2. 31-01-2024 Presented by: 2
“ End-stage Renal disease in T2DM is due to
Non-diabetic Renal Disease in 40 – 60% of the
cases ”
Gopaliah LR, Lakshminarayana SG, Nalumakkal SV. Nondiabetic renal disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Integr Nephrol Androl 2017;4:21-5
3. 31-01-2024 Presented by: 3
Prevalence – Non-diabetic Kidney Disease
India
Various studies report high prevalence of
NDRD in India ranging from
46 – 50% - 64%
https://www.journal-ina.com/article.asp?issn=2394-2916;year=2017;volume=4;issue=1;spage=21;epage=25;aulast=Gopaliah
Global Data
Several studies have suggested that nondiabetic
renal disease (NDRD) is common in diabetic
patients, with the prevalence ranging from 27%
to 79% among patients undergoing renal biopsy
4. 31-01-2024 Presented by: 4
Definitions of Diabetic and Non-diabetic nephropathy in diabetes patients
5. 31-01-2024 Presented by: 5
Introduction to ND-Kidney Disease
• Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is one of the major complications of diabetes
mellitus (DM). It is estimated that 20–40% of patients with DM will develop a
diabetic renal disease.
• DN is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease
worldwide.
• Non-diabetic renal diseases (NDRD) such as minimal change disease or
idiopathic membranous nephropathy, are either isolated or superimposed on
an underlying DN.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0064184
6. 31-01-2024 Presented by: 6
• Treatments for DN and NDRD are quite different.
• Many NDRD lesions can be treated with immuno-suppressants other than the
standard angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin
receptor blockers (ARBs).
• Thus, it is important to distinguish NDRD from DN early !!
• A kidney biopsy is necessary to confirm the diagnosis……….BUT …..
Introduction to ND-Kidney Disease
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0064184
7. 31-01-2024 Presented by: 7
A kidney biopsy is INVASIVE
Nephros reluctant to perform potential risks of the
procedure such as hematuria, peri-renal hematoma, arterial
embolization, and even the necessity for a nephrectomy
Contraindications for renal biopsy such as the
solitary kidney and cortical atrophy
Many primary hospitals may be unable to
perform the renal biopsy
Therefore, nephrologists must provide a suspected
diagnosis using the clinical and laboratory data available
before a biopsy is performed.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0064184
8. 31-01-2024 Presented by: 8
Indications for a Kidney Biopsy
Kidney biopsy indication:
a) Nephrotic Proteinuria without retinopathy
b) kidney function involvement without retinopathy
c) Nephrotic Proteinuria and diabetes duration<5ans NDRD
d) Nephrotic Proteinuria discordant with normal clearance
e) Acute kidney injury unexplained
f) Unexplained haematuria.
g) Rapid degradation of kidney function
https://lupinepublishers.com/urology-nephrology-journal/fulltext/non-diabetic-nephropathy-when-should-we-think-about-it.ID.000126.php
9. 31-01-2024 Presented by: 9
The kidney biopsy is helpful in two ways;
(i) It will differentiate diabetic from non-diabetic
glomerulopathy and
(ii) Knowledge of the underlying cause of proteinuria, may play
an important role in planning the correct treatment of these
patients.
11. 31-01-2024 Presented by: 11
IgA Nephropathy in most
studies is the most
common type of NDRD
seen
12. 31-01-2024 Presented by: 12
Clinical Predictors that help to differentiate NDRD from DN
Absence of
Diabetic
retinopathy*
Shorter Diabetes
Mellitus
Duration
Lower HbA1C
Lower Blood
pressure
Abrupt increase
in serum
creatinine
Active urinary
sediment
Presence of
Hematuria
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0064184
A higher level of
proteinuria and hematuria
with the absence of
retinopathy* strongly
predicts NDRD
superimposed on DGS
Renal biopsy should be performed
in diabetics when the clinical
scenario is atypical
* In some cases, the presence or absence of DR alone does not prove to
be significant enough in distinguishing between DN and NDRD in T2DM.
16. 31-01-2024 Presented by: 16
A 2017 Indian Study - Nondiabetic renal disease (NDRD) in type 2 diabetes mellitus
Among patients with NDRD:
• 69% - Primary Glomerular Diseases – (IgA
Nephropathy (Most common among PGDs)
• 16% - Tubulo-interstitial diseases (Acute
Interstitial Nephritis – Most common)
• 13% - secondary Glomerular diseases
(Primary Amyloidosis most common)
• DN with associated NDRD was found in
21.13% patients
17. 31-01-2024 Presented by: 17
A 2017 Indian Study – Clinico-pathological study of nondiabetic renal disease in type 2
diabetic patients: A single center experience from India
https://www.sjkdt.org/article.asp?issn=1319-2442;year=2017;volume=28;issue=6;spage=1330;epage=1337;aulast=Kanodia
Key Findings from the study
NDRD prevalence in this study was 66%
Males more commonly affected than females
SCr - significantly high in combined disease than in patients with isolated NDRD and DN
Proteinuria was higher in patients with DN than those with NDRD
Strong correlation between NDRD and microscopic hematuria
Low serum complement (C3 and/or C4) levels in patients with isolated NDRD and combined
disease rather than DN alone
18. 31-01-2024 Presented by: 18
Types of Nephropathy in relation to duration of diabetes
(Indian Study 2015)
Longer duration of
diabetes was
associated with a
greater likelihood of DN
and lower likelihood of
NDRD
https://indianjnephrol.org/article.asp?issn=0971-
4065;year=2015;volume=25;issue=4;spage=222;epage=228;aulast=Prakash
Diabetic patients with micro-haematuria, older age and without
DR are more prone to develop NDRD
Hence, in such patients a renal biopsy should be indicated under
the minimal suspicion of non-diabetic kidney disease
19. 31-01-2024 Presented by: 19
Non-diabetic renal diseases in patients with diabetes mellitus clinico-pathological
correlation – 2020 Indian Study
Isolated Non-diabetic renal diseases spectrum.
ANCA = Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies; GN = Glomerulonephritis; HIV = Human immune deficiency virus; IgA = Immunoglobulin A
https://www.indianjnephrol.org/article.asp?issn=0971-4065;year=2020;volume=30;issue=5;spage=295;epage=300;aulast=Arora
22. 31-01-2024 Presented by: 22
Minimal change disease (MCD) is characterized clinically by the nephrotic syndrome (NS) and a
renal biopsy that shows no glomerular lesions on light microscopy (or only minimal mesangial
prominence), negative staining on immuno-flouorescence microscopy (or low-level staining for
C3 and IgM), and foot process effacement but no electron-dense deposits on electron
microscopy.
MCD may also be suspected clinically in the absence of a biopsy by exhibiting responsiveness to
corticosteroid treatment, and it is sometimes called steroid-sensitive NS.
The causes of NS in adults are more varied, and although some physicians may choose a trial of
corticosteroids without histologic evidence of MCD, a kidney biopsy is usually warranted to
establish the etiology.
Minimal Change Disease
23. 31-01-2024 Presented by: 23
Treatment of MCD with corticosteroids
The steroid group showed a rapid decrease in proteinuria and improvement in edema
within the first month of treatment compared with control.
Importantly, by 2 years, a significant number of patients in the control group had
experienced a spontaneous remission, leading ultimately to similar outcomes with
respect to proteinuria, serum albumin, and edema in the two groups
https://jasn.asnjournals.org/content/24/5/702
24. 31-01-2024 Presented by: 24
Corticosteroid therapy leads to complete remission in over 80% of adults
with MCD.
The time to complete remission is longer than the time observed in
children, with 50% of patients responding by 4 weeks and 10%–25% of
patients requiring 12–16 weeks of therapy.
Moreover, although alternate-day (every other day) therapy may have a
more favorable effect on growth rates in children, the advantages of this
regimen in adults have not been proven.
https://jasn.asnjournals.org/content/24/5/702
25. 31-01-2024 Presented by: 25
Alkylating agents In retrospective reports, oral cyclophosphamide (CYC) leads to remission in a significant number
of FR or SD adults with MCD. The relapse-free interval seems to be longer than with
cyclosporine.
Calcineurin
inhibitors
Tacrolimus achieved 6-month and 2-year remission rates of 79%–91% and 50%–62% in SD/SR
MCD patients and it may allow for the discontinuation of steroids. Tacrolimus has also shown
efficacy in various case studies with remission rates of 64%–100%. Moreover, as observed with
cyclosporine, relapse after tacrolimus discontinuation compared with CYC favors a slow taper
off this medication.
Mycophenolate
mofetil
In adults, mycophenolate mofetil has shown efficacy in case reports and small case series, with
remission rates of 60%–80%
Azathioprine One retrospective series described 13 patients with SR MCD, 5 of whom (on biopsy review) had
FSGS, who were treated with azathioprine (2–2.5 mg/kg per day) for 4 years. The time to
remission in the MCD patients was variable at 3–18 months, and all patients continued to be in
remission 3–15 years after discontinuation of therapy.
Treatment of frequently relapsing, steroid-dependent and steroid resistant MCD
https://jasn.asnjournals.org/content/24/5/702
27. 31-01-2024 Presented by: 27
IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is an inflammatory renal disease characterised
by the deposition of IgA in the glomerular mesangium.
Described first by Jean Berger in 1968, it is now recognised as the most
commonly reported primary glomerulonephritis worldwide
IgAN has a distinct geographical variation, being more common and
aggressive in East and South East Asia, and only 30–40% of patients
develop a progressive form of the disease, typically necessitating renal
replacement therapy within two decades of diagnosis
IgA Nephropathy
28. 31-01-2024 Presented by: 28
Asymptomatic urine abnormalities, microscopic hematuria with or without proteinuria, are a common presentation
and with increasing age these features are more likely to be accompanied by renal impairment and hypertension
when first seen.
The typical presentation of macroscopic hematuria following a mucosal (usually upper respiratory) infection is most
common in the second and third decades of life and is almost never the presenting symptom after the age of 40
years.
Nephrotic syndrome occurs in around 5% of cases. Acute renal failure may result from acute tubular necrosis as a
consequence of macroscopic hematuria or superimposed crescentic nephritis and is seen during the course of the
disease in o5% of cases.
Renal biopsy confirms the diagnostic feature of diffuse mesangial IgA deposition with a wide range of light
microscopic appearances, although diffuse or segmental mesangial proliferation is the most common
Clinical Presentation
29. 31-01-2024 Presented by: 29
Supportive management
Diet modification Low-sodium diets have been shown to be efficacious in IgAN. The benefits of sodium restriction
are thought to be related to sodium sensitivity of blood pressure, which correlates with renal
ultrastructural damage
The deleterious effects of heightened sodium sensitivity are thought to be mediated through
the renin–angiotensin system (RAS) and indeed, sodium restriction enhances the
antiproteinuric effects of RAS inhibition in IgAN
Weight
management
Body mass index (BMI) at either extreme correlates with increased morbidity and mortality in
CKD
Obesity is postulated to increase proteinuria by inducing ultrastructural changes to the
glomerular basement membrane
Smoking
cessation
There is some evidence from case–control and observational cohort studies that smoking may
be an independent and dose-dependent risk factor for progressive renal function decline in
IgAN
Fish oil
supplementation
KDIGO and Japanese guidelines both suggest use of fish oil in IgAN, with KDIGO limiting its
recommendation to patients with persistent proteinuria despite optimised supportive care
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6469670/
30. 31-01-2024 Presented by: 30
Supportive management
The role of RAS blockade in IgAN patients is well established. Guidelines recommend RAS
antagonism with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) or an angiotensin II-receptor
blocker (ARB) in patients with proteinuria greater than 1 g/day. Several RCTs have demonstrated
the benefits of RAS blockade, and a meta-analysis of 11 such trials found ACE-I/ARBs were
successful at reducing proteinuria, lowering blood pressure and slowing the rate of renal
function decline.
This finding has been corroborated by more recent studies, such as the STOP-IgAN trial, in which
the use of ACE-I /ARBs in addition to other supportive measures was as effective as combination
therapy with immunosuppressants in preventing decline in eGFR in IgAN
RAS blockade is the first-line management in IgAN
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6469670/
31. 31-01-2024 Presented by: 31
Recommended Treatments
Kidney International (2006) 69, 1934–1938. doi:10.1038/sj.ki.5000419; published online 26 April 2006
35. 31-01-2024 Presented by: 35
Management of NDRD in T2DM
The nature of specific therapy will depend on the nature of underlying NDRD (e.g. corticosteroid
for minimal change disease/or FSGS, combination of steroid and cytotoxic drugs for idiopathic
membranous nephropathy, intensive immunosuppressive therapy for crescentic GN).
In certain studies, remission of nephrotic syndrome was observed with prolonged (4-6 month)
course of corticosteroid therapy in patients with FSGS in Type 2 proteinuric diabetic patients
https://www.japi.org/q2647434/non-diabetic-renal-disease-ndrd-in-patients-with-type-2-diabetes-mellitus-type-2-dm
Editor's Notes
NDRD was found in 50.71% (36 of 71) of participants. Among the participants with NDRD, 69.44% (25) had primary glomerular diseases (PGDs), 16.67% (6) had tubulointerstitial diseases (TIDs), and 13.89% (5) had secondary glomerular diseases (SGDs). IgA nephropathy (IgAN) was the most common among PGDs affecting 28% (7) of participants, followed by postinfective glomerulonephritis (PIGN) in 20% (5), membranous nephropathy (MN) in 16% (4), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) in 12% (3), chronic glomerulonephritis (CGN) in 8% (2), membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) in 8% (2), IgM nephropathy (IgMN) in 4% (1), and minimal change disease (MCD) in 4% (1). All the cases of PIGN in the study were characterized by low C3 and normal C4 and were secondary to infections.Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) was the most common among TIDs found in 50% (3) of participants, followed by chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis (CTIN) in 33.33% (2) and cast nephropathy in 16.67% (1).Primary amyloidosis was the most common among SGDs affecting 40% (2), followed by nonamyloid deposition disease 20% (1), antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) related pauci-immune glomerulonephritis in 20% (1), and anti-glomerular basement membrane disease in 20% (1).Diabetic nephropathyThe isolated DN was found in 28.16% (20 of 71) of participants and was diagnosed by presence characteristics as described in methods.
NDRD was found in 50.71% (36 of 71) of participants. Among the participants with NDRD, 69.44% (25) had primary glomerular diseases (PGDs), 16.67% (6) had tubulointerstitial diseases (TIDs), and 13.89% (5) had secondary glomerular diseases (SGDs). IgA nephropathy (IgAN) was the most common among PGDs affecting 28% (7) of participants, followed by postinfective glomerulonephritis (PIGN) in 20% (5), membranous nephropathy (MN) in 16% (4), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) in 12% (3), chronic glomerulonephritis (CGN) in 8% (2), membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) in 8% (2), IgM nephropathy (IgMN) in 4% (1), and minimal change disease (MCD) in 4% (1). All the cases of PIGN in the study were characterized by low C3 and normal C4 and were secondary to infections.Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) was the most common among TIDs found in 50% (3) of participants, followed by chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis (CTIN) in 33.33% (2) and cast nephropathy in 16.67% (1).Primary amyloidosis was the most common among SGDs affecting 40% (2), followed by nonamyloid deposition disease 20% (1), antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) related pauci-immune glomerulonephritis in 20% (1), and anti-glomerular basement membrane disease in 20% (1).Diabetic nephropathyThe isolated DN was found in 28.16% (20 of 71) of participants and was diagnosed by presence characteristics as described in methods.
Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the leading cause of end stage renal disease worldwide. Despite this, most patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are not formally evaluated with a renal biopsy. Kidney biopsy can differentiate DN from non-diabetic renal diseases (NDRD), but it is invasive, not suitable for every patient, associated with serious complications (though rare) and other issues like availability and reluctance, especially more in developing countries like India. The diagnosis is mostly made on clinical grounds. Proteinuria or renal failure in diabetic patients is usually interpreted as a clinical manifestation of DN. However, not all diabetic subjects with proteinuria or renal failure have DN. Non-diabetic renal diseases, though rarer than DN, have been seen to cause proteinuria or renal failure in diabetics.[1] The occurrence of NDRD in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is rare compared with those with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). It has been well demonstrated that renal disease in patients suffering from T1DM for over 10 years is usually the result of DN, as proven histologically in >95% of these patients.[2],[3],[4]It is usually believed that DN is hard to reverse and further management aims at prevention of progression of disease. But some NDRDs such as minimal change disease, immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy and membranous nephropathy are often treatable and even curable. The therapy and prognosis of DN and NDRD are quite different and the differential diagnosis is of considerable importance. Hence, it is necessary to suspect, diagnose and treat the concurrent glomerular diseases or the unrelated renal disorders that are superimposed on DN because of the prognostic and therapeutic implications.[5]Non-diabetic renal diseases are an important cause of renal involvement in diabetics but few research works focusing on this entity have been carried out. So, we carried out this study to assess the frequency and spectrum of NDRD in diabetic population and correlate differences in clinical and laboratory parameters between NDRD and DN groups.
Among patients having isolated NDRD, the most common NDRDs (≥5% of patients) were minimal change disease (19.2%) followed by lupus nephritis (11.5%), post-infectious GN (7.7%), antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (+) crescentic glomerulonephritis (7.7%), chronic interstitial nephritis (7.7%), membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (7.7%), IgA nephropathy (7.7%), and HIV nephropathy (7.7%; [Figure 1]). Among patients with NDRD superimposed on DN, 33.3% of patients had DN + chronic pyelonephritis and 16.7% of patients each had DN + acute tubular necrosis, DN + kappa light-chain deposition disease, DN + thrombotic microangiopathy and DN + lupus nephritis Class 3
Antibody-guided diagnosis and treatment algorithm for primary membranous nephropathy (PMN). Patients who undergo biopsies for proteinuria of uncertain cause who have MN should initially be classified as anti-PLA2R/THSD7A–positive (active disease) or negative (Table 2). Patients who are antibody-negative should have the absence of a PLA2R/THSD7A-related mechanism further excluded by the absence of PLA2R/THSD7A staining in glomeruli and usually the dominance of IgG1–3 in the biopsy sample. Most of these latter patients have secondary MN and require other tests to identify the cause. They are treated with supportive care and therapy for their underlying systemic disease. Patients who are negative for anti-PLA2R/THSD7A in the serum but have PLA2R or THSD7A antigen staining in the biopsy sample, and usually predominately IgG4 deposition in glomeruli, have inactive anti-PLA2R/THSD7A–mediated PMN and should be treated with supportive care while monitoring anti-PLA2R levels for 4–6 months. They would be considered for IST only if anti-PLA2R becomes positive or proteinuria>3.5 g/d persists after 6 months of supportive care. Patients with elevated anti-PLA2R levels (with positive PLA2R staining and [usually] predominantly IgG4 in the biopsy sample) and proteinuria <3.5 g/d have active anti-PLA2R/THSD7A–mediated PMN but would receive supportive care with monthly anti-PLA2R monitoring because most of these patients will undergo spontaneous remission. If patients have, or develop, elevated anti-PLA2R levels and >3.5 g/d of proteinuria they have active, anti-PLA2R/THSD7A–mediated PMN and would be considered for immediate IST. IST options would be selected on the basis of characteristics of individual patients with dose and duration of therapy (Table 6) guided by regular monitoring of anti-PLA2R levels. About 10% of patients with anti-PLA2R/THSD7A–negative antibody and glomerular staining have PMN presumably mediated by a different anti-podocyte antibody rather than secondary MN and would be treated with traditional restrictive care (4,52,53). Occasional patients with negative anti-PLA2R antibody but dominant IgG4 in the biopsy sample have also been reported and should be monitored for later development of positive circulating anti-PLA2R antibody. ANA, anti-nuclear antibody; HBV, hepatitis B; HCV, hepatitis C; IST, immunosuppressive therapy; MN, membranous nephropathy. Modified from other schemas in references 1 and 4, with permission.