Park Quantification Of Aesthetic Viewing Using Eye Tracking Technology The In...Kalle
The purpose of this study is to explore how the viewers’ previous training is related to their aesthetic viewing in various interactions with the form and the context, in relation to apparel design. Berlyne’s two types of exploratory behavior, diversive and specific, provided a theoretical framework to this study. Twenty female subjects (mean age=21, SD=1.089) participated. Twenty model images, posed by a male and a female model, were shown on an eye-tracker screen for 10 seconds each. The findings of this study verified Berlyne’s concepts of visual exploration. One of the different findings from Berlyne’s theory was that the untrained viewers’ visual attention tended to be more significantly focused on peripheral areas of visual interest, compared to the trained viewers, while there was no significant difference on the central, foremost areas of visual interest between the two groups. The overall aesthetic viewing patterns were also identified.
Client Side Exploitation Techniques for attack client-side then access into intranet for fun, Additional latest Microsoft vulnerability that never patch for year (MS was Suck...)
Kammerer Gaze Based Web Search The Impact Of Interface Design On Search Resul...Kalle
This paper presents a study which examined the selection of Web search results with a gaze-based input device. A standard list interface was compared to a grid and a tabular layout with regard to task performance and subjective ratings. Furthermore, the gazebased input device was compared to conventional mouse interaction. Test persons had to accomplish a series of search tasks by selecting search results. The study revealed that mouse users accomplished more tasks correctly than users of the gazebased input device. However, no differences were found between input devices regarding the number of search results taken into account to accomplish a task. Regarding task completion time and ease of search result selection only in the list interface gaze-based interaction was inferior to mouse interaction. Moreover, with a gaze-based input device search tasks were accomplished faster in tabular presentation than in a standard list interface, suggesting a tabular interface as best suited for gaze-based interaction.
Park Quantification Of Aesthetic Viewing Using Eye Tracking Technology The In...Kalle
The purpose of this study is to explore how the viewers’ previous training is related to their aesthetic viewing in various interactions with the form and the context, in relation to apparel design. Berlyne’s two types of exploratory behavior, diversive and specific, provided a theoretical framework to this study. Twenty female subjects (mean age=21, SD=1.089) participated. Twenty model images, posed by a male and a female model, were shown on an eye-tracker screen for 10 seconds each. The findings of this study verified Berlyne’s concepts of visual exploration. One of the different findings from Berlyne’s theory was that the untrained viewers’ visual attention tended to be more significantly focused on peripheral areas of visual interest, compared to the trained viewers, while there was no significant difference on the central, foremost areas of visual interest between the two groups. The overall aesthetic viewing patterns were also identified.
Client Side Exploitation Techniques for attack client-side then access into intranet for fun, Additional latest Microsoft vulnerability that never patch for year (MS was Suck...)
Kammerer Gaze Based Web Search The Impact Of Interface Design On Search Resul...Kalle
This paper presents a study which examined the selection of Web search results with a gaze-based input device. A standard list interface was compared to a grid and a tabular layout with regard to task performance and subjective ratings. Furthermore, the gazebased input device was compared to conventional mouse interaction. Test persons had to accomplish a series of search tasks by selecting search results. The study revealed that mouse users accomplished more tasks correctly than users of the gazebased input device. However, no differences were found between input devices regarding the number of search results taken into account to accomplish a task. Regarding task completion time and ease of search result selection only in the list interface gaze-based interaction was inferior to mouse interaction. Moreover, with a gaze-based input device search tasks were accomplished faster in tabular presentation than in a standard list interface, suggesting a tabular interface as best suited for gaze-based interaction.
