The document evaluates and compares several websites based on criteria such as accessibility, accuracy, conciseness, and memorability. For accessibility, Expedia.com receives high marks for having all links working and an easy to navigate format, while Havenworks.com receives low marks for being difficult to navigate with broken links. For accuracy, Toyota.com provides up-to-date car information, unlike D-B.net which promotes outdated human cloning content from 1997. For conciseness, Australiaun.org presents straightforward, perfectly simple information of just the right length, unlike a site promoting a meaningless game. For memorability, Apple.com avoids redundancy and boredom through simple presentation of complex topics, unlike Ocgov.

1. Mae Guerra - Net Servers Project
2/10/09
Website Rubric 1- Poor 4 - Excellent
1. Accessible -
The links are
working and the
page is easy to
navigate
http://www.havenworks.com/
• Voted worst web page in
2008 by
http://www.webpagesthatsu
ck.com/worst-web-sites-of-
2008.html
• Not easily accessible
because it is difficult to
navigate and links are not all
working
http://www.expedia.com/
• Obviously this web page is meant to
be easy to use and navigate through
• All links are working and the page is
arranged in an easy to view format
for better access to all readers
• Excellent web site for the vast
majority of web surfers (people of all
ages could use this site)
2. Accurate -
The information
is up-to-date and
accurate
http://www.d-b.net/dti/
• This website is just plain
weird. It promotes human
cloning but has not been
updated since November 4,
1997!
• Information is not up-to-
date or accurate
http://www.toyota.com/
• As with any commercial web site
designed to be up-to-date with
customers needs, this website
provides the most accurate
information involving Toyota cars
3. Concise - The
information is
complete and
concise
http://webpagesthatsuck.smugmug.c
om/gallery/6872802_vfkua -
440962016_WRpSV-A-LB
• The 5th Worst Web Site of
2008 according to Web
pages that suck --
Honorary. This site was a
promotion for a game where
having a meaningful web
site wasn't important.
• There is apparently no
information to go along with
this page and it leaves the
reader empty handed as far
as what the purpose of this
site is about
http://www.australiaun.org/
• Straightforward- perfectly simple
and well put together
• Information is concise and complete
• While navigating through the page
you notice that the information is not
to long or short – it is just the right
length to get the information across
to its readers
• This website was found on
http://www.un.org/events/workshop/
dpi-unitar/2003/dreamweaver/bad-
design.htm - a website that reviews
good and bad web site design
4. Memorable -
The information
is interesting
and memorable
(not redundant
or boring)
http://egov.ocgov.com/portal/site/oc
gov/
• To much information and
not enough organization
causes this website to be
boring and not memorable
to the reader
http://www.apple.com/
• This website presents complicated
information in a simple and
understandable way
• Information is not redundant or
boring