The document summarizes the progress of a software engineering class project over several months. It discusses meetings to assess client needs and specifications, dividing work into subgroups, researching and creating documentation on intellectual property issues, testing the website, discussing issues with a lawyer, revising documents, and preparing for a final presentation. The project involved designing a website and database for a client while addressing legal topics like patents, copyrights, and user agreements.
Enhancement and Enrichment of Digital Content by User Communities: The Aust...guest6a9161
Presentation by Rose Holley, Manager - Australian Newspapers Digitisation Program to the Innovative Ideas Forum held at the National Library of Australia 27 March 2009
Here is a generic user research protocol that might help guiding a Contextual Inquiry interview: make sure the modify it according to your topic and design challenge.
Companies often have a problem in capturing the experience of their technical or field personnel if the that person falls back to using email or a favorite word processor on a whim to record their knowledge.
Particularly in the support arena, special tools have been devised to try to capture and correlate the knowledge that is often created in the course of handling support calls. Lately, and across wider domains of knowledge or disciplines, wikis have been used with varying success for capturing at least some of that otherwise misplaced knowledge. But even on a centralized resource like a wiki, there is still the problem of how to retrieve and reuse that content as a more strategically-tagged corporate asset.
The DITA Content Collaboration project seeks to make DITA authoring commonplace for scenarios in which content creators can benefit from the structuring disciplines of this tool.
This presentation demonstrates a structured approach to collaborative writing that benefits the preservation and curation of valued, yet too-often marginalized content of knowledge workers in an organization or company.
Assignment 3 Presenting With PowerPointJane R. Doe .docxrock73
Assignment 3: Presenting With PowerPoint
Jane R. Doe 9/3/17
CIS105 Intro to Information Systems
1
Hello, my name is Jane Doe and today I will be presenting my Assignment 3: Presenting with PowerPoint presentation, all about everything I learned in CIS105 Intro to Information Systems in my first term here at Strayer University.
1
Information Systems Terms and Concepts
Digital Literacy
Knowledge, skills, and behaviors needed for the effective use of digital devices and effective participation in an information-based society
Hardware
The physical components of a computer that you can touch
Software
The coded instructions that tell the computer’s hardware what to do
2
We started the course by learning some basic information systems terms and concepts. This was important to get us started learning all about the world of computers. I work in the security field so I didn’t have very much experience with computers at all coming into this course, other than knowing how to download an app on my phone.
One thing I learned about was digital literacy—this means the knowledge, skills, and behaviors needed for the effective use of digital devices and effective participation in an information-based society. Being digitally literate is an essential skill for being an online student, working in today’s information-based job market, and just being a citizen of the modern world and being able to do what you need to do as far as taking care of your family, paying your bills, ordering things online, and everyday actions like that.
I also learned the difference between your computer’s hardware and software. The hardware is the physical parts of a computer that you can see and touch, like the keyboard, the monitor, the tower, the mouse, the webcam. The software is the programs that run it – the coded instructions that tell the computer’s hardware what to do. The Microsoft Office Suite that we learn later in the class is an example of computer software.
2
Internet
Internet Service Provider (ISP)
A company that provides Internet access for a fee
Protocol
Standard set of rules, requirements, and criteria for all devices and networks to follow
Search Engine
Software system that relies on algorithms to process data and search for content on the Web
3
NOTE: In this sample only the first two (2) slides contain sample audio, remember to add audio to each slide.
Next in Weeks 2 and 3 we learned all about the Internet—what it is, what it does, and how to best use it most effectively and efficiently for your needs.
One of the main things I learned here was that an Internet Service Provider, or ISP, is a company that provides Internet access for a fee. Service Electric and Verizon in my home area of Pennsylvania are our main providers.
I learned that protocol refers to the standard set of rules, requirements, and criteria that all devices (computers, iPads, phones, etc.) and networks follow. This allows the devices and networks t ...
Enhancement and Enrichment of Digital Content by User Communities: The Aust...guest6a9161
Presentation by Rose Holley, Manager - Australian Newspapers Digitisation Program to the Innovative Ideas Forum held at the National Library of Australia 27 March 2009
Here is a generic user research protocol that might help guiding a Contextual Inquiry interview: make sure the modify it according to your topic and design challenge.
Companies often have a problem in capturing the experience of their technical or field personnel if the that person falls back to using email or a favorite word processor on a whim to record their knowledge.
Particularly in the support arena, special tools have been devised to try to capture and correlate the knowledge that is often created in the course of handling support calls. Lately, and across wider domains of knowledge or disciplines, wikis have been used with varying success for capturing at least some of that otherwise misplaced knowledge. But even on a centralized resource like a wiki, there is still the problem of how to retrieve and reuse that content as a more strategically-tagged corporate asset.
The DITA Content Collaboration project seeks to make DITA authoring commonplace for scenarios in which content creators can benefit from the structuring disciplines of this tool.
This presentation demonstrates a structured approach to collaborative writing that benefits the preservation and curation of valued, yet too-often marginalized content of knowledge workers in an organization or company.
Assignment 3 Presenting With PowerPointJane R. Doe .docxrock73
Assignment 3: Presenting With PowerPoint
Jane R. Doe 9/3/17
CIS105 Intro to Information Systems
1
Hello, my name is Jane Doe and today I will be presenting my Assignment 3: Presenting with PowerPoint presentation, all about everything I learned in CIS105 Intro to Information Systems in my first term here at Strayer University.
1
Information Systems Terms and Concepts
Digital Literacy
Knowledge, skills, and behaviors needed for the effective use of digital devices and effective participation in an information-based society
Hardware
The physical components of a computer that you can touch
Software
The coded instructions that tell the computer’s hardware what to do
2
We started the course by learning some basic information systems terms and concepts. This was important to get us started learning all about the world of computers. I work in the security field so I didn’t have very much experience with computers at all coming into this course, other than knowing how to download an app on my phone.
One thing I learned about was digital literacy—this means the knowledge, skills, and behaviors needed for the effective use of digital devices and effective participation in an information-based society. Being digitally literate is an essential skill for being an online student, working in today’s information-based job market, and just being a citizen of the modern world and being able to do what you need to do as far as taking care of your family, paying your bills, ordering things online, and everyday actions like that.
I also learned the difference between your computer’s hardware and software. The hardware is the physical parts of a computer that you can see and touch, like the keyboard, the monitor, the tower, the mouse, the webcam. The software is the programs that run it – the coded instructions that tell the computer’s hardware what to do. The Microsoft Office Suite that we learn later in the class is an example of computer software.
2
Internet
Internet Service Provider (ISP)
A company that provides Internet access for a fee
Protocol
Standard set of rules, requirements, and criteria for all devices and networks to follow
Search Engine
Software system that relies on algorithms to process data and search for content on the Web
3
NOTE: In this sample only the first two (2) slides contain sample audio, remember to add audio to each slide.
Next in Weeks 2 and 3 we learned all about the Internet—what it is, what it does, and how to best use it most effectively and efficiently for your needs.
One of the main things I learned here was that an Internet Service Provider, or ISP, is a company that provides Internet access for a fee. Service Electric and Verizon in my home area of Pennsylvania are our main providers.
I learned that protocol refers to the standard set of rules, requirements, and criteria that all devices (computers, iPads, phones, etc.) and networks follow. This allows the devices and networks t ...
Presentation by Owen O'Neil. This presentation will provide an update on a number of technical standards for e-learning content that are being collaboratively agreed on through the Australian Flexible Learning Framework’s E-standards project. Topics will include m-learning, e-portfolios, computer network and firewall access, e-learning content development standards and more. The focus of the presentation will be on how such standards can be utilised by e-learning practitioners.
This document was part of the OERP Workshop; Methods & Processes held during the EE2010 conference (July 6th -8th 2010 @Aston University).
Please see the handout and presentation supporting this session.
Design Suggestions for EPA’s One Wiki in Support of the EPA OGD Work Groupguest8c518a8
1. Background:
1.1 Supporting EPA's Top Priorities
1.2 An EPA EA Roadmap
1.3 Solution Architecture 2010
1.4 My List of Action Items
1.5 EPA’s OGD Workgroup
1.6 EPA’s New Social Media Policy
2. EPA’s One Wiki:
2.1 Initial Impressions
2.2 The Environment in Wikipedia
2.3 Web 2.0 Whitepaper Pilot Wiki
2.4 Information / Data Model
2.5 Sheetster for Data.gov/semantic
3. Recommendations
Design Suggestions for EPA’s One Wiki in Support of the EPA OGD Work Groupguest8c518a8
1. Background:
1.1 Supporting EPA's Top Priorities
1.2 An EPA EA Roadmap
1.3 Solution Architecture 2010
1.4 My List of Action Items
1.5 EPA’s OGD Workgroup
1.6 EPA’s New Social Media Policy
2. EPA’s One Wiki:
2.1 Initial Impressions
2.2 The Environment in Wikipedia
2.3 Web 2.0 Whitepaper Pilot Wiki
2.4 Information / Data Model
2.5 Sheetster for Data.gov/semantic
3. Recommendations
Usability Testing in Federal Libraries: A Case Studynullhandle
Presentation given to the Federal Library Information Network (FLICC) Emerging Technologies Working Group on improvised usability testing of a redesigned electronic resources access portal for the U.S. Supreme Court Library.
1. Journal for Software Engineering
, 2011
January 20th, 2011
Took notes regarding the meeting we had with the client. We assessed and sorted out the
important information that we would need to ensure we accomplished our objective of a
finished site.
January 27th, 2011
Each of us went over the entire Specifications document that David Wuske had created.
We made some modifications, and doubly ensured we had a firm idea on what needed to
be done to make the site its best. I took up the position as head of the documentation
subgroup at this time.
February 3rd, 2011
We went over the Specification document and method of grading primarily, along with
some focus on designing the database. Discussions continued on blackboard, with
another topic of interest being the control of intellectual property.
February 10th, 2011
Together we laid out plans for the majority of the semester, with such topics addressed as
the database, data dictionary, and back-up. The issue of the ER diagram was also
addressed, with testing and intellectual property-related documents mentioned as well. At
this time much of the work each subgroup and each person had to do was discussed and
for the most part decided. For those involved in documentation, we needed to do research
on what the User Agreement, Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and other intellectual
property issued entailed, along with how they applied to our site. We also had to work on
deciding some questions we may ask the Patent Lawyer who was planned to come in
later in the semester.
February 17th, 2011
We began working on creating the many documents our subgroup was tasked to be
doing, based off of the research we each performed. General examples were one such
way we were able to better understand how User Agreements and the Terms of Service
operated.
February 24th, 2011
Discussions over how Test Cases would be executed were one of the major highlights of
this class. Likewise, testing of the site had been divided amongst each member, with my
area being decided on as the Dashboard/User Account sections. During this time I had
been reading the book on intellectual property that was handed out between both groups,
as were the other members of my group.
March 10th, 2011
Went over the concept of Test Cases in further detail. Reformatted what I had done
regarding my own Test Cases, adding and renaming sections accordingly. Went over how
to apply the test cases toward the wireframes that had been designed.
2. March 17th, 2011
I finished with the book on intellectual property at this point. I also handed in my test
cases at this time. Discussions for this class focused on the book and the test cases once
again. Another topic we touched on was how to incorporate e-mails with pre-generated
messages that users of the site would get, depending on their actions. The questions we
would ask the lawyer were also discussed at this point.
March 24th, 2011
We talked with the lawyer as a class, with notes being taken by many of us, including
myself. Discussions continued on how the User Agreement, Terms of Service, and
Privacy Policy should be modified and finished. Minor discussions regarding testing and
registration to the site were also covered at this time. Notes taken while talking to the
lawyer, along with the information the lawyer himself conveyed offered a lot of insight
on patents and copyrights, and how employees are affected by each. The effects, ability,
and composition of both patents and copyrights were covered in great detail.
March 31st, 2011
I turned in some results regarding the beginning sessions of testing. Testing the site
actively was a major focus of this particular class, with some clarification on areas of
testing allowing me to know where to focus my attention on. General tests were also
employed, in order to test the interactive features that the site needed to be capable of.
April 7th, 2011
This class was mostly focused on testing the site, with re-registering a necessity, as it
would be again in the future, to incorporate changes. The remainder of the semester’s
schedule was decided at this time. Regarding errors, it was decided we would go into
detail over each error we had found and then notify those who would fix them.
April 14th, 2011
I ensured that the many items based on intellectual property were finished by this time,
with most changes and revisions done by now. The User Agreement, FAQs, Terms of
Service, and Privacy Policy were handed over, to be added to the site. Work started in
regards to the final presentation, mostly deciding how to present the site. More testing
was done, both inside and outside of class.
April 28th, 2011, May 4th, 2011
Further testing was done, but most errors found were fixed by this point. The presentation
became the focus of my subgroup, with each of us pitching in ideas for information to be
placed in it. Eventually we worked with the designers on the look of the presentation,
along with deciding who would be presenting it. I collected any remaining information at
this point, to ensure it was kept intact.
May 5th, 2011
This was the day of the presentation, and the last class. I made sure to contribute test
items for the presentation as I had during the testing phase.