The document outlines strategies for effective trial advocacy, including when and how to conduct cross-examinations, developing a case theme, understanding important rules of evidence, plotting cross-examination strategy in advance, selecting an effective sequence of questions, controlling cross-examinations, and building a powerful closing argument. It provides tips on each of these aspects of litigation and emphasizes starting early in developing an overall case theme and strategy.
Arbitration is a growing venue for resolving disputes. Experience with the process is vital to helping your client win their case at arbitration - or decide if arbitration is right for them at all.
Anatomy of a Trial (Series: Newbie Litigator School 101 - Part 1)Financial Poise
This webinar’s focus is on the “nuts and bolts” of a civil trial. Panelists discuss witness preparation, the selection and presentation of exhibits, motions in limine, opening statements, direct and cross-examination, and closing arguments. They will also address issues that often arise during trials and how best to present a case to the finder of fact.
To view the accompanying webinar, go to: https://www.financialpoise.com/financial-poise-webinars/anatomy-of-a-trial-2021/
Arbitration is a growing venue for resolving disputes. Experience with the process is vital to helping your client win their case at arbitration - or decide if arbitration is right for them at all.
Anatomy of a Trial (Series: Newbie Litigator School 101 - Part 1)Financial Poise
This webinar’s focus is on the “nuts and bolts” of a civil trial. Panelists discuss witness preparation, the selection and presentation of exhibits, motions in limine, opening statements, direct and cross-examination, and closing arguments. They will also address issues that often arise during trials and how best to present a case to the finder of fact.
To view the accompanying webinar, go to: https://www.financialpoise.com/financial-poise-webinars/anatomy-of-a-trial-2021/
How to Conduct a Bullet Proof Harassment InvestigationNow Dentons
How to Conduct a Bullet Proof Harassment Investigation includes Who Should Investigate?, Develop the Procedural Script, Develop the Substantive Script, Interview the Respondent and Witnesses, Draft the Report and How to Document?
Student Conduct Investigations - Examining Evidence and Determining CredibiliityDan Michaluk
A one hour presentation to student conduct investigators at colleges and universities in Canada. Support for the "hard" cases in which credibility is at issue, including hard sexual violence cases.
Documenting Your Workplace Investigation: Protect Your Case and Your Organiza...Case IQ
Investigations depend on collecting and analyzing evidence. Documentation is an important part of any workplace investigation. It is used to record who said what and when, to outline issues and investigation steps, to synthesize evidence and ensure nothing falls through the cracks. The final report is where all the pieces come together. But many investigators aren’t sure how to best document their investigations. They write notes without knowing what to record and what to leave out and cobble together reports with no plan or organization.
Join Meric Bloch as he outlines best practices for documenting workplace investigations.
This presentation was part of a workshop carried out in Department of Law & Justice in Jahangirnagar University where law students were briefed on the basics of moot court related activities.
This Security Guard training is ideal to improve your skills in investigative interviews.
This training will help you if you are working in private security or loss prevention, as investigative interviews are an important part of the job.
Feel free to use this training to use this security guard training to get a better understanding of the duties of a security officer on your journey to become a security guard.
Effective Legal Writing for Your Client and Court AudiencesRichik Sarkar
This CLE focused on making direct arguments in all briefs to ensure critical messages are effectively conveyed and that they answer judges’ primary questions about why they should do what a litigant asks and how they have that authority. Attendees learned how to ensure that their briefs convey not only the necessary legal argument but also the client’s perspective on issues.
Combining from many sources specially the ones I get from English Debate Society of Universitas Bakrie, here's the Debate 101 presentation that I usually used in my coaching or teaching activities.
Judgement & Decision-making - the joys of blissful ignorance!.pptxJon Stephenson
I've found that sound judgement and decision-making requires an open mind and a proven process.
I've captured the main points of the process and the likely outputs in a slide.
I've also included a grid showing the four main decision types based upon their urgency and importance.
I hope you find them useful.
Please use this link to check out my full LinkedIn article that was inspired by the comments of a former colleague about my approach to decision-making:
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/judgement-decision-making-joys-blissful-ignorance-jon-stephenson
Litigation Leaders Webinar Series: Presenting the Case with the Jury in MindQuarles & Brady
Please join us for the kick-off program in our Litigation Leaders Webinar Series. Led by Mark Kircher, an experienced trial attorney, this quick thirty-minute webinar will provide best practices to maximize the likelihood of the jury delivering the verdict you seek. You will learn how to set and fulfill jury expectations; the essential elements of voir dire, opening statements, and closing arguments, and the effective use of technology to deliver your message.
BTI Consulting Group, Inc., a leader in legal industry research, has named Quarles & Brady to its Fearsome Foursome Honor Roll as well as the Honor Roll in IP Litigation in its annual Litigation Outlook publication. Quarles & Brady is one of only 53 law firms named in IP Litigation and one of only 37 firms named among the most feared as opposing counsel. Quarles is the only firm in the states of Wisconsin, Arizona, Indiana and the metro areas of Tampa and Naples, to be named in both lists.
How to Conduct a Bullet Proof Harassment InvestigationNow Dentons
How to Conduct a Bullet Proof Harassment Investigation includes Who Should Investigate?, Develop the Procedural Script, Develop the Substantive Script, Interview the Respondent and Witnesses, Draft the Report and How to Document?
Student Conduct Investigations - Examining Evidence and Determining CredibiliityDan Michaluk
A one hour presentation to student conduct investigators at colleges and universities in Canada. Support for the "hard" cases in which credibility is at issue, including hard sexual violence cases.
Documenting Your Workplace Investigation: Protect Your Case and Your Organiza...Case IQ
Investigations depend on collecting and analyzing evidence. Documentation is an important part of any workplace investigation. It is used to record who said what and when, to outline issues and investigation steps, to synthesize evidence and ensure nothing falls through the cracks. The final report is where all the pieces come together. But many investigators aren’t sure how to best document their investigations. They write notes without knowing what to record and what to leave out and cobble together reports with no plan or organization.
Join Meric Bloch as he outlines best practices for documenting workplace investigations.
This presentation was part of a workshop carried out in Department of Law & Justice in Jahangirnagar University where law students were briefed on the basics of moot court related activities.
This Security Guard training is ideal to improve your skills in investigative interviews.
This training will help you if you are working in private security or loss prevention, as investigative interviews are an important part of the job.
Feel free to use this training to use this security guard training to get a better understanding of the duties of a security officer on your journey to become a security guard.
Effective Legal Writing for Your Client and Court AudiencesRichik Sarkar
This CLE focused on making direct arguments in all briefs to ensure critical messages are effectively conveyed and that they answer judges’ primary questions about why they should do what a litigant asks and how they have that authority. Attendees learned how to ensure that their briefs convey not only the necessary legal argument but also the client’s perspective on issues.
Combining from many sources specially the ones I get from English Debate Society of Universitas Bakrie, here's the Debate 101 presentation that I usually used in my coaching or teaching activities.
Judgement & Decision-making - the joys of blissful ignorance!.pptxJon Stephenson
I've found that sound judgement and decision-making requires an open mind and a proven process.
I've captured the main points of the process and the likely outputs in a slide.
I've also included a grid showing the four main decision types based upon their urgency and importance.
I hope you find them useful.
Please use this link to check out my full LinkedIn article that was inspired by the comments of a former colleague about my approach to decision-making:
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/judgement-decision-making-joys-blissful-ignorance-jon-stephenson
Litigation Leaders Webinar Series: Presenting the Case with the Jury in MindQuarles & Brady
Please join us for the kick-off program in our Litigation Leaders Webinar Series. Led by Mark Kircher, an experienced trial attorney, this quick thirty-minute webinar will provide best practices to maximize the likelihood of the jury delivering the verdict you seek. You will learn how to set and fulfill jury expectations; the essential elements of voir dire, opening statements, and closing arguments, and the effective use of technology to deliver your message.
BTI Consulting Group, Inc., a leader in legal industry research, has named Quarles & Brady to its Fearsome Foursome Honor Roll as well as the Honor Roll in IP Litigation in its annual Litigation Outlook publication. Quarles & Brady is one of only 53 law firms named in IP Litigation and one of only 37 firms named among the most feared as opposing counsel. Quarles is the only firm in the states of Wisconsin, Arizona, Indiana and the metro areas of Tampa and Naples, to be named in both lists.
3. VII. BUILDING A POWERFUL
CLOSING ARGUMENT
NBI Seminar December 17, 2010
4. TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Should You Always Use Cross-Examination?
II. Developing Causes of Action and the Case
Theme
III. Rules of Evidence You Need to Know
IV. Plotting Your Strategy Beforehand
V. Selecting an Effective Sequence for Cross-
Examination
VI. Destroying Safe Havens
VII. Handling and Introducing Exhibits
VIII. Effective Cross-Examination of Expert Witnesses
5. TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Anatomy of a Persuasive Closing Argument
II. Using Body Language to Make Your Point
III. How Pace and Tempo Can Bolster Your Case
IV. Problem Solving With Your Closing Argument
V. Effective Use of Analogies, Fables and
Metaphors
VI. Pitfalls to Avoid When Making Closing Arguments
6. WHEN TO CROSS
Don’t cross examine a witness just
because he/she is a witness detrimental
to your case.
Only cross examine if doing so can help
your case.
Cross examining a witness that hurts
your case only serves to solidify your
opponents position.
7. DEVELOPING CASE THEMES
Start early—well ahead of trial
Outline theme, story, witnesses and
exhibits in voir dire and opening
statements
Your cross examination should be
consistent and move your case theme
forward
8. RULES OF EVIDENCE
• Rule 401—Definition of Relevant Evidence
• Rule 403—Exclusion of Relevant Evidence on Grounds of
Prejudice
• Rule 404—Character Evidence Not Admissible to Prove Conduct
• Rule 602—Lack of Personal Knowledge
• Rule 701—Opinion Testimony By Lay Witness
• Rule 801—Hearsay Defined
• Rule 803—Hearsay Exceptions
• Rule 804—Hearsy Exceptions; Declarant Unavailable
• Rule 1001—Definitions of Writings Recordings and Photographs
• Rule 1002—Requirement of Original
• Rule 1003—Admisibility of Duplicates
• See the attached handout
9. PLOTTING YOUR STRATEGY
Start early—well ahead of trial
What can this witness say that can help
your case?
How do you make him/her say it?
Think outside the box
Don’t let the witness get comfortable
• Don’t let them anticipate the next question
10. SELECTING A SEQUENCE
Do not take the witness’ deposition a
second time
• You only have the jury’s attention for a short
time, use it wisely. Be selective about your
questions.
• Impeachment on anything but a material
question of fact is ineffective, and improper.
• End on an up tick.
11. TAKING CONTROL
Focus on the examiner—not the witness
Use controlling, confining, leading
questions
Only ask questions to which you already
know the answer
Do not argue with the witness
Do not restate direct examination
Do not let the witness explain
12. TAKING CONTROL
You, the witness and the jury
should always feel like the piano is
about to fall. Taking control means
the witness knows it is coming but
cannot avoid it because you have
boxed him/her in with your
questions.