1
Sixy and We Know It
Detailed Design Review: December 4th, 2020
Team Lead
(Ray L)
Project Manager
(Julie W)
Research Lead
(Boxuan S)
Calculation Lead
(Junsei R)
CAD Lead
(Jim D)
Report Lead
(Serena C)
Research Assistant
(WIlson F)
CAD Assistant
(Tanios N)
Calculation Assistant
(Simon S)
Report Assistant
(Christina M)
Report Assistant
(Jake C)
Engine Summary:
● Inline-four, DOHC
● Total displacement: 1500.19cc
● Compression ratio: 10:1
● Liquid cooled
● Wet sump lubrication
2
Summary of Product
Goals and Objectives
Project Statement:
● Design an original inline 4 cruiser motorcycle engine for the middle class market in the USA
for the Spartan Motorcycle Company.
● This engine will comply with all safety, emissions, and noise regulations. The project
schedule will span from August 24th, 2020 to December 11th, 2020.
● Expect to produce 7500 units in the first year (2022), followed by 12000 units (2023), and
15000 units (2024).
3
Purpose (Market Fit):
● US motorcycle market size estimated at 7.85 billion USD in 2016
● Anticipated to grow at a CAGR of 3.7% over next 10 years
● Over 468,000 units sold in 2019, approximately 485,000 units expected in 2020
● Most cruisers have V-twin engines, so our inline 4 engine provides customers with an
alternative and reliable engine for a cruiser motorcycle
4
Satisfaction of Design Requirements
5
6
7
Materials Selection Process
Research and identify
common materials
currently used for
components in the
motorcycle industry
Determine important
material properties for the
component’s specific
function
Use Granta EduPack +
other resources to
compare materials with the
desired properties
Choose most favorable
material based on
manufacturing and
performance criteria. Apply
FEA to necessary
components
Before we dive into the different subsystems and
specifics of our manufacturing and material and
make vs buy decisions, we will first look into the
approach this team took to arrive to such decisions.
8
Manufacturing Methods Selection
Using Edupack, Engineering
Handbook, and other
resources to find out what
processes are suitable for
particular materials.
Research and find out
the traditionally used
process from empirical
resources.
Depending on
performance requirement
and material, determine
the primary manufacturing
processes.
Determine any secondary
manufacturing processes.
9
Buy vs Make Selection
Decide if part has many
dimensional choices available for
purchase or if it is of critical
importance to core function of the
engine that requires custom
dimensions.
For parts with several dimensional
options available, we will purchase
them (e.g. bolts, nuts, pumps, etc).
For parts with custom dimensions
and our critical to our engine, we
will make (e.g. engine block, piston
head, etc)
Do research on whether or not
purchased parts meet engine
performance and dimension
requirements. If not, we will make
the part.
10
Engine Body
11
Assembly Drawing
12
Drawings of Engine Body: Engine Block
13
Drawings of Engine Body: Cylinder Head (Preliminary)
14
Drawings of Engine Body: Crankcase
15
Engine Body Materials and Manufacturing
16
Relevant FMEA for Engine Body
(S) (O) (D)
17
Engine Body BOM
Part Number Designation:
Company Callout - Subassembly - #
Ex: SAWKI-EB-001 is for part #1 of engine block subassembly
*COTS = Commercial off the shelf
Make vs buy decision:
● Studs, washers, nuts, pins, and screws are purchased parts because
there are a variety of options available for these on the market that our
engine can be designed around
● Parts that the team has identified as core importance to the engine and
thus should be designed by us to produce a unique engine include engine
block, cylinder head, cylinder head cover, and etc
18
Valvetrain
19
Drawings of Valvetrain: Cylinder Head
20
Drawings of Valvetrain: Subassembly
21
Drawings of Valvetrain: Valve Assembly
22
Drawings of Valvetrain: Exhaust & Intake Valves
23
Drawings of Valvetrain: Camshafts
~ Revised FOS:
- Intake Valve: 3.5
- Exhaust Valve: 3.8
24
Relevant FEA for Valvetrain
25
Valvetrain Materials and Manufacturing
26
Relevant FMEA for Valvetrain
27
Valvetrain BOM
*COTS = Commercial off the shelf
● Buy:
○ Small parts with multiple dimensional options that we can fit our engine dimension to such as valve spring, valve guide seal, screws, keys, and
bearings.
● Make:
○ Camshafts and valve components since they are crucial parts that can be designed by our team to make a unique engine
28
Valvetrain Calculations: Discharge Coefficient and Lift
Using exhaust valve and port design b (chart on the
right) for analysis:
29
Valvetrain Calculations: Mass Flow
30
Powertrain
31
Drawings of Powertrain: Subassembly
32
Drawings of Powertrain: Crankshaft
33
Drawings of Powertrain: Conrod
34
Drawings of Powertrain: Piston
~ Revised FOS: 3.25
35
Powertrain FEA: Piston
~ Revised FOS: 3
~ 2 slots of shear stress
concentration due to clearance
between piston and conrod.
36
Powertrain FEA: Wrist Pin
~ Revised FOS: 6.23
37
Powertrain FEA: Conrod
Revised FOS: 3
38
Powertrain FEA: Crankshaft
39
Powertrain Materials and Manufacturing
40
Relevant FMEA for Powertrain
41
Powertrain BOM
*COTS = Commercial off the shelf
● Buy:
○ Small parts with multiple dimensional options that we can fit our engine dimension to such as screws, keys, nuts, bearings, sprockets, and
piston rings
● Make:
○ Crankshaft, connecting rod, piston, and wrist pin are parts that will undergo a lot of load, so the team decided to design them to make sure
performance requirements of the engine are met
42
Powertrain Calculations: Non-Ideal Cycle
44
Cooling and Lubrication
Red: Coolant path Yellow: Oil path
45
Model of Cooling and Lubrication
46
Cylinder Head Oil Path
47
Lubrication Materials and Manufacturing
48
Relevant FMEA for Cooling and Lubrication
49
Lubrication and Cooling BOM
*COTS = Commercial off the shelf
● Buy:
○ Small parts with multiple dimensional options that we can fit our
engine dimension to such oil and cooling components
● Make:
○ Gaskets since they will have to fit to our engine which has custom
dimensions for core components to create a proper seal
○ Oil pan since it will be designed to have an outer dimension that
matches our engine to create a seal to prevent lubrication
leakage
50
Cooling & Lubrication: Lubrication Calculations
51
Cooling and Lubrication: Cooling Calculations
Parameters Value with Unit
Gas Temperature 1474 K
Inner Cylinder Wall Temperature 976 K
Coolant Temperature 366 K
Outside Surface Temperature of
Engine Block
315 K
Mass Flow 0.55 kg/s
The minimum temperature to sustain burns : 318 K
Volumetric Flow Rate of Coolant at 6500 RPM : 11.86
gpm
Coolant Pump
● Part #: WP136S
● Supplier: Meziere
● Satisfies volumetric flow rate of 8.35 GPM
52
Coolant and Lubricant Pump Selection
Oil Pump
● Part #: M16422012
● Supplier: Marco
● Subject to change as current volumetric flow
rate of 8507.41 mm^3/s is incorrect
53
Other: Fuel Efficiency
65 mph 5000 Rpm: 36.05 MPG > 35 MPG (required value)
Mair (mass of air) 0.000505 kg
AFR (air to fuel ratio) 14.7
Density of octane 2.86 kg/gal
● For AFR of 14.7 our engine will produce 158.3 g/km of CO and 29.64
g/km of NOx at 5000rpm.
● To meet the federal requirement, we have chosen Universal Catalytic
Converter 51355 from MagnaFlow.
54
Other: Emissions
55
Theory of Operations
56
Quality Control and Testing
Destructive Testings Non-Destructive Testings
Fatigue
Fracture and
Mechanical
Residual Stress
Measurement
Aggressive
Environment
Coordinate-
Measuring
Machine
Visual Testing
Magnetic
Particle/Liquid
Penetrant
Vibration
Analysis
Test Cell Decibel Meter
First Year
Purchased Parts 1 in 500 1 in 500 1 in 500 1 in 500 N/A All 1 in 500 N/A N/A N/A
Manufactured
Parts
Critical 1 in 50 1 in 50 1 in 50 1 in 50 All All All N/A N/A N/A
Non-Critical 1 in 100 1 in 100 1 in 100 1 in 100 1 in 100 All 1 in 100 N/A N/A N/A
Assembled Engine N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All N/A 1 in 100 1 in 100 1 in 100
Second
Year
Purchased Parts 1 in 1000 1 in 1000 1 in 1000 1 in 1000 N/A All 1 in 1000 N/A N/A N/A
Manufactured
Parts
Critical 1 in 100 1 in 100 1 in 100 1 in 100 1 in100 All 1 in 100 N/A N/A N/A
Non-Critical 1 in 200 1 in 200 1 in 200 1 in 200 1 in 500 All 1 in 500 N/A N/A N/A
Assembled Engine N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All N/A 1 in 200 1 in 200 1 in 200
Third Year
Purchased Parts 1 in 1000 1 in 1000 1 in 1000 1 in 1000 N/A All 1 in 1000 N/A N/A N/A
Manufactured
Parts
Critical 1 in 200 1 in 200 1 in 200 1 in 200 1 in 200 All 1 in 200 N/A N/A N/A
Non-Critical 1 in 500 1 in 500 1 in 500 1 in 500 1 in 1000 All 1 in 1000 N/A N/A N/A
Assembled Engine N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All N/A 1 in 500 1 in 500 1 in 500
There is a decrease in testing rate because:
1. Increasing production, and
2. More consistent quality as we
produce more.
However, a part’s testing rate will return to first-
year standard if the part fails any testings.
Critical Parts: Connecting Rods, Cylinder Sleeve, Crankshaft, Piston Head, Intake Valves, Exhaust Valves, Wrist Pins, Camshafts.
Non-critical Parts: All the manufactured parts not listed in critical parts.
57
Cost Estimate
Manufacturing Cost:
● Overhead cost ($/hr) = 100
● Labor ($/hr) = 21.73
● Focused on primary and secondary
processes
Purchased Cost:
● Accounted for an estimated 20% markup
retail price
*Cost subject to change as we finalize CAD. If
cost requirement is not met, a root cause
analysis and next steps will be provided in the
Final Report.
Manufacturing Cost ($) Material Cost ($) Purchased Cost ($) Total Cost per Engine ($)
Original 6984.46 181.71 3526.05 10692.22
Extra Cost for Manufacturing
and Purchased defects
349.22 9.09 70.52 428.83
Extra Cost for Destructive
Testing
63.11 34.59 7.05 104.76
Sum 7396.80 225.39 3603.63 11225.81
Scrap Rate (%)
Make 5
Buy 2
58
Team Member Contribution Matrix
Link to more detailed contribution table:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bHFtE6ZA2H7I4eMlNsfK5eIKP53iDOgBUCVewqBMyfs/edit#gid=0
59
Team Member Contribution Chart
60
Thank You!
Questions? Feedback?
● Scope
○ https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uYN3Kzk68p5pE0NjM6FMkMz3LxVFO8zqk1yzyUqNCaE/edit?usp=sharing
● Full Derived Requirements
○ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sMIHcQhcnjza3Yr3R7RntVngGTOD-mHwropvHfzkw0M/edit?usp=sharing
● Abbreviated Derived Requirements
○ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ohSYr8MiRrmH7aRShHGncW_HOBIPjGjHCIL0h-wLFB8/edit#gid=78626143
● Pugh Charts
○ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18ELRqXrPOghy-d9uP6Rad8a3WH-p9Xcz0kamU0qsRhI/edit?usp=sharing
● PDS _ Pricing Policy
○ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ED7uESZL6-nspWkAcAZFDGAuGvYXRb_KWy1KndVXfVY/edit?usp=sharing
● Gantt Chart
○ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WUQXCFwA4uwXKh9erpvrv2VRez4WSzKVEj9jpNCmJ4w/edit?usp=sharing
● Bill of Materials
○ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15V80KvX34m_qI1ohdNmOaIdU7w35qXYGIlH_kxIg_NA/edit#gid=0
● Material and Manufacturing Justification
○ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16AFzN7gmQR57AN-oiaFdzXS8Y27kMWFZ-knbgTNbsdg/edit#gid=0
● FMEA
○ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1F9aQfaNuH3c6Wg3EVwDwbaet28BUIdUvyf1i6TW0lv8/edit#gid=0
61
Links
● Theory of Operations
○ https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dHuip1QgGM-Jskde5y2eMqmoUGNA9r9hDGsRY7w6d1Q/edit
● Emissions and Fuel Efficiency
○ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jP_jdJ3sziOsTPAV5oynLPkkyucf3oJXzxk_eeX97mc/edit#gid=0
● Cooling and Lubrication
○ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lue-VBOdPQOK7iepezoYVlwi5MUEjrPtXmrfUPIG-DQ/edit#gid=218397271
● Labor Cost
○ https://www.bls.gov/iag/tgs/iagauto.htm
62
Links

Motorcycle Engine Design

  • 1.
    1 Sixy and WeKnow It Detailed Design Review: December 4th, 2020 Team Lead (Ray L) Project Manager (Julie W) Research Lead (Boxuan S) Calculation Lead (Junsei R) CAD Lead (Jim D) Report Lead (Serena C) Research Assistant (WIlson F) CAD Assistant (Tanios N) Calculation Assistant (Simon S) Report Assistant (Christina M) Report Assistant (Jake C)
  • 2.
    Engine Summary: ● Inline-four,DOHC ● Total displacement: 1500.19cc ● Compression ratio: 10:1 ● Liquid cooled ● Wet sump lubrication 2 Summary of Product
  • 3.
    Goals and Objectives ProjectStatement: ● Design an original inline 4 cruiser motorcycle engine for the middle class market in the USA for the Spartan Motorcycle Company. ● This engine will comply with all safety, emissions, and noise regulations. The project schedule will span from August 24th, 2020 to December 11th, 2020. ● Expect to produce 7500 units in the first year (2022), followed by 12000 units (2023), and 15000 units (2024). 3 Purpose (Market Fit): ● US motorcycle market size estimated at 7.85 billion USD in 2016 ● Anticipated to grow at a CAGR of 3.7% over next 10 years ● Over 468,000 units sold in 2019, approximately 485,000 units expected in 2020 ● Most cruisers have V-twin engines, so our inline 4 engine provides customers with an alternative and reliable engine for a cruiser motorcycle
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
    7 Materials Selection Process Researchand identify common materials currently used for components in the motorcycle industry Determine important material properties for the component’s specific function Use Granta EduPack + other resources to compare materials with the desired properties Choose most favorable material based on manufacturing and performance criteria. Apply FEA to necessary components Before we dive into the different subsystems and specifics of our manufacturing and material and make vs buy decisions, we will first look into the approach this team took to arrive to such decisions.
  • 8.
    8 Manufacturing Methods Selection UsingEdupack, Engineering Handbook, and other resources to find out what processes are suitable for particular materials. Research and find out the traditionally used process from empirical resources. Depending on performance requirement and material, determine the primary manufacturing processes. Determine any secondary manufacturing processes.
  • 9.
    9 Buy vs MakeSelection Decide if part has many dimensional choices available for purchase or if it is of critical importance to core function of the engine that requires custom dimensions. For parts with several dimensional options available, we will purchase them (e.g. bolts, nuts, pumps, etc). For parts with custom dimensions and our critical to our engine, we will make (e.g. engine block, piston head, etc) Do research on whether or not purchased parts meet engine performance and dimension requirements. If not, we will make the part.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
    12 Drawings of EngineBody: Engine Block
  • 13.
    13 Drawings of EngineBody: Cylinder Head (Preliminary)
  • 14.
    14 Drawings of EngineBody: Crankcase
  • 15.
    15 Engine Body Materialsand Manufacturing
  • 16.
    16 Relevant FMEA forEngine Body (S) (O) (D)
  • 17.
    17 Engine Body BOM PartNumber Designation: Company Callout - Subassembly - # Ex: SAWKI-EB-001 is for part #1 of engine block subassembly *COTS = Commercial off the shelf Make vs buy decision: ● Studs, washers, nuts, pins, and screws are purchased parts because there are a variety of options available for these on the market that our engine can be designed around ● Parts that the team has identified as core importance to the engine and thus should be designed by us to produce a unique engine include engine block, cylinder head, cylinder head cover, and etc
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
    22 Drawings of Valvetrain:Exhaust & Intake Valves
  • 23.
  • 24.
    ~ Revised FOS: -Intake Valve: 3.5 - Exhaust Valve: 3.8 24 Relevant FEA for Valvetrain
  • 25.
  • 26.
  • 27.
    27 Valvetrain BOM *COTS =Commercial off the shelf ● Buy: ○ Small parts with multiple dimensional options that we can fit our engine dimension to such as valve spring, valve guide seal, screws, keys, and bearings. ● Make: ○ Camshafts and valve components since they are crucial parts that can be designed by our team to make a unique engine
  • 28.
    28 Valvetrain Calculations: DischargeCoefficient and Lift Using exhaust valve and port design b (chart on the right) for analysis:
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33.
  • 34.
  • 35.
    ~ Revised FOS:3.25 35 Powertrain FEA: Piston
  • 36.
    ~ Revised FOS:3 ~ 2 slots of shear stress concentration due to clearance between piston and conrod. 36 Powertrain FEA: Wrist Pin
  • 37.
    ~ Revised FOS:6.23 37 Powertrain FEA: Conrod
  • 38.
  • 39.
  • 40.
  • 41.
    41 Powertrain BOM *COTS =Commercial off the shelf ● Buy: ○ Small parts with multiple dimensional options that we can fit our engine dimension to such as screws, keys, nuts, bearings, sprockets, and piston rings ● Make: ○ Crankshaft, connecting rod, piston, and wrist pin are parts that will undergo a lot of load, so the team decided to design them to make sure performance requirements of the engine are met
  • 42.
  • 43.
  • 44.
    Red: Coolant pathYellow: Oil path 45 Model of Cooling and Lubrication
  • 45.
  • 46.
  • 47.
    48 Relevant FMEA forCooling and Lubrication
  • 48.
    49 Lubrication and CoolingBOM *COTS = Commercial off the shelf ● Buy: ○ Small parts with multiple dimensional options that we can fit our engine dimension to such oil and cooling components ● Make: ○ Gaskets since they will have to fit to our engine which has custom dimensions for core components to create a proper seal ○ Oil pan since it will be designed to have an outer dimension that matches our engine to create a seal to prevent lubrication leakage
  • 49.
    50 Cooling & Lubrication:Lubrication Calculations
  • 50.
    51 Cooling and Lubrication:Cooling Calculations Parameters Value with Unit Gas Temperature 1474 K Inner Cylinder Wall Temperature 976 K Coolant Temperature 366 K Outside Surface Temperature of Engine Block 315 K Mass Flow 0.55 kg/s The minimum temperature to sustain burns : 318 K Volumetric Flow Rate of Coolant at 6500 RPM : 11.86 gpm
  • 51.
    Coolant Pump ● Part#: WP136S ● Supplier: Meziere ● Satisfies volumetric flow rate of 8.35 GPM 52 Coolant and Lubricant Pump Selection Oil Pump ● Part #: M16422012 ● Supplier: Marco ● Subject to change as current volumetric flow rate of 8507.41 mm^3/s is incorrect
  • 52.
    53 Other: Fuel Efficiency 65mph 5000 Rpm: 36.05 MPG > 35 MPG (required value) Mair (mass of air) 0.000505 kg AFR (air to fuel ratio) 14.7 Density of octane 2.86 kg/gal
  • 53.
    ● For AFRof 14.7 our engine will produce 158.3 g/km of CO and 29.64 g/km of NOx at 5000rpm. ● To meet the federal requirement, we have chosen Universal Catalytic Converter 51355 from MagnaFlow. 54 Other: Emissions
  • 54.
  • 55.
    56 Quality Control andTesting Destructive Testings Non-Destructive Testings Fatigue Fracture and Mechanical Residual Stress Measurement Aggressive Environment Coordinate- Measuring Machine Visual Testing Magnetic Particle/Liquid Penetrant Vibration Analysis Test Cell Decibel Meter First Year Purchased Parts 1 in 500 1 in 500 1 in 500 1 in 500 N/A All 1 in 500 N/A N/A N/A Manufactured Parts Critical 1 in 50 1 in 50 1 in 50 1 in 50 All All All N/A N/A N/A Non-Critical 1 in 100 1 in 100 1 in 100 1 in 100 1 in 100 All 1 in 100 N/A N/A N/A Assembled Engine N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All N/A 1 in 100 1 in 100 1 in 100 Second Year Purchased Parts 1 in 1000 1 in 1000 1 in 1000 1 in 1000 N/A All 1 in 1000 N/A N/A N/A Manufactured Parts Critical 1 in 100 1 in 100 1 in 100 1 in 100 1 in100 All 1 in 100 N/A N/A N/A Non-Critical 1 in 200 1 in 200 1 in 200 1 in 200 1 in 500 All 1 in 500 N/A N/A N/A Assembled Engine N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All N/A 1 in 200 1 in 200 1 in 200 Third Year Purchased Parts 1 in 1000 1 in 1000 1 in 1000 1 in 1000 N/A All 1 in 1000 N/A N/A N/A Manufactured Parts Critical 1 in 200 1 in 200 1 in 200 1 in 200 1 in 200 All 1 in 200 N/A N/A N/A Non-Critical 1 in 500 1 in 500 1 in 500 1 in 500 1 in 1000 All 1 in 1000 N/A N/A N/A Assembled Engine N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All N/A 1 in 500 1 in 500 1 in 500 There is a decrease in testing rate because: 1. Increasing production, and 2. More consistent quality as we produce more. However, a part’s testing rate will return to first- year standard if the part fails any testings. Critical Parts: Connecting Rods, Cylinder Sleeve, Crankshaft, Piston Head, Intake Valves, Exhaust Valves, Wrist Pins, Camshafts. Non-critical Parts: All the manufactured parts not listed in critical parts.
  • 56.
    57 Cost Estimate Manufacturing Cost: ●Overhead cost ($/hr) = 100 ● Labor ($/hr) = 21.73 ● Focused on primary and secondary processes Purchased Cost: ● Accounted for an estimated 20% markup retail price *Cost subject to change as we finalize CAD. If cost requirement is not met, a root cause analysis and next steps will be provided in the Final Report. Manufacturing Cost ($) Material Cost ($) Purchased Cost ($) Total Cost per Engine ($) Original 6984.46 181.71 3526.05 10692.22 Extra Cost for Manufacturing and Purchased defects 349.22 9.09 70.52 428.83 Extra Cost for Destructive Testing 63.11 34.59 7.05 104.76 Sum 7396.80 225.39 3603.63 11225.81 Scrap Rate (%) Make 5 Buy 2
  • 57.
    58 Team Member ContributionMatrix Link to more detailed contribution table: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bHFtE6ZA2H7I4eMlNsfK5eIKP53iDOgBUCVewqBMyfs/edit#gid=0
  • 58.
  • 59.
  • 60.
    ● Scope ○ https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uYN3Kzk68p5pE0NjM6FMkMz3LxVFO8zqk1yzyUqNCaE/edit?usp=sharing ●Full Derived Requirements ○ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sMIHcQhcnjza3Yr3R7RntVngGTOD-mHwropvHfzkw0M/edit?usp=sharing ● Abbreviated Derived Requirements ○ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ohSYr8MiRrmH7aRShHGncW_HOBIPjGjHCIL0h-wLFB8/edit#gid=78626143 ● Pugh Charts ○ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18ELRqXrPOghy-d9uP6Rad8a3WH-p9Xcz0kamU0qsRhI/edit?usp=sharing ● PDS _ Pricing Policy ○ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ED7uESZL6-nspWkAcAZFDGAuGvYXRb_KWy1KndVXfVY/edit?usp=sharing ● Gantt Chart ○ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WUQXCFwA4uwXKh9erpvrv2VRez4WSzKVEj9jpNCmJ4w/edit?usp=sharing ● Bill of Materials ○ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15V80KvX34m_qI1ohdNmOaIdU7w35qXYGIlH_kxIg_NA/edit#gid=0 ● Material and Manufacturing Justification ○ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16AFzN7gmQR57AN-oiaFdzXS8Y27kMWFZ-knbgTNbsdg/edit#gid=0 ● FMEA ○ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1F9aQfaNuH3c6Wg3EVwDwbaet28BUIdUvyf1i6TW0lv8/edit#gid=0 61 Links
  • 61.
    ● Theory ofOperations ○ https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dHuip1QgGM-Jskde5y2eMqmoUGNA9r9hDGsRY7w6d1Q/edit ● Emissions and Fuel Efficiency ○ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jP_jdJ3sziOsTPAV5oynLPkkyucf3oJXzxk_eeX97mc/edit#gid=0 ● Cooling and Lubrication ○ https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1lue-VBOdPQOK7iepezoYVlwi5MUEjrPtXmrfUPIG-DQ/edit#gid=218397271 ● Labor Cost ○ https://www.bls.gov/iag/tgs/iagauto.htm 62 Links

Editor's Notes

  • #2 Ray
  • #3 Ray some basic information. (summary of the product)
  • #4 The goal our team set out to accomplish was the design of an original inline 4 cylinder cruiser motorcycle to be sold in the US market. The engine design objectives were made with safety, environmental, and other various operational standards and regulations in mind. The motorcycle engine market is large, but with healthy room for growth. Most cruisers have V-twin engines, so our inline 4 engine provides customers with an alternative and reliable engine for a cruiser motorcycle making it stand out against the competition Our engine falls in the mid to upper price range when compared with other competing engines in the market Ray with satisfaction of design requirements Compound Annual Growth Rate Show why our design is called for - runs into market ID and needs. How many people are expected to buy the motorcycle with our engine?
  • #5 When presenting, focus on the things we did not meet and talk about our next steps for these.
  • #7 Ray
  • #8 Justification slide Important material properties include, fatigue strength, yield strength, price, thermal coefficient of expansion, etc Our most important justification is typically the FEA analysis for any load bearing component and these analyses will be discussed later in our presentation Chose A356 for timing cover and not 383 bc does not experience as much heat and is cheaper
  • #9 Justification slide Important material properties include, fatigue strength, yield strength, price, thermal coefficient of expansion, etc Our most important justification is typically the FEA analysis for any load bearing component and these analyses will be discussed later in our presentation Chose A356 for timing cover and not 383 bc does not experience as much heat and is cheaper
  • #11 10-14 Jim
  • #16 Tanios and Juliace
  • #17 Christina Next is Jake talking about the engine body bill of materials Engineering Design 5th Edition, written by George E. Dieter and Linda C. Schmidt
  • #18  Talk about how for this presentation we split up the BOM into different subsections to be cohesive with rest of presentation Talk about how overall BOM can be sign through a link at the end of the presentation Mention that on complete BOM we have 91 total parts and 31 are manufactured while 60 are purchased Talk about part number designation COTS = commercial off the shelf Jim has next slide
  • #19 Jim
  • #27 Christina Next Jake is going to talk about the valvetrain bill of materials
  • #28 Junsei has next slide
  • #29 Junsei
  • #30 Boxuan
  • #31 30-38 Jim
  • #33 Subassembly to subassembly A few critical components in that subassembly
  • #34 Subassembly to subassembly A few critical components in that subassembly
  • #35 Subassembly to subassembly A few critical components in that subassembly
  • #41 Christina Next Jake is going to talk about the powertrain bill of materials
  • #42 Junsei has next slide
  • #43 Junsei
  • #45 44-45 Ray
  • #46 Subassembly to subassembly A few critical components in that subassembly
  • #49 Christina
  • #50 Junsei has next slide
  • #51 Junsei
  • #52 Simon
  • #54 Boxuan
  • #55 Junsei The converter should be able to run with at least 92.2% efficiency for CO and 97.3% to meet the federal requirement.
  • #56 Jim
  • #57 Christina Next Tanios is going to talk about the materials selection process ISO and ASTM standards I may remove this if we do not have time for proper research. Or we can put the quality control table here and say the testing for emissions, safety, fuel efficiency, and noise are still be researched. Critical Parts Connecting Rods Cylinder Sleeve Crankshaft Piston Head Intake Valves Exhaust Valves Wrist Pins Camshafts
  • #58 Serena
  • #59 Juliace