Unit 1 of AQA Law GCE requires you to know the advantages and disadvantages of the jury system. These jury cases will help show your knowledge and bump your grade.
Al Bakhtiar bin Ab Samat v Public Prosecutor [2012] 4 MLJ 713
Evidence -- Similar fact evidence -- Admission of -- First charge was for possession of 30.40g of cannabis and second charge for trafficking dangerous drugs -- Whether any similarity in respect of both charges -Whether trial judge misdirected himself when acted on evidence of first charge to prove knowledge of trafficking charge -- Principles relating to similar fact evidence -- Evidence Act 1950 ss 14 & 15
Arrest, Summon and Warrants under Malaysian CPC (2017-2018)Intan Muhammad
Contents are listed in the 1st page.
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English), if you are a grammar nazi person, my notes are definitely not a good reference yeah:) Last but not least, as law revolves everyday, you might find some of my notes are outdated. 2 ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 but SHARE WITH ME OTHERS! Have a good day.
Al Bakhtiar bin Ab Samat v Public Prosecutor [2012] 4 MLJ 713
Evidence -- Similar fact evidence -- Admission of -- First charge was for possession of 30.40g of cannabis and second charge for trafficking dangerous drugs -- Whether any similarity in respect of both charges -Whether trial judge misdirected himself when acted on evidence of first charge to prove knowledge of trafficking charge -- Principles relating to similar fact evidence -- Evidence Act 1950 ss 14 & 15
Arrest, Summon and Warrants under Malaysian CPC (2017-2018)Intan Muhammad
Contents are listed in the 1st page.
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English), if you are a grammar nazi person, my notes are definitely not a good reference yeah:) Last but not least, as law revolves everyday, you might find some of my notes are outdated. 2 ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 but SHARE WITH ME OTHERS! Have a good day.
The contents are listed in the 1st page of the note :) credit goes to Dr Munzil for the amazing comprehensive notes, I just added / rearranged few parts to ease my understanding.
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves everyday, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
ADMISSIBILITY OF BAD CHARACTER LAW IN UNITED KINGDOMASMAH CHE WAN
It is a study about bad character law in UK, the history, development and current position.
at first the bad character is not admissible, but how by time it becomes admissible.
This claims club is devoted entirely to issues that touch upon the handling of abuse claims – our specialist team will update you on the initiative being run by Master McCloud to introduce a protocol specifically for claims of historical abuse. We will discuss ways in which to secure a recovery direct from the abuser, and also a new limitation initiative to assist you in defending some very old claims.
The contents are listed in the 1st page of the note :) credit goes to Dr Munzil for the amazing comprehensive notes, I just added / rearranged few parts to ease my understanding.
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves everyday, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
ADMISSIBILITY OF BAD CHARACTER LAW IN UNITED KINGDOMASMAH CHE WAN
It is a study about bad character law in UK, the history, development and current position.
at first the bad character is not admissible, but how by time it becomes admissible.
This claims club is devoted entirely to issues that touch upon the handling of abuse claims – our specialist team will update you on the initiative being run by Master McCloud to introduce a protocol specifically for claims of historical abuse. We will discuss ways in which to secure a recovery direct from the abuser, and also a new limitation initiative to assist you in defending some very old claims.
This claims club is devoted entirely to issues that touch upon the handling of abuse claims – our specialist team will update you on the initiative being run by Master McCloud to introduce a protocol specifically for claims of historical abuse. We will discuss ways in which to secure a recovery direct from the abuser, and also a new limitation initiative to assist you in defending some very old claims.
marketing questions relevant to scholars, educators, managers, consumers, policy makers and other societal stakeholders. It is the premier outlet for substantive research in marketing. Since its founding in 1936, JM has played a significant role in shaping the content and boundaries of the marketing discipline?
Publisher Information
Sara Miller McCune founded SAGE Publishing in 1965 to support the dissemination of usable knowledge and educate a global community. SAGE is a leading international provider of innovative, high-quality content publishing more than 900 journals and over 800 new books each year, spanning a wide range of subject areas. A growing selection of library products includes archives, data, case studies and video. SAGE remains majority owned by our founder and after her lifetime will become owned by a charitable trust that secures the company’s continued independence. Principal offices are located in Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC and Melbourne. www.sagepublishing.com
Rights & Usage
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Journal of Marketing
Criminal Defense Lawyer Mr. Kontou has received his Bachelor of Laws in 1983 from University of Victoria Law School. He has got more than 25 years of experience in the field of criminal law, with cases ranging from Murder, Drugs and Sexual offences
This claims club is devoted entirely to issues that touch upon the handling of abuse claims – our specialist team will update you on the initiative being run by Master McCloud to introduce a protocol specifically for claims of historical abuse. We will discuss ways in which to secure a recovery direct from the abuser, and also a new limitation initiative to assist you in defending some very old claims.
This claims club is devoted entirely to issues that touch upon the handling of abuse claims – our specialist team will update you on the initiative being run by Master McCloud to introduce a protocol specifically for claims of historical abuse. We will discuss ways in which to secure a recovery direct from the abuser, and also a new limitation initiative to assist you in defending some very old claims.
This claims club is devoted entirely to issues that touch upon the handling of abuse claims – our specialist team will update you on the initiative being run by Master McCloud to introduce a protocol specifically for claims of historical abuse. We will discuss ways in which to secure a recovery direct from the abuser, and also a new limitation initiative to assist you in defending some very old claims.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
2. Bushells Case
• The jury refused to convict the defendants so were imprisoned by the
judges. The judge said “you shall not be dismissed until we have a verdict
that the court will accept”. The jurors were locked up without meat, drink,
fire or tobacco in a prison cell until the paid a fine.
• This case is important because what came out of it was the reminder of
juries being ‘the sole arbiter of fact’.
3. R v Ponting 1985
• Clive Ponting sent confidential documents about the sinking of a ship to a
labour backbencher. He was definitely guilty but the jury acquitted him
arguing that his prosecution was politically inspired.
• Point of law: Jury equity- advantage questions.
4. R v Owen 1992
• The defendants son had been killed by a careless driver and was sent to
prison for 12 months. This did not appease his anger so he went to the
defendants house after he was out of prison and fired at him with a
shotgun, wounding him.
• The defendant was acquitted as the jury shared his feelings of outrage
• Point of law: juries can create perverse decisions and still get away with it-
disadvantage questions.
5. R v Kronlid 1996
• 3 women broke onto a plane and caused £1.5 million worth of damage, the
women did leave a video explaining their actions though.
• Their case got acquitted because the jury believed they did it for right reasons-
stopping the plane from arriving in East Timor to attack the survivors.
• Point of law: jury equity.
6. R v Rayment and others
• Evidence was given over a course of 5 months due to recurring illness and
commitments with the jury.
• Too much time between the giving of evidence made the jurors decision
less accurate so the trial is unfair.
• Point of law: too much time (disadvantages questions)
7. Brinks Mat Trial
• Robbers stole gold bullion ( £26 million worth of gold, diamonds and cash).
They poured petrol over staff and threatened them with a lit match if they
did not reveal the combination numbers of the vault.
• They got sentenced to 25 years imprisonment for armed robbery and one
defendant, Noye, was fined £500,000 plus £200,000 costs.
• Point of law:
8. R v Green 2007
• After shooting his father he was sentenced to 9 years imprisonment
charged with manslaughter.
• He appealed against his sentence stating it was out of line for offences of
domestic violence in which the victim is seen to have been subjected to.
• The court decided the sentence was appropriate to 5 or 6 years .His
sentence was reduced considerably.
• Point of law:
9. R v West
• Guilty rosemary west murdered 10 young girls and she appealed arguing
that the media influenced her case. The judge dismissed her appeal
stating even if she had a brand new case she would still be ruled guilty as
the allegations of murder were sufficiently horrendous.
• Point of law: media influence (disadvantage questions).