During the 2019 NADO Annual Training Conference (October 19 - 22 in Reno, NV), Rob Hyman shares information on the basics of federal environmental reviews and permits required by the National Environmental Policy Act.
1. R . O. U . T. E . S .
w w w. t r a n s p o r t a t i o n . g o v / r u r a l
R U R A L O P P O R T U N I T I E S TO
U S E T R A N S P O R TAT I O N F O R
E C O N O M I C S U C C E S S
U . S . D E P A R T M E N T O F
T R A N S P O R T A T I O N
2. Rural America feeds our nation, fuels our
gas tanks, and offers recreational fun
Rural networks are necessary for…
• Production of agriculture ($381B), mining ($97B), forestry ($55B), and energy products ($305B in coal, oil
and gas)
• Outdoor recreation ($400B+)
• Quality of life for rural residents and for urban residents accessing tourism/recreational opportunities
But, rural transportation has unique challenges
• Safety – fatality rate 2.1 times higher than urban areas and off-the-roadway fatality rate is 50% higher in
rural areas
• Productivity – rural industries require heavy trucks that have significantly more wear-and-tear on roadways
and cannot traverse bridges that are posted for weight restrictions
• Limited multimodal transportation options for local and intercity travel – difficult for an aging population
and for those in poverty
And, rural communities are less likely to fund their own projects or competitively apply for
Federal grants
• Local governments own 72% of rural roads, but most are ineligible for Federal formula funds
• Local agencies lack resources for capital improvements and creating applications for Federal grants/funds
• DOT innovative financing programs just recently adapted to rural challenges and needs
2
3. Rural Areas Have 9x More Roadway
Infrastructure per Capita
3
Urban areas:
1,064 lane miles
per 100,000 residents
69% of total lane-miles are
in rural areas –
but only 20% of the
population
Rural areas:
9,925 lane miles
per 100,000 residents
Notes: Total does not add due to rounding. Urban = Census urbanized area, rural otherwise
Sources: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Highway Information Management, Highway Statistics, table
HM-60, available at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics.cfm.
Urban areas:
1,064 lane miles
per 100,000 residents
19% of Americans live in rural
areas but 69% of our nation’s
total lane-miles are in rural
areas Rural
Transportation
Challenges:
1. Safety
2. Infrastructure
Condition
3. Traffic/Usage
4. Safety: rural areas have significantly higher
fatality rates on roads and at rail crossings
4
39%
of fatalities at
highway-rail
crossings occur in
rural areas
80%
of railroad crossings
without active
warning devices are
found in rural areas
Fatality Rate Per 100 Million Vehicle-Miles
Traveled is 2.1 times greater in rural areas
Rural =
1.79
Urban =
0.85
46%
of highway fatalities occur on rural roads
Rural Urban
17,216 19,038
5. Infrastructure Condition:
80% of closed bridges and
90% of posted bridges are in rural areas
Deliberative Pre-Decisional; do not distribute 5
Detours
required by a
closed or
posted bridge
are
3x longer
in rural areas
Posted:
53,924
Closed:
3,290
6. Traffic/Usage: 81% of U.S. counties
have rural transit service
11/1/2019 Deliberative Pre-Decisional; do not distribute 6
1,333 public transit
operators in rural
America
62% provide only
demand-response
service
Costs 2x per
trip more
than fixed
route service
7. 11,449
(19.8%)
46,409
(80.2%)
Traffic/Usage: rural networks are critical for
nationwide freight and passenger travel
47%
of Truck VMT
Occurs in Rural Areas
Two-thirds
of rail freight originates
in rural areas
Note: “Originates” refers to products grown, mined, and manufactured in rural areas, or comes from a rural port of entry;
44% of rural passenger vehicle traffic:
urban residents traveling to destinations outside their urban home From 2000-2017, rural
volume per interstate
lane-mile grew 6.5% in
rural areas versus less
than 1% in urban areas
8. R.O.U.T.E.S is a new DOT initiative that will…
Collect input from stakeholders on the benefits rural projects offer for
safety and economic outcomes, as well as the type and degree of
assistance rural projects require
Provide user-friendly information to rural communities to enhance
understanding about DOT’s infrastructure grant options
Improve DOT’s data-driven approaches to better assess needs and
benefits of rural transportation infrastructure projects
8
R.O.U.T.E.S.
Rural Opportunities to Use Transportation for Economic Success
Editor's Notes
Ag, Mining and Forestry stats: BEA: https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?reqid=56&step=2&isuri=1#reqid=56&step=2&isuri=1
Outdoor recreation: Bureau of Economic Analysis, https://www.bea.gov/system/files/2018-09/orsa0918_0.pdf
Ethanol: https://ethanolrfa.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/RFA2019Outlook.pdf
Truck VMT: Highway Statistics 2017, Table VM-1, https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2017/vm1.cfm
Of the 8.8 million lane-miles in the US, 69% are in rural areas (areas outside of Census urbanized areas).
Total Public At-Grade Railroad Crossings
128,588
Total Railroad Crossings without Active Warning Devices
57,858
Note: 879 road fatalities occurred in unknown areas (2%) (2017)
Potential Framing for Discussion
“USDOT would like to hear your thoughts on current transportation needs in rural areas”
“We have outlined a few questions to better understand current challenges and needs in rural areas when it comes to USDOT discretionary grant programs and support”
“Today, we would like to discuss unmet transportation needs, barriers to success, your experiences with the grants process, and opportunities to improve rural transportation for your and your constituents. Please refer to these questions as a guide”
Initial Areas of Interest for Rural Applicants in USDOT Discretionary Grant Programs*
Set asides: Some programs include statutory set asides for projects that meet the program’s definition of ‘rural’. Four grant programs (BUILD, INFRA, CRISI, and FTA Buses and Bus Facilities Discretionary Grants) have explicit rural set asides that total approximately $794M**
Evaluation criteria: Some programs have included evaluation criteria that assess a project’s ability to support rural communities. For example, FRA’s Restoration and Enhancement Grants and multiple PHMSA programs include evaluation criteria that assess an applicant’s ability to serve rural populations
Matching requirements: Some programs have discounted local match requirements for rural projects, allowing the Federal share of program cost to exceed what it would for non-rural projects
Special considerations: Some programs provide special consideration to projects that support rural populations, e.g., rural technology deployments, projects in qualified opportunity zones, or tribal transit
Opportunities for Further Engagement
For additional thoughts or comments, please email us: rural@dot.gov
Please also refer to our website: www.transportation.gov/rural
We will be releasing a Request for Public Comment to share with any parties that would also be interested in providing feedback [est. end of October]