SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Collaboration works:
                                                                   Leadership Development
Collaboration is a key element in the successful
                                                                   Program Yields Results
collection, dissemination and use of national HIV/AIDS
data. In Cote d’Ivoire, multiple ministries are responsible
for Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) tasks related to
the country’s HIV/AIDS response.
                                                                   in Côte d’Ivoire
Before participating in a Leadership Development Program,
                                                                    Results from the Leadership Development Program
these ministries worked without established, harmonized and         Four ministries worked together to develop and publish a compendium of harmonized and validated HIV/AIDS indicators for
validated national indicators because of a lack of coordination     monitoring and evaluation of Cote d’Ivoire’s national HIV/AIDS response.
and collaboration.

As a result of the Leadership Development Program, the
four ministries worked together to develop and publish
a compendium of harmonized and validated HIV/AIDS
indicators, marking the accomplishment of the first of
several previously elusive goals. This step definitively moved
the country toward having high quality, timely and accessible
national HIV/AIDS data for informing the national
HIV/AIDS response.
                                                                   Cote d’Ivoire LDP participants                        LDP Team discusses M&E indicators                  Quality data collected on meaningful
                                                                                                                                                                            indicators inform quality HIV/AIDS services

                                                                   PROCESS                                                                          RESULTS
  The MEASURE Evaluation project, which began in                                                                                                    The results presentation was held on October 6th and
  1998, is USAID’s flagship Monitoring and Evaluation              In February 2010, the LDP was launched with a Senior
                                                                   Alignment Meeting attended by members of the four                                included among the attendees PEPFAR Coordinator
  project and was established based on the premise                                                                                                  Jennifer Walsh, USAID Technical Advisor Bijou Muhu-
  that generating demand for and improving the use                 ministry cabinets and Directors of the M&E units within
                                                                   the ministries. At this meeting, the senior group developed                      ra, and CDC Director Anna Likos, as well as cabinet
  of data in policy formulation, program planning,                                                                                                  members, technical advisors, directors and other repre-
  monitoring and evaluation improves health systems                a shared vision for the future:
                                                                   “The fight against HIV/AIDS in Cote d’Ivoire is                                  sentatives from the four ministries.
  which in turn affects health outcomes.
                                                                   coordinated by a Strategic Information Group that meets
                                                                   regularly and produces quality data for better monitoring                        The results highlighted in the meeting included the
  The project is now in Phase III and is led by the                                                                                                 published compendium of the harmonized and validat-
  University of North Carolina – Carolina Population               and evaluation.”
                                                                                                                                                    ed indicators representing the fulfillment of the desired
  Center. The partners include Futures Group, ICF                  The first workshop of the LDP was held with teams of
                                                                                                                                                    measurable result, as well as a testimonial by one of the
  Macro, John Snow, Inc., Management Sciences for                  M&E specialists from the four ministries. The shared
                                                                                                                                                    participants who related the impact of the LDP pro-
  Health, and Tulane University. This activity in Cote             vision the participants developed was one in which
                                                                                                                                                    gram on his particular team at the Ministry of Health.
  d’Ivoire and the results achieved were made possible             collaboration was also the central element:
  through collaboration and synergies within the                   “A collaborative group representing an inter-ministerial
  partner group.                                                   partnership for the regular administration of strategic HIV/                     The compendium of indicators was developed
                                                                   AIDS information is functional and produces high quality                         with input and collaboration from all of the major
                                                                   information that is accessible and used by all of the actors                     stakeholders engaged in collecting HIV/AIDS
                                                                   in the fight against AIDS to diminish the transmission of                        information. These organizations included:
BACKGROUND                                                         HIV/AIDS in Cote d’Ivoire.”
                                                                   Given the strong emphasis on collaboration, it was decided                        ƒƒ Donors, including PEPFAR, CDC, USAID
When the MEASURE Evaluation Chief of Party and her
team identified leadership as the key challenge impeding           to have the participants from all four ministries continue                        ƒƒ Non-governmental organizations, such as EGPAF and
the ministries’ success, MEASURE Evaluation offered a              working together as a single team to achieve their desired                           Alliance CI
Leadership Development Program (LDP) that brought                  result which they stated as:
together the M&E teams from all four ministries. The need           “A compendium of all the national HIV/AIDS                                       ƒƒ Ministries and other government agencies, including
for leadership development was evidenced by difficulties           indicators fully harmonized and validated by all of the                              the Ministry of Defense, the pharmaceutical agency,
bringing the teams together and by a lack of coordination          actors in the fight against AIDS within 6 months.”                                   the national program for persons living with HIV/
among the ministries to produce national data. There was                                                                                                AIDS, and the regional hospital authority
a lack of trust and commitment, and a desire on the part
of different teams to “protect” their data and perceived                                                                                                                                                         For more information contact:
national M&E positions and roles. The team-focused LDP            At the end of the first workshop, Dr. Edwige Bosso, MEASURE Evaluation M&E Advisor, exclaimed,                                                              Xavier Alterescu
was an ideal way to address these issues.                         “We have already achieved one important result. Before this program, we couldn’t even get the participants into the                                    xalterescu@msh.org
                                                                                                                                                                                                                               Scott McKeown
                                                                  same room, much less seeking to collaborate with each other!”                                                                                      smckeown@email.unc.edu
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Susan Post
                                                                                                                                                                                                                               spost@msh.org

More Related Content

Similar to Leadership Development Program Yields Results in Côte d’Ivoire

Applying the UNAIDS HIV Prevention Evaluation Guidelines in Ghana and Rwanda:...
Applying the UNAIDS HIV Prevention Evaluation Guidelines in Ghana and Rwanda:...Applying the UNAIDS HIV Prevention Evaluation Guidelines in Ghana and Rwanda:...
Applying the UNAIDS HIV Prevention Evaluation Guidelines in Ghana and Rwanda:...
MEASURE Evaluation
 
Core operations research_framework_en-1
Core operations research_framework_en-1Core operations research_framework_en-1
Core operations research_framework_en-1
Adeyinka Adepoju
 
National monitoring and evaluation guidelines and standard operating procedur...
National monitoring and evaluation guidelines and standard operating procedur...National monitoring and evaluation guidelines and standard operating procedur...
National monitoring and evaluation guidelines and standard operating procedur...
Obongo Komingola
 
Accountable and effective development cooperation in a post 2015 era
Accountable and effective development cooperation in a post 2015 eraAccountable and effective development cooperation in a post 2015 era
Accountable and effective development cooperation in a post 2015 era
Dr Lendy Spires
 
Evaluation capacity development news
Evaluation capacity development newsEvaluation capacity development news
Evaluation capacity development news
Dr Lendy Spires
 
UNDP - Global Integrity - a users' guide to measuring corruption - 09.2008 - ...
UNDP - Global Integrity - a users' guide to measuring corruption - 09.2008 - ...UNDP - Global Integrity - a users' guide to measuring corruption - 09.2008 - ...
UNDP - Global Integrity - a users' guide to measuring corruption - 09.2008 - ...
Ochir Consulting Ltd
 
Monitoring_and_Evaluation_2.pdf
Monitoring_and_Evaluation_2.pdfMonitoring_and_Evaluation_2.pdf
Monitoring_and_Evaluation_2.pdf
ssusere0ee1d
 
Developing a Framework and Approach for Measuring Success
Developing a Framework and Approach for Measuring Success Developing a Framework and Approach for Measuring Success
Developing a Framework and Approach for Measuring Success
MEASURE Evaluation
 

Similar to Leadership Development Program Yields Results in Côte d’Ivoire (20)

Applying the UNAIDS HIV Prevention Evaluation Guidelines in Ghana and Rwanda:...
Applying the UNAIDS HIV Prevention Evaluation Guidelines in Ghana and Rwanda:...Applying the UNAIDS HIV Prevention Evaluation Guidelines in Ghana and Rwanda:...
Applying the UNAIDS HIV Prevention Evaluation Guidelines in Ghana and Rwanda:...
 
Core operations research_framework_en-1
Core operations research_framework_en-1Core operations research_framework_en-1
Core operations research_framework_en-1
 
National monitoring and evaluation guidelines and standard operating procedur...
National monitoring and evaluation guidelines and standard operating procedur...National monitoring and evaluation guidelines and standard operating procedur...
National monitoring and evaluation guidelines and standard operating procedur...
 
Evidence Diagnostic - Thinking & Working Politically
Evidence Diagnostic - Thinking & Working Politically Evidence Diagnostic - Thinking & Working Politically
Evidence Diagnostic - Thinking & Working Politically
 
Accountable and effective development cooperation in a post 2015 era
Accountable and effective development cooperation in a post 2015 eraAccountable and effective development cooperation in a post 2015 era
Accountable and effective development cooperation in a post 2015 era
 
REPORT OF OYO SEMO[1]
REPORT OF OYO SEMO[1]REPORT OF OYO SEMO[1]
REPORT OF OYO SEMO[1]
 
Duplicate jdhfihq
Duplicate jdhfihqDuplicate jdhfihq
Duplicate jdhfihq
 
Evaluation capacity development news
Evaluation capacity development newsEvaluation capacity development news
Evaluation capacity development news
 
T0 numtq0odu=
T0 numtq0odu=T0 numtq0odu=
T0 numtq0odu=
 
Case Study: Developing a truly integrated media measurement system in support...
Case Study: Developing a truly integrated media measurement system in support...Case Study: Developing a truly integrated media measurement system in support...
Case Study: Developing a truly integrated media measurement system in support...
 
UNDP - Global Integrity - a users' guide to measuring corruption - 09.2008 - ...
UNDP - Global Integrity - a users' guide to measuring corruption - 09.2008 - ...UNDP - Global Integrity - a users' guide to measuring corruption - 09.2008 - ...
UNDP - Global Integrity - a users' guide to measuring corruption - 09.2008 - ...
 
Nfhk2011 ali arsalo_parallel5
Nfhk2011 ali arsalo_parallel5Nfhk2011 ali arsalo_parallel5
Nfhk2011 ali arsalo_parallel5
 
Building Sustainable Accountability into Strategic RI Planning.
Building Sustainable Accountability into Strategic RI Planning. Building Sustainable Accountability into Strategic RI Planning.
Building Sustainable Accountability into Strategic RI Planning.
 
Botswana's Integration of Data Quality Assurance into Standard Operating Proc...
Botswana's Integration of Data Quality Assurance into Standard Operating Proc...Botswana's Integration of Data Quality Assurance into Standard Operating Proc...
Botswana's Integration of Data Quality Assurance into Standard Operating Proc...
 
Organizing Framework for functional National HIV and AIDS M&E system – 12 Com...
Organizing Framework for functional National HIV and AIDS M&E system – 12 Com...Organizing Framework for functional National HIV and AIDS M&E system – 12 Com...
Organizing Framework for functional National HIV and AIDS M&E system – 12 Com...
 
Botswana’s Integration of Health Data Quality Assurance Into Standard Operati...
Botswana’s Integration of Health Data Quality Assurance Into Standard Operati...Botswana’s Integration of Health Data Quality Assurance Into Standard Operati...
Botswana’s Integration of Health Data Quality Assurance Into Standard Operati...
 
Monitoring_and_Evaluation_2.pdf
Monitoring_and_Evaluation_2.pdfMonitoring_and_Evaluation_2.pdf
Monitoring_and_Evaluation_2.pdf
 
HFG Burundi Final Country Report
HFG Burundi Final Country ReportHFG Burundi Final Country Report
HFG Burundi Final Country Report
 
Developing a Framework and Approach for Measuring Success
Developing a Framework and Approach for Measuring Success Developing a Framework and Approach for Measuring Success
Developing a Framework and Approach for Measuring Success
 
Building a Resilient Health System in Liberia: Health Information System (HIS...
Building a Resilient Health System in Liberia: Health Information System (HIS...Building a Resilient Health System in Liberia: Health Information System (HIS...
Building a Resilient Health System in Liberia: Health Information System (HIS...
 

More from MEASURE Evaluation

Malaria Data Quality and Use in Selected Centers of Excellence in Madagascar:...
Malaria Data Quality and Use in Selected Centers of Excellence in Madagascar:...Malaria Data Quality and Use in Selected Centers of Excellence in Madagascar:...
Malaria Data Quality and Use in Selected Centers of Excellence in Madagascar:...
MEASURE Evaluation
 
Evaluating National Malaria Programs’ Impact in Moderate- and Low-Transmissio...
Evaluating National Malaria Programs’ Impact in Moderate- and Low-Transmissio...Evaluating National Malaria Programs’ Impact in Moderate- and Low-Transmissio...
Evaluating National Malaria Programs’ Impact in Moderate- and Low-Transmissio...
MEASURE Evaluation
 

More from MEASURE Evaluation (20)

Managing missing values in routinely reported data: One approach from the Dem...
Managing missing values in routinely reported data: One approach from the Dem...Managing missing values in routinely reported data: One approach from the Dem...
Managing missing values in routinely reported data: One approach from the Dem...
 
Use of Routine Data for Economic Evaluations
Use of Routine Data for Economic EvaluationsUse of Routine Data for Economic Evaluations
Use of Routine Data for Economic Evaluations
 
Routine data use in evaluation: practical guidance
Routine data use in evaluation: practical guidanceRoutine data use in evaluation: practical guidance
Routine data use in evaluation: practical guidance
 
Tuberculosis/HIV Mobility Study: Objectives and Background
Tuberculosis/HIV Mobility Study: Objectives and BackgroundTuberculosis/HIV Mobility Study: Objectives and Background
Tuberculosis/HIV Mobility Study: Objectives and Background
 
How to improve the capabilities of health information systems to address emer...
How to improve the capabilities of health information systems to address emer...How to improve the capabilities of health information systems to address emer...
How to improve the capabilities of health information systems to address emer...
 
LCI Evaluation Uganda Organizational Network Analysis
LCI Evaluation Uganda Organizational Network AnalysisLCI Evaluation Uganda Organizational Network Analysis
LCI Evaluation Uganda Organizational Network Analysis
 
Using Organizational Network Analysis to Plan and Evaluate Global Health Prog...
Using Organizational Network Analysis to Plan and Evaluate Global Health Prog...Using Organizational Network Analysis to Plan and Evaluate Global Health Prog...
Using Organizational Network Analysis to Plan and Evaluate Global Health Prog...
 
Understanding Referral Networks for Adolescent Girls and Young Women
Understanding Referral Networks for Adolescent Girls and Young WomenUnderstanding Referral Networks for Adolescent Girls and Young Women
Understanding Referral Networks for Adolescent Girls and Young Women
 
Data for Impact: Lessons Learned in Using the Ripple Effects Mapping Method
Data for Impact: Lessons Learned in Using the Ripple Effects Mapping MethodData for Impact: Lessons Learned in Using the Ripple Effects Mapping Method
Data for Impact: Lessons Learned in Using the Ripple Effects Mapping Method
 
Local Capacity Initiative (LCI) Evaluation
Local Capacity Initiative (LCI) EvaluationLocal Capacity Initiative (LCI) Evaluation
Local Capacity Initiative (LCI) Evaluation
 
Development and Validation of a Reproductive Empowerment Scale
Development and Validation of a Reproductive Empowerment ScaleDevelopment and Validation of a Reproductive Empowerment Scale
Development and Validation of a Reproductive Empowerment Scale
 
Sustaining the Impact: MEASURE Evaluation Conversation on Maternal and Child ...
Sustaining the Impact: MEASURE Evaluation Conversation on Maternal and Child ...Sustaining the Impact: MEASURE Evaluation Conversation on Maternal and Child ...
Sustaining the Impact: MEASURE Evaluation Conversation on Maternal and Child ...
 
Using Most Significant Change in a Mixed-Methods Evaluation in Uganda
Using Most Significant Change in a Mixed-Methods Evaluation in UgandaUsing Most Significant Change in a Mixed-Methods Evaluation in Uganda
Using Most Significant Change in a Mixed-Methods Evaluation in Uganda
 
Lessons Learned In Using the Most Significant Change Technique in Evaluation
Lessons Learned In Using the Most Significant Change Technique in EvaluationLessons Learned In Using the Most Significant Change Technique in Evaluation
Lessons Learned In Using the Most Significant Change Technique in Evaluation
 
Malaria Data Quality and Use in Selected Centers of Excellence in Madagascar:...
Malaria Data Quality and Use in Selected Centers of Excellence in Madagascar:...Malaria Data Quality and Use in Selected Centers of Excellence in Madagascar:...
Malaria Data Quality and Use in Selected Centers of Excellence in Madagascar:...
 
Evaluating National Malaria Programs’ Impact in Moderate- and Low-Transmissio...
Evaluating National Malaria Programs’ Impact in Moderate- and Low-Transmissio...Evaluating National Malaria Programs’ Impact in Moderate- and Low-Transmissio...
Evaluating National Malaria Programs’ Impact in Moderate- and Low-Transmissio...
 
Improved Performance of the Malaria Surveillance, Monitoring, and Evaluation ...
Improved Performance of the Malaria Surveillance, Monitoring, and Evaluation ...Improved Performance of the Malaria Surveillance, Monitoring, and Evaluation ...
Improved Performance of the Malaria Surveillance, Monitoring, and Evaluation ...
 
Lessons learned in using process tracing for evaluation
Lessons learned in using process tracing for evaluationLessons learned in using process tracing for evaluation
Lessons learned in using process tracing for evaluation
 
Use of Qualitative Comparative Analysis in the Assessment of the Actionable D...
Use of Qualitative Comparative Analysis in the Assessment of the Actionable D...Use of Qualitative Comparative Analysis in the Assessment of the Actionable D...
Use of Qualitative Comparative Analysis in the Assessment of the Actionable D...
 
Sustaining the Impact: MEASURE Evaluation Conversation on Health Informatics
Sustaining the Impact: MEASURE Evaluation Conversation on Health InformaticsSustaining the Impact: MEASURE Evaluation Conversation on Health Informatics
Sustaining the Impact: MEASURE Evaluation Conversation on Health Informatics
 

Leadership Development Program Yields Results in Côte d’Ivoire

  • 1. Collaboration works: Leadership Development Collaboration is a key element in the successful Program Yields Results collection, dissemination and use of national HIV/AIDS data. In Cote d’Ivoire, multiple ministries are responsible for Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) tasks related to the country’s HIV/AIDS response. in Côte d’Ivoire Before participating in a Leadership Development Program, Results from the Leadership Development Program these ministries worked without established, harmonized and Four ministries worked together to develop and publish a compendium of harmonized and validated HIV/AIDS indicators for validated national indicators because of a lack of coordination monitoring and evaluation of Cote d’Ivoire’s national HIV/AIDS response. and collaboration. As a result of the Leadership Development Program, the four ministries worked together to develop and publish a compendium of harmonized and validated HIV/AIDS indicators, marking the accomplishment of the first of several previously elusive goals. This step definitively moved the country toward having high quality, timely and accessible national HIV/AIDS data for informing the national HIV/AIDS response. Cote d’Ivoire LDP participants LDP Team discusses M&E indicators Quality data collected on meaningful indicators inform quality HIV/AIDS services PROCESS RESULTS The MEASURE Evaluation project, which began in The results presentation was held on October 6th and 1998, is USAID’s flagship Monitoring and Evaluation In February 2010, the LDP was launched with a Senior Alignment Meeting attended by members of the four included among the attendees PEPFAR Coordinator project and was established based on the premise Jennifer Walsh, USAID Technical Advisor Bijou Muhu- that generating demand for and improving the use ministry cabinets and Directors of the M&E units within the ministries. At this meeting, the senior group developed ra, and CDC Director Anna Likos, as well as cabinet of data in policy formulation, program planning, members, technical advisors, directors and other repre- monitoring and evaluation improves health systems a shared vision for the future: “The fight against HIV/AIDS in Cote d’Ivoire is sentatives from the four ministries. which in turn affects health outcomes. coordinated by a Strategic Information Group that meets regularly and produces quality data for better monitoring The results highlighted in the meeting included the The project is now in Phase III and is led by the published compendium of the harmonized and validat- University of North Carolina – Carolina Population and evaluation.” ed indicators representing the fulfillment of the desired Center. The partners include Futures Group, ICF The first workshop of the LDP was held with teams of measurable result, as well as a testimonial by one of the Macro, John Snow, Inc., Management Sciences for M&E specialists from the four ministries. The shared participants who related the impact of the LDP pro- Health, and Tulane University. This activity in Cote vision the participants developed was one in which gram on his particular team at the Ministry of Health. d’Ivoire and the results achieved were made possible collaboration was also the central element: through collaboration and synergies within the “A collaborative group representing an inter-ministerial partner group. partnership for the regular administration of strategic HIV/ The compendium of indicators was developed AIDS information is functional and produces high quality with input and collaboration from all of the major information that is accessible and used by all of the actors stakeholders engaged in collecting HIV/AIDS in the fight against AIDS to diminish the transmission of information. These organizations included: BACKGROUND HIV/AIDS in Cote d’Ivoire.” Given the strong emphasis on collaboration, it was decided ƒƒ Donors, including PEPFAR, CDC, USAID When the MEASURE Evaluation Chief of Party and her team identified leadership as the key challenge impeding to have the participants from all four ministries continue ƒƒ Non-governmental organizations, such as EGPAF and the ministries’ success, MEASURE Evaluation offered a working together as a single team to achieve their desired Alliance CI Leadership Development Program (LDP) that brought result which they stated as: together the M&E teams from all four ministries. The need “A compendium of all the national HIV/AIDS ƒƒ Ministries and other government agencies, including for leadership development was evidenced by difficulties indicators fully harmonized and validated by all of the the Ministry of Defense, the pharmaceutical agency, bringing the teams together and by a lack of coordination actors in the fight against AIDS within 6 months.” the national program for persons living with HIV/ among the ministries to produce national data. There was AIDS, and the regional hospital authority a lack of trust and commitment, and a desire on the part of different teams to “protect” their data and perceived For more information contact: national M&E positions and roles. The team-focused LDP At the end of the first workshop, Dr. Edwige Bosso, MEASURE Evaluation M&E Advisor, exclaimed, Xavier Alterescu was an ideal way to address these issues. “We have already achieved one important result. Before this program, we couldn’t even get the participants into the xalterescu@msh.org Scott McKeown same room, much less seeking to collaborate with each other!” smckeown@email.unc.edu Susan Post spost@msh.org