rubric

1. Assignment 1 Marking Rubric
CLO Focus: CLO 1 – Students should be able to extract relevant information from the text.
Article 1
Part 1 -
POV, Tone,
Purpose
Ideas are vague or
unclear - shows little
to no understanding of
the theories discussed.
0points
Ideas are vague or
unclear - shows little
to no understanding of
the theories discussed.
1points
Ideas are presented in
a consistent manner,
shows clear
understanding on
theories discussed.
2points
Ideas are presented in
a consistent manner,
shows clear
understanding on
theories discussed.
3points
Ideas are presented in
an original manner,
shows strong
understanding on
theories discussed.
4points
Ideas are presented
in an original
manner, shows
strong
understanding on
theories discussed.
5points
Article 1
Part 2 -
Opinion
based on
article
No organization from
beginning to the end
such as no sense of
sentence structure or
flow. very limited use
of word choices in the
discussion. There were
numerous errors in the
short essay.
0points
No organization from
beginning to the end
such as no sense of
sentence structure or
flow. very limited use
of word choices in the
discussion. There were
numerous errors in the
short essay.
1points
Organized from the
beginning to the end
such as sentence
structure is evident;
sentences mostly flow
well together. Word
choices make the
report informative.
There were very few
errors in the short
essay report.
2points
Organized from the
beginning to the end
such as sentence
structure is evident;
sentences mostly flow
well together. Word
choices make the
report informative.
There were very few
errors in the short
essay report.
3points
Strong and organized
from beginning to the
end. Sentence
structure enhances
meaning; flows
throughout the report.
Sophisticated use of
word choices, making
the report very
informative. there
were very few (if any)
errors in the short
essay.
4points
Strong and
organized from
beginning to the
end. Sentence
structure enhances
meaning; flows
throughout the
report.
Sophisticated use of
word choices,
making the report
very informative.
there were very few
(if any) errors in the
short essay.
5points

2. Article 2
Part 1 -
POV, Tone,
Purpose
Ideas are vague or
unclear - shows little
to no understanding of
the theories discussed.
0points
Ideas are vague or
unclear - shows little
to no understanding of
the theories discussed.
1points
Ideas are presented in
a consistent manner,
shows clear
understanding on
theories discussed.
2points
Ideas are presented in
a consistent manner,
shows clear
understanding on
theories discussed.
3points
Ideas are presented in
an original manner,
shows strong
understanding on
theories discussed.
4points
Ideas are presented
in an original
manner, shows
strong
understanding on
theories discussed.
5points
Article 2
Part 2 -
Opinion
based on
article
No organization from
beginning to the end
such as no sense of
sentence structure or
flow. very limited use
of word choices in the
discussion. There were
numerous errors in the
short essay.
0points
No organization from
beginning to the end
such as no sense of
sentence structure or
flow. very limited use
of word choices in the
discussion. There were
numerous errors in the
short essay.
1points
Organized from the
beginning to the end
such as sentence
structure is evident;
sentences mostly flow
well together. Word
choices make the
report informative.
There were very few
errors in the short
essay report.
2points
Organized from the
beginning to the end
such as sentence
structure is evident;
sentences mostly flow
well together. Word
choices make the
report informative.
There were very few
errors in the short
essay report.
3points
Strong and organized
from beginning to the
end. Sentence
structure enhances
meaning; flows
throughout the report.
Sophisticated use of
word choices, making
the report very
informative. there
were very few (if any)
errors in the short
essay.
4points
Strong and
organized from
beginning to the
end. Sentence
structure enhances
meaning; flows
throughout the
report.
Sophisticated use of
word choices,
making the report
very informative.
there were very few
(if any) errors in the
short essay.
5points