BARRIER MATERIALS, FLEXIBLE, ELECTROSTATIC PROTECTIVE,
HEAT-SEALABLE BAGS: Requirements for heat-sealable, electrostatic protective, flexible barrier materials used for the military packaging of microcircuits, sensitive semiconductor devices, sensitive resistors, and associated higher assemblies.
This specification establishes the requirements for transparent, flexible, heat-sealable barrier materials having waterproof or low water vapor transmission characteristics for use in military packaging
Mil prf-81705 d-amendment-1 military packagingpinkinator
Mil prf-81705 d- Amendment: Requirements for heat-sealable, electrostatic protective, flexible barrier materials used for the military packaging of microcircuits, sensitive semiconductor devices, sensitive resistors, and associated higher assemblies: BARRIER MATERIALS, FLEXIBLE, ELECTROSTATIC PROTECTIVE, HEAT-SEALABLE BAGS.
BARRIER MATERIALS, FLEXIBLE, ELECTROSTATIC PROTECTIVE,
HEAT-SEALABLE BAGS: Requirements for heat-sealable, electrostatic protective, flexible barrier materials used for the military packaging of microcircuits, sensitive semiconductor devices, sensitive resistors, and associated higher assemblies.
This specification establishes the requirements for transparent, flexible, heat-sealable barrier materials having waterproof or low water vapor transmission characteristics for use in military packaging
Mil prf-81705 d-amendment-1 military packagingpinkinator
Mil prf-81705 d- Amendment: Requirements for heat-sealable, electrostatic protective, flexible barrier materials used for the military packaging of microcircuits, sensitive semiconductor devices, sensitive resistors, and associated higher assemblies: BARRIER MATERIALS, FLEXIBLE, ELECTROSTATIC PROTECTIVE, HEAT-SEALABLE BAGS.
Mil prf-22191 f-amendment-1 military packagingpinkinator
This specification establishes the requirements for transparent, flexible, heatsealable
barrier materials having waterproof or low water vapor transmission characteristics for
use in military packaging: BARRIER MATERIALS, TRANSPARENT, FLEXIBLE, HEAT-SEALABLE BAGS
This BLH handbook is intended to educate the user regarding the proper selection ofelectronic weighing systems used in hazardous locations. This document does not cover the installation of equipment as this is typically the responsibility of the installing electrician and/ or engineering design rm. Information contained herein has been compiled from a number of published sources and condensed to cover the subject as related to electronic weighing equipment only.
Due to the stoppage of some 3M DriShield* moisture barrier bags, many companies are seeking alternatives to meet their needs. Protective Packaging can create static shielding bags and moisture barrier bags of all sizes from these materials.
Moisture Barrier Bags for Mil Spec Packagingpinkinator
Protective Packaging provides ready made and custom moisture barrier bags in all sizes (literally for anything from paper clips to airplanes) and military packaging solutions that meet an array of military specifications.
Protective Packaging’s industrial vacuum sealers and hand held rotary heat sealers provide a convenient heat source to create pouches and bags out of materials lined with polyethylene.
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...Neo4j
Leonard Jayamohan, Partner & Generative AI Lead, Deloitte
This keynote will reveal how Deloitte leverages Neo4j’s graph power for groundbreaking digital twin solutions, achieving a staggering 100x performance boost. Discover the essential role knowledge graphs play in successful generative AI implementations. Plus, get an exclusive look at an innovative Neo4j + Generative AI solution Deloitte is developing in-house.
GridMate - End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid...ThomasParaiso2
End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid regressions. In this session, we share our journey building an E2E testing pipeline for GridMate components (LWC and Aura) using Cypress, JSForce, FakerJS…
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024Neo4j
Neha Bajwa, Vice President of Product Marketing, Neo4j
Join us as we explore breakthrough innovations enabled by interconnected data and AI. Discover firsthand how organizations use relationships in data to uncover contextual insights and solve our most pressing challenges – from optimizing supply chains, detecting fraud, and improving customer experiences to accelerating drug discoveries.
Dr. Sean Tan, Head of Data Science, Changi Airport Group
Discover how Changi Airport Group (CAG) leverages graph technologies and generative AI to revolutionize their search capabilities. This session delves into the unique search needs of CAG’s diverse passengers and customers, showcasing how graph data structures enhance the accuracy and relevance of AI-generated search results, mitigating the risk of “hallucinations” and improving the overall customer journey.
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...SOFTTECHHUB
The choice of an operating system plays a pivotal role in shaping our computing experience. For decades, Microsoft's Windows has dominated the market, offering a familiar and widely adopted platform for personal and professional use. However, as technological advancements continue to push the boundaries of innovation, alternative operating systems have emerged, challenging the status quo and offering users a fresh perspective on computing.
One such alternative that has garnered significant attention and acclaim is Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, a sleek, powerful, and user-friendly Linux distribution that promises to redefine the way we interact with our devices. With its focus on performance, security, and customization, Nitrux Linux presents a compelling case for those seeking to break free from the constraints of proprietary software and embrace the freedom and flexibility of open-source computing.
Mil prf-22191 f-amendment-1 military packagingpinkinator
This specification establishes the requirements for transparent, flexible, heatsealable
barrier materials having waterproof or low water vapor transmission characteristics for
use in military packaging: BARRIER MATERIALS, TRANSPARENT, FLEXIBLE, HEAT-SEALABLE BAGS
This BLH handbook is intended to educate the user regarding the proper selection ofelectronic weighing systems used in hazardous locations. This document does not cover the installation of equipment as this is typically the responsibility of the installing electrician and/ or engineering design rm. Information contained herein has been compiled from a number of published sources and condensed to cover the subject as related to electronic weighing equipment only.
Due to the stoppage of some 3M DriShield* moisture barrier bags, many companies are seeking alternatives to meet their needs. Protective Packaging can create static shielding bags and moisture barrier bags of all sizes from these materials.
Moisture Barrier Bags for Mil Spec Packagingpinkinator
Protective Packaging provides ready made and custom moisture barrier bags in all sizes (literally for anything from paper clips to airplanes) and military packaging solutions that meet an array of military specifications.
Protective Packaging’s industrial vacuum sealers and hand held rotary heat sealers provide a convenient heat source to create pouches and bags out of materials lined with polyethylene.
GraphSummit Singapore | The Future of Agility: Supercharging Digital Transfor...Neo4j
Leonard Jayamohan, Partner & Generative AI Lead, Deloitte
This keynote will reveal how Deloitte leverages Neo4j’s graph power for groundbreaking digital twin solutions, achieving a staggering 100x performance boost. Discover the essential role knowledge graphs play in successful generative AI implementations. Plus, get an exclusive look at an innovative Neo4j + Generative AI solution Deloitte is developing in-house.
GridMate - End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid...ThomasParaiso2
End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid regressions. In this session, we share our journey building an E2E testing pipeline for GridMate components (LWC and Aura) using Cypress, JSForce, FakerJS…
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024Neo4j
Neha Bajwa, Vice President of Product Marketing, Neo4j
Join us as we explore breakthrough innovations enabled by interconnected data and AI. Discover firsthand how organizations use relationships in data to uncover contextual insights and solve our most pressing challenges – from optimizing supply chains, detecting fraud, and improving customer experiences to accelerating drug discoveries.
Dr. Sean Tan, Head of Data Science, Changi Airport Group
Discover how Changi Airport Group (CAG) leverages graph technologies and generative AI to revolutionize their search capabilities. This session delves into the unique search needs of CAG’s diverse passengers and customers, showcasing how graph data structures enhance the accuracy and relevance of AI-generated search results, mitigating the risk of “hallucinations” and improving the overall customer journey.
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...SOFTTECHHUB
The choice of an operating system plays a pivotal role in shaping our computing experience. For decades, Microsoft's Windows has dominated the market, offering a familiar and widely adopted platform for personal and professional use. However, as technological advancements continue to push the boundaries of innovation, alternative operating systems have emerged, challenging the status quo and offering users a fresh perspective on computing.
One such alternative that has garnered significant attention and acclaim is Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, a sleek, powerful, and user-friendly Linux distribution that promises to redefine the way we interact with our devices. With its focus on performance, security, and customization, Nitrux Linux presents a compelling case for those seeking to break free from the constraints of proprietary software and embrace the freedom and flexibility of open-source computing.
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge GraphGuy Korland
Guy Korland, CEO and Co-founder of FalkorDB, will review two articles on the integration of language models with knowledge graphs.
1. Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08302
2. Microsoft Research's GraphRAG paper and a review paper on various uses of knowledge graphs:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/graphrag-unlocking-llm-discovery-on-narrative-private-data/
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software FuzzingAftab Hussain
Imagine a world where software fuzzing, the process of mutating bytes in test seeds to uncover hidden and erroneous program behaviors, becomes faster and more effective. A lot depends on the initial seeds, which can significantly dictate the trajectory of a fuzzing campaign, particularly in terms of how long it takes to uncover interesting behaviour in your code. We introduce DIAR, a technique designed to speedup fuzzing campaigns by pinpointing and eliminating those uninteresting bytes in the seeds. Picture this: instead of wasting valuable resources on meaningless mutations in large, bloated seeds, DIAR removes the unnecessary bytes, streamlining the entire process.
In this work, we equipped AFL, a popular fuzzer, with DIAR and examined two critical Linux libraries -- Libxml's xmllint, a tool for parsing xml documents, and Binutil's readelf, an essential debugging and security analysis command-line tool used to display detailed information about ELF (Executable and Linkable Format). Our preliminary results show that AFL+DIAR does not only discover new paths more quickly but also achieves higher coverage overall. This work thus showcases how starting with lean and optimized seeds can lead to faster, more comprehensive fuzzing campaigns -- and DIAR helps you find such seeds.
- These are slides of the talk given at IEEE International Conference on Software Testing Verification and Validation Workshop, ICSTW 2022.
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing DaysKari Kakkonen
My slides at Nordic Testing Days 6.6.2024
Climate impact / sustainability of software testing discussed on the talk. ICT and testing must carry their part of global responsibility to help with the climat warming. We can minimize the carbon footprint but we can also have a carbon handprint, a positive impact on the climate. Quality characteristics can be added with sustainability, and then measured continuously. Test environments can be used less, and in smaller scale and on demand. Test techniques can be used in optimizing or minimizing number of tests. Test automation can be used to speed up testing.
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdfPaige Cruz
Monitoring and observability aren’t traditionally found in software curriculums and many of us cobble this knowledge together from whatever vendor or ecosystem we were first introduced to and whatever is a part of your current company’s observability stack.
While the dev and ops silo continues to crumble….many organizations still relegate monitoring & observability as the purview of ops, infra and SRE teams. This is a mistake - achieving a highly observable system requires collaboration up and down the stack.
I, a former op, would like to extend an invitation to all application developers to join the observability party will share these foundational concepts to build on:
Elevating Tactical DDD Patterns Through Object CalisthenicsDorra BARTAGUIZ
After immersing yourself in the blue book and its red counterpart, attending DDD-focused conferences, and applying tactical patterns, you're left with a crucial question: How do I ensure my design is effective? Tactical patterns within Domain-Driven Design (DDD) serve as guiding principles for creating clear and manageable domain models. However, achieving success with these patterns requires additional guidance. Interestingly, we've observed that a set of constraints initially designed for training purposes remarkably aligns with effective pattern implementation, offering a more ‘mechanical’ approach. Let's explore together how Object Calisthenics can elevate the design of your tactical DDD patterns, offering concrete help for those venturing into DDD for the first time!
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 4DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 4. In this session, we will cover Test Manager overview along with SAP heatmap.
The UiPath Test Manager overview with SAP heatmap webinar offers a concise yet comprehensive exploration of the role of a Test Manager within SAP environments, coupled with the utilization of heatmaps for effective testing strategies.
Participants will gain insights into the responsibilities, challenges, and best practices associated with test management in SAP projects. Additionally, the webinar delves into the significance of heatmaps as a visual aid for identifying testing priorities, areas of risk, and resource allocation within SAP landscapes. Through this session, attendees can expect to enhance their understanding of test management principles while learning practical approaches to optimize testing processes in SAP environments using heatmap visualization techniques
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into SAP testing best practices
2. Heatmap utilization for testing
3. Optimization of testing processes
4. Demo
Topics covered:
Execution from the test manager
Orchestrator execution result
Defect reporting
SAP heatmap example with demo
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
1. Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com on 2012-04-26T2:15:30.
INCH-POUND
MIL-DTL-117H
30 April 2001
SUPERSEDING
MIL-B-117G
18 August 1993
DETAIL SPECIFICATION
BAGS, HEAT-SEALABLE
This specification is approved for use by all Departments and Agencies of the Department of
Defense.
1. SCOPE
1.1 Scope. This document covers heat-sealable bags used in military preservation.
1.2 Classification. Bags are furnished in the following types, classes, and styles as specified
(see 6.2):
1.2.1 Type. The type of bags is as follows:
Type I - Heavy duty
Type II - Medium duty
Type III - Light duty
1.2.2 Class. The class of bags is as follows:
Class A - Waterproof, electrostatic protective, static dissipative
Class B - Waterproof
Class C - Waterproof, greaseproof
Beneficial comments (recommendations, additions, deletions) and any pertinent data which
may be used in improving this document should be addressed to: Commander, Naval Air
Warfare Center Aircraft Division (Code 414100B120-3), Highway 547, Lakehurst, NJ
08753-5100 by using the Standardization Document Improvement Proposal (DD Form
1426) appearing at the end of this document or by letter.
AMSC N/A FSC 8105
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
2. Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com on 2012-04-26T2:15:30.
MIL-DTL-117H
Class E - Watervaporproof, greaseproof
Class F - Watervaporproof, electrostatic protective, electrostatic and
electromagnetic shielding
Class H - Waterproof, electrostatic protective, electrostatic shielding
1.2.3 Style. The style of bags is as follows:
Style 1 - Opaque
Style 2 - Transparent
Style 3 - One side opaque, other side transparent
2. APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS
2.1 General. The documents listed in this section are specified in sections 3 and 4 of this
specification. This section does not include documents cited in other sections of this specification
or recommended for additional information or as examples. While every effort has been made to
ensure the completeness of this list, document users are cautioned that they must meet all
specified requirements documents cited in sections 3 and 4 of this specification, whether or not
they are listed.
2.2 Government documents.
2.2.1 Specifications and standards. The following specifications and standards form a part
of this document to the extent specified herein. Unless otherwise specified, the issues of these
documents are those listed in the issue of the Department of Defense Index of Specifications and
Standards (DoDISS) and supplement thereto, cited in the solicitation (see 6.2).
SPECIFICATIONS
FEDERAL
A-A-3174 - Plastic Sheet, Polyolefin.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
MIL-PRF-121 - Barrier Materials, Greaseproof, Waterproof, Flexible,
Heat-Sealable.
MIL-PRF-131 - Barrier Materials, Watervaporproof, Greaseproof, Flexible,
Heat-Sealable.
MIL-PRF-22191 - Barrier Materials, Transparent, Flexible, Heat-Sealable.
MIL-PRF-81705 - Barrier Materials, Flexible, Electrostatic Protective,
Heat-Sealable.
2
3. Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com on 2012-04-26T2:15:30.
MIL-DTL-117H
STANDARDS
FEDERAL
FED-STD-101 - Test Procedures for Packaging Materials.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
MIL-STD-129 - Standard Practice for Military Marking.
MIL-STD-2073-1 - Standard Practice for Military Packaging.
(Unless otherwise indicated, copies of the above specifications and standards are available
from the Standardization Document Order Desk, 700 Robbins Avenue, Building 4D, Philadelphia,
PA 19111-5094.)
2.3 Non-Government publications. The following documents form a part of this document
to the extent specified herein. Unless otherwise specified, the issues of the documents, which are
DoD adopted, are those listed in the issue of the DoDISS cited in the solicitation. Unless
otherwise specified, the issues of documents not listed in the DoDISS are the issues cited in the
solicitation (see 6.2).
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR QUALITY CONTROL (ASQC)
ASQC-Z1.4 - Procedures, Sampling and Tables for Inspection by Attributes.
(DoD adopted)
(Application for copies should be addressed to the American Society for Quality Control,
P.O. Box 3005, 611 East Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53201-4604).
2.4 Order of precedence. In the event of a conflict between the text of this document and
the references cited herein, the text of this document takes precedence. Nothing in this document,
however, supersedes applicable laws and regulations unless a specific exemption has been
obtained.
3. REQUIREMENTS
3.1 First article. When specified (see 6.2), samples shall be subjected to first article
inspection in accordance with 4.2.
3.2 Material. Materials shall meet the requirements of the types, classes, and styles specified
in table I.
3
4. Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com on 2012-04-26T2:15:30.
MIL-DTL-117H
TABLE I. Classification of materials.
MIL-DTL-117 Required Materials for Bag Fabrication
Type Class Style Document Type Class
I E 1 MIL-PRF-131 - 1
I E 2 MIL-PRF-22191 I 1 or 2
MIL-PRF-131 or - 1
I E 3
MIL-PRF-22191 I 1 or 2
I F 1 MIL-PRF-81705 I 1 or 2
II A 2 MIL-PRF-81705 II 1 or 2
II C 1 MIL-PRF-121 I -
II C 2 MIL-PRF-22191 II 1 or 2
MIL-PRF-121 or I -
II C 3
MIL-PRF-22191 II 1 or 2
II E 1 MIL-PRF-131 - 2
II H 2 MIL-PRF-81705 III 1 or 2
MIL-PRF-22191 or III 1 or 2
III B 2
A-A-3174 1/ I or II 1 2/
III C 1 MIL-PRF-121 II -
1/ Unless otherwise specified (see 6.2), nominal thickness shall be 0.004 inches.
2/ Finish shall be No. 2 (treated).
3.3 Construction. Class A, B, C, and E bags shall be formed using two sheets or by folding
one sheet of material. Heat-sealable surfaces of the specified material shall be placed face to face,
heat-sealing along both sides and the bottom edge as required. Transparent bags fabricated by the
side weld process shall be folded and have two side seams. The side seams shall be parallel to
each other and to the outer edges of the bag in all cases. The bottom fold shall be at right angles
to the side seams. Class F and H bags shall be formed from one folded sheet of material heat-
sealed on three sides (fold shall be heat-sealed).
3.3.1 Notched bags. When specified (see 6.2), bags shall have a tear, nick, or V-notch
1/8 inch deep with a tolerance of ± 1/16 inch, in at least one edge located 1 to 1-1/4 inches from
the open (unsealed) end of the bag. The legend “TEAR HERE TO OPEN” with an arrow
pointing to the tear, nick, or V-notch shall be printed on the bag with lettering that shall be not
less than 1/8 inch in height.
3.4 Dimensions and tolerances. The length and width of bags shall be specified in the
contract or purchase order (see 6.2). The width shall be measured from the inside edges of the
side seams. The length shall be measured from the inside edge of the bottom seam or bottom
fold to the edge of the opening. The tolerances for the length and width shall be as indicated in
table II. The maximum heat-seal widths shall be as indicated in table II.
4
5. Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com on 2012-04-26T2:15:30.
MIL-DTL-117H
TABLE II. Dimensions and tolerances.
Bag area Length and width Maximum heat-seal
(one side) tolerances (inch) width (inch) 1/
25 sq. in. or less -1/16, +1/8 3/8
26 thru 200 sq. in. -1/8, +1/4 1/2
201 thru 500 sq. in. -1/4, +3/8 5/8
501 sq. in. or over -1/4, +1/2 5/8
1/ Seams fabricated by the dielectric, impulse, or ultra-sonic process shall have a minimum
1/32-inch heat-seal. Seams fabricated from unsupported plastic sheet such as polyethylene or
polyolefin shall meet the heat-sealed seam test specified in 3.5 with no minimum seal width
required.
3.5 Bag integrity requirements. Bags shall meet the leakage test requirements of
FED-STD-101, Method 5009 (see 4.4.2). Heat-seals shall meet the requirements of the heat-
sealed seam test of MIL-STD-2073-1, Appendix G (see 4.4.1).
3.6 Identification. Each bag shall be marked or printed in capital letters or numbers, using
10-point type, and shall contain the following information: This specification number and revision
letter; type, class, and style; bag manufacturer's name and bag designation; month; and year of bag
fabrication. Each bag shall contain this printing on at least one surface with the color and position
of the printing being optional. When the marking is interrupted or incomplete due to the size of
the bags, the individual bag need not be marked as specified, but shall be accompanied within the
shipping container by an identification sheet marked or printed with the same information. When
specified (see 6.2), a pressure sensitive label shall be applied to the outer surface of each bag in
lieu of marking the bag.
3.6.1 Sealing recommendation. Each unit package of bags shall include a sheet legibly
marked with the following heat-sealing information.
a. Jaw type sealer (temperature, pressure, and dwell).
b. Band type sealer (temperature, pressure, and dwell).
c. Rotary type sealer (preheat, pressure, and speed).
3.7 Workmanship. Bags shall be free from any foreign matter, pinholes, tears, cuts, splits,
slits, creases, wrinkles, or other imperfections.
5
6. Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com on 2012-04-26T2:15:30.
MIL-DTL-117H
4. VERIFICATION
4.1 Classification of inspections. The inspection requirements specified herein are classified
as follows:
a. First article inspection (see 4.2).
b. Conformance inspection (see 4.3).
4.2 First article inspection. First article inspection shall consist of all the tests and
examinations specified in this specification.
4.3 Conformance inspection. Conformance inspections shall consist of the bag integrity tests
listed in 4.4 and the visual examinations listed in 4.3.2.
4.3.1 Sampling for conformance inspection. For the purpose of determining the sample size
in accordance with ASQC-Z1.4, the lot size (see 6.3) shall be expressed in number of bags
produced in one production run and shall use an inspection level of S-1 for testing and S-3 for
visual examination.
4.3.2 Visual examination of end item for defects in materials, construction, notching,
dimensions and tolerance, sealing recommendation. The sample unit for the end item visual
inspection shall be one bag. The sample unit shall be visually inspected and measured to ensure it
meets the requirements specified in 3.2, 3.3, 3.3.1, 3.4, 3.6, 3.6.1, and 3.7.
4.4 Bag integrity testing.
4.4.1 Heat-sealed seam test. Heat-seal specimens from bags shall be tested in accordance
with the heat-sealed seam test described in MIL-STD-2073-1, Appendix G.
4.4.2 Leakage test. Before conducting the leakage test, paper towels or similar dunnage
material shall be placed in the bag to simulate representative contents. A unit pack shall then be
formed by heat-sealing the bag opening using the same equipment and technique used during
fabrication of the bag. The completed unit pack shall then be subjected to the leakage test using
the submersion technique described in FED-STD-101, Method 5009.
5. PACKAGING
5.1 Packaging. For acquisition purposes, the packaging requirements shall be as specified in
the contract or order (see 6.2). When actual packaging of materiel is to be performed by DoD
personnel, these personnel need to contact the responsible packaging activity to ascertain requisite
packaging requirements. Packaging requirements are maintained by the Inventory Control Point's
6
7. Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com on 2012-04-26T2:15:30.
MIL-DTL-117H
packaging activity within the Military Department or Defense Agency, or within the Military
Department's System Command. Packaging data retrieval is available from the managing Military
Department's or Defense Agency's automated packaging files, CD-ROM products, or by
contacting the responsible packaging activity.
6. NOTES
(This section contains information of a general or explanatory nature that may be helpful, but
is not mandatory.)
6.1 Intended use. Bags covered by this specification are intended for use in specialized
military methods of preservation. The barrier materials, from which these bags are constructed of,
are all approved and military unique and provide the necessary requirements for protection from
exposure to the extremes of the navy/naval aviation environment. There are no commercial
equivalents that meet the requirements necessary to protect materiel that is exposed to the
operational naval aviation environment. Specifically, Methods of Preservation 31, 32, 33, 41, 42,
51, and 52 utilize these bags in order to provide the specialized military preservation required by
MIL-STD-2073-1.
6.1.1 Classes A and H bags. Class A and H bags are intended for preserving electrostatic
discharge sensitive items.
6.1.2 Class B bags. Class B bags are intended for preserving items that require waterproof
protection as specified in MIL-STD-2073-1, Method 31and Method 32.
6.1.3 Class C bags. Class C bags are intended for preserving items that require greaseproof
protection in addition to waterproof protection as specified in MIL-STD-2073-1 Method 33.
6.1.4 Class E bags. Class E bags are intended for preserving items that require
watervaporproof, waterproof, and greaseproof protection as specified in MIL-STD-2073-1,
Method 41, 42, 51, and 52.
6.1.5 Class F bags. Class F bags are intended for preserving electrostatic discharge sensitive
items. They also provide electromagnetic interference and electrostatic shielding protection.
Additionally, these bags provide the watervaporproof protection as specified in
MIL-STD-2073-1, Method 41 and Method 51.
7
8. Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com on 2012-04-26T2:15:30.
MIL-DTL-117H
6.1.6 Size of bags.
6.1.6.1 Size limitations. Although the size of bag is unrestricted, the following
recommendations are provided:
a. Type II, class E, style 1 – sum of bag inside dimensions should not exceed 42 inches and
bag should not contain a double seam junction.
b. Type III, class C, style 1 – maximum area (product of inside bag dimensions): 50 square
inches.
6.1.6.2 Bag stock sizes. Commonly stocked bag sizes are listed in table III.
TABLE III. Common bag stock sizes.
Size Inside dimensions
designation (inches) (W x L)
1 2-1/2 by 3
2 2-1/2 by 6
3 3 by 5
4 4 by 6
5 4 by 8
6 4 by 12
7 6 by 6
8 6 by 8
9 8 by 12
10 10 by 10
11 10 by 13
12 10 by 12
13 12 by 12
6.1.7 Weight limitations. No weight limitations are imposed if any filled bag is further
packed in a supporting container. When a bag is used without an additional supporting container,
the net weight of contents should not exceed 10 pounds, with the following exceptions:
a. Maximum weight of contents should be restricted to 5 pounds when A-A-3174 material is
used for type III, class B, style 2 bags.
b. No weight restrictions apply to type I, class E, style 1, 2, or 3 bags or to type I, class F,
style 1 bags.
8
9. Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com on 2012-04-26T2:15:30.
MIL-DTL-117H
6.2 Acquisition requirements. Acquisition documents must specify the following:
a. Title, number, and date of this specification.
b. Type, class, and style of bags (see 1.2).
c. Issue of DoDISS to be cited in the solicitation, and if required, the specific issue of
individual documents referenced (see 2.2.1).
d. If nominal thickness of A-A-3174 material other than .004 inches is required (see table I).
e. If tears, nicks, or V-notches are required (see 3.3.1).
f. Size of bags (inside length and width dimensions) (see 3.4 and 6.1.6 )
g. If pressure-sensitive labels should be applied (see 3.6).
h. If first article inspection is required (see 4.2).
i. Packaging requirements (see 5.1).
6.3 Lot size. Inspection lot should consist of all bags manufactured by the same process
from the same raw material during one production run.
6.4 Subject term (key word) listing.
Container
Electrostatic-protective
Electromagnetic shielding
Greaseproof
Packaging material
Preservation
Waterproof
Watervaporproof
6.5 Changes from previous issue. Marginal notations are not used in this revision to identify
changes with respect to the previous issue due to the extensiveness of the changes.
CONCLUDING MATERIAL
Custodians: Preparing activity:
Army – SM Navy – AS
Navy – AS
Air Force – 11 (Project 8105-0378)
DLA – DH
Review activities:
Army – AT, AV, EA, GL3, MI
Navy – MC, OS, SA, SH
9
10. Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com on 2012-04-26T2:15:30.
STANDARDIZATION DOCUMENT IMPROVEMENT PROPOSAL
INSTRUCTIONS
1. The preparing activity must complete blocks 1, 2, 3, and 8. In block 1, both the document number and revision letter
should be given.
2. The submitter of this form must complete blocks 4, 5, 6, and 7, and send to preparing activity.
3. The preparing activity must provide a reply within 30 days from receipt of the form.
NOTE: This form may not be used to request copies of documents, nor to request waivers, or clarification of
requirements on current contracts. Comments submitted on this form do not constitute or imply authorization to waive
any portion of the referenced document(s) or to amend contractual requirements.
1. DOCUMENT NUMBER 2. DOCUMENT DATE (YYYYMMDD)
I RECOMMEND A CHANGE: MIL-DTL-117H 20010430
3. DOCUMENT TITLE
BAGS, HEAT-SEALABLE
4. NATURE OF CHANGE (Identify paragraph number and include proposed rewrite, if possible. Attach extra sheets as needed.)
5. REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
6. SUBMITTER
a. NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial) b. ORGANIZATION
c. ADDRESS (Include ZIP Code) d. TELEPHONE (Include Area Code) 7. DATE SUBMITTED
(1) Commercial (YYYYMMDD)
(2) DSN
(If applicable)
8. PREPARING ACTIVITY
a. NAME b. TELEPHONE (Include Area Code)
COMMANDER (1) Commercial (2) DSN
NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER (732) 323-2947 624-2947
AIRCRAFT DIVISION
c. ADDRESS (Include ZIP Code) IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE A REPLY WITHIN 45 DAYS, CONTACT:
CODE 414100B120-3 Defense Standardization Program Office (DLSC-LM)
HIGHWAY 547 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 2533
LAKEHURST, NJ 08733-5100 Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060-6221
Telephone (703) 767-6888 DSN 427-6888
DD Form 1426, FEB 1999 (EG) PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE. WHS/DIOR, Feb 99
10