Erik Kulick is suing the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (CJCLDS), Wendell Coombs, and Steven Westerberg for assault, battery, and abuse of process. Kulick alleges that on August 11, 2013 at a CJCLDS meetinghouse in Salem, Oregon, Coombs grabbed and punched Kulick during a confrontation over Kulick attending a meeting early. Later, Coombs and Westerberg, who are agents of CJCLDS, apprehended Kulick without his consent with the help of Officer Menges and dropped him face-first onto the sidewalk, causing harm. Kulick further alleges CJCLDS knew their agents had previously
Sample opposition to request for domestic violence restraining order in Calif...LegalDocsPro
This sample opposition to request for domestic violence restraining order in California is used to oppose a request for a domestic violence restraining order in California on the grounds that (1) the Petitioner has failed to meet their burden of showing reasonable proof of a past act or acts of abuse as required by California law and (2) the conduct of the opposing party does not constitute domestic violence and the law in California clearly states that the purpose of a domestic violence restraining order namely Family Code § 6300 is to prevent a recurrence of domestic violence and to ensure a period of separation of the parties involved. The sample on which this preview is based is 13 pages and contains brief instructions, a memorandum of points and authorities with citations to case law and statutory authority, sample declaration and proof of service. The author is an entrepreneur and retired litigation paralegal that worked in California and Federal litigation from January 1995 through September 2017. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided.
Sample opposition to request for domestic violence restraining order in Calif...LegalDocsPro
This sample opposition to request for domestic violence restraining order in California is used to oppose a request for a domestic violence restraining order in California on the grounds that (1) the Petitioner has failed to meet their burden of showing reasonable proof of a past act or acts of abuse as required by California law and (2) the conduct of the opposing party does not constitute domestic violence and the law in California clearly states that the purpose of a domestic violence restraining order namely Family Code § 6300 is to prevent a recurrence of domestic violence and to ensure a period of separation of the parties involved. The sample on which this preview is based is 13 pages and contains brief instructions, a memorandum of points and authorities with citations to case law and statutory authority, sample declaration and proof of service. The author is an entrepreneur and retired litigation paralegal that worked in California and Federal litigation from January 1995 through September 2017. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided.
The case study presents the case in which husband shows the misleading information to enter her wife's room in Hotel and tortured her. The information which he provide at front desk was prior to his wife's filing for divorce.
Analysis of ABC News/Washington Post poll results on the 2014 midterm elections and a look ahead to 2016. Produced for ABC News by Langer Research Associates and presented by Gary Langer at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, May 15, 2015, in Hollywood, Florida.
Country Club Chanakyapuri is inviting all fashion fanatics and fitness freaks in Kolkata on the 4th of June, for an event celebrating fashion and fitness. Register soon to avoid disappointment. Hope to see you there!
The case study presents the case in which husband shows the misleading information to enter her wife's room in Hotel and tortured her. The information which he provide at front desk was prior to his wife's filing for divorce.
Analysis of ABC News/Washington Post poll results on the 2014 midterm elections and a look ahead to 2016. Produced for ABC News by Langer Research Associates and presented by Gary Langer at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, May 15, 2015, in Hollywood, Florida.
Country Club Chanakyapuri is inviting all fashion fanatics and fitness freaks in Kolkata on the 4th of June, for an event celebrating fashion and fitness. Register soon to avoid disappointment. Hope to see you there!
Sample California complaint for assault and batteryLegalDocsPro
This sample California complaint for assault and battery also includes a cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The sample could be modified to add other causes of action as well. This is a preview of the sample complaint sold by LegalDocsPro.
Federal court, excluding police report, Darren Chaker, provides law on keeping a police report away from the jury in a criminal case, which is important since are usually hearsay and unreliable.
COMPLAINT - Andrea Constand vs William H CosbyVogelDenise
WHY it is important to see documents for yourself. There are NO EXHIBITS to SUPPORT Sex Allegations made - Just MERE Words - with JEWS at the HELM OF THE SHIP!
Sample California motion to strike answer LegalDocsPro
This sample motion to strike an answer to a complaint for California is made pursuant to Sections 435-437 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The sample requests that the entire answer be stricken as it is not verified, or in the alternative that all of the affirmative defenses contained in the answer should be stricken as they contain only immaterial allegations. The sample contains brief instructions, a memorandum of points and authorities and a proof of service by mail.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORKNowseore
YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to answer the Complaint in this action and to serve a copy of your Answer on the undersigned attorneys for Plaintiff, AIDALA, BERTUNA & KAMINS P.C., at 546 5th Avenue, New York, New York, 10036, within twenty (20) days after the service of this Summons and Complaint, exclusive of the day of service, or within thirty (30) days after the service is complete, if this Summons is not personally delivered to you within the State of New York.
A judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the past 11 years, Sonia Sotomayor is now high on lists that lawyers and politicians have assembled of possible replacements for Justice David H. Souter of the Supreme Court. She has a reputation as a sharp, outspoken and fearless jurist, and many of her opinions have demonstrated a willingness to take the government to task whenever she believes the circumstances warrant it.
The official motion filed with the New York State Court of Appeals, NY's highest court, to hear the case of Norse Energy v Town of Dryden over the town's vote to ban all fracking and drilling throughout the township.
Sample Bail Bond Related Criminal Law MotionsSamuel Partida
A list of common motions filed in a criminal case related to the bail bond are provided. Six sample motions are provided that a prosecutor may typically file. Seven sample motions are provided that a defense attorney may typically file over the span of a typical criminal case.
PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Precedent, or stare decisis, is a cornerstone of common law systems where past judicial decisions guide future cases, ensuring consistency and predictability in the legal system. Binding precedents from higher courts must be followed by lower courts, while persuasive precedents may influence but are not obligatory. This principle promotes fairness and efficiency, allowing for the evolution of the law as higher courts can overrule outdated decisions. Despite criticisms of rigidity and complexity, precedent ensures similar cases are treated alike, balancing stability with flexibility in judicial decision-making.
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY v/s Union of India.pptxshweeta209
transfer of the P.I.L filed by lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in Delhi High Court to Supreme Court.
on the issue of UNIFORM MARRIAGE AGE of men and women.
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
1. 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON
FOR THE COUNTY OF MARION
ERIK KULICK
! ! Plaintiff,
! vs.
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER
DAY SAINTS; WENDELL COOMBS; and
STEVEN WESTERBERG
! ! Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 13-32111
COMPLAINT
1. Assault
2. Battery
3. Abuse of Process
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Plaintiff ERIK KULICK alleges:
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1.
Plaintiff Erik Kulick is an individual who resided in at all material times in Marion
County, Oregon.
2.
Defendant Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (CJCLDS) is a domestic
corporation registered in, and with its principle place of business in, Utah. CJCLDS has
numerous meetinghouses in Oregon, and the events which give rise to this action occurred on the
property of CJCLDS in Marion County, Oregon. Additionally, official representatives and agents
- 1 -
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Complaint
2. 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
of CJCLDS, the two other defendants listed in this complaint, were sent by CJCLDS to
physically remove Plaintiff from CJCLDS property.
3.
Defendants Wendell Coombs and Steven Westerberg are both individuals who resided in
at all material times in Marion County, Oregon.
4.
Venue is proper because Plaintiff and two of the three defendants live in Marion County,
Oregon, the third defendant has minimum contacts in Oregon, and the events which give rise to
this action happened on the third defendant’s property in Marion County, Oregon.
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
(Assault)
5.
Plaintiff realleges Paragraphs 1 through 4.
6.
On August 11, 2013, Defendant Coombs met Plaintiff in the entry way of the CJCLDS
meetinghouse on Lone Oak Road in Salem, Oregon. Plaintiff was less than two hours early for
the apostasy trial he had to demand the week before from the leaders of this meetinghouse after
the official representative and agent of CJCLDS in Turner, Oregon physically removed Plaintiff
from the meetinghouse in that location after Plaintiff sat in the congregation and quietly waited
for the meeting to begin.
7.
When Plaintiff attempted to enter the meetinghouse in Salem, Defendant Coombs
grabbed Plaintiff and pinned him to the doors. After Defendant Coombs informed Plaintiff that
- 2 -
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Complaint
3. 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
he would not be welcome back to the building until the appointed time and that he would be
trespassed if he did not comply, Plaintiff refused to leave the premises and voluntarily walked
out of the entry way and onto the grass out front.
8.
Defendant Coombs then followed Plaintiff outside and continued to insist on the
departure of Plaintiff, but never once trespassed Plaintiff. Defendant Coombs at one point made
false claims about Plaintiff regarding the interaction at the meetinghouse in Turner, Oregon, the
week before, and when Plaintiff tried to explain his mistake, Defendant punched Plaintiff in the
face.
9.
Plaintiff continued to refuse to leave early, and finally walked around to the locked doors
by the parking lot a few moments before his fellow church members were scheduled to be
released from their meetings. At this point, Defendant Westerberg approached Plaintiff and
immediately began making accusations towards Plaintiff about his behavior while trying to help
Defendant Coombs’ riling up of Plaintiff. The two Defendants were positioned in a way that
obstructed Plaintiff’s view of either of the walkways converging at the door he was standing next
to, so that when officer Menges began to approach Plaintiff, he was unable to see the officer as
he approached. Instead of assuring that Plaintiff was aware of his presence, Officer Menges
shouted to Plaintiff to “come here!” Plaintiff thought it was just another member coming to
harass him, so he refused. Immediately, Defendants Coombs and Westerberg grabbed Plaintiff’s
arms. One of the two defendants then quickly said, “you’re under arrest!”, and then Officer
Menges’ running footsteps can be heard as he echoes the sentiment that Plaintiff is under arrest.
- 3 -
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Complaint
4. 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Video then shows Defendant Coombs swinging out of the way as Officer Menges swings around
to help the two defendants pick up Plaintiff’s feet and drop him face-first onto the sidewalk.
10.
Defendant CJCLDS and Defendant Agents Coombs and Westerberg knew that another
agent of CJCLDS had physically touched Plaintiff without his consent, and should have known
that having Defendants Coombs and Westerberg apprehend Plaintiff in the manner that they did
would cause more unwanted touching that Plaintiff would not consent to.
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
(Battery)
11.
Plaintiff realleges paragraphs 1 through 10.
12.
Defendants caused Plaintiff to be touched with the intent to harm him.
13.
Plaintiff did not consent to the touching.
14.
As a proximate result of the acts alleged herein Plaintiff suffered harm, entitling him to
damages in an amount to be proven at trial.
THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
(Abuse of Process)
15.
Plaintiff realleges paragraphs 1 through 14.
16.
- 4 -
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Complaint
5. 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Defendant Agents willfully and wrongfully attempted to have Plaintiff hit with multiple
criminal charges when they assaulted Plaintiff as Officer Menges was approaching instead of
waiting for the on-duty officer to take over the situation in order to harass and harm Plaintiff.
17.
Defendant CJCLDS knew that the agents it sent to apprehend Plaintiff had law
enforcement careers in their lay occupations, and used these law enforcement statuses to
successfully avoid criminal charges for assaulting and battering Plaintiff, as Salem police
department internal affairs refused to properly investigate or remedy the situation.
18.
As a proximate result of the acts alleged herein, Plaintiff is entitled to damages in an
amount to be proven at trial.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for relief and judgment as follows:
Awarding compensatory and punitive damages in an amount to be proven at trial and
costs.
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: August 10, 2015 By:
Erik Kulick
Pro Se Attorney
- 5 -
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Complaint