The document summarizes a settlement agreement between Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. and other participants to resolve a rate case. The settlement agreement establishes reduced rates for Iroquois over three years, provides rate stability through August 2020, and resolves all issues in the proceeding. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approves the settlement as fair and reasonable.
A SYNOPSIS OF THE REGISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS IN NIGERIANnagozie Azih
The registration and enforcement of foreign judgments in Nigeria is governed by two statutes - the Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgments Ordinance 1922 and the Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act 1961. The 1922 Ordinance applies to judgments from UK and other Commonwealth countries, while the 1961 Act applies to other foreign countries if an order is made by the Minister of Justice. However, the 1961 Act has not been brought into effect through a Ministerial Order to date. As such, only judgments from countries covered by the 1922 Ordinance can currently be registered and enforced in Nigeria. The requirements and process for registering foreign judgments are outlined in the two statutes.
Revised regulations from the Dept. of Interiori's Bureau of Land Management (BLM) that will govern how and when fracking happens on the 700 million acres of federally owned land, mostly in the Western United States. The BLM oversees a huge amount of land with some 92,000 oil and gas wells on its property. The new rules tighten reporting of fracking chemicals and the way cement is used to protect holes drilled to retrieve oil and gas.
Kaaihue's Preliminary Title Report, as of Mar. 2021, dates back to 1970Angela Kaaihue
This preliminary report was issued on May 8, 2020 by Hawaii Title Agency, LLC for 98-673 Kilinoe Street, Aiea, HI 96701. The report provides information on the title to the property, which is currently vested in Angela Sue Kaaihue and Yong Nam Fryer as joint tenants. The report lists 31 exceptions that may affect the insurable title, including easements, deed restrictions, and legal orders regarding access rights.
This document is an act to amend the Internal Revenue Code to exclude discharges of indebtedness on principal residences from gross income. It contains 9 sections that 1) exclude mortgage debt forgiveness from taxable income, 2) extend a tax deduction for mortgage insurance premiums, 3) provide alternative tests for qualifying as a cooperative housing corporation, 4) exclude certain benefits for volunteer firefighters from taxable income, 5) clarify student housing eligibility for low-income housing tax credits, 6) allow a higher capital gains exclusion for sales of a principal residence within 2 years of a spouse's death, 7) modify penalties for failure to file partnership and S corporation tax returns, and 8) modify required corporate estimated tax installment dates.
This bill proposes several amendments to Ohio's Oil and Gas Law. It would require recording and notification of assignments of leases for real property used for injection wells. It would revise permit application and issuance procedures for wells injecting brine and other waste from oil and gas operations. It would establish additional fees for injection and require permitting for pre-2014 injection operations. It would also establish groundwater monitoring requirements related to injection.
The document provides state information for Illinois' 2012-2013 block grant application including:
- The Illinois Department of Human Services Division of Mental Health will be the grantee.
- Contact information is provided for Mary Smith, who is responsible for the application submission.
- The most recent state expenditure period that is closed out is July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010.
The Central Provinces Laws Act of 1875 aimed to declare and amend certain portions of law in force in the Central Provinces of India. Specifically, it repealed many Bengal Regulations and Acts that did not extend to the Central Provinces. It also deemed certain enactments specified in a schedule to remain in force to the extent indicated. The Act provided that in cases not expressly covered by legislation, the courts would apply principles of justice, equity and good conscience. It also empowered the state government to make rules on various matters and establish penalties for rule violations.
A still-incomplete bill to rewire the U.S. judicial system from scratch, making it consistent with the constitutional right to trial by jury rather than dependent upon judges, removing the travesty of plea bargaining, and instituting other reforms.
A SYNOPSIS OF THE REGISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS IN NIGERIANnagozie Azih
The registration and enforcement of foreign judgments in Nigeria is governed by two statutes - the Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgments Ordinance 1922 and the Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act 1961. The 1922 Ordinance applies to judgments from UK and other Commonwealth countries, while the 1961 Act applies to other foreign countries if an order is made by the Minister of Justice. However, the 1961 Act has not been brought into effect through a Ministerial Order to date. As such, only judgments from countries covered by the 1922 Ordinance can currently be registered and enforced in Nigeria. The requirements and process for registering foreign judgments are outlined in the two statutes.
Revised regulations from the Dept. of Interiori's Bureau of Land Management (BLM) that will govern how and when fracking happens on the 700 million acres of federally owned land, mostly in the Western United States. The BLM oversees a huge amount of land with some 92,000 oil and gas wells on its property. The new rules tighten reporting of fracking chemicals and the way cement is used to protect holes drilled to retrieve oil and gas.
Kaaihue's Preliminary Title Report, as of Mar. 2021, dates back to 1970Angela Kaaihue
This preliminary report was issued on May 8, 2020 by Hawaii Title Agency, LLC for 98-673 Kilinoe Street, Aiea, HI 96701. The report provides information on the title to the property, which is currently vested in Angela Sue Kaaihue and Yong Nam Fryer as joint tenants. The report lists 31 exceptions that may affect the insurable title, including easements, deed restrictions, and legal orders regarding access rights.
This document is an act to amend the Internal Revenue Code to exclude discharges of indebtedness on principal residences from gross income. It contains 9 sections that 1) exclude mortgage debt forgiveness from taxable income, 2) extend a tax deduction for mortgage insurance premiums, 3) provide alternative tests for qualifying as a cooperative housing corporation, 4) exclude certain benefits for volunteer firefighters from taxable income, 5) clarify student housing eligibility for low-income housing tax credits, 6) allow a higher capital gains exclusion for sales of a principal residence within 2 years of a spouse's death, 7) modify penalties for failure to file partnership and S corporation tax returns, and 8) modify required corporate estimated tax installment dates.
This bill proposes several amendments to Ohio's Oil and Gas Law. It would require recording and notification of assignments of leases for real property used for injection wells. It would revise permit application and issuance procedures for wells injecting brine and other waste from oil and gas operations. It would establish additional fees for injection and require permitting for pre-2014 injection operations. It would also establish groundwater monitoring requirements related to injection.
The document provides state information for Illinois' 2012-2013 block grant application including:
- The Illinois Department of Human Services Division of Mental Health will be the grantee.
- Contact information is provided for Mary Smith, who is responsible for the application submission.
- The most recent state expenditure period that is closed out is July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010.
The Central Provinces Laws Act of 1875 aimed to declare and amend certain portions of law in force in the Central Provinces of India. Specifically, it repealed many Bengal Regulations and Acts that did not extend to the Central Provinces. It also deemed certain enactments specified in a schedule to remain in force to the extent indicated. The Act provided that in cases not expressly covered by legislation, the courts would apply principles of justice, equity and good conscience. It also empowered the state government to make rules on various matters and establish penalties for rule violations.
A still-incomplete bill to rewire the U.S. judicial system from scratch, making it consistent with the constitutional right to trial by jury rather than dependent upon judges, removing the travesty of plea bargaining, and instituting other reforms.
This bill amends existing Kansas statutes regarding open government and public records. It makes the following changes:
1) Limits fees charged for copies of public records to no more than $0.25 per page and prohibits including staff time in fees.
2) Requires money received from fees for copies to be deposited in the state or local government's general fund.
3) Repeals the existing statutes being amended and replaces them with the new language.
This document is the Public Law 96-465, also known as the Foreign Service Act of 1980. It was passed by Congress on October 17, 1980 to strengthen and improve the Foreign Service of the United States.
The law finds that a professional foreign service is essential to conducting US foreign affairs effectively. It aims to preserve, strengthen and improve the Foreign Service to better respond to modern diplomacy. Key objectives include ensuring admission and promotion based on merit, fostering diversity, providing competitive compensation and benefits, and establishing a Senior Foreign Service.
The law contains 12 chapters that cover topics such as general provisions on the Foreign Service, management of the Service, appointments and promotions, compensation, labor relations, and retirement benefits.
Senate spending bill after appropriations committeeEducationNC
This document is a proposed bill from the General Assembly of North Carolina providing aid to North Carolinians in response to the COVID-19 crisis. It establishes reserves and funds using federal relief money, appropriates over $623 million to the Department of Health and Human Services and other agencies, and allocates the funds for purposes like medical supplies, food banks, foster care assistance, agriculture, healthcare clinics and community colleges.
Vested property settlement policy in BangladeshNur E Sowrove
This document outlines the Vested Property Act passed in Bangladesh in 2001. Some key points:
- The act reverts some government-owned "vested property" back to their original Bangladeshi owners or successors. Vested property includes property confiscated under previous defense and enemy property acts.
- It establishes tribunals to review claims for properties to be reverted and determine rightful owners. District commissioners are tasked with implementing tribunal decrees.
- The act prohibits new claims for inclusion on the revertible property list after the act's passage and transfer of ownership of revertible properties until reversion is complete.
- It outlines the process for property owners to apply for reversion and appeal
This document proposes amendments to Nevada's public records law. Key points include:
- Requiring governmental entities to provide public records in electronic format if feasible.
- Establishing civil penalties from $500 to $2,500 for failing to comply with public records requests.
- Requiring entities to provide contact information for the person responsible for public records decisions.
- Shifting the burden to public agencies to prove a records request is vexatious or frivolous if seeking relief.
മിച്ചഭൂമി സീലിംഗ് പരിധിയും നടപടിക്രമങ്ങളും Sruitiny of draft delaration-Solve your land problems in Kerala - bhoomi thram mattam - resurvey - PATTYAM - klc- land assignment bhoomi tharam mattom , ditial survey, ponnum vila, land valuation, fair vsalue , pokkuvaravu and document issues - tile verification
JAMES JOSEPH ADHIKARATHIL, land consulatant - FORMER DEPUTY COLLECTOR ALAPPUZHA
9447464502
Full Text of the “Woznicki Fix” (2003 Wisconsin Act 47)SteveJohnson125
This document contains the full text of 2003 Wisconsin Act 47, which is sometimes called the “Woznicki Fix.” Act 47 addressed certain issues related to the “Woznicki Rule” that was established as a result of the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s 1996 ruling in the case of Thomas Woznicki vs. Dennis Erickson. Specifically, the “Woznicki Fix” clarified who was required to receive a “Woznicki Notice” and specified a timeframe during which a public employee could challenge the release of records under the “Woznicki Rule.”
LICENSING OF HOUSES IN MULTIPLE OCCUPATIONsuzi smith
What is this guidance for ?
1.1.1 This guidance is intended predominantly for local authorities. It provides statutory guidance on the exercise of their functions in relation to HMO licensing under Part 5 of the Housing (Scotland) Act 2006. This guidance is issued under section 163 of the Housing (Scotland) Act 2006. That means that it is statutory, and local authorities must have regard to it on the exercise of their functions under Part 5. It may also be helpful to organisations working with local authorities on HMO issues.
1.1.2 This guidance should be read in conjunction with the relevant legislation, Part 5 of the 2006 Act and its explanatory notes. The guidance should not be interpreted as an authoritative statement as to the law in this area.
1.1.3 Separate, non-statutory guidance is available for local authorities on transitional arrangements from the previous regime under the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982 (Licensing of Houses in Multiple Occupation) Order 2000, as amended, to Part 5 of the Housing (Scotland) Act 2006.
This document is a bill introduced in the North Carolina General Assembly to provide aid to North Carolinians in response to the COVID-19 crisis. It establishes reserves and funds using federal relief money. Key allocations include $50 million to purchase medical supplies, $6 million to food banks, $15 million to assist facilities serving vulnerable older/disabled residents, and $25 million to community colleges for online learning and campus sanitation.
This document provides an overview and history of Goods and Service Tax (GST) law in India. It discusses key points:
1) The Constitution (One Hundred and First) Amendment Act 2016 enabled the implementation of GST and amended various articles of the Constitution relating to tax powers.
2) GST is to be levied on supply of goods and services in the course of inter-state and intra-state trade or commerce. The GST Council was established to make recommendations on GST-related issues.
3) The document outlines the history of GST in India from 2000 when an empowered committee was set up through its passage in Parliament and implementation in 2016-2017. It also provides a
1. The document discusses the KLR Act of 1963 in Kerala, which addressed land reforms including granting ownership rights to cultivating tenants and fixing a ceiling on family land holdings.
2. It outlines various sections of the act related to exemptions, identifying excess land holders, filing statements, serving notices, determining land to be surrendered, vesting excess land with the government, and procedures for Tahsildars and the Land Board.
3. Models for Land Board proceedings are provided, including templates for details about the case, parties involved, family members, land owned, and land eligible for exemptions.
Договор между украинской государственной нефтегазовой монополией и вашингтонс...Stranaua
This document is a procurement contract between Yorktown Solutions LLC and the Ukrainian Industry Association "Federation of Employers of the Oil and Gas Industry" to provide public affairs and consulting services. The services include promoting Ukraine's oil and gas industry in the US, informing stakeholders about Ukraine's gas market reforms, and addressing threats from the Nord Stream 2 pipeline project. The price of the contract is $960,000 to be paid in quarterly installments over the course of the contract period.
The document is an Act to enact a new Constitution for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, replacing the previous 1979 Constitution. It repeals and replaces the previous Constitution with a new Constitution contained in a schedule. It establishes a transitional period and provides that existing laws, property, legal proceedings, rights and obligations will continue with the new government structures under the new Constitution.
The document discusses strategies and procedures for removing a case from state to federal court, including:
- Cases that can be removed include those involving diversity of citizenship, federal questions, and certain civil rights cases.
- Defendants must file a notice of removal within 30 days of receiving the state court filing and establish federal jurisdiction.
- The notice of removal can be amended within 30 days to correct deficiencies but not assert new grounds for removal.
- Cases arising from state workers' compensation laws cannot be removed to federal court.
A copy of the lawsuit filed Sept. 15, 2011 by landowner and resident of the Township of Middlefield (Otsego County, NY) Jennifer Huntington against the township seeking to overturn Middlefield's recent ban on gas drilling. Huntington claims it violates New York State law which reserves the right to regulate oil and gas drilling in the state.
This presentation is from jamesadhikaram.com. James Joseph Adhikarathil, Managing Director and Chief Consultant of jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy which offers total solution to your land problems in Kerala, .James joseph Adhikarathil is Certified Trainer of both Government of India ,Certified trainer of Government of Kerala and former Deputy Collector Alappuzha. Visit us at www.jamesadhikaram.com or call mob 9447464502. Our Facebook pages - kerala laws on land , kerala land assignment , michabhoomi , pokkuvaravu , kerala resurvey , kerala land conservancy , kerala building tax , kerala certificates , thanneerthadaniyamam. our email jamesadhikaram@gmail.com
1. Facebook time line
https://www.facebook.com/jamesjoseph2011/
Face book pages
2. Kerala laws on land https://www.facebook.com/keralalawsonland/
3. Kerala disaster management https://www.facebook.com/Kerala-disaster-management-694459641171427/
4. Kerala mining procedures https://www.facebook.com/Kerala-Mining-Procedures-636052660372278/
5. Ahikaram hr solutions https://www.facebook.com/jamesadhikaramhr/
6. Pokkuvaravu https://www.facebook.com/jamesadhikarams/
7. Wefare schemes https://www.facebook.com/jamesadhikaramwelfare/
8. Kerala certificates https://www.facebook.com/Kerala-Certificates-109969533820489/
9. Kerala buildingtax https://www.facebook.com/Kerala-Building-tax-103998291190661/
10. Kerala Resurvey https://www.facebook.com/jamesadhikaramsurvey/
11. Kerala land assignment https://www.facebook.com/adhikaramhr/
12. Kerla revenue recovery https://www.facebook.com/Kerala-Revenue-Recovery-105429304318074/
13. Thanneerthadaniyamam https://www.facebook.com/Thanneerthada-niyamam-109096300644827/
14. Michabhoomi https://www.facebook.com/Michabhoomi-100979434805415/
15. LSG kerala trainers https://www.facebook.com/LSG-Kerala-Trainers-358931498266232/
16. Kerala registration of land https://www.facebook.com/Kerala-Registration-of-Land-107269217761754/
17. Business success https://www.facebook.com/Business-Success-110380097060352/
18. Kerala Land conservancy https://www.facebook.com/Kerala-Land-Conservancy-586345548669008/
19. SLIDESHARE https://www.slideshare.net/mysandesham
20. Issuu https://issuu.com/mysandesham
21. Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/James-Joseph-Adhikarathil
This document summarizes several proposed bills in the Texas Legislature related to property taxes. It discusses bills that would create exemptions for things like new businesses, homesteads of disabled veterans, mineral interests under $2,000, and property leased to charter schools. It also covers bills that would impose caps of 5% on annual increases in appraised homestead and commercial property values. Finally, it mentions bills related to appraising properties damaged by disasters, valuing mineral interests, and recognizing uncommon agricultural uses.
The document summarizes amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules that take effect on August 1, 2016. Key changes include new rules for filing confidential attachments electronically, requirements for certificates of service and proof of electronic service, allowing expedited filings to be notified by email, lengthening times for objections to proposed orders, and changes to filing requirements in domestic relations cases. The amendments aim to update efiling procedures and standards.
A response sent to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in June 2016 by Rio Grande LNG. The request asks FERC to reject numerous requests for "intervenor" status by antis who desire nothing more than to slow down the FERC approval process. Rio Grande says the applications are incomplete and should be rejected.
This bill amends existing Kansas statutes regarding open government and public records. It makes the following changes:
1) Limits fees charged for copies of public records to no more than $0.25 per page and prohibits including staff time in fees.
2) Requires money received from fees for copies to be deposited in the state or local government's general fund.
3) Repeals the existing statutes being amended and replaces them with the new language.
This document is the Public Law 96-465, also known as the Foreign Service Act of 1980. It was passed by Congress on October 17, 1980 to strengthen and improve the Foreign Service of the United States.
The law finds that a professional foreign service is essential to conducting US foreign affairs effectively. It aims to preserve, strengthen and improve the Foreign Service to better respond to modern diplomacy. Key objectives include ensuring admission and promotion based on merit, fostering diversity, providing competitive compensation and benefits, and establishing a Senior Foreign Service.
The law contains 12 chapters that cover topics such as general provisions on the Foreign Service, management of the Service, appointments and promotions, compensation, labor relations, and retirement benefits.
Senate spending bill after appropriations committeeEducationNC
This document is a proposed bill from the General Assembly of North Carolina providing aid to North Carolinians in response to the COVID-19 crisis. It establishes reserves and funds using federal relief money, appropriates over $623 million to the Department of Health and Human Services and other agencies, and allocates the funds for purposes like medical supplies, food banks, foster care assistance, agriculture, healthcare clinics and community colleges.
Vested property settlement policy in BangladeshNur E Sowrove
This document outlines the Vested Property Act passed in Bangladesh in 2001. Some key points:
- The act reverts some government-owned "vested property" back to their original Bangladeshi owners or successors. Vested property includes property confiscated under previous defense and enemy property acts.
- It establishes tribunals to review claims for properties to be reverted and determine rightful owners. District commissioners are tasked with implementing tribunal decrees.
- The act prohibits new claims for inclusion on the revertible property list after the act's passage and transfer of ownership of revertible properties until reversion is complete.
- It outlines the process for property owners to apply for reversion and appeal
This document proposes amendments to Nevada's public records law. Key points include:
- Requiring governmental entities to provide public records in electronic format if feasible.
- Establishing civil penalties from $500 to $2,500 for failing to comply with public records requests.
- Requiring entities to provide contact information for the person responsible for public records decisions.
- Shifting the burden to public agencies to prove a records request is vexatious or frivolous if seeking relief.
മിച്ചഭൂമി സീലിംഗ് പരിധിയും നടപടിക്രമങ്ങളും Sruitiny of draft delaration-Solve your land problems in Kerala - bhoomi thram mattam - resurvey - PATTYAM - klc- land assignment bhoomi tharam mattom , ditial survey, ponnum vila, land valuation, fair vsalue , pokkuvaravu and document issues - tile verification
JAMES JOSEPH ADHIKARATHIL, land consulatant - FORMER DEPUTY COLLECTOR ALAPPUZHA
9447464502
Full Text of the “Woznicki Fix” (2003 Wisconsin Act 47)SteveJohnson125
This document contains the full text of 2003 Wisconsin Act 47, which is sometimes called the “Woznicki Fix.” Act 47 addressed certain issues related to the “Woznicki Rule” that was established as a result of the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s 1996 ruling in the case of Thomas Woznicki vs. Dennis Erickson. Specifically, the “Woznicki Fix” clarified who was required to receive a “Woznicki Notice” and specified a timeframe during which a public employee could challenge the release of records under the “Woznicki Rule.”
LICENSING OF HOUSES IN MULTIPLE OCCUPATIONsuzi smith
What is this guidance for ?
1.1.1 This guidance is intended predominantly for local authorities. It provides statutory guidance on the exercise of their functions in relation to HMO licensing under Part 5 of the Housing (Scotland) Act 2006. This guidance is issued under section 163 of the Housing (Scotland) Act 2006. That means that it is statutory, and local authorities must have regard to it on the exercise of their functions under Part 5. It may also be helpful to organisations working with local authorities on HMO issues.
1.1.2 This guidance should be read in conjunction with the relevant legislation, Part 5 of the 2006 Act and its explanatory notes. The guidance should not be interpreted as an authoritative statement as to the law in this area.
1.1.3 Separate, non-statutory guidance is available for local authorities on transitional arrangements from the previous regime under the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982 (Licensing of Houses in Multiple Occupation) Order 2000, as amended, to Part 5 of the Housing (Scotland) Act 2006.
This document is a bill introduced in the North Carolina General Assembly to provide aid to North Carolinians in response to the COVID-19 crisis. It establishes reserves and funds using federal relief money. Key allocations include $50 million to purchase medical supplies, $6 million to food banks, $15 million to assist facilities serving vulnerable older/disabled residents, and $25 million to community colleges for online learning and campus sanitation.
This document provides an overview and history of Goods and Service Tax (GST) law in India. It discusses key points:
1) The Constitution (One Hundred and First) Amendment Act 2016 enabled the implementation of GST and amended various articles of the Constitution relating to tax powers.
2) GST is to be levied on supply of goods and services in the course of inter-state and intra-state trade or commerce. The GST Council was established to make recommendations on GST-related issues.
3) The document outlines the history of GST in India from 2000 when an empowered committee was set up through its passage in Parliament and implementation in 2016-2017. It also provides a
1. The document discusses the KLR Act of 1963 in Kerala, which addressed land reforms including granting ownership rights to cultivating tenants and fixing a ceiling on family land holdings.
2. It outlines various sections of the act related to exemptions, identifying excess land holders, filing statements, serving notices, determining land to be surrendered, vesting excess land with the government, and procedures for Tahsildars and the Land Board.
3. Models for Land Board proceedings are provided, including templates for details about the case, parties involved, family members, land owned, and land eligible for exemptions.
Договор между украинской государственной нефтегазовой монополией и вашингтонс...Stranaua
This document is a procurement contract between Yorktown Solutions LLC and the Ukrainian Industry Association "Federation of Employers of the Oil and Gas Industry" to provide public affairs and consulting services. The services include promoting Ukraine's oil and gas industry in the US, informing stakeholders about Ukraine's gas market reforms, and addressing threats from the Nord Stream 2 pipeline project. The price of the contract is $960,000 to be paid in quarterly installments over the course of the contract period.
The document is an Act to enact a new Constitution for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, replacing the previous 1979 Constitution. It repeals and replaces the previous Constitution with a new Constitution contained in a schedule. It establishes a transitional period and provides that existing laws, property, legal proceedings, rights and obligations will continue with the new government structures under the new Constitution.
The document discusses strategies and procedures for removing a case from state to federal court, including:
- Cases that can be removed include those involving diversity of citizenship, federal questions, and certain civil rights cases.
- Defendants must file a notice of removal within 30 days of receiving the state court filing and establish federal jurisdiction.
- The notice of removal can be amended within 30 days to correct deficiencies but not assert new grounds for removal.
- Cases arising from state workers' compensation laws cannot be removed to federal court.
A copy of the lawsuit filed Sept. 15, 2011 by landowner and resident of the Township of Middlefield (Otsego County, NY) Jennifer Huntington against the township seeking to overturn Middlefield's recent ban on gas drilling. Huntington claims it violates New York State law which reserves the right to regulate oil and gas drilling in the state.
This presentation is from jamesadhikaram.com. James Joseph Adhikarathil, Managing Director and Chief Consultant of jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy which offers total solution to your land problems in Kerala, .James joseph Adhikarathil is Certified Trainer of both Government of India ,Certified trainer of Government of Kerala and former Deputy Collector Alappuzha. Visit us at www.jamesadhikaram.com or call mob 9447464502. Our Facebook pages - kerala laws on land , kerala land assignment , michabhoomi , pokkuvaravu , kerala resurvey , kerala land conservancy , kerala building tax , kerala certificates , thanneerthadaniyamam. our email jamesadhikaram@gmail.com
1. Facebook time line
https://www.facebook.com/jamesjoseph2011/
Face book pages
2. Kerala laws on land https://www.facebook.com/keralalawsonland/
3. Kerala disaster management https://www.facebook.com/Kerala-disaster-management-694459641171427/
4. Kerala mining procedures https://www.facebook.com/Kerala-Mining-Procedures-636052660372278/
5. Ahikaram hr solutions https://www.facebook.com/jamesadhikaramhr/
6. Pokkuvaravu https://www.facebook.com/jamesadhikarams/
7. Wefare schemes https://www.facebook.com/jamesadhikaramwelfare/
8. Kerala certificates https://www.facebook.com/Kerala-Certificates-109969533820489/
9. Kerala buildingtax https://www.facebook.com/Kerala-Building-tax-103998291190661/
10. Kerala Resurvey https://www.facebook.com/jamesadhikaramsurvey/
11. Kerala land assignment https://www.facebook.com/adhikaramhr/
12. Kerla revenue recovery https://www.facebook.com/Kerala-Revenue-Recovery-105429304318074/
13. Thanneerthadaniyamam https://www.facebook.com/Thanneerthada-niyamam-109096300644827/
14. Michabhoomi https://www.facebook.com/Michabhoomi-100979434805415/
15. LSG kerala trainers https://www.facebook.com/LSG-Kerala-Trainers-358931498266232/
16. Kerala registration of land https://www.facebook.com/Kerala-Registration-of-Land-107269217761754/
17. Business success https://www.facebook.com/Business-Success-110380097060352/
18. Kerala Land conservancy https://www.facebook.com/Kerala-Land-Conservancy-586345548669008/
19. SLIDESHARE https://www.slideshare.net/mysandesham
20. Issuu https://issuu.com/mysandesham
21. Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/James-Joseph-Adhikarathil
This document summarizes several proposed bills in the Texas Legislature related to property taxes. It discusses bills that would create exemptions for things like new businesses, homesteads of disabled veterans, mineral interests under $2,000, and property leased to charter schools. It also covers bills that would impose caps of 5% on annual increases in appraised homestead and commercial property values. Finally, it mentions bills related to appraising properties damaged by disasters, valuing mineral interests, and recognizing uncommon agricultural uses.
The document summarizes amendments to the Uniform Trial Court Rules that take effect on August 1, 2016. Key changes include new rules for filing confidential attachments electronically, requirements for certificates of service and proof of electronic service, allowing expedited filings to be notified by email, lengthening times for objections to proposed orders, and changes to filing requirements in domestic relations cases. The amendments aim to update efiling procedures and standards.
A response sent to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in June 2016 by Rio Grande LNG. The request asks FERC to reject numerous requests for "intervenor" status by antis who desire nothing more than to slow down the FERC approval process. Rio Grande says the applications are incomplete and should be rejected.
According To An Article On The BESTCASE Website – Supreme Court Approves Amen...tonyturnerlaw
The U.S. Supreme Court approved amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure that are expected to take effect on December 1, 2018. Many of the amendments are technical in nature and are intended to update bankruptcy rules related to electronic filing, appeals, judgments, and other procedural matters. Key changes include mandating electronic filing for attorneys, updating rules related to home equity loans and fees/expenses, expanding the definition of entry of judgment, and addressing bankruptcy court jurisdiction over final judgments.
This document outlines regulations established by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission of India regarding the development of a market for power from non-conventional energy sources through the issuance of transferable and saleable renewable energy certificates. Key points include:
- The regulations define renewable energy certificates and establish two categories - solar certificates and non-solar certificates.
- Generating companies engaged in renewable energy generation can apply for registration and issuance of certificates if they meet specified eligibility criteria including obtaining accreditation and not having a power purchase agreement at a preferential tariff.
- The Central Agency will be designated to undertake functions related to registration of eligible entities, issuance and maintenance of accounts for certificates, and acting as a
This document outlines regulations established by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission of India regarding the development of a market for power from non-conventional energy sources through the issuance of transferable and saleable renewable energy certificates. Key points include:
- The regulations define renewable energy certificates and establish two categories - solar certificates and non-solar certificates.
- Generating companies engaged in renewable energy generation can apply for registration and issuance of certificates if they meet specified eligibility criteria including obtaining accreditation and not having a power purchase agreement at a preferential tariff.
- The Central Agency will be designated to undertake functions related to registration of eligible entities, issuance and maintenance of accounts for certificates, and acting as a
Williams Request for Pre-Filing Review on Transco Northeast Supply Enhancemen...Marcellus Drilling News
A pre-filing review request from Williams to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). The Transco Northeast Supply Enhancement Project would bump up capacity on the Transco pipeline system to meet extra demand from utility company National Grid.
The approval certificate issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on April 7, 2016 for a project to beef up a connection between two pipelines not yet built--PennEast Pipeline and Southern Reliability Project pipeline. Both new pipelines will be located, at least partially, in NJ.
FERC Order Denying Rehearing Requested by NY AG Schneiderman re Constitution ...Marcellus Drilling News
New York Attorney General Eric Scheiderman requested the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission rehear and investigate the matter of tree clearing in NY along the proposed path of the Constitution Pipeline (still not built). Schneiderman alleged the Constitution should have prevented landowners from clearing trees on their own property ahead of the pipeline's approval by Lord Cuomo. FERC told Schneiderman to get lost--no rehearing of the matter.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) just issued a press release announcing KBR, Inc. has its “first enforcement action against a company for using improperly restrictive language in confidentiality agreements with the potential to stifle the whistleblowing process.”
At issue, was KBR, Inc.’s standard practice of requiring employees interviewed in internal investigations to sign confidentiality statements with the following language:
“I understand that in order to protect the integrity of this review, I am prohibited from discussing any particulars regarding this interview and the subject matter discussed during the interview, without the prior authorization of the Law Department. I understand that the unauthorized disclosure of information may be grounds for disciplinary action up to and including termination of employment.”
The SEC found those terms violated Rule 21F-17, which prohibits companies from taking any action that would impede whistleblowers from reporting possible securities violations to the SEC.
In addition to agreeing to pay a fine of $130,000, KBR, Inc. also agreed to amend its standard confidentiality statement signed by employees interviewed during an internal investigation to read as follows:
“Nothing in this Confidentiality Statement prohibits me from reporting possible violations of federal law or regulation to any governmental agency or entity, including but not limited to the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Congress, and any agency Inspector General, or making other disclosures that are protected under the whistleblower provisions of federal law or regulation. I do not need the prior authorization of the Law Department to make any such reports or disclosures and I am not required to notify the company that I have made such reports or disclosures.”
To read more visit www.WinWinHR.com
The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission's Final Implementation Order for Chapter 23 of Act 13, otherwise known as the shale gas impact fee. These are the guidelines the PUC will use to collect and disburse monies from Marcellus Shale drillers in PA.
The document summarizes the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2004. The regulations establish guidelines for determining tariffs for electricity generation and transmission in India. Key points include:
1) The regulations establish norms for determining tariffs and come into effect on April 1, 2004 for a period of 5 years.
2) Tariffs will be determined separately for each stage of generation or transmission projects.
3) Guidelines are provided for filing tariff applications, determination of capital costs, operation and maintenance costs, taxes, and other cost recovery elements.
4) Detailed definitions are provided for terms related to thermal power generation.
San Jose Water Company (SJWC) submitted Advice Letter 506 to the Public Utilities Commission of California requesting authorization to increase its revenue requirement by $5,338,823 through a rate base offset. This would allow recovery of costs associated with upgrades to the Montevina Water Treatment Plant (MWTP) completed in 2016. Work in 2016 included construction activities, equipment installation, and permitting. The total recorded costs for the MWTP project from 2013-2016 are below the approved $62 million budget cap. SJWC is requesting to recover 30% of the revenue requirement through a service charge increase and 70% through volumetric rate increases.
This document is a unitization and unit operating agreement between Ghana National Petroleum Corporation and several oil and gas companies (Tullow Ghana Limited, Kosmos Energy Ghana HC, Anadarko WCTP Company, Sabre Oil & Gas Holdings Limited, and EO Group Limited) regarding the development of the Jubilee Field Unit located offshore Ghana. The agreement defines terms, establishes an effective date and term, outlines the scope and creation of the unit, and addresses tract participations, unit interests, default provisions, production disposition, decommissioning, transfers of interest, withdrawal from the agreement, confidentiality, and other standard provisions governing the joint development and operation of the unitized field. It includes several exhibits providing additional
67/2010 Issuing Service Price Control Regulationtraoman
This document is an unofficial translation of a resolution issued by the Telecommunications Regulatory Authority of Oman regarding price control regulations for telecommunications licensees providing services in specific geographical areas. It outlines maximum price limits for various telecom services that licensees must adhere to, including packages for fixed voice, internet, and mobile services. It also describes procedures for licensees to seek approval for price changes and terms and conditions, and establishes a framework for audits, complaints, and requests related to the prices of regulated services.
The document provides an overview of the proposed new electricity market arrangements in Ukraine. Key points include:
1. The market will have forward bilateral contracting, a day-ahead market (DAM), and an intra-day market (IDM). In the forward market, participants bilaterally trade physical products.
2. In the DAM, suppliers and producers submit hourly bids and orders for residual volumes not contracted bilaterally. The market operator runs optimization to determine clearing prices.
3. The continuous IDM allows participants to modify positions from bilateral contracts and the DAM. The regulator may impose obligations to ensure adequate DAM liquidity.
4. Renewable and CHP generators will contract with a Guarante
OH Supreme Court Decision: State ex rel. Morrison v. Beck Energy Corp.Marcellus Drilling News
Decision by the Ohio Supreme Court in a case striking down so-called "home rule" laws in which local municipalities try to prevent shale drilling by enacting local zoning regulations. The court found that according to OH law, the state and only the state may regulate where and when drilling is done. A huge victory for both landowners and the shale industry in the Buckeye State.
The Body Corporate and Community Management and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2010 introduces important changes for agents involved in the sale of community title lots. Key changes include requiring a Community Management Scheme Statement to accompany disclosure statements and introducing new information that must be disclosed. Agents should review and supplement existing disclosure statements to comply with the new requirements, which take effect upon the Act's assent. The Real Estate Institute of Queensland will also be releasing revised disclosure statement forms.
The Body Corporate and Community Management and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2010 introduces important changes for agents involved in the sale of community title lots. Key changes include requiring a Community Management Scheme Statement to accompany disclosure statements and introducing new information that must be disclosed. Agents should review and supplement existing disclosure statements to comply with the new requirements, which take effect upon the Act's assent. The Real Estate Institute of Queensland will also be releasing revised disclosure statement forms.
Similar to Iroquois Gas Transmission Proposed Rate Settlement Agreement to Charge Customers Less (20)
The document summarizes five key facts about the recovery of US shale oil production:
1) Rig counts have increased by 90% since bottoming out in May 2016 and are up 30% year-over-year, signaling increased drilling and production capacity.
2) While decline rates remain steep, production profiles have increased substantially due to technological advances, meaning aggregate supply will be stronger.
3) Preliminary data shows that net new shale supply turned positive in December 2016 for the first time since March 2015, recovering just 7 months after rig counts increased.
4) Increased drilling activity is supported by a large stock of drilled but uncompleted wells, demonstrating the recovery and expansion of the shale sector.
5)
Quarterly legislative action update: Marcellus and Utica shale region (4Q16)Marcellus Drilling News
A quarterly update from the legal beagles at global law firm Norton Rose Fulbright. A quarterly legislative action update for the second quarter of 2016 looking at previously laws acted upon, and new laws introduced, affecting the oil and gas industry in Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia.
An update from Spectra Energy on their proposed $3 billion project to connect four existing pipeline systems to flow more Marcellus/Utica gas to New England. In short, Spectra has put the project on pause until mid-2017 while it attempts to get new customers signed.
A letter from Rover Pipeline to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission requesting the agency issue the final certificate that will allow Rover to begin tree-clearing and construction of the 511-mile pipeline through Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Ohio and Michigan. If the certificate is delayed beyond the end of 2016, it will delay the project an extra year due to tree-clearing restrictions (to accommodate federally-protected bats).
DOE Order Granting Elba Island LNG Right to Export to Non-FTA CountriesMarcellus Drilling News
An order issued by the U.S. Dept. of Energy that allows the Elba Island LNG export facility to export LNG to countries with no free trade agreement with the U.S. Countries like Japan and India have no FTA with our country (i.e. friendly countries)--so this is good news indeed. Although the facility would have operated by sending LNG to FTA countries, this order opens the market much wider.
A study released in December 2016 by the London School of Economics, titled "On the Comparative Advantage of U.S. Manufacturing: Evidence from the Shale Gas Revolution." While America has enough shale gas to export plenty of it, exporting it is not as economic as exporting oil due to the elaborate processes to liquefy and regassify natural gas--therefore a lot of the gas stays right here at home, making the U.S. one of (if not the) cheapest places on the planet to establish manufacturing plants, especially for manufacturers that use natural gas and NGLs (natural gas liquids). Therefore, manufacturing, especially in the petrochemical sector, is ramping back up in the U.S. For every two jobs created by fracking, another one job is created in the manufacturing sector.
Letter From 24 States Asking Trump & Congress to Withdraw the Unlawful Clean ...Marcellus Drilling News
A letter from the attorneys general from 24 of the states opposed to the Obama Clean Power Plan to President-Elect Trump, RINO Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnel and RINO House Speaker Paul Ryan. The letter asks Trump to dump the CPP on Day One when he takes office, and asks Congress to adopt legislation to prevent the EPA from such an egregious overreach ever again.
Report: New U.S. Power Costs: by County, with Environmental ExternalitiesMarcellus Drilling News
Natural gas and wind are the lowest-cost technology options for new electricity generation across much of the U.S. when cost, public health impacts and environmental effects are considered. So says this new research paper released by The University of Texas at Austin. Researchers assessed multiple generation technologies including coal, natural gas, solar, wind and nuclear. Their findings are depicted in a series of maps illustrating the cost of each generation technology on a county-by-county basis throughout the U.S.
Annual report issued by the U.S. Energy Information Administration showing oil and natural gas proved reserves, in this case for 2015. These reports are issued almost a year after the period for which they report. This report shows proved reserves for natural gas dropped by 64.5 trillion cubic feet (Tcf), or 16.6%. U.S. crude oil and lease condensate proved reserves also decreased--from 39.9 billion barrels to 35.2 billion barrels (down 11.8%) in 2015. Proved reserves are calculated on a number of factors, including price.
The document is a report from the U.S. Energy Information Administration analyzing oil and gas production from seven regions in the U.S. It includes charts and tables showing historical and projected production levels of oil and gas from each region from 2008 to 2017, as well as metrics like the average production per rig. The regions - Bakken, Eagle Ford, Haynesville, Marcellus, Niobrara, Permian, and Utica - accounted for 92% of domestic oil production growth and all domestic natural gas production growth from 2011-2014.
Velocys is the manufacturer of gas-to-liquids (GTL) plants that convert natural gas (a hyrdocarbon) into other hydrocarbons, like diesel fuel, gasoline, and even waxes. This PowerPoint presentation lays out the Velocys plan to get the company growing. GTL plants have not (so far) taken off in the U.S. Velocys hopes to change that. They specialize in small GTL plants.
PA DEP Revised Permit for Natural Gas Compression Stations, Processing Plants...Marcellus Drilling News
In January 2016, Gov. Wolf announced the DEP would revise its current general permit (GP-5) to update the permitting requirements for sources at natural gas compression, processing, and transmission facilities. This is the revised GP-5.
PA DEP Permit for Unconventional NatGas Well Site Operations and Remote Piggi...Marcellus Drilling News
In January 2016, PA Gov. Wolf announced the Dept. of Environmental Protection would develop a general permit for sources at new or modified unconventional well sites and remote pigging stations (GP-5A). This is the proposed permit.
Onerous new regulations for the Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale industry proposed by the state Dept. of Environmental Protection. The new regs will, according to the DEP, help PA reduce so-called fugitive methane emissions and some types of air pollution (VOCs). This is liberal Gov. Tom Wolf's way of addressing mythical man-made global warming.
The monthly Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO) from the U.S. Energy Information Administration for December 2016. This issue makes a couple of key points re natural gas: (1) EIA predicts that natural gas production in the U.S. for 2016 will see a healthy decline over 2015 levels--1.3 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) less in 2016. That's the first annual production decline since 2005! (2) The EIA predicts the average price for natural gas at the benchmark Henry Hub will climb from $2.49/Mcf (thousand cubic feet) in 2016 to a whopping $3.27/Mcf in 2017. Why the jump? Growing domestic natural gas consumption, along with higher pipeline exports to Mexico and liquefied natural gas exports.
This document provides an overview of the natural gas market in the Northeast United States, including New England, New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. It details statistics on gas customers, consumption, infrastructure like pipelines and storage, and production. A key point is that the development of the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania has significantly increased domestic gas production in the region and reduced its reliance on other supply basins and imports.
The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission responded to each point raised in a draft copy of the PA Auditor General's audit of how Act 13 impact fee money, raised from Marcellus Shale drillers, gets spent by local municipalities. The PUC says it's not their job to monitor how the money gets spent, only in how much is raised and distributed.
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Act 13/Impact Fees Audit by PA Auditor...Marcellus Drilling News
A biased look at how 60% of impact fees raised from PA's shale drilling are spent, by the anti-drilling PA Auditor General. He chose to ignore an audit of 40% of the impact fees, which go to Harrisburg and disappear into the black hole of Harrisburg spending. The Auditor General claims, without basis in fact, that up to 24% of the funds are spent on items not allowed under the Act 13 law.
The final report from the Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection that finds, after several years of testing, no elevated levels of radiation from acid mine drainage coming from the Clyde Mine, flowing into Ten Mile Creek. Radical anti-drillers tried to smear the Marcellus industry with false claims of illegal wastewater dumping into the mine, with further claims of elevated radiation levels in the creek. After years of testing, the DEP found those allegations to be false.
FERC Order Denying Stay of Kinder Morgan's Broad Run Expansion ProjectMarcellus Drilling News
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission denied a request to stay the authorization of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company's Broad Run Expansion Project. The Commission found that the intervenors requesting the stay did not demonstrate they would suffer irreparable harm if the project proceeded. Specifically, the Commission determined that the environmental impacts to forest and a nearby animal rehabilitation center would be insignificant. Additionally, conditioning authorization on future permits did not improperly encroach on state authority. Therefore, justice did not require granting a stay.
Here is Gabe Whitley's response to my defamation lawsuit for him calling me a rapist and perjurer in court documents.
You have to read it to believe it, but after you read it, you won't believe it. And I included eight examples of defamatory statements/
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series) The Acolyte. Learn about the influence of the program on the Star Wars world, as well as new characters and story twists.
El Puerto de Algeciras continúa un año más como el más eficiente del continente europeo y vuelve a situarse en el “top ten” mundial, según el informe The Container Port Performance Index 2023 (CPPI), elaborado por el Banco Mundial y la consultora S&P Global.
El informe CPPI utiliza dos enfoques metodológicos diferentes para calcular la clasificación del índice: uno administrativo o técnico y otro estadístico, basado en análisis factorial (FA). Según los autores, esta dualidad pretende asegurar una clasificación que refleje con precisión el rendimiento real del puerto, a la vez que sea estadísticamente sólida. En esta edición del informe CPPI 2023, se han empleado los mismos enfoques metodológicos y se ha aplicado un método de agregación de clasificaciones para combinar los resultados de ambos enfoques y obtener una clasificación agregada.
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptxPragencyuk
Discover the essential tools and strategies for modern PR business success. Learn how to craft compelling news releases, leverage press release sites and news wires, stay updated with PR news, and integrate effective PR practices to enhance your brand's visibility and credibility. Elevate your PR efforts with our comprehensive guide.
04062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
An astonishing, first-of-its-kind, report by the NYT assessing damage in Ukraine. Even if the war ends tomorrow, in many places there will be nothing to go back to.
Iroquois Gas Transmission Proposed Rate Settlement Agreement to Charge Customers Less
1. DRAFT
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426
In re:
Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
Docket No. RP16-301-000
Issued: _______, 2016
Joseph S. Koury
Wright & Talisman P.C.
1200 G Street N.W., Suite 600
Washington, D.C. 20005
Reference: August 18, 2016 Stipulation and Settlement Agreement
On August 18, 2016, pursuant to Rule 602 of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission’s (“Commission”) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 C.F.R. § 385.602, Iroquois
Gas Transmission System, L.P. (“Iroquois”) filed an offer of settlement in the form of a
Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (“Settlement”) that resolves all issues set for hearing in
this proceeding. As discussed below, the Commission approves the Settlement as fair and
reasonable and in the public interest.
On January 21, 2016, the Commission issued an order initiating an investigation of
Iroquois’ rates under section 5 of the Natural Gas Act.1
Pursuant to that January 21 Order,
Iroquois submitted a Cost and Revenue Study on April 5, 2016. Substantial discovery was
thereafter undertaken by the active participants. The participants convened publicly-noticed
settlement conferences on April 28, 2016, May 18, 2016, June 1, 2016, and June 16, 2016. As a
result of these settlement negotiations, the participants ultimately reached this Settlement
resolving all of the issues set for hearing in this proceeding, as set forth below.
The terms of the Agreement are summarized as follows:
Article I (Rate Matters): Section 1.1 establishes Iroquois’ base tariff recourse rates, as set forth
on Pro Forma Sheet Nos. 4, 4.01. 4B, 4C, 4D, and 5A contained in Appendix A to the
Settlement, providing three scheduled rate reductions to be effective September 1 of 2016, 2017,
and 2018. Section 1.2 provides that Iroquois will file revised tariff sheets reflecting the
Settlement Rates within 15 days after the Settlement becomes effective. Section 1.3 provides
that Iroquois will file Interim Settlement Rates to be effective September 1, 2016, pending
Commission approval of the Settlement. Section 1.4 provides that Iroquois will use the
depreciation, amortization, and negative salvage rates set forth on Appendix B to the Settlement.
1
Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., Notice of Initiation of Section 5 Proceeding,
Docket No. RP16-301-000 (Jan. 21, 2016); Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., 154
FERC ¶ 61,028 (2016) (“January 21 Order”).
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
2. DRAFT
2
Article II (Rate Moratorium): Section 2.1 establishes a Moratorium that prohibits parties from
requesting a change to the Settlement Rates prior to September 1, 2020. Sections 2.2 and 2.3
identify certain types of filings that are not prohibited by the Moratorium. Section 2.4 provides
that, in the event that Iroquois makes a Tariff filing pursuant to Section 2.2 or 2.3 during the
Moratorium, parties retain their right to protest such section 4 filings (except on the ground that
such filing violates the Moratorium). Section 2.5 provides that Iroquois will afford shippers an
opportunity to preview and comment on certain section 4 tariff filings that Iroquois may submit
during the Moratorium. Section 2.6 provides that the Moratorium and all provisions of Article II
terminate on August 31, 2020.
Article III (Future Section 4 Rate Filing): Section 3.1 provides that, upon conclusion of the
Moratorium, Iroquois will file a general section 4 rate case no later than September 1, 2022,
unless such obligation is extinguished through a prior change to the Settlement Rates. Section
3.2 provides that Iroquois will provide shippers thirty days notice and overview of the general
section 4 filing.
Article IV (Term): The term of the Settlement shall commence on September 1, 2016 and shall
terminate after the end of the Moratorium, upon the earliest post-Moratorium effectiveness of
new base tariff rates that are the result of a general rate change pursuant to section 4 of the
Natural Gas Act, a general rate settlement, or a general modification of Iroquois’ base tariff rates
in a proceeding instituted pursuant to section 5 of the Natural Gas Act.
Article V (Effectiveness): Section 5.1 provides that the various provisions of the Settlement are
not severable and will become effective on the date the Settlement is approved by a final
Commission order. Section 5.2 provides that, in the event the Commission modifies the
Settlement, parties may refuse to accept the modified Settlement and become a Contesting Party.
While the parties know of no opposition to the Settlement, in the event that the Settlement is
contested, Section 5.3 provides that it is the intent of the parties that the Commission approve the
Settlement for all Non-Contesting Parties.2
Any Contesting Parties will neither be bound by, nor
receive the benefits of, the Settlement.
Article VI (Waiver and Authority): Approval of the Settlement constitutes any and all waivers
and provides all authority under the Natural Gas Act and the Commission’s rules and regulations
that may be necessary for the Settlement to be effectuated in accordance with all of its terms.
Article VII (Changes to Settlement and Standard of Review): Section 7.1 establishes that the
Settlement is the final and binding agreement of the Non-Contesting Parties and may be
modified only by written agreement of all Non-Contesting Parties. Section 7.2 sets forth the
standard of review for changes to the settlement after approval.
2
“Non-Contesting Parties” are parties that either support, do not oppose, or take no
position regarding this Settlement. “Contesting Parties” are parties that oppose this
Settlement or suggest or request in any manner a modification, reservation or condition to
this Settlement as originally filed, regardless of whether such party characterizes its
comments as being in support of the Settlement. Parties that fail to accept a Commission
modification to this Settlement pursuant to Section 5.2 shall also be Contesting Parties.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
3. DRAFT
3
Article VIII (Reservations and Conditions): Article VIII contains standard reservations stating
that parties waive no rights other than as specifically provided in the Settlement, that the
Settlement should not be construed against any party as drafter, that the Settlement does not
establish any principles, policies, or practices, and that Commission approval of the Settlement
authorizes Iroquois to implement the Settlement Rates on the dates without suspension.
The Commission has reviewed the Settlement and the record certified by the Presiding Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 602(g), the Commission finds that the Settlement is fair and reasonable and in
the public interest. Accordingly, the Commission approves the Settlement. This order
constitutes final agency action. Requests for rehearing by the Commission may be filed within
30 days of the date of issuance of this order, pursuant to 18 C.F.R. § 385.713.
By direction of the Commission,
Kimberly D. Bose
Secretary
cc: All Parties
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
4. VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
August 18, 2016
Honorable Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
888 First Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20426
Re: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P., Docket No. RP16-301-000
Stipulation and Settlement Agreement
Unopposed Request for Shortened Comment Period
Dear Secretary Bose:
Pursuant to Rule 602 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (“Commission”), 18 C.F.R. § 385.602, Iroquois Gas
Transmission System, L.P. (“Iroquois”) hereby files the attached Stipulation and
Settlement Agreement (“Settlement”) resolving all issues in this proceeding. Iroquois
believes that the Settlement is supported or not opposed by all participants.
As discussed below, Iroquois requests a shortened comment period, given that the
Settlement has been previously circulated to all participants and none has expressed
opposition to the Settlement or the request for a shortened comment period.
Additionally, to facilitate timely implementation of the Settlement, Iroquois respectfully
requests that the Commission act on the Settlement by no later than December 1, 2016.
This filing includes:
The Settlement resolving all issues set for hearing in this proceeding;
A separate Explanatory Statement, which contains a summary of the Settlement
terms, as well as the information required by the Chief Administrative Law
Judge’s October 15, 2003 Notice;
Pro forma tariff sheets in both redlined and non-redlined format reflecting the
Settlement Rates (contained in Appendix A to the Settlement); and
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
5. Honorable Kimberly D. Bose
August 18, 2016
Page 2
A draft Commission Letter Order approving the Settlement, in accordance with
the Chief Administrative Law Judge’s December 21, 1999 Notice.
As explained in more detail in the Settlement (at 1-2), this proceeding concerns an
investigation of Iroquois’ rates under section 5 of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. § 717d,
which was initiated by the Commission’s January 21, 2016 order.1
Thereafter, Presiding
Judge Coffman adopted a procedural schedule, active participants conducted substantial
discovery, and the participants convened publicly-noticed settlement conferences on
April 28, 2016, May 18, 2016, June 1, 2016, and June 16, 2016, which resulted in the
Settlement.
The Settlement reflects an interrelated package of compromises between and
among Iroquois and the active participants. The Settlement resolves all issues in this
proceeding, reduces Iroquois’ rates in three scheduled step-downs and ensures rate
predictability and stability on Iroquois’ system through August 31, 2020.2
All
participants were provided an opportunity to participate in the negotiation of the
Settlement. Iroquois believes that the Settlement is supported or unopposed by the
Commission’s Trial Staff and all other participants to this proceeding.
Accordingly, as discussed below, Iroquois requests that the Settlement be
promptly certified by the Presiding Judge and approved by the Commission by no later
than December 1, 2016.
Request for Transmission to Presiding Judge
In accordance with Rule 602(b)(2)(i), 18 C.F.R. § 602(b)(2)(i), Iroquois requests
that the Settlement and accompanying documents be transmitted to Presiding Judge
David H. Coffman for certification. Iroquois believes that the Settlement will be
“uncontested” within the meaning of 18 C.F.R. § 385.602(g).
Unopposed Request for Shortened Comment Period
Iroquois respectfully requests a shortened comment period to facilitate timely
certification and approval of the Settlement and to avoid any delay in realizing the
benefits of the Settlement for all participants. Additionally, all participants were given an
opportunity to review and comment on drafts of the Settlement before it was filed. In the
1
Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., Notice of Initiation of Section 5
Proceeding, Docket No. RP16-301-000 (Jan. 21, 2016); Iroquois Gas
Transmission Sys., L.P., 154 FERC ¶ 61,028 (2016).
2
Concurrently with the filing of the Settlement, and pursuant to Section 1.3 of the
Settlement, Iroquois is filing an unopposed request to place Interim Settlement
Rates in effect September 1, 2016, pending approval of the Settlement.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
6. Honorable Kimberly D. Bose
August 18, 2016
Page 3
weeks prior to the filing of this Settlement, Iroquois circulated drafts of the Settlement to
all active participants, solicited comments on the drafts, and resolved the limited
comments received. Additionally, Iroquois consulted with all participants regarding this
proposal for a shortened comment period. No participant expressed opposition to the
Settlement or this request for a shortened comment period. Accordingly, Iroquois
requests that the initial comments be due within seven (7) business days of this filing
(i.e., on or before August 29, 2016), and reply comments be due within seven (7)
business days thereafter (i.e., on or before September 8, 2016).
In the event that a shortened comment period is not granted, in accordance with Rule
602(f)(2), comments regarding the Settlement would be due no later than 20 days after
this filing, i.e. by September 8, 2016, and reply comments are due not later than 30 days
after this filing, i.e., by September 19, 2016 (accounting for the weekend).
Request for Commission Action by December 1, 2016
Iroquois respectfully requests that the Commission approve the Settlement by
December 1, 2016, which will facilitate implementation of the Settlement and realization
of its benefits during this calendar year. Action by this date will allow rate certainty for
the upcoming heating season. Additionally, it will allow Iroquois to implement the
Settlement depreciation and negative salvage rates and conform its books and records
before the close of the fiscal year.
Waivers
While Iroquois knows of no required waivers, Iroquois respectfully requests that the
Commission grant any waivers of its regulations, policy or precedent that the Commission
may deem necessary to accept this Settlement as proposed herein.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
7. Honorable Kimberly D. Bose
August 18, 2016
Page 4
Certification of Posting and Service
In accordance with 18. C.F.R. §§ 385.602(d) and 154.2(d), the undersigned
certifies that copies of this filing have been posted and served to all customers and
interested state regulatory commissions, as well as all persons on the service list prepared
by the Secretary in this docket.
Respectfully submitted,
By /s/ Joseph S. Koury
M. Lisanne Crowley
Daniel P. Archuleta
Troutman Sanders LLP
401 9th St., N.W., Suite 1000
Washington, D.C. 20004-2134
(P) (202) 274-2814
lisanne.crowley@troutmansanders.com
daniel.archuleta@troutmansanders.com
Joseph S. Koury
Ryan J. Collins
Wright & Talisman P.C.
1200 G Street N.W., Suite 600
Washington, D.C. 20005
(P) (202) 393-1200
koury@wrightlaw.com
collins@wrightlaw.com
Helen M. Gallagher
Director of Legal Services & Secretary
Iroquois Pipeline Operating Company
One Corporate Drive, Suite 600
Shelton, CT 06484
(P) (203) 925-7201
helen_gallagher@iroquois.com
Attorneys for
Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
August 18, 2016
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
9. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE THE
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
)
Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. ) Docket No. RP16-301-000
)
STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
(August 18, 2016)
Pursuant to Rule 602 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (“Commission”), 18 C.F.R. § 385.602, Iroquois Gas Transmission
System, L.P. (“Iroquois”) submits this Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (“Settlement”),
which establishes three scheduled reductions to Iroquois’ rates, provides rate certainty through
August 31, 2020, and resolves all issues in this proceeding. The Settlement is supported or not
opposed by the Commission’s Trial Staff and all active parties to this proceeding.1
Iroquois is
not aware of any opposition to this Settlement. The participants therefore urge the Commission
to promptly approve the Settlement without modification or conditions.
BACKGROUND
On January 21, 2016,2
the Commission initiated an investigation of Iroquois’ rates under
section 5 of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. § 717d. On February 12, 2016, Presiding Judge
1
Participants that support or do not oppose the settlement are set forth on Appendix D.
2
Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., Notice of Initiation of Section 5 Proceeding,
Docket No. RP16-301-000 (Jan. 21, 2016); Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., 154
FERC ¶ 61,028 (2016).
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
10. 2
Coffman adopted the procedural schedule for this proceeding.3
Substantial discovery was
thereafter undertaken by the active participants. The participants convened publicly-noticed
settlement conferences on April 28, 2016, May 18, 2016, June 1, 2016, and June 16, 2016, which
culminated in the agreement memorialized in this Settlement.
This Settlement is the result of numerous compromises between and among Iroquois and
the active participants. The Settlement reflects a package of interrelated provisions that will
resolve all issues in this proceeding, reduce Iroquois’ rates in three scheduled step-downs and
ensure rate predictability and stability through August 31, 2020.
ARTICLE I
RATE MATTERS
1.1 Settlement Rates
Iroquois’ base tariff rates4
shall be the rates set forth on Pro Forma Sheet Nos. 4, 4.01.
4B, 4C, 4D, and 5A contained in Appendix A to be effective for the respective periods set forth
thereon (“Settlement Rates”).
1.2 Implementation of Settlement Rates
a. Within fifteen (15) days after this Settlement becomes effective, in accordance
with Article V, Iroquois shall file revised tariff sheets reflecting the Settlement Rates shown on
3
Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P., Order Establishing Procedural Schedule, Docket
No. RP16-301-000 (Feb. 12, 2016).
4
As used in the Settlement, the term “base tariff rates” means Iroquois’ recourse rates for
existing services, exclusive of the following applicable rate adjustments: (1) the Annual
Charge Adjustment (“ACA”) surcharge, and any other industry-wide surcharge or credit
imposed by the Commission; and (2) Iroquois’ fuel and losses retention mechanism,
which is currently referred to as the Measurement Variance/Fuel Use Factor (“MV/FU”).
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
11. 3
Pro Forma Sheet Nos. 4, 4.01. 4B, 4C, 4D, and 5A contained in Appendix A, to be effective
September 1, 2016.
b. The Commission’s order approving this Settlement and making it effective in
accordance with Article V shall constitute all authority necessary for Iroquois to place into effect
the revised tariff sheets filed in accordance with Section 1.2(a).
1.3 Interim Settlement Rates
Concurrently with Iroquois’ filing of the Settlement, Iroquois will file a motion to place
into effect, on an interim basis, effective September 1, 2016, the Settlement Rates shown on Pro
Forma Sheet Nos. 4, 4.01. 4B, 4C, 4D, and 5A under the column “Effective 9/1/2016” (“Interim
Settlement Rates”). In the event that the Settlement does not become effective to some or all
shippers in accordance with Article V, Iroquois may file with the Commission, and the parties5
will not oppose, a request to reinstate Iroquois’ rates in effect prior to the filing of the Interim
Settlement Rates (“Existing Rates”), and to surcharge shippers to which the Settlement did not
become effective and that were charged the Interim Settlement Rates, for the difference between
the amounts collected under the Interim Settlement Rates and amounts that would have been
collected under the Existing Rates for the period the Interim Settlement Rates were effective.
1.4 Depreciation, Amortization, and Negative Salvage Rates
Iroquois shall apply the depreciation, amortization, and negative salvage rates, and
conform its related regulatory accounts to the rates set forth on Appendix B, commencing
September 1, 2016.
5
As used in the Settlement, the terms “party” and “participant” (in singular or plural) shall
have the same meaning as in 18 C.F.R. §§ 385.102(b) and (c), and shall include all
successors and assignees.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
12. 4
ARTICLE II
RATE MORATORIUM
2.1 Moratorium
All participants agree to not initiate a change to the Settlement Rates under either section
4 or section 5 of the Natural Gas Act prior to September 1, 2020 (i.e., four (4) years following the
September 1, 2016 effective date of the Settlement pursuant to Article V), which period shall be
the “Moratorium.”
2.2 Exceptions to Moratorium
The Moratorium shall not prohibit:
(1) Changes to Iroquois’ FERC Gas Tariff (“Tariff”) required to comply with
generally applicable changes in law or Commission policy;
(2) Tariff changes associated with new projects or services, provided however,
Iroquois will not propose to make effective during the Moratorium:
(a) any authorized overrun rate applicable to existing services,
(b) any rate tracking mechanism to recover costs of compliance with
regulations of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration or with laws or regulations regarding greenhouse
gases;
(c) hourly services not related to new construction projects, or
(d) services substantially similar to those listed in (a), (b), or (c) above
under a different name;
provided further, that any new services Iroquois proposes that use existing
facilities: (1) will not degrade existing firm service or existing imbalance
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
13. 5
flexibility under Operational Balancing Agreements (“OBAs”); and (2) will
not require existing firm shippers to pay higher rates in order to maintain
substantially the same quality of service under existing firm services;
(3) Periodic tracker filings in accordance with Iroquois’ Tariff; and
(4) Tariff changes that do not change the Settlement Rates, do not require existing
firm shippers to pay higher rates in order to maintain substantially the same
quality of service under existing firm services, and do not degrade existing
firm services or existing imbalance flexibility under OBAs, including, but not
limited to, the Tariff Modernization filings in Section 2.3.
2.3 Specific Moratorium Exceptions for Tariff Modernization Filings
The Moratorium shall not prohibit Iroquois from making filings under section 4 of the
Natural Gas Act to implement the following Tariff Modernization provisions, as further
described in Appendix C, and subject to the qualifications in Section 2.2:
(1) Fuel and Loss Provisions;
(2) System Reliability and Integrity Protection Enhancements;
(3) Updated and Clarified Right of First Refusal Process; and
(4) Clarified Service Rights, so long as the clarified service rights do not
degrade existing firm services or existing imbalance flexibility under
OBAs.
2.4 Right to Protest Tariff Filings
In the event that Iroquois makes a Tariff filing pursuant to Section 2.2 or 2.3 during the
Moratorium, nothing in this Settlement shall limit the right of parties to protest any such filing on
any grounds except the ground that the Iroquois filing violates the Moratorium.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
14. 6
2.5 Preview of Tariff Filings
Prior to filing with the Commission, Iroquois shall afford shippers an opportunity to
preview and comment on any section 4 Tariff filings during the Moratorium that propose
generally applicable changes to Iroquois’ general terms and conditions and/or services.6
Where
practical, Iroquois will endeavor to provide shippers at least fifteen (15) days prior notice.
2.6 Termination of Moratorium
The Moratorium and all provisions of this Article II shall terminate August 31, 2020.
ARTICLE III
FUTURE SECTION 4 RATE FILING
3.1 Obligation to File Section 4 Rate Case
After the conclusion of the Moratorium, Iroquois shall file a general rate case under
section 4 of the Natural Gas Act with the Commission no later than September 1, 2022;
provided, however, such obligation is extinguished in the event that, after the end of the
Moratorium but before September 1, 2022, Iroquois has filed a general rate case under section 4
of the Natural Gas Act or a general rate settlement that is approved by the Commission, or in the
event that the Commission has instituted a general investigation of Iroquois’ rates under section 5
of the Natural Gas Act.
6
This tariff preview process does not include filings such as tracker filings (e.g., fuel
filings), customer-specific filings (e.g., negotiated rate or non-conforming service
agreements), or Commission-directed compliance filings.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
15. 7
3.2 Notice of Section 4 Filing
At least thirty (30) days prior to filing a general rate case under section 4 of the Natural
Gas Act pursuant to Section 3.1, Iroquois will provide shippers notice and an overview of the
filing and an opportunity to comment.
ARTICLE IV
TERM
Upon becoming effective in accordance with Article V, this Settlement shall be effective
for a term commencing on September 1, 2016 and terminating after the end of the Moratorium
upon the earliest post-Moratorium effectiveness of new base tariff rates pursuant to: (1) a
superseding general rate change filing under section 4 of the Natural Gas Act; (2) a general
modification of Iroquois’ base tariff rates in a proceeding instituted pursuant to section 5 of the
Natural Gas Act; or (3) a general rate settlement between Iroquois and the other parties.
ARTICLE V
EFFECTIVENESS
5.1 Effective Date / Nonseverability
The various provisions of this Settlement are not severable and shall become binding and
effective on the date that this Settlement has been approved by a final Commission order7
as to
all its terms without material modification(s), reservation(s) or condition(s) (collectively referred
to as “modification”), unless such modification is accepted pursuant to Section 5.2 below. Upon
approval by the Commission pursuant to this Article V, the effective date of the Settlement shall
be September 1, 2016.
7
For purposes of this Settlement, a final Commission order is an order no longer subject to
rehearing pursuant to 18 C.F.R. § 385.713 or judicial review.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
16. 8
5.2 Commission Modification to Settlement
In the event the Commission by final order approves this Settlement with a modification
materially adverse to any Non-Contesting Party,8
then such party shall be deemed to have
accepted such modification unless, by written notice filed with the Commission and served on all
parties no later than fourteen (14) days after such final order, such party states its refusal to
accept the Settlement as modified. On the fifteenth (15th
) day after such final Commission order,
this Settlement, as modified by the Commission, shall become effective and binding as to all
Non-Contesting Parties that have accepted the Commission’s modification. In the event that a
Non-Contesting Party gives notice of its refusal to accept the Settlement as modified, such party
shall become a Contesting Party9
for purposes of Section 5.3 below; provided, however, in the
event that Iroquois gives notice of its refusal to accept the Settlement as modified, the Settlement
shall upon such notice become null and void (with the exception of the Interim Settlement Rates
provisions pertaining to reinstatement and surcharge in Section 1.3).
5.3 Applicability of Settlement to Contesting Parties / Non-Contesting Parties
While the participants know of no opposition to this Settlement, in the event this
Settlement is opposed, it is the intent of the participants that the Commission approve this
Settlement and allow its effectiveness for all Non-Contesting Parties. Any Contesting Parties
8
“Non-Contesting Parties” are parties that either support or do not oppose this Settlement.
“Contesting Parties” are parties that oppose this Settlement or suggest or request in any
manner a modification, reservation or condition to this Settlement as originally filed,
regardless of whether such party characterizes its comments as being in support of the
Settlement. Parties that provide notice that they refuse to accept a Commission
modification to this Settlement pursuant to Section 5.2 shall also be Contesting Parties.
9
Id.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
17. 9
shall neither be bound by, nor receive the benefits of, this Settlement, and shall pay Iroquois’
Existing Rates (subject to any agreed upon discount or negotiated rate, and subject to Section 1.3
reinstatement and surcharge provisions).
ARTICLE VI
WAIVER AND AUTHORITY
The Commission’s approval of this Settlement shall constitute any and all waivers and
provide all authority under the Natural Gas Act and the Commission’s rules and regulations that
may be necessary for Iroquois to implement the Settlement in accordance with all of its terms.
ARTICLE VII
CHANGES TO SETTLEMENT AND STANDARD OF REVIEW
7.1 Changes to Settlement
This Settlement is the final and binding agreement of the Non-Contesting Parties. After
becoming effective in accordance with Article V, this Settlement shall not be modified except by
written agreement of all Non-Contesting Parties.
7.2 Standard of Review for Changes to Settlement After Effectiveness
Absent an agreement pursuant to Section 7.1, and after the Settlement becomes effective
in accordance with Article V, in the event the Commission considers changes to the settlement
on behalf of any party, the standard of review shall be the “public interest” standard of review set
forth in United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Services Corp., 350 U.S. 332 (1956), Federal
Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co., 350 U.S. 348 (1956), and Morgan Stanley
Capital Group Inc. v. Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1, 554 U.S. 527 (2008). The standard of review for
changes to the Settlement proposed by a non-party or the Commission acting sua sponte shall be
the most stringent standard permissible under applicable law.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
18. 10
ARTICLE VIII
RESERVATIONS AND CONDITIONS
8.1 Negotiated Settlement
This Settlement represents a negotiated resolution of only the specific matters addressed
herein. Except as specifically provided in this Settlement, no participant shall be deemed to have
waived any claim or right as to matters not addressed. This Settlement represents the entire
agreement of the participants with respect to the matters resolved.
8.2 No Drafter
No party shall be deemed the drafter of this Settlement and this Settlement shall not be
construed against any party as drafter. In the event of a conflict between terms contained in the
Settlement and those of the attached Explanatory Statement, the terms of Settlement control.
8.3 Settlement Has No Precedential Value
The provisions of this Settlement are for purposes of settlement only and shall have no
precedential effect. The Commission’s approval of this Settlement shall constitute a finding that
the Settlement is fair and reasonable and in the public interest, but shall not constitute a
determination on the merits of the specific provisions of the Settlement. Except as specifically
provided in this Settlement, no participant shall be deemed to have accepted or consented to any
policy or principle purported to underlie the provisions of this Settlement. Except as specifically
provided in this Settlement, the participants shall have the same rights under the Natural Gas Act
that they would have had absent approval of this Settlement.
The methods or practices or absence of methods or practices used or purported to be used
in deriving rates shall not be evidence that a particular method is a “long-standing practice” as
that term is used in Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. FERC, 628 F.2d 578 (D.C. Cir. 1979),
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
19. 11
or a “settled practice” as that term is used in Public Service Commission of New York v. FERC,
642 F.2d 1335 (D.C. Cir. 1980).
8.4 Effect of Commission Approval
The Commission’s approval of this Settlement shall constitute all necessary authority and
approval for Iroquois to implement the Settlement Rates on their stated effective dates without
further filings (other than pursuant to Section 1.2), without suspension, and without conditions
other than those specified herein, and granting any waiver of the Commission’s regulations
necessary to implement such Settlement Rates in accordance with this Settlement.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
21. Pro forma Tariff Sheets
(Redline)
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
22. PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4
-------- --------------- NON-EASTCHESTER RATES (All in $ Per Dth) 1/ ---------------
----------
Non-Settlement ------------------ Settlement Recourse Rates ---------------------
Recourse & ---- Applicable to Non-Eastchester/Non-Contesting Shippers 2/ ----
Maximum Maximum Maximum Eastchester
Initial Effective Effective Effective Effective
Effective
Minimum Minimum Rates 3/ 1/1/2003 97/1/201604 91/1/201705
91/1/201806 1/1/2007
RTS DEMAND (Monthly):
Zone 1 $0.0000 $7.5637 $0.00007.5637 $6.19289586 $5.99826.8514
$5.59976.7788 $6.5971
Zone 2 $0.0000 $6.4976 $0.00006.4976 $5.33819778 $5.16785.8857
$4.79985.8233 $5.6673
Inter-Zone $0.0000 $12.7150 $0.000012.7150 $10.47551.6978 $9.867211.5177
$8.802611.3956 $11.0902
Zone 1 (MFV) 1/ $0.0000 $5.3607 $5.3607 $4.9318 $4.8559 $4.8044 $4.6757
RTS COMMODITY (Daily):
Zone 1 $0.0030 $0.0030 $0.00340 $0.00340 $0.00340 $0.00340
$0.0030
Zone 2 $0.0024 $0.0024 $0.00224 $0.00224 $0.00224 $0.00224
$0.0024
Inter-Zone $0.0054 $0.0054 $0.00564 $0.00564 $0.00564 $0.00564
$0.0054
Zone 1 (MFV) 1/ $0.0300 $0.1506 $0.1506 $0.1386 $0.1364 $0.1350 $0.1314
ITS COMMODITY (Daily):
23. Zone 1 $0.0030 $0.2517 $0.00342517 $0.20702318 $0.20062283
$0.18752259 $0.2199
Zone 2 $0.0024 $0.2160 $0.00222160 $0.17771989 $0.17211959
$0.16001938 $0.1887
Inter-Zone $0.0054 $0.4234 $0.00564234 $0.35003900 $0.33003840
$0.29503800 $0.3700
Zone 1 (MFV) 1/ $0.0300 $0.3268 $0.3268 $0.3007 $0.2960 $0.2929 $0.2850
MAXIMUM VOLUMETRIC CAPACITY RELEASE RATE (Daily) 24/:
Zone 1 $0.0000 $0.2487 $0.00002487 $0.20362288 $0.19722253
$0.18412229 $0.2169
Zone 2 $0.0000 $0.2136 $0.00002136 $0.17551965 $0.16991935
$0.1578915 $0.1863
Inter-Zone $0.0000 $0.4180 $0.00004180 $0.3444846 $0.32443787
$0.28943746 $0.3646
Zone 1 (MFV) 1/ $0.0000 $0.1762 $0.1762 $0.1621 $0.1596 $0.1580 $0.1537
**SEE SHEET NOS. 4A, 4B, and 4C FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO RATES WHICH MAY BE APPLICABLE
(Footnotes continued on Sheet 4.01)
24. PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4.01
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
1/ As authorized pursuant to order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Docket Nos. RS92-17-003,
et al., dated June 18, 1993 (63 FERC para. 61,285).
21/ Settlement Recourse Rates were established in Iroquois' Transporter’s Settlement dated August 29,
2003 August 18, 2016[TBD], in Docket No. RP16-301-000, which was
approved by Commission order issued Oct. 24, 2003[TBD], in Docket No. RP03-589-000RP16-301-
000established new base tariff recourse rates referred to as “Settlement Rates” and . That Settlement also
established a moratorium on changes to the Settlement Rates until January 1, 2008September 1, 2020,
defines the
Non-Eastchester/Non-Contesting parties to which it applies, and provides that Iroquois' TCRA will be
terminated on July 1, 2004. All
recourse/ Maximum and Minimum Rates listed on Sheet Nos. 4, 4B, 4C, and 5A are Settlement Rates were
established in the
Settlement and therefore are subject to the moratorium.
3/ See Sections 1.2 and 4.3 of the Settlement referenced in footnote 2. As directed by the Commission's
January 30, 2004 Order in Docket No. RP04-136, the Eastchester Initial Rates apply for service to
Eastchester Shippers prior to the July 1, 2004 effective date of the rates set forth on Sheet No. 4C.
42/ No rate cap shall apply to any capacity releases with terms of less than or equal to one year
pursuant to FERC Order Nos. 712 et al.
25. PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4B
EXTENDED RECEIPT AND EXTENDED DELIVERY RATES (All in $ Per Dth)
Applicable to Non-Eastchester/Non-Contesting Shippers 1/
ER/ED COMMODITY (Daily):
----------- Maximum Rates -------------
Minimum Effective Effective Effective
Primary Contract Path Rate 9/1/2016 9/1/2017 9/1/2018
Zone 1 $0.0056 $0.1464 $0.1328 $0.1109
Zone 2 $0.0056 $0.1745 $0.1601 $0.1372
------------------- Maximum Rates -----------------------
Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective
Minimum 1/1/2003 7/1/2004 1/1/2005 1/1/2006 1/1/2007
ER/ED COMMODITY:
Zone 1 $0.0054 $0.2098 $0.1935 $0.1906 $0.1886 $0.1837
Zone 2 $0.0054 $0.1747 $0.1612 $0.1588 $0.1572 $0.1531
Zone 2 (MFV) $0.0324 $0.3223 $0.2968 $0.2922 $0.2892 $0.2815
_________________________________________________________________________________
1/ Extended Receipt ("ER") and Extended Delivery ("ED") rates are
derived from
the Settlement Recourse Maximum and Minimum Rates shown on Sheet No. 4,
using the methodology
approved by the Commission for ER/ED rates in
Docket No. RP03-258. The Non-Eastchester/Non-Contesting Shippers to
which ER/ED rates apply are defined in Iroquois' August 29, 2003
Settlement approved by the Commission's October 24, 2003 order in
Docket No. RP03-589. ER/ED rates
apply to transactions utilizing a zone
other than the zone/Lateral for which
service was contracted in
26. Shipper's RTS contract pursuant to Sections 7.1.1
and 7.3.1 of
Transporter's General Terms and Conditions and are in addition to
rates otherwise applicable under such contract.
28. Primary Contract Path:
Zone 1 $0.0000 $0.2480 $0.2544 $0.2075
Zone 2 $0.0000 $0.2773 $0.2829 $0.2350
Inter-Zone $0.0000 $0.1050 $0.1250 $0.1000
---------------------- Maximum Rates -------------------------------
-------
Minimum Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective
7/1/2004 1/1/2005 1/1/2006 1/1/2007 1/1/2008
Primary Contract Path
Zone 1 $0.0000 $0.4282 $0.4317 $0.4341 $0.4401 $0.4151
Zone 2 $0.0000 $0.4611 $0.4641 $0.4662 $0.4713 $0.4463
Inter-Zone $0.0000 $0.2700 $0.2760 $0.2800 $0.2900 $0.2650
Zone 1 (MFV) 1/ $0.0000 $0.3593 $0.3640 $0.3671 $0.3750 $0.3500
**SEE SHEET NO. 4A FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO RATES WHICH MAY BE APPLICABLE 5/ 4/
____________________________
1/ As authorized pursuant to order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Docket Nos. RS92-17-003,
et al., dated June 18, 1993 (63 FERC para. 61,285).
2/ Applicable to "Eastchester Shipper" as defined in Section 2.27 of the General Terms & Conditions.
(Footnotes continued on Sheet 4D)
29. PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4D
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
1/ Applicable to "Eastchester Shipper" as defined in Section 2.27 of the General Terms & Conditions.
32/ Transporter’s Settlement dated August 18, 2016, in Docket No. RP16-301-000, which was approved by
Commission order issued [TBD], established new base tariff recourse rates referred to as “Settlement Rates”
and a moratorium on changes to the Settlement Rates until September 1, 2020. All recourse Maximum and
Minimum Rates listed on Sheet Nos. 4, 4B, 4C, and 5A are Settlement Rates subject to the moratorium.
3/ No rate cap shall apply to any capacity releases with terms of less than or equal to one year
pursuant to FERC Order Nos. 712 et al.
4/ Eastchester Secondary Access Rates ("ESAR") are derived from the Settlement Rates shown
on Sheet Nos. 4 and 4C.
Applicable to "Eastchester Shipper" that accesses Eastchester from Iroquois' pre-Eastchester system.
See Section 1.2(c) of Iroquois' August 29, 2003 rate settlement in Docket No. RP03-589. Eastchester
Secondary Access Rates are subject to change (increase or decrease) based on changes to rates for
service on the pre-Eastchester system, in accordance with Section 1.1 of Iroquois' August 12, 2004
rate settlement in Docket No. RP04-136.
45/ Eastchester Shippers (including those using Eastchester Secondary Access Service) are subject to
tThe
ACA Adjustment and the Measurement Variance/Fuel Use Factor, all as set forth on Sheet 4A,
and any similar adjustment or surcharge of general applicability approved by the Commission except
that in no event shall such an adjustment be assessed more than once for a single transaction.
5/ No rate cap shall apply to any capacity releases with terms of less than or equal to one year pursuant
to FERC Order Nos. 712 et al.
30. PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 5A
---------------- HUB SERVICE RATES 1/ (All rates in $ Per Dth) ------------------
HUB SERVICE COMMODITY RATES (Daily):
-------------- Maximum Rates ------------------
Minimum Effective Effective Effective
Rate 3/7/20069/1/2016 1/1/20079/1/2017 1/1/20089/1/2018
Zone 1 $0.00340 $ 0.22990.2110 $ 0.22390.2046 $ 0.22390.1915
Inter-Zone $0.00564 $ 0.38400.3540 $ 0.37400.3340 $ 0.37400.2990
Eastchester 2/ $0.0000 $ 0.66400.4590 $ 0.66400.4590 $ 0.63900.3990
HUB SERVICE DAILY BALANCE RATES:
Minimum $ 0.0000
Maximum $ 0.0154
_________________________________________________________________________________
1/ SEE SHEET NO. 4A FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO RATES WHICH MAY BE APPLICABLE
2/ Applicable to "Eastchester Shipper" as defined in Section 2.27 of the General
Terms & Conditions.
31. Pro forma Tariff Sheets
(Clean)
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
32. PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4
---------- NON-EASTCHESTER RATES (All in $ Per Dth) 1/ ------------
Maximum Maximum Maximum
Effective Effective Effective
Minimum 9/1/2016 9/1/2017 9/1/2018
RTS DEMAND (Monthly):
Zone 1 $0.0000 $6.1928 $5.9982 $5.5997
Zone 2 $0.0000 $5.3381 $5.1678 $4.7998
Inter-Zone $0.0000 $10.4755 $9.8672 $8.8026
RTS COMMODITY (Daily):
Zone 1 $0.0034 $0.0034 $0.0034 $0.0034
Zone 2 $0.0022 $0.0022 $0.0022 $0.0022
Inter-Zone $0.0056 $0.0056 $0.0056 $0.0056
ITS COMMODITY (Daily):
Zone 1 $0.0034 $0.2070 $0.2006 $0.1875
Zone 2 $0.0022 $0.1777 $0.1721 $0.1600
Inter-Zone $0.0056 $0.3500 $0.3300 $0.2950
VOLUMETRIC CAPACITY RELEASE (Daily) 2/:
Zone 1 $0.0000 $0.2036 $0.1972 $0.1841
Zone 2 $0.0000 $0.1755 $0.1699 $0.1578
Inter-Zone $0.0000 $0.3444 $0.3244 $0.2894
**SEE SHEET NOS. 4A, 4B, and 4C FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO RATES WHICH MAY BE APPLICABLE
(Footnotes continued on Sheet 4.01)
33. PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4.01
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
1/ Transporter’s Settlement dated August 18, 2016, in Docket No. RP16-301-000, which was approved by
Commission order issued [TBD], established new base tariff recourse rates referred to as “Settlement Rates”
and a moratorium on changes to the Settlement Rates until September 1, 2020. All recourse Maximum and
Minimum Rates listed on Sheet Nos. 4, 4B, 4C, and 5A are Settlement Rates subject to the moratorium.
2/ No rate cap shall apply to any capacity releases with terms of less than or equal to one year
pursuant to FERC Order Nos. 712 et al.
34. PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4B
EXTENDED RECEIPT AND EXTENDED DELIVERY RATES (All in $ Per Dth)
Applicable to Non-Eastchester Shippers 1/
ER/ED COMMODITY (Daily):
----------- Maximum Rates -------------
Minimum Effective Effective Effective
Primary Contract Path Rate 9/1/2016 9/1/2017 9/1/2018
Zone 1 $0.0056 $0.1464 $0.1328 $0.1109
Zone 2 $0.0056 $0.1745 $0.1601 $0.1372
_________________________________________________________________________________
1/ Extended Receipt ("ER") and Extended Delivery ("ED") rates are derived from
the Maximum and Minimum Rates shown on Sheet No. 4, using the methodology
approved by the Commission for ER/ED rates in Docket No. RP03-258. ER/ED rates
apply to transactions utilizing a zone other than the zone/Lateral for which
service was contracted in Shipper's RTS contract pursuant to Sections 7.1.1
and 7.3.1 of Transporter's General Terms and Conditions and are in addition to
rates otherwise applicable under such contract.
35. PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4C
---------------- EASTCHESTER RATES 1/ (All in $ Per Dth) --------------------
Eastchester Primary Access Rates
--------- Maximum Rates 2/ -----------
Minimum Effective Effective
Rate 9/1/2016 9/1/2018
RTS Demand (Monthly) $0.0000 $13.8396 $12.0146
RTS Commodity (Daily) $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000
ITS Commodity (Daily) $0.0000 $0.4550 $0.3950
Volumetric Capacity
Release (Daily) 3/ $0.0000 $0.4550 $0.3950
Eastchester Secondary Access Rates (Daily) 4/
---------- Maximum Rates -------------
Minimum Effective Effective Effective
Rate 9/1/2016 9/1/2017 9/1/2018
Primary Contract Path:
Zone 1 $0.0000 $0.2480 $0.2544 $0.2075
Zone 2 $0.0000 $0.2773 $0.2829 $0.2350
Inter-Zone $0.0000 $0.1050 $0.1250 $0.1000
**SEE SHEET NO. 4A FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO RATES WHICH MAY BE APPLICABLE 5/
(Footnotes continued on Sheet 4D)
36. PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 4D
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
1/ Applicable to "Eastchester Shipper" as defined in Section 2.27 of the General Terms & Conditions.
2/ Transporter’s Settlement dated August 18, 2016, in Docket No. RP16-301-000, which was approved by
Commission order issued [TBD], established new base tariff recourse rates referred to as “Settlement Rates”
and a moratorium on changes to the Settlement Rates until September 1, 2020. All recourse Maximum and
Minimum Rates listed on Sheet Nos. 4, 4B, 4C, and 5A are Settlement Rates subject to the moratorium.
3/ No rate cap shall apply to any capacity releases with terms of less than or equal to one year
pursuant to FERC Order Nos. 712 et al.
4/ Eastchester Secondary Access Rates ("ESAR") are derived from the Settlement Rates shown
on Sheet Nos. 4 and 4C.
5/ Eastchester Shippers (including those using Eastchester Secondary Access Service) are subject to
the ACA Adjustment and the Measurement Variance/Fuel Use Factor, all as set forth on Sheet 4A,
and any similar adjustment or surcharge of general applicability approved by the Commission except
that in no event shall such an adjustment be assessed more than once for a single transaction.
37. PRO FORMA SHEET NO. 5A
---------------- HUB SERVICE RATES 1/ (All rates in $ Per Dth) ------------------
HUB SERVICE COMMODITY RATES (Daily):
-------------- Maximum Rates ------------------
Minimum Effective Effective Effective
Rate 9/1/2016 9/1/2017 9/1/2018
Zone 1 $0.0034 $ 0.2110 $ 0.2046 $ 0.1915
Inter-Zone $0.0056 $ 0.3540 $ 0.3340 $ 0.2990
Eastchester 2/ $0.0000 $ 0.4590 $ 0.4590 $ 0.3990
HUB SERVICE DAILY BALANCE RATES:
Minimum $ 0.0000
Maximum $ 0.0154
_________________________________________________________________________________
1/ SEE SHEET NO. 4A FOR ADJUSTMENTS TO RATES WHICH MAY BE APPLICABLE
2/ Applicable to "Eastchester Shipper" as defined in Section 2.27 of the General
Terms & Conditions.
41. APPENDIX C
Iroquois Gas Transmission, L.P.
Docket No. RP16-301-000
Summary of Tariff Modernization Changes Per Article II, Section 2.3
Subject to the limitations specified in Article II, Sections 2.2 and 2.3 of the Stipulation
and Settlement Agreement, Iroquois may file the following tariff changes during the Moratorium:
I. Fuel & Losses Provision
Iroquois may file to update its fuel and losses mechanism to retain the current practice of
establishing fuel and losses percentages on a monthly basis, but streamline the tariff
language, including the elimination of formula provisions, and include supporting detail
in annual FERC filings.
II. System Reliability and Integrity Protection Enhancements
Subject to the limitations contained in Article 2.2 and 2.3 of the Stipulation, Iroquois may
file to update its tariff rules to be more in line with those of other pipelines serving the
same market areas in order to protect Iroquois’ system integrity, avoid risk to firm service
reliability, and allocate appropriate cost responsibility for service utilization. During the
Moratorium, these changes may include:
A. Critical Notice/OFO Provisions
Iroquois may file tariff changes to include details regarding circumstances
in which it might issue Critical Notice (“CN”) or Operational Flow Order
(“OFO”) declarations, the required scope, duration, information, and steps
to incent compliance with such declarations.
Iroquois may file tariff changes to memorialize protocol, give examples of
circumstances in which Iroquois may determine to issue CN/OFO
declarations, and provide sanctions (including penalties and flow control)
for shipper failure to adhere to CN/OFO declarations.
B. Daily and Hourly Variance Requirements, Imbalance Management, and
Associated Penalties
Iroquois may file tariff changes to establish monthly cash-out requirements
for non-OBA imbalances.
Iroquois may file tariff changes to clarify obligations of shippers vs. point
operators.
Iroquois may file to update its existing tariff penalty provisions to conform
to FERC policy and industry practice.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
42. Iroquois may file to eliminate the ACA charge for PAL service, given that
PAL customers will have already paid the ACA charge as part of the
associated transportation.
C. Iroquois may file to eliminate ER/ED to afford primary firm shippers greater
reliability of service in later Gas Day nomination windows.
III. Updated and Clarified ROFR Process
Iroquois may file to update and clarify its ROFR tariff provisions to better reflect
Commission policy and market needs. During the Moratorium such proposed changes
may include:
Streamline timeframes, add flexibility for timing of open seasons, and
close gaps in process (such as what happens when there is no competing
bid);
Clarify and potentially eliminate second renewal option; and
Clarify process for addressing instances of no third party bidder and failure
of Iroquois and shipper to agree on renewal terms.
IV. Clarified Service Rights
During the Moratorium, Iroquois may file to clarify service rights, including:
A. New RTS-Displacement (“RTS-D”) Rate Schedule - To clearly distinguish firm
service rights that are qualified by the need for offsetting service (i.e., backhaul),
Iroquois may file to establish a new RTS-D Rate Schedule; with the exception of
the requirement for offsetting service, the same RTS rates and terms will apply to
such new RTS-D service.
B. New Flow Path Designation - Given that Iroquois’ system has become bi-
directional, Iroquois may file tariff changes to require assignment of flow paths in
all firm shipper service agreements (both new and existing) and clarify path and
point entitlements.
C. HUB Service Update – Iroquois may file tariff changes to expand HUB service
availability (currently limited to Waddington) so that shippers may borrow and
pay back gas at each physical receipt point on Iroquois’ system.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
43. APPENDIX D
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS
SUPPORTING OR NOT OPPOSING
THE SETTLEMENT
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
44. APPENDIX D
Iroquois Gas Transmission, L.P.
Docket No. RP16-301-000
Participants Supporting or Not Opposing
the Settlement
American Forest & Paper Association
Bay State Gas Company d/b/a Columbia Gas of Massachusetts
BG Energy Merchants, LLC
BP Energy Company
Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation
Calpine Energy Services, L.P.
Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers
Cargill, Incorporated
Castleton Commodities Merchant Trading L.P.
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation
Connecticut Natural Gas Corporation
Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority
ConocoPhillips Company
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Direct Energy Business Marketing, LLC
Emera Energy Services Inc.
Exelon Corporation
George Jepsen, Attorney General for the State of Connecticut
Iberdrola Energy Services LLC
Infinite Energy, Inc.
Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
Koch Energy Services, LLC
Liberty Utilities (EnergyNorth Natural Gas) Corp. d/b/a Liberty Utilities
Massachusetts Attorney General
Mercuria Energy Gas Trading LLC
National Grid Gas Delivery Companies
New Athens Generating Company, LLC
New Jersey Board of Public Utilities
New Jersey Division of Rate Counsel
New Jersey Natural Gas Company
New York Public Service Commission
New York State Electric & Gas Corporation
NJR Energy Services Company
NSTAR Gas Company d/b/a Eversource
Process Gas Consumers Group
Public Citizen, Inc
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
45. Sequent Energy Management, L.P.
St. Lawrence Gas Company, Inc.
Talen Energy Marketing, LLC
Tenaska Marketing Ventures
The New England Local Distribution Companies
The Southern Connecticut Gas Company
Yankee Gas Services Company d/b/a Eversource
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
47. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE THE
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
)
Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. ) Docket No. RP16-301-000
)
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT TO
STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENTAGREEMENT
(August 18, 2016)
Pursuant to Rule 602(c)(1) of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (“Commission”), 18 C.F.R. § 385.602(c)(1), Iroquois
Gas Transmission System, L.P. (“Iroquois”) provides this Explanatory Statement to the
concurrently filed Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (“Settlement”),1
which resolves
all issues in this rate proceeding under section 5 of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C.
§ 717d. Iroquois is aware of no opposition to the Settlement.
I. SUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT
Article I (Rate Matters): Section 1.1 establishes Iroquois’ base tariff recourse
rates, as set forth on Pro Forma Sheet Nos. 4, 4.01. 4B, 4C, 4D, and 5A contained in
Appendix A to the Settlement, providing three scheduled rate reductions to be effective
September 1 of 2016, 2017, and 2018. Section 1.2 provides that Iroquois will file revised
tariff sheets reflecting the Settlement Rates within 15 days after the Settlement becomes
effective. Section 1.3 provides that Iroquois will file Interim Settlement Rates to be
effective September 1, 2016, pending Commission approval of the Settlement. Section
1
This Explanatory Statement is provided for informational purposes only. The
terms of the Settlement are controlling.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
48. 2
1.4 provides that Iroquois will use the depreciation, amortization, and negative salvage
rates set forth on Appendix B to the Settlement.
Article II (Rate Moratorium): Section 2.1 establishes a Moratorium that
prohibits parties from requesting a change to the Settlement Rates prior to September 1,
2020. Sections 2.2 and 2.3 identify certain types of filings that are not prohibited by the
Moratorium. Section 2.4 provides that, in the event that Iroquois makes a Tariff filing
pursuant to Section 2.2 or 2.3 during the Moratorium, parties retain their right to protest
such a section 4 filing. Section 2.5 provides that Iroquois will afford shippers an
opportunity to preview and comment on certain section 4 tariff filings that Iroquois may
submit during the Moratorium. Section 2.6 provides that the Moratorium and all
provisions of Article II terminate on August 31, 2020.
Article III (Future Section 4 Rate Filing): Section 3.1 provides that, upon
conclusion of the Moratorium, Iroquois will file a general section 4 rate case no later than
September 1, 2022, unless such obligation is extinguished through a prior change to the
Settlement Rates. Section 3.2 provides that Iroquois will provide shippers thirty days
notice and overview of the general section 4 filing.
Article IV (Term): The term of the Settlement shall commence on September 1,
2016 and shall terminate after the end of the Moratorium, upon the earliest post-
Moratorium effectiveness of new base tariff rates that are the result of a general rate
change pursuant to section 4 of the Natural Gas Act, a general rate settlement, or a
general modification of Iroquois’ base tariff rates in a proceeding instituted pursuant to
section 5 of the Natural Gas Act.
Article V (Effectiveness): Section 5.1 provides that the various provisions of the
Settlement are not severable and will become effective on the date the Settlement is
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
49. 3
approved by a final Commission order. Section 5.2 provides that, in the event the
Commission modifies the Settlement, parties may refuse to accept the modified
Settlement and become a Contesting Party. While the parties know of no opposition to
the Settlement, in the event that the Settlement is contested, Section 5.3 provides that it is
the intent of the parties that the Commission approve the Settlement for all Non-
Contesting Parties.2
Any Contesting Parties will neither be bound by, nor receive the
benefits of, the Settlement.
Article VI (Waiver and Authority): Approval of the Settlement constitutes any
and all waivers and provides all authority under the Natural Gas Act and the
Commission’s rules and regulations that may be necessary for the Settlement to be
effectuated in accordance with all of its terms.
Article VII (Changes to Settlement and Standard of Review): Section 7.1
establishes that the Settlement is the final and binding agreement of the Non-Contesting
Parties and may be modified only by written agreement of all Non-Contesting Parties.
Section 7.2 sets forth the standard of review for changes to the settlement after approval,
as further described in Section II, Question 5, below.
Article VIII (Reservations and Conditions): Article VIII contains standard
reservations stating that parties waive no rights other than as specifically provided in the
Settlement, that the Settlement should not be construed against any party as drafter, that
2
“Non-Contesting Parties” are parties that either support, do not oppose, or take no
position regarding this Settlement. “Contesting Parties” are parties that oppose
this Settlement or suggest or request in any manner a modification, reservation or
condition to this Settlement as originally filed, regardless of whether such party
characterizes its comments as being in support of the Settlement. Parties that fail
to accept a Commission modification to this Settlement pursuant to Section 5.2
shall also be Contesting Parties.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
50. 4
the Settlement does not establish any principles, policies, or practices, and that
Commission approval of the Settlement authorizes Iroquois to implement the Settlement
Rates on the dates without suspension.
II. QUESTIONS RAISED BY THE CHIEF JUDGE’S OCTOBER 23, 2003
NOTICE
The Chief Administrative Law Judge’s October 23, 2003 Notice requires parties
submitting settlement agreements to address the following five questions:
1. What are the issues underlying the settlement and what are the major
implications?
Response: As a rate case under section 5 of the Natural Gas Act, this case
presents typical rate issues, such as cost of service, cost allocation, throughput, and rate
design, as applied to Iroquois’ recourse rates.
2. Whether any of the issues raise policy implications.
Response: The issues presented are primarily factual issues, which do not
raise major policy implications.
3. Whether other pending cases may be affected.
Response: No other pending cases are affected by this Settlement.
4. Whether the settlement involves issues of first impression, or if there
are any reversals on the issues involved.
Response: The Settlement involves no issues of first impression and no
reversals on the issues involved.
5. Whether the proceeding is subject to the just and reasonable standard
or whether there is Mobile-Sierra language making it the standard,
i.e., the applicable standards of review.
Response: The governing review standard for approval of the Settlement is
provided by Rule 602, 18 C.F.R. § 385.602. Assuming that the Settlement is uncontested
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
51. 5
as Iroquois expects, Rule 602(g)(3) provides that the Commission may approve the
Settlement “upon a finding that the settlement appears to be fair and reasonable and in the
public interest.” However, as provided in Article VII of the Settlement, after approval,
any changes to the Settlement on behalf of a party must satisfy the “public interest”
standard of review set forth in United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Services Corp.,
350 U.S. 332 (1956), Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co., 350 U.S.
348 (1956), and Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. v. Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1, 554 U.S.
527 (2008), while changes to the Settlement on behalf of a non-party or the Commission
acting sua ponte must satisfy the most stringent standard permissible under applicable
law.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
52. DRAFT COMMISSION LETTER ORDER
APPROVING THE SETTLEMENT
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
53. DRAFT
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20426
In re:
Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
Docket No. RP16-301-000
Issued: _______, 2016
Joseph S. Koury
Wright & Talisman P.C.
1200 G Street N.W., Suite 600
Washington, D.C. 20005
Reference: August 18, 2016 Stipulation and Settlement Agreement
On August 18, 2016, pursuant to Rule 602 of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission’s (“Commission”) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 C.F.R. § 385.602, Iroquois
Gas Transmission System, L.P. (“Iroquois”) filed an offer of settlement in the form of a
Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (“Settlement”) that resolves all issues set for hearing in
this proceeding. As discussed below, the Commission approves the Settlement as fair and
reasonable and in the public interest.
On January 21, 2016, the Commission issued an order initiating an investigation of
Iroquois’ rates under section 5 of the Natural Gas Act.1
Pursuant to that January 21 Order,
Iroquois submitted a Cost and Revenue Study on April 5, 2016. Substantial discovery was
thereafter undertaken by the active participants. The participants convened publicly-noticed
settlement conferences on April 28, 2016, May 18, 2016, June 1, 2016, and June 16, 2016. As a
result of these settlement negotiations, the participants ultimately reached this Settlement
resolving all of the issues set for hearing in this proceeding, as set forth below.
The terms of the Agreement are summarized as follows:
Article I (Rate Matters): Section 1.1 establishes Iroquois’ base tariff recourse rates, as set forth
on Pro Forma Sheet Nos. 4, 4.01. 4B, 4C, 4D, and 5A contained in Appendix A to the
Settlement, providing three scheduled rate reductions to be effective September 1 of 2016, 2017,
and 2018. Section 1.2 provides that Iroquois will file revised tariff sheets reflecting the
Settlement Rates within 15 days after the Settlement becomes effective. Section 1.3 provides
that Iroquois will file Interim Settlement Rates to be effective September 1, 2016, pending
Commission approval of the Settlement. Section 1.4 provides that Iroquois will use the
depreciation, amortization, and negative salvage rates set forth on Appendix B to the Settlement.
1
Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., Notice of Initiation of Section 5 Proceeding,
Docket No. RP16-301-000 (Jan. 21, 2016); Iroquois Gas Transmission Sys., L.P., 154
FERC ¶ 61,028 (2016) (“January 21 Order”).
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
54. DRAFT
2
Article II (Rate Moratorium): Section 2.1 establishes a Moratorium that prohibits parties from
requesting a change to the Settlement Rates prior to September 1, 2020. Sections 2.2 and 2.3
identify certain types of filings that are not prohibited by the Moratorium. Section 2.4 provides
that, in the event that Iroquois makes a Tariff filing pursuant to Section 2.2 or 2.3 during the
Moratorium, parties retain their right to protest such section 4 filings (except on the ground that
such filing violates the Moratorium). Section 2.5 provides that Iroquois will afford shippers an
opportunity to preview and comment on certain section 4 tariff filings that Iroquois may submit
during the Moratorium. Section 2.6 provides that the Moratorium and all provisions of Article II
terminate on August 31, 2020.
Article III (Future Section 4 Rate Filing): Section 3.1 provides that, upon conclusion of the
Moratorium, Iroquois will file a general section 4 rate case no later than September 1, 2022,
unless such obligation is extinguished through a prior change to the Settlement Rates. Section
3.2 provides that Iroquois will provide shippers thirty days notice and overview of the general
section 4 filing.
Article IV (Term): The term of the Settlement shall commence on September 1, 2016 and shall
terminate after the end of the Moratorium, upon the earliest post-Moratorium effectiveness of
new base tariff rates that are the result of a general rate change pursuant to section 4 of the
Natural Gas Act, a general rate settlement, or a general modification of Iroquois’ base tariff rates
in a proceeding instituted pursuant to section 5 of the Natural Gas Act.
Article V (Effectiveness): Section 5.1 provides that the various provisions of the Settlement are
not severable and will become effective on the date the Settlement is approved by a final
Commission order. Section 5.2 provides that, in the event the Commission modifies the
Settlement, parties may refuse to accept the modified Settlement and become a Contesting Party.
While the parties know of no opposition to the Settlement, in the event that the Settlement is
contested, Section 5.3 provides that it is the intent of the parties that the Commission approve the
Settlement for all Non-Contesting Parties.2
Any Contesting Parties will neither be bound by, nor
receive the benefits of, the Settlement.
Article VI (Waiver and Authority): Approval of the Settlement constitutes any and all waivers
and provides all authority under the Natural Gas Act and the Commission’s rules and regulations
that may be necessary for the Settlement to be effectuated in accordance with all of its terms.
Article VII (Changes to Settlement and Standard of Review): Section 7.1 establishes that the
Settlement is the final and binding agreement of the Non-Contesting Parties and may be
modified only by written agreement of all Non-Contesting Parties. Section 7.2 sets forth the
standard of review for changes to the settlement after approval.
2
“Non-Contesting Parties” are parties that either support, do not oppose, or take no
position regarding this Settlement. “Contesting Parties” are parties that oppose this
Settlement or suggest or request in any manner a modification, reservation or condition to
this Settlement as originally filed, regardless of whether such party characterizes its
comments as being in support of the Settlement. Parties that fail to accept a Commission
modification to this Settlement pursuant to Section 5.2 shall also be Contesting Parties.
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM
55. DRAFT
3
Article VIII (Reservations and Conditions): Article VIII contains standard reservations stating
that parties waive no rights other than as specifically provided in the Settlement, that the
Settlement should not be construed against any party as drafter, that the Settlement does not
establish any principles, policies, or practices, and that Commission approval of the Settlement
authorizes Iroquois to implement the Settlement Rates on the dates without suspension.
The Commission has reviewed the Settlement and the record certified by the Presiding Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 602(g), the Commission finds that the Settlement is fair and reasonable and in
the public interest. Accordingly, the Commission approves the Settlement. This order
constitutes final agency action. Requests for rehearing by the Commission may be filed within
30 days of the date of issuance of this order, pursuant to 18 C.F.R. § 385.713.
By direction of the Commission,
Kimberly D. Bose
Secretary
cc: All Parties
20160818-5258 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 8/18/2016 11:29:53 AM