This is a First Amendment case implicating the rights of artists in New Orleans that I had the pleasure of working on while serving as a judicial extern in Federal District Court.
Michael Dinwiddie is an accomplished playwright, screenwriter, and musician who served as my advisor at NYU\’s Gallatin School, and continues to be a valuable resource and great friend to this day.
This is a casenote I wrote concerning the tenuous balance between public domain works and the Foreign Works Restoration Act, which essentially takes foreign works out of the public domain in the US and "re-copyrights" them, essentially upending the federal copyright regime.
This is a legal comment I wrote and submitted to the Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, addressing the first criminal prosecution of an upper cadre official of the Khymer Rouge, which ravaged Cambodia in the aftermath of the Vietnam War.
A short review by the "All Songs Considered" segment of NPR showcasing the song "Who Have I to Blame" by The Apple Bros., my brothers and bandmates up in Manhattan.
Michael Dinwiddie is an accomplished playwright, screenwriter, and musician who served as my advisor at NYU\’s Gallatin School, and continues to be a valuable resource and great friend to this day.
This is a casenote I wrote concerning the tenuous balance between public domain works and the Foreign Works Restoration Act, which essentially takes foreign works out of the public domain in the US and "re-copyrights" them, essentially upending the federal copyright regime.
This is a legal comment I wrote and submitted to the Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, addressing the first criminal prosecution of an upper cadre official of the Khymer Rouge, which ravaged Cambodia in the aftermath of the Vietnam War.
A short review by the "All Songs Considered" segment of NPR showcasing the song "Who Have I to Blame" by The Apple Bros., my brothers and bandmates up in Manhattan.
Our aim is to create a visual archive of different actors and movements around the globe focused on art labour. We think this is will grow into a great resource and encourage all persons working in art and culture to submit their materials to this public archive.
42212 Washingtonpost.com New York Art Show in a Heap of Con.docxalinainglis
4/22/12 Washingtonpost.com: New York Art Show in a Heap of Controversy
1/4www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/daily/sept99/brooklyn24.htm
On The Web
The Brooklyn
Museum of Art
New York Art Show in a Heap of Controversy
By Paula Span
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, September 24, 1999; Page C1
NEW YORK, Sept. 23—He's particularly outraged, Mayor Rudolph
Giuliani has said, by a collage of the Virgin Mary dotted with elephant
dung. He isn't impressed by the pickled pig carcasses, either. And he's
taken dead aim at the Brooklyn Museum of Art: It will lose $7 million
in city funds, he warns, unless it cancels a "sick" exhibit of British
works scheduled to open next week.
But the museum has vowed that the show will proceed regardless.
And all the usual parties--outraged defenders of religion, infuriated
civil libertarians, art world types rolling their eyes--are taking up their
now-accustomed positions. The Culture Wars have flared anew, this
time in a city that likes to think it's above such things and a state where
the jousting may draw in would-be senator Hillary Rodham Clinton.
"Sensation: Young British Artists From the Saatchi Collection," which
has already drawn throngs in London and Berlin, always aimed to be
provocative. Its 90 works include a rotting cow's head and a shark
preserved in a tank of formaldehyde, both by internationally known
take-that artist Damien Hirst, another artist's sculpture made from his
own frozen blood, and a portrait of a convicted child murderer
fashioned from what look like tiny handprints. The Brooklyn
Museum's ad agency came up with a cheerful mock "health warning"
that's run in several publications and is slated to appear on city buses
and in a half-page New York Times ad: "The contents of this
exhibition may cause shock, vomiting, confusion, panic, euphoria and
anxiety."
But shock and confusion arose earlier than expected, once a Daily
News story brought the show to the attention of the combative mayor.
The City of New York provides almost a third of the Brooklyn
Museum's $23 million annual operating budget, and Giuliani has
announced that its monthly check won't be in the mail on Oct. 1 as
long as "Sensation" remains on the calendar. Giuliani's probable
opponent in next year's Senate race had nothing to say on the subject
today, but the mayor had plenty.
When a reporter asked Giuliani at his regular news briefing
Wednesday whether the exhibit was offensive, he let fly. "Well, it
offends me," he said. "The idea, in the name of art, of having a city-
4/22/12 Washingtonpost.com: New York Art Show in a Heap of Controversy
2/4www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/daily/sept99/brooklyn24.htm
subsidized building have so-called works of art in which people are
throwing elephant dung at a picture of the Virgin Mary is sick. If
someone wants to do that privately and pay for it privately, that's what
the First Amendment is all about. . . . But to have the government
subsidize something like t.
Important Artworks by Moore, Marini, Meyer will Headline Ahlers & Ogletree's ...associate14
Ahlers & Ogletree is inviting the public to join them in a grand opening preview reception on Tuesday, June 13th, from 5-8 pm, at their new Atlanta gallery location off of Howell Mill Road.
Appendix B: Erin Riggins, “Stateside Modern: Marguerite Zorach and the American Modernists,” Visual Essay Exhibition Project for American Modernism: Alfred Stieglitz’s America, Fall 2017
Experience the thrill of Progressive Puzzle Adventures, like Scavenger Hunt Games and Escape Room Activities combined Solve Treasure Hunt Puzzles online.
More Related Content
Similar to New Orleans Times-Picayune - First Amendment Case
Our aim is to create a visual archive of different actors and movements around the globe focused on art labour. We think this is will grow into a great resource and encourage all persons working in art and culture to submit their materials to this public archive.
42212 Washingtonpost.com New York Art Show in a Heap of Con.docxalinainglis
4/22/12 Washingtonpost.com: New York Art Show in a Heap of Controversy
1/4www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/daily/sept99/brooklyn24.htm
On The Web
The Brooklyn
Museum of Art
New York Art Show in a Heap of Controversy
By Paula Span
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, September 24, 1999; Page C1
NEW YORK, Sept. 23—He's particularly outraged, Mayor Rudolph
Giuliani has said, by a collage of the Virgin Mary dotted with elephant
dung. He isn't impressed by the pickled pig carcasses, either. And he's
taken dead aim at the Brooklyn Museum of Art: It will lose $7 million
in city funds, he warns, unless it cancels a "sick" exhibit of British
works scheduled to open next week.
But the museum has vowed that the show will proceed regardless.
And all the usual parties--outraged defenders of religion, infuriated
civil libertarians, art world types rolling their eyes--are taking up their
now-accustomed positions. The Culture Wars have flared anew, this
time in a city that likes to think it's above such things and a state where
the jousting may draw in would-be senator Hillary Rodham Clinton.
"Sensation: Young British Artists From the Saatchi Collection," which
has already drawn throngs in London and Berlin, always aimed to be
provocative. Its 90 works include a rotting cow's head and a shark
preserved in a tank of formaldehyde, both by internationally known
take-that artist Damien Hirst, another artist's sculpture made from his
own frozen blood, and a portrait of a convicted child murderer
fashioned from what look like tiny handprints. The Brooklyn
Museum's ad agency came up with a cheerful mock "health warning"
that's run in several publications and is slated to appear on city buses
and in a half-page New York Times ad: "The contents of this
exhibition may cause shock, vomiting, confusion, panic, euphoria and
anxiety."
But shock and confusion arose earlier than expected, once a Daily
News story brought the show to the attention of the combative mayor.
The City of New York provides almost a third of the Brooklyn
Museum's $23 million annual operating budget, and Giuliani has
announced that its monthly check won't be in the mail on Oct. 1 as
long as "Sensation" remains on the calendar. Giuliani's probable
opponent in next year's Senate race had nothing to say on the subject
today, but the mayor had plenty.
When a reporter asked Giuliani at his regular news briefing
Wednesday whether the exhibit was offensive, he let fly. "Well, it
offends me," he said. "The idea, in the name of art, of having a city-
4/22/12 Washingtonpost.com: New York Art Show in a Heap of Controversy
2/4www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/daily/sept99/brooklyn24.htm
subsidized building have so-called works of art in which people are
throwing elephant dung at a picture of the Virgin Mary is sick. If
someone wants to do that privately and pay for it privately, that's what
the First Amendment is all about. . . . But to have the government
subsidize something like t.
Important Artworks by Moore, Marini, Meyer will Headline Ahlers & Ogletree's ...associate14
Ahlers & Ogletree is inviting the public to join them in a grand opening preview reception on Tuesday, June 13th, from 5-8 pm, at their new Atlanta gallery location off of Howell Mill Road.
Appendix B: Erin Riggins, “Stateside Modern: Marguerite Zorach and the American Modernists,” Visual Essay Exhibition Project for American Modernism: Alfred Stieglitz’s America, Fall 2017
Similar to New Orleans Times-Picayune - First Amendment Case (20)
Experience the thrill of Progressive Puzzle Adventures, like Scavenger Hunt Games and Escape Room Activities combined Solve Treasure Hunt Puzzles online.
At Digidev, we are working to be the leader in interactive streaming platforms of choice by smart device users worldwide.
Our goal is to become the ultimate distribution service of entertainment content. The Digidev application will offer the next generation television highway for users to discover and engage in a variety of content. While also providing a fresh and
innovative approach towards advertainment with vast revenue opportunities. Designed and developed by Joe Q. Bretz
Hollywood Actress - The 250 hottest galleryZsolt Nemeth
Hollywood Actress amazon album eminent worldwide media, female-singer, actresses, alhletina-woman, 250 collection.
Highest and photoreal-print exclusive testament PC collage.
Focused television virtuality crime, novel.
The sheer afterlife of the work is activism-like hollywood-actresses point com.
173 Illustrate, 250 gallery, 154 blog, 120 TV serie logo, 17 TV president logo, 183 active hyperlink.
HD AI face enhancement 384 page plus Bowker ISBN, Congress LLCL or US Copyright.
Tom Selleck Net Worth: A Comprehensive Analysisgreendigital
Over several decades, Tom Selleck, a name synonymous with charisma. From his iconic role as Thomas Magnum in the television series "Magnum, P.I." to his enduring presence in "Blue Bloods," Selleck has captivated audiences with his versatility and charm. As a result, "Tom Selleck net worth" has become a topic of great interest among fans. and financial enthusiasts alike. This article delves deep into Tom Selleck's wealth, exploring his career, assets, endorsements. and business ventures that contribute to his impressive economic standing.
Follow us on: Pinterest
Early Life and Career Beginnings
The Foundation of Tom Selleck's Wealth
Born on January 29, 1945, in Detroit, Michigan, Tom Selleck grew up in Sherman Oaks, California. His journey towards building a large net worth began with humble origins. , Selleck pursued a business administration degree at the University of Southern California (USC) on a basketball scholarship. But, his interest shifted towards acting. leading him to study at the Hills Playhouse under Milton Katselas.
Minor roles in television and films marked Selleck's early career. He appeared in commercials and took on small parts in T.V. series such as "The Dating Game" and "Lancer." These initial steps, although modest. laid the groundwork for his future success and the growth of Tom Selleck net worth. Breakthrough with "Magnum, P.I."
The Role that Defined Tom Selleck's Career
Tom Selleck's breakthrough came with the role of Thomas Magnum in the CBS television series "Magnum, P.I." (1980-1988). This role made him a household name and boosted his net worth. The series' popularity resulted in Selleck earning large salaries. leading to financial stability and increased recognition in Hollywood.
"Magnum P.I." garnered high ratings and critical acclaim during its run. Selleck's portrayal of the charming and resourceful private investigator resonated with audiences. making him one of the most beloved television actors of the 1980s. The success of "Magnum P.I." played a pivotal role in shaping Tom Selleck net worth, establishing him as a major star.
Film Career and Diversification
Expanding Tom Selleck's Financial Portfolio
While "Magnum, P.I." was a cornerstone of Selleck's career, he did not limit himself to television. He ventured into films, further enhancing Tom Selleck net worth. His filmography includes notable movies such as "Three Men and a Baby" (1987). which became the highest-grossing film of the year, and its sequel, "Three Men and a Little Lady" (1990). These box office successes contributed to his wealth.
Selleck's versatility allowed him to transition between genres. from comedies like "Mr. Baseball" (1992) to westerns such as "Quigley Down Under" (1990). This diversification showcased his acting range. and provided many income streams, reinforcing Tom Selleck net worth.
Television Resurgence with "Blue Bloods"
Sustaining Wealth through Consistent Success
In 2010, Tom Selleck began starring as Frank Reagan i
Meet Dinah Mattingly – Larry Bird’s Partner in Life and Loveget joys
Get an intimate look at Dinah Mattingly’s life alongside NBA icon Larry Bird. From their humble beginnings to their life today, discover the love and partnership that have defined their relationship.
Scandal! Teasers June 2024 on etv Forum.co.zaIsaac More
Monday, 3 June 2024
Episode 47
A friend is compelled to expose a manipulative scheme to prevent another from making a grave mistake. In a frantic bid to save Jojo, Phakamile agrees to a meeting that unbeknownst to her, will seal her fate.
Tuesday, 4 June 2024
Episode 48
A mother, with her son's best interests at heart, finds him unready to heed her advice. Motshabi finds herself in an unmanageable situation, sinking fast like in quicksand.
Wednesday, 5 June 2024
Episode 49
A woman fabricates a diabolical lie to cover up an indiscretion. Overwhelmed by guilt, she makes a spontaneous confession that could be devastating to another heart.
Thursday, 6 June 2024
Episode 50
Linda unwittingly discloses damning information. Nhlamulo and Vuvu try to guide their friend towards the right decision.
Friday, 7 June 2024
Episode 51
Jojo's life continues to spiral out of control. Dintle weaves a web of lies to conceal that she is not as successful as everyone believes.
Monday, 10 June 2024
Episode 52
A heated confrontation between lovers leads to a devastating admission of guilt. Dintle's desperation takes a new turn, leaving her with dwindling options.
Tuesday, 11 June 2024
Episode 53
Unable to resort to violence, Taps issues a verbal threat, leaving Mdala unsettled. A sister must explain her life choices to regain her brother's trust.
Wednesday, 12 June 2024
Episode 54
Winnie makes a very troubling discovery. Taps follows through on his threat, leaving a woman reeling. Layla, oblivious to the truth, offers an incentive.
Thursday, 13 June 2024
Episode 55
A nosy relative arrives just in time to thwart a man's fatal decision. Dintle manipulates Khanyi to tug at Mo's heartstrings and get what she wants.
Friday, 14 June 2024
Episode 56
Tlhogi is shocked by Mdala's reaction following the revelation of their indiscretion. Jojo is in disbelief when the punishment for his crime is revealed.
Monday, 17 June 2024
Episode 57
A woman reprimands another to stay in her lane, leading to a damning revelation. A man decides to leave his broken life behind.
Tuesday, 18 June 2024
Episode 58
Nhlamulo learns that due to his actions, his worst fears have come true. Caiphus' extravagant promises to suppliers get him into trouble with Ndu.
Wednesday, 19 June 2024
Episode 59
A woman manages to kill two birds with one stone. Business doom looms over Chillax. A sobering incident makes a woman realize how far she's fallen.
Thursday, 20 June 2024
Episode 60
Taps' offer to help Nhlamulo comes with hidden motives. Caiphus' new ideas for Chillax have MaHilda excited. A blast from the past recognizes Dintle, not for her newfound fame.
Friday, 21 June 2024
Episode 61
Taps is hungry for revenge and finds a rope to hang Mdala with. Chillax's new job opportunity elicits mixed reactions from the public. Roommates' initial meeting starts off on the wrong foot.
Monday, 24 June 2024
Episode 62
Taps seizes new information and recruits someone on the inside. Mary's new job
Matt Rife Cancels Shows Due to Health Concerns, Reschedules Tour Dates.pdfAzura Everhart
Matt Rife's comedy tour took an unexpected turn. He had to cancel his Bloomington show due to a last-minute medical emergency. Fans in Chicago will also have to wait a bit longer for their laughs, as his shows there are postponed. Rife apologized and assured fans he'd be back on stage soon.
https://www.theurbancrews.com/celeb/matt-rife-cancels-bloomington-show/
_7 OTT App Builders to Support the Development of Your Video Applications_.pdfMega P
Due to their ability to produce engaging content more quickly, over-the-top (OTT) app builders have made the process of creating video applications more accessible. The invitation to explore these platforms emphasizes how over-the-top (OTT) applications hold the potential to transform digital entertainment.
240529_Teleprotection Global Market Report 2024.pdfMadhura TBRC
The teleprotection market size has grown
exponentially in recent years. It will grow from
$21.92 billion in 2023 to $28.11 billion in 2024 at a
compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 28.2%. The
teleprotection market size is expected to see
exponential growth in the next few years. It will grow
to $70.77 billion in 2028 at a compound annual
growth rate (CAGR) of 26.0%.
Skeem Saam in June 2024 available on ForumIsaac More
Monday, June 3, 2024 - Episode 241: Sergeant Rathebe nabs a top scammer in Turfloop. Meikie is furious at her uncle's reaction to the truth about Ntswaki.
Tuesday, June 4, 2024 - Episode 242: Babeile uncovers the truth behind Rathebe’s latest actions. Leeto's announcement shocks his employees, and Ntswaki’s ordeal haunts her family.
Wednesday, June 5, 2024 - Episode 243: Rathebe blocks Babeile from investigating further. Melita warns Eunice to stay clear of Mr. Kgomo.
Thursday, June 6, 2024 - Episode 244: Tbose surrenders to the police while an intruder meddles in his affairs. Rathebe's secret mission faces a setback.
Friday, June 7, 2024 - Episode 245: Rathebe’s antics reach Kganyago. Tbose dodges a bullet, but a nightmare looms. Mr. Kgomo accuses Melita of witchcraft.
Monday, June 10, 2024 - Episode 246: Ntswaki struggles on her first day back at school. Babeile is stunned by Rathebe’s romance with Bullet Mabuza.
Tuesday, June 11, 2024 - Episode 247: An unexpected turn halts Rathebe’s investigation. The press discovers Mr. Kgomo’s affair with a young employee.
Wednesday, June 12, 2024 - Episode 248: Rathebe chases a criminal, resorting to gunfire. Turf High is rife with tension and transfer threats.
Thursday, June 13, 2024 - Episode 249: Rathebe traps Kganyago. John warns Toby to stop harassing Ntswaki.
Friday, June 14, 2024 - Episode 250: Babeile is cleared to investigate Rathebe. Melita gains Mr. Kgomo’s trust, and Jacobeth devises a financial solution.
Monday, June 17, 2024 - Episode 251: Rathebe feels the pressure as Babeile closes in. Mr. Kgomo and Eunice clash. Jacobeth risks her safety in pursuit of Kganyago.
Tuesday, June 18, 2024 - Episode 252: Bullet Mabuza retaliates against Jacobeth. Pitsi inadvertently reveals his parents’ plans. Nkosi is shocked by Khwezi’s decision on LJ’s future.
Wednesday, June 19, 2024 - Episode 253: Jacobeth is ensnared in deceit. Evelyn is stressed over Toby’s case, and Letetswe reveals shocking academic results.
Thursday, June 20, 2024 - Episode 254: Elizabeth learns Jacobeth is in Mpumalanga. Kganyago's past is exposed, and Lehasa discovers his son is in KZN.
Friday, June 21, 2024 - Episode 255: Elizabeth confirms Jacobeth’s dubious activities in Mpumalanga. Rathebe lies about her relationship with Bullet, and Jacobeth faces theft accusations.
Monday, June 24, 2024 - Episode 256: Rathebe spies on Kganyago. Lehasa plans to retrieve his son from KZN, fearing what awaits.
Tuesday, June 25, 2024 - Episode 257: MaNtuli fears for Kwaito’s safety in Mpumalanga. Mr. Kgomo and Melita reconcile.
Wednesday, June 26, 2024 - Episode 258: Kganyago makes a bold escape. Elizabeth receives a shocking message from Kwaito. Mrs. Khoza defends her husband against scam accusations.
Thursday, June 27, 2024 - Episode 259: Babeile's skillful arrest changes the game. Tbose and Kwaito face a hostage crisis.
Friday, June 28, 2024 - Episode 260: Two women face the reality of being scammed. Turf is rocked by breaking
Modern Radio Frequency Access Control Systems: The Key to Efficiency and SafetyAITIX LLC
Today's fast-paced environment worries companies of all sizes about efficiency and security. Businesses are constantly looking for new and better solutions to solve their problems, whether it's data security or facility access. RFID for access control technologies have revolutionized this.
From the Editor's Desk: 115th Father's day Celebration - When we see Father's day in Hindu context, Nanda Baba is the most vivid figure which comes to the mind. Nanda Baba who was the foster father of Lord Krishna is known to provide love, care and affection to Lord Krishna and Balarama along with his wife Yashoda; Letter’s to the Editor: Mother's Day - Mother is a precious life for their children. Mother is life breath for her children. Mother's lap is the world happiness whose debt can never be paid.
1. New Orleans gets OK to enforce ban on selling art prints in Jac... http://blog.nola.com/news_impact/2009/07/new_orleans_gets_o...
New Orleans gets OK to enforce ban on selling art prints in Jackson Square
Posted by rvargas July 27, 2009 07:00AM
Eliot Kamenitz / The Times-
PicayuneArtist Jim Maurer of Mobile, Alabama hangs up on the fence outside Jackson Square, a just
completed painting of Marilyn Monroe on Monday, June 15, 2009. A federal judge recently upheld
New Orleans' law banning the sale of art prints on the sidewalks around Jackson Square to protect the
colony of artists that sell their original paintings and drawings there.
A federal judge has cleared the way for New Orleans to enforce its law banning artists from selling
prints on the sidewalks around Jackson Square (view live Jackson Square webcam ).
U.S. District Judge Ivan Lemelle said the city is within its rights in permitting the display and sale
only of works that "have been accomplished essentially by hand" and without the use of "any
mechanical or duplicative process." (See more New Orleans art news)
Although Lemelle had suggested three years ago that the city should adopt a "more narrowly tailored
ordinance" than a total ban on prints, the City Council refused to go along with his idea.
In a 14-page decision last week rejecting a suit by artist Holly Sarre challenging the city's law,
Lemelle said he had become "convinced that allowing print sales would subvert the creative,
improvisatory interplay between working artists and audiences that is inherent in the Jackson Square
experience."
However, he said, the issue may not be closed. "We predict . . . this matter will be revisited" as more
evidence becomes available over time about whether the city's restriction is justified, Lemelle wrote.
Artists have been exhibiting and selling their work around the historic square for generations, and for
1 of 10 7/27/09 10:18 AM
2. New Orleans gets OK to enforce ban on selling art prints in Jac... http://blog.nola.com/news_impact/2009/07/new_orleans_gets_o...
many years the city has banned the sale of anything but "original" paintings and drawings.
Sarre began several years ago to sell $35 prints of her more expensive acrylic-on-canvas renderings of
New Orleans scenes. Her actions roused the ire of other Jackson Square artists, who called on the
police to enforce the law prohibiting the sale of prints.
Sarre went to court in 2005, saying the law violates her rights of free speech under the First
Amendment and of "basic economic liberty" under the 14th Amendment. The ban on prints, her suit
said, "denies her the ability to pursue her chosen livelihood and is not rationally related to public
health, safety and welfare concerns."
The city responded that Sarre has other places to sell her prints, such as galleries or the French
Market's flea market, and that the city has a legitimate interest in preserving a thriving colony of
practicing artists at Jackson Square.
If artists such as Sarre were allowed to sell prints at lower prices than original works bring, the city
said, they would inevitably take the lion's share of the business, driving out many of the artists
producing original works and thus diluting the square's attractiveness to tourists and its value as part
of the French Quarter's overall appeal.
In July 2006, Lemelle ordered the city to consider allowing some artists at the square to sell prints of
their own works while ensuring that "a substantial majority" of total sales continued to involve
original works.
He said he thought such a regulation "could be fashioned without harm" to the square's "tout
ensemble, " or overall atmosphere and appearance, which he said the city "has a genuine interest in
maintaining."
In April 2007, the council considered amending the law to allow every Jackson Square artist to "sell
reproductions of his or her own paintings, sketches and drawings, " provided they did not generate
more than 20 percent of the artist's total sales. Another idea was to restrict print sales to a limited
edition of 100 signed and numbered copies of an original painting or drawing.
Tommy Milliner, the attorney for the Jackson Square Artists Association, told the council that major
French Quarter business and residential organizations all supported the total ban on prints. Removing
it would lead to the "extermination" of the square's artists colony, he warned.
In the end, and at the urging of Councilman James Carter, whose district includes the French Quarter,
the council decided unanimously to stick with the total ban on prints.
Councilwoman Stacy Head said the city couldn't enforce a law designating what percentage of an
artist's sales could be from what type of art or setting up other complex rules.
"We need to protect what's unique about the French Quarter, " Councilman Arnie Fielkow said.
The council's arguments appeared to carry weight with Lemelle. Although the total ban "may not be
the most narrowly tailored regulation possible, judicial deference should be afforded" to the council's
2 of 10 7/27/09 10:18 AM
3. New Orleans gets OK to enforce ban on selling art prints in Jac... http://blog.nola.com/news_impact/2009/07/new_orleans_gets_o...
position that allowing print sales at Jackson Square would "threaten the survival of a unique and
historical artists colony, " he said.
He said Sarre and other artists wishing to sell prints can do so at the French Market, in print shops or
on the Internet.
The city has generally refrained from enforcing the ban on prints at the square while the lawsuit has
been pending, but it is now free to resume enforcement.
Bruce Eggler can be reached at beggler@timespicayune.com or 504.826.3320.
• More metro New Orleans news
Categories: City Hall, N.O., Entertainment, Interact, News, News: New Orleans, The Arts
Comments
Hermicane says...
I mis-read the headline, thinking the ban was on art. You can buy prints anywhere, let's leave Jackson
Square to the real artists like this law wants. (FINALLY--a law I can agree with!)
Posted on 07/27/09 at 7:37AM
rhythmnola says...
I'm sorry, but I don't see what the Three Stooges have anything to do with Jackson Square and it's
history.
And God knows we have enough stooges at City Hall.
So people that wish to buy celebrity prints and silkscreens can go somewhere's else.
Posted on 07/27/09 at 7:44AM
Candycan says...
I am so glad (I am not an artist) that the artists on the square will sell only original art works. Keep the
integrity of the artists' colony. Good call.
Posted on 07/27/09 at 7:44AM
GreenOnions says...
For once, I agree with you Hermicane. The artists producing their original works in and around
Jackson Square are a part of our city's cultural tapestry. The street performers, fortune tellers,
musicians, and artists are all some of the the many reasons why people visit our city. Entertaining
visitors and selling artwork provides these folks with an honest living and the money they make is
3 of 10 7/27/09 10:18 AM
4. New Orleans gets OK to enforce ban on selling art prints in Jac... http://blog.nola.com/news_impact/2009/07/new_orleans_gets_o...
cycled right back into our economy.
Why would we want to threaten this by allowing mass-produced stuff to be sold right alongside them?
There are dozens of shops where prints are readily available elsewhere in the Quarter.
Posted on 07/27/09 at 7:45AM
feedupnola says...
I agree. This is a good law. If we allow prints the next thing hanging on the fence in Jackson Square
will be T-Shirts from Canal Street and the French Market vendors. We all can agree we don't need
anymore of these vendors here in the city.
Posted on 07/27/09 at 7:46AM
feedupnola says...
I agree. This is a good law. If we allow prints the next thing hanging on the fence in Jackson Square
will be T-Shirts from Canal Street and the French Market vendors. We all can agree we don't need
anymore of these vendors here in the city.
Posted on 07/27/09 at 7:47AM
underdike says...
I like art. I like looking, hearing, tasting, feeling and smelling art. I like to try to make art. Sometimes
I make art not everyone would describe as art.
But, really, this isn't really about art. This is about tradition and trying to preserve something precious
- painters displaying paintings in Jackson Square. The painters do add to the positive character of
Jackson Square. Aside from the ice cream cart, IMHO, the hucksters and jivvers, including scam artist
palm reader, fortune tellers, astrologists and the like DETRACT from the positive character. So do
display/sales of reproductions - next they might sell unboxed chia pets as art.
Although I'm really a huge fan of photography, I completely understand why reproductions, rather
than original hand made art, shouldn't clutter up the square. I believe it is best for the future of our
city to try to make it only ok to display/sell original hand made paintings/pastels/charcoals/pencil
sketches on paper, canvas, slate, what have you if you want to do your thing in Jackson Square.
Otherwise, Mr. or Ms. Artist, use the flea market or a gallery. Please take no offense, but reproduced
art, is not the type of art our community needs to display in Jackson Square.
Posted on 07/27/09 at 7:49AM
feedupnola says...
I agree with this law. If we allow prints of works here the next thing hanging on the fences in Jackson
4 of 10 7/27/09 10:18 AM
5. New Orleans gets OK to enforce ban on selling art prints in Jac... http://blog.nola.com/news_impact/2009/07/new_orleans_gets_o...
Square will be T-Shirts from the French Market and Canal Street Vendors. We can all agree we don't
need anymore of these vendors here in the city.
Posted on 07/27/09 at 7:49AM
Hermicane says...
GreenOnions, altho I can't recall ever disagreeing with you (unless you had a different login) your
post elaborated exactly on why this is a good thing. Well said!
Posted on 07/27/09 at 7:57AM
Astrid says...
It should be original art work only and it should be sold only by the artist. The artist should
demonstrate on the spot that he/she can and does produce the art.
Portraits on display to show the artist style and ability should be done by the artist and not someone
else so that the ones getting the work will have the same quality or lack of in their portrait.
Each Pen and ink should be done in their entirety and not just a few lines added onto a photo copy.
Posted on 07/27/09 at 8:01AM
COLONELJPSO says...
ART PRINTS OR ORIGINAL PAINTED ART IS NO DIFFERENT IN TERMS OF EQUAL IT'S
STILL ART.... AND TO TELL ONE PERSON THEY CANNOT DISPLAY AND SELL THEIRS
,BUT IT'S OK FOR OTHERS TO DO THE SAME IS A CLEAR VIOLATION OF EQUAL
PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW AND POSSIBLY VIOLATES FREE SPEECH CLAUSES
ALSO ... APPEAL LEMELLE'S DECISION ALL THE WAY TO THE SUPREME COURT YOU
WILL WIN......
Posted on 07/27/09 at 8:01AM
COLONELJPSO says...
ART PRINTS OR ORIGINAL PAINTED ART IS NO DIFFERENT IN TERMS OF EQUAL IT'S
STILL ART.... AND TO TELL ONE PERSON THEY CANNOT DISPLAY AND SELL THEIRS
,BUT IT'S OK FOR OTHERS TO DO THE SAME IS A CLEAR VIOLATION OF EQUAL
PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW AND POSSIBLY VIOLATES FREE SPEECH CLAUSES
ALSO ... APPEAL LEMELLE'S DECISION ALL THE WAY TO THE SUPREME COURT YOU
WILL WIN......
Posted on 07/27/09 at 8:01AM
5 of 10 7/27/09 10:18 AM
6. New Orleans gets OK to enforce ban on selling art prints in Jac... http://blog.nola.com/news_impact/2009/07/new_orleans_gets_o...
yhnguik says...
Man, this hurts.....where am I gonna' sell my Saints' and Zephyrs'sports cards and the Elvis posters
????
LAWS SUCK !
Posted on 07/27/09 at 8:07AM
uptownray says...
good law. good job city council and judge!
Posted on 07/27/09 at 8:10AM
nolaw504 says...
this is so against the first amendment. this law will be struck down on appeal. I want my right to buy
posters of Michael Jackson in Jackson Square.
Posted on 07/27/09 at 8:14AM
NOLAman123 says...
This is absolutely wonderful! I am glad the judge agreed with the city in support of original works of
art. Protecting Jackson Square from turning into another knock off, tacky t-shirt shop selling cheap
prints on cardboard.
Posted on 07/27/09 at 8:17AM
NOLAman123 says...
This is absolutely wonderful! I am glad the judge agreed with the city in support of original works of
art. Protecting Jackson Square from turning into another knock off, tacky t-shirt shop selling cheap
prints on cardboard.
Posted on 07/27/09 at 8:17AM
nolaanarchy says...
While I can agree to the logic of keeping the space available for people who produce their own art, I
could see the argument for an artist to sell prints of their own art only, provided they can display the
original. This would allow them an additional income stream (I know artists who make 90% of their
income from prints of their own work because more people - especially tourists - will spend $30-$60
on the spot than will spend $300-$2500)
6 of 10 7/27/09 10:18 AM
7. New Orleans gets OK to enforce ban on selling art prints in Jac... http://blog.nola.com/news_impact/2009/07/new_orleans_gets_o...
I also think that photographers are getting the pointy end of the stick. Photographers are artists (and
like all artists there are good ones and not-so-good ones) and there are some amazing and very
"artistic" photos of New Orleans being created. These artists are not necessarily making any different
income than those who paint, sketch, sculpt or scribble. Some even mix their mediums for new
perspectives.
This law needs some tempering with another New Orleans tradition - "neutral ground".
Posted on 07/27/09 at 8:27AM
replay2u2 says...
Good law I hope it will be aggressively enforced. Jackson Square is looking more and more like
"Jittney Jungle"
Posted on 07/27/09 at 8:32AM
midcity42 says...
I agree with the print ban. I also do not believe that the "artist" from Alabama's work is anything more
than quickly made commercial-grade quick money for the "artist" rather than contributing a
substantial perspective upon reality (art.) Copying popular people and movies (other people's art) and
turning them into black-and-white screens with maybe a touch of color is not unique, in fact it rips off
many original works and ideas. Sorry. I want less of that cranked-out dorm-room crap hanging from
the fences of the Vieux Carre.
Posted on 07/27/09 at 8:39AM
5inchheels says...
I like the law and the ruling. You can buy prints and photos all over town. Jackson Square should
remain the preserve of working artists. It's part of New Orleans's (fast diminishing) charm.
Posted on 07/27/09 at 8:41AM
midcity42 says...
About the posters who claim that artists can sell posters and the like on th streets:
They can find a venue for their wares. If they are at the point that they can make commercial-grade
copies of their work it is time for the artists to get off the streets and find a gallery or other
commercial outlet. The street should be starting-off point and not a final destination. Thank God the
city understands this point.
Posted on 07/27/09 at 8:42AM
7 of 10 7/27/09 10:18 AM
8. New Orleans gets OK to enforce ban on selling art prints in Jac... http://blog.nola.com/news_impact/2009/07/new_orleans_gets_o...
leveeliar says...
Good law. Let's start enforcing it immediately for the upcoming tourist season. Let's also get rid of the
fortune tellers that are all over the place. If these so called psychics are legitimate, make the get
licensed like real estate agents, insurance agents, attorneys, doctors and everybody else. Make them
take a real simple test and even then they won't pass.
Posted on 07/27/09 at 8:46AM
nolalou says...
Bravo, Judge Lemelle!
Artists can sell their prints in galleries, on line, out of their homes, etc. But selling them in a legally-
established artists' colony was cheapening the colony as well as the Square. I hope this will mean a
resurgence in the true art of Jackson Square!
Posted on 07/27/09 at 8:47AM
noladude51 says...
While I agree with this action that original art will be protected in Jackson Square, there's another
issue here that is much more important for all of us as citizens: "Although Lemelle had suggested
three years ago that the city should adopt a "more narrowly tailored ordinance" than a total ban on
prints, the City Council refused to go along with his idea."
Why in the hell is a judge suggesting anything? His job is to interpret the law. No one should care
about his opinions on the culture of the city or on business implications. That's for the politicians and
citizens to worry about. If the laws of New Orleans say it's this or that, end of story!! There was no
middle ground here from the beginning.....no reproductions.
Posted on 07/27/09 at 8:54AM
tina50 says...
Nice law for the artist I guess, but what about all the other panhandlers and fortune tellers that are in
Jackson square? I guess this opinion was more about money and competition. But if you are talking
about the tacky or sleaze factor, prints aren't the only contributor of that.
Posted on 07/27/09 at 9:04AM
soulinola says...
I have to disagree with a part of this ordinance.
I have friends who carve wood blocks, then make
8 of 10 7/27/09 10:18 AM
9. New Orleans gets OK to enforce ban on selling art prints in Jac... http://blog.nola.com/news_impact/2009/07/new_orleans_gets_o...
prints from those blocks. The original is
rarely for sale, and the prints are usually
limited, numbered and signed.
I do, however, agree that there are plenty of
other venues for the sale of these items
all over the city.
Now.......where do tarot card readers fall
in this art display?
Posted on 07/27/09 at 9:07AM
madscience says...
Sure, this is a great law. It's kind of like the government controlled monopolies that cause us to only
have Entergy as a choice for electricity, and Cox as a choice for cable. Since when does the
government have the right to control everything?
While Americans are chanting freedom, they fail to realize that we have been under a socialist-fascist
dictatorship since Woodrow Wilson and FDR.
Posted on 07/27/09 at 9:34AM
bigfrankeee2 says...
maybe the city coucil should spend more time worrying about all the murders in the city and quit
worrying about the few artist why might lose a few sales
Posted on 07/27/09 at 9:35AM
hunni504 says...
Is the sale of art prints strickly banned from jackson square or the french market as well. What about
the artist's who created their own work of art and sell it in print for signed by themselves????? This
would apply to all blue dog prints which we love so much
Posted on 07/27/09 at 9:36AM
RandyBadger says...
When it come to art on theSquare it's too ba we can't legally define "talentless", "Copy-cat" or just
plain old "Bad".
Posted on 07/27/09 at 9:41AM
9 of 10 7/27/09 10:18 AM
10. New Orleans gets OK to enforce ban on selling art prints in Jac... http://blog.nola.com/news_impact/2009/07/new_orleans_gets_o...
RandyBadger says...
Ban Blue Dog and all such derivative superficial drivel that blatantly rips off tradition Black Naive
style painiting, in order to hide the fact that hacks like Rodrigue and Dr. Bob have no talent or
capacity for originial thought.
Posted on 07/27/09 at 9:46AM
jdkingbear says...
uh huh, but leave the Square to the myriad of fake soothsayers, readers, palmists and all other sorts of
charlatans who ply their trade in the dark? That is not art. Its bilking people and it makes a mockery
of what was a lovely place to walk and enjoy real art.
Do something about that.
Posted on 07/27/09 at 9:56AM
batterdip says...
my neighbor has been painting on the square for over 30 years. Its how she raised her kids, cared for
her grandkids, pays her house note and insurance. After a health crisis she was unable to keep up the
pace and also began selling prints OF HER OWN WORK. She is an intergral member of this
community and needs to sell these prints to get by. It hurts no one. Several artists with their own
galleries on Royal St. sell both their originals and prints of their own work. Is this really an evil that
needs stamping out?
Posted on 07/27/09 at 10:00AM
Footer
10 of 10 7/27/09 10:18 AM