SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 30
TBG 2013

                             GENETICS




NAME       : SITI SARAH BT MOHD SAIFUDDIN        D20091034843

             AMEERA BT YAHYA                     D20091034814

             NURUL HUSNA BT ALIAS                D20091034858




PRACTICAL : 2 (SIMPLE MENDELIAN GENETICS IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER)

DATE       : 2 AUGUST 2010

LECTURER’S NAME: EN. HAMZAH B ABDUL AZIZ
Title: SIMPLE MENDELIAN GENETICS IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

Objectives:

   1. To introduce normal "wild type" and various mutant phenotypes.

   2. To conduct a genetics experiment this spans of generation.

   3. To introduce the use of the Chi square statistic to test hypotheses concerning
       expected and observed ratios.

   4. To compare predicted result with actual result.

   5. To determine the ratio of monohybrid cross, dihybrid cross and sex linkage cross of
       Drosophila melanogaster.

   6. To design genetic cross to illustrate segregation, independent assortment and sex
       linkage.

   7. To discuss the life cycle of Drosophila melanogaster.

   8. To differentiate between male and female of Drosophila melanogaster.

   9. To determine the progeny from the cross between wild type and vestigial
       (monohybrid cross), wild type and vestigial, sepia eye (dihybrid cross) and wild type
       and white eyes (sex linkage cross).

Introduction:

Gregor Mendel was born in 1822, is now known as Father of Genetics. He initially studies
inheritance of just one pair of contrasting traits. Mendel begins his experiment with garden
pea plant. Mendel recognized two principles that were later call Principle of Mendelian
Inheritance:

Principle of Mendelian Inheritance

   1. Law of Segregation (The "First Law")

       The Law of Segregation states that when any individual produces gametes, the
       copies of a gene separate so that each gamete receives only one copy. A gamete
       will receive one allele or the other. The direct proof of this was later found when the
       process of meiosis came to be known. In meiosis, the paternal and maternal
       chromosomes are separated and the alleles with the traits of a character are
       segregated into two different gametes.
2. Law of Independent Assortment (The "Second Law")

       The Law of Independent Assortment, also known as "Inheritance Law", states that
       alleles of different genes assort independently of one another during gamete
       formation. While Mendel's experiments with mixing one trait always resulted in a 3:1
       ratio between dominant and recessive phenotypes, his experiments with mixing two
       traits (dihybrid cross) showed 9:3:3:1 ratios. Mendel concluded that different traits are
       inherited independently of each other, so that there is no relation, for example,
       between a cat's colour and tail length. This is actually only true for genes that are
       not linked to each other.
Drosophila melanogaster is a small, common fly found near unripe and rotted fruit. It has
been in use for over a century to study genetics and lends itself well to behavioral studies.
Thomas Hunt Morgan was the preeminent biologist studying Drosophila early in the 1900's.
Morgan was the first to discover sex linkage and genetic recombination, which placed the
small fly in the forefront of genetic research. Due to its small size, ease of culture and short
generation time, geneticists have been using Drosophila ever since. It is one of the few
organisms whose entire genome is known, many genes have been identified.Fruit flies are
easily obtained from the wild, and most biological science companies carry a variety of
different mutations. In addition, these companies sell any equipment needed to culture the
flies. Costs are relatively low and most equipment can be used year after year. There are a
variety of laboratory exercises one could purchase, although the necessity to do so is
questionable. In this experiment Drosophila are use because they are small and easily
handled, Drosophila are sexually dimorphic (males and females are different), making it is
quite easy to differentiate the sexes, and flies have a short generation time (10-12 days) and
do well at room temperature.

Life cycle of Drosophila melanogaster

D. melanogaster exhibits complete metamorphism, meaning the life cycle includes an egg,
larval (worm-like) form, pupa and finally emergence (eclosure) as a flying adult. This is the
same as the well-known metamorphosis of butterflies and many other insects. The larval
stage has three instars, or molts.

Life cycle by day

Day 0: Female lays eggs
Day 1: Eggs hatch

Day 2: First instar (one day in length)

Day 3: Second instar (one day in length)

Day 5: Third and final instar (two days in length)

Day 7: Larvae begin roaming stage. Pupariation (pupal formation) occurs 120 hours after
egg laying

Day 11-12: Eclosion (adults emerge from the pupa case). Females become sexually mature
8-10 hours after eclosion

The time from egg to adult is temperature- dependent. The above cycle is for a temperature
range of 21-23 degrees C. The higher the temperature, the faster the generation time,
whereas a lower (to 18 degrees C) temperature causes a longer generation time. Females
can lay up to 100 eggs/day. Virgin females are able to lay eggs; however, they will be sterile
and few in number. After the eggs hatch, small larvae should be visible in the growing
medium. If your media is white, look for the black area at the head of the larvae. Some dried
premixed media is blue to help identify larvae however this is not a necessity and with a little
patience and practice, larvae are easily seen. In addition, as the larvae feed they disrupt the
smooth surface of the media and so by looking only at the surface one can tell if larvae are
present. However, it is always a good idea to double check using a stereomicroscope. After
the third instar, larvae will begin to migrate up the culture vial in order to pupate.
Sex difference

Several criteria may be used to distinguish male and female Drosophila melanogaster

   •   Body size – female is generally larger than male.




   •   Abdomen shape – the female abdomen curve to a point, the male abdomen is round
       and much shorter. Figure below show Male (left) and Female (right) wild-type
       Drosophila.




   •   Mark on their abdomen - Alternating dark and light bands can be seen on the entire
       rear portion                                                        of the female;
       the last few                                                        segments    of
       the male are                                                        fused.
•   Sex comb - On males there is a tiny tuft of hairs on the basal tarsal segment of the
    front leg. This is the only sure method of distinguishing young male and female flies
    (less than 2 hours old), since the other adult traits are not always immediately
    recognizable. Sexing via the sex comb can also be done successfully in the pupal
    stage (Hadden and Cunningham, 1970).




•   Sex organ at abdomen - The genitalia are the easiest and most reliable character to
    use in determining sex (right; ventral view, posterior is up). Note the circle of darkly
    pigmented parts in the male. In contrast, the tip of the female's abdomen is lightly
    colored and pointed.
Dorsal view




Ventral view of abdomen
Hereditary Traits

Before one observes their mutants, one needs to be familiar with the appearance of the wild
type Drosophila, the type found most often in natural populations of the organisms. Although
thousands of mutations in Drosophila are known, only those which are relevant to these
exercises are listed.

1. Eyes

Wild type: red, oval in shape and many-faceted

Mutants: white, black, apricot, scarlet red, pink, or brown; changes in shape and number of
facets

2. Wings

Wild type: smooth edges, uniform venation, extend beyond the abdomen

Mutants: changes in size and shape; absence of specific veins; changes in position in which
wings are held when at rest

3. Bristles

Wild type: fairly long and smooth (note distribution on head and thorax)

Mutants: shortened, thickened, or deformed bristles changes in patterns of distribution

4. Body colour

Wild type: basically gray, with pattern of light and dark areas

Mutants: black (in varying degrees), yellow, in doubtful cases, color can often be determined
most clearly on wing veins and legs

Mutants’ traits can be assumed as recessive to the wild type.
Material and apparatus

Drosophila melanogaster (male and female)

‘Cornmeal’ medium

Ether/ Flynap

Vial tube with sponge cover

Filter paper

Petri dish and its cover

Soft paint brush

Label

Procedures

Anesthetizing system




   1. Ether or Fly nap is dropped on the cotton which placed under the etherizer cap and
        closed the bottle for a few seconds until the ether gas fulfill the entire bottle.

   2. Then, the base of the bottle is strike lightly on the palm of the hand so that the flies
        will drop to the bottom.

   3. Next, the bottle cap is removed, quickly replaced it with mouth of etherizer, the bottle
        is inverted over the etherizer and shaked the flies into the etherizer. Don’t invert the
        bottle over the etherizer because the ether is heavier than air and it could flow to the
        culture tube and kill the larvae and pupa. Both etherizer and culture tube are inverted
        and strike slowly until the adult Drosophila drop down in to the bottom.

   4. Quickly, the bottle is separated from its cover.

   5. The flies are then subjected to the ether for a minute or until they ceased moving.
6. After that, the etherized flies are transferred on the filter paper.

7. If the flies revived before we finished examining them, a few drops of ether is added
     to the cotton and put in the petri dish and covered it.

8. The etherized flies are examined with a dissecting microscope.

9.   A soft brush is used for moving the flies about on stage of the microscope.

10. Finally, after finishing our experiment, the Drosophila is discarded in a soup water or
     mineral oil, except the ones we need for the further crosses which we have to put on
     dry surface in the culture bottle before they come into contact with the moist medium.




     Procedure in the experiment

     The wild type and mutant flies are identified. Their morphology are examined
     thoroughly before we do the crosses. We will use dissecting microscope. Here are
     some traits for the experiments:

     Mendel Law 1

     - Ebony body

     - curved wings

     - Sepia eyes

     - Scarlet eyes

     Mendel Law 2

         -   Ebony body, yellow body

     X-linked

     -   white eyes

     -   yellow body

     -   echinus eyes

     -   bar eyes
Procedures for monohybrid crosses




1.    In monohybrid crosses, red eyes drosophila (male) and scarlet eyes (female )
      drosophila was used for mating.

2.    10 male Drosophila and 10 female Drosophila are shifted into the bottle which
      contains new medium/ substrate and the bottle is closed with the cotton. The
      rest is killed and the traits are observed.

3.     After a few days, the Drosophila will mate and finally the female Drosophila
      will lay eggs which then will hatch. At this moment, all the parental Drosophila
      has to be discarded to prevent mixed-up with the F2 generation.

4.    The experiment is repeated by using red eyes (female) and scarlet eyes
      ( male).




ANALYSIS OF F2 GENERATION

1.    By using the ether/ Flynap, the F2 Drosophila is killed and is put on the filter
      paper.

2.     The total number of every F2 phenotype is counted. From the monohybrid
      crosses, there are TWO phenotypes only. The distribution of the F2
      phenotypes is tested by using X2.

4.    By using the appropriate symbols a diagram which shows the genotypes in
      each crosses, from the parental stage to the F2 stage is draw.




Procedures for dihybrid crosses




1.    In dihybrid crosses, wild type drosophila (male) and vestigial, sepia eyes
      (female) drosophila was used for mating.

2.    10 male Drosophila and 10 female Drosophila are shifted into the bottle which
      contains new medium/ substrate and the bottle is closed with the cotton. The
      rest is killed and the traits are observed.
3.    After a few days, the Drosophila will mate and finally the female Drosophila
      will lay eggs which then will hatch. At this moment, all the parental Drosophila
      has to be discarded to prevent mixed-up with the F2 generation.

4.    The experiment is repeated by using wild type (female) and vestigial, sepia
      eyes (male).




ANALYSIS OF F2 GENERATION

1.    By using the ether/ Flynap, the F2 Drosophila is killed and is put on the filter
      paper.

2.    The total number of every F2 phenotype is counted. From the dihybrid
      crosses, there are FOUR phenotypes.The distribution of the F2 phenotypes is
      tested by using X2.

4.    By using the appropriate symbols a diagram which shows the genotypes in
      each cross, from the parental stage to the F2 stage is draw.




Procedures for X-linked




1.    To determine sex-linked traits, backcross protocol can be used.

2.    Wild type female will be crossed with white eye male and wild type male will
      be crossed with white eye female to produce F1 progeny.

3.    Then F1 progeny is crossed each other to produce F2.

4.    The F2 has been analysed and X2 test has been conducted.
Results

       Monohybrid Crosses




Figure 1 : Scarlet Drosophilla melanogaster      Figure 2: Red eye Drosophila melanogaster




       The crosses between wild type (male) × scarlet eyes (female)

       St+ is dominant allele for wild type

       st is recessive allele for scarlet eyes




                      male normal eye (wild type)                  female Scarlet eye

       Parent                 st+st+                 ×             stst




                                st+                                st
       Gamete
F1                                     st+st

                                          All wild-type




       F1 × F1              st+st              ×               st+st




       Gamete             st+        st                      st+       st




       F2               st+st+      st+st                  st+st            stst




       Ratio                                   3: 1

                                     wild-type : scarlet-eye




       To test Mendel’s Law of Segregation, we examined the inheritance of eye color by
       crossing two pure breeding strains of Drosophila melanogaster that is wild type and
       scarlet eyes. We determined which allele is dominant by setting up the cross st+st+
       males × stst females as described above. The phenotypes of the progeny are shown
       below.

Phenotypes                                            Number of progeny
                                 Males                   Females                   Total
Wild type                         13                         23                     36
Scarlet eyes                       0                          0                      0
The further whether eye color was inherited according to Mendelian laws, we crossed
         the F1 progeny and examined the phenotypes of the resulting F2 flies.

Phenotypes                                              Number of progeny
                                     Males                 Females                     Total
Wild type                             27                       38                       65
Scarlet eyes                           7                       12                       19
                                                                                        84


         To determine the statistical relevance of the data, we performed the Chi square test
         on our F2 data.
Class                Observed                Expected          (O-E)2               (O-E)2/ Expected
Wild type                  65                63                ( 65-63)2            4/ 63
                                                               =4                   =0.06
Scarlet eyes                  19             21                ( 19-21)2            4/21
                                                               =4                   =0.19
Totals               84                      84                                     X2 = 0.25

         The degree of freedom, df          = n-1 (n= total number of categories)
                                            = 2-1
                                            =1
         From the Chi square table, p = 0.5
         Since the p value is greater than 0.05, it can be concluded that it is not possible to
         reject the null hypothesis on the basis of this experiment.


The crosses between wild type (female) × scarlet eyes (male)

         St+is dominant allele for wild type

         st is recessive allele for scarlet eyes




                           female normal eye (wild-type)            male scarlet eye

         Parent                    st+st+                 ×                stst




                                    st+                                    st
         Gamete
F1                                     st+st

                                   All wild-type




F1 × F1              st+st              ×              st+st




Gamete             st+        st                     st+       st




F2               st+st+      st+st                 st+st            stst




     Ratio                              3: 1

                             wild-type : scarlet-eyed

To test Mendel’s Law of Segregation, we examined the inheritance of eye color by
crossing two pure breeding strains of Drosophila melanogaster that is wild type and
scarlet eyes. We determined which allele is dominant by setting up the cross st+st+
males × stst females as described above. The phenotypes of the progeny are shown
below.
Phenotypes                                          Number of progeny
                                 Males                 Females                     Total
Wild type                         13                       23                       36
Scarlet eyes                       0                        0                        0


The further whether eye color was inherited according to Mendelian laws, we crossed the F1
progeny and examined the phenotypes of the resulting F2 flies.

Phenotypes                                          Number of progeny
                                 Males                 Females                     Total
Wild type                         21                       32                       53
Scarlet eyes                       6                        9                       15
                                                                                    68


To determine the statistical relevance of the data, we performed the Chi square test on our
F2 data.


Class                Observed            Expected          (O-E)2              (O-E)2/ Expected
                                                                       2
Wild type                  53                  51          (53 – 51)           4/51
                                                           =4                  = 0.08
Scarlet eyes               15                  17          (15 – 17)2          4/17
                                                           =4                  = 0.24
Totals                     68                 68                               X2 = 0.32
         The degree of freedom, df    = n-1 (n= total number of categories)
                                      = 2-1
                                      =1
         From the Chi square table, p = 0.5
Since the p value is greater than 0.05, it can be concluded that it is not possible to reject the
null hypothesis on the basis of this experiment.


DISCUSSION
The results of the parental cross ( st+st+ males × stst females) demonstrate that the wild
type allele (st+) is dominant allele for scarlet eyes (st) as no scarlet-eyed progeny were seen
in the F1 progeny.
Calculations from the F2 data show that the ratio of normal eye (wild-type) to scarlet eyed
flies is 3.42:1. Although this ratio is very close to the expected 3:1 ratio for a monohybrid
cross, the Chi square test performed to determine whether this experimental data differed
significantly from the 3:1 ratio expected for simple monohybrid cross. The results of the Chi
square test suggest that the experimental data do not differ significantly from the expected
3:1 ratio. Specifically, there is between 50% and 90% probability that differences seen due
to chance. In this case, the differences seen are probably due to the small sample size
scored from the cross. The result of the parental cross ( st+st+ females x stst male ) show
the same result parental cross ( st+st+ males × stst females)


CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the phenotype of the F1 progeny confirmed that the allele for wild type scarlet
eyes, st+ is dominant to the allele for scarlet eyes, st. The ratio of normal-eyed (wild-type) to
scarlet-eyed flies of 3.42:1 seen in the F2 is very near that of the expected 3:1 ratio for a
monohybrid cross, and the Chi square test verifies that it is within statistical limits. Therefore,
the results of this experiment confirm Mendel’s Law of Segregation. The result of the
parental cross ( st+st+ females x stst male ) show the same result parental cross ( st+st+
males × stst females) because scarlet eye does not located on sex chromosome.




Dihybrid Crosses
Dihybrid crosses involve manipulation and analysis of two traits controlled by pairs of alleles
at different loci.
In this experiment, we cross wild type with vestigial wing, sepia eyes
        e is recessive allele for sepia eyes
        e+ is dominant allele for wild-type eyes
        vg is recessive allele for vestigial wing shape
        vg+ is dominant allele for wild-type wing shape
Vestigial, sepia female    Vestigial sepia male            Vestigial male           vestigial female


The cross between wild type male and vestigial, sepia female
                 Wild type male                vestigial, sepia female
 Parent          e+e+ vg+vg+        ×          ee vgvg




Gamete
                    e+                            e vg
                    vg+




F1                              e+e vg+vg
                               All wild-type




F1 × F1           e+e vg+vg                            ×                     e+e vg+vg




     e+vg+         e+vg        evg+      ev                     e+vg+        e+vg        evg+     ev
                                         g                                                        g


F2 is cross using Punnett square


                           e+ vg+              e+ vg                 e vg+                e vg
      +      +
     e vg            e+e+ vg+vg+         e+e+ vg+vg            e+e vg+vg+            +    +
                                                                                    e e vg vg
     e+ vg           e+e+ vg+vg          e+e+ vgvg             e+e vg+vg            e+e vgvg
     e vg+           e+e vg+vg+          e+e vg+vg             ee vg+vg+            ee vg+vg
      e vg           e+e vg+vg           e+e vgvg              ee vg+vg             ee vgvg



F2 Phenotype ratio: 9 wild-type: 3 sepia: 3 vestigial: 1 sepia vestigial


In a dihybrid cross, each of the F1 parents can produce four different gamete types, so there
are 16 (= 4 x 4) possible offspring combinations. Because the two traits show complete
dominance and separate independently of each other (Law of Independent Assortment), the
expected genotypic and phenotypic ratios from an analysis of these 16 possibilities can be
calculated.
To test Mendel’s Law of Independent Assortment, we examined the inheritance of eyes
colour and wing shape by crossing two pure breeding strains of Drosophila melanogaster
that is wild-type and vestigial, sepia. We determined which allele is dominant by setting up
the cross e+e+ vg+vg+ males × ee vgvg females as described above. The phenotypes of the
progeny are shown below.


Phenotypes                                         Number of progeny
                               Males                  Females                 Total
Wild type                        9                        13                    22
Vestigial, sepia                 0                         0                     0




The further whether eyes colour and wing shape was inherited according to Mendelian laws,
we crossed the F1 progeny and examined the phenotypes of the resulting F2 flies.


Phenotypes                                         Number of progeny
                               Males                  Females                 Total
wild type                       23                        34                   57
sepia                            5                         9                   14
vestigial                        4                         7                   11
sepia, vestigial                 2                         4                   6
                                                                               88

To determine the statistical relevance of the data, we performed the Chi square test on our
F2 data.
Class              Observed            Expected           (O-E)2           (O-E)2/ Expected
wild type                57            9/16 × 88          (57 - 50)2       49/50
                                       = 50               = 49             = 0.98
sepia                    14            3/16 × 88          (14- 16)2        4/16
                                       = 16               =4               = 0.25
vestigial                11            3/16 × 88          (11 – 16)2       25/16
                                       = 16               = 25             = 1.56
sepia, vestigial           6           1/16 × 88          (9 – 6)2         9/6
                                       =6                 =9               = 1.50
Totals                   88                  88                            X2 = 4.29
The degree of freedom, df       = n-1 (n= total number of categories)
                                = 4-1
                                =3
From the chi square table, p = 0.1


Since the p value is greater than 0.05, it can be concluded that it is not possible to reject the
null hypothesis on the basis of this experiment.




The cross between wild type female and vestigial, sepia male
                 Wild type female                 vestigial, sepia male
 Parent          e+e+ vg+vg+       ×              ee vgvg




Gamete
                    e+                             e vg
                    vg+




F1                              e+e vg+vg
                               All wild-type




F1 × F1           e+e vg+vg                           ×                     e+e vg+vg




     e+vg+         e+vg        evg+      ev                     e+vg+       e+vg        evg+    ev
                                         g                                                      g


F2 is cross using Punnett square


                          e+ vg+              e+ vg                 e vg+                e vg
      +      +
     e vg            e e vg+vg+
                      + +
                                         e e vg+vg
                                            + +
                                                              e e vg+vg+
                                                                +
                                                                                   e+e vg+vg
e+ vg      e+e+ vg+vg            e+e+ vgvg          e+e vg+vg       e+e vgvg
        e vg+      e+e vg+vg+            e+e vg+vg          ee vg+vg+       ee vg+vg
        e vg       e+e vg+vg             e+e vgvg           ee vg+vg        ee vgvg



F2 Phenotype ratio: 9 wild-type: 3 sepia: 3 vestigial: 1 sepia vestigial




In a dihybrid cross, each of the F1 parents can produce four different gamete types, so there
are 16 (= 4 x 4) possible offspring combinations. Because the two traits show complete
dominance and separate independently of each other (Law of Independent Assortment), the
expected genotypic and phenotypic ratios from an analysis of these 16 possibilities can be
calculated.
To test Mendel’s Law of Independent Assortment, we examined the inheritance of eyes
colour and wing shape by crossing two pure breeding strains of Drosophila melanogaster
that is wild-type and vestigial, sepia. We determined which allele is dominant by setting up
the cross e+e+ vg+vg+ males × ee vgvg females as described above. The phenotypes of the
progeny are shown below.


Phenotypes                                           Number of progeny
                                 Males                  Females                Total
Wild type                         13                        21                  34
Vestigial, sepia                   0                         0                  0

The further whether eyes colour and wing shape was inherited according to Mendelian laws,
we crossed the F1 progeny and examined the phenotypes of the resulting F2 flies.
Phenotypes                                           Number of progeny
                                 Males                  Females                Total
wild type                         23                        33                  56
sepia                              6                         9                  15
vestigial                          6                        10                  16
sepia, vestigial                   2                         4                  6
                                                                                93


To determine the statistical relevance of the data, we performed the Chi square test on our
F2 data.
Class              Observed              Expected           (O-E)2          (O-E)2/ Expected
wild type                56              9/16 × 93          (56 - 53)2      9/53
                                         = 53               =9              = 0.17
sepia                      15            3/16 × 93          (14- 17)2       9/17
= 17                =9                  = 0.53
Vestigial                  16           3/16 × 93           (16 – 17)2          1/17
                                        = 17                =1                  = 0.06
sepia, vestigial            6           1/16 × 93           (6 – 6)2            0/6
                                        =6                  =0                  =0
Totals                     93                  93                               X2 = 0.76


The degree of freedom, df       = n-1 (n= total number of categories)
                                = 4-1
                                =3
From the chi square table, p = 0.95


Since the p value is greater than 0.05, it can be concluded that it is not possible to reject the
null hypothesis on the basis of this experiment.


DISCUSSION
The results of the parental cross ( e+e+ vg+vg+ males × ee vgvg females) demonstrate that
the wild type allele (e+e+ vg+vg+) is dominant allele for sepia, vestigial alleles (ee vgvg) as
only wild-type progeny were seen in the F1 progeny. Calculations from the F2 data show that
the ratio of wild-type to sepia to vestigial and to sepia, vestigial flies is 9.5:2.3:1.8:1.
Although this ratio is close to the expected 9:3:3:1 ratio for a dihybrid cross, the Chi square
test performed to determine whether this experimental data differed significantly from the
9:3:3:1 ratio expected for simple dihybrid cross. The results of the Chi square test suggest
that the experimental data do not differ significantly from the expected 9:3:3:1 ratio.
Specifically, there is between 10% and 50% probability that differences seen due to chance.
In this case, the differences seen are probably due to the small sample size scored from the
cross.



CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the phenotype of the F1 progeny confirmed that the allele for wild type, e +e+
vg+vg+ is dominant to the allele for sepia, vestigial, ee vgvg. The ratio of wild type to sepia to
vestigial and to sepia, vestigial of 9.5:2.3:1.8:1 seen in the F2 is very near that of the
expected 9:3:3:1 ratio for a dihybrid cross, and the Chi square test verifies that it is within
statistical limits. Therefore, the results of this experiment confirm Mendel’s Law of
Independent Assortment. The result of the parental cross          between wild type male and
vestigial, sepia female show the same result parental cross between wild type female and
vestigial, sepia male because      vestigial wing and sepia eyes does not located on sex
chromosome.
Sex linked Traits
In sex-linked inheritance, alleles on sex chromosomes are inherited in predictable patterns.
In Drosophila the locus for eye color is located on the X chromosome. The allele for red eye
color, which is normal in wild flies, is dominant to the mutant allele for white eyes.




In the left hand example, homozygous red eyed females (RR) mate with homozygous white
eyed males (w-). In the offspring, all the daughters are red eyed heterozygotes (Rr) and all
sons are red eyed homozygotes (R-). In the right hand, homozygous white eyed females (rr)
mate with homozygous red eyed males (R-). In the offspring, all the daughters are red eyed
heterozygotes (Rr) and all sons are white eyed homozygotes (r-).

Females have two chromosomes X (with a locus for eye color), they might be homozygous
or heterozygous for either allele. Males, carry only one X chromosome, are always
hemizygous. They carry only the one X chromosome inherited from their mother, and it
determines their eye color.

The first cross is between normal female with red eyes and the mutant male with white eyes.
The first cross is to determine whether the white or red eyes were dominant. The F1
generation all had red eyes. So we can conclude that red eyes are dominant over white.
Then, F1 generations are crossed each other to give F2 progenies.

From the result of the experiment, only male Drosophila shows white eyes. X-linked
inherited diseases occur far more frequently in males because they only have one X
chromosome. Females must receive a copy of the gene from both parents to have such a
recessive disease. However, they will still be carriers if they receive one copy of the gene.

Cross between red eye (wild type) female X white eye male


 B+ Dominant allele codes for red eye

 B Recessive allele codes for white-eye


 Parental:         Red eye (female)               X               white eye (male)

 Genotype:         XB+ XB+                        X                      XB Y




               XB          XB                                       XB         Y
 Gamete:          +          +




 F1:          XB+XB               XB+Y                    XB+XB                     XB+Y


                                         (all red eyes)

 F1 X F1:          XB+XB                          X                      XB+Y




              XB           XB                                      XB           Y
 Gamete:      +                                                     +




 F2:          XB+XB+             XB+Y                              XB+XB XBY


 Phenotypic ratio:         2 red eyes female : 1 red eye male : 1 white-eye male
. Cross between white-eye female x wild type male


 B+ Dominant allele codes for red eye type (wild type)

 B Recessive allele codes for white-eye


 Parental:        white-eye (female)           X                 Red eye (male)

 Genotype:        XB XB                   X                      XB+ Y




 Gamete:      XB               XB                           XB             Y
                                                             +




 F1:              XB+XB             XBY                     XB+XB                  XBY


 Phenotypic ratio: 2 red eyes type female : 2 white-eyes male

 F1 X F1:         XB+XB                        X                         XBY




             XB           XB                                      XB           Y
 Gamete:      +




 F2:         XB+XB        XB+Y                                    XBXB             XBY


 Phenotypic ratio:        1 red eye female : 1 red eye male : 1 white-eye female : 1 white-eye
 male
RESULT

The female with red eyes will be crossed with white-eyed male to produce F1 progeny. Then,
this F1 were crossed each other

R is dominant allele for wild type eyes (red eyes)

w is recessive allele for white eyes

The phenotype of F1 progeny is:

Phenotypes                                           Number of progeny

                                  Males                  Females             Total

Wild type                          8                        9                   17

White eyes                         0                        0                   0



The phenotype of F2 progeny is:

Phenotypes                                           Number of progeny

                                  Males                  Females             Total

Wild type                          14                       33                  47

White eyes                         16                       0                   16



Class              Observed               Expected          (O-E)2       (O-E)2/ Expected
wild type male           14               1/4 × 63          (14-16)2     4/16
                                          = 16              =4           = 0.25
Wild type                  33             2/4 × 63          (33-31)2     4/31
female                                    = 31              =4           = 0.13
White eyes                 16             1/4 × 63          (16-16)2     0/16
male                                      = 16              =0           =0
White eyes                 0              0/4 × 62          (0 – 6)2     36/6
female                                    =6                = 36         =6
Totals                     63                   63                       X2 = 6.38


Interpretation with the chi square value
df = 3

With df = 3, the chi square value of 6.38 is slightly greater than 4.642 (which correspond to
P > 0.20). Therefore P = 0.20 show that expected to occur are 20% of the time. 80% error
occurred. Hypothesis accepted.




The male with red eyes will be crossed with white-eyed female to produce F1 progeny. Then,
this F1 were crossed each other

R is dominant allele for wild type eyes (red eyes)

w is recessive allele for white eyes

The phenotype of F1 progeny is:

Phenotypes                                           Number of progeny

                                  Males                  Females               Total

Wild type                          0                        13                     13

White eyes                         15                       0                      15



The phenotype of F2 progeny is:

Phenotypes                                           Number of progeny

                                  Males                  Females               Total

Wild type                          14                       15                     29

White eyes                         13                       14                     27




Class              Observed               Expected          (O-E)2          (O-E)2/ Expected
wild type male           14               1/4 × 56          (14-14)2        0/14
                                          = 14              =0              =0
Wild type                  15             1/4 × 56          (15- 14)2       1/14
female                                    = 14              =1              = 0.07
White eyes                 13             1/4 × 56          (13-14)2        1/14
male                                      = 14              =1              = 0.07
White eyes                 14             1/4 × 56          (14-14)2        0/14
female                                 = 14              =0                 =0
Totals                    29                  29                            X2 = 0.14


Interpretation with the chi square value

   df = 3

With df = 10, the chi square value of 0.14 is slightly greater than 0.115 (which correspond to
P > 0.99). Therefore P = 0.99 show that expected to occur are 99% of the time. 1% error
occurred. Hypothesis accepted.

Discussion


From the result of the experiment, in first cross only male Drosophila shows white eyes. X-
linked inherited diseases occur far more frequently in males because they only have one X
chromosome. Females must receive a copy of the gene from both parents to have such a
recessive disease. However, they will still be carriers if they receive one copy of the gene.
From the results that obtain theoretically in cross 1, it is proven according to the Morgan
(1910) that the gene for white eyes in Drosophila is located on the X chromosome and not
the Y chromosome. This can be shown from the cross where wild type female is cross with
white eye male and the result shows that 2:1:1 ratio in F 2 offspring. The white eye type is
inherited in male because male has only one X chromosome which means that the male
phenotype is not reflective of a dominant or recessive trait, but it reflects only the sex
chromosomes that the male fly carries. This state of male genotype which has only one X
chromosome is termed as hemizygous.


 As from cross 2, female flies carry the mutant gene. When it is crossed with normal male,
 ratio of 1:1:1:1 can be seen in the F2 offsprings. This is because all possible combinations
 of white eye and sex are possible and the white eye trait can be carried over to female
 when F1 females are crossed with white eye male.


Conclusion

From this experiment, we learn on how to conduct a genetic experiment which spans of
generation. We also learn on how to design genetic crosses to illustrate segregation,
independent assortment and sex-linkage. There are four stages of Drosophila melanogaster
life cycles that are egg, larva, pupa, and adult. From study of its life cycle, we are able to
perform this experiment. We can differentiate the male and female of Drosophila
melanogaster based on several characteristic such as size of adult, shape of abdomen,
markings on abdomen, appearance of sex comb external genitilia on abdomen and sex
organ during larval stage. This making easier for us to differentiate them especially in the
experiment about sex-linkage. What is more important is we are able to recognize wild-type
flies and those with classic mutations. To test the result that we obtained, we use the Chi
square statistic to test hypotheses concerning expected and observed ratios. If the p value is
less than 0.005, so the hypothesis can be rejected.

References

       Paul Arnold (2009). Human Genetics and the Fruit Fly Drosophila Melanogaster.
Retrieved March 29, 2010, from http://www.biol.org/DrosPics.htm#Misc

       Christin E. Arnini (1996). Using Drosophila to Teach Genetics. Retrieved March 29,
2010,http://www.google.com.my/search?
hlen&qdrosophila+melanogaster+phenotypes&revid.

       Basic Genetics: Thomas Hunt Morgan and Sex-linked Traits. Retrieved April 6, 2010
from   http://library.thinkquest.org/20465/sexlinked.html

Miko, I. (2008) Thomas Hunt Morgan and sex linkage. Nature Education 1(1). Retrieved April
       6,     2010 from http://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/Thomas-Hunt-Morgan-
       and-Sex-Linkage-452#TB_inline?height=300&width=400&inlineId=trOutLine


Retrieve              on               8              April              2010               at
http://www.mun.ca/biology/dinnes/B2250/DrosophilaGenetics.PDF

Retrieved on 8 April 2010 at http://www.dreamessays.com/customessays/Science
%20Research%20Papers/11452.htm

More Related Content

What's hot

Barr Body Staining
Barr Body StainingBarr Body Staining
Barr Body StainingAmna Jalil
 
Theories of preformation, pangenesis, epigenesis,
Theories of preformation, pangenesis, epigenesis,Theories of preformation, pangenesis, epigenesis,
Theories of preformation, pangenesis, epigenesis,Gauri Haval
 
Chromosomal abnormalities
Chromosomal abnormalitiesChromosomal abnormalities
Chromosomal abnormalitiesFarhan Ali
 
Sex determination in drosophila
Sex determination in drosophilaSex determination in drosophila
Sex determination in drosophilakishoreGupta17
 
Female selection in Drosophila melanogaster
Female selection in Drosophila melanogasterFemale selection in Drosophila melanogaster
Female selection in Drosophila melanogasterNethravathi Siri
 
Drosophila Features, Life Cycle & Culture
Drosophila  Features, Life Cycle & Culture Drosophila  Features, Life Cycle & Culture
Drosophila Features, Life Cycle & Culture Ruchira Agarwal
 
Biology Form 5 Chapter 5 : 5.1 Inheritance
Biology Form 5 Chapter 5 : 5.1 InheritanceBiology Form 5 Chapter 5 : 5.1 Inheritance
Biology Form 5 Chapter 5 : 5.1 InheritanceNirmala Josephine
 
4. Gene interaction - Epistasis - Dominant & Recessive, Non-epistatsis
4. Gene interaction - Epistasis - Dominant & Recessive, Non-epistatsis4. Gene interaction - Epistasis - Dominant & Recessive, Non-epistatsis
4. Gene interaction - Epistasis - Dominant & Recessive, Non-epistatsisNethravathi Siri
 
environmental influence on gene expression
environmental influence on gene expressionenvironmental influence on gene expression
environmental influence on gene expressionIan Lee Gatchalian
 
Penetrance and expressivity
Penetrance and expressivityPenetrance and expressivity
Penetrance and expressivityFarhanaShiekh
 
Drosophila melanogaster (genome analysis)
Drosophila melanogaster (genome analysis)Drosophila melanogaster (genome analysis)
Drosophila melanogaster (genome analysis)ahmet varis
 
Sex determination and nondisjunction
Sex determination and nondisjunctionSex determination and nondisjunction
Sex determination and nondisjunctionBruno Mmassy
 
Mitochondrial inheritance
Mitochondrial inheritanceMitochondrial inheritance
Mitochondrial inheritanceHarshita537316
 
INCOMPLETE DOMINANCE VS CO-DOMINANCE
INCOMPLETE DOMINANCE VS CO-DOMINANCEINCOMPLETE DOMINANCE VS CO-DOMINANCE
INCOMPLETE DOMINANCE VS CO-DOMINANCEAshish Pratim Mahanta
 

What's hot (20)

Barr Body Staining
Barr Body StainingBarr Body Staining
Barr Body Staining
 
Theories of preformation, pangenesis, epigenesis,
Theories of preformation, pangenesis, epigenesis,Theories of preformation, pangenesis, epigenesis,
Theories of preformation, pangenesis, epigenesis,
 
Chromosomal abnormalities
Chromosomal abnormalitiesChromosomal abnormalities
Chromosomal abnormalities
 
Developmental genetics
Developmental genetics Developmental genetics
Developmental genetics
 
Sex determination in drosophila
Sex determination in drosophilaSex determination in drosophila
Sex determination in drosophila
 
Female selection in Drosophila melanogaster
Female selection in Drosophila melanogasterFemale selection in Drosophila melanogaster
Female selection in Drosophila melanogaster
 
Drosophila Features, Life Cycle & Culture
Drosophila  Features, Life Cycle & Culture Drosophila  Features, Life Cycle & Culture
Drosophila Features, Life Cycle & Culture
 
PLEIOTROPY
PLEIOTROPYPLEIOTROPY
PLEIOTROPY
 
Biology Form 5 Chapter 5 : 5.1 Inheritance
Biology Form 5 Chapter 5 : 5.1 InheritanceBiology Form 5 Chapter 5 : 5.1 Inheritance
Biology Form 5 Chapter 5 : 5.1 Inheritance
 
4. Gene interaction - Epistasis - Dominant & Recessive, Non-epistatsis
4. Gene interaction - Epistasis - Dominant & Recessive, Non-epistatsis4. Gene interaction - Epistasis - Dominant & Recessive, Non-epistatsis
4. Gene interaction - Epistasis - Dominant & Recessive, Non-epistatsis
 
Pedigrees Lecture
Pedigrees LecturePedigrees Lecture
Pedigrees Lecture
 
environmental influence on gene expression
environmental influence on gene expressionenvironmental influence on gene expression
environmental influence on gene expression
 
Penetrance and expressivity
Penetrance and expressivityPenetrance and expressivity
Penetrance and expressivity
 
Drosophila melanogaster (genome analysis)
Drosophila melanogaster (genome analysis)Drosophila melanogaster (genome analysis)
Drosophila melanogaster (genome analysis)
 
Sex determination and nondisjunction
Sex determination and nondisjunctionSex determination and nondisjunction
Sex determination and nondisjunction
 
Mitochondrial inheritance
Mitochondrial inheritanceMitochondrial inheritance
Mitochondrial inheritance
 
INCOMPLETE DOMINANCE VS CO-DOMINANCE
INCOMPLETE DOMINANCE VS CO-DOMINANCEINCOMPLETE DOMINANCE VS CO-DOMINANCE
INCOMPLETE DOMINANCE VS CO-DOMINANCE
 
2014 sex-linkage
2014 sex-linkage2014 sex-linkage
2014 sex-linkage
 
Maternal effects
Maternal effectsMaternal effects
Maternal effects
 
Gastrulation
GastrulationGastrulation
Gastrulation
 

Similar to LAB REPORT DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

Mendelian Ratio Of Wings Essay
Mendelian Ratio Of Wings EssayMendelian Ratio Of Wings Essay
Mendelian Ratio Of Wings EssayBrianna Johnson
 
Drosophila Melanogaster Lab Report Essay
Drosophila Melanogaster Lab Report EssayDrosophila Melanogaster Lab Report Essay
Drosophila Melanogaster Lab Report EssayAdriana Wilson
 
Meiosis on the GO!
Meiosis on the GO!Meiosis on the GO!
Meiosis on the GO!rbbrdcke
 
Comparative Anatomy
Comparative AnatomyComparative Anatomy
Comparative AnatomyMsJGemmell
 
Burgess Shale Essay
Burgess Shale EssayBurgess Shale Essay
Burgess Shale EssayJulie May
 
Forensic entomology
Forensic entomologyForensic entomology
Forensic entomologySaniya Zedi
 
Earthworm dissection
Earthworm dissectionEarthworm dissection
Earthworm dissectionkleinkea
 

Similar to LAB REPORT DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER (11)

Mendelian Ratio Of Wings Essay
Mendelian Ratio Of Wings EssayMendelian Ratio Of Wings Essay
Mendelian Ratio Of Wings Essay
 
Drosophila Melanogaster Lab Report Essay
Drosophila Melanogaster Lab Report EssayDrosophila Melanogaster Lab Report Essay
Drosophila Melanogaster Lab Report Essay
 
ENTM 105 Essay
ENTM 105 EssayENTM 105 Essay
ENTM 105 Essay
 
Meiosis on the GO!
Meiosis on the GO!Meiosis on the GO!
Meiosis on the GO!
 
Drosophila
DrosophilaDrosophila
Drosophila
 
Comparative Anatomy
Comparative AnatomyComparative Anatomy
Comparative Anatomy
 
Evolution
EvolutionEvolution
Evolution
 
Burgess Shale Essay
Burgess Shale EssayBurgess Shale Essay
Burgess Shale Essay
 
Pasini
PasiniPasini
Pasini
 
Forensic entomology
Forensic entomologyForensic entomology
Forensic entomology
 
Earthworm dissection
Earthworm dissectionEarthworm dissection
Earthworm dissection
 

LAB REPORT DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

  • 1. TBG 2013 GENETICS NAME : SITI SARAH BT MOHD SAIFUDDIN D20091034843 AMEERA BT YAHYA D20091034814 NURUL HUSNA BT ALIAS D20091034858 PRACTICAL : 2 (SIMPLE MENDELIAN GENETICS IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER) DATE : 2 AUGUST 2010 LECTURER’S NAME: EN. HAMZAH B ABDUL AZIZ
  • 2. Title: SIMPLE MENDELIAN GENETICS IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER Objectives: 1. To introduce normal "wild type" and various mutant phenotypes. 2. To conduct a genetics experiment this spans of generation. 3. To introduce the use of the Chi square statistic to test hypotheses concerning expected and observed ratios. 4. To compare predicted result with actual result. 5. To determine the ratio of monohybrid cross, dihybrid cross and sex linkage cross of Drosophila melanogaster. 6. To design genetic cross to illustrate segregation, independent assortment and sex linkage. 7. To discuss the life cycle of Drosophila melanogaster. 8. To differentiate between male and female of Drosophila melanogaster. 9. To determine the progeny from the cross between wild type and vestigial (monohybrid cross), wild type and vestigial, sepia eye (dihybrid cross) and wild type and white eyes (sex linkage cross). Introduction: Gregor Mendel was born in 1822, is now known as Father of Genetics. He initially studies inheritance of just one pair of contrasting traits. Mendel begins his experiment with garden pea plant. Mendel recognized two principles that were later call Principle of Mendelian Inheritance: Principle of Mendelian Inheritance 1. Law of Segregation (The "First Law") The Law of Segregation states that when any individual produces gametes, the copies of a gene separate so that each gamete receives only one copy. A gamete will receive one allele or the other. The direct proof of this was later found when the process of meiosis came to be known. In meiosis, the paternal and maternal chromosomes are separated and the alleles with the traits of a character are segregated into two different gametes.
  • 3. 2. Law of Independent Assortment (The "Second Law") The Law of Independent Assortment, also known as "Inheritance Law", states that alleles of different genes assort independently of one another during gamete formation. While Mendel's experiments with mixing one trait always resulted in a 3:1 ratio between dominant and recessive phenotypes, his experiments with mixing two traits (dihybrid cross) showed 9:3:3:1 ratios. Mendel concluded that different traits are inherited independently of each other, so that there is no relation, for example, between a cat's colour and tail length. This is actually only true for genes that are not linked to each other. Drosophila melanogaster is a small, common fly found near unripe and rotted fruit. It has been in use for over a century to study genetics and lends itself well to behavioral studies. Thomas Hunt Morgan was the preeminent biologist studying Drosophila early in the 1900's. Morgan was the first to discover sex linkage and genetic recombination, which placed the small fly in the forefront of genetic research. Due to its small size, ease of culture and short generation time, geneticists have been using Drosophila ever since. It is one of the few organisms whose entire genome is known, many genes have been identified.Fruit flies are easily obtained from the wild, and most biological science companies carry a variety of different mutations. In addition, these companies sell any equipment needed to culture the flies. Costs are relatively low and most equipment can be used year after year. There are a variety of laboratory exercises one could purchase, although the necessity to do so is questionable. In this experiment Drosophila are use because they are small and easily handled, Drosophila are sexually dimorphic (males and females are different), making it is quite easy to differentiate the sexes, and flies have a short generation time (10-12 days) and do well at room temperature. Life cycle of Drosophila melanogaster D. melanogaster exhibits complete metamorphism, meaning the life cycle includes an egg, larval (worm-like) form, pupa and finally emergence (eclosure) as a flying adult. This is the same as the well-known metamorphosis of butterflies and many other insects. The larval stage has three instars, or molts. Life cycle by day Day 0: Female lays eggs
  • 4. Day 1: Eggs hatch Day 2: First instar (one day in length) Day 3: Second instar (one day in length) Day 5: Third and final instar (two days in length) Day 7: Larvae begin roaming stage. Pupariation (pupal formation) occurs 120 hours after egg laying Day 11-12: Eclosion (adults emerge from the pupa case). Females become sexually mature 8-10 hours after eclosion The time from egg to adult is temperature- dependent. The above cycle is for a temperature range of 21-23 degrees C. The higher the temperature, the faster the generation time, whereas a lower (to 18 degrees C) temperature causes a longer generation time. Females can lay up to 100 eggs/day. Virgin females are able to lay eggs; however, they will be sterile and few in number. After the eggs hatch, small larvae should be visible in the growing medium. If your media is white, look for the black area at the head of the larvae. Some dried premixed media is blue to help identify larvae however this is not a necessity and with a little patience and practice, larvae are easily seen. In addition, as the larvae feed they disrupt the smooth surface of the media and so by looking only at the surface one can tell if larvae are present. However, it is always a good idea to double check using a stereomicroscope. After the third instar, larvae will begin to migrate up the culture vial in order to pupate.
  • 5. Sex difference Several criteria may be used to distinguish male and female Drosophila melanogaster • Body size – female is generally larger than male. • Abdomen shape – the female abdomen curve to a point, the male abdomen is round and much shorter. Figure below show Male (left) and Female (right) wild-type Drosophila. • Mark on their abdomen - Alternating dark and light bands can be seen on the entire rear portion of the female; the last few segments of the male are fused.
  • 6. Sex comb - On males there is a tiny tuft of hairs on the basal tarsal segment of the front leg. This is the only sure method of distinguishing young male and female flies (less than 2 hours old), since the other adult traits are not always immediately recognizable. Sexing via the sex comb can also be done successfully in the pupal stage (Hadden and Cunningham, 1970). • Sex organ at abdomen - The genitalia are the easiest and most reliable character to use in determining sex (right; ventral view, posterior is up). Note the circle of darkly pigmented parts in the male. In contrast, the tip of the female's abdomen is lightly colored and pointed.
  • 8. Hereditary Traits Before one observes their mutants, one needs to be familiar with the appearance of the wild type Drosophila, the type found most often in natural populations of the organisms. Although thousands of mutations in Drosophila are known, only those which are relevant to these exercises are listed. 1. Eyes Wild type: red, oval in shape and many-faceted Mutants: white, black, apricot, scarlet red, pink, or brown; changes in shape and number of facets 2. Wings Wild type: smooth edges, uniform venation, extend beyond the abdomen Mutants: changes in size and shape; absence of specific veins; changes in position in which wings are held when at rest 3. Bristles Wild type: fairly long and smooth (note distribution on head and thorax) Mutants: shortened, thickened, or deformed bristles changes in patterns of distribution 4. Body colour Wild type: basically gray, with pattern of light and dark areas Mutants: black (in varying degrees), yellow, in doubtful cases, color can often be determined most clearly on wing veins and legs Mutants’ traits can be assumed as recessive to the wild type.
  • 9. Material and apparatus Drosophila melanogaster (male and female) ‘Cornmeal’ medium Ether/ Flynap Vial tube with sponge cover Filter paper Petri dish and its cover Soft paint brush Label Procedures Anesthetizing system 1. Ether or Fly nap is dropped on the cotton which placed under the etherizer cap and closed the bottle for a few seconds until the ether gas fulfill the entire bottle. 2. Then, the base of the bottle is strike lightly on the palm of the hand so that the flies will drop to the bottom. 3. Next, the bottle cap is removed, quickly replaced it with mouth of etherizer, the bottle is inverted over the etherizer and shaked the flies into the etherizer. Don’t invert the bottle over the etherizer because the ether is heavier than air and it could flow to the culture tube and kill the larvae and pupa. Both etherizer and culture tube are inverted and strike slowly until the adult Drosophila drop down in to the bottom. 4. Quickly, the bottle is separated from its cover. 5. The flies are then subjected to the ether for a minute or until they ceased moving.
  • 10. 6. After that, the etherized flies are transferred on the filter paper. 7. If the flies revived before we finished examining them, a few drops of ether is added to the cotton and put in the petri dish and covered it. 8. The etherized flies are examined with a dissecting microscope. 9. A soft brush is used for moving the flies about on stage of the microscope. 10. Finally, after finishing our experiment, the Drosophila is discarded in a soup water or mineral oil, except the ones we need for the further crosses which we have to put on dry surface in the culture bottle before they come into contact with the moist medium. Procedure in the experiment The wild type and mutant flies are identified. Their morphology are examined thoroughly before we do the crosses. We will use dissecting microscope. Here are some traits for the experiments: Mendel Law 1 - Ebony body - curved wings - Sepia eyes - Scarlet eyes Mendel Law 2 - Ebony body, yellow body X-linked - white eyes - yellow body - echinus eyes - bar eyes
  • 11. Procedures for monohybrid crosses 1. In monohybrid crosses, red eyes drosophila (male) and scarlet eyes (female ) drosophila was used for mating. 2. 10 male Drosophila and 10 female Drosophila are shifted into the bottle which contains new medium/ substrate and the bottle is closed with the cotton. The rest is killed and the traits are observed. 3. After a few days, the Drosophila will mate and finally the female Drosophila will lay eggs which then will hatch. At this moment, all the parental Drosophila has to be discarded to prevent mixed-up with the F2 generation. 4. The experiment is repeated by using red eyes (female) and scarlet eyes ( male). ANALYSIS OF F2 GENERATION 1. By using the ether/ Flynap, the F2 Drosophila is killed and is put on the filter paper. 2. The total number of every F2 phenotype is counted. From the monohybrid crosses, there are TWO phenotypes only. The distribution of the F2 phenotypes is tested by using X2. 4. By using the appropriate symbols a diagram which shows the genotypes in each crosses, from the parental stage to the F2 stage is draw. Procedures for dihybrid crosses 1. In dihybrid crosses, wild type drosophila (male) and vestigial, sepia eyes (female) drosophila was used for mating. 2. 10 male Drosophila and 10 female Drosophila are shifted into the bottle which contains new medium/ substrate and the bottle is closed with the cotton. The rest is killed and the traits are observed.
  • 12. 3. After a few days, the Drosophila will mate and finally the female Drosophila will lay eggs which then will hatch. At this moment, all the parental Drosophila has to be discarded to prevent mixed-up with the F2 generation. 4. The experiment is repeated by using wild type (female) and vestigial, sepia eyes (male). ANALYSIS OF F2 GENERATION 1. By using the ether/ Flynap, the F2 Drosophila is killed and is put on the filter paper. 2. The total number of every F2 phenotype is counted. From the dihybrid crosses, there are FOUR phenotypes.The distribution of the F2 phenotypes is tested by using X2. 4. By using the appropriate symbols a diagram which shows the genotypes in each cross, from the parental stage to the F2 stage is draw. Procedures for X-linked 1. To determine sex-linked traits, backcross protocol can be used. 2. Wild type female will be crossed with white eye male and wild type male will be crossed with white eye female to produce F1 progeny. 3. Then F1 progeny is crossed each other to produce F2. 4. The F2 has been analysed and X2 test has been conducted.
  • 13. Results Monohybrid Crosses Figure 1 : Scarlet Drosophilla melanogaster Figure 2: Red eye Drosophila melanogaster The crosses between wild type (male) × scarlet eyes (female) St+ is dominant allele for wild type st is recessive allele for scarlet eyes male normal eye (wild type) female Scarlet eye Parent st+st+ × stst st+ st Gamete
  • 14. F1 st+st All wild-type F1 × F1 st+st × st+st Gamete st+ st st+ st F2 st+st+ st+st st+st stst Ratio 3: 1 wild-type : scarlet-eye To test Mendel’s Law of Segregation, we examined the inheritance of eye color by crossing two pure breeding strains of Drosophila melanogaster that is wild type and scarlet eyes. We determined which allele is dominant by setting up the cross st+st+ males × stst females as described above. The phenotypes of the progeny are shown below. Phenotypes Number of progeny Males Females Total Wild type 13 23 36 Scarlet eyes 0 0 0
  • 15. The further whether eye color was inherited according to Mendelian laws, we crossed the F1 progeny and examined the phenotypes of the resulting F2 flies. Phenotypes Number of progeny Males Females Total Wild type 27 38 65 Scarlet eyes 7 12 19 84 To determine the statistical relevance of the data, we performed the Chi square test on our F2 data. Class Observed Expected (O-E)2 (O-E)2/ Expected Wild type 65 63 ( 65-63)2 4/ 63 =4 =0.06 Scarlet eyes 19 21 ( 19-21)2 4/21 =4 =0.19 Totals 84 84 X2 = 0.25 The degree of freedom, df = n-1 (n= total number of categories) = 2-1 =1 From the Chi square table, p = 0.5 Since the p value is greater than 0.05, it can be concluded that it is not possible to reject the null hypothesis on the basis of this experiment. The crosses between wild type (female) × scarlet eyes (male) St+is dominant allele for wild type st is recessive allele for scarlet eyes female normal eye (wild-type) male scarlet eye Parent st+st+ × stst st+ st Gamete
  • 16. F1 st+st All wild-type F1 × F1 st+st × st+st Gamete st+ st st+ st F2 st+st+ st+st st+st stst Ratio 3: 1 wild-type : scarlet-eyed To test Mendel’s Law of Segregation, we examined the inheritance of eye color by crossing two pure breeding strains of Drosophila melanogaster that is wild type and scarlet eyes. We determined which allele is dominant by setting up the cross st+st+ males × stst females as described above. The phenotypes of the progeny are shown below.
  • 17. Phenotypes Number of progeny Males Females Total Wild type 13 23 36 Scarlet eyes 0 0 0 The further whether eye color was inherited according to Mendelian laws, we crossed the F1 progeny and examined the phenotypes of the resulting F2 flies. Phenotypes Number of progeny Males Females Total Wild type 21 32 53 Scarlet eyes 6 9 15 68 To determine the statistical relevance of the data, we performed the Chi square test on our F2 data. Class Observed Expected (O-E)2 (O-E)2/ Expected 2 Wild type 53 51 (53 – 51) 4/51 =4 = 0.08 Scarlet eyes 15 17 (15 – 17)2 4/17 =4 = 0.24 Totals 68 68 X2 = 0.32 The degree of freedom, df = n-1 (n= total number of categories) = 2-1 =1 From the Chi square table, p = 0.5 Since the p value is greater than 0.05, it can be concluded that it is not possible to reject the null hypothesis on the basis of this experiment. DISCUSSION The results of the parental cross ( st+st+ males × stst females) demonstrate that the wild type allele (st+) is dominant allele for scarlet eyes (st) as no scarlet-eyed progeny were seen in the F1 progeny. Calculations from the F2 data show that the ratio of normal eye (wild-type) to scarlet eyed flies is 3.42:1. Although this ratio is very close to the expected 3:1 ratio for a monohybrid cross, the Chi square test performed to determine whether this experimental data differed significantly from the 3:1 ratio expected for simple monohybrid cross. The results of the Chi square test suggest that the experimental data do not differ significantly from the expected 3:1 ratio. Specifically, there is between 50% and 90% probability that differences seen due
  • 18. to chance. In this case, the differences seen are probably due to the small sample size scored from the cross. The result of the parental cross ( st+st+ females x stst male ) show the same result parental cross ( st+st+ males × stst females) CONCLUSION In conclusion, the phenotype of the F1 progeny confirmed that the allele for wild type scarlet eyes, st+ is dominant to the allele for scarlet eyes, st. The ratio of normal-eyed (wild-type) to scarlet-eyed flies of 3.42:1 seen in the F2 is very near that of the expected 3:1 ratio for a monohybrid cross, and the Chi square test verifies that it is within statistical limits. Therefore, the results of this experiment confirm Mendel’s Law of Segregation. The result of the parental cross ( st+st+ females x stst male ) show the same result parental cross ( st+st+ males × stst females) because scarlet eye does not located on sex chromosome. Dihybrid Crosses Dihybrid crosses involve manipulation and analysis of two traits controlled by pairs of alleles at different loci. In this experiment, we cross wild type with vestigial wing, sepia eyes e is recessive allele for sepia eyes e+ is dominant allele for wild-type eyes vg is recessive allele for vestigial wing shape vg+ is dominant allele for wild-type wing shape
  • 19. Vestigial, sepia female Vestigial sepia male Vestigial male vestigial female The cross between wild type male and vestigial, sepia female Wild type male vestigial, sepia female Parent e+e+ vg+vg+ × ee vgvg Gamete e+ e vg vg+ F1 e+e vg+vg All wild-type F1 × F1 e+e vg+vg × e+e vg+vg e+vg+ e+vg evg+ ev e+vg+ e+vg evg+ ev g g F2 is cross using Punnett square e+ vg+ e+ vg e vg+ e vg + + e vg e+e+ vg+vg+ e+e+ vg+vg e+e vg+vg+ + + e e vg vg e+ vg e+e+ vg+vg e+e+ vgvg e+e vg+vg e+e vgvg e vg+ e+e vg+vg+ e+e vg+vg ee vg+vg+ ee vg+vg e vg e+e vg+vg e+e vgvg ee vg+vg ee vgvg F2 Phenotype ratio: 9 wild-type: 3 sepia: 3 vestigial: 1 sepia vestigial In a dihybrid cross, each of the F1 parents can produce four different gamete types, so there are 16 (= 4 x 4) possible offspring combinations. Because the two traits show complete dominance and separate independently of each other (Law of Independent Assortment), the
  • 20. expected genotypic and phenotypic ratios from an analysis of these 16 possibilities can be calculated. To test Mendel’s Law of Independent Assortment, we examined the inheritance of eyes colour and wing shape by crossing two pure breeding strains of Drosophila melanogaster that is wild-type and vestigial, sepia. We determined which allele is dominant by setting up the cross e+e+ vg+vg+ males × ee vgvg females as described above. The phenotypes of the progeny are shown below. Phenotypes Number of progeny Males Females Total Wild type 9 13 22 Vestigial, sepia 0 0 0 The further whether eyes colour and wing shape was inherited according to Mendelian laws, we crossed the F1 progeny and examined the phenotypes of the resulting F2 flies. Phenotypes Number of progeny Males Females Total wild type 23 34 57 sepia 5 9 14 vestigial 4 7 11 sepia, vestigial 2 4 6 88 To determine the statistical relevance of the data, we performed the Chi square test on our F2 data. Class Observed Expected (O-E)2 (O-E)2/ Expected wild type 57 9/16 × 88 (57 - 50)2 49/50 = 50 = 49 = 0.98 sepia 14 3/16 × 88 (14- 16)2 4/16 = 16 =4 = 0.25 vestigial 11 3/16 × 88 (11 – 16)2 25/16 = 16 = 25 = 1.56 sepia, vestigial 6 1/16 × 88 (9 – 6)2 9/6 =6 =9 = 1.50 Totals 88 88 X2 = 4.29
  • 21. The degree of freedom, df = n-1 (n= total number of categories) = 4-1 =3 From the chi square table, p = 0.1 Since the p value is greater than 0.05, it can be concluded that it is not possible to reject the null hypothesis on the basis of this experiment. The cross between wild type female and vestigial, sepia male Wild type female vestigial, sepia male Parent e+e+ vg+vg+ × ee vgvg Gamete e+ e vg vg+ F1 e+e vg+vg All wild-type F1 × F1 e+e vg+vg × e+e vg+vg e+vg+ e+vg evg+ ev e+vg+ e+vg evg+ ev g g F2 is cross using Punnett square e+ vg+ e+ vg e vg+ e vg + + e vg e e vg+vg+ + + e e vg+vg + + e e vg+vg+ + e+e vg+vg
  • 22. e+ vg e+e+ vg+vg e+e+ vgvg e+e vg+vg e+e vgvg e vg+ e+e vg+vg+ e+e vg+vg ee vg+vg+ ee vg+vg e vg e+e vg+vg e+e vgvg ee vg+vg ee vgvg F2 Phenotype ratio: 9 wild-type: 3 sepia: 3 vestigial: 1 sepia vestigial In a dihybrid cross, each of the F1 parents can produce four different gamete types, so there are 16 (= 4 x 4) possible offspring combinations. Because the two traits show complete dominance and separate independently of each other (Law of Independent Assortment), the expected genotypic and phenotypic ratios from an analysis of these 16 possibilities can be calculated. To test Mendel’s Law of Independent Assortment, we examined the inheritance of eyes colour and wing shape by crossing two pure breeding strains of Drosophila melanogaster that is wild-type and vestigial, sepia. We determined which allele is dominant by setting up the cross e+e+ vg+vg+ males × ee vgvg females as described above. The phenotypes of the progeny are shown below. Phenotypes Number of progeny Males Females Total Wild type 13 21 34 Vestigial, sepia 0 0 0 The further whether eyes colour and wing shape was inherited according to Mendelian laws, we crossed the F1 progeny and examined the phenotypes of the resulting F2 flies. Phenotypes Number of progeny Males Females Total wild type 23 33 56 sepia 6 9 15 vestigial 6 10 16 sepia, vestigial 2 4 6 93 To determine the statistical relevance of the data, we performed the Chi square test on our F2 data. Class Observed Expected (O-E)2 (O-E)2/ Expected wild type 56 9/16 × 93 (56 - 53)2 9/53 = 53 =9 = 0.17 sepia 15 3/16 × 93 (14- 17)2 9/17
  • 23. = 17 =9 = 0.53 Vestigial 16 3/16 × 93 (16 – 17)2 1/17 = 17 =1 = 0.06 sepia, vestigial 6 1/16 × 93 (6 – 6)2 0/6 =6 =0 =0 Totals 93 93 X2 = 0.76 The degree of freedom, df = n-1 (n= total number of categories) = 4-1 =3 From the chi square table, p = 0.95 Since the p value is greater than 0.05, it can be concluded that it is not possible to reject the null hypothesis on the basis of this experiment. DISCUSSION The results of the parental cross ( e+e+ vg+vg+ males × ee vgvg females) demonstrate that the wild type allele (e+e+ vg+vg+) is dominant allele for sepia, vestigial alleles (ee vgvg) as only wild-type progeny were seen in the F1 progeny. Calculations from the F2 data show that the ratio of wild-type to sepia to vestigial and to sepia, vestigial flies is 9.5:2.3:1.8:1. Although this ratio is close to the expected 9:3:3:1 ratio for a dihybrid cross, the Chi square test performed to determine whether this experimental data differed significantly from the 9:3:3:1 ratio expected for simple dihybrid cross. The results of the Chi square test suggest that the experimental data do not differ significantly from the expected 9:3:3:1 ratio. Specifically, there is between 10% and 50% probability that differences seen due to chance. In this case, the differences seen are probably due to the small sample size scored from the cross. CONCLUSION In conclusion, the phenotype of the F1 progeny confirmed that the allele for wild type, e +e+ vg+vg+ is dominant to the allele for sepia, vestigial, ee vgvg. The ratio of wild type to sepia to vestigial and to sepia, vestigial of 9.5:2.3:1.8:1 seen in the F2 is very near that of the expected 9:3:3:1 ratio for a dihybrid cross, and the Chi square test verifies that it is within statistical limits. Therefore, the results of this experiment confirm Mendel’s Law of Independent Assortment. The result of the parental cross between wild type male and vestigial, sepia female show the same result parental cross between wild type female and
  • 24. vestigial, sepia male because vestigial wing and sepia eyes does not located on sex chromosome. Sex linked Traits In sex-linked inheritance, alleles on sex chromosomes are inherited in predictable patterns. In Drosophila the locus for eye color is located on the X chromosome. The allele for red eye color, which is normal in wild flies, is dominant to the mutant allele for white eyes. In the left hand example, homozygous red eyed females (RR) mate with homozygous white eyed males (w-). In the offspring, all the daughters are red eyed heterozygotes (Rr) and all sons are red eyed homozygotes (R-). In the right hand, homozygous white eyed females (rr) mate with homozygous red eyed males (R-). In the offspring, all the daughters are red eyed heterozygotes (Rr) and all sons are white eyed homozygotes (r-). Females have two chromosomes X (with a locus for eye color), they might be homozygous or heterozygous for either allele. Males, carry only one X chromosome, are always hemizygous. They carry only the one X chromosome inherited from their mother, and it determines their eye color. The first cross is between normal female with red eyes and the mutant male with white eyes. The first cross is to determine whether the white or red eyes were dominant. The F1
  • 25. generation all had red eyes. So we can conclude that red eyes are dominant over white. Then, F1 generations are crossed each other to give F2 progenies. From the result of the experiment, only male Drosophila shows white eyes. X-linked inherited diseases occur far more frequently in males because they only have one X chromosome. Females must receive a copy of the gene from both parents to have such a recessive disease. However, they will still be carriers if they receive one copy of the gene. Cross between red eye (wild type) female X white eye male B+ Dominant allele codes for red eye B Recessive allele codes for white-eye Parental: Red eye (female) X white eye (male) Genotype: XB+ XB+ X XB Y XB XB XB Y Gamete: + + F1: XB+XB XB+Y XB+XB XB+Y (all red eyes) F1 X F1: XB+XB X XB+Y XB XB XB Y Gamete: + + F2: XB+XB+ XB+Y XB+XB XBY Phenotypic ratio: 2 red eyes female : 1 red eye male : 1 white-eye male
  • 26. . Cross between white-eye female x wild type male B+ Dominant allele codes for red eye type (wild type) B Recessive allele codes for white-eye Parental: white-eye (female) X Red eye (male) Genotype: XB XB X XB+ Y Gamete: XB XB XB Y + F1: XB+XB XBY XB+XB XBY Phenotypic ratio: 2 red eyes type female : 2 white-eyes male F1 X F1: XB+XB X XBY XB XB XB Y Gamete: + F2: XB+XB XB+Y XBXB XBY Phenotypic ratio: 1 red eye female : 1 red eye male : 1 white-eye female : 1 white-eye male
  • 27. RESULT The female with red eyes will be crossed with white-eyed male to produce F1 progeny. Then, this F1 were crossed each other R is dominant allele for wild type eyes (red eyes) w is recessive allele for white eyes The phenotype of F1 progeny is: Phenotypes Number of progeny Males Females Total Wild type 8 9 17 White eyes 0 0 0 The phenotype of F2 progeny is: Phenotypes Number of progeny Males Females Total Wild type 14 33 47 White eyes 16 0 16 Class Observed Expected (O-E)2 (O-E)2/ Expected wild type male 14 1/4 × 63 (14-16)2 4/16 = 16 =4 = 0.25 Wild type 33 2/4 × 63 (33-31)2 4/31 female = 31 =4 = 0.13 White eyes 16 1/4 × 63 (16-16)2 0/16 male = 16 =0 =0 White eyes 0 0/4 × 62 (0 – 6)2 36/6 female =6 = 36 =6 Totals 63 63 X2 = 6.38 Interpretation with the chi square value
  • 28. df = 3 With df = 3, the chi square value of 6.38 is slightly greater than 4.642 (which correspond to P > 0.20). Therefore P = 0.20 show that expected to occur are 20% of the time. 80% error occurred. Hypothesis accepted. The male with red eyes will be crossed with white-eyed female to produce F1 progeny. Then, this F1 were crossed each other R is dominant allele for wild type eyes (red eyes) w is recessive allele for white eyes The phenotype of F1 progeny is: Phenotypes Number of progeny Males Females Total Wild type 0 13 13 White eyes 15 0 15 The phenotype of F2 progeny is: Phenotypes Number of progeny Males Females Total Wild type 14 15 29 White eyes 13 14 27 Class Observed Expected (O-E)2 (O-E)2/ Expected wild type male 14 1/4 × 56 (14-14)2 0/14 = 14 =0 =0 Wild type 15 1/4 × 56 (15- 14)2 1/14 female = 14 =1 = 0.07 White eyes 13 1/4 × 56 (13-14)2 1/14 male = 14 =1 = 0.07 White eyes 14 1/4 × 56 (14-14)2 0/14
  • 29. female = 14 =0 =0 Totals 29 29 X2 = 0.14 Interpretation with the chi square value df = 3 With df = 10, the chi square value of 0.14 is slightly greater than 0.115 (which correspond to P > 0.99). Therefore P = 0.99 show that expected to occur are 99% of the time. 1% error occurred. Hypothesis accepted. Discussion From the result of the experiment, in first cross only male Drosophila shows white eyes. X- linked inherited diseases occur far more frequently in males because they only have one X chromosome. Females must receive a copy of the gene from both parents to have such a recessive disease. However, they will still be carriers if they receive one copy of the gene. From the results that obtain theoretically in cross 1, it is proven according to the Morgan (1910) that the gene for white eyes in Drosophila is located on the X chromosome and not the Y chromosome. This can be shown from the cross where wild type female is cross with white eye male and the result shows that 2:1:1 ratio in F 2 offspring. The white eye type is inherited in male because male has only one X chromosome which means that the male phenotype is not reflective of a dominant or recessive trait, but it reflects only the sex chromosomes that the male fly carries. This state of male genotype which has only one X chromosome is termed as hemizygous. As from cross 2, female flies carry the mutant gene. When it is crossed with normal male, ratio of 1:1:1:1 can be seen in the F2 offsprings. This is because all possible combinations of white eye and sex are possible and the white eye trait can be carried over to female when F1 females are crossed with white eye male. Conclusion From this experiment, we learn on how to conduct a genetic experiment which spans of generation. We also learn on how to design genetic crosses to illustrate segregation, independent assortment and sex-linkage. There are four stages of Drosophila melanogaster life cycles that are egg, larva, pupa, and adult. From study of its life cycle, we are able to perform this experiment. We can differentiate the male and female of Drosophila melanogaster based on several characteristic such as size of adult, shape of abdomen,
  • 30. markings on abdomen, appearance of sex comb external genitilia on abdomen and sex organ during larval stage. This making easier for us to differentiate them especially in the experiment about sex-linkage. What is more important is we are able to recognize wild-type flies and those with classic mutations. To test the result that we obtained, we use the Chi square statistic to test hypotheses concerning expected and observed ratios. If the p value is less than 0.005, so the hypothesis can be rejected. References Paul Arnold (2009). Human Genetics and the Fruit Fly Drosophila Melanogaster. Retrieved March 29, 2010, from http://www.biol.org/DrosPics.htm#Misc Christin E. Arnini (1996). Using Drosophila to Teach Genetics. Retrieved March 29, 2010,http://www.google.com.my/search? hlen&qdrosophila+melanogaster+phenotypes&revid. Basic Genetics: Thomas Hunt Morgan and Sex-linked Traits. Retrieved April 6, 2010 from http://library.thinkquest.org/20465/sexlinked.html Miko, I. (2008) Thomas Hunt Morgan and sex linkage. Nature Education 1(1). Retrieved April 6, 2010 from http://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/Thomas-Hunt-Morgan- and-Sex-Linkage-452#TB_inline?height=300&width=400&inlineId=trOutLine Retrieve on 8 April 2010 at http://www.mun.ca/biology/dinnes/B2250/DrosophilaGenetics.PDF Retrieved on 8 April 2010 at http://www.dreamessays.com/customessays/Science %20Research%20Papers/11452.htm