Granting or Denying New Trial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 iv. Post-Judgment Orders Related to Discovery. . . 105 v. Post-Judgment Contempt Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . 105 vi. Orders Granting or Denying Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) Relief. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 vii. Other Post-Judgment Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 22. PRE-FILING REVIEW ORDER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 23. RECEIVERSHIP. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 24. REMAND. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 a. Order Remanding to State Court. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 i. Remand Due to Defect in Removal Procedure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 ii. Remand Due to Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 iii. Remand for Reasons Other than Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction or Defect in Removal Procedure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 b. Order Remanding to Federal Agency. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 i. Remand to Federal Agency on Factual Grounds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 -viii-
  • 10. ii. Remand to Federal Agency on Legal Grounds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 c. Order Denying Petition for Removal from State Court. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 d. Order Denying Motion to Remand to State Court. . . . 115 25. SANCTIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 26. STAYS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 a. Stay Granted. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 i. Abstention-Based Stays. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 ii. Other Stays. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 b. Stay Denied.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 27. SUMMARY JUDGMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 a. Order Denying Summary Judgment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 b. Order Granting Partial Summary Judgment. . . . . . . . . 119 28. TAX. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 29. TRANSFER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 a. Transfer from District Court to District Court. . . . . . . 120 b. Transfer from District Court to Court of Appeals. . . . 120 D. PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 1. GENERALLY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 2. BAUMAN FACTORS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 a. Alternative Relief Unavailable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 b. Possibility of Irreparable Damage or Prejudice. . . . . . 122 c. Clear Error by District Court. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 d. Potential for Error to Recur. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 e. Important Question of First Impression. . . . . . . . . . . . 123 3. NOTICE OF APPEAL CONSTRUED AS PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 a. Appeal Construed as Petition for Writ of Mandamus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 b. Appeal Not Construed as Petition for Writ of Mandamus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 4. AVAILABILITY OF MANDAMUS RELIEF FROM SPECIFIC ORDERS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 a. Class Certification Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 i. Fed. R. Civ. P. 23. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 ii. Decisions Predating Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f). . . . . 126 -ix-
  • 11. b. Contempt Orders.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 c. Discovery Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 i. Mandamus Relief Available. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 ii. Mandamus Relief Not Available. . . . . . . . . . . . 127 d. Disqualification Orders.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 i. Disqualification of Judge. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 ii. Disqualification of Counsel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 e. Jury Demand Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129 f. Media Access Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129 g. Remand Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 i. Mandamus Relief Available. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 ii. Mandamus Relief Not Available. . . . . . . . . . . . 131 h. Transfer Orders.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 i. Other Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 i. Mandamus Relief Available. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 ii. Mandamus Relief Not Available. . . . . . . . . . . . 134 III. TIMELINESS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 A. TIME PERIOD FOR APPEAL.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 1. TIMELY NOTICE REQUIRED FOR JURISDICTION. . . . 136 2. DEADLINE FOR FILING NOTICE OF APPEAL. . . . . . . . 136 3. WHETHER UNITED STATES IS A PARTY.. . . . . . . . . . . 136 a. Liberal Construction of Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). . . . . . . . 136 b. Determining Party Status. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137 i. Federal Official as Defendant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137 ii. United States as Nominal Plaintiff. . . . . . . . . . . 137 iii. United States Dismissed Prior to Appeal. . . . . . 137 iv. United States as Party in Bifurcated Proceedings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 v. United States as Party to Consolidated Action. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 vi. Foreign Government Not Treated Like United States. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 vii. United States Not a Party to Attorney Discipline Proceeding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 c. Defining Agency.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139 i. Relevant Factors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139 -x-
  • 12. ii. Factors Applied. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139 4. COMPUTATION OF TIME TO FILE NOTICE OF APPEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140 a. Days Counted in Determining Deadline for Filing Notice of Appeal.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140 b. Date Notice of Appeal Deemed “Filed”. . . . . . . . . . . . 141 i. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141 ii. Pro Se Prisoners. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142 5. APPLICABILITY OF FED. R. APP. P. 4(a) TIME LIMITS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142 a. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) Time Limits Applicable.. . . . . . . 142 b. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) Time Limits Not Applicable. . . . 143 6. CROSS-APPEALS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 B. ENTRY OF JUDGMENT.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 1. GENERALLY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 2. 150-DAY RULE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 a. Application of the 150-Day Rule. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 3. SEPARATE DOCUMENT REQUIREMENT.. . . . . . . . . . . 146 a. Document Distinct from Memorandum. . . . . . . . . . . . 147 i. Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 Requirements Not Satisfied. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147 ii. Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 Requirements Satisfied. . . . . 148 b. Lack of Opinion or Memorandum. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 c. Minute Orders.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 d. Lack of Separate Judgment Does Not Render Appeal Premature. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 i. Waiver of Separate Document Requirement by Appellee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 ii. Waiver of Separate Document Requirement by Appellant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151 iii. Objection by Appellee to Lack of Separate Judgment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151 4. MANNER OF ENTERING JUDGMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 5. JUDGMENT SIGNED BY CLERK.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 6. NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153 C. PREMATURE NOTICE OF APPEAL.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153 1. GENERALLY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153 -xi-
  • 13. 2. NOTICE FILED BEFORE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. . . . . 153 a. Premature Notice Effective.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 b. Premature Notice Not Effective. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 3. REMAINING CLAIMS FINALIZED AFTER NOTICE OF APPEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156 a. Compare Rule 54(b) Certification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156 b. Premature Notice of Appeal Cured.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156 c. Premature Notice of Appeal Not Cured. . . . . . . . . . . . 157 D. EXTENSION OF TIME TO APPEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 1. GENERALLY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 a. Extension of Time to Appeal by Court of Appeals. . . 157 b. Extension of Time to Appeal by District Court. . . . . . 158 2. EXTENSION OF TIME TO APPEAL UNDER FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(5). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 a. Timeliness of Motion for Extension. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 b. Form of Motion for Extension. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 i. Formal Motion Required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 ii. When Notice Required. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 c. Standard for Granting Motion for Extension. . . . . . . . 159 i. Good Cause. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 ii. Excusable Neglect. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 d. Length of Extension. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 e. Appealability of Extension Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 3. EXTENSION OF TIME TO APPEAL UNDER FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(6). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 a. Timeliness of Motion for Extension. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162 b. Form of Motion for Extension. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162 c. Standard for Granting Motion for Extension. . . . . . . . 162 i. Entitlement to Notice of Entry of Judgment. . . 163 ii. Failure to Receive Notice of Entry of Judgment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 iii. Absence of Prejudice to Any Party. . . . . . . . . . 164 d. Length of Extension. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164 e. Appealability of Extension Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164 4. EXTENSION OF TIME TO APPEAL UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164 a. Timeliness of Motion for Extension. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165 -xii-
  • 14. b. Factors Considered in Evaluating Motion for Extension. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165 E. UNTIMELY FILING NOT EXCUSED BY UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES DOCTRINE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166 1. OSTERNECK STANDARD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166 2. PRE-OSTERNECK DECISIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167 3. UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCE DOCTRINE ILLEGITIMATE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168 F. EFFECT OF POST-JUDGMENT MOTIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168 1. GENERALLY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168 2. POST-JUDGMENT TOLLING MOTIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . 168 a. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168 b. Tolling Motion Must Be Specifically Enumerated.. . . 169 c. Tolling Motion Must Be Timely Filed. . . . . . . . . . . . . 169 i. Time Period for Filing Tolling Motion . . . . . . . 170 ii. Days Counted in Calculating Deadline for Filing Tolling Motion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171 iii. Classification of Motion Filed Prior to Entry of Judgment as “Post-Judgment”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171 iv. Effect of Premature Tolling Motion.. . . . . . . . . 172 v. Effect of Untimely Tolling Motion. . . . . . . . . . 172 d. Tolling Motion Must Be Written or Recorded. . . . . . . 172 e. Tolling Motion Need Not Be Properly Labeled. . . . . . 172 i. Motion to Amend or Vacate Judgment. . . . . . . 173 ii. Motion for Clarification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173 iii. Motion for Attorney’s Fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174 iv. Motion for Costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174 v. Motion for Prejudgment Interest. . . . . . . . . . . . 175 f. Effect of Motion That Lacks Merit or is Procedurally Defective.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175 g. Tolling Motion May Address Any Appealable Order.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176 3. NON-TOLLING POST-JUDGMENT MOTIONS. . . . . . . . 176 4. MULTIPLE POST-JUDGMENT MOTIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . 177 -xiii-
  • 15. IV. NOTICE OF APPEAL (Form, Content and Effect on District Court Jurisdiction). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178 A. GENERALLY.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178 B. DOCUMENTS CONSTITUTING NOTICE OF APPEAL. . . . . . . 178 1. GENERALLY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178 2. PRO SE APPELLANTS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179 3. DOCUMENTS CONSTRUED AS NOTICE OF APPEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180 4. DOCUMENTS NOT CONSTRUED AS NOTICE OF APPEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182 C. CONTENTS OF NOTICE OF APPEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182 1. DESIGNATION OF PARTIES APPEALING.. . . . . . . . . . . 182 a. Fed. R. App. P. 3 Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182 b. Parties Inadequately Designated.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183 c. Parties Adequately Designated. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184 2. DESIGNATION OF ORDER BEING APPEALED. . . . . . . 185 a. Notice of Appeal Effective Even Though Order Mistakenly or Vaguely Designated. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185 b. Notice of Appeal from One Part of Order Deemed to Encompass Other Part of Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186 c. Notice of Appeal from Final Judgment Deemed to Encompass Prior Rulings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187 d. Notice of Appeal from Post-Judgment Order Deemed to Encompass Final Judgment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188 e. Effect of Second Notice of Appeal.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189 3. SIGNATURE OF APPEALING PARTY OR ATTORNEY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189 D. AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190 1. PERMISSIBLE AMENDMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190 2. IMPERMISSIBLE AMENDMENTS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190 E. CROSS-APPEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190 1. ARGUMENT SUPPORTING JUDGMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . 191 2. ARGUMENT ATTACKING JUDGMENT.. . . . . . . . . . . . . 192 3. JURISDICTION OR COMITY ARGUMENT. . . . . . . . . . . 193 F. EFFECT OF NOTICE OF APPEAL ON DISTRICT COURT JURISDICTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193 -xiv-
  • 16. 1. APPEAL FROM FINAL JUDGMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194 2. APPEAL FROM POST-JUDGMENT ORDER.. . . . . . . . . . 195 3. APPEAL FROM PARTIAL JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 54(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195 4. APPEAL FROM COLLATERAL ORDER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195 a. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195 b. Qualified Immunity Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196 5. APPEAL FROM INTERLOCUTORY ORDER. . . . . . . . . . 196 6. EXCEPTIONS TO DIVESTITURE RULE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197 a. Ineffective Notice of Appeal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197 b. Jurisdiction to Clarify Order or Correct Error. . . . . . . 197 c. Jurisdiction to Maintain Status Quo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198 i. Jurisdiction to Modify Injunction . . . . . . . . . . . 198 ii. Jurisdiction to Award Sanctions.. . . . . . . . . . . . 199 iii. Jurisdiction to Adjudicate Substantive Rights. . 199 V. SCOPE OF APPEAL (Which Orders and Issues Are Considered on Appeal). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 A. ORDERS CONSIDERED ON APPEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 1. ORDERS CONSIDERED ON APPEAL FROM FINAL DECISION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 a. Rulings That Merge into a Final Judgment. . . . . . . . . 200 i. Partial Dismissal.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 ii. Partial Summary Judgment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201 iii. Denial of Immunity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201 iv. New Trial Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201 v. Class Certification Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201 vi. Transfer Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202 vii. Disqualification Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202 viii. Contempt Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202 ix. Interlocutory Injunctive Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203 x. Order Certified for Permissive Interlocutory Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 xi. Refusal to Rule on Motion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 b. Rulings That Do Not Merge into Final Judgment. . . . 204 i. Interlocutory Orders Not Affecting Outcome. . 204 ii. Certain Collateral Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205 -xv-
  • 17. iii. Orders Certified under Rule 54(b). . . . . . . . . . . 205 iv. Certain Orders Denying Summary Judgment.. . 206 v. Certain Orders Denying Remand. . . . . . . . . . . . 207 vi. Orders Preceding Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208 vii. Post-Judgment Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209 2. ORDERS CONSIDERED ON APPEAL FROM AN INJUNCTIVE ORDER UNDER § 1292(a)(1).. . . . . . . . . . . 209 a. Order Granting or Denying Summary Judgment. . . . . 210 b. Order Denying Remand. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211 c. Order Granting or Denying Sanctions. . . . . . . . . . . . . 211 d. Entry of Default. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211 e. Order Certifying Class. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 f. Order Modifying Or Refusing to Modify Injunction. . 212 g. Order Compelling Arbitration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213 h. Entry of Final Judgment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213 3. ORDERS CONSIDERED ON APPEAL FROM AN ORDER CERTIFIED UNDER § 1292(b).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214 a. Only Certified Order May Be Reviewed. . . . . . . . . . . 214 b. Any Ruling Contained in Certified Order May Be Reviewed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214 4. ORDERS CONSIDERED ON APPEAL FROM AN ORDER CERTIFIED UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 54(b). . . . . . . . . . . . 215 5. ORDERS CONSIDERED ON APPEAL FROM A COLLATERAL ORDER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216 a. Review of Related Rulings Permitted.. . . . . . . . . . . . . 216 b. Review of Related Rulings Not Permitted. . . . . . . . . . 217 6. ORDERS CONSIDERED ON APPEAL FROM A POST- JUDGMENT ORDER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218 a. Order Denying Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 Motion. . . . . . . . . . 218 b. Order Denying Motion to Intervene. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218 B. ISSUES CONSIDERED ON APPEAL (WAIVER). . . . . . . . . . . . 218 1. WAIVER OF JURISDICTIONAL ISSUE.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218 a. Appellate Jurisdiction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218 b. District Court Jurisdiction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219 i. Issue Not Waived. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219 ii. Issue Partially Waived. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220 -xvi-
  • 18. iii. Issue Waived. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221 2. WAIVER OF ISSUE IN DISTRICT COURT. . . . . . . . . . . . 222 a. General Rule. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222 i. Rule of Discretion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 ii. Waivable Issues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 iii. Waiver by Failure to Adequately Raise Issue. . 223 iv. Waiver by Stipulation or Concession. . . . . . . . . 225 b. Exceptions and Exemptions to Rule of Waiver. . . . . . 226 i. Preventing Manifest Injustice.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226 ii. Intervening Change in Law. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227 iii. Intervening Change in Circumstance. . . . . . . . . 227 iv. Pure Question of Law.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228 v. Issue Considered by District Court. . . . . . . . . . 229 vi. Alternative Basis for Affirming. . . . . . . . . . . . . 229 vii. Additional Citations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230 c. Waiver and Pleadings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230 i. Factual Allegations.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230 ii. Causes of Action. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230 iii. Affirmative Defenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231 iv. Request for Relief.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231 v. Repleading Dismissed Claims in Amended Complaint. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232 d. Waiver and Pretrial Motions.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232 i. Motion to Dismiss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232 ii. Motion for Summary Judgment. . . . . . . . . . . . . 233 e. Waiver of Trial Issues.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233 i. Peremptory Challenges.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233 ii. Admissibility of Evidence. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234 iii. Legal Theory. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234 iv. Jury Instructions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234 v. Consistency of Jury Findings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235 vi. Sufficiency of Evidence. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235 vii. Specificity of Court Findings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236 viii. Waiver and Post-Trial/Post-Judgment Submissions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237 f. Waiver of Magistrate/Special Master Issues. . . . . . . . 238 i. Waiver of Objections to Order of Reference. . . 238 -xvii-
  • 19. ii. Waiver of Objection to Magistrate’s Findings & Recommendations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239 iii. Waiver of Objection to Special Master’s Findings & Conclusions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240 3. WAIVER OF ISSUE IN COURT OF APPEALS. . . . . . . . . 241 a. Failure to Raise Issue in Earlier Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . 241 b. Failure to Adequately Brief Issue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241 i. Issue Waived. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242 ii. Issue Not Waived. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243 c. Failure to Provide Adequate Record on Appeal. . . . . . 244 d. Explicit Abandonment of Issue on Appeal. . . . . . . . . . 245 VI. BANKRUPTCY APPEALS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246 A. OVERVIEW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246 1. BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PROCESS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246 2. ORIGINS OF BANKRUPTCY APPEALS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246 a. Allocation of Original Bankruptcy Jurisdiction. . . . . . 246 b. Determining Origin of Bankruptcy Decision. . . . . . . . 247 i. Cases Involving District Courts. . . . . . . . . . . . . 247 ii. Cases Involving the BAP. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247 B. STATUTORY BASES FOR APPEAL TO NINTH CIRCUIT. . . . 247 1. APPEALS FROM DECISIONS OF BAP OR DISTRICT COURT ACTING IN APPELLATE CAPACITY. . . . . . . . . 247 a. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247 b. Finality under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248 i. Standard for Finality.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249 ii. Finality of Orders that Affirm or Reverse Outright. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250 iii. Finality of Orders Involving Remand. . . . . . . . 250 iv. Finality of Other BAP and District Court Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256 v. Determining Finality of Underlying Bankruptcy Court Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257 c. Other Bases for Ninth Circuit Review. . . . . . . . . . . . . 269 i. 28 U.S.C. § 1292. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269 ii. Mandamus. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270 -xviii-
  • 20. 2. APPEALS FROM DECISIONS OF DISTRICT COURT EXERCISING ORIGINAL BANKRUPTCY JURISDICTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270 a. Direct Appeal to the Ninth Circuit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270 b. Standards for Finality. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270 i. General Rule.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270 ii. “Special Exceptions”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271 iii. Collateral Order Doctrine & Forgay-Conrad Rule. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271 c. Appealability of Specific Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271 i. Appealable District Court Decisions. . . . . . . . . 271 ii. Non-Appealable District Court Decisions. . . . . 272 d. Effect of Appeal on District Court Jurisdiction. . . . . . 272 C. TIMELINESS OF BANKRUPTCY APPEALS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272 1. APPEAL FROM DECISION OF BAP OR DISTRICT COURT ACTING IN APPELLATE CAPACITY. . . . . . . . . 272 a. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273 b. Time to Appeal BAP or District Court Appellate Decision. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273 i. Basic Time Period. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273 ii. United States as a Party to a Bankruptcy Case. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274 iii. “Filing” of Notice of Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274 iv. Commencement of Time Period.. . . . . . . . . . . . 274 v. Computation of Appeal Deadline.. . . . . . . . . . . 275 c. Extensions of Time to Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275 d. Tolling Motions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275 i. Motion for Rehearing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275 ii. Time in Which to File Motion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275 iii. Restarting Time to Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276 iv. Need for New or Amended Notice of Appeal. . 276 e. Determining Timeliness of Underlying Appeal from Bankruptcy Court to BAP or District Court. . . . . . . . . 276 i. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276 ii. Time Period for Filing Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 277 iii. Procedure for Filing Notice. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 277 iv. Entry of Judgment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 277 -xix-
  • 21. v. Effect of Notice Filed Before Entry of Judgment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 278 vi. Extension of Time to Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 278 vii. Motions that Toll Time Period for Appeal. . . . . 279 2. APPEALS FROM DECISIONS OF DISTRICT COURT EXERCISING ORIGINAL BANKRUPTCY JURISDICTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280 D. SCOPE OF BANKRUPTCY APPEALS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280 1. MERGER OF INTERLOCUTORY RULINGS INTO FINAL JUDGMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280 a. General Rule. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280 b. Rulings that Merge. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280 c. Rulings that Do Not Merge. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281 d. Issues Undecided Below.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283 2. WAIVER OF ISSUES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283 E. DECISIONS BARRED FROM REVIEW IN COURT OF APPEALS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284 1. DECISIONS WHETHER TO REMAND TO STATE COURT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284 2. DECISIONS WHETHER TO ABSTAIN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285 3. DECISIONS WHETHER TO DISMISS OR STAY. . . . . . . 285 4. DECISIONS NOT APPEALABLE BY CERTAIN ENTITIES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285 a. Securities and Exchange Commission. . . . . . . . . . . . . 285 b. Federal Transportation Agencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286 c. Labor Unions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286 d. State and Local Commissions.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286 e. State Attorneys General. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286 F. CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES IN BANKRUPTCY APPEALS. . . 286 1. STANDING TO APPEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286 a. General Rule. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286 b. Examples of Standing to Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 287 c. Examples of No Standing to Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289 2. MOOTNESS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289 a. Appeals Concerning Property Transactions. . . . . . . . . 289 i. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289 ii. Broad Application of Stay Requirement. . . . . . 290 -xx-
  • 22. iii. Good Faith Requirement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290 iv. Need for Transaction Participants to Be Present on Appeal to Avoid Mootness.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292 v. Exceptions to Mootness. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292 vi. Rejected Theories for Avoiding Mootness.. . . . 294 vii. Scope of Mootness. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294 b. Appeals Concerning Loan Transactions. . . . . . . . . . . . 295 c. Appeals Concerning Reorganization Plans. . . . . . . . . 296 d. Payment of, or Inability to Pay, Judgments, Settlements or Fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297 i. Payment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297 ii. Inability to Pay. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298 e. Dismissal of Bankruptcy Case While Appeal is Pending. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 299 f. Nature of Stay Needed to Prevent Mootness. . . . . . . . 300 i. Stay Must Be Issued by Court with Jurisdiction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300 ii. Stay Must Pertain to Affected Transactions.. . . 300 iii. Stay Must Cover Time of Affected Transactions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300 VII. AGENCY AND TAX COURT APPEALS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301 A. AGENCY DECISIONS GENERALLY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301 1. INITIATING APPELLATE REVIEW OF AGENCY DECISIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301 2. AGENCY DECISIONS FOR WHICH DIRECT REVIEW BY THE COURT OF APPEALS IS AUTHORIZED. . . . . . . . . 301 a. Specific Agencies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301 b. Venue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 307 c. Time in Which to Petition for Review.. . . . . . . . . . . . 307 B. IMMIGRATION CASES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308 C. TAX COURT DECISIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308 1. INITIATING APPELLATE REVIEW OF TAX COURT DECISIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308 2. VENUE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308 3. TIME IN WHICH TO FILE NOTICE OF APPEAL. . . . . . . 308 -xxi-
  • 23. VIII. DIRECT CRIMINAL APPEALS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310 A. APPEAL BY DEFENDANT (28 U.S.C. § 1291, 1292(a)(1)). . . . . 310 1. STATUTORY AUTHORITY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310 a. Final Judgment (Sentence). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310 b. Interlocutory Order (Injunction). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310 c. Collateral Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311 i. Collateral Order Doctrine.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311 ii. Pendent Jurisdiction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 312 2. ASSETS SEIZURE OR RESTRAINT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313 3. BAIL DECISION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313 a. Pretrial Bail.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313 b. Bail Pending Appeal by Federal Defendants. . . . . . . . 314 c. Bail in Habeas Cases Brought by State Prisoners. . . . 315 d. Bail in Extradition Cases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315 e. Bail in Cases Concerning Revocation of Supervised Release or Probation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315 i. Bail Pending Disposition in District Court. . . . 315 ii. Bail Pending Appeal.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315 4. COMMITMENT ORDER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315 5. CONSTITUTIONALITY OF DEATH PENALTY STATUTE.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316 6. DANGEROUSNESS HEARING UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 4246 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316 7. DISCLOSURE OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION. . . . . . . 316 8. DISCOVERY REQUESTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316 9. DISMISSAL OF INDICTMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316 10. DISQUALIFICATION OF COUNSEL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317 11. DOUBLE JEOPARDY AND SUCCESSIVE PROSECUTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317 a. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317 b. Double Punishment.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318 c. Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 319 d. Successive Prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 5032. . . . . 319 12. GRAND JURY IRREGULARITIES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 319 13. IMMUNITY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 320 14. INDICTMENT CLAUSE VIOLATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321 -xxii-
  • 24. 15. JURISDICTION OF DISTRICT COURT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321 16. JUVENILE PROSECUTED AS ADULT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321 17. JUVENILE RIGHT TO SPEEDY TRIAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 322 18. LACK OF FAIR WARNING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 322 19. PLEA AGREEMENTS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 322 20. PRIMARY JURISDICTION DOCTRINE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 322 21. PROBABLE CAUSE DETERMINATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323 22. PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323 a. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323 b. Vindictive or Selective Prosecution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323 23. RES JUDICATA AND COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL. . . . . . 324 24. RETURN OF PROPERTY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 324 25. SHACKLING ORDER.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 324 26. SPEEDY TRIAL RIGHTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 324 a. Sixth Amendment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 324 b. Speedy Trial Act. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 324 c. Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act.. . . . . . . . . . . . 325 27. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325 28. SUFFICIENCY OF INDICTMENT.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325 29. SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE OR RETURN OF PROPERTY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325 a. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325 b. Criminal Proceedings Pending. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 326 30. TRANSFER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 326 B. APPEAL BY GOVERNMENT (28 U.S.C. § 1291, 18 U.S.C. § 3731). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327 1. STATUTORY AUTHORITY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327 a. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327 b. 18 U.S.C. § 3731. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327 c. 28 U.S.C. § 1291. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327 d. Appeal by State Government. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328 i. Order Denying Remand. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328 ii. Other Orders.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328 2. ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL, NEW TRIAL, OR ACQUITTAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 328 a. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329 i. Order of Dismissal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329 -xxiii-
  • 25. ii. Order Tantamount to Dismissal. . . . . . . . . . . . . 329 iii. Order Granting New Trial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329 iv. Acquittal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 329 b. Double Jeopardy Limitations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 330 i. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 330 ii. Attachment of Jeopardy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 330 iii. “Acquittal” of Defendant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 331 c. Further Factual Proceedings Necessary. . . . . . . . . . . . 335 i. General Rule.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 335 ii. Need for Formal Finding of Guilt. . . . . . . . . . . 335 d. Scope of Double Jeopardy Bar. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336 i. Alternative Theories of Liability. . . . . . . . . . . . 336 ii. Separate Counts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336 e. Use of Mandamus to Avoid Double Jeopardy Bar. . . . 337 3. ORDER SUPPRESSING/EXCLUDING EVIDENCE OR REQUIRING RETURN OF SEIZED PROPERTY. . . . . . . . 337 a. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337 b. Provision Broadly Interpreted. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 338 c. Certification Requirement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339 i. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339 ii. No Purpose of Delay. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340 iii. “Substantial Proof of a Fact Material” . . . . . . . 340 iv. Timing of Certification.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 340 d. Double Jeopardy Limitation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341 e. Cross-Appeals by Defendants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341 4. ORDER IMPOSING SENTENCE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 342 a. Sentence Imposed under Guidelines.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 342 b. Other Sentences and Related Orders. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 342 5. ORDER RELEASING PERSON CHARGED OR CONVICTED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 343 6. OTHER ORDERS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 343 a. Additional Orders Appealable by the Government. . . 344 b. Additional Orders Not Appealable by the Government. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 345 C. APPEALS CONCERNING GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS. . . . 345 1. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 346 -xxiv-
  • 26. 2. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 346 3. ORDER CONFINING RECALCITRANT WITNESS (28 U.S.C. § 1826). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 346 4. ORDER DENYING KASTIGAR HEARING. . . . . . . . . . . . . 347 5. ORDER GRANTING OR DENYING DISCLOSURE OF GRAND JURY MATERIALS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 347 a. Disclosure Motions Made During Criminal Proceedings.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 347 b. Independent Actions Seeking Disclosure. . . . . . . . . . . 347 D. APPEALS FROM DECISIONS OF MAGISTRATE JUDGES. . . 348 1. INITIAL APPEAL TO DISTRICT COURT. . . . . . . . . . . . . 348 a. Statutory Authority. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 348 b. Time in Which to Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 348 c. Appeals Mistakenly Taken to Ninth Circuit. . . . . . . . . 348 2. APPEALS FROM DISTRICT COURT TO NINTH CIRCUIT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349 a. Statutory Authority. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349 i. Government Appeals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349 ii. Appeals by Defendants.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349 iii. Appealability of Non-Final District Court Decisions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349 E. APPEALS CONCERNING DEFENSE FEES AND COMPENSATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 350 1. DISTRICT COURT JURISDICTION OVER FEE APPLICATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 350 2. AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 350 F. TIMELINESS OF CRIMINAL APPEALS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351 1. NON-JURISDICTIONAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351 2. TIME TO FILE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351 a. Appeal by Defendant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 351 b. Appeal by Government.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352 3. APPLICABILITY OF FED. R. APP. P. 4(b) TIME LIMITS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352 a. Cases Governed by Rule 4(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352 b. Cases Not Governed by Rule 4(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 353 4. COMPUTATION OF APPEAL DEADLINE. . . . . . . . . . . . 354 -xxv-
  • 27. a. Days Counted. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 354 b. Date Notice of Appeal “Filed”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 354 5. “ENTRY” OF JUDGMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 354 6. DOCUMENTS CONSTRUED AS NOTICE OF APPEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 355 7. PREMATURE NOTICE OF APPEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 355 8. EXTENSION OF TIME TO APPEAL (EXCUSABLE NEGLECT). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 356 a. Timing of Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 356 i. Appeal Outside 30-Day Extension Period. . . . . 356 ii. Appeal Within 30-Day Extension Period. . . . . . 356 b. Express Finding by District Court. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357 c. “Excusable Neglect” Standard under Pioneer. . . . . . . 357 d. Determining Excusable Neglect. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357 i. Lack of Notice from Clerk. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357 ii. Mistake of Counsel.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358 iii. Other Grounds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358 9. EFFECT OF POST-JUDGMENT MOTIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . 358 a. Motion for Reconsideration (by Defendant or Government). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358 b. Other Post-Judgment Motions (by Defendant).. . . . . . 359 c. Notice of Appeal Filed While Post-Judgment Motion Pending. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359 G. SCOPE OF DIRECT CRIMINAL APPEALS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360 1. ISSUES NOT RAISED BELOW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360 a. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360 b. Plain Error. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360 c. Other Grounds. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 361 2. SCOPE OF APPEAL BY DEFENDANT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 361 a. Review of Interlocutory Order on Appeal from Final Judgment.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 361 b. Ability of Other Defendants to Join in Appeal. . . . . . . 362 c. Appeals from Separate Cases Arising from Same Conduct.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362 d. Appeal Following Unconditional Guilty Plea. . . . . . . 362 i. General Rule.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362 ii. Specific Claims Waived by Guilty Plea. . . . . . . 363 -xxvi-
  • 28. iii. Specific Claims Not Waived by Guilty Plea. . . 364 e. Appeal Following Conditional Guilty Plea. . . . . . . . . 365 f. Appeal Following Guilty Plea under Rule 11(c)(1)(C) Agreement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 365 g. Waiver of Right to Appeal in Plea Agreement. . . . . . . 366 i. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 366 ii. Non-Waivable Issues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 366 iii. Scope of Appeal Waiver. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 367 3. SCOPE OF APPEAL BY GOVERNMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . 371 a. Interlocutory Appeal from Successive Orders. . . . . . . 371 b. Effect of Contents of Notice of Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . 371 H. EFFECT OF APPEAL ON DISTRICT COURT JURISDICTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372 1. EFFECT OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS. . . . . . . . . . . . 372 a. Appeal by Defendant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372 i. General Rule.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372 ii. Exceptions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372 b. Appeal by Government.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373 2. EFFECT OF APPEAL AFTER SENTENCING. . . . . . . . . . 373 a. Effect on Trial of Severed Counts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373 b. Effect on Motion for New Trial under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373 c. Effect on Entry of Factual Findings under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 374 d. Effect on Correction of Sentence under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 374 e. Effect on Collateral Attack on Proceedings. . . . . . . . . 374 I. MANDAMUS REVIEW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 375 1. GENERAL PRINCIPLES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 375 a. Jurisdictional Basis for Writs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 375 b. General Standards.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 376 2. DEFENDANTS’ PETITIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 377 a. Appointment of Public Defender. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 377 b. Arraignment by Closed-Circuit Television. . . . . . . . . 377 c. Authority of Government Attorney. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 377 d. Bail in Habeas Cases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 377 e. Constitutionality of Death Penalty Provision. . . . . . . . 377 -xxvii-
  • 29. f. Dangerousness of Defendant. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 378 g. Disqualification of Defense Counsel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 378 h. Grand Jury Irregularities.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 378 i. Restraint Order Directed at Counsel.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 378 j. Sealing of Defendant’s Financial Information. . . . . . . 379 k. Speedy Trial Act Violation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 379 l. Transfer.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 379 m. Urinalysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 379 n. Venue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 379 3. GOVERNMENT PETITIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380 a. Arrest Warrants.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380 b. Bill of Particulars. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380 c. Defenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380 d. Discovery. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380 e. Removal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 381 f. Splitting Elements of Crime for Trial. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 381 4. THIRD-PARTY PETITIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 381 a. Petition by Media Seeking Access. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 381 b. Petition by Material Witness Seeking Release. . . . . . . 381 J. MOOTNESS IN CRIMINAL APPEALS.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 382 1. LAPSE OF GRAND JURY TERM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 382 2. RETURN OF INDICTMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 382 3. ISSUANCE OF SUPERCEDING CHARGES. . . . . . . . . . . 382 4. CONVICTION OF DEFENDANT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383 5. RELEASE OF DEFENDANT FROM CONFINEMENT. . . 383 a. Bail Issues.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383 b. Defendants’ Challenges to Merits of Conviction. . . . . 383 c. Government Challenge to Reversal of Conviction. . . . 384 d. Challenge to Sentences. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 384 i. Initial Sentences. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 385 ii. Additional Sentences Imposed on Revocation of Probation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 385 e. Challenges to Competency Proceedings.. . . . . . . . . . . 385 6. DEPORTATION OF DEFENDANT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 386 7. DEFENDANTS’ FUGITIVE STATUS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 386 a. Government Appeals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 386 i. Bail Issues. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 386 -xxviii-
  • 30. ii. Issues Concerning Reversal of Conviction. . . . 386 b. Appeals by Defendants (Fugitive Disentitlement Doctrine). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 387 i. General Rule Regarding Escape While Appeal is Pending.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 387 ii. Dismissal Not Constitutionally Required. . . . . . 387 iii. Conditional Dismissals.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 388 iv. Application in Cases Where Defendants Return to Custody Prior to Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 388 8. DEATH OF DEFENDANT (Abatement Doctrine). . . . . . . . 389 IX. CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS ON FEDERAL JURISDICTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 391 A. STANDING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 391 1. GENERAL PRINCIPLES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 391 a. Constitutional Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 391 b. Prudential Limitations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 392 2. STANDING TO APPEAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 392 a. Party Status. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 392 i. Intervenors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 392 ii. Non-parties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 393 b. Aggrieved by Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 397 i. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 397 ii. Standing of Class Members. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 398 iii. Standing of Attorneys/Clients. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 398 iv. Standing of Prevailing Parties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 399 v. Remittitur Orders .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 399 vi. Standing to Appeal Voluntary Dismissal. . . . . . 400 B. MOOTNESS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 401 1. JURISDICTIONAL NATURE OF MOOTNESS. . . . . . . . . 401 2. GENERAL STANDARD FOR ASSESSING MOOTNESS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 401 a. Availability of Effective Relief. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 401 b. Kinds of Relief Available to Preclude Mootness. . . . . 402 i. Generally. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 402 ii. Focus on Injuries for Which Relief is Sought. . 402 -xxix-
  • 31. iii. Availability of Damages to Preclude Mootness. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 403 c. “Speculative Contingencies” Insufficient to Sustain Controversy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 403 d. Controversy Must Continue Throughout Litigation. . . 404 3. EXCEPTIONS TO MOOTNESS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405 a. “Capable of Repetition Yet Evading Review”. . . . . . . 405 i. General Standard. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405 ii. Events Capable of Being Stayed Pending Appeal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405 iii. Particular Cases Found Justiciable. . . . . . . . . . . 406 iv. Particular Cases Found Not Justiciable. . . . . . . 407 b. Voluntary Cessation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 408 i. General Standard. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 408 ii. Particular Cases Found Justiciable. . . . . . . . . . . 408 iii. Particular Cases Not Justiciable. . . . . . . . . . . . . 409 4. MOOTNESS PRINCIPLES IN PARTICULAR CONTEXTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 410 a. Cases Involving Changes to Legislation or Regulations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 410 i. Generally . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 410 ii. Cases Not Mooted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 410 iii. Cases Mooted. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 411 b. Declaratory Relief Cases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 412 c. Cases Involving Property. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 412 i. Cases Not Mooted. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 412 ii. Cases Mooted. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 413 d. In Rem and Civil Forfeiture Cases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 413 e. Preliminary Injunction Cases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 414 f. Cases Regarding Summons and Subpoenas. . . . . . . . . 414 g. Class Actions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 415 h. Cases Concerning Intervention.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 416 i. Insurance Cases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 416 j. Environmental Cases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 416 5. SCOPE OF MOOTING EVENT’S EFFECT.. . . . . . . . . . . . 417 a. Relationship Among Claims for Retrospective and Prospective Relief.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 417 -xxx-
  • 32. b. Relationship between Merits and Claims for Attorney’s Fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 418 6. PROCEDURAL ASPECTS OF MOOTNESS. . . . . . . . . . . . 418 a. Duty of Counsel to Notify Court. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 418 b. Burden of Proof. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 419 c. Disposition of Moot Appeals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 419 -xxxi-