The document provides a summary of an EU report on retail financial services. The report examined pre-contractual information, advice provided to customers, and bank fees in EU countries. It found that pre-contractual information is often difficult to understand for consumers. Advice from banks is sometimes unsuitable and influenced by commissions. Bank fee structures are often opaque, with prices varying significantly between countries and some consumers paying much higher fees. The report ranks EU countries based on the simplicity, transparency and level of bank fees.
The document provides summaries of regulatory news from January 2019 across multiple areas:
1. ESAs published joint standards for simple, transparent, and standardized securitizations to ensure consistent treatment under EMIR.
2. The EBA launched consultations to simplify credit risk data reporting requirements and promote sustainability in EU capital markets.
3. The European Commission adopted implementing regulations for securities financing transaction reporting under SFTR, which also impact EMIR.
This presentation by Fabienne ILZKOVITZ & Adriaan DIERX from the DG Competition at the European Commission, was made during the Workshop on market studies selection and prioritisation of sectors and industries held on 9 March 2017 at the OECD Headquarters. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/market-studies-workshop-on-selection-prioritisation-of-sectors-industries.htm
- Banca IFIS is a specialized bank focused on factoring and short-term lending to small and medium enterprises in Italy with a highly profitable business model and strong growth opportunities.
- It has a large sales network and aims to expand its product offerings and international presence while maintaining excellent asset quality and profitability.
- Strategies include growing the core factoring business in Italy and abroad, broadening products and services, and diversifying funding sources to support continued expansion.
This presentation by Thibaud Vergé, Professor at ENSAE, Researcher at CREST Paris and Senior Academic Consultant to Charles River Associates ; was made during the Workshop on market studies selection and prioritisation of sectors and industries held on 9 March 2017 at the OECD Headquarters. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/market-studies-workshop-on-selection-prioritisation-of-sectors-industries.htm
This document discusses how the UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) selects cases for market studies. It notes that market studies are a flexible tool to explore whether markets work well for consumers. The CMA draws ideas for market studies from various sources, including other areas of its work, problems identified by other organizations, and horizon scanning of economic indicators and consumer complaints. The selection process involves developing initial proposals before fully scoping out a market study. The CMA reflects that directly linking economic indicators to competition issues can be challenging, so it often uses market studies themselves to identify new areas of focus, such as where markets are changing.
The document provides summaries of regulatory news from February 2019 across multiple jurisdictions and topics:
1) It addresses upcoming issues with implementing aspects of EMIR Refit and discusses reports from ESAs on regulatory sandboxes and innovation hubs. Updated bank risk dashboards show improved capital ratios but weak profitability.
2) New standards for market risk are announced with a simplified approach for smaller banks. EBA and ESMA reports address crypto-asset regulations and need for an EU-wide approach. Another report finds investment costs significantly reduce returns.
3) Draft delegated regulations on sustainable finance and sector views from FCA are published. Guidance is provided on exposures associated with high risk and on ESG disclosure. Reviews
This presentation by Roman Inderst, Professor at Goethe University Frankfurt, was made during the discussion “Environmental Considerations in Competition Enforcement” held at the 136th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 1 December 2021. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/ecce.
This presentation by Caroline Teyssié, Rapporteure at the Autorité de la concurrence (French Competition Authority), was made during the Workshop on market studies selection and prioritisation of sectors and industries held on 9 March 2017 at the OECD Headquarters. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/market-studies-workshop-on-selection-prioritisation-of-sectors-industries.htm
The document provides summaries of regulatory news from January 2019 across multiple areas:
1. ESAs published joint standards for simple, transparent, and standardized securitizations to ensure consistent treatment under EMIR.
2. The EBA launched consultations to simplify credit risk data reporting requirements and promote sustainability in EU capital markets.
3. The European Commission adopted implementing regulations for securities financing transaction reporting under SFTR, which also impact EMIR.
This presentation by Fabienne ILZKOVITZ & Adriaan DIERX from the DG Competition at the European Commission, was made during the Workshop on market studies selection and prioritisation of sectors and industries held on 9 March 2017 at the OECD Headquarters. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/market-studies-workshop-on-selection-prioritisation-of-sectors-industries.htm
- Banca IFIS is a specialized bank focused on factoring and short-term lending to small and medium enterprises in Italy with a highly profitable business model and strong growth opportunities.
- It has a large sales network and aims to expand its product offerings and international presence while maintaining excellent asset quality and profitability.
- Strategies include growing the core factoring business in Italy and abroad, broadening products and services, and diversifying funding sources to support continued expansion.
This presentation by Thibaud Vergé, Professor at ENSAE, Researcher at CREST Paris and Senior Academic Consultant to Charles River Associates ; was made during the Workshop on market studies selection and prioritisation of sectors and industries held on 9 March 2017 at the OECD Headquarters. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/market-studies-workshop-on-selection-prioritisation-of-sectors-industries.htm
This document discusses how the UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) selects cases for market studies. It notes that market studies are a flexible tool to explore whether markets work well for consumers. The CMA draws ideas for market studies from various sources, including other areas of its work, problems identified by other organizations, and horizon scanning of economic indicators and consumer complaints. The selection process involves developing initial proposals before fully scoping out a market study. The CMA reflects that directly linking economic indicators to competition issues can be challenging, so it often uses market studies themselves to identify new areas of focus, such as where markets are changing.
The document provides summaries of regulatory news from February 2019 across multiple jurisdictions and topics:
1) It addresses upcoming issues with implementing aspects of EMIR Refit and discusses reports from ESAs on regulatory sandboxes and innovation hubs. Updated bank risk dashboards show improved capital ratios but weak profitability.
2) New standards for market risk are announced with a simplified approach for smaller banks. EBA and ESMA reports address crypto-asset regulations and need for an EU-wide approach. Another report finds investment costs significantly reduce returns.
3) Draft delegated regulations on sustainable finance and sector views from FCA are published. Guidance is provided on exposures associated with high risk and on ESG disclosure. Reviews
This presentation by Roman Inderst, Professor at Goethe University Frankfurt, was made during the discussion “Environmental Considerations in Competition Enforcement” held at the 136th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 1 December 2021. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/ecce.
This presentation by Caroline Teyssié, Rapporteure at the Autorité de la concurrence (French Competition Authority), was made during the Workshop on market studies selection and prioritisation of sectors and industries held on 9 March 2017 at the OECD Headquarters. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/market-studies-workshop-on-selection-prioritisation-of-sectors-industries.htm
This presentation by the OECD Competition Division was made at the workshop on Competition in Publicly Funded Markets (28 February 2019). Find out more at http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/workshop-on-competition-in-publicly-funded-markets.htm
News, case studies and articles from Asian-Pacific competition authorities are welcome. If you have material that you wish to be considered for publication in this newsletter, please contact ajahn@oecdkorea.org.
This presentation by Amelia Fletcher, Professor of Competition Policy, Norwich Business School and Non-Executive Director, UK Financial Conduct Authority ; was made during the Workshop on market studies selection and prioritisation of sectors and industries held on 9 March 2017 at the OECD Headquarters. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/market-studies-workshop-on-selection-prioritisation-of-sectors-industries.htm
Interesting material about the market of financial consumer products. Margins, profitability, customer behavior, service models. What will matter and what will not.
This presentation by Ania Thiemann, OECD Secretariat, was made during the discussion “Ex-Ante Regulation and Competition in Digital Markets” held at the 136th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 2 December 2021. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/rcdm.
The European Commission report evaluates the implementation of the Late Payment Directive across EU member states. It finds that while the directive has increased awareness of late payments and led to some reductions in average payment periods, its effects have been modest so far. Public authorities in over half of member states do not meet the 30-day limit, and businesses often do not exercise their legal rights due to commercial relationships. The report recommends maintaining the directive, establishing common monitoring systems, and encouraging additional national measures to further accelerate its impact.
Roland berger eurofinas-rb-europeancf_survey2018_publicreportAdam Kuszyk
An interesting study on consumer financial products. Margins, growth rates, competition, changing customer experience. Projection from 2015 to 2018. Soon, edition of 2018 will be available with a projection of 2021. I am glad that I could be a participant in both.
This presentation by Ramsis Croes and Misja Mikkers was made at the workshop on Competition in Publicly Funded Markets (28 February 2019). Find out more at http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/workshop-on-competition-in-publicly-funded-markets.htm
This presentation by Johannes Erlandsson from the Swedish Competition Authority was made during the discussion “Safe harbours and legal presumptions in competition law” held at the 128th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 5 December 2017. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/21v.
This presentation by Albania was made during the break-out Session 3, “Techniques and evidence for assessing predatory pricing, margin squeeze and exploitative abuses” in the discussion “Economic analysis and evidence in abuse cases” held at the 20th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 7 December 2021. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/eac.
This presentation by Indonesia was made during the break-out Session 3, “Techniques and evidence for assessing predatory pricing, margin squeeze and exploitative abuses” in the discussion “Economic analysis and evidence in abuse cases” held at the 20th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 7 December 2021. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/eac.
This presentation by the UK was made during the discussion “Personalised Pricing in the Digital Era” held at the Joint meeting between the Competition Committee and the Committee on Consumer Policy on 28 November 2018. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/ppd.
IT Outsourcing in Insurance - Annual Report 2013Everest Group
This report provides an overview of the Application Outsourcing (AO) market for the insurance industry, through an in-depth analysis of large-sized AO contracts (i.e., contracts that are over US$ 25 million in TCV and over three years in duration). The report analyzes key trends in market size & growth, demand drivers, adoption & scope trends, emerging priorities of buyers, key investment themes, and future outlook for 2014 with regards to such large insurance AO deals
This presentation by Chile Fiscalía Nacional Económica was made during the discussion on “Market study methodologies for competition authorities” held at the 125th meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 20 June 2017. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/1ZX.
This presentation by India was prepared for the break-out Session 1, “Surveys and other data gathering techniques”, in the discussion “Economic Analysis in Merger Investigations” at the 19th OECD Global Forum on Competition on 9 December 2020. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at http://oe.cd/eami.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Carolina Abate from the OECD Competition Division, was made during the discussion on “Competition law and state-owned enterprises”, held during the 17th OECD Global Forum on Competition on 30 November 2018. More documents and presentations on this topic can be found at oe.cd/csoes.
Barriers to exit are often not assessed in competition cases for three main reasons:
1) Merger regimes focus on the incremental impact of a merger on competition rather than existing barriers, which are taken as a given.
2) Article 101 and 102 cases compare scenarios with and without the agreement/behavior, where most barriers would be present in both.
3) Other cases usually frame barriers to exit as barriers to entry instead.
This presentation by Camila CABRAL PIRES-ALVES, Professor at Institute of Economics at Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) and coordinator at the Research Group on Law, Economics, and Competition (Gdec), was made during the discussion “Methodologies to Measure Market Competition” held at the 135th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 11 June 2021. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/mmmc.
The document summarizes key aspects of Australia's quasi-market for employment services that has developed over time. It notes the long-term trends of increasing standardization, loss of diversity in the market, and providers copying each other's approaches. Performance-based contracting and payment-by-results models have led to market consolidation among large, existing providers who can handle the financial risks. High transaction costs of compliance and monitoring also favor insiders and discourage new entrants. As a result, the quasi-market exhibits less variety and innovation over time as frontline work becomes more rule-focused than client-focused.
This document summarizes key differences between the European Commission (E.C.) and U.S. approaches to analyzing the competitive effects of conglomerate mergers, particularly regarding digital platforms. The E.C. has been more active in challenging conglomerate mergers based on various economic theories, while the U.S. has not challenged such mergers due to lack of empirical evidence of harm and concerns about penalizing efficiency-enhancing mergers. The document discusses several recent E.C. cases involving conglomerate theories and investigations into digital platforms, as well as uncertainties around U.S. treatment of acquisitions of potential competitors after withdrawing guidelines on non-horizontal mergers.
Este documento es una reflexión del escritor Facundo Cabral sobre la felicidad y el bienestar. Cabral argumenta que las personas a menudo se sienten deprimidas cuando en realidad solo están distraídas de las maravillas que las rodean como la naturaleza, la música y el arte. También aconseja no compararse con los demás y enfocarse en hacer solo aquello que ama para encontrar la plenitud. Finalmente, alienta a las personas a servir a los demás y a amar incondicionalmente para convertirse en el amor mismo.
The document summarizes highlights from technology surveys conducted by NTAP and LSC regarding technologies used in legal aid offices. It finds that most offices have basic case management and legal work technologies in place but opportunities remain for improved document automation, virtualization, and communication tools. Budgets primarily allocate funds to hardware and personnel, with training receiving the least. Common priorities included improving word processing capabilities and adopting VOIP, video conferencing, and wireless networks. While most offices have security software, opportunities remain for strengthened technology policies and records management procedures. Training needs centered on case management systems and productivity tools.
This presentation by the OECD Competition Division was made at the workshop on Competition in Publicly Funded Markets (28 February 2019). Find out more at http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/workshop-on-competition-in-publicly-funded-markets.htm
News, case studies and articles from Asian-Pacific competition authorities are welcome. If you have material that you wish to be considered for publication in this newsletter, please contact ajahn@oecdkorea.org.
This presentation by Amelia Fletcher, Professor of Competition Policy, Norwich Business School and Non-Executive Director, UK Financial Conduct Authority ; was made during the Workshop on market studies selection and prioritisation of sectors and industries held on 9 March 2017 at the OECD Headquarters. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/market-studies-workshop-on-selection-prioritisation-of-sectors-industries.htm
Interesting material about the market of financial consumer products. Margins, profitability, customer behavior, service models. What will matter and what will not.
This presentation by Ania Thiemann, OECD Secretariat, was made during the discussion “Ex-Ante Regulation and Competition in Digital Markets” held at the 136th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 2 December 2021. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/rcdm.
The European Commission report evaluates the implementation of the Late Payment Directive across EU member states. It finds that while the directive has increased awareness of late payments and led to some reductions in average payment periods, its effects have been modest so far. Public authorities in over half of member states do not meet the 30-day limit, and businesses often do not exercise their legal rights due to commercial relationships. The report recommends maintaining the directive, establishing common monitoring systems, and encouraging additional national measures to further accelerate its impact.
Roland berger eurofinas-rb-europeancf_survey2018_publicreportAdam Kuszyk
An interesting study on consumer financial products. Margins, growth rates, competition, changing customer experience. Projection from 2015 to 2018. Soon, edition of 2018 will be available with a projection of 2021. I am glad that I could be a participant in both.
This presentation by Ramsis Croes and Misja Mikkers was made at the workshop on Competition in Publicly Funded Markets (28 February 2019). Find out more at http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/workshop-on-competition-in-publicly-funded-markets.htm
This presentation by Johannes Erlandsson from the Swedish Competition Authority was made during the discussion “Safe harbours and legal presumptions in competition law” held at the 128th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 5 December 2017. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/21v.
This presentation by Albania was made during the break-out Session 3, “Techniques and evidence for assessing predatory pricing, margin squeeze and exploitative abuses” in the discussion “Economic analysis and evidence in abuse cases” held at the 20th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 7 December 2021. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/eac.
This presentation by Indonesia was made during the break-out Session 3, “Techniques and evidence for assessing predatory pricing, margin squeeze and exploitative abuses” in the discussion “Economic analysis and evidence in abuse cases” held at the 20th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 7 December 2021. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/eac.
This presentation by the UK was made during the discussion “Personalised Pricing in the Digital Era” held at the Joint meeting between the Competition Committee and the Committee on Consumer Policy on 28 November 2018. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/ppd.
IT Outsourcing in Insurance - Annual Report 2013Everest Group
This report provides an overview of the Application Outsourcing (AO) market for the insurance industry, through an in-depth analysis of large-sized AO contracts (i.e., contracts that are over US$ 25 million in TCV and over three years in duration). The report analyzes key trends in market size & growth, demand drivers, adoption & scope trends, emerging priorities of buyers, key investment themes, and future outlook for 2014 with regards to such large insurance AO deals
This presentation by Chile Fiscalía Nacional Económica was made during the discussion on “Market study methodologies for competition authorities” held at the 125th meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement on 20 June 2017. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/1ZX.
This presentation by India was prepared for the break-out Session 1, “Surveys and other data gathering techniques”, in the discussion “Economic Analysis in Merger Investigations” at the 19th OECD Global Forum on Competition on 9 December 2020. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at http://oe.cd/eami.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
This presentation by Carolina Abate from the OECD Competition Division, was made during the discussion on “Competition law and state-owned enterprises”, held during the 17th OECD Global Forum on Competition on 30 November 2018. More documents and presentations on this topic can be found at oe.cd/csoes.
Barriers to exit are often not assessed in competition cases for three main reasons:
1) Merger regimes focus on the incremental impact of a merger on competition rather than existing barriers, which are taken as a given.
2) Article 101 and 102 cases compare scenarios with and without the agreement/behavior, where most barriers would be present in both.
3) Other cases usually frame barriers to exit as barriers to entry instead.
This presentation by Camila CABRAL PIRES-ALVES, Professor at Institute of Economics at Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) and coordinator at the Research Group on Law, Economics, and Competition (Gdec), was made during the discussion “Methodologies to Measure Market Competition” held at the 135th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 11 June 2021. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/mmmc.
The document summarizes key aspects of Australia's quasi-market for employment services that has developed over time. It notes the long-term trends of increasing standardization, loss of diversity in the market, and providers copying each other's approaches. Performance-based contracting and payment-by-results models have led to market consolidation among large, existing providers who can handle the financial risks. High transaction costs of compliance and monitoring also favor insiders and discourage new entrants. As a result, the quasi-market exhibits less variety and innovation over time as frontline work becomes more rule-focused than client-focused.
This document summarizes key differences between the European Commission (E.C.) and U.S. approaches to analyzing the competitive effects of conglomerate mergers, particularly regarding digital platforms. The E.C. has been more active in challenging conglomerate mergers based on various economic theories, while the U.S. has not challenged such mergers due to lack of empirical evidence of harm and concerns about penalizing efficiency-enhancing mergers. The document discusses several recent E.C. cases involving conglomerate theories and investigations into digital platforms, as well as uncertainties around U.S. treatment of acquisitions of potential competitors after withdrawing guidelines on non-horizontal mergers.
Este documento es una reflexión del escritor Facundo Cabral sobre la felicidad y el bienestar. Cabral argumenta que las personas a menudo se sienten deprimidas cuando en realidad solo están distraídas de las maravillas que las rodean como la naturaleza, la música y el arte. También aconseja no compararse con los demás y enfocarse en hacer solo aquello que ama para encontrar la plenitud. Finalmente, alienta a las personas a servir a los demás y a amar incondicionalmente para convertirse en el amor mismo.
The document summarizes highlights from technology surveys conducted by NTAP and LSC regarding technologies used in legal aid offices. It finds that most offices have basic case management and legal work technologies in place but opportunities remain for improved document automation, virtualization, and communication tools. Budgets primarily allocate funds to hardware and personnel, with training receiving the least. Common priorities included improving word processing capabilities and adopting VOIP, video conferencing, and wireless networks. While most offices have security software, opportunities remain for strengthened technology policies and records management procedures. Training needs centered on case management systems and productivity tools.
The document discusses several web browsers:
1. Internet Explorer is a series of graphical web browsers developed by Microsoft and included in Windows operating systems starting in 1995. It has gone through several versions.
2. Firefox uses sandbox security and SSL/TLS encryption. It has features like tabbed browsing and extensions.
3. Google Chrome is developed by Google and based on the WebKit layout engine. It has automatic updates and is available for Windows, Mac OS, and Linux.
4. Opera is a full-featured browser available for free with features like tabbed browsing, mouse gestures, and an integrated download manager. It has built-in security protections.
This document discusses succession strategies for financial advisors. It covers four critical pieces: understanding what the practice looks like, creating transferable value, determining value, and transitioning the practice. Key points include building a team-based model to ensure client and management succession, conducting audits to increase value, using the income approach to valuation, negotiating purchase agreements, and including terms like non-competes and earn-outs. The overall message is on planning for an orderly transition that protects clients and realizes full value for the seller.
Search Mojo is a search engine marketing firm that helps companies achieve high rankings on Bing. Bing is Microsoft's search engine that now powers Yahoo's search results, giving it a large market share. To rank well on Bing, companies should submit their sitemap to Bing Webmaster Tools, optimize their site for keywords by including them in titles, meta descriptions and throughout content, and build two-way links from relevant sites. Ecommerce sites can list products on Bing Shopping and join the Bing Cashback program to boost clicks and sales.
Introduction to methodological issues and points to consider - Paul Parks (...Esther Petrilli-Massey
The document discusses gas flaring and the use of clean development mechanism (CDM) methodologies to reduce emissions from gas flaring. It notes that while the technology for gas flaring is well understood, developing CDM projects has proven difficult due to the remote locations and need for unique designs. Existing methodologies have had limited impact on reducing gas flaring emissions. The document calls for expanding and improving methodologies, developing new ones, and increasing coordination between parties to help CDM have a meaningful impact on reducing gas flaring emissions.
"Gym Shoes, Maps, and Passports, Oh My!: Creating Community or Creating ...Elizabeth A., Ph.D.
The document discusses criticisms of the National Museum of the American Indian (NMAI) by journalists Marc Fisher and Paul Richard. They were confused and annoyed by exhibits that resisted easy classification of Indigeneity and presented multiple perspectives. However, the author argues the museum's structure intentionally echoes how Indigenous communities share stories. By challenging stereotypes and empowering Indigenous voices, the NMAI aims to confront colonial tendencies of earlier museums and situate Native stories through a web-like structure.
This document discusses the National Museum of the American Indian (NMAI) and the concept of rhetorical sovereignty. It argues that for the NMAI to effectively communicate Native cultural sovereignty to both Native and non-Native audiences, it must examine the rhetorical frameworks and structures it uses. It defines rhetorical sovereignty as Native peoples taking control of communication and redefining it along Native lines. The document then analyzes the three inaugural exhibits at the NMAI to demonstrate how it both asserts sovereignty and navigates potential communicative ambiguities with non-Native audiences.
The document summarizes the impact of the 2007 Conference on Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining in Africa (CASM 2007) and current situation in Mongolia. It discusses that CASM 2007 raised awareness, involved more institutions and people, and increased public and government consciousness about artisanal mining issues. It led to a sub-program and temporary regulation on artisanal mining as well as experimental ore processing centers. CASM 2007 also strengthened networking and coordination to help artisanal miners. The document expects CASM 2008 to further discussions on transforming regulations, sharing experiences with processing centers, and improving skills in working with artisanal miners and stakeholders.
This document provides an executive summary of the 2014 EBA Consumer Trends Report. It summarizes actions taken since the 2013 report to address previously identified trends related to indebtedness, mis-selling, and transparency. It then outlines eight trends identified for 2014 related to household borrowing, bank accounts, payment methods, crowdfunding, and financial literacy. The EBA will take actions to address these trends, including assessing guidelines on responsible lending and developing requirements for product oversight and governance.
The document summarizes mortgage regulation at three levels - global, European, and UK. At the global level, standards are set by organizations like the FSB. In Europe, a new Directive aims to encourage a single market for mortgages while reducing risks. It covers areas like marketing, advice, and credit assessments. Key concerns for the UK include pre-contractual information requirements and the ability of lenders to provide advice. The timeline for the Directive and its interaction with the UK's Mortgage Market Review are also discussed.
This document from EURELECTRIC outlines a future-proof, customer-centric model for retail electricity markets in the EU. The model includes 10 key features: well-functioning wholesale markets, clear roles and responsibilities of market actors, removing regulated end-user prices, efficient information exchange, a customer interface with suppliers as the main point of contact, single bills tailored to customer needs, a market-consistent focus on customer protection, reliable sources of customer information, privacy and data confidentiality, and a stepwise approach to converging retail market design across the EU. The overall goal is to create competitive retail markets that allow customers to benefit from low-carbon, reliable electricity at competitive prices.
“The private banks want a European digital single market for financial services and will help to actively promote it,” stresses Michael Mandel, Chairman of the association’s Retail and Wholesale Banking Committee and Member of Commerzbank’s Board of Managing Directors with responsibility for the Business Segment Private and Business Customers. Taking as its starting point the question of how the dynamics of digitisation can be harnessed for this purpose and avoid being held back, the Association of German Banks has now published the study “Digital Payments 2020”. Mandel: “Our goal must be to enable consumers to use standardised mobile payment methods across national borders throughout Europe.”
Mandel sees a particular need to ensure in the context of the new payment services directive PSD2 that the same rules apply to all payment service providers – be they banks or fintechs. Andreas Krautscheid, Member of the Senior Management Board of the Association of German Banks, underlines: “We certainly see room for improvement on some aspects of PSD2 in this respect.” He finds it incomprehensible, for instance, that third-party providers have legally binding access to banks’ infrastructure, but not vice versa. “On top of that, we’re expecting the European Commission to publish an action plan on retail financial services in March. To make sure discussions move in the right direction, we want to get a debate going as soon as possible,” Krautscheid adds.
In its study, the association identifies three key areas for action: 1. mobile payment solutions need to be promoted to increase their reach in person-to-person (P2P) and point-of-sale (POS) transactions, 2. there should be more competition and freedom of choice between e-commerce payment methods, and 3. a standardised modern, digital onboarding procedure should be established to ensure services can be offered digitally and Europe-wide.
Michael Mandel: “We shouldn’t get bogged down in details in Europe but should focus on what really matters – for us that means providing payment services and having a standard procedure for registering and identifying customers.”
The European Commission is consulting on barriers to the cross-border distribution of investment funds in the EU. Currently, funds face varying national marketing requirements across Member States, with costs associated with researching each state's rules and adapting fund materials. The consultation seeks feedback on regulatory and tax barriers, including differing definitions of marketing, marketing requirements imposed by host states, and notification processes. The Commission aims to identify unjustified barriers and increase cross-border competition to benefit investors. Responses will inform Commission efforts to improve the single market for investment products under the Capital Markets Union initiative.
RRD Investment Management Solutions November Regulatory Update. Covering PRIIPs, Solvency II and also an update from the FCA on "Smarter Consumer Communications"
-What is the Number of Cashless Transactions Globally in 2020 & 2025f & 2030f?
-What is the Number of Third-Party Providers in Open Banking in Europe?
-What is the General Willingness to Share Data in Exchange for Benefits in Turkey?
For answers find the full report available at:
https://ystats.com/shop/global-open-banking-market-trends-2021/
This document describes FORFIRM, an ICT company specialized in fintech, and its spinoff IBANP, which aims to introduce account number portability to the European banking market. It discusses the issues faced by banks and account holders due to the lack of ANP, and how IBANP's proposed solutions using blockchain and PSD2 regulations could address these issues by allowing account numbers to remain portable between banks. The benefits mentioned include facilitating bank reorganizations and internal/international customer mobility while reducing compliance costs. Potential objections from industry groups are addressed, and views from the European Commission supporting further evaluation of ANP are presented.
The document provides summaries of recent regulatory developments from several European authorities and industry organizations. Key updates include:
1) The EBA launching a consultation on technical standards for the standardized approach to counterparty credit risk.
2) ESMA launching a call for evidence on position limits for commodity derivatives under MiFID II.
3) The FCA extending the deadline for notifications for the temporary permissions regime for EU firms to October 30, 2019 due to Brexit.
4) European supervisory authorities consulting on draft implementing technical standards for reporting of intragroup transactions under the Financial Conglomerates Directive.
This presentation by the Austrian Competition Authority was made during Break-out Session 1: Advocacy in the framework of the discussion on “Overcoming adversity and attaining success: Small and developing competition agencies” held at the 16th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 8 December 2017. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/sda.
It is clear the banking landscape is changing. Explore what open banking means and the impact it could have on the market. Find out more in our report at Deloitte.co.uk/Flourish. You can also discover further analysis on open banking and the future of banking generally at Deloitte.co.uk/FutureBank.
The document discusses the evolution of open banking into open finance in the UK and Europe. Open banking has grown significantly since its introduction through regulation, with billions of API calls enabling new financial products and services for millions of customers. There is now interest in expanding open banking into open finance by increasing access to broader financial data across sectors, with the goal of improving consumer outcomes through greater competition and innovation. International bodies are also working to develop open finance standards beyond payments and banking at a European level.
The Expert Group on e-Invoicing has been making progress on developing a European e-Invoicing Framework. They have established three work streams: developing business requirements, simplifying the legal/regulatory framework, and establishing network solutions and standards. They have held three meetings so far and are on track to deliver a mid-term report in 2008 and the final European e-Invoicing Framework by the end of 2009. The framework aims to establish common structures to support interoperable e-Invoicing across Europe and help realize an estimated 238 billion euros in cost savings.
Openconf Einvoicing Status Report Final[1]Friso de Jong
The Expert Group on e-Invoicing has been making progress on developing a European e-Invoicing Framework. They have established three work streams: developing business requirements, simplifying the legal/regulatory framework, and establishing network solutions and standards. They have held three meetings so far and are on track to deliver a mid-term report in 2008 and the final European e-Invoicing Framework by the end of 2009. The framework aims to establish common structures and recommendations to support interoperable e-invoicing across Europe.
This document summarizes a dissertation that examines the extent to which government bailouts during the 2008 financial crisis distorted competition in the European banking sector. It begins with an introduction that provides background on the crisis and vast state aid provided to banks. It then outlines the methodology, literature review, theoretical framework, and analysis that will be used to assess if bailed out banks gained competitive advantages through lower funding costs. The dissertation aims to determine if bailouts undermined competition by benefiting some banks over others.
Sample Report: Western Europe B2C E-Commerce and Online Payment Market 2019yStats.com
Free Report Samples for our publication "Western Europe B2C E-Commerce and Online Payment Market 2019".
Find the full report available for purchase at: https://bit.ly/3t3JzHw
Sample Report_Europe Buy Now Pay Later Industry and Trends 2021_by yStats.comyStats.com
-What is the Share of Consumers Who Would Like BNPL Added to the Credit Card or Current Account?
-What Top 5 Banks Offering BNPL Financing?
-What is the Average Customer Debt?
For answer you can find the full report available at:
https://ystats.com/shop/europe-buy-now-pay-later-industry-and-trends-2021/
The document summarizes the EBA's FinTech roadmap based on feedback from its consultation on its approach to financial technology. Key points include:
- Respondents supported the EBA's work on FinTech and priorities like authorizations, sandboxes, and business model impacts.
- The roadmap sets priorities for 2018-2019 including monitoring regulations, risks, and consumer issues to promote innovation while ensuring stability and protection.
- An EBA FinTech Knowledge Hub will facilitate knowledge sharing between authorities and firms to help monitor FinTech's effects.
Black Friday 2015 - Banco Santander - Mundo 123diegops
Este documento describe las condiciones de la campaña "Black Friday - Compras online" de Banco Santander. Los participantes deben tener una tarjeta Mundo 1, 2 o 3 y una Cuenta 1, 2 o 3. La campaña incluye dos acciones: "Black Friday", donde se entrega una acción por cada 100 euros gastados online del 27 al 29 de noviembre, y "Navidad Mundo 123", donde se entrega una acción por cada compra de al menos 100 euros financiada con 3 o más cuotas del 27 de noviembre al 6 de enero. Las acciones se
Protocolo de actuación ante situaciones de violencia - Bankiadiegops
El documento proporciona pautas de actuación ante situaciones de violencia externa. Indica que ante una situación de violencia se debe comunicar a las fuerzas de seguridad, seguridad interna y dirección correspondiente. Recomienda no afrontar la situación solo y evitar provocaciones, además de no realizar declaraciones a medios de comunicación. También indica que tras el incidente se debe comunicar lo sucedido a recursos humanos para dar soporte al empleado y ponerlo en conocimiento de seguridad y comunicación.
Oficinas con apertura durante las tardes. NovaGalicia Bancodiegops
Este documento proporciona una lista de oficinas bancarias en España, incluyendo su ubicación, localidad, provincia y tipo de oficina (particular o empresa). Se enumeran más de 100 oficinas en provincias como A Coruña, Lugo, Ourense, Pontevedra, Barcelona, Bilbao, Asturias y León.
Este documento presenta la Memoria del Servicio de Reclamaciones del Banco de España correspondiente a 2009. Se resumen los principales resultados: 1) Se recibieron 57.007 nuevos casos, un aumento sin precedentes debido a la crisis; 2) Las reclamaciones crecieron un 93% hasta 13.640, destacando las de empresas; 3) Madrid concentró el 31% de reclamaciones y Canarias experimentó el mayor crecimiento; 4) Los bancos y cajas absorvieron el 88% de reclamaciones. La actividad del Servicio creció de forma importante para dar resp
Este documento describe una promoción para regalar iPads a nuevos clientes que abran cuentas de valores o fondos de inversión en Cortal Consors. Los clientes deben transferir al menos 25,000€ en acciones u otros valores o 100,000€ en fondos de inversión. También deben cumplir con requisitos mínimos de saldo y valor de cartera para mantener el incentivo. Se aplicarán penalizaciones a quienes cierren sus cuentas antes de que finalice la promoción.
El documento presenta la estructura organizativa de una entidad bancaria, dividiéndola en diferentes direcciones generales, adjuntas y áreas funcionales, como estrategia, riesgos, finanzas, sistemas, comercial y medios, con sus respectivos responsables.
Este documento establece las bases de un sorteo de iPads realizado por Líne@España. Los participantes deben ser clientes particulares que realicen operaciones en la Oficina Virtual durante el periodo de vigencia. A los nuevos usuarios se les asignará un número por completar el primer acceso, mientras que a los usuarios existentes se les asignará un número por cada día en que realicen operaciones. Cada mes se sortearán cuatro iPads entre los participantes.
El documento describe la estrategia de unoe, un nuevo banco digital del Grupo BBVA, para posicionarse como el banco más sencillo del mercado. Unoe ofrecerá soluciones bancarias simples y transparentes a través de canales 100% remotos y autoservicio, con el objetivo de aumentar la vinculación de los clientes y ganar 100.000 nuevos clientes en los próximos 3 años.
Este es el octavo informe anual de responsabilidad corporativa del Grupo BBVA. Detalla el desempeño de la entidad en esta materia durante 2009. El Grupo BBVA es una entidad financiera global con presencia destacada en España y América Latina y creciente presencia en Estados Unidos y Asia, formada por más de 103,000 empleados. El informe describe la consolidación en 2009 del plan estratégico de responsabilidad corporativa de BBVA, articulado en torno a educación financiera, inclusión financiera, banca responsable y compromiso con
El documento presenta el discurso del Gobernador del Banco de España ante el Consejo de Gobierno sobre el Informe Anual de 2009. El Gobernador explica que la economía española se enfrenta a grandes retos debido a la crisis griega y los desequilibrios acumulados durante la expansión. La economía española sufrió una fuerte recesión en 2009 y la recuperación será lenta. Se requieren reformas estructurales para generar empleo y crecimiento sostenible.
El Banco de España sustituyó a los administradores de CajaSur y designó al Fondo de Reestructuración Ordenada Bancaria como administrador provisional debido a los problemas de viabilidad de la entidad y la imposibilidad de completar su integración con Unicaja. El FROB proporcionará capital y liquidez para garantizar las operaciones normales de CajaSur y proteger a los depositantes y acreedores. CajaSur representa solo el 0,6% de los activos del sistema bancario español, por lo que esta medida no afect
El Banco de España sustituyó a los administradores de CajaSur y designó al Fondo de Reestructuración Ordenada Bancaria como administrador provisional debido a los problemas de viabilidad de la entidad y la imposibilidad de completar su integración con Unicaja. El FROB proporcionará capital y liquidez para garantizar las operaciones normales de CajaSur y proteger a los depositantes y acreedores. CajaSur representa solo el 0,6% de los activos del sistema bancario español, por lo que esta medida no afect
El Banco de España sustituyó a los administradores de CajaSur y designó al Fondo de Reestructuración Ordenada Bancaria como administrador provisional debido a los problemas de viabilidad de la entidad y la imposibilidad de completar su integración con Unicaja. El FROB suscribirá capital y proporcionará líneas de liquidez para que CajaSur mantenga los coeficientes de solvencia legales y cubra sus necesidades, sin afectar la solidez del sistema bancario español dado que CajaSur representa solo
El Banco de España sustituyó a los administradores de CajaSur y designó al Fondo de Reestructuración Ordenada Bancaria como administrador provisional debido a los problemas de viabilidad de la entidad y la imposibilidad de completar su integración con Unicaja. El FROB suscribirá capital y proporcionará líneas de liquidez para que CajaSur mantenga los coeficientes de solvencia legales y cubra sus necesidades, sin afectar la solidez del sistema bancario español dado que CajaSur representa solo
El banco realizará un sorteo de 20 iPads entre clientes que usen su servicio de banca móvil. Para participar, los clientes deben tener contrato de banca multicanales y haber accedido a la banca móvil entre el 20 de abril y el 20 de junio. El sorteo se llevará a cabo el 6 de julio ante notario, y los ganadores tendrán 60 días para reclamar su premio.
Este documento resume la expansión de la banca cívica de CAN a Estados Unidos a través de su equipo CanAmérica con sede en Washington D.C. Describe cómo Estados Unidos representa una gran oportunidad para la banca cívica debido a su gran economía y cultura filantrópica. CanAmérica está estableciendo alianzas con grandes organizaciones sin fines de lucro para promover la banca cívica y atraer clientes para CAN.
Caja Navarra realizará un sorteo entre clientes nuevos que se den de alta entre el 8 de abril y el 15 de junio de 2010. El premio será un iPad y se sorteará el 21 de junio ante notario. Para participar, los clientes deben tener una cuenta, tarjeta de débito y banca electrónica con saldo mínimo de 50 euros. El ganador será contactado para aceptar el premio en 20 días o pasará al suplente.
Este documento presenta las bases de una promoción organizada por Ipar Kutxa Rural S. Coop. de Crédito entre el 1 de marzo y el 31 de marzo de 2010 en Bizkaia, Álava y Gipuzkoa. La promoción consiste en sortear 10 cajas regalo de tratamientos de olivoterapia valoradas en 200€ cada una entre clientes que incrementen su saldo en al menos 1.500€ durante el periodo. El sorteo se realizará el 30 de abril extrayendo 10 ganadores y 10 reservas de una lista numerada de participantes
1. MEMO/09/402
Brussels, 22 September 2009
EU report on retail financial services: fact sheet
SECTION: 1. THE REPORT (background)
SECTION: 2. THE MAIN RESULTS
2.1 Pre-contractual information
2.2 Advice
2.3 Bank Fees
2.4 Switching
SECTION 1. THE REPORT
As a follow up to the Consumer Market Scoreboard 2008, the Commission has
published:
- (1) A Commission Staff Working Paper on Retail Financial Services ("Follow up
in Retail Financial Services to the Consumer Market Scoreboard,")
- (2) An in-depth bank fees study by independent consultants analysing the prices
of accounts, packages and operations for 224 banks across the EU 27, covering
on average 81% of the EU market.
The purpose of the Report is to assess three areas where consumers are faced with
a number of problems:
- (1) Pre-contractual information and the related issue of advice
- (2) Level and transparency of bank fees
- (3) Switching of bank accounts
These three issues were singled out as problematic based on the Annual Consumer
Market Scoreboard (annual market monitoring across more than 20 sectors) in 2008.
The Consumer Markets Scoreboard is a monitoring tool developed by the European
Commission, designed to watch EU markets from the consumer's perspective and to
assess if they are performing effectively for consumers. The Scoreboard uses five
main criteria to assess the health of a specific consumer market: consumer
satisfaction, the number of consumer complaints, switching rates (customer
mobility), prices and safety (see MEMO/09/44 for more details on the Scoreboard
methodology).
The latest edition of the Scoreboard published in February 2009, again, identified
retail financial services (next to energy and transport) as a sector that is
particularly problematic to consumers and therefore in need of in-depth analysis.
Some of the most acute problems in the banking sector that were detected by the
Scoreboard included the comparability of offers, stark differences in bank charges in
ways that were not always easily explained, and the difficulties in switching accounts
(see IP/09/202 for an overview of the Scoreboard results).
2. SECTION 2: THE MAIN RESULTS: Staff Working Paper on Financial
Services and Bank Fees Study
The sections below contain an overview of the main findings for the three specific
issues examined by the Commission Staff Working Document and Bank Fees Study.
1. On pre-contractual information
The sources:
The findings on pre-contractual information used in the report draw on a range of
sources including: a 2008 Eurobarometer survey, a report of 2008 on focus groups
organised in all 27 Member States and studies by organisations such as the UK
Better Regulation Executive and the National Consumer Council of 2007.
The results:
Pre-contractual information is one of the key instruments intending to facilitate
consumer's decision-making when buying financial services. Yet, evidence shows
that in many cases the information is difficult to understand. Information which is
incomprehensible, insufficient and presented in too many different ways making it
difficult for consumers to compare different offers and to obtain the best deal are
important barriers to cross-border shopping of financial services.
In different surveys consumers complain about deficiencies of information they
receive:
- Information is incomprehensible because of complex language using difficult
financial or legal jargon.
- Important details of the product are hidden in small print.
- Information is often too long not sufficiently concentrating on the key features
of the product.
- Too many different formats confuse consumers and hamper the comparison
of offers.
- Sometimes information is given only at the point of sale so that consumers do
not have sufficient time to take it into account.
For example:
- In focus groups on pre-contractual information requirements in financial services
organised by the Commission services in all 27 Member States, consumers
strongly criticised the complex language using difficult financial or legal
jargon. The group members evinced considerable distrust towards financial
services providers, based inter alia on opaque language which makes them
believe that banks intend to hide unfavourable conditions.
- While consumers emphasised their need for a complete set of information on
all necessary aspects of a financial product, they stressed equally that they
receive too much information. For instance in the UK, consumers found a
consumer credit agreement which required 55 minutes to read is not suitable for
information purposes.
2
3. Background – the current rules
The regulation of pre-contractual information is done at both EU and national level - it
depends on different products. For example mortgage credit is regulated at national
level (with an EU self regulatory code of conduct). When a product is regulated at
EU level – e.g. consumer credit or payment services, then pre-contractual
information is also regulated at EU level. Otherwise requirement are set at national
level.
At EU level, in recent years the Commission has done extensive work to improve
standards of pre-contractual information – focusing on improving the comparability
and clarity by providing standardised, comparable information forms for consumers.
The feedback from consumers is very positive on this kind of comparable
information. Where product features allow this, a well-drafted set of standardised
information disclosures facilitates clearly the comparison of offers. Examples of
where this kind of regulation, with standard information for consumers, has been
introduced at EU level is for products such as: consumer credit (in 2008) and UCITS
(in 2009).
Looking ahead, for packaged retail investment products (PRIPS), the Commission
has adopted a Communication in April 2009, announcing its intention to introduce as
far as possible standard information requirements to allow for consumers to compare
products. For mortgages pre-contractual information is one of the major issues to be
discussed in the follow up to the White Paper on Mortgage Credit of 2007. The
evidence provided in the reports published today will feed into these debates.
2. On advice provided to customers
The sources:
With regard to advice, the Commission's report draws on a range of sources,
including: a study on financial services intermediaries of 2008 launched by the
German Consumer Affairs Ministry, a Commission study on credit intermediaries of
2009 and various other surveys and studies of the same time period.
The results:
The preliminary analysis of the data assessed in the Staff Working Paper indicates
that:
- The problems of reliability of advice and the inbuilt conflict of interest
faced by advisors due to remuneration systems that can bias them towards
selling particular financial products are clearly matters which deserve further
attention.
- Advice from bank employees or brokers is often a determining factor in
consumers' decisions to buy a specific product. Research shows that many
consumers rely, without much reflection, on the advice of a familiar bank
employee in their local bank branch or a broker dealing with their financial
affairs because they perceive them to be trustworthy.
- There is growing evidence that consumers often do not obtain suitable advice
on financial services.
- For example, in Germany, consumers terminate 50-80% of all long-term
investments prematurely because of inadequate advice when buying the
products. This leads to estimated damages for consumers of 20-30 billion
Euros every year. In one survey where 25 German bank advisors were
approached in a mystery shopping exercise, 24 of these provided unsuitable
advice. Recommending expensive and unsuitable mortgages is a typical
example of selling practices resulting in consumer detriment.
3
4. - In Ireland, complaints about advice on financial services doubled in 2008
compared to 2007 and almost 65% of them were resolved in favour of the
consumer.
- The suspicion is that many of those selling financial products do not have a
sufficient understanding of these products to be able to effectively advise
consumers on their advantages and risks.
- Furthermore, bank employees or intermediaries may often face an inherent
conflict between their interests and the interests of their clients, given
remuneration structures which create so-called "commission biases". A study on
the impact of these conflicts for direct marketing agents reveals that firms
gradually become more lax in relation to the promotion and selling of unsuitable
products. The results of a survey on (inter alia) retail investment products
revealed that 72% of the investment professionals surveyed consider the fee
structures rather than the suitability of investment products for customers as the
main driver for sales. (See Staff Working Paper for details.)
Background - the current rules
For all forms of credit – consumer credit, mortgage credit and others – advice is still
a Member State responsibility. For investment there are some rules at EU level. After
the financial crisis, the issue of advice has become increasingly important and is
being looked at closely by the Commission and authorities at national level to see if
further action is necessary. This report contributes to the evidence and will feed into
those debates.
3. Bank Fees
The sources
The Commission also published a study by an independent consultant to examine
the bank fees charged for current accounts across the EU-27.
The study "Data collection for prices of current accounts provided to consumers"
analysed a sample of 224 financial institutions, which covers 81% of the retail
banking market in terms of customer deposits. The sample was representative of
the diverse banking institutions in the EU.
The data on bank fees charged for current accounts were based on the tariffs
available on the websites of banks and on the additional contacts with the banks to
complete and clarify the information. The tariffs were assembled between
February and April 2009.
The data used to build the usage profiles was developed based on a variety of
sources, in particular the European Central Bank, national central banks, market
studies, consumer association surveys and assumptions where no data was
available. Market authorities (including banking associations) were consulted on the
usage profiles and were invited to provide data or to confirm existing data.
The aim of the study was to assess:
- prices of current accounts for different usage profiles in each country, e.g. for
average and intensive users (see below for the information on usage profiles);
- the transparency of bank tariffs in all countries;
- the simplicity of bank tariffs;
- the use of payment tools, grouping countries according to national
preferences for using electronic payments or manual operations, e.g. over-
the-counter cash withdrawals.
4
5. Some examples of current account fees and services which were examined in the
study are:
- basic annual charges (e.g. package fees and account maintenance charges),
- account charges (e.g. opening/closing, overdrafts, insufficient funds, over-the-
counter transactions, accounts movements, internet and phone banking, income
from credit interest, etc.),
- debit and credit card charges (issuance, annual fees, blocking and replacement,
charges for withdrawals, purchases and online payments, etc.),
- credit transfer charges (reception and transmission of credit transfers, standing
orders including setup, modification and closure, etc.),
- direct debit charges (fees for setting up direct debits, sending and closure),
- cheques related charges (fees for order of chequebooks, cheque drawing,
cheque lodging and cheque bouncing).
The methodology:
To investigate the bank fees, a key concept used in the study is that of a "consumer
usage profile":
- four consumer usage profiles were created for each EU country (average,
active, passive and basic), based on the intensity of usage and in relation to
domestic preferences, i.e. the average number of banking transactions carried
out by an individual customer ("a banked adult") in a specific country;
- Four equivalent profiles (average, active, passive and basic) were created
for the EU as a whole, also based on the intensity of usage but in relation to
average number of banking transactions carried out by an individual customer
("a banked adult") for the whole EU.
Two other important concepts used in the study were transparency and simplicity.
- The transparency of bank tariffs. This was checked in the study by how easy
it was to find relevant information on websites and to calculate the price of the
different elements in the price so the consumer can compare offers
- The simplicity of bank tariffs. The study measures simplicity of bank tariffs in
terms of how many components were there in the price. e.g. one basic charge
for a service, or a charge that depends on the number of transactions you
make, or the amount you have in your account etc.
Main findings on bank fees
The key findings of the study on bank fees are:
- the fee structures of current accounts are often so opaque that it is difficult
for consumers to know how much they are paying and to compare different
offers. Almost one in three of EU consumers have difficulties in comparing offers
in relation to these same current accounts and so they are not in a position to
choose the best account for their needs.
- Online price information is incomplete. In two out of three cases, additional
contact with the bank was needed to clarify the fees. Even then, banks in many
situations only offered oral information on their tariffs, but refused to send tariff
lists by e-mail or by fax. Around 10% of the banks had little or no price
information available on their websites and 33% of the banks had incomplete
price information in their tariffs.
5
6. - For example, a 2008 study by the UK Office of Fair Trading1 found that
consumers basically do not know what they were paying in bank charges,
either before or after they were incurred. Over three-quarters of consumers did
not know the credit interest rate of their current account. Two thirds of
consumers did not know what their bank charged for an unarranged overdraft.2
Overall, the report found that the personal current account market was set up in
a way which placed consumers at a disadvantage compared with their provider.
- In some EU countries, consumers pay considerably more for current accounts
than in others. For example, the prices of accounts with normal usage range
from as high as € 253 (country average) in Italy to as low as €27 (country
average) in Bulgaria. For "intensive" users, the difference is even clearer: from a
maximum of € 831 in Italy to a minimum of € 28 in Bulgaria (see the sections
below for country-specific data).
- High prices are directly linked to opaque price information. Therefore,
consumers in countries with opaque price structures are likely to pay more for
bank accounts.
Summary table. The overall results
Table 1 – Ranking of countries in terms of price of current bank account charges.
(see bank fees study or Annex 1 for country by country breakdown of bank fees)
Rank Country Key contributing factors Simplicity Transparency
1 Italy All key charges are very high Below average Below average
2 Spain All key charges are very high Below average Below average
Very high account and debit card charges; Above average Above average
3 Latvia
low basic annual charges
High basic annual charges; very high debit Below average Below average
4 France
card charges
Very high basic annual charges; low credit Above average Below average
5 Austria
transfer charges
6 Finland All key charges are high Above average Above average
Czech Below average Above average
7 High basic annual charges
Republic
8 Slovenia High basic annual charges Above average Above average
Very high basic annual charges; high debit Above average Above average
9 Germany
card charges; very low account charges
10 Greece High credit transfer charges Below average Below average
11 Slovakia High basic annual charges Above average Above average
12 Lithuania Very low basic annual charges Above average Above average
Low basic annual and account charges; high Below average Above average
13 Cyprus
credit transfer charges
14 Romania Low basic annual charges Above average Below average
15 Hungary High debit card charges Below average Below average
High account charges; very low credit Below average Below average
16 Ireland
transfer charges
United Most charges are very low; very high Above average Below average
17
Kingdom account charges
18 Sweden Very low account charges; high debit card Above average Above average
1
Cf. footnote 40.
2
Cf. footnote 40, p. 72.
6
7. charges
19 Poland Charges are within EU27 averages Below average Below average
20 Luxembourg Low account charges Above average Above average
Very low basic annual charges; high account Above average Above average
21 Estonia
charges
22 Denmark Low debit card charges Below average Below average
Very low basic annual charges and credit Above average Above average
23 Malta
transfer charges; high account charges
24 Portugal Very low account charges Above average Above average
25 Belgium Very low account and credit transfer charges Above average Above average
The Very low account charges; high basic annual Above average Above average
26
Netherlands charges
27 Bulgaria Low basic annual and account charges Above average Below average
Source: Van Dijk calculations
Summary:
The following results emerge from the ranking and analysis of the breakdown of
charges. The ranking reflects the average position of each country in the eight
profiles considered together.
- The top two positions are occupied consistently by Italy and Spain, with the
exception of one profile, implying that the two countries have the most costly
accounts in the EU. In Spain, the pricing arrangements are subject to
negotiation on a case-by-case basis between the client and his or her bank. The
actual costs could therefore be expected to be lower than the official price listsi.
Latvia’s high ranking is largely due to the high charges associated with the
usage of cheques (in the EU-27 profile), which are virtually non-existent in the
country.ii
- Austria and France present the most expensive accounts in almost all user
profiles. As the breakdown of charges provided in Annex 7 clearly shows, these
high costs are mostly due to a combination of above-average basic annual
charges and account charges.iii For France, an additional contributing factor is
the high debit card charges.
- At the other end of the cost spectrum, Bulgaria and Portugal consistently
secure low rankings, implying that the current accounts are cheap in these
countries for all customer profiles. For Bulgaria, the low usage intensity does not
appear to support this result; although the country ranks last in both the number
and value of transactions by banked adults (see section 3.5), the country’s
relative ranking changes little when the significantly higher EU average usage
rates are used. Likewise, Portugal’s ranking changes little when the EU profile is
used.iv The current accounts offered in Belgium and Netherlands are also
relatively low-cost. As depicted in the breakdown of charges given in Annex 7,
in both countries variable costs arising from fees and charges associated with
the number of transactions are also very low. In turn, the basic annual charges
comprise a significant share of total costs (especially in the Netherlands), with a
share of over two-thirds in the domestic average profile. The existence of these
high fixed costs also explains why the two countries’ relative rankings go up
when the lower usage rates associated with passive profiles are considered.
Nevertheless, despite these high costs, the costs associated with transactions
are low, which contribute to the lower ranking of the two countries.v (See Bank
Fee Study for details and Annexes)
7
8. As regards all other countries:
- Finland and Denmark, in turn, are cheaper when the EU profiles are
considered than when the country-specific rates are applied. The individuals in
both countries have above-average usage of credit transfers (see section 3.5),
which contribute to high costs emanating from these transactions.vi When the
usage rates for credit transfers are reduced to EU-27 average levels, the
rankings for these countries go down;
- Greece and Lithuania are costlier when the EU profiles are considered even
though the two countries are at the bottom of the list when the country-specific
usage rates are applied. For Greece, the higher costs arise from high charges
associated with credit transfers. These transactions are significantly below the
NMS-12 averages in the country, (see section 3.5 for comparisons). These
findings suggest that the high costs may be inhibiting the development of credit
transfers or other electronic transactions in the country. For Lithuania, the high
rankings in EU profiles arise from charges on cheques, which are virtually
unused in the country according to the country-specific usage rates, (see
section 3.5);3 See Bank Fee Study for details and Annexes)
Background - the current rules
The EU has some of the toughest legislation on misleading and unfair practices in
the world. The EU's Unfair Commercial Practices Directive was adopted in 2005
and entered into force on December 2007. It contains a general clause banning
unfair commercial practices distorting consumers' economic behaviour. The Directive
regulates two key categories of unfair practices (misleading and aggressive): traders
must provide truthful information on their products and services, including their price.
They must also provide all the relevant information consumers need to make an
informed choice. The Directive covers online and offline commercial practices and
applies to all sectors, including financial services.
Enforcement of UCP Directive is the task of national authorities and courts. Member
States have an obligation to enforce EU consumer law in financial services as in
every other sector.
The new Payment Services Directive, to be implemented by 1 November 2009, will
improve the situation for certain charges, i.e. it contains information requirements on
the cost of a payment service (e.g. a standing order, direct debit or credit transfer). It
will help with transparency in terms of some kinds of fees covered by the report.
4. Switching
The sources
The data on switching used in the report draws on evidence collected in a special
Eurobarometer of July 2008 and reported in the 2009 edition of the Consumer
Scoreboard. It covered switching levels across eleven services including financial
services over the previous two years.
The main results
The switching rate is an important indicator of market health. For current bank
accounts, it remains low at only 9%, compared for instance with 25% for car
insurance. Difficulties in comparing offers are a key factor.
3
Accordingly, the European Commission’s Retail Banking Sector Inquiry Interim Report II
found that the estimated costs per payment transactions (which excluded cheque
transactions) in Lithuania was close to the European average calculated in the study.
8
9. The report highlights the strong correlation between high switching rates and lower
prices of current accounts. The report finds that switching is good for the consumer,
but also good for the market in general.
Background - the current rules
On 1 December 2008, the Commission announced (IP/08/1841) that the European
banking industry had adopted a set of Common Principles for Bank Account
Switching, which will make it easier for consumers to switch their current account
from one bank to another within their own Member State. These Common Principles
are due to be implemented across the EU by 1 November 2009. (IP/09/1841)
Banks will provide consumers who want to switch their current account with clear
and complete information. The information provided will indicate the respective
responsibilities of the ‘former’ bank, the ‘new’ bank and the consumer, and the
timescales for the process as well as fees, if any, to be imposed.
The switching service will allow banks ten days in which to co-operate to arrange the
opening and closing of the accounts of customers who wish to switch, as well as
transferring balances and rearranging credit transfers. Where automated processes
are in place for information exchange, banks will offer a free of charge service. The
level at which banks may recover the cost of collecting information manually will be a
market decision left up to the individual bank.
The Commission will follow the implementation of the Common Principles closely, to
ensure that they do in fact produce concrete positive outcomes for the consumer. In
order to benchmark their effectiveness, the Commission will monitor their impact.
The Context:
Data in the Staff Working Paper - consumer over-indebtedness,
foreclosures and financial inclusion.
The report on financial services also includes findings on issues which serve as a
backdrop to the problems consumers are experiencing with information and advice,
fees and switching. These issues are consumer over-indebtedness, foreclosures and
financial inclusion. Although the figures relate to pre-crisis levels, they are useful as
additional context of the report.
The sources:
The data on debts and foreclosures draws on evidence mainly collected by the
European Credit Research Institute (ECRI) in 1995 – 2007 and by the European
Central Bank in 2006. The data for financial inclusion is based on a Commission
report of 2008.
Debt
- There has been a strong increase in the ratio of household debt to disposable
income, up by more than 50% since the early 90s, reaching 86% at the end of
2004.
- The outstanding loans granted to households for personal use in the
consumption of goods and services in the EU27 accounted for almost one
trillion euros in 2007.
- In 2007, the UK had by far the highest amount of outstanding consumer credit
per capita (€4,969), followed by Ireland (€4,258), Cyprus (€3,996) and Denmark
(€3,414). EU 12 Member States present low levels of indebtedness. Slovakia
(€229), Latvia (€314), Bulgaria (€477) and from the EU 15 Belgium (€1,334)
rank among the countries with the least indebted population.
9
10. Foreclosures
- 70% of a household's loan obligations are made up of mortgage credit.
- Commission services are currently seeking information from Member States on
the number of foreclosures; data show an increase for many Member States.
Financial Inclusion
- At the end of 2003, 10% of adults aged 18 and over in the EU 15 countries and
47 % of adults in the EU10 had no bank account at all whereas 6% to 8%
respectively have only very limited access to financial services.
The Commission services launched a consultation on "Financial Inclusion: Ensuring
access to a basic bank account" with the aim of collecting views on how financial
inclusion can be improved.
http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/2009/financial_inclusion_en.htm
10
11. ANNEX 1: Bank Fees: EU 27: Country by County profile on bank fees
AUSTRIA
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €140 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, Austria has high current account
prices on average: it ranks as 5th most expensive country in the EU. This is mainly
due to very high basic annual charges.
The tariffs of current bank accounts are below average in terms of transparency but
above average in terms of simplicity. Approximately 80% of the banks included in the
study had to be contacted to provide further details or to clarify the information
provided on their websites.
As regards the use of payments tools, Austria is part of the group of countries where
consumers have a preference for electronic transactions, which reach 77% of the
total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is above the EU average.
A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in Austria, 41% of consumers had
difficulties comparing current account offers. Only 6% of consumers have switched
their current account in the previous two years despite the fact that 58% of those
who did reported finding a cheaper provider. Austria has one of the lowest current
account switching rates in Europe.
BELGIUM
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €58 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, Belgium has low current account
prices on average: is in the 25th position in the EU. This is mainly due to very low
account and credit transfer charges.
The tariffs of current bank accounts are above average in terms of transparency and
simplicity. Approximately 50% of the banks included in the study had to be contacted
to provide further details or to clarify the information provided on their websites.
As regards the use of payments tools, Belgium is part of the group of countries
where consumers have a preference for electronic transactions, which reach 83% of
the total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is above the EU average.
A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in Belgium, 35% of consumers had
difficulties comparing current account offers. Only 7% of consumers have switched
their current account in the previous two years despite the fact that 65% of those
who did reported finding a cheaper provider.
BULGARIA
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €27 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, Bulgaria has the lowest current
account prices in the EU. This is mainly due to low basic and annual account
charges.
11
12. The tariffs of current bank accounts are below average in terms of transparency but
above average in terms of simplicity. Approximately 70% of the banks included in the
study had to be contacted to provide further details or to clarify the information
provided on their websites.
As regards the use of payments tools, Bulgaria is part of the group of countries
where consumers have a preference for manual transactions which reach 53% of the
total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is the lowest in the EU.
A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in Bulgaria, 20% of consumers had
difficulties comparing current account offers. Only 10% of consumers have switched
their current account in the previous two years despite the fact that 40% of those
who did reported finding a cheaper provider.
CYPRUS
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €85 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, Cyprus has average current account
prices and is in the 13th position in the EU. This is mainly due to low basic annual
and account charges combined with high credit transfer charges.
The tariffs of current bank accounts are above average in terms of transparency but
below average in terms of simplicity. Approximately 70% of the banks included in the
study had to be contacted to provide further details or to clarify the information
provided on their websites.
As regards the use of payments tools, Cyprus is part of the group of countries where
consumers have a preference for manual transactions which reach 56% of the total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is below the EU average.
A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in Cyprus, 25% of consumers had
difficulties comparing current account offers. Only 10% of consumers have switched
their current account in the previous two years despite the fact that 37% of those
who did reported finding a cheaper provider.
CZECH REPUBLIC
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €95 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, the Czech Republic has high current
account prices on average: it is in the 7th position in the EU. This is mostly due to
high basic annual charges.
The tariffs of current bank accounts are above average in terms of transparency but
below average in terms of simplicity. Approximately 80% of the banks included in the
study had to be contacted to provide further details or to clarify the information
provided on their websites.
As regards the use of payments tools, the Czech Republic is part of the group of
countries where manual transactions, although not higher than electronic
transactions, reach 42% of the total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is below the EU average.
12
13. A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in the Czech Republic, 35% of
consumers had difficulties comparing current account offers. Only 9% of consumers
have switched their current account in the previous two years despite the fact that
64% of those who did reported finding a cheaper provider.
DENMARK
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €74 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, Denmark low current account prices:
it is in the 22nd position in the EU. This is mainly due to low debit card charges.
The tariffs of current bank accounts are below average in terms of transparency but
in line with the average in terms of simplicity. Approximately 60% of the banks
included in the study had to be contacted to provide further details or to clarify the
information provided on their websites.
As regards the use of payments tools, Denmark is part of the group of countries
where consumers have a strong preference for electronic transactions which reach
90% of the total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is the second highest in the EU.
A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in Denmark, 42% of consumers
had difficulties comparing current account offers. Only 10% of consumers have
switched their current account in the previous two years despite the fact that 54% of
those who did reported finding a cheaper provider.
ESTONIA
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €51 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, Estonia has low current account
prices on average: it is in the 21st position in the EU. This is mainly due to very low
basic annual charges.
The tariffs of current bank accounts are above average in terms of transparency and
simplicity. Approximately 30% of the banks included in the study had to be contacted
to provide further details or to clarify the information provided on their websites.
As regards the use of payments tools, Estonia is part of the group of countries where
consumers have a preference for electronic transactions which reach 82% of the
total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is below the EU average.
A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in Estonia, 22% of consumers had
difficulties comparing current account offers. Only 9% of consumers have switched
their current account in the previous two years despite the fact that 60% of those
who did reported finding a cheaper provider.
FINLAND
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €104 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, Finland has high current account
prices on average: it ranks as the 6th most expensive country in the EU. This is
mainly due to high overall charges.
13
14. The tariffs of current bank accounts are above average in terms of transparency and
simplicity. More than 70% of the banks included in the study had to be contacted to
provide further details or to clarify the information provided on their websites.
As regards the use of payments tools, Finland is part of the group of countries where
consumers have a strong preference for electronic transactions which reach 88% of
the total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is the highest in the EU.
A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in Finland, 37% of consumers had
difficulties comparing current account offers. Only 8% of consumers have switched
their current account in the previous two years despite the fact that 42% of those
who did reported finding a cheaper provider.
FRANCE
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €154 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, France has high current account
prices on average: it ranks as the 4th most expensive country in the EU. This is
mostly due to high basic annual charges and very high debit card charges.
The tariffs of current bank accounts are below average in terms of transparency and
below average in terms of simplicity. More than 50% of the banks included in the
study had to be contacted to provide further details or to clarify the information
provided on their websites.
As regards the use of payments tools, France is part of the group of countries where
manual transactions, although not higher than electronic transactions, reach 33% of
the total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is the fourth biggest in the EU.
A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in France, 48% of consumers had
difficulties comparing current account offers, the highest percentage in Europe. Only
11% of consumers have switched their current account in the previous two years
despite the fact that 41% of those who did reported finding a cheaper provider.
France has one of the top three current account switching rates in Europe.
GERMANY
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €89 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, Germany has high current account
prices on average: it ranks as the 9th most expensive country in the EU. This is
mainly due to high basic annual charges combined with high debit card charges.
The tariffs of current bank accounts are above average in terms of transparency and
simplicity. Less than 30% of the banks included in the study had to be contacted to
provide further details or to clarify the information provided on their websites.
As regards the use of payments tools, Germany is part of the group of countries
where consumers have a preference for electronic transactions which reach 81% of
the total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is in line with the EU average.
14
15. A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in Germany, 34% of consumers
had difficulties comparing current account offers. Only 7% of consumers have
switched their current account in the previous two years despite the fact that 90% of
those who did reported finding a cheaper provider. Germany has the highest
percentage of consumers who found a cheaper provider after switching.
GREECE
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €54 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, Greece has high current account
prices on average: it ranks as 10th most expensive country in the EU. This is mainly
due to high credit transfer charges.
The tariffs of current bank accounts are below average in terms of transparency and
below average in terms of simplicity. Approximately 90% of the banks included in the
study had to be contacted to provide further details or to clarify the information
provided on their websites.
As regards the use of payments tools, Greece is part of the group of countries where
consumers have a preference for manual transactions which reach 53% of the total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is the third lowest in the EU.
A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in Greece, 41% of consumers had
difficulties comparing current account offers. Only 12% of consumers have switched
their current account in the previous two years despite the fact that 55% of those
who did reported finding a cheaper provider. Greece has one of the top three current
account switching rates in Europe.
HUNGARY
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €76 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, Hungary has average current
account prices and is in the 15th position in the EU. High debt card charges are part
of the balance.
The tariffs of current bank accounts are below average in terms of transparency and
below average in terms of simplicity. Approximately 70% of the banks included in the
study had to be contacted to provide further details or to clarify the information
provided on their websites.
Based on the usage of payments tools, countries were assigned to groups reflecting
the preference for electronic versus manual operations. Hungary is part of the group
of countries where manual transactions, although not higher than electronic
transactions, reach 41% of the total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is below the EU average.
A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in Hungary, 36% of consumers had
difficulties comparing current account offers. Only 8% of consumers have switched
their current account in the previous two years despite the fact that 79% of those
who did reported finding a cheaper provider. Hungary has one of the highest
percentages of consumers who found a cheaper provider after switching.
15
16. IRELAND
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €82 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, Ireland has average current account
prices and is in the 16th position in the EU. This is mostly due to high account
charges combined with low credit transfer charges.
The tariffs of current bank accounts are below average in terms of transparency but
in line with the average in terms of simplicity. More than 70% of the banks included in
the study had to be contacted to provide further details or to clarify the information
provided on their websites.
As regards the use of payments tools, Ireland is part of the group of countries where
manual transactions, although not higher than electronic transactions, reach 30% of
the total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is below the EU average.
A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in Ireland, 30% of consumers had
difficulties comparing current account offers. Only 7% of consumers have switched
their current account in the previous two years despite the fact that 71% of those
who did reported finding a cheaper provider. Ireland has one of the highest
percentages of consumers who found a cheaper provider after switching.
ITALY
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €253 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, Italy has the highest current account
prices in the EU on average. This is due to all key charges being very high.
The tariffs of current bank accounts are below average in terms of transparency and
they have the lowest scores in terms of simplicity. More than 90% of the banks
included in the study had to be contacted to provide further details or to clarify the
information provided on their websites.
As regards the use of payments tools, Italy is part of the group of countries where
consumers have a preference for manual transactions which reach 64% of the total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is below the EU average.
A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in Italy, 42% of consumers had
difficulties comparing current account offers, the second highest percentage in the
EU. Only 10% of consumers have switched their current account in the previous two
years despite the fact that 67% of those who did reported finding a cheaper provider.
LATVIA
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €115 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, Latvia has very high current account
prices on average: it ranks as 3rd most expensive country in the EU. This is mostly
due to high account and debit card charges.
The tariffs of current bank accounts are above average in terms of transparency and
simplicity. Approximately 50% of the banks included in the study had to be contacted
to provide further details or to clarify the information provided on their websites.
16
17. As regards the use of payments tools, Latvia is part of the group of countries where
manual transactions, although not higher than electronic transactions, reach 30% of
the total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is below the EU average.
A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in Latvia, 18% of consumers had
difficulties comparing current account offers, one of the lowest percentages in
Europe. Only 7% of consumers have switched their current account in the previous
two years despite the fact that 41% of those who did reported finding a cheaper
provider.
LITHUANIA
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €35 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, Lithuania has average current
account prices and is in the 12th position in the EU.
The scores for the tariffs of current bank accounts are among the highest in terms of
transparency and simplicity. Approximately 30% of the banks included in the study
had to be contacted to provide further details or to clarify the information provided on
their websites.
Based on the usage of payments tools, countries were assigned to groups reflecting
the preference for electronic versus manual operations. Lithuania is part of the group
of countries where consumers have a strong preference for electronic transactions
which reach 87%of the total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is significantly below the EU average.
A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in Lithuania, 9% of consumers had
difficulties comparing current account offers, the lowest percentage in Europe. Only
10% of consumers have switched their current account in the previous two years
despite the fact that 31% of those who did reported finding a cheaper provider.
LUXEMBOURG
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €57 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, Luxembourg has low current
account prices on average: is in the 20th position in the EU. This is mostly due to low
account charges.
The tariffs of current bank accounts are above average in terms of transparency and
simplicity. Approximately 60% of the banks included in the study had to be contacted
to provide further details or to clarify the information provided on their websites.
As regards the use of payments tools, Luxembourg is part of the group of countries
where consumers have a preference for electronic transactions which reach 80% of
the total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is below the EU average.
A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in Luxembourg, 28% of consumers
had difficulties comparing current account offers. Only 6% of consumers have
switched their current account in the previous two years despite the fact that 44% of
those who did reported finding a cheaper provider. Luxembourg has one of the
lowest current account switching rates in Europe.
17
18. MALTA
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €72 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, Malta has low current account prices
on average: is in the 23rd position in the EU. This is mainly due to low basic annual
charges and credit transfer charges.
The tariffs of current bank accounts are above average in terms of transparency and
simplicity. All of the banks included in the study had to be contacted to provide
further details or to clarify the information provided on their websites.
Based on the usage of payments tools, countries were assigned to groups reflecting
the preference for electronic versus manual operations. Malta is part of the group of
countries where manual transactions, although not higher than electronic
transactions, reach 44% of the total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is below the EU average.
A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in Malta, 31% of consumers had
difficulties comparing current account offers. Only 7% of consumers have switched
their current account in the previous two years despite the fact that 24% of those
who did reported finding a cheaper provider.
NETHERLANDS
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €46 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, the Netherlands has low current
account prices on average: is in the 26th position in the EU. This is mostly due to very
low account charges.
The scores for the tariffs of current bank accounts are among the highest in terms of
transparency and simplicity. Approximately 50% of the banks included in the study
had to be contacted to provide further details or to clarify the information provided on
their websites.
As regards the use of payments tools, the Netherlands is part of the group of
countries where consumers have a strong preference for electronic transactions
which reach 92% of the total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is above the EU average.
A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in the Netherlands, 28% of
consumers had difficulties comparing current account offers. Only 5% of consumers
have switched their current account in the previous two years despite the fact that
43% of those who did reported finding a cheaper provider. Netherlands has the
lowest current account switching rates in Europe.
POLAND
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €73 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, Poland has average current account
prices and is in the 19th position in the EU.
18
19. The tariffs of current bank accounts are below average in terms of transparency and
below average in terms of simplicity. Approximately 80% of the banks included in the
study had to be contacted to provide further details or to clarify the information
provided on their websites.
As regards the use of payments tools, Poland is part of the group of countries where
manual transactions, although not higher than electronic transactions, reach 43% of
the total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is below the EU average.
A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in Poland, 22% of consumers had
difficulties comparing current account offers. Only 8% of consumers have switched
their current account in the previous two years despite the fact that 64% of those
who did reported finding a cheaper provider.
PORTUGAL
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €45 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, Portugal has low current account
prices on average: is in the 24th position in the EU. This is mainly due to very low
account charges.
The tariffs of current bank accounts are above average in terms of transparency and
simplicity. Approximately 70% of the banks included in the study had to be contacted
to provide further details or to clarify the information provided on their websites.
Based on the usage of payments tools, countries were assigned to groups reflecting
the preference for electronic versus manual operations. Portugal is part of the group
of countries where consumers have a preference for electronic transactions which
reach 83% of the total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is below the EU average.
A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in Portugal, 32% of consumers had
difficulties comparing current account offers. Only 8% of consumers have switched
their current account in the previous two years despite the fact that 64% of those
who did reported finding a cheaper provider.
ROMANIA
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €83 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, Romania has average current
account prices and is in the 14th position in the EU.
The tariffs of current bank accounts are below average in terms of transparency but
above average in terms of simplicity. More than 70% of the banks included in the
study had to be contacted to provide further details or to clarify the information
provided on their websites.
As regards the use of payments tools, Romania is part of the group of countries
where consumers have a preference for manual transactions which reach 90% of the
total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is the second lowest in the EU.
19
20. A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in Romania, 33% of consumers
had difficulties comparing current account offers. Only 10% of consumers have
switched their current account in the previous two years despite the fact that 33% of
those who did reported finding a cheaper provider.
SLOVAKIA
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €74 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, Slovakia has average current
account prices and is in the 11th position in the EU.
The tariffs of current bank accounts are above average in terms of transparency and
simplicity. Approximately 60% of the banks included in the study had to be contacted
to provide further details or to clarify the information provided on their websites.
As regards the use of payments tools, Slovakia is part of the group of countries
where consumers have a preference for electronic transactions which reach 75% of
the total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is below the EU average.
A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in Slovakia, 31% of consumers had
difficulties comparing current account offers. Only 9% of consumers have switched
their current account in the previous two years despite the fact that 49% of those
who did reported finding a cheaper provider.
SLOVENIA
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €100 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, Slovenia has high current account
prices on average: it ranks as the 8th most expensive country in the EU. This is
mainly due to high basic annual charges.
The tariffs of current bank accounts are above average in terms of transparency and
simplicity. Approximately 70% of the banks included in the study had to be contacted
to provide further details or to clarify the information provided on their websites.
Based on the usage of payments tools, countries were assigned to groups reflecting
the preference for electronic versus manual operations. Slovenia is part of the group
of countries where manual transactions, although not higher than electronic
transactions, reach 32% of the total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is below the EU average.
A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in Slovenia, 24% of consumers had
difficulties comparing current account offers. Only 7% of consumers have switched
their current account in the previous two years despite the fact that 51% of those
who did reported finding a cheaper provider.
SPAIN
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €178 on average.
20
21. Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, Spain has very high current account
prices: it is the second most expensive country in the EU. This is due to all key
charges being very high.
The tariffs of current bank accounts are below average in terms of transparency and
below average in terms of simplicity. More than 90% of the banks included in the
study had to be contacted to provide further details or to clarify the information
provided on their websites.
As regards the use of payments tools, Spain is part of the group of countries where
consumers have a preference for electronic transactions which reach 75% of the
total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is below the EU average.
A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in Spain, 27% of consumers had
difficulties comparing current account offers. Only 15% of consumers have switched
their current account in the previous two years despite the fact that 59% of those
who did reported finding a cheaper provider. Spain has the highest current account
switching rate in Europe.
SWEDEN
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €62 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, Sweden has average current
account prices and is in the 18th position in the EU. This is mainly due to very low
account charges combined with high debt card charges.
The tariffs of current bank accounts are above average in terms of transparency and
simplicity. Approximately 70% of the banks included in the study had to be contacted
to provide further details or to clarify the information provided on their websites.
As regards the use of payments tools, Sweden is part of the group of countries
where consumers have a preference for electronic transactions, which reach 85% of
the total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is above the EU average.
A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in Sweden, 40% of consumers had
difficulties comparing current account offers. Only 8% of consumers have switched
their current account in the previous two years despite the fact that 53% of those
who did reported finding a cheaper provider.
UNITED KINGDOM
The price of a current account, for an average usage profile which reflects domestic
preferences, is about €103 on average.
Based on all the eight consumer usage profiles, the United Kingdom has average
current account prices and is in the 17th position in the EU. This is mostly due to
most charges being very low combined with very high account charges.
The tariffs of current bank accounts are below average in terms of transparency but
above average in terms of simplicity. More than 50% of the banks included in the
study had to be contacted to provide further details or to clarify the information
provided on their websites.
21
22. As regards the use of payments tools, the UK is part of the group of countries where
consumers have a strong preference for electronic transactions which reach 88% of
the total.
The number of transactions per banked adult is the third highest in the EU.
A 2008 Eurobarometer survey has revealed that, in the UK, 24% of consumers had
difficulties comparing current account offers. Only 9% of consumers have switched
their current account in the previous two years despite the fact that 44% of those
who did reported finding a cheaper provider.
i
Keeping in mind that the official price lists are the only sources of price information for the present
study.
ii
The findings in points 1 and 2 are, by and large, in line with the European Commission’s Retail
Banking Sector Inquiry Interim Report II (released on 17 July 2006). The report’s results on account
usage and pricing were based primarily on a market survey of 234 banks. The findings confirm that
charges on account management and selected payment transactions (only corresponding to fees on
credit transfers, standing orders and direct debits) were extremely high in Italy (p.89). In Latvia,
charges were also found to be high for the covered payment transactions, even though charges on
cheques were excluded. The Commission’s report does not consider charges on card transactions,
which could explain why our findings for France are not echoed in the report. For Spain, the report
finds that the account management fees are below the EU-27 averages, which may be taking into
account the actual prices resulting from case-by-case negotiations between the banks and their
customers.
iii
As remarked in Annex 7, basic annual charges comprise package and account maintenance fees
while account charges include charges on opening/closing accounts, overdrafts, insufficient funds,
OTC transactions, account movement, internet and phone banking as well as income from credit
interest.
iv
The finding on Portugal runs somewhat counter to the results of the European Commission’s Retail
Banking Sector Inquiry Interim Report II. One reason could be the exclusion of a number of key
transactions from the analysis provided in the report. It is also possible that the services have become
cheaper since 2004, the year that the survey for the report was conducted.
v
Belgium and the Netherlands were also found to have low-cost current accounts in the European
Commission’s Retail Banking Sector Inquiry Interim Report II.
vi
These findings are in line with the European Commission’s Retail Banking Sector Inquiry Interim
Report II, which found that the estimated costs per payment transactions (which cover credit
transfers as well as direct debits) are above the European averages in both countries, (pg. 89). Much
like our study, the charges in Finland were found to be greater.
22