SlideShare a Scribd company logo
My storybook of Jury cases
By Eleanor Walker
Bushells Case
• The jury refused to convict the defendants so were imprisoned by the
judges. The judge said “you shall not be dismissed until we have a verdict
that the court will accept”. The jurors were locked up without meat, drink,
fire or tobacco in a prison cell until the paid a fine.
• This case is important because what came out of it was the reminder of
juries being ‘the sole arbiter of fact’.
R v Ponting 1985
• Clive Ponting sent confidential documents about the sinking of a ship to a
labour backbencher. He was definitely guilty but the jury acquitted him
arguing that his prosecution was politically inspired.
• Point of law: Jury equity- advantage questions.
R v Owen 1992
• The defendants son had been killed by a careless driver and was sent to
prison for 12 months. This did not appease his anger so he went to the
defendants house after he was out of prison and fired at him with a
shotgun, wounding him.
• The defendant was acquitted as the jury shared his feelings of outrage
• Point of law: juries can create perverse decisions and still get away with it-
disadvantage questions.
R v Kronlid 1996
• 3 women broke onto a plane and caused £1.5 million worth of damage, the
women did leave a video explaining their actions though.
• Their case got acquitted because the jury believed they did it for right reasons-
stopping the plane from arriving in East Timor to attack the survivors.
• Point of law: jury equity.
R v Rayment and others
• Evidence was given over a course of 5 months due to recurring illness and
commitments with the jury.
• Too much time between the giving of evidence made the jurors decision
less accurate so the trial is unfair.
• Point of law: too much time (disadvantages questions)
Brinks Mat Trial
• Robbers stole gold bullion ( £26 million worth of gold, diamonds and cash).
They poured petrol over staff and threatened them with a lit match if they
did not reveal the combination numbers of the vault.
• They got sentenced to 25 years imprisonment for armed robbery and one
defendant, Noye, was fined £500,000 plus £200,000 costs.
• Point of law:
R v Green 2007
• After shooting his father he was sentenced to 9 years imprisonment
charged with manslaughter.
• He appealed against his sentence stating it was out of line for offences of
domestic violence in which the victim is seen to have been subjected to.
• The court decided the sentence was appropriate to 5 or 6 years .His
sentence was reduced considerably.
• Point of law:
R v West
• Guilty rosemary west murdered 10 young girls and she appealed arguing
that the media influenced her case. The judge dismissed her appeal
stating even if she had a brand new case she would still be ruled guilty as
the allegations of murder were sufficiently horrendous.
• Point of law: media influence (disadvantage questions).

More Related Content

What's hot

Criminal Trial Process
Criminal Trial ProcessCriminal Trial Process
Criminal Trial ProcessMr Shipp
 
Actus reus
Actus reusActus reus
Actus reus
Kirsty Allison
 
Civil Family Law - Promise to Marry (Betrothal)
Civil Family Law - Promise to Marry (Betrothal)Civil Family Law - Promise to Marry (Betrothal)
Civil Family Law - Promise to Marry (Betrothal)
Azrin Hafiz
 
Legal Memorandum
Legal MemorandumLegal Memorandum
Legal MemorandumDean Goff
 
Resulting trust (short notes)
Resulting trust (short notes)Resulting trust (short notes)
Resulting trust (short notes)
Ikram Abdul Sattar
 
Criminal law notes - Trifles, accident and duress
Criminal law notes - Trifles, accident and duressCriminal law notes - Trifles, accident and duress
Criminal law notes - Trifles, accident and duress
surrenderyourthrone
 
Topic 10_Maintenance of Wife and Children under Civil Law.pptx
Topic 10_Maintenance of Wife and Children under Civil Law.pptxTopic 10_Maintenance of Wife and Children under Civil Law.pptx
Topic 10_Maintenance of Wife and Children under Civil Law.pptx
TanHockXiang
 
Legal Memorandum Khan vs. Randall
Legal Memorandum Khan vs. RandallLegal Memorandum Khan vs. Randall
Legal Memorandum Khan vs. RandallNicole Williams
 
Similar facts evidence-Civil cases
Similar facts evidence-Civil casesSimilar facts evidence-Civil cases
Similar facts evidence-Civil cases
INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA
 
Lecture on duress copy
Lecture on duress   copyLecture on duress   copy
Lecture on duress copyshummi
 
Zainur Zakaria v Public Prosecutor
Zainur Zakaria v Public ProsecutorZainur Zakaria v Public Prosecutor
Zainur Zakaria v Public Prosecutor
surrenderyourthrone
 
FAMILY LAW - NULLITY OF MARRIAGE
FAMILY LAW - NULLITY OF MARRIAGEFAMILY LAW - NULLITY OF MARRIAGE
FAMILY LAW - NULLITY OF MARRIAGE
Insyirah Mohamad Noh
 
Bail under CPC Malaysia (2017/2018)
Bail under CPC Malaysia (2017/2018)Bail under CPC Malaysia (2017/2018)
Bail under CPC Malaysia (2017/2018)
Intan Muhammad
 
Rights of An Accused Person in Malaysia
Rights of An Accused Person in MalaysiaRights of An Accused Person in Malaysia
Rights of An Accused Person in Malaysia
 Selvakumar Balakrishnan
 
Page v Smith [1995]
Page v Smith [1995]Page v Smith [1995]
Page v Smith [1995]
Amalia Sulaiman
 
ADMISSIBILITY OF BAD CHARACTER LAW IN UNITED KINGDOM
ADMISSIBILITY OF BAD CHARACTER LAW IN UNITED KINGDOMADMISSIBILITY OF BAD CHARACTER LAW IN UNITED KINGDOM
ADMISSIBILITY OF BAD CHARACTER LAW IN UNITED KINGDOM
ASMAH CHE WAN
 
EVIDENCE LAW 1(12) judicial notice (pengiktirafan penghakiman)
EVIDENCE LAW 1(12) judicial notice (pengiktirafan penghakiman)EVIDENCE LAW 1(12) judicial notice (pengiktirafan penghakiman)
EVIDENCE LAW 1(12) judicial notice (pengiktirafan penghakiman)
Hafizul Mukhlis
 
Pathmanaban Nalliannen v PP & Other Appeals
Pathmanaban Nalliannen v PP & Other AppealsPathmanaban Nalliannen v PP & Other Appeals
Pathmanaban Nalliannen v PP & Other Appeals
Studious Season
 
(1) evidence (overview)
(1) evidence (overview)(1) evidence (overview)
(1) evidence (overview)
Hafizul Mukhlis
 
Secret trust (short notes)
Secret trust (short notes)Secret trust (short notes)
Secret trust (short notes)
Ikram Abdul Sattar
 

What's hot (20)

Criminal Trial Process
Criminal Trial ProcessCriminal Trial Process
Criminal Trial Process
 
Actus reus
Actus reusActus reus
Actus reus
 
Civil Family Law - Promise to Marry (Betrothal)
Civil Family Law - Promise to Marry (Betrothal)Civil Family Law - Promise to Marry (Betrothal)
Civil Family Law - Promise to Marry (Betrothal)
 
Legal Memorandum
Legal MemorandumLegal Memorandum
Legal Memorandum
 
Resulting trust (short notes)
Resulting trust (short notes)Resulting trust (short notes)
Resulting trust (short notes)
 
Criminal law notes - Trifles, accident and duress
Criminal law notes - Trifles, accident and duressCriminal law notes - Trifles, accident and duress
Criminal law notes - Trifles, accident and duress
 
Topic 10_Maintenance of Wife and Children under Civil Law.pptx
Topic 10_Maintenance of Wife and Children under Civil Law.pptxTopic 10_Maintenance of Wife and Children under Civil Law.pptx
Topic 10_Maintenance of Wife and Children under Civil Law.pptx
 
Legal Memorandum Khan vs. Randall
Legal Memorandum Khan vs. RandallLegal Memorandum Khan vs. Randall
Legal Memorandum Khan vs. Randall
 
Similar facts evidence-Civil cases
Similar facts evidence-Civil casesSimilar facts evidence-Civil cases
Similar facts evidence-Civil cases
 
Lecture on duress copy
Lecture on duress   copyLecture on duress   copy
Lecture on duress copy
 
Zainur Zakaria v Public Prosecutor
Zainur Zakaria v Public ProsecutorZainur Zakaria v Public Prosecutor
Zainur Zakaria v Public Prosecutor
 
FAMILY LAW - NULLITY OF MARRIAGE
FAMILY LAW - NULLITY OF MARRIAGEFAMILY LAW - NULLITY OF MARRIAGE
FAMILY LAW - NULLITY OF MARRIAGE
 
Bail under CPC Malaysia (2017/2018)
Bail under CPC Malaysia (2017/2018)Bail under CPC Malaysia (2017/2018)
Bail under CPC Malaysia (2017/2018)
 
Rights of An Accused Person in Malaysia
Rights of An Accused Person in MalaysiaRights of An Accused Person in Malaysia
Rights of An Accused Person in Malaysia
 
Page v Smith [1995]
Page v Smith [1995]Page v Smith [1995]
Page v Smith [1995]
 
ADMISSIBILITY OF BAD CHARACTER LAW IN UNITED KINGDOM
ADMISSIBILITY OF BAD CHARACTER LAW IN UNITED KINGDOMADMISSIBILITY OF BAD CHARACTER LAW IN UNITED KINGDOM
ADMISSIBILITY OF BAD CHARACTER LAW IN UNITED KINGDOM
 
EVIDENCE LAW 1(12) judicial notice (pengiktirafan penghakiman)
EVIDENCE LAW 1(12) judicial notice (pengiktirafan penghakiman)EVIDENCE LAW 1(12) judicial notice (pengiktirafan penghakiman)
EVIDENCE LAW 1(12) judicial notice (pengiktirafan penghakiman)
 
Pathmanaban Nalliannen v PP & Other Appeals
Pathmanaban Nalliannen v PP & Other AppealsPathmanaban Nalliannen v PP & Other Appeals
Pathmanaban Nalliannen v PP & Other Appeals
 
(1) evidence (overview)
(1) evidence (overview)(1) evidence (overview)
(1) evidence (overview)
 
Secret trust (short notes)
Secret trust (short notes)Secret trust (short notes)
Secret trust (short notes)
 

Similar to Jury cases

Unit 3.5 the medieval crime and punishment
Unit 3.5 the medieval crime and punishmentUnit 3.5 the medieval crime and punishment
Unit 3.5 the medieval crime and punishment
Wan Farida Hamimi
 
Social care claims club, March 2017, Exeter
Social care claims club, March 2017, ExeterSocial care claims club, March 2017, Exeter
Social care claims club, March 2017, Exeter
Browne Jacobson LLP
 
Social care claims club, February 2017, Birmingham
Social care claims club, February 2017, BirminghamSocial care claims club, February 2017, Birmingham
Social care claims club, February 2017, Birmingham
Browne Jacobson LLP
 
negligence.pptx
negligence.pptxnegligence.pptx
negligence.pptx
Zaina59
 
5. Consideration.pptx
5. Consideration.pptx5. Consideration.pptx
5. Consideration.pptx
AlizaIshra
 
Criminal Lawyer in Vancouver
Criminal Lawyer in VancouverCriminal Lawyer in Vancouver
Criminal Lawyer in Vancouver
kontoulawbc
 
Social care claims club, March 2017, Nottingham
Social care claims club, March 2017, NottinghamSocial care claims club, March 2017, Nottingham
Social care claims club, March 2017, Nottingham
Browne Jacobson LLP
 
Social care claims club, February 2017, London
Social care claims club, February 2017, LondonSocial care claims club, February 2017, London
Social care claims club, February 2017, London
Browne Jacobson LLP
 
Social care claims club, March 2017, Manchester
Social care claims club, March 2017, ManchesterSocial care claims club, March 2017, Manchester
Social care claims club, March 2017, Manchester
Browne Jacobson LLP
 

Similar to Jury cases (9)

Unit 3.5 the medieval crime and punishment
Unit 3.5 the medieval crime and punishmentUnit 3.5 the medieval crime and punishment
Unit 3.5 the medieval crime and punishment
 
Social care claims club, March 2017, Exeter
Social care claims club, March 2017, ExeterSocial care claims club, March 2017, Exeter
Social care claims club, March 2017, Exeter
 
Social care claims club, February 2017, Birmingham
Social care claims club, February 2017, BirminghamSocial care claims club, February 2017, Birmingham
Social care claims club, February 2017, Birmingham
 
negligence.pptx
negligence.pptxnegligence.pptx
negligence.pptx
 
5. Consideration.pptx
5. Consideration.pptx5. Consideration.pptx
5. Consideration.pptx
 
Criminal Lawyer in Vancouver
Criminal Lawyer in VancouverCriminal Lawyer in Vancouver
Criminal Lawyer in Vancouver
 
Social care claims club, March 2017, Nottingham
Social care claims club, March 2017, NottinghamSocial care claims club, March 2017, Nottingham
Social care claims club, March 2017, Nottingham
 
Social care claims club, February 2017, London
Social care claims club, February 2017, LondonSocial care claims club, February 2017, London
Social care claims club, February 2017, London
 
Social care claims club, March 2017, Manchester
Social care claims club, March 2017, ManchesterSocial care claims club, March 2017, Manchester
Social care claims club, March 2017, Manchester
 

Recently uploaded

XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdfXYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
bhavenpr
 
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
osenwakm
 
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point PresentationLifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
seri bangash
 
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Syed Muhammad Humza Hussain
 
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
CIkumparan
 
1比1制作(swansea毕业证书)英国斯旺西大学毕业证学位证书托业成绩单原版一模一样
1比1制作(swansea毕业证书)英国斯旺西大学毕业证学位证书托业成绩单原版一模一样1比1制作(swansea毕业证书)英国斯旺西大学毕业证学位证书托业成绩单原版一模一样
1比1制作(swansea毕业证书)英国斯旺西大学毕业证学位证书托业成绩单原版一模一样
9ib5wiwt
 
定制(nus毕业证书)新加坡国立大学毕业证学位证书实拍图原版一模一样
定制(nus毕业证书)新加坡国立大学毕业证学位证书实拍图原版一模一样定制(nus毕业证书)新加坡国立大学毕业证学位证书实拍图原版一模一样
定制(nus毕业证书)新加坡国立大学毕业证学位证书实拍图原版一模一样
9ib5wiwt
 
Understanding about ITR-1 and Documentation
Understanding about ITR-1 and DocumentationUnderstanding about ITR-1 and Documentation
Understanding about ITR-1 and Documentation
CAAJAYKUMAR4
 
办理(waikato毕业证书)新西兰怀卡托大学毕业证双学位证书原版一模一样
办理(waikato毕业证书)新西兰怀卡托大学毕业证双学位证书原版一模一样办理(waikato毕业证书)新西兰怀卡托大学毕业证双学位证书原版一模一样
办理(waikato毕业证书)新西兰怀卡托大学毕业证双学位证书原版一模一样
9ib5wiwt
 
Secure Your Brand: File a Trademark Today
Secure Your Brand: File a Trademark TodaySecure Your Brand: File a Trademark Today
Secure Your Brand: File a Trademark Today
Trademark Quick
 
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita power.pptx
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita power.pptxBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita power.pptx
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita power.pptx
ShivkumarIyer18
 
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
osenwakm
 
Daftar Rumpun, Pohon, dan Cabang Ilmu (28 Mei 2024).pdf
Daftar Rumpun, Pohon, dan Cabang Ilmu (28 Mei 2024).pdfDaftar Rumpun, Pohon, dan Cabang Ilmu (28 Mei 2024).pdf
Daftar Rumpun, Pohon, dan Cabang Ilmu (28 Mei 2024).pdf
akbarrasyid3
 
Business and Corporate Case Update (2024)
Business and Corporate Case Update (2024)Business and Corporate Case Update (2024)
Business and Corporate Case Update (2024)
Wendy Couture
 
Highlights_of_Bhartiya_Nyaya_Sanhita.pptx
Highlights_of_Bhartiya_Nyaya_Sanhita.pptxHighlights_of_Bhartiya_Nyaya_Sanhita.pptx
Highlights_of_Bhartiya_Nyaya_Sanhita.pptx
anjalidixit21
 
原版仿制(aut毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰理工大学毕业证文凭毕业证雅思成绩单原版一模一样
原版仿制(aut毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰理工大学毕业证文凭毕业证雅思成绩单原版一模一样原版仿制(aut毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰理工大学毕业证文凭毕业证雅思成绩单原版一模一样
原版仿制(aut毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰理工大学毕业证文凭毕业证雅思成绩单原版一模一样
9ib5wiwt
 
Rokita Releases Soccer Stadium Legal Opinion
Rokita Releases Soccer Stadium Legal OpinionRokita Releases Soccer Stadium Legal Opinion
Rokita Releases Soccer Stadium Legal Opinion
Abdul-Hakim Shabazz
 
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptxPatenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
ssuser559494
 
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMatthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
MattGardner52
 
Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem
Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th semTax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem
Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem
azizurrahaman17
 

Recently uploaded (20)

XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdfXYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
 
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
 
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point PresentationLifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
 
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
 
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
 
1比1制作(swansea毕业证书)英国斯旺西大学毕业证学位证书托业成绩单原版一模一样
1比1制作(swansea毕业证书)英国斯旺西大学毕业证学位证书托业成绩单原版一模一样1比1制作(swansea毕业证书)英国斯旺西大学毕业证学位证书托业成绩单原版一模一样
1比1制作(swansea毕业证书)英国斯旺西大学毕业证学位证书托业成绩单原版一模一样
 
定制(nus毕业证书)新加坡国立大学毕业证学位证书实拍图原版一模一样
定制(nus毕业证书)新加坡国立大学毕业证学位证书实拍图原版一模一样定制(nus毕业证书)新加坡国立大学毕业证学位证书实拍图原版一模一样
定制(nus毕业证书)新加坡国立大学毕业证学位证书实拍图原版一模一样
 
Understanding about ITR-1 and Documentation
Understanding about ITR-1 and DocumentationUnderstanding about ITR-1 and Documentation
Understanding about ITR-1 and Documentation
 
办理(waikato毕业证书)新西兰怀卡托大学毕业证双学位证书原版一模一样
办理(waikato毕业证书)新西兰怀卡托大学毕业证双学位证书原版一模一样办理(waikato毕业证书)新西兰怀卡托大学毕业证双学位证书原版一模一样
办理(waikato毕业证书)新西兰怀卡托大学毕业证双学位证书原版一模一样
 
Secure Your Brand: File a Trademark Today
Secure Your Brand: File a Trademark TodaySecure Your Brand: File a Trademark Today
Secure Your Brand: File a Trademark Today
 
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita power.pptx
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita power.pptxBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita power.pptx
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita power.pptx
 
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
 
Daftar Rumpun, Pohon, dan Cabang Ilmu (28 Mei 2024).pdf
Daftar Rumpun, Pohon, dan Cabang Ilmu (28 Mei 2024).pdfDaftar Rumpun, Pohon, dan Cabang Ilmu (28 Mei 2024).pdf
Daftar Rumpun, Pohon, dan Cabang Ilmu (28 Mei 2024).pdf
 
Business and Corporate Case Update (2024)
Business and Corporate Case Update (2024)Business and Corporate Case Update (2024)
Business and Corporate Case Update (2024)
 
Highlights_of_Bhartiya_Nyaya_Sanhita.pptx
Highlights_of_Bhartiya_Nyaya_Sanhita.pptxHighlights_of_Bhartiya_Nyaya_Sanhita.pptx
Highlights_of_Bhartiya_Nyaya_Sanhita.pptx
 
原版仿制(aut毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰理工大学毕业证文凭毕业证雅思成绩单原版一模一样
原版仿制(aut毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰理工大学毕业证文凭毕业证雅思成绩单原版一模一样原版仿制(aut毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰理工大学毕业证文凭毕业证雅思成绩单原版一模一样
原版仿制(aut毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰理工大学毕业证文凭毕业证雅思成绩单原版一模一样
 
Rokita Releases Soccer Stadium Legal Opinion
Rokita Releases Soccer Stadium Legal OpinionRokita Releases Soccer Stadium Legal Opinion
Rokita Releases Soccer Stadium Legal Opinion
 
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptxPatenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
 
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMatthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
 
Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem
Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th semTax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem
Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem
 

Jury cases

  • 1. My storybook of Jury cases By Eleanor Walker
  • 2. Bushells Case • The jury refused to convict the defendants so were imprisoned by the judges. The judge said “you shall not be dismissed until we have a verdict that the court will accept”. The jurors were locked up without meat, drink, fire or tobacco in a prison cell until the paid a fine. • This case is important because what came out of it was the reminder of juries being ‘the sole arbiter of fact’.
  • 3. R v Ponting 1985 • Clive Ponting sent confidential documents about the sinking of a ship to a labour backbencher. He was definitely guilty but the jury acquitted him arguing that his prosecution was politically inspired. • Point of law: Jury equity- advantage questions.
  • 4. R v Owen 1992 • The defendants son had been killed by a careless driver and was sent to prison for 12 months. This did not appease his anger so he went to the defendants house after he was out of prison and fired at him with a shotgun, wounding him. • The defendant was acquitted as the jury shared his feelings of outrage • Point of law: juries can create perverse decisions and still get away with it- disadvantage questions.
  • 5. R v Kronlid 1996 • 3 women broke onto a plane and caused £1.5 million worth of damage, the women did leave a video explaining their actions though. • Their case got acquitted because the jury believed they did it for right reasons- stopping the plane from arriving in East Timor to attack the survivors. • Point of law: jury equity.
  • 6. R v Rayment and others • Evidence was given over a course of 5 months due to recurring illness and commitments with the jury. • Too much time between the giving of evidence made the jurors decision less accurate so the trial is unfair. • Point of law: too much time (disadvantages questions)
  • 7. Brinks Mat Trial • Robbers stole gold bullion ( £26 million worth of gold, diamonds and cash). They poured petrol over staff and threatened them with a lit match if they did not reveal the combination numbers of the vault. • They got sentenced to 25 years imprisonment for armed robbery and one defendant, Noye, was fined £500,000 plus £200,000 costs. • Point of law:
  • 8. R v Green 2007 • After shooting his father he was sentenced to 9 years imprisonment charged with manslaughter. • He appealed against his sentence stating it was out of line for offences of domestic violence in which the victim is seen to have been subjected to. • The court decided the sentence was appropriate to 5 or 6 years .His sentence was reduced considerably. • Point of law:
  • 9. R v West • Guilty rosemary west murdered 10 young girls and she appealed arguing that the media influenced her case. The judge dismissed her appeal stating even if she had a brand new case she would still be ruled guilty as the allegations of murder were sufficiently horrendous. • Point of law: media influence (disadvantage questions).