SlideShare a Scribd company logo
DRAFT
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426
In re:
Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
Docket No. RP16-301-000
Issued: _______, 2016
Joseph S. Koury
Wright & Talisman P.C.
1200 G Street N.W., Suite 600
Washington, D.C. 20005
Reference: August 18, 2016 Stipulation and Settlement Agreement
On August 18, 2016, pursuant to Rule 602 of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission’s (“Commission”) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 C.F.R. § 385.602, Iroquois
Gas Transmission System, L.P. (“Iroquois”) filed an offer of settlement in the form of a
Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (“Settlement”) that resolves all issues set for hearing in
this proceeding. As discussed below, the Commission approves the Settlement as fair and
reasonable and in the public interest.
On January 21, 2016, the Commission issued an order initiating an investigation of
Iroquois’ rates under section 5 of the Natural Gas Act.1
Pursuant to that January 21 Order,
Iroquois submitted a Cost and Revenue Study on April 5, 2016. Substantial discovery was
thereafter undertaken by the active participants. The participants convened publicly-noticed
settlement conferences on April 28, 2016, May 18, 2016, June 1, 2016, and June 16, 2016. As a
result of these settlement negotiations, the participants ultimately reached this Settlement
resolving all of the issues set for hearing in this proceeding, as set forth below.
The terms of the Agreement are summarized as follows:
Article I (Rate Matters): Section 1.1 establishes Iroquois’ base tariff recourse rates, as set forth
on Pro Forma Sheet Nos. 4, 4.01. 4B, 4C, 4D, and 5A contained in Appendix A to the
Settlement, providing three scheduled rate reductions to be effective September 1 of 2016, 2017,
and 2018. Section 1.2 provides that Iroquois will file revised tariff sheets reflecting the
Settlement Rates within 15 days after the Settlement becomes effective. Section 1.3 provides
that Iroquois will file Interim Settlement Rates to be effective September 1, 2016, pending
Commission approval of the Settlement. Section 1.4 provides that Iroquois will use the
depreciation, amortization, and negative salvage rates set forth on Appendix B to the Settlement.
1
Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., Notice of Initiation of Section 5 Proceeding,
Docket No. RP16-301-000 (Jan. 21, 2016); Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., 154
FERC ¶ 61,028 (2016) (“January 21 Order”).
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
DRAFT
2
Article II (Rate Moratorium): Section 2.1 establishes a Moratorium that prohibits parties from
requesting a change to the Settlement Rates prior to September 1, 2020. Sections 2.2 and 2.3
identify certain types of filings that are not prohibited by the Moratorium. Section 2.4 provides
that, in the event that Iroquois makes a Tariff filing pursuant to Section 2.2 or 2.3 during the
Moratorium, parties retain their right to protest such section 4 filings (except on the ground that
such filing violates the Moratorium). Section 2.5 provides that Iroquois will afford shippers an
opportunity to preview and comment on certain section 4 tariff filings that Iroquois may submit
during the Moratorium. Section 2.6 provides that the Moratorium and all provisions of Article II
terminate on August 31, 2020.
Article III (Future Section 4 Rate Filing): Section 3.1 provides that, upon conclusion of the
Moratorium, Iroquois will file a general section 4 rate case no later than September 1, 2022,
unless such obligation is extinguished through a prior change to the Settlement Rates. Section
3.2 provides that Iroquois will provide shippers thirty days notice and overview of the general
section 4 filing.
Article IV (Term): The term of the Settlement shall commence on September 1, 2016 and shall
terminate after the end of the Moratorium, upon the earliest post-Moratorium effectiveness of
new base tariff rates that are the result of a general rate change pursuant to section 4 of the
Natural Gas Act, a general rate settlement, or a general modification of Iroquois’ base tariff rates
in a proceeding instituted pursuant to section 5 of the Natural Gas Act.
Article V (Effectiveness): Section 5.1 provides that the various provisions of the Settlement are
not severable and will become effective on the date the Settlement is approved by a final
Commission order. Section 5.2 provides that, in the event the Commission modifies the
Settlement, parties may refuse to accept the modified Settlement and become a Contesting Party.
While the parties know of no opposition to the Settlement, in the event that the Settlement is
contested, Section 5.3 provides that it is the intent of the parties that the Commission approve the
Settlement for all Non-Contesting Parties.2
Any Contesting Parties will neither be bound by, nor
receive the benefits of, the Settlement.
Article VI (Waiver and Authority): Approval of the Settlement constitutes any and all waivers
and provides all authority under the Natural Gas Act and the Commission’s rules and regulations
that may be necessary for the Settlement to be effectuated in accordance with all of its terms.
Article VII (Changes to Settlement and Standard of Review): Section 7.1 establishes that the
Settlement is the final and binding agreement of the Non-Contesting Parties and may be
modified only by written agreement of all Non-Contesting Parties. Section 7.2 sets forth the
standard of review for changes to the settlement after approval.
2
“Non-Contesting Parties” are parties that either support, do not oppose, or take no
position regarding this Settlement. “Contesting Parties” are parties that oppose this
Settlement or suggest or request in any manner a modification, reservation or condition to
this Settlement as originally filed, regardless of whether such party characterizes its
comments as being in support of the Settlement. Parties that fail to accept a Commission
modification to this Settlement pursuant to Section 5.2 shall also be Contesting Parties.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
DRAFT
3
Article VIII (Reservations and Conditions): Article VIII contains standard reservations stating
that parties waive no rights other than as specifically provided in the Settlement, that the
Settlement should not be construed against any party as drafter, that the Settlement does not
establish any principles, policies, or practices, and that Commission approval of the Settlement
authorizes Iroquois to implement the Settlement Rates on the dates without suspension.
The Commission has reviewed the Settlement and the record certified by the Presiding Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 602(g), the Commission finds that the Settlement is fair and reasonable and in
the public interest. Accordingly, the Commission approves the Settlement. This order
constitutes final agency action. Requests for rehearing by the Commission may be filed within
30 days of the date of issuance of this order, pursuant to 18 C.F.R. § 385.713.
By direction of the Commission,
Kimberly D. Bose
Secretary
cc: All Parties
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
August 18, 2016
Honorable Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
888 First Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20426
Re: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P., Docket No. RP16-301-000
Stipulation and Settlement Agreement
Unopposed Request for Shortened Comment Period
Dear Secretary Bose:
Pursuant to Rule 602 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (“Commission”), 18 C.F.R. § 385.602, Iroquois Gas
Transmission System, L.P. (“Iroquois”) hereby files the attached Stipulation and
Settlement Agreement (“Settlement”) resolving all issues in this proceeding. Iroquois
believes that the Settlement is supported or not opposed by all participants.
As discussed below, Iroquois requests a shortened comment period, given that the
Settlement has been previously circulated to all participants and none has expressed
opposition to the Settlement or the request for a shortened comment period.
Additionally, to facilitate timely implementation of the Settlement, Iroquois respectfully
requests that the Commission act on the Settlement by no later than December 1, 2016.
This filing includes:
 The Settlement resolving all issues set for hearing in this proceeding;
 A separate Explanatory Statement, which contains a summary of the Settlement
terms, as well as the information required by the Chief Administrative Law
Judge’s October 15, 2003 Notice;
 Pro forma tariff sheets in both redlined and non-redlined format reflecting the
Settlement Rates (contained in Appendix A to the Settlement); and
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
Honorable Kimberly D. Bose
August 18, 2016
Page 2
 A draft Commission Letter Order approving the Settlement, in accordance with
the Chief Administrative Law Judge’s December 21, 1999 Notice.
As explained in more detail in the Settlement (at 1-2), this proceeding concerns an
investigation of Iroquois’ rates under section 5 of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. § 717d,
which was initiated by the Commission’s January 21, 2016 order.1
Thereafter, Presiding
Judge Coffman adopted a procedural schedule, active participants conducted substantial
discovery, and the participants convened publicly-noticed settlement conferences on
April 28, 2016, May 18, 2016, June 1, 2016, and June 16, 2016, which resulted in the
Settlement.
The Settlement reflects an interrelated package of compromises between and
among Iroquois and the active participants. The Settlement resolves all issues in this
proceeding, reduces Iroquois’ rates in three scheduled step-downs and ensures rate
predictability and stability on Iroquois’ system through August 31, 2020.2
All
participants were provided an opportunity to participate in the negotiation of the
Settlement. Iroquois believes that the Settlement is supported or unopposed by the
Commission’s Trial Staff and all other participants to this proceeding.
Accordingly, as discussed below, Iroquois requests that the Settlement be
promptly certified by the Presiding Judge and approved by the Commission by no later
than December 1, 2016.
Request for Transmission to Presiding Judge
In accordance with Rule 602(b)(2)(i), 18 C.F.R. § 602(b)(2)(i), Iroquois requests
that the Settlement and accompanying documents be transmitted to Presiding Judge
David H. Coffman for certification. Iroquois believes that the Settlement will be
“uncontested” within the meaning of 18 C.F.R. § 385.602(g).
Unopposed Request for Shortened Comment Period
Iroquois respectfully requests a shortened comment period to facilitate timely
certification and approval of the Settlement and to avoid any delay in realizing the
benefits of the Settlement for all participants. Additionally, all participants were given an
opportunity to review and comment on drafts of the Settlement before it was filed. In the
1
Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., Notice of Initiation of Section 5
Proceeding, Docket No. RP16-301-000 (Jan. 21, 2016); Iroquois Gas
Transmission Sys., L.P., 154 FERC ¶ 61,028 (2016).
2
Concurrently with the filing of the Settlement, and pursuant to Section 1.3 of the
Settlement, Iroquois is filing an unopposed request to place Interim Settlement
Rates in effect September 1, 2016, pending approval of the Settlement.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
Honorable Kimberly D. Bose
August 18, 2016
Page 3
weeks prior to the filing of this Settlement, Iroquois circulated drafts of the Settlement to
all active participants, solicited comments on the drafts, and resolved the limited
comments received. Additionally, Iroquois consulted with all participants regarding this
proposal for a shortened comment period. No participant expressed opposition to the
Settlement or this request for a shortened comment period. Accordingly, Iroquois
requests that the initial comments be due within seven (7) business days of this filing
(i.e., on or before August 29, 2016), and reply comments be due within seven (7)
business days thereafter (i.e., on or before September 8, 2016).
In the event that a shortened comment period is not granted, in accordance with Rule
602(f)(2), comments regarding the Settlement would be due no later than 20 days after
this filing, i.e. by September 8, 2016, and reply comments are due not later than 30 days
after this filing, i.e., by September 19, 2016 (accounting for the weekend).
Request for Commission Action by December 1, 2016
Iroquois respectfully requests that the Commission approve the Settlement by
December 1, 2016, which will facilitate implementation of the Settlement and realization
of its benefits during this calendar year. Action by this date will allow rate certainty for
the upcoming heating season. Additionally, it will allow Iroquois to implement the
Settlement depreciation and negative salvage rates and conform its books and records
before the close of the fiscal year.
Waivers
While Iroquois knows of no required waivers, Iroquois respectfully requests that the
Commission grant any waivers of its regulations, policy or precedent that the Commission
may deem necessary to accept this Settlement as proposed herein.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
Honorable Kimberly D. Bose
August 18, 2016
Page 4
Certification of Posting and Service
In accordance with 18. C.F.R. §§ 385.602(d) and 154.2(d), the undersigned
certifies that copies of this filing have been posted and served to all customers and
interested state regulatory commissions, as well as all persons on the service list prepared
by the Secretary in this docket.
Respectfully submitted,
By /s/ Joseph S. Koury
M. Lisanne Crowley
Daniel P. Archuleta
Troutman Sanders LLP
401 9th St., N.W., Suite 1000
Washington, D.C. 20004-2134
(P) (202) 274-2814
lisanne.crowley@troutmansanders.com
daniel.archuleta@troutmansanders.com
Joseph S. Koury
Ryan J. Collins
Wright & Talisman P.C.
1200 G Street N.W., Suite 600
Washington, D.C. 20005
(P) (202) 393-1200
koury@wrightlaw.com
collins@wrightlaw.com
Helen M. Gallagher
Director of Legal Services & Secretary
Iroquois Pipeline Operating Company
One Corporate Drive, Suite 600
Shelton, CT 06484
(P) (203) 925-7201
helen_gallagher@iroquois.com
Attorneys for
Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
August 18, 2016
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
STIPULATION AND
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE THE
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
)
Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. ) Docket No. RP16-301-000
)
STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
(August 18, 2016)
Pursuant to Rule 602 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (“Commission”), 18 C.F.R. § 385.602, Iroquois Gas Transmission
System, L.P. (“Iroquois”) submits this Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (“Settlement”),
which establishes three scheduled reductions to Iroquois’ rates, provides rate certainty through
August 31, 2020, and resolves all issues in this proceeding. The Settlement is supported or not
opposed by the Commission’s Trial Staff and all active parties to this proceeding.1
Iroquois is
not aware of any opposition to this Settlement. The participants therefore urge the Commission
to promptly approve the Settlement without modification or conditions.
BACKGROUND
On January 21, 2016,2
the Commission initiated an investigation of Iroquois’ rates under
section 5 of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. § 717d. On February 12, 2016, Presiding Judge
1
Participants that support or do not oppose the settlement are set forth on Appendix D.
2
Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., Notice of Initiation of Section 5 Proceeding,
Docket No. RP16-301-000 (Jan. 21, 2016); Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., 154
FERC ¶ 61,028 (2016).
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
2
Coffman adopted the procedural schedule for this proceeding.3
Substantial discovery was
thereafter undertaken by the active participants. The participants convened publicly-noticed
settlement conferences on April 28, 2016, May 18, 2016, June 1, 2016, and June 16, 2016, which
culminated in the agreement memorialized in this Settlement.
This Settlement is the result of numerous compromises between and among Iroquois and
the active participants. The Settlement reflects a package of interrelated provisions that will
resolve all issues in this proceeding, reduce Iroquois’ rates in three scheduled step-downs and
ensure rate predictability and stability through August 31, 2020.
ARTICLE I
RATE MATTERS
1.1 Settlement Rates
Iroquois’ base tariff rates4
shall be the rates set forth on Pro Forma Sheet Nos. 4, 4.01.
4B, 4C, 4D, and 5A contained in Appendix A to be effective for the respective periods set forth
thereon (“Settlement Rates”).
1.2 Implementation of Settlement Rates
a. Within fifteen (15) days after this Settlement becomes effective, in accordance
with Article V, Iroquois shall file revised tariff sheets reflecting the Settlement Rates shown on
3
Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P., Order Establishing Procedural Schedule, Docket
No. RP16-301-000 (Feb. 12, 2016).
4
As used in the Settlement, the term “base tariff rates” means Iroquois’ recourse rates for
existing services, exclusive of the following applicable rate adjustments: (1) the Annual
Charge Adjustment (“ACA”) surcharge, and any other industry-wide surcharge or credit
imposed by the Commission; and (2) Iroquois’ fuel and losses retention mechanism,
which is currently referred to as the Measurement Variance/Fuel Use Factor (“MV/FU”).
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
3
Pro Forma Sheet Nos. 4, 4.01. 4B, 4C, 4D, and 5A contained in Appendix A, to be effective
September 1, 2016.
b. The Commission’s order approving this Settlement and making it effective in
accordance with Article V shall constitute all authority necessary for Iroquois to place into effect
the revised tariff sheets filed in accordance with Section 1.2(a).
1.3 Interim Settlement Rates
Concurrently with Iroquois’ filing of the Settlement, Iroquois will file a motion to place
into effect, on an interim basis, effective September 1, 2016, the Settlement Rates shown on Pro
Forma Sheet Nos. 4, 4.01. 4B, 4C, 4D, and 5A under the column “Effective 9/1/2016” (“Interim
Settlement Rates”). In the event that the Settlement does not become effective to some or all
shippers in accordance with Article V, Iroquois may file with the Commission, and the parties5
will not oppose, a request to reinstate Iroquois’ rates in effect prior to the filing of the Interim
Settlement Rates (“Existing Rates”), and to surcharge shippers to which the Settlement did not
become effective and that were charged the Interim Settlement Rates, for the difference between
the amounts collected under the Interim Settlement Rates and amounts that would have been
collected under the Existing Rates for the period the Interim Settlement Rates were effective.
1.4 Depreciation, Amortization, and Negative Salvage Rates
Iroquois shall apply the depreciation, amortization, and negative salvage rates, and
conform its related regulatory accounts to the rates set forth on Appendix B, commencing
September 1, 2016.
5
As used in the Settlement, the terms “party” and “participant” (in singular or plural) shall
have the same meaning as in 18 C.F.R. §§ 385.102(b) and (c), and shall include all
successors and assignees.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
4
ARTICLE II
RATE MORATORIUM
2.1 Moratorium
All participants agree to not initiate a change to the Settlement Rates under either section
4 or section 5 of the Natural Gas Act prior to September 1, 2020 (i.e., four (4) years following the
September 1, 2016 effective date of the Settlement pursuant to Article V), which period shall be
the “Moratorium.”
2.2 Exceptions to Moratorium
The Moratorium shall not prohibit:
(1) Changes to Iroquois’ FERC Gas Tariff (“Tariff”) required to comply with
generally applicable changes in law or Commission policy;
(2) Tariff changes associated with new projects or services, provided however,
Iroquois will not propose to make effective during the Moratorium:
(a) any authorized overrun rate applicable to existing services,
(b) any rate tracking mechanism to recover costs of compliance with
regulations of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration or with laws or regulations regarding greenhouse
gases;
(c) hourly services not related to new construction projects, or
(d) services substantially similar to those listed in (a), (b), or (c) above
under a different name;
provided further, that any new services Iroquois proposes that use existing
facilities: (1) will not degrade existing firm service or existing imbalance
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
5
flexibility under Operational Balancing Agreements (“OBAs”); and (2) will
not require existing firm shippers to pay higher rates in order to maintain
substantially the same quality of service under existing firm services;
(3) Periodic tracker filings in accordance with Iroquois’ Tariff; and
(4) Tariff changes that do not change the Settlement Rates, do not require existing
firm shippers to pay higher rates in order to maintain substantially the same
quality of service under existing firm services, and do not degrade existing
firm services or existing imbalance flexibility under OBAs, including, but not
limited to, the Tariff Modernization filings in Section 2.3.
2.3 Specific Moratorium Exceptions for Tariff Modernization Filings
The Moratorium shall not prohibit Iroquois from making filings under section 4 of the
Natural Gas Act to implement the following Tariff Modernization provisions, as further
described in Appendix C, and subject to the qualifications in Section 2.2:
(1) Fuel and Loss Provisions;
(2) System Reliability and Integrity Protection Enhancements;
(3) Updated and Clarified Right of First Refusal Process; and
(4) Clarified Service Rights, so long as the clarified service rights do not
degrade existing firm services or existing imbalance flexibility under
OBAs.
2.4 Right to Protest Tariff Filings
In the event that Iroquois makes a Tariff filing pursuant to Section 2.2 or 2.3 during the
Moratorium, nothing in this Settlement shall limit the right of parties to protest any such filing on
any grounds except the ground that the Iroquois filing violates the Moratorium.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
6
2.5 Preview of Tariff Filings
Prior to filing with the Commission, Iroquois shall afford shippers an opportunity to
preview and comment on any section 4 Tariff filings during the Moratorium that propose
generally applicable changes to Iroquois’ general terms and conditions and/or services.6
Where
practical, Iroquois will endeavor to provide shippers at least fifteen (15) days prior notice.
2.6 Termination of Moratorium
The Moratorium and all provisions of this Article II shall terminate August 31, 2020.
ARTICLE III
FUTURE SECTION 4 RATE FILING
3.1 Obligation to File Section 4 Rate Case
After the conclusion of the Moratorium, Iroquois shall file a general rate case under
section 4 of the Natural Gas Act with the Commission no later than September 1, 2022;
provided, however, such obligation is extinguished in the event that, after the end of the
Moratorium but before September 1, 2022, Iroquois has filed a general rate case under section 4
of the Natural Gas Act or a general rate settlement that is approved by the Commission, or in the
event that the Commission has instituted a general investigation of Iroquois’ rates under section 5
of the Natural Gas Act.
6
This tariff preview process does not include filings such as tracker filings (e.g., fuel
filings), customer-specific filings (e.g., negotiated rate or non-conforming service
agreements), or Commission-directed compliance filings.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
7
3.2 Notice of Section 4 Filing
At least thirty (30) days prior to filing a general rate case under section 4 of the Natural
Gas Act pursuant to Section 3.1, Iroquois will provide shippers notice and an overview of the
filing and an opportunity to comment.
ARTICLE IV
TERM
Upon becoming effective in accordance with Article V, this Settlement shall be effective
for a term commencing on September 1, 2016 and terminating after the end of the Moratorium
upon the earliest post-Moratorium effectiveness of new base tariff rates pursuant to: (1) a
superseding general rate change filing under section 4 of the Natural Gas Act; (2) a general
modification of Iroquois’ base tariff rates in a proceeding instituted pursuant to section 5 of the
Natural Gas Act; or (3) a general rate settlement between Iroquois and the other parties.
ARTICLE V
EFFECTIVENESS
5.1 Effective Date / Nonseverability
The various provisions of this Settlement are not severable and shall become binding and
effective on the date that this Settlement has been approved by a final Commission order7
as to
all its terms without material modification(s), reservation(s) or condition(s) (collectively referred
to as “modification”), unless such modification is accepted pursuant to Section 5.2 below. Upon
approval by the Commission pursuant to this Article V, the effective date of the Settlement shall
be September 1, 2016.
7
For purposes of this Settlement, a final Commission order is an order no longer subject to
rehearing pursuant to 18 C.F.R. § 385.713 or judicial review.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
8
5.2 Commission Modification to Settlement
In the event the Commission by final order approves this Settlement with a modification
materially adverse to any Non-Contesting Party,8
then such party shall be deemed to have
accepted such modification unless, by written notice filed with the Commission and served on all
parties no later than fourteen (14) days after such final order, such party states its refusal to
accept the Settlement as modified. On the fifteenth (15th
) day after such final Commission order,
this Settlement, as modified by the Commission, shall become effective and binding as to all
Non-Contesting Parties that have accepted the Commission’s modification. In the event that a
Non-Contesting Party gives notice of its refusal to accept the Settlement as modified, such party
shall become a Contesting Party9
for purposes of Section 5.3 below; provided, however, in the
event that Iroquois gives notice of its refusal to accept the Settlement as modified, the Settlement
shall upon such notice become null and void (with the exception of the Interim Settlement Rates
provisions pertaining to reinstatement and surcharge in Section 1.3).
5.3 Applicability of Settlement to Contesting Parties / Non-Contesting Parties
While the participants know of no opposition to this Settlement, in the event this
Settlement is opposed, it is the intent of the participants that the Commission approve this
Settlement and allow its effectiveness for all Non-Contesting Parties. Any Contesting Parties
8
“Non-Contesting Parties” are parties that either support or do not oppose this Settlement.
“Contesting Parties” are parties that oppose this Settlement or suggest or request in any
manner a modification, reservation or condition to this Settlement as originally filed,
regardless of whether such party characterizes its comments as being in support of the
Settlement. Parties that provide notice that they refuse to accept a Commission
modification to this Settlement pursuant to Section 5.2 shall also be Contesting Parties.
9
Id.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
9
shall neither be bound by, nor receive the benefits of, this Settlement, and shall pay Iroquois’
Existing Rates (subject to any agreed upon discount or negotiated rate, and subject to Section 1.3
reinstatement and surcharge provisions).
ARTICLE VI
WAIVER AND AUTHORITY
The Commission’s approval of this Settlement shall constitute any and all waivers and
provide all authority under the Natural Gas Act and the Commission’s rules and regulations that
may be necessary for Iroquois to implement the Settlement in accordance with all of its terms.
ARTICLE VII
CHANGES TO SETTLEMENT AND STANDARD OF REVIEW
7.1 Changes to Settlement
This Settlement is the final and binding agreement of the Non-Contesting Parties. After
becoming effective in accordance with Article V, this Settlement shall not be modified except by
written agreement of all Non-Contesting Parties.
7.2 Standard of Review for Changes to Settlement After Effectiveness
Absent an agreement pursuant to Section 7.1, and after the Settlement becomes effective
in accordance with Article V, in the event the Commission considers changes to the settlement
on behalf of any party, the standard of review shall be the “public interest” standard of review set
forth in United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Services Corp., 350 U.S. 332 (1956), Federal
Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co., 350 U.S. 348 (1956), and Morgan Stanley
Capital Group Inc. v. Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1, 554 U.S. 527 (2008). The standard of review for
changes to the Settlement proposed by a non-party or the Commission acting sua sponte shall be
the most stringent standard permissible under applicable law.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
10
ARTICLE VIII
RESERVATIONS AND CONDITIONS
8.1 Negotiated Settlement
This Settlement represents a negotiated resolution of only the specific matters addressed
herein. Except as specifically provided in this Settlement, no participant shall be deemed to have
waived any claim or right as to matters not addressed. This Settlement represents the entire
agreement of the participants with respect to the matters resolved.
8.2 No Drafter
No party shall be deemed the drafter of this Settlement and this Settlement shall not be
construed against any party as drafter. In the event of a conflict between terms contained in the
Settlement and those of the attached Explanatory Statement, the terms of Settlement control.
8.3 Settlement Has No Precedential Value
The provisions of this Settlement are for purposes of settlement only and shall have no
precedential effect. The Commission’s approval of this Settlement shall constitute a finding that
the Settlement is fair and reasonable and in the public interest, but shall not constitute a
determination on the merits of the specific provisions of the Settlement. Except as specifically
provided in this Settlement, no participant shall be deemed to have accepted or consented to any
policy or principle purported to underlie the provisions of this Settlement. Except as specifically
provided in this Settlement, the participants shall have the same rights under the Natural Gas Act
that they would have had absent approval of this Settlement.
The methods or practices or absence of methods or practices used or purported to be used
in deriving rates shall not be evidence that a particular method is a “long-standing practice” as
that term is used in Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. FERC, 628 F.2d 578 (D.C. Cir. 1979),
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
11
or a “settled practice” as that term is used in Public Service Commission of New York v. FERC,
642 F.2d 1335 (D.C. Cir. 1980).
8.4 Effect of Commission Approval
The Commission’s approval of this Settlement shall constitute all necessary authority and
approval for Iroquois to implement the Settlement Rates on their stated effective dates without
further filings (other than pursuant to Section 1.2), without suspension, and without conditions
other than those specified herein, and granting any waiver of the Commission’s regulations
necessary to implement such Settlement Rates in accordance with this Settlement.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
APPENDIX A
PRO FORMA
TARIFF SHEETS
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
Pro forma Tariff Sheets
(Redline)
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4
-------- --------------- NON-EASTCHESTER RATES (All in $ Per Dth) 1/ ---------------
----------
Non-Settlement ------------------ Settlement Recourse Rates ---------------------
Recourse & ---- Applicable to Non-Eastchester/Non-Contesting Shippers 2/ ----
Maximum Maximum Maximum Eastchester
Initial Effective Effective Effective Effective
Effective
Minimum Minimum Rates 3/ 1/1/2003 97/1/201604 91/1/201705
91/1/201806 1/1/2007
RTS DEMAND (Monthly):
Zone 1 $0.0000 $7.5637 $0.00007.5637 $6.19289586 $5.99826.8514
$5.59976.7788 $6.5971
Zone 2 $0.0000 $6.4976 $0.00006.4976 $5.33819778 $5.16785.8857
$4.79985.8233 $5.6673
Inter-Zone $0.0000 $12.7150 $0.000012.7150 $10.47551.6978 $9.867211.5177
$8.802611.3956 $11.0902
Zone 1 (MFV) 1/ $0.0000 $5.3607 $5.3607 $4.9318 $4.8559 $4.8044 $4.6757
RTS COMMODITY (Daily):
Zone 1 $0.0030 $0.0030 $0.00340 $0.00340 $0.00340 $0.00340
$0.0030
Zone 2 $0.0024 $0.0024 $0.00224 $0.00224 $0.00224 $0.00224
$0.0024
Inter-Zone $0.0054 $0.0054 $0.00564 $0.00564 $0.00564 $0.00564
$0.0054
Zone 1 (MFV) 1/ $0.0300 $0.1506 $0.1506 $0.1386 $0.1364 $0.1350 $0.1314
ITS COMMODITY (Daily):
Zone 1 $0.0030 $0.2517 $0.00342517 $0.20702318 $0.20062283
$0.18752259 $0.2199
Zone 2 $0.0024 $0.2160 $0.00222160 $0.17771989 $0.17211959
$0.16001938 $0.1887
Inter-Zone $0.0054 $0.4234 $0.00564234 $0.35003900 $0.33003840
$0.29503800 $0.3700
Zone 1 (MFV) 1/ $0.0300 $0.3268 $0.3268 $0.3007 $0.2960 $0.2929 $0.2850
MAXIMUM VOLUMETRIC CAPACITY RELEASE RATE (Daily) 24/:
Zone 1 $0.0000 $0.2487 $0.00002487 $0.20362288 $0.19722253
$0.18412229 $0.2169
Zone 2 $0.0000 $0.2136 $0.00002136 $0.17551965 $0.16991935
$0.1578915 $0.1863
Inter-Zone $0.0000 $0.4180 $0.00004180 $0.3444846 $0.32443787
$0.28943746 $0.3646
Zone 1 (MFV) 1/ $0.0000 $0.1762 $0.1762 $0.1621 $0.1596 $0.1580 $0.1537
**SEE SHEET NOS. 4A, 4B, and 4C FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO RATES WHICH MAY BE APPLICABLE
(Footnotes continued on Sheet 4.01)
PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4.01
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
1/ As authorized pursuant to order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Docket Nos. RS92-17-003,
et al., dated June 18, 1993 (63 FERC para. 61,285).
21/ Settlement Recourse Rates were established in Iroquois' Transporter’s Settlement dated August 29,
2003 August 18, 2016[TBD], in Docket No. RP16-301-000, which was
approved by Commission order issued Oct. 24, 2003[TBD], in Docket No. RP03-589-000RP16-301-
000established new base tariff recourse rates referred to as “Settlement Rates” and . That Settlement also
established a moratorium on changes to the Settlement Rates until January 1, 2008September 1, 2020,
defines the
Non-Eastchester/Non-Contesting parties to which it applies, and provides that Iroquois' TCRA will be
terminated on July 1, 2004. All
recourse/ Maximum and Minimum Rates listed on Sheet Nos. 4, 4B, 4C, and 5A are Settlement Rates were
established in the
Settlement and therefore are subject to the moratorium.
3/ See Sections 1.2 and 4.3 of the Settlement referenced in footnote 2. As directed by the Commission's
January 30, 2004 Order in Docket No. RP04-136, the Eastchester Initial Rates apply for service to
Eastchester Shippers prior to the July 1, 2004 effective date of the rates set forth on Sheet No. 4C.
42/ No rate cap shall apply to any capacity releases with terms of less than or equal to one year
pursuant to FERC Order Nos. 712 et al.
PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4B
EXTENDED RECEIPT AND EXTENDED DELIVERY RATES (All in $ Per Dth)
Applicable to Non-Eastchester/Non-Contesting Shippers 1/
ER/ED COMMODITY (Daily):
----------- Maximum Rates -------------
Minimum Effective Effective Effective
Primary Contract Path Rate 9/1/2016 9/1/2017 9/1/2018
Zone 1 $0.0056 $0.1464 $0.1328 $0.1109
Zone 2 $0.0056 $0.1745 $0.1601 $0.1372
------------------- Maximum Rates -----------------------
Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective
Minimum 1/1/2003 7/1/2004 1/1/2005 1/1/2006 1/1/2007
ER/ED COMMODITY:
Zone 1 $0.0054 $0.2098 $0.1935 $0.1906 $0.1886 $0.1837
Zone 2 $0.0054 $0.1747 $0.1612 $0.1588 $0.1572 $0.1531
Zone 2 (MFV) $0.0324 $0.3223 $0.2968 $0.2922 $0.2892 $0.2815
_________________________________________________________________________________
1/ Extended Receipt ("ER") and Extended Delivery ("ED") rates are
derived from
the Settlement Recourse Maximum and Minimum Rates shown on Sheet No. 4,
using the methodology
approved by the Commission for ER/ED rates in
Docket No. RP03-258. The Non-Eastchester/Non-Contesting Shippers to
which ER/ED rates apply are defined in Iroquois' August 29, 2003
Settlement approved by the Commission's October 24, 2003 order in
Docket No. RP03-589. ER/ED rates
apply to transactions utilizing a zone
other than the zone/Lateral for which
service was contracted in
Shipper's RTS contract pursuant to Sections 7.1.1
and 7.3.1 of
Transporter's General Terms and Conditions and are in addition to
rates otherwise applicable under such contract.
PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4C
------------------------ EASTCHESTER RATES 12/ (All in $ Per Dth) ------------------------
Eastchester Primary Access Rates
--------- Maximum Rates 2/ -----------
Minimum Effective Effective
Rate 9/1/2016 9/1/2018
RTS Demand (Monthly) $0.0000 $13.8396 $12.0146
RTS Commodity (Daily) $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000
ITS Commodity (Daily) $0.0000 $0.4550 $0.3950
Volumetric Capacity
Release (Daily) 3/ $0.0000 $0.4550 $0.3950
-------------- Maximum Rates ------------------
Minimum Effective Effective
7/1/2004 - 12/31/2007 1/1/2008
Eastchester RTS Demand 5/: $0.0000 $20.075 $19.3146
Eastchester RTS Commodity: $0.0000 $ 0.0000 $ 0.0000
Eastchester ITS Commodity: $0.0000 $ 0.6600 $ 0.6350
Eastchester Secondary Access Rates (Daily) 4/ 3/
---------- Maximum Rates -------------
Minimum Effective Effective Effective
Rate 9/1/2016 9/1/2017 9/1/2018
Primary Contract Path:
Zone 1 $0.0000 $0.2480 $0.2544 $0.2075
Zone 2 $0.0000 $0.2773 $0.2829 $0.2350
Inter-Zone $0.0000 $0.1050 $0.1250 $0.1000
---------------------- Maximum Rates -------------------------------
-------
Minimum Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective
7/1/2004 1/1/2005 1/1/2006 1/1/2007 1/1/2008
Primary Contract Path
Zone 1 $0.0000 $0.4282 $0.4317 $0.4341 $0.4401 $0.4151
Zone 2 $0.0000 $0.4611 $0.4641 $0.4662 $0.4713 $0.4463
Inter-Zone $0.0000 $0.2700 $0.2760 $0.2800 $0.2900 $0.2650
Zone 1 (MFV) 1/ $0.0000 $0.3593 $0.3640 $0.3671 $0.3750 $0.3500
**SEE SHEET NO. 4A FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO RATES WHICH MAY BE APPLICABLE 5/ 4/
____________________________
1/ As authorized pursuant to order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Docket Nos. RS92-17-003,
et al., dated June 18, 1993 (63 FERC para. 61,285).
2/ Applicable to "Eastchester Shipper" as defined in Section 2.27 of the General Terms & Conditions.
(Footnotes continued on Sheet 4D)
PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4D
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
1/ Applicable to "Eastchester Shipper" as defined in Section 2.27 of the General Terms & Conditions.
32/ Transporter’s Settlement dated August 18, 2016, in Docket No. RP16-301-000, which was approved by
Commission order issued [TBD], established new base tariff recourse rates referred to as “Settlement Rates”
and a moratorium on changes to the Settlement Rates until September 1, 2020. All recourse Maximum and
Minimum Rates listed on Sheet Nos. 4, 4B, 4C, and 5A are Settlement Rates subject to the moratorium.
3/ No rate cap shall apply to any capacity releases with terms of less than or equal to one year
pursuant to FERC Order Nos. 712 et al.
4/ Eastchester Secondary Access Rates ("ESAR") are derived from the Settlement Rates shown
on Sheet Nos. 4 and 4C.
Applicable to "Eastchester Shipper" that accesses Eastchester from Iroquois' pre-Eastchester system.
See Section 1.2(c) of Iroquois' August 29, 2003 rate settlement in Docket No. RP03-589. Eastchester
Secondary Access Rates are subject to change (increase or decrease) based on changes to rates for
service on the pre-Eastchester system, in accordance with Section 1.1 of Iroquois' August 12, 2004
rate settlement in Docket No. RP04-136.
45/ Eastchester Shippers (including those using Eastchester Secondary Access Service) are subject to
tThe
ACA Adjustment and the Measurement Variance/Fuel Use Factor, all as set forth on Sheet 4A,
and any similar adjustment or surcharge of general applicability approved by the Commission except
that in no event shall such an adjustment be assessed more than once for a single transaction.
5/ No rate cap shall apply to any capacity releases with terms of less than or equal to one year pursuant
to FERC Order Nos. 712 et al.
PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 5A
---------------- HUB SERVICE RATES 1/ (All rates in $ Per Dth) ------------------
HUB SERVICE COMMODITY RATES (Daily):
-------------- Maximum Rates ------------------
Minimum Effective Effective Effective
Rate 3/7/20069/1/2016 1/1/20079/1/2017 1/1/20089/1/2018
Zone 1 $0.00340 $ 0.22990.2110 $ 0.22390.2046 $ 0.22390.1915
Inter-Zone $0.00564 $ 0.38400.3540 $ 0.37400.3340 $ 0.37400.2990
Eastchester 2/ $0.0000 $ 0.66400.4590 $ 0.66400.4590 $ 0.63900.3990
HUB SERVICE DAILY BALANCE RATES:
Minimum $ 0.0000
Maximum $ 0.0154
_________________________________________________________________________________
1/ SEE SHEET NO. 4A FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO RATES WHICH MAY BE APPLICABLE
2/ Applicable to "Eastchester Shipper" as defined in Section 2.27 of the General
Terms & Conditions.
Pro forma Tariff Sheets
(Clean)
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4
---------- NON-EASTCHESTER RATES (All in $ Per Dth) 1/ ------------
Maximum Maximum Maximum
Effective Effective Effective
Minimum 9/1/2016 9/1/2017 9/1/2018
RTS DEMAND (Monthly):
Zone 1 $0.0000 $6.1928 $5.9982 $5.5997
Zone 2 $0.0000 $5.3381 $5.1678 $4.7998
Inter-Zone $0.0000 $10.4755 $9.8672 $8.8026
RTS COMMODITY (Daily):
Zone 1 $0.0034 $0.0034 $0.0034 $0.0034
Zone 2 $0.0022 $0.0022 $0.0022 $0.0022
Inter-Zone $0.0056 $0.0056 $0.0056 $0.0056
ITS COMMODITY (Daily):
Zone 1 $0.0034 $0.2070 $0.2006 $0.1875
Zone 2 $0.0022 $0.1777 $0.1721 $0.1600
Inter-Zone $0.0056 $0.3500 $0.3300 $0.2950
VOLUMETRIC CAPACITY RELEASE (Daily) 2/:
Zone 1 $0.0000 $0.2036 $0.1972 $0.1841
Zone 2 $0.0000 $0.1755 $0.1699 $0.1578
Inter-Zone $0.0000 $0.3444 $0.3244 $0.2894
**SEE SHEET NOS. 4A, 4B, and 4C FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO RATES WHICH MAY BE APPLICABLE
(Footnotes continued on Sheet 4.01)
PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4.01
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
1/ Transporter’s Settlement dated August 18, 2016, in Docket No. RP16-301-000, which was approved by
Commission order issued [TBD], established new base tariff recourse rates referred to as “Settlement Rates”
and a moratorium on changes to the Settlement Rates until September 1, 2020. All recourse Maximum and
Minimum Rates listed on Sheet Nos. 4, 4B, 4C, and 5A are Settlement Rates subject to the moratorium.
2/ No rate cap shall apply to any capacity releases with terms of less than or equal to one year
pursuant to FERC Order Nos. 712 et al.
PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4B
EXTENDED RECEIPT AND EXTENDED DELIVERY RATES (All in $ Per Dth)
Applicable to Non-Eastchester Shippers 1/
ER/ED COMMODITY (Daily):
----------- Maximum Rates -------------
Minimum Effective Effective Effective
Primary Contract Path Rate 9/1/2016 9/1/2017 9/1/2018
Zone 1 $0.0056 $0.1464 $0.1328 $0.1109
Zone 2 $0.0056 $0.1745 $0.1601 $0.1372
_________________________________________________________________________________
1/ Extended Receipt ("ER") and Extended Delivery ("ED") rates are derived from
the Maximum and Minimum Rates shown on Sheet No. 4, using the methodology
approved by the Commission for ER/ED rates in Docket No. RP03-258. ER/ED rates
apply to transactions utilizing a zone other than the zone/Lateral for which
service was contracted in Shipper's RTS contract pursuant to Sections 7.1.1
and 7.3.1 of Transporter's General Terms and Conditions and are in addition to
rates otherwise applicable under such contract.
PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4C
---------------- EASTCHESTER RATES 1/ (All in $ Per Dth) --------------------
Eastchester Primary Access Rates
--------- Maximum Rates 2/ -----------
Minimum Effective Effective
Rate 9/1/2016 9/1/2018
RTS Demand (Monthly) $0.0000 $13.8396 $12.0146
RTS Commodity (Daily) $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000
ITS Commodity (Daily) $0.0000 $0.4550 $0.3950
Volumetric Capacity
Release (Daily) 3/ $0.0000 $0.4550 $0.3950
Eastchester Secondary Access Rates (Daily) 4/
---------- Maximum Rates -------------
Minimum Effective Effective Effective
Rate 9/1/2016 9/1/2017 9/1/2018
Primary Contract Path:
Zone 1 $0.0000 $0.2480 $0.2544 $0.2075
Zone 2 $0.0000 $0.2773 $0.2829 $0.2350
Inter-Zone $0.0000 $0.1050 $0.1250 $0.1000
**SEE SHEET NO. 4A FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO RATES WHICH MAY BE APPLICABLE 5/
(Footnotes continued on Sheet 4D)
PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4D
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
1/ Applicable to "Eastchester Shipper" as defined in Section 2.27 of the General Terms & Conditions.
2/ Transporter’s Settlement dated August 18, 2016, in Docket No. RP16-301-000, which was approved by
Commission order issued [TBD], established new base tariff recourse rates referred to as “Settlement Rates”
and a moratorium on changes to the Settlement Rates until September 1, 2020. All recourse Maximum and
Minimum Rates listed on Sheet Nos. 4, 4B, 4C, and 5A are Settlement Rates subject to the moratorium.
3/ No rate cap shall apply to any capacity releases with terms of less than or equal to one year
pursuant to FERC Order Nos. 712 et al.
4/ Eastchester Secondary Access Rates ("ESAR") are derived from the Settlement Rates shown
on Sheet Nos. 4 and 4C.
5/ Eastchester Shippers (including those using Eastchester Secondary Access Service) are subject to
the ACA Adjustment and the Measurement Variance/Fuel Use Factor, all as set forth on Sheet 4A,
and any similar adjustment or surcharge of general applicability approved by the Commission except
that in no event shall such an adjustment be assessed more than once for a single transaction.
PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 5A
---------------- HUB SERVICE RATES 1/ (All rates in $ Per Dth) ------------------
HUB SERVICE COMMODITY RATES (Daily):
-------------- Maximum Rates ------------------
Minimum Effective Effective Effective
Rate 9/1/2016 9/1/2017 9/1/2018
Zone 1 $0.0034 $ 0.2110 $ 0.2046 $ 0.1915
Inter-Zone $0.0056 $ 0.3540 $ 0.3340 $ 0.2990
Eastchester 2/ $0.0000 $ 0.4590 $ 0.4590 $ 0.3990
HUB SERVICE DAILY BALANCE RATES:
Minimum $ 0.0000
Maximum $ 0.0154
_________________________________________________________________________________
1/ SEE SHEET NO. 4A FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO RATES WHICH MAY BE APPLICABLE
2/ Applicable to "Eastchester Shipper" as defined in Section 2.27 of the General
Terms & Conditions.
APPENDIX B
DEPRECIATION, AMORTIZATION, AND
NEGATIVE SALVAGE RATES
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
APPENDIX B
Iroquois Gas Transmission, L.P.
Docket No. RP16-301-000
Depreciation, Amortization, and Negative Salvage Rates
Transmission Plant
Mainline 1.50%
Eastchester 2.75%
Total (Weighted Ave) 1.97%
Mainline Negative Salvage 0.20%
Eastchester Negative Salvage 0.20%
General Plant
Land and Land Rights (Acct. 389) 0.00%
Structures & Improvements (Acct. 390) 1.90%
Office Furniture & Equipment (Acct. 391) 6.67%
Transportation Equipment (Acct. 392) 12.00%
Communication Equipment (Acct. 397) 10.00%
Miscellaneous Equipment (Acct. 398) 10.00%
Other Tangible Property (Acct. 399) 10.00%
Amortization
Intangible – Mainline (Acct. 303) 0.35%
Intangible – Eastchester (Acct. 303) 2.00%
Total (Weighted Ave) 1.38%
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
APPENDIX C
TARIFF MODERNIZATION
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
APPENDIX C
Iroquois Gas Transmission, L.P.
Docket No. RP16-301-000
Summary of Tariff Modernization Changes Per Article II, Section 2.3
Subject to the limitations specified in Article II, Sections 2.2 and 2.3 of the Stipulation
and Settlement Agreement, Iroquois may file the following tariff changes during the Moratorium:
I. Fuel & Losses Provision
Iroquois may file to update its fuel and losses mechanism to retain the current practice of
establishing fuel and losses percentages on a monthly basis, but streamline the tariff
language, including the elimination of formula provisions, and include supporting detail
in annual FERC filings.
II. System Reliability and Integrity Protection Enhancements
Subject to the limitations contained in Article 2.2 and 2.3 of the Stipulation, Iroquois may
file to update its tariff rules to be more in line with those of other pipelines serving the
same market areas in order to protect Iroquois’ system integrity, avoid risk to firm service
reliability, and allocate appropriate cost responsibility for service utilization. During the
Moratorium, these changes may include:
A. Critical Notice/OFO Provisions
 Iroquois may file tariff changes to include details regarding circumstances
in which it might issue Critical Notice (“CN”) or Operational Flow Order
(“OFO”) declarations, the required scope, duration, information, and steps
to incent compliance with such declarations.
 Iroquois may file tariff changes to memorialize protocol, give examples of
circumstances in which Iroquois may determine to issue CN/OFO
declarations, and provide sanctions (including penalties and flow control)
for shipper failure to adhere to CN/OFO declarations.
B. Daily and Hourly Variance Requirements, Imbalance Management, and
Associated Penalties
 Iroquois may file tariff changes to establish monthly cash-out requirements
for non-OBA imbalances.
 Iroquois may file tariff changes to clarify obligations of shippers vs. point
operators.
 Iroquois may file to update its existing tariff penalty provisions to conform
to FERC policy and industry practice.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
 Iroquois may file to eliminate the ACA charge for PAL service, given that
PAL customers will have already paid the ACA charge as part of the
associated transportation.
C. Iroquois may file to eliminate ER/ED to afford primary firm shippers greater
reliability of service in later Gas Day nomination windows.
III. Updated and Clarified ROFR Process
Iroquois may file to update and clarify its ROFR tariff provisions to better reflect
Commission policy and market needs. During the Moratorium such proposed changes
may include:
 Streamline timeframes, add flexibility for timing of open seasons, and
close gaps in process (such as what happens when there is no competing
bid);
 Clarify and potentially eliminate second renewal option; and
 Clarify process for addressing instances of no third party bidder and failure
of Iroquois and shipper to agree on renewal terms.
IV. Clarified Service Rights
During the Moratorium, Iroquois may file to clarify service rights, including:
A. New RTS-Displacement (“RTS-D”) Rate Schedule - To clearly distinguish firm
service rights that are qualified by the need for offsetting service (i.e., backhaul),
Iroquois may file to establish a new RTS-D Rate Schedule; with the exception of
the requirement for offsetting service, the same RTS rates and terms will apply to
such new RTS-D service.
B. New Flow Path Designation - Given that Iroquois’ system has become bi-
directional, Iroquois may file tariff changes to require assignment of flow paths in
all firm shipper service agreements (both new and existing) and clarify path and
point entitlements.
C. HUB Service Update – Iroquois may file tariff changes to expand HUB service
availability (currently limited to Waddington) so that shippers may borrow and
pay back gas at each physical receipt point on Iroquois’ system.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
APPENDIX D
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS
SUPPORTING OR NOT OPPOSING
THE SETTLEMENT
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
APPENDIX D
Iroquois Gas Transmission, L.P.
Docket No. RP16-301-000
Participants Supporting or Not Opposing
the Settlement
American Forest & Paper Association
Bay State Gas Company d/b/a Columbia Gas of Massachusetts
BG Energy Merchants, LLC
BP Energy Company
Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation
Calpine Energy Services, L.P.
Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers
Cargill, Incorporated
Castleton Commodities Merchant Trading L.P.
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation
Connecticut Natural Gas Corporation
Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority
ConocoPhillips Company
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Direct Energy Business Marketing, LLC
Emera Energy Services Inc.
Exelon Corporation
George Jepsen, Attorney General for the State of Connecticut
Iberdrola Energy Services LLC
Infinite Energy, Inc.
Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
Koch Energy Services, LLC
Liberty Utilities (EnergyNorth Natural Gas) Corp. d/b/a Liberty Utilities
Massachusetts Attorney General
Mercuria Energy Gas Trading LLC
National Grid Gas Delivery Companies
New Athens Generating Company, LLC
New Jersey Board of Public Utilities
New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel
New Jersey Natural Gas Company
New York Public Service Commission
New York State Electric & Gas Corporation
NJR Energy Services Company
NSTAR Gas Company d/b/a Eversource
Process Gas Consumers Group
Public Citizen, Inc
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
Sequent Energy Management, L.P.
St. Lawrence Gas Company, Inc.
Talen Energy Marketing, LLC
Tenaska Marketing Ventures
The New England Local Distribution Companies
The Southern Connecticut Gas Company
Yankee Gas Services Company d/b/a Eversource
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT TO
SETTLEMENT
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE THE
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
)
Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. ) Docket No. RP16-301-000
)
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT TO
STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENTAGREEMENT
(August 18, 2016)
Pursuant to Rule 602(c)(1) of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (“Commission”), 18 C.F.R. § 385.602(c)(1), Iroquois
Gas Transmission System, L.P. (“Iroquois”) provides this Explanatory Statement to the
concurrently filed Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (“Settlement”),1
which resolves
all issues in this rate proceeding under section 5 of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C.
§ 717d. Iroquois is aware of no opposition to the Settlement.
I. SUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT
Article I (Rate Matters): Section 1.1 establishes Iroquois’ base tariff recourse
rates, as set forth on Pro Forma Sheet Nos. 4, 4.01. 4B, 4C, 4D, and 5A contained in
Appendix A to the Settlement, providing three scheduled rate reductions to be effective
September 1 of 2016, 2017, and 2018. Section 1.2 provides that Iroquois will file revised
tariff sheets reflecting the Settlement Rates within 15 days after the Settlement becomes
effective. Section 1.3 provides that Iroquois will file Interim Settlement Rates to be
effective September 1, 2016, pending Commission approval of the Settlement. Section
1
This Explanatory Statement is provided for informational purposes only. The
terms of the Settlement are controlling.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
2
1.4 provides that Iroquois will use the depreciation, amortization, and negative salvage
rates set forth on Appendix B to the Settlement.
Article II (Rate Moratorium): Section 2.1 establishes a Moratorium that
prohibits parties from requesting a change to the Settlement Rates prior to September 1,
2020. Sections 2.2 and 2.3 identify certain types of filings that are not prohibited by the
Moratorium. Section 2.4 provides that, in the event that Iroquois makes a Tariff filing
pursuant to Section 2.2 or 2.3 during the Moratorium, parties retain their right to protest
such a section 4 filing. Section 2.5 provides that Iroquois will afford shippers an
opportunity to preview and comment on certain section 4 tariff filings that Iroquois may
submit during the Moratorium. Section 2.6 provides that the Moratorium and all
provisions of Article II terminate on August 31, 2020.
Article III (Future Section 4 Rate Filing): Section 3.1 provides that, upon
conclusion of the Moratorium, Iroquois will file a general section 4 rate case no later than
September 1, 2022, unless such obligation is extinguished through a prior change to the
Settlement Rates. Section 3.2 provides that Iroquois will provide shippers thirty days
notice and overview of the general section 4 filing.
Article IV (Term): The term of the Settlement shall commence on September 1,
2016 and shall terminate after the end of the Moratorium, upon the earliest post-
Moratorium effectiveness of new base tariff rates that are the result of a general rate
change pursuant to section 4 of the Natural Gas Act, a general rate settlement, or a
general modification of Iroquois’ base tariff rates in a proceeding instituted pursuant to
section 5 of the Natural Gas Act.
Article V (Effectiveness): Section 5.1 provides that the various provisions of the
Settlement are not severable and will become effective on the date the Settlement is
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
3
approved by a final Commission order. Section 5.2 provides that, in the event the
Commission modifies the Settlement, parties may refuse to accept the modified
Settlement and become a Contesting Party. While the parties know of no opposition to
the Settlement, in the event that the Settlement is contested, Section 5.3 provides that it is
the intent of the parties that the Commission approve the Settlement for all Non-
Contesting Parties.2
Any Contesting Parties will neither be bound by, nor receive the
benefits of, the Settlement.
Article VI (Waiver and Authority): Approval of the Settlement constitutes any
and all waivers and provides all authority under the Natural Gas Act and the
Commission’s rules and regulations that may be necessary for the Settlement to be
effectuated in accordance with all of its terms.
Article VII (Changes to Settlement and Standard of Review): Section 7.1
establishes that the Settlement is the final and binding agreement of the Non-Contesting
Parties and may be modified only by written agreement of all Non-Contesting Parties.
Section 7.2 sets forth the standard of review for changes to the settlement after approval,
as further described in Section II, Question 5, below.
Article VIII (Reservations and Conditions): Article VIII contains standard
reservations stating that parties waive no rights other than as specifically provided in the
Settlement, that the Settlement should not be construed against any party as drafter, that
2
“Non-Contesting Parties” are parties that either support, do not oppose, or take no
position regarding this Settlement. “Contesting Parties” are parties that oppose
this Settlement or suggest or request in any manner a modification, reservation or
condition to this Settlement as originally filed, regardless of whether such party
characterizes its comments as being in support of the Settlement. Parties that fail
to accept a Commission modification to this Settlement pursuant to Section 5.2
shall also be Contesting Parties.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
4
the Settlement does not establish any principles, policies, or practices, and that
Commission approval of the Settlement authorizes Iroquois to implement the Settlement
Rates on the dates without suspension.
II. QUESTIONS RAISED BY THE CHIEF JUDGE’S OCTOBER 23, 2003
NOTICE
The Chief Administrative Law Judge’s October 23, 2003 Notice requires parties
submitting settlement agreements to address the following five questions:
1. What are the issues underlying the settlement and what are the major
implications?
Response: As a rate case under section 5 of the Natural Gas Act, this case
presents typical rate issues, such as cost of service, cost allocation, throughput, and rate
design, as applied to Iroquois’ recourse rates.
2. Whether any of the issues raise policy implications.
Response: The issues presented are primarily factual issues, which do not
raise major policy implications.
3. Whether other pending cases may be affected.
Response: No other pending cases are affected by this Settlement.
4. Whether the settlement involves issues of first impression, or if there
are any reversals on the issues involved.
Response: The Settlement involves no issues of first impression and no
reversals on the issues involved.
5. Whether the proceeding is subject to the just and reasonable standard
or whether there is Mobile-Sierra language making it the standard,
i.e., the applicable standards of review.
Response: The governing review standard for approval of the Settlement is
provided by Rule 602, 18 C.F.R. § 385.602. Assuming that the Settlement is uncontested
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
5
as Iroquois expects, Rule 602(g)(3) provides that the Commission may approve the
Settlement “upon a finding that the settlement appears to be fair and reasonable and in the
public interest.” However, as provided in Article VII of the Settlement, after approval,
any changes to the Settlement on behalf of a party must satisfy the “public interest”
standard of review set forth in United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Services Corp.,
350 U.S. 332 (1956), Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co., 350 U.S.
348 (1956), and Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. v. Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1, 554 U.S.
527 (2008), while changes to the Settlement on behalf of a non-party or the Commission
acting sua ponte must satisfy the most stringent standard permissible under applicable
law.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
DRAFT COMMISSION LETTER ORDER
APPROVING THE SETTLEMENT
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
DRAFT
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426
In re:
Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
Docket No. RP16-301-000
Issued: _______, 2016
Joseph S. Koury
Wright & Talisman P.C.
1200 G Street N.W., Suite 600
Washington, D.C. 20005
Reference: August 18, 2016 Stipulation and Settlement Agreement
On August 18, 2016, pursuant to Rule 602 of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission’s (“Commission”) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 C.F.R. § 385.602, Iroquois
Gas Transmission System, L.P. (“Iroquois”) filed an offer of settlement in the form of a
Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (“Settlement”) that resolves all issues set for hearing in
this proceeding. As discussed below, the Commission approves the Settlement as fair and
reasonable and in the public interest.
On January 21, 2016, the Commission issued an order initiating an investigation of
Iroquois’ rates under section 5 of the Natural Gas Act.1
Pursuant to that January 21 Order,
Iroquois submitted a Cost and Revenue Study on April 5, 2016. Substantial discovery was
thereafter undertaken by the active participants. The participants convened publicly-noticed
settlement conferences on April 28, 2016, May 18, 2016, June 1, 2016, and June 16, 2016. As a
result of these settlement negotiations, the participants ultimately reached this Settlement
resolving all of the issues set for hearing in this proceeding, as set forth below.
The terms of the Agreement are summarized as follows:
Article I (Rate Matters): Section 1.1 establishes Iroquois’ base tariff recourse rates, as set forth
on Pro Forma Sheet Nos. 4, 4.01. 4B, 4C, 4D, and 5A contained in Appendix A to the
Settlement, providing three scheduled rate reductions to be effective September 1 of 2016, 2017,
and 2018. Section 1.2 provides that Iroquois will file revised tariff sheets reflecting the
Settlement Rates within 15 days after the Settlement becomes effective. Section 1.3 provides
that Iroquois will file Interim Settlement Rates to be effective September 1, 2016, pending
Commission approval of the Settlement. Section 1.4 provides that Iroquois will use the
depreciation, amortization, and negative salvage rates set forth on Appendix B to the Settlement.
1
Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., Notice of Initiation of Section 5 Proceeding,
Docket No. RP16-301-000 (Jan. 21, 2016); Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., 154
FERC ¶ 61,028 (2016) (“January 21 Order”).
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
DRAFT
2
Article II (Rate Moratorium): Section 2.1 establishes a Moratorium that prohibits parties from
requesting a change to the Settlement Rates prior to September 1, 2020. Sections 2.2 and 2.3
identify certain types of filings that are not prohibited by the Moratorium. Section 2.4 provides
that, in the event that Iroquois makes a Tariff filing pursuant to Section 2.2 or 2.3 during the
Moratorium, parties retain their right to protest such section 4 filings (except on the ground that
such filing violates the Moratorium). Section 2.5 provides that Iroquois will afford shippers an
opportunity to preview and comment on certain section 4 tariff filings that Iroquois may submit
during the Moratorium. Section 2.6 provides that the Moratorium and all provisions of Article II
terminate on August 31, 2020.
Article III (Future Section 4 Rate Filing): Section 3.1 provides that, upon conclusion of the
Moratorium, Iroquois will file a general section 4 rate case no later than September 1, 2022,
unless such obligation is extinguished through a prior change to the Settlement Rates. Section
3.2 provides that Iroquois will provide shippers thirty days notice and overview of the general
section 4 filing.
Article IV (Term): The term of the Settlement shall commence on September 1, 2016 and shall
terminate after the end of the Moratorium, upon the earliest post-Moratorium effectiveness of
new base tariff rates that are the result of a general rate change pursuant to section 4 of the
Natural Gas Act, a general rate settlement, or a general modification of Iroquois’ base tariff rates
in a proceeding instituted pursuant to section 5 of the Natural Gas Act.
Article V (Effectiveness): Section 5.1 provides that the various provisions of the Settlement are
not severable and will become effective on the date the Settlement is approved by a final
Commission order. Section 5.2 provides that, in the event the Commission modifies the
Settlement, parties may refuse to accept the modified Settlement and become a Contesting Party.
While the parties know of no opposition to the Settlement, in the event that the Settlement is
contested, Section 5.3 provides that it is the intent of the parties that the Commission approve the
Settlement for all Non-Contesting Parties.2
Any Contesting Parties will neither be bound by, nor
receive the benefits of, the Settlement.
Article VI (Waiver and Authority): Approval of the Settlement constitutes any and all waivers
and provides all authority under the Natural Gas Act and the Commission’s rules and regulations
that may be necessary for the Settlement to be effectuated in accordance with all of its terms.
Article VII (Changes to Settlement and Standard of Review): Section 7.1 establishes that the
Settlement is the final and binding agreement of the Non-Contesting Parties and may be
modified only by written agreement of all Non-Contesting Parties. Section 7.2 sets forth the
standard of review for changes to the settlement after approval.
2
“Non-Contesting Parties” are parties that either support, do not oppose, or take no
position regarding this Settlement. “Contesting Parties” are parties that oppose this
Settlement or suggest or request in any manner a modification, reservation or condition to
this Settlement as originally filed, regardless of whether such party characterizes its
comments as being in support of the Settlement. Parties that fail to accept a Commission
modification to this Settlement pursuant to Section 5.2 shall also be Contesting Parties.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
DRAFT
3
Article VIII (Reservations and Conditions): Article VIII contains standard reservations stating
that parties waive no rights other than as specifically provided in the Settlement, that the
Settlement should not be construed against any party as drafter, that the Settlement does not
establish any principles, policies, or practices, and that Commission approval of the Settlement
authorizes Iroquois to implement the Settlement Rates on the dates without suspension.
The Commission has reviewed the Settlement and the record certified by the Presiding Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 602(g), the Commission finds that the Settlement is fair and reasonable and in
the public interest. Accordingly, the Commission approves the Settlement. This order
constitutes final agency action. Requests for rehearing by the Commission may be filed within
30 days of the date of issuance of this order, pursuant to 18 C.F.R. § 385.713.
By direction of the Commission,
Kimberly D. Bose
Secretary
cc: All Parties
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
Document Content(s)
W0095446.DOCX.........................................................1-3
W0098049.PDF..........................................................4-55
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM

More Related Content

What's hot

SB10
SB10SB10
465
465465
Senate spending bill after appropriations committee
Senate spending bill after appropriations committeeSenate spending bill after appropriations committee
Senate spending bill after appropriations committee
EducationNC
 
Vested property settlement policy in Bangladesh
Vested property settlement policy in BangladeshVested property settlement policy in Bangladesh
Vested property settlement policy in Bangladesh
Nur E Sowrove
 
Senate Bill 287 Amendments
Senate Bill 287 AmendmentsSenate Bill 287 Amendments
Senate Bill 287 Amendments
This Is Reno
 
മിച്ചഭൂമി സീലിംഗ് പരിധിയും നടപടിക്രമങ്ങളും Sruitiny of draft delaration JAM...
മിച്ചഭൂമി സീലിംഗ്  പരിധിയും നടപടിക്രമങ്ങളും  Sruitiny of draft delaration JAM...മിച്ചഭൂമി സീലിംഗ്  പരിധിയും നടപടിക്രമങ്ങളും  Sruitiny of draft delaration JAM...
മിച്ചഭൂമി സീലിംഗ് പരിധിയും നടപടിക്രമങ്ങളും Sruitiny of draft delaration JAM...
Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
 
Full Text of the “Woznicki Fix” (2003 Wisconsin Act 47)
Full Text of the “Woznicki Fix” (2003 Wisconsin Act 47)Full Text of the “Woznicki Fix” (2003 Wisconsin Act 47)
Full Text of the “Woznicki Fix” (2003 Wisconsin Act 47)
SteveJohnson125
 
LICENSING OF HOUSES IN MULTIPLE OCCUPATION
LICENSING OF HOUSES IN MULTIPLE  OCCUPATIONLICENSING OF HOUSES IN MULTIPLE  OCCUPATION
LICENSING OF HOUSES IN MULTIPLE OCCUPATION
suzi smith
 
Senate COVID-19 spending bill and more
Senate COVID-19 spending bill and moreSenate COVID-19 spending bill and more
Senate COVID-19 spending bill and more
EducationNC
 
GST Series 1 by ourCAgang
GST Series 1 by ourCAgangGST Series 1 by ourCAgang
GST Series 1 by ourCAgang
Chandan Kumar Gupta
 
185-Assignment of Government land and house sites to the Freedom Fighters in ...
185-Assignment of Government land and house sites to the Freedom Fighters in ...185-Assignment of Government land and house sites to the Freedom Fighters in ...
185-Assignment of Government land and house sites to the Freedom Fighters in ...
bansi default
 
Departmental inquiries (enforcement of attendance of witness
Departmental inquiries (enforcement of attendance of witnessDepartmental inquiries (enforcement of attendance of witness
Departmental inquiries (enforcement of attendance of witness
gururaj lulkarni
 
കേരള ഭൂ പരിഷ്കരണ നിയമം 1963 -Ppt present
കേരള ഭൂ പരിഷ്കരണ നിയമം 1963 -Ppt presentകേരള ഭൂ പരിഷ്കരണ നിയമം 1963 -Ppt present
കേരള ഭൂ പരിഷ്കരണ നിയമം 1963 -Ppt present
Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
 
Договор между украинской государственной нефтегазовой монополией и вашингтонс...
Договор между украинской государственной нефтегазовой монополией и вашингтонс...Договор между украинской государственной нефтегазовой монополией и вашингтонс...
Договор между украинской государственной нефтегазовой монополией и вашингтонс...
Stranaua
 
Stvincent.constitution.09
Stvincent.constitution.09Stvincent.constitution.09
Stvincent.constitution.09
Augustine Ferdinand
 
Removal To Federal Court Rob Foos
Removal To Federal Court   Rob FoosRemoval To Federal Court   Rob Foos
Removal To Federal Court Rob Foos
rfoos
 
Lawsuit Filed Against Middlefield, NY to Repeal Ban on Gas Drilling
Lawsuit Filed Against Middlefield, NY to Repeal Ban on Gas DrillingLawsuit Filed Against Middlefield, NY to Repeal Ban on Gas Drilling
Lawsuit Filed Against Middlefield, NY to Repeal Ban on Gas Drilling
Marcellus Drilling News
 
Land acquisition India - LARRACT 2013 Note uploaded by James joseph adhikara...
Land acquisition India - LARRACT 2013  Note uploaded by James joseph adhikara...Land acquisition India - LARRACT 2013  Note uploaded by James joseph adhikara...
Land acquisition India - LARRACT 2013 Note uploaded by James joseph adhikara...
Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
 
Property Tax Bills 2017
Property Tax Bills 2017Property Tax Bills 2017
Property Tax Bills 2017
cutmytaxes
 

What's hot (19)

SB10
SB10SB10
SB10
 
465
465465
465
 
Senate spending bill after appropriations committee
Senate spending bill after appropriations committeeSenate spending bill after appropriations committee
Senate spending bill after appropriations committee
 
Vested property settlement policy in Bangladesh
Vested property settlement policy in BangladeshVested property settlement policy in Bangladesh
Vested property settlement policy in Bangladesh
 
Senate Bill 287 Amendments
Senate Bill 287 AmendmentsSenate Bill 287 Amendments
Senate Bill 287 Amendments
 
മിച്ചഭൂമി സീലിംഗ് പരിധിയും നടപടിക്രമങ്ങളും Sruitiny of draft delaration JAM...
മിച്ചഭൂമി സീലിംഗ്  പരിധിയും നടപടിക്രമങ്ങളും  Sruitiny of draft delaration JAM...മിച്ചഭൂമി സീലിംഗ്  പരിധിയും നടപടിക്രമങ്ങളും  Sruitiny of draft delaration JAM...
മിച്ചഭൂമി സീലിംഗ് പരിധിയും നടപടിക്രമങ്ങളും Sruitiny of draft delaration JAM...
 
Full Text of the “Woznicki Fix” (2003 Wisconsin Act 47)
Full Text of the “Woznicki Fix” (2003 Wisconsin Act 47)Full Text of the “Woznicki Fix” (2003 Wisconsin Act 47)
Full Text of the “Woznicki Fix” (2003 Wisconsin Act 47)
 
LICENSING OF HOUSES IN MULTIPLE OCCUPATION
LICENSING OF HOUSES IN MULTIPLE  OCCUPATIONLICENSING OF HOUSES IN MULTIPLE  OCCUPATION
LICENSING OF HOUSES IN MULTIPLE OCCUPATION
 
Senate COVID-19 spending bill and more
Senate COVID-19 spending bill and moreSenate COVID-19 spending bill and more
Senate COVID-19 spending bill and more
 
GST Series 1 by ourCAgang
GST Series 1 by ourCAgangGST Series 1 by ourCAgang
GST Series 1 by ourCAgang
 
185-Assignment of Government land and house sites to the Freedom Fighters in ...
185-Assignment of Government land and house sites to the Freedom Fighters in ...185-Assignment of Government land and house sites to the Freedom Fighters in ...
185-Assignment of Government land and house sites to the Freedom Fighters in ...
 
Departmental inquiries (enforcement of attendance of witness
Departmental inquiries (enforcement of attendance of witnessDepartmental inquiries (enforcement of attendance of witness
Departmental inquiries (enforcement of attendance of witness
 
കേരള ഭൂ പരിഷ്കരണ നിയമം 1963 -Ppt present
കേരള ഭൂ പരിഷ്കരണ നിയമം 1963 -Ppt presentകേരള ഭൂ പരിഷ്കരണ നിയമം 1963 -Ppt present
കേരള ഭൂ പരിഷ്കരണ നിയമം 1963 -Ppt present
 
Договор между украинской государственной нефтегазовой монополией и вашингтонс...
Договор между украинской государственной нефтегазовой монополией и вашингтонс...Договор между украинской государственной нефтегазовой монополией и вашингтонс...
Договор между украинской государственной нефтегазовой монополией и вашингтонс...
 
Stvincent.constitution.09
Stvincent.constitution.09Stvincent.constitution.09
Stvincent.constitution.09
 
Removal To Federal Court Rob Foos
Removal To Federal Court   Rob FoosRemoval To Federal Court   Rob Foos
Removal To Federal Court Rob Foos
 
Lawsuit Filed Against Middlefield, NY to Repeal Ban on Gas Drilling
Lawsuit Filed Against Middlefield, NY to Repeal Ban on Gas DrillingLawsuit Filed Against Middlefield, NY to Repeal Ban on Gas Drilling
Lawsuit Filed Against Middlefield, NY to Repeal Ban on Gas Drilling
 
Land acquisition India - LARRACT 2013 Note uploaded by James joseph adhikara...
Land acquisition India - LARRACT 2013  Note uploaded by James joseph adhikara...Land acquisition India - LARRACT 2013  Note uploaded by James joseph adhikara...
Land acquisition India - LARRACT 2013 Note uploaded by James joseph adhikara...
 
Property Tax Bills 2017
Property Tax Bills 2017Property Tax Bills 2017
Property Tax Bills 2017
 

Similar to Iroquois Gas Transmission Proposed Rate Settlement Agreement to Charge Customers Less

Supreme Court Approves Amendments To Bankruptcy Rules!
Supreme Court Approves Amendments To Bankruptcy Rules!Supreme Court Approves Amendments To Bankruptcy Rules!
Supreme Court Approves Amendments To Bankruptcy Rules!
tonyturnerlaw
 
UTCR amendments 2016
UTCR amendments 2016UTCR amendments 2016
UTCR amendments 2016
Oregon Law Practice Management
 
Rio Grande LNG Opposition to Motions to Intervene
Rio Grande LNG Opposition to Motions to InterveneRio Grande LNG Opposition to Motions to Intervene
Rio Grande LNG Opposition to Motions to Intervene
Marcellus Drilling News
 
According To An Article On The BESTCASE Website – Supreme Court Approves Amen...
According To An Article On The BESTCASE Website – Supreme Court Approves Amen...According To An Article On The BESTCASE Website – Supreme Court Approves Amen...
According To An Article On The BESTCASE Website – Supreme Court Approves Amen...
tonyturnerlaw
 
Cerc regulation on_renewable_energy_certificates_rec
Cerc regulation on_renewable_energy_certificates_recCerc regulation on_renewable_energy_certificates_rec
Cerc regulation on_renewable_energy_certificates_rec
Sanjayan Kizhakkedathu
 
Cerc regulation on_renewable_energy_certificates_rec
Cerc regulation on_renewable_energy_certificates_recCerc regulation on_renewable_energy_certificates_rec
Cerc regulation on_renewable_energy_certificates_rec
Vikas Kumar Pathak
 
Williams Request for Pre-Filing Review on Transco Northeast Supply Enhancemen...
Williams Request for Pre-Filing Review on Transco Northeast Supply Enhancemen...Williams Request for Pre-Filing Review on Transco Northeast Supply Enhancemen...
Williams Request for Pre-Filing Review on Transco Northeast Supply Enhancemen...
Marcellus Drilling News
 
FERC Docket No. CP15-89-000 - Approving Garden State Expansion Project
FERC Docket No. CP15-89-000 - Approving Garden State Expansion ProjectFERC Docket No. CP15-89-000 - Approving Garden State Expansion Project
FERC Docket No. CP15-89-000 - Approving Garden State Expansion Project
Marcellus Drilling News
 
FERC Order Denying Rehearing Requested by NY AG Schneiderman re Constitution ...
FERC Order Denying Rehearing Requested by NY AG Schneiderman re Constitution ...FERC Order Denying Rehearing Requested by NY AG Schneiderman re Constitution ...
FERC Order Denying Rehearing Requested by NY AG Schneiderman re Constitution ...
Marcellus Drilling News
 
Securities and Exchange Commission Cease & Desist Order Against KBR, Inc.
Securities and Exchange Commission Cease & Desist Order Against KBR, Inc.Securities and Exchange Commission Cease & Desist Order Against KBR, Inc.
Securities and Exchange Commission Cease & Desist Order Against KBR, Inc.
Workplace Investigations Group
 
PA PUC Final Implementation Order for Act 13 Impact Fee
PA PUC Final Implementation Order for Act 13 Impact FeePA PUC Final Implementation Order for Act 13 Impact Fee
PA PUC Final Implementation Order for Act 13 Impact Fee
Marcellus Drilling News
 
Cerc
CercCerc
San Jose Water Company Letter 506
San Jose Water Company Letter 506San Jose Water Company Letter 506
San Jose Water Company Letter 506
Rishi Kumar
 
212211972 labor-cases-week-13
212211972 labor-cases-week-13212211972 labor-cases-week-13
212211972 labor-cases-week-13
homeworkping8
 
UUOA_Jubilee_Field_SEC.pdf
UUOA_Jubilee_Field_SEC.pdfUUOA_Jubilee_Field_SEC.pdf
UUOA_Jubilee_Field_SEC.pdf
bgu36547
 
67/2010 Issuing Service Price Control Regulation
67/2010 Issuing Service Price Control Regulation67/2010 Issuing Service Price Control Regulation
67/2010 Issuing Service Price Control Regulation
traoman
 
Concept desing of new electricity market of Ukraine
Concept desing of new electricity market of UkraineConcept desing of new electricity market of Ukraine
Concept desing of new electricity market of Ukraine
Stanislav Masevych
 
OH Supreme Court Decision: State ex rel. Morrison v. Beck Energy Corp.
OH Supreme Court Decision: State ex rel. Morrison v. Beck Energy Corp.OH Supreme Court Decision: State ex rel. Morrison v. Beck Energy Corp.
OH Supreme Court Decision: State ex rel. Morrison v. Beck Energy Corp.
Marcellus Drilling News
 
Bccm Amendment Act V2
Bccm Amendment Act V2Bccm Amendment Act V2
Bccm Amendment Act V2
LJ Gilland Real Estate Pty Ltd
 
Bccm Amendment Act V2
Bccm Amendment Act V2Bccm Amendment Act V2
Bccm Amendment Act V2
LJ Gilland Real Estate Pty Ltd
 

Similar to Iroquois Gas Transmission Proposed Rate Settlement Agreement to Charge Customers Less (20)

Supreme Court Approves Amendments To Bankruptcy Rules!
Supreme Court Approves Amendments To Bankruptcy Rules!Supreme Court Approves Amendments To Bankruptcy Rules!
Supreme Court Approves Amendments To Bankruptcy Rules!
 
UTCR amendments 2016
UTCR amendments 2016UTCR amendments 2016
UTCR amendments 2016
 
Rio Grande LNG Opposition to Motions to Intervene
Rio Grande LNG Opposition to Motions to InterveneRio Grande LNG Opposition to Motions to Intervene
Rio Grande LNG Opposition to Motions to Intervene
 
According To An Article On The BESTCASE Website – Supreme Court Approves Amen...
According To An Article On The BESTCASE Website – Supreme Court Approves Amen...According To An Article On The BESTCASE Website – Supreme Court Approves Amen...
According To An Article On The BESTCASE Website – Supreme Court Approves Amen...
 
Cerc regulation on_renewable_energy_certificates_rec
Cerc regulation on_renewable_energy_certificates_recCerc regulation on_renewable_energy_certificates_rec
Cerc regulation on_renewable_energy_certificates_rec
 
Cerc regulation on_renewable_energy_certificates_rec
Cerc regulation on_renewable_energy_certificates_recCerc regulation on_renewable_energy_certificates_rec
Cerc regulation on_renewable_energy_certificates_rec
 
Williams Request for Pre-Filing Review on Transco Northeast Supply Enhancemen...
Williams Request for Pre-Filing Review on Transco Northeast Supply Enhancemen...Williams Request for Pre-Filing Review on Transco Northeast Supply Enhancemen...
Williams Request for Pre-Filing Review on Transco Northeast Supply Enhancemen...
 
FERC Docket No. CP15-89-000 - Approving Garden State Expansion Project
FERC Docket No. CP15-89-000 - Approving Garden State Expansion ProjectFERC Docket No. CP15-89-000 - Approving Garden State Expansion Project
FERC Docket No. CP15-89-000 - Approving Garden State Expansion Project
 
FERC Order Denying Rehearing Requested by NY AG Schneiderman re Constitution ...
FERC Order Denying Rehearing Requested by NY AG Schneiderman re Constitution ...FERC Order Denying Rehearing Requested by NY AG Schneiderman re Constitution ...
FERC Order Denying Rehearing Requested by NY AG Schneiderman re Constitution ...
 
Securities and Exchange Commission Cease & Desist Order Against KBR, Inc.
Securities and Exchange Commission Cease & Desist Order Against KBR, Inc.Securities and Exchange Commission Cease & Desist Order Against KBR, Inc.
Securities and Exchange Commission Cease & Desist Order Against KBR, Inc.
 
PA PUC Final Implementation Order for Act 13 Impact Fee
PA PUC Final Implementation Order for Act 13 Impact FeePA PUC Final Implementation Order for Act 13 Impact Fee
PA PUC Final Implementation Order for Act 13 Impact Fee
 
Cerc
CercCerc
Cerc
 
San Jose Water Company Letter 506
San Jose Water Company Letter 506San Jose Water Company Letter 506
San Jose Water Company Letter 506
 
212211972 labor-cases-week-13
212211972 labor-cases-week-13212211972 labor-cases-week-13
212211972 labor-cases-week-13
 
UUOA_Jubilee_Field_SEC.pdf
UUOA_Jubilee_Field_SEC.pdfUUOA_Jubilee_Field_SEC.pdf
UUOA_Jubilee_Field_SEC.pdf
 
67/2010 Issuing Service Price Control Regulation
67/2010 Issuing Service Price Control Regulation67/2010 Issuing Service Price Control Regulation
67/2010 Issuing Service Price Control Regulation
 
Concept desing of new electricity market of Ukraine
Concept desing of new electricity market of UkraineConcept desing of new electricity market of Ukraine
Concept desing of new electricity market of Ukraine
 
OH Supreme Court Decision: State ex rel. Morrison v. Beck Energy Corp.
OH Supreme Court Decision: State ex rel. Morrison v. Beck Energy Corp.OH Supreme Court Decision: State ex rel. Morrison v. Beck Energy Corp.
OH Supreme Court Decision: State ex rel. Morrison v. Beck Energy Corp.
 
Bccm Amendment Act V2
Bccm Amendment Act V2Bccm Amendment Act V2
Bccm Amendment Act V2
 
Bccm Amendment Act V2
Bccm Amendment Act V2Bccm Amendment Act V2
Bccm Amendment Act V2
 

More from Marcellus Drilling News

Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strongFive facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
Marcellus Drilling News
 
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
Marcellus Drilling News
 
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 UpdateAccess Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
Marcellus Drilling News
 
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final CertificateRover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
Marcellus Drilling News
 
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA CountriesDOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
Marcellus Drilling News
 
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. ManufacturingLSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
Marcellus Drilling News
 
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
Marcellus Drilling News
 
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental ExternalitiesReport: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
Marcellus Drilling News
 
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
Marcellus Drilling News
 
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
Marcellus Drilling News
 
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids PlantsVelocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
Marcellus Drilling News
 
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
Marcellus Drilling News
 
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
Marcellus Drilling News
 
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas OperationsPA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
Marcellus Drilling News
 
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy OutlookUS EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
Marcellus Drilling News
 
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical GuideNortheast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
Marcellus Drilling News
 
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee AuditPA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
Marcellus Drilling News
 
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
Marcellus Drilling News
 
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final ReportClyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
Marcellus Drilling News
 
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion ProjectFERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
Marcellus Drilling News
 

More from Marcellus Drilling News (20)

Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strongFive facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
Five facts about shale: it’s coming back, and coming back strong
 
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)
 
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 UpdateAccess Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
Access Northeast Pipeline Project - Dec 2016 Update
 
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final CertificateRover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
Rover Pipeline Letter to FERC Requesting Final Certificate
 
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA CountriesDOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA Countries
 
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. ManufacturingLSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
LSE Study: Fracking is Revitalizing U.S. Manufacturing
 
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...
 
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental ExternalitiesReport: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental Externalities
 
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves, Year-end 2015
 
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
U.S. EIA's Drilling Productivity Report - December 2015
 
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids PlantsVelocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
Velocys Plan to "Build the Business" - Gas-to-Liquids Plants
 
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...
 
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...
 
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas OperationsPA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
PA DEP: Methane Reduction Strategies for Natural Gas Operations
 
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy OutlookUS EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
US EIA's December 2016 Short-Term Energy Outlook
 
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical GuideNortheast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
Northeast Gas Association's 2016 Statistical Guide
 
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee AuditPA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
PA PUC Responses to Auditor General's Act 13 Impact Fee Audit
 
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...
 
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final ReportClyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
Clyde Mine Discharge/Tenmile Creek Water Quality Final Report
 
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion ProjectFERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion Project
 

Recently uploaded

2015pmkemenhub163.pdf 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf2015pmkemenhub163.pdf 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
CIkumparan
 
Letter-from-ECI-to-MeiTY-21st-march-2024.pdf
Letter-from-ECI-to-MeiTY-21st-march-2024.pdfLetter-from-ECI-to-MeiTY-21st-march-2024.pdf
Letter-from-ECI-to-MeiTY-21st-march-2024.pdf
bhavenpr
 
Gabriel Whitley's Motion Summary Judgment
Gabriel Whitley's Motion Summary JudgmentGabriel Whitley's Motion Summary Judgment
Gabriel Whitley's Motion Summary Judgment
Abdul-Hakim Shabazz
 
Hogan Comes Home: an MIA WWII crewman is returned
Hogan Comes Home: an MIA WWII crewman is returnedHogan Comes Home: an MIA WWII crewman is returned
Hogan Comes Home: an MIA WWII crewman is returned
rbakerj2
 
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series)..pdf
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series)..pdfAcolyte Episodes review (TV series)..pdf
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series)..pdf
46adnanshahzad
 
EED - The Container Port PERFORMANCE INDEX 2023
EED - The Container Port PERFORMANCE INDEX 2023EED - The Container Port PERFORMANCE INDEX 2023
EED - The Container Port PERFORMANCE INDEX 2023
El Estrecho Digital
 
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptxEssential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
Pragencyuk
 
04062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
04062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf04062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
04062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
FIRST INDIA
 
What Ukraine Has Lost During Russia’s Invasion
What Ukraine Has Lost During Russia’s InvasionWhat Ukraine Has Lost During Russia’s Invasion
What Ukraine Has Lost During Russia’s Invasion
LUMINATIVE MEDIA/PROJECT COUNSEL MEDIA GROUP
 
Hindustan Insider 2nd edition release now
Hindustan Insider 2nd edition release nowHindustan Insider 2nd edition release now
Hindustan Insider 2nd edition release now
hindustaninsider22
 

Recently uploaded (10)

2015pmkemenhub163.pdf 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf2015pmkemenhub163.pdf 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
 
Letter-from-ECI-to-MeiTY-21st-march-2024.pdf
Letter-from-ECI-to-MeiTY-21st-march-2024.pdfLetter-from-ECI-to-MeiTY-21st-march-2024.pdf
Letter-from-ECI-to-MeiTY-21st-march-2024.pdf
 
Gabriel Whitley's Motion Summary Judgment
Gabriel Whitley's Motion Summary JudgmentGabriel Whitley's Motion Summary Judgment
Gabriel Whitley's Motion Summary Judgment
 
Hogan Comes Home: an MIA WWII crewman is returned
Hogan Comes Home: an MIA WWII crewman is returnedHogan Comes Home: an MIA WWII crewman is returned
Hogan Comes Home: an MIA WWII crewman is returned
 
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series)..pdf
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series)..pdfAcolyte Episodes review (TV series)..pdf
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series)..pdf
 
EED - The Container Port PERFORMANCE INDEX 2023
EED - The Container Port PERFORMANCE INDEX 2023EED - The Container Port PERFORMANCE INDEX 2023
EED - The Container Port PERFORMANCE INDEX 2023
 
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptxEssential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
 
04062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
04062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf04062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
04062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
What Ukraine Has Lost During Russia’s Invasion
What Ukraine Has Lost During Russia’s InvasionWhat Ukraine Has Lost During Russia’s Invasion
What Ukraine Has Lost During Russia’s Invasion
 
Hindustan Insider 2nd edition release now
Hindustan Insider 2nd edition release nowHindustan Insider 2nd edition release now
Hindustan Insider 2nd edition release now
 

Iroquois Gas Transmission Proposed Rate Settlement Agreement to Charge Customers Less

  • 1. DRAFT FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 In re: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. Docket No. RP16-301-000 Issued: _______, 2016 Joseph S. Koury Wright & Talisman P.C. 1200 G Street N.W., Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20005 Reference: August 18, 2016 Stipulation and Settlement Agreement On August 18, 2016, pursuant to Rule 602 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (“Commission”) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 C.F.R. § 385.602, Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. (“Iroquois”) filed an offer of settlement in the form of a Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (“Settlement”) that resolves all issues set for hearing in this proceeding. As discussed below, the Commission approves the Settlement as fair and reasonable and in the public interest. On January 21, 2016, the Commission issued an order initiating an investigation of Iroquois’ rates under section 5 of the Natural Gas Act.1 Pursuant to that January 21 Order, Iroquois submitted a Cost and Revenue Study on April 5, 2016. Substantial discovery was thereafter undertaken by the active participants. The participants convened publicly-noticed settlement conferences on April 28, 2016, May 18, 2016, June 1, 2016, and June 16, 2016. As a result of these settlement negotiations, the participants ultimately reached this Settlement resolving all of the issues set for hearing in this proceeding, as set forth below. The terms of the Agreement are summarized as follows: Article I (Rate Matters): Section 1.1 establishes Iroquois’ base tariff recourse rates, as set forth on Pro Forma Sheet Nos. 4, 4.01. 4B, 4C, 4D, and 5A contained in Appendix A to the Settlement, providing three scheduled rate reductions to be effective September 1 of 2016, 2017, and 2018. Section 1.2 provides that Iroquois will file revised tariff sheets reflecting the Settlement Rates within 15 days after the Settlement becomes effective. Section 1.3 provides that Iroquois will file Interim Settlement Rates to be effective September 1, 2016, pending Commission approval of the Settlement. Section 1.4 provides that Iroquois will use the depreciation, amortization, and negative salvage rates set forth on Appendix B to the Settlement. 1 Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., Notice of Initiation of Section 5 Proceeding, Docket No. RP16-301-000 (Jan. 21, 2016); Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., 154 FERC ¶ 61,028 (2016) (“January 21 Order”). 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 2. DRAFT 2 Article II (Rate Moratorium): Section 2.1 establishes a Moratorium that prohibits parties from requesting a change to the Settlement Rates prior to September 1, 2020. Sections 2.2 and 2.3 identify certain types of filings that are not prohibited by the Moratorium. Section 2.4 provides that, in the event that Iroquois makes a Tariff filing pursuant to Section 2.2 or 2.3 during the Moratorium, parties retain their right to protest such section 4 filings (except on the ground that such filing violates the Moratorium). Section 2.5 provides that Iroquois will afford shippers an opportunity to preview and comment on certain section 4 tariff filings that Iroquois may submit during the Moratorium. Section 2.6 provides that the Moratorium and all provisions of Article II terminate on August 31, 2020. Article III (Future Section 4 Rate Filing): Section 3.1 provides that, upon conclusion of the Moratorium, Iroquois will file a general section 4 rate case no later than September 1, 2022, unless such obligation is extinguished through a prior change to the Settlement Rates. Section 3.2 provides that Iroquois will provide shippers thirty days notice and overview of the general section 4 filing. Article IV (Term): The term of the Settlement shall commence on September 1, 2016 and shall terminate after the end of the Moratorium, upon the earliest post-Moratorium effectiveness of new base tariff rates that are the result of a general rate change pursuant to section 4 of the Natural Gas Act, a general rate settlement, or a general modification of Iroquois’ base tariff rates in a proceeding instituted pursuant to section 5 of the Natural Gas Act. Article V (Effectiveness): Section 5.1 provides that the various provisions of the Settlement are not severable and will become effective on the date the Settlement is approved by a final Commission order. Section 5.2 provides that, in the event the Commission modifies the Settlement, parties may refuse to accept the modified Settlement and become a Contesting Party. While the parties know of no opposition to the Settlement, in the event that the Settlement is contested, Section 5.3 provides that it is the intent of the parties that the Commission approve the Settlement for all Non-Contesting Parties.2 Any Contesting Parties will neither be bound by, nor receive the benefits of, the Settlement. Article VI (Waiver and Authority): Approval of the Settlement constitutes any and all waivers and provides all authority under the Natural Gas Act and the Commission’s rules and regulations that may be necessary for the Settlement to be effectuated in accordance with all of its terms. Article VII (Changes to Settlement and Standard of Review): Section 7.1 establishes that the Settlement is the final and binding agreement of the Non-Contesting Parties and may be modified only by written agreement of all Non-Contesting Parties. Section 7.2 sets forth the standard of review for changes to the settlement after approval. 2 “Non-Contesting Parties” are parties that either support, do not oppose, or take no position regarding this Settlement. “Contesting Parties” are parties that oppose this Settlement or suggest or request in any manner a modification, reservation or condition to this Settlement as originally filed, regardless of whether such party characterizes its comments as being in support of the Settlement. Parties that fail to accept a Commission modification to this Settlement pursuant to Section 5.2 shall also be Contesting Parties. 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 3. DRAFT 3 Article VIII (Reservations and Conditions): Article VIII contains standard reservations stating that parties waive no rights other than as specifically provided in the Settlement, that the Settlement should not be construed against any party as drafter, that the Settlement does not establish any principles, policies, or practices, and that Commission approval of the Settlement authorizes Iroquois to implement the Settlement Rates on the dates without suspension. The Commission has reviewed the Settlement and the record certified by the Presiding Judge. Pursuant to Rule 602(g), the Commission finds that the Settlement is fair and reasonable and in the public interest. Accordingly, the Commission approves the Settlement. This order constitutes final agency action. Requests for rehearing by the Commission may be filed within 30 days of the date of issuance of this order, pursuant to 18 C.F.R. § 385.713. By direction of the Commission, Kimberly D. Bose Secretary cc: All Parties 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 4. VIA ELECTRONIC FILING August 18, 2016 Honorable Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20426 Re: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P., Docket No. RP16-301-000 Stipulation and Settlement Agreement Unopposed Request for Shortened Comment Period Dear Secretary Bose: Pursuant to Rule 602 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“Commission”), 18 C.F.R. § 385.602, Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. (“Iroquois”) hereby files the attached Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (“Settlement”) resolving all issues in this proceeding. Iroquois believes that the Settlement is supported or not opposed by all participants. As discussed below, Iroquois requests a shortened comment period, given that the Settlement has been previously circulated to all participants and none has expressed opposition to the Settlement or the request for a shortened comment period. Additionally, to facilitate timely implementation of the Settlement, Iroquois respectfully requests that the Commission act on the Settlement by no later than December 1, 2016. This filing includes:  The Settlement resolving all issues set for hearing in this proceeding;  A separate Explanatory Statement, which contains a summary of the Settlement terms, as well as the information required by the Chief Administrative Law Judge’s October 15, 2003 Notice;  Pro forma tariff sheets in both redlined and non-redlined format reflecting the Settlement Rates (contained in Appendix A to the Settlement); and 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 5. Honorable Kimberly D. Bose August 18, 2016 Page 2  A draft Commission Letter Order approving the Settlement, in accordance with the Chief Administrative Law Judge’s December 21, 1999 Notice. As explained in more detail in the Settlement (at 1-2), this proceeding concerns an investigation of Iroquois’ rates under section 5 of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. § 717d, which was initiated by the Commission’s January 21, 2016 order.1 Thereafter, Presiding Judge Coffman adopted a procedural schedule, active participants conducted substantial discovery, and the participants convened publicly-noticed settlement conferences on April 28, 2016, May 18, 2016, June 1, 2016, and June 16, 2016, which resulted in the Settlement. The Settlement reflects an interrelated package of compromises between and among Iroquois and the active participants. The Settlement resolves all issues in this proceeding, reduces Iroquois’ rates in three scheduled step-downs and ensures rate predictability and stability on Iroquois’ system through August 31, 2020.2 All participants were provided an opportunity to participate in the negotiation of the Settlement. Iroquois believes that the Settlement is supported or unopposed by the Commission’s Trial Staff and all other participants to this proceeding. Accordingly, as discussed below, Iroquois requests that the Settlement be promptly certified by the Presiding Judge and approved by the Commission by no later than December 1, 2016. Request for Transmission to Presiding Judge In accordance with Rule 602(b)(2)(i), 18 C.F.R. § 602(b)(2)(i), Iroquois requests that the Settlement and accompanying documents be transmitted to Presiding Judge David H. Coffman for certification. Iroquois believes that the Settlement will be “uncontested” within the meaning of 18 C.F.R. § 385.602(g). Unopposed Request for Shortened Comment Period Iroquois respectfully requests a shortened comment period to facilitate timely certification and approval of the Settlement and to avoid any delay in realizing the benefits of the Settlement for all participants. Additionally, all participants were given an opportunity to review and comment on drafts of the Settlement before it was filed. In the 1 Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., Notice of Initiation of Section 5 Proceeding, Docket No. RP16-301-000 (Jan. 21, 2016); Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., 154 FERC ¶ 61,028 (2016). 2 Concurrently with the filing of the Settlement, and pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Settlement, Iroquois is filing an unopposed request to place Interim Settlement Rates in effect September 1, 2016, pending approval of the Settlement. 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 6. Honorable Kimberly D. Bose August 18, 2016 Page 3 weeks prior to the filing of this Settlement, Iroquois circulated drafts of the Settlement to all active participants, solicited comments on the drafts, and resolved the limited comments received. Additionally, Iroquois consulted with all participants regarding this proposal for a shortened comment period. No participant expressed opposition to the Settlement or this request for a shortened comment period. Accordingly, Iroquois requests that the initial comments be due within seven (7) business days of this filing (i.e., on or before August 29, 2016), and reply comments be due within seven (7) business days thereafter (i.e., on or before September 8, 2016). In the event that a shortened comment period is not granted, in accordance with Rule 602(f)(2), comments regarding the Settlement would be due no later than 20 days after this filing, i.e. by September 8, 2016, and reply comments are due not later than 30 days after this filing, i.e., by September 19, 2016 (accounting for the weekend). Request for Commission Action by December 1, 2016 Iroquois respectfully requests that the Commission approve the Settlement by December 1, 2016, which will facilitate implementation of the Settlement and realization of its benefits during this calendar year. Action by this date will allow rate certainty for the upcoming heating season. Additionally, it will allow Iroquois to implement the Settlement depreciation and negative salvage rates and conform its books and records before the close of the fiscal year. Waivers While Iroquois knows of no required waivers, Iroquois respectfully requests that the Commission grant any waivers of its regulations, policy or precedent that the Commission may deem necessary to accept this Settlement as proposed herein. 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 7. Honorable Kimberly D. Bose August 18, 2016 Page 4 Certification of Posting and Service In accordance with 18. C.F.R. §§ 385.602(d) and 154.2(d), the undersigned certifies that copies of this filing have been posted and served to all customers and interested state regulatory commissions, as well as all persons on the service list prepared by the Secretary in this docket. Respectfully submitted, By /s/ Joseph S. Koury M. Lisanne Crowley Daniel P. Archuleta Troutman Sanders LLP 401 9th St., N.W., Suite 1000 Washington, D.C. 20004-2134 (P) (202) 274-2814 lisanne.crowley@troutmansanders.com daniel.archuleta@troutmansanders.com Joseph S. Koury Ryan J. Collins Wright & Talisman P.C. 1200 G Street N.W., Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20005 (P) (202) 393-1200 koury@wrightlaw.com collins@wrightlaw.com Helen M. Gallagher Director of Legal Services & Secretary Iroquois Pipeline Operating Company One Corporate Drive, Suite 600 Shelton, CT 06484 (P) (203) 925-7201 helen_gallagher@iroquois.com Attorneys for Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. August 18, 2016 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 8. STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 9. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. ) Docket No. RP16-301-000 ) STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (August 18, 2016) Pursuant to Rule 602 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“Commission”), 18 C.F.R. § 385.602, Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. (“Iroquois”) submits this Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (“Settlement”), which establishes three scheduled reductions to Iroquois’ rates, provides rate certainty through August 31, 2020, and resolves all issues in this proceeding. The Settlement is supported or not opposed by the Commission’s Trial Staff and all active parties to this proceeding.1 Iroquois is not aware of any opposition to this Settlement. The participants therefore urge the Commission to promptly approve the Settlement without modification or conditions. BACKGROUND On January 21, 2016,2 the Commission initiated an investigation of Iroquois’ rates under section 5 of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. § 717d. On February 12, 2016, Presiding Judge 1 Participants that support or do not oppose the settlement are set forth on Appendix D. 2 Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., Notice of Initiation of Section 5 Proceeding, Docket No. RP16-301-000 (Jan. 21, 2016); Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., 154 FERC ¶ 61,028 (2016). 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 10. 2 Coffman adopted the procedural schedule for this proceeding.3 Substantial discovery was thereafter undertaken by the active participants. The participants convened publicly-noticed settlement conferences on April 28, 2016, May 18, 2016, June 1, 2016, and June 16, 2016, which culminated in the agreement memorialized in this Settlement. This Settlement is the result of numerous compromises between and among Iroquois and the active participants. The Settlement reflects a package of interrelated provisions that will resolve all issues in this proceeding, reduce Iroquois’ rates in three scheduled step-downs and ensure rate predictability and stability through August 31, 2020. ARTICLE I RATE MATTERS 1.1 Settlement Rates Iroquois’ base tariff rates4 shall be the rates set forth on Pro Forma Sheet Nos. 4, 4.01. 4B, 4C, 4D, and 5A contained in Appendix A to be effective for the respective periods set forth thereon (“Settlement Rates”). 1.2 Implementation of Settlement Rates a. Within fifteen (15) days after this Settlement becomes effective, in accordance with Article V, Iroquois shall file revised tariff sheets reflecting the Settlement Rates shown on 3 Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P., Order Establishing Procedural Schedule, Docket No. RP16-301-000 (Feb. 12, 2016). 4 As used in the Settlement, the term “base tariff rates” means Iroquois’ recourse rates for existing services, exclusive of the following applicable rate adjustments: (1) the Annual Charge Adjustment (“ACA”) surcharge, and any other industry-wide surcharge or credit imposed by the Commission; and (2) Iroquois’ fuel and losses retention mechanism, which is currently referred to as the Measurement Variance/Fuel Use Factor (“MV/FU”). 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 11. 3 Pro Forma Sheet Nos. 4, 4.01. 4B, 4C, 4D, and 5A contained in Appendix A, to be effective September 1, 2016. b. The Commission’s order approving this Settlement and making it effective in accordance with Article V shall constitute all authority necessary for Iroquois to place into effect the revised tariff sheets filed in accordance with Section 1.2(a). 1.3 Interim Settlement Rates Concurrently with Iroquois’ filing of the Settlement, Iroquois will file a motion to place into effect, on an interim basis, effective September 1, 2016, the Settlement Rates shown on Pro Forma Sheet Nos. 4, 4.01. 4B, 4C, 4D, and 5A under the column “Effective 9/1/2016” (“Interim Settlement Rates”). In the event that the Settlement does not become effective to some or all shippers in accordance with Article V, Iroquois may file with the Commission, and the parties5 will not oppose, a request to reinstate Iroquois’ rates in effect prior to the filing of the Interim Settlement Rates (“Existing Rates”), and to surcharge shippers to which the Settlement did not become effective and that were charged the Interim Settlement Rates, for the difference between the amounts collected under the Interim Settlement Rates and amounts that would have been collected under the Existing Rates for the period the Interim Settlement Rates were effective. 1.4 Depreciation, Amortization, and Negative Salvage Rates Iroquois shall apply the depreciation, amortization, and negative salvage rates, and conform its related regulatory accounts to the rates set forth on Appendix B, commencing September 1, 2016. 5 As used in the Settlement, the terms “party” and “participant” (in singular or plural) shall have the same meaning as in 18 C.F.R. §§ 385.102(b) and (c), and shall include all successors and assignees. 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 12. 4 ARTICLE II RATE MORATORIUM 2.1 Moratorium All participants agree to not initiate a change to the Settlement Rates under either section 4 or section 5 of the Natural Gas Act prior to September 1, 2020 (i.e., four (4) years following the September 1, 2016 effective date of the Settlement pursuant to Article V), which period shall be the “Moratorium.” 2.2 Exceptions to Moratorium The Moratorium shall not prohibit: (1) Changes to Iroquois’ FERC Gas Tariff (“Tariff”) required to comply with generally applicable changes in law or Commission policy; (2) Tariff changes associated with new projects or services, provided however, Iroquois will not propose to make effective during the Moratorium: (a) any authorized overrun rate applicable to existing services, (b) any rate tracking mechanism to recover costs of compliance with regulations of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration or with laws or regulations regarding greenhouse gases; (c) hourly services not related to new construction projects, or (d) services substantially similar to those listed in (a), (b), or (c) above under a different name; provided further, that any new services Iroquois proposes that use existing facilities: (1) will not degrade existing firm service or existing imbalance 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 13. 5 flexibility under Operational Balancing Agreements (“OBAs”); and (2) will not require existing firm shippers to pay higher rates in order to maintain substantially the same quality of service under existing firm services; (3) Periodic tracker filings in accordance with Iroquois’ Tariff; and (4) Tariff changes that do not change the Settlement Rates, do not require existing firm shippers to pay higher rates in order to maintain substantially the same quality of service under existing firm services, and do not degrade existing firm services or existing imbalance flexibility under OBAs, including, but not limited to, the Tariff Modernization filings in Section 2.3. 2.3 Specific Moratorium Exceptions for Tariff Modernization Filings The Moratorium shall not prohibit Iroquois from making filings under section 4 of the Natural Gas Act to implement the following Tariff Modernization provisions, as further described in Appendix C, and subject to the qualifications in Section 2.2: (1) Fuel and Loss Provisions; (2) System Reliability and Integrity Protection Enhancements; (3) Updated and Clarified Right of First Refusal Process; and (4) Clarified Service Rights, so long as the clarified service rights do not degrade existing firm services or existing imbalance flexibility under OBAs. 2.4 Right to Protest Tariff Filings In the event that Iroquois makes a Tariff filing pursuant to Section 2.2 or 2.3 during the Moratorium, nothing in this Settlement shall limit the right of parties to protest any such filing on any grounds except the ground that the Iroquois filing violates the Moratorium. 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 14. 6 2.5 Preview of Tariff Filings Prior to filing with the Commission, Iroquois shall afford shippers an opportunity to preview and comment on any section 4 Tariff filings during the Moratorium that propose generally applicable changes to Iroquois’ general terms and conditions and/or services.6 Where practical, Iroquois will endeavor to provide shippers at least fifteen (15) days prior notice. 2.6 Termination of Moratorium The Moratorium and all provisions of this Article II shall terminate August 31, 2020. ARTICLE III FUTURE SECTION 4 RATE FILING 3.1 Obligation to File Section 4 Rate Case After the conclusion of the Moratorium, Iroquois shall file a general rate case under section 4 of the Natural Gas Act with the Commission no later than September 1, 2022; provided, however, such obligation is extinguished in the event that, after the end of the Moratorium but before September 1, 2022, Iroquois has filed a general rate case under section 4 of the Natural Gas Act or a general rate settlement that is approved by the Commission, or in the event that the Commission has instituted a general investigation of Iroquois’ rates under section 5 of the Natural Gas Act. 6 This tariff preview process does not include filings such as tracker filings (e.g., fuel filings), customer-specific filings (e.g., negotiated rate or non-conforming service agreements), or Commission-directed compliance filings. 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 15. 7 3.2 Notice of Section 4 Filing At least thirty (30) days prior to filing a general rate case under section 4 of the Natural Gas Act pursuant to Section 3.1, Iroquois will provide shippers notice and an overview of the filing and an opportunity to comment. ARTICLE IV TERM Upon becoming effective in accordance with Article V, this Settlement shall be effective for a term commencing on September 1, 2016 and terminating after the end of the Moratorium upon the earliest post-Moratorium effectiveness of new base tariff rates pursuant to: (1) a superseding general rate change filing under section 4 of the Natural Gas Act; (2) a general modification of Iroquois’ base tariff rates in a proceeding instituted pursuant to section 5 of the Natural Gas Act; or (3) a general rate settlement between Iroquois and the other parties. ARTICLE V EFFECTIVENESS 5.1 Effective Date / Nonseverability The various provisions of this Settlement are not severable and shall become binding and effective on the date that this Settlement has been approved by a final Commission order7 as to all its terms without material modification(s), reservation(s) or condition(s) (collectively referred to as “modification”), unless such modification is accepted pursuant to Section 5.2 below. Upon approval by the Commission pursuant to this Article V, the effective date of the Settlement shall be September 1, 2016. 7 For purposes of this Settlement, a final Commission order is an order no longer subject to rehearing pursuant to 18 C.F.R. § 385.713 or judicial review. 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 16. 8 5.2 Commission Modification to Settlement In the event the Commission by final order approves this Settlement with a modification materially adverse to any Non-Contesting Party,8 then such party shall be deemed to have accepted such modification unless, by written notice filed with the Commission and served on all parties no later than fourteen (14) days after such final order, such party states its refusal to accept the Settlement as modified. On the fifteenth (15th ) day after such final Commission order, this Settlement, as modified by the Commission, shall become effective and binding as to all Non-Contesting Parties that have accepted the Commission’s modification. In the event that a Non-Contesting Party gives notice of its refusal to accept the Settlement as modified, such party shall become a Contesting Party9 for purposes of Section 5.3 below; provided, however, in the event that Iroquois gives notice of its refusal to accept the Settlement as modified, the Settlement shall upon such notice become null and void (with the exception of the Interim Settlement Rates provisions pertaining to reinstatement and surcharge in Section 1.3). 5.3 Applicability of Settlement to Contesting Parties / Non-Contesting Parties While the participants know of no opposition to this Settlement, in the event this Settlement is opposed, it is the intent of the participants that the Commission approve this Settlement and allow its effectiveness for all Non-Contesting Parties. Any Contesting Parties 8 “Non-Contesting Parties” are parties that either support or do not oppose this Settlement. “Contesting Parties” are parties that oppose this Settlement or suggest or request in any manner a modification, reservation or condition to this Settlement as originally filed, regardless of whether such party characterizes its comments as being in support of the Settlement. Parties that provide notice that they refuse to accept a Commission modification to this Settlement pursuant to Section 5.2 shall also be Contesting Parties. 9 Id. 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 17. 9 shall neither be bound by, nor receive the benefits of, this Settlement, and shall pay Iroquois’ Existing Rates (subject to any agreed upon discount or negotiated rate, and subject to Section 1.3 reinstatement and surcharge provisions). ARTICLE VI WAIVER AND AUTHORITY The Commission’s approval of this Settlement shall constitute any and all waivers and provide all authority under the Natural Gas Act and the Commission’s rules and regulations that may be necessary for Iroquois to implement the Settlement in accordance with all of its terms. ARTICLE VII CHANGES TO SETTLEMENT AND STANDARD OF REVIEW 7.1 Changes to Settlement This Settlement is the final and binding agreement of the Non-Contesting Parties. After becoming effective in accordance with Article V, this Settlement shall not be modified except by written agreement of all Non-Contesting Parties. 7.2 Standard of Review for Changes to Settlement After Effectiveness Absent an agreement pursuant to Section 7.1, and after the Settlement becomes effective in accordance with Article V, in the event the Commission considers changes to the settlement on behalf of any party, the standard of review shall be the “public interest” standard of review set forth in United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Services Corp., 350 U.S. 332 (1956), Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co., 350 U.S. 348 (1956), and Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. v. Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1, 554 U.S. 527 (2008). The standard of review for changes to the Settlement proposed by a non-party or the Commission acting sua sponte shall be the most stringent standard permissible under applicable law. 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 18. 10 ARTICLE VIII RESERVATIONS AND CONDITIONS 8.1 Negotiated Settlement This Settlement represents a negotiated resolution of only the specific matters addressed herein. Except as specifically provided in this Settlement, no participant shall be deemed to have waived any claim or right as to matters not addressed. This Settlement represents the entire agreement of the participants with respect to the matters resolved. 8.2 No Drafter No party shall be deemed the drafter of this Settlement and this Settlement shall not be construed against any party as drafter. In the event of a conflict between terms contained in the Settlement and those of the attached Explanatory Statement, the terms of Settlement control. 8.3 Settlement Has No Precedential Value The provisions of this Settlement are for purposes of settlement only and shall have no precedential effect. The Commission’s approval of this Settlement shall constitute a finding that the Settlement is fair and reasonable and in the public interest, but shall not constitute a determination on the merits of the specific provisions of the Settlement. Except as specifically provided in this Settlement, no participant shall be deemed to have accepted or consented to any policy or principle purported to underlie the provisions of this Settlement. Except as specifically provided in this Settlement, the participants shall have the same rights under the Natural Gas Act that they would have had absent approval of this Settlement. The methods or practices or absence of methods or practices used or purported to be used in deriving rates shall not be evidence that a particular method is a “long-standing practice” as that term is used in Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. FERC, 628 F.2d 578 (D.C. Cir. 1979), 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 19. 11 or a “settled practice” as that term is used in Public Service Commission of New York v. FERC, 642 F.2d 1335 (D.C. Cir. 1980). 8.4 Effect of Commission Approval The Commission’s approval of this Settlement shall constitute all necessary authority and approval for Iroquois to implement the Settlement Rates on their stated effective dates without further filings (other than pursuant to Section 1.2), without suspension, and without conditions other than those specified herein, and granting any waiver of the Commission’s regulations necessary to implement such Settlement Rates in accordance with this Settlement. 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 20. APPENDIX A PRO FORMA TARIFF SHEETS 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 21. Pro forma Tariff Sheets (Redline) 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 22. PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4 -------- --------------- NON-EASTCHESTER RATES (All in $ Per Dth) 1/ --------------- ---------- Non-Settlement ------------------ Settlement Recourse Rates --------------------- Recourse & ---- Applicable to Non-Eastchester/Non-Contesting Shippers 2/ ---- Maximum Maximum Maximum Eastchester Initial Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Minimum Minimum Rates 3/ 1/1/2003 97/1/201604 91/1/201705 91/1/201806 1/1/2007 RTS DEMAND (Monthly): Zone 1 $0.0000 $7.5637 $0.00007.5637 $6.19289586 $5.99826.8514 $5.59976.7788 $6.5971 Zone 2 $0.0000 $6.4976 $0.00006.4976 $5.33819778 $5.16785.8857 $4.79985.8233 $5.6673 Inter-Zone $0.0000 $12.7150 $0.000012.7150 $10.47551.6978 $9.867211.5177 $8.802611.3956 $11.0902 Zone 1 (MFV) 1/ $0.0000 $5.3607 $5.3607 $4.9318 $4.8559 $4.8044 $4.6757 RTS COMMODITY (Daily): Zone 1 $0.0030 $0.0030 $0.00340 $0.00340 $0.00340 $0.00340 $0.0030 Zone 2 $0.0024 $0.0024 $0.00224 $0.00224 $0.00224 $0.00224 $0.0024 Inter-Zone $0.0054 $0.0054 $0.00564 $0.00564 $0.00564 $0.00564 $0.0054 Zone 1 (MFV) 1/ $0.0300 $0.1506 $0.1506 $0.1386 $0.1364 $0.1350 $0.1314 ITS COMMODITY (Daily):
  • 23. Zone 1 $0.0030 $0.2517 $0.00342517 $0.20702318 $0.20062283 $0.18752259 $0.2199 Zone 2 $0.0024 $0.2160 $0.00222160 $0.17771989 $0.17211959 $0.16001938 $0.1887 Inter-Zone $0.0054 $0.4234 $0.00564234 $0.35003900 $0.33003840 $0.29503800 $0.3700 Zone 1 (MFV) 1/ $0.0300 $0.3268 $0.3268 $0.3007 $0.2960 $0.2929 $0.2850 MAXIMUM VOLUMETRIC CAPACITY RELEASE RATE (Daily) 24/: Zone 1 $0.0000 $0.2487 $0.00002487 $0.20362288 $0.19722253 $0.18412229 $0.2169 Zone 2 $0.0000 $0.2136 $0.00002136 $0.17551965 $0.16991935 $0.1578915 $0.1863 Inter-Zone $0.0000 $0.4180 $0.00004180 $0.3444846 $0.32443787 $0.28943746 $0.3646 Zone 1 (MFV) 1/ $0.0000 $0.1762 $0.1762 $0.1621 $0.1596 $0.1580 $0.1537 **SEE SHEET NOS. 4A, 4B, and 4C FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO RATES WHICH MAY BE APPLICABLE (Footnotes continued on Sheet 4.01)
  • 24. PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4.01 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1/ As authorized pursuant to order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Docket Nos. RS92-17-003, et al., dated June 18, 1993 (63 FERC para. 61,285). 21/ Settlement Recourse Rates were established in Iroquois' Transporter’s Settlement dated August 29, 2003 August 18, 2016[TBD], in Docket No. RP16-301-000, which was approved by Commission order issued Oct. 24, 2003[TBD], in Docket No. RP03-589-000RP16-301- 000established new base tariff recourse rates referred to as “Settlement Rates” and . That Settlement also established a moratorium on changes to the Settlement Rates until January 1, 2008September 1, 2020, defines the Non-Eastchester/Non-Contesting parties to which it applies, and provides that Iroquois' TCRA will be terminated on July 1, 2004. All recourse/ Maximum and Minimum Rates listed on Sheet Nos. 4, 4B, 4C, and 5A are Settlement Rates were established in the Settlement and therefore are subject to the moratorium. 3/ See Sections 1.2 and 4.3 of the Settlement referenced in footnote 2. As directed by the Commission's January 30, 2004 Order in Docket No. RP04-136, the Eastchester Initial Rates apply for service to Eastchester Shippers prior to the July 1, 2004 effective date of the rates set forth on Sheet No. 4C. 42/ No rate cap shall apply to any capacity releases with terms of less than or equal to one year pursuant to FERC Order Nos. 712 et al.
  • 25. PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4B EXTENDED RECEIPT AND EXTENDED DELIVERY RATES (All in $ Per Dth) Applicable to Non-Eastchester/Non-Contesting Shippers 1/ ER/ED COMMODITY (Daily): ----------- Maximum Rates ------------- Minimum Effective Effective Effective Primary Contract Path Rate 9/1/2016 9/1/2017 9/1/2018 Zone 1 $0.0056 $0.1464 $0.1328 $0.1109 Zone 2 $0.0056 $0.1745 $0.1601 $0.1372 ------------------- Maximum Rates ----------------------- Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Minimum 1/1/2003 7/1/2004 1/1/2005 1/1/2006 1/1/2007 ER/ED COMMODITY: Zone 1 $0.0054 $0.2098 $0.1935 $0.1906 $0.1886 $0.1837 Zone 2 $0.0054 $0.1747 $0.1612 $0.1588 $0.1572 $0.1531 Zone 2 (MFV) $0.0324 $0.3223 $0.2968 $0.2922 $0.2892 $0.2815 _________________________________________________________________________________ 1/ Extended Receipt ("ER") and Extended Delivery ("ED") rates are derived from the Settlement Recourse Maximum and Minimum Rates shown on Sheet No. 4, using the methodology approved by the Commission for ER/ED rates in Docket No. RP03-258. The Non-Eastchester/Non-Contesting Shippers to which ER/ED rates apply are defined in Iroquois' August 29, 2003 Settlement approved by the Commission's October 24, 2003 order in Docket No. RP03-589. ER/ED rates apply to transactions utilizing a zone other than the zone/Lateral for which service was contracted in
  • 26. Shipper's RTS contract pursuant to Sections 7.1.1 and 7.3.1 of Transporter's General Terms and Conditions and are in addition to rates otherwise applicable under such contract.
  • 27. PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4C ------------------------ EASTCHESTER RATES 12/ (All in $ Per Dth) ------------------------ Eastchester Primary Access Rates --------- Maximum Rates 2/ ----------- Minimum Effective Effective Rate 9/1/2016 9/1/2018 RTS Demand (Monthly) $0.0000 $13.8396 $12.0146 RTS Commodity (Daily) $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 ITS Commodity (Daily) $0.0000 $0.4550 $0.3950 Volumetric Capacity Release (Daily) 3/ $0.0000 $0.4550 $0.3950 -------------- Maximum Rates ------------------ Minimum Effective Effective 7/1/2004 - 12/31/2007 1/1/2008 Eastchester RTS Demand 5/: $0.0000 $20.075 $19.3146 Eastchester RTS Commodity: $0.0000 $ 0.0000 $ 0.0000 Eastchester ITS Commodity: $0.0000 $ 0.6600 $ 0.6350 Eastchester Secondary Access Rates (Daily) 4/ 3/ ---------- Maximum Rates ------------- Minimum Effective Effective Effective Rate 9/1/2016 9/1/2017 9/1/2018
  • 28. Primary Contract Path: Zone 1 $0.0000 $0.2480 $0.2544 $0.2075 Zone 2 $0.0000 $0.2773 $0.2829 $0.2350 Inter-Zone $0.0000 $0.1050 $0.1250 $0.1000 ---------------------- Maximum Rates ------------------------------- ------- Minimum Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective 7/1/2004 1/1/2005 1/1/2006 1/1/2007 1/1/2008 Primary Contract Path Zone 1 $0.0000 $0.4282 $0.4317 $0.4341 $0.4401 $0.4151 Zone 2 $0.0000 $0.4611 $0.4641 $0.4662 $0.4713 $0.4463 Inter-Zone $0.0000 $0.2700 $0.2760 $0.2800 $0.2900 $0.2650 Zone 1 (MFV) 1/ $0.0000 $0.3593 $0.3640 $0.3671 $0.3750 $0.3500 **SEE SHEET NO. 4A FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO RATES WHICH MAY BE APPLICABLE 5/ 4/ ____________________________ 1/ As authorized pursuant to order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Docket Nos. RS92-17-003, et al., dated June 18, 1993 (63 FERC para. 61,285). 2/ Applicable to "Eastchester Shipper" as defined in Section 2.27 of the General Terms & Conditions. (Footnotes continued on Sheet 4D)
  • 29. PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4D ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1/ Applicable to "Eastchester Shipper" as defined in Section 2.27 of the General Terms & Conditions. 32/ Transporter’s Settlement dated August 18, 2016, in Docket No. RP16-301-000, which was approved by Commission order issued [TBD], established new base tariff recourse rates referred to as “Settlement Rates” and a moratorium on changes to the Settlement Rates until September 1, 2020. All recourse Maximum and Minimum Rates listed on Sheet Nos. 4, 4B, 4C, and 5A are Settlement Rates subject to the moratorium. 3/ No rate cap shall apply to any capacity releases with terms of less than or equal to one year pursuant to FERC Order Nos. 712 et al. 4/ Eastchester Secondary Access Rates ("ESAR") are derived from the Settlement Rates shown on Sheet Nos. 4 and 4C. Applicable to "Eastchester Shipper" that accesses Eastchester from Iroquois' pre-Eastchester system. See Section 1.2(c) of Iroquois' August 29, 2003 rate settlement in Docket No. RP03-589. Eastchester Secondary Access Rates are subject to change (increase or decrease) based on changes to rates for service on the pre-Eastchester system, in accordance with Section 1.1 of Iroquois' August 12, 2004 rate settlement in Docket No. RP04-136. 45/ Eastchester Shippers (including those using Eastchester Secondary Access Service) are subject to tThe ACA Adjustment and the Measurement Variance/Fuel Use Factor, all as set forth on Sheet 4A, and any similar adjustment or surcharge of general applicability approved by the Commission except that in no event shall such an adjustment be assessed more than once for a single transaction. 5/ No rate cap shall apply to any capacity releases with terms of less than or equal to one year pursuant to FERC Order Nos. 712 et al.
  • 30. PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 5A ---------------- HUB SERVICE RATES 1/ (All rates in $ Per Dth) ------------------ HUB SERVICE COMMODITY RATES (Daily): -------------- Maximum Rates ------------------ Minimum Effective Effective Effective Rate 3/7/20069/1/2016 1/1/20079/1/2017 1/1/20089/1/2018 Zone 1 $0.00340 $ 0.22990.2110 $ 0.22390.2046 $ 0.22390.1915 Inter-Zone $0.00564 $ 0.38400.3540 $ 0.37400.3340 $ 0.37400.2990 Eastchester 2/ $0.0000 $ 0.66400.4590 $ 0.66400.4590 $ 0.63900.3990 HUB SERVICE DAILY BALANCE RATES: Minimum $ 0.0000 Maximum $ 0.0154 _________________________________________________________________________________ 1/ SEE SHEET NO. 4A FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO RATES WHICH MAY BE APPLICABLE 2/ Applicable to "Eastchester Shipper" as defined in Section 2.27 of the General Terms & Conditions.
  • 31. Pro forma Tariff Sheets (Clean) 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 32. PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4 ---------- NON-EASTCHESTER RATES (All in $ Per Dth) 1/ ------------ Maximum Maximum Maximum Effective Effective Effective Minimum 9/1/2016 9/1/2017 9/1/2018 RTS DEMAND (Monthly): Zone 1 $0.0000 $6.1928 $5.9982 $5.5997 Zone 2 $0.0000 $5.3381 $5.1678 $4.7998 Inter-Zone $0.0000 $10.4755 $9.8672 $8.8026 RTS COMMODITY (Daily): Zone 1 $0.0034 $0.0034 $0.0034 $0.0034 Zone 2 $0.0022 $0.0022 $0.0022 $0.0022 Inter-Zone $0.0056 $0.0056 $0.0056 $0.0056 ITS COMMODITY (Daily): Zone 1 $0.0034 $0.2070 $0.2006 $0.1875 Zone 2 $0.0022 $0.1777 $0.1721 $0.1600 Inter-Zone $0.0056 $0.3500 $0.3300 $0.2950 VOLUMETRIC CAPACITY RELEASE (Daily) 2/: Zone 1 $0.0000 $0.2036 $0.1972 $0.1841 Zone 2 $0.0000 $0.1755 $0.1699 $0.1578 Inter-Zone $0.0000 $0.3444 $0.3244 $0.2894 **SEE SHEET NOS. 4A, 4B, and 4C FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO RATES WHICH MAY BE APPLICABLE (Footnotes continued on Sheet 4.01)
  • 33. PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4.01 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1/ Transporter’s Settlement dated August 18, 2016, in Docket No. RP16-301-000, which was approved by Commission order issued [TBD], established new base tariff recourse rates referred to as “Settlement Rates” and a moratorium on changes to the Settlement Rates until September 1, 2020. All recourse Maximum and Minimum Rates listed on Sheet Nos. 4, 4B, 4C, and 5A are Settlement Rates subject to the moratorium. 2/ No rate cap shall apply to any capacity releases with terms of less than or equal to one year pursuant to FERC Order Nos. 712 et al.
  • 34. PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4B EXTENDED RECEIPT AND EXTENDED DELIVERY RATES (All in $ Per Dth) Applicable to Non-Eastchester Shippers 1/ ER/ED COMMODITY (Daily): ----------- Maximum Rates ------------- Minimum Effective Effective Effective Primary Contract Path Rate 9/1/2016 9/1/2017 9/1/2018 Zone 1 $0.0056 $0.1464 $0.1328 $0.1109 Zone 2 $0.0056 $0.1745 $0.1601 $0.1372 _________________________________________________________________________________ 1/ Extended Receipt ("ER") and Extended Delivery ("ED") rates are derived from the Maximum and Minimum Rates shown on Sheet No. 4, using the methodology approved by the Commission for ER/ED rates in Docket No. RP03-258. ER/ED rates apply to transactions utilizing a zone other than the zone/Lateral for which service was contracted in Shipper's RTS contract pursuant to Sections 7.1.1 and 7.3.1 of Transporter's General Terms and Conditions and are in addition to rates otherwise applicable under such contract.
  • 35. PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4C ---------------- EASTCHESTER RATES 1/ (All in $ Per Dth) -------------------- Eastchester Primary Access Rates --------- Maximum Rates 2/ ----------- Minimum Effective Effective Rate 9/1/2016 9/1/2018 RTS Demand (Monthly) $0.0000 $13.8396 $12.0146 RTS Commodity (Daily) $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 ITS Commodity (Daily) $0.0000 $0.4550 $0.3950 Volumetric Capacity Release (Daily) 3/ $0.0000 $0.4550 $0.3950 Eastchester Secondary Access Rates (Daily) 4/ ---------- Maximum Rates ------------- Minimum Effective Effective Effective Rate 9/1/2016 9/1/2017 9/1/2018 Primary Contract Path: Zone 1 $0.0000 $0.2480 $0.2544 $0.2075 Zone 2 $0.0000 $0.2773 $0.2829 $0.2350 Inter-Zone $0.0000 $0.1050 $0.1250 $0.1000 **SEE SHEET NO. 4A FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO RATES WHICH MAY BE APPLICABLE 5/ (Footnotes continued on Sheet 4D)
  • 36. PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4D ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1/ Applicable to "Eastchester Shipper" as defined in Section 2.27 of the General Terms & Conditions. 2/ Transporter’s Settlement dated August 18, 2016, in Docket No. RP16-301-000, which was approved by Commission order issued [TBD], established new base tariff recourse rates referred to as “Settlement Rates” and a moratorium on changes to the Settlement Rates until September 1, 2020. All recourse Maximum and Minimum Rates listed on Sheet Nos. 4, 4B, 4C, and 5A are Settlement Rates subject to the moratorium. 3/ No rate cap shall apply to any capacity releases with terms of less than or equal to one year pursuant to FERC Order Nos. 712 et al. 4/ Eastchester Secondary Access Rates ("ESAR") are derived from the Settlement Rates shown on Sheet Nos. 4 and 4C. 5/ Eastchester Shippers (including those using Eastchester Secondary Access Service) are subject to the ACA Adjustment and the Measurement Variance/Fuel Use Factor, all as set forth on Sheet 4A, and any similar adjustment or surcharge of general applicability approved by the Commission except that in no event shall such an adjustment be assessed more than once for a single transaction.
  • 37. PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 5A ---------------- HUB SERVICE RATES 1/ (All rates in $ Per Dth) ------------------ HUB SERVICE COMMODITY RATES (Daily): -------------- Maximum Rates ------------------ Minimum Effective Effective Effective Rate 9/1/2016 9/1/2017 9/1/2018 Zone 1 $0.0034 $ 0.2110 $ 0.2046 $ 0.1915 Inter-Zone $0.0056 $ 0.3540 $ 0.3340 $ 0.2990 Eastchester 2/ $0.0000 $ 0.4590 $ 0.4590 $ 0.3990 HUB SERVICE DAILY BALANCE RATES: Minimum $ 0.0000 Maximum $ 0.0154 _________________________________________________________________________________ 1/ SEE SHEET NO. 4A FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO RATES WHICH MAY BE APPLICABLE 2/ Applicable to "Eastchester Shipper" as defined in Section 2.27 of the General Terms & Conditions.
  • 38. APPENDIX B DEPRECIATION, AMORTIZATION, AND NEGATIVE SALVAGE RATES 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 39. APPENDIX B Iroquois Gas Transmission, L.P. Docket No. RP16-301-000 Depreciation, Amortization, and Negative Salvage Rates Transmission Plant Mainline 1.50% Eastchester 2.75% Total (Weighted Ave) 1.97% Mainline Negative Salvage 0.20% Eastchester Negative Salvage 0.20% General Plant Land and Land Rights (Acct. 389) 0.00% Structures & Improvements (Acct. 390) 1.90% Office Furniture & Equipment (Acct. 391) 6.67% Transportation Equipment (Acct. 392) 12.00% Communication Equipment (Acct. 397) 10.00% Miscellaneous Equipment (Acct. 398) 10.00% Other Tangible Property (Acct. 399) 10.00% Amortization Intangible – Mainline (Acct. 303) 0.35% Intangible – Eastchester (Acct. 303) 2.00% Total (Weighted Ave) 1.38% 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 40. APPENDIX C TARIFF MODERNIZATION 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 41. APPENDIX C Iroquois Gas Transmission, L.P. Docket No. RP16-301-000 Summary of Tariff Modernization Changes Per Article II, Section 2.3 Subject to the limitations specified in Article II, Sections 2.2 and 2.3 of the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement, Iroquois may file the following tariff changes during the Moratorium: I. Fuel & Losses Provision Iroquois may file to update its fuel and losses mechanism to retain the current practice of establishing fuel and losses percentages on a monthly basis, but streamline the tariff language, including the elimination of formula provisions, and include supporting detail in annual FERC filings. II. System Reliability and Integrity Protection Enhancements Subject to the limitations contained in Article 2.2 and 2.3 of the Stipulation, Iroquois may file to update its tariff rules to be more in line with those of other pipelines serving the same market areas in order to protect Iroquois’ system integrity, avoid risk to firm service reliability, and allocate appropriate cost responsibility for service utilization. During the Moratorium, these changes may include: A. Critical Notice/OFO Provisions  Iroquois may file tariff changes to include details regarding circumstances in which it might issue Critical Notice (“CN”) or Operational Flow Order (“OFO”) declarations, the required scope, duration, information, and steps to incent compliance with such declarations.  Iroquois may file tariff changes to memorialize protocol, give examples of circumstances in which Iroquois may determine to issue CN/OFO declarations, and provide sanctions (including penalties and flow control) for shipper failure to adhere to CN/OFO declarations. B. Daily and Hourly Variance Requirements, Imbalance Management, and Associated Penalties  Iroquois may file tariff changes to establish monthly cash-out requirements for non-OBA imbalances.  Iroquois may file tariff changes to clarify obligations of shippers vs. point operators.  Iroquois may file to update its existing tariff penalty provisions to conform to FERC policy and industry practice. 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 42.  Iroquois may file to eliminate the ACA charge for PAL service, given that PAL customers will have already paid the ACA charge as part of the associated transportation. C. Iroquois may file to eliminate ER/ED to afford primary firm shippers greater reliability of service in later Gas Day nomination windows. III. Updated and Clarified ROFR Process Iroquois may file to update and clarify its ROFR tariff provisions to better reflect Commission policy and market needs. During the Moratorium such proposed changes may include:  Streamline timeframes, add flexibility for timing of open seasons, and close gaps in process (such as what happens when there is no competing bid);  Clarify and potentially eliminate second renewal option; and  Clarify process for addressing instances of no third party bidder and failure of Iroquois and shipper to agree on renewal terms. IV. Clarified Service Rights During the Moratorium, Iroquois may file to clarify service rights, including: A. New RTS-Displacement (“RTS-D”) Rate Schedule - To clearly distinguish firm service rights that are qualified by the need for offsetting service (i.e., backhaul), Iroquois may file to establish a new RTS-D Rate Schedule; with the exception of the requirement for offsetting service, the same RTS rates and terms will apply to such new RTS-D service. B. New Flow Path Designation - Given that Iroquois’ system has become bi- directional, Iroquois may file tariff changes to require assignment of flow paths in all firm shipper service agreements (both new and existing) and clarify path and point entitlements. C. HUB Service Update – Iroquois may file tariff changes to expand HUB service availability (currently limited to Waddington) so that shippers may borrow and pay back gas at each physical receipt point on Iroquois’ system. 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 43. APPENDIX D LIST OF PARTICIPANTS SUPPORTING OR NOT OPPOSING THE SETTLEMENT 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 44. APPENDIX D Iroquois Gas Transmission, L.P. Docket No. RP16-301-000 Participants Supporting or Not Opposing the Settlement American Forest & Paper Association Bay State Gas Company d/b/a Columbia Gas of Massachusetts BG Energy Merchants, LLC BP Energy Company Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation Calpine Energy Services, L.P. Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers Cargill, Incorporated Castleton Commodities Merchant Trading L.P. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation Connecticut Natural Gas Corporation Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority ConocoPhillips Company Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Direct Energy Business Marketing, LLC Emera Energy Services Inc. Exelon Corporation George Jepsen, Attorney General for the State of Connecticut Iberdrola Energy Services LLC Infinite Energy, Inc. Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. Koch Energy Services, LLC Liberty Utilities (EnergyNorth Natural Gas) Corp. d/b/a Liberty Utilities Massachusetts Attorney General Mercuria Energy Gas Trading LLC National Grid Gas Delivery Companies New Athens Generating Company, LLC New Jersey Board of Public Utilities New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel New Jersey Natural Gas Company New York Public Service Commission New York State Electric & Gas Corporation NJR Energy Services Company NSTAR Gas Company d/b/a Eversource Process Gas Consumers Group Public Citizen, Inc 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 45. Sequent Energy Management, L.P. St. Lawrence Gas Company, Inc. Talen Energy Marketing, LLC Tenaska Marketing Ventures The New England Local Distribution Companies The Southern Connecticut Gas Company Yankee Gas Services Company d/b/a Eversource 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 46. EXPLANATORY STATEMENT TO SETTLEMENT 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 47. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. ) Docket No. RP16-301-000 ) EXPLANATORY STATEMENT TO STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENTAGREEMENT (August 18, 2016) Pursuant to Rule 602(c)(1) of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“Commission”), 18 C.F.R. § 385.602(c)(1), Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. (“Iroquois”) provides this Explanatory Statement to the concurrently filed Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (“Settlement”),1 which resolves all issues in this rate proceeding under section 5 of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. § 717d. Iroquois is aware of no opposition to the Settlement. I. SUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT Article I (Rate Matters): Section 1.1 establishes Iroquois’ base tariff recourse rates, as set forth on Pro Forma Sheet Nos. 4, 4.01. 4B, 4C, 4D, and 5A contained in Appendix A to the Settlement, providing three scheduled rate reductions to be effective September 1 of 2016, 2017, and 2018. Section 1.2 provides that Iroquois will file revised tariff sheets reflecting the Settlement Rates within 15 days after the Settlement becomes effective. Section 1.3 provides that Iroquois will file Interim Settlement Rates to be effective September 1, 2016, pending Commission approval of the Settlement. Section 1 This Explanatory Statement is provided for informational purposes only. The terms of the Settlement are controlling. 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 48. 2 1.4 provides that Iroquois will use the depreciation, amortization, and negative salvage rates set forth on Appendix B to the Settlement. Article II (Rate Moratorium): Section 2.1 establishes a Moratorium that prohibits parties from requesting a change to the Settlement Rates prior to September 1, 2020. Sections 2.2 and 2.3 identify certain types of filings that are not prohibited by the Moratorium. Section 2.4 provides that, in the event that Iroquois makes a Tariff filing pursuant to Section 2.2 or 2.3 during the Moratorium, parties retain their right to protest such a section 4 filing. Section 2.5 provides that Iroquois will afford shippers an opportunity to preview and comment on certain section 4 tariff filings that Iroquois may submit during the Moratorium. Section 2.6 provides that the Moratorium and all provisions of Article II terminate on August 31, 2020. Article III (Future Section 4 Rate Filing): Section 3.1 provides that, upon conclusion of the Moratorium, Iroquois will file a general section 4 rate case no later than September 1, 2022, unless such obligation is extinguished through a prior change to the Settlement Rates. Section 3.2 provides that Iroquois will provide shippers thirty days notice and overview of the general section 4 filing. Article IV (Term): The term of the Settlement shall commence on September 1, 2016 and shall terminate after the end of the Moratorium, upon the earliest post- Moratorium effectiveness of new base tariff rates that are the result of a general rate change pursuant to section 4 of the Natural Gas Act, a general rate settlement, or a general modification of Iroquois’ base tariff rates in a proceeding instituted pursuant to section 5 of the Natural Gas Act. Article V (Effectiveness): Section 5.1 provides that the various provisions of the Settlement are not severable and will become effective on the date the Settlement is 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 49. 3 approved by a final Commission order. Section 5.2 provides that, in the event the Commission modifies the Settlement, parties may refuse to accept the modified Settlement and become a Contesting Party. While the parties know of no opposition to the Settlement, in the event that the Settlement is contested, Section 5.3 provides that it is the intent of the parties that the Commission approve the Settlement for all Non- Contesting Parties.2 Any Contesting Parties will neither be bound by, nor receive the benefits of, the Settlement. Article VI (Waiver and Authority): Approval of the Settlement constitutes any and all waivers and provides all authority under the Natural Gas Act and the Commission’s rules and regulations that may be necessary for the Settlement to be effectuated in accordance with all of its terms. Article VII (Changes to Settlement and Standard of Review): Section 7.1 establishes that the Settlement is the final and binding agreement of the Non-Contesting Parties and may be modified only by written agreement of all Non-Contesting Parties. Section 7.2 sets forth the standard of review for changes to the settlement after approval, as further described in Section II, Question 5, below. Article VIII (Reservations and Conditions): Article VIII contains standard reservations stating that parties waive no rights other than as specifically provided in the Settlement, that the Settlement should not be construed against any party as drafter, that 2 “Non-Contesting Parties” are parties that either support, do not oppose, or take no position regarding this Settlement. “Contesting Parties” are parties that oppose this Settlement or suggest or request in any manner a modification, reservation or condition to this Settlement as originally filed, regardless of whether such party characterizes its comments as being in support of the Settlement. Parties that fail to accept a Commission modification to this Settlement pursuant to Section 5.2 shall also be Contesting Parties. 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 50. 4 the Settlement does not establish any principles, policies, or practices, and that Commission approval of the Settlement authorizes Iroquois to implement the Settlement Rates on the dates without suspension. II. QUESTIONS RAISED BY THE CHIEF JUDGE’S OCTOBER 23, 2003 NOTICE The Chief Administrative Law Judge’s October 23, 2003 Notice requires parties submitting settlement agreements to address the following five questions: 1. What are the issues underlying the settlement and what are the major implications? Response: As a rate case under section 5 of the Natural Gas Act, this case presents typical rate issues, such as cost of service, cost allocation, throughput, and rate design, as applied to Iroquois’ recourse rates. 2. Whether any of the issues raise policy implications. Response: The issues presented are primarily factual issues, which do not raise major policy implications. 3. Whether other pending cases may be affected. Response: No other pending cases are affected by this Settlement. 4. Whether the settlement involves issues of first impression, or if there are any reversals on the issues involved. Response: The Settlement involves no issues of first impression and no reversals on the issues involved. 5. Whether the proceeding is subject to the just and reasonable standard or whether there is Mobile-Sierra language making it the standard, i.e., the applicable standards of review. Response: The governing review standard for approval of the Settlement is provided by Rule 602, 18 C.F.R. § 385.602. Assuming that the Settlement is uncontested 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 51. 5 as Iroquois expects, Rule 602(g)(3) provides that the Commission may approve the Settlement “upon a finding that the settlement appears to be fair and reasonable and in the public interest.” However, as provided in Article VII of the Settlement, after approval, any changes to the Settlement on behalf of a party must satisfy the “public interest” standard of review set forth in United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Services Corp., 350 U.S. 332 (1956), Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co., 350 U.S. 348 (1956), and Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. v. Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1, 554 U.S. 527 (2008), while changes to the Settlement on behalf of a non-party or the Commission acting sua ponte must satisfy the most stringent standard permissible under applicable law. 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 52. DRAFT COMMISSION LETTER ORDER APPROVING THE SETTLEMENT 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 53. DRAFT FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426 In re: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. Docket No. RP16-301-000 Issued: _______, 2016 Joseph S. Koury Wright & Talisman P.C. 1200 G Street N.W., Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20005 Reference: August 18, 2016 Stipulation and Settlement Agreement On August 18, 2016, pursuant to Rule 602 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (“Commission”) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 C.F.R. § 385.602, Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. (“Iroquois”) filed an offer of settlement in the form of a Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (“Settlement”) that resolves all issues set for hearing in this proceeding. As discussed below, the Commission approves the Settlement as fair and reasonable and in the public interest. On January 21, 2016, the Commission issued an order initiating an investigation of Iroquois’ rates under section 5 of the Natural Gas Act.1 Pursuant to that January 21 Order, Iroquois submitted a Cost and Revenue Study on April 5, 2016. Substantial discovery was thereafter undertaken by the active participants. The participants convened publicly-noticed settlement conferences on April 28, 2016, May 18, 2016, June 1, 2016, and June 16, 2016. As a result of these settlement negotiations, the participants ultimately reached this Settlement resolving all of the issues set for hearing in this proceeding, as set forth below. The terms of the Agreement are summarized as follows: Article I (Rate Matters): Section 1.1 establishes Iroquois’ base tariff recourse rates, as set forth on Pro Forma Sheet Nos. 4, 4.01. 4B, 4C, 4D, and 5A contained in Appendix A to the Settlement, providing three scheduled rate reductions to be effective September 1 of 2016, 2017, and 2018. Section 1.2 provides that Iroquois will file revised tariff sheets reflecting the Settlement Rates within 15 days after the Settlement becomes effective. Section 1.3 provides that Iroquois will file Interim Settlement Rates to be effective September 1, 2016, pending Commission approval of the Settlement. Section 1.4 provides that Iroquois will use the depreciation, amortization, and negative salvage rates set forth on Appendix B to the Settlement. 1 Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., Notice of Initiation of Section 5 Proceeding, Docket No. RP16-301-000 (Jan. 21, 2016); Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., 154 FERC ¶ 61,028 (2016) (“January 21 Order”). 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 54. DRAFT 2 Article II (Rate Moratorium): Section 2.1 establishes a Moratorium that prohibits parties from requesting a change to the Settlement Rates prior to September 1, 2020. Sections 2.2 and 2.3 identify certain types of filings that are not prohibited by the Moratorium. Section 2.4 provides that, in the event that Iroquois makes a Tariff filing pursuant to Section 2.2 or 2.3 during the Moratorium, parties retain their right to protest such section 4 filings (except on the ground that such filing violates the Moratorium). Section 2.5 provides that Iroquois will afford shippers an opportunity to preview and comment on certain section 4 tariff filings that Iroquois may submit during the Moratorium. Section 2.6 provides that the Moratorium and all provisions of Article II terminate on August 31, 2020. Article III (Future Section 4 Rate Filing): Section 3.1 provides that, upon conclusion of the Moratorium, Iroquois will file a general section 4 rate case no later than September 1, 2022, unless such obligation is extinguished through a prior change to the Settlement Rates. Section 3.2 provides that Iroquois will provide shippers thirty days notice and overview of the general section 4 filing. Article IV (Term): The term of the Settlement shall commence on September 1, 2016 and shall terminate after the end of the Moratorium, upon the earliest post-Moratorium effectiveness of new base tariff rates that are the result of a general rate change pursuant to section 4 of the Natural Gas Act, a general rate settlement, or a general modification of Iroquois’ base tariff rates in a proceeding instituted pursuant to section 5 of the Natural Gas Act. Article V (Effectiveness): Section 5.1 provides that the various provisions of the Settlement are not severable and will become effective on the date the Settlement is approved by a final Commission order. Section 5.2 provides that, in the event the Commission modifies the Settlement, parties may refuse to accept the modified Settlement and become a Contesting Party. While the parties know of no opposition to the Settlement, in the event that the Settlement is contested, Section 5.3 provides that it is the intent of the parties that the Commission approve the Settlement for all Non-Contesting Parties.2 Any Contesting Parties will neither be bound by, nor receive the benefits of, the Settlement. Article VI (Waiver and Authority): Approval of the Settlement constitutes any and all waivers and provides all authority under the Natural Gas Act and the Commission’s rules and regulations that may be necessary for the Settlement to be effectuated in accordance with all of its terms. Article VII (Changes to Settlement and Standard of Review): Section 7.1 establishes that the Settlement is the final and binding agreement of the Non-Contesting Parties and may be modified only by written agreement of all Non-Contesting Parties. Section 7.2 sets forth the standard of review for changes to the settlement after approval. 2 “Non-Contesting Parties” are parties that either support, do not oppose, or take no position regarding this Settlement. “Contesting Parties” are parties that oppose this Settlement or suggest or request in any manner a modification, reservation or condition to this Settlement as originally filed, regardless of whether such party characterizes its comments as being in support of the Settlement. Parties that fail to accept a Commission modification to this Settlement pursuant to Section 5.2 shall also be Contesting Parties. 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
  • 55. DRAFT 3 Article VIII (Reservations and Conditions): Article VIII contains standard reservations stating that parties waive no rights other than as specifically provided in the Settlement, that the Settlement should not be construed against any party as drafter, that the Settlement does not establish any principles, policies, or practices, and that Commission approval of the Settlement authorizes Iroquois to implement the Settlement Rates on the dates without suspension. The Commission has reviewed the Settlement and the record certified by the Presiding Judge. Pursuant to Rule 602(g), the Commission finds that the Settlement is fair and reasonable and in the public interest. Accordingly, the Commission approves the Settlement. This order constitutes final agency action. Requests for rehearing by the Commission may be filed within 30 days of the date of issuance of this order, pursuant to 18 C.F.R. § 385.713. By direction of the Commission, Kimberly D. Bose Secretary cc: All Parties 20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM