SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 56
Joint share ownership plans and
Share Incentive Plans
(and why every independent company should now
look again at establishing a SIP)
www.pettfranklin.com
One Moorgate Place
Thursday 27 February 2014
Welcome
JSOPs – How do they work?
Stephen Woodhouse
Pett Franklin
www.pettfranklin.com
27th February 2014
JSOPs summary
• Not share awards; not options
• Employee jointly acquires shares with co-owner
(usually a trust)
• Held under terms of JOA
• Proceeds of sale unequal
• Employee receives growth (less carry charge)
• Co-owner receives rest
• Capital gains treatment for employee (like EMI)
• Performance link
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 3
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 4
£
[ 4] % p.a. ‘Carrying’ Cost
SaleAcquisition
Tax point
Employee’s gain
Co-owner’s gain
3 years
‘Threshold
amount’
Carry charge
• Term in JOA which splits proceeds
• Only fair concept
• Percentage and or threshold
• Set by modeling trade off
• Term of JOA –fixed
• Reduces IUMV and potentially accounting fair
value
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 5
JSOP Benefits
• Growth taxed as capital not income
• Employee pays tax at 28 % not 47 %
• Company saves NICs 13.8 %
• Proven technology
• Tax analysis repeatedly publicly accepted by
HMRC and JSOP valuation method accepted
• Flexible
• Same treatment as other shareholders on
takeovers
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 6
JSOP Issues
• Shares in existence from start (hence carry
charge)
• Surplus shares trapped in conventional EBT if
performance condition fails (use GPT)
• Close company loans to EBT
• No CT relief on growth
• Upfront cost of participation based on initial
market value of employee’s interest (IUMV)
• Need to fix carry charge in advance
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 7
History
2002 fully disclosed to HMRC
2002 ERM valuation with HMRC
2006 HMRC confirmation that it is not a disclosable tax avoidance scheme
2006 COP10 ruling confirming tax treatment of JSOP for a specific client
2009 HMRC confirmation to Share Plan Lawyers Group that they accept tax
analysis and do not propose to challenge this
2010 Budget: review and consultation on “geared growth” arrangements “to
ensure employment income is subject to correct tax and NICs” NEVER
HAPPENED
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 8
• Early dialogue with HMRC Shares Valuation
from which emerged ERM method
• Involves splitting the value of an existing
instrument not valuing a new instrument
• New thinking so consulted a leading
mathematician
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 9
Valuation
Joint ownership paradox
• Challenge to conventional option pricing theory
and valuation
• Value of employee’s interest AND co-owner’s
interest cannot exceed value of share
• Paradox the more value you attribute to the
employee’s interest the less you attribute to the
trust’s interest but initially the trust holds all the
value
• In the meantime ERM method is as good as
anything
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 10
ERM
• Developed with HMRC
• Split value of a share to identify value of
employees initial unrestricted interest IUMV in
share price
• Beta factor and carry charge key but sensitive to
all assumptions
• Black Scholes comparison
• Can’t agree in advance
• Best estimate and or PTVC
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 11
Valuation Risk factors
Valuation
• Significance of the “carrying cost”
• No ability to agree IUMV in advance of execution of
JOA
• Will HMRC Shares & Assets Valuation accept the
valuation methodology?
• HMRC not obliged to agree value under “health check”
procedure
• Will local inspector re-open question of valuation in
response to disclosure under ‘self-assessment’?
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 12
Conditions For JSOP
• Can’t use EMI
• Share value meaningful (or not certain that
HMRC will agree its not meaningful)
• IUMV sufficiently low for upfront cost to be
economically feasible
• Growth prospects; if share price can only fall
or flat line not much point as employee gets
nothing
• Financial modelling to assess choices
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 13
JSOP: Accounting treatment
• IFRS2 charge
• Is it an option: “substance over form”?
• Is it a “cash-settled share-based payment”?
– need for co-owner’s/employee’s options to call for
exchange of interests?
• What is the fair value of the interest acquired by the
employee?
• Recognise as a “premium-priced option”?
• Experience to date
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 14
Documentation
• Design report and financial modeling
• Shareholders circular
• Plan Rules (to be a scheme)
• Trust deed
• JOA
• S431 election
• Participants booklet
• Management manual
• ERM valuation report
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 15
Disclosures
• Form 42
• PDMR disclosures
• Notification to employee of valuation
agreement
• Self assessment form
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 16
Quoted company JSOPs
• In place of unapproved options/PSPs
• But can be combined with PSPs and matching and deferred share awards
so that growth from these awards is delivered as capital
• Convert existing awards sometimes
• Objections
-cost of participation too high- convert after a share price dip
-insufficient growth expectations
-too many Non UK resident senior managers
-badly informed Remco
• Build into rules to give future flexibility
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 17
Potential Remco concerns
• Is this aggressive tax planning? - No
• Current climate for tax planning and executive
compensation
• HMRC attitudes generally
• Balance between loss of CT reliefs and tax savings for
employees
• NIC saving for employer but should it take some of tax
benefit as well by reducing number of shares that vest
• Uncertainty over tax and accounting treatment of gains
in GPT
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 18
Why companies should look again at
“Share Incentive Plans”
27 February 2014
David Pett
Partner
www.pettfranklin.com
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP 19www.pettfranklin.com
SIPs – a reminder
• Must have a UK trust for the purpose
• “Partnership shares”
– £1,500 (£1,800 from 6 April) per tax year or, if less, 10% of salary
– Out of gross salary/bonus
– Can have deductions from salary over up to 12 months
– Can have 18 month qualifying period (6 months if accumulation
of savings)
– Otherwise, all UK resident employees must be invited
– No preferential treatment for directors or highest paid
– No forfeiture provisions
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 20
• “Matching shares”
– Up to 2:1 against Partnership Shares purchased
– Can be subject to forfeiture at any time
– Min 3, max 5 year holding period
• “Free shares”
– Up to £3,000 (£3,600 from 6 April) per tax year
– Min 3, max 5 year holding period
– Can be performance-linked (but messy and complex)
– Can be subject to forfeiture at any time
• “Dividend shares”
– Reinvestment of cash dividends
– Fixed 3-year holding period
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 21
Why it’s time to look again at SIPs
• Since 2000
• Low take-up amongst unquoted companies
• Thought to be too complex
• Risk of penal clawback if company sold within
3 years
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 22
SIP what has changed ?
• OTS report on tax-advantaged share schemes
– Nearly all recommendations accepted
• FA 2013 changes (from July 2013)
– Removal of need for a specified retirement age (so no charge to tax on
withdrawal of plan shares upon retirement at any age)
– Removal of charge to tax on a withdrawal of shares upon a takeover
(subject to conditions)
– Removal of “material interest” (25%) test
– Freedom to use restricted shares – but restrictions ignored for
valuation purposes
– restrictions on transfer
– good/bad leaver provisions
– can be non- voting
– Uncertainty re scope for allowing forfeiture on early leaving
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 23
Accumulation Period etc
• Preferred by unquoted companies as illiquid
• Problem: exposure to changes in share value
• Payment for “Partnership shares” by monthly
deductions from salary over up to 12 months: number
of shares acquired can be calculated by reference to
M.V. at outset (or at time of acquisition, or lesser of
either – but company must specify at outset)
• Removal of limit on reinvestment of dividends on plan
shares (although company can specify a cap on the
proportion which can be so reinvested)
– From 6 April 2013
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 24
What if the company is sold ?
• From 17 July 2013
• No tax on a withdrawal and sale of SIP shares pursuant to:
– general offer to acquire control
– a takeover offer (not defined)
– a scheme of arrangement
• In consequence of which the participant receives cash
(only) for SIP shares
• Must not be an alternative ‘shares- for – shares’ exchange
on offer
• Avoids any risk of clawback if company sold early
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP 25www.pettfranklin.com
Changes in 2014
• self certification/registration from 6 April 2014
• increases in limits on tax-free shares
– Free shares £3,000 to £3,600
– Partnership shares £1,500 to £1,800
– Matching shares ( 2 for 1) £6,000 to £7,200
– Dividend reinvestment (already no limit)
• annual returns to HMRC to be made electronically
• Partnership shares: may allow obligation to sell on
leaving for at least amount of money used to buy
Partnership shares (or MV, if less)
• new rules for enquiries and appeals
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP 26www.pettfranklin.com
Compare SIP award of partnership
shares with SAYE options
• SAYE options: the discount (of up to 20%) is a cost
to shareholders through dilution;
• SIP partnership shares: the discount (by
acquisition out of gross salary) is a cost to HM
Treasury !
• SAYE options: must pay bank/building soc. to
administer the plan and hold savings under an
authorised savings plan;
• SIP partnership shares: savings held by trustee in
a normal trustees’ bank account
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 27
Compare SIP award of Partnership shares
with EMI/CSOP options for all employees
• no CGT on sale after 5 years
• ‘discount’ on acquisition (as bought out of
gross pre-tax salary)
• can offer tax-free Matching shares (1 for 10 at
least out of NI savings)
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP 28www.pettfranklin.com
Using a SIP in an early-stage/start-up
company
• Alternative to SEIS relief ?
• “Founders share plan”
– 4 employee subscribers (being the only employees)
each subscribe one share (1p par value) for £1 per
share
– company funds SIP trust to subscribe for 4 x 99 shares
– shares gifted as free SIP shares
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 29
Advantages of a SIP
(as against “growth shares”)
• Standard-form documentation
• Growth in value of “Founders” plan shares is entirely free of tax
(exempt from CGT)
– Non-SIP shares probably entirely tax-free because of CGT nil-rate band
• Relative ease of administration
– Can normally be undertaken in-house
• GAAR?
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 30
SIPs – the need for a trustee
• Use a guarantee company specially-formed as
a wholly-owned subsidiary
• In a small company, use individual directors?
– Risk of unlimited personal liability
– Indemnity from company is only as good as the
company itself
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 31
Disadvantages of a SIP
• Shares must be offered on a “same terms”
basis to all qualifying employees
• Performance-linking of awards of free shares
is permitted, but is “messy”
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 32
Restricted Shares
• Problem:
– pre-emption of SIP shares of leavers had to apply
to all shares of the class forcing an existing non-
SIP shareholder employee to sell
• New regime:
– shares can be subject to restrictions which only
apply to SIP shareholders
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 33
• Up-front CT relief for funding a SIP to acquire a 10% interest
• Of interest to independent companies seeking to establish “employee
ownership model” or proprietors seeking a tax-efficient exit
• SIP trust must acquire 10% within a 12 month period
• Shares must be acquired otherwise than “from a company”
• 30% of shares must be awarded as Free, Matching or Partnership Shares
within 5 years, and 100% within 10 years. If not, HMRC may withdraw all
of the relief by treating amount as taxable receipt when direction given
• Limits, of £1,500 Partnership (with up to £3,000 Matching) and £3,000
Free shares, means that employee profile may not enable sufficient shares
to be awarded in time!
• If shares not awarded within 2 years (5, if not RCAs), then SIP trustees
subject to CGT on growth in value
Independent companies: using a
SIP
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 34
• The individual vendor can “roll-over” the gain on
sale to a SIP which acquires 10% or more within
12 months if, within 6 months of the SIP trust
acquiring 10%, all of the consideration is
reinvested in chargeable assets, excluding (only):
– private residence
– EIS shares
– same group company shares
Vendor’s relief for sale
to a SIP holding > 10%
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 35
SIP Illustration
• Company gifts free shares when company
worth £1 million
• Free shares gifted to employees @ 75%
discount for minority holding agreed with
HMRC
• Company sold or floated more than 5 years
later for £10 million
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 36
Employee’s Position (Free)
• Gifted £3,000 worth of shares (equivalent to
£12,000 before valuation discount)
representing 1.2% of share capital
• No Income Tax or NICs on award
• On exit, shares sold for £120,000 (10 x
£12,000) completely free of tax
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 37
Employee’s Position (Partnership)
• Buys £1,500 worth of shares (equivalent to
£6,000 before discount) representing 0.6% of
share capital
• For 40% tax payer because of tax and NI actual
cost is only £870
• On exit shares sold for £60,000 – Tax Free
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 38
No Growth Company
• Shares do not increase in value when
company is sold
• On exit shares sold for £6,000 Tax Free
• Effectively a £5,130 tax-free gain (£6,000 -
£870) on an £870 investment
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 39
Costs of implementation
• documentation
• trust establishment
• share valuation
• ongoing administration/ reporting/
compliance
www.pettfranklin.com©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP 40
Conclusions
If:
• company is independent
• wishes to allow all employees to benefit from
holding shares
the establishment of a Share Incentive Plan is
the obvious ‘plan of choice’ !
©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 41
Sharetrack
Executive Share Plan
Software
Better Business - The Employee Ownership Advantage
27 February 2014
Background
⎯ Small private company established January 2000
⎯ Dedicated to developing affordable share plans
software for companies & administrators
⎯ Based at one London location
⎯ Broker & Trustee neutral
⎯ Renowned for quality products & customer service
A number of our clients
use sharetrack and their
feedback
is always extremely
positive.
We enjoy an excellent
relationship and are keen
to continue working with
Cytec
to develop new ways to
improve the participant
experience.
Michael Sleet – JP Morgan
Managing Your SIP
⎯ Outsourced
⎯ Function fully outsourced to third party
administrator
⎯ In-house
⎯ On excel spread-sheets
⎯ Administration software
⎯ Co-sourced
⎯ On excel spread-sheets
⎯ Administration software with transaction
processing assistance from trustee, broker or
third party administrator
Since their appointment
the sharetrack software
has lived
up to expectation fulfilling
our current requirements
and more. We are very
happy with the system, the
level and quality of the
support we have received.
Sue Wells – Travis
Perkins
Sharetrack – Plan Details
Sharetrack – Personnel
Records
Sharetrack – Participants
Sharetrack – Payments
Received
Sharetrack - Contributions
Sharetrack – Share
Purchases
Sharetrack - Reports
Sharetrack
Executive Share Plan
Software
Better Business - The Employee Ownership Advantage
27 February 2014
Questions
Reflections and Close
Contact details
David Pett david.pett@pettfranklin.com mobile: 07836 657 658
William Franklin william.franklin@pettfranklin.com mobile: 07889 726767
Stephen Woodhouse stephen.woodhouse@pettfranklin.com mobile: 07836 756031
Office: 0121 348 7878
Twitter: www.twitter.com/pettfranklin
For lots of information, go to our website:
www.pettfranklin.com
©2014 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 55

More Related Content

What's hot

It staffing, inc.- LBO Analysis
It staffing, inc.- LBO AnalysisIt staffing, inc.- LBO Analysis
It staffing, inc.- LBO AnalysisTravis Nauman
 
Performance equity global-gilead-20100627
Performance equity global-gilead-20100627Performance equity global-gilead-20100627
Performance equity global-gilead-20100627PERFORMENSATION
 
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - October 2012
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - October 2012Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - October 2012
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - October 2012Safeguard Scientifics
 
Equity Compensation - Comparison of Plan Types: Including Stock Options, RSUs...
Equity Compensation - Comparison of Plan Types: Including Stock Options, RSUs...Equity Compensation - Comparison of Plan Types: Including Stock Options, RSUs...
Equity Compensation - Comparison of Plan Types: Including Stock Options, RSUs...PERFORMENSATION
 
Financial management notes
Financial management  notesFinancial management  notes
Financial management notesMaria Thomas
 
Cash Flow Statement Analysis HUL FMCG 2014
Cash Flow Statement Analysis HUL FMCG 2014Cash Flow Statement Analysis HUL FMCG 2014
Cash Flow Statement Analysis HUL FMCG 2014Gursimran Mickey
 
Safeguard Scientifics Corporate Presentation - March 2015
Safeguard Scientifics Corporate Presentation - March 2015Safeguard Scientifics Corporate Presentation - March 2015
Safeguard Scientifics Corporate Presentation - March 2015Safeguard Scientifics
 
Key Ratio Analysis of Colgate
Key Ratio Analysis of ColgateKey Ratio Analysis of Colgate
Key Ratio Analysis of ColgateAJ Raina
 
Profitability ratio analysis
Profitability ratio analysisProfitability ratio analysis
Profitability ratio analysiswahidsajol
 
The BEE Challenge
The BEE ChallengeThe BEE Challenge
The BEE ChallengeDirk Kemp
 
Introduction to financial management ppt @ mba
Introduction to financial management ppt @ mbaIntroduction to financial management ppt @ mba
Introduction to financial management ppt @ mbaBabasab Patil
 

What's hot (15)

Lec10 11 financial ratio analysis
Lec10 11 financial ratio analysisLec10 11 financial ratio analysis
Lec10 11 financial ratio analysis
 
It staffing, inc.- LBO Analysis
It staffing, inc.- LBO AnalysisIt staffing, inc.- LBO Analysis
It staffing, inc.- LBO Analysis
 
Employee transfer business model
Employee transfer business modelEmployee transfer business model
Employee transfer business model
 
Performance equity global-gilead-20100627
Performance equity global-gilead-20100627Performance equity global-gilead-20100627
Performance equity global-gilead-20100627
 
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - October 2012
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - October 2012Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - October 2012
Safeguard Scientifics (NYSE: SFE) Investor Relations Presentation - October 2012
 
Equity Compensation - Comparison of Plan Types: Including Stock Options, RSUs...
Equity Compensation - Comparison of Plan Types: Including Stock Options, RSUs...Equity Compensation - Comparison of Plan Types: Including Stock Options, RSUs...
Equity Compensation - Comparison of Plan Types: Including Stock Options, RSUs...
 
Financial management notes
Financial management  notesFinancial management  notes
Financial management notes
 
Cash Flow Statement Analysis HUL FMCG 2014
Cash Flow Statement Analysis HUL FMCG 2014Cash Flow Statement Analysis HUL FMCG 2014
Cash Flow Statement Analysis HUL FMCG 2014
 
Safeguard Scientifics Corporate Presentation - March 2015
Safeguard Scientifics Corporate Presentation - March 2015Safeguard Scientifics Corporate Presentation - March 2015
Safeguard Scientifics Corporate Presentation - March 2015
 
Key Ratio Analysis of Colgate
Key Ratio Analysis of ColgateKey Ratio Analysis of Colgate
Key Ratio Analysis of Colgate
 
Profitability ratio analysis
Profitability ratio analysisProfitability ratio analysis
Profitability ratio analysis
 
The BEE Challenge
The BEE ChallengeThe BEE Challenge
The BEE Challenge
 
Infosys - Ratio analysis
Infosys - Ratio analysisInfosys - Ratio analysis
Infosys - Ratio analysis
 
Introduction to financial management ppt @ mba
Introduction to financial management ppt @ mbaIntroduction to financial management ppt @ mba
Introduction to financial management ppt @ mba
 
Valuation sample report
Valuation sample reportValuation sample report
Valuation sample report
 

Similar to Jsop and sip presentation

"Employee Share Schemes" - The Chartered Institute of Taxation
"Employee Share Schemes" - The Chartered Institute of Taxation"Employee Share Schemes" - The Chartered Institute of Taxation
"Employee Share Schemes" - The Chartered Institute of TaxationBernersMarketing
 
One moorgate place slides as corrected on 15 may 150513 (v)
One moorgate place slides as corrected on 15 may 150513 (v)One moorgate place slides as corrected on 15 may 150513 (v)
One moorgate place slides as corrected on 15 may 150513 (v)BernersMarketing
 
FCTC London Conference - June 2016
FCTC London Conference - June 2016FCTC London Conference - June 2016
FCTC London Conference - June 2016PKF Francis Clark
 
Tax Effective Share Plans in Ireland
Tax Effective Share Plans in IrelandTax Effective Share Plans in Ireland
Tax Effective Share Plans in IrelandGlobal Shares
 
Bournemouth - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - June 2018
Bournemouth - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - June 2018Bournemouth - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - June 2018
Bournemouth - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - June 2018PKF Francis Clark
 
Business Succession: The ESOP Model
Business Succession: The ESOP ModelBusiness Succession: The ESOP Model
Business Succession: The ESOP ModelPeter E. Jones
 
Incorporation for dentists
Incorporation for dentistsIncorporation for dentists
Incorporation for dentistsArunmehra123
 
10 Minute Presentation from our June Networking in Chester
10 Minute Presentation from our June Networking in Chester10 Minute Presentation from our June Networking in Chester
10 Minute Presentation from our June Networking in ChesterLumisi Group of Solutions
 
Breakfast Briefings - January 2018
Breakfast Briefings - January 2018Breakfast Briefings - January 2018
Breakfast Briefings - January 2018PKF Francis Clark
 
EIS & SEIS Relief Workshop - Plus Accounting, Chartered Accountants
EIS & SEIS Relief Workshop - Plus Accounting, Chartered AccountantsEIS & SEIS Relief Workshop - Plus Accounting, Chartered Accountants
EIS & SEIS Relief Workshop - Plus Accounting, Chartered AccountantsVictoria King
 
FICs-in-Tax-Estate-Planning_JK_27-July-22.pdf
FICs-in-Tax-Estate-Planning_JK_27-July-22.pdfFICs-in-Tax-Estate-Planning_JK_27-July-22.pdf
FICs-in-Tax-Estate-Planning_JK_27-July-22.pdfSean Rowbotham FCA MBA
 
Stock Appreciation Rights (SAR) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)
Stock Appreciation Rights (SAR) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)Stock Appreciation Rights (SAR) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)
Stock Appreciation Rights (SAR) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)Chief Innovation
 
Jle Hull Presentation
Jle Hull PresentationJle Hull Presentation
Jle Hull Presentationjendacott
 
Contentious Issues & Practical Solutions - Companies Act, 2013
Contentious Issues & Practical Solutions - Companies Act, 2013Contentious Issues & Practical Solutions - Companies Act, 2013
Contentious Issues & Practical Solutions - Companies Act, 2013Ajay Garg
 
Exeter - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - November 2017
Exeter - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - November 2017Exeter - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - November 2017
Exeter - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - November 2017PKF Francis Clark
 
Taunton - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - November 2017
Taunton - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - November 2017Taunton - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - November 2017
Taunton - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - November 2017PKF Francis Clark
 
Plymouth - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - June 2018
Plymouth - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - June 2018Plymouth - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - June 2018
Plymouth - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - June 2018PKF Francis Clark
 
Proxy Season Recap – Trends and Lessons from 2014
Proxy Season Recap – Trends and Lessons from 2014Proxy Season Recap – Trends and Lessons from 2014
Proxy Season Recap – Trends and Lessons from 2014Winston & Strawn LLP
 

Similar to Jsop and sip presentation (20)

"Employee Share Schemes" - The Chartered Institute of Taxation
"Employee Share Schemes" - The Chartered Institute of Taxation"Employee Share Schemes" - The Chartered Institute of Taxation
"Employee Share Schemes" - The Chartered Institute of Taxation
 
One moorgate place slides as corrected on 15 may 150513 (v)
One moorgate place slides as corrected on 15 may 150513 (v)One moorgate place slides as corrected on 15 may 150513 (v)
One moorgate place slides as corrected on 15 may 150513 (v)
 
FCTC London Conference - June 2016
FCTC London Conference - June 2016FCTC London Conference - June 2016
FCTC London Conference - June 2016
 
Tax Effective Share Plans in Ireland
Tax Effective Share Plans in IrelandTax Effective Share Plans in Ireland
Tax Effective Share Plans in Ireland
 
Bournemouth - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - June 2018
Bournemouth - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - June 2018Bournemouth - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - June 2018
Bournemouth - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - June 2018
 
Wf slides 230415
Wf slides 230415Wf slides 230415
Wf slides 230415
 
Business Succession: The ESOP Model
Business Succession: The ESOP ModelBusiness Succession: The ESOP Model
Business Succession: The ESOP Model
 
Incorporation for dentists
Incorporation for dentistsIncorporation for dentists
Incorporation for dentists
 
10 Minute Presentation from our June Networking in Chester
10 Minute Presentation from our June Networking in Chester10 Minute Presentation from our June Networking in Chester
10 Minute Presentation from our June Networking in Chester
 
Breakfast Briefings - January 2018
Breakfast Briefings - January 2018Breakfast Briefings - January 2018
Breakfast Briefings - January 2018
 
EIS & SEIS Relief Workshop - Plus Accounting, Chartered Accountants
EIS & SEIS Relief Workshop - Plus Accounting, Chartered AccountantsEIS & SEIS Relief Workshop - Plus Accounting, Chartered Accountants
EIS & SEIS Relief Workshop - Plus Accounting, Chartered Accountants
 
FICs-in-Tax-Estate-Planning_JK_27-July-22.pdf
FICs-in-Tax-Estate-Planning_JK_27-July-22.pdfFICs-in-Tax-Estate-Planning_JK_27-July-22.pdf
FICs-in-Tax-Estate-Planning_JK_27-July-22.pdf
 
Stock Appreciation Rights (SAR) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)
Stock Appreciation Rights (SAR) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)Stock Appreciation Rights (SAR) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)
Stock Appreciation Rights (SAR) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)
 
ESOPs for Professional Service Firms
ESOPs for Professional Service FirmsESOPs for Professional Service Firms
ESOPs for Professional Service Firms
 
Jle Hull Presentation
Jle Hull PresentationJle Hull Presentation
Jle Hull Presentation
 
Contentious Issues & Practical Solutions - Companies Act, 2013
Contentious Issues & Practical Solutions - Companies Act, 2013Contentious Issues & Practical Solutions - Companies Act, 2013
Contentious Issues & Practical Solutions - Companies Act, 2013
 
Exeter - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - November 2017
Exeter - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - November 2017Exeter - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - November 2017
Exeter - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - November 2017
 
Taunton - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - November 2017
Taunton - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - November 2017Taunton - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - November 2017
Taunton - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - November 2017
 
Plymouth - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - June 2018
Plymouth - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - June 2018Plymouth - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - June 2018
Plymouth - Essential 6-monthly Finance Directors' Update - June 2018
 
Proxy Season Recap – Trends and Lessons from 2014
Proxy Season Recap – Trends and Lessons from 2014Proxy Season Recap – Trends and Lessons from 2014
Proxy Season Recap – Trends and Lessons from 2014
 

Jsop and sip presentation

  • 1. Joint share ownership plans and Share Incentive Plans (and why every independent company should now look again at establishing a SIP) www.pettfranklin.com One Moorgate Place Thursday 27 February 2014
  • 3. JSOPs – How do they work? Stephen Woodhouse Pett Franklin www.pettfranklin.com 27th February 2014
  • 4. JSOPs summary • Not share awards; not options • Employee jointly acquires shares with co-owner (usually a trust) • Held under terms of JOA • Proceeds of sale unequal • Employee receives growth (less carry charge) • Co-owner receives rest • Capital gains treatment for employee (like EMI) • Performance link ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 3
  • 5. ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 4 £ [ 4] % p.a. ‘Carrying’ Cost SaleAcquisition Tax point Employee’s gain Co-owner’s gain 3 years ‘Threshold amount’
  • 6. Carry charge • Term in JOA which splits proceeds • Only fair concept • Percentage and or threshold • Set by modeling trade off • Term of JOA –fixed • Reduces IUMV and potentially accounting fair value ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 5
  • 7. JSOP Benefits • Growth taxed as capital not income • Employee pays tax at 28 % not 47 % • Company saves NICs 13.8 % • Proven technology • Tax analysis repeatedly publicly accepted by HMRC and JSOP valuation method accepted • Flexible • Same treatment as other shareholders on takeovers ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 6
  • 8. JSOP Issues • Shares in existence from start (hence carry charge) • Surplus shares trapped in conventional EBT if performance condition fails (use GPT) • Close company loans to EBT • No CT relief on growth • Upfront cost of participation based on initial market value of employee’s interest (IUMV) • Need to fix carry charge in advance ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 7
  • 9. History 2002 fully disclosed to HMRC 2002 ERM valuation with HMRC 2006 HMRC confirmation that it is not a disclosable tax avoidance scheme 2006 COP10 ruling confirming tax treatment of JSOP for a specific client 2009 HMRC confirmation to Share Plan Lawyers Group that they accept tax analysis and do not propose to challenge this 2010 Budget: review and consultation on “geared growth” arrangements “to ensure employment income is subject to correct tax and NICs” NEVER HAPPENED ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 8
  • 10. • Early dialogue with HMRC Shares Valuation from which emerged ERM method • Involves splitting the value of an existing instrument not valuing a new instrument • New thinking so consulted a leading mathematician ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 9 Valuation
  • 11. Joint ownership paradox • Challenge to conventional option pricing theory and valuation • Value of employee’s interest AND co-owner’s interest cannot exceed value of share • Paradox the more value you attribute to the employee’s interest the less you attribute to the trust’s interest but initially the trust holds all the value • In the meantime ERM method is as good as anything ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 10
  • 12. ERM • Developed with HMRC • Split value of a share to identify value of employees initial unrestricted interest IUMV in share price • Beta factor and carry charge key but sensitive to all assumptions • Black Scholes comparison • Can’t agree in advance • Best estimate and or PTVC ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 11
  • 13. Valuation Risk factors Valuation • Significance of the “carrying cost” • No ability to agree IUMV in advance of execution of JOA • Will HMRC Shares & Assets Valuation accept the valuation methodology? • HMRC not obliged to agree value under “health check” procedure • Will local inspector re-open question of valuation in response to disclosure under ‘self-assessment’? ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 12
  • 14. Conditions For JSOP • Can’t use EMI • Share value meaningful (or not certain that HMRC will agree its not meaningful) • IUMV sufficiently low for upfront cost to be economically feasible • Growth prospects; if share price can only fall or flat line not much point as employee gets nothing • Financial modelling to assess choices ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 13
  • 15. JSOP: Accounting treatment • IFRS2 charge • Is it an option: “substance over form”? • Is it a “cash-settled share-based payment”? – need for co-owner’s/employee’s options to call for exchange of interests? • What is the fair value of the interest acquired by the employee? • Recognise as a “premium-priced option”? • Experience to date ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 14
  • 16. Documentation • Design report and financial modeling • Shareholders circular • Plan Rules (to be a scheme) • Trust deed • JOA • S431 election • Participants booklet • Management manual • ERM valuation report ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 15
  • 17. Disclosures • Form 42 • PDMR disclosures • Notification to employee of valuation agreement • Self assessment form ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 16
  • 18. Quoted company JSOPs • In place of unapproved options/PSPs • But can be combined with PSPs and matching and deferred share awards so that growth from these awards is delivered as capital • Convert existing awards sometimes • Objections -cost of participation too high- convert after a share price dip -insufficient growth expectations -too many Non UK resident senior managers -badly informed Remco • Build into rules to give future flexibility ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 17
  • 19. Potential Remco concerns • Is this aggressive tax planning? - No • Current climate for tax planning and executive compensation • HMRC attitudes generally • Balance between loss of CT reliefs and tax savings for employees • NIC saving for employer but should it take some of tax benefit as well by reducing number of shares that vest • Uncertainty over tax and accounting treatment of gains in GPT ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 18
  • 20. Why companies should look again at “Share Incentive Plans” 27 February 2014 David Pett Partner www.pettfranklin.com ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP 19www.pettfranklin.com
  • 21. SIPs – a reminder • Must have a UK trust for the purpose • “Partnership shares” – £1,500 (£1,800 from 6 April) per tax year or, if less, 10% of salary – Out of gross salary/bonus – Can have deductions from salary over up to 12 months – Can have 18 month qualifying period (6 months if accumulation of savings) – Otherwise, all UK resident employees must be invited – No preferential treatment for directors or highest paid – No forfeiture provisions ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 20
  • 22. • “Matching shares” – Up to 2:1 against Partnership Shares purchased – Can be subject to forfeiture at any time – Min 3, max 5 year holding period • “Free shares” – Up to £3,000 (£3,600 from 6 April) per tax year – Min 3, max 5 year holding period – Can be performance-linked (but messy and complex) – Can be subject to forfeiture at any time • “Dividend shares” – Reinvestment of cash dividends – Fixed 3-year holding period ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 21
  • 23. Why it’s time to look again at SIPs • Since 2000 • Low take-up amongst unquoted companies • Thought to be too complex • Risk of penal clawback if company sold within 3 years ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 22
  • 24. SIP what has changed ? • OTS report on tax-advantaged share schemes – Nearly all recommendations accepted • FA 2013 changes (from July 2013) – Removal of need for a specified retirement age (so no charge to tax on withdrawal of plan shares upon retirement at any age) – Removal of charge to tax on a withdrawal of shares upon a takeover (subject to conditions) – Removal of “material interest” (25%) test – Freedom to use restricted shares – but restrictions ignored for valuation purposes – restrictions on transfer – good/bad leaver provisions – can be non- voting – Uncertainty re scope for allowing forfeiture on early leaving ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 23
  • 25. Accumulation Period etc • Preferred by unquoted companies as illiquid • Problem: exposure to changes in share value • Payment for “Partnership shares” by monthly deductions from salary over up to 12 months: number of shares acquired can be calculated by reference to M.V. at outset (or at time of acquisition, or lesser of either – but company must specify at outset) • Removal of limit on reinvestment of dividends on plan shares (although company can specify a cap on the proportion which can be so reinvested) – From 6 April 2013 ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 24
  • 26. What if the company is sold ? • From 17 July 2013 • No tax on a withdrawal and sale of SIP shares pursuant to: – general offer to acquire control – a takeover offer (not defined) – a scheme of arrangement • In consequence of which the participant receives cash (only) for SIP shares • Must not be an alternative ‘shares- for – shares’ exchange on offer • Avoids any risk of clawback if company sold early ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP 25www.pettfranklin.com
  • 27. Changes in 2014 • self certification/registration from 6 April 2014 • increases in limits on tax-free shares – Free shares £3,000 to £3,600 – Partnership shares £1,500 to £1,800 – Matching shares ( 2 for 1) £6,000 to £7,200 – Dividend reinvestment (already no limit) • annual returns to HMRC to be made electronically • Partnership shares: may allow obligation to sell on leaving for at least amount of money used to buy Partnership shares (or MV, if less) • new rules for enquiries and appeals ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP 26www.pettfranklin.com
  • 28. Compare SIP award of partnership shares with SAYE options • SAYE options: the discount (of up to 20%) is a cost to shareholders through dilution; • SIP partnership shares: the discount (by acquisition out of gross salary) is a cost to HM Treasury ! • SAYE options: must pay bank/building soc. to administer the plan and hold savings under an authorised savings plan; • SIP partnership shares: savings held by trustee in a normal trustees’ bank account ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 27
  • 29. Compare SIP award of Partnership shares with EMI/CSOP options for all employees • no CGT on sale after 5 years • ‘discount’ on acquisition (as bought out of gross pre-tax salary) • can offer tax-free Matching shares (1 for 10 at least out of NI savings) ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP 28www.pettfranklin.com
  • 30. Using a SIP in an early-stage/start-up company • Alternative to SEIS relief ? • “Founders share plan” – 4 employee subscribers (being the only employees) each subscribe one share (1p par value) for £1 per share – company funds SIP trust to subscribe for 4 x 99 shares – shares gifted as free SIP shares ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 29
  • 31. Advantages of a SIP (as against “growth shares”) • Standard-form documentation • Growth in value of “Founders” plan shares is entirely free of tax (exempt from CGT) – Non-SIP shares probably entirely tax-free because of CGT nil-rate band • Relative ease of administration – Can normally be undertaken in-house • GAAR? ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 30
  • 32. SIPs – the need for a trustee • Use a guarantee company specially-formed as a wholly-owned subsidiary • In a small company, use individual directors? – Risk of unlimited personal liability – Indemnity from company is only as good as the company itself ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 31
  • 33. Disadvantages of a SIP • Shares must be offered on a “same terms” basis to all qualifying employees • Performance-linking of awards of free shares is permitted, but is “messy” ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 32
  • 34. Restricted Shares • Problem: – pre-emption of SIP shares of leavers had to apply to all shares of the class forcing an existing non- SIP shareholder employee to sell • New regime: – shares can be subject to restrictions which only apply to SIP shareholders ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 33
  • 35. • Up-front CT relief for funding a SIP to acquire a 10% interest • Of interest to independent companies seeking to establish “employee ownership model” or proprietors seeking a tax-efficient exit • SIP trust must acquire 10% within a 12 month period • Shares must be acquired otherwise than “from a company” • 30% of shares must be awarded as Free, Matching or Partnership Shares within 5 years, and 100% within 10 years. If not, HMRC may withdraw all of the relief by treating amount as taxable receipt when direction given • Limits, of £1,500 Partnership (with up to £3,000 Matching) and £3,000 Free shares, means that employee profile may not enable sufficient shares to be awarded in time! • If shares not awarded within 2 years (5, if not RCAs), then SIP trustees subject to CGT on growth in value Independent companies: using a SIP ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 34
  • 36. • The individual vendor can “roll-over” the gain on sale to a SIP which acquires 10% or more within 12 months if, within 6 months of the SIP trust acquiring 10%, all of the consideration is reinvested in chargeable assets, excluding (only): – private residence – EIS shares – same group company shares Vendor’s relief for sale to a SIP holding > 10% ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 35
  • 37. SIP Illustration • Company gifts free shares when company worth £1 million • Free shares gifted to employees @ 75% discount for minority holding agreed with HMRC • Company sold or floated more than 5 years later for £10 million ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 36
  • 38. Employee’s Position (Free) • Gifted £3,000 worth of shares (equivalent to £12,000 before valuation discount) representing 1.2% of share capital • No Income Tax or NICs on award • On exit, shares sold for £120,000 (10 x £12,000) completely free of tax ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 37
  • 39. Employee’s Position (Partnership) • Buys £1,500 worth of shares (equivalent to £6,000 before discount) representing 0.6% of share capital • For 40% tax payer because of tax and NI actual cost is only £870 • On exit shares sold for £60,000 – Tax Free ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 38
  • 40. No Growth Company • Shares do not increase in value when company is sold • On exit shares sold for £6,000 Tax Free • Effectively a £5,130 tax-free gain (£6,000 - £870) on an £870 investment ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 39
  • 41. Costs of implementation • documentation • trust establishment • share valuation • ongoing administration/ reporting/ compliance www.pettfranklin.com©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP 40
  • 42. Conclusions If: • company is independent • wishes to allow all employees to benefit from holding shares the establishment of a Share Incentive Plan is the obvious ‘plan of choice’ ! ©2013 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 41
  • 43. Sharetrack Executive Share Plan Software Better Business - The Employee Ownership Advantage 27 February 2014
  • 44. Background ⎯ Small private company established January 2000 ⎯ Dedicated to developing affordable share plans software for companies & administrators ⎯ Based at one London location ⎯ Broker & Trustee neutral ⎯ Renowned for quality products & customer service A number of our clients use sharetrack and their feedback is always extremely positive. We enjoy an excellent relationship and are keen to continue working with Cytec to develop new ways to improve the participant experience. Michael Sleet – JP Morgan
  • 45. Managing Your SIP ⎯ Outsourced ⎯ Function fully outsourced to third party administrator ⎯ In-house ⎯ On excel spread-sheets ⎯ Administration software ⎯ Co-sourced ⎯ On excel spread-sheets ⎯ Administration software with transaction processing assistance from trustee, broker or third party administrator Since their appointment the sharetrack software has lived up to expectation fulfilling our current requirements and more. We are very happy with the system, the level and quality of the support we have received. Sue Wells – Travis Perkins
  • 53. Sharetrack Executive Share Plan Software Better Business - The Employee Ownership Advantage 27 February 2014
  • 56. Contact details David Pett david.pett@pettfranklin.com mobile: 07836 657 658 William Franklin william.franklin@pettfranklin.com mobile: 07889 726767 Stephen Woodhouse stephen.woodhouse@pettfranklin.com mobile: 07836 756031 Office: 0121 348 7878 Twitter: www.twitter.com/pettfranklin For lots of information, go to our website: www.pettfranklin.com ©2014 Pett, Franklin & Co. LLP www.pettfranklin.com 55