1) Steven Donziger is facing trial on September 9th for criminal contempt charges related to his representation of Indigenous peoples in a lawsuit against Chevron.
2) Donziger believes the trial is being rushed through during the pandemic without proper precautions or ability for him to defend himself due to the recent disqualification of his lead lawyers.
3) He is asking for support through donations, contacting members of Congress, or witnessing the trial to bring accountability, as he feels the process is unfair and aims to convict him before an upcoming related case.
Federal Cannabis (Kaneh-Bos) Religious Permit and CorrespondenceAlan Gordon
Correspondence between activists Anne Armstrong and Alan Gordon and the National Park Service, leading to religious use permit for cannabis (Kaneh-Bos).
TNT Tony - Iraqi Dinar Guru Scam - Court Sentencing TranscriptIraqi Dinar News
TNT Tony, the dinar guru who scammed people out of over 1 million dollars, is going to prison for one year, one day. Here are the court documents and official transcripts of what was said behind closed doors.
No audio or video recording was made, this is it. Tony promoted the Iraqi dinar revaluation scam and would continually ask for either donations or mention certain Iraqi currency dealers by name, both during his time in PTR, with BlogTalk radio, and now on Free Conference call.
His brother Raymond Renfrow RayRen98 has taken over to continue the deception. Please share this document.
Because of the individual nature of a sentence, it is always best to consult with an experienced California criminal defense attorney. If you have specific questions about your sentence, however, a general overview of common probation sentencing terms and conditions may also be useful to you. Learn more about probation sentencing in California in this presentation.
TNT Dinar - TNT Tony Court Sentencing Documents Tony Renfrow 14 Daily PlusIraqi Dinar News
Here are the TNT Tony court documents following his sentencing on 11/30/2015 for the 14dailyplus.com ponzi scheme. Tony's brother Raymond Renfrow (RayRen98 / RayRay) has been conducting the TNT Dinar calls in Tony's absense. Tony is not permitted to make any calls or to even use social media. Court transcripts will be release soon. Court case 2:12-cr-20041.
Follow this Slideshare channel for updates. Please share this presentation. Thanks to Sherif for showing up at the courthouse to confront Tony before his sentencing.
Shelby Garigen, a soccer trainer who pleaded guilty to child pornography charges after receiving pictures from a 17-year-old boy, is trying to appeal her 37-month prison sentence.
Supreme Court to Decide Whether Landmark Civil Rights Law Applies .docxmabelf3
Supreme Court to Decide Whether Landmark Civil Rights Law Applies to Gay and Transgender Workers
The Supreme Court will hear cases based on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which forbids employment discrimination based on sex, and whether it applies to sexual orientation or transgender status. CreditT.J. Kirkpatrick for The New York Times
By Adam Liptak
The Supreme Court announced on Monday that it would decide whether the Civil Rights Act of 1964 guarantees protections from workplace discrimination to gay and transgender people in three cases expected to provide the first indication of how the court’s new conservative majority will approach L.G.B.T. rights.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has said the 1964 act does guarantee the protections. But the Trump administration has taken the opposite position, saying that the landmark legislation that outlawed discrimination based on race, religion, national origin and, notably, sex, cannot fairly be read to apply to discrimination based on sexual orientation or transgender status.
The three cases the court accepted are the first concerning L.G.B.T. rights since the retirement last summer of Justice Anthony M. Kennedy (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., a champion of gay rights. His replacement by the more conservative Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh could shift the court’s approach to cases concerning gay men, lesbians and transgender people.
Most federal appeals courts have interpreted Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to exclude sexual orientation discrimination. But two of them, in New York and Chicago, recently issued decisions ruling that discrimination against gay men and lesbians is a form of sex discrimination.
The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case from New York, Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., No. 17-1623, along with one from Georgia that came to the opposite conclusion, Bostock v. Clayton County, Ga. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., No. 17-1618.
The New York case was brought by a skydiving instructor, Donald Zarda, who said he was fired because he was gay. His dismissal followed a complaint from a female customer who had voiced concerns about being tightly strapped to Mr. Zarda during a tandem dive. Mr. Zarda, hoping to reassure the customer, told her that he was “100 percent gay.”
Mr. Zarda sued under Title VII and lost the initial rounds. He died in a 2014 skydiving accident, and his estate pursued his case.
Last year, a divided 13-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit allowed the lawsuit to proceed. Writing for the majority, Chief Judge Robert A. Katzmann concluded that (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.“sexual orientation discrimination is motivated, at least in part, by sex and is thus a subset of sex discrimination.”
In dissent, Judge Gerard E. Lynch wrote that the words of Title VII did not support the majority’s interpre.
Prepared remarks for City Attorney Dennis Herrera: commencement address to graduating law students of Golden Gate University School of Law, at the Nob Hill Masonic Center, 1111 California Street in San Francisco, California (May 13, 2005)
Letter to JamesMadisonTO JAMES MADISON.Paris, December 20, 1.docxSHIVA101531
Letter to James
Madison
TO JAMES MADISON.
Paris, December 20, 1787.
Dear Sir,—My last to you was of October the 8th, by the Count de Moustier. Yours of July the
18th, September the 6th and October the 24th, were successively received, yesterday, the day
before, and three or four days before that. I have only had time to read the letters; the printed
papers communicated with them, however interesting, being obliged to lie over till I finish my
despatches for the packet, which despatches must go from hence the day after to-morrow. I have
much to thank you for; first and most for the cyphered paragraph respecting myself. These little
informations are very material towards forming my own decisions. I would be glad even to
know, when any individual member thinks I have gone wrong in any instance. If I know myself,
it would not excite ill blood in me, while it would assist to guide my conduct, perhaps to justify
it, and to keep me to my duty, alert. I must thank you, too, for the information in Thomas Burke’s
case; though you will have found by a subsequent letter, that I have asked of you a further
investigation of that matter. It is to gratify the lady who is at the head of the convent wherein my
daughters are, and who, by her attachment and attention to them, lays me under great obligations.
I shall hope, therefore, still to receive from you the result of all the further inquiries my second
letter had asked. The parcel of rice which you informed me had miscarried, accompanied my
letter to the Delegates of South Carolina. Mr. Bourgoin was to be the bearer of both, and both
were delivered together into the hands of his relation here, who introduced him to me, and
who, at a subsequent moment, undertook to convey them to Mr. Bourgoin. This person was an
engraver, particularly recommended to Dr. Franklin and Mr. Hopkinson. Perhaps he may have
mislaid the little parcel of rice among his baggage. I am much pleased that the sale of western
lands is so successful. I hope they will absorb all the certificates of our domestic debt speedily, in
the first place, and that then, offered for cash, they will do the same by our foreign ones.
The season admitting only of operations in the cabinet, and these being in a great measure secret,
I have little to fill a letter. I will, therefore, make up the deficiency, by adding a few words on the
Constitution proposed by our convention.
I like much the general idea of framing a government, which should go on of itself, peaceably,
without needing continual recurrence to the State legislatures. I like the organization of the
government into legislative, judiciary and executive. I like the power given the legislature to
levy taxes, and for that reason solely, I approve of the greater House being chosen by the people
directly. For though I think a House so chosen, will be very far inferior to the present Congress,
will be very illy qualified to legislate for the Union, for foreign nations, etc., yet this evil does
not weig ...
Respond to these four Kimberly HolcombThursdayMay 9 at 72.docxcwilliam4
Respond to these four
Kimberly Holcomb
ThursdayMay 9 at 7:24pm
Manage Discussion Entry
September 11, 2001 is a day that no one in America will forget. I can still remember where I was, at the time, what I was doing, and how I reacted to it. September 11, 2001 will always be remembered as 9/11. This is the day that terrorist attacked America, on American soil. Terrorist hijacked 4 airplanes attacking the twin towers in New York, the pentagon, one was crashed in Pennsylvania. There were several people killed and injured, but America as a hole was wounded (Costly, 2019 para1).
Not long after 9/11, U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft, went to congress with several options to combat terrorism. Many of them was omitted by congress because they infringed on citizens rights, but they did approve the USA Patriot Act. The USA Patriot Act stands for United and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools, that will Intersect and Obstruct Terrorism (Costly, 2019).
The day after the Patriot Act was implemented, the House of Representatives passed a bill called 357-66. 357-66 is a bill that is 357 pages long and changed over 15 laws. In 2005, President George W. Bush approved surveillance of cell phone and monitor all emails. President Bush decision did not go over well with many people in America, they felt their civil liberties was being violated (Doherty, 2014).
The U.S. Constitution's Fourth Amendment and Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 made it where the government had to have a warrant to search someone’s property, so when President Bush made that decision, it made many U.S. citizens feel their liberties were violated. Then there was NSL’s (National Security Letters). The NSL’s allowed the government to access people “suspected” of terrorisms phone records, and the electronic communication (Doherty).
Paul Hillman
Paul Hillman
ThursdayMay 9 at 7:53pm
Manage Discussion Entry
The landscape of National Security definitely changed after the attacks of 9/11. The war on terror and the way it was covered by the national media helped to put the nation into a state of near panic. Both political parties were looking for ways to increase ways to gain intelligence A domestically they are hampered by the constitution. The patriot act enables the government to wiretap its own citizens without a warrant signed by a judge if it is believed it is in the best interest of national security. Ailong with the creation of the TSA and the increased regulations that come with flying commercially, there are numerous ways that our government has slowly took away more civil liberties. There is good argument that it has helped make our country a safer place because there have been multiple attempted terrorist attacks stopped before anyone was hurt. The civil liberties aren’t the only ones being stripped as the war on terror has also led to increased use of “enhanced interrogation techniques” or what s.
Federal Cannabis (Kaneh-Bos) Religious Permit and CorrespondenceAlan Gordon
Correspondence between activists Anne Armstrong and Alan Gordon and the National Park Service, leading to religious use permit for cannabis (Kaneh-Bos).
TNT Tony - Iraqi Dinar Guru Scam - Court Sentencing TranscriptIraqi Dinar News
TNT Tony, the dinar guru who scammed people out of over 1 million dollars, is going to prison for one year, one day. Here are the court documents and official transcripts of what was said behind closed doors.
No audio or video recording was made, this is it. Tony promoted the Iraqi dinar revaluation scam and would continually ask for either donations or mention certain Iraqi currency dealers by name, both during his time in PTR, with BlogTalk radio, and now on Free Conference call.
His brother Raymond Renfrow RayRen98 has taken over to continue the deception. Please share this document.
Because of the individual nature of a sentence, it is always best to consult with an experienced California criminal defense attorney. If you have specific questions about your sentence, however, a general overview of common probation sentencing terms and conditions may also be useful to you. Learn more about probation sentencing in California in this presentation.
TNT Dinar - TNT Tony Court Sentencing Documents Tony Renfrow 14 Daily PlusIraqi Dinar News
Here are the TNT Tony court documents following his sentencing on 11/30/2015 for the 14dailyplus.com ponzi scheme. Tony's brother Raymond Renfrow (RayRen98 / RayRay) has been conducting the TNT Dinar calls in Tony's absense. Tony is not permitted to make any calls or to even use social media. Court transcripts will be release soon. Court case 2:12-cr-20041.
Follow this Slideshare channel for updates. Please share this presentation. Thanks to Sherif for showing up at the courthouse to confront Tony before his sentencing.
Shelby Garigen, a soccer trainer who pleaded guilty to child pornography charges after receiving pictures from a 17-year-old boy, is trying to appeal her 37-month prison sentence.
Supreme Court to Decide Whether Landmark Civil Rights Law Applies .docxmabelf3
Supreme Court to Decide Whether Landmark Civil Rights Law Applies to Gay and Transgender Workers
The Supreme Court will hear cases based on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which forbids employment discrimination based on sex, and whether it applies to sexual orientation or transgender status. CreditT.J. Kirkpatrick for The New York Times
By Adam Liptak
The Supreme Court announced on Monday that it would decide whether the Civil Rights Act of 1964 guarantees protections from workplace discrimination to gay and transgender people in three cases expected to provide the first indication of how the court’s new conservative majority will approach L.G.B.T. rights.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has said the 1964 act does guarantee the protections. But the Trump administration has taken the opposite position, saying that the landmark legislation that outlawed discrimination based on race, religion, national origin and, notably, sex, cannot fairly be read to apply to discrimination based on sexual orientation or transgender status.
The three cases the court accepted are the first concerning L.G.B.T. rights since the retirement last summer of Justice Anthony M. Kennedy (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., a champion of gay rights. His replacement by the more conservative Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh could shift the court’s approach to cases concerning gay men, lesbians and transgender people.
Most federal appeals courts have interpreted Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to exclude sexual orientation discrimination. But two of them, in New York and Chicago, recently issued decisions ruling that discrimination against gay men and lesbians is a form of sex discrimination.
The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case from New York, Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., No. 17-1623, along with one from Georgia that came to the opposite conclusion, Bostock v. Clayton County, Ga. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., No. 17-1618.
The New York case was brought by a skydiving instructor, Donald Zarda, who said he was fired because he was gay. His dismissal followed a complaint from a female customer who had voiced concerns about being tightly strapped to Mr. Zarda during a tandem dive. Mr. Zarda, hoping to reassure the customer, told her that he was “100 percent gay.”
Mr. Zarda sued under Title VII and lost the initial rounds. He died in a 2014 skydiving accident, and his estate pursued his case.
Last year, a divided 13-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit allowed the lawsuit to proceed. Writing for the majority, Chief Judge Robert A. Katzmann concluded that (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.“sexual orientation discrimination is motivated, at least in part, by sex and is thus a subset of sex discrimination.”
In dissent, Judge Gerard E. Lynch wrote that the words of Title VII did not support the majority’s interpre.
Prepared remarks for City Attorney Dennis Herrera: commencement address to graduating law students of Golden Gate University School of Law, at the Nob Hill Masonic Center, 1111 California Street in San Francisco, California (May 13, 2005)
Letter to JamesMadisonTO JAMES MADISON.Paris, December 20, 1.docxSHIVA101531
Letter to James
Madison
TO JAMES MADISON.
Paris, December 20, 1787.
Dear Sir,—My last to you was of October the 8th, by the Count de Moustier. Yours of July the
18th, September the 6th and October the 24th, were successively received, yesterday, the day
before, and three or four days before that. I have only had time to read the letters; the printed
papers communicated with them, however interesting, being obliged to lie over till I finish my
despatches for the packet, which despatches must go from hence the day after to-morrow. I have
much to thank you for; first and most for the cyphered paragraph respecting myself. These little
informations are very material towards forming my own decisions. I would be glad even to
know, when any individual member thinks I have gone wrong in any instance. If I know myself,
it would not excite ill blood in me, while it would assist to guide my conduct, perhaps to justify
it, and to keep me to my duty, alert. I must thank you, too, for the information in Thomas Burke’s
case; though you will have found by a subsequent letter, that I have asked of you a further
investigation of that matter. It is to gratify the lady who is at the head of the convent wherein my
daughters are, and who, by her attachment and attention to them, lays me under great obligations.
I shall hope, therefore, still to receive from you the result of all the further inquiries my second
letter had asked. The parcel of rice which you informed me had miscarried, accompanied my
letter to the Delegates of South Carolina. Mr. Bourgoin was to be the bearer of both, and both
were delivered together into the hands of his relation here, who introduced him to me, and
who, at a subsequent moment, undertook to convey them to Mr. Bourgoin. This person was an
engraver, particularly recommended to Dr. Franklin and Mr. Hopkinson. Perhaps he may have
mislaid the little parcel of rice among his baggage. I am much pleased that the sale of western
lands is so successful. I hope they will absorb all the certificates of our domestic debt speedily, in
the first place, and that then, offered for cash, they will do the same by our foreign ones.
The season admitting only of operations in the cabinet, and these being in a great measure secret,
I have little to fill a letter. I will, therefore, make up the deficiency, by adding a few words on the
Constitution proposed by our convention.
I like much the general idea of framing a government, which should go on of itself, peaceably,
without needing continual recurrence to the State legislatures. I like the organization of the
government into legislative, judiciary and executive. I like the power given the legislature to
levy taxes, and for that reason solely, I approve of the greater House being chosen by the people
directly. For though I think a House so chosen, will be very far inferior to the present Congress,
will be very illy qualified to legislate for the Union, for foreign nations, etc., yet this evil does
not weig ...
Respond to these four Kimberly HolcombThursdayMay 9 at 72.docxcwilliam4
Respond to these four
Kimberly Holcomb
ThursdayMay 9 at 7:24pm
Manage Discussion Entry
September 11, 2001 is a day that no one in America will forget. I can still remember where I was, at the time, what I was doing, and how I reacted to it. September 11, 2001 will always be remembered as 9/11. This is the day that terrorist attacked America, on American soil. Terrorist hijacked 4 airplanes attacking the twin towers in New York, the pentagon, one was crashed in Pennsylvania. There were several people killed and injured, but America as a hole was wounded (Costly, 2019 para1).
Not long after 9/11, U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft, went to congress with several options to combat terrorism. Many of them was omitted by congress because they infringed on citizens rights, but they did approve the USA Patriot Act. The USA Patriot Act stands for United and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools, that will Intersect and Obstruct Terrorism (Costly, 2019).
The day after the Patriot Act was implemented, the House of Representatives passed a bill called 357-66. 357-66 is a bill that is 357 pages long and changed over 15 laws. In 2005, President George W. Bush approved surveillance of cell phone and monitor all emails. President Bush decision did not go over well with many people in America, they felt their civil liberties was being violated (Doherty, 2014).
The U.S. Constitution's Fourth Amendment and Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 made it where the government had to have a warrant to search someone’s property, so when President Bush made that decision, it made many U.S. citizens feel their liberties were violated. Then there was NSL’s (National Security Letters). The NSL’s allowed the government to access people “suspected” of terrorisms phone records, and the electronic communication (Doherty).
Paul Hillman
Paul Hillman
ThursdayMay 9 at 7:53pm
Manage Discussion Entry
The landscape of National Security definitely changed after the attacks of 9/11. The war on terror and the way it was covered by the national media helped to put the nation into a state of near panic. Both political parties were looking for ways to increase ways to gain intelligence A domestically they are hampered by the constitution. The patriot act enables the government to wiretap its own citizens without a warrant signed by a judge if it is believed it is in the best interest of national security. Ailong with the creation of the TSA and the increased regulations that come with flying commercially, there are numerous ways that our government has slowly took away more civil liberties. There is good argument that it has helped make our country a safer place because there have been multiple attempted terrorist attacks stopped before anyone was hurt. The civil liberties aren’t the only ones being stripped as the war on terror has also led to increased use of “enhanced interrogation techniques” or what s.
Mort de l'avocate Ebru Timtik - interpellation des affaires étrangères belgesJLMB
Le SAD, le CCBE, AVOCATS.BE, la FIDH, ASF, ainsi que les barreaux de Bruxelles, de Liège-Huy, du Brabant wallon, de Namur et du Luxembourg demande au Ministre des affaires étrangères belges d'intervenir auprès de son homologue turc pour stigmatiser la mort d'Ebru Timtik et lui demander de libérer Aytac Ünsal sans condition
Grève de la faim dans les prisons turques : deux morts récentsJLMB
L'avocate Ayse Bingol, prix DH du CCBE 2016 nous annonce le décès de deux prisonniers politiques en grève de la faim, Mustafa Kocac et Helin Bolek, une chanteuse renommée. Deux avocats, Ebru Timtik et Aytac Unsa sont en situation critique
Philippines - liste des attaques contre des avocatsJLMB
Depuis l'arrivée au pouvoir du président Duterte, on compte 64 tentatives d'assassinats contre des avocats : 52 morts, 11 blessés graves, 1 disparu !!!!
Lettre commune au président de la Colombie en soutien à Me PradoJLMB
Lawyers'Rights Watch Canada, The law Society of Engalnd & Wales, Human Rights Institute, The General Council of the Bars et Lawyers 4 Lawyers aadressent une lettre commune au président de la Colombie en soutien à Maître David Prado Albarcacin, qui défend les victimes des exactions de la milice "Les 12 apôtres" et est sujet à de graves manoeuvres d'intimidation
Après la libération des 17 avocats du CHD emprisonnés pour l'émission de nouveaux mandats d'arrêts à leur encontre (et leur confirmation dans des conditions scandaleuses), le barreau d'Istanbul et 35 autres barreaux turcs émettent un communiqué de presse dénonçant la politisation de la justice.
Cameroun : Enlèvement, séquestration et détention arbitraire de Me Mowha Frak...JLMB
ENLEVEMENT, SEQUESTRATION ET DETENTION ARBITRAIREDE MOWHA FRANKLIN, DEFENSEUR DES DROITS HUMAINS, Président National de l’Association Frontline Fighters for Citizen Interests (FFCI), Membre du Réseau des Défenseurs des droits Humains en Afrique Centrale
Audience du 10 septembre 2018 en cause de 17 avocats du CHD (Istanbul)JLMB
CE 10 septembre 2018, devant la Cour de Bakirköy à Istanbul, comparaissaient 17 avocats de l'Association turque des Juristes Progressistes (CHD) dont son président Selçuk Kozagaçli. Compte rendu d'une audience mouvementée au cours de laquelle des prévenus ont été battus par la police.
AVOCATS.BE demande la libération de Me Nasrin SotoudehJLMB
L'avocate iranienne, défenseuse des droits de l'homme et particulièrement des femmes qui contestent le port du viole obligatoire, vient d'être condamnée à 5 ans de prison et arrêtée. AVOCATS.BE s'adresse au président de la république Islamique d'Iran pour réclamer sa libération
Rapport de mission DSF en Turquie du 23 mai 2018 IstanbulJLMB
Les avocats qui ont assisté à l'audience du 23 mai 2018 de la Cour criminelle d'Istanbul témoignent des multiples violations des droits de défense des prévenus, avocats CHD
Introducing New Government Regulation on Toll Road.pdfAHRP Law Firm
For nearly two decades, Government Regulation Number 15 of 2005 on Toll Roads ("GR No. 15/2005") has served as the cornerstone of toll road legislation. However, with the emergence of various new developments and legal requirements, the Government has enacted Government Regulation Number 23 of 2024 on Toll Roads to replace GR No. 15/2005. This new regulation introduces several provisions impacting toll business entities and toll road users. Find out more out insights about this topic in our Legal Brief publication.
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Victims of crime have a range of rights designed to ensure their protection, support, and participation in the justice system. These rights include the right to be treated with dignity and respect, the right to be informed about the progress of their case, and the right to be heard during legal proceedings. Victims are entitled to protection from intimidation and harm, access to support services such as counseling and medical care, and the right to restitution from the offender. Additionally, many jurisdictions provide victims with the right to participate in parole hearings and the right to privacy to protect their personal information from public disclosure. These rights aim to acknowledge the impact of crime on victims and to provide them with the necessary resources and involvement in the judicial process.
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY v/s Union of India.pptxshweeta209
transfer of the P.I.L filed by lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in Delhi High Court to Supreme Court.
on the issue of UNIFORM MARRIAGE AGE of men and women.
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
1. Dear Friends,
I hoped I never would have to write this email -- but I must given the disturbing events of the last few
days that might end up forcing me to prison as soon as two weeks from now if I cannot stop a non-
jury "trial" that Judges Lewis A. Kaplan and Loretta Preska are trying to hold on Sept. 9 in the middle
of the COVID pandemic.
While thousands of defendants are incarcerated pre-trial in New York and elsewhere facing felony
charges while courthouses are largely closed, these judges want to make my misdemeanor case the
first criminal trial in New York since the pandemic hit in March -- putting lives at risk for a relatively
minor case that in normal circumstances never leads to jail time. To say this is being set up as a
railroading of a human rights lawyer might be the understatement of the year.
Critically, Judge Preska last week disqualified my lead lawyers Rick Friedman and Zoe Littlepage from
the case on the eve of trial over a minor issue related to a conflict affecting one of the six counts
against me. My other lawyers (all of whom are working pro bono) cannot travel safely to New York to
be with me because of the pandemic; nor can many of my witnesses come to court to help me
defend myself.
If this trial goes forward as planned on Sept. 9, I likely will be alone in the courtroom with no way to
defend myself in the absence of my lead lawyers.
Judge Preska rejected our proposal to postpone the trial until at least December so all can
safely attend and so my right to a fair trial under the Constitution can be protected. She also assigned
a new lawyer to represent me who cannot possibly be prepared by Sept. 9 even if I wanted to work
with him. (He represented me in this case before withdrawing without notice a few months ago).
This appears to be part of a plan to obtain my conviction without due process of law. Judge Kaplan
now controls the charging apparatus (he charged me after the U.S. Attorney rejected the case); the
judge (he appointed Judge Preska, violating rules requiring random assignment of cases); he named
the private prosecutor from a law firm that has financial ties to Chevron; and now, to close the loop,
he is assigning me my own defense lawyer and denying my choice of counsel! This is not how it is
supposed to happen in a rule of law country like the United States.
Once the case ends, Judge Preska will have the option to put in jail immediately to start serving a six-
month sentence on top of the 13 months I have been detained at home. She can make me serve this
time during my appeal which won't be decided until well after any prison term has ended. I believe
she is prepared to do this despite the fact the longest sentence ever imposed on a lawyer convicted
of a contempt charge in New York is three months of home confinement.
Judge Kaplan, a former tobacco industry lawyer, has been facilitating Chevron's attacks against me
for years after I helped win the $9.5b pollution judgment against the company in 2011. He charged
me with misdemeanor "criminal" contempt in 2018 when I challenged his unprecedented order that I
turn over my computer and cell phone to Chevron -- an order that clearly violates the sacrosanct
attorney-client privilege. My argument on the appeal of that order is scheduled for Sept. 15. This
might explain the rush to trial on Sept. 9. Judge Kaplan no doubt wants me to be a "convicted
criminal" when that case gets argued.
Here is how you can help:
2. 1) If you can, please donate to my legal defense fund at www.donzigerdefense.com. If I go to jail, my
lawyers will have to fight to get me out. My family will have to survive. We need funds urgently. (For
those who have already given, our deep thanks.)
2) If you cannot give, please go to our website at makechevroncleanup.com to join the campaign
and send an email to Congress to investigate the many irregularities afflicting this case.
3) If the trial happens on Sept. 9, please come and bear witness at the federal courthouse in lower
Manhattan if you can. Without a public presence, there will be little if any accountability. The
address of the courthouse is 500 Pearl Street. I will give more details as we get closer to the date --
and it might be possible to watch some or all of the trial online. (DO NOT COME TO COURT UNTIL
WE CONFIRM DATE.)
On the "good news" front, we are getting some amazing press. Pulitzer-prize winning journalist Chris
Hedges (formerly of the New York Times) posted this great article that includes a long interview with
me; seven prominent lawyers have formed a trial monitoring committee to call out the many due
process violations in my case; and my own team of lawyers have acted courageously in calling for a
postponement of the trial due to the pandemic.
Just today, more than 200 lawyers and 37 legal organizations filed an ethics complaint against Judge
Kaplan that is breathtaking in its level of detail.
One member of the case monitoring committee, Jeannie Mirer, is President of the International
Association of Democratic Lawyers. She said: "The campaign of judicial and corporate harassment
being waged against Steven Donziger is chilling in scope and intensity. We want all parties to know
that from this point forward we will be watching."
Please understand how unprecedented it is for the government to give a private corporation (via its
law firm) the judicial power to prosecute a lawyer who beat it in court. I am the first lawyer in U.S.
history detained prior to trial for a contempt charge. This is a direct assault on my rights as well as
those of thousands of Indigenous peoples and local residents in the Amazon who are still being
poisoned by oil pollution and have no funds to remediate their ancestral lands. (For background, see
this article.)
In closing, please know we are deeply appreciative of your support. If you have any questions, please
reach out to me via this email or text me. The situation is fluid. I will keep you posted and let you
know where things stand prior to Sept. 9.
Hugs to everybody,
Steven Donziger
Here are some more background articles:
Two retired federal judges publicly criticize Judges Kaplan and Preska for running an unfair judicial
process against me; they also urge my immediate release:
3. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5ac2615b8f5130fda4340fcb/t/5f0dc3fd6a8632767c2de633/1
594737663061/2020-07-13-law360-gertner-bennett.pdf
Statement of support from 29 Nobel laureates:
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5ac2615b8f5130fda4340fcb/t/5e9890f6d641a53d544792d6/
1587056892216/2020-04-nobel-laureates-statement.pdf
Letter from 475 lawyers and bar associations that concludes my detention is illegal:
https://iadllaw.org/2020/05/over-475-lawyers-legal-organizations-and-human-rights-defenders-
support-lawyer-steven-donziger/
Israeli environmentalists are trying to block Chevron from buying the country's gas assets until it pays
the Ecuador judgment:
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5ac2615b8f5130fda4340fcb/t/5f1eff219fe42f649e0514f6/15
95866914406/2020-07-27-zalul-alistair-letter.pdf