Law of whistleblowing class # 12
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
1 like•197 views
This document discusses landmark Supreme Court cases on whistleblowing from 1968 to 1983, including Pickering v Board of Education, Givhan v Western Line Consolidated School District, and Connick v Myers. It also mentions Model Rule 3.8(d) regarding a prosecutor's disclosure of evidence, 42 USC § 1983 concerning deprivation of civil rights, and the roles and ethical obligations of citizens, employees, and professionals.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
United states of america portofolio
Martinez-Jimenez was convicted of robbing a bank in Bellflower, California using a gun. He appealed his conviction for armed bank robbery to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment, holding that even though a toy gun is not technically a firearm, it can still be considered a dangerous weapon under the law because it appears threatening and creates the same risks as displaying an unloaded real gun during a robbery. The court's decision reflects a policy that using any object that creates the appearance of a dangerous weapon warrants an enhanced punishment for robbery.
George Cadkin Kent State
The document summarizes the key events that led to the shootings at Kent State University on May 4, 1970. It describes how students were protesting the announcement that the US would attack Cambodia. The National Guard was called in and clashes erupted between students and guardsmen. During one confrontation, the National Guard opened fire on students, killing four and injuring nine. While survivors claim the guardsmen were ordered to shoot, the guardsmen say they fired in self-defense after believed sniper shots.
Kent State Shooting
On May 4, 1970 at Kent State University in Ohio, the Ohio National Guard was called to disperse an anti-war protest on campus. During the protest, between 61 and 67 shots were fired by the Guard over a 13 second period, killing four students and wounding nine others. In the aftermath, there were widespread student protests across the US with millions of students participating. The Kent State shootings also led the National Guard to re-examine their crowd control methods.
Law of whistleblowing class # 15
The document discusses Illinois Rule 1.6(b) which states that a lawyer shall reveal information about a client to prevent the client from committing an act that would result in death or serious bodily harm. It also discusses Model Rule 1.6(b) which allows a lawyer to reveal information if necessary to prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm. The document appears to be about the law of whistleblowing and the rules governing what information a lawyer can disclose about a client.
Law of whistleblowing class # 17
This document discusses whistleblowing and the options available to a demoted employee seeking assistance. It also addresses whether a lawyer can use information learned from a client in legal proceedings. The document reviews exceptions under Missouri Rule 1.6 for when a lawyer can disclose client information, such as to prevent death or serious bodily harm, prevent the client from committing a crime or fraud, or to rectify substantial financial injuries resulting from a client's criminal acts.
Law of whistleblowing class # 16
This document discusses the law of whistleblowing and retaliatory discharge. It summarizes the 1994 California Supreme Court case General Dynamics v. Superior Court, which established that an implied contract can protect employees from retaliatory discharge. It then lists the elements required for a claim of retaliatory discharge, including that the employee refused to commit a crime, reported a crime to the government, or reported an illegal, unethical, or unsafe practice. The document concludes by questioning whether retaliatory discharge protections apply to non-lawyers and addresses issues of confidentiality.
Law of Whistleblowing - class # 7
Hawkins v. King County, legal malpractice, clients with diminished capacity, Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests
Law of whistleblowing class # 18
The document discusses exceptions to confidentiality rules for attorneys under Missouri Rule 1.6 and 17 CFR 205.3(d) that allow disclosure to prevent substantial harm, comply with the law, or prevent a client from committing a crime or fraud. It also discusses protections for whistleblowers under the Whistleblower Protection Act that allow disclosure of information reasonably believed to evidence violations of law or regulation.
Recommended
United states of america portofolio
Martinez-Jimenez was convicted of robbing a bank in Bellflower, California using a gun. He appealed his conviction for armed bank robbery to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment, holding that even though a toy gun is not technically a firearm, it can still be considered a dangerous weapon under the law because it appears threatening and creates the same risks as displaying an unloaded real gun during a robbery. The court's decision reflects a policy that using any object that creates the appearance of a dangerous weapon warrants an enhanced punishment for robbery.
George Cadkin Kent State
The document summarizes the key events that led to the shootings at Kent State University on May 4, 1970. It describes how students were protesting the announcement that the US would attack Cambodia. The National Guard was called in and clashes erupted between students and guardsmen. During one confrontation, the National Guard opened fire on students, killing four and injuring nine. While survivors claim the guardsmen were ordered to shoot, the guardsmen say they fired in self-defense after believed sniper shots.
Kent State Shooting
On May 4, 1970 at Kent State University in Ohio, the Ohio National Guard was called to disperse an anti-war protest on campus. During the protest, between 61 and 67 shots were fired by the Guard over a 13 second period, killing four students and wounding nine others. In the aftermath, there were widespread student protests across the US with millions of students participating. The Kent State shootings also led the National Guard to re-examine their crowd control methods.
Law of whistleblowing class # 15
The document discusses Illinois Rule 1.6(b) which states that a lawyer shall reveal information about a client to prevent the client from committing an act that would result in death or serious bodily harm. It also discusses Model Rule 1.6(b) which allows a lawyer to reveal information if necessary to prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm. The document appears to be about the law of whistleblowing and the rules governing what information a lawyer can disclose about a client.
Law of whistleblowing class # 17
This document discusses whistleblowing and the options available to a demoted employee seeking assistance. It also addresses whether a lawyer can use information learned from a client in legal proceedings. The document reviews exceptions under Missouri Rule 1.6 for when a lawyer can disclose client information, such as to prevent death or serious bodily harm, prevent the client from committing a crime or fraud, or to rectify substantial financial injuries resulting from a client's criminal acts.
Law of whistleblowing class # 16
This document discusses the law of whistleblowing and retaliatory discharge. It summarizes the 1994 California Supreme Court case General Dynamics v. Superior Court, which established that an implied contract can protect employees from retaliatory discharge. It then lists the elements required for a claim of retaliatory discharge, including that the employee refused to commit a crime, reported a crime to the government, or reported an illegal, unethical, or unsafe practice. The document concludes by questioning whether retaliatory discharge protections apply to non-lawyers and addresses issues of confidentiality.
Law of Whistleblowing - class # 7
Hawkins v. King County, legal malpractice, clients with diminished capacity, Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests
Law of whistleblowing class # 18
The document discusses exceptions to confidentiality rules for attorneys under Missouri Rule 1.6 and 17 CFR 205.3(d) that allow disclosure to prevent substantial harm, comply with the law, or prevent a client from committing a crime or fraud. It also discusses protections for whistleblowers under the Whistleblower Protection Act that allow disclosure of information reasonably believed to evidence violations of law or regulation.
Law of whistleblowing class # 21
This document discusses whistleblowing laws and incentives. It outlines five ways that laws encourage whistleblowing, including by requiring whistleblowing, prohibiting retaliation, compensating whistleblowers, and providing financial incentives. The document then discusses provisions of the False Claims Act that allow private citizens to file lawsuits on behalf of the government, provides criteria for an "original source" of information, and notes a case where a whistleblower received $500 for reporting issues internally and to oversight bodies.
Law of Whistleblowing - Class # 9
This document summarizes key topics around whistleblowing law from a class at Washington University in Fall 2014. It outlines five ways that laws encourage whistleblowing, such as by prohibiting retaliation against whistleblowers. It also defines a whistleblower and discusses perspectives on whistleblowing from an individual, institutional, and societal level. Additionally, it covers the development of common law protections for whistleblowers dating back to a 1959 California court case that established a public policy exception to employment at will.
law of whistleblowing - Slides class 3 f14
This document discusses the law of whistleblowing and attorney-client privilege in the context of internal investigations. It summarizes the Upjohn v. United States Supreme Court case which established that a corporation can assert attorney-client privilege and rejected the "control group" test. It also discusses the Garner v. Wolfinbarger case where the court found that in a derivative action, a corporation's attorney-client privilege is qualified if the corporation owes fiduciary duties to shareholders. Sample interview instructions are provided cautioning that while discussions are privileged, the company may choose to disclose results to outside parties.
Law of whistleblowing class # 25
This document summarizes Minnesota whistleblower protection law. It discusses the Minnesota statute that protects employees who report violations of law to their employer or a government body in good faith. It also discusses court cases related to whistleblower protection under federal law. Additionally, it outlines amendments made to the Minnesota statute in 2013 to define "good faith" and clarify that the law does not protect knowingly false statements or those made with reckless disregard for the truth.
Law of whistleblowing class # 19
The document discusses US laws protecting whistleblowers, specifically the Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) which protects disclosures of information about violations of law, gross mismanagement, or threats to health and safety. It provides details on what is covered under the WPA and exceptions for classified information or if disclosure is prohibited by law. It also lists intelligence agencies excluded from the WPA and details charges and convictions under the Uniform Code of Military Justice and US code for conduct unbecoming and unauthorized disclosure of national defense information.
Law of Whistleblowing - Class # 1
This document discusses the law of whistleblowing and contains information about a law school class on the topic. It mentions five levels of learning about whistleblowing including how-to, black letter law, doctrine/policy, theoretical/interdisciplinary perspectives, and ideological/critical views. It also lists dates from May 1998 to August 2001 where Jerry Sandusky assaulted victims while a coach at Penn State, raising issues of special obligations organizations have to report such crimes discussed in Model Rule 1.13.
AutoCAD Lisp Routines and Commands List
Get here full list of Lisp Routines and Shortcut Commands that Survey Engineer should have to know for quick designing.
Law of whistleblowing class # 26
The document discusses the UK's Public Interest Disclosure Act (PIDA), which protects whistleblowers. Under PIDA, a disclosure must be both qualifying and protected to receive protections. A qualifying disclosure is one that raises reasonable concerns about criminal acts, legal violations, dangers to health/safety, environmental damage, or deliberate coverups. A disclosure is protected if made to the employer, a lawyer, a minister, a prescribed regulatory body, or someone else, depending on certain additional criteria specified in the Act. The criteria for disclosures to someone else under Section 43G or of an exceptionally serious nature under Section 43H are described. The document also notes some exclusions to PIDA and amendments made in 2013.
Law of whistleblowing class # 10
This document discusses 18 USC 1514A, which protects employees of publicly traded companies from retaliation if they provide information to government agencies about conduct that violates securities laws or SEC regulations. Under this law, companies cannot fire, demote, suspend, threaten, or harass employees who disclose information to the SEC, Congress, or other supervisory individuals about suspected violations of laws around mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, or securities fraud. The document also lists legal ethics resources for researching issues around the law of lawyering, including treatises, annotated rules, restatements, textbooks on legal malpractice, and manuals.
Land Surveying Software(AutoCAD) Tutorial
This document provides an overview of the topics covered in a tutorial for using AutoCAD software for land surveying. The tutorial covers introductions to AutoCAD and how to use its interface, commands for creating different types of entities like lines and arcs, how to delete or modify existing entities, entering different coordinate systems, basic AutoCAD concepts, and accessing the full tutorial on the website.
Earthwork Volume Calculation Methods
Find here complete lessons of volume calculation (earthwork / takeoff) methods provided by Survey Drawing.
Darren Chaker Amicus Brief
Minessota v. Mansky amicus brief filed by Cato Institute. Darren Chaker provides this well written brief to showcase great talent writing on First Amendmnet issues presented to the United States Supreme Court. The Supreme Court found that the state could not restrict speech at the poles when it came to wearing t-shirts expressing certain messages.
Group project
Barbara Grutter, a white woman, was denied admission to the University of Michigan Law School despite having a high GPA and LSAT score. She sued the university, arguing that their consideration of race in admissions violated the Equal Protection Clause. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled 5-4 in favor of the university, finding that a narrowly tailored use of race as one factor among many in admissions is permissible to further the compelling interest of achieving a diverse student body. The four dissenting justices argued that the university's program amounted to an unconstitutional effort to achieve racial balancing.
PETITION MICHIGAN
Petitioners filed an emergency motion in district court seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to challenge the results of the 2020 Michigan election. The district court denied the motion without a hearing. Petitioners now seek a writ of certiorari from the Supreme Court, arguing the district court erred in denying the emergency motion without considering the evidence, and in finding petitioners' claims barred by immunity, mootness, laches, abstention doctrine, and lack of standing. The petitioners assert they presented sufficient evidence of irregularities and fraud to support claims under Section 1983 and the US Constitution.
The case concerning avena and other mexican nationals (mexico v.
The document discusses the Case Concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. United States) from a Mexican perspective. Mexico brought the case before the International Court of Justice arguing that the U.S. violated the Vienna Convention by failing to notify 49 Mexican nationals on death row of their right to consular access. Mexico was concerned this denial prevented fair trials and due process, potentially leading to wrongful death penalty convictions. The case examined whether the U.S. upheld consular rights for foreign nationals as required by international law.
The New Jim Crow 2013
This document discusses chapters 1-2 of a book about mass incarceration in the United States. It covers topics like the war on drugs, police use of stop and frisk tactics, drug sweeps targeting minor traffic violations, coerced plea bargains that deny defendants proper legal representation, and disproportionately long mandatory minimum sentences for non-violent drug offenses that have filled prisons with non-violent offenders and disadvantaged communities. It argues that the drug war and tough-on-crime policies have led to mass incarceration and the discrimination and exclusion of millions of Americans through stigma, loss of voting rights, and permanent loss of opportunities once released from prison.
Supreme court project
- Marbury vs Madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review, allowing courts to declare laws made by legislatures unconstitutional.
- Engel vs Vitale (1961) ruled that requiring prayer in public schools violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
- Roe vs Wade (1973) established a woman's right to abortion under the right to privacy, though this right is not absolute and subject to regulation after the first trimester.
COUNT 4 - CONSPIRACY TO MURDER (For UIE...Criminal Complaint)
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
CONFEDERATE STATES OF AMERICA’S A/K/A UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S CONFEDERATES, KU KLUX KLAN, WHITE SUPREMACISTS/ZIONISTS CONSPIRE TO HAVE THE UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY’S INTERIM PRIME MINISTER VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME ASSASSINATED AND/OR MURDERED
Law of whistleblowing class # 24
This document discusses issues related to whistleblowing and the law, including whether an attorney named May Cabrazzo can share or use information with her legal counsel or in a lawsuit. It also discusses options for inadvertent disclosure of information, such as doing nothing, consulting with a client, copying and using the information, notifying the other party, or seeking court guidance. Finally, it discusses approaches to privilege waiver, including strict waiver with any disclosure, lenient waiver only for intended disclosures, and a middle approach that balances factors.
Law of whistleblowing class # 23
This document appears to be notes from a law school class about whistleblowing law. It covers several questions: whether a private sector employee can file a False Claims Act lawsuit, if an employee named Alex can use documents in an FCA suit, how Model Rule 1.9(a) would apply to Alex as an FCA relator, a 1967 case from the Eastern District of Virginia called "In re: Ryder", and questions about what information an employee named Cabrazzo can share with her lawyer or use in a lawsuit, and how much data an employee is allowed to copy from their work computer.
Law of whistleblowing class # 22
This document discusses the law of whistleblowing and includes summaries of legal cases and ethics rules regarding conflicts of interest. It summarizes a 10th Circuit case about a whistleblower who reported to several parties and received $500, sections of the federal false claims act about whistleblower lawsuits and the definition of an "original source", and Model Rules regarding simultaneous, multiple, and subsequent conflicts between clients.
More Related Content
Viewers also liked
Law of whistleblowing class # 21
This document discusses whistleblowing laws and incentives. It outlines five ways that laws encourage whistleblowing, including by requiring whistleblowing, prohibiting retaliation, compensating whistleblowers, and providing financial incentives. The document then discusses provisions of the False Claims Act that allow private citizens to file lawsuits on behalf of the government, provides criteria for an "original source" of information, and notes a case where a whistleblower received $500 for reporting issues internally and to oversight bodies.
Law of Whistleblowing - Class # 9
This document summarizes key topics around whistleblowing law from a class at Washington University in Fall 2014. It outlines five ways that laws encourage whistleblowing, such as by prohibiting retaliation against whistleblowers. It also defines a whistleblower and discusses perspectives on whistleblowing from an individual, institutional, and societal level. Additionally, it covers the development of common law protections for whistleblowers dating back to a 1959 California court case that established a public policy exception to employment at will.
law of whistleblowing - Slides class 3 f14
This document discusses the law of whistleblowing and attorney-client privilege in the context of internal investigations. It summarizes the Upjohn v. United States Supreme Court case which established that a corporation can assert attorney-client privilege and rejected the "control group" test. It also discusses the Garner v. Wolfinbarger case where the court found that in a derivative action, a corporation's attorney-client privilege is qualified if the corporation owes fiduciary duties to shareholders. Sample interview instructions are provided cautioning that while discussions are privileged, the company may choose to disclose results to outside parties.
Law of whistleblowing class # 25
This document summarizes Minnesota whistleblower protection law. It discusses the Minnesota statute that protects employees who report violations of law to their employer or a government body in good faith. It also discusses court cases related to whistleblower protection under federal law. Additionally, it outlines amendments made to the Minnesota statute in 2013 to define "good faith" and clarify that the law does not protect knowingly false statements or those made with reckless disregard for the truth.
Law of whistleblowing class # 19
The document discusses US laws protecting whistleblowers, specifically the Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) which protects disclosures of information about violations of law, gross mismanagement, or threats to health and safety. It provides details on what is covered under the WPA and exceptions for classified information or if disclosure is prohibited by law. It also lists intelligence agencies excluded from the WPA and details charges and convictions under the Uniform Code of Military Justice and US code for conduct unbecoming and unauthorized disclosure of national defense information.
Law of Whistleblowing - Class # 1
This document discusses the law of whistleblowing and contains information about a law school class on the topic. It mentions five levels of learning about whistleblowing including how-to, black letter law, doctrine/policy, theoretical/interdisciplinary perspectives, and ideological/critical views. It also lists dates from May 1998 to August 2001 where Jerry Sandusky assaulted victims while a coach at Penn State, raising issues of special obligations organizations have to report such crimes discussed in Model Rule 1.13.
AutoCAD Lisp Routines and Commands List
Get here full list of Lisp Routines and Shortcut Commands that Survey Engineer should have to know for quick designing.
Law of whistleblowing class # 26
The document discusses the UK's Public Interest Disclosure Act (PIDA), which protects whistleblowers. Under PIDA, a disclosure must be both qualifying and protected to receive protections. A qualifying disclosure is one that raises reasonable concerns about criminal acts, legal violations, dangers to health/safety, environmental damage, or deliberate coverups. A disclosure is protected if made to the employer, a lawyer, a minister, a prescribed regulatory body, or someone else, depending on certain additional criteria specified in the Act. The criteria for disclosures to someone else under Section 43G or of an exceptionally serious nature under Section 43H are described. The document also notes some exclusions to PIDA and amendments made in 2013.
Law of whistleblowing class # 10
This document discusses 18 USC 1514A, which protects employees of publicly traded companies from retaliation if they provide information to government agencies about conduct that violates securities laws or SEC regulations. Under this law, companies cannot fire, demote, suspend, threaten, or harass employees who disclose information to the SEC, Congress, or other supervisory individuals about suspected violations of laws around mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, or securities fraud. The document also lists legal ethics resources for researching issues around the law of lawyering, including treatises, annotated rules, restatements, textbooks on legal malpractice, and manuals.
Land Surveying Software(AutoCAD) Tutorial
This document provides an overview of the topics covered in a tutorial for using AutoCAD software for land surveying. The tutorial covers introductions to AutoCAD and how to use its interface, commands for creating different types of entities like lines and arcs, how to delete or modify existing entities, entering different coordinate systems, basic AutoCAD concepts, and accessing the full tutorial on the website.
Earthwork Volume Calculation Methods
Find here complete lessons of volume calculation (earthwork / takeoff) methods provided by Survey Drawing.
Viewers also liked (12)
Similar to Law of whistleblowing class # 12
Darren Chaker Amicus Brief
Minessota v. Mansky amicus brief filed by Cato Institute. Darren Chaker provides this well written brief to showcase great talent writing on First Amendmnet issues presented to the United States Supreme Court. The Supreme Court found that the state could not restrict speech at the poles when it came to wearing t-shirts expressing certain messages.
Group project
Barbara Grutter, a white woman, was denied admission to the University of Michigan Law School despite having a high GPA and LSAT score. She sued the university, arguing that their consideration of race in admissions violated the Equal Protection Clause. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled 5-4 in favor of the university, finding that a narrowly tailored use of race as one factor among many in admissions is permissible to further the compelling interest of achieving a diverse student body. The four dissenting justices argued that the university's program amounted to an unconstitutional effort to achieve racial balancing.
PETITION MICHIGAN
Petitioners filed an emergency motion in district court seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to challenge the results of the 2020 Michigan election. The district court denied the motion without a hearing. Petitioners now seek a writ of certiorari from the Supreme Court, arguing the district court erred in denying the emergency motion without considering the evidence, and in finding petitioners' claims barred by immunity, mootness, laches, abstention doctrine, and lack of standing. The petitioners assert they presented sufficient evidence of irregularities and fraud to support claims under Section 1983 and the US Constitution.
The case concerning avena and other mexican nationals (mexico v.
The document discusses the Case Concerning Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. United States) from a Mexican perspective. Mexico brought the case before the International Court of Justice arguing that the U.S. violated the Vienna Convention by failing to notify 49 Mexican nationals on death row of their right to consular access. Mexico was concerned this denial prevented fair trials and due process, potentially leading to wrongful death penalty convictions. The case examined whether the U.S. upheld consular rights for foreign nationals as required by international law.
The New Jim Crow 2013
This document discusses chapters 1-2 of a book about mass incarceration in the United States. It covers topics like the war on drugs, police use of stop and frisk tactics, drug sweeps targeting minor traffic violations, coerced plea bargains that deny defendants proper legal representation, and disproportionately long mandatory minimum sentences for non-violent drug offenses that have filled prisons with non-violent offenders and disadvantaged communities. It argues that the drug war and tough-on-crime policies have led to mass incarceration and the discrimination and exclusion of millions of Americans through stigma, loss of voting rights, and permanent loss of opportunities once released from prison.
Supreme court project
- Marbury vs Madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review, allowing courts to declare laws made by legislatures unconstitutional.
- Engel vs Vitale (1961) ruled that requiring prayer in public schools violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
- Roe vs Wade (1973) established a woman's right to abortion under the right to privacy, though this right is not absolute and subject to regulation after the first trimester.
COUNT 4 - CONSPIRACY TO MURDER (For UIE...Criminal Complaint)
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
CONFEDERATE STATES OF AMERICA’S A/K/A UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S CONFEDERATES, KU KLUX KLAN, WHITE SUPREMACISTS/ZIONISTS CONSPIRE TO HAVE THE UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY’S INTERIM PRIME MINISTER VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME ASSASSINATED AND/OR MURDERED
Similar to Law of whistleblowing class # 12 (7)
The case concerning avena and other mexican nationals (mexico v.
The case concerning avena and other mexican nationals (mexico v.
COUNT 4 - CONSPIRACY TO MURDER (For UIE...Criminal Complaint)
COUNT 4 - CONSPIRACY TO MURDER (For UIE...Criminal Complaint)
More from Washington University
Law of whistleblowing class # 24
This document discusses issues related to whistleblowing and the law, including whether an attorney named May Cabrazzo can share or use information with her legal counsel or in a lawsuit. It also discusses options for inadvertent disclosure of information, such as doing nothing, consulting with a client, copying and using the information, notifying the other party, or seeking court guidance. Finally, it discusses approaches to privilege waiver, including strict waiver with any disclosure, lenient waiver only for intended disclosures, and a middle approach that balances factors.
Law of whistleblowing class # 23
This document appears to be notes from a law school class about whistleblowing law. It covers several questions: whether a private sector employee can file a False Claims Act lawsuit, if an employee named Alex can use documents in an FCA suit, how Model Rule 1.9(a) would apply to Alex as an FCA relator, a 1967 case from the Eastern District of Virginia called "In re: Ryder", and questions about what information an employee named Cabrazzo can share with her lawyer or use in a lawsuit, and how much data an employee is allowed to copy from their work computer.
Law of whistleblowing class # 22
This document discusses the law of whistleblowing and includes summaries of legal cases and ethics rules regarding conflicts of interest. It summarizes a 10th Circuit case about a whistleblower who reported to several parties and received $500, sections of the federal false claims act about whistleblower lawsuits and the definition of an "original source", and Model Rules regarding simultaneous, multiple, and subsequent conflicts between clients.
Law of whistleblowing class # 14
This document summarizes key aspects of whistleblowing law from an international and US perspective. It discusses the burden of proof in US First Amendment retaliation cases and a relevant 2008 case from the European Court of Human Rights. It also outlines international standards and conventions related to whistleblowing from the Council of Europe and United Nations. Additionally, it lists five ways laws encourage whistleblowing, such as by prohibiting retaliation and requiring organizations to facilitate the process. Finally, it presents three perspectives on whistleblowing - the individual, institutional, and societal levels.
Law of whistleblowing class # 11
This document discusses whistleblowing laws and protections. It outlines five ways that the law encourages whistleblowing: 1) requiring whistleblowing in some instances, 2) prohibiting retaliation against whistleblowers, 3) compensating whistleblowers who experience retaliation, 4) requiring or encouraging organizations to facilitate whistleblowing, and 5) providing financial incentives to whistleblowers. The document also discusses protected whistleblowing activities under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and what constitutes a prima facie case of whistleblower retaliation.
Law of Whistleblowing - Class # 8
This document appears to be notes from a law school class discussing the law of whistleblowing and an attorney's obligations regarding reporting child abuse. Some of the topics covered include whether an attorney should advocate for the client's stated interests or beliefs about their best interests, the allocation of decision-making authority between attorneys and clients, whether an attorney can report child abuse against a client's wishes, if reporting abuse is required, and if an attorney could face liability for disclosing or failing to disclose abuse. Relevant statutes from § 7A-543 are also summarized regarding reporting abuse and exceptions for knowledge gained during legal representation.
The Law of Whistleblowing - class # 6
This document discusses several Model Rules and a Missouri Rule regarding an attorney's obligations around whistleblowing and disclosure of client information. It addresses when disclosure is optional versus mandatory, such as when a client uses the attorney's services to commit a crime or fraud. The rules also cover when an attorney must withdraw from representation that would involve violating rules or laws or assisting in illegal conduct. An attorney may take certain actions like asking for reconsideration if representing an organization that is acting illegally.
Law of Whistlblowing - class # 5
This document discusses the law of whistleblowing and the roles and ethical responsibilities of lawyers. It covers exceptions to attorney-client privilege related to crimes and frauds. Several model rules are examined, including rules regarding a lawyer's duty of confidentiality and mandatory disclosure if a client uses the lawyer's services to commit a crime or fraud. The document also discusses when a lawyer must or may withdraw from representing a client.
The Law of Whistleblowing Slides class 4 s wf14
ABA Model Rule 1.13; Internal investigations; Garner v. Wolfinbarger; Crime-Fraud Exception to Attorney-Client Privilege
The Law of Whistleblowing - Slides class 2
This document discusses whistleblowing law and legal ethics. It covers topics like bar discipline for Watergate-related conduct, attorney-client privilege and its broad and narrow scopes, whether lawyers can voluntarily or be compelled to disclose information, and how states follow the ABA Model Rules except California. It also lists 5 levels of learning covered in a law school class: clinical how-to skills, black letter rules, doctrine and policy, theoretical and interdisciplinary analysis, and ideological or critical perspectives.
More from Washington University (10)
Recently uploaded
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
The Art and Science of Cryptoforensic Investigation: Best Practices and Tools
The Art and Science of Cryptoforensic Investigation: Best Practices and Tools
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...Syed Muhammad Humza Hussain
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
USDA grants bolster rural communities, driving growth, sustainability, and prosperity through strategic development initiatives and financial support.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
Lincoln硕士毕业证成绩单【微信95270640】办理新西兰林肯大学毕业证原版一模一样、Lincoln毕业证制作【Q微信95270640】《新西兰林肯大学毕业证购买流程》《Lincoln成绩单制作》新西兰林肯大学毕业证书Lincoln毕业证文凭新西兰林肯大学
本科毕业证书,学历学位认证如何办理【留学国外学位学历认证、毕业证、成绩单、大学Offer、雅思托福代考、语言证书、学生卡、高仿教育部认证等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务】代办国外（海外）英国、加拿大、美国、新西兰、澳大利亚、新西兰等国外各大学毕业证、文凭学历证书、成绩单、学历学位认证真实可查。
[留学文凭学历认证(留信认证使馆认证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单毕业证证书大学Offer请假条成绩单语言证书国际回国人员证明高仿教育部认证申请学校等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务。
多年留学服务公司,拥有海外样板无数能完美1:1还原海外各国大学degreeDiplomaTranscripts等毕业材料。海外大学毕业材料都有哪些工艺呢？工艺难度主要由：烫金.钢印.底纹.水印.防伪光标.热敏防伪等等组成。而且我们每天都在更新海外文凭的样板以求所有同学都能享受到完美的品质服务。
国外毕业证学位证成绩单办理方法：
1客户提供办理新西兰林肯大学新西兰林肯大学毕业证学位证信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：我们有专业老师帮你查询）；
2开始安排制作毕业证成绩单电子图；
3毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快读邮寄）
— — — — 我们是挂科和未毕业同学们的福音我们是实体公司精益求精的工艺！ — — — -
一真实留信认证的作用(私企外企荣誉的见证):
1：该专业认证可证明留学生真实留学身份同时对留学生所学专业等级给予评定。
2：国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书这个入网证书并且可以归档到地方。
3：凡是获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内将在公安部网内查询个人身份证信息后同步读取人才网入库信息。
4：个人职称评审加20分个人信誉贷款加10分。
5：在国家人才网主办的全国网络招聘大会中纳入资料供国家500强等高端企业选择人才。问山娃想买什么想吃什么山娃知道父亲赚钱很辛苦除了书籍和文具山娃啥也不要能牵着父亲的手满城闲逛他已心满意足了父亲连挑了三套童装叫山娃试穿山娃有点不想父亲说城里不比乡下要穿得漂漂亮亮爸怎么不穿得漂亮望着父亲山娃反问道父亲听了并不回答只是吃吃地笑山娃很精神越逛越起劲父亲却越逛越疲倦望着父亲呵欠连天的样子山娃也说困了累了回家吧小屋闷罐一般头顶上的三叶扇彻夜呜呜作响搅得满屋热气腾腾也搅得山娃心烦意乱父亲一的
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
Presentation by Justin Ordoyo
University of the Philippines College of Law
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
slide deck : Patenting innovations in 3D printing
Business Laws Sunita saha
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Search Warrants for NH Law Enforcement Officers
Training aid for law enforcement officers related to search warrants, the requirements needed, drafting, and execution of the search warrant.
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Pim Betist's presentation about generative AI in the legal sector at Lexpo.com '24
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptxGodwin Emmanuel Oyedokun MBA MSc PhD FCA FCTI FCNA CFE FFAR
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
Recently uploaded (20)
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
The Art and Science of Cryptoforensic Investigation: Best Practices and Tools
The Art and Science of Cryptoforensic Investigation: Best Practices and Tools
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Law of whistleblowing class # 12
- 1. The Law of Whistleblowing Washington University – Fall 2014 class # 12
- 2. Pickering v Board of Education 1968 Givhan v Western Line Consol. School Dist. 1979 Connick v Myers 1983
- 3. Pickering v Board of Education 1968 Givhan v Western Line Consol. School Dist. 1979 Connick v Myers 1983
- 4. Pickering v Board of Education 1968 Givhan v Western Line Consol. School Dist. 1979 Connick v Myers 1983
- 5. Pickering v Board of Education 1968 Givhan v Western Line Consol. School Dist. 1979 Connick v Myers 1983
- 6. Model Rule 3.8(d) timely disclosure to defense all evidence / information known to prosecutor that tends to negate guilt / mitigates offense
- 7. Ceballos’s speech disposition memo statements to supervisors testimony at hearing speech to Mexican American Bar Assn.
- 8. 42 USC § 1983 under color of statute, custom, usage of any state subjects U.S. citizen to deprivation of rights secured by Constitution liable to party injured
- 9. Ceballos’s speech disposition memo statements to supervisors testimony at hearing speech to Mexican American Bar Assn.
- 10. Pickering v Board of Education 1968 Givhan v Western Line Consol. School Dist. 1979 Connick v Myers 1983
- 11. Ceballos’s speech disposition memo statements to supervisors testimony at hearing speech to Mexican American Bar Assn.
- 12. Roles citizen employee professional
- 13. Roles citizen employee professional
- 14. Code of Ethics for U.S. Government Service . . . Expose corruption wherever discovered. . . .